On 1 July 1992, introducing The USS Vincennes: Public War, Secret War for ABC News, America' top political commentator, Ted Koppel, said this:
"GOVERNMENTS LIE. THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME. And, much as we’d like to believe otherwise, the US government is no exception. There were times when we may have believed otherwise. But after Vietnam and Watergate, we know better."
The 2005 New Labour Manifesto promised the British people a referendum on whether we should sign up to the proposed European Constitution.
This is how it was put:
“It is a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe. WE WILL PUT IT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM and campaign wholeheartedly for a ‘yes’ vote to keep Britain a leading nation in Europe.”
In a 24 June 2007 statement during a BBC interview with Jon Sopel, Gordon Brown reiterated this position thus:
"The manifesto is what we put to the public. WE'VE GOT TO HONOUR THAT MANIFESTO. THAT IS AN ISSUE OF TRUST WITH ME AND THE ELECTORATE."
Amazingly, Brown was duplicitous enough to renege upon this utterly categoric statement within the very same interview:
"THIS IS NOT A NEW CONSTITUTION,” he said. “IT'S AN AMENDING TREATY… THE ISSUES THAT WE WERE WORRIED ABOUT HAVE BEEN DEALT WITH… THE PUBLIC WOULD NOT… EXPECT THERE TO BE A REFERENDUM."
Let’s test the "not-a-constitution" assertion against the things one or two other in-the-know folk have said:
The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, was quoted thus in the 29 June 2007 edition of The Daily Telegraph:
"THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONSTITUTION IS MAINTAINED. THIS IS A FACT."
Jose Luis Zapatero, the Spanish Prime Minister, said this on 27 July 2007:
"WE HAVE NOT ABANDONED ANY ESSENTIAL POINT OF THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS WITHOUT DOUBT BETTER THAN A TREATY. IT’S A PROJECT WHICH HAS A FOUNDING CHARACTER, A TREATY FOR A NEW EUROPE."
Bertie Ahern, the Irish Prime Minister, was quoted thus in the 24 June 2007 edition of The Irish Independent:
"90 PER CENT OF THE CONSTITUTION REMAINS... The changes have brought absolutely no spectacular modification to the 2004 accord."
Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, the former French President and principal author of the original Constitution, was quoted thus in the 14 June 2007 edition of Le Monde:
"We had to camouflage parts of the Constitutional Treaty… In this way, OPINION WOULD BE LED TO ACCEPT, WITHOUT KNOWING IT, THE PROVISIONS WHICH ONE DOES NOT DARE TO PRESENT TO THE PUBLIC IN A DIRECT MANNER."
Karel de Gucht, the Belgian Minister for Foreign Affairs, was quoted thus by the 23 June 2007 edition of Flanders Information:
"The goal of the Constitutional Treaty was to be legible. The goal of this Treaty is to be illegible. THE CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY WAS CLEAR WHEREAS THIS NEW TREATY IS OBSCURE. IT IS A SUCCESS."
The 3 July 2007 edition of The Telegraph quoted Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg, thus:
"OF COURSE THERE WILL BE A TRANSFER OF SOVEREIGNTY BUT WOULD I BE INTELLIGENT TO DRAW THE PUBLIC ATTENTION TO THIS FACT?"
Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, was quoted as follows by the 13 June 2007 edition of The Guardian:
"THE CHANGES HAVE PURELY BEEN COSMETIC AND THE BASE DOCUMENT STAYS THE SAME."
On 7 March 2008, The Daily Mail commented as follows:
"Yesterday will go down in history as the day our politicians surrendered most of what was left of Britain's sovereignty and trusted the nation's future to a European superstate. It will also go down as one of the blackest ever for our democracy...
BOTH GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION MPS DELIBERATELY BROKE THE SOLEMN PLEDGE THEY MADE TO THE ELECTORATE IN 2005. EVERY LABOUR CANDIDATE WENT INTO THAT ELECTION COMMITTED TO AN UNEQUIVOCAL PLEDGE TO CALL A REFERENDUM ON WHAT WAS THEN CALLED THE EU CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY - now known, after a few cosmetic tweaks, as the Lisbon Treaty. Their manifesto said…
‘WE WILL PUT IT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM'...
Not much room for misunderstanding there, was there?
Yet last night, THE GREAT MAJORITY OF LABOUR MPS TROOPED THROUGH THE DIVISION LOBBIES TO VOTE AGAINST A REFERENDUM. WHAT HOPE IS THERE FOR DEMOCRACY, WHEN MPS PLEDGE ONE THING TO GET ELECTED - AND THEN DO THE EXACT OPPOSITE WHEN THE VOTERS HAVE GIVEN THEM THEIR TRUST?
The LibDems' official position, under their pathetic new leader Nick Clegg, has been every bit as morally contemptible - perhaps even more so. Here, verbatim, is the party's 2005 election pledge…
‘RATIFICATION MUST BE SUBJECT TO A REFERENDUM OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE’… Yet last night, Mr CLEGG ORDERED HIS MPS TO ABSTAIN - THEREBY ENSURING THE TREATY WOULD BE RATIFIED WITHOUT VOTERS' CONSENT…
WHAT WE WITNESSED LAST NIGHT WAS THE POLITICAL CLASS GANGING UP AGAINST THE VOTERS WHO GAVE THEM POWER.
THE RESULT - BARRING A MIRACLE - IS THAT BRITAIN WILL NOW SURRENDER ITS VETO OVER 60 IMPORTANT AREAS OF POLICY TO THE UNELECTED BUREAUCRACY IN BRUSSELS. Meanwhile, we will be obliged to take orders from AN UNELECTED PRESIDENT OF EUROPE - WHO, GOD FORBID, MAY EVEN BE TONY BLAIR.
As the pettifogging regulations flood in from Brussels over the years ahead, there will be absolutely nothing we can do about it. And all because, ON WEDNESDAY MARCH 5, 2008, BRITISH MPS DECIDED EN MASSE TO BREAK THEIR WORD TO THE PEOPLE - AND SURRENDERED THE NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE FOR WHICH THEIR FOREFATHERS LAID DOWN THEIR LIVES.”
Gisela Stuart, the New Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston, who is German, played a key role in drawing up the original EU constitution on the UK‘s behalf.
She was as damning as the author of the preceding article in her 15 October 2007 comment in The Evening Standard:
"Sticking to your guns in defence of A PATENTLY DISHONEST POSITION is not leadership but the soft option and A COP OUT FROM A SPECIFIC PROMISE MADE TO VOTERS", she said. "THE PATH ADOPTED BY THE GOVERNMENT IS NEITHER HONEST NOR COHERENT."
The next day she was quoted thus throughout the mainstream media:
"IT'S A MATTER OF TRUST AND INTEGRITY. A REFERENDUM WAS PROMISED. IT SHOULD BE DELIVERED. IF LABOUR CAN'T TRUST THE PEOPLE, WHY SHOULD THE PEOPLE TRUST LABOUR?"
Anyway, when the next General Election rolls around, if some party hack comes a-knocking on your door and insists that the Lisbon Treaty isn’t, to all intents and purposes, just the same as the original constitutional fit-up, he’ll be lying.
And when you see Gordon Brown revisiting his “public… would not expect there to be a referendum” nonsense, you can be sure that he is telling as big a porkie pie as any his predecessor ever told.
As Ted Koppel said, ladies and gentlemen: “Politicians lie. They do it all the time”.
The really remarkable thing, as far as I’m concerned, is the fact that we keep falling for their lies.
Over and over again.
On 2 November 2009, at a Royal Society for the Arts gathering: the Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, admitted that New Labour had been "maladroit" in handling the immigration issue.
Here are some of the apologetic truths Johnson told:
"I accept that governments of both persuasions, including this one, have been maladroit in their handling of this issue."
"Our record is not perfect".
"There are communities which have been disproportionately affected by immigration, where PEOPLE HAVE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT THE STRAIN THAT THE GROWTH IN THE LOCAL POPULATION HAS PLACED ON JOBS AND SERVICES."
"Unreturned national prisoners and asylum seekers may have accumulated under previous administrations but THEY CONTINUED TO BE IGNORED FOR FAR TOO LONG ON OUR WATCH."
This is all a bit of a turnabout since Johnson made the following blasé comment a little over three months ago:
"I DO NOT LIE AWAKE AT NIGHT WORRYING ABOUT A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION. I’M HAPPY TO LIVE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY."
Most political commentators are putting Johnson's new-found humility down to the popularity of the BNP.
In other words, he's trawling for lost votes.
Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of think tank Migrationwatch UK, responded thus to Johnson's partial climbdown:
"THIS APOLOGY IS THREE MILLION IMMIGRANTS TOO LATE...
We now know that SOME OF HIS COLLEAGUES DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED MASS IMMIGRATION SO AS TO ENGINEER A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY WERE FLYING IN THE FACE OF PUBLIC OPINION, ESPECIALLY THEIR OWN WORKING CLASS SUPPORTERS... LABOUR HAVE SECRETLY ENCOURAGED MASS IMMIGRATION SO AS TO ENGINEER A HUGE CHANGE IN OUR SOCIETY IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT IT WOULD BE TOTALLY AGAINST PUBLIC OPINION."
And that, ladies and gents, is the plain truth.
Here a Johnsonian fib:
"WE STRUGGLED TO CONTAIN THE HUGE SURGE IN MIGRATION, Legal and illegal, that emerged from countries such as Kosovo, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka and Somalia."
Anyone who thinks New Labour "struggled" to do anything other than open the floodgates as wide as they'd go is a brainwashed airhead or a bought-and-paid-for quangocrat.
Here's a misleading half-truth:
"When we came in to government in 1997, THERE WAS NO MAGIC BUTTON we could push immediately to resolve all the historic, political and operation problems associated with immigration."
The "magic button" would have involved New Labour raising the drawbridge and lowering the benefits, so I guess, for them, there was, indeed, "no magic button".
As they always intended to do precisely the opposite.
During the course of Johnson's speech he told one great, big porkie:
"THIS GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER PURSUED AN OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION POLICY."
Lied the Home Secretary.
Here's proof of Johnson's dishonesty:
On 23 October 2009, Andrew Neather, a former government advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, dropped this revelatory bombshell in The Evening Standard:
“THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION…
The PIU's reports were legendarily tedious within Whitehall BUT THEIR BIG IMMIGRATION REPORT WAS SURROUNDED BY AN UNUSUAL AIR OF BOTH ANTICIPATION AND SECRECY. DRAFTS WERE HANDED OUT IN SUMMER 2000 ONLY WITH EXTREME RELUCTANCE: THERE WAS A PARANOIA ABOUT IT REACHING THE MEDIA.
Eventually published in January 2001, the innocuously labelled ‘RDS Occasional Paper no. 67’, ‘Migration: an economic and social analysis’ focused heavily on the labour market case. But THE EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL.
I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date…
THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS…
The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”.
You might think, from the astounding revelations Andrew Neather apprises us of above, that he is a whistleblower.
Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't Listen to the Whingers - London Needs Immigrants, suggests, he is still four square behind the imposition of the Multicult upon the bewildered and disenfranchised majority.
On 14 October 2009, Simon Duke wrote the following in The Daily Mail:
"City bank Goldman Sachs is expected to confirm tomorrow that BONUSES WILL SMASH ALL RECORDS IN 2009, JUST A YEAR AFTER THE GOVERNMENT RESCUED THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM OBLIVION...
The return to business as usual for the so-called 'Masters of the Universe' of the Square Mile will anger the MILLIONS OF FAMILIES whose finances have been devastated by the financial crisis...
THE WALL STREET GIANT IS ON COURSE TO LAVISH £14 BILLION ON PAY AND BONUSES ON STAFF THIS YEAR following a surge in profits between July and September… GOLDMAN'S 5,500 UK WORKERS ARE NOW SET TO POCKET AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST £500,000 EACH for this year - the highest rewards in the firm's 140-year history...
High-flyers, such as UK boss MICHAEL SHERWOOD, COULD EARN BONUSES STRETCHING INTO EIGHT FIGURES."
Sherwood, one of two "Masters of the Universe" working for Goldman Sachs cited in Simon Duke's article, is Jewish.
The other, Peter Sutherland, is, truly, a credit-crunching wallet-stuffer of the highest international order. His "Father of Globalisation" CV suggests he would rank much higher in the NWO hierarchy than ubiquitous factotums like Blair or Brown, for example.
Check out what Wikipedia has to say about him here...
On 13 July 2009, Matt Taibbi, published The Great American Bubble Machine in Rolling Stone magazine.
At the beginning of the article, he says:
"From tech stocks to high gas prices, “GOLDMAN SACHS HAS ENGINEERED EVERY MAJOR MARKET MANIPULATION SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION - AND THEY'RE ABOUT TO DO IT AGAIN”!
Check out Matt Taibbi's great exposé here.
Check out what Matt has to say, in person, about Goldman in this video.
Here’s a novel idea:
Instead of putting the price of everything up and taxing the innocent majority up to the hilt, tax the greedy bankers, the hedge fund managers; the private equity wallahs and the biggest of trough-gobbling big businessmen up to the hilt. Let's have 90 PER CENT OF THEIR INCOME off them! And make the tax retrospective - all the way back to 1979, when Margaret Thatcher began institutionalising fat cat greed!
That’d get rid of the national debt in a flash. And the process would be a just one - As opposed to the injustice of making the decent majority pay for the crimes of an amoral elite minority, that is.
Besides, THEY would still have their 10 per cent, wouldn’t THEY? 10 percent of a billion is still a hundred mil.
99.999 per cent of us would be happy enough with that, I reckon.
As the British people have sought to make sense of sub-prime, the credit-crunch and the world-wide recession that followed, the journalist who has attained most public acclaim and notoriety for guiding us through this financial minefield is, without doubt, Robert Peston, the BBC's Business Editor.
Bearing in mind the fact that Peston is, himself, very much an establishment figure, it would be difficult for any of his fellow bigshots to gainsay any of the astoundingly unequivocal criticisms of the status quo in his 2008 book, Who Runs Britain.
Here's a sample:
“The recent history of British and US companies is littered with sorry tales of companies being damaged by executives' fraudulent or near-fraudulent attempts to manufacture profits in the hope of boosting their personal earnings...
In the late 1970s, THE GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR STARTED TO WIDEN AND WOULD NEVER NARROW AGAIN. INCREASING INEQUALITY WAS TO DEFINE THE THATCHER YEARS FROM 1979 TO 1990... HER WAY OF SEEING THE WORLD BECAME THE ESTABLISHMENT VIEW... In her world, STRIVING FOR EQUALITY AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS WERE ANTITHETICAL ASPIRATIONS, SO EQUALITY MUST DIE - AND IT DID…
In the words of the Institute of Fiscal Studies, the respected economic think tank, in Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2007, THE MAGNITUDE OF THE RISE IN INEQUALITY UNDER HER CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT WAS UNPARALLELED…
In 2005-06, for the first time in many years, the pattern of income growth replicated what went on during the Thatcher years, with THE RICHEST FIFTH OF THE POPULATION SEEING THE HIGHEST INCOME RISE, AND PAY INCREMENTS BECOMING PROGRESSIVELY SMALLER FOR THE LOWER-INCOME GROUPS…
The really striking social phenomenon under New Labour has been THE TRIUMPH OF THE SUPER-RICH... The presence on British soil of a disproportionate number of immensely wealthy people, who are becoming wealthier by the minute, HAS BEEN ENCOURAGED BY TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN. THEY HAVE NURTURED A WELCOMING ENVIRONMENT FOR BILLIONAIRES OF ANY NATIONALITY, WHO CAN LIVE IN THE UK AND PAY RELATIVELY LITTLE TAX…
Brown as Chancellor was, AS A MATTER OF DELIBERATE POLICY, STRIKINGLY GENEROUS TO THE CITY'S NEW PLUTOCRATS - THE OWNERS OF HEDGE-FUND AND PRIVATE-EQUITY FIRMS…
Thanks to the magnanimity of Gordon Brown when he was Chancellor, the tax that the partners of these is have been paying on their share of this profit has been AT MOST 10 PER CENT. In fact, due to clever tax planning, SOME PAY JUST 5 PER CENT AND OTHERS PAY NOTHING AT ALL...
IN 2006, THE ACCOUNTANTS GRANT THORNTON ESTIMATED THAT 54 UK-BASED BILLIONAIRES WERE PAYING INCOME TAX OF JUST £14.7M ON A COMBINED FORTUNE OF £126 BILLION… Of these, at least 32 of the billionaire dynasties had probably not paid any personal taxes on their wealth…
What has been going on is A SUPERCHARGED VERSION OF THE TRENDS PROMOTED BY THATCHER…
By design of a Labour premier, Gordon Brown, and a socialist Mayor, Ken Livingstone, LONDON IS NOW THE CAPITAL CITY OF THE BORDERLESS WORLD OF THE SUPER-RICH.”
On 4 March 2006, Tony Blair appeared on an edition of Parkinson.
During the interview, Michael Parkinson asked him if he regretted sending troops into Iraq. Blair replied:
"In the end there is a judgment that, well, I think IF YOU HAVE FAITH ABOUT THESE THINGS THEN YOU REALISE THAT JUDGMENT IS MADE BY OTHER PEOPLE," he said.
Asked to explain what he meant, Blair replied:
"IF YOU BELIEVE IN GOD, IT'S MADE BY GOD AS WELL."
So now you know.
As far as The Dear Leader was concerned, as soon as Iraq went pear-shaped, the decision to invade wasn't his.
The decision was made by "other people and... God as well".
Is this OK by you, ladies and gentlemen?
Are you happy that the leader of the British people was prepared to bow to will of "others" and "God" in the matter of making war?
On 23 May 2009, John Burton, Tony Blair’s political agent in his Sedgefield constituency for 24 years, described his former boss thus in The Telegraph:
“It's very simple to explain the idea of Blair the Warrior. IT WAS PART OF TONY LIVING OUT HIS FAITH… Tony's Christian faith is part of him, down to his cotton socks. He believed strongly at the time, that INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO, SIERRA LEONE, IRAQ TOO, WAS ALL PART OF THE CHRISTIAN BATTLE; GOOD SHOULD TRIUMPH OVER EVIL… HIS RELIGION GAVE HIM A TOTAL BELIEF IN WHAT'S RIGHT AND WHAT'S WRONG”.
That's the shiny-eyed Messiah, responsible for creating hell on earth in Iraq and Afghanistan, this twit is talking about.
"Living out his faith," Johnny? Whilst so many others were dying from it?
Not my kind of Christianity, pal. And not Jesus Christ's either.
At the Tory Party Conference, in October 2000, Michael Portillo said this:
“We are for all Britons. Black Britons, British Asians, white Britons. BRITAIN IS A COUNTRY OF RICH DIVERSITY”.
Britain is a country of festering hatreds, Michael.
The “rich diversity” rubbish is what saw fifty two innocent Londoners blown to bits on 7/7/2005.
On 11 December 2006, Valerie Amos, Tony Blair’s Leader of the House of Lords, said this from the 10 Downing Street web site:
"OUR MULTI-CULTURAL SOCIETY HAS BEEN A SUCCESS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY BRITISH PEOPLE THINK THAT TOO. EIGHTY PER CENT of those surveyed about multi-culturalism in Britain say that one of the reasons they enjoy being British and living in Britain is BECAUSE OUR SOCIETY IS DIVERSE…
I AM AN IMMIGRANT MYSELF… I value the fact that I have multiple identities. I am British. I was born in Guyana. I HAVE A STRONG AFFINITY TO AFRICA...
THE LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE GOVERNMENT’S INCLUSIVENESS AGENDA...
We will continue to look at THE BEST WAYS OF... PROMOTING INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES AND CHALLENGING THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN OUR WAY OF LIFE."
The Brit-bashing race laws are “the best way” to promote “inclusive communities” and torture those who don’t think like you, Val.
The PC Crowd had that figured out by 1965 when the first such law was introduced.
As regards the eighty per cent who, according to you, “enjoy being British and living in Britain… because our society is diverse”, I wonder which section of the population you surveyed? Was it the bit located in Brixton, Tottenham, Wormwood Scrubs or the Westminster village, perhaps?
What do you think, ladies and gents? Do you think the black Baroness is being just a little economical with the actualité here? I mean, does anyone out there actually believe that the British people enjoy being ethnically cleansed out of their own back yards and sneered at, threatened, fined and imprisoned if they ever dare say “boo“ to the immigrant goose?
Tony Blair made Amos a life peer in 1997 and, in 2003, he appointed her Secretary of State for International Development. At this time the unelected Guyanan immigrant became the first black woman to sit in the UK Cabinet. Later in 2003, she was created Leader of the House of Lords. Although she left the Cabinet when Gordon Brown became Prime Minister, he nominated her as a European Union Special Representative to the African Union.
Amos, who was Chief Executive of the Equal Opportunities Commission from 1989 to 1994 and Deputy Chair of the Runnymede Trust from 1990 to 1998, has spent the whole of her working life promoting the cause of immigrants just like herself.
In other words, she's never had a proper job in her life.
On 17 January 2009, The French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, echoed Marr's desire to disappear the white European in an address to the students of the École Polytechnique in Palaiseau.
Early on in his speech he uses a form of the noun "métissage" seven times within a minute. This word can mean mixing of cultures and/or interbreeding.
Here is a translation of Sarkozy’s words:
"The objective is to meet the challenge of the mélange - the challenge of coming together that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of the melting pot, France has always been familiar with it and, by meeting the challenge of the mix, France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, IT IS CONSANGUINITY THAT HAS ALWAYS PROVOKED THE END OF CIVILISATIONS AND SOCIETIES… In the course of centuries, FRANCE HAS ALWAYS UNDERSTOOD ‘INTER-BREEDING’, FRANCE HAS ALWAYS BEEN MIXED RACE.
France has mixed cultures, ideas and histories. France, who was able to blend these cultures and these histories, constructed a universal language, because FRANCE HERSELF IS UNIVERSAL IN THE DIVERSITY OF HER ORIGINS…
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: if republican will power does not function, IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE REPUBLIC TO RESORT TO EVEN MORE FORCIBLE METHODS…
We don't have a choice. DIVERSITY AT THE BASE OF THE COUNTRY MUST BE REFLECTED BY DIVERSITY AT THE HEAD OF THE COUNTRY… IT IS NOT A CHOICE. IT IS AN OBLIGATION. IT IS AN IMPERATIVE. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems.
WE MUST CHANGE, SO WE WILL CHANGE."
On 23 April 2006, The Times reported the remarks of Professor Ted Cantle, Tony Blair's senior race relations advisor at the time of the Oldham Riots.
This is what was said:
"In an apparent reference to Heanor, a predominantly white town in the Amber Valley area of Derbyshire, Cantle said he was concerned about the strength of support for the far-right British National Party in some parts of the East Midlands...
Cantle’s remarks go further by describing parts of the country as 'UNHEALTHILY' WHITE."
The exact wording that Ted Cantle used was this:
"SOME OF THE NEIGHBOURING AREAS OF NOTTS AND DERBYSHIRE DO SEEM TO BE UNHEALTHILY ALL-WHITE."
On 30 April 2006, the Institute Of Community Cohesion, an organisation founded by Ted Cantle, produced a report titled: Challenging Local Communities to Change Oldham; a Review of Community Cohesion in Oldham.
“Oldham needs to further transform itself INTO THE BOROUGH THAT DEFEATED SEGREGATION… a beacon for best practice IN BUILDING COHESION ACROSS ALL ITS COMMUNITIES.”
What do you think The ISC means by this?
Perhaps the following statement will give you a clue:
“The Tenancy Support Team within FCHO has had considerable success in SETTLING AND SUPPORTING BLACK AND MINORITY ETHNIC FAMILIES MOVING INTO AREAS WITH A LOW BME PRESENCE.”
In other words, Cantle’s crew were praising the fact that immigrants had been successfully foist upon those indigenous Oldham residents that had, up till then, successfully repelled attempts to impose the Multicult upon them.
The ISC adds:
“ACCELERATING THE PACE OF CHANGE IS CRITICAL. Oldham will experience dramatic changes in the composition of its population over the next two decades, WITH ITS WHITE POPULATION DECLINING AND ITS BME POPULATION INCREASING.”
Thus did the ISC suggest not only that they are determined that Oldham should become less and less white but that “accelerating the pace” of this process is “critical”!
In the aforementioned Institute Of Community Cohesion document, the word “cohesion” is mentioned no less than 239 times!
A question for you, ladies and gentlemen:
How would you feel if you or any of your loved ones were forced to “cohere” with any of the immigrant criminals listed in the Rogues’ Gallery linked to this site?
Here’s another, even more crucial, question:
What would you think of those who had done the forcing?
On 17 June 2007, Marie Woolf, Political Editor of The Independent on Sunday, told us what David Lammy, New Labour's Culture Minister, was thinking at the time.
This is how she put it:
"David Lammy, the culture minister, has threatened to fine museums and art galleries if they fail to put more black and ethnic minority figures on their management boards. Mr Lammy complains that the boards of most national museums and libraries are 'PALE, MALE AND STALE'.
He said there was a 'WHIFF OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM' in the country's 1,400 museums and galleries because ethnic minorities were so under-represented in top-level jobs."
I wonder if I'd be hauled before the courts if I described those who murdered most of the teenagers who lost their lives in London in the last three years as "black, macho and whiffy"?
On 28 December 2008, Lammy, who was by this time, the Minister for Higher Education, appeared on Celebrity Mastermind.
You might have expected a Higher Education Minister to have done very well on such a show. Particularly as Victoria Derbyshire, a BBC Radio presenter, had recently blown the whistle on her bosses regarding "crib sheets" being made available for the various celebs.
At one point in the show Lammy was asked this question:
"Who acceded to the English throne at the age of 9 on the death of his father Henry VIII in 1547?"
Lammy answered: "Henry VII"!
Which, when you think about it, was not the most intelligent thing a Mastermind contestant has ever said.
Lammy scored a total of 13 points.
Check out his abysmal performance here.
On 27 May 209, the alternative comedian, Eddie Izzard, was quoted thus by The Daily Mirror:
"IF THE SAME GENETIC PEOPLE HAVE KIDS WITH EACH OTHER, WE ALL KNOW WHERE THAT LEADS. IT'S CALLED IN-BREEDING. IT IS THE BLEND OF YOUR GENES THAT MAKES YOU POWERFUL AND MAKES US, AS A COUNTRY, STRONG. IF YOUR MUM'S FROM ENGLAND AND YOUR DAD'S FROM UKRAINE, THAT'S A GOOD THING. IF YOU'RE BORN IN HAWAII, YOUR MUM'S A WHITE WOMAN FROM KANSAS AND YOUR DAD'S A BLACK MAN FROM KENYA, YOU COULD BE PRESIDENT OF THE US…
I WAS BORN IN YEMEN but, whatever the place of my birth, I FEEL I AM A BRITISH EUROPEAN...
If you believe in humanity, in our modern, diverse country, I ask you to reject the politics of hate. On election day, I WILL BE VOTING LABOUR.”
Is there anyone out there, aside from the odd gene-blending transvestite, who thinks British men were fighting and dying in WWII, so that a "British European" alternative comedian could encourage Ukrainian and Kenyan men, amongst many others, to breed we white folk out of existence?
Is there anyone out there who thinks that if the Englishmen who fought and died in World War I were to rise up out of their graves, they wouldn’t string up a traitorous, make-up caked loony like Izzard, who suggested that for them to have had a child with an English girl before their death was tantamount to “in-breeding”?
During the course of his Daily Mirror rant Izzard also said this:
“I believe it's a weakness of the human spirit to hate people”.
And yet the Izzards positively bristle with hatred for anyone who dares to speak up for the indigenous “people” of these islands in these fashionably anti-British times.
The PC Crowd's spittal-drenched hypocrisy would be comical if the lunatics were not running the asylum.
But they are, aren't they?
On 5 September 2009, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman said this in Newsweek:
"Minority parents are more likely to help their children develop a racial identity... from a very young age, minority children are coached to be proud of their ethnic history... THIS WAS EXCEEDINGLY GOOD FOR CHILDREN'S SELF-CONFIDENCE…
That leads to the question that everyone wonders but rarely dares to ask. If 'black pride' is good for African-American children, where does that leave white children? IT'S HORRIFYING TO IMAGINE KIDS BEING ‘PROUD TO BE WHITE’… A PRIDE MESSAGE WOULD NOT JUST BE ABHORRENT — IT'D BE REDUNDANT.” More...
And that, ladies and gents, is what the PC Crowd has been after all along; one life-affirming rule for THEM, another, completely different and deadly rule for US.
Nanette Ecker co-authored a UNESCO report which recommended "children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach (them) about masturbation". (Fox News - 26 August 2009)
Asked if five was “a little early to understand the concept of sexuality”, Ms Ecker replied:
“CHILDREN ARE BORN SEXUAL BEINGS and as adults, die sexual beings. Sexuality extends from birth to death… Using a building-block approach, WE THEREFORE NEED TO START SEXUALITY EDUCATION YOUNG.”
Fox News added:
“The United Nations is recommending that CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS FIVE RECEIVE MANDATORY SEXUAL EDUCATION THAT WOULD TEACH EVEN PRE-KINDERGARTENERS ABOUT MASTURBATION... AND THAT PRIVATE PARTS 'CAN FEEL PLEASURABLE WHEN TOUCHED BY ONESELF'. BY THE TIME THEY'RE 9 YEARS OLD, THEY'LL LEARN ABOUT 'POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF APHRODISIACS,' AND WRESTLE WITH THE IDEAS OF 'HOMOPHOBIA, TRANSPHOBIA AND ABUSE OF POWER".
On 7 July 2008, The Daily Mail told us what a Government-funded advisory group calling itself the National Children's Bureau had in mind for our children.
This is what we were told:
"TODDLERS SHOULD BE TAUGHT ABOUT RACISM AND SINGLED OUT FOR CRITICISM IF THEY HAVE RACIST ATTITUDES…
NURSERY TEACHERS, PLAYGROUP LEADERS AND CHILDMINDERS (must) RECORD AND REPORT EVERY RACIST INCIDENT INVOLVING CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS THREE…
NURSERIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT AS MANY RACIST INCIDENTS AS POSSIBLE TO LOCAL COUNCILS...
EVEN BABIES SHOULD NOT BE IGNORED IN THE HUNT FOR RACISM…
ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS RACIST THEMSELVES"!
The foreword to the NCB document was penned by Lord Hermann Ousely, a West Indian immigrant who was once the Chief Executive of the Commission for Racial Equality.
Lord Herman informed us in his foreword that toddlers can, indeed, be "racists". He also said that children of different races should be encouraged to play together "from day one" in order to prevent bigotry and help them "UNLEARN ANY RACIST ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR THAY MAY HAVE ALREADY LEARNED".
That’s "from day one", ladies and gents.
Lord Herman was actually suggesting that we white folks can develop unsavoury, politically incorrect thoughts in the womb!
Before we’ve actually been born!
On the 14th of September 2008, The Mail on Sunday told us what a government-funded advisory group calling itself "No Outsiders", had in mind for our children.
This is what was said:
"CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS FIVE SHOULD BE TAUGHT TO UNDERSTAND THE PLEASURES OF GAY SEX".
So now you know.
Now you know what the PC Crowd, the politicians and their government-funded advisory groups have in mind for our children and grandchildren.
Now that you know what their plans are, who are going to vote for?
A New Labour candidate?
A Tory? A Lib Dem?
Or do you think you might, for once, consider electing someone who cares a bit more about your kids than they do?
On 4 September 2009, Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, opined thus.
“I URGE PEOPLE, PARTICULARLY DURING RAMADAN, TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT ISLAM, INCREASE YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND LEARNING, EVEN FAST FOR A DAY WITH YOUR MUSLIM NEIGHBOUR AND BREAK YOUR FAST AT THE LOCAL MOSQUE...
MUSLIMS ARE AT THE HEART OF EVERY ASPECT OF SOCIETY. THEIR CONTRIBUTION IS SOMETHING THAT ALL LONDONERS BENEFIT FROM. MUSLIM POLICE OFFICERS, DOCTORS, SCIENTISTS AND TEACHERS ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE FABRIC OF LONDON.”
And you thought Boris was just an amusing, Tory wally whose easy-going and affable heart was always in the right place.
Boris Johnson's Turkish great-grandfather was, of course, a Muslim.
On 11 August 2009, the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, appeared on Radio 4's "Great Lives" to pay tribute to his own choice of a "great life", the former leader of both the South African Communist Party and the ANC's military wing, Jo Slovo.
At one point, Matthew Parris asked Miliband whether there were any circumstances in which terrorism was justified. This was Miliband's reply:
"YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS JUSTIFIABLE, AND YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS EFFECTIVE."
I guess our Foreign Secretary, whose Marxist parents were both immigrants, must believe that terrorism is "justifiable" when Communists like Jo Slovo are doing the terrorising.
And the terrorism in question happens to be black-on-white.
On 9 August 2004, the Darcus Howe documentary, "Who You Calling A Nigger" featured Shaja, a British born Pakistani living in the Burchill's area of Walsall.
Shaja said this on the Channel 4 programme:
"For years it was a NO-GO ZONE FOR WHITE PEOPLE, black people, anyone, man... If you ain't a Paki, you ain't comin' in Burchills' man. You come fuck with us, YOU'RE DEAD...
Twenty years ago, there was no Pakis 'ere, no one was doin' nothin'. But now the Pakis have made a stamp, man. Now, think 20 years ahead, fuck knows, man, THIS IS GOING TO BE PAKISTAN, NOT ENGLAND, PAKISTAN! They're all fucking shipping over, know what I mean, man, fake passports...
I don't like Jews. If I had the chance, I'd do one over, I'd break 'im, man. Jews are my enemies."
On 14 July 2009, New Labour’s "Cohesion" Minister, Shahid Malik, said this in The House of Commons:
“Fairness is what the Department for Communities and Local Government, my Department, and the Government are all about, BUT FAIRNESS DOES NOT MEAN TREATING EVERYBODY EQUALLY; it means addressing the different needs of different people”.
Malik commented as he did in a debate about the contrast between the preferential treatment doled out to the Gypsy and Traveller communities, which Malik thought was right and just, at the expense of local people.
Remember what George Orwell said?
“All animals are Equal but SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS”.
I think you’ll agree that this New Labour lot are nothing if not Orwellian.
Baroness Sayeeda Warsi is the Tories' Shadow "Cohesion" Minster.
She, just like Malik, is a Muslim.
On 9 July 2009, Fay Maxted of The Survivors Trust was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"IT IS BEYOND OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVITED TO SHAKE HANDS WITH LEADING OFFICIALS at the memorial service... THE SUFFERING OF HOLNESS'S YOUNG VICTIMS SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN FORGOTTEN".
The Mail explained:
"David Cameron was criticised yesterday after HE WAS PICTURED CHATTING TO A VIOLENT GANG RAPIST at the memorial to the July 7 victims. THE CONSERVATIVE LEADER ALSO SHOOK THE HAND OF GARRI HOLNESS...
In the weeks after the 2005 attacks, which claimed 52 lives, it emerged HOLNESS HAD BEEN JAILED FOR HIS PART IN THE HORRIFIC RAPE OF TWO 16-YEAR-OLD GIRLS IN 1985. HE WAS PART OF A GANG KNOWN AS THE YOUNG RAIDERS WHO DRAGGED THE SCHOOLGIRLS INTO AN UNDERGROUND GARAGE IN BRIXTON, SOUTH LONDON, WHERE THEY WERE RAPED MORE THAN 40 TIMES AT KNIFEPOINT...
IN JANUARY 2007 IT EMERGED HOLNESS HAD BEEN AWARDED MORE THAN £100,000 IN COMPENSATION FOR HIS INJURIES... IT IS MORE THAN TEN TIMES THAT GIVEN TO HIS TWO TEENAGE VICTIMS, WHO RECEIVED JUST £7,000 EACH."
On 5 July 2009, Judge Ian Trigger, said this to Lucien McClearley, a Jamaican drug dealer, before jailing him for two years:
“Your case illustrates all too clearly the COMPLETELY LAX IMMIGRATION POLICY that exists and has existed over recent years. People like you, and THERE ARE LITERALLY HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU, COME TO THESE SHORES TO AVAIL THEMSELVES OF THE GENEROUS WELFARE BENEFITS THAT EXIST HERE.
In the past ten years THE NATIONAL DEBT OF THIS COUNTRY HAS RISEN TO EXTRAORDINARY HEIGHTS, LARGELY BECAUSE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HAS WASTED BILLIONS OF POUNDS. MUCH OF THAT HAS BEEN WASTED ON WELFARE PAYMENTS.
For every £1 that the decent citizen, who is hard-working, pays in taxes, nearly 10 PER CENT GOES ON SERVICING THAT NATIONAL DEBT. THAT IS TWICE THE AMOUNT IT WAS IN 1997 WHEN THIS GOVERNMENT CAME TO POWER… The fact that it took nearly two years to process your claim shows how desperate the situation in this country has become.”
On 10 July 2009, Commenting on New Labour's reaction to the embarassing honesty of Judge Ian Trigger, Richard Littlejohn wrote this in The Daily Mail:
"THE FULL APPARATUS OF GOVERNMENT IS DEPLOYED TO DESTROY DISSENTERS. ENTER THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY, STEAL, SELL DRUGS, FORGE PASSPORTS AND YOU'LL BE LAVISHED WITH UNLIMITED LEGAL AID, BENEFITS AND SYMPATHY. SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND THEY WILL TRY TO RUIN YOU. UNDER NEW LABOUR, THE MOST HEINOUS CRIME ANYONE CAN COMMIT IS TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE WICKEDNESS OF THE PAST 12 YEARS."
On 14 September 2009, an unnamed teacher was quoted thus in a Melanie Philips’ Mail on Sunday article:
“PATRIOTISM ABOUT BEING BRITISH DIVIDES GROUPS ALONG RACIAL LINES WHEN WE AIM TO BRING PUPILS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT MAKES US THE SAME.”
Melanie Philips, herself, responded:
“NATIVE-BORN CHILDREN HAVE BEEN LEFT… BEREFT OF ANYTHING IN THEIR COUNTRY WITH WHICH THEY CAN FEEL A PROUD SENSE OF IDENTIFICATION. THESE TEACHERS HAVE PRODUCED EQUALITY, ALL RIGHT: AN EQUALITY OF ROOTLESSNESS. THEY HAVE ALSO PRODUCED WIDESPREAD IGNORANCE... People are usually desperate if they cannot root themselves. Yet FOR IDEOLOGICAL REASONS, THE TEACHING WORLD DECIDED UNILATERALLY TO DEPRIVE CHILDREN OF THE ABILITY TO DO SO.
THE PROMOTION OF MULTICULTURALISM... HAS TURNED PATRIOTISM INTO A DIRTY WORD… WITHOUT PATRIOTISM, A SOCIETY STARTS TO DIE. If the core purpose of education is to transmit a culture down through the generations, IT IS NOT PATRIOTISM THAT IS A MENACE TO THIS COUNTRY, BUT THE TEACHERS WHOSE REAL TARGET IS BRITAIN'S IDENTITY ITSELF.”
Those who educate our children have a track record in the anti-patriotic department.
On 31 January 2008, Michael Hand, of the Institute of Education, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
“THE CASE FOR PROMOTING PATRIOTISM IN SCHOOLS IS WEAK. PATRIOTISM IS LOVE OF ONE'S COUNTRY, BUT ARE COUNTRIES REALLY APPROPRIATE OBJECTS OF LOVE? LOVING THINGS CAN BE BAD FOR US!'... Since all national histories are at best morally ambiguous, IT'S AN OPEN QUESTION WHETHER CITIZENS SHOULD LOVE THEIR COUNTRIES!"
The Mail added:
“Moral failings in Britain's past mean PUPILS SHOULD NOT BE TAUGHT PATRIOTISM, teachers said in a survey. Nearly 90 PER CENT OPPOSED PLANS FOR HISTORY AND CITIZENSHIP LESSONS AIMED AT FOSTERING NATIONAL IDENTITY AND PRIDE...
PATRIOTISM SHOULD BE COVERED AS A 'CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE' ONLY.
The Left-leaning institute polled 47 teachers and 299 students at secondary schools in the capital. THREE-QUARTERS OF THE STAFF SAID THEY FELT OBLIGED TO ALERT THEIR PUPILS TO THE DANGERS OF PATRIOTIC SENTIMENTS.
'PRAISING PATRIOTISM EXCLUDES NON-BRITISH PUPILS,' said one. 'PATRIOTISM ABOUT BEING BRITISH IN MY EXPERIENCE TENDS TO BE A WHITE PRESERVE SO DIVIDES GROUPS ALONG RACIAL LINES, WHEN WHAT WE AIM TO DO IS BRING PUPILS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT MAKES US ALL THE SAME.'
Another said: 'It can be quite divisive. THERE IS A PROPENSITY FOR THAT SORT OF BNP-TYPE THINKING TO COME THROUGH.'
A third said: 'LEFT TO MY OWN DEVICES I WOULDN'T DREAM OF COVERING IT REALLY, EXPLICITLY. TO ME IT SORT OF REEKS OF THE OLD BRITISH EMPIRE’.”
So, the Institute of Education thinks:
PATRIOTISM = CONTROVERSIAL!
OUR HISTORY = MORALLY AMBIGUOUS!
The Author of Report thinks:
PATRIOTISM = CASE FOR IT WEAK!
LOVE OF COUNTRY = INAPPROPRIATE!
LOVING THINGS = BAD FOR US!
And those who teach our children think:
BRITAIN'S PAST = MORALLY DUBIOUS!
PATRIOTISM = DANGEROUS!
PATRIOTISM = EXCLUDES NON-BRITS!
PATRIOTISM = DIVISIVE!
PATRIOTISM = BNP THINKING!
Those who think a love of one's history and country is dangerous should not be teaching our children or compiling Brit-bashing reports.
They should be charged with treason and hauled before the courts.
On 4 September 2009, Douglas Murray, the Director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, wrote the following in The Daily Express:
"WHEN THE UK STATISTICS AUTHORITY RELEASED FIGURES SHOWING THAT ONE IN NINE CURRENT UK RESIDENTS WAS BORN OVERSEAS, (Immigration Minister) PHIL WOOLAS ATTACKED THE MESSENGER, CLAIMING THAT ITS RELEASE OF SUCH FIGURES, RATHER THAN BEING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, WAS 'SINISTER'.
While the Home Secretary doesn't seem to worry about immigration, it is increasingly clear that THE VOTERS WHO PUT HIM IN OFFICE DO. IN POLL AFTER POLL THE PUBLIC SITE IMMIGRATION AS THEIR TOP, OR NEXT-TO-TOP CONCERN. YET THE POLITICAL CLASS IGNORES IT...
THANKS TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS FORCED ON US BY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE FORCING IMMIGRANTS ON US, ONCE THEY ARE HERE THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO...
OUR ENTIRE POLITICAL CLASS AT WESTMINSTER, AND MUCH OF IT IN BRUSSELS, SEEMS TO LABOUR UNDER THE BELIEF THAT WE ARE A COUNTRY YOU CAN PERFORM ANY EXPERIMENT ON. YOU CAN DESTROY OUR SOVEREIGNTY, CHANGE THE FACE OF OUR NATION AND TELL PEOPLE WHO OBJECT THAT THEY ARE BACKWARD RACISTS.
YET SUCH PEOPLE HAVE NO ANSWERS TO THE EVIDENCE BEFORE OUR VERY EYES. ONE IN FIVE MURDERS IN THE UK IS COMMITED BY A FOREIGNER... SOMALI GANGS AND OTHERS BRING GENUINELY DISGUSTING, BACKWARD BEHAVIOUR TO OUR STREETS. YET OUR POLITICAL CLASS WON'T FACE UP TO THE FACT THEY ARE IMPORTING MORE OF THIS...
THEY ARE DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY.”
On 28 March 2009, Simon Walters said this in The Mail on Sunday:
“Most Church of England bishops show little or no interest in the idea of celebrating St George's Day by asking all churches to ring their bells.
ONLY FIVE OUT OF THE CHURCH'S 44 BISHOPS ENTHUSIASTICALLY BACK THE PLAN - AND SEVERAL ARE HOSTILE, CLAIMING IT COULD BE 'DANGEROUS' AND CAUSE A BACKLASH FROM OTHER RELIGIOUS GROUPS.”
By my reckoning that makes 39 out of 44 Bishops are anti-English.
As for those that are “hostile”, they’d be traitors by the same Anglophile reckoning.
On 7 January 2010, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, wrote this in The Times:
“Too often in recent years the call for a rational debate on mass migration has degenerated into NAME-CALLING AND CHARGES OF RACISM... A rise in the UK population by ten million in two decades will put our nation’s resources under considerable strain, STRETCHING ALMOST TO BREAKING POINT THE ENORMOUS RESERVES OF TOLERANCE AND GENEROSITY OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE…
In Dagenham, where I was brought up, there is a very real danger that a white working-class electorate, ALIENATED BY FAR-REACHING SOCIAL CHANGE AND LARGELY IGNORED BY THE MAINSTREAM PARTIES, COULD VOTE FOR A BNP MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT…
The sheer numbers of migrants from within Europe and elsewhere put the resources of Britain under enormous pressure, but also THREATEN THE VERY ETHOS OR DNA OF OUR NATION…
THE IDEA THAT BRITAIN CAN CONTINUE TO WELCOME WITH OPEN ARMS IMMIGRANTS WHO IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISH THEIR OWN TRIBUNALS TO APPLY SHARIA, RATHER THAN MAKE USE OF BRITISH CIVIL LAW, IS DEEPLY SOCIALLY DIVISIVE."
On 20 September 2008, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:
"The cold, miserable truth is that BOTH OUR MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES ARE CORPSES, their original purposes long forgotten, their loyal members driven away or sidelined, THEIR TRADITIONAL VOTERS TAKEN FOR GRANTED. Every so often, by a mysterious process, one of them is declared electable and the other is declared unelectable. And we, the voters, do as we are told…
THE RULE NOWADAYS IS THAT YOU CANNOT BECOME THE GOVERNMENT UNLESS YOU BOW TO THE VIEWS OF THE ‘CENTRE-LEFT’ MEDIA ELITE, especially the broadcast media elite. That elite speaks for the 1968 generation which fanned out in the Seventies into the civil service, education, entertainment, the law, the arts, rock music and - above all - the media...
THE WINNER IS ALWAYS THE ‘CENTRE-LEFT’, WHICH CLAIMS TO BE MODERATE BUT IS IN FACT A SWIRLING CAULDRON OF WILD SIXTIES LEFTISM - ANTI-BRITISH, ANTI-FAMILY, ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-EDUCATION AND PRO-CRIME. BUT IF YOU DARE TO OPPOSE THIS STUFF, THEY’LL CALL YOU AN EXTREMIST.
BRITISH DEMOCRACY, AS WE USED TO KNOW IT, IS QUITE DEAD."
On 8 August 2009, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:
“THEY HAVE BECOME THE UNIFORMED WING OF NEW LABOUR, not preventing crime or seeing that it is punished – but mediating neutrally between ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ and SPYING OUT POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS, in their own ranks and beyond. Sooner or later, millions of people will catch on to the fact that THE POLICE IN THIS COUNTRY AREN’T ON THEIR SIDE AND DON’T WANT TO DO WHAT WE PAY THEM FOR."
On 21 September 2009, General Stanley McChrystal, the top American military man in Afghanistan, said this:
"FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESOURCES ... RISKS A LONGER CONFLICT, GREATER CASUALTIES… Any of these risks, in turn, are likely to result in MISSION FAILURE...
Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near term... risks an outcome where DEFEATING THE INSURGENCY IS NO LONGER POSSIBLE...
WE HAVE OPERATED IN A MANNER THAT DISTANCES US PHYSICALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY FROM THE PEOPLE WE SEEK TO PROTECT... IT IS REALISTIC TO EXPECT THAT AFGHAN AND COALITION CASUALTIES WILL INCREASE…
THE WEAKNESS OF STATE INSTITUTIONS, MALIGN ACTIONS OF POWERBROKERS, WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION AND ABUSE OF POWER BY VARIOUS OFFICIALS AND ISAF’S OWN ERRORS HAVE GIVEN AFGHANS LITTLE REASON TO SUPPORT THEIR GOVERNMENT… ISAF does not sufficiently appreciate the dynamics in local communities, nor how the insurgency, corruption, incompetent officials, powerbrokers and criminality all combine to affect the Afghan population...
THE INSURGENTS CONTROL OR CONTEST A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE COUNTRY".
On 28 January 2009, the former head of the Royal Navy, Lord West, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"TONY BLAIR WOULD NEVER ACCEPT THAT OUR FOREIGN POLICY ACTUALLY HAD ANY IMPACT ON RADICALISATION... WELL THAT IS CLEARLY BULLS***, ‘THAT’S CLEARLY RUBBISH...
TO PRETEND WHAT HAPPENS ABROAD HAS NO IMPACT IS NONSENSE. For example, this business in Gaza has not helped us at all in our counter-radicalisation policy. There is no doubt about that, it would be wrong to say that it has.”
On 13 October 2006, General Sir Richard Dannat, the UK's top soldier, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
“I WANT AN ARMY IN FIVE YEARS TIME AND 10 YEARS TIME. DON'T LET'S BREAK IT ON THIS ONE... As a foreigner, you can be welcomed by being invited in a country, but WE WEREN?T INVITED… Whatever consent we may have had in the first place… has largely turned to intolerance. THAT IS A FACT...
I think history will show that THE PLANNING FOR WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE INITIAL SUCCESSFUL WAR FIGHTING PHASE WAS POOR…
When I see the Islamist threat in this country I hope it doesn’t make undue progress because THERE IS A MORAL AND SPIRITUAL VACUUM IN THIS COUNTRY. OUR SOCIETY HAS ALWAYS BEEN EMBEDDED IN CHRISTIAN VALUES...
WE CAN’T WISH THE ISLAMIST CHALLENGE TO OUR SOCIETY AWAY... WE NEED TO FACE UP TO THE ISLAMIST THREAT, TO THOSE WHO ACT IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND IN A PERVERTED WAY TRY TO IMPOSE ISLAM BY FORCE ON SOCIETIES THAT DO NOT WISH IT.
It is said that we live in a post Christian society. I think that is a great shame… It underpins the British army…
I am going to stand up for what is right for the army. HONESTY IS WHAT IT IS ABOUT. THE TRUTH WILL OUT. WE HAVE GOT TO SPEAK THE TRUTH."
Well said, sir.
It's nice to hear another top chap telling the truth for a change.
On 26 June 2009, Frederick Forsyth, author of The Day of the Jackal, wrote this in The Daily Express:
“Not for the first time I am almost speechless at THE CYNICISM AND MENDACITY OF THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT IN SEEKING TO COVER SOMETHING UP WHILE PRETENDING TO BE HONEST...
WHEN A PRIME MINISTER, HAVING TAKEN THE OATH OF A PRIVY COUNSELLOR, GOES TO THE DESPATCH BOX AND LIES, THAT IS NOT SIMPLY AN UNTRUTH, IT IS PERJURY. AND PERJURY IS AN INDICTABLE, EVEN AN IMPEACHABLE, OFFENCE… IN CLAIMING THERE WAS PROOF ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY WAR, BLAIR LIED; AND 179 YOUNG SOLDIERS NOW IN THEIR GRAVES CRY FOR JUSTICE.
It is extremely unlikely they will ever get it. POWERFUL FORCES ARE NOW TRYING TO CREATE THIS MULTI-MILLIONAIRE PRESIDENT OF EUROPE.”
On 8 December 2008, at the savethemales web site, Dr Henry Makow told us that, on March 20 1969, Dr. Richard Day, the National Medical Director of 'Planned Parenthood', informed an audience of elite medical personnel of the sinister plans of the New World Order:
This is how he put it:
"THEY ARE WEANING US OFF NATIONAL ALLEGIANCE AND WILL RESORT TO TERRORISM TO WIN OUR ASSENT TO THEIR GLOBAL POLICE STATE...
THE CENTRAL BANKERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MOST TERRORISM, USING MI-6, MOSSAD AND THE CIA. Dr. Day also said that 'war is obsolete' given the danger of nuclear exchange so TERRORISM WOULD BE USED INSTEAD. This was 1969.
He said that there are always two reasons for anything... THE PRETEXT WHICH MAKES IT PALATABLE TO THE GULLIBLE PUBLIC AND THE REAL REASON...
Dr. Day said sex will be separated from marriage and reproduction to break up the family and reduce population. Abortion, divorce and homosexuality will be made socially acceptable...
PORNOGRAPHY, VIOLENCE AND OBSCENITY ON TV AND IN MOVIES WILL BE INCREASED. People will be desensitized to violence and porn... THERE WILL BE UNEMPLOYMENT AND MASS MIGRATION IN ORDER TO UPROOT LONG ESTABLISHED COMMUNITIES...
He said PEOPLE ARE CONTROLLED BY MEANS OF THE INFORMATION THEY ARE GIVEN. THUS, INFORMATION WILL BE SELECTIVE... PEOPLE WILL SPEND LONGER IN SCHOOL BUT NOT LEARN ANYTHING…
OUR POLITICAL AND CULTURAL 'LEADERS' ARE ACCOMPLICES IN A PLOT TO RE-ENGINEER HUMANITY... WARS, TERRORISM, DEPRESSIONS, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CHANGE, ENTERTAINMENT AND FADS ARE ALL CONTRIVED TO GRADUALLY BRING ABOUT AN ORWELLIAN POLICE STATE.
DR. DAY SAYS POLITICIANS ARE MANIPULATED 'WITHOUT THEIR EVEN KNOWING IT'. Their failure to protect us from this Satanic conspiracy IS A BETRAYAL OF THE FIRST ORDER."
On 3 November 2008, the article, GM genocide: Thousands of Indian Farmers are Committing Suicide after using Genetically Modified Crops, by Andrew Malone, appeared in The Daily Mail.
"Shankara, like millions of other Indian farmers, had been promised previously unheard of harvests and income IF HE SWITCHED FROM FARMING WITH TRADITIONAL SEEDS TO PLANTING GM SEEDS INSTEAD.
Beguiled by the promise of future riches, he borrowed money in order to buy the GM seeds. But WHEN THE HARVESTS FAILED, HE WAS LEFT WITH SPIRALLING DEBTS - AND NO INCOME. SO SHANKARA BECAME ONE OF AN ESTIMATED 125,000 FARMERS TO TAKE THEIR OWN LIFE AS A RESULT OF THE RUTHLESS DRIVE TO USE INDIA AS A TESTING GROUND FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS...
The Indian government had agreed to allow new bio-tech giants, such as the U.S. market-leader Monsanto, to sell their new seed creations. In return for allowing western companies access to the second most populated country in the world… India was granted International Monetary Fund loans in the Eighties and Nineties, helping to launch an economic revolution. But while cities such as Mumbai and Delhi have boomed, THE FARMERS' LIVES HAVE SLID BACK INTO THE DARK AGES…
Far from being 'magic seeds', GM pest-proof 'breeds' of cotton have been devastated by bollworms, a voracious parasite. Nor were the farmers told that these seeds require double the amount of water. This has proved a matter of life and death. With rains failing for the past two years, MANY GM CROPS HAVE SIMPLY WITHERED AND DIED, LEAVING THE FARMERS WITH CRIPPLING DEBTS AND NO MEANS OF PAYING THEM OFF.
Having taken loans from traditional money lenders at extortionate rates, hundreds of thousands of small farmers have faced losing their land as the expensive seeds fail, while those who could struggle on faced a fresh crisis.
WHEN CROPS FAILED IN THE PAST, FARMERS COULD STILL SAVE SEEDS AND REPLANT THEM THE FOLLOWING YEAR. BUT WITH GM SEEDS THEY CANNOT DO THIS. THAT'S BECAUSE GM SEEDS CONTAIN SO-CALLED 'TERMINATOR TECHNOLOGY', MEANING THAT THEY HAVE BEEN GENETICALLY MODIFIED SO THAT THE RESULTING CROPS DO NOT PRODUCE VIABLE SEEDS OF THEIR OWN.
AS A RESULT, FARMERS HAVE TO BUY NEW SEEDS EACH YEAR AT THE SAME PUNITIVE PRICES… Take the case of Suresh Bhalasa, another farmer who was cremated this week, leaving a wife and two children.
As night fell after the ceremony, and neighbours squatted outside while sacred cows were brought in from the fields, his family had no doubt that their troubles stemmed from the moment THEY WERE ENCOURAGED TO BUY BT COTTON, A GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANT CREATED BY MONSANTO.
'We are ruined now,' said the dead man's 38-year-old wife. 'We bought 100 grams of BT Cotton. Our crop failed twice. My husband had become depressed. He went out to his field, lay down in the cotton and swallowed insecticide’...
The crisis, branded the 'GM Genocide' by campaigners, was highlighted recently when Prince Charles claimed that the issue of GM had become a 'global moral question' - and THE TIME HAD COME TO END ITS UNSTOPPABLE MARCH.
Speaking by video link to a conference in the Indian capital, Delhi, he infuriated bio-tech leaders and some politicians by condemning 'THE TRULY APPALLING AND TRAGIC RATE OF SMALL FARMER SUICIDES IN INDIA, STEMMING... FROM THE FAILURE OF MANY GM CROP VARIETIES'." More...
That’s your global, trough-gobbler for you, they get all “infuriated” when somebody points out that genociding the poor isn't very nice.
Marketed as Nutrasweet, Equal and Spoonful, almost all "low-calorie, diet or no-added sugar drinks" now contain the artificial sweetner, Aspartame.
Since it was introduced in 1981, Aspartame has been the subject of a great many of the complaints reported to the adverse reaction monitors of the US Food and Drug Administration. Coca-Cola knew of the dangers of Aspartame because it originally opposed approval by the FDA. It said that it was inherently unstable and breaks down into methyl alcohol, formic acid, formaldehyde and other toxins.
And yet, Aspartame is now to be found in every diet coke can.
When news leaked out alleging that G.D.Searle, who owned Aspartame, had falsified test results, congress pledged $60,000,000 for the prosecution of the firm's Chairman. However, the Reagan administration closed ranks and prevented the trial of one of their own from taking place.
The chairman of G.D. Searle at the time was none other than DONALD RUMSFELD, George Bush's infamous Defence Secretary and one of the leading Neoconservative "hawks" that forced Gulf War II upon the world.
G.D. Searle is now a subsidiary of MONSANTO.
Anone out there think I'm a conspiracy theorist?
Check out what Roger Williams, the Lib Dem MP for Brecon and Radnorshire, had to say on the floor of the House of Commons on 14 January 2005:
“For almost a year, I have been looking into the safety of the artificial sweetener, aspartame, and I WAS TRULY HORRIFIED BY WHAT I DISCOVERED. WHEN I began my research, I was unconvinced by the off-the-wall internet conspiracy theories. I am a man of science, not of the internet. However, a number of eminent academics from the UK and further afield have persuaded me beyond doubt that ASPARTAME REPRESENTS A SERIOUS HEALTH PROBLEM.
There is strong scientific evidence that THE COMPONENTS OF ASPARTAME AND THEIR METABOLITES CAN CAUSE VERY SERIOUS TOXIC EFFECTS IN HUMANS. THERE IS ALSO A WEALTH OF SUBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT SUGGESTS A RANGE OF ADVERSE NEUROLOGICAL REACTIONS TO ASPARTAME… LONG-TERM ASPARTAME USE CAUSES CANCER IN RODENTS. THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION RECOGNISES SUCH FINDINGS IN RATS AS HIGHLY PREDICTIVE OF CARCINOGENIC RISK FOR HUMANS...
ASPARTAME IS CONSUMED EVERY DAY BY AN AVERAGE OF ONE IN 15 PEOPLE WORLDWIDE, MOST OF WHOM ARE CHILDREN. How many children in Britain do not consume Walker's prawn cocktail crisps, Orbit or Airwaves chewing gum, Robinson's fruit squash, Lucozade or Diet Coke? Aspartame is even found in Centrum Kidz multivitamins, Lemsip cold and flu sachets for children, and Nurofen Meltlets for children. Those are the very products that are designed to cure our children when they are sick.
The economic reality of a sweetening agent that costs one third of the price of sugar means that IT IS PRESENT IN NO FEWER THAN 6,000 FOODS, DRINKS AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS IN OUR SUPERMARKETS...
ASPARTAME TOXICITY MIMICS CONDITIONS SUCH AS MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, PARKINSON'S DISEASE, ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, ARTHRITIS, CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME, PANIC DISORDER, LUPUS, DIABETES, LYMPHOMA, DEPRESSION AND OTHER PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS…
The conclusions of the Ramazzini study deserve painstaking dissection… This vast
study demonstrated that aspartame administered at varying levels in feed causes a statistically significant increase of lymphomas and leukaemias, malignant tumours of the kidneys in female rats and malignant tumours of peripheral and cranial nerves in male rats. Such tumours occurred even in two of the doses that were well below the acceptable daily intake recommended by regulatory authorities in the EU and the US...
Professor Ralph Walton... demonstrated in 1996 that of the 166 studies conducted on aspartame's safety deemed relevant to humans, 74 WERE SPONSORED BY THE ASPARTAME INDUSTRY and 92 were independently funded. OF THE 92 NON-INDUSTRY SPONSORED STUDIES, 92 PER CENT IDENTIFIED ONE OR MORE PROBLEMS WITH ASPARTAME'S SAFETY. The industry-sponsored studies, on the other hand, found unanimously in favour of aspartame's safety…
ON THE POLITICAL SCENE, DONALD RUMSFELD WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN SECURING ITS APPROVAL. AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SEARLE FROM 1977, HE PUBLICLY PLEDGED TO CALL IN HIS MARKERS TO GET IT APPROVED…
When Ronald Reagan was inaugurated as President in 1981, Donald Rumsfeld was on his transition team. PRESIDENT REAGAN SEALED THE LID ON THE ASPARTAME CONTROVERSY. ON THE VERY DAY OF HIS INAUGURATION, REAGAN PERSONALLY WROTE THE EXECUTIVE ORDER SUSPENDING THE FDA COMMISSIONER'S POWERS ON ASPARTAME. REAGAN REPLACED THE COMMISSIONER ONE MONTH LATER WITH ARTHUR HAYES JR., WHO GRANTED THE OFFICIAL LICENCE FOR ASPARTAME.
The history of its approval is littered with examples showing that IF KEY DECISION-MAKERS FOUND AGAINST ITS SAFETY, THEY WERE DISCREDITED, IGNORED OR REPLACED BY INDUSTRY SYMPATHISERS, WHO WERE IN TURN RECOMPENSED WITH LUCRATIVE JOBS…
THERE IS SOLID EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT ITS REGULAR LONG-TERM USE CAN CAUSE CANCER AND A RANGE OF OTHER HEALTH PROBLEMS. EMERGENCY ACTION IS NOW NEEDED TO REMOVE THE TOXIN FROM OUR OWN AND OUR CHILDREN'S DIETS...
Today, I am giving the Government a chance to set right what previous British, European and international health authorities have so dismally failed to do.
A TOTAL BAN IS THE ONLY WAY TO PROTECT THE BRITISH PUBLIC.” More..
Check out this Aspartame Video
Four years on, Aspartame is still to be found in many of our "foods, drinks and pharmaceutical products".
The politicians never did ban it.
On 12 May 2003, Charlotte Dovey said this in The Evening Standard:
"This week, leaked Government papers revealed plans to add fluoride to all drinking water in England and Wales...
Fluoride may... be linked to INCREASED RISKS OF OSTEOPOROSIS, KIDNEY PROBLEMS, AND EVEN CANCER, AND SOME SAY IT IS STEALTHY MASS MEDICATION...
ARTIFICIAL FLUORIDE IS FOUND IN TOOTHPASTES, TOOTH GELS AND MOUTH RINSES... HALF THE FLUORIDE INGESTED IS RETAINED IN THE BODY - IN THE BONES AND TEETH - the other half is excreted... Taken in quantity IT IS EXTREMELY TOXIC AND DANGEROUS. Just over 2 grams of fluoride (roughly a teaspoon) is enough to kill an 11st adult, while just 300mg (found in a tube of toothpaste) is enough to kill a 1st 6lb child...
Last year THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT OUTLAWED THE SALE OF FLUORIDE TABLETS AND CHEWING GUM. This was based on fears that IT MIGHT INCREASE THE RISK OF OSTEOPOROSIS. FRANCE, ITALY, GERMANY, SWEDEN, DENMARK AND HOLLAND HAVE ALSO REJECTED MASS WATER FLUORIDATION. THERE HAS ALSO BEEN MOUNTING OPPOSITION TO IT IN IRELAND.
A large review of the scientific literature on water fluoridation was recently published in the British Medical Journal. This showed that JUST ONE IN SIX PEOPLE DRINKING FLUORIDATED WATER APPEARS TO BENEFIT.
Fluordation has been linked to:
Dental Fluorosis: ALMOST HALF OF PEOPLE DRINKING FLUORIDATED WATER AT PERMISSIBLE LEVELS... EXHIBIT DENTAL FLUOROSIS. WHITE AND BROWN SPOTS APPEAR ON THE ENAMEL OF THE TEETH - CAUSING AN UNSIGHTLY 'MOTTLED' EFFECT. THIS IS THE FIRST SIGN THAT FLUORIDE HAS POISONED ENZYMES IN THE BODY. SOME DENTISTS UNDERSTANDABLY QUESTION THE WISDOM OF PREVENTING DENTAL DISEASE IN ONE IN SIX PEOPLE, ONLY TO CAUSE IT IN ONE IN TWO.
Skeletal Fluorosis: According to American research, THIS CRIPPLING DISEASE - SYMPTOMS INCLUDE PAINS IN THE BONES AND JOINTS, MUSCLE WEAKNESS AND GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS - MAY OCCUR IN PEOPLE WHO HAVE INGESTED 10-20MG OF FLUORIDE PER DAY FOR 10 TO 20 YEARS. IN THE MOST SEVERE CASES, THE SPINE BECOMES COMPLETELY RIGID.
Osteoporosis... THE BONE APPEARS TO BE WEAKER THAN NORMAL BONE... A STUDY OF ELDERLY PATIENTS IN UTAH FOUND 'A SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT INCREASE' IN THE RISK OF HIP FRACTURE IN BOTH MEN AND WOMEN.
Cancer... A study by the New Jersey Department of Health in the U.S. found A STRONG LINK BETWEEN FLUORIDATION AND BONE CANCER IN YOUNG MALES. THEY REPORTED THAT OSTEOSARCOMA RATES WERE THREE TO SEVEN TIMES HIGHER IN FLUORIDATED AREAS THAN NON-FLUORIDATED AREAS… AT VERY LOW LEVELS FLUORIDE CAN INTERFERE WITH THE MALE HORMONE TESTOSTERONE.
Kidney Problems: A STUDY PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL UROLOGICAL RESEARCH HAS FOUND AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HIGH LEVELS OF FLUORIDE IN THE WATER AND PAINFUL KIDNEY STONES. According to the study, UROLITHIASIS (KIDNEY STONES) WAS 4.6 TIMES MORE COMMON IN AN AREA WITH HIGH FLUORIDE THAN IN A SIMILAR AREA WITHOUT HIGH FLUORIDE…
A document signed by health and environment ministers last month concludes that OPPONENTS ARE IN THE MINORITY AND THAT 'THIS MINORITY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DEPRIVE HEALTH COMMUNITIES FROM OPTING FOR FLUORIDATION‘...
It seems the only way to avoid the fluoridated water is either to buy water filters or spend a small fortune on bottled drinking waters - as many of us already do."
On 22 September 2009, Nirmala M Nagaraj said this in The Times of India:
"For good health, the quality of drinking water is critical. But in Karnataka, where much of groundwater sources are concentrated with fluorides and nitrates, the impact is devastating. DENTAL AND SPINE-RELATED AILMENTS ARE SHOWING UP IN MANY CITIES AND VILLAGES. In some of the fluoride-endemic districts like Kolar, Chitradurga, Gadag and Bellary, SMILES ON THE FACES OF YOUNG CHILDREN HAVE VANISHED AS THEY ARE AFFLICTED BY DENTAL FLUOROSIS...
Dean and director, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Dr S S Hiremath, said: 'More than 6% of the state's population is afflicted by dental flourosis. Children don't have proper teeth formation.'
After years of consuming fluoride, when the spinal cord starts compressing and even before the cause for disability is known, THE PATIENT IS PARALYZED. This is a shocking condition in some fluoride-intense districts like Tumkur, where many people in a few villages have spinal cord-related diseases...
Director of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Dr D Nagaraj, said: 'DUE TO FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION IN WATER, MANY PEOPLE IN DISTRICTS LIKE DHARWAD AND TUMKUR HAVE SPINAL CORD DISEASES.. PEOPLE ARE BATTLING WITH PERMANENT DISABILITIES'."
In June 2009, Gordon Brown made Andy Burnham his new Health Secretary.
In his very first speech in this position, Burnham said this:
“Let’s press ahead with fluoridation of water supplies, given the clear evidence that it can improve children’s dental health.”
A spokesman for the National Pure Water Association responded thus:
“It is complete and utter madness. YOU CANNOT MEDICATE A WHOLE POPULATION. THIS IS POLITICAL and Andy Burnham has a conflict of interest because HE WAS OR IS VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE BRITISH FLUORIDATION SOCIETY WHICH IS BASED IN HIS CONSTITUENCY.” (Burnham was Vice President of the BFS from 2004 until his appointment as Health Secretary)
Which would you prefer for your children, ladies and gents?
Mass medication, a 50 per cent certainty of mottled teeth and a distinct possibility of muscle weakness, interference with your testosterone levels, gastrointestinal disorders, kidney problems, osteoporosis, hip fractures, spinal cord-related diseases, bone cancer and paralysis, all curtesy of Big Brother?
Or fluoride-free water, fluoride-free toothpaste and a good toothbrush used frequently?
PS. Fluoride, a chemical that was, not so long ago, considered to be a toxic waste, can have a soporific effect. It was used in both the Nazi concentration camps and the Soviet gulags to subdue the inmates. More...
Take a look at these videos:
The Fluoride Deception - Part 1
The Fluoride Deception - Part 2
The Fuoride Deception - Part 3
Dumbing Down Society
On 15 January 2009, the article, Did Privatization Increase the Russian Death Rate? By R.M. Schneiderman, appeared in The New York Times' Business section.
Schneiderman answered his own question thus:
"That’s what a new study published online today in The Lancet, an independent medical journal, says.
The authors of the study write that THE RAPID AND WIDESPREAD PRIVATIZATION OF STATE INDUSTRIES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION AND EASTERN BLOC COUNTRIES DURING THE EARLY 1990S INCREASED THE DEATH RATE 13 PERCENT...
As communism collapsed in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the former Eastern bloc countries saw dire health consequences: MORE THAN THREE MILLION PEOPLE DIED PREMATURELY, according to the United Nations... As the former Eastern bloc countries began making the transition from communism to capitalism... some (economists) advocated 'SHOCK THERAPY,' a term that denotes an immediate and rapid transition to capitalism...
JEFFREY SACHS, the director of Columbia University’s Earth Institute, A LEADING ADVOCATE OF THE 'SHOCK THERAPY' SCHOOL OF THOUGHT, SERVED AS AN ECONOMIC ADVISER TO A NUMBER OF THE EASTERN BLOC COUNTRIES, including Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Russia." More...
Jeffrey Sachs is Jewish.
As are most of the "Oligarchs" who plundered the wealth of the ordinary people and profited so obscenely from Russia's particularly nasty variation on the privatisation scam. A good few of these Oligarchs (Roman Abramovich, Boris Berezovsky etc.) are now living in London.
Anyway, that's what Privatisation did for the ordinary Soviet citizen.
The Tory and New Labour versions of the great privatisation rip-off didn't do much for the least well off over here either.
In October 2008, Trevor Philips, Chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said this about the brutish behaviour of some African youths once they get here:
"We admit them - RIGHTLY - and then we plonk them in schools and we expect behave like everyone else. You look at the names of those who are involved, they come from Congo, they come from east Africa and so on. I don't think anybody has been very keen on saying it. Let's recognise what it is that is making it happen. IT IS NOT THE FACT THAT THEY ARE BLACK but the fact that they have come from vicious, wartorn regions."
If black Africans stab, shoot, rape, rob, mug, pimp or drug up anyone in this country, it's "not because they're black", it's because he's "they have come from vicious, wartorn regions."
Where the "vicious", as well as the victim, just happens to be black.
Nice try, Phil.
It'll work on the PC Crowd, the brainwashed, the dumbed-down, the drugged-up, the government jobsworths, your establishment politician, Big Brother and the immigrants themselves, but the long-suffering silent majority?
Doubt it somehow.
At the Visionaries web site, certain people are described as having been appointed as Joseph Rowntree Visionaries for a Just and Peaceful World.
Karen Chouhan, a girlfriend of the dreadful Ken Livingstone anti-Brit, Lee Jasper, is one of these Visionaries. She was awarded this accolade for her “black-led decision making approach to race equality in the UK”.
At her own page at the Visionaries site, Chouhan describes her “vision” thus:
“Black communities in Britain will be first across the world TO LEAD IN DECIDING RACE EQUALITY POLICY and discourse, working... with government... AND SETTING THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE... THE UK MODEL WILL BE ONE THAT IS COPIED AND IMPACTS WORLDWIDE... WE WILL ONLY HAVE GENUINE EQUALITY WHEN BLACK COMMUNITIES ARE ABLE TO DIRECTLY SET THE RACE AGENDA."
You heard it here, folks, there is a "race agenda" that the visionary has in mind for our white "communities".
It is an agenda that "black communities" will "lead" and be "deciding" upon.
Maybe this self-serving partiality is what old Enoch was warning us of when he spoke of the black man gaining "the whip hand".
Even Enoch didn't imagine their women would be at it as well.
On 8 August 2008, Deputy Chief Constable Jon Murphy was quoted thus in The Times:
“Some 60 per cent of criminal groups are involved in drug trafficking...
WHEN THE GOVERNMENT TOOK A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO CANNABIS THERE WAS A BIG SHIFT BY ORGANISED CRIMINALS INTO CANNABIS... THE PROFITS WERE HIGH BUT THE PENALTIES WERE LESS...
What we’re talking about here is a continuum of harm from a poppy field in Kandahar to a burglary on an estate or somebody getting shot here. The two things are linked.”
So, the idiocy (or intent) of the politicians caused a “big shift by organised criminals into cannabis”.
Don’t you think that they might have guessed that if “the profits were high but the penalties were less”, criminality in this area might increase?
Perhaps the politicians behind the “different approach” (the law was changed so that cannabis usage and possession was no longer an arrestable offence in most cases) weren’t being stupid. Perhaps they weren’t just being ultra PC and lessening the criminal load for their immigrant pets.
Perhaps some of them were, actually, HAPPY to inflict the damage upon our society that was always going to follow from the relaxation of the law.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that 536,000 immigrants signed up with a GP practice in England and Wales in 2008 alone.
On 22 December 2009, The Daily Mail quoted the response of Dr Richard Fieldhouse, Chief Executive of the National Association of Sessional GPs, which represents locum doctors, to these figures thus:
"THE WORKLOAD AT PRACTICES IS STRAINING AT THE SEAMS. Quite a lot of cover is for BURNT OUT GPS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT COPE WITH THIS. People can only work so many hours a week. Some locums have seen bookings increase by 30 per cent year on year."
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the Taxpayer's Alliance, added:
"Existing patients must always come first and IT IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE THAT SOMEONE WHO HAS PAID FOR THE NHS THROUGHOUT THEIR WORKING LIFE SHOULD FACE DELAYS OR QUEUES AS A RESULT OF RECENT IMMIGRATION USING THE NHS AHEAD OF THEM."
Despite the appalling workload of many GPs and the disappearance of quality time with their doctor that the British are suffering as a result of mass migration, the New Labour government (the one that beckoned all these unwanted foreigners into our country) has decreed that the NHS must find savings of £20 billion over the next four years.
On 27 August 2009, the Agony Aunt, Claire Rayner, President of the Patients Association and a former nurse herself, said this:
“For far too long now, the Patients Association has been receiving calls on our helpline from people wanting to talk about THE DREADFUL, NEGLECTFUL, DEMEANING, PAINFUL AND SOMETIMES DOWNRIGHT CRUEL TREATMENT THEIR ELDERLY RELATIVES HAD EXPERIENCED AT THE HANDS OF NHS NURSES. I am sickened by what has happened to some part of my profession of which I was so proud.”
On 15 September 2009, Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, said this in The Daily Mail:
“I AM FED UP TO THE BACK TEETH WITH BANKRUPT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS... In March this year it was revealed that THE DEPARTMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES HAS GIVEN £25,000 TO THE BRITISH HUMANIST ASSOCIATION TO RUN LOCAL CAMPAIGNS PROMOTING ATHEISM! Meanwhile, THE EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HAS GIVEN THEM £35,000 OF TAXPAYERS’ MONEY TO PROMOTE SECULARISM IN THE PUBLIC SERVICES UNDER EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS.”
On 6 August 2009, Martin Sixsmith, a former Head of Communications at the Department of Transport in the Blair Government, said this in The Daily Mail:
“When Mr Brown became Prime Minister he promised to clean things up - he was going to be 'Gordon, not Flash'... HIS PROMISE OF AN END TO SPIN HAS ITSELF BEEN REVEALED AS SPIN OF THE MOST CYNICAL KIND. NOWADAYS CIVIL SERVICE NEUTRALITY IS NO MORE THAN A DISTANT MEMORY... Instead of providing impartial, factual information, OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASES ARE STUFFED WITH TENDENTIOUS PARTY PROPAGANDA, MASSAGED STATISTICS AND DISINFORMATION against political opponents. THOSE IN THE MEDIA NO LONGER BELIEVE WHAT THEY READ AND NEITHER SHOULD THE PUBLIC. ....
It is quite unacceptable for GORDON BROWN'S GOVERNMENT TO TURN PUBLIC SERVANTS INTO A NEW LABOUR MOUTHPIECE. IT MEANS THAT, AS TAXPAYERS, WE ARE PAYING FOR OFFICIALS TO LIE TO US… Quite simply, WE CAN NO LONGER BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD THAT COMES OUT OF OUR PRIME MINISTER'S MOUTH".
On 4 July 2008, Tarique Ghaffur, Assistant Commissioner of the Met, was quoted thus in The Daily Mail:
"I WILL TEACH THOSE PIGS A LESSON ONE DAY".
He was castigating his fellow officers at the time for not promoting him enough. After launching a claim for massive damages against the Met, Ghaffur’s former wife told us this in The Mail article:
"HE'S CRAZY... I THINK HE HAS BENEFITED FROM POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION… HE OWES AN ETERNAL DEBT OF GRATITUDE TO BRITAIN FOR ALLOWING HIM TO COME HERE, TO SAVE HIM FROM PERSECUTION, AND TOLERATING HIS RACE AND RELIGION. YET THIS IS HOW HE REPAYS SUCH KINDNESS.
You cannot take all the opportunities that have been given to you, all the promotions, and then not accept that one day perhaps you will not rise any further. To turn round just because things aren't going your way and accuse someone of racial discrimination, which is such a dreadful allegation, is cowardly and lazy…
The police wanted Asians in the force and those who joined were being pushed onwards and upwards. I DON'T THINK THERE WAS ANY DOUBT THAT TARIQUE BENEFITED FROM HAVING THE RIGHT COLOUR OF SKIN, IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME. FAST TRACKING IS WHAT I WOULD CALL IT…
Within six weeks of us marrying, I DISCOVERED HE HAD A MISTRESS… TARIQUE LATER TOLD ME HE NEVER WANTED TO GET MARRIED, HE DID IT ONLY BECAUSE HIS FATHER THREATENED TO KILL HIMSELF".
On 18 January 2009, the politically correct media darling, Liz Jones, said this in The Independent:
"I’VE NEVER HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH A WHITE MAN. I’VE NEVER HAD SEX WITH A WHITE MAN…
UNLESS YOU ARE BLACK OR ASIAN YOU CANNOT KNOW WHAT RACISM FEELS LIKE… RACISM IS STILL THERE... WE HAVEN’T STAMPED IT OUT, we have merely buried it...
I think IN THE NINETIES I FELL IN LOVE WITH THREE BLACK MEN PARTLY BECAUSE IT WAS FASHIONABLE AND GAVE ME A VENEER OF ‘COOL’ THAT, AS A BORING ESSEX GIRL, I DIDN’T POSSESS. I MARRIED, ON THE WAVE OF ASIANS BEING THE NEW BLACKS, WITH LOTS OF HOT NEW BOOKS IN THE BESTSELLER LISTS, AN INDIAN...
WHITE PEOPLE, no matter how many community projects we might fund or months we might serve fighting for a foreign cause, ARE CAPABLE OF RACIST THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS THAT NEED TO BE STAMPED ON, HARD... RACISM CAN BE IN OUR DNA. We need to examine ourselves more deeply.”
No Liz, you need to examine yourself more deeply.
You need to examine why you wanted your children to look like no one else in the family album. You need to examine why you were such a silly, vacuous airhead in your youth and why you have never grown up. You need to examine why a juvenile desire to be “cool” and not “boring” entitles you, in middle age, to inflict your still juvenile beliefs upon the British people.
A white woman who marries, “on the wave of Asians being the new blacks, with lots of hot new books in the best-seller lists” is an unthinking, undoubtedly brainwashed airhead. The immature certainty of your youth, is still, even now, wagging its finger at those whose attitudes do not correspond precisely to yours, just as they were when you married your “new black” Indian.
Once upon a time, Liz, I may have found your fashionable political correctness irritating.
Nowadays, it smacks of treachery.
On 10 December 1973, National Security Council Memorandum 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests, was added to the USA's list of "Classified and Confidential" documents.
It was declassified, perhaps in error, in 1988. The memo said:
"If future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that MEASURES TO REDUCE FERTILITY BE STARTED AND MADE EFFECTIVE IN THE 1970S AND 1980S."
On 12 September 1999, the BBC reported thus:
"Average sperm count in Britain fell from a high of 113 million per millilitre in 1940 to 66 million in 1990."
On 3 September 2000, Anthony Browne reported thus in The Observer:
"WHITES WILL BE AN ETHNIC MINORITY IN BRITAIN BY THE END OF THE CENTURY. Analysis of official figures indicate that, at current fertility rates and levels of immigration, there will be more non-whites than whites by 2100.
IT WOULD BE THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY THAT A MAJOR INDIGENOUS POPULATION HAS VOLUNTARILY BECOME A MINORITY, rather than through war, famine or disease.
WHITES WILL BE A MINORITY IN LONDON BY 2010." more...
On 4 February 2003, 73 British Parliamentarians signed an Early Day Motion, introduced by the New Labour MP, Neil Gerrard, titled: Humane Treatment for Migrants with HIV.
"This House notes the recent upsurge in inflammatory media coverage depicting asylum seekers as disease carriers and terrorists, notes how damaging such reports can be to people who have come to this country, in search of a safe haven and freedom from political persecution BUT ALSO HAVE HIV; believes that SUCH MEDIA ATTENTION ONLY FUELS RACISM AND STIGMA which is wholly counterproductive to THE NECESSITY TO TREAT SUCH INDIVIDUALS WITH RESPECT AND COMPASSION".
Now, it seems to me that a politician whose first instinct would put the welfare of an HIV-positive would-be immigrant, before any thought of the dire consequences that the importation of such diseases might have upon his indigenous constituents, poses an enormous threat to the wellbeing of those who elected him.
The unthinking sympathies of such people place the health, happiness and, for that matter, the survival of the native born population at tremendous risk.
If the British electorate would protect themselves and their children from the blinkered generosity of these politically correct bleeding hearts, such one-sided generosity should not be tolerated. The people of Britain should consider when, if ever, their politicians were as keen to act with such charity towards them.
At the time this EDM was signed, in some parts of sub-Saharan Africa, as many as 1 in 4 of all adults were infected with the AIDS virus.
On 11 June 2003, the BBC quoted the Health Committee Chairman, New Labour MP David Hinchliffe, thus:
"I do not use the word lightly, but during the course of the inquiry, it has become plain that WITH SEXUAL HEALTH WE ARE LOOKING AT A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS".
Liberal Democrat MP, Sandra Gidley, added:
"RATES OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE, INCLUDING HIV/AIDS, ARE ASTRONOMICAL."
The BBC explained:
"A report by the influential Commons health committee has found THE NHS IS NO LONGER ABLE TO COPE WITH THE RECORD NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH STIS. It has called for urgent government action to tackle what it describes as a public health crisis. The report reveals that the number of people being diagnosed with infections is continuing to rocket.
ONE IN 10 YOUNG PEOPLE ARE NOW INFECTED WITH CHLAMYDIA, WHICH CAN CAUSE INFERTILITY IN WOMEN. SYPHILIS RATES HAVE JUMPED BY 500% IN THE LAST SIX YEARS, while gonorrhoea infections have doubled. More people are also being diagnosed with HIV than ever before. Around 6,500 people were told they had the disease last year.
THE REPORT FOUND THAT THE NHS IS FAILING TO ADDRESS OR EVEN RECOGNISE THE PROBLEM. IT SAYS SEXUAL HEALTH CLINICS ARE ILL-EQUIPPED TO COPE AND ARE TURNING AWAY HUNDREDS OF PATIENTS EACH WEEK…
THE REPORT BLAMED A LACK OF POLITICAL DIRECTION AND UNDER-FUNDING OVER MANY YEARS FOR THE CRISIS".
On 14 November 2008, The Daily Mail told us this:
"AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT MAY HAVE INFECTED HUNDREDS OF WOMEN WITH HIV IN A STRING OF ONE-NIGHT-STANDS, it has emerged. The infected Jamaican reveller prowled nightclubs to pick up women and then spent almost a year unchecked in hospital where he looked for sex with vulnerable patients. HEALTH OFFICIALS HAVE WRITTEN TO MORE THAN 400 WOMEN TO WARN THEM THEY MIGHT HAVE THE DEADLY VIRUS after having unprotected sex with him." more...
On 14 October 2005, at a meeting convened at Howard University in Washington, Dr. Kamau Kambon, a lecturer in Africana Studies at North Carolina State University, said this:
"We are at war… White people want to kill us. I want you to understand that. They want to kill you. They want to kill you because that is part of their plan… They’re monitoring our people to try to prevent the one person from coming up with the one idea. And the one idea is, HOW WE ARE GOING TO EXTERMINATE WHITE PEOPLE...
WE HAVE TO EXTERMINATE WHITE PEOPLE OFF THE FACE OF THE PLANET TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. (Applause) THE PROBLEM ON THE PLANET IS WHITE PEOPLE… White people want to kill you… because that is part of their plan… THE ONLY NIGGER ON THE PLANET IS THE WHITE MAN AND THE WHITE WOMAN."
Kambon has been a Visiting Professor at North Carolina State University since 2003.
Before teaching at NCSU, he was a Professor of Education at St. Augustine's College in North Carolina's capital, Raleigh. In 1999, a Citizen's Award was bestowed upon him by the left-wing newspaper, The Independent Weekly.
If you find it difficult to believe that an august and respected Professor of African Studies could think and say such things, Kambon's anti-white tirade may be seen here.
On 7 October 2008, The Daily Express quoted Professor Steve Jones, of the Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment at University College, London, thus:
"The country is one of the most sexually open in the world. WE ARE MIXING INTO A GLOBAL MASS, AND THE FUTURE IS BROWN."
On 27 September 2002, the BBC told us this:
"BLONDES ‘TO DIE OUT IN 200 YEARS.’
Scientists believe the last blondes will be in Finland… THE LAST NATURAL BLONDES WILL DIE OUT WITHIN 200 YEARS, SCIENTISTS BELIEVE. A study by experts in Germany suggests people with blonde hair are an endangered species and will become extinct by 2202. Researchers predict the last truly natural blonde will be born in Finland - the country with the highest proportion of blondes… they say TOO FEW PEOPLE NOW CARRY THE GENE FOR BLONDES TO LAST BEYOND THE NEXT TWO CENTURIES."
Is this OK by all you fair-haired, fair skinned Viking types? I'm not. I don't want my tribe to die out, let alone my race.
Anyway, welcome to ancient history, ladies and gents.
Which is what we'll all be a century or so down the line if the PC Crowd continue to have their way.
Robert Whelan, a director of the think-tank Civitas, was quoted thus in the 10 January 2009 edition of The Daily Mail:
"THE WHITE WORKING CLASS IS GROWING BITTER… They loyally supported Old Labour, but NEW LABOUR HAS IGNORED THEM.
Ministers have shut down the debate on mass migration. If the working class object to what is happening, they are called racist. They are not allowed to discuss their concerns publicly… The working classes feel there has been a huge unfairness, particularly when it comes to housing… They feel they have paid into the system, and should get something out. That was how it used to work right up to the 1990s. Then New Labour dismantled the system."
On 2 January 2008, Liverpudlian comedian, Alexei Sayle, was quoted thus by Sky News:
"IT IS THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE MURDERER, THE RAPIST, THE BULLY. THAT'S WHAT ISRAEL IS IN THIS SITUATION."
Sayle, who was speaking out against the Israeli invasion of Gaza, added:
"I think that Israel has an idea of itself as being noble. When you attack somebody but you have this idea of yourself that you're the good guy - you think 'how can this be?' What you do is BLAME THE PEOPLE YOU HAVE KILLED - and you hear all the time from Israeli spokespeople that THEY ARE ANGRY WITH THE PEOPLE THAT THEY HAVE MURDERED, FOR MAKING THEM MURDER THEM."
The following day, he told the BBC that Israel's response was "massively disproportionate", adding:
"Stop killing people, STOP KILLING CHILDREN and then start thinking about the little things after that."
Alexei Sayle is Jewish himself.
On 6 January 2009, Yonotan Shapira, a former captain in the Israeli Air Force, spoke out as follows against the Gaza invasion:
"MY GOVERNMENT IS NOW ENGAGED IN A MASSIVE WAR CRIME KILLING HUNDREDS OF INNOCENTS…
On behalf of thousands of Israelis that are demonstrating right now in the streets of Tel A Viv and Jerusalem and many other places, with Palestinians with Internationals, people from all kinds of backgrounds… are completely, completely ashamed and against this crazy assault… As Jewish people we know that YOU CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE.
WE CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE PEOPLE TO LIVE IN FREEDOM…
Stop THIS MASSIVE KILLING… please, for the sake of Israel for the sake of Palestine and for the sake of the world. I want to cry and to shout and ask you people dying right now… It’s crazy that my government... is continuing this crazy assault thinking that they can kill THE DESIRE OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE…
The Palestinians… THEY ARE BEING TRAPPED IN THIS OPEN-AIR PRISON FOR DECADES AND THEY CANNOT EAT, THEY CANNOT HAVE THEIR MEDICINE, THEY CANNOT GO IN, THEY CANNOT GO OUT. WE LOCK THEM THERE IN A DEEP GHETTO… WE ARE LOCKING ONE AND A HALF MILLION PEOPLE FOR SO LONG AND WE TREAT THEM AS ANIMALS AND THIS IS THE RESULT."
On 13 January 2009, the Israeli historian and Oxford University professor, Avi Shlaim, said this on Channel 4 News:
“The current offensive in Gaza is the climax of the Israeli tendency to shun diplomacy and compromise and to rely overwhelmingly on BRUTE MILITARY FORCE.
The key to Israel’s intransigence in the conflict is UNCRITICAL AMERICAN SUPPORT. Today ISRAEL IS, GETTING AWAY, LITERALLY, WITH MURDER IN GAZA because there is no restraint from America. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN LESS AMERICAN RESTRAINT ON ISRAEL IN THE HISTORY OF THIS TRAGIC CONFLICT.
One recent example of THIS BLIND AMERICAN SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL is the Security Council cease-fire resolution which CONDOLEEZA RICE SUPPORTED, MADE A SPEECH IN FAVOUR and everyone thought America was going to vote for it and yet, AT THE LAST MINUTE, BUSH AND CHENEY VETOED, didn’t veto the resolution but AMERICA ABSTAINED! THAT SENT A CLEAR SIGNAL TO ISRAEL THAT IT CAN CONTINUE WITH THIS INSANE OFFENSIVE.
The only thing that might change is American public opinion, as a result of EXCESSIVE ISRAELI BRUTALITY, gradually changing and that would weaken the power of the Israel lobby in Washington and eventually it might have an effect on American foreign policy towards the region…
Here is the crucial point, THIS IS AN UNNECESSAY AND ILLEGAL WAR because... in July of last year Egypt brokered a cease-fire. The cease-fire succeeded. THE CEASE-FIRE WAS A STUNNING SUCCESS, CONTRARY TO ISRAELI PROPAGANDA. Before cease-fire came into effect, 170 KASSAM ROCKETS A MONTH WERE FIRED FROM GAZA ON ISRAEL After the cease-fire came into effect, for the next 4 months THE NUMBER DROPPED TO 3 A MONTH. Again CONTRARY TO ISRAEL’S PROPAGANDA, IT WAS NOT HAMAS THAT BROKE THE CEASE-FIRE, IT WAS ISRAEL WHO BROKE THE CEASE-FIRE BY LAUNCHING A RAID INTO GAZA AND KILLING SIX HAMAS MEN."
Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia, tells us this about the "Israel Lobby in the United Kingdom":
"After pop music mogul Michael Levy began fundraising for the Labour Party IT BECAME FAR MORE PRO-ISRAEL… LEVY RAN BLAIR’S 1997 CAMPAIGN FOR PRIME MINISTER AND AFTER WINNING BLAIR MADE LEVY A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS (which appointment later became part of the Cash for Honours political scandal) as well as 'special envoy' to the Middle-East…
BROWN IS EVEN MORE PRO-ISRAEL THAN BLAIR AND HAS 'ENSURED CONTINUED JEWISH FUNDING OF ‘NEW LABOUR’ BY APPOINTING FORMER LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DIRECTOR JON MENDELSOHN AS HIS CHIEF FUNDRAISER FOR THE NEXT ELECTION. HE ALSO APPOINTED FORMER BRITISH AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL, SIMON MCDONALD, AS HIS CHIEF FOREIGN POLICY ADVISER. HE APPOINTED SEVERAL FORMER CHAIRS OF LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL TO HIGH POSITIONS: James Purnell as Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport with oversight over the British Broadcasting Corporation and all British media; Jim Murphy as Minister of State for Europe with responsibility for the BBC World Service and the British Council; and Kim Howells as 'Middle East Minister' (Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office with oversight of Middle East affairs)…
LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL HAS A GROWING MEMBERSHIP IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS AND IS SEEN AS A LADDER TO SUCCESS FOR ASPIRING POLITICIANS.
80 PERCENT OF CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ALSO ARE CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL, INCLUDING DAVID CAMERON, LEADER OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY... THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FRIENDS OF ISRAEL WEB SITE IS MORE 'STRIDENTLY PRO-ISRAEL' THAN LABOUR, CALLING ISRAEL’S OCCUPATION OF THE WEST BANK A 'MYTH'...
In late 2007 it was revealed that DAVID ABRAHAMS, WHO WAS DEPUTY CHAIR OF LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL UNTIL 2002, HAD MADE SECRET AND ILLEGAL DONATIONS THROUGH JUNIOR EMPLOYEES OF 600,000 POUNDS STERLING (APPROXIMATELY $1.2 MILLION) TO THE LABOUR PARTY. Abrahams, 'a Jewish millionaire,' admitted in The Jewish Chronicle that he concealed his activity because 'I DIDN'T WANT JEWISH MONEY AND THE LABOUR PARTY BEING PUT TOGETHER'.
The Telegraph ran a photograph of Abrahams with Israeli former ambassador to Britain, Zvi Heifetz, and 'insinuated that ISRAEL WAS THE SOURCE OF THE ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS'. According to an article in Haaretz, several in the media have maintained there was A CONNECTION BETWEEN MONEY DONATED BY ZIONIST JEWS AND THE PRO-ISRAEL POLICY OF BRITISH PRIME MINISTERS TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN.
Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told The Forward 'CLEARLY THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR IT TO TURN AGAINST US'…
The former Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament, Baroness Jenny Tonge said in 2006: 'THE PRO-ISRAELI LOBBY HAS GOT ITS GRIPS ON THE WESTERN WORLD, ITS FINANCIAL GRIPS. I THINK THEY'VE PROBABLY GOT A GRIP ON OUR PARTY’.” ...more
In September 2009, after the BBC had suggested that it would only be fair to give the BNP a spot on the current affairs programme Question Time, John Mann, New Labour MP for Bassetlaw, said this:
"It’s absurd to give the BNP any space. This is how Hitler came to power and these people have got the same objectives. It’s typical BBC intellectualism giving them airtime." (6 September 2009)
John Mann is the Chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism.
The Wikipedia essay can be seen in its entirety here.
In the 15 April 2002 edition of The New Statesman, John Kampfner explained how things were going to be shortly after Tony Blair assumed the leadership of the Labour Party:
"The roots of the British government's current policy towards the Middle East can be traced back to a single event, not the founding of the Jewish state, not the Six Day War, not the Oslo accords or the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, but Brighton in the autumn of 1994.
TO DEFINE YOURSELF AS NEW LABOUR, YOU HAD TO PROVE YOUR CREDENTIALS AS PRO-BUSINESS, ANTI-TAX AND PRO-ISRAEL,' says one party official.
'Palestinian sympathies were the preserve of the old left and we quite simply had to get rid of ours IF WE WANTED TO GET ON.'
At Blair's first party conference as leader, LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ASSEMBLED IN A HUGE TURNOUT FOR ITS MAIN MEETING OF THE WEEK. EVERY ASPIRING YOUNG APPARACHIK FELT THE NEED TO ATTEND. THEY DID THEN. THEY STILL DO."
Such is life in Airstrip 1.
On 21 February 2008, the article, "How Labour used the law to keep criticism of Israel secret", by Richard Norton-Taylor, was published by The Guardian.
"THE FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE SUCCESSFULLY FOUGHT TO KEEP SECRET ANY MENTION OF ISRAEL CONTAINED ON THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE CONTROVERSIAL, NOW DISCREDITED IRAQ WEAPONS DOSSIER. At the heart of it was NERVOUSNESS AT THE TOP OF GOVERNMENT ABOUT ANY MENTION OF ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR ARSENAL IN AN OFFICIAL PAPER ACCUSING IRAQ OF FLOUTING THE UN'S AUTHORITY ON WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION...
The FCO had no objections to references to other countries in the margin of the Williams document...
The Information Tribunal ordered the release of the draft, without reference to Israel, observing that IT MAY HAVE PLAYED A BIGGER ROLE IN INFLUENCING THE FINAL DOSSIER THAN PREVIOUSLY SUPPOSED. The government tried to distance itself from the Williams draft."
In the 5 April 2003 edition of the Israeli daily, Ha’aretz, Ari Shavit told us this:
"THE WAR IN IRAQ WAS CONCEIVED BY 25 NEOCONSERVATIVE INTELLECTUALS, MOST OF THEM JEWISH, WHO ARE PUSHING PRESIDENT BUSH TO CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY."
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, of course, didn't need any pushing at all.
On the seventh anniverary of the 9/11 attacks, a rally was held in Lea Bridge Road Mosque, Leyton, East London.
The Muslim lawyer, Anjem Choudary, said this at the event:
"Islam is superior and will never be surpassed. THE FLAG OF ISLAM WILL RISE OVER DOWNING STREET...
IT WOULD BE EASY FOR US TO DECLARE JIHAD IN BRITAIN AND EACH ONE OF US COULD BECOME A TIME-BOMB WAITING TO GO OFF...
The Home Office say there are 1.5million Muslims but there were 1.5million ten years ago. SINCE THEN OUR BROTHERS IN BETHNAL GREEN, WHITECHAPEL AND OTHER PLACES HAVE HAD EIGHT OR NINE CHILDREN EACH. Eight children here, ten children, 15 children. THERE MUST BE AT LEAST SIX MILLION PEOPLE…
BRITAIN WILL BECOME AN ISLAMIC STATE. WE MAY NEVER NEED TO CONQUER IT FROM THE OUTSIDE... We do not integrate into Christianity. WE WILL ENSURE THAT ONE DAY YOU WILL INTEGRATE INTO THE SHARIA ISLAMIC LAW! OUR EYES ARE ON DOWNING STREET... THAT IS WHY THE BRITISH ARE SO AFRAID."
On 30 March 2009, Kenneth Minogue, Emeritus Professor of Political Science at the London School of Economics, wrote this in The Daily Mail:
“Never before in history have our civic institutions laid such emphasis on compassion. The eagerness to show empathy and concern is a central theme of the state, running through everything from the justice system to the Armed Forces. YOUNG OFFENDERS ARE GIVEN COUNSELLING RATHER THAN PUNISHMENT. OUR TROOPS ARE SENT OVERSEAS, NOT TO FIGHT BUT TO 'WIN HEARTS AND MINDS'. In large swathes of the public sector, the fashionable concept of 'EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE' HAS REPLACED EFFICIENCY AS THE CENTRAL GOAL OF THE WORKFORCE. Yet IN THE FACE OF THIS SWEEPING TIDE OF OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED BENEVOLENCE, BRITAIN IS INCREASINGLY VIOLENT AND DEGRADED.
'The gentleness of English civilisation is its most marked characteristic,' George Orwell once wrote.
HOW HOLLOW THOSE WORDS SOUND TODAY, AS THE SHADOWS OF AGGRESSION AND DISORDER LOOM OVER OUR SOCIETY. THE 'NICENESS' MOVEMENT IS ACHIEVING THE VERY OPPOSITE OF ITS PROFESSED AIM. THE RELUCTANCE TO PUNISH WRONG-DOERS ALLOWS THEM TO ESCAPE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS, SO DISCIPLINE COLLAPSES AND THUGGERY TRIUMPHS.”
Anyone but the PC Crowd, the media darlings, New Labour, the Lib Dems, the Health and Safety Nazis, the bought-and-paid-for jobsworths with gold-plated pensions, the immigrants and the criminals disagree with this?
On 9 May 2009, author and journalist, Jeremy Seabrook, wrote the following in The Guardian:
“NEW LABOUR COULD NOT WAIT TO REPUDIATE EVERYTHING THE LABOUR PARTY HAD EVER STOOD FOR AND THIS LEFT ITS FORMER HEARTLAND A POLITICAL DESERT...
THE WHITE WORKING CLASS... COULD BE LEFT TO THEIR FATE IN FORLORN ESTATES OF LIQUOR SHOPS COVERED WITH CHICKEN WIRE, LEAKY DRAINPIPES, SEMI-WILD DOGS AND TATTERED FLAGS OF ST GEORGE – EVERYTHING THAT SYMBOLISED THE LAST GASP OF A DISAPPEARING WORKING CLASS...
Margaret Thatcher... understood that THE BEST WAY TO BE RID OF TROUBLESOME ORGANISED LABOUR WAS TO DESTROY THE ECONOMIC BASE ON WHICH IT DEPENDED AND SHE WAS AN EARLY PROPONENT OF OUTSOURCING MANUFACTURED GOODS. SHE SET ABOUT THE DEMOLITION OF INDUSTRY WITH GUSTO, AND WITH IT, THE UNMAKING OF THE WORKING CLASS, HER ALLIES THE INVISIBLE ARMY OF APPARENTLY INVINCIBLE GLOBAL ECONOMIC FORCES.
A LABOUR PARTY THAT SAW ITS ORIGINAL CONSTITUENCY ERASED FROM THE POLITICAL MAP READILY ABANDONED THE VICTIMS OF THESE PROCESSES, THOSE IT HAD ALWAYS TAKEN FOR GRANTED. ‘OUR OWN PEOPLE’, THEY POSSESSIVELY CALLED THEM, ADDING THAT, NO MATTER WHAT LABOUR DID, ‘THEY HAD NOWHERE ELSE TO GO’...
You don't have to agree with what the British National Party stands for TO RECOGNISE THE LEGITIMACY OF ITS CONCERN FOR 'THESE PEOPLE', THOSE WRITTEN OFF BY A PARTY WHICH, ASSUMING SEIGNEURIAL RIGHTS OVER THEIR VOTE, HAD EXILED THEM TO THE PERIPHERY NOT ONLY OF ITS OWN CONSCIOUSNESS, BUT ALSO OF THE DECLINING INDUSTRIAL TOWNS AND CITIES THEY INHABITED.”
On 22 May 2009, Peter Oborne opined thus in The Daily Mail:
“THE POLITICAL CLASS FINDS ITSELF LITERALLY UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE VALUES THAT APPEAR ADMIRABLE TO MOST PEOPLE, SUCH AS HONESTY, PATRIOTISM AND RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE...
British democracy now faces an historic crisis. THE GULF BETWEEN THE CORRUPT RULING ELITE AND THE GREAT MASS OF ORDINARY BRITISH CITIZENS IS TODAY GREATER THAN AT ANY TIME SINCE THE EARLY 19TH CENTURY. This means there is one great burning question in our public life... Will there BE SOME KIND OF REVOLUTION?”
On 4 February 2009, Melanie Philips said this in The Daily Mail:
“Sometimes you have to pinch yourself to remember that Britain has historically always been the cradle of liberty. For TODAY WE SEEM TO BE SLIDING INEXORABLY INTO A CULTURE OF CONTROL WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY FAMILIAR TO THE STASI OR THE KGB...
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS NOW THE GOVERNING CHARACTERISTIC OF PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS THE BBC AND THE NHS, ALONG WITH AN INTELLIGENTSIA DETERMINED UPON A DRACONIAN PROCESS OF SOCIAL ENGINEERING AIMED AT CHANGING NOT JUST SOCIETY BUT HUMAN NATURE ITSELF...
BEHAVIOUR SUCH AS THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN A KEY FEATURE OF POLICE STATES AND TOTALITARIAN REGIMES. THE STASI OR THE KGB GAINED MUCH OF THEIR POWER OVER THE POPULATION THEY TYRANNISED BY GETTING PEOPLE TO INFORM ON EACH OTHER, USING SUCH INFORMERS TO BRING FORWARD EVIDENCE OF 'THOUGHT CRIMES' from private or overheard conversations. Such use of informers SETS PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER in a climate of permanent and corrosive suspicion.
Destroying the trust which is the basis of relationships, it is thus A PRINCIPAL MEANS OF CONTROLLING THE POPULATION...
It is THIS COMBINATION OF LUNACY AND COERCION which leads one to think that the land of those great apostles of free thinking, John Milton and John Locke, is fast TURNING INTO A NIGHTMARE STRAIGHT OUT OF THE PAGES OF GEORGE ORWELL OR FRANZ KAFKA."
In the 3 August 2009 edition of The Daily Express, Leo McKinstry said this:
“OUR ONCE WELL-ORDERED, COHESIVE NATION HAS BEEN TURNED INTO AN OVERCROWDED LAND FULL OF DISPARATE CULTURES. As the influx of foreigners continues at an unprecedented rate, MANY BRITONS INCREASINGLY FEEL LIKE ALIENS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY…
LABOUR’S OBSESSION WITH DIVERSITY MEANS THAT OUR CIVIC INSTITUTIONS HAVE TRADUCED OUR HISTORY, SMASHED OUR TRADITIONS AND TREATED OUR INSTINCTIVE NATIONAL PRIDE AS A DANGEROUS FORM OF RACISM...
The idea that all migrants come here to work hard is just a myth. In fact MIGRANTS ARE FAR MORE LIKELY THAN BRITISH PEOPLE TO BE UNEMPLOYED, IN RECEIPT OF BENEFITS OR HOUSED IN STATE-FUNDED ACCOMMODATION. MEANWHILE OUR SOCIETY IS NOW BESET BY EXTREMISM, BARBARIC VIOLENCE, ETHNIC TENSIONS AND SUPERSTITION...
MASS IMMIGRATION HAS ACHIEVED ITS GOAL. (LABOUR) HAS SUCCEEDED IN RUINING OUR ONCE GENTLE, UNITED LAND."
On 2 July 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
"HARRIET HARMAN’S NEW ‘EQUALITY’ BILL REQUIRES PUBLIC BODIES TO PRACTISE OVERT DISCRIMINATION IN FAVOUR OF ETHNIC MINORITIES... DURING 12 YEARS OF LABOUR RULE THE CULTURE OF BIAS TOWARDS THE NON-BRITISH HAS BEEN DEEPLY EMBEDDED ACROSS THE PUBLIC SECTOR... UNDER BROWN AND BLAIR, BRITISH-BORN FAMILIES HAVE BEEN RUTHLESSLY MARGINALISED BY A HOUSING SYSTEM THAT IS LOADED AGAINST THEM...
In 2007 the Government claimed that only one per cent of taxpayer-funded homes are handed to immigrants. THIS WAS A BLATANT LIE. ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL STATISTICS PUBLISHED IN APRIL 2008, ONE-IN-NINE, MORE THAN 11 PER CENT, OF ALL SUBSIDISED HOMES ACROSS BRITAIN ARE OCCUPIED BY MIGRANTS... Only last year research by Channel 4... found that 80 PER CENT OF SOMALIS LIVE IN SOCIAL HOUSING, 49 PER CENT OF TURKS AND 41 OF BANGLADESHIS, COMPARED TO JUST 17 PER CENT OF BRITISH-BORN PEOPLE...
IDEOLOGICAL SOCIALISTS ARE ALMOST PSYCHOTIC IN THEIR DETERMINATION TO UPHOLD THE INTERESTS OF FOREIGNERS WHO HAVE CONTRIBUTED NOTHING TO OUR COUNTRY, AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIGENOUS WORKING-CLASS. I saw this myself when I was a Labour councillor in Islington in the early Nineties. In my ward THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT HAD DECIDED THAT A CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE RESERVED MAINLY FOR REFUGEES. AT ONE PARTY MEETING, WHEN SOME WORKING-CLASS MEMBERS JUSTIFIABLY OBJECTED TO THIS ON THE GROUNDS THAT LOCAL PEOPLE WERE BEING EXCLUDED, THEY WERE HOWLED DOWN AS ‘RACISTS’ BY MIDDLE-CLASS LABOUR MEMBERS WHO OWNED THEIR OWN PROPERTIES.”
On 22 January 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
"It is remarkable that THE LABOUR PARTY, WHICH WAS FOUNDED IN THE EDWARDIAN AGE TO REPRESENT THE WORKING CLASS, SHOULD BE INDULGING IN THIS BETRAYAL OF THE VERY PEOPLE WHO FORM THE BACKBONE OF BRITAIN. Great Labour figures of the past, such as post-war foreign secretary and former union boss Ernie Bevin, saw their job as protecting British workers, not SUBJECTING THEM TO EXPLOITATION AND MARGINALISATION.
Today, on the contrary, LABOUR PRACTISES OPEN PREJUDICE AGAINST THE INDIGENOUS WORKING CLASS IN ITS EAGERNESS TO ENFORCE GLOBALISATION AND DIVERSITY, WHAT LABOUR’S DEPUTY LEADER HARRIET HARMAN HAS DESCRIBED AS 'A NEW SOCIAL ORDER'. In fact, under Harman’s misnamed Equalities Bill, DIRECT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WHITE MEN IS TO BE BECOME LEGAL, AS FIRMS WILL BE ALLOWED TO RESERVE JOBS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITY ETHNIC GROUPS.
IF WE HAD A GOVERNMENT THAT CARED AT ALL ABOUT THE WORKING CLASS, WE WOULD BE HELPING THE BRITISH PEOPLE INSTEAD OF DISCRIMINATING AGAINST THEM."
On 6 August 2008, The Daily Mail quoted Adam Sampson, of the housing charity Shelter, regarding the rate of home repossession in Gordon Brown's Cool Britannia:
"We have reached crisis point in the number of people at risk of repossession and alarm bells must be ringing in Government. These figures paint a terrifying picture showing real people living in the shadow of repossession and ultimately homelessness."
The Mail added:
"Mortgage lenders were criticised yesterday for rushing to evict families from their homes, as the number kicked out SOARED BY 41% IN A YEAR... The Financial Services Authority said some lenders were 'too ready' to repossess customers' homes...
FROM JANUARY TO MARCH, 9,152 PEOPLE LOST THEIR HOMES, compared to 6,471 in the same period last year. The FSA also warns that 302,000 FAMILIES ARE IN 'THE LAST CHANCE SALOON', having not made repayments for at least three months."
On 7 March 2009, Stephen Glover said this in The Daily Mail:
"Twice this week I have been reminded of a peculiar quality of the British. WE LOVE TO PRAISE, HONOUR AND REWARD THOSE WHO DON'T REALLY LIKE US - WHO MAY INDEED HATE US.
While Gordon Brown was sweet-talking the Americans, it was announced that an honorary knighthood is being conferred on 77-year-old Senator Edward Kennedy... One might suppose that Mr Kennedy... was an old friend of this country. BUT HE ISN'T... During the Seventies he portrayed the British role in Northern Ireland as one of virtual occupation, and even suggested that the majority Protestant population be encouraged to 'return' to Britain...
91-year-old historian Eric Hobsbawm... has lived in this country since 1933... One might suppose that Mr Hobsbawm was a kindly old gentleman who would never harm a flea. A panegyric by Seumas Milne in The Guardian newspaper called him Britain's 'greatest living historian'. HE IS ALMOST INVARIABLY SO DESCRIBED... The truth about Mr Hobsbawm is almost the exact opposite of what has been stated. For most of his adult life Mr HOBSBAWM SUPPORTED THE SOVIET UNION, whose methods made MI5 look like a bunch of amateurs...
He either turned a blind eye to Soviet atrocities, OR JUSTIFIED THEM. He defended... the Russian invasion of Hungary in 1956. He deprecated Nikita Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin's totalitarian methods. Long after decent fellow communists had disowned Soviet communism, HOBSBAWM REFUSED TO CONDEMN IT. In his book On History, published in 1997, he wrote: 'Fragile as the communist systems turned out to be, only a limited, even minimal, use of force was necessary to maintain them from 1957 until 1989.' Somehow, he had forgotten about the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.
Asked whether 'the radiant tomorrow' promised by Stalin would have justified 'the loss of 15 to 20 million people', HOBSBAWM SIMPLY REPLIED: 'YES'...
Despite all this - despite his well-publicised support for an inhumane regime - HE IS WIDELEY TEATED AS A GRAND, AS WELL AS A DELIGHTFUL OLD MAN, WHOSE VIEWS DESERVE TO BE VENERATED.
One may wonder why Hobsbawm should seek an honour from a country for which he has never shown much affection, and whose interests he undermined during the Cold War through his support for the Soviet Union... It would be as pointless to demand that he be stripped of his Companion of Honour as it would be to ask Gordon Brown to think again about Senator Kennedy's honorary knighthood. NEW LABOUR HAS EMBRACED BOTH THESE GHASTLY MEN WITH OPEN EYES."
"We love to praise, honour and reward those who don't really like us - who may indeed hate us", says Glover.
This, of course, is not true. We have never wanted anything to do with "those who don't really like us", much less anyone who "hates" us.
However, the powers-that-be do indeed "love to praise, honour and reward those... who may indeed hate us".
The better to dismay and demoralise those THEY, themselves, hate.
Now go to Chronological Quotations