The Madhouse Update

"Instead of agitating for war the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way, for they will be among the first to feel its consequences... No person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them.... The greatest danger to this country lies in their ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government."

A. Charles Lindbergh, first man to fly the Atlantic solo

B. Paul Robeson, actor, renowned singer and political activist

C. Jesse Owens, Olympic athlete

D. Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Cpmpany

"I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods, and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country, there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvellous transformation...

There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany."

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, (Lenin's grandfather was Jewish) The majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders."

Who wrote it? 

"A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief - even by pogroms, if necessary. 

The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Rússia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed to prominent Jewish bankers."

"In 1915, during World War I, the Kurds killed about 1 million Armenians... The Young Turks, who had been put in power by the British, used the Kurds to slaughter the Armenians... While in power, the Young Turks ran several newspapers, including 'The Young Turk,' whose editor was none other than the Russian Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky...

Jabotinsky later created the most anti-Arab of all the Zionist organizations... "

"A report submitted to the United Nations Security Council by UN observers in the Golan Heights over the past 18 months shows that Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) have been in regular contact with Syrian rebels, including Islamic State (ISIS) militants. Reports by UN observers in the Golan Heights over the past 18 months reveal the type and extent of cooperation between Israel and Syrian opposition figures. 

The reports, submitted to the 15 members of the UN Security Council and available on the UN’s website, detail regular contacts held on the border between IDF officers and soldiers and Syrian rebels." 

"If I become Prime Minister, Israel has a friend who will never turn his back on Israel!"

“In the occupied territories, Israel is an apartheid state. There is no two ways about it. When settlers travel on one road and Palestinians have to use another road; when settlers are governed by Israeli law and Palestinians are governed by military law, you are talking about apartheid."

“I think it would be a terribly dangerous thing if the British press were made to feel that they couldn't criticise Israel because they were going to be held up as anti-Semites. I think it's a very disreputable argument.”

"On July 20 (William) Haig made a speech. In it he called the Israeli response ‘disproportionate‘, moderate enough you might think but LORD KALMS, A LEADING CFI DONOR, WHO OWNS DIXONS AND WAS TREASURER OF THE PARTY, WAS OUTRAGED AND THREATENED TO WITHDRAW FUNDING TO THE PARTY."

“William Haig's usual good sense has deserted him. Think again William. For whom do you speak? Your comments are not merely unhelpful, they are downright dangerous.”

"I knew Stanley Kalms when I was Chairman of the Party and he was one of those who took the view that ANY CRITICISM OF ISRAEL is effectively damaging to the Israeli state."

"THE ISRAELI LOBBIES APPEARED TO CENSOR BRITISH POLITICIANS from saying that elements of the Israeli reaction was ‘disproportionate’ and THEY APPEARED TO BE WILLING TO USE FINANCIAL PRESSURES AS A WAY OF ENFORCING THAT DECISION."

"The Conservative Friends of Israel was founded in 1974 by the Conservative MP Michael Fidler. (Jewish) Since then it has emerged as a powerful lobby group. By 1984, the CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER, MARGARET THATCHER, HAD BEEN PREVAILED ON TO BECOME CHAIRMAN OF THE CFI BRANCH AT HER LOCAL FINCHLEY CONSTITUENCY".

Lib Dem MP, David Ward, said this during the debate:

"Israel is in breach of the contract set out in the Balfour declaration stating that 'nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.'

In the light of the Nakba and everything since, that seems like a sick joke...

This Sunday at Eden Camp in north Yorkshire there will be a gathering of the Palestine veterans... they are all over the age of 80. They went to that land in 1945 as a peacekeeping force, but lost over 700 members of the armed forces and 200 police. I believe that we owe it to them for tonight’s motion to succeed... Many were veterans of Arnhem, Normandy and Bergen-Belsen. Many felt, and still feel, betrayed by Israel and question the sacrifice that so many of their colleagues made."

 The (912) dead Britons were not killed by Palestinians. They were not killed by Arabs. Almost all were killed by Jews.

“I was a friend of Israel long before I became a Tory. My wife’s family were instrumental in the creation of the Jewish state. Indeed, some of them were with Weizmann at the Paris conference…

I have stood by Israel through thick and thin, through the good years and the bad. I have sat down with Ministers and senior Israeli politicians and urged peaceful negotiations and a proportionate response to prevarication and I thought that they were listening.

But I realise now, in truth, looking back over the past 20 years, that Israel has been slowly drifting away from world public opinion. The annexation of the 950 acres of the west bank just a few months ago has outraged me more than anything else in my political life, mainly because it makes me look a fool, and that is something that I resent…

Under normal circumstances, I would oppose the motion tonight; but such is my anger over Israel’s behaviour in recent months that I will not oppose the motion. I have to say to the Government of Israel that if they are losing people like me, they will be losing a lot of people.”

“They call themselves Neoconservatives, right wing thinkers whose dreams of a new American century have become George Bush's foreign policy… They believe America's military might should promote America's ideals... Will America's super hawks drag us into more wars against their enemies?"

Here are some of the things the Neocons are seen to say:

"Iran, Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia are the big four and then there's Libya... We are a warlike people and that we love war… We're going to have to bring down a series of regimes who are the sponsors of a network of various terrorist organisations and Iraq is part of it...

I believe that if the tyrants are removed that there'll be a great deal more peace and chances for peace in the Middle East." (Michael Ledeen)

“The President of the United States, on issue after issue, has reflected the thinking of Neoconservatives…When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so… For those of us who are involved in foreign and defence policy today, my generation, the defining moment of our history was certainly the Holocaust…

I think Tony Blair's moral sense is very much reflected in the thinking of many Neoconservatives… His sense that it was right to liberate Iraq is the sense of Neo-conservatives, and was not the view of most foreign offices including probably his own.” (Richard Perle)

“George Bush's current foreign policy is basically a Neoconservative foreign policy... Saddam Hussein is there and he's a dictator and he has weapons of mass destruction and are you going to do something about it or not. And, in so far as Tony Blair's answer was 'yes,' even if the rest of the US Security Council doesn't agree with us, I think Tony Blair is a kind of Neoconservative despite himself...

I think we need to… work to remove other dictators with weapons of mass destruction and deal with the threat of terrorism around the world…

I think the President and the military and our leadership will need the support of all of us... as we continue to make this world a safer and a better, and a freer place." (William Kristol)

"I was sitting in a bar in Capital Hill and I was told by congressional staff: ‘Careful how you use the word 'Neoconservative'. People might think you're being anti-Semitic. Can you just explain this for me?"

"It's not secret," replied Jim. "The majority of Neoconservatives have been and remain Jewish, that is a fact."

In their 1999 history, 'The Saga of Deir Yassin,' Daniel A. Mcgowan and Matthew C. Hogan tell us this:

"On the night of the attack… the leader of the Irgun (Menchem Begin, future Prime Minister of Israel) consciously exaggerated the death toll to 254 in a public statement that has become the source of the most commonly reported figure by all sides. Such willingness to make a tragedy appear worse indicates the result was desired and that the fight was not gruesome enough for them…

A member of the Jewish paramilitary youth organization commented that the attackers appeared proud of what they had done as they carried the bodies about…

The guerrillas reveal no regrets or guilt but rather indifference and even pride about the carnage that included women and children… From the beginning, THEIR BEHAVIOR REFLECTS A CONSISTENT THEME OF PROFOUND SATISFACTION WITH THE GRISLY SLAUGHTER. ONE OF THEIR FIRST OBSERVED ACTIONS AFTER THE FIGHTING WAS TO SIT DOWN AMONG THE CORPSES . . . AND HAVE LUNCH… THE LACK OF SORROW OR REVULSION AMONG THE GUERRILLAS AT DEIR YASSIN IN THE FACE OF A RARE WAR HORROR, and the apparent pride of the killers, even to a ghoulish degree, argue definitively that the carnage was not an unintended misfortune but the grisly aftermath of a deliberate massacre."

On 10 April 1948, 'The New York Times' reported thus:

"It was an act of violence that was proposed and discussed in advance. The guerrillas' lack of restraint after meeting resistance caused many to follow through on plans to murder regardless of instructions to inhibit them. Their leaders proved unwilling or unable to stop them. Afterwards, they proved quite willing to benefit from the fear effect and embellish the bloody outcome. That evening, Irgun chief Raanan met with the international press in a tea-and-cookies party in Givat Shaul and told them that 254 Arabs had been killed."

On 9 April 1982, Zvi Anlori, the commander of the Haganah unit that controlled Deir Yassin after the massacre, said this in the Hebrew daily, Davar:

"I went into six to seven houses. I saw cut off genitalia and women's crushed stomachs. According to the shooting signs on the bodies, it was direct murder."

In 'The Life and Times of Menachem Begin,' by Amos Perlmutter, Ben-Zion Cohen, the Irgun commander for the Deir Yassin operation, informed the Jabotinsky Archives thus:

"We eliminated every Arab that came our way… The majority was for liquidation of all the men in the village and any other force that opposed us, whether it be old people, women, or children."

In his book, 'The War of Independence: Out of Crisis Came Decision,' Uri Milstein said:

"I told the reporters that 254 were killed so that a big figure would be published, and so that the Arabs would panic not only in Jerusalem but across the country, and this goal was accomplished."

General Richard Catling, a British Army Assistant Inspector, said this in 'The Palestinian Catastrophe,' by Michael Palumbo:

"There is no doubt that many sexual atrocities were committed by the attacking Jews. Many young girls were raped and later slaughtered. Old women were also molested."

On 21 July 2008, UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, said this to the Israeli Knesset:

"To be able to come here at the invitation of your Speaker and of your Prime Minister Olmert - and to applaud you and the citizens of Israel for the courage you have shown in the face of adversity, resolution in the face of conflict, resilience in the face of challenge - is, for me, a singular honour indeed. Everyday you meet in this Knesset you live out the hopes - the promises - of centuries...

I am especially pleased - as the first British Prime Minister to address the Knesset - to congratulate you at this sixtieth anniversary on THE ACHIEVEMENT OF 1948: the centuries of exile ended, the age-long dream realised, the ancient promise redeemed - the promise that even amidst suffering, you will find your way home to the fields and shorelines where your ancestors walked."

Hey, Gordon! 

You know the 700,000+ that fled Israeli atrocity 60 years ago? Would you call that an 'achievement of 1948?' It was ever so simple really. You just slaughter a peaceful, non-combatant village full of Arabs and, hey presto, the rest will disappear as if by magic!

The essay, 'What about Deir Yassin, Gordon?' can be seen here 

You may also wish to take a look at what the Israeli daily, Haaretz, has to say about Deir Yassin, in the article, 'Testimonies From the Censored Deir Yassin Massacre'

Question 6 - C  General Barker was actually in the King David Hotel when the bomb went off and, outraged, wrote the order to his troops (which he would come to regret) soon afterwards.

On 27 April 1947, Barker expressed his contempt for the Jews in a letter to his former lover, Katie Antonius:

"Yes I loathe the lot - whether they be Zionists or not. Why should we be afraid of saying we hate them. Its time this damned race knew what we think of them - loathsome people".

Wikipedia tells us this: 

"Barker was the target of several assassination efforts, which included explosive devices placed around his Palestinian residence. The future President of Israel, Ezer Weizman, was one of Barker's several attempted assassins."

 

Israel seems to prefer its elite politicians to have a murderous streak. 

Future Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, was the leader of the Irgun when the King David Hotel was bombed.

On 6 November 1944, The Minister Resident for the Middle East, Lord Moyne, (Walter Guinness) was murdered in Cairo by the Stern Gang. 

His chauffeur was also killed.

On 17 September 1948, Count Folke Bernadotte, the United Nations Mediator in Palestine, was also murdered by the Stern Gang. 

Colonel André Serot was shot dead alongside him.

Yitzhak Shamir was the leader of the Stern Gang when both these events took place.

He too would become President of Israel.

On 22 May 2003, The article Jewish Groups plotted to kill Bevin, appeared in The Telegraph.

"Be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible for the alliance of large-scale capital with Marxism and was the driving force behind so many anti-Spanish revolutionary agreements, will not be got rid of in a day." (Victory speech in Madrid - 19 May 1939)

"We have torn up Marxist materialism and we have disorientated Masonry. We have thwarted the Satanic machinations of the clandestine Masonic superstate, despite its control of the world’s press and numerous international politicians." (Speech to the women’s section of the Falange in Madrid - 11 September 1945)

"The whole secret of the campaigns unleashed against Spain can be explained in two words: Masonry and Communism." (14 December 1946) 

Question 10 - B  In the 17 September 1936 edition of The Daily Express, former Prime Minister, David Lloyd George, said this:

“I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods – and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country – there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvellous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook.

He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement had made a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war – broken, dejected and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and impotence. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers.

There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change.

One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic and dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, as resolute will and a dauntless heart. He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded.

He is also securing them against the constant dread of starvation which is one of the most poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace. Over 700,000 died of sheer hunger in those dark years. You can still see the effect in the physique of those who were born into that bleak world.

The fact that Hitler has rescued his country from the fear of a repetition of that period of despair, penury and humiliation has given him an unchallenged authority in modern Germany.

As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolise him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondency and degradation.

To those who have actually seen and sensed the way Hitler reigns over the heart and mind of Germany, this description may appear extravagant. All the same, it is the bare truth. This great people will work better, sacrifice more, and, if necessary, fight with greater resolution because Hitler asks the to do so. Those who do not comprehend this central fact cannot judge the present possibilities of modern Germany.

That impression more than anything I witnessed during my short visit to the new Germany. There was a revivalist atmosphere. It had an extraordinary effect in unifying the nation. Catholic and Protestant, Prussian and Bavarian, employer and workman, rich and poor, have been consolidated into one people. Religious, provincial and class origins no longer divide the nation. There is a passion for unity born of dire necessity.

I have never met a happier people than the Germans and Hitler is one of the greatest men.”

"He (the Kaiser) was much disturbed by the strong Jewish-Masonic influence in France, and thought that this was at the bottom of much that went wrong...

The Jewish influence among the Young Turks worries him and he fears that Bolshevist elements are becoming too powerful among them."

It announced support for the establishment of a 'national home for the Jewish people' in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration read:

"Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour"

A few months after WW1 had been won, Balfour casually dismissed the above arrangement thus:

"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country….The Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land...

In short, so far as Palestine is concerned, the Powers have made no statement of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter, they have not always intended to violate." (February 1919 memo, quoted on p.73 of 'Palestine Papers, 1917 - 1922, Seeds of Conflict,' by Doreen Ingram)

Curiously, twelve years before the 'declaration', Balfour hadn't been as enamoured of Jewish 'aspirations'. In the House of Commons on 10 July 1905, he was happy to blame 'the undoubted evils that had fallen upon the country' on 'an immigration which was largely Jewish.' 

So, why would the British government promise to hand over Palestine to the Jews? Indeed, how could they, seeing as Palestine was not theirs to give away? It belonged to the Arabs who lived there and was controlled by the Turks.

In the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs of November 2005, John Cornelius explains 'The Hidden History of The Balfour Declaration' as follows:

"Herbert Asquith, who had been Prime Minister since 1908, had begun, reluctantly, to consider a negotiated peace, but negotiations with the Zionists, through Weizmann and Balfour, provided another option for Britain, although not for Asquith. That option was the possibility of a formal, but secret, alliance between the Zionists and the Monarchy, whereby the British Monarchy would undertake to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine and THE ZIONISTS WOULD UNDERTAKE TO HELP BRING AMERICA INTO THE WAR ON THE SIDE OF THE ALLIES, thus assuring an Allied victory."

On 12 January 1999, under the heading, 'Balfour Declaration's Author Was A Secret Jew,' The Jerusalem Post presented the following article to the world:

"Leopold Amery, the author of the Balfour Declaration, the 1917 document from British foreign secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild which laid the groundwork for the establishment of the State of Israel, was a secret Jew.

This has been disclosed in just-published research by William Rubinstein, professor of modern history at the University of Wales, who says Amery hid his Jewish background. Ironically, one of Amery's sons, John, achieved infamy when he defected to Nazi Germany and was hanged for treason in London after World War II. The other son, Julian, succeeded his father as a member of Parliament and was a staunch supporter of Israel…

In his 1955 autobiography, Amery, who was assistant secretary to the British war cabinet in 1917, said his own father, Charles Frederick Amery, came from an old English family. His mother, Elisabeth Leitner Amery, he wrote, was part of a stream of Hungarian exiles who fled first to Constantinople and then to England.

According to Rubinstein's research, Amery's mother was born to Jewish parents in 1841 and was named Elisabeth Joanna Saphir. The family lived in Pest, which later became part of Budapest and contained the city's first Jewish quarter.Both of her parents were Jewish, says Rubinstein, who adds that Amery himself changed his middle name from Moritz to Maurice in an attempt to disguise its origins.

As assistant secretary to the war cabinet, Amery not only drafted the Balfour Declaration, but also was responsible for establishing the Jewish Legion, the first organized Jewish fighting force since Roman times, which proved to be the forerunner of the modern Israel Defense Forces.

Later, as secretary of state for dominion affairs from 1925 to 1929, he spearheaded what many regard as the most impressive period of peaceful growth in pre-state Palestine. But his most significant contribution to British politics was a powerful speech in parliament which is thought to have played a key role in precipitating the departure of prime minister… Chamberlain in 1940 and the accession to power of Winston Churchill…

Rubinstein, whose disclosures are contained in the February edition of History Today, describes Amery's deception as ‘possibly the most remarkable example of concealment of identity in 20th century British political history.’

Rubinstein, who suspects that both of Amery's sons knew of their Jewish origins, believes Leopold Amery decided to conceal his own Jewishness… because of the obstacles it might have posed at the time to his political ambitions".

The above article can no longer be accessed at The Jerusalem Post. The Jewish Virtual Library site, however, confirms its authenticity here

"In 1915, during World War I, the Kurds killed about 1 million Armenians... The Young Turks, who had been put in power by the British, used the Kurds to slaughter the Armenians. The British then used this genocide as a justification for trying to eliminate Turkey...

The founder of the Young Turks was an Italian, B'nai B'rith official named Emmanuel Carasso... Carasso was also the grand master of an Italian masonic lodge there, called 'Macedonia Resurrected.' The lodge was the headquarters of the Young Turks, and all the top Young Turk leadership were members...

While in power, the Young Turks ran several newspapers, including 'The Young Turk,' whose editor was none other than the Russian Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky...

The paper... was funded by the Russian Zionist federation, and managed by B'nai B'rith. The editorial policy of the paper was overseen by a Dutch Zionist named Jacob Kann, who was the personal banker of the king and queen of the Netherlands.

Jabotinsky later created the most anti-Arab of all the Zionist organizations, the Irgun."

Wikipedia tells us this:

"B'nai B'rith... is committed to the security and continuity of the Jewish people and the State of Israel and combating antisemitism and other forms of bigotry." 

In his 1929 history, 'Inner Folds of the Ottoman Revolution,' Mevlan Zadeh Rifat wrote:

“The Armenian genocide was decided in August 1910 and October 1911 by a Young Turk committee composed entirely of displaced Balkan Jews in the format of a syncretist Jewish-Muslim sect which included Tala’at, Enver, Behaeddin Shakir, Jemal and Nizam posing as Muslims. 

It met in the Rothschild-funded Grand Orient lodge/hotel of Salonika." 

In his 2016 history, 'The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Chistians,' Christopher Jon Bjerknes tells us this:

"In 1905, Jewish leaders calling themselves "Young Turks" met in Masonic lodges in Salonika, Italy, Paris and Vienna. They plotted a coup d'etat against the Sultan of Turkey Abdul Hamid II. Jews and crypto-Jewish Doenmeh of the Committee for Union and Progress took over complete control of the Turkish Empire in 1909. 

They had several goals. Their primary objective was to establish a segregated Jewish State in Palestine. They also sought to instigate World War I, to slaughter entire Christian populations, and to destroy the Turkish Empire and supplant Islamic religion and culture with a soulless and cultureless society engineered by Jewish positivists in Vienna, Paris, Italy and Salonika." 

Question 19 - A  Wikipedia's 'Fandom' section tells us this:

"In perhaps his most famous financial action, (Jacob) Schiff... through Kuhn, Loeb & Co., extended a critical series of loans to the Empire of Japan, in the amount of $200 million... No European nation had yet been defeated by a non-European nation in a modern, full-scale war. It is quite likely Schiff also saw this loan as a means of avenging, on behalf of the Jewish people, the anti-Semitic actions of the Tsarist regime...

This loan attracted worldwide attention and had major consequences. Japan won the war, thanks in large part to the purchase of munitions made possible by Schiff's loan...

Schiff grew to be one of American Jewry's top philanthropists and leaders, donating to nearly every major Jewish cause... As an observant Jew, Schiff supported political, secular Zionism...

Historian George Kennan noted that Schiff helped finance revolutionary propaganda during the Russo-Japanese war and revolution of 1905. The Jewish Communal Register of New York City stated that 'Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money markets of the United States'."

 

The 14 March 1917 edition of The New York Times told us that, at a Madison Square Garden rally celebrating the Russian Revolution, Jacob Schiff sent the following telegram when he could not appear in person:

"Will you say for me to those present tonight how deeply I regret my inability to celebrate with the Friends of Russian Freedom the actual reward of what we had hoped and striven for these long years!"

In his review of Joseph W. Bendersky's 2000 book 'The Jewish Threat, Enemies of My Enemy,’ Professor Kevin MacDonald says this:

“The idea that the Bolshevik Revolution was part of a coordinated conspiracy… rested on the widespread intelligence reports that wealthy Jews were important financiers of revolutionary movements… American Jewish capitalists like Jacob Schiff did finance Russian radical movements directed at overthrowing the Czar and may well have had considerable impact."

Jacob Schiff was married to Therese Loeb, daughter of Solomon Loeb, the founder of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. 

Another Loeb daughter, Nina, was married to another German Jew, Paul Warburg, the man most responsible for creating the Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful banking house in the world.

"If the Jews were out of the question it would be easy enough to come to an agreement but they are apparently intent upon plunging the country into civil strife...  

Indications are too evident here to allow one to doubt the existence of strong undercurrents, the movers of which are bent upon war at all costs for their own selfish ends." 

The following Butler quotations can be found on pages 5 - 8 of Ivor Benson's 1979 history, 'The Battle for South Africa.'

"We are fighting in order to place a small international oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power in Pretoria. Englishmen will do well to recognise that the economic and political destinies of South Africa are, and seem likely to remain, in the hands of men, most of whom are foreigners by origin, whose trade is finance and whose trade interests are not British.

This international oligarchy may be better for the country and for the world than the present or any other rule; and England may be performing a meritorious world-service in establishing it. But it is right for us to understand quite clearly what we are doing...

Indications are too evident here to allow one to doubt the existence of strong undercurrents, the movers of which are bent upon war at all costs, for their own selfish ends. It has been my aim since I came here to keep myself clear ofthis gang. They brought many of our people into their slime and grime a few years since...

No one knew better than I did all that we had suffered from false information during the preceding quarter century. It had been the root of all our past trouble. Now, all at once, I was brought face to face with this old evil, multiplied to a degree I could not have imagined possible, no longer sporadic, but systematised, gigantic, unscrupulous; powerful in means of execution; directed to one end, that end fraught with possibilities of the gravest kind".

John Atkinson Hobson, (1858-1940) was an English economist who blew the whistle on the real reasons for the 2nd Boer War. (1899-1902) 

The following Hobsonian excerpts are taken from, 'The War in South Africa.'

"We are fighting in order to place a small international oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power in Pretoria. Englishmen would do well to recognise that the economic and political destinies of South Africa are, and seem likely to remain, in the hands of men most of whom are foreigners by origin, whose trade is finance and whose trade interests are not British…

South Africa presents a unique example of a large press, owned, controlled and operated by a small body of men with the direct aim of bringing about a conflict which shall serve their business interests...

The small group of international financiers (are) chiefly German in origin and Jewish in race."

 In a February 1999 speech in Johannesburg's marketplace, Paul Kruger, (1825-1904) President of the Transvaal, said this a few months before the outbreak of the second Boer War.

"If it were possible to eject the Jew monopolists from this country’s neck and crop without incurring war with Great Britain, then the problem of ever lasting peace would be settled in South Africa."

Lord Kitchener was the Commander of British forces in South Africa, from 1900-1902.

In The Boer War, by T. Pakenham, Kitchener is quoted as stating that the Boers were 'afraid of getting into the hands of certain Jews who no doubt wield great influence in the country.'

Anyway, the it would seem that an exactly similar type to 'the small group of international financiers... Jewish in race' of Boer War infamy, with the financial and strategic assistance of the secretive 'Focus' group headed by Baron Robert Waley-Cohen, (See answer to question 12 above) enabled World War 2 to be prosecuted to their eventual advantage as well.

Around sixty million lives would be lost in the process.

Add up all the rest and, boy oh-boy, Mr Marx has a lot to answer for!

SCORE