On 12 December 2009, renowned political journalist, Peter Oborne, told it like it is in The Daily Mail, when he said:
"THE KEY BATTLE IN BRITISH POLITICS IS BETWEEN A PAMPERED, COSY AND CORRUPT POLITICAL CLASS WHICH HAS LOST ALL CONNECTION WITH THE REAL WORLD - AND THE MASS OF ORDINARY PEOPLE BETRAYED BY POLITICIANS OF ALL PARTIES."
On 18 August 2003, The Birmingham Evening Mail quoted Adrian Chiles thus:
“I WANT ALL THE SPECIES TO MARRY EACH OTHER SO THAT IN 300 YEARS' TIME WE ARE ALL THE SAME COLOUR... I WOULD LOVE MY DAUGHTER TO MARRY AN ASIAN OR BLACK MAN'."
On 21 June 2009, the African immigrant Sorious Samura wrote the following in The Sunday Independent:
“When I moved to Britain I believed I had escaped... horrific sexual violence... I was mistaken. Gang rape is happening here – and what I have found most disturbing as an African is that A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF THESE ATTACKS ARE BEING CARRIED OUT BY BLACK OR MIXED-RACE YOUNG MEN…
In December, nine schoolboys, (8 of them black) some as young as 13 at the time of the attack, were convicted of raping a 14-year-old (white) girl. She was dragged between tower blocks in Hackney where she was threatened with a knife, hit and raped during an ordeal that lasted an hour and a half – some of which was filmed on mobile phones. In January, three (black) men were convicted of gang raping a 16-year-old with learning disabilities for two hours BEFORE DOUSING HER WITH CAUSTIC SODA in an effort to get rid of the evidence…
Despite the seriousness of the crime, I was amazed to discover that NO NATIONAL STATISTICS EXIST: gang rape is simply not recorded as a separate crime category…
One of the few police forces to have begun recording the figures of reported gang rape is the Metropolitan Police. In 2008 alone, they received reports of 85 gang rapes... We tracked down 29 cases, from January 2006 to March 2009, in which a total of 92 young people were convicted of involvement in gang rape... Of those convicted, 66 WERE BLACK OR MIXED RACE, 13 were white and THE REMAINDER WERE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES INCLUDING AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ AND LIBYA…
The groups of young men I met in London... explained how they make arrangements for ‘line-ups’ in which one girl has oral sex with up to six or seven of them at one time…
Girls can unwittingly walk into a trap, innocently visiting someone's house to listen to music or watch a film only to discover that A GROUP OF BOYS ARE LYING IN WAIT. Or they might be hanging out with friends in a park and suddenly realise they have become surrounded by A GROUP OF BOYS INTENT ON SEX…
Occasionally gang rape is used to punish a girl for minor transgressions against gang members... I met A GIRL WHO ADMITTED SHE HAD HELPED TO SET UP GIRLS FOR GANG RAPE. As the girlfriend of a gang member, SHE ORGANISED THESE RAPES, partly out of fear and PARTLY TO FIT IN...
‘There was just loads of boys and the girl's tights were ripped up, like, she was bleeding as well, because I THINK SHE WAS A VIRGIN, and they were just taking turns on her basically, and SHE WAS CRYING, and I didn't get involved because I thought if I get involved they're gonna turn on me'...
A 14-year-old girl described her ordeal when she was gang raped by a total of nine boys who told her that she was not the only girl they had attacked. In that case, nine boys were subsequently convicted of raping her. The youngest perpetrator was just 12 years old...
The Rev Joyce Daley, from the Black Parents Forum in Hackney, told me that gang rape... IS HAPPENING ON A REGULAR BASIS… Sheldon Thomas, a youth worker in Brixton, said:
‘WE'VE GOT A GENERATION THAT LOOKS AT SEX AS IF IT'S NOTHING, AND TREATS DISRESPECTING WOMEN AS IF IT'S NOTHING. These guys are like 13, 14 and 15, and their actual attitudes towards young girls – towards sex – is mind-blowing. It's actually leaving you asking: WHERE ARE THEIR MORALS, WHERE ARE THEIR VALUES?"
Values? They were not imported to be be moral or to value those who gave them sanctuary here. They were brought over to destroy. The “black or mixed race” gang rapists, those from “Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya”, and all the rest of the foreigners imported into our world in recent times, are the foot soldiers in the war being waged by the elite belligerents of the New World Order upon the working-class communities of the white world.
Hey! All you New Labour and Lib Dem voters! All you PC Crowd “pity the poor immigrant” types! THIS IS WHAT YOU VOTED FOR! YOU DID THIS!
As for you who voted for Old Labour and the Tories, you did it as well. This has been happening ever since they started coming over here in droves. Like the man says, “no national statistics exist.” Immigrant-upon-indigenous gang rape was brushed under the carpet by ALL the mainstream parties. It still is.
THEY are at war with our little girls, ladies and gentlemen. Why are you still voting for THEM?
Are you at war with our little girls as well?
On 9 November 2010, EU President, Herman Van Rompuy, said this in Berlin:
"THE TIME OF THE HOMOGENOUS NATION STATE IS OVER... WE HAVE TOGETHER TO FIGHT THE DANGER OF A NEW EUROSCEPTICISM...
In every member state, there are people who believe their country can survive alone in the globalised world. IT IS MORE THAN AN ILLUSION – IT IS A LIE...
The biggest enemy of Europe today is fear. Fear leads to egoism. Egoism leads to nationalism. Nationalism leads to war...
Today’s nationalism is often not a positive feeling of pride in one’s own identity, but a negative feeling of apprehension of the others...
Just imagine the big recession of 2008/09 with the old currencies. A currency war always ends in protectionism."
On 20 November 2009, Paul Belien, the author of "A Throne In Brussels: Britain, the Saxe-Coburgs and the Belgianisation Of Europe", who knows Van Rompuy personally, said this in The Daily Mail:
"DEVOID OF PATRIOTISM AND CONTEMPTUOUS OF DEMOCRACY, HERMAN VAN ROMPUY PERFECTLY EMBODIES THE CULTURE OF THE EU. HIS SOLE POLITICAL IDEAL IS THE CREATION OF A FEDERAL SUPERSTATE, DESTROYING NATIONAL IDENTITIES ACROSS EUROPE...
The tragedy of Van Rompuy's political career is that he used to have a very different outlook. When I first met him in 1985, he was much more sceptical about European federalism. A conservative Catholic, he had been heavily influenced by the Flemish philosopher Lode Claes, WHO PASSIONATELY BELIEVED THAT WITHOUT A GENUINE SPIRIT OF NATIONHOOD, THERE COULD BE NO DEMOCRACY AND NO POLITICAL MORALITY.
Van Rompuy wrote elegantly about THE IMPORTANCE OF TRADITIONAL VALUES AND THE NEED TO MAINTAIN THE CHRISTIAN ROOTS OF EUROPE. He was so disgusted by the Belgian establishment's rejection of these principles he told me he was thinking of leaving politics. But his bosses the Flemish Christian-Democrat Party were appalled at the thought of losing this bright young star. So he was offered rapid advancement up the political ladder.
Van Rompuy accepted, and embarked on a series of shabby compromises which brought him high office but proved HE HAD SOLD HIS SOUL.”
On 29 March 2010, The Jewish Chronicle quoted the New Labour MP, Martin Linton, as having said the following at a House of Commons meeting the previous week:
“THERE ARE LONG TENTACLES OF ISRAEL IN THIS COUNTRY WHO ARE FUNDING ELECTION CAMPAIGNS AND PUTTING MONEY INTO THE BRITISH POLITICAL SYSTEM FOR THEIR OWN ENDS.
You must consider over the next few weeks, when you make decisions about how you vote… YOU MUST MAKE THEM AWARE OF THE ATTEMPT BY ISRAELIS AND BY PRO-ISRAELIS TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION.”
At the same meeting the New Labour MP, Sir Gerald Kaufman, a Jew himself, said this:
“Just as Lord Ashcroft owns most of the Conservative Party, RIGHT-WING JEWISH MILLIONAIRES OWN THE REST,”
The Jewish Chronicle also told us this:
“ANDREW DISMORE (a New Labour MP) HAS BEEN A CONSISTENT CHAMPION OF THE CONCERNS OF THE LOCAL JEWISH COMMUNITY. But after a series of allegations about his EXPENSES, he faces a tough fight with the Tories’ Matthew Offord and MATTHEW HARRIS, SECRETARY OF LIB DEM FRIENDS OF ISRAEL.
One of the most intriguing battles will be for the Bury South seat of MIDDLE EAST MINISTER IVAN LEWIS, A FORMER CHAIR OF MANCHESTER JEWISH FEDERATION. Although Mr Lewis sits on a substantial majority, he faces a formidable opponent in MICHELLE WISEMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF MANCHESTER JEWISH CARE.”
An edition of the aforementioned Peter Oborne's courageous documentary, The Israel Lobby, may be viewed here.
On 15 February 2010, Muslim gang member, Amir, was quoted thus by The Sun:
"BRITAIN'S UNDERWORLD BELONGS TO THE MUSLIMS…
People don't f*** with us because they think we're all in al-Qaeda. Our status in the criminal hierarchy changed literally the day the Twin Towers went down. From then, Asians have been associated with terrorism. People, including other criminals, think if you're Asian you'll blow up a Tube train or bomb an aeroplane. IN THE PAST 20 YEARS WE'VE CAPITALISED ON THAT. IF WE'RE GOING TO BE THOUGHT OF AS EXTREMISTS, WHY NOT USE THAT FEAR?…
WITH ISLAM COMES FEAR, AND WITH FEAR COMES POWER…
Through religion we speak the same language, live in the same areas, go to the same schools AND CAN EVEN USE MOSQUES AS A SAFE PLACE AWAY FROM THE POLICE OR OTHER GANGS. If you f*** with a Muslim gang you'd better be able to run fast or hide well, because THEY WILL COME BACK AT YOU IN NUMBERS…
WE CARRY SWORDS FOR PROTECTION. I'VE HAD TO USE MINE MORE THAN ONCE… These days NOBODY FIGHTS ON THEIR OWN. YOU'LL GET ATTACKED BY A WHOLE GANG…
If you go to school in an ethnic area you either join a gang or end up bullied, in some cases TO THE POINT OF BEING KILLED. So TO AVOID A LIFE OF HELL A KID JOINS A GANG. Once you're in, life is easy - no more beatings, people to talk to, stuff to do. AFTER SCHOOL YOU GRADUATE INTO MORE SERIOUS GANG ACTIVITY…
A boss can make up to £8,000 a day running a gang of 40 workers drug-dealing or scamming credit cards, and a worker can make £1,000.
Ten years ago, Asian gangs would go to war with Yardies and white gangs. But now, WE'VE GOT LONDON ALL SEWN UP… MUSLIMS HAVE THIS COUNTRY UNDER CONTROL. NOBODY CAN TOUCH US."
The Sun added:
“The 21-year-old, WHOSE ORGANISATION TURNED OVER THOUSANDS OF POUNDS A DAY FROM DRUG-DEALING AND CREDIT CARD SCAMS, claims a post-9/11 fear of terrorism has allowed Muslims to develop a stranglehold on our criminal community. Through Islam, he says, THEY HAVE NUMBERS WHICH CANNOT BE MATCHED, and rival gangs are being forced out by ruthless Islamic criminals who only deal with each other.
They recruit black and white members in Britain's jails, TEMPTING THEM TO CONVERT TO ISLAM in exchange for a cushier life inside. Once released, THE CONVERTED CONS HAVE ACCESS TO AN ENTIRELY NEW NETWORK OF MUSLIM CRIMINAL CONTACTS - and are trusted because they pray to Allah.
Amir claims that BRITAIN'S UNDERWORLD WILL SOON BE COMPLETELY DOMINATED BY ISLAMIC GANGS…
We spoke to a former prisoner we will refer to only as Steven, who was repeatedly approached by prison imams - Muslim priests - and asked to convert. Steven, who is British-born and white, rejected the approaches. He says:
‘When I went inside the MUSLIMS OFFERED ME HELP FROM TOP LAWYERS ON THE OUTSIDE WHO WOULD FIGHT TO GET MY SENTENCE CHANGED, IF I JOINED THEM.
I always resisted, but you have to understand how tempting it is to convert. First, you have their protection. You're totally alone in prison when you get there, AND IF YOU CAN'T LOOK AFTER YOURSELF LIFE IS HELL. YOU'RE BEATEN, ROBBED AND BULLIED.
Second, EVERY FRIDAY MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED PRAYER MEETINGS. THIS IS FREE TIME AWAY FROM THE GUARDS, SO THEY CAN PLOT, MAKE NEW CONTACTS AND OFTEN DISCUSS ANTI-WEST IDEOLOGY.
MUSLIMS ALSO GET BETTER FOOD. They have money sent in for their kitchens from the Muslim community outside, and they get special Halal dishes stipulated by Islam. Then, WHEN A CONVERTED PRISONER FINISHES HIS TIME, HE LEAVES AS AN EVEN BIGGER CRIMINAL WITH AN ENTIRELY NEW CONTACT BOOK OF MUSLIM CRIMINALS TO DO BUSINESS WITH…
Where the Muslim gangs come into their own is shifting drugs. If a white gang from London buys a kilo of coke, they then have to sell it. You can only sell your gear if you have contacts. The white gang will only know a few people in their area and won't trust or be trusted by other gangs. They won't deal with Eastern European, black or Asian gangs.
But THE MUSLIM NETWORK IS VAST AND STRETCHES UP AND DOWN THE UK, SO THEY CAN SHIFT DRUGS EXTREMELY QUICKLY. THAT MAKES THE MONEY-MAKING POTENTIAL OF A MUSLIM GANG A HUNDRED TIMES THAT OF A BRITISH OR EUROPEAN GANG’.”
This is what the politicians have given us over the course of the last fifty years, ladies and gentlemen.
Along with more than a thousand Mosques and a hundred thousand Asian-run businesses. This is what the anti-British race laws tell us we must endure. This is what the same politicians, the media darlings, the PC Crowd, Big Business, the Global Villagers and the immigrants themselves insist we must now “cohere” with.
If ever some brainwashed lemming dares to call you “racist” for railing against those who gave away what was once wholly ours to such savage effect that the immigrant criminal is now able to boast that “Muslims have this country under control”, call him TRAITOR!
For that, indeed, is what he is.
Anyone claiming to be British who would put the “Eastern European, black or Asian gangs”, the “Islamic gangs”, the "Muslim Priests”, the “Muslim network” and the plotters who “often discuss anti-West ideology”, before those such alien forces routinely brutalise, should be tried for treason, found guilty and punished accordingly.
Even if it is only stupidity or cowardice that causes them to attack their own with such rubber-stamped, fashion-following zeal.
On 8 February 2010, Vanessa Allen informed us thus in The Daily Mail:
“For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britain’s freedom and independence. The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nation’s frontier with the Continent.
But now part of THAT PROUD HISTORY IS UP FOR SALE AND THE LEADING BIDDER IS REVEALED AS THE FORMER AGE-OLD ENEMY – FRANCE.
It is one of a string of public assets which have been EARMARKED FOR PRIVATISATION AS THE GOVERNMENT BATTLES WITH A RECORD £830BILLION NATIONAL DEBT.
A sale of the Port of Dover, Europe’s busiest ferry port, could net up to £350million for the Treasury. Its harbour board applied to the Transport Secretary for voluntary privatisation last month. THE SALE IS EXPECTED TO BE RUBBER-STAMPED AND THE LEADING BIDDER HAS EMERGED AS NORD-PAS-DE-CALAIS REGIONAL COUNCIL, WHICH ALSO OWNS CALAIS...
The Port of Dover is the largest British port still in the public sector and made a profit of £15.1million in 2008.”
As I keep saying, ladies and gentlemen, the powers-that-be are at war with us.
On 27 January 2010, David Pilditch wrote the following in The Daily Express:
"TONY BLAIR WAS WARNED TWO MONTHS BEFORE THE INVASION OF IRAQ THAT IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL TO GO TO WAR WITHOUT UN BACKING... SENIOR GOVERNMENT LAWYERS TOLD THE IRAQ INQUIRY THAT THEY ADVISED THE ACTION HAD 'NO LEGAL BASIS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW'.
Last night it was reported EVERY ONE OF THE 27 LAWYERS IN THE DEPARTMENT ADVISED THE WAR WAS ILLEGAL. Yesterday Sir Michael Wood, who was the Foreign Office’s chief legal adviser, told the hearing HE WARNED THE THEN FOREIGN SECRETARY JACK STRAW AN INVASION WOULD 'AMOUNT TO THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION'.
Sir Michael said he considered resigning in protest at the decision to join the US-led attack. He described how HE WAS SIDELINED AFTER HE MADE CLEAR HIS OBJECTIONS TO MILITARY ACTION. His deputy, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, quit in protest on the eve of the invasion in March 2003...
Newly declassified Government papers show Lord Goldsmith, then Attorney General, was initially 'pessimistic' that there was sufficient legal basis for military action. HE WAS URGED TO CHANGE HIS VIEW BY MR STRAW – AND EVENTUALLY RULED IT WAS LAWFUL. Sir Michael told the inquiry:
'He [Straw] took the view that I was being very dogmatic and that international law was pretty vague and that HE WASN’T USED TO PEOPLE TAKING SUCH A FIRM POSITION.'
Ms Wilmshurst told the inquiry the FOREIGN OFFICE LAWYERS HAD BEEN UNITED IN THEIR BELIEF OF THE NEED FOR A SECOND UN RESOLUTION. But she said:
'IT WAS CLEAR THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS NOT GOING TO STAND IN THE WAY OF THE GOVERNMENT... THE PROCESS THAT WAS FOLLOWED IN THIS CASE WAS LAMENTABLE'...
Labour MP John McDonnell SAID IT BROUGHT THE PROSPECT OF A TRIAL OF TONY BLAIR AND OTHER LEADERS OF THE GOVERNMENT AT THE TIME OF THE INVASION A STEP CLOSER.
'The net is clearly closing in on those who took us into the illegal and immoral war. The time is coming when THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE WILL BE FORCED TO CONSIDER THE PROSECUTION OF THOSE WHO PERPETRATED THIS ACT OF UNJUST AGGRESSION'."
In my opinion, Tony Blair is the greatest traitor that ever held power in this country.
Gordon Brown is the the second greatest.
Bassetlaw's MP, John Mann, has voted the same way as both of the aforementioned anti-Brits 100 per cent of the time since he entered parliament.
The 2005 New Labour Manifesto promised the British people a referendum on whether we should sign up to the proposed European Constitution.
This is how it was put:
“It is a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe. WE WILL PUT IT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM and campaign wholeheartedly for a ‘yes’ vote to keep Britain a leading nation in Europe.”
In a 24 June 2007 statement during a BBC interview with Jon Sopel, Gordon Brown reiterated this position thus:
"The manifesto is what we put to the public. WE'VE GOT TO HONOUR THAT MANIFESTO. THAT IS AN ISSUE OF TRUST WITH ME AND THE ELECTORATE."
There will be no referendum. We are now, officially, subject to the rule of unelected and faceless Brussels Eurocrat in just about everything.
David Cameron as good as promised us a referendum as well. Now we are being told that we won't get one if the Tories get in.
Politicians lie, you see.
It's as simple as that.
On 5 December 2009, Ulrich Schluer, a member of the Swiss People's Party that voted to ban the building of any more minarets in Switzerland, was quoted thus by The Sun:
“I'm surprised a country like GREAT BRITAIN with its grand tradition of liberty and freedom IS NOW GAGGING MPS WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT MUSLIM EXTREMISM. If there were an Islamist bomb attack in London YOU CAN HARDLY DESCRIBE THE PEOPLE WHO DID IT AS FRIENDS...
I'M FEARFUL FOR THE FUTURE OF BRITAIN. WHEN PUBLIC FIGURES ARE NO LONGER ABLE TO SPEAK THE TRUTH OR EXPRESS THEMSELVES IN RELEVANT LANGUAGE, IT ISN'T REALLY A FREE COUNTRY AT ALL... POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS GETTING BEYOND A JOKE AND COMPROMISING HARD-WON FREEDOMS IN MANY EUROPEAN COUNTRIES...
As in other European countries, WE HAVE SEEN MUSLIM LEADERS AND IMAMS SLOWLY TRYING TO INTRODUCE SHARIA LAW... The minaret ban received huge support because VOTERS FELT STRONGLY THAT THIS POLITICAL SYMBOL APPEARING IN OUR TOWNS AND CITIES WOULD LIKEWISE UNDERMINE OUR DEMOCRACY.”
On behalf of the British people, thanks for saying it like it is, Mr Schluer.
On 23 October 2009, Andrew Neather, a former government advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, dropped this revelatory bombshell in The Evening Standard:
“THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION…
Eventually published in January 2001, the innocuously labelled ‘RDS Occasional Paper no. 67’, ‘Migration: an economic and social analysis’ focused heavily on the labour market case. But THE EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL.
I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date…
THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS…
The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”.
You might think, from the astounding revelations Andrew Neather apprises us of above, that he is a whistleblower.
Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't Listen to the Whingers - London Needs Immigrants, suggests, he is still four square behind the imposition of the Multicult upon the bewildered and disenfranchised majority.
On 1 February 2009, Frank Field, the former New Labour Welfare Minister, was quoted thus in The Daily Express:
"HIS (Gordon Brown's) CLAIM TO HAVE PROVIDED BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS IS AS HOLLOW AS IT COULD BE... Foreign firms can win a contract and import their own labour TO THE EXCLUSION OF BRITISH WORKERS.
I have been calling on ministers for years to cut down on the number of people coming here to work. NO GOVERNMENT HAS HAD MORE WARNINGS. OF THE THREE MILLION JOBS CREATED IN THE LAST DECADE, NINE OUT OF 10 HAVE GONE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT BRITISH.”
On 1 October 2009, Mr Field was quoted thus by The Daily Telegraph:
“Come the election, Labour will have been in office for 13 years. Voters are entitled to ask why, if crisis moves are required now, the Government didn't act sooner to counter the hothouse in which neighbours from hell are so easily bred…
All the crime figures over the past 50 to 100 years show how anti-social disorder has gradually taken over. In my constituency of Birkenhead, THERE ARE NOW MORE VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON THAN THERE WERE IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY 50 YEARS AGO…
THIS IS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY, and IT IS TIME FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO EMPOWER DECENT CITIZENS TO RECLAIM THE STREETS.”
On 30 November 2009, former New Labour Minister, Tom Harris, said this on his own blog, here:
"This post from Alex Smith of LabourList has caught my attention...
'THE LABOUR PARTY HAS EMBRACED AN IDEOLOGY THAT ACTIVELY UNDERMINES THE BELIEFS AND CULTURE OF ORDINARY WORKING PEOPLE. IMMIGRATION, WHILST THE MOST TOPICAL, ISN’T THE ONLY BATTLEGROUND. One by one, it seems that THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL OUTLOOK OF MANY IS SCORNED UPON BY AN ELITE WHO, WHILST LAUGHABLY PAINTING THEMSELVES AS ON THE SIDE OF THE ‘OPPRESSED’, CHOOSE TO STUDIOUSLY IGNORE THIS PARTICULAR SUBJUGATION. ON ISSUES RANGING FROM SCHOOL/PARENTAL DISCIPLINE (’CHILD ABUSE’), TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (’BARBARIC’), TO PATRIOTISM (’LITTLE ENGLANDER’), TO EURO-SCEPTICISM (’XENOPHOBIC’), TO IMMIGRATION (’RACIST’), TO MORALITY (’BIGOTED’) – ACROSS ALL THESE ISSUES AND MORE, THE GENERAL BELIEFS OF VAST SWATHES OF THE ELECTORATE ARE DEMONISED AND RIDICULED BY AN ELITE INTERESTED ONLY IN SECURING THE DOMINANCE OF THEIR OWN PARTICULAR WORLDVIEW’…
He clealry (sic) has a point... And although Merrick talks of immigration as just one of the pressure points, it’s clearly near the top of an awful lot of people’s agenda today.
A few weeks ago... I was forced to concede by commenters that LABOUR HAD, IN THE PAST, BEEN GUILTY OF ATTEMPTING TO SHUT DOWN DEBATES ON IMMIGRATION BY SHOUTING 'RACIST'... IT WAS STUPID AND WRONG...
Knocking on doors in my constituency on Saturday morning, I once again had to try to defend the government’s policies on immigration. This is a very regular occurrence these days, particularly in so-called 'solid' Labour areas. These people are not racists by any stretch of the imagination, but THEY ARE WORRIED. AND THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT THEIR CONCERNS NOW BECAUSE IT’S ONLY NOW THEY FEEL THEY HAVE 'PERMISSION' TO DO SO... More often than not, the people expressing the concerns are the people least likely to have benefited directly from Britain’s economic growth to 2008. And they have as much right to have a say in this area – and to be listened to – as anyone else.
I DETECT A HUGE AMOUNT OF SNOBBERY FROM SOME ON THE LIBERAL LEFT TOWARDS SUCH PEOPLE AND THEIR VIEWS...
And WE ARE WAY, WAY PAST THE POINT AT WHICH WE CAN SNEER 'RACIST' AT GOOD PEOPLE FOR DARING TO HOLD A VIEW WITH WHICH WE’RE UNCOMFORTABLE."
I wonder why Tom Harris is saying this right now?
Does he imagine that he can hang on to his seat by baring his behind, the “stupid and wrong” one, a few months before the election? Does he think he will be forgiven for 12 years of saying nothing, for saying it now, when the immigrant horse has well and truly bolted?
Actually, that’s not quite right, is it? He did say something. He was one of those who, by his own admission, sneered “'racist' at good people”. He was one of those who stood by and applauded whilst the “liberal left” were directing their PC bile “towards such people and their views.”
And all the while those we never wanted kept piling in.
On 14 December 2009, Ken Macdonald QC, who was Tony Blair’s Director of Public Prosecutions from 2003 to 2006 and Gordon Brown’s until 2008, presented the accusatory essay, INTOXICATED BY POWER, BLAIR TRICKED US INTO WAR, in The Times.
This is it:
“The degree of deceit involved in our decision to go to war on Iraq becomes steadily clearer. THIS WAS A FOREIGN POLICY DISGRACE OF EPIC PROPORTIONS and playing footsie on Sunday morning television does nothing to repair the damage. It is now very difficult to avoid the conclusion that TONY BLAIR ENGAGED IN AN ALARMING SUBTERFUGE WITH HIS PARTNER GEORGE BUSH AND WENT ON TO MISLEAD AND CAJOLE THE BRITISH PEOPLE INTO A DEADLY WAR THEY HAD MADE PERFECTLY CLEAR THEY DIDN’T WANT, and on a basis that it’s increasingly hard to believe even he found truly credible. Who is any longer naive enough to accept that the then Prime Minister’s mind remained innocently open after his visit to Crawford, Texas?…
BLAIR’S FUNDAMENTAL FLAW WAS HIS SYCOPHANCY TOWARDS POWER… WASHINGTON TURNED HIS HEAD AND HE COULDN’T RESIST THE STAGE OR THE GLAMOUR THAT IT GAVE HIM. IN THIS SENSE HE WAS WEAK AND, AS WE CAN SEE, HE REMAINS SO. Since those sorry days we have frequently heard him repeating THE SELF-REGARDING MANTRA THAT ‘HAND ON HEART, I ONLY DID WHAT I THOUGHT WAS RIGHT‘. But THIS IS A NARCISSIST’S DEFENCE AND SELF-BELIEF IS NO ANSWER TO MISJUDGMENT: IT IS CERTAINLY NO ANSWER TO DEATH. ‘Yo, Blair‘, perhaps, was his truest measure…
IN BRITISH PUBLIC LIFE, LOYALTY AND SERVICE TO POWER CAN SOMETIMES COUNT FOR MORE TO INSIDERS than any tricky questions of wider reputation. IT’S THE REGARD YOU ARE HELD IN BY YOUR PEERS THAT REALLY COUNTS, SO THAT STEADFASTNESS IN THE FACE OF ATTACK AND THREATENED EXPOSURE BRINGS ITS OWN RICH HIERARCHY OF HONOUR AND REWARD. Disloyalty, on the other hand, means a terrible casting out, a rocky and barren Roman exile that few have the courage to endure…
IT IS PRECISELY THIS PRIVATELY ARRANGED NATURE OF BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT POWER, STUBBORN BEYOND SYMPATHY FOR YEARS IN THE FACE OF THE MODERN WORLD, THAT HAS BROUGHT OUR POLITICS SO LOW. If Chilcot fails to reveal the truth without fear in this Middle Eastern story of violence and destruction, the inquiry will be held in deserved and withering contempt. This would be a serious blow to the integrity of the State. It would not restore trust…
THE TAX ON DISHONESTY IS RISING… CITIZENS BELIEVE DEEPLY IN A DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO KNOW AND THEY NO LONGER ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR UNWORTHINESS TO ENJOY ITS NOURISHMENT. Naturally, THIS IS A LESS COMFORTABLE WORLD FOR PEOPLE IN POWER, BUT IT’S A MUCH BETTER WORLD FOR EVERYONE ELSE. The real tragedy of Iraq, beyond all the danger and the terrible loss, is that it rendered any affair of the heart between government and people no more than a wisp, like A LIE IN THE WIND. It broke faith…
We have seen enormous acts of courage on the part of our men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan. The most heart-rending sacrifices have been made… But none of this sprinkles, as he might once have hoped it would, any starlight on Tony Blair. On the contrary, it is entirely the work of WARRIORS THRUST CARELESSLY INTO DEATH’S WAY BY A PRIME MINISTER LOST IN SELF-AGGRANDISEMENT and a governing class too closed to speak truth to power.”
The rats are leaving the establishment ship at a wonderfully alarming rate, are they not?
If anyone out there thinks I’m being harsh, associating MacDonald with the bringers of Black Death, I ask you this: why did he not speak out when it mattered? Was he really “tricked into war”? Were the parliamentarians and the press who lusted for it at the time equally “tricked”?
Many of the elite characters slavering for a great slaughter at the time will, indeed, have been “tricked”, in so far as they chose not to question what they ought to have been questioning. In so far as they did not investigate in any depth what they should have.
MacDonald was one of those who went along with “a foreign policy disgrace of epic proportions”. He wasn’t interested in challenging and/or exposing Tony Blair’s “sycophancy”. He, with many others, aided and abetted Bush and Blair as they “went on to mislead and cajole the British people into a deadly war they had made perfectly clear they didn’t want”.
The MacDonalds were much better placed to know what the reality was than the many, outside the loop, who protested. And, if they were not aware of the full facts, they would easily have been able to find out what they were if they had chosen to do so.
A great many concerned British citizens, who believed “deeply in a democratic right to know”, did.
That’s why I say Ken MacDonald is a bit of an old, murine ship-leaver.
Nevertheless, if his belated condemnation helps to nail Tony B Liar to the cross, I’d forgive him the long silence on these matters.
On 6 November 2009, Sue Reid’s remarkable exposé, ‘How the Kremlin hijacked Labour: Diary of a Kremlin insider reveals the hold Soviets had over Labour politicians’, appeared in The Daily Mail.
This is it:
“The leader of the Communist Party of Great Britain stood in front of the group of high-flying young Left-wingers at Cambridge University. Harry Pollitt told them:
'Don't join us. Work hard, get good degrees, JOIN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND SERVE OUR CAUSE FROM WITHIN'...
Within a decade, the Communist Party foundered (its membership peaked at 60,000 in 1945) as Pollitt's bright young devotees infiltrated the Establishment.
THEY WERE SOON EXERCISING CONSIDERABLE INFLUENCE IN UNIVERSITIES, THE STATE EDUCATION SYSTEM, PUBLISHING HOUSES, THE LEGAL HIERARCHY AND THE CIVIL SERVICE. BUT IT WAS IN POLITICS THAT THESE HIGH-FLYING MEMBERS OF THE LEFT ESTABLISHED THEIR GREATEST POWER-BASE, BOTH IN THE LABOUR PARTY AND THE TRADES' UNION MOVEMENT.
Just how deep the tentacles of communism reached into the heart of British government has now been revealed with the emergence of an extraordinary diary by Anatoly Chernyaev, the Soviet Union's contact man with the West at the icy height of the Cold War... IT TELLS THE STORY OF A 'SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP'… BETWEEN THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND SOVIET COMMUNISTS...
One of the most shocking of the diary's many revelations is how LABOUR LEADERS MICHAEL FOOT AND NEIL KINNOCK COLLUDED WITH THE SOVIET COMMUNISTS to try to beat their 'common enemy', Margaret Thatcher. But more worrying, perhaps, is the fact that the document shows in stark detail how THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF SO MANY OF THOSE WHO GOVERN US TODAY WAS SHAPED BY THE UNSPEAKABLE COMMUNIST CREED OF THE SOVIET UNION.
The unpalatable truth is that many ministers in Government today rose through the ranks of A BRITISH SOCIALIST MOVEMENT THAT WAS HEAVILY INFLUENCED - AND EVEN CONTROLLED - BY THE KREMLIN IN MOSCOW...
TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION LEADER JACK JONES - WHO RECEIVED EFFUSIVE PRAISE FROM PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN WHEN HE DIED IN APRIL THIS YEAR - WAS A PAID AGENT FOR THE USSR. In exchange for information, he used to take cash handouts from his Soviet handler in London, Oleg Gordievsky, even as late as the 1980s...
One of the key figures in this murky affair was RON HAYWARD, THE LABOUR PARTY'S GENERAL SECRETARY between 1972 and 1982, who died in 1996... It is clear from the diary that HAYWARD ENVISAGED A REAL SOVIET-STYLE SYSTEM IN BRITAIN, with the Party General Secretary (ie Hayward himself) - not a Prime Minister selected by MPs - at the very top. He would refer to himself openly as the 'party leader'. More specifically, he informed the Soviets that HE WANTED TO DEVELOP A CADRE OF YOUNG ACTIVISTS TO PREPARE FOR COMMUNIST RULE.
'I AM THE FIRST LABOUR LEADER IN BRITISH HISTORY WHO IS NOT AFRAID TO COME OUT ALONGSIDE COMMUNISTS WITH THE SAME AGENDA', he said...
It was in the unions where Chernyaev's International Department aimed to infiltrate the deepest. THE REGULAR TO-ING AND FRO-ING BETWEEN UNION LEADERS AND MOSCOW WAS COMMONPLACE...
The diary says, the TGWU's deputy leader Alec Kitson turned up drunkenly at a meeting with Chernyaev in the Russian capital. He had been drinking with his Soviet trade union counterparts for hours beforehand. 'There was a f*** in every sentence that came out of Kitson's mouth,' the diary records. But when Kitson sobered up, he and Chernyaev concocted a plan to send a team of Russians to the Scottish TUC conference 'TO DELIVER THE SOVIET POINT OF VIEW'...
Party leaders such as the donkey-jacketed MICHAEL FOOT AND THE WELSHMAN NEIL KINNOCK WERE AT TIMES DEEPLY REVERENTIAL TO THEIR RUSSIAN 'COMRADES', the diary reveals...
IN DECEMBER 1984, KINNOCK WENT TO MOSCOW ACCOMPANIED BY, AMONG OTHERS, THE YOUNG CHARLES CLARKE AND PATRICIA HEWITT - both to become ministers in Blair's government - to see Brezhnev's successor, the senile Constantin Chernenko... The Russian promised he would help in the Labour Party's attempts to oust Margaret Thatcher from power...
IN 1985, KINNOCK AGAIN TURNED TO MOSCOW FOR SUPPORT... The diarist recorded: 'WE HAVE DISCUSSED EVERYTHING WITH HIM. I TOOK IT UPON MYSELF TO PROMISE HIM EVERYTHING THEY WANTED FROM US...
ONE OF JACK JONES'S BRIGHTEST PROTEGES... WAS GORDON BROWN. THE DECISION TO GIVE THE YOUNG SCOTSMAN HIS FIRST AND ONLY SAFE SEAT, DUNFERMLINE EAST, WAS MADE BY TWO TGWU SENIOR OFFICIALS - ONE OF THEM WAS JACK JONES, THE OTHER THE DRUNKEN ALEC KITSON. BOTH WERE FRIENDS OF THE KREMLIN.
THE UNION'S PATRONAGE WAS UBIQUITOUS. NEIL KINNOCK AND TONY BLAIR, AS WELL AS CABINET MINISTERS MARGARET BECKETT, HARRIET HARMAN AND JOHN REID, WERE ALL SPONSORED BY TGWU AND MADE THEIR LABOUR PARTY CAREERS THANKS TO IT.
The control the Soviets had over Labour, its leadership and aspiring politicians, is still having a profound impact on Britain. As the Spectator says: 'Indeed, NEW LABOUR, WHICH HAS GOVERNED SINCE 1997, CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD UNLESS THESE COMMUNIST INFLUENCES ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. Many of New Labour's characteristics - its deep suspicion of outsiders, its STRUCTURAL HOSTILITY TO DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, ITS SECRECY, ITS FAITH IN BUREAUCRACY, THE EMBEDDED PREFERENCE FOR STRIKING DEALS OUT OF THE PUBLIC EYE, AND ITS RUTHLESS RELIANCE ON A SMALL GROUP OF TRUSTED ACTIVISTS, RESULT FROM THE LENGTHY DETENTE WITH THE KREMLIN'...
As for Harry Pollitt, the British communist who played such a vital role in the Soviet infiltration of this country... he is better known in Moscow, where he is proclaimed as a hero, than here. In 1970, some years after his death, THE USSR ISSUED A POSTAGE STAMP WITH POLLITT'S PICTURE ON IT. A year later, IN 1971, HIS DEVOTION TO THE SOVIET CAUSE AND TO THE SPREAD OF 'INTERNATIONAL COMMUNISM' WAS FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGED BY MOSCOW. THE SOVIET NAVY LAUNCHED A NEW BATTLESHIP AND NAMED IT AFTER HIM.
MEANWHILE, HIS MANY DISCIPLES IN THE FIFTH COLUMN HE CREATED IN BRITAIN CONTINUE TO EXERT THEIR MALIGN INFLUENCE.” More...
On 26 September 2006, during his final Prime Ministerial appearance at a Labour Party Conference, Tony Blair said this:
"30 million people now come to Britain every year… YET WE HAVE NO MEANS OF CHECKING WHO IS HERE LAWFULLY!"
10 years as the boss and he never bothers to introduce a system which might tell us who should be here and who shouldn't?
Not a great idea if you care about the British, I say.
On 8 December 2009, Gordon Brown's Immigration Minster, Phil Woolas, said this during a BBC Radio 4 interview:
"There are 285million people who visit the United Kingdom every year".
30 million? 285 million?
I wonder which of these two figures is closer to the truth? If it's 285 million, I wonder how many of them ever bother to leave?
As a result of a grotesque level of anti-British machination and deceit at the highest level, ladies and gentlemen, it may well be that we are already outnumbered in our own land by the alien who has no intention of leaving.
On 15 July 2007, at the RISE Anti-Racist Festival, Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London and Chairman of Unite Against Fascism, said this:
"London's fortunes are tied up with our stand against racism and prejudice... Fighting racism is a daily fight and a political priority for our city."
Regarding the teenage violence that had plagued London in 2007, Tim Donovan put these questions to the Mayor:
"Are you worried about this recent spate of teenage violence is it something new and alarming?... Tony Blair said, not long ago, that this was a black, cultural thing, do you agree?"
To which he replied:
"There is an element of that, particularly around the drug trade but NO! IT’S A LOT OF WHITE KIDS STABBING OTHER WHITE KIDS!"
Now that is as big a lie, if not bigger, than any Tony B Liar ever told.
In the year to 15 July 2007, when Livingstone said what he said, 16 teenagers had been murdered in London.
Ten of the dead teenagers were black boys, three were black girls, one was mixed race and the other two dead children were white. At the time of Livingstone’s great lie, ALL OF THE KNOWN KILLERS AND THOSE SUSPECTED OF THE KILLINGS WERE BLACK.
Red Ken's casual dishonesty has been captured in A Lot of White Kids
On 3 March 2008, Emily Thornberry, New Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"I SUSPECT THERE ARE HARDLY ANY CHILDREN IN ISLINGTON WHO HAVE NOT BEEN MUGGED AT SOME STAGE… If you talk to kids it is the main thing they are afraid of... It is a hidden crime. Kids are robbing other kids but you don't hear about it... YOUNG PEOPLE ARE BEING MUGGED REGULARLY. WE DON'T WANT IT TO BECOME A WAY OF LIFE."
Er, Emily, "if hardly any children in Islington... have not been mugged", it already HAS "become a way of life"!
And the fact that it’s “hidden” and we "don't hear about it", well, that's down to New Labour, Emily.
Your lot. That's who's done its best over the years to keep such damning information quiet.
On 19 April 2009, Alice Mahon, MP for Halifax between 1987 and 2005, told us why she was resigning from the New Labour Party.
“I can no longer be a member of a party that AT THE LEADERSHIP LEVEL HAS BETRAYED MANY OF THE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES THAT INSPIRED ME as a teenager to join… I've reached the end of the road with the Labour Party. I'VE LOST FAITH IN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE DIRECTION THEY ARE TAKING US IN… What is the point in being in a party when you don't believe in most of the policies that they are pursuing”.
Speaking of the Damien McBride/Derek Draper email scandal, Ms Mahon added:
“Most decent people in the party would be shocked and absolutely scandalised by the smears that were about to be launched on our behalf. I cannot imagine what kind of person would think it is a good idea to smear a couple who have just lost a loving son, I really can't…
THIS LABOUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD HANG ITS HEAD IN SHAME FOR INFLICTING THIS ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC JUST AS WE FACE THE MOST SEVERE RECESSION ANY OF US HAVE EXPERIENCED IN A LIFETIME."
During the 3 June 2009 edition of Channel 4 News, veteran Labour left-winger, Tony Benn said this:
“BLAIR WAS A TORY. HE TOOK OVER MRS THATCHER’S ECONOMIC POLICY AND TRIED TO FOLLOW IT. THIS CRISIS IS A CRISIS OF THATCHERISM AND BLAIRISM COMBINED...
People are really, really angry about the expenses and about a lot of other things… There was no referendum on Lisbon, WHICH WAS PROMISED. They’re privatising part of the post office, WHICH THEY PROMISED NOT TO DO. There’s a war in Afghanistan which WE WERE NEVER CONSULTED ABOUT. THERE A LOT OF MONEY FOR THE BANKERS BUT NO HELP FOR THE PEOPLE.”
On 19 April 2009, John McDonnell MP, another veteran Labour left-winger, was quoted thus by The Morning Star:
"THE LABOUR LEADERSHIP MUST APPRECIATE THE POLITICAL CATASTROPHE THAT IS EMERGING. We need the Prime Minister to immediately launch an inquiry into the operation of the party WITH THE AIM OF RESTORING DEMOCRACY."
On 16 April 2006, Councillor Peter Arnold, the Lib Dem Leader of Newcastle City Council, was quoted thus by The Independent:
"THERE IS NO NEED FOR AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT BECAUSE THERE IS NO ENGLAND... There are millions of Scots, Welsh and Irish living in England. The overwhelming majority of non-white migrants also live in England, along with many hundreds of thousands of other Europeans and people from other parts of the world. ENGLAND IS THE GENUINE MONGREL NATION, AND I WELCOME THAT… I HAVE NO LOYALTY TO ENGLAND!"
The Lib Dem Council Leader who has no loyalty to England, is now the Lord Mayor of Newcastle.
On 26 January 2009, David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party said the following as he was being interviewed by Jeff Randall for Sky News:
“WE BELIEVE IN A MULTIRACIAL BRITAIN. WE BELIEVE IT’S A SUCCESS. WE THINK IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN GOOD FOR BRITAIN IN THE PAST. WE THINK IMMIGRATION WILL CONTINUE.”
On 14 July 2009, New Labour’s "Cohesion" Minister, Shahid Malik, said this in The House of Commons:
“FAIRNESS DOES NOT MEAN TREATING EVERYBODY EQUALLY”. More...
Malik commented as he did in a debate about the contrast between the preferential treatment doled out to the Gypsy and Traveller communities, which Malik thought was right and just, at the expense of local people.
Remember what George Orwell said?
“All animals are Equal but SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS”.
I think you’ll agree that this New Labour lot are nothing if not Orwellian.
On 13 January 2010, Samantha Mosedale described what happened after a family of Romanian Gypsies moved into their home in The Daily Mail:
“We called the police as soon as we found out they were in there. AN OFFICER SUGGESTED I WAS RACIST when I asked if they were Romanians, and did they have a legal right to be in this country.
We are hard-working citizens YET GET TREATED LIKE CRIMINALS WHEN OUR HOME IS STOLEN. This whole thing is making me feel constantly sick. All we want to do is get on with our lives. WE FEEL LET DOWN BY THE LAW, BY GOVERNMENT, AND BY THE POLICE, IN FACT ALL THE AUTHORITIES THAT ONE WOULD EXPECT TO PROTECT SOCIETY...
All the children are incredibly unsettled… We were in the process of creating our dream home and it has been ruined. At the moment there are at least four women, four children and one man living in our home, but neighbours said they have seen many more people going in and out. In the meantime WE FACE THE PROSPECT OF BECOMING HOMELESS OURSELVES”.
Her husband Julian added:
“When the papers were served on them THEY TORE THEM UP AND THREW THEM BACK AT THE GUY WHO'D TAKEN THEM ROUND”.
The Mail added:
“When Mr Mosedale turned up with a possession order to reclaim his property yesterday, the families demanded compensation for the £2,000 they claim to have paid to an unnamed man they claim posed as the landlord...
Before the police arrived yesterday, the two husbands disappeared into another house about 100 yards away with an estate agent's board outside. Throughout the day, the women carried their five children (plus some kitchen equipment and one of their two TVs) down the street."
Samantha Mosedale added:
“I just hope someone takes notice of what has happened and the law changes in future.”
Someone take notice, Samantha?
What, like the cop who called you racist? Like a traitorous New Labour government that would rather see a bunch of Romanian Gypsies living in YOUR house than YOU? Like a Cohesion Minister, who doesn't appear to hugely interested in treating everyone equally? No, love, those who make our laws are at war with us. THEY wish the British disenfranchised and demoralised in their own land. Characters like the ones who stole your house are merely THEIR willing foot-soldiers.
I just hope the British people are taking notice. I just hope they still give a damn. Trouble is, we’re not what we were. Too few, nowadays, are prepared to raise any kind of a fuss unless it’s actually happening to them.
Will you and Julian be voting New Labour when the next General Election rolls around, Samantha? Perhaps not. But I guarantee that many who read of your plight will.
It hasn‘t happened to them yet, you see.
On 2 September 2009, BBC 2’s This World featured Liviu Tipurita’s “Gypsy Child Thieves”.
One Gypsy interviewed by Tipurita said he’d sold his daughter and made a tidy sum in the process.
“I got 25 million lei for my daughter in 2004. THIS IS OUR GYPSY CUSTOM; IF SHE’S A VIRGIN, IF SHE’S UNTOUCHED, SHE’S VALUABLE.”
In an attempt to trace the roots of the problem and the origins of this exploitation within the Gypsy community, Tipurita travelled to his native Romania, home to the largest Gypsy population in the world, where he interviewed one of the most powerful leaders of the Gypsy underworld in some depth.
Here are a few excerpts from Liviu Tipurita’s film:
Tipurita: "I’ve come to one of the Gypsy crime strongholds, the city of Cryova. MOST OF THOSE IN PRISON FOR CHILD ENSLAVEMENT... COME FROM HERE. This is a dangerous place…
I’m here to meet up with the powerful leader of the Gypsy underworld. (Brillian) The neighbourhood where he lives is home to over ten thousand Gypsies. Most of them belong to one clan - THE THIEVES.”
Brillian: “That’s my father, one of the greatest Gypsy leaders of Cryova. And HE WAS PART OF THE CLAN OF THE BEST THIEVES. I AM PART OF THIS FAMILY THAT OCCUPIES ITSELF WITH STEALING.”
Tipurita: “FOR HIM STEALING IS A PROFESSION THAT HAS BEEN PASSED ON FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION… Having come from a long line of thieves Brillian has a special insight into the history of Gypsy crime…
When did the Romany Gypsies from Romania start going West?”
Brillian: “Between 1980 and 1989. They earned quickly because, HAVING ESCAPED A COMMUNIST COUNTRY, THEY HAD THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM AND RESIDENCY IN THESE COUNTRIES and they came back with special cars and built outstanding houses and they came back to use the power that they had and they said WHOEVER GOES TO THESE COUNTRIES GETS RICH!”
Tipurita: “When Brillian was a child this district was dirt poor. But at the beginning of the nineties, when THE GYPSIES FROM HERE WENT TO THE WEST TO STEAL AND BEG, the neighbourhood started to pick up.”
Brillian: “When they saw the possibility of making money, at a certain point they no longer wanted to go BEGGING themselves… Then, IN ORDER TO KEEP MAKING MONEY, UNDER THE PRETENCE THAT THEY WANT TO HELP OTHERS, THEY TRY TO PERSUADE THEM TO GO AND BEG”.
Tipurita: “In the last twenty years the neighbourhood has flourished. And nowadays EVERY STREET HERE HAS DOZENS OF IMPOSING VILLAS THAT BRILLIANT SAYS ARE BUILT ON THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME ABROAD.”
Brillian: “Look at this house… now there’s a guy who stayed for a long time in Italy… HE BEGGED HE STOLE, HE MADE A LOT OF MONEY. And he sent it home and started lending at interest…
These two houses belong to Merisi and Calistrada. Calistrada is my first cousin… THEY SORTED THEMSELVES OUT IN ENGLAND. A LARGE PART OF HIS FORTUNE WAS MADE FROM STEALING… IN ENGLAND...
THE THIEVING, what they’re doing now, it’s no longer a national problem. IT’S HAPPENING ON AN INTERNATIONAL SCALE. Now the whole of Europe, the whole of the world talk about the Gypsies… If the new generations growing up now continue in the same way NO ONE WILL HAVE US! THE WESTERN COUNTRIES WILL CHASE US AWAY”.
Tipurita: "Over the last twenty years I've seen the anti-Gypsy feeling getting stronger, not only in Romania but across Europe. I'VE ALSO SEEN GYPSY PETTY CRIME TURN INTO SERIOUS CRIME, INTO INTERNATIONAL ORGANISED CRIME. Most Gypsies in Romania still live in shacks but THERE ARE ALSO MANY WHO NOW LIVE IN PALACES!" More...
We are all aware that, with a good deal of multicultural relish, New Labour has been importing lots and lots of lovely, fluffy, non-indigenous "organised crime" types into the UK in recent times.
If ever you thought that they were doing so for the greater good, what you see in the edition of Liviu Tipurita's film (Gypsies), may just change your mind.
If that isn't enough to convince you, take a look the essay, Renata Gural and the Demetries.
On 17 January 2010 Muslim "hate-preacher", Anjem Choudary spoke of the Government's decision to ban Islam4UK, the fundamentalist Islamic group he heads, in the The Daily Star Sunday.
“THERE COULD BE A BLOODBATH ON THE STREETS... When you start to suppress ideological movements, you push them underground and THERE IS MORE CHANCE OF CONFLICT.
IN SOME CITIES, ONE IN SIX OF THE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE MUSLIM. PEOPLE DON’T REALISE THAT THERE ARE ACTUALLY FOUR TO FIVE MILLION MUSLIMS IN THE UK. Many of them do not register to vote so the GOVERNMENT’S FIGURES DO NOT REFLECT THE TRUE SIZE OF THE MUSLIM POPULATION…
IT’S A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION. You have to consider how, IF THERE IS ANOTHER 7/7, the country would cope. More and more disaffected whites would be driven towards far-right extremist groups such as the British National Party and the English Defence League IF THERE WAS ANOTHER ATTACK."
Don't you mean "when"?
On 23 April 2006, The Times reported the remarks of Professor Ted Cantle, Tony Blair's senior race relations advisor at the time of the Oldham Riots.
This is what was said:
"In an apparent reference to Heanor, a predominantly white town in the Amber Valley area of Derbyshire, Cantle said he was concerned about the strength of support for the far-right British National Party in some parts of the East Midlands...
Cantle’s remarks go further by describing parts of the country as 'UNHEALTHILY' WHITE."
The exact wording that Ted Cantle used was this:
"SOME OF THE NEIGHBOURING AREAS OF NOTTS AND DERBYSHIRE DO SEEM TO BE UNHEALTHILY ALL-WHITE."
On 14 July 2009, The UK's Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, said this to other MPs on the Home Affairs Committee:
"I DO NOT LIE AWAKE AT NIGHT WORRYING ABOUT A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION. I’M HAPPY TO LIVE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY. I’m happy to live in a society where we not only welcome those coming to live and work in this country but where we can go and live and work in other countries."
On 21 November 2009, The Tony Rennell article, 'This isn't the Britain we fought for' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII’, was published by The Daily Mail.
This cited many of the comments of WWII veterans, as they surveyed what the world they fought so hard for had become, as featured in the book, The Unknown Warriors by Nicholas Pringle.
Here is what a Commando who took part in the disastrous Dieppe raid (4,000 men were lost) thinks of New Labour:
“MORE OF A SHAMBLES THAN SOME OF THE ACTIONS I WAS IN DURING THE WAR”!
“THOSE COMRADES OF MINE WHO NEVER MADE IT BACK WOULD BE APPALLED IF THEY COULD SEE THE WORLD AS IT IS TODAY. THEY WOULD WONDER WHAT HAPPENED TO THE BRAVE NEW WORLD THEY FOUGHT SO DAMNED HARD FOR.”
A former Durham Light Infantryman wrote:
“OUR BRITISH CULTURE IS DRAINING AWAY AT AN EVER INCREASING PACE,' 'AND WE ARE ALMOST FORBIDDEN TO MAKE ANY COMMENT.”
A widow from Solihull blamed the Thatcher years “when WE STARTED TO LOSE ALL OUR INDUSTRY AND PROFIT BECAME THE ONLY AIM IN LIFE'.
Speaking of her husband, a veteran of Dunkirk and Burma, she said:
“It is 18 years since I lost him and AS I LOOK AROUND PARTS OF BIRMINGHAM TODAY YOU WOULD NEVER KNOW YOU WERE IN ENGLAND… He would have hated it. He also disliked the immoral way things are going. I don't think people are really happy now, for all the modern, easy-living conveniences.
I DISAGREE WITH SAME-SEX MARRIAGES… RUBBISH TV PROGRAMMES, SO-CALLED CELEBRITIES AND, MOST OF ALL, UNLIMITED IMMIGRATION. I AM VERY UNHAPPY ABOUT THE WAY THIS COUNTRY IS BEING TRANSFORMED.
I go nowhere after dark. I don't even answer my doorbell then.”
A Desert Rat who fought at El Alamein and in Sicily, Italy and Greece added:
'THIS IS NOT THE COUNTRY I FOUGHT FOR. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, LACK OF DISCIPLINE, COMPENSATION MADNESS, UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION - THE ‘DO-GOODERS’ HAVE A LOT TO ANSWER FOR.”
A former “Land Girl” had this to say:
'In my day, DRUGS WERE UNKNOWN, FAMILIES REMAINED TOGETHER, DIVORCE WAS A RARITY AND CHILDREN FELT SECURE. WE'RE NOW CONTROLLED BY GERMANY AND FRANCE. WHAT A SAD IRONY! WERE OUR SACRIFICES MADE SO HOOLIGANS MAY RUN WILD AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR BE ACCEPTED AS THE NORM BY TV INTERVIEWERS AND SOCIETY IN GENERAL”?
An RAF mechanic quoted the following poetic lines:
'I mourned them then,
But now surviving IN A WORLD,
INDIFFERENT TO THEIR HOPES AND DREAMS,
I GRIEVE MORE FOR THE LIVING’.” More...
I grieve for the living too.
That’s why I’m standing for parliament in the next General Election.
I WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK!
If you want it too, ladies and gentlemen, you’re going to have to stop voting for those who stole it!
It’s as simple as that.
Sir Jimmy Young is an 88-year-old DJ who interviews politicians and celebs for BBC Radio.
He was also a pop star in the 1950s and had two number one hits.
On 9 August 2009, he wrote the following in The Sunday Express:
“GORDON BROWN PURSUES HIS POLICY OF OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION, INTENT ON BUILDING UP A CLIENT STATE OF VOTERS WHO WILL BE DULY GRATEFUL TO LABOUR.
Recently Home Secretary Alan Johnson infamously declared that he doesn’t lie awake at night worrying about immigration. Well perhaps he should. Huge numbers of ordinary people declare to pollsters and political activists that the level of immigration is near the top of their list of worries. They protest that allowing our present population of 61million to increase to the 70million predicted by Whitehall statisticians would be A GROSS ABUSE OF BRITISH HOSPITALITY…
But the Government is so traumatised by the public’s resentment of its open-door policy that IT VICIOUSLY ATTACKS ANYONE WHO DARES TO CRITICISE IT.”
On 14 October 2009, Simon Duke wrote the following in The Daily Mail:
"City bank Goldman Sachs is expected to confirm tomorrow that BONUSES WILL SMASH ALL RECORDS IN 2009, JUST A YEAR AFTER THE GOVERNMENT RESCUED THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM OBLIVION...
The return to business as usual for the so-called 'Masters of the Universe' of the Square Mile will anger the MILLIONS OF FAMILIES whose finances have been devastated by the financial crisis...
THE WALL STREET GIANT IS ON COURSE TO LAVISH £14 BILLION ON PAY AND BONUSES ON STAFF THIS YEAR following a surge in profits between July and September… GOLDMAN'S 5,500 UK WORKERS ARE NOW SET TO POCKET AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST £500,000 EACH for this year - the highest rewards in the firm's 140-year history."
As the British people have sought to make sense of sub-prime, the credit-crunch and the world-wide recession that followed, the journalist who has attained most public acclaim and notoriety for guiding us through this financial minefield is, without doubt, Robert Peston, the BBC's Business Editor.
Bearing in mind the fact that Peston is, himself, very much an establishment figure, it would be difficult for any of his fellow bigshots to gainsay any of the astoundingly unequivocal criticisms of the status quo in his 2008 book, Who Runs Britain.
Here's a sample:
“In the late 1970s, THE GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR STARTED TO WIDEN AND WOULD NEVER NARROW AGAIN. INCREASING INEQUALITY WAS TO DEFINE THE THATCHER YEARS FROM 1979 TO 1990... HER WAY OF SEEING THE WORLD BECAME THE ESTABLISHMENT VIEW... In her world, STRIVING FOR EQUALITY AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS WERE ANTITHETICAL ASPIRATIONS, SO EQUALITY MUST DIE - AND IT DID…
In 2005-06, for the first time in many years, the pattern of income growth replicated what went on during the Thatcher years, with THE RICHEST FIFTH OF THE POPULATION SEEING THE HIGHEST INCOME RISE, AND PAY INCREMENTS BECOMING PROGRESSIVELY SMALLER FOR THE LOWER-INCOME GROUPS…
The really striking social phenomenon under New Labour has been THE TRIUMPH OF THE SUPER-RICH... The presence on British soil of a disproportionate number of immensely wealthy people, who are becoming wealthier by the minute, HAS BEEN ENCOURAGED BY TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN. THEY HAVE NURTURED A WELCOMING ENVIRONMENT FOR BILLIONAIRES OF ANY NATIONALITY, WHO CAN LIVE IN THE UK AND PAY RELATIVELY LITTLE TAX…
Brown as Chancellor was, AS A MATTER OF DELIBERATE POLICY, STRIKINGLY GENEROUS TO THE CITY'S NEW PLUTOCRATS - THE OWNERS OF HEDGE-FUND AND PRIVATE-EQUITY FIRMS…
IN 2006, THE ACCOUNTANTS GRANT THORNTON ESTIMATED THAT 54 UK-BASED BILLIONAIRES WERE PAYING INCOME TAX OF JUST £14.7M ON A COMBINED FORTUNE OF £126 BILLION… Of these, at least 32 of the billionaire dynasties had probably not paid any personal taxes on their wealth…
What has been going on is A SUPERCHARGED VERSION OF THE TRENDS PROMOTED BY THATCHER…
By design of a Labour premier, Gordon Brown, and a socialist Mayor, Ken Livingstone, LONDON IS NOW THE CAPITAL CITY OF THE BORDERLESS WORLD OF THE SUPER-RICH.”
In October 2000, The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, which was commissioned by Jack Straw, the New Labour Home Secretary, was published by The Runnymede Trust.
Here are some of the things it said:
"BRITISHNESS AND ENGLISHNESS ARE RACIALLY CODED TERMS WITH A WHITES-ONLY CONNOTATION... A RETHINKING OF THE NATION'S SELF-IMAGE IS NEEDED...
BRITISHNESS, AS MUCH AS ENGLISHNESS, HAS SYSTEMATIC, LARGELY UNSPOKEN, RACIST CONNOTATIONS... IT IS WIDELY UNDERSTOOD THAT ENGLISHNESS, AND THEREFORE BY EXTENSION BRITISHNESS, IS RACIALLY CODED. THE UNSTATED ASSUMPTION IS THAT BRITISHNESS AND WHITENESS GO TOGETHER LIKE ROAST BEEF AND YORKSHIRE PUDDING...
The absence from the national curriculum of A REWRITTEN HISTORY OF BRITAIN as an imperial force, involving dominance in Ireland, Africa, the Caribbean and Asia, is proving to be an unmitigated disaster...
THERE AIN'T NO BLACK IN THE UNION JACK".
When a flurry of pro-British criticism greeted the release of the October 2000 report, Trevor Phillips, who had been the Chairman of the Runnymede Trust from 1993 to 1998 and was Chairman of the Greater London Assembly at the time, dismissed the dissent as:
"THE KNEE-JERK REACTIONS OF LITTLE ENGLANDERS."
Phillips is now the Chairman of the Brit-bashing quango, The Commission for Equalities and Human Rights.
During the 4 June 2006 edition of Dateline London, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, who arrived here as a refugee from Idi Amin's Uganda in 1972, was asked this question by presenter, Gavin Essler:
"What's wrong with white guys, by the way?"
To which Alibhai-Brown replied:
"I don't like them. I WANT THEM TO BE THE LOST SPECIES IN 100 YEARS".
No one, as far as I'm aware, has ever questioned Alibhai-Brown's absolute Asiatic right to want the white man gone.
In the 28 February 1999 edition of The Observer, Andrew Marr, the BBC's top political commentator, said this:
"Widespread and vigorous miscegenation (race mixing)... is the best answer...
Teachers are the most effective anti-racist campaigners in the country, this means more than education in other religions, it means a form of POLITICAL EDUCATION. Only people who understand the economic forces changing their world, threatening them... have a chance of being immune to the old tribal chants.
And the final answer, frankly, is THE VIGOROUS USE OF STATE POWER TO COERCE AND REPRESS!... I firmly believe that REPRESSION CAN BE A GREAT CIVILISING INSTRUMENT FOR GOOD! STAMP HARD on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost KILL THEM OFF!...
A NEW RACE RELATIONS ACT WILL IMPOSE THE WILL OF THE STATE ON MILLIONS!"
The chattering classes have every bit as much of a hold over our lives as the politicians do.
They hand our opinions to us on a plate, they shape our beliefs and attitudes. Everything the media throws at us, from cradle to grave, affects the way we behave and think. Shiny eyed zealots like Andrew Marr do not care what we want or feel, they care only for the promised land that their wisdom, their insight and their determination will lead us on to in the future.
That's us Andrew Marr is talking about, folks. That's the British people Marr wants to breed out of the pages of history.
Now you know what we're up against, what are you going to do about it?
On 29 November 2007, Vanessa Feltz, David Aaronovich, Yasmin Alibhai Brown and Nick Ferrari appeared in an episode of London Talking.
The programme was hosted by the former Blue Peter presenter, Konnie Huq.
Feltz said this on that show:
"If we stopped immigration... WE'D BE BOG BORING, WE WOULD BE BLEAK AND DREARY AND HOMOGENOUS! WE'D LOOK AS IF WE'D BEEN PUMPED OUT BY THE SAME GHASTLY FACTORY PRODUCTION LINE... AS SOON AS YOU GO OUTSIDE LONDON, YOU THINK, 'OH MY GOD'! WHERE HAVE I ENDED UP? IT'S LIKE MIDDLE AMERICA OUT THERE!" More...
The immediate ancestors of Vanessa Feltz, David Aaronovich, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Konnie Huq's and Nick Ferrari's dad may have been immigrants but mine and most of those Vanessa Feltz is happy to sneer at here weren't.
The Brit-loathing attitude evidenced here is by no means new.
In an episode of The Wright Stuff, Matthew Wright said this:
"There aren't a lot of black people in Norfolk."
To which Feltz replied:
"Good Lor, have you seen the people in Norfolk? I think THEY NEED A GREAT INFLUX OF AS MANY DIFFERENT CULTURES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE - STOP ALL THAT INBREEDING! That's what we should do!"
On 9 March 2009, Sir Andrew Green, the Chairman of MigrationWatch, was quoted thus by The Daily Star:
"THE GOVERNMENT HAS HELD PUBLIC OPINION IN CONTEMPT FOR YEARS. DESPITE HAVING DISMANTLED BORDER CONTROLS, THEY DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED IMMIGRATION... THE CONSERVATIVES HANDED OVER BORDER CONTROLS TO THE EU BUT ALL THE OTHER FACTORS ARE DOWN TO NEW LABOUR…
The Government seems to make a habit of blaming ‘global forces’ but OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS THIS PROBLEM IS ALMOST ENTIRELY HOME GROWN".
On 30 May 2009, Jeremy Clarkson, presenter of Top Gear, said this in The Sun:
"THE MAIN PARTIES SEEM TO HAVE COMPLETELY LOST TOUCH WITH WHAT THEIR SUPPORTERS ACTUALLY WANT OUT OF LIFE…
I can quite understand why the champagne socialists are worried about the plight of poor Ndjama. His village has been sacked by rebels, he has nowhere to live and nothing to eat. Of course they would want him to have a home in Britain… THEY WANT NDJAMA TO COME HERE BECAUSE WHEN HE DOES, HE'S NOT GOING TO BE LIVING IN THEIR STREET. SO, NDJAMA WILL GO AND LIVE IN SOMEONE ELSE'S STREET and that person will be quite cross. ESPECIALLY WHEN HE GOES TO WORK ONE DAY AND FINDS NDJAMA AT THE WHEEL OF HIS FORKLIFT TRUCK.
THE LABOUR PARTY SAY THAT IMMIGRATION IS GOOD FOR BRITAIN AND MORALLY THE RIGHT POLICY TO PURSUE… BUT THOSE WHO PUT THEM IN POWER, EMPHATICALLY, DO NOT THINK THIS WAY. We are all tribal. WE LIKE BEING IN A GROUP AND WE DISTRUST OUTSIDERS. WE HAVE OUR FAMILY UNIT, OUR BUNCH OF FRIENDS, THE TOWN WHERE WE LIVE… the country of which we are proud.
THE BIG-HEARTED, LIBERAL-THINKING CHAPS AND CHAPESSES WHO ADVISE BROWN AND HIS GANG OF FIDDLERS MAY THINK THIS IS BACKWARD AND PRE-HISTORIC… But… IF YOU LET HALF OF AFRICA COME TO BRITAIN… YOU'RE GOING TO WIND PEOPLE UP."
On 5 December 2005, Rod Liddle said this in The Spectator:
“THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF STREET CRIME, KNIFE CRIME, GUN CRIME, ROBBERY AND CRIMES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN LONDON IS CARRIED OUT BY YOUNG MEN FROM THE AFRICAN-CARIBBEAN COMMUNITY.
In return, we have rap music, goat curry and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us.”
I wonder, given that PC isn't the force it was, if the British were allowed a secret ballot, would they vote to put things back the way they were before Big Brother began importing criminality from elsewhere on the planet?
On 17 February 2009, The Daily Telegraph quoted Dame Stella Rimmington, former head of MI5, following in an interview with La Vanguardia newspaper.
“Since I have retired I feel more at liberty to be against certain decisions of the Government, especially the attempt to pass laws which interfere with people’s privacy… It would be better that the Government recognised that there are risks, rather than FRIGHTENING PEOPLE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO PASS LAWS WHICH RESTRICT CIVIL LIBERTIES, precisely one of the objects of terrorism: that WE LIVE IN FEAR AND UNDER A POLICE STATE”.
Arthur Chaskelson, the Chairman of an International Commission of Jurists, said this in the same Telegraph article:
"WE HAVE BEEN SHOCKED BY THE DAMAGE DONE OVER THE PAST SEVEN YEARS BY EXCESSIVE OR ABUSIVE COUNTER-TERRORISM MEASURES IN A WIDE RANGE OF COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD. Many governments, ignoring the lessons of history, have allowed themselves to be rushed into hasty responses to terrorism that have UNDERMINED CHERISHED VALUES AND VIOLATED HUMAN RIGHTS.”
Welcome to the world of Bush, Blair, Brown and those who own them, Arthur.
Police Federation Chairman, Paul McKeever, was quoted as follows by the 13 May 2009 edition of The Daily Mail:
"THE GOVERNMENT HAS CREATED THE HOKEY COKEY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM... IT’S IN OUT, IN OUT, LET ALL THE PRISONERS OUT. IN OUT, IN OUT, SHAKE THE SYSTEM ABOUT… OFFICERS ARE SICK TO DEATH OF SEEING THE SAME CRIMINALS AGAIN AND AGAIN.”
McKeever said what he said in the presence of the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, at the Police Federation’s annual conference in Bournemouth.
On 27 August 2009, Leo McKinstry commented thus in The Daily Express:
“PATRIOTISM IS ONE OF MAN-KIND’S MOST NOBLE IDEALS, an extension of THE NATURAL LOYALTY WE FEEL TO OUR FAMILIES, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD. In its highest form, it requires us TO LAY DOWN OUR LIVES TO PROTECT OTHERS...
But IN OUR MODERN AGE, PATRIOTISM IS DESPISED RATHER THAN ADMIRED. FOR THE MARXIST IDEOLOGUES WHO NOW RUN BRITAIN, LOVE OF COUNTRY IS A VICE, NOT A VIRTUE...
It is a bizarre paradox of our times that, THANKS TO THE PREDOMINANCE OF MULTI-CULTURAL DOGMA, THE PATRIOTIC INSTINCT THAT LED TO NATIONAL SALVATION IN 1945 IS NOW TREATED AS A THOUGHT CRIME.
THE SENSE OF UNIFYING NATIONAL IDENTITY THAT ONCE MOTIVATED MILLIONS OF BRITONS TO DEFEND THEIR HOMELAND IS HELD TO BE SUSPECT BY A POLITICAL ELITE OBSESSED WITH CULTURAL DIVERSITY. WE ARE TOLD THAT OPPOSITION TO MASS IMMIGRATION IS THE EQUIVALENT OF SIDING WITH THE NAZIS...
The Government’s own educational quango, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, boasts that HISTORY TEACHING SHOULD BE A TOOL FOR ‘VALUING DIVERSITY AND CHALLENGING RACISM’ BY GAINING INSIGHTS ‘INTO ISSUES AROUND HUMAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY AND MIGRATION'...
I recently spoke to a D-Day veteran from the West Midlands. With anger and regret, he told me that HE DID NOT FIGHT IN ORDER TO END UP AS AN ALIEN IN HIS OWN COUNTRY. Even more insulting, he said, was BEING TOLD BY POLITICIANS THAT THE DESTRUCTION OF HIS SOCIETY WAS THE IDEAL FOR WHICH HE HAD GONE INTO BATTLE.”
Leo McKinstry, the mainstream political journalist whose views most closely resemble my own, was once a Labour councillor and an aide to New Labour's Deputy Leader, Harriet Harman.
More of his insightful writings may be perused here.
On 9 June 2009, Patrick O'Flynn opined thus in The Daily Express:
“THE LABOUR PARTY THAT HAS ABANDONED THE BRITISH WORKING CLASS in a process of disengagement that has taken place over decades… ITS POLICIES HAVE UNDERMINED WORKING-CLASS AMBITION, REFUSED TO PUNISH PROPERLY THE CRIMINALITY THAT PLAGUES WORKING-CLASS NEIGHBOURHOODS, RIGGED THE JOBS MARKET AGAINST INDIGENOUS WORKERS, ENCOURAGED EXCESSIVE IMMIGRATION AND DOWNGRADED PATRIOTISM – REPLACING IT WITH THE DISASTROUS IDEOLOGY OF MULTICULTURALISM...
THE DAUGHTER OF AN AFRICAN PRINCE, AFTER BEING PUT THROUGH A BRILLIANT PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ENGLAND, WILL FIND THAT ‘AFFIRMATIVE ACTION’ OPENS ALL KINDS OF CAREER DOORS THAT REMAIN SHUT TO THE WHITE SON OF A WORKING-CLASS FAMILY FROM A COUNCIL ESTATE.”
On 1 February 2009, Simon Walters, Political Editor of The Mail on Sunday, told us this:
"THE LABOUR PEER LORD TRUSCOTT, AT THE HEART OF THE LORDS SLEAZE ROW, HAS SECRET LINKS TO SOVIET RUSSIA, a Mail on Sunday investigation has uncovered. The party faced calls for a new inquiry into Lord Truscott in the face of fresh information about his astonishing rise to power, which throws new light on the 'love at first sight' account of how he met his Russian wife Svetlana in the former Soviet Union.
At the time they married, LADY TRUSCOTT WAS AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY AND HER FATHER WAS A SENIOR RED ARMY OFFICER AT A SECRET MILITARY INSTITUTE CONNECTED TO THE SOVIET EQUIVALENT OF THE SAS.
The Mail on Sunday has also obtained new details about THE COUPLE'S PRIVATE FORTUNE, WHICH INCLUDES A £1MILLION HOME IN MAYFAIR, A COUNTRY HOME IN BATH AND PROPERTY INTERESTS IN RUSSIA. This newspaper has been told that LORD TRUSCOTT WAS AWARDED HIS PEERAGE BY TONY BLAIR IN 2004 AFTER OFFERING PRIVATE ADVICE ON RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA."
It's the Truscott types that really rule our lives nowadays, ladies and gentlemen.
That's who pays no attention to what we want. That's who lies and spins and screws everything up and that's who won't ever take any of the blame.
And all this time you thought you were voting the same way as your dad and grandad.
On 21 June 2008, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:
"THIS IS THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT SINCE OLIVER CROMWELL, DEDICATED TO OVERTHROWING THE MORAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ORDER OF THIS COUNTRY… The truth is – and I know it because I was a Sixties Trotskyist myself – that THE BLAIR-BROWN LABOUR PARTY IS CRAMMED FULL OF UNREFORMED REVOLUTIONARIES. THAT’S WHY THE MI5 FILES OF THAT ERA HAVE BEEN SO ZEALOUSLY DESTROYED.
I tried to obtain my own docket and was refused on feeble grounds. The fact is that mine went in the incinerator ALONG WITH PETER MANDELSON’S, JOHN REID’S AND MANY OTHERS whose interesting pasts are much-rumoured around Westminster…
But now you don’t have to take my word for it. Last week, my lonely warnings were confirmed in an astonishing public statement by Tony McNulty, Minister of State at the Home Office… Believing that everyone there was a Leftist like him, he tried to win them over with these words:
'I KNOW IT’S TERRIBLY HARD TO BELIEVE BUT I USED TO BE RADICAL MYSELF… LIKE A LOT OF GOVERNMENT, I’M AN EX-TROT’…
Looking at the bland, prosperous faces of the Parliamentary Labour Party I see my generation, THE ONES WHO BETWEEN ABOUT 1965 AND 1975 LEARNED TO LOATHE PATRIOTISM, THE ARMED FORCES, PROPER POLICING, PROPER SCHOOLS, TRADITIONAL RELIGION, MARRIAGE, THE MONARCHY AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT ‘ALTERNATIVE’ COMEDIANS ARE PAID HANDSOMELY TO SNEER AT ON THE BBC...
TROTSKY WOULD HAVE APPROVED".
Though Lenin has been given the credit as leader of the Bolshevik revolution, Trotsky did more than any other to make it happen.
He raised many millions of dollars from American businessmen, without which there wouldn't have been a revolution, and, through the campaigns of terror he ordered and organised as Head of the Red Army, all resistance was crushed and Bolshevik rule established.
On 12 October 2008, The Andrew Marr Show featured the Tory MP and former Shadow Home Secretary, David Davis, who had just returned from a fact-finding trip to Afghanistan.
Bear in mind as you read his laudably honest appraisal of the situation, that Davis voted to go to war against Afghanistan.
"THE AFGHANS THINK WE'RE LOSING… WE ARE EFFECTIVELY DEFENDING A GOVERNMENT WHICH IS WEAK, CORRUPT AND INEFFECTIVE. I MEAN APART FROM ITS WARLORD ALLIES, IT DOESN'T EXTEND A RIFLE SHOT BEYOND KABUL IN TERMS OF ITS POWER. And MANY OF THE MINISTERS, GOVERNORS AND SO ON HAVE BECOME MULTI-MILLIONAIRES WHILST PUBLIC SERVANTS, I MEAN WHICH THE ORDINARY AFGHAN… JUST VIEWS WITH HATRED. And on the ground... the Afghan National Police, who we support… well, bluntly, MORE THAN HALF OF THEM ARE DRUG ADDICTS, A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF THEM ARE CORRUPT.
THEY ARE KNOWN PRINCIPALLY FOR STOPPING AFGHANS ON THE ROAD AND TAKING MONEY OFF THEM, FOR ROBBING THEM, EVEN OCCASIONALLY FOR RAPE AND KIDNAP. Now all those things mean YOU'VE GOT A SORT OF BANDITRY IN UNIFORM.
So I'm afraid the truth is… WE ARE NOT SEEN BY THE ORDINARY AFGHAN AS THE LIBERATORS...
You know IF YOU'VE HAD A MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY RAPED OR YOU'VE BEEN ROBBED OR YOU'VE BEEN DENIED JUSTICE IN SOME WAY, THEN I'M AFRAID YOU KNOW THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE IN TOWN IS THE TALIBAN… The most outstanding story we've picked up - and we've confirmed it from a couple of sources - was that ORDINARY AFGHANS WILL LEAVE GOVERNMENT AREAS TO GO TO A TALIBAN AREA TO GET JUSTICE, to get a trial on the subject.”
It's nice to hear a top chap telling the truth for a change, isn't it?
On 8 August 2009, General Sir David Richards, the new head of the British Army, told us that the politicians might be putting the lives of our soldiers at risk in Afghanistan for the next forty years!
He was quoted thus by The Telegraph:
"This is nation building... THE WHOLE PROCESS MIGHT TAKE AS LONG AS 30 TO 40 YEARS. There is absolutely no chance of NATO pulling out."
Long enough for tens of thousands of ours and hundreds of thousands of theirs to lose their lives for the Nation Builders, eh, Dave?
On 15 March 2006, Prince Charles said this:
"NEARLY 25 PER CENT OF ALL HOMELESS PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY ARE EX-SERVICEMEN." More...
On 20 January 2010, The Huffington Post quoted the gay rights campaigner, Peter Tatchell, thus:
“IN BRITAIN… WE CAN ONLY DREAM OF A BLACK HEAD OF STATE… The UK system is rigged against A BLACK LEADER… The Windsors are WHITE and only their descendants are eligible to be monarch and British head of state. The result is a de facto RACE BAR... BLACK PEOPLE ARE EXCLUDED. THE ALL-WHITE WINDSOR FAMILY has the exclusive franchise on the office of head of state. THIS WHITE-FAVOURING FEUDAL SYSTEM is totally out of step with the democratic, egalitarian and meritocratic ethos of modern British life.
A head of state is supposed to represent the nation and its people, and to symbolise its values and culture. In a DIVERSE MULTI-ETHNIC SOCIETY SUCH AS BRITAIN, surely it is wrong to automatically, a priori, deny this honoured, revered role to non-WHITE citizens?…
THE CURRENT METHOD OF APPOINTING THE HEAD OF STATE (is) RACIST BY DEFAULT… It reflects an INSTITUTIONAL RACISM…
ONLY THE GREEN PARTY IS CALLING FOR A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED HEAD OF STATE…
THIS MANNER OF DETERMINING BRITAIN'S HEAD OF STATE IS SURELY AN OFFENSIVE, BIGOTED ANACHRONISM. It is premised on the assumption that the most ignorant, stupid, immoral WHITE Windsor is more entitled to be head of state than THE BEST-INFORMED, WISEST AND MOST MORAL BLACK BRITON. THIS IS A TRULY REPULSIVE RACIST ASSUMPTION…
Catholics and people of non-Christian faiths are also barred from being monarchs and heads of state…
It is true, of course, that BRITAIN COULD ONE DAY HAVE A BLACK HEAD OF STATE. If a future monarch married a non-WHITE person, their first born child could ascend to the throne and become head of state… WHY SHOULD BLACK AND ASIAN BRITONS HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR GENERATIONS? IT IS A VILE INSULT TO MAKE THEM STAND AT THE BACK OF THE QUEUE FOR THE OFFICE OF HEAD OF STATE…
IF WILLIAM MARRIED A BLACK BRITISH WOMAN HIS FIRST-BORN MALE CHILD FROM THAT MARRIAGE COULD INHERIT THE HEAD OF STATE TITLE.” More...
The top, gay Australian doesn’t appear to like white folks much, does he?
As a point of interest, are there any native Britons out there, of a non-homosexual persuasion, who are "dream(ing) of a black head of state"?
Ah yes, New Labour,* the Tories** and the PC Crowd. Anyone else?
* In July 2000, Tony Blair said this at a meeting of non-indigenous business leaders:
"One day, yes, one day, THERE WILL BE A BLACK PRIME MINISTER!"
** On 2 June 2008, the former Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party, Jeffrey Archer, was interviewed by the Editor-in-Chief of The Indian Express, Shekhar Gupta.
At one point in the interview, Gupta asked Archer if he saw any change in Britain. He replied:
"Massive. It IS GOING TO BE TAKEN OVER BY THE INDIANS. And I don't joke...
WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS WHAT THE JEWS DID 30-40 YEARS AGO WHEN THEY CAME TO ENGLAND AFTER THE WAR. THEY TOOK OVER THE LOCAL COUNCILS AND THEY BECAME MAYORS. NOW THEY ARE IN PARLIAMENT. THE INDIANS ARE NOW TAKING OVER THE LOCAL COUNCILS. THERE ARE MAYORS ALL OVER ENGLAND WHO ARE INDIAN.
You are young enough, I suspect, TO LIVE TO SEE AN INDIAN PRIME MINISTER IN ENGLAND."
On 4 April 2005, after deciding the fate of six Asian fraudsters, Judge Richard Mawrey said that there was evidence of "MASSIVE, SYSTEMATIC AND ORGANISED FRAUD" in Birmingham.
"THE SYSTEM IS WIDE OPEN TO FRAUD and any would-be political fraudster knows that...
I have just tried and listened to evidence of ELECTORAL FRAUD THAT WOULD DISGRACE A BANANA REPUBLIC... It indicates a state NOT SIMPLY OF COMPLACENCY, BUT OF DENIAL... Short of writing ‘STEAL ME’ on the (postal vote) envelopes, it is hard to see what more could be done TO ENSURE THEIR COMING INTO THE WRONG HANDS”. More and More.
On 10 June 2006, Sandra Laville, the Crime Correspondent, and Hugh Muir, the Diary Editor wrote the following in The Guardian:
"A secret high-level Metropolitan police report has concluded that MUSLIM OFFICERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BECOME CORRUPT THAN WHITE OFFICERS BECAUSE OF THEIR CULTURAL AND FAMILY BACKGROUNDS… Complaints of misconduct and corruption against Asian officers are 10 TIMES HIGHER THAN AGAINST THEIR WHITE COLLEAGUES.
The main conclusions of the study, commissioned by the Directorate of Professional Standards and WRITTEN BY AN ASIAN DETECTIVE CHIEF INSPECTOR, stated:
'ASIAN OFFICERS AND IN PARTICULAR PAKISTANI MUSLIM OFFICERS ARE UNDER GREATER PRESSURE FROM THE FAMILY, THE EXTENDED FAMILY ... AND THEIR COMMUNITY AGAINST THAT OF THEIR WHITE COLLEAGUES TO ENGAGE IN ACTIVITY THAT MIGHT LEAD TO MISCONDUCT OR CRIMINALITY'...
The report argued that British Pakistanis live in a cash culture in which 'assisting your extended family is considered a duty...
THE FIRST VERSION (of the report) WAS CONSIDERED SO INFLAMMATORY WHEN IT WAS SHOWN TO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE STAFF ASSOCIATIONS FOR BLACK, HINDU, SIKH AND MUSLIM OFFICERS, THAT IT HAD TO BE TONED DOWN."
On 17 January 2010, an article from the LiveLeak news service informed us of an astounding set of statistics released by the Oslo police.
This is what was said:
“ALL 21 REPORTED CASES OF RAPE WITH AGGRAVATED ASSAULT — THE HIGHEST NUMBER SINCE RECORDS WERE STARTED — IN THE NORWEGIAN CAPITAL OF OSLO LAST YEAR WERE COMMITTED BY ‘NON-WESTERN IMMIGRANTS’ AND 90 PERCENT OF ALL RAPE VICTIMS WERE NORWEGIAN WOMEN...
Oslo police spokesman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK...
According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, ‘IN EACH AND EVERY CASE, NOT ONLY IN 2008 AND 2009 BUT ALSO IN 2007, THE OFFENDER WAS A NON-WESTERN IMMIGRANT. AT THE SAME TIME, IN 9 OUT OF 10 CASES, THE VICTIM WAS NORWEGIAN, NOT JUST BY NATIONALITY, BUT ALSO BY ETHNICITY… NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE OFFENDERS HAD A WESTERN BACKGROUND’...
According to official figures released in 2008, THIRD WORLD IMMIGRATION ACCOUNTED FOR 25 PERCENT OF OSLO’S POPULATION... The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan. Next in line is Somalia...
In a study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that IMMIGRATION HAS INCREASED THE PRESSURE ON THE WELFARE STATE, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population. THIRD WORLD IMMIGRANTS ARE, THE STUDY SHOWED, RECIPIENTS OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS AT A RATE TEN TIMES THAT OF NATIVE NORWEGIANS, destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.
MORE THAN HALF OF ALL SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS IN THE CITY OF OSLO ARE SPENT ON NON-WESTERN IMMIGRANTS.”
On 28 August 2006, The New Statesman quoted Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones thus:
"Our parents established beachheads in the cities; it is now up to our generation to move out of those beachheads AND CLAIM THE REST OF BRITAIN AS OUR OWN.”
Emmanuel-Jones, who is black, will be the Conservative candidate for the Chippenham constituency in the 2010 General Election.
More Illuminating Quotations may be found here..