The Madhouse Update

On 4 November 2009, The Daily Express reported thus:

“MILLIONS OF HEART PATIENTS ARE NOT BEING WARNED ABOUT THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF STATINS because of a row over how a leaflet should be worded. Drugs firms were told to add an alert to advice for patients after data showed THE PILLS CAN TRIGGER DEPRESSION, MEMORY LOSS, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION AND SLEEP DISTURBANCE. But more than a year later THE WARNINGS HAVE STILL NOT BEEN ADDED AFTER A DRUGS FIRM SAID THEY DID NOT LIKE THE WORDING.

Medical groups have said they are outraged by the delay because it ignores patient welfare. The leading medicines journal, the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, says it is furious that A DRUGS FIRM CAN DERAIL PATIENT SAFETY.”



On 4 November 2009, Peter Oborne said this in The Spectator:

“Judging only by its electoral performance, the Communist Party of Great Britain was a near-total failure in the 20th century. It only secured a tiny number of MPs at Westminster, while the party membership peaked at just over 60,000 at the height of Soviet popularity during the second world war. But this public lack of success was misleading. THE COMMUNISTS EXERCISED CONSIDERABLE SECRET INFLUENCE IN UNIVERSITIES, PUBLISHING HOUSES, JOURNALISM AND EVEN THE CIVIL SERVICE FOR DECADES AFTER 1945.

ITS GREATEST POWER, HOWEVER, LAY INSIDE THE LABOUR PARTY AND THE TRADE UNIONS. It was perhaps especially strong in the National Union of Mineworkers and the Amalgamated Union of Engineering Workers. This strength survived long after the catastrophic Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. WE KNOW THAT THE TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION LEADER JACK JONES — WHO RECEIVED EFFUSIVE PRAISE FROM PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN WHEN HE DIED IN APRIL THIS YEAR — WAS A PAID AGENT FOR THE USSR, AND IN RECEIPT OF CASH HANDOUTS FROM HIS SOVIET HANDLER OLEG GORDIEVSKY AS LATE AS THE 1980S.

The merit of Anatoly Chernyaev’s diaries is that they show that… by the 1970s, AN ALTERNATIVE GOVERNMENT WAS IN PLACE, HANDPICKED BY MOSCOW TO TAKE OVER THE APPARATUS OF THE BRITISH STATE ONCE THE COLD WAR WAS LOST. THERE WOULD BE A SOVIET-STYLE POWER SPLIT: REAL POWER WOULD REST IN THE CHAIRMANSHIP AND THE BUREAUCRACY, WITH THE POLITICIANS SIMPLY THE FRONT MEN. Some of the Labour men the Soviets were grooming were paid agents, others fellow travellers. Yet EVEN FRONT-RANK POLITICIANS WERE PATHETICALLY ANXIOUS TO REACH SOME KIND OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE SOVIET REGIME.

Even today we still do not possess anything like a clear picture of how far this penetration stretched… It remains quite staggering how many aspirant Labour politicians were either members of the communist party or, like the Justice Secretary Jack Straw, influenced by the CP at a time when it was controlled by Moscow. The former defence secretary John Reid, for example, was a CP member well into the 1970s, while Peter Mandelson was an influential Young Communist.

Indeed THE NEW LABOUR GOVERNMENT WHICH HAS GOVERNED BRITAIN SINCE 1997 CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD UNLESS THESE COMMUNIST INFLUENCES ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. MANY OF NEW LABOUR’S CHARACTERISTICS — ITS DEEP SUSPICION OF OUTSIDERS, ITS STRUCTURAL HOSTILITY TO DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, ITS SECRECY, ITS FAITH IN BUREAUCRACY, EMBEDDED PREFERENCE FOR STRIKING DEALS AWAY FROM THE PUBLIC EYE, ITS RUTHLESS RELIANCE ON A SMALL GROUP OF TRUSTED ACTIVISTS — RESULT FROM THE EARLY CP TRAINING OF REID, MANDELSON AND OTHERS…

Soviet infiltration of the Labour movement remains a neuralgic subject on the left. ONE OF JACK JONES’S BRIGHTEST PROTÉGÉS WAS GORDON BROWN. And WHEN I APPROACHED DOWNING STREET TO ASK THE PRIME MINISTER WHETHER HE WOULD WITHDRAW HIS OUTSPOKEN PRAISE FOR JONES IN THE LIGHT OF THE RECENTLY DISCLOSED FACT THAT HE WAS A KGB ASSET AND LONG-TERM TRAITOR, THE PRIME MINISTER DITHERED AND DAWDLED.

At length Downing Street came back with a robust ‘no comment’.”



On 4 November 2009, Patrick O’Flynn said this in The Daily Express:

“When the Tories left office net immigration was running at a manageable 60,000 a year. UNDER LABOUR IT HAS QUADRUPLED TO 240,000.

A SERIES OF DELIBERATE POLICY DECISIONS HAVE LED TO THIS.

LABOUR’S SCRAPPING OF THE PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE THAT LIMITED THE NUMBER OF NEW FOREIGN SPOUSES COMING TO BRITAIN, ITS REFUSAL TO IMPOSE TRANSITIONAL LABOUR MARKET CONTROLS ON EASTERN EUROPEAN MIGRANTS AND ITS READINESS TO ISSUE NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBERS TO ILLEGAL WORKERS are among the factors that have fuelled the immigration boom. SO HAS ITS REFUSAL TO PLACE AN OVERALL CAP ON MIGRANT NUMBERS, THE ISSUING OF RECORD NUMBERS OF WORK PERMITS AND BRITISH PASSPORTS TO FOREIGNERS, UNWILLINGNESS TO TACKLE THE BOGUS STUDENT VISA RACKET AND ITS FAILURE TO SET UP A DEDICATED BORDER POLICE FORCE.

Then there has been its pathetic inability to fulfil a 2001 manifesto promise to deport 30,000 failed asylum seekers a year. IT QUIETLY DROPPED THAT POLICY AFTER IT COULDN’T EVEN ACHIEVE A THIRD OF THAT TARGET. Time and again Labour has been warned – sometimes by its own experts – that THE PACE OF CHANGE HAS PLACED A MASSIVE STRAIN ON LOCAL COMMUNITIES. It has ignored all the warnings, HAPPY IN THE KNOWLEDGE THAT MOST INCOMERS WILL VOTE LABOUR.

LABOUR, WHICH WAS ONCE THE PARTY OF THE WHITE WORKING CLASS, IS NOW LARGELY RUN IN THE INTERESTS OF TWO LARGE GROUPS. THE FIRST IS THE WELFARE-DEPENDENT UNDERCLASS, THE SECOND IS POWERFUL ETHNIC MINORITY PRESSURE GROUPS WHO WISH TO FACILITATE FURTHER MIGRATION FROM THEIR COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN.

MR JOHNSON DOES NOT WANT US TO KNOW THIS. THE TRUTH IS THAT LABOUR HAS NOT BEEN MALADROIT BUT MALIGNANT ON IMMIGRATION. ”



On 4 November 2009, a witness to the murder of 23-year-old Richard Price outside the Empire cinema in Bromley High Street said this in The Evening Standard:

“It was four-on-one and they beat him to death viciously and savagely.”

Asked how the attackers reacted, the witness said:

“IMAGINE SOMEONE SCORING A FOOTBALL GOAL. THEN THEY STRODE OFF PROUDLY.”

Despite the 'four-on-one' evidence of the above witness, only Jagtar Johal was found guilty and he of manlaughter only.

Michael Liddell, Murat Karabeyaz and Param-Jit Theara were cleared of the charges brought against them.

It's called getting away with murder.



On 3 November 2009, The Daily Express reported thus:

“THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN FAMILIES LIVING ON BENEFITS HAS INCREASED BY 170,000 OVER THE PAST YEAR, with child poverty growing in affluent as well as traditionally hard hit areas. The Campaign to End Child Poverty said A 'STAGGERING' TWO MILLION BRITISH CHILDREN NOW HAD NO PARENT IN WORK… Without substantial investment now, 2.3 million children will be living in poverty in 2010, more than half a million above the Government's target, it was warned. ”



On 3 November 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:

“GRADUATE UNEMPLOYMENT HAS SOARED 44 PER CENT IN A YEAR AND IS AT ITS HIGHEST FOR MORE THAN A DECADE. Research published yesterday shows that NEARLY ONE IN 10 STUDENTS WHO GRADUATED FROM UNIVERSITY IN THE SUMMER OF 2008 WERE OUT OF WORK THE FOLLOWING JANUARY - NEARLY DOUBLE THE YEAR BEFORE…

The authors of the research warn that STUDENTS WHO GRADUATED THIS YEAR FACE AN EVEN TOUGHER STRUGGLE TO FIND WORK.”



On 3 November 2009, New Labour MP, Kim Howells said this in The Guardian:

“Seven years of military involvement and civilian aid in Afghanistan have succeeded in subduing al-Qaida's activities in that country, BUT HAVE NOT DESTROYED THE ORGANISATION OR ITS LEADER, Osama bin Laden. Nor have they succeeded in eliminating al-Qaida's protectors, the Taliban. THERE CAN BE NO GUARANTEE THAT THE NEXT SEVEN YEARS WILL BRING SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER SUCCESS…

It would be better… TO BRING HOME THE GREAT MAJORITY OF OUR FIGHTING MEN AND WOMEN and concentrate on using the money saved to secure our own borders, gather intelligence on terrorist activities inside Britain, EXPAND OUR INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS ABROAD, CO-OPERATE WITH FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, and counter the propaganda of those who encourage terrorism…

WE WOULD NEED TO REINVENT OURSELVES DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY. Treaties and international agreements would have to be renegotiated. In particular, relationships with our Nato partners, ESPECIALLY WITH THE AMERICANS – our most trusted and valued allies – would alter fundamentally.

LIFE INSIDE THE UK WOULD HAVE TO CHANGE. THERE WOULD BE MORE INTRUSIVE SURVEILLANCE in certain communities, MORE POLICE OFFICERS ON THE STREETS”.

Would it just be the Muslims you’ve been importing for more the forty years now that the boys-in-blue and the Thought Police would be watching, Mr Howells?

Or would the native population fall foul of your intrusive surveillance as well. Thought so.

Howells continued:

“If media reports are true, the British public is becoming increasingly hostile to the notion that any of our service personnel should be killed or wounded in support of DIFFICULT OUTCOMES AND FLAWED REGIMES IN FARAWAY COUNTRIES”.

The “British public” has always been "hostile” to the predictably “difficult outcomes” foist upon them by parliamentary warmongers on behalf of “flawed regimes in faraway countries”, Mr Howells.

Seven years too late, such as yourself have decided to take notice of that hostility.

Howells continued:

“THE SIZE OF THE AFGHAN CONFLICT MIGHT GROW, RATHER THAN DECREASE… I doubt whether the presence, even of another 40,000 American troops… will guarantee that the Taliban and their allies will no longer be able to terrorise and control significant stretches of countryside, rural communities and key roads. Recent attacks in Kabul and other centres suggest that THE PRESENT BALANCE OF TERRITORIAL CONTROL IS AT BEST LIKELY TO REMAIN – OR, MORE LIKELY, TO SHIFT IN FAVOUR OF THE TALIBAN…

I had hoped that by now a degree of stability might have returned to Afghanistan.

I ASSUMED, WRONGLY, THAT A DESIRE AMONG ORDINARY AFGHANS FOR PEACE WOULD PREVAIL over the prospect of continued war and the spectre of being ruled by a tyrannical theocracy in one of the world's poorest and most backward countries…

In a Commons debate some months ago, I expressed the view that a deadly combination of ANTI-DEMOCRATIC ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM, CORRUPTION AND THE PROXIMITY OF SAFE PAKISTANI HAVENS FOR TERRORISTS ALL MILITATED AGAINST THE NOTION THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE CONVINCING THE BRITISH PEOPLE THAT THEY SHOULD PREPARE THEMSELVES FOR A ‘30-YEAR’ CAMPAIGN.”

The “anti-democratic Islamic fundamentalism, corruption and the proximity of safe Pakistani havens for terrorists” were all there in 2001, Mr Howells, when you and the other warmongers voted to go slaughter the Afghans. Howells continued:

“They are the views of someone WHO SUPPORTED THE DEPLOYMENT OF OUR FORCES TO AFGHANISTAN. I was convinced that, given the opportunity offered to them by the UN-led intervention, the Afghans would display the resolve, skills and courage to tackle the problems that have blighted Afghanistan for so long".

The "problems that have blighted Afghanistan for so long” are the foreign powers that keep on invading their country and killing them off.

The Afghans have “displayed” the same “resolve, skills and courage" against the coalition forces that they’ve shown numerous times during the last three centuries against all the previous invaders of their country.

Thing is, Mr Howells, as I've already say, the “outcome” was as predictable in 2001, when you voted to make war upon them, as it is now. The Russians couldn’t beat them. We couldn’t beat them when Britain was the most powerful nation on the planet. The clue was in the “Islamic fundamentalism, corruption and the proximity of safe Pakistani havens for terrorists”, Mr Howells. Pity you didn’t pick up on it back when it mattered. A lot of innocent people would have been alive to day if you had.

Howells continued:

“Sooner rather than later A PROPERLY PLANNED, PHASED WITHDRAWAL OF OUR FORCES FROM HELMAND PROVINCE HAS TO BE ANNOUNCED. If it is an answer that serves, also, to focus the minds of those in the Kabul government who have shown such A POVERTY OF LEADERSHIP OVER THE PAST SEVEN YEARS, then so much the better."

Who installed the “Kabul government”?

The Bushes, the Blairs, the bought media and the US-Jewish Neoconservatives who instigated and guided the whole process. That’s who.

Kim Howells is a former Chairman of the New Labour Friends of Israel group.



On 2 October 2009, "Is it Better to be Mixed-Race" was presented by Aarathi Prasad on Channel 4 TV:

During the course of this documentary, this was said:

“MANY MIXED-RACE PEOPLE SEEM TO BE SO GIFTED... MIXED-RACE PEOPLE MIGHT HAVE A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE. Could there be something happening at the level of their genes that MAKES THEM SO SPECIAL? IS IT BETTER TO BE MIXED-RACE?...

There’s a controversial new idea that's not going to please the BNP one little bit. It's a theory outlined in a book called, ‘BREEDING BETWEEN THE LINES’ by science writer, ALON ZIV. It claims that MIXED-RACE PEOPLE ARE BORN WITH A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE, THE RESULT OF THEIR GENETIC DIVERSITY."

Here are a few examples of the standard of Mr Ziv’s “Between the Lines”:

“After 18 holes, Tiger Woods probably SMELLS BETTER than Phil Mickelson”.

“Julia Roberts was MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AN ORGASM with Benjamin Bratt than with Lyle Lovett”.

“Odds are, Lenny Kravitz LOST HIS VIRGINITY EARLIER than Justin Timberlake.”

And the concluding sentence:

“Our DIVERSITY IS A GIFT, and TO KEEP OURSELVES SEPARATED AND COMPARTMENTALIZED WOULD BE TO WASTE THAT GIFT.”

Alon Ziv is Jewish.

Ms Prasad continues:

“Heterozygosity (increased genetic diversity) is good - AND THE KEY TO THAT IS TO HAVE PARENTS WHO ARE GENETICALLY AS DIFFERENT AS POSSIBLE. Does that mean it would help to have PARENTS FROM DIFFERENT RACES...

It's looking like racial purity can be really bad for your health...

THE GENETIC MAKEUP OF THE WORLD IS CHANGING. WITH AIR TRAVEL SO EASY AND RELATIONSHIPS FORMING ACROSS THE GLOBE we're all going to be mixed-race one day.”

The genetic makeup of the world has changed alright.

In 1900, we white folks comprised 30 percent of the world’s population. t’s down to around 14 percent now and, by 2100, it’s scheduled to be 3 percent or thereabouts.

Ms Prasad continues:

“If you want to know what that future looks like, take a look at Brazil. I've come here to continue my hunt for mixed-race advantage... THERE REALLY COULD BE A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE TO BEING MIXED-RACE… MIXED-RACE PEOPLE COULD HAVE MORE ROBUST MENTAL HEALTH...

I've learnt that... if you're mixed race your DNA is more likely to be heterozygous and that might lead to possible benefits in physical health and mental health AND MIGHT MAKE YOU MORE ATTRACTIVE...

Being mixed race doesn't have to dilute culture, I've discovered it might just dilute disease...

DIVERSITY IS ALWAYS BETTER. I've always felt that culturally but now I've found out that it just might be true genetically as well.”

“Diversity is always better?”

Well, you heard it here, folks. Big Brother and the alien hordes have been after diversifying the greatest race out of the history books since time immemorial and Aarathi Prasad is intent on carrying on the good work.

I wonder whether, when she’s back in India, Ms Prasad is inclined to preach the case for diversity quite so zealously? Given that her fellow caste members might have to admit the odd, extra-lowly Dalit into their hearts, minds, sitting-rooms, ivory towers, whited sepulchres and gaudy boudoirs if they do.

I wonder if it has ever occurred to Ms Prasad that the fact that she was drawn to mate with a blonde, blue-eyed Englishman is really a bit of giveaway? I mean, why didn’t she get it together with one of those super-diverse Brazilians? Should hubbie be feeling a bit insecure now that his Indian paramour has discovered there are better genetic prospects out there?

Nah, little Ms India nabbed Mr England because she, instinctively, recognised an upwardly mobile union. Let’s face it folks, she chose one of us, she didn’t choose any of those she's advocating here. She didn’t want an Untouchable, a Pakistani, an African, a Jew, a Chinese chap, an Australian aborigine or, for that matter, a high caste Hindu or a mixed-race superman. What she wanted was Whitey.

She just doesn’t want our girls to want him as well.

On 2 November 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:

“ENGLAND'S TEENAGE PREGNANCY FIGURES ARE THE WORST IN WESTERN EUROPE”.



On 2 November 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:

“TAXPAYERS ARE FUNDING CHILD BENEFIT FOR MORE THAN 50,000 CHILDREN OF MIGRANT WORKERS - EVEN THOUGH THE YOUNGSTERS STILL LIVE IN THEIR HOME COUNTRIES. Treasury figures show that Poles make up the vast majority of the payments made under a loophole in EU legislation. BENEFITS ARE PAID TO 37,941 CHILDREN IN THE FORMER EASTERN BLOC COUNTRY, WHO HAVE ONE OR BOTH PARENTS WORKING IN THE UK. The cost is estimated at more than £24million a year.”



On 2 November 2009, Former Lance Corporal, Christopher Finney, of the Blues and Royals, told The Times newspaper that he felt “betrayed and let down” by New Labour.

He added:

“What makes me furious is the demonstrable lack of respect shown by the Government to those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice, the war dead...

I couldn’t believe it when I read that Gordon Brown had phoned Simon Cowell to ask how Britain’s Got Talent contestant Susan Boyle was when she had a breakdown. HE DOESN’T PHONE ANY OF THE BEREAVED MILITARY FAMILIES... I thought it was absolutely disgusting, a real slap in the face for the parents of the hundreds of soldiers killed...

My medal says I am a hero of the Iraqi conflict, a man of outstanding valour and strength of character. But NOW I WORK IN A CALL CENTRE ON HALF MY ARMY PAY."

The Times added:

"Meanwhile, a former senior civil servant has disclosed that he had been critical of the safety of Sea King helicopters used in the Iraq war. Two of the helicopters collided in mid-air in 2003, killing six Royal Navy personnel and one American serviceman. The former civil servant told The Sunday Times that HE HAD WARNED THEY WERE UNAIRWORTHY BUT HAD BEEN OVERRULED BY SUPERIORS, WHO WERE TRYING TO CUT COSTS."

Christopher Finney is the Army’s youngest holder of the George Cross.

He won it at the age of 18 in Iraq in 2003 when he saved the life of a comrade, Lance Corporal Alan Tudball, after two American A10 Warthog aircraft attacked his Scimitar reconnaissance vehicle in a friendly fire incident that killed Lance Corporal of Horse Matty Hull.



On 2 November 2009, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer, QC, published a "Statement of Ethical Principles", setting out what was expected of public prosecutors in England and Wales.

The "statement" said:

"This Statement sets out the ethical principles that underpin and guide our work as public prosecutors. It confirms OUR COMMITMENT TO INTERNATIONALLY AGREED STANDARDS of probity, fairness, openness and accountability in our dealings with others, whether they are victims, defendants or other criminal justice legal professionals...

Prosecutors must maintain the highest standards of fairness and impartiality at all times. IN PARTICULAR, THEY MUST UPHOLD THE PRINCIPLE OF A DEFENDANTS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AS ENSHRINED IN ARTICLE 6 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS...

Prosecutors must act in accordance with the law of England and Wales and IN A WAY WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 AND... THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS."

On 3 November 2009, The Daily Mail commented thus:

"Mr Starmer's move puts the Human Rights Act at the centre of the criminal justice system for the first time since Labour passed it into law 11 years ago. It means that IN FUTURE, CRIMINALS MAY ESCAPE BEING BROUGHT TO TRIAL IF PROSECUTORS THINK EVIDENCE AGAINST THEM WAS GATHERED BY POLICE IN BREACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS RULES.

Independent lawyers who do not take full account of human rights legislation when hired to appear in court as prosecutors or work on prosecuting cases will also be BARRED FROM WORKING FOR THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE."

Ah, the brute stink of "internationally agreed standards of probity".

The criminal, ladies and gentlemen, is the New World Order's footsoldier, his victim is the enemy it seeks to destroy.

As George Orwell said in 1984:

"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - FOREVER"!

That's what in store for us, folks, if the Keir Starmers (and the Blair/Brown/Mandlesons who employ them) continue to get their way.

That's what's in store for us until we're all gone!



On 1 November 2009, Lucy Johnston said this in The Sunday Express:

"LONG-TERM MOBILE PHONE USE COULD LEAD TO 1,500 NEW CASES OF BRAIN TUMOURS A YEAR OVER THE NEXT TWO DECADES a study shows... It involved more than 12,000 patients who had developed brain tumours and 25,000 who had not.

It concluded MOBILE PHONE USE OF 10 YEARS OR LONGER WAS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INCREASED RISK OF TUMOURS OF UP TO 34 PER CENT."



On 1 October 2009, Lord Pearson was quoted thus by The News of the World:

"THE MUSLIMS ARE BREEDING TEN TIMES FASTER THAN US... I don't know at what point they reach such a number we are no longer able to resist the rest of their demands. We must be looking at somewhere between 10 or 20 years. If we don't do something in the next year or two we have in effect lost...

WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THE THREAT THAT FACES US FROM VIOLENT ISLAM."

Pearson can be seen saying what he said in this video:

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/video/?vxSiteId=6d2e103b-e170-4f86-9c51-6eac37f8a93e&vxChannel=News&vxClipId=2160_576469&vxBitrate=300



In November 2009, The Washington Report's Alison Weir reported thus:

"In August Sweden’s largest daily newspaper published an article containing grisly evidence suggesting that Israel had been taking Palestinian internal organs. The article, by veteran photojournalist Donald Bostrom, called for an international investigation...

Israel immediately accused Bostrom and the newspaper of 'anti-Semitism,' and charged that suggesting Israelis could be involved in the illicit removal of body parts constituted a modern 'blood libel' (medieval stories of Jews killing people for their blood). Numerous Israeli partisans repeated these accusations, including Commentary’s Jonathan Tobin, who asserted that the story was 'merely the tip of the iceberg in terms of European funded and promoted anti-Israel hate'...

The fact is, however, that Israeli organ harvesting—sometimes with Israeli governmental funding and the participation of high Israeli officials, prominent Israeli physicians, and Israeli ministries—has been documented for many years...

Nancy Scheper-Hughes is Chancellor’s Professor of Medical Anthropology at the University of California Berkeley, the founder of Organ Watch... While Scheper-Hughes emphasizes that traffickers and procurers come from numerous nations and ethnicities, including Americans and Arabs, she is unflinchingly honest in speaking about the Israeli connection:

'Israel is at the top,' she states. 'It has tentacles reaching out worldwide.'

In a lecture last year sponsored by New York’s PBS 13 Forum, Scheper-Hughes explained that Israeli organ traffickers, 'had and still have a pyramid system at work that’s awesome... they have brokers everywhere, bank accounts everywhere; they’ve got recruiters, they’ve got translators, they’ve got travel agents who set up the visas.'

Lest this sound simply like a successful international concern, it’s important to understand the nature of such a business. As Scheper-Hughes describes it, organ trafficking consists of 'paying the poor and the hungry to slowly dismantle their bodies.'

Organ traffickers prey on the world’s poorest, most desperate citizens—slum dwellers, inhabitants of dying villages, people without means or hope. Traffickers promise them what seem like astronomical sums of money (from $1,000 to $10,000)—which they frequently don’t even deliver—in return for vital internal organs...

Whether or not there have ever been organ-inspired murders in Israel as it appears there have elsewhere, numerous groups around the world are urging an international investigation into Israel’s handling of Palestinian bodies in its custody.

However, the Israeli government and its powerful advocates abroad, who regularly block investigations into Israeli actions, are doing their utmost to prevent this.



On 31 October 2009, The Daily Express reported thus:

"Cambridge University is to ditch centuries of tradition to allow female Muslim students to wear burkhas under their mortar boards at graduation ceremonies”.



On 31 October 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:

"If Mr Blair emerged from a meeting with an Arab emir having won a donation to the Palestinians, a donation to the Tony Blair faith foundation, and a consultancy fee, that would be a 'good trip'.

And so far this year, he's been to more than 20 countries. All of this activity is masterminded by an astonishing 80 STAFF, ALL WORKING FROM A SPLENDID SUITE IN GROSVENOR SQUARE, MAYFAIR, CONVENIENTLY LOCATED NEAR TO THE AMERICAN EMBASSY. At the heart of his web of overlapping and conflicting interests is TONY BLAIR ASSOCIATES, A CONSULTANCY, MODELLED ON A FOUNDATION SET UP BY HENRY KISSINGER, THE FORMER U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE, WHICH HAS MADE KISSINGER VERY WEALTHY. A friend told a Sunday newspaper recently:

'TBA has been set up to make money from foreign governments and companies. THERE'S A FOCUS ON THE MIDDLE EAST, BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE THE MONEY IS.'

And Mr Blair is in the Middle East regularly, in his peace envoy role, with all expenses picked up by taxpayers around the world and instant access to any foreign potentate he cares to see. WHICH IS, AS IT TURNS OUT, VERY HELPFUL FOR HIS BUSINESS INTERESTS. He's official enough to keep his credibility and his contacts, and commercial enough to be making a fortune. IT'S THE NEW BLAIRITE THIRD WAY."



On 31 October 2009, John Bercow, the Speaker of the House of Commons, said this to the "youth parliament" that had been convened for the first time in the Commons:

"The Nazis in Germany in the 30s, and the neo-Nazis today, seek to scapegoat whole communities as they peddle their message of hate and scurrilously appeal for support. They depend on either ignorance, or apathy. And THE COUNTER TO IGNORANCE AND APATHY IS EDUCATION…

I'M UNDER ABSOLUTELY NO OBLIGATION WHATSOEVER TO BE IMPARTIAL as between the forces of democracy on the one hand and the forces of evil on the other. I do feel very, very, very strongly AS SOMEONE FROM A JEWISH BACKGROUND that the evil of the BNP is that its whole politics is based upon and driven by hate. That is a poison which we could well do without."

The Independent commented thus:

"CENTURIES OF POLITICAL IMPARTIALITY DEMANDED OF THE SPEAKER WERE ROLLED BACK IN SPECTACULAR FASHION BY MR BERCOW YESTERDAY. IT IS THOUGHT TO BE THE FIRST TIME THAT A SPEAKER HAS EVER LAUNCHED SUCH AN ASSAULT ON A LEGAL PARTY."

The Jews don’t like it when the citizens of a country they have taken control of want the country back. Thus the “democracy” (Jews) v “evil” (BNP) deceit.

Israel’s a democracy and we all know what’s been happening there for the last 61 years.

Anyway, you heard it from the horse’s a**e. “The counter to ignorance and apathy is education”.

Get finding out, folks.

Before it’s too late.



"I have tried to avoid griping about helicopters - we all know WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH. We cannot not move people, so THIS MONTH WE HAVE CONDUCTED A GREAT DEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOVEMENT BY ROAD. THIS INCREASES THE IED THREAT AND OUR EXPOSURE TO IT... The current level of... (helicopter) support is therefore unsustainable."

Thorneloe concluded by saying that helicopter operations in Afghanistan were "very clearly NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE".

Lieutenant Colonel Rupert Thorneloe, Commander of the 1st Battalion Welsh Guards - his weekly report to the Ministry of Defence, titled "Battle Group Weekly Update" and classified "Nato Secret" - 5 June 2009.

Less than a month after telling his Westminster superiors that British troops would die because they were being forced to make trips by road, Lieutenant Colonel Thorneloe lost his own life, alongside Trooper Joshua Hammond, when their convoy set off a roadside bomb during a patrol north of the town of Lashkar Gah.

He was the most senior military man to die thus far in Tony Blair's immoral wars

A 10 July leaked report, by another senior officer in Afghanistan, says this:

"Aviation has been erratic throughout this week. This has forced us to conduct MORE ROAD MOVES THAN I WOULD LIKE. I understand the strains in the fly programme but any improvement would greatly assist."

Just two weeks later, on 22 July, Gordon Brown said this in the Commons:

"In the operations we are having at the moment IT IS COMPLETELY WRONG TO SAY THAT THE LOSS OF LIVES HAS BEEN CAUSED BY THE ABSENCE OF HELICOPTERS."

The memos were leaked by an MoD official, who, himself, dared to say this in a subsequent email:

"As you can see, situation: no change, despite Rupert Thorneloe's death. STILL NO AVIATION, STILL UNNECESSARY ADMINISTRATIVE ROAD MOVES WHICH ARE KILLING PEOPLE. STILL CLAIMS BY THE GOVERNMENT THAT THE MILITARY HAVE GOT ENOUGH HELICOPTERS AND ALL THE TOOLS THEY NEED.

LIES."

In a statement 30 October 2009, Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth said this:

"My thoughts remain with the family and friends of Lt-Col Rupert Thorneloe, who was a courageous soldier and a fine man. Our brave forces deserve the very best equipment and we remain determined to provide it."

THEY are at war with us, ladies and gentlemen.

THEY REALLY ARE.



"IN 2009, TWO AND A HALF MILLION OF LONDON'S EIGHT MILLION INHABITANTS WERE BORN OVERSEAS. The city is probably the most diverse in terms of its range of nationalities in the world. The rate of absorption since the mid-nineties has been extraordinary... MIGRATION TO LONDON AND THE UK WILL CONTINUE.

In this year's European elections, the BNP... won two seats in those elections. In Yorkshire & Humberside, its vote came close to 10 per cent. In London, 12 BNP councillors were elected in Barking & Dagenham in the 2006 borough elections. Last year Richard Barnbrook won a seat on the London Assembly. In the same elections, more than 24 per cent of voters in Barking & Dagenham opted for the BNP; 16.8 per cent in Havering and 12.7 per cent in Bexley did the same.

Privately, THE POLITICAL CLASSES ARE SPOOKED BY THE GROWING IMPACT OF THE BNP, as the hysterical debate over Nick Griffin's appearance on Question Time showed.

After the failure to stop the BNP from winning seats on local councils, the London assembly and in the European Parliament, the BBC was seen as an easier target by those, particularly on the left, who are worried, and rightly so, by the party's notch-by-notch progress. THE TOTAL LABOUR-PLUS-CONSERVATIVE SHARE OF THE VOTE HAS FALLEN FROM MORE THAN 98 PER CENT IN GENERAL ELECTIONS DURING THE FIFTIES TO BARELY 68 PER CENT IN 2005.

LABOUR AND THE TORIES HAVE LOST VIRTUALLY ALL THEIR ACTIVIST BASE...

Overwhelmingly, the BNP's most fertile territory is in the white working class. So how did the mainstream parties manage to lose these voters? The massive vote for Boris Johnson in many outer boroughs in the 2008 mayoral election almost certainly resulted from VOTERS IN BOROUGHS SUCH AS BEXLEY, BROMLEY AND HAVERING FEELING LEFT OUT OF KEN LIVINGSTONE'S LONDON. Ken piled up the core Labour vote in inner London but his message worked less well beyond zone 3.

LABOUR, AS THE PARTY OF GOVERNMENT SINCE 1997, CANNOT ESCAPE RESPONSIBILITY. The collapse of traditional industries and jobs is one factor; but whatever ministers' equivocations, immigration has also scored highly when pollsters ask voters about their concerns. THE INCREASE IN IMMIGRATION SINCE THE MID-NINETIES WAS NEVER PROPERLY EXPLAINED TO THE PUBLIC. MINISTERS DID NOT TELL PEOPLE WHY A MAJOR INCREASE IN OVERSEAS-BORN RESIDENTS WAS OCCURRING...

As recently as the early seventies, many on the left saw the working class as noble, expressing a culture to be celebrated... Today, THE LEFT IS OFTEN SUSPICIOUS OF SUCH PEOPLE, SEEING THEM AS A THREATENING, RACIST 'UNDERCLASS'."

Tony Travers - Director of the Greater London Group at the LSE - The Evening Standard - 30 October 2009.

This last paragraph is very illuminating, coming as it does from a top bloke at the London School of Economics, which has been a hotbed of radical thought and Marxist philosophy since Russian Revolutionary times.

What Tony Travers is admitting to here is this: thirty-odd years ago, many on the left were happy to “celebrate” and represent working-class culture and aspirations. This, of course, was just as it should be, seeing as how the Labour party, spiritual home of most left-wingers, was formed to represent the working-classes. Nowadays, however, the left has changed so much that it is often wary of such folk.

Thus did a politically correct insider, a highly placed member of the left-wing elite, point out that, where once the left wing of the Labour party was happy to represent the "noble" British worker, now they despise him and consider him to be part of a "threatening, racist underclass".


And remember, ladies and gentlemen, we newly ignoble types have been routinely putting our trust in those who despise us at the ballot box!

Anyway, if you want your country back you're going to have to stop electing people to parliament who, for the last forty years, have been "suspicious" of you. If you care to vote for anyone next time around, make sure you put your cross against someone who doesn't see you as threatening, racist or belonging to some despised, unconsidered underclass.

Vote for someone who will put you first in the land that your ancestors made.

PS. Tony Blair's Home Secretaries, David Blunkett and Charles Clarke were both at the “loony” edge of left-wing activities in their pre-parliamentary lives. Jack Straw and John Reid, Blair's other top chaps in the Home Office, were both avowed Communists at one time.





“There should be nothing quite as offensive to Africans -- here or anywhere -- as Africans starving to death in Africa, by their tens of millions, as they will certainly be, unless Africa's headlong rush to Armageddon is halted. That means Africans having to learn simple things like SEXUAL CONTINENCE, AND LONG-TERM PLANNING, AND DEFERRED REWARD.

We cannot teach them. THEY MUST TEACH THEMSELVES THESE LESSONS, the hard way if necessary. They have not yet known the hard way. ETHIOPIA WAS RESCUED BY OUTSIDERS FROM ITS SELF-MADE FAMINE 25 YEARS AGO, AND IT THEN REWARDED THIS KINDNESS BY PROMPTLY DOUBLING ITS POPULATION, BUT WITHOUT DOUBLING ITS OWN FOOD SUPPLY OR ITS ECONOMIC BASE.

THIS IS STUPIDITY ON AN EPIC SCALE, FOR WHICH ONLY ETHIOPIA IS ANSWERABLE.

Furthermore, it's long overdue that the Irish people abandoned their patronising and racist conceit that we can save Africa. We can't. ONLY AFRICANS CAN SAVE AFRICA, and THE LONGER WE INTERFERE IN THEIR BUSINESS, AND THE LONGER WE CONTINUE TO REWARD THE OUTSTRETCHED BEGGING BOWL, THEN THE LONGER IT WILL TAKE AFRICA TO LEARN THAT BASIC LESSON.”

Kevin Myers - The Irish Independent – 30 October 2009.



"FEWER THAN ONE IN THREE VOTERS WANT TONY BLAIR TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, an exclusive poll shows...

Only 31 per cent of voters want to see him become President of the European Council. Another 31 per cent are opposed, and 38 per cent said they are undecided."

The Daily Telegraph - 30 October 2009.

The 31 percent who believe that the UK's greatest-ever traitor ought to be the President of Europe, should not be voting for me in the General Election.

The "undecideds", and those who do not want him to be President, ought to consider it.



“There is a general view that TONY BLAIR IS A GOOD CANDIDATE AND WOULD BE AN EXCELLENT PRESIDENT. People would be pleased if a British person became President. I think most people would prefer a British person taking this job rather than citizens of other countries.”

Gordon Brown - The Daily Mail - 30 October 2009.



"As many as 40,000 YOUNGSTERS A YEAR ARE BEING WRONGLY BRANDED RACISTS as new rules force schools to investigate every playground spat. CHILDREN IN NURSERIES AND PRIMARY SCHOOLS ARE BEING DISCIPLINED OVER RACIST INSULTS EVEN BEFORE THEY KNOW WHAT THE TERMS MEAN...

The report said a child had been severely disciplined for calling two other children a 'chocolate bar'. another child had been punished for calling a boy 'white trash'. Schools minister Diana Johnson said:

‘IF RACIST BULLYING IS NOT DEALT WITH IN SCHOOLS, THEN THIS WILL SEND A POWERFUL MESSAGE TO CHILDREN THAT RACISM IS ACCEPTABLE - NOT ONLY IN SCHOOLS BUT IN SOCIETY AS A WHOLE'."

The Daily Mail - 30 October 2009.

Diana Johnson - The very definition of a PC traitor.



"IN 70 YEARS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE ESTABLISHMENT HELD IN SUCH LOATHING BY THE BROAD MASSES OF THE PEOPLE. And I HAVE NEVER SEEN OUR GOVERNORS TREAT THE GOVERNED WITH SUCH CONTEMPT... I HAVE NEVER SEEN OUR PEOPLE SO UTTERLY DISILLUSIONED, DISENCHANTED AND DEMORALISED, SO DEVOID OF SELF-CONFIDENCE, SELF-ESTEEM, QUIET PRIDE AND SENSE OF SELF-WORTH...

We seem to head every league table of shame. The most violent, the most abusive, the most foul-mouthed, the most drunk, the most drug-abusing people in Europe. Add top of the division for teenage pregnancies; teen abortions; teenage single mothers; venereal disease; divorce; child abuse; yobbery and vandalism without hindrance.

THIS NADIR OF OUR FORTUNES DERIVES FROM 20 YEARS OF BAD GOVERNMENT...

BETRAYAL OF OUR SOLDIERY, DEDICATION TO SELF, GROTESQUE ENRICHMENT WHILE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AND DELIBERATE NO-LIMITS MASS IMMIGRATION. THE PAST 12 YEARS HAVE BEEN THE WORST IN A CENTURY, DIE-STAMPED BY THE PERSONALITY OF THE MOST SHAMELESS LIAR WHO EVER ENTERED DOWNING STREET AND WHO IS NOW TIPPED TO BECOME EU PRESIDENT."

Frederick Forsyth - The Daily Express - 30 October 2009.



“A staggering £1 MILLION A YEAR IS BEING SPENT ON 120 ASYLUM SEEKERS who have been refused permission to stay in the country but are still living in Croydon. SOME HAVE NOT BEEN DEPORTED YEARS AFTER APPLICATIONS TO REMAIN IN BRITAIN WERE REJECTED, and until they are the council is continuing to support them. Because they have been refused asylum they cannot work, so the council gives them benefits and somewhere to live.

The asylum seekers have all come to Croydon, unaccompanied by an adult, when under the age of 18. The council is reimbursed for looking after them until they are 18 but after that it gets no money at all, forcing taxpayers to foot the bill. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THIS SITUATION HAS TRIPLED IN JUST TWO YEARS, WITH THE COST OF LOOKING AFTER THEM QUADRUPLING FROM £250,000 IN 2007 TO AN ESTIMATED £1 MILLION FOR 2009.”

This is Croydon – 30 October 2009.



"'We find ourselves in the year 2009, waiting for Rome to fall, waiting for the White House to fall and indeed waiting for Buckingham Palace to fall.'

(Anjem) Choudary said that under sharia law the Queen’s official residence in London would have a dome fitted and a tannoy system to call followers to prayer. The Palace would be used as a judiciary court for handing down sharia punishments and a detention place for “prisoners of war”.In addition, the building would become the headquarters of the Islamic States’ supreme leadership and the Department of Information and Culture.”

The Daily Express – 29 October 2009.



“The number of unmarried couples has risen sharply over the past decade, while marriage has been declining. Analysis by the Office for National Statistics found that in the ten years between 1996 and 2006, the number of cohabiting couples rose by 65 per cent from 1.4million to 2.3million. The number of married couples fell by 4 per cent to 12.1million. It is estimated that as many as 350,000 people die each year without making a will, even though some have vast fortunes. Four-fifths of cohabiting couples have not made a will.”

The Daily Mail – 29 October 2009.



"THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN ENGAGED UPON A DELIBERATE AND SECRET POLICY OF NATIONAL CULTURAL SABOTAGE…

A deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate. There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT DID HAPPEN. This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett…

The Government's 'driving political purpose', wrote Neather, was 'TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL'. It was therefore A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED ATTEMPT BY MINISTERS TO TRANSFORM THE FUNDAMENTAL MAKE-UP AND IDENTITY OF THIS COUNTRY. IT WAS DONE TO DESTROY THE RIGHT OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE TO LIVE IN A SOCIETY DEFINED BY A COMMON HISTORY, RELIGION, LAW, LANGUAGE AND TRADITIONS. IT WAS DONE TO DESTROY FOR EVER WHAT IT MEANS TO BE CULTURALLY BRITISH AND TO PUT ANOTHER 'MULTICULTURAL' IDENTITY IN ITS PLACE. AND IT WAS DONE WITHOUT TELLING OR ASKING THE BRITISH PEOPLE WHETHER THEY WANTED THEIR COUNTRY AND THEIR CULTURE TO BE TRANSFORMED IN THIS WAY.

Spitefully, ONE MOTIVATION BY LABOUR MINISTERS WAS 'TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date'. Even Neather found that particular element of gratuitous Left-wing bullying to be 'a manoeuvre too far'. Yet apart from this, Neather sees nothing wrong in the policy he has described. Indeed, THE REASON FOR HIS ASTONISHING CANDOUR IS HE THINKS IT'S SOMETHING TO BOAST ABOUT. Mass immigration, he wrote, had provided the 'foreign nannies, cleaners and gardeners' without whom London could hardly function. WHAT ELITIST ARROGANCE! AS IF MOST PEOPLE EMPLOY NANNIES, CLEANERS AND GARDENERS. AND WHAT IGNORANCE. THE ARGUMENT THAT BRITAIN IS BETTER OFF WITH THIS LEVEL OF IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN CONCLUSIVELY SHOWN TO BE ECONOMICALLY ILLITERATE.

Neather gave the impression that most immigrants are Eastern Europeans. But these form fewer than a quarter of all immigrants. And the fact is that, despite his blithe assertions to the contrary, SCHOOLS IN AREAS OF VERY HIGH IMMIGRATION FIND IT DESPERATELY DIFFICULT TO COPE WITH SO MANY CHILDREN WHO DON'T EVEN HAVE BASIC ENGLISH. OTHER SERVICES, SUCH AS HEALTH OR HOUSING, ARE SIMILARLY BEING OVERWHELMED BY THE SHEER WEIGHT OF NUMBERS. But the most shattering revelation was that this policy of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the likes of Neather. It was TO DESTROY BRITAIN'S IDENTITY AND TRANSFORM IT INTO A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY where British attributes would have no greater status than any other country's.

No wonder JACK STRAW WAS SO SHIFTY on last week's Question Time when he was asked whether it was the Government's failure to halt immigration which lay behind increasing support for the BNP. Now we know IT WAS NO SUCH FAILURE OF POLICY. IT WAS DELIBERATE.

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF WHICH STRAW IS SUCH A LONG- STANDING MEMBER HAD SECRETLY PLOTTED TO FLOOD THE COUNTRY WITH IMMIGRANTS TO CHANGE ITS VERY CHARACTER AND IDENTITY.”

Melanie Phillips - The Daily Mail – 28 October 2009.

Who thinks Blair, Brown, Harman, Straw, Mandelson et al have betrayed the British people?

Who thinks they should be put up against a wall and shot?

You're learning.

By the way, I'm not one of those who thinks they ought to be shot.

I'd rather see them boiled.



“The director of economic inclusion for Yorkshire Forward, Thea Stein, said:

‘Yorkshire Forward has developed this project because of our recognition of the importance of the Muslim faith sector in Bradford as holding critical keys in improving the economic outcomes for Bradford's communities.’

A £550,000 programme is aiming to improve grades and employment rates in some of Bradford's Islamic supplementary schools. The Open Madrasah Network is a pilot project which will offer additional support in some of the district's madaris. The madaris participating in the project will receive English and maths tutoring along with supplementary GCSE courses, careers advice and jobs fairs.”

The Yorkshire Post – 28 October 2009.





“Tests show that regularly eating doughnuts, streaky bacon, cheap sausages, burgers and chocolate cakes can become a substitute for happiness. And over the years, a diet rich in these junk foods can lead bingers to effectively become hooked – just like a drug addict.”

The Daily Express – 28 October 2009.



"A mum who launched an online petition to stop her daughter's sex attacker from moving into her street says she has been asked to remove it IN CASE IT OFFENDS THE ATTACKER".

The Daily Echo - 28 October 2009.



"LABOUR CENSORED A HUGELY CONTROVERSIAL REPORT ON IMMIGRATION TO REMOVE DETAILS OF ITS POSSIBLE LINKS TO ORGANISED CRIME, STREET FIGHTS AND BEGGING.

Ministers have come under fire over comments made by ex-government advisor Andrew Neather, who claimed that EARLY DRAFTS OF THE REPORT SAID MASS IMMIGRATION WOULD MAKE BRITAIN MORE MULTICULTURAL and enable Labour to portray the Tories as racists. Critics said it blew the lid off a 'secret Labour plot' to use mass immigration for political gain.

But the row took a twist when it emerged that KEY PASSAGES WHICH MAY HAVE HARMED THE CASE FOR BRITAIN ADOPTING AN OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION POLICY HAD ALSO BEEN AIRBRUSHED FROM THE REPORT. THEY INCLUDED A SECTION HEADED 'CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR', WHICH WARNED OF POSSIBLE LINKS BETWEEN MASS IMMIGRATION AND SOME CRIMES. THE passages were allegedly removed when the report was being finalised in 2000 by the Cabinet Office's performance and innovation unit, which has been described as A BLAIRITE 'THINK TANK' OPERATING AT THE HEART OF WHITEHALL.

One of the sections missing from the final report, which was published in 2001, said:

'THERE IS EMERGING EVIDENCE THAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ASYLUM SEEKERS ARE LIVING IS LEADING TO CRIMINAL OFFENCES, INCLUDING FIGHTS AND BEGGING.' A second section warned:

'MIGRATION HAS OPENED UP NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR ORGANISED CRIME'."

The Daily Mail – 28 October 2009.



"LABOUR HAS BEEN EXPOSED ON TWO FRONTS AS THE MOST ANTI-DEMOCRATIC REGIME TO HOLD POWER IN BRITAIN SINCE THE ADVENT OF UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE MORE THAN 80 YEARS AGO. If its disgusting conduct is properly explained to the voting public IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE IT EVER BEING ELECTED INTO POWER AGAIN.

THE TWO ISSUES UPON WHICH THE CURTAIN HAS BEEN LIFTED TO EXPOSE UGLY GOINGS-ON BACKSTAGE ARE EUROPE AND IMMIGRATION.”

Patrick O'Flynn - The Daily Express - 27 October 2009.



"GUN CRIME HAS SOARED SIXFOLD IN SOME AREAS OF THE UK OVER THE LAST DECADE, figures revealed today. FIREARMS OFFENCES ARE UP IN ALMOST EVERY CORNER OF THE COUNTRY AS GANG CULTURE HAS SPREAD…

The number of people killed or injured by a gun has doubled from 864 to 1,760 in the 10 years to 2008, according to provisional Home Office figures."

The Daily Mirror - 27 October 2009.



“Water is a basic need and a right, but FOR MANY PALESTINIANS OBTAINING EVEN POOR-QUALITY, SUBSISTENCE-LEVEL QUANTITIES OF WATER HAS BECOME A LUXURY THAT THEY CAN BARELY AFFORD."

Donatella Rovera - Amnesty' International - BBC News – 27 October 2009.

The BBC added:

“ISRAEL IS DENYING PALESTINIANS ACCESS TO EVEN THE BASIC MINIMUM OF CLEAN, SAFE WATER, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SAYS. While Israeli settlers in the West Bank enjoy lush gardens and swimming pools, Amnesty describes a series of Israeli measures it says are discriminating against Palestinians:

ISRAEL HAS 'ENTIRELY APPROPRIATED THE PALESTINIANS' SHARE OF THE JORDAN RIVER' AND USES 80% OF A KEY SHARED AQUIFER. West Bank Palestinians are not allowed to drill wells without Israeli permits, which are 'often impossible' to obtain. Rainwater HARVESTING CISTERNS ARE 'OFTEN DESTROYED BY THE ISRAELI ARMY'. Israeli soldiers confiscated a water tanker from villagers who were trying to remain in land Israel had declared a 'closed military area'."



“The number of first-time criminal offenders in their 40s rose more than any other age group in a seven-year period, it has been revealed. Government figures made public in a parliamentary answer showed the number of people aged 40 to 49 entering the justice system for the first time rose by 57.4% between 2000/01 and 2007/08. The number of over 50s in the same position also rose by 46.3% in those seven years from 16,400 to 24,000.”

The Daily Express – 27 October 2009.



“THE NUMBER OF PAEDOPHILES, RAPISTS AND SEX ATTACKERS RATED A DANGER TO THE PUBLIC HAS INCREASED BY HALF IN ONLY FIVE YEARS. The big rise in the number of convicts placed on the Sex Offenders Register - which now stands at 31,392 - came amid allegations that MINISTERS ARE CONCEALING THE EXTENT OF THEIR REOFFENDING. SOME RAPES AND KILLINGS BY SUPERVISED CRIMINALS ARE BEING EXCLUDED FROM OFFICIAL FIGURES.

THE SEX OFFENDERS' REGISTER FIGURES SHOW A 47 PER CENT INCREASE IN ENGLAND AND WALES - FROM 21,415 IN 2002/03 TO 31,392 IN 2007/08.”

The Daily Mail – 26 October 2009.



“NEARLY 30% OF SCHOOL STAFF HAVE BEEN THE SUBJECT OF A FALSE ALLEGATION OF MISCONDUCT BY A PUPIL, a survey by a teaching union suggests. The Association of Teachers and Lecturers said false claims blighted careers and damaged private lives. The ATL, which surveyed 1,155 support staff and teachers, said the safety of children was paramount but argued staff should not be presumed guilty. It said in half of the cases, the claim had been immediately dismissed.”

BBC News – 26 October 2009.



“Ministers are accused of profiteering from thousands of vulnerable people after A LITTLE-KNOWN COURT SEIZED ASSETS WORTH £3.2 BILLION FROM THE ELDERLY AND MENTALLY IMPAIRED. THE COURT OF PROTECTION WAS SET UP BY JUSTICE SECRETARY JACK STRAW to look after the finances of people suffering from a mental incapacity. But IN THE PAST YEAR ALONE, THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000 COMPLAINTS FROM RELATIVES OF SUFFERERS, WHO SAID THEY HAD BEEN 'BULLIED' OR 'TREATED LIKE A CRIMINAL'.

It is also understood that FEES OF £23MILLION HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO ADMINSTER THE AFFAIRS OF THOSE WHO HAVE NOT DRAWN UP A ‘LIVING WILL‘ where a friend or relative is nominated to take charge of their assets.”

The Daily Express – 26 October 2009.



“We had Blair as Prime Minister for ten years. We never thought we would get him back as an unelected President of Europe. HE LET US DOWN TOO OFTEN. WE DO NOT TRUST HIM, WE NO LONGER LIKE HIM, WE DO NOT WANT HIM.”

William Rees Mogg - The Daily Express – 25 October 2009.



“BRITAIN HAS 1.6 MILLION HARDENED CRIMINALS COMMITTING DOZENS OF OFFENCES EVERY YEAR, a study revealed. The total, based on unpublished Home Office research, represents A LEAP OF 410,000 IN THE NUMBER OF SO-CALLED 'ACTIVE' OFFENDERS REGULARLY INFLICTING MISERY.

When the Government last produced an estimate - in Lord Birt's Reducing Crime Review - he said there were 1.19million such criminals, committing an average of 58 offences a year. These include muggings, burglaries and shoplifting. The latest figures by the Policy Exchange think-tank also identify 350,000 HIGH-RATE, PERSISTENT OFFENDERS - SOME 200,000 MORE THAN IN 2001...

They will cost the public around £105billion during the span of their criminal 'careers'. The report also points out that very few of the offenders are actually in jail, which at least temporarily halts their law breaking.The prison population at the end of June 2009 was 83,450.”

The Daily Mail – 24 October 2009.



“Almost TWO THIRDS think mainstream, political parties have no credible policies on immigration.

FOREIGN ARRIVALS ARE GETTING FAVOURABLE TREATMENT OVER HOUSING AND OTHER BENEFITS...

ONE THIRD of voters believe in a core BNP policy - that BRITISH-BORN PEOPLE FROM ETHNIC MINORITIES SHOULD LOSE ALL STATE BENEFITS, INCLUDING NHS MEDICAL TREATMENT, TO PAY FOR THEM TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY…

44% SAY WHITE WORKING CLASS PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ABANDONED…

The BNP message IS getting through among white working class voters.

THE NUMBER WHO SAY THEY HAVE BEEN ABANDONED BY THE MAINSTREAM POLITICAL PARTIES RISES FROM 62% TO 71%. AND THE NUMBER WHO SAY THEY SHOULD COME FIRST OVER PEOPLE FROM ETHNIC MINORITIES GOES UP FROM 28% TO 41%.”

News of the World - 24 October 2009.




“Only days after Mr Phillips was controversially reappointed to his £120,000-a-year role by Harriet Harman THE NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REFUSED TO SIGN OFF THE EHRC ACCOUNTS. The NAO had objected to the fact that the commission had paid £325,000 to seven senior staff WHO WERE RE-EMPLOYED AS CONSULTANTS DAYS AFTER TAKING GENEROUS EARLY SEVERANCE PACKAGES…

When the NAO criticised the rehiring of the consultants, Mr Phillips insisted that he was not told they were back on the payroll. Three are senior figures at Dignity Management Consultancy, a business partner of Equate Organisation which is A PRIVATE COMPANY IN WHICH MR PHILLIPS OWNS 70 PER CENT OF THE SHARES.


Asked by an MP on the committee IF THE COMMISSION WAS DOMINATED BY FRIENDS AND CRONIES OF MR PHILLIPS, Mr Summerskill replied:

‘DID YOU SAY TOADIES AND CRONIES? I THINK WE WOULD AGREE WITH BOTH…

Trevor as chairman has at least twice interfered inappropriately in the appointment of commissioners TO PROMOTE THE CANDIDACY OF EITHER INAPPROPRIATE OR LESS WELL QUALIFIED PERSONAL FRIENDS OF HIS’.”

The Telegraph – 24 October 2009.




“BRITAIN HAS 1.6MILLION HARDENED CRIMINALS COMMITTING DOZENS OF OFFENCES EVERY YEAR, a study revealed yesterday. The total, based on unpublished Home Office research, represents A LEAP OF 410,000 IN THE NUMBER OF SO-CALLED 'ACTIVE' OFFENDERS REGULARLY INFLICTING MISERY.

When the Government last produced an estimate - in Lord Birt's Reducing Crime Review - he said there were 1.19million such criminals, committing an average of 58 offences a year. These include muggings, burglaries and shoplifting. The latest figures by the Policy Exchange think-tank also identify 350,000 HIGH-RATE, PERSISTENT OFFENDERS - SOME 200,000 MORE THAN IN 2001. THESE MOST PROLIFIC OFFENDERS, WHO COMMIT AROUND 260 CRIMES A YEAR, COST AN AVERAGE OF £300,000 EACH IN DAMAGE TO INDIVIDUALS AND HOUSEHOLDS.

This means THEY WILL COST THE PUBLIC AROUND £105BILLION DURING THE SPAN OF THEIR CRIMINAL 'CAREERS'.”

The Daily Mail – 24 October 2009.




According to an ICM poll:

“The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED ATTEMPT BY MINISTERS TO RADICALLY CHANGE THE COUNTRY AND ‘RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY’, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was A DELIBERATE PLAN TO ‘OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION’ but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its ‘core working class vote‘. As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said THE REVELATIONS SHOWED A ‘CONSPIRACY’ WITHIN GOVERNMENT TO IMPOSE MASS IMMIGRATION FOR ‘CYNICAL’ POLITICAL REASONS.

In his column, Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also A ‘DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE’ BEHIND IMMIGRATION POLICY. He defended the policy, saying MASS IMMIGRATION HAS ‘ENRICHED‘ BRITAIN, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place. But he acknowledged that ‘NERVOUS‘ MINISTERS MADE NO MENTION OF THE POLICY AT THE TIME FOR FEAR OF ALIENATING LABOUR VOTERS.

‘Part by accident, part BY DESIGN, THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM. But ministers wouldn't talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: WHILE MINISTERS MIGHT HAVE BEEN PASSIONATELY IN FAVOUR OF A MORE DIVERSE SOCIETY, IT WASN'T NECESSARILY A DEBATE THEY WANTED TO HAVE IN WORKING MEN'S CLUBS IN SHEFFIELD OR SUNDERLAND‘."

The Telegraph – 23 October 2009.




“It's outrageous. The condition should be that people have to speak English, not Polish. I have lived in this area my entire life, so where am I going to learn Polish? It's totally discriminatory.”

Unemployed carpenter, Adam Bull, responding to an ad placed by pet food producer, Supreme Nutrition Ltd., which insisted that the required “factory operative” be “Polish-speaking” - The Daily Mail – 23 October 2009.

The Mail continued:

“Another 32-year-old man, struggling to find work after he was made redundant from his job in the building trade, said: ‘It doesn’t seem right or fair - THERE ARE PLENTY OF LOCAL PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE MORE THAN WILLING TO FILL THOSE JOBS. BUT THEY DON’T STAND A CHANCE OF BEING TAKEN ON because the only people who speak Polish around here are the Poles who have moved here in recent years’…

The advert for pet food producer Supreme Nutrition Ltd read:

'Factory operative required to work in busy manufacturing plant in Acton, near Sudbury. MUST BE POLISH SPEAKING.'

Details of the minimum wage £5.80-an-hour vacancies were displayed at a Jobcentre Plus but were taken down following a flood of complaints in the Suffolk town, where 1,500 ARE OUT OF WORK.”



"The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED ATTEMPT BY MINISTERS TO RADICALLY CHANGE THE COUNTRY AND ‘RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY‘, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to ‘open up the UK to mass migration’ but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly FOR FEAR IT WOULD ALIENATE ITS ‘CORE WORKING CLASS VOTE‘.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s. Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the ‘major shift’ in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report. He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said. He wrote:

‘Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL. I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED – EVEN IF THIS WASN'T ITS MAIN PURPOSE – TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date.’

The ‘deliberate policy‘, from late 2000 until ‘at least February last year‘, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

In his column, Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a ‘driving political purpose’ behind immigration policy.

He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has ‘ENRICHED’ Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place. But he acknowledged that ‘nervous’ ministers made no mention of the policy at the time for fear of alienating Labour voters.

Part by accident, part by design, THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM. BUT MINISTERS WOULDN'T TALK ABOUT IT. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while MINISTERS MIGHT HAVE BEEN PASSIONATELY IN FAVOUR OF A MORE DIVERSE SOCIETY, it wasn't necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men's clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.’

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said:

‘Now at least the truth is out, and IT'S DYNAMITE. Many have long suspected that MASS IMMIGRATION UNDER LABOUR WAS NOT JUST A COCK UP BUT ALSO A CONSPIRACY. THEY WERE RIGHT. THIS GOVERNMENT HAS ADMITTED THREE MILLION IMMIGRANTS FOR CYNICAL POLITICAL REASONS concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.’

The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said:

‘We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true.
IT IS THE FIRST BEAM OF TRUTH THAT HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN SHONE ON THE IMMIGRATION ISSUE IN BRITAIN.’

A Home Office spokesman said…

‘The British people can be confident that immigration is under control’.”

The Telegraph - 23 October 2009.

And if you believe that you’ll believe that mass immigration was a policy designed to improve the lot of the British working-classes.

Or you’ll be a brainwashed moron.

Or a New Labour jobs-for-the-immigrant-boys-and-girls quangocrat.

Or just some Yasmin Alibhai-Brown immigrant type who wants the white man gone.



“I feel sorry for the Christian councillors who have been discriminated against in this way.”

Reverend Mike Slade, Vicar of Winscombe and Sandford - The Telegraph – 22 October 2009.

The Telegraph added:

A council has scrapped its 115-year-old tradition of saying Christian prayers before meetings after one complaint that it may offend other faiths. Reverend Mike Slade, Vicar of Winscombe and Sandford, feels IT IS THE CHRISTIAN COUNCILLORS WHO ARE BEING ‘DISCRIMINATED AGAINST' AND NOT MEMBERS OF OTHER FAITHS.”



“Sir Andrew Green, chairman of think tank MigrationwatchUK, said: 'The Government is in denial about the impact of immigration on our population growth. 70 PER CENT OF THE FASTEST GROWTH RATE IN HISTORY IS DUE TO IMMIGRATION.’

IMMIGRATION WILL ACCOUNT FOR TWO THIRDS OF POPULATION GROWTH IN THE UK OVER THE NEXT QUARTER OF A CENTURY, according to official figures released. AROUND 180,000 IMMIGRANTS WILL ARRIVE IN THIS COUNTRY EVERY YEAR, the Office of National Statistics (ONS) said.

The surge in immigration will mean that in less than 25 years the UK's population will increase by 10 million to more than 71 million in 2033 - the fastest rise since the post-war baby boom. EVERY YEAR 425,000 MORE PEOPLE WILL BE LIVING IN THE UK, THE EQUIVALENT OF A CITY THE SIZE OF BRISTOL.”

The Daily Mail – 21 October 2009.



"THE ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN THIS COUNTRY IS ALMOST ENTIRELY HOME-GROWN. Where it does have foreign contacts and influences, these are unlikely to be in Afghanistan, which was also rather loosely connected with the September 11 outrages in the USA. Most of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, remember. All this is known to anyone who pays any serious attention.

IT IS KNOWN TO MR BROWN. IT IS KNOWN TO THE TORIES. IT IS KNOWN TO THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS. IT IS INCREASINGLY UNDERSTOOD BY THE BRITISH PEOPLE, WHO HAVE GOOD REASON TO BE SUSPICIOUS OF THEIR LEADERS’ NEW FONDNESS FOR FOREIGN WARS."

The Daily Mail - 19 October 2009.



"'Not only have they (the government) totally failed to be honest with the British people but have treated their legitimate concerns with ill-concealed contempt. The success of the BNP can be laid firmly at their door.'

The number of migrants who have come to Britain since Labour came to power has almost doubled according to a Government report.

More than 700 migrants a day have been let in, bringing the total to around three million since 1997. In the last eight years, Whitehall has estimated that figures have reached 2.3million. Out of a population of 60.4 million, there is now a total of 6.6 million immigrants in the UK.

The report for the Communities and Local Government Department by consultants Oxford Economics said THERE WERE 4.3MILLION FOREIGN-BORN PEOPLE LIVING IN THE UK IN 2001. THAT NUMBER HAD RISEN TO 6.6 MILLION BY LAST YEAR - JUST UNDER 11 PER CENT OF THE POPULATION. Of the 3.5million working migrants, just over two million were in the country before 2004.

Among the 1.5million people who have arrived since 2004, 620,000 are from Poland and other Eastern European countries who joined the EU that year, the report added."

The Daily Mail - 19 October 2009.

6.6 million immigrants (officially) here.

3.5 million of these work.

That means 3.1 million don’t.

How many of these will be claiming benefits?

It is war, ladies and gentlemen.

THEY are at war with us.

PS.

I wonder how many “working” immigrants will be claiming benefits as well?



"ONE PERSON DRINKS THEMSELVES TO DEATH EVERY HOUR, according to figures that expose the full horror of binge-drinking Britain. Cheap alcohol means YOUNG PEOPLE CAN GET DRUNK FOR LESS THAN THE PRICE OF A CHOCOLATE BAR. Experts say this has led to an ‘epidemic‘ that will kill almost 100,000 people in the next 10 years.

THE DEATH TOLL IS THREE TIMES HIGHER THAN IN THE 1980S."

The Daily Express - 19 October 2009.




"This is a Government that can put spy cameras in our bins but cannot be bothered to control the number of people who actually settle here… The Government has admitted that it ‘doesn’t have a clue’ how many illegal migrants are living here, while – for all Labour’s aggressive talk of action – WORK PERMITS, BRITISH PASSPORTS AND VISAS ARE DISHED OUT LIKE CONFETTI.

Last year alone no fewer than 733,000 NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBERS WERE HANDED OUT TO NEWLY ARRIVED FOREIGNERS, making a mockery of Government claims that net migration is on the decline. At least 10 per cent of the workforce comes from overseas, while THE MAJORITY OF CHILDREN IN MANY OF OUR CITIES, INCLUDING THE CAPITAL, ARE BORN TO MIGRANT FAMILIES.

This transformation in our society points to a more fundamental lie at the heart of government. Throughout the past 12 years, ministers have loudly claimed that mass immigration is an unalloyed benefit to our economy and our wider society. But THIS NOW STANDS EXPOSED AS NONSENSE. THE DRAMATIC RISE IN IMMIGRATION HAS COINCIDED WITH THE DEEPEST RECESSION SINCE THE THIRTIES.

Moreover, THE MASS ARRIVAL OF FOREIGNERS HAS IMPOSED AN INTOLERABLE STRAIN ON PUBLIC SERVICES, ESPECIALLY THE NHS, SOCIAL SECURITY, HOUSING AND EDUCATION, AS WELL AS CREATING A HUGE BURDEN FOR THE TAXPAYER, COSTING MORE THAN £30BILLION A YEAR…

Economies can be rebuilt but nations cannot. PATRIOTISM, ONE OF THE MOST NATURAL OF ALL HUMAN IMPULSES, IS DENOUNCED AS RACISM. Lacking a shared heritage, Britain has become a place of apprehension, fear and suspicion.

But THE LABOUR LIE MACHINE GOES ON REMORSELESSLY, BULLYING US INTO ‘CELEBRATING’ OUR NATION’S OWN DEMISE. NEVER IN MODERN HISTORY HAS ANY COUNTRY BEEN GOVERNED BY SUCH A BUNCH OF MENDACIOUS TRAITORS."

Leo McKinstry in The Daily Express - 19 October 2009.



"Members of staff who have been convicted of crimes including harassment, battery, assault, indecent exposure, indecent assault and possessing Class A drugs HAVE NOT BEEN BANNED FROM TEACHING. They have either escaped punishment entirely or just received a 'slap on the wrist' from the profession's watchdog, the General Teaching Council. This is despite a public furore three years ago about a loophole that allowed sex offenders to work in schools."

The Daily Mail - 19 October 2009.




“Members of staff who have been convicted of crimes including harassment, battery, assault, indecent exposure, indecent assault and possessing Class A drugs HAVE NOT BEEN BANNED FROM TEACHING. They have either escaped punishment entirely or just received a 'slap on the wrist' from the profession's watchdog, the General Teaching Council.

This is despite a public furore three years ago about a loophole that allowed sex offenders to work in schools.”

The Daily Mail – 19 October 2009.



"The Government has wasted a shocking £100million over the past 12 months in a vain attempt to help failing schools."

The Daily Express - 18 October 2009.



"TWO COUNCILS HAVE INSTRUCTED ALL SCHOOLS UNDER THEIR CONTROL TO SHUT FOR THE ANNUAL CELEBRATIONS OF EID-UL-FITR, DIWALI AND GURU NANAK'S BIRTHDAY, in addition to the Christian festivals of Christmas and Easter. The directive, by Waltham Forest and Newham councils, in east London, EVEN AFFECTS SCHOOLS WHERE VERY FEW PUPILS ARE MUSLIM, HINDU OR SIKH."

The Telegraph - 17 October 2009.




"Protester Abu Mousa said: 'What he (Geert Wilders) says DESERVES THE DEATH SENTENCE UNDER ISLAM.' Sayful Islam, said he wanted to see Mr Wilders 'tried in an Islamic court' for 'insulting the Prophet'. He added: 'WE NEED TO PUT THIS DOG ON A LEASH.'

Mr Wilders said: 'I have a problem with the Islamic ideology, the Islamic culture, because I feel that THE MORE ISLAM WE GET IN OUR SOCIETIES, THE LESS FREEDOM WE GET.' "

The Daily Mail - 17 October 2009.



"As I reached the bottom of Tufnell Park Road I heard heavy footsteps pounding fast behind me and just had time to think:

'This is it!' when I was punched in my back. I dropped like a stone and crooked my arm to hold on to my bag. I remembered that my voice was a weapon and yelled: 'Help me! Help me!'

My attacker yanked at my bag AND KICKED MY HEAD while I tried to snatch at his foot to topple him.

I noticed that he had big thighs — he wasn't a spindly druggie. HE KICKED ME VERY HARD SEVERAL TIMES UNTIL I HEARD THE CRUNCH OF MY SKULL AND UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS PREPARED TO KICK ME UNTIL I WAS DEAD OR UNCONSCIOUS. I let go of my bag.

He immediately stopped kicking me and ran off with it. I knew then that THE ATTACK WAS PURELY FUNCTIONAL, HE DIDN'T ACTUALLY WANT TO HURT ME, HE JUST WANTED MY BAG.”

So that’s alright then. The guy with big thighs was prepared to kick skull “very hard” and yet somehow functionally, until it crunched but “he didn’t actually want to hurt” the nice lady. Anyone figured out why he wasn’t out to hurt her yet? Although the ultra-PC Penny Woolcock doesn’t mention the ethnicity of her “attacker”, trust me, he was black. Funny, isn’t it, she doesn’t mind mentioning that “a young black man… and a young Asian man… came out to help” but she was never going to tell us that a young black man was prepared to kick her until she was “dead or unconscious”. Oh no, not Ms Woolcock.

She continues:

“I staggered on to my feet to chase him and we both froze and looked each other straight in the eye. I saw HE WAS JUST AS FREAKED OUT AND TERRIFIED AS I WAS. I don't know how to put this but IT WAS A REAL MOMENT OF COMMON HUMANITY — we were trapped together in the eye of the storm.”

Wow!

“A real moment of common humanity” between brute mugger and airhead victim!

Does anyone out there think she’d be coming out with this crap if the bad guy had been white?

“Then he picked up my phone and ran off, looking so silly, a large young man clutching a handbag. I stumbled after him yelling: ‘Leave my notebook.’ He jumped into a waiting car (more than one “dead or unconscious” type who "didn’t want to hurt” her then) and it tore off.

I had a huge lump on my head and was starting to feel very dizzy. A young black man on a push bike and a young Asian man from the flats opposite came out to help me and called the police and an ambulance. I started projectile-vomiting, which is a symptom of concussion, and I WASN'T WELL FOR A LONG TIME AFTERWARDS. (Thanks to the big, black nut-cruncher who didn’t want to hurt her)

The following day my handbag was found neatly perched on top of a car in Hackney with everything in it apart from my cash and my phone. I STILL BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS A SIGN OF RESPECT FROM MY ATTACKER. The policeman who returned it laughed at me. (I’m with PC Plod, Penny)

‘They are all scum,’ he replied. I don't believe it. They are not scum. But who are they?

I never hated my attacker. I wanted to know why SOMEONE WHO WAS NOT SADISTIC… (although he was prepared to kick her until she was “dead or unconscious”) thought it was all right to punch and kick a lone women for a few pounds...

I could have made this film in any major town or city with young men of any background — white, Asian or black. GANGS, STREET CRIME, GUN AND KNIFE CRIME ARE NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE and everything to do with frustration, exclusion and segregation."

Interesting how the vast majority of the gang members, who are prepared to do such violence to complete strangers, are black though, isn’t it, Penny?

Funny how when ours was a homogenous, almost entirely British, society and starving in the twenties and thirties, in a way none of the non-native gang members are starving nowadays, they didn’t take their “frustration” out on the weak and defenceless. They were excluded and segregated too but they would have rather gone without than do what that black savage did to you, Penny. But then such truth doesn’t suit your happy-clappy mindset, does it?

So your lovely, black nut-crunching mugger is just some poor disadvantaged chap who happens to be frustrated, excluded and segregated.

Thus do the PC Crowd excuse their ethnic foot soldiers.

Even when they happen to turn on their benefactors.


Ms Woolcock continues:

“It's only ever in the interests of the rich and powerful for poor people to fight and kill each other.”

Half-true.

It’s in the interests of the liberal elite, the social engineers and the PC Crowd as well.

Ms Woolcock continues:

“In Birmingham there are two big gangs known as the Burgers and the Johnsons, (both black) separated by postcodes.

I gradually realised that MANY OF THE BOYS ON OPPOSITE SIDES WERE CLOSELY RELATED. (First, second and third-generation immigrants) They had attended the same primary schools, their mothers and grandmothers (black) still worship at the same churches, and none of them knew why the war had started. (Is it coz they’s black?)

If a young man is caught in the wrong neighbourhood it can spell death… The rest of us travel around our towns and cities unaware that we are tramping across (BLACK) battlefields.

If you are a young man born in a particular place, you will be affiliated whether you like it or not. You may not get involved to the extent of carrying a gun but you can't ignore it. THE MOST ACTIVE YOUNG MEN REFER TO THEMSELVES AS SOLDIERS AND TO THEIR FRIENDS IN THE CEMETERY AS FALLEN SOLDIERS. (The business of soldiers is killing)

Individually, they will acknowledge that the war must stop, that there have been too many deaths, but it's not easy to go against the group. I learned that IT ALL STARTS — THE ROBBING AND DEALING, AND THE VIOLENCE THAT GOES WITH IT — WHEN BOYS GET EXCLUDED FROM SCHOOL. This is the turning point. Then older ones tease them about having bad hair and crap trainers and advise them to do something about it.

‘Pop a tom, pull a bag and run rude boy, and don't get nabbed,’ as the character of Flash advises the younger Pest in the film… 1 Day follows Flash (Dylan Duffus) as he races against the clock pursued by his own top man, a rival gang, the police, his three irate BABYMOTHERS (the mothers of his three children) (for whom the absent dad takes little if no responsibility) and his granny. Along the way he picks up Pest, his little sidekick, who is starting off his life on the road.

I WANTED THE FILM TO SHOW THE HUMOUR AND ENERGY OF THE ‘ROADSTER’ THING (someone who doesn't work within society's normal parameters), (the umour and energy of the non-natives who mug, rob, burgle, deal drugs, rape, gang-rape and murder) not just the sadness and the waste of life.

When it came to casting I knew that there was so much talent locally that we held open auditions and cast ALL THE (black) RAPPERS and actors from the street.

From the start 1 Day was always going to be a musical — like Singin' in the Rain...

We need to listen.”

Nah, Penny.

We need to deport the f***ers.

Penny Woolcock is a traitor to her tribe.

Let me tell you why.

Self-evidently, she would rather pander to brute criminality than punish it. She would rather “share a moment of common humanity” with a man who would have happily killed her for her handbag, than see him disappeared from the streets. She would rather celebrate the lives of such people on film than have them dealt with.

Such genocidally uncritical acceptance AND PROMOTION of the unacceptable is what gets our young and gullible involved with such savages. When the media associates creatures like these with “humanity”, “respect” and an absence of “sadism” they usher the most trusting and air-headed towards experiences similar to the one Ms Woolcock managed to survive. What makes the black mugger appear “cool” and untouchable to our youth is what gets them drugged-up, raped and murdered.

The Penny Woolcocks aid-and-abet this foreigner-on-Brit savagery.

They aid-and-abet to the max.

If anyone must be kicked hard until they are “dead or unconscious”, please God let it be those who deserve such treatment.

Let it be the Penny Woolcocks.




The Evening Standard - 16 October 2009.

"Jacqui Smith is refusing to repay a £1,500 bill which Sir Thomas Legg has demanded she hand back to taxpayers.

The disgraced former Home Secretary dug in her heels over her controversial claims only days after she was forced to apologise to the Commons for wrongly claiming £116,000 of public cash. Sir Thomas has written to Miss Smith demanding that she repay the money for claiming excessive amounts for cleaning, a barbecue and other items on her second-home allowance.

But while she has agreed to send back £1,000 for the cleaning bill, she is resisting calls to return cash for other items. "

The Daily Mail - 15 October 2009.



"We now have a vast, sprawling benefits system which actually provides direct encouragement towards idleness and infirmity. Thanks to the lucrative array of handouts on offer, SPONGING IS PROMOTED AND CHEATING IS REWARDED.

Meanwhile, HONEST, HARD-WORKING TAXPAYERS ARE FINANCIALLY PUNISHED SO THAT THE FECKLESS CAN CARRY ON ABUSING PUBLIC MONEY. The destructive absurdities of the welfare state have been graphically highlighted by new official figures which show that THREE QUARTERS OF CLAIMANTS ON INCAPACITY BENEFIT ARE PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF HOLDING DOWN JOBS. NO LESS THAN £11BILLION A YEAR IS NOW DRAINED FROM THE PUBLIC PURSE BY ALMOST TWO MILLION SPONGERS WHO ARE FAKING THEIR ILLNESSES OR DISABILITIES SO THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE TO LOOK FOR WORK.

That colossal sum is more than four times the amount the Government spends every year on prisons. We are constantly told by Ministers that we cannot lock up more criminals because of ‘lack of resources‘ yet Gordon Brown’s disastrous state machine seems to have plenty of resources to keep skivers in the lifestyle which they are accustomed…

One of the remarkable achievements of modern British social security is to have created more apparently disabled people in this country than the blood-stained carnage of the First World War.

The idea that incapacity claims have dramatically risen because of a decline in the nation’s health is ridiculous… BY FAR THE GREATEST OUTRAGE IS THE MONEY DISHED OUT TO MORE THAN 100,000 ALCOHOLICS AND DRUG ADDICTS. IT IS THE HEIGHT OF LUNACY AND IMMORALITY FOR THE STATE TO PAY PEOPLE TO CONTINUE WITH THEIR DANGEROUS HABITS. AWARDING ‘DISABILITY’ HANDOUTS TO DRUG ABUSERS MAKES A COMPLETE MOCKERY OF THE LAW, GIVEN NOT ONLY THAT NARCOTICS ARE ILLEGAL BUT ALSO THAT A SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF CRIME IS COMMITTED BY ADDICTS.

THESE PEOPLE DESERVE SPELLS IN PRISONS, NOT AN EASY LIFETIME ON THE DOLE.

The incapacity benefits system has been disastrous for the moral fibre of our nation. It is an injustice against taxpayers, undermines the economy, costs a fortune, and has led to the promotion of mass immigration as employers find that too many benefit-dependent Britons cannot be bothered to work. The Tories did nothing to tackle these abuses during their last spell in office, because the unemployment figures could be massaged by categorising claimants as ‘disabled.’ Labour has been even more cynical, because THE PARTY HAS SEEN ELECTORAL ADVANTAGE IN THE CREATION OF A VAST CLIENT ARMY WHICH OWES ITS LIVING TO THE SOCIALIST STATE.

Labour has failed woefully in its 12 years in power and has no belief in the radical surgery that is required. So THE MORAL DECLINE OF BRITAIN WILL CONTINUE UNTIL THE ERA OF BROWN IS ENDED."

Leo McKinstry - The Daily Express - 15 October 2009.



“We hereby request all Muslims in the United Kingdom, in Manchester, Leeds, Cardiff, Glasgow and all other places to join us and collectively declare that as submitters to Almighty Allah, WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF DEMOCRACY AND MAN-MADE LAW AND THE DEPRAVITY OF THE BRITISH CULTURE.

On this day WE WILL CALL FOR A COMPLETE UPHEAVAL OF THE BRITISH RULING SYSTEM ITS MEMBERS AND LEGISLATURE, AND DEMAND THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF SHARI’AH IN BRITAIN.”

The Daily Express - 15 October 2009.



"GUN CRIME IN LONDON HAS RISEN BY 17% OVER THE PAST YEAR AND THERE WAS A 20% RISE IN RAPES. There were 1,736 gun crimes in London between April and September, Metropolitan Police said - 252 more than in the same period last year. Rape has risen by 233 offences to 1,387 and residential burglaries have risen by 9.8% to 29,448."

BBC News - 15 October 2009.



“Labour's failure to crack down on scroungers has let three-quarters of incapacity benefit claimants get away with faking their illnesses. Taxpayers are now handing over a stunning £11 BILLION EVERY YEAR TO AROUND 1.9 MILLION PEOPLE WHO ARE ABLE TO WORK and should be looking for jobs."

The Daily Express - 14 October 2009.



"City bank Goldman Sachs is expected to confirm tomorrow that BONUSES WILL SMASH ALL RECORDS IN 2009, JUST A YEAR AFTER THE GOVERNMENT RESCUED THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM OBLIVION.

THE WALL STREET GIANT IS ON COURSE TO LAVISH £14 BILLION ON PAY AND BONUSES ON STAFF THIS YEAR following a surge in profits between July and September…

GOLDMAN'S 5,500 UK WORKERS ARE NOW SET TO POCKET AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST £500,000 EACH for this year - the highest rewards in the firm's 140-year history."

The Daily Mail - 14 October 2009.

Here’s a novel idea: instead of putting the price of everything up and taxing the innocent majority up to the hilt, tax the greedy bankers, the hedge fund managers; the private equity wallahs and the biggest of trough-gobbling big businessmen on 90 PER CENT OF THEIR INCOME!

And make the tax retrospective - all the way back to 1979, when Margaret Thatcher institutionalised fat cat greed.

That’d get rid of the national debt in a flash.

And the process would be a just one - As opposed to the injustice of making the decent majority pay for the crimes of an amoral elite minority, that is.

Besides, THEY would still have their 10 per cent, wouldn’t THEY?

10 percent of a billion dollars is still a hundred mil.

99.999 per cent of us would be happy enough with that, I reckon.



“I HOLD TONY BLAIR PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATH OF MY SON. There’s a lot of anger here, and I WOULD LIKE TONY BLAIR TO BE INDICTED AS A WAR CRIMINAL… I’d like someone to apportion blame for what happened in Iraq.

TONY BLAIR LIED TO HIS CABINET, HE LIED TO THE GOVERNMENT, HE LIED TO THE COUNTRY. HE DECEIVED THE COUNTRY ABOUT IRAQ’S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BECAUSE HE HAD AN AGENDA WITH GEORGE BUSH.”

Deirde Gover, mother of Flight Lieutenant Kristian Gover, telling it how it is - The Times - 14 October 2009.

Kristian was killed in Iraq.

According to The Times, at the official inquiry into Gulf War II, the families of servicemen killed in the conflict were saying:

"TONY BLAIR SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH WAR CRIMES FOR ORDERING BRITISH TROOPS TO INVADE IRAQ”.

Amen to that.



"We will make it clear that Government is committed to making sure, IN EVERY COMMUNITY, IN EVERY CORNER OF THIS COUNTRY, PEOPLE KNOW WE ARE ON THEIR SIDE. No favours. No privileges. No special interest groups. Just fairness.”

John Denham, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, insisting that New Labour is committed to "fairness" and is not in the business of favouring "special interest groups" - The Daily Mail - 14 October 2009.

And if the British working-classes believe that they’ll believe anything.



"More than ONE IN THREE YOUNG PEOPLE ON THE DOLE HAVE BEEN JOBLESS FOR MORE THAN SIX MONTHS – THE WORST RATE FOR 15 YEARS. The analysis from trade union research adds to growing evidence that the recession is giving rise to a ‘lost generation’.

The long spell of looking unsuccessfully for work for 366,000 young people aged between 16 and 24 has bolstered the million-strong pool of Neets – those not in employment, education or training."

The Daily Mail - 13 October 2009.



"Donating blood saves lives and the need for it is constant, whether it's used in everyday medical situations (surgery, childbirth) or emergencies (road traffic accidents), yet ONLY SIX PER CENT OF THE BRITISH POPULATION BOTHERS.

The lack of donors among South Asian and Afro-Caribbean Britons, of whom ONLY THREE PER CENT DONATE BLOOD, is especially concerning… Furthermore, blood conditions more prevalent in South Asians, such as thalassemia major, and Afro Caribbeans, such as sickle cell anaemia, REQUIRE REGULAR BLOOD EXCHANGES AND TRANSFUSIONS."

Metro News - 12 October 2009.

Yep.

We give, they take.

What else is new?



"Eating at a family dining table, playing board games together and saying please and thank you – these are the sort of values most of us would like to see return."

The Daily Express - 12 October 2009.

So, someone killed such righteous behaviours off?

Of course THEY did!



"BRITAIN IS THE WORST PLACE IN EUROPE TO LIVE despite offering the biggest salaries, a study revealed today."

The Daily Mail - 12 October 2009.



"ONE IN TEN WHITE BOYS IS LEAVING SCHOOL WITH NO REAL QUALIFICATIONS, figures reveal.

In many towns and cities THE FIGURE IS CLOSE TO ONE IN FIVE FAILING TO GET AT LEAST FIVE GCSES - the Government's benchmark of basic secondary school achievement.

The figures show that NATIONWIDE, 10 PER CENT OF WHITE BOYS - 23,860 PUPILS - ENDED COMPULSORY EDUCATION WITHOUT GETTING FIVE GCSES…

Research has shown that WHITE BOYS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE SCHOOL MEALS DO WORSE IN THEIR GCSES THAN ALL PUPIL GROUPS APART FROM GYPSY AND TRAVELLER CHILDREN AND THOSE IN CARE, whose schooling has been disrupted.

Christine Gilbert, the chief inspector of schools, has warned their futures are 'blighted' by low attainment. POOR GCSE PERFORMANCE HAS BEEN LINKED TO POVERTY AT HOME, LIVING IN A DEPRIVED AREA AND CHANGING SCHOOLS DURING GCSE YEAR - OFTEN THE RESULT OF PARENTAL DIVORCE.

JUST 16 PER CENT OF WHITE BOYS ENTITLED TO FREE SCHOOL MEALS ACHIEVED C GRADES IN AT LEAST FIVE GCSES LAST SUMMER, including in the crucial subjects of English and maths - a slight increase on 2007's 15 per cent.

Black Caribbean boys from similar backgrounds moved from 17 per cent in 2007 to 23 per cent last year while Asian males went up from 29 per cent to 32 per cent."

The Daily Mail - 12 October 2009.

Dumbing down the native Brits - Oh yes, we know what it’s all about, don’t we, folks?



"THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS FAST BECOMING AN INSTRUMENT OF OPPRESSION RATHER THAN A BULWARK OF CIVILISATION. Such is the grip of Left-wing thinking on our so-called law enforcers that they are no longer willing to protect society from violence and thuggery.

Instead, they prefer to hound ordinary citizens over offences such as thought crimes or breaches of their myriad environmental regulations. Similarly, infringements of traffic rules are pursued with far more authoritarian zeal than is ever applied to burglary, assault, theft, drug abuse or vandalism. In this process of politicisation, COMMON SENSE HAS DISAPPEARED AND BASIC FREEDOMS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED.

IN THE BIG BROTHER CULTURE CREATED BY LABOUR, full of vast databases, surveillance cameras, state-employed spies and intrusive questionnaires, ALL OF US ARE NOW TREATED AS POTENTIAL CRIMINAL SUSPECTS FOR BEING INSUFFICIENTLY ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT CULTURAL DIVERSITY…

Yet the real enemies of our society, like crack-addicted thieves, drunken yobs, benefit swindlers or Islamic terrorists, have little to fear from our enfeebled courts, which wallow in leniency and excuse-making. THE ONLY PEOPLE WHOSE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNT ARE THOSE OF OFFENDERS, NOT THEIR VICTIMS...

UNDER LABOUR MORE THAN 3,600 NEW OFFENCES HAVE BEEN CREATED SINCE 1997 AT A RATE OF 320 A YEAR, including such major crimes as holding an unlicensed concert in a church hall."

Leo McKinstry - The Daily Express - 12 October 2009.



“This has been a huge problem for the last decade. SOME OF THE BIGGEST MOSQUES AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE UK HAVE BEEN FUNDED BY FOREIGN MONEY AND HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE PORTRAYING EXTREMIST VIEWPOINTS.”

Haras Rafiq, co-founder of the Sufi Muslim council - The Times - 11 October 2009.

The Times added:

“Salim Lorgat, a Lib Dem councillor in Blackburn, said Straw was widely credited among Muslims with securing the funding for the Bicknell Street mosque.

‘The Labour party said it was because of Jack that we had got this money,’ Lorgat said."



"Despite the government’s many initiatives — Safer Neighbourhoods, the Respect agenda and so on — THOSE WHO LIVE ON BRITAIN’S ESTATES SEEM TO HAVE LITTLE FAITH IN THE AUTHORITIES’ ABILITY TO PROTECT THEM. In the government’s most recent Crime and Communities review, when asked what more could be done to protect people who have witnessed or been a victim of a crime, the vast majority of respondents chose ‘protection from intimidation/reprisal‘, followed by ‘more/better support’.”

The Times - 11 October 2009.



“DON’T YOU DARE. YOU HAVE MY SON’S BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS!”

Peter Brierley to Tony Blair as the latter offered to shake his hand during the reception that followed a service at St Paul’s to commemorate the dead of the Iraq war - The Daily Mail - 10 October 2009.

The Mail also quoted Peter thus:

“AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED THAT MAN IS A WAR CRIMINAL. I can’t bear to be in the same room as him. I cannot believe he’s been allowed to come to this reception. I sat through that service listening to people preaching to me about tolerance but I DON’T THINK ANYONE SHOULD BE FORCED TO TOLERATE BEING IN THE SAME ROOM AS HIM.

HE HAS MADE £14MILLION ON THE BACK OF TAKING US TO WAR AND THEY ARE NOW TALKING ABOUT MAKING HIM PRESIDENT OF THE EU.
But I BELIEVE HE’S GOT THE BLOOD OF MY SON – AND ALL OF THE OTHER MEN AND WOMEN WHO DIED IN THAT WAR – ON HIS HANDS.

The truth is that WE WENT TO WAR ON THE LIES OF BLAIR AND HIS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. HE SENT OUR FINE MEN AND WOMEN TO FIGHT WITHOUT PROPER TRANSPORT, KIT OR ARMS. And as a result of that decision, I have lost my son."



"An investigation has uncovered scores of cases where OFFENDERS FROM OVERSEAS, INCLUDING KILLERS AND SEX ATTACKERS, HAVE BEEN ABLE TO STAY IN BRITAIN despite strenuous attempts by the Government to deport them.

The findings demonstrate how CRIMINALS ARE USING THE 1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT TO AVOID BEING SENT BACK TO THEIR HOMELANDS – DESPITE A PLEDGE BY GORDON BROWN TO REMOVE ANY FOREIGNER WHO BREAKS THE LAW.

In cases thought to have cost the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds, IMMIGRATION JUDGES HAVE OVERTURNED ATTEMPTS BY THE HOME OFFICE TO REMOVE AT LEAST 50 FOREIGN CRIMINALS FROM THE COUNTRY IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS, AFTER LAWYERS ARGUED THAT DEPORTING THEM WOULD BREACH THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS.”

The Telegraph - 10 October 2009.



"The Home Office, in a frantic bid to slash a backlog of 450,000 cases, could soon give almost 200,000 asylum seekers the right to stay.

A leaked memo published yesterday revealed that IN 40,000 CASES APPLICANTS WILL BE CLEARED AFTER SPENDING AS LITTLE AS FOUR YEARS HERE INSTEAD OF THE USUAL 12.

AND THERE ARE A FURTHER 144,000 ASYLUM SEEKERS WHO HAVE BEEN IN THE UK SO LONG THAT FORCING THEM TO LEAVE WOULD INFRINGE THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS…

Sir Andrew Green of the anti-immigration think tank MigrationWatch UK warned that giving an asylum applicant the right to stay in Britain meant they could bring their relatives to live here. He claimed that would bring the total number to more than a quarter of a -million. He said:

'The Home Office has taken the path of least resistance but the effect is to grant full access to the welfare state to 200,000 people who have done nothing to deserve it‘."

The Daily Express - 10 October 2009.



"Almost 500 CHILDREN A DAY ARE ALLOWED BACK TO SCHOOL FOLLOWING EXCLUSIONS FOR ATTACKING STAFF AND PUPILS.

HEADMASTERS ISSUED NEARLY 90,000 SUSPENSIONS FOR PHYSICAL ASSAULT LAST YEAR, according to official figures out .

This suggests that ON ANY SCHOOL DAY 469 VIOLENT PUPILS RETURN TO CLASS.

SCHOOLS HANDED OUT A FURTHER 8,550 SUSPENSIONS FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL OFFENCES, up 370 on the year before. NEARLY 1,000 PUPILS WERE SUSPENDED FROM SCHOOL MORE THAN TEN TIMES LAST YEAR. MORE THAN 5,000 WERE SUSPENDED AT LEAST FIVE TIMES.

ATTACKS ON TEACHERS BY PRIMARY SCHOOL PUPILS ROSE BY 5.6 PER CENT TO MORE THAN 7,000."

The Daily Mail - 9 October 2009.



"THE GOVERNMENT HAS 'QUIETLY' RELAXED IMMIGRATION RULES TO HELP CLEAR A BACKLOG OF ASYLUM CLAIMS.


Ministers have changed Home Office guidelines in a move WHICH COULD SEE 40,000 PREVIOUSLY INELIGIBLE FOREIGNERS BEING GIVEN INDEFINITE LEAVE TO REMAIN IN THE UK.

Three years ago, Labour promised to have dealt with the growing backlog of 450,000 asylum cases clogging up the system by 2011. But officials realised it would be virtually impossible to send many of them back as they were from countries with poor human rights records such as Zimbabwe, Somalia, Iran and China.

So in a bid to massage the official figures, MINISTERS HAVE CHANGED THE RULES MAKING IT EASIER FOR THEM TO STAY IN BRITAIN, thus drastically reducing the backlog. Previously officials could only grant indefinite leave to remain when a claimant had already lived in Britain for 10 to 12 years, but now they can apply after just six.

This means AROUND 40,000 IDENTIFIED CASES CAN BE TAKEN OFF THE BACKLOG IMMEDIATELY - by being granted permission to stay in Britain."

The Daily Mail - 9 October 2009.



"A central banker's attack on Turks and Arabs living in Germany has attracted a flood of popular support and sparked warnings that RACIAL TOLERANCE IS ON THE WANE, EXPOSING A DEEP RIFT IN THE COUNTRY OVER INTEGRATION.

The comments by Thilo Sarrazin, a board member of the Bundesbank, have been criticised by his employer, won praise from neo-Nazis, and inspired thousands of Germans to take a public stand on the issue.

In an interview published last week in culture magazine Lettre International, SARRAZIN CALLED FOR A CRACKDOWN ON IMMIGRATION, ARGUING THAT TOO MANY MUSLIMS WERE SPONGING OFF GERMANY.

‘I DON'T NEED TO ACCEPT ANYONE WHO LIVES OFF THE STATE, REJECTS THIS COUNTRY ... AND IS ALWAYS PRODUCING LITTLE GIRLS WITH HEADSCARVES. This is true of 70 percent of the Turkish and 90 percent of the Arab population of Berlin,’ Sarrazin said.

‘THE TURKS ARE CONQUERING GERMANY JUST LIKE KOSOVARS ONCE DID KOSOVO -- THROUGH A HIGHER BIRTH RATE… The path we're on means that the share of the intellectual elite (in society) is continually falling for demographic reasons.’"

Reuters - 9 October 2009.

On 11 October 2009, The German newspaper, Bild am Sonntag, added this:

“51 PER CENT OF THE GERMANS AGREE WITH SARRAZIN’S STATEMENT THAT MOST ARAB AND TURKISH IMMIGRANTS ARE NEITHER ABLE NOR WILLING TO INTEGRATE. Only 39 per cent disagreed with the former Berlin Finance Minister… 69 per cent think it’s a good thing that Sarrazin began this debate, whereas just 22 per cent think he should have kept quiet…

THE CENTRAL CONSISTORY OF JEWS SAID SARRAZIN WAS CLOSE TO BEING A NAZI.”



"The global Muslim population stands at 1.57 billion, meaning that nearly one in four people in the world practice Islam, according to a report billed as the most comprehensive of its kind.

The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life report provides a precise number for a population whose size has long has been subject to guesswork, with estimates ranging anywhere from one billion to 1.8 billion. The project, three years in the making, also presents a portrait of the Muslim world that might surprise some.

For instance, Germany has more Muslims than Lebanon, China has more Muslims than Syria, Russia has more Muslims than Jordan and Libya combined, and Ethiopia has nearly as many Muslims as Afghanistan."

The Daily Express - 8 October 2009.

The Daily Mail added:

“BRITAIN HAS 1,647,000 MUSLIMS - 2.7 per cent of the UK population, and 0.1 per cent of the global Muslim population. EUROPE IS HOME TO ABOUT 38 MILLION MUSLIMS, or about five per cent of its population."



"Over the past decades each generation has seen more and more people milking the benefit system, which has sapped their will to work, the research from the Centre for Economic Performance said. There are 2.6million adults who claim the handout meant for the sick and incapable, with AROUND 20 PER CENT THOUGHT TO BE FULLY ABLE - BUT UNWILLING - TO WORK. "

The Daily Mail - 8 October 2009.



"MORE THAN THREE MILLION CHILDREN LIVE IN HOUSEHOLDS WHERE AT LEAST ONE OF THE PARENTS IS A BINGE DRINKER, a shock survey showed . The figure is three times as many as previously thought, according to the study by a charity.

The National Addiction Centre also found that ONE MILLION ARE LIVING WITH AT LEAST ONE PARENT WHO ABUSES DRUGS.

It means a mother is defined as a binger if she regularly consumes more than six units a night, while a father has to knock back eight. One unit is equal to half a pint of beer, a shot of spirit or a small glass of wine. They estimate that AROUND 3.4 MILLION CHILDREN SHARE A HOME WITH AT LEAST ONE 'BINGE DRINKING' PARENT.

THE REPORT ALSO FOUND THAT 2.6 MILLION CHILDREN LIVED WITH A HAZARDOUS DRINKER, DEFINED AS BEING DEPENDENT ON DRINK."

The Daily Mail - 8 October 2009.



"YOUNG TEACHERS ARE TOO SCARED TO BE FRIGHTENING. So what will happen when the older generation is gone?

It's a deeply alarming prospect and it's coming very soon. In Wales, the numbers of teachers taking early retirement is up 65 per cent in the past five years. SOME ARE SO DESPERATE THAT THEY LEAVE EVEN BEFORE THEY ARE ENTITLED TO THEIR PENSION.

Ninety-two per cent of teachers claim to have been verbally abused and 49 per cent have been physically attacked. Of those, 53 per cent have been assaulted with with a thrown object. "

The Daily Mail - 7 October 2009.



"‘It’s my generation that has to pay the price for Gordon Brown’s mismanagement of the economy.’

Annabel Shaw won rapturous applause as she said this to representatives. Every child born in Britain was £22,500 in debt due to the burgeoning borrowing requirement, she said."

The Daily Express - 7 October 2009.



"In the last six months, 27,739 homes were targeted in the capital, compared to 25,402 during the same period last year. Police forces across the country are reporting a similar upward trend, just as they did during the recessions of the 1970s and early 1990s. Publicly, Scotland Yard chiefs are reluctant to blame the surge in burglaries on the recession."

The Daily Mail - 5 October 2009.



"Outspoken Calais mayor Natacha Bouchard called on Britain to let in the thousands of migrants who continue to gather in the Channel port and has accused the UK of making France do its ‘dirty work’ by trying to keep them out.

But with our outdated asylum system and houses-for-everyone benefits culture, ANYONE WHO SETS FOOT ON BRITISH SOIL IS ALMOST AUTOMATICALLY ENSURED A NEW LIFE AT THE TAXPAYERS’ EXPENSE."

The Daily Express - 5 October 2009.



“What hypocrisy we have heard from some moralising, mealy-mouthed politicians…

How dare you criticise our parents for footing the bill to educate their own children or seek to make it more difficult for them to do so? Our parents’ taxes have not only funded a state education… but have paid for YOUR MORTGAGES, YOUR MOATS AND YOUR MINT IMPERIALS… This would indeed be a spectacularly stupid cutting off of a useful, elegant and extremely efficient nose TO SPITE A FACE THAT DOESN’T FIT IDEOLOGICALLY AND POLITICALLY…

Let’s be clear: the threat that currently underlies the Charity Commission’s guidance is the well-tried mediaeval one of confiscation of land and property and IT LOOKS NO LESS CRUDE AND UGLY UNDER THE ROSE OF LABOUR THAN IT DID UNDER THE ROSE OF TUDOR.”

Andrew Grant, Chairman of the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference, comparing the Government’s crackdown on independent schools’ charitable status to Henry VIII’s seizure of land and property in the 1500s - the annual meeting of HMC - The Telegraph - 5 October 2009.



“The EU juggernaut grinds on remorselessly, crushing the last gasps of independence from the member nations. Now that THE PEOPLE OF IRELAND HAVE BEEN BULLIED AND BRAINWASHED INTO VOTING FOR THE LISBON TREATY, the Euro-fanatics’ plans for a united superstate can be fully enacted.

The centrepiece of this drive for European political unity is the creation of a new post of EU president. As if the destruction of our national freedoms were not depressing enough, it is clear that THE OVERWHELMING FAVOURITE FOR THE PRESIDENCY IS NONE OTHER THAN TONY BLAIR, OUR SHALLOW, DISCREDITED FORMER PRIME MINISTER.

Having wrecked our country once with his destructive brand of messianic socialism, now he wants to come back for another go. According to one EU official, Blair could be provisionally appointed to the job before the end of October. His wife Cherie, notorious for her grasping behaviour, may already be eyeing up multi-million-pound properties in Brussels.

But IT WOULD BE AN OUTRAGE IF BLAIR WAS FOISTED ON US AS EU PRESIDENT. SUCH A MOVE WOULD MAKE A MOCKERY OF DEMOCRACY, for he would have not the slightest mandate to govern us. For a start, the British people have never been allowed to vote on the establishment of the EU Presidency, THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAVING RENEGED ON ITS PROMISE TO HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE NEW TREATY.

Just as importantly, BLAIR WILL BE ABLE TO TAKE POWER WITHOUT HAVING BEEN VOTED INTO OFFICE BY ANY OF THE ELECTORATES OF EUROPE SINCE, AS IN THE OLD SOVIET UNION, THE PRESIDENT WILL BE APPOINTED BY THE EU’S RULING COUNCIL. The European Union’s bosses are fond of lecturing the rest of the world about the importance of democracy but THEIR SPECTACULAR ELITISM MEANS THAT THEY NEVER APPLY SUCH PRINCIPLES TO THEIR OWN CLOSED, UNACCOUNTABLE REGIME.

THE IDEA OF AN UNELECTED PRESIDENT BLAIR IS ENOUGH TO PROVOKE THOUGHTS OF REVOLUTION. In the past, we were always able to throw out our rulers if they became too arrogant or incompetent but THAT BECOMES AN IMPOSSIBILITY IN THE NEW EUROPE CREATED BY LISBON. WITHOUT THE SAFETY VALVE OF THE BALLOT BOX, WE ARE STUCK WITH THIS GRINNING, PATRONISING, WAR-MONGERING SOCIALIST, WHOM MOST OF US WERE SICK OF YEARS AGO. What is more, with Labour still in office, WE ARE FACED WITH THE DIRE PROSPECT OF BEING GOVERNED FOR MONTHS BY THE GRISLY CABAL OF BLAIR, GORDON BROWN, AND THE PUPPET-MASTER LORD MANDELSON, NONE OF WHOM WERE ELECTED TO THEIR POSITIONS BY THE BRITISH PEOPLE.

It is obvious why Blair is so desperate for the job of EU President.

Money, power and ideology are the reasons. While keen on lecturing us about the importance of fairness, BLAIR AND HIS WIFE HAVE AMASSED VAST PERSONAL ENRICHMENT. THE LAVISH REWARDS OF THE EU PRESIDENCY WILL ONLY ENHANCE THEIR FORTUNE…

The enormous international status of the job adds to its attraction for Blair, who has always been a man of overweening ambition. An actor and an egotist, he loves to be the centre of attention, the bigger the stage the better. Even when he was prime minister he exuded the grandiosity of a president, LARGELY IGNORING THE HOUSE OF COMMONS AND APPOINTING HIMSELF THE GLOBAL AMBASSADOR FOR THE SO-CALLED WAR ON TERROR.

AS EU PRESIDENT, BLAIR WILL REVEL IN THE CHANCE TO COMPLETE THE DESTRUCTION OF BRITAIN’S TRADITIONAL NATIONAL IDENTITY, THE PROJECT HE BEGAN IN 1997. A FERVID, LEFT-WING INTERNATIONALIST, HE HAS NOT A PATRIOTIC BONE IN HIS BODY. THAT IS WHY HE USED MASS IMMIGRATION, EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND THE DOGMA OF MULTI-CULTURALISM AS BATTERING RAMS AGAINST OUR HERITAGE.

Through his new office, Blair will continue where he left off in 2007. There will MORE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BORDERS AND MORE PROPAGANDA FOR DIVERSITY. THE ISLAMIFICATION OF EUROPE WILL ACCELERATE AS BLAIR PUSHES THROUGH THE ACCEPTANCE OF TURKEY INTO THE EU, LONG ONE OF HIS PET PROJECTS. Refusing to learn the lessons of the recent past in Afghanistan or Iraq, he will use the new European Defence Force as an instrument for global interventionism… He will ratchet up the pressure for Britain to join the Euro, thereby obliterating the last remnants of our economic sovereignty. The man whose government became infamous for its financial scandals will not be worried to head AN ORGANISATION WHOSE ACCOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR 14 YEARS BECAUSE OF FRAUD.

Hugh Gaitskell, one of Blair’s predecessors as Labour leader, said in 1962 that European integration would mean ‘the end of a thousand years of history’ of British independence. The presidency of Tony Blair could mark the final page in that glorious, but fading history."

Leo McKinstry - The Daily Express - 5 October 2009.



"BRITISH UNDERGRADUATES ARE ALMOST THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO MAKE ERRORS IN THEIR ENGLISH THAN THOSE FROM OVERSEAS.

A study of written work produced by final-year students revealed that, on average, they had 52.2 punctuation, grammatical and spelling errors per paper compared with just 18.8 from the international students. Wrong plurals - such as varietys, two theorys and the two hypothesis - were common, it added. Grammatical errors included ‘done by my partner and I’ and ‘a women.’

Spelling errors included ‘flourescence‘ for ‘fluorescence’, ‘a lot’ for ‘a lot’, ‘seperate" for ‘separate,’ ‘yeild’ for ‘yield‘, ‘relevant’ for ‘relevant’, ‘introduications’ for ‘introductions’ and ‘pail vains’ for ‘pale veins’."

The Telegraph - 4 October 2009.



“POLICE OFFICERS SPEND LESS THAN SIX HOURS A WEEK PATROLLING THE STREETS, it was reported.

The amount of time bobbies are spending on the beat has dropped by almost 10 per cent in three years, according to official figures. At the same time PAPERWORK HAS RISEN, DESPITE THE GOVERNMENT VOWING TO SLASH BUREAUCRACY.”

The Daily Express – 3 October 2009.



“THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE USING SHAM MARRIAGES TO STAY IN THE UK AFTER A CRACKDOWN WAS ‘SCANDALOUSLY’ RULED UNLAWFUL. Registrars around the country are reporting a surge in bogus weddings following a House of Lords ruling which lifted restrictions. One registrar said:

‘You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to think these are not love matches. THESE ARE PURELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMMIGRATION AVOIDANCE.’

Campaign group Migrationwatch’s chairman Sir Andrew Green said last night:

‘This situation is scandalous. EACH SUCCESSFUL SHAM MARRIAGE OPENS THE DOOR TO FULL ACCESS TO THE WELFARE STATE. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE.’

Mark Rimmer, Service Director for Registrations of Marriages at Brent Council in north-west London, said:

‘WE ARE SEEING A STEADY INCREASE IN THE NUMBERS COMING THROUGH OUR DOORS WHO ARE PRODUCING CERTIFICATES OF APPROVAL FROM THE HOME OFFICE WHO HAVE NO CONNECTION WITH THEIR PARTNER – SOMETIMES THEY DON’T EVEN SHARE THE SAME LANGUAGE’.”

The Daily Express – 3 October 2009.



“TENS OF THOUSANDS OF POLITICIANS AND CELEBRITIES WILL BE ALLOWED TO KEEP THEIR NAMES OFF A NEW GOVERNMENT CHILDREN'S DATABASE, MINISTERS SAID YESTERDAY. THEIR IDENTITIES WILL BE 'SHIELDED' on the list which will carry details of 11MILLION CHILDREN IN ENGLAND AND THEIR PARENTS…

NEARLY 400,000 COUNCIL AND HEALTH WORKERS, POLICE OFFICERS AND CHARITY STAFF WILL BE ABLE TO LOOK AT CHILDREN'S RECORDS on ContactPoint.”

The Daily Mail – 3 October 2009.

I wonder how many “Council and Health Workers, Police Officers and Charity staff” happen to be paedophiles?

I don’t know about the cops, charity staff and Health Workers but the Council folk?

If these are your unlected quangocrat, Blairite, Common Purpose types, well, I wouldn’t want any of them digging into my dirty details, much less those of your average British kiddie.



"Mr Blair is among the favourites to become the first President of the European Union, a role that is chosen by the EU's 27 leaders AND NOT BY VOTERS. Such an appointment would restore him to the world stage AS WELL AS BOOST HIS LONG-TERM INCOME.”

The Daily Mail – 2 October 2009.

Income that is already considerable.



“The expenses system was never an ancient one. It only dates back to 2002 AND WAS DEVISED BY – YES, HIM AGAIN – TONY BLAIR, A ROGUE WHOM I BELIEVE WILL GO DOWN AS THE MAN WHO DIRTIED OUR POLITICS ALMOST BEYOND CLEANSING...

The system itself was so appalling that it might as well have had a placard round its neck saying: ‘Embezzle me. it’s what I was designed for.’

Unfortunately, if you present even honest people with a tub of money and urge them to dig deep and carry away all they can, corruption will follow as night follows day.

TONY BLAIR’S OWN RECORDS AND CLAIMS WERE ALL SHREDDED WHEN HE LEFT OFFICE: another convenient accident. It is extremely hard to look back on the 10 years he sat in Downing Street and discern one single issue he masterminded that has not turned out a catastrophe for our country.

Five wars: Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan (first time), Iraq and Afghanistan again. All on a peace-time defence budget.

Even if you disregard the Ecclestone scam, ALL THE LIES DAY AFTER DAY, THE DEBAUCHING OF OUR COMMONS, LORDS, CIVIL SERVICE AND JUDICIARY, THE GREEDY FREELOADING, THE POSTURING ABROAD, THE SANCTIMONIOUS BEAMING, IT IS STILL THE IMAGE OF THOSE SERRIED ROWS AND COLUMNS OF FINE YOUNG MEN THAT STICKS IN THE CRAW.

Guilty though Gordon Brown was, as Chancellor blocking the funds for soldiers’ wages, barracks, houses, compensations and kit, BLAIR WAS THE MAN AT THE TOP. Brown was always his subordinate. Subordinates do what they are told. Now, still grinning away, HE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE ENTIRE CONTINENT OF EUROPE.

What he deserves is to be impeached. As Voltaire remarked, to encourage the others:

‘FOR NO NATION WILL EVER BE WELL SERVED THAT SHRINKS FROM RETRIBUTION FOR ROTTEN CONDUCT’.”

Frederick Forsyth - The Daily Express – 2 October 2009.



“Once, doctors knew that their primary duty was to protect their patients. Today, however, THE DOGMA OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS HAS OBLITERATED SUCH CERTAINTIES.

Miss Wooltorton, a severely depressed young woman, committed suicide by swallowing poison. Having embarked on this agonising suicide bid, she phoned for an ambulance and was rushed to the Accident and Emergency Department of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Here doctors refused to take any action to save her life because they said she had drawn up a so-called living will in which she had expressed the wish to die and claimed to be '100 per cent aware of the consequences.'

It has been reported that, having taken legal advice, the consultant renal physician Dr Alexander Heaton took the view that she was mentally capable of reaching this decision and therefore he had to respect her wishes. He even told an inquest into Miss Wooltorton's death that HE FEARED HE MIGHT BE CHARGED WITH ASSAULT IF HE TRIED TO INTERVENE...

The acceptance of the 'right' to commit suicide IS A FORM OF PASSIVE AGGRESSION, utterly contradictory to the ethics of our profession… The claim that Miss Wooltorton was in a balanced state of mind and therefore her wishes were paramount seems to me ALMOST SURREAL IN ITS ABSURDITY…

If we really have to respect the wishes of potential suicide victims, then WHY BOTHER WITH THE WHOLE PANOPOLY OF PSYCHIATRIC CARE FOR THE DISTRESSED? According to this logic, we should abolish the Samaritans, sack the counsellors for the self-harmers and just leave the anguished to their pre-ordained fate. The whole concept of 'suicide watch' for prisoners and young offenders is obviously redundant…

In the brave new world envisioned by the Wooltorton case, a successful medical intervention is one in which the patient ends up killing herself, whereas failure is the prevention of suicide. Taken to its philosophical conclusion, this approach would rule out a vast swathe of medical interventions. So we should not treat alcoholics or smokers, respecting their desire not to heed medical advice about the dangers of tobacco or excessive drinking. The same is true of promiscuous gay men who deliberately put themselves at risk of HIV infection, or the overweight who refuse to curb the carbs, or drug addicts who inject themselves with dirty needles.

In the context of using legislation as a defence for this decision, it might also be asked why Miss Wooltorton was not sectioned under the Mental Health Act to protect her own safety... In one extraordinary case, I had a patient standing on a window still, claiming to be Jesus and purporting to have the ability to fly. Even then, THE SOCIAL WORKER REFUSED TO HAVE THEM SECTIONED.

In the coverage of this case, I was also astonished to read that LIVING WILLS ARE SUPPOSEDLY LEGALLY BINDING UNDER THE MENTAL CAPACITY ACT.

If that is really case, it renders irrelevant the whole debate about assisted suicide…

According to the outlook of Norwich hospital's advisers, ALL THE HAND-WRINGING FROM LAW-MAKERS, CAMPAIGNERS, AND POLITICIANS OVER ASSISTED SUICIDE IS JUST A WASTE OF TIME… The impulse to give doctors the power of life and death, dependent on a patient's mental state, is a step too far. IT IS A CLIMATE OF LETHAL AUTHORITARIANISM THAT ANYONE WITH A SHRED OF HUMANITY SHOULD OPPOSE.”

Dr Martin Scurr - BBC News - 2 October 2009.




“If we say that all of our past involvement with the world was bad and wicked and wrong, I think we're doing ourselves a great disservice.”

Michael Palin - The Daily Mail - 2 October 2009.

The Mail added:

“BRITONS SHOULD STOP APOLOGISING FOR THEIR COLONIAL PAST AND BE PROUD OF OUR EMPIRE'S ACHIEVEMENTS…

The travel show presenter and former Monty Python star said we should… remember the good that arose from Britain's days at the helm of a global empire. Palin's feelings are in contrast to THE TENDENCY OF MODERN POLITICIANS TO BEND OVER BACKWARDS TO APOLOGISE FOR BRITAIN'S IMPERIAL PAST.”



“I JUST WANT TO BE JEWISH. My manager's Jewish and I have a lot of Jewish people in my life."

Boy George (who has a star of David tattooed on his head) - Totally Jewish News - 1 October 2009.

Jews like their Gentiles gay.

That’s why they don’t judge him.



"This will never become a country where ministers of Israel are unable to come and have proper dialogue with the government of the United Kingdom."

David Miliband, the UK's Foreign Secretary - Totally Jewish News - 1 October 2009.

Totally Jewish added:

"Foreign Secretary David Miliband this week insisted Britain would never be a country Israeli ministers would be unable to visit for talks, hours after Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak narrowly avoided arrest over war crimes allegations.

Palestinian groups, the Mezan Center for Human Rights in Gaza City and Ramallah-based al-Haq, called for an arrest warrant to be issued for the veteran politician during his visit to the UK to meet Miliband and Gordon Brown and to address the annual Labour Friends of Israel reception at the party's Brighton conference. But on Tuesday afternoon, Westminster Magistrates Court Deputy District Judge Daphne Wickham accepted the arguments of the British Foreign Office and stated that Barak 'has immunity from prosecution as he would not be able to perform his functions efficiently if he were the subject of criminal proceedings in this jurisdiction'."



“I can't think anyone would want their child portrayed this way and I think it is obscene to do so… To masquerade under the guise of edgy art is ridiculous. It is soft kiddy porn. Putting a sign on the door like that means every paedophile in the land will head straight to that room.”

Michele Elliott, founder of children's charity Kidscape, criticising the Tate Gallery’s decision to exhibit a nude picture of 10-year-old Brooke Shields - The Daily Mail - 1 October 2009.



“I think that any parent of young girls would just be so shocked to hear that A TAX-PAYER FUNDED GALLERY THINKS IT IS ALRIGHT TO SHOW PHOTOGRAPHS OF A NUDE TEN-YEAR-OLD IN THE MIDDLE OF A PORNOGRAPHY EXHIBITION. How far do things have to go before we eventually say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. They took legal advice to see what they could get away with. WHY DIDN'T THEY TAKE ADVICE FROM ORDINARY PARENTS AND THE PUBLIC AS TO WHAT'S APPROPRIATE.”

Simon Calvert, spokesman for The Christian Institute - also criticising the Tate - The Daily Mail - 1 October 2009.

The Mail added:

“Child abuse campaigners are furious at Tate Modern gallery's decision to show an 'obscene' picture of a naked 10-year-old Brooke Shields… Gallery chiefs themselves admit they sought legal advice before including the picture, titled Spiritual America, in the Pop Life: Art In A Material World show. The exhibition also features HUGE SEXUALLY EXPLICIT IMAGES OF PENETRATION AND WORKS MADE FROM THE PAGES OF PORNOGRAPHIC MAGAZINES.

Richard Prince's image of Shields shows her from the knees up, naked, oiled and wearing make-up, looking directly at the viewer… The artist himself described the 1983 work, which is in fact a photograph of a photograph taken by another artist, Gary Gross, as 'an extremely complicated photo of a naked girl who looks like a boy made up to look like a woman'…

Jack Bankowsky, the exhibitions co-curator, said he hoped the artistic interest in Spiritual America would not be overshadowed by controversy over its content. He said:

'I hope that people respond to what is provocative and understand what the artist was trying to achieve’.”

Richard Prince was trying to achieve what most of us think he was trying to achieve, Bankovsky, old bean.

Another brick in the pervert wall.










“If we say that all of our past involvement with the world was bad and wicked and wrong, I think we're doing ourselves a great disservice.”

Michael Palin - The Daily Mail - 2 October 2009.

The Mail added:

“BRITONS SHOULD STOP APOLOGISING FOR THEIR COLONIAL PAST AND BE PROUD OF OUR EMPIRE'S ACHIEVEMENTS…

The travel show presenter and former Monty Python star said we should… remember the good that arose from Britain's days at the helm of a global empire. Palin's feelings are in contrast to THE TENDENCY OF MODERN POLITICIANS TO BEND OVER BACKWARDS TO APOLOGISE FOR BRITAIN'S IMPERIAL PAST.”



“I JUST WANT TO BE JEWISH. My manager's Jewish and I have a lot of Jewish people in my life."

Boy George (who has a star of David tattooed on his head) - Totally Jewish News - 1 October 2009.

Jews like their Gentiles gay.

That’s why they don’t judge him.



"This will never become a country where ministers of Israel are unable to come and have proper dialogue with the government of the United Kingdom."

David Miliband, the UK's Foreign Secretary - Totally Jewish News - 1 October 2009.

Totally Jewish added:

"Foreign Secretary David Miliband this week insisted Britain would never be a country Israeli ministers would be unable to visit for talks, hours after Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak narrowly avoided arrest over war crimes allegations.

Palestinian groups, the Mezan Center for Human Rights in Gaza City and Ramallah-based al-Haq, called for an arrest warrant to be issued for the veteran politician during his visit to the UK to meet Miliband and Gordon Brown and to address the annual Labour Friends of Israel reception at the party's Brighton conference. But on Tuesday afternoon, Westminster Magistrates Court Deputy District Judge Daphne Wickham accepted the arguments of the British Foreign Office and stated that Barak 'has immunity from prosecution as he would not be able to perform his functions efficiently if he were the subject of criminal proceedings in this jurisdiction'."



“I can't think anyone would want their child portrayed this way and I think it is obscene to do so… To masquerade under the guise of edgy art is ridiculous. It is soft kiddy porn. Putting a sign on the door like that means every paedophile in the land will head straight to that room.”

Michele Elliott, founder of children's charity Kidscape, criticising the Tate Gallery’s decision to exhibit a nude picture of 10-year-old Brooke Shields - The Daily Mail - 1 October 2009.




“I think that any parent of young girls would just be so shocked to hear that A TAX-PAYER FUNDED GALLERY THINKS IT IS ALRIGHT TO SHOW PHOTOGRAPHS OF A NUDE TEN-YEAR-OLD IN THE MIDDLE OF A PORNOGRAPHY EXHIBITION. How far do things have to go before we eventually say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. They took legal advice to see what they could get away with. WHY DIDN'T THEY TAKE ADVICE FROM ORDINARY PARENTS AND THE PUBLIC AS TO WHAT'S APPROPRIATE.”

Simon Calvert, spokesman for The Christian Institute - also criticising the Tate - The Daily Mail - 1 October 2009.

The Mail added:

“Child abuse campaigners are furious at Tate Modern gallery's decision to show an 'obscene' picture of a naked 10-year-old Brooke Shields… Gallery chiefs themselves admit they sought legal advice before including the picture, titled Spiritual America, in the Pop Life: Art In A Material World show. The exhibition also features HUGE SEXUALLY EXPLICIT IMAGES OF PENETRATION AND WORKS MADE FROM THE PAGES OF PORNOGRAPHIC MAGAZINES.

Richard Prince's image of Shields shows her from the knees up, naked, oiled and wearing make-up, looking directly at the viewer… The artist himself described the 1983 work, which is in fact a photograph of a photograph taken by another artist, Gary Gross, as 'an extremely complicated photo of a naked girl who looks like a boy made up to look like a woman'…

Jack Bankowsky, the exhibitions co-curator, said he hoped the artistic interest in Spiritual America would not be overshadowed by controversy over its content. He said:

'I hope that people respond to what is provocative and understand what the artist was trying to achieve’.”

Richard Prince was trying to achieve what most of us think he was trying to achieve, Bankovsky, old bean.

Another brick in the pervert wall.



“How thrilling to see at last a British politician who is unafraid to brandish a watch that takes more than a year to build… Pateks have been worn by Queen Victoria, Albert Einstein, Duke Ellington and Vladimir Putin. So- called 'God's Banker' Roberto Calvi was wearing one when he was found hanging under Blackfriars Bridge in 1982.

Pateks could not be further from the bling of the MTV generation who favour half a kilo of gold and a few carats of diamonds. Instead, a Patek Philippe has all the traditional qualities you would expect of a Swiss watch: accuracy, discretion and a price tag that is perhaps best described as reassuring…

A watch such as the one worn by Mandelson costs £21,490 - that's with its crocodile- skin strap…

Lord Mandelson is not the only European statesman to fall for a Patek. Carla Bruni gave Nicolas Sarkozy a Patek Philippe as her wedding present.”

The Daily Mail - 30 September 2009.

So that’s what the architect of new Labour spends his ill-gotten gains upon.

£21,490 for a watch. Yep, that’s New Labour for you.



“Labour finally admitted 24-HOUR DRINKING WAS ‘NOT WORKING’ as Gordon Brown promised effectively to dismantle the hugely controversial policy. A law will be passed to give councils the power to impose blanket bans on round-the-clock or late serving in town centres and streets blighted by violence.”

The Daily Mail – 30 September 2009.



“Tony Blair said things could only get better, and few doubted him. But did they get better? THE REAL STORY OF THE LABOUR YEARS IS ONE OF UNDER-ACHIEVEMENT, RANK FAILURE AND A VAST EXPANSION OF WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE IN EVERYONE'S LIVES.

Labour FAILED on law and order!
Labour FAILED on schools!
Labour FAILED on health!
Labour FAILED on immigration!
Labour FAILED the children!
Labour FAILED our troops!“

The Sun – 30 September 2009.

And The Sun backed Tony B and Peter Mandleson’s New Labour for twelve, long years. In other words, all the time they were failing.



“Mandelson was wearing a Patek Philippe watch - and not just any old Patek Philippe but - to give it its full name - a Reference 5146 annual calendar in yellow gold with a dark slate grey dial. How thrilling to see at last a British politician who is unafraid to brandish a watch that takes more than a year to build and which is powered by the legendary self-winding calibre known as 315 S IRM QA LU. Mandelson is wearing a tiny micromechanical marvel painstakingly assembled from 355 minuscule components. A WATCH SUCH AS THE ONE WORN BY MANDELSON COSTS £21,490 “

The Daily Mail – 30 September 2009.



“Several years of Labour government has again left Britain in a financial shambles. Like in 1978, a general election is just around the corner – and again it is one that the nation expects Labour to lose. But there the similarity ends.

Compared with Callaghan’s responsible approach, Brown placed short-term party political advantage ahead of the long-term British interest. In other words, HE CHOSE TO SAVE HIS OWN SKIN RATHER THAN DO THE RIGHT THING BY BRITAIN. An honest speech would have set out the grave economic problems this country faces and spelt out the true size of the financial shortfall – some £200 billion next year, representing a terrifying 14 per cent or more of national output. He would have then explained the painful but necessary measures needed to rein back this spiralling national debt and warned about the level of future public spending cuts and the prospect of painful job losses.

Such candour would have been the statesmanlike act of a politician with integrity – preparing the country for the dark days that lie ahead. Instead, though, BROWN CHOSE TO IGNORE THE TRUTH AND DELIVERED A CYNICAL DECEPTION.

He claimed he could make the swingeing cuts in spending without reducing front-line services in health, education, and law and order. For someone who was Chancellor for ten years and is well versed at handling departmental budgets, BROWN MUST KNOW THAT THESE CLAIMS ARE NOT EVEN REMOTELY TRUE. Indeed, he failed to outline a single spending cut – an omission which reeks of personal cowardice and a culpable refusal to deal with the dire circumstances created by the worst recession in 60 years. Nor was that all. With reckless irresponsibility, Brown then launched himself into a long list of spending commitments as if Britain were enjoying an economic boom.”

Peter Oborne - The Daily Mail – 30 September 2009.





“BRITAIN HAS THE HIGHEST RATE OF TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN EUROPE. Last year 44,700 children were born to girls aged 19 or less, of which around 1,100 were to those aged between 11 and 15. NINE OUT OF TEN TEENAGE MOTHERS HAVE THEIR CHILDREN OUT OF WEDLOCK. Every year 2,000 teenage mothers apply for a council house and in total 10,000 16 and 17-year-olds enter social housing, meaning more than 6,000 places are likely to be required over three years.”

The Daily Mail – 30 September 2009.




"When you look at the size of the sector, the numbers of patients involved, this is an extremely big problem and I think the report has only touched the tip of the iceberg."

Daniel Blake, of Action Against Elder Abuse, commenting upon an official NHS study determining that “more than half of care home residents have been the victim of prescription blunders” - The Daily Mail - 30 September 2009.

The Mail added:

“Slip-ups ranging in severity from clerical errors to LIFE-THREATENING MISTAKES AFFECTED MORE THAN 50 PER CENT OF THE PENSIONERS surveyed for the Department of Health. Some of the mistakes were made by the care or nursing home staff, some by pharmacists and others by GPs.

Even apparently MINOR ERRORS COULD HAVE A DREADFUL EFFECT, doctors and campaigners have warned… Researchers visited 55 residential and nursing homes for the elderly over a period of two-and-a-half years and surveyed 256 residents…

In some cases GPs prescribed the wrong drug. In others, they failed to consider how a newly-prescribed medicine might interfere with one the patient was already taking.

Dr (Duncan) Forsyth said the failure of GPs to monitor medication of care home residents could be caused by many factors.

‘It may be that they don’t have adequate information when someone is discharged (from hospital) to a care home. If may be that they don’t have the competencies to look after such frail, vulnerable elderly people. Sadly, in some circumstances, IT MAY BE THAT THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THIS VERY COMPLEX WORK’…

Eighty-year- old Florence Bell spent her final weeks in agony after SHE WAS GIVEN TEN TIMES THE CORRECT DOSE OF THE BLOOD-THINNING DRUG WARFARIN IN A PORTSMOUTH NURSING HOME. Her daughter May Goodale tells tonight’s Channel 4 News:

'It caused her extreme pain. She couldn’t walk without being helped. She was bleeding profusely. She was bleeding from her cheeks and she had really serious nosebleeds. SHE HAD A TERRIBLE DEATH AND IT WAS SOMETHING YOU WOULDN’T WANT TO WISH ON ANYONE’.”





“THE MIGRANTS MAKE IT TO BRITAIN WHATEVER THE OBSTACLES. POLICE OPERATIONS WILL DO NOTHING TO STOP THEM.”

Calais MP, Jack Lang - The Daily Mail - 30 September 2009.

“It is no secret that our welfare system is so bloated it attracts immigrants from all over the world”.

Susie Squires of the TaxPayers’ Alliance - The Daily Mail - 30 September 2009.

The Mail added:

“France last night admitted it was fighting a losing battle against illegal migrants – AND DEMANDED BRITAIN SHOULD OPEN ITS DOORS TO THEM. A week after being forced from their shanty town, (the Jungle) the asylum seekers were back, still seeking a passage to the UK…

Last night Calais mayor Natacha Bouchard said the Channel port would remain an immigrant dumping ground UNTIL BRITAIN OPENED ITS BORDERS and stopped asking France to do its dirty work.

She insisted that THE BRITISH SHOULD SIGN UP TO THE SCHENGEN AGREEMENT, A EUROPEAN UNION ACCORD THAT ALLOWS FREE MOVEMENT OF ALL PEOPLE BETWEEN EUROPEAN MEMBER STATES WITHOUT THE NEED FOR PASSPORTS OR VISAS.

‘BRITAIN IS UNABLE TO CONTROL ITS BORDERS, so we’re doing the job for them because they’re not part of the agreement. There are still some 20 squatter camps in Calais alone’.”



“Mothers in full-time work, including those who work flexible hours, were found to have children who eat too few portions of fruit and vegetables, watch more television and consume more fizzy drinks than the children of mothers who stay at home.”

The Times – 29 September 2009.



"If a boy breaks a pink band, a girl has to flash her boobs, a red band means you have to give him a lap dance and A BLUE IS SOME SORT OF ORAL SEX. THE BLACK MEANS YOU HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY WITH A BOY. A GOLD BAND IS THE MOST IMPORTANT AND MEANS YOU HAVE TO DO ALL OF THE ABOVE…

I don't think parents have any idea what the bracelets mean because ALL THE KIDS AT MY SCHOOL WEAR THEM and don't get told off…

In my group at school, THE LEADER - WHO EVERYBODY LOOKS UP TO - WEARS ONLY BLACK AND GOLD BANDS. All the boys in my class wear black ones and if a girl wears a black bracelet, all the boys fancy her…

For a while I DIDN'T WEAR ANY BRACELETS AND PEOPLE WOULDN'T HANG AROUND WITH ME. AT MY SCHOOL, YOU HAVE TO WEAR A BAND TO BE PART OF THE COOL CROWD…

My SEVEN-YEAR-OLD cousin came to stay with us - and she lives miles away. She said a green band at her school meant fondling a boy and that pink meant sucking his neck until you draw blood”.

A 12-year-old girl discussing the meaning of “shag bands”, the latest craze in Britain’s schools - Dulcie Pearce - The Sun - 29 September 2009.

The Sun added:

“At first sight the cheap coloured plastic bracelets worn by children seem a bit of innocent fun. But in reality they are a shocking new craze for children as young as seven, and it will horrify parents across the country.

THEY ARE ‘SHAG BANDS‘, WHICH ARE WORN IN THOUSANDS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL PLAYGROUNDS… THE DIFFERENT COLOURS - BLACK, BLUE, RED, PINK, PURPLE, ORANGE, YELLOW, GREEN AND GOLD - SHOW HOW FAR THE LITTLE PUPILS WILL ‘GO’ IF PROPOSITIONED, FROM A KISS TO FULL SEX.

Kids chase each other around schools and, IF THEY BREAK THE BAND OFF THE WEARER'S WRIST, THE WEARER HAS TO OFFER THE PHYSICAL ACT THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE COLOUR OF THE BAND. It is the latest in A TERRIFYING WAVE OF PROMISCUOUS BEHAVIOUR WHICH SUGGESTS THAT CHILDHOOD INNOCENCE COULD BE A THING OF THE PAST.

Just as shocking are ‘rainbow parties’ - booze and drug-fuelled gatherings where girls wear bright lipstick of different colours TO LEAVE THEIR ‘MARK’ ON BOYS WHILE GIVING THEM ORAL SEX...

One teen blogger wrote:

‘I love sex parties and try to arrange a rainbow party at least once a month. It's all we talk about at school and we always find a free house where we can get together. I'm a champion at rainbow parties and always try my best to leave my mark on the most boys. It's fun and the blokes love it - obviously.’

Another says:

‘Some people think rainbow parties are an urban myth - but if they came to some of the parties I have been to, they would know this isn't true. They are awesome. Everyone gets drunk and THERE ARE USUALLY PLENTY OF CLASS A DRUGS AROUND. IT GETS EVERYONE GOING.’

One parent who overheard her 14-year-old daughter talking about attending a rainbow party was heartbroken to discover what she had been doing.

She said… ‘It breaks my heart to think my lovely little girl is behaving in this way‘."

“It breaks your heart”?

Who did you vote for at the last election?

Which political party do you think it’s OK to sneer at?

That’s why your “lovely little girl is behaving in this way”, lady.

Anyway, when the bloke who is soon to be the President of Europe was saying “education, education, education”, did he really mean “shag bands" for seven-year-olds, do you think?

You can be sure, ladies and gents, when Tony B Liar gets to be our overlord all over again, there will be lots more stories as jaw-dropping as this one.



“SOME OF BERNARD MADOFF’S EMPLOYEES IN LONDON COULD FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES BY THE END OF THE YEAR, a senior prosecutor said yesterday. Madoff pleaded guilty in March to a global fraud of as much as £41billion and is serving a 150-year prison sentence.

According to court documents, the London office traded for the personal accounts of Madoff and members of his immediate family. The assets and bank accounts were used by the fraudster to buy luxury yachts, cars and furnishings for himself and members of the family.

The latest revelations follow news that MADOFF’S SONS MARK AND ANDREW, HIS BROTHER PETER AND NIECE SHANA will be sued this week for $198million (£125million) by Irving Picard, the trustee winding down Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in New York, to recover money for defrauded investors.”

The Daily Mail - 29 September 2009.



"You'd hope that LA County prosecutors had BETTER THINGS TO DO THAN CAUSE AN INTERNATIONAL FUROR BY HOUNDING A FILM DIRECTOR for a 32-year-old sex crime…

Whether the LA County district attorney's office has its way or not, it is not a story that can have a happy ending. I THINK POLANSKI HAS ALREADY PAID A HORRIBLE, SOUL-WRENCHING Price for the infamy surrounding his actions. THE REAL TRAGEDY is that he will always, till his death, be snubbed and stalked and confronted by people who think the price he has already paid isn't enough."

Film columnist, Patrick Goldstein, speaking out against the arrest and possible extradition from Switzerland of film director, Roman Polanski - LA Times - 28 September 2009.

I don’t think that’s a tragedy, Mr Goldstein.

I think that’s justice.

"To put him on trial or keep him in jail does not serve society in general or his victim in particular."

Columnist, Anne Applebaum - The Washington Post - 28 September 2009.

I beg to differ, Ms Goldstein.

I think putting Polanski on trial and jailing him would, indeed, “serve society in general” by sending out a powerful message that a creepy, untouchable elite was as subject to the law as the rest of us.

Particularly when a minor had been raped by the creep in question.

"We're calling on every film-maker we can to help fix this terrible situation.”

Film mogul Harvey Weinstein - The Guardian - 28 September 2009.

It was a “terrible situation” that would have been fixed in 1978, Mr Weinstein, if Polanski hadn’t fled the wrath of the American authorities.

Now he should, but probably won’t, pay the price of the crime he committed.

Polanski, Weinsten, Goldstein and Applebaum are Jewish.

PS. Where do you think Polanski fled to all those years ago?

He escaped to England.



“Despite a promise to make sport an integral part of the school week, a new poll shows that few children are doing anything like the amount of exercise needed to stay healthy. The survey by a leading health charity blows apart official figures that claim more than 90 per cent of children do at least two hours a week. Health experts said last night the findings were ‘extremely worrying‘. The poll of more than 1,000 8-15- year-olds by the British Heart Foundation shows only ONE IN FIVE CHILDREN DO THE 60 MINUTES OF DAILY EXERCISE RECOMMENDED FOR GOOD HEALTH. Almost 80 per cent said they did not even know how much exercise they should be doing.”

The Daily Express – 28 September 2009.



“WHY ARE BULLIES BEING LET OFF AND INNOCENT PEOPLE BEING BULLIED IN THIS WAY? IT IS SURELY THE OUTCOME OF A CULTURE DISTORTED BY THE WARPED VALUES OF OUR INTELLIGENTSIA AND POLITICAL CLASS. Obsessed by the impossible aim of eradicating all forms of prejudice or discrimination, it is also gripped by the belief that all punishment or retribution is a form of vengeance and must be avoided at all costs. The combination of these two beliefs has meant that YOBS WHO TERRORISE PEOPLE TO DEATH MUST NEVER BE JAILED, WHILE THOSE WHO CAUSE OFFENCE TO GROUPS THAT TICK THE RIGHT BOXES MUST BE PROSECUTED.

It is also a means for the incompetent to avoid being held accountable for the failings on their watch. RIGHT AND WRONG, VICTIM AND BULLY ARE BEING TURNED UPSIDE-DOWN - AND THE POLICE, WHO HOLD THE LINE FOR A SOCIETY'S VALUES, ARE NOW IN THE VERY FRONT OF THE CHARGE.”

Melanie Phillips - The Daily Mail – 28 September 2009.



“'It’s a unique souvenir,' said Norman Stowe

Admirers of Tony Blair have paid £180 a time to have their photographs taken with him. IT IS THE LATEST GIMMICK TO BOOST THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER’S EARNING POTENTIAL ON LECTURE TOURS. As many as 100 people will be whisked through in a one-hour session in which they will meet, but barely greet, Blair while the cameras flash. IT IS THOUGHT BLAIR HAS BEEN PAID AT LEAST £15M SINCE HE LEFT DOWNING STREET TWO YEARS AGO, HELPED BY AN ALMOST UNRIVALLED NETWORK OF POLITICAL AND BUSINESS CONTACTS. He is also raising funds for his faith foundation.“

The Times – 27 September 2009.



"That is disgusting - there's no place for that in the game... Surely we can't have that sort of behaviour now? Anyone who does it should be put in prison... Stick them where they belong, in the nut-house...

I listen to the radio people talking about chants and singing songs to people at different clubs that just turn me over, I can't believe it. You've got to be some kind of nutter to do that... They are sickos who have got to be locked up somewhere. Put them away and don't let them come to football... Without the fantastic black players you wouldn't have teams"?

Harry Redknapp, venting his anger after Blackpool footballer Jason Euell was racially abused at Stoke in a Carling Cup clash - The Sun - 26 September 2009.

Oh, you'd still have teams, Harry.

If there weren't any "fantastic black players" there'd just be more native, white British lads gaining all the plaudits and pocketing all the dosh, that's all.

Harry Redknapp lives in Dorset, the whitest county in England.

Actually, he lives in a waterfront villa in the "millionaires’ playground" of Sandbanks, the poshest part of the ultra-posh Poole.

Awarded the accolade of Britain's “Monte Carlo”, Sandbanks is home to Redknapp's footballer son Jamie and pop-star wife Louise, who live in a penthouse nearby. Geoff Boycott, Max Bygraves, footballer David Seaman, DJ Ed Stewart and rock star Greg Lake all live just around the corner.

Try living in Brixton, Tottenham or any of our inner cities for a while, Harry! You might just end up sneering a somewhat different tune.

As the 14 April 2009 edition of The Daily Mail put it:

"At the last count, there were more millionaires in this small Dorset town than in Islington or Notting Hill in London."

As Wikipedia puts it:

"Sandbanks has, by area, the fourth highest land value in the world".

I wonder if Harry is angling for the England job?

The powers-that-be do love an I'm-all-right-Jack wide boy made good, who sneers in all the right places.



"Hitler was a genius orator. To make that many people turn and change and hate, he had to be a showman and he was."

Michael Jackson, as related by his close friend, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach - The Sun - 25 September 2009.



“The Supreme Court, CREATED BY TONY BLAIR, will open for business at the expensively revamped Middlesex Guildhall in Parliament Square. IT REPLACES THE HOUSE OF LORDS AS THE HIGHEST JUDICIAL APPELLATE BODY IN THE LAND. Twelve judges chosen by an appointments commission will hear cases which, unprecedentedly, will be recorded on film.

Even before the first words have been spoken in its chamber, fierce controversy attends the new creation. Many judges are furious about the manner in which this momentous change has been introduced, IN FURTHERANCE OF A DOWNING STREET WHIM.


Back in 2003, Blair's aggressively assertive old mentor, windbag and claret lover, the Lord Chancellor Derry Irvine, allowed his conceit to overreach itself. Irvine believed that his relationship with the Prime Minister empowered him to say what he liked, including expressing views on sentencing policy that were completely at odds with those of the then Home Secretary, David Blunkett.

Blair astonished not only Irvine but the legal world by sacking his Lord Chancellor and decreeing a wholly new dispensation for the top tier of Britain's judiciary. None of the law's grand panjandrums was consulted. Nobody, as far as is known, gave serious thought to the consequences for Britain's political system of wrenching a centuries-old system onto a new template. The outcome, six years later, is that THE BRITISH PEOPLE ARE GETTING A SUPREME COURT WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT.

The danger with inventing a body which is titled 'Supreme', such as Britain has never before possessed, is that SOONER OR LATER IT WILL BEGIN TO ACT IN A SUPREME FASHION. For centuries, the nation has been governed on the basis of a fundamental principle: our elected Parliament makes law, and represents the highest arbitrator of the public interest. Yet OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS, AND ESPECIALLY SINCE THE COMING OF THE 1997 LABOUR GOVERNMENT, REAL POWER IN BRITAIN HAS SHIFTED. PRIME MINISTERS BEHAVE EVER MORE LIKE PRESIDENTS. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS HAS EBBED, AS MPS BECOME MERE LOBBY-FODDER, FULFILLING DOWNING STREET'S BIDDING.

LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF MOST OF THEIR HISTORIC RIGHTS. GLOBALISATION HAS SHRUNK THE AUTHORITY OF NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS. DEVOLUTION HAS TRANSFERRED MANY WESTMINSTER RESPONSIBILITIES TO EDINBURGH AND CARDIFF. THE EU HAS ASSUMED POWERS WHICH OVERRIDE THE SOVEREIGNTY OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS. And, as a consequence, the role of judges has dramatically expanded, as interpreters of European law.

Most conspicuously in human rights and immigration cases, MORE AND MORE JUDGES HAND DOWN DECISIONS THAT ESTABLISH PRECEDENTS AND DEFY THE EXPRESSED VIEWS OF ELECTED MINISTERS - AND, INDEED, MUCH OF THE ELECTORATE.

Judge-made law, as distinct from measures endorsed by Parliament, has been playing a growing part in all our lives for a generation. THE ELECTORATE HAS NEVER BEEN ASKED WHETHER THIS IS AN INNOVATION IT WELCOMES, OR EVEN WISHES TO ACCEPT; WE ARE MERELY TOLD THIS IS THE WAY THINGS ARE. EVEN BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT WAS THOUGHT OF, JUDGES HAVE BEEN EXTENDING THEIR DISCRETIONARY POWERS TO THE LIMITS, AND SOMETIMES BEYOND.

The full cost of Blair's follies will only become apparent in the years ahead. The Supreme Court already looks like one of them.”

Max Hastings - The Daily Mail – 24 September 2009.



“FEMINISM IS A CYNICAL, MISGUIDED PLOY… FEMINISTS STARTED DEMONISING ALL FATHERS… FEMINISM, I REALISED, WAS A LIE. Women and men are both capable of extraordinary cruelty. Indeed, the only thing a child really needs - two biological parents under one roof - WAS BEING UNDERMINED BY THE VERY IDEOLOGY WHICH CLAIMED TO SPEAK UP FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS.

THIS COUNTRY IS NOW ON THE BRINK OF SERIOUS MORAL COLLAPSE. WE MUST STOP DEMONISING MEN and start healing the rift that feminism has created between men and women. HARRIET HARMAN'S INSIDIOUS AND MANIPULATIVE PHILOSOPHY THAT WOMEN ARE ALWAYS VICTIMS AND MEN ALWAYS OPPRESSORS CAN ONLY CONTINUE THIS UNSPEAKABLE CYCLE OF VIOLENCE. AND IT'S OUR CHILDREN WHO WILL SUFFER.”

Erin Pizzey - The Daily Mail - 24 September 2009.

Erin set up the world's first refuge for battered women in 1971 and went on to establish an international movement for victims of domestic violence.



“REPORTS OF OFFICERS BEING IMPOLITE, INTOLERANT AND NEGLECTING THEIR DUTY ACCOUNT FOR 45 PER CENT OF ALLEGATIONS TO THE POLICE WATCHDOG. THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 31,259 COMPLAINTS AGAINST FORCES IN ENGLAND AND WALES IN 2008/9 to the Independent Police Complaints Commission - an increase of 8 per cent on the previous year.”

The Daily Mail – 24 September 2009.





“The warped values of the modern police are a graphic indicator of Britain’s decline. WE ONCE HAD THE FINEST FORCE IN THE WORLD, A BULWARK OF CIVILISATION THAT PROTECTED SOCIETY AND PUNISHED CRIMINALITY BUT THAT SENSE OF MORAL PURPOSE HAS EVAPORATED.

TODAY’S POLICE DO NOT REGARD THE MAINTENANCE OF ORDER AS THEIR CENTRAL DUTY. OBSESSED WITH SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY, THEY NO LONGER KNOW WHOSE SIDE THEY ARE ON. TOO MANY POLICE CHIEFS SEE THEIR CONSTABULARIES AS THE SHOCK TROOPS OF NEW LABOUR, PROMOTING MARXIST ORTHODOXIES RATHER THAN FIGHTING CRIME. The results of this change have been disastrous. VIOLENT CRIME IS AT RECORD LEVELS. ASSAULT, FRAUD, BURGLARY AND GANG WARFARE ARE ALL RIFE. WHILE OFFICERS PLAY THEIR POLITICAL GAMES OR BECOME SWAMPED BY THEIR USELESS BUREAUCRACY, THE VERY PEOPLE WHO RELY MOST ON THE POLICE FOR PROTECTION ARE LEFT PREY TO THE THUGS.

THIS GOVERNMENT HAS LONG BEEN CONTEMPTUOUS OF FREE SPEECH. MINISTERS APPEAR EAGER TO SIDE WITH MUSLIM GRIEVANCE MONGERS. THEY ARE INSTINCTIVELY HOSTILE TOWARDS CHRISTIANITY. Their political correctness has influenced the pattern of modern policing. FORTY PER CENT OF VICTIMS OF CRIME ARE NEVER VISITED BY THE POLICE, yet there were more than 50 officers available to arrest Tory spokesman Damien Green last year FOR DARING TO QUESTION LABOUR’S IMMIGRATION POLICIES.

DETECTION RATES FOR VIOLENT CRIME ARE AT THEIR LOWEST EVER LEVEL, REACHING JUST 47 PER CENT, YET THE WEST MIDLANDS POLICE WASTED ITS TIME SEEKING THE PROSECUTION OF CHANNEL FOUR TV PRODUCERS FOR HIGHLIGHTING HATE PREACHERS IN BIRMINGHAM’S MOSQUES.

THE POLICE FORCE IS NOW BUILT IN NEW LABOUR’S IMAGE: A HUGE, MISMANAGED BUREAUCRACY THAT GRIEVOUSLY FAILS TO DELIVER WHAT THE PUBLIC PAY FOR; PROTECTION AGAINST CRIME.

THE VERY PEOPLE WHO RELY MOST ON THE POLICE FOR PROTECTION ARE LEFT PREY TO THE THUGS.”

Leo McInstry - The Daily Express - 24 September 2009.





"FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESOURCES ... RISKS A LONGER CONFLICT, GREATER CASUALTIES… Any of these risks, in turn, are likely to result in MISSION FAILURE...

Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near term... risks an outcome where DEFEATING THE INSURGENCY IS NO LONGER POSSIBLE...

Preoccupied with protection of our own forces, WE HAVE OPERATED IN A MANNER THAT DISTANCES US PHYSICALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY FROM THE PEOPLE WE SEEK TO PROTECT ... the insurgents cannot defeat us militarily, but we can defeat ourselves...

IT IS REALISTIC TO EXPECT THAT AFGHAN AND COALITION CASUALTIES WILL INCREASE…

THE WEAKNESS OF STATE INSTITUTIONS, MALIGN ACTIONS OF POWERBROKERS, WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION AND ABUSE OF POWER BY VARIOUS OFFICIALS AND ISAF’S OWN ERRORS HAVE GIVEN AFGHANS LITTLE REASON TO SUPPORT THEIR GOVERNMENT… ISAF does not sufficiently appreciate the dynamics in local communities, nor how the insurgency, corruption, incompetent officials, powerbrokers and criminality all combine to affect the Afghan population...

THE INSURGENTS CONTROL OR CONTEST A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE COUNTRY".

General Stanley McChrystal, the top American military man in Afghanistan - 21 September 2009.



“A new and swanky European Union headquarters is being planned in Brussels at a cost of £280million. Named the Residence Palace, it will contain the no doubt sumptuous offices of the first President of the EU, as well as of its first Foreign Minister.

The man who hopes to become President of Europe is none other than OUR OWN TONY BLAIR.

According to an authoritative new book, THE SOLE REMAINING RAISON D'ETRE OF THIS GOVERNMENT IS TO SEE MR BLAIR SAFELY INSTALLED AS PRESIDENT, picking up the telephone as Europe's number one politician to chew the cud on equal terms with Barack Obama.

If anyone has worthwhile insights into what is going on in the ex-Prime Minister's mind, it is Mr Boulton. He says LORD MANDELSON IS PROPPING UP GORDON BROWN ONLY SO THAT HIS FRIEND TONY BLAIR CAN BECOME PRESIDENT OF EUROPE.

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A NASTY LITTLE PLOT, CHIEFLY ORCHESTRATED BY LORD MANDELSON, WHOSE OVERWHELMING PURPOSE IS TO SEE THE RATIFICATION OF THE LISBON TREATY AND, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, SECURE THE CORONATION OF TONY BLAIR AS PRESIDENT. Even the timing of the General Election is part of the plot. This is how it works. In less than two weeks, on October 2, the Irish will vote on the Lisbon Treaty. In June last year, they voted against it. That was not what Brussels wanted, since until the treaty is ratified by all member states, it cannot become law and there can be no European President, no European Foreign Minister and no other integrationist measures. Which is why the Irish are being made to vote again.

So much for democracy! This time they are expected to say 'Yes'. Battered by a recession far worse even than ours, and in dire need of financial support from other member states, they are unlikely to stand up to Europe this time.

The reason Lord Mandelson wants the General Election to be held next June, which is the latest possible date, is not because he seriously believes that Gordon Brown has an earthly chance of winning by leaving it until then. HE WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE AS MUCH TIME AS POSSIBLE FOR THE TREATY TO BE RATIFIED BEFORE DAVID CAMERON ARRIVES IN NO 10.

David Cameron and William Hague, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, can reasonably argue that voters must be consulted over Lisbon if our membership of the European Union is to command widespread consent. What a sordid, undemocratic racket this supposedly noble European project has become. Our real concern should not be whether Tony Blair becomes the first President of Europe, with Lord Mandelson's snout no doubt deeply embedded in a neighbouring trough. The most important issue is whether there should be a European President and a Lisbon Treaty at all - and, to that prospect, the overwhelming verdict of the British people would appear to be a resounding 'No'.”

Stephen Glover in The Daily Mail – 21 September 2009.



“RAPE CLAIMS ARE BEING LEFT OFF OFFICIAL CRIME RECORDS.

Figures obtained following a Freedom of Information request showed SOME UK POLICE FORCES WERE FAILING TO RECORD MORE THAN 40% OF CASES. Rules state only allegations verified as false, reported to the wrong force, or recorded in error can be removed.



The Association of Chief Police Officers said advances had been made in rape investigation but campaigners said women were being denied justice. The figures showed wide regional variations but some forces had such a high number of cases removed from records - known as 'no-criming'.”

BBC News – 21 September 2009.





“Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, has called for the NHS to give out heroin on prescription to addicts where other forms of treatment have failed. He called for 'imaginative' solutions to hard-drug abuse and said there could be 'huge benefits' to issuing the drug to chronic addicts. At the moment addicts can be prescribed heroin substitutes designed to wean them off the drug, but the idea of prescribing the drug itself is aimed at keeping long-term addicts away from drug dealers and crime.”

The Telegraph – 20 September 2009.



“More than £2 billion will be cut from the schools budget as part of a huge recession-fuelled cost-cutting drive, Children's Secretary Ed Balls revealed. Mr Balls became the first cabinet minister to set out how the cuts Gordon Brown publicly conceded were needed this week would affect public services. Up to 3,000 senior school staff, including heads and deputies as well as bureaucrats, could be axed as schools are merged into "federations" run by a single team, he told The Sunday Times. But most of those posts could be lost by "natural wastage", he suggested.

He warned teachers they would have to accept pay restraint to keep staff on the frontline and said more money could be saved by scrapping the 300-strong "field forces" of Whitehall officials that advise schools on the curriculum."

It is going to be tougher on spending over the next few years," said Balls of the post-2011 squeeze that will see up to 5% taken off school spending. Teachers' pay is set by an independent body but Mr Balls made clear his determination that they and other public sector workers should play their part in cutting costs.”

The Daily Mail – 19 September 2009.



“Secret plans to slash public spending by up to 30 per cent, with massive cuts affecting public transport, the Armed Forces, schools, hospitals and welfare benefits, are being drawn up by Whitehall mandarins. The draconian proposals could see spending reduced by a staggering £75billion a year, the biggest cut in British history.”

The Daily Mail – 19 September 2009.



“Between 2005 and 2008, the government issued 270,000 work permits to foreigners. In theory, these documents for students last for a maximum of three years and then the foreigner has to re-apply. For other workers, the permits differ depending on length and type of job. Yet during the same period of 2005 to 2008, almost 900,000 NINO numbers (which is a pathway to work and social welfare entitlements) were handed to foreigners in the UK.

Once given, these last their owner a lifetime. The disparity in these two figures concerning work permits and NI numbers makes it appear that one part of the Government has absolutely no idea what another is doing. Certainly, critics believe that the scandal of study visa overstayers is made worse by the ease with which foreigners can get a national insurance number. For the simple truth is that without the ability to earn money from work, many foreign students with expiring visas would be forced to return to their home country.”

The Daily Mail – 18 September 2009.





"Paul came home for a week’s R and R in July and I learned more about the situation in his base.

THERE ARE NO ARMOURED VEHICLES THERE.

HELICOPTERS ARE NOT WIDELY AVAILABLE…

THE INSURGENTS HAVE THE SAME METAL DETECTORS THAT OUR TROOPS HAVE AND USE THEM WHEN PLANTING THEIR IEDS, MAKING THEM VIRTUALLY UNDETECTABLE TO OUR TROOPS.

ANY GROUND CLEARED BY OUR TROOPS IS LEFT UNPROTECTED WHEN THEY RETURN TO BASE AND THE INSURGENTS JUST PLACE MORE IEDS IN THE SAME AREA.

THE IEDS ARE PLANTED WITHIN METRES OF THE BASE AND THERE IS NO EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE TO MONITOR THE AREA AND NOT ENOUGH TROOPS AVAILABLE TO MAINTAIN OBSERVATION POSTS ON THE GROUND.

Considering the number of soldiers killed from FOB Wishtan, it must be the most dangerous place in the whole of Afghanistan. I was already aware of the debacle concerning the purchase of CHINOOK HELICOPTERS THAT HAVE BEEN UNAVAILABLE FOR OVER TWO YEARS AS VITAL EQUIPMENT TO OPERATE THEM WAS NOT PURCHASED.

THE CLAIMS THAT OUR TROOPS ARE PROVIDED WITH THE BEST EQUIPMENT AND THAT WE HAVE ENOUGH HELICOPTERS IS CLEARLY UNTRUE AND SUPPORT OF THESE CLAIMS BY MPS OR SENIOR OFFICERS CONCERNED FOR THEIR CAREERS DOES NOT STAND UP TO THE FACTS.

On August 20, Paul and another soldier called John were killed by IEDs while on foot patrol from FOB Wishtan. IT TOOK NEARLY THREE HOURS FOR A HELICOPTER TO BECOME AVAILABLE TO FLY PAUL TO CAMP BASTION AND THIS WAS THEN PROVIDED BY THE US AS THERE WERE NO BRITISH CRAFT AVAILABLE.

THEY DIED BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT PROVIDED WITH THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT OR A SAFE SYSTEM OF WORK. THEY DID NOT HAVE DOGS OR SUITABLE EQUIPMENT TO DETECT THE IEDS THAT KILLED THEM. THERE WERE NO ARMOURED VEHICLES FOR THEM TO TRAVEL IN WHICH MAY HAVE ENABLED THEM TO SURVIVE THE EXPLOSIONS. IF THEY WERE NOT SENT OUT ON FOOT THEY WOULD STILL BE ALIVE.

I believe that Paul and John were not killed by the Taliban or the insurgents; THEY WERE KILLED BY WHOEVER SENT THEM OUT THERE KNOWING THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE THE EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO DO IT WITH ANY DEGREE OF SAFETY. THE SIX SOLDIERS ALREADY KILLED IN THE SAME AREA CLEARLY BEING PROOF THAT THEY WERE ILL-EQUIPPED TO DEAL WITH THE THREAT.

Any killing of our troops should be because of the actions of our enemies AND NOT BY THE INACTIONS OF OUR MPS.

BECAUSE OF YOU, I NOW HAVE A 26-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER WITH NO HUSBAND AND A FIVE-MONTH-OLD GRANDSON WITH NO FATHER… THE FACT THAT PAUL’S DEATH WAS NEEDLESS AND AVOIDABLE MAKES US EXTREMELY ANGRY.

AS THE PRIME MINISTER, YOU MUST ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF YOUR TROOPS. YOU HAVE A DUTY TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE PROVIDED WITH THE BEST EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE AND THE OPERATIONAL TACTICS THAT ARE USED ARE SOUND AND SENSIBLE. FAILING TO ENSURE THIS WILL BE SEEN AS AN ACT OF NEGLECT AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO GO UNANSWERED.”

Stephen Minter, the father-in-law of Sergeant Paul McAleese - a letter to Gordon Brown - The Daily Mail - 18 September 2009.




“The Board of Deputies complained to the BBC over perceived inaccuracies and lack of context in The Frankincense Trail, in which presenter Kate Humble followed the trade route which first connected the Arab world with the West. In an episode shown on BBC2 on September 3, she referred to an incident in 524CE. She said the Yemeni Jewish Himyar tribe, led by King Dhu Nuwas, set upon Christian residents of a village in Saudi Arabia.

Ms Humble said THE JEWS HAD OFFERED THE VILLAGERS THE CHOICE BETWEEN CONVERSION TO JUDAISM OR DEATH AND THAT 20,000 CHRISTIANS HAD THEN BEEN MASSACRED…

The BBC said the information had been obtained from an authentic source and it stood by the content…

Professor Dan Shapira, of Bar-Ilan University, said…

‘There is a street in Jerusalem named after Joseph Dhu Nuwas. People from the Jewish Kingdom of Himyar are among those buried at Beit-She’arim in Israel.’

A BBC spokeswoman said:

‘The source was a surviving text written by the Bishop of Beth Arsham in 524 CE.”

The Jewish Chronicle - 18 September 2009.






"In the fighting in Gaza... many civilians unnecessarily died and even more were seriously hurt.

In Israel, THREE CIVILIANS WERE KILLED and hundreds wounded by rockets from Gaza fired by Hamas and other groups... In Gaza, HUNDREDS OF CIVILIANS DIED. (B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said 1,387 Palestinians died, over half of them civilians and 252 of them children) They died from disproportionate attacks on legitimate military targets AND FROM ATTACKS ON HOSPITALS AND OTHER CIVILIAN STRUCTURES. They died from precision weapons like missiles from aerial drones as well as from heavy artillery. REPEATEDLY, THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COMBATANTS AND CIVILIANS…

Our fact-finding team found that IN MANY CASES ISRAEL COULD HAVE DONE MUCH MORE TO SPARE CIVILIANS without sacrificing its stated and legitimate military aims. IT SHOULD HAVE REFRAINED FROM ATTACKING CLEARLY CIVILIAN BUILDINGS, and from actions that might have resulted in a military advantage but at the cost of too many civilian lives. In these cases, Israel must investigate and Hamas is obliged to do the same. They must examine what happened and appropriately punish any soldier or commander found to have violated the law.

Unfortunately... while Israel has begun investigations into alleged violations by its forces in the Gaza conflict, THEY ARE UNLIKELY TO BE SERIOUS AND OBJECTIVE...

Pursuing justice in this case is essential because NO STATE OR ARMED GROUP SHOULD BE ABOVE THE LAW. Western governments in particular face a challenge because they have pushed for accountability in places like Darfur, but NOW MUST DO THE SAME WITH ISRAEL, AN ALLY and a democratic state.

FAILING TO PURSUE JUSTICE FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS DURING THE FIGHTING WILL HAVE A DEEPLY CORROSIVE EFFECT ON INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE, AND REVEAL AN UNACCEPTABLE HYPOCRISY. As a service to the hundreds of civilians who needlessly died and for the equal application of international justice, THE PERPETRATORS OF SERIOUS VIOLATIONS MUST BE HELD TO ACCOUNT."

Richard Goldstone, South African Judge and head of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict - New York Times - 17 September 2009.

If anyone out there wishes to accuse this gentleman of anti-semitism I'm afraid you're out of luck.

Goldstone is Jewish himself.



“The UK Conservative Party would foster the development of Islamic finance as much as the Labour government, if it comes to power after next year's general election, an Islamic finance expert linked to the Party said.”

LSE – 17 September 2009.



"I am not among those who believe Iran is an existential issue for Israel...

ISRAEL IS STRONG, I DON'T SEE ANYONE WHO COULD POSE AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT."

Former Israeli leader, Ehud Barak - Israeli daily, Yedioth Ahronoth - 17 September 2009.

And yet, on the same day, The Telegraph quoted Ephraim Sneh, Israel's former Deputy Defence Minister, thus:

"The Israeli government is the only entity that is responsible for the existence of the Jewish people. Iran has been explicit in its hostility to Israel time and again. They would use these weapons… We believe that Iran has the capacity and the delivery capability for nuclear weapons. They can proceed to production.

WE HAVE GOT TWO MONTHS TO ACT, BEFORE THE END OF 2009... WE CANNOT TAKE THE RISK."





"We simply cannot have a position where BANKS THAT ENGAGE IN HIGH-RISK CASINO-TYPE OPERATIONS ARE UNDERWRITTEN BY THE TAXPAYER…

What I thought was odd about Mervyn King's role is that TWO OR THREE YEARS BEFORE THE CRASH HE WAS WARNING IN VERY PUBLIC TERMS ABOUT THE ASSET BUBBLE AND HOUSE PRICES… There was a serious flurry of concern, which he expressed with all the authority of his position. The bubble got bigger – BUT THEN HE DIDN'T SAY ANY MORE. Either he was told this was none of his business, or he calculated that it wasn't having any impact and he didn't have any authority to act on it."

Vince Cable, Britain's most respected politician - The Independent - 16 September 2009.



"Gordon Brown was accused of misleading the nation over spending cuts as a leaked document revealed plans for the tightest squeeze since the 1970s. The Budget papers, marked 'confidential', showed public spending would have to be slashed by almost 10 per cent to meet Labour's pledge to halve the national debt. The only other option would be to raise taxes by £29billion - or £930 per family - every year, according to economists at the authoritative Institute for Fiscal Studies. The leaked document also forecast that benefit payments and spiralling debt interest will account for more than one pound in every three the Government spends in four years' time.”

The Daily Mail – 16 September 2009.





“More than one in 10 murders are committed by people on bail. Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act expose the shocking extent to which suspected criminals are freed to kill.Of 269 murders to April 2009, 27 were committed by people already on bail.But the national total is expected to be much worse as some of the biggest constabularies were unable to provide statistics.”

The Daily Express – 15 September 2009.





“How much of the national economic cake do Britain’s trade unions think the State should be entitled to? Is there any amount of money that could be poured into public services that would leave them content and convince them not to ask for more?

Is there in fact an amount that they would regard as excessive and that would lead them to call for rebates to tax-payers and a bit of belt-tightening in the state-funded sector? The answers to these questions would appear to be: all of it, no and no again.

Despite financial distress among the taxpayers who fund public spending and job losses across the private sector, union leaders are throwing their toys out of the pram at the very suggestion it is time to seek public sector efficiency savings.

Under Labour amazing sums of money have been thrown into a public sector that has continued operating on monopolistic lines, with restrictive opening hours, national bargaining, frequent strikes, excessive absence rates among staff and collapsing productivity.

The vast majority of new posts created have been in unnecessary administrative roles rather than among frontline staff. At a cost to taxpayers of £40billion a year and rising, final-salary pensions schemes for public sector workers have been protected even as they have died away in the private sector. Where public sector wages were once 10-15 per cent lower than in the private sector in acknowledgement of the greater job security on offer, that gap has now disappeared. Under Labour salaries in the public sector have eclipsed the average in the private sector.”

The Daily Express – 15 September 2009.





“Mohammed is now the most common name for baby boys born in London and three other English regions. The Islamic name overtook traditional choices like Jack, Thomas and Daniel to become the number one name in the West Midlands, Yorkshire and the Humber, and the North West, as well as in the capital, in 2008.”

The Telegraph - 15 September 2009.




“It's an absolute disgrace. If these crooks had a shred of humility, they'd pay the money back, apologise and crawl away into a hole and die.' “said..“…outraged businessman John Towers, former chairman of MG Rover, said Mandelson had ‘brass neck' to criticise the auditors. He said the Phoney Four should be banned from ever holding directorships again. The extraordinary greed, arrogance and incompetence which led to the collapse of one of the world's great countries is laid bare in a report published today. An independent inquiry into the so-called 'Phoney Four' has revealed an astonishing tale of sex, lies and money. Investigators uncovered a trail of shady property deals, interest-free loans, private jets and exotic holidays. The only mystery is how they got away with it for so long. The consortium took over GB Limited with a large sweetener from the previous management. They also inherited a healthy bank balance and a huge fund of public goodwill. Even though none of them had any experience of running such an enterprise, they were cheered to the rafters on their arrival. In retrospect, entrusting the operation to a failed lawyer, a psychologically-flawed Scottish sociopath, a temperamental television researcher and a chippy ship's steward was always going to be a huge risk.

But the British people were so glad to see the back of the old board of directors that they were prepared to overlook the obvious flaws. GB was once the largest exporter of motor cars and manufactured goods in the world.”

Richard Littlejohn - The Daily Mail – 15 September 2009.



“A recent report by The Centre For Social Justice, entitled Every Family Matters, called upon Parliament and parties across the political spectrum to recognise that HEALTHY MARRIAGES BUILD HEALTHY FAMILIES, AND HEALTHY FAMILIES BUILD A HEALTHY SOCIETY.

The report highlighted that while approximately HALF OF ALL COHABITING COUPLES WITH CHILDREN WILL SPLIT BY THE TIME THE CHILD IS FIVE, THE EQUIVALENT FIGURE FOR MARRIED COUPLES IS ONE IN 12.

AS A SOCIETY, WE HAVE ALLOWED MARRIAGE TO BECOME DEVALUED AND APART FROM THE FINANCIAL COST OF FAMILY BREAKDOWN, THE IMPACT UPON YOUNG PEOPLE IS INCALCULABLE. MARRIAGE HAS SUFFERED IN TERMS OF CENTRAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING, FISCAL OPPORTUNITIES, WELFARE BENEFITS AND LEGAL REFORMS.

In terms of finance alone, the report estimated that FAMILY BREAKDOWN FUELS CRIME, ADDING £60BILLION TO ITS ANNUAL COST; DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE ADDING £40BILLION AND EDUCATIONAL FAILURE A FURTHER £20BILLION...

Polling carried out by YouGov that showed 57 per cent believed the law should promote marriage in preference to other kinds of family structure. An overwhelming 85 per cent backed a tax break to promote marriage...

I AM FED UP TO THE BACK TEETH WITH THE BANKRUPT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS which refuses to recognise the distinctive impact made on this country by the Church of England and other churches. More people do unpaid work for church groups than any other organisation, with churchgoers contributing 23.2 million hours of voluntary service each month in their local communities outside the church.

The Church of England alone provides activities outside church worship in the local community for more than half-a-million under-16-year-olds…

In March this year it was revealed that THE DEPARTMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES HAS GIVEN £25,000 TO THE BRITISH HUMANIST ASSOCIATION TO RUIN LOCAL CAMPAIGNS PROMOTING ATHEISM. Meanwhile, THE EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HAS GIVEN THEM £35,000 OF TAXPAYERS’ MONEY TO PROMOTE SECULARISM IN THE PUBLIC SERVICES UNDER EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS.”

Archbishop of York, John Sentamu - The Daily Mail - 15 September 2009.



"If Labour are serious about re-engaging with their core supporters, they can prove it by making a bold statement on PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF THE RAILWAYS."

Bob Crowe, the Rail Maritime and Transport Union's General Secretary - BBC News - 14 September 2009.

The BBC added:

"MOST PEOPLE ARE IN FAVOUR OF RETURNING THE RAILWAYS TO PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, with just 23% supporting privatisation… Seven out of 10 of those questioned backed re-nationalisation...

RMT General Secretary Bob Crow said the poll showed the government is 'out of step with the voters" on who owns and runs the rail network'."



“Labour is mounting a £400million stealth raid on the pensions of millions of middle-class Britons. Changes to the second state pension – which many rely on to top up basic payouts – means the benefits paid to middle earners will be slashed. Millions of widows will also see their pension cut dramatically ¬because they will now be entitled to only half of their husband’s ¬second state pension, or S2P.”

The Daily Express – 14 September 2009.





“One of the most startling aspects of our society at present is the way things that were once considered to be virtues have now become the object of intense disapproval, and vice versa. A recent survey of teachers by London University's Institute of Education found that some three-quarters of them believed it was their duty to warn their pupils about the dangers of patriotism. Once upon a time, loving your country enough that you were prepared to die for it was held to be the highest virtue. Indeed, without patriotism there would be no one serving in the Armed Forces.

For the past 1,000 years, it has given the people of these islands the strength and courage to repel invaders and defeat the enemies of liberty.

Is it not extraordinary that such affection for your country should now be considered so objectionable that children should be told it is positively dangerous? One teacher said that praising patriotism excluded non-British pupils…

But on the grounds that love for your country is wrong, many teachers have long stopped passing on to children the knowledge they need if they are to admire and identify with Britain. Somehow this has got mixed up with racism, xenophobia and the BNP.”

Melanie Phillips - The Daily Mail – 14 September 2009.





“Bungling officials at a Whitehall department have overpaid the civil servants who work there by more than £1.5million in the past three years, it emerged. The Ministry of Justice - which is run by Jack Straw and oversees prisons, courts and probation - has admitted that almost £1million will never be recovered. In one case, a junior civil servant almost doubled his salary. The unnamed official was supposed to be paid £22,000 a year but walked away with an extra £18,500. It is not know whether that money was clawed back. The ministry was forced to reveal the errors following requests under the Freedom of Information Act, which revealed that more than 1,000 staff were overpaid by a total of £1,522,995 over the last three years. Barely a third of that sum has been recovered, with £904,076 written off as losses by Government accountants.”

The Daily Mail – 14 September 2009.





“Gordon Brown's 'mishandling' of the economy has cost £50,000 for every man, woman and child in Britain, it has been claimed. The Prime Minister has frittered away a staggering £3trillion since arriving in Downing Street in 1997, according to a new book. He squandered the eye-watering sums on 'profligate' Government spending, record levels of borrowing, bailing out the UK's failing banks and the soaring cost of gold-plated public sector pensions, a breakdown of official statistics has found.The figures were a 'devastating indictment' of the damage to the country finances during Mr Brown's 12 years at the Treasury and in Number 10, the authors' claimed.

The book also pointed out that Labour had taken public spending to levels last seen under Harold Wilson and James Callaghan in 1976.”

The Daily Mail – 14 September 2009.



“'You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of A RELIGION WHICH RESPECTS WOMEN AND SELF-DISCIPLINE”.

Judge Anthony Goldstaub QC - The Daily Mail – 13 September 2009.

The judge lambasted a rapist for claiming his victim was a liar - then commended him for becoming a Muslim!



“VAST SUMS ARE BEING FUNNELLED INTO FOREIGN MOSQUES AND MADRASSAS VIA A GROUP OF BRITISH MUSLIM TV STATIONS THAT HAVE LINKS TO A CONVICTED FRAUDSTER. They are airing all-night appeals from TV studios in east London each night during Ramadan which ends next week. Much of the money is being raised by charities that have often only just registered in the UK. As such, they have little traceable financial history and security sources are concerned how donations could be spent.

This year, the head of the Stockport-based Green Crescent charity was arrested in Bangladesh after arms were found at an Islamic school it had allegedly funded… The TV licences are held at the east London offices of Mohammed Ferdhaus, 36, who served four months for insurance fraud.”

The Daily Express – 13 September 2009.



"If you think about your situation well, you will know that THE WHITE HOUSE IS OCCUPIED BY PRESSURE GROUPS… The bitter truth is that THE NEO-CONSERVATIVES CONTINUE TO CAST THEIR HEAVY SHADOWS UPON YOU…

All we will do is to continue the war of attrition against you on all possible axes, like we exhausted the Soviet Union for ten years until it collapsed with grace from Allah the Almighty and became a memory of the past…

Obama and his administration have sowed new seeds of hatred against America…

Let the American people prepare to harvest the crops of what the leaders of the White House plant in the next years and decades."

Osama Bin Laden - a video titled ‘Message to the American People’ - Google News - 13 September 2009.



“PRAISING PATRIOTISM EXCLUDES NON-BRITISH PUPILS,' one teacher told researchers.

THREE-QUARTERS OF TEACHERS IN BRITAIN'S SCHOOLS BELIEVE THEY SHOULD WARN PUPILS ABOUT THE DANGERS OF PATRIOTISM - WHICH SOME REGARD AS A FORM OF 'BRAINWASHING', researchers have found… Even those who felt positively about patriotism felt the need to qualify and tone down their support, stressing that they disliked 'jingoistic flag-waving'. “

The Daily Mail – 12 September 2009.



“School nurses are so overburdened that EACH OF THEM HAS TO LOOK AFTER AN AVERAGE OF 2,590 PUPILS, according to a report today from the Royal College of Nursing (RCN).”

The Daily Mail -12 September 2009.



“ONE IN FOUR ADULTS IN BRITAIN WILL HAVE TO BE SCREENED BY THE INDEPENDENT SAFEGUARDING AUTHORITy when it goes live next month, before they are allowed to work in any job involving access to children.

It could even cover those who do no more than give neighbours' or friends' children lifts to sports or club events… THE ISA WILL BECOME THE WORLD'S LARGEST VETTING AND CHECKING SYSTEM WHEN IT STARTS WORK NEXT MONTH, CHECKING THE BACKGROUNDS OF AN ESTIMATED 11.3MILLION ADULTS IN ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

Anyone whose work brings them into contact with children will have to undergo checks costing £64, including all teachers, doctors, nurses dentists, pharmacists, prison officers, and school governors and dinner ladies.

Most controversially, parents who give lifts to friends' children to attend a football match or Cubs' evening will have to be vetted in all cases where the arrangements are made through the club or organisation. Parents will also need official clearance before giving up their free time to visit their child's school occasionally to help youngsters learn to read. ADULTS BREACHING THE RULES COULD FACE A £5,000 FINE, AS CAN CLUBS WHICH MAKE USE OF UNVETTED VOLUNTEERS - ENOUGH TO PUT MANY SMALL GROUPS OUT OF BUSINESS.”

The Daily Mail – 11 September 2009.



“The shocking reality of soft justice in Labour’s Britain was exposed y by the revelation that THOUSANDS OF CRIMINALS, INCLUDING RAPISTS AND PAEDOPHILES, WERE LET OFF BY POLICE.

Critics described as disturbing the disclosure that ONE FORCE ALLOWED 4,256 OFFENDERS TO GO FREE WITH A CAUTION, REPRIMAND OR FINAL WARNING IN JUST ONE YEAR.

Among the serious crimes never brought to trial were 10 sexual offences against children under 13, including three of rape. The rapists got final warnings, while the others were cautioned or reprimanded for sexual assault. Another 12 sex attackers avoided court for assaults on girls over 13 while one went free after being cautioned for sexually assaulting a boy. In TOTAL 1,485 SERIOUS OFFENCES INVOLVING SEX OR VIOLENCE WENT UNPUNISHED. CAMBRIDGESHIRE POLICE were forced to reveal the figures by a Freedom of Information request.”

The Daily Express – 11 September 2009.



“PEOPLE HAVE BEEN FINED AS LITTLE AS £1 FOR CARRYING A KNIFE AND FOUR OUT OF FIVE PEOPLE CAUGHT WITH BLADES AVOID JAIL… Just over 6,200 PEOPLE WERE CONVICTED OF POSSESSING A KNIFE OR OFFENSIVE WEAPON BETWEEN APRIL AND JUNE THIS YEAR. OF THOSE, ONLY 1,159 WERE IMMEDIATELY JAILED. IN 2005 ONE ADULT WAS FINED JUST £1 FOR THE OFFENCE.”

The Daily Express – 11 September 2009.



“TEACHING ASSISTANTS ARE TAKING LESSONS ALONE IN SOME SCHOOLS IN ENGLAND, WITHOUT BEING SUPERVISED BY QUALIFIED TEACHERS, a report says.

The study by London Metropolitan University SAID EIGHT IN 10 SCHOOLS USE TEACHING ASSISTANTS IN THIS WAY. Assistants are meant to be support staff, but researchers found them covering for absent teachers".

BBC News – 10 September 2009.



“Myth 1: The BNP's arguments can be defeated through rational argument.

This argument ignores the reason why most people vote BNP: because they're angry. THE IDEA THAT THEY'VE SPENT TIME PORING OVER POLICY POSITIONS OF EACH OF THE PARTIES AND COME TO A CONSIDERED DECISION IS NONSENSICAL. And so THE IDEA THE BNP CAN BE DEFEATED VIA RATIONAL ARGUMENTS AND 'EXPOSING THEM' IS EQUALLY DELUDED...

The BNP's core support is derived from PEOPLE WHO THINK THE ENTIRE NATION IS UNDER THE CONTROL OF A VAST CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE HONEST PEOPLE OF BRITAIN...

'No Platform' worked quite well in sidelining the BNP in mainstream conversation. It wasn't that long ago that the National Front and its affiliates were fearlessly marching through various streets in Britain and expressing support for the National Front was something to be proud of. 'NO PLATFORM' CHANGED THAT BY ACTIVELY TRYING TO PAINT THE BNP ET AL AS EXTREMIST MOVEMENTS THAT RIGHT-THINKING PEOPLE SHOULD SHUN…

The party has grown thanks to a mixture of: THE LABOUR PARTY ABANDONING GRASSROOTS POLITICS IN KEY AREAS, FEARS OVER MULTICULTURALISM, IMMIGRATION, AND ECONOMIC COLLAPSE in many towns across England".

Sunny Hundal, a second-generation Indian immigrant, editor of Asians in Media magazine, founder of the think tank, New Generation Network and the host of the Pickled Politics weblog, citicising the BBC's decision to allow the BNP to participate on Question Time - The BNP Doesn't Deserve Political Respect - The Guardian - 7 September 2009.



“THE EDIFICE OF OFFICIAL LIES OVER THE RELEASE OF THE LOCKERBIE BOMBER HAS COLLAPSED. Amid the rubble we can now see the full extent of Labour’s deceit and hypocrisy. What has been presented as a noble act of ‘compassion’ is in fact AN ABJECT SURRENDER…

LABOUR IS SO DESPERATE TO APPEASE ISLAMIC SENTIMENT THAT IT CAVES IN AT THE FIRST HINT OF PRESSURE. The impulse that led to the release of Megrahi is the same mentality that presides over THE ISLAMIFICATION OF OUR COUNTRY, THAT DERIDES OUR HERITAGE AND THAT SENDS TROOPS TO DIE TO PROP UP THE CORRUPT REGIME OF PRESIDENT KARZAI.

We once had rulers who saw it as their duty to protect the British public. TODAY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT COLLUDES WITH THE ENEMIES OF OUR SOCIETY. The release of Megrahi… is in line with Britain’s enfeebled policy on crime, WHERE ALL COMPASSION IS GEARED TOWARDS THE PERPETRATORS NOT THE VICTIMS.

WE WERE ONCE ONE OF THE GREATEST NATIONS ON EARTH.

TODAY, THANKS TO LABOUR, WE HAVE BEEN PROSTITUTED IN THE LIBYAN DESERT.”

Leo McKinstry - The Daily Express – 7 September 2009.



“THE CHILDREN OF BAD PARENTS SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY AS BABIES AND OFFERED FOR ADOPTION, the head of a leading charity said yesterday. Barnardo's chief Martin Narey said it is impossible to fix some families that are 'broken'. He acknowledged that many in the social work establishment will see his views as 'illiberal heresy'.

MR NAREY'S CALL REVIVES THE PUSH FOR MORE ADOPTIONS LAUNCHED BY TONY BLAIR IN HIS EARLY YEARS IN POWER.”

The Daily Mail – 7 September 2009.



“MORE THAN 250 PRIMARY SCHOOLS WILL HAVE TO BE BUILT OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS TO PROVIDE PLACES FOR THE CHILDREN OF MIGRANTS, an MPs' pressure group said.

It said THE SCHOOLS WILL BE NEEDED FOR 67,000 CHILDREN WHO HAVE A FOREIGN-BORN PARENT AND THE COST TO TAXPAYERS WILL BE AROUND £1BILLION.

The bill for the schools is just one element of the impact on taxpayers and families of 'uncontrolled immigration', the Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration said.”

The Daily Mail – 7 September 2009.



“The head of the Government’s Equalities quango was under fresh pressure last night over A £300,000 CONTRACT AWARDED TO A COMPANY RUN BY A CLOSE FRIEND.

Trevor Phillips was heavily criticised last month when it emerged that THE EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HAD BROKEN EUROPEAN LAW WHEN HIRING JUNIPER COMMUNICATIONS TO PRODUCE 46 SHORT VIDEO CLIPS OF CELEBRITIES TALKING ABOUT ‘DIFFERENCE’ called My Story.

JUNIPER IS OWNED BY DR SAMIR SHAH, A NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE BBC WHO MADE PROGRAMMES AT LONDON WEEKEND TELEVISION WITH MR PHILLIPS IN THE EIGHTIES and worked with him at a charity in the Nineties. Now The Mail on Sunday can reveal that THE £70MILLION-A-YEAR QUANGO PAID JUNIPER TEN TIMES WHAT WAS PROPOSED IN THE ORIGINAL BUDGET. DR SHAH’S FIRM WAS PAID £308,000 FOR THE MY STORY CLIPS featuring TV fashion expert Gok Wan, comedian Sanjeev Bhaskar and paralympian Dame Tanni Grey-Thompson. However, an investigation into the deal, passed to The Mail on Sunday, found THE ORIGINAL BUDGET FOR THE FILMS WAS JUST £30,000.”

The Daily Mail – 6 September 2009.



"It’s absurd to give the BNP any space. This is how Hitler came to power and these people have got the same objectives. It’s typical BBC intellectualism giving them airtime."

John Mann, New Labour MP for Bassetlaw - The Times - 6 September 2009.

This was said after the BBC had suggested that it would only be fair to give the BNP a spot on the current affairs programme Question Time.

I wonder, Mr Mann, at what point would a party that won 6.2 per cent of the vote in the EU election become eligible to be treated precisely the same as all the others? Are you one of these democracy-but-not-for everyone types? Are you one of these “some animals are more equal than others” politicians?

Are you a fan of Joseph Stalin, Mr Mann? Napoleon, the sinister boss pig in Animal Farm, was responsible for the preceding quotation and he represented Uncle Joe in Orwell’s great book.

You know, almost all of the 6.2 per cent will have been native Britons. My guess is a good few will have cast their vote this way because your party has, very ostentatiously, championed the immigrant over the last 45 years or so. Whereas the British working man, particularly since 1997, has been left in the lurch.

John Mann is the Chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Anti-semitism.

The Jewish community that Mann, an MP who represents a working-class community, is happy to stand up for represents 0.5 per cent of the British population. This particular percentage contains a good many of the richest and most powerful people on earth.

Most of the 6.2 per cent (943,598) who voted for the BNP in the EU elections will have been comparatively poor and powerless.

The poor and powerless are the very people the Labour Party was formed to represent.



"It was no surprise that in a liberal city like Austin, EVERY PARENT WAS A WELCOMING MULTICULTURALIST, EMBRACING DIVERSITY… THEY WANTED THEIR CHILDREN TO GROW UP COLORBLIND... THEY DIDN'T WANT THE WRONG THING COMING OUT OF THE MOUTH OF THEIR KIDS…

MINORITY PARENTS ARE MORE LIKELY TO HELP THEIR CHILDREN DEVELOP A RACIAL IDENTITY... April Harris-Britt, a clinical psychologist and professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, found that… some PREPARATION FOR BIAS was beneficial… But if children heard these preparation-for-bias warnings often… they were… MUCH MORE LIKELY TO BLAME THEIR FAILURES ON THEIR TEACHERS…

Preparation for bias is not, however, the only way minorities talk to their children about race. The other broad category of conversation, in Harris-Britt's analysis, is ethnic pride. FROM A VERY YOUNG AGE, MINORITY CHILDREN ARE COACHED TO BE PROUD OF THEIR ETHNIC HISTORY. She found that THIS WAS EXCEEDINGLY GOOD FOR CHILDREN'S SELF-CONFIDENCE…

That leads to the question that everyone wonders but rarely dares to ask. IF ‘BLACK PRIDE’ IS GOOD FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN CHILDREN, WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE WHITE CHILDREN? IT'S HORRIFYING TO IMAGINE KIDS BEING ‘PROUD TO BE WHITE’…

A PRIDE MESSAGE WOULD NOT JUST BE ABHORRENT — IT'D BE REDUNDANT.”

Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman - Newsweek - 5 September 2009.

And that, ladies and gents, is what the PC Crowd has been after all along; one rule for THEM, another, completely different rule for us.

It is war, folks.

It really is.



“Mr Phillips admitted there had been ‘serious managerial oversights’ in setting up the controversial watchdog in 2007 and ‘painful lessons’ learned. Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission has been rocked by THE RESIGNATION OF SIX COMMISSIONERS, ATTACKS ON HIS MANAGEMENT AND CRITICISM BY SPENDING WATCHDOG THE NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE.

The former TV journalist, who earns £120,000-a-year for the part-time role, also defended taking on other work outside his chairmanship. The EHRC took over from the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), the Disability Rights Commission (DRC) and the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC).

ITS BUDGET IS £70 MILLION.”


The Daily Express – 5 September 2009.



“In a single week Brown has underlined all his main drawbacks: his inability to communicate, his chronic dithering, his tin ear for public opinion and his addiction to tax increases. In combination, THESE MAKE HIM UNELECTABLE AND MOST LABOUR MPS REALISE THAT.”

Patrick O'Flynn - The Daily Express – 5 September 2009.



"WHILE THE FOREIGN OFFICE TALKS ABOUT THE EU SERVING BRITAIN'S NEEDS, WELL-PAID EMPLOYEES OF BRUSSELS ARE PROMOTING A COUNTRY CALLED EUROPE AROUND THE GLOBE. It is astonishing that British ministers are still in denial about the way this harms our international standing.”

Dr Lee Rotherham, EU Policy Analyst at the TaxPayers' Alliance - The Daily Express – 4 September 2009.

The Express continued:

“A survey by the Taxpayers' Alliance claims EU diplomats based in lavish residences are being publicly funded to the tune of £3.4 billion a year as part of an EU ‘Foreign Service‘. The Alliance says the EU's own diplomatic service - which the European Commission says does not exist - ‘HAS QUIETLY GROWN TO EFFECTIVELY CHALLENGE THE BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE AROUND THE GLOBE‘.

The property portfolio of ‘EU embassies’ is worth £55 million pounds, says the Alliance, while the occupants enjoy classic diplomatic perks, allowances, and even, in some cases, butlers and chauffeurs.”

“London Mayor Boris Johnson today encouraged people to undergo a day of fasting to help them gain a better understanding of their 'Muslim neighbour'
He said:

“Whether it's in theatre, comedy, sports, music or politics, Muslims are challenging the traditional stereotypes and showing that they are, and want to be, a part of the mainstream community. 'That's why I URGE PEOPLE, PARTICULARLY DURING RAMADAN, TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT ISLAM, INCREASE YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND LEARNING, EVEN FAST FOR A DAY WITH YOUR MUSLIM NEIGHBOUR AND BREAK YOUR FAST AT THE LOCAL MOSQUE.

I would be very surprised if you didn't find that you share more in common than you thought…

MUSLIMS ARE AT THE HEART OF EVERY ASPECT OF SOCIETY. THEIR CONTRIBUTION IS SOMETHING THAT ALL LONDONERS BENEFIT FROM. MUSLIM POLICE OFFICERS, DOCTORS, SCIENTISTS AND TEACHERS ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE FABRIC OF LONDON.

Islamic finance is contributing to the economy by changing the way Londoners invest, save, borrow and spend. THERE ARE VALUABLE LESSONS THAT PEOPLE OF ALL BACKGROUNDS CAN LEARN FROM ISLAM SUCH AS THE IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNITY SPIRIT, FAMILY TIES, COMPASSION AND HELPING THOSE LESS FORTUNATE, ALL OF WHICH LIE AT THE HEART OF THE TEACHINGS OF RAMADAN.'”

The Daily Mail – 4 September 2009.



"LIVING IN A NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A LOT OF PEOPLE OF SIMILAR ETHNIC BACKGROUND MAY HAVE SOME HEALTH BENEFIT, hints a new study from the United Kingdom.

In the study, FEWER ACTIVITY-LIMITING LONG-TERM ILLNESSES WERE REPORTED BY PEOPLE WHO LIVED IN NEIGHBORHOODS THEY FELT WERE MORE THAN HALF MADE UP OF PEOPLE WITH WHOM THEY SHARED A COMMON ETHNICITY.

This effect was seen among white (primarily of British and Irish ancestry), Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and African race and ethnic groups… Dr. Mai Stafford, from University College London, told Reuters Health in an email correspondence.

A HEALTH BENEFIT OF LIVING IN NEIGHBORHOOD WITH PEOPLE OF THE SAME ETHNIC BACKGROUND WAS EVIDENT FOR ALL ETHNIC GROUPS - except those of Caribbean ethnicity."

Reuters - 4 September 2009.

“Except those of Caribbean ethnicity”?

Perhaps this is why, over the last 61 years, the West Indian has proved so determined to live alongside us? As opposed to living alongside their own, that is?

Anyway, it looks like the indigenous, white “racists”, “Nazis”, “Fascists”, “bigots”, “dinosaurs” and “little Englanders” were right all along, doesn’t it? No one actually wants to be enriched by all manner of other peoples and cultures. We all want to live amongst our own kind.

And yet, over the last 44 years, the politicians have built up an enormous body of race law to ensure that the possibility of so living, for the native, white majority of these islands, was diminished to the point of impossibility.

At the same time, of course, all the governmental and most of the media propaganda has been of the happy-clappy, cohere-with-the-alien, be-enriched-by-the-Multicult, variety.

Oh yes, the politicians and the bought media has been playing a very sinister game with the British people over the course of the last fifty years.



“There is every sign that THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT, AND THE CIVIL SERVICE WHICH ANSWERS TO IT, IS RIPE FOR BEING SECTIONED UNDER SOME MENTAL HEALTH ACT… Any index of governmental performance gives the same reading of certifiable lunacy…

THE IMMIGRATION FIGURES FROM BRITAIN ARE EVEN MORE TERRIFYING THAN THE ALREADY STUPEFYING ONES FOR IRELAND. ALMOST A QUARTER OF ALL BABIES BORN IN BRITAIN LAST YEAR WERE TO FOREIGN-BORN MOTHERS...

HOW DOES ONE INCULCATE A SENSE OF ENGLISHNESS AMONGST SCHOOLCHILDREN IN ENTIRE CITIES WHERE THE MAJORITY OF THEIR MOTHERS ARE FOREIGN?…

MANY YOUNG ENGLISH-BORN MOTHERS HAVE BEEN RAISED IN ALIEN CANTONMENTS… THEY ARE AS MUCH PART OF ENGLAND AS ONE OF SOMERSET MAUGHAM'S TEA-PLANTERS WAS CULTURALLY MALAY.

Moreover, for the first time in decades, a straightforward increase in fertility, rather than immigration, was a prime mover in the overall growth of population in Britain, by some 408,000 people. BUT THIS WAS NOT OF BRITISH PEOPLE. NEARLY 60PC OF THE INCREASE WAS DUE TO THE FECUNDITY OF FOREIGN-BORN MOTHERS. More births in Britain does not necessarily mean more Britons. BRITAIN DOESN'T NEED IMMIGRATION TO HAVE LOTS OF FOREIGNERS ANY MORE, BECAUSE NOW IT'S GROWING THEM AT HOME.

Just about every single statistic in the British birth survey should be ringing action stations in the British media, but INSTEAD THERE IS MERELY THE WHITE FLAG OF MUTE SURRENDER TO POST-POWELLITE POLITICAL CORRECTNESS…

The population of Britain rose by two million in seven years, to reach 61.4 million. That is more than one fifth the population of the US, but IN JUST ONE-FORTIETH OF THE LAND MASS. And THERE'S ALMOST NOTHING TO STOP ANY PART OF THAT MULTINATIONAL, CULTURALLY-INCHOATE MASS MOVING TO IRELAND“.

Kevin Myers - The Irish Independent - 4 September 2009.

Given that The Independent is the biggest selling newspaper in Ireland, Kevin Myers' article would suggest that the first world's mainstream media is some way beyond the "end of the beginning" stage.

As regards what the PC Crowd has done to us, that is.

The New World Order pushed too far, too fast, I reckon.

Roll on the beginning of the end.



“Before the US invasion of March 2003 some very shrewd heads who knew that weird country well tried to advise Washington that it would not work simply to invade, conquer and then presume all problems would be over. In fact, the White House was informed, the problems would just be beginning.

But those two MALIGN IDIOTS DONALD RUMSFELD AT DEFENCE AND DICK CHENEY AS VICE-PREZ KNEW BETTER. The invasion and conquest was textbook but with the massive superiority in firepower why would it not be? THEN CAME UTTER CHAOS.

Without a clue what to do next the terrible twins fired the entire Iraqi army who, unemployed but armed to the teeth, promptly became insurgents. Also fired en masse was the Baath Party and with them went any chance of administering the conquered country. Al Qaeda had a field day. Previously proscribed by Saddam Hussein, who was a secular monster, not a religious one, THE RELIGIOUS NUTTERS FORMED COMMON CAUSE WITH THE REBELLIOUS IRAQIS AND THE DEATH TOLL OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH TROOPS BEGAN. That lasted for six years, LONGER THAN THE SECOND WORLD WAR.

As for the cost, don’t even ask. THE AFGHAN MISCALCULATION HAS BEEN JUST AS BAD…

It is a simple fact that you cannot defeat a fanatical terrorist movement if it has four things. LIMITLESS FUNDS (THE HEROIN CROP), LIMITLESS RECRUITS (THE MADRASSAH SCHOOLS), A FRIENDLY BORDER (THE PAKISTAN SANCTUARY) AND A DISCREDITED AND CORRUPT SPIV AS THE NATIONAL PRESIDENT (KARZAI).

Now General McChrystal expresses the hope he can persuade the Taliban to return to their villages and join the struggle to rebuild Afghanistan. As what? Why, AS A SECULAR DEMOCRACY. But that is exactly what the Taliban loathe. THEY WANT AN ULTRA-HARSH SHARIA-GOVERNED CALIPHATE...

Maybe our Yankee allies should listen a bit more. We have a lot of experience and superb fighting men and women.

TROUBLE IS WE ALSO HAVE A RUBBISH GOVERNMENT".

Frederick Forsyth - The Daily Express - 4 September 2009.



“There seem to me to be some PROBLEMS WHICH NEED FIXING WITH THE GREATEST URGENCY… I DO NOT THINK THE PUBLIC WILL ACCEPT FOR MUCH LONGER THAT OUR LOSSES CAN BE JUSTIFIED BY SIMPLY REFERRING TO THE RISK OF GREATER TERRORISM ON OUR STREETS.

I think we must be much more direct about the reality that we do punch a long way above our weight, that many of our allies do far too little, and that leaving the field to the United States would mean the end of NATO as a meaningful proposition.

The British people… would appreciate more direct approach by politicians. We also need to make it clear that our commitment in Afghanistan is high but time limited. It should be possible now to say that we will move off our present war-footing and reduce our forces there substantially during our next term in government…

For many, Britain fights; Germany pays, France calculates; Italy avoids. ..

I DO NOT THINK THE BRITISH PEOPLE WILL SUPPORT THE PHYSICAL RISK TO OUR SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN UNLESS THEY CAN BE GIVEN CONFIDENCE THAT AFGHANISTAN'S GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN PROPERLY ELECTED AND HAS A CLEAR INTENT TO DEAL WITH THE CORRUPTION THERE WHICH HAS CONTINUED UNABATED IN RECENT YEARS…

Most important of all, we must make it clear to every serviceman and woman, their families and the British public that WE GIVE THEIR WELL-BEING THE HIGHEST POLITICAL PRIORITY. Behind the hand attacks by any Labour figure on senior service personnel are now, to the public, indistinguishable from attacks on the services themselves. Conversely, in my view we should allow our service personnel greater latitude to voice their views…

Above all, LABOUR MUST REMEMBER THAT SERVICE FOLK AND THEIR FAMILIES ARE OUR PEOPLE.”

Eric Joyce, New Labour MP and Personal Private Secretary of the Defence Minister, Bob Ainsworth - His resignation letter to Gordon Brown - BBC News - 3 September 2009.

This Blairite toady was just about the most strident of New Labour’s backbench warmongers in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack upon the World Trade Centre.



"Our advocacy is for a fair process overseen by the Independent Election Commission, taking into account the decisions of the Election Complaints Commission, a process which then elects a government that is legitimate and reflects the will of the people who voted...

During that process there are going to be many claims of irregularities; THAT HAPPENS IN EVERY DEMOCRACY. We recently had a senatorial election in Minnesota which took seven months to determine the outcome, THERE WERE SO MANY CHARGES OF IRREGULARITIES... THAT HAPPENS IN DEMOCRACIES, EVEN WHEN THEY ARE NOT IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR."

Richard Holbrooke, Barack Obama's "Special Representative" to Aghanistan and Pakistan, dismissing the evidence of widespread corruption in the Afgan elections as "democracy" at work - A conference in Paris - 2 September 2009.

Holbrooke is Jewish.



“In 1951, six countries gathered together with the aim ‘to make war unthinkable‘. Since then, the European Union has helped to build peace and security across 27 countries… THE BIG CHALLENGES OF THE MODERN WORLD NEED MORE, NOT LESS, INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION.

POLAND IS THE COUNTRY MY MOTHER CAME FROM… Poles are proud of their history, heritage and national identity. But they rightly see no conflict between pride in their country and wanting to be part of European co-operation. NOR SHOULD WE…

EXTREMISTS LIKE THE BNP OPPOSE WHAT EUROPE STANDS FOR - it goes against their xenophobia and hatred. THEY ARE OUT OF STEP WITH MODERN BRITAIN.”

David Miliband - The Mirror - 1 September 2009.

"Xenophobia and hatred"?

Most British Nationalists would, I presume, feel something akin to "hatred" for our treacherous politicians and the PC Crowd.

But then, as these have been at war with the British people for quite some time now, why wouldn't we be?

As for the "xenophobia" bit, the Miliband types fear and despise the Brit who dares to stick up for his own far more than that Briton fears and despises the foreigner. That's why they call us nasty names and do their damnedest to convince the foolish that those who would put the downtrodden Brit first in his own land are the bad guys.

Our Foreign Secretary is a second-generation Jewish immigrant.

Figure it out.



"MORE THAN HALF OF VIOLENT CRIMES WENT UNSOLVED LAST YEAR…

Almost half a million thugs committed violent acts without being caught.

Police solved only 47 per cent of 903,993 violent attacks, compared to 77 per cent as recently as 1996, the year before Labour came to power. Only 48 per cent of suspects identified in violence against the person cases are summonsed to appear in court. The remainder are issued cautions or on-the-spot fines, have their crime 'taken into consideration' as part of sentencing for another offence or face no further action.

Home Office statisticians also estimate that ONLY AROUND HALF OF VIOLENT CRIME IS REPORTED. This means that violent offenders have only a one in eight chance of facing serious punishment.”

The Daily Mail – 1 September 2009.



“In 1951, six countries gathered together with the aim ‘to make war unthinkable‘. Since then, the European Union has helped to build peace and security across 27 countries…

THE BIG CHALLENGES OF THE MODERN WORLD NEED MORE, NOT LESS, INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION.

POLAND IS THE COUNTRY MY MOTHER CAME FROM… Poles are proud of their history, heritage and national identity. But they rightly see no conflict between pride in their country and wanting to be part of European co-operation. NOR SHOULD WE…

EXTREMISTS LIKE THE BNP OPPOSE WHAT EUROPE STANDS FOR - it goes against their xenophobia and hatred. THEY ARE OUT OF STEP WITH MODERN BRITAIN.”

David Miliband - The Mirror - 1 September 2009.



“A THIRD OF TEENAGE GIRLS SUFFER SEXUAL ABUSE IN A RELATIONSHIP AND A QUARTER EXPERIENCE VIOLENCE AT THE HANDS OF THEIR BOYFRIENDS, a survey suggests.

Nearly 90% of 1,400 girls aged 13 to 17 had been in intimate relationships, the NSPCC and University of Bristol found.

Of these, one in six said they had been pressured into sexual intercourse and ONE IN 16 SAID THEY HAD BEEN RAPED.

BBC News – 1 September 2009.



"THERE MAY BE SOME MEMBERS IN THIS ORGANISATION WHO DO NOT DESERVE TO BE PROTECTED BY THE LAW".

Judge John Stobart fining Matthew Single just £200 for publishing the BNP membership list - BBC News - 1 September 2009.

This is an interestingly partizan thing for a supposedly impartial British judge to say in a British court of law, don't you think? Not what you might call a "great, British Justice" approach.


“UP TO A FIFTH OF KILLERS IN ENGLAND AND WALES ARE FOREIGN, POLICE FIGURES SUGGEST. OUT OF 371 INDIVIDUALS ACCUSED OR CONVICTED OF MURDER OR MANSLAUGHTER LAST YEAR, 79 WERE FROM ABROAD - MORE THAN 21 PER CENT.
Foreign immigrants make up only around a tenth of the UK population, meaning THEY ARE STATISTICALLY TWICE AS LIKELY AS NATIVE BRITONS TO BE CHARGED WITH OR FOUND GUILTY OF AN ILLEGAL KILLING.

IN LONDON, ALMOST 40 PER CENT OF THOSE IN SUCH CASES IN THE PAST YEAR WERE FROM OVERSEAS, OR OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN...

The most common nationality for foreigners involved in murder and manslaughter cases was Polish, followed by Nepalese, Lithuanian, Somalian and Sri Lankan.”

The Daily Mail – 31 August 2009.



“Prisoners are enjoying carbohydrate-rich, low-fat foods which in many cases are better than they would have been eating on the outside. PATIENTS IN HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITALS ARE FAR MORE LIKELY TO GO HUNGRY THAN CRIMINALS IN JAIL, scientists warned.

They say frail and elderly patients do not get the help they need with meals, and NOBODY CHECKS WHETHER THEY GET ENOUGH TO EAT. Despite years of Government promises to tackle poor hospital nutrition, food still arrives cold, and patients often miss out because meal times clash with tests and operations.”

The Daily Mail – 31 August 2009.



“UP TO A FIFTH OF KILLERS IN ENGLAND AND WALES ARE FOREIGN, POLICE FIGURES SUGGEST. OUT OF 371 INDIVIDUALS ACCUSED OR CONVICTED OF MURDER OR MANSLAUGHTER LAST YEAR, 79 WERE FROM ABROAD - MORE THAN 21 PER CENT.

Foreign immigrants make up only around a tenth of the UK population, meaning THEY ARE STATISTICALLY TWICE AS LIKELY AS NATIVE BRITONS TO BE CHARGED WITH OR FOUND GUILTY OF AN ILLEGAL KILLING.

IN LONDON, ALMOST 40 PER CENT OF THOSE IN SUCH CASES IN THE PAST YEAR WERE FROM OVERSEAS, OR OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN...

The most common nationality for foreigners involved in murder and manslaughter cases was Polish, followed by Nepalese, Lithuanian, Somalian and Sri Lankan.”

The Daily Mail – 31 August 2009.




“Prisoners are enjoying carbohydrate-rich, low-fat foods which in many cases are better than they would have been eating on the outside. PATIENTS IN HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITALS ARE FAR MORE LIKELY TO GO HUNGRY THAN CRIMINALS IN JAIL, scientists warned.

They say frail and elderly patients do not get the help they need with meals, and NOBODY CHECKS WHETHER THEY GET ENOUGH TO EAT. Despite years of Government promises to tackle poor hospital nutrition, food still arrives cold, and patients often miss out because meal times clash with tests and operations.”

The Daily Mail – 31 August 2009.



“A RADICAL PLAN TO RAISE £100 BILLION BY PRIVATISING THE MOTORWAY NETWORK HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THE THREE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES BY NM ROTHSCHILD, THE INFLUENTIAL INVESTMENT BANK.”

The Times – 30 August 2009.



"The stories are horrifying — OLD PEOPLE NEGLECTED, LYING IN THEIR OWN FAECES AND URINE, HUNGRY, THIRSTY AND AFRAID, WHILE NURSES CHAT CALLOUSLY AT THE NURSING STATION, INDIFFERENT TO THE SUFFERING AROUND THEM...

What is also particularly sickening is that NONE OF THIS IS REMOTELY NEW. It has been a long time since anybody with any knowledge of National Health Service nurses could be that proud of them. FOR MANY YEARS PAST, A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF THEM HAVE BEEN EVERY BIT AS BAD AS THIS REPORT NOW CLAIMS...

There is no shortage of nightmare nurses. I know from many personal visits to hospitals over 20 years, and from many hundreds of heartbreaking readers’ letters over 15 years, that NHS NURSING HORROR STORIES ARE LEGION. Whenever I’ve written an article about them, I get in response a collection of anecdotes that would disgrace a Third World country. And, as the Patients Association report points out, MOST OF THESE STORIES ARE ABOUT OLD PEOPLE...

Why has everyone been so determinedly deaf to the obvious truth?

Nearly 12 years ago I wrote an article for another newspaper headlined 'The devil nurses of the health services'…

NURSES’ PERSONAL STANDARDS WOULD HAVE HORRIFIED FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE. IT struck me forcibly HOW SLOVENLY MANY NURSES WERE, with loose hair trailing and hanging over patients’ wounds, with unkempt nails and hands all too rarely washed between patients. MANY WERE JUST MEAN: THEY IGNORED AND PATRONISED THE PATIENTS.

'THEY BRING THEM TO THE OPERATING TABLE UNWASHED, LEAVE THEM FRIGHTENED AND UNFED, DISTRESSED BY LOUD MUSIC, OVERFLOWING CATHETER BAGS AND BED SORES, BY DIRTY SHEETS AND FILTHY LAVATORIES WITH BLOOD IN THE SINKS AND EXCREMENT ON THE FLOOR,' I wrote. 'THESE ARE HORRORS CAUSED NOT BY SHORTAGE OF MONEY, BUT BY PERSONAL LAZINESS, INDIFFERENCE, LACK OF SELF-DISCIPLINE OR OF ANY DISCIPLINE AT ALL.' And so on.

THERE WAS TOTAL SILENCE FROM THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING AND THE GENERAL NURSING COUNCIL. Yet not only patients but also many nurses and doctors wrote to me in agreement, describing even worse things. So why didn’t nurses and doctors protest?

When Professor Lord Winston publicly complained about the terrible mistreatment of his elderly mother in hospital in 2000, I thought how late in the day it was for a distinguished and powerful doctor to bring this up. Surely he cannot have been the first consultant to notice the disgusting wards and vile treatment in many hospitals? Surely countless other top consultants knew about this scandalous state of affairs (or should have done), and should have brought it up?

Given the abysmal standards of nursing hygiene on many hospital wards, it is hardly surprising that we have had a growing number of scandals which no one can ignore. POOR BASIC HYGIENE WAS A FACTOR IN THE RECENT DISASTER AT THE MID STAFFORDSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST HOSPITAL WHERE AT LEAST 400 PATIENTS DIED NEEDLESSLY; the official report of 2007 blamed 'shocking and appalling' standards of care. But TWO YEARS ON, IT EMERGED EARLIER THIS YEAR THAT 10 NHS HEALTH TRUSTS HAVE EVEN WORSE DEATH RATES THAN MID STAFFORDSHIRE HAD. As a spokesman for the Patients Association said at the time: 'We are amazed that trusts could have these high mortality rates and yet not automatically face any action.'

Quite…

One of the problems is that... ANY NURSE OR DOCTOR BRAVE ENOUGH TO BLOW THE WHISTLE RUNS THE RISK OF NEVER WORKING IN MEDICINE AGAIN... Perversely, IT IS ONLY FOR WHISTLE-BLOWING THAT NHS STAFF ARE PUNISHED OR DISMISSED… THERE SEEM TO BE NO SANCTIONS FOR BAD PRACTICE.

THE UNIONS HAVE SEEN TO THAT… Another problem may, sadly, BE A WIDESPREAD FEAR AND DISLIKE OF OLD PEOPLE as a constant and unwelcome memento mori."

Minette Marrin - The Sunday Times - 30 August 2009.

So, we now live in a society where the most benevolent section of it (we hope) “dislike old people” and regard them as an “unwelcome memento mori”.

Welcome to a world socially engineered by Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Thatcher, the Fat Cats, sub-prime, greed-is-good and the creatures behind the scenes who gave all of these the office to create a system that despises vulnerable old age.



“Justice Secretary Jack Straw dropped a demand to exclude the Lockerbie bomber from a Libyan prisoner transfer accord, the Sunday Times has reported. Letters leaked to the paper say Mr Straw wanted to exclude Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi from the accord. He backed down citing ‘overwhelming’ UK interests.

A MAJOR OIL DEAL WAS BEING DISCUSSED AT THE TIME. “

BBC News – 30 August 2009.



“The British government decided it was ‘in the overwhelming interests of the United Kingdom’ to make Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, the Lockerbie bomber, eligible for return to Libya, leaked ministerial letters reveal.

Gordon Brown’s government made the decision after discussions between Libya and BP over a multi-million-pound oil exploration deal had hit difficulties. THESE WERE RESOLVED SOON AFTERWARDS.

The letters were sent two years ago BY JACK STRAW, the justice secretary, to Kenny MacAskill, his counterpart in Scotland, who has been widely criticised for taking the formal decision to permit Megrahi’s release.

THE CORRESPONDENCE MAKES IT PLAIN THAT THE KEY DECISION TO INCLUDE MEGRAHI IN A DEAL WITH LIBYA TO ALLOW PRISONERS TO RETURN HOME WAS, IN FACT, TAKEN IN LONDON FOR BRITISH NATIONAL INTERESTS.”

The Times – 30 August 2009.



“BRITISH SOLDIERS ARE BEING FORCED TO TRAIN WITH BLANKS RATHER THAN LIVE ROUNDS TO SAVE MONEY.”

The Times – 30 August 2009.



“BOB AINSWORTH IS NOT FIT TO BE SECRETARY OF STATE AND LEAD THE ARMED FORCES. Blaming a commanding officer for the MoD’s failings is outrageous. He should resign his post with immediate effect…

BOB AINSWORTH WAS TRYING TO COVER UP THE REAL REASON FOR JAMES’S DEATH. HE WAS TRYING TO SHIFT BLAME AWAY FROM THE LACK OF EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH THE MOD WAS RESPONSIBLE AND NEGLIGENT…

James was a friend of Major Bristow and the suggestion that he played a part in my son’s death is despicable. He would have wanted me to pursue this until his commanding officer was exonerated.”

Tony Philippson, whose son James was the first British soldier killed in Afghanistan, accusing Bob Ainsworth, the Defence Secretary, of trying to deflect blame for his son’s death by criticising Major Jonny Bristow, his son’s commander - The Times - 30 August 2009.

The Times added:

“Surviving colleagues said there were only three or four night-vision kits between as many as 40 men. They also lacked Minimi machineguns and under-slung grenade launchers, leaving them ‘totally outgunned’ as they faced Taliban forces armed with multiple rocket-propelled grenade launchers...

In an interview just hours after the inquest, AINSWORTH, THEN THE ARMED FORCES MINISTER, ATTEMPTED TO SHIFT THE BLAME ONTO BRISTOW…

AT THE TIME OF THE INQUEST, AINSWORTH INSISTED THAT EQUIPMENT SHORTAGES IN HELMAND HAS BEEN RESOLVED AND BRITISH TROOPS WERE AMONG THE ‘BEST EQUIPPED’ IN THE WORLD.”

At the inquest into James Philippson’s death, the Coroner, Andrew Walker, said that "totally inadequate" resources led to Major Bristow’s patrol being "outgunned by a bunch of renegades".

He added:

"The soldiers were defeated not by the terrorists but BY THE LACK OF BASIC EQUIPMENT.

TO SEND SOLDIERS INTO A COMBAT ZONE WITHOUT BASIC EQUIPMENT IS UNFORGIVABLE, INEXCUSABLE AND A BREACH OF TRUST BETWEEN THE SOLDIERS AND THOSE WHO GOVERN THEM."



“Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's son said there had been an 'obvious' link between trade talks and a UK-Libya prisoner exchange deal. Saif Gaddafi said it was 'not a secret' that A LUCRATIVE OIL AND TRADE DEAL SIGNED BY TONY BLAIR IN 2007 HAD BEEN CONNECTED TO ATTEMPTS TO AGREE A TREATY THAT WOULD HAVE LET ABDELBASET ALI AL MEGRAHI RETURN TO LIBYA.

But he said the man convicted of the worst terrorist atrocity in British history - 270 people died in the December 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 - was not mentioned during Mr Blair's 'deal in the desert', although it was 'obvious we were targeting Mr Megrahi'.”

The Daily Mail – 29 August 2009.



“CHILDREN WITH ADHD ARE VERY IMPULSIVE AND JUST CAN’T COPE IN A QUEUE OR WHEN THERE IS A DELAY IN GRATIFICATION.”

So they are to be given special wristbands permitting them and their friends to walk to the front of the queue when visiting some of the country’s top theme parks. However, some teachers have criticised the scheme, saying it would be better for the children to be taught how to wait.”

Andrea Bilbow, Chief Executive of the National Attention Deficit Disorder Information and Support Service - The Daily Express - 29 August 2009.

I like the bit about the selfish, me-first, delay-in-gratification yobbos being “taught how to wait”.

As regards the poor, “impulsive” dears, who “just can’t cope in a queue”, how about a clip round the ear or six of the best?

It worked in my day.

But then, what works is, nowadays, anathema to the bad guys, isn’t it?



“Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's son said there had been an 'obvious' link between trade talks and a UK-Libya prisoner exchange deal.
Saif Gaddafi said it was 'not a secret' that a lucrative oil and trade deal signed by Tony Blair in 2007 had been connected to attempts to agree a treaty that would have let Abdelbaset Ali al Megrahi return to Libya.

But he said the man convicted of the worst terrorist atrocity in British history - 270 people died in the December 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 - was not mentioned during Mr Blair's 'deal in the desert', although it was 'obvious we were targeting Mr Megrahi'.”

The Daily Mail – 29 August 2009.



“BRITAIN WILL COMMIT $1.08 BILLION IN AID TO HELP PAKISTAN stabilise its violent border areas and tackle the underlying causes of extremism, Prime Minister Gordon Brown said on Friday.”

Reuters UK – 28 August 2009.



“THE BRITISH PEOPLE CAN BE CONFIDENT THAT IMMIGRATION IS UNDER CONTROL.”

Phil Woolas, New Labour Immigration Minister - The Daily Express – 28 August 2009.

The Express added:

“A baby boom among immigrant families has helped send Britain’s population soaring over 61 million for the first time in history. LAST YEAR’S INCREASE OF 408,000 IS THE BIGGEST FOR NEARLY HALF A CENTURY, Government figures revealed. IMMIGRANT MOTHERS NOW GIVE BIRTH TO ONE IN EVERY FOUR BABIES BORN IN THE UK. IN LONDON, MORE THAN HALF OF ALL BIRTHS – 55 PER CENT – ARE TO MOTHERS BORN OVERSEAS.

HALF A MILLION NEWCOMERS CAME TO LIVE IN BRITAIN DURING 2008 while asylum claims increased by four per cent between April and June this year, the Office for National Statistics revealed.

OF THE 791,000 BABIES BORN IN THE UK LAST YEAR, 24 PER CENT HAD IMMIGRANT MOTHERS. Overwhelmingly, they were from Pakistan, India or Poland.”



“ALMOST 400,000 PEOPLE QUIT BRITAIN TO FIND A BETTER LIFE ABROAD LAST YEAR as the recession took hold. A total of 395,000 people emigrated from the UK during 2008, a rise of 24 per cent compared with the 318,000 who left in 2007, according to the Office of National Statistics. About 158,000 WERE BRITISH CITIZENS LEAVING THE COUNTRY for an expat life overseas. The exodus is the equivalent of THREE BRITONS QUITTING THE COUNTRY EVERY MINUTE… One recent estimate said one in 12 Britons now lives abroad.”

The Daily Express – 28 August 2009.



“For far too long now, the Patients Association has been receiving calls on our helpline from people wanting to talk about THE DREADFUL, NEGLECTFUL, DEMEANING, PAINFUL AND SOMETIMES DOWNRIGHT CRUEL TREATMENT THEIR ELDERLY RELATIVES HAD EXPERIENCED AT THE HANDS OF NHS NURSES. I am sickened by what has happened to some part of my profession of which I was so proud.

These bad, cruel nurses may be – probably are – a tiny proportion of the nursing work force, but even if they are only one or two percent of the whole THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AND STRUCK OFF THE REGISTER.”

Agony Aunt, Claire Rayner, President of the Patients Association and a former nurse herself - 27 August 2009.

I wonder, Clare, might it be political correctness that is keeping so many the bad and the cruel in place?



“Being British, I AM PROUD OF MY COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLES, proud to serve under the Union Jack AND REGARD IT AS AN ENGLISHMAN’S PRIVILEGE TO FIGHT FOR ALL THOSE THINGS THAT MAKE LIFE WORTH LIVING: FREEDOM, HONOUR AND FAIR PLAY.”

Spitfire pilot, Bill Millington, writing to his parents on the eve of the Battle of Britain in 1940.

Bill made the ultimate sacrifice. His plane was shot down during the conflict.

Leo McKinstry comments thus in the 27 August 2009 edition of The Daily Express:

“His words beautifully encapsulate the spirit of patriotism that galvanised the British people during the Second World War. It was the same deep love of our island home which inspired the soaring rhetoric of Winston Churchill, drove men to fight on the beaches of Normandy and the deserts of north Africa, compelled exhausted bomber crews to fly on missions for night after night over Germany, and enabled the British public to survive the Blitz so stoically.

PATRIOTISM IS ONE OF MAN-KIND’S MOST NOBLE IDEALS, an extension of THE NATURAL LOYALTY WE FEEL TO OUR FAMILIES, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD. In its highest form, it requires us TO LAY DOWN OUR LIVES TO PROTECT OTHERS, just as a devoted husband might risk all to defend his wife or children.

But IN OUR MODERN AGE, PATRIOTISM IS DESPISED RATHER THAN ADMIRED. FOR THE MARXIST IDEOLOGUES WHO NOW RUN BRITAIN, LOVE OF COUNTRY IS A VICE, NOT A VIRTUE. As a result we are now encouraged to learn entirely the wrong lessons from the Second World War. Instead of being presented as a magnificent defence of our native land against a savage aggressor, THE CONFLICT IS NOW PORTRAYED AS A TRIUMPH FOR THE FORCES OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AGAINST RIGHT-WING EXTREMISM.

In this warped narrative the Second World War has been transformed into a gigantic crusade against xenophobia, while our soldiers, sailors and airmen are regarded as armed outreach workers in a vast anti- racism project. It is a bizarre paradox of our times that, THANKS TO THE PREDOMINANCE OF MULTI-CULTURAL DOGMA, THE PATRIOTIC INSTINCT THAT LED TO NATIONAL SALVATION IN 1945 IS NOW TREATED AS A THOUGHT CRIME.

THE SENSE OF UNIFYING NATIONAL IDENTITY THAT ONCE MOTIVATED MILLIONS OF BRITONS TO DEFEND THEIR HOMELAND IS HELD TO BE SUSPECT BY A POLITICAL ELITE OBSESSED WITH CULTURAL DIVERSITY. WE ARE TOLD THAT OPPOSITION TO MASS IMMIGRATION IS THE EQUIVALENT OF SIDING WITH THE NAZIS...

It is impossible to imagine the Britain of 2009 enjoying the same sense of patriotic cohesion that existed in 1940 if our very existence came under threat. IN OFFICIAL CIRCLES, THE CONCEPT OF BRITISHNESS IS A SOURCE OF EMBARRASSMENT AND SHAME. WE ARE A NATION WHOSE SOVEREIGNTY HAS BEEN SURRENDERED TO BRUSSELS AND WHOSE UNITY HAS BEEN DESTROYED BY THE COLLAPSE OF OUR BORDERS.

The Second World War has been dragooned into service by the political zealots as a battering ram against our national identity. The Government’s own educational quango, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, boasts that HISTORY TEACHING SHOULD BE A TOOL FOR ‘VALUING DIVERSITY AND CHALLENGING RACISM’ BY GAINING INSIGHTS ‘INTO ISSUES AROUND HUMAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY AND MIGRATION.’

EVERY MUSEUM RELATED TO THE SECOND WORLD WAR FOCUSES OBSESSIVELY ON THE ROLE OF ETHNIC MINORITIES IN THE CONFLICT, EVERY EU BUREAUCRAT STRESSES THE IMPORTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AS A MEANS OF OVERCOMING DANGEROUS NATIONALIST SENTIMENTS…

The supreme irony is that we fought in 1940 to defend our national independence from German aggression, yet almost 70 years later we are now subsumed within a German-dominated continental bureaucracy.

I recently spoke to a D-Day veteran from the West Midlands. With anger and regret, he told me that HE DID NOT FIGHT IN ORDER TO END UP AS AN ALIEN IN HIS OWN COUNTRY. Even more insulting, he said, was BEING TOLD BY POLITICIANS THAT THE DESTRUCTION OF HIS SOCIETY WAS THE IDEAL FOR WHICH HE HAD GONE INTO BATTLE.”



“WE WERE COMPLETELY AND OFFICIALLY IGNORED.”

Jim Chanos, an American hedge-fund manager who, addressing a meeting of G7 finance ministers at a closed session in Washington in April 2007, warned Gordon Brown that “toxic loans” could send the global banking system into meltdown - The Daily Express – 27 August 2009.

The Express added:

"Gordon Brown faced huge embarrassment yesterday when A LEADING US FINANCIER SAID THE PREMIER HAD BEEN WARNED THAT THE WORLD’S BANKS WERE HEADING FOR A CRISIS.

Mr Chanos, who made his name predicting the downfall of US energy-trading giant Enron, said that Mr Brown was told of the ‘canary in the coal mine’ BUT CHOSE TO CARRY ON REGARDLESS. Just 18 months later, US investment bank Lehman Brothers collapsed – taking dozens of others with it…

There was more embarrassment for Mr Brown last night when a damning report showed LABOUR’S £12.5BILLION CUT IN VAT HAD DONE NOTHING TO LIFT BRITAIN OUT OF RECESSION.”



"Controversial Tory MEP Daniel Hannan has caused fresh embarrassment for Conservative leader David Cameron after naming Enoch Powell as his political hero.

Mr Hannan recently provoked controversy by describing the NHS as a '60 year mistake', saying that he 'wouldn't wish it on anyone'.
Now in He said:

“In the British context, Enoch Powell ...

as somebody who understood the importance of national democracy, who understood why you need to live in an independent country and what that meant, as well as being a free marketeer and a small-government Conservative.”

Tory MEP, Daniel Hannan, nominated Powell as his major political influence - US internet TV channel reason.tv - The Daily Mail – 27 August 2009.



“DEATHS FROM COCAINE ARE UP BY A FIFTH IN A YEAR, figures show.

The tragic toll lays bare the lie that it is a safe, middle-class 'dinner party' drug. Some 235 DEATHS WERE LINKED TO COCAINE LAST YEAR, up from 196 in 2007. THIS IS THE FIFTH YEAR IN A ROW THAT THE NUMBER OF VICTIMS HAS RISEN. DEATHS FROM ALL ILLEGAL DRUGS HAVE ALSO HIT AN EIGHT-YEAR HIGH IN ENGLAND AND WALES.”

The Daily Mail – 27 August 2009.



“THE NUMBER OF WOMEN DYING FROM DRUG ABUSE IN ENGLAND AND WALES ROSE BY 17 PER CENT LAST YEAR, according to new figures.

The Office for National Statistics said 853 WOMEN HAD DIED FROM TAKING DRUGS. THE NUMBER OF MALE DEATHS ROSE EIGHT PER CENT COMPARED WITH 2007 TO 2,075, THE HIGHEST TOLL SINCE 2001... The number of deaths linked to all illegal drugs was also up to an eight-year high. There were 1,738 overdose deaths from illegal drugs in 2008, a rise of eight per cent.”

The Daily Express – 27 August 2009.



“THE PROPORTION OF HOMES IN WHICH NOBODY WORKS HAS SOARED TO ONE IN SIX - the highest level in a decade, official figures reveal. Some 3.3MILLION HOUSEHOLDS WITH AT LEAST ONE PERSON OF WORKING AGE NOW HAVE NO BREADWINNER. Alarmingly, it means a sixth of children, or 1.9 MILLION, ARE GROWING UP IN HOMES WITH NO WORKING ROLE MODEL. Such children are far more likely to become benefit-dependent adults…

Fathers are bearing the brunt of the recession, suffering the largest fall in the employment rate... THE NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH SOMEONE IN WORK FELL BY 410,000 TO 10.7MILLION OVER THE PAST YEAR. “

The Daily Mail – 27 August 2009.



“According to the data from the Office for National Statistics… the number of jobless households has risen at its fastest rate since Labour came to power with ALMOST FIVE MILLION PEOPLE NOW LIVING IN HOMES WHERE NO ONE WORKS.

New figures reveal a massive 4.8MILLION PEOPLE OF WORKING AGE NOW LIVE IN A HOME WHERE NO ONE HOLDS DOWN A JOB. The data for April to June this year shows an increase of 500,000 on a year ago…

The figure does not include the 1.9million children who now live in workless homes, which is up 170,000 on 2008. WORKLESS HOUSEHOLDS NOW NUMBER 3.3MILLION, UP FROM 240,000, WHILE WORKING HOMES ARE AT 10.7MILLION - DOWN 410,000.”

The Daily Mail - 26 August 2009.


“The United Nations is recommending that children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach even pre-kindergarteners about masturbation...

UNESCO released a 98-page report in June offering a universal lesson plan for kids ranging in age from 5-18, an 'informed approach to effective sex, relationships' and HIV education that they say is essential for 'all young people.'

Under the U.N.'s voluntary sex-ed regime, kids just 5-8 years old will be told that 'touching and rubbing one's genitals is called masturbation' and that private parts 'can feel pleasurable when touched by oneself.'

By the time they're 9 years old, they'll learn about 'positive and negative effects of 'aphrodisiacs,' and wrestle with the ideas of 'homophobia, transphobia and abuse of power.'

At 12, they'll learn the 'reasons for' abortions... When they're 15, they'll be exposed to direct 'advocacy to promote the right to and access to safe abortion'.”

FOX News – 26 August 2009.



“A third of primary care trusts are flying in GPs from as far away as Lithuania, Poland, Germany, Hungary, Italy and Switzerland because of a shortage of doctors in Britain willing to work in the evenings and at weekends. The stand-ins earn up to £100 an hour, and one trust paid Polish and German doctors a total of £267,000 in a year.”

The Daily Mail – 25 August 2009.



“AN EXPLOSION IN THE NUMBER OF NON-EU STUDENTS ALLOWED TO STAY IN THE UK IS ADDING 100,000 TO THE POPULATION EVERY YEAR, figures show. It is by far the biggest factor in the boom in net migration from outside the European Union - the only immigration route over which the Government has any control. THE NUMBER OF FOREIGN STUDENTS GRANTED PERMISSION TO STAY FOR A YEAR OR MORE HAS TREBLED TO 110,000 A YEAR SINCE LABOUR CAME TO POWER. BUT ANNUALLY ONLY 10,000 GO HOME - A RATIO OF 11 ARRIVALS FOR EVERY DEPARTURE.”

The Daily Mail – 24 August 2009.



“TAXPAYERS ARE BEING FORCED TO UNDERWRITE THE GENEROUS FINAL-SALARY PENSIONS OF THOUSANDS OF FAILED BANKERS.

Northern Rock workers, including disgraced former chief executive Adam Applegarth, could be in line for handouts under the controversial plans. Such a move by the Government would see the level of state protection for bank retirement schemes reach nearly £1 billion.”

The Daily Express – 23 August 2009.



“The BPIX poll for the Mail on Sunday found 69% DID NOT BELIEVE THAT BRITISH FORCES SHOULD BE FIGHTING IN AFGHANISTAN, as against 31% who thought the mission was worthwhile. Almost three out of four - 72% - THOUGHT GORDON BROWN WAS HANDLING THE WAR 'BADLY', WITH 32% SAYING THAT HE WAS DOING 'VERY BADLY'.

That compared with just 26% who said he was doing ‘fairly well’ and 1.5% who said that he was doing 'very well'.”

The Daily Express – 23 August 2009.



“DOZENS OF QUANGOS AND TAXPAYER-FUNDED ORGANISATIONS HAVE ORDERED A PURGE OF COMMON WORDS AND PHRASES SO AS NOT TO CAUSE OFFENCE. AMONG THE EVERYDAY SAYINGS THAT HAVE BEEN QUIETLY DROPPED IN A BID TO STAMP OUT RACISM AND SEXISM ARE ‘WHITER THAN WHITE‘, ‘GENTLEMAN’S AGREEMENT‘, ‘BLACK MARK’ AND ‘RIGHT-HAND MAN‘.”

The Times – 23 August 2009.



“I cannot forgive any of them who do not now begin to demand our immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan. THE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR OUR PRESENCE THERE, WHERE THEY ARE NOT DRIVEL, ARE LIES. If you doubt it, LOOK AT THE BITTERLY COMICAL ‘ELECTION’ WHICH HAS JUST TAKEN PLACE. NOBODY CAN CONCEAL THE TRUTH. HUGE NUMBERS OF VOTERS STAYED AWAY OUT OF FEAR.

REVOLTING WAR CRIMINALS SUCH AS ‘GENERAL’ DOSTUM ARE OFFICIALLY ON ‘OUR’ SIDE, IN WHICH CASE I CAN SEE NO MORAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ‘OUR’ SIDE AND THE TALIBAN.

VOTES WERE BOUGHT, BALLOT BOXES STUFFED, FIGURES FIDDLED.”

Peter Hitchens - The Daily Mail – 22 August 2009.



“I have reluctantly become convinced, over the last few weeks, that THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY OF RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN PARLIAMENT IS FOR THERE TO BE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN MEMBERS’ SALARIES…

In order to ensure that Members could perform their parliamentary and constituency duties effectively, and have, where necessary, a second home, THE SALARY OF MEMBERS WOULD HAVE TO BE DOUBLED AT LEAST.”

Sir Patrick Cormack, Tory MP for South Staffordshire - The Daily Express - 20 August 2009.

Douglas Hogg, the moat-claiming Tory MP for Sleaford and North Hykeham, whined thus:

“THE SALARY OF MPS IS NOW SO LOW IN BOTH ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE TERMS AS TO DETER MEMBERS OF PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLASSES FROM ENTERING PARLIAMENT. A PARLIAMENTARY SALARY DOES NOT SUPPORT THE LIFESTYLE TO WHICH MOST PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLASSES ASPIRE.

My own conclusion is that IN ORDER NOT TO DETER THE PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLASSES FROM COMING INTO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, MPS SHOULD BE PAID A SALARY OF AROUND £100,000 TOGETHER WITH APPROPRIATE EXPENSES.”



"FROM THE START THERE WAS A DETERMINATION TO TRY TO PREVENT THIS APPEAL BEING HEARD. It opened but never got off the ground, with stall after stall as each month Megrahi weakened with the cancer that was killing him.


THERE WAS REJOICING IN THE CROWN OFFICE IN EDINBURGH WHEN HE WAS RELEASED AND THE APPEAL ABANDONED.

There may well be political manoeuvres behind his release but AT THE HEART WAS A DECISION TO SAVE THE FACE OF THE SCOTTISH JUDICIARY - IN PARTICULAR THE CROWN PROSECUTION, WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN AN ABUSE OF PROCESS BY NON-DISCLOSURE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS."

Ian Ferguson, co-author of the book Cover-up of Convenience - The Hidden Scandal of Lockerbie - The Mail on Sunday - 23 August 2009.

The Mail on Sunday added:

"It took the use of the U.S. Freedom of Information Act to unlock the full intelligence documents which are now highlighted in the appeal submission. They show memos from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) which suggested THE DOWNING OF PAN AM FLIGHT 103, WHICH KILLED 270 PEOPLE IN 1988, WAS IN RESPONSE TO THE SHOOTING DOWN OF AN IRANIAN AIRBUS BY THE AMERICAN WARSHIP USS VINCENNES FIVE MONTHS EARLIER.

In a memo dated September 24, 1989, and reproduced in the appeal submission, the DIA states:

'THE BOMBING OF THE PAN AM FLIGHT WAS CONCEIVED, AUTHORISED AND FINANCED BY ALI-AKBAR MOHTASHEMI-PUR, IRAN’S FORMER INTERIOR MINISTER. THE EXECUTION OF THE OPERATION WAS CONTRACTED TO AHMAD [JIBRIL], POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE GENERAL COMMAND LEADER, for a sum of $1million [£600,000'.

Another DIA briefing - PAN AM 103, Deadly Co-Operation - in December 1989 named IRAN AS THE COUNTRY MOST LIKELY TO BE BEHIND THE OUTRAGE. DISCOUNTING LIBYA’S INVOLVEMENT ON THE BASIS THAT THERE WAS ‘NO CURRENT CREDIBLE INTELLIGENCE', it added:

'Following a brief increase in anti-U.S. terrorist attacks after the U.S. airstrike on Libya, GADDAFI HAS MADE AN EFFORT TO DISTANCE LIBYA FROM TERRORIST ATTACKS'.

THE MEMOS AND REPORTS, DENIED IN FULL TO THE ORIGINAL TRIAL, WERE AVAILABLE TO THE SCOTTISH CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION WHICH, TWO YEARS AGO, CAST DOUBT ON THE SAFETY OF MEGRAHI’S CONVICTION based on six separate counts of the legal argument."

That's the powers-that-be for you, dishonest to the core.



"TEENAGE MUGGERS AND BURGLARS CAN ESCAPE JAIL BY CARRYING OUT AS LITTLE AS TEN MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICE A WEEK, it has emerged.


Courts are being encouraged to hand young criminals so-called 'referral orders' as an alternative to custody… But the statutory guidance on the use of referral orders, issued by Justice Secretary Jack Straw and Children's Secretary Ed Balls, reveals this could constitute as little as ten minutes of work a week. The guidance also reveals that THE DETAILS OF THE YOUNG CRIMINAL'S PUNISHMENT MUST BE 'NEGOTIATED', NOT IMPOSED.

Some of the 'interventions' suggested by ministers may include 'SPORT', 'LEISURE PROGRAMMES' OR EVEN 'A REQUIREMENT TO ATTEND SCHOOL'…

The number of offences committed by youngsters aged ten to 17 in the past year was 277,986 - MORE THAN ONE EVERY TWO MINUTES.

A report from the Youth Justice Board said THAT ROBBERIES COMMITTED BY YOUNGSTERS SURGED BY 29 PER CENT OVER THREE YEARS to 6,669 last year. The 2008 figure included more than 30 carried out by children aged just ten. Offences of VIOLENCE AGAINST THE PERSON SURGED BY A FIFTH FROM 44,988 TO 53,930, WHILE DRUG CRIME AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE WERE BOTH UP BY 12 PER CENT."

The Daily Mail - 22 August 2009.



"The truth is the NHS divides into two. The surgeons are world class, the physicians excellent and the nurses beyond praise. So what is wrong? THERE ARE MORE BUREAUCRATS WITH THE WORD ‘MANAGER’ IN THEIR JOB TITLE THAN THERE ARE DOCTORS.

AS EVER WITH MODERN BRITAIN WE ARE LET DOWN BY A VAST, OVERMANNED, OVER- FUNDED, HIDEBOUND, OBSTRUCTIVE, BOX-TICKING AND INCOMPETENT BUREAUCRACY.

Keeping the hospitals deep-cleaned with disinfectant at all times is not the job of the surgeons, physicians or nurses. IT IS THE JOB OF THE BLOATED ADMINISTRATOR CASTE WHO NOW SWALLOW HALF THE BUDGET."

Frederick Forsyth - The Daily Express - 21 August 2009.



"IN SOME PARTS OF THE UK THERE ARE MORE MIGRANTS SEARCHING FOR JOBS THAN NATIVE BRITONS - EVEN AT THIS TIME OF SOARING UNEMPLOYMENT.

NEARLY THREE QUARTERS OF A MILLION NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBERS, A PREREQUISITE FOR GETTING EMPLOYMENT, WERE HANDED OUT TO FOREIGN NATIONALS LAST YEAR. The figure exposes as a sham the New Labour pledge of 'British jobs for British workers'."

The Daily Mail - 20 August 2009.



"BRITAIN HAD AN £8 BILLION BUDGET DEFICIT IN JULY, THE LARGEST FOR THE MONTH SINCE RECORDS BEGAN IN 1993, as the economic recession ravaged tax revenue and the cost of unemployment benefits surged."

The Business Mirror - 20 August 2009.



"Despite the rising death toll, Mr Ainsworth said: ‘The troops know that WE HAVE MADE PROGRESS IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS AND I STILL FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT AFGHANISTAN IS WINNABLE.

The horrific toll of the war in Afghanistan was exposed yesterday as it was revealed that ALMOST 1,000 MEN AND WOMEN HAVE BEEN KILLED OR WOUNDED in the eight years of conflict.
But critics claim that THE NUMBER OF WOUNDED IS MUCH HIGHER BECAUSE MANY SOLDIERS’ INJURIES GO UNREPORTED.

Britain has already lost 67 troops this year – far more than the whole of the previous worst year, 2008, when 51 died. Britain has also had 236 men wounded in action in the first seven months of this year, more than in the whole of last year."

The Daily Express - 18 August 2009.



"SIX MILLION PEOPLE IN BRITAIN ARE LIVING ON UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, shocking new figures revealed. They mean that ALMOST ONE IN SIX OF THE WORKING-AGE POPULATION IS NOW ON HANDOUTS INSTEAD OF WORKING FOR A LIVING.

THE CRIPPLING COST OF THE BENEFITS CULTURE IS NOW £193 BILLION A YEAR – UP FROM £93BILLION IN 1997 in payments like Incapacity Benefit and Income Support. That’s nearly double NHS spending. The six-million figure is made up of 1.58million on Jobseeker’s Allowance, 2.6million on incapacity benefits and the new Employment and Support Allowance, 740,000 on lone parents’ benefits, 400,000 on carers’ benefits, 180,000 on income-related benefits, 360,000 on disability benefits and 95,000 on bereavement benefits.

TOTAL JOBLESSNESS FOR THE UNDER-25S HAS REACHED ALMOST ONE MILLION – EQUAL TO ONE IN FIVE. BRITAIN’S YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT FIGURE IS NOW THE HIGHEST IN EUROPE."

The Daily Express - 18 August 2009.



"When we think of the Islamist war on Western civilisation, we usually think of 9/11, of home-grown suicide bombers on London buses, of the flower of British youth being blown up in Basra and Helmand. What we often forget, though, is there’s another equally important strand to the Islamist movement’s political campaigning. Not war by poison or the sword but what you might call war by stealth.

This takes many insidious forms. You see it, for example, WHEN THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY ACTS AS THE ISLAMISTS’ USEFUL IDIOT BY SAYING THAT THE PARTIAL ADOPTION OF SHARIA LAW IN BRITAIN IS ‘INEVITABLE’; when 16-year-old Muslim girls fight court cases (AIDED BY CHERIE BLAIR) for their inalienable right to go to school dressed in a sack (the jilbab); when, IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, SHOP WORKERS ARE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO DICTATE THE TERMS OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT (REFUSING TO SELL ALCOHOL OR BIBLES; FAILING TO SEE THAT MUSLIM HEADGEAR ISN’T THE MOST APPROPRIATE DRESS FOR A GROOVY, URBAN HAIRDRESSING SALON); AND WHEN LOCAL COUNCILS DREAM UP A KIND OF RELIGIOUS APARTHEID IN PUBLIC SWIMMING BATHS.

Islamism… is a political movement – AS DANGEROUS IN ITS WAY AS STALINISM OR NAZISM – WHICH SEEKS TO IMPOSE ON THE WHOLE WORLD A PARTICULARLY EXTREME FORM OF ISLAM – WAHHABISM – born in the deserts of Saudi Arabia and now being exported through A MIX OF TERROR, BIG MONEY AND AGGRESSIVE PROSELYTISING to Muslims from much gentler traditions."

James Delingpole - The Daily Express - 18 August 2009.



"Foreign Secretary David Miliband was accused of condoning terrorism after declaring that THERE WERE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT WAS ‘JUSTIFIABLE’.

Mr Miliband was speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Great Lives programme, in which HE CHOSE TO PAY TRIBUTE TO THE SOUTH AFRICAN ANTI-APARTHEID ACTIVIST JOE SLOVO – A FRIEND OF MR MILIBAND’S FATHER, the academic Ralph Miliband.

Mr Slovo, WHO SHARED MILIBAND SENIOR’S BELIEF IN MARXIST IDEOLOGY, WAS ONE OF THE LEADERS OF UMKHONTO WE SIZWE… THE ARMED MILITARY WING OF THE ANC.

Asked by presenter Matthew Parris whether there were any circumstances in which terrorism was justified, Mr Miliband said: ‘YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS JUSTIFIABLE, AND YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS EFFECTIVE’."

The Daily Mail - 16 August 2009.

So, if we white folks begin terrorising Jews like you for practicing immigrant and banker-hugging Blairism upon us for the last twelve years, that’ll be OK will it, Dave?

And if we white folks begin terrorising Jews like your dad for teaching two whole generations of university students like Blair and Brown to loathe their own kind and love the Commie philosophies of the Jew, Karl Marx, that’ll be OK will it, Dave?

And if we white folks begin terrorising Jews like Jo Slovo for, well, terrorising white folks in order to ensure that Jews like him and black terrorists like Mandela got to have the whip hand over Whitey in the Rainbow Nation, that’ll be OK will it, Dave?

Or is it only “justifiable” when you Jews, and whoever your best pals happen to be at the time, are doing the terrorising?



"Baby Peter’s killers will apply for fresh identities on their release. In letters sent from jail, the couple have boasted of how they 'can't wait’ for the 'new life' that their notoriety will entitle them to when they have served their time. 'I'm just going to s--- around for a bit and have loads of fun,’ Connelly gloated, while Barker boasted: ‘They will have to give me a new identity… I fancy Canada.’

Ironically it is the seriousness and the viciousness of the threats that make the possibility of the pair successfully arguing for new identities, paid for by the taxpayer, highly likely. Government guidelines demand that those applying to the High Court for new identities as their release date approaches must prove their lives would be at risk without anonymity. And, as privacy lawyer Niri Shan points out, NOT ONLY COULD THE COUPLE BE GIVEN NEW LIVES AT GREAT COST BUT, WITH THEIR ANONYMITY GUARANTEED, PERHAPS MORE WORRYINGLY, THE NEW COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBOURHOODS INTO WHICH THEY INTEGRATE WILL KNOW NOTHING OF THEIR HEINOUS CRIMES."

The Telegraph - 16 August 2009.



“EXCESSIVE DRINKING HABITS HAVE LED TO A SHARP RISE IN ALCOHOL-RELATED DISEASE IN ENGLAND OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS, WITH CASES OF CIRRHOSIS INCREASING BY 42% SINCE 2004, TO ALMOST 5,000 CASES A YEAR...

Apart from the cirrhosis figures… SINCE 2004 THERE HAS BEEN A 17.2% INCREASE IN ALCOHOLIC-RELATED LIVER DISEASE, TO 14,500 CASES LAST YEAR. THERE WAS A 41% INCREASE IN ALCOHOLIC HEPATIC FAILURE – TO 1,200 CASES A YEAR. A QUARTER OF PEOPLE IN ENGLAND AGED 16 AND OVER CAN NOW BE CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS DRINKERS…

Last week Cancer Research UK published statistics that showed oral cancer rates for men in their 40s have risen by 28% since the mid-1990s, and rates for women in their 40s have increased by 24% over the same period. The rise was attributed to the increase in heavy drinking.”

Jamie Doward, Home Affairs editor of The Observer - 16 August 2009.



"BRITISH SWIMMING POOLS ARE IMPOSING MUSLIM DRESS CODES...

Under the rules, swimmers – INCLUDING NON-MUSLIMS – are barred from entering the pool in normal swimming attire. Instead THEY ARE TOLD THAT THEY MUST COMPLY WITH THE ‘MODEST’ CODE OF DRESS REQUIRED BY ISLAMIC CUSTOM, with women covered from the neck to the ankles and men, who swim separately, covered from the navel to the knees.

The phenomenon runs counter to developments in France, where last week a woman was evicted from a public pool for wearing a burkini – the headscarf, tunic and trouser outfit which allows Muslim women to preserve their modesty in the water."

The Telegraph - 15 August 2009.



"MORE THAN 30,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED AFTER CONTRACTING THE HOSPITAL INFECTIONS MRSA AND CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE IN JUST FIVE YEARS, official figures will show.

Data from the Office for National Statistics covering 2004 to 2008 is expected to show record numbers of deaths linked to the superbugs in England and Wales…

BETWEEN 2004 AND 2007 THERE WERE MORE THAN 20,000 DEATHS LINKED TO C. DIFF AND MORE THAN 6,000 ASSOCIATED WITH MRSA."

The Telegraph - 15 August 2009.

It is war, ladies and gentlemen.

It really is.



“Fairness is what the Department for Communities and Local Government, my Department, and the Government are all about, BUT FAIRNESS DOES NOT MEAN TREATING EVERYBODY EQUALLY; it means addressing the different needs of different people”.

New Labour’s "Cohesion" Minister, Shahid Malik - the House of Commons - 14 July 2009.

How about that, eh?

Shahid Malik seems to be saying that the needs of one lot (us) can treated with less fairness than another lot. (THEM)

Remember what George Orwell said?

“All animals are Equal but SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS”.

I think you’ll agree that this New Labour lot are nothing if not Orwellian.

Malik commented as he did in a debate about the contrast between the preferential treatment doled out to the Gypsy and Traveller communities at the expense of local people. Malik did not mince words in this area and was happy to declare whose side his department would be on in these matters.

“We are committed to increasing the number of authorised, good-quality sites“, he said.

“Increased site provision, alongside THE EFFECTIVE USE OF ENFORCEMENT POWERS and a joined-up approach between the various organisations with a role in Gypsy, Traveller and broader housing issues is critical to addressing the issues that we are debating today”.

On 18 August 2009, The Daily Mail commented thus:

“Mr Malik's apparent redefinition of the word (fairness) stems from the Government's decision in 2000 to classify gipsies and Irish travellers as distinct racial groups under the Race Relations Act. This decision - coupled with changes to planning law and a desire to build many more gipsy and traveller sites - CONFERRED EXTRA RIGHTS UPON THESE GROUPS UNDER BOTH RACE RELATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION.

In 2005, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (John Prescott) issued council planners with a so-called 'good practice guide' telling them how to deal with gipsy and traveller camps. The guide says:

'Some planners...think that ‘treating everyone the same’ helps to ensure equality. But THIS IS NOT THE CASE. EXPLICIT RECOGNITION OF DIFFERENCE IS NEEDED to ensure that the right action can be taken to deliver a planning service responsive to different needs within the communities it serves'.

Critics say this means that IN ANY PLANNING BATTLE, AN ARGUMENT BETWEEN A 'SETTLED' FAMILY AND THEIR TRAVELLER NEIGHBOURS IS A DISPUTE NOT BETWEEN EQUALS, but two groups with different legal rights and privileges.

In June, the Daily Mail revealed that THE NUMBER OF LEGAL GIPSY AND TRAVELLER SITES HAS QUADRUPLED TO 1,279 OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS. OVER THE SAME PERIOD, ILLEGAL SITES MORE THAN DOUBLED TO 3,680.”

The Mail cited the following story to illustrate the "fairness" of Shaid Malik's "enforcement powers" as they stand:

"All George Frost, the owner of three not particularly productive fields, wanted was a place to shelter from the rain and make a cup of tea. So he asked his local council for permission to put a caravan on his land on the outskirts of the village of Carleton Rode. Not one of the 727 villagers objected. Unfortunately for him, however, his fields were in a 'protected' area under the local development plan and his application was rejected.

Last year, Mr Frost, now retired, sold the fields to John Leveridge, who applied to put six mobile homes and two touring caravans on the site. At last week's packed meeting of South Norfolk Council, 175 local people objected.

But Mr LEVERIDGE IS A ROMANY GYPSY and, even though he has lived for eleven years in a bungalow nearby, he told the council that he wished to return to his traditional traveller ways.

South Norfolk planning officer, Chris Trett, said that, ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT TARGETS, there is in 'inadequate' supply of pitches for Gypsies in the area and councillors were warned that discrimination against Gypsies and Irish travellers was unlawful.

So, although the fields remain 'protected', MR LEVERIDGE'S APPLICATION WAS PASSED BY THE COUNCIL"!



“THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN ARE BEING SMUGGLED INTO BRITAIN AND SOLD INTO MODERN-DAY SLAVERY EVERY YEAR, police warned.

CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS THREE-MONTHS ARE TRADED TO HELP FRAUDSTERS JUMP THE HOUSING QUEUE. OTHERS ARE FORCED INTO PROSTITUTION OR TO WORK AS PETTY CRIMINALS. At least three children a week are identified as victims, say police, but the true scale runs into thousands a year.”

The Daily Express – 14 August 2009.



“Labour came to power 12 years ago promising a new dawn for our country. Instead THEY HAVE PLUNGED BRITAIN INTO A DARKENING NIGHTMARE OF ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, MASS UNEMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL DIVISION AND UNPRECEDENTED DEBTS...

With unemployment approaching 2.5million, around one in five of those aged under 25 are now on the dole. HALF OF ALL THE JOBS LOST OVER THE PAST YEAR HAVE BEEN THOSE OF YOUNGSTERS, A TERRIBLE INDICTMENT OF LABOUR’S POLICIES.

When he was in opposition in the Nineties, Gordon Brown constantly berated the Tory Government for its failure to improve the job prospects of young people... Yet, THROUGH HIS MIX OF LEFT-WING IDEOLOGY AND ECONOMIC MISMANAGEMENT HE HAS CREATED A MUCH BIGGER LOST GENERATION. YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT IS A THIRD HIGHER TODAY THAN IT WAS WHEN LABOUR TOOK OFFICE IN 1997...

Labour’s own policies are directly responsible for this shameful betrayal of the young. Standards of achievement in the education system are a national disgrace. Continual grade inflation cannot hide the reality that 20 PER CENT OF PRIMARY SCHOOL-LEAVERS ARE FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE AND INNUMERATE, WHILE 40 PER CENT OF THEM LACK BASIC SKILLS.

This is not due to any shortage of resources, the defence so often wheeled out by Left-wingers to explain the failures of the system they created. In fact more taxpayers’ money has been poured into the schools than ever before, reaching a total of £95billion this year. But the extra funding is worthless because of THE EDUCATIONAL DOGMA THAT CONTINUES TO PREVAIL, A PREFERENCE FOR MARXIST SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND MULTICULTURALISM OVER GAINING KNOWLEDGE.

The dumbing down of exams means that QUALIFICATIONS SUCH AS GSCES AND A-LEVELS ARE INCREASINGLY DESPISED BY EMPLOYERS. THE SAME IS TRUE OF UNIVERSITY DEGREES…

Softness runs through the whole education system. Exams are too easy, discipline too weak. Schools act like cheerleaders for youngsters, dishing out lavish praise for even the most minor tasks. Teachers are discouraged from correcting mistakes or punishing bad behaviour for fear of damaging pupils’ ‘self-esteem‘. Although this is dressed up as compassion it is another form of treachery, for school-leavers and students are left unprepared for the tough realities of the competitive world of work. COSSETED BY AN ENFEEBLED, DEGRADED SYSTEM, THEY HAVE AN ABSURDLY INFLATED VIEW OF THEIR OWN WORTH...

LABOUR’S FIXATION WITH MASS IMMIGRATION has grotesquely distorted the jobs market in two ways. First, RATHER THAN PROVIDE PROPER SKILLS TRAINING THROUGH APPRENTICESHIPS AND COURSES THAT OUR COUNTRY REALLY NEEDS, THE GOVERNMENT HAS ENCOURAGED EMPLOYERS TO IMPORT STAFF FROM OVERSEAS BY DISHING OUT WORK PERMITS LIKE CONFETTI.

Second, at the lower end of earning scale, YOUNG WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM JOBS BY THE VAST INFLUX OF IMMIGRANTS. It is an absolute scandal that over the past five years 90 PER CENT OF THE NEW JOBS IN THE ECONOMY HAVE GONE TO MIGRANTS, WHILE EVEN IN A TIME OF RISING UNEMPLOYMENT FOREIGNERS ARE STILL ARRIVING HERE AT A RATE OF 500,000 A YEAR.”

Leo McKinstry - The Daily Express – 14 August 2009.



“CHRISTIAN PUPILS ARE NOW OUTNUMBERED BY MUSLIMS AT ROMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS IN SOME PARTS OF ENGLAND.”

The Telegraph – 14 August 2009.



"I spend my money on my garden... I could claim the whole bloody lot but I don't... I'm afraid the world has gone mad. No one who has done anything in the outside world, or is capable of doing such a thing, will ever come into this place again, the way we are going".

The homosexual Tory MP and Shadow Leader of the House, Alan Duncan - 13 August 2009.

When questioned about the system as it is now, Duncan added:

"Basically, it's being nationalised. YOU HAVE TO LIVE ON RATIONS AND ARE TREATED LIKE SH**!”

I wonder, is there anyone out there who wouldn't be delighted to spend some time living on Alan Duncan’s "rations"?

Thought so. The impoverished, sh**-treated multi-millionaire is, as we speak, paying back £4,000 of the expenses he claimed for his garden.



“Heads were swamped with nearly 1.3 MILLION WORDS OF GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE LAST YEAR - ONE AND A HALF TIMES AS MANY AS IN THE BIBLE. They were sent more than 250 documents including a 'simplification plan' DETAILING HOW OFFICIALS HAD REDUCED BUREAUCRACY. It ran to 90 pages.

If all the 3,982 pages of guidance emailed to schools between April 2008 and April 2009 were printed, the stack of paper would be 16inches thick.”

The Daily Mail – 13 August 2009.



“The Business Secretary let slip in an interview that he no longer owes the bank a penny for his grand home on the edge of Regent’s Park… Land Registry records show that at the time he paid £2.4million - plus £100,000 in stamp duty and legal fees - THE EQUIVALENT OF MORE THAN 20 TIMES HIS PRESENT MINISTERIAL SALARY OF £108,253.

Mr Mandelson, as he was then, put down an astonishing £1.65million deposit on the house, needing a mortgage of 'only' £750,000 to make up the shortfall. But even that has now been paid off, the Business Secretary revealed earlier this week. He claimed a 'windfall' from selling shares in an advertising agency he helped set up had enabled him to clear his mortgage.

Yet several mysteries still surround the peach-hued terraced Regency house, which boasts three bedrooms, two reception rooms and three bathrooms, and is 'exquisitely' decorated, according to one friend.


Chief among them is HOW THE MINISTER COULD AFFORD TO PUT DOWN A £1.65MILLION DEPOSIT, when he has been a public servant or a Labour Party worker for much of his life.”

The Daily Mail – 12 August 2009.



“Connelly is the southern version of the north’s Karen Matthews, the mother of another litter of appallingly neglected and disturbed youngsters, who pocketed hundreds of pounds a week in benefits while never doing a day’s work in her life.

The chilling fact is that THESE WOMEN AND THE DESTRUCTIVE LIFE CHOICES THEY MAKE ARE CREATIONS OF THE MODERN WELFARE STATE. Our society presents young women from deprived backgrounds with a stark choice. They can opt for the grind of unstimulating minimum-wage work, hoping one day to reach the front of the queue for a council flat or THEY CAN CHOOSE PREMATURE PARENTHOOD, OPENING THE DOOR TO A PLETHORA OF BENEFITS AND A LIFE OF LEISURE. Under Labour’s crusade to abolish child poverty THEY ARE GUARANTEED BENEFITS IN CASH AND KIND WORTH 60 PER CENT OF THE INCOME OF THE AVERAGE BRITISH HOUSEHOLD. THE MORE CHILDREN THEY HAVE, THE GREATER THE SUM OF MONEY FLUNG IN THEIR DIRECTION. THEY ARE CATAPULTED TO THE TOP OF THEIR LOCAL AUTHORITY HOUSING LIST. They do not even have to pretend to be looking for work until their youngest child is 12 (there are plans to change that to seven)...

It is no wonder that, under Labour, every target for reducing the number of teen pregnancies has been missed? The vast majority of such pregnancies are deliberate – the rational response of selfish people to the financial package on offer.

It follows from this that LABOUR’S ANTI-POVERTY CRUSADE IS ACTUALLY ENTRENCHING CHILD POVERTY”.

Patrick O'Flynn - The Daily Express – 12 August 2009.



“GREEDY MPS SQUEEZED £6.1MILLION OUT OF TAXPAYERS LAST YEAR TO SUBSIDISE CUT-PRICE FOOD AND DRINK IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. The subsidy meant bars, restaurants and cafeterias within the Palace of Westminster could sell lavish meals and fine wines at around half the cost ordinary consumers would pay.”

The Daily Express – 11 August 2009.



“More genetically-modified crops used to feed pigs, poultry and dairy cattle could be imported into Britain to meet the demand for animal feed. MINISTERS ARE PRESSING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO SPEED UP APPROVAL OF GM CROP VARIETIES OR RISK A COLLAPSE IN THE MARKET FOR HOME-PRODUCED CHICKEN, EGGS, PORK AND MILK.”

The Times – 11 August 2009.

And yet 125,000 poor Indian farmers committed suicide after purchasing Monsanto’s “magic” seeds!

I guess the “Ministers pressing the European Commission to speed up approval of GM crop varieties” won’t be mentioning them



“THE CATALOGUE OF DEATHS IS FAST BECOMING A MONUMENT TO SOCIALIST VANITY. Why should brave young men have to sacrifice their lives to ‘make Afghanistan a better place’? Britain has no more responsibility for the Afghan people than we have for those living in Peru or Timbuctu.

SOLDIERS ARE RECRUITED TO DEFEND OUR COUNTRY, NOT TO ACT AS CHARITY WORKERS IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD. IT IS THE HEIGHT OF ARROGANCE FOR OUR LEFT-WING POLITICIANS TO TREAT OUR TROOPS AS NOTHING MORE THAN FODDER FOR THEIR INTERNATIONALIST SOCIALIST AGENDA...

A GOVERNMENT THAT REALLY BELIEVED IN TACKLING MUSLIM EXTREMISM WOULD CRACK DOWN ON IMMIGRATION FROM ASIA AND AFRICA, REMOVE THE DOGMA OF MULTI-CULTURALISM FROM THE PUBLIC SECTOR AND DEPORT HARD-LINERS INSTEAD OF GIVING THEM LEGAL AID AND BENEFITS.

Thanks to Labour we now have the grotesque paradox of British soldiers dying in Afghanistan in the fight against militant Islam, yet the same militancy is flourishing within our country. Our troops are dying to liberate Afghan women from vicious, superstitious misogyny yet policewomen in south Yorkshire wear burkas for a day to show their empathy with the Muslim community….

Rather than planning to spend the next 40 years battling the Taliban in Asia OUR SUPINE, LEFT-WING POLITICAL ELITE SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON HALTING THE SPREAD OF SHARIA LAW, HONOUR KILLINGS, FORCED MARRIAGES AND HATE SERMONS AT HOME. While British troops have been deprived of equipment, numbers and proper medical support, MUSLIM TERROR SUSPECTS ARE LAVISHED WITH LEGAL AID AND SOCIAL SECURITY. IT IS SICKENING THAT OUR PATRIOTIC HEROES IN THE ARMED FORCES SHOULD BE LED INTO WAR BY A BUNCH OF TRAITORS, NONE OF WHOM HAVE THE SLIGHTEST CONCEPT OF NATIONAL PRIDE.

THEY HAVE RUINED BRITAIN WITH THEIR ECONOMIC MISMANAGEMENT AND THEIR IDEOLOGICAL FIXATION WITH MULTI-CULTURAL DIVERSITY YET THINK THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO STRUT AROUND THE WORLD, SQUANDERING LIVES AND MONEY IN THEIR ARROGANT SOCIALIST VISION.

IT SEEMS THAT THEY WANT TO BUILD UP EVERY OTHER NATION EXCEPT THEIR OWN.”

Leo McKinstry - The Daily Express – 10 August 2009.



"LEADING UNIVERSITIES HAVE CLOSED THEIR DOORS TO WELL-QUALIFIED BRITISH APPLICANTS WHILE RECRUITING HEAVILY FROM OVERSEAS CANDIDATES paying up to £15,000 a year.

Institutions including Bristol, Edinburgh, Nottingham and Surrey are EXPLOITING A GOVERNMENT POLICY WHICH PUTS NO RESTRICTIONS ON THE LUCRATIVE INTERNATIONAL STUDENT MARKET, WHILE IMPOSING STRICT CAPS ON BRITISH NUMBERS. "

The Times - 9 August 2009.



"ALMOST ONE IN FOUR BLACK CHILDREN OVER 10 HAVE HAD THEIR PROFILES PLACED ON THE POLICE DNA DATABASE.

The disclosure has sparked claims from the chair of an influential parliamentary committee that the disparity with white children is undermining social integration.

About a million children have been added since the national DNA database started in 1995. However, there has been a dramatic rise from 2004, when police were given the power to add the profiles of people routinely arrested, even if not convicted of a crime.

According to new figures obtained by the campaign group Genewatch, ALMOST 45,000 BLACK CHILDREN AGED 10 TO 17 IN ENGLAND AND WALES – ABOUT 23% OF ALL BLACK CHILDREN IN THE AGE GROUP – HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE DATABASE IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS. By contrast, the DNA profiles of just under 10% of white youths aged 10 to 17 – about 440,000 children – have been added."

The Guardian - 9 August 2009.

Do you understand what you have just read? “Almost 45,000 black children aged 10 to 17 in England and Wales” would appear to have been arrested in the last five years. “Black children aged 10 to 17” seem to be 2.3 times more likely to be arrested than white children of the same age.

Doesn’t it make you wonder how much more criminally inclined the rest of the aliens, whom the political establishment invited in against our wishes, are than us?

It doesn’t?

I guess you must be one of the few who will still be voting New Labour at the next General Election.



"This is nation building - not the starry-eyed type, but nation-building nonetheless. It is not just reconstruction: jobs and simple governance that works are key, and there has to be a strong reconciliation element to the latter...

The Army's role might evolve, but THE WHOLE PROCESS MIGHT TAKE AS LONG AS 30 TO 40 YEARS. There is absolutely no chance of NATO pulling out."

General Sir David Richards, the new head of the British Army - The Telegraph - 8 August 2009.



“THEY (the police) HAVE BECOME THE UNIFORMED WING OF NEW LABOUR, not preventing crime or seeing that it is punished – but mediating neutrally between ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ and SPYING OUT POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS, in their own ranks and beyond. Sooner or later, millions of people will catch on to the fact that THE POLICE IN THIS COUNTRY AREN’T ON THEIR SIDE AND DON’T WANT TO DO WHAT WE PAY THEM FOR. Those who can afford it will hire their own protection. Everyone else will just suffer. The three main political parties will do nothing."

Peter Hitchens - The Daily Mail - 8 August 2009.



“POLICE ARE NOW THE USELESS UNIFORMED WING OF NEW LABOUR…

How about being really, really adventurous, dressing up as British police officers instead of members of the LAPD, ditching the huge club, the scowl, the pepper spray and the cuffs and going round the towns and cities alone, approachable and on foot?

Forget it. THAT’S NOT WHAT THE MODERN POLICE ARE FOR. They’re useless for a reason, not by accident. THEY HAVE BECOME THE UNIFORMED WING OF NEW LABOUR, NOT PREVENTING CRIME OR SEEING THAT IT IS PUNISHED – BUT MEDIATING NEUTRALLY BETWEEN ‘VICTIM’ AND ‘OFFENDER’ AND SPYING OUT POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS, IN THEIR OWN RANKS AND BEYOND.

SOONER OR LATER, MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WILL CATCH ON TO THE FACT THAT THE POLICE IN THIS COUNTRY AREN’T ON THEIR SIDE AND DON’T WANT TO DO WHAT WE PAY THEM FOR. Those who can afford it will hire their own protection. EVERYONE ELSE WILL JUST SUFFER.

THE THREE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES WILL DO NOTHING."

Peter Hitchens - The Daily Mail - 8 August 2009.



"BRITAIN AND THE REST OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ARE IGNORING A DEMOGRAPHIC TIME BOMB: a recent rush into the EU by migrants, including millions of Muslims, will change the continent beyond recognition over the next two decades, and almost NO POLICY-MAKERS ARE TALKING ABOUT IT.

The numbers are startling. ONLY 3.2 PER CENT OF SPAIN'S POPULATION WAS FOREIGN-BORN IN 1998. IN 2007 IT WAS 13.4 PER CENT. EUROPE'S MUSLIM POPULATION HAS MORE THAN DOUBLED IN THE PAST 30 YEARS AND WILL HAVE DOUBLED AGAIN BY 2015. IN BRUSSELS, THE TOP SEVEN BABY BOYS' NAMES RECENTLY WERE MOHAMED, ADAM, RAYAN, AYOUB, MEHDI, AMINE AND HAMZA.

Europe's low white birth rate, coupled with faster multiplying migrants, will change fundamentally what we take to mean by European culture and society. The altered population mix has far-reaching implications for education, housing, welfare, labour, the arts and everything in between. It could have a critical impact on foreign policy: a study was submitted to the US Air Force on how America's relationship with Europe might evolve. YET EU OFFICIALS ADMIT THAT THESE ISSUES ARE NOT RECEIVING THE ATTENTION THEY DESERVE…

The growing Muslim population is of particular interest. This is not because Muslims are the only immigrants coming into the EU in large numbers; there are plenty of entrants from all points of the compass.

But Muslims represent a particular set of issues beyond the fact that ATROCITIES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED IN THE WEST IN THE NAME OF ISLAM…

EU numbers on general immigration tell a story on their own. In the latter years of the 20th century, the 27 countries of the EU attracted half a million more people a year than left. ‘SINCE 2002, HOWEVER,’ THE LATEST EU REPORT SAYS, ‘NET MIGRATION INTO THE EU HAS ROUGHLY TRIPLED TO BETWEEN 1.6 MILLION AND TWO MILLION PEOPLE PER YEAR.’

The increased pace has made a nonsense of previous forecasts. IN 2004 THE EU THOUGHT ITS POPULATION WOULD DECLINE BY 16 MILLION BY 2050. NOW IT THINKS IT WILL INCREASE BY 10 MILLION BY 2060.

BRITAIN IS EXPECTED TO BECOME THE MOST POPULOUS EU COUNTRY BY 2060, WITH 77 MILLION INHABITANTS."

The Telegraph - 8 August 2009.



"THE PRISON POPULATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES HAS REACHED A RECORD HIGH, exceeding 84,000 for the first time. There has been an increase of 3,000 inmates over two years - even though 2,500 are released early every month… Juliet Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust, said…

‘THE PRISON POPULATION HAS NOW INCREASED BY ALMOST 25,000 PEOPLE SINCE 1997’."

BBC News - 7 August 2009.



"THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE BEING DECLARED INSOLVENT HAS HIT A NEW RECORD IN ENGLAND AND WALES. THERE WERE 33,073 PERSONAL INSOLVENCIES IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2009, said the government's Insolvency Service.

That was a 9% rise on the first three months of the year, and 27% more than in the same period last year."

BBC News - 7 August 2009.




"ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND BOSS STEPHEN HESTER IS TO POCKET A £6.4 MILLION BONUS DESPITE THE BANK ANNOUNCING A NET LOSS OF MORE THAN £1BILLION.

THOUSANDS OF OTHER EXECUTIVES AT THE BANK, BAILED OUT WITH £20BILLION OF TAXPAYERS’ CASH, ARE ALSO SET TO SHARE A BUMPER BONUS POT. While pre-tax results showed the banking giant – now 70 per cent owned by the taxpayer – made a small profit of £15million, IT HAS ALSO HAD TO WRITE OFF A MASSIVE £7.5BILLION IN BAD DEBTS.

Mr Hester’s bonus comes ON TOP OF HIS £1.2MILLION ANNUAL PAY when RBS shares hit 70p."

The Daily Express - 7 August 2009.

Stephen Hester is Jewish.

Just like his predecessor, Fred Goodwin.

Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling and co. elected Hester to the trough.



"Years ago the late Tory grandee Lord Hailsham predicted that if we carried on without governmental reform we would soon be ruled by what he prophetically called an elective dictatorship. He has turned out to be right.

Every five years we troop to the polls – basically to elect a parliamentary dictator, one of two on offer. Once in power and if granted a large majority of MPs the new PM can do virtually what he wants. With his 175-seat majority Tony Blair could have ordered a new act to declare the world was flat or he was divine (he seems to have held both views all the time). Who would oppose him? Labour MPs have shown they are timorous little serfs of the party machine, terrified of the whips and slavishly obedient. That is not what participatory parliamentary democracy is supposed to be about. They are supposed to represent us out here in the provinces yet between elections we are just about irrelevant.

It is this sense of utter helplessness that caused the national “turn- off” from politics. The expenses scandal was just an excuse for us to yell our outrage, not the cause of the outrage...

We are not harassed on a daily basis by politicians, just ignored. The teeth-grinding harassment comes from petty officialdom. so deal with that first. Give us back our freedom from persecution then devolve the political power but first things first. Every day we read of another harmless village fete cancelled on the orders of some jobsworth, a school sports day, a youngsters’ outing banned, thumping fines admin- istered on the spot for minuscule accidental offences – or none at all. And we ask: who are these gauleiters?

By what authority have they become our masters and tyrants? The answer is: restore the ombudsmen. remember the ombudsman? a swedish word: the champion of the downtrodden citizen. Great fanfare when he was introduced.

When did you last hear of the ombudsman righting a wrong? It was a brilliant idea, now knackered and eviscerated by triumphant petty officialdom... The new ombudsmen should not be a tiny handful covering a vast area, either in terms of remit or territory. The service should encompass one people’s champion per constituency. all issues. Petty officialdom has convinced itself that it is our true master, forgetting that in the British system public service is supposed to be just that: service, not tyranny."

Frederick Forsyth - The Daily Express - 7 August 2009.



“When Mr Brown became Prime Minister he promised to clean things up - he was going to be 'Gordon, not Flash'. But, sorry to say, he has continued resolutely down the same road. HIS PROMISE OF AN END TO SPIN HAS ITSELF BEEN REVEALED AS SPIN OF THE MOST CYNICAL KIND. NOWADAYS CIVIL SERVICE NEUTRALITY IS NO MORE THAN A DISTANT MEMORY....

Instead of providing impartial, factual information, OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASES ARE STUFFED WITH TENDENTIOUS PARTY PROPAGANDA, MASSAGED STATISTICS AND DISINFORMATION against political opponents. THOSE IN THE MEDIA NO LONGER BELIEVE WHAT THEY READ AND NEITHER SHOULD THE PUBLIC. ....

It is quite unacceptable for GORDON BROWN'S GOVERNMENT TO TURN PUBLIC SERVANTS INTO A NEW LABOUR MOUTHPIECE. IT MEANS THAT, AS TAXPAYERS, WE ARE PAYING FOR OFFICIALS TO LIE TO US…

Quite simply, WE CAN NO LONGER BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD THAT COMES OUT OF OUR PRIME MINISTER'S MOUTH".

Martin Sixsmith, a former Head of Communications at the Department of Transport in the Blair Government - The Daily Mail - 6 August 2009.



"GORDON BROWN HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF TRYING TO SUPPRESS A REPORT SHOWING THAT THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE IS LETTING DOWN BRITISH TROOPS BY SQUANDERING £2.5BILLION A YEAR ON THE WRONG EQUIPMENT. The damning report into military procurement, by former MoD aide Bernard Gray, is reported to have accused the Government of wasting money which could have been spent on protecting troops abroad.

The Daily Mail - 6 August 2009.



"How low can any government stoop?

The story of John Salisbury-Baker, the civil servant who says HE WAS DELIBERATELY ORDERED BY HIS SUPERIORS TO MISLEAD GRIEVING RELATIVES OF WAR DEAD ABOUT THE SAFETY OF EQUIPMENT ISSUED TO OUR TROOPS IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN, has been greeted with understandable incredulity.

How could any public official be instructed to lie about such things? How could ministers bully the Civil Service into doing their political dirty work for them?

TONY BLAIR SET THE BALL ROLLING. As a former head of communications at the Department of Transport, I remember vigorous pep talks from Mr Blair and Gordon Brown telling us that the Civil Service needed 'to raise its game' and get 'ON-MESSAGE'.

When Mr Brown became Prime Minister he promised to clean things up - he was going to be 'Gordon, not Flash'. But, sorry to say, HE HAS CONTINUED RESOLUTELY DOWN THE SAME ROAD. HIS PROMISE OF AN END TO SPIN HAS ITSELF BEEN REVEALED AS SPIN OF THE MOST CYNICAL KIND.

NOWADAYS CIVIL SERVICE NEUTRALITY IS NO MORE THAN A DISTANT MEMORY....

INSTEAD OF PROVIDING IMPARTIAL, FACTUAL INFORMATION, OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASES ARE STUFFED WITH TENDENTIOUS PARTY PROPAGANDA, MASSAGED STATISTICS AND DISINFORMATION AGAINST POLITICAL OPPONENTS.

THOSE IN THE MEDIA NO LONGER BELIEVE WHAT THEY READ AND NEITHER SHOULD THE PUBLIC. ....

It is quite unacceptable FOR GORDON BROWN'S GOVERNMENT TO TURN PUBLIC SERVANTS INTO A NEW LABOUR MOUTHPIECE. IT MEANS THAT, AS TAXPAYERS, WE ARE PAYING FOR OFFICIALS TO LIE TO US.

Think how the families of soldiers who died because of faulty equipment must feel when they discover that civil servants were telling them the kit was safe while knowing all along that it was not…

WE CAN NO LONGER BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD THAT COMES OUT OF OUR PRIME MINISTER'S MOUTH. AND THAT IS A TRAGEDY NOT JUST FOR MR BROWN, BUT FOR DEMOCRACY ITSELF."

Martin Sixsmith - The Daily Mail - 6 August 2009.



"ONE IN FIVE YOUNGSTERS - 25 PER CENT OF BOYS AND 15 PER CENT OF GIRLS - FAILED TO ACHIEVE 'LEVEL FOUR' IN ENGLISH, THE STANDARD EXPECTED OF 11-YEAR- OLDS, DESPITE BILLIONS OF POUNDS INVESTED IN LITERACY AND NUMERACY DRIVES.

In what was seen as a stunning admission of failure, Schools Minister Diana Johnson suggested that 'LEVEL THREE', THE STANDARD EXPECTED OF NINE-YEAR-OLDS, SHOULD BE SEEN AS A DECENT ACHIEVEMENT FOR MANY 11-YEAR-OLDS.

YOUNGSTERS AT LEVEL THREE ARE TYPICALLY UNABLE TO READ WELL ENOUGH TO GRASP THE POINT OF A STORY OR REPORT.

THEY ALSO STRUGGLE TO WRITE EXTENDED SENTENCES USING COMMAS AND ARE UNABLE TO ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY AND DIVIDE IN THEIR HEADS OR RECITE THE SIX TIMES TABLE."

The Daily Mail - 5 August 2009.



"INCENTIVES SHOULD BE OFFERED TO KEEP HIGHLY SKILLED IMMIGRANTS IN THE UK, as more are staying for just a short time before leaving, a report argues.

The Institute for Public Policy Research think tank warned the UK could lose what it called ‘super mobile’ migrants to competing countries. It suggested incentives such as simpler visa extensions AND TAX BREAKS."

BBC News - 5 August 2009.



"IMMIGRANTS ARE TO BE GIVEN INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO CLAIM BENEFITS AS THEIR FIRST STEP IN A NEW LIFE IN BRITAIN. They will be told to attend ‘orientation days’ at which they will be given information including THEIR RIGHT TO CLAIM HANDOUTS."

The Daily Mail - 4 August 2009.



“BRITAIN’S OUT-OF-CONTROL BENEFITS SYSTEM NOW EATS UP A QUARTER OF ALL GOVERNMENT SPENDING, AMOUNTING TO £186BILLION A YEAR.

And the welfare system has become so bloated and complicated under Labour that it is almost impossible to control, according to a damning report by the Centre for Policy Studies think-tank.

There are now more than 50 benefits and tax credits available for claimants, increasing the risk of fraud and error that costs taxpayers billions of pounds every year."

The Daily Express - 3 August 2009.



"SIXTY MPS RECEIVED A TOTAL OF ALMOST £300,000 IN EXPENSES FOR PETTY CASH ALLOWANCES - WITHOUT THEM HAVING TO SUBMIT A SINGLE RECEIPT.

Members of all parties received the 'no questions asked' payments from the Commons authorities between 2004 and 2008, with some MPs claiming as much as £12,000 in total. MPs said the payments were used to cover small administrative costs such as office materials or drinks for visitors to their office."

The Daily Mail - 3 August 2009.



"Labour’s rhetoric on immigration is a colossal exercise in deceit.

Ministers are fond of talking tough, endlessly boasting of ‘crackdowns’ and ‘robust new rules’ on entry. But in reality THEY HAVE PRESIDED OVER THE WILFUL COLLAPSE OF OUR BORDERS AND THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BRITISH IDENTITY.

OUR ONCE WELL-ORDERED, COHESIVE NATION HAS BEEN TURNED INTO AN OVERCROWDED LAND FULL OF DISPARATE CULTURES. AS THE INFLUX OF FOREIGNERS CONTINUES AT AN UNPRECEDENTED RATE, MANY BRITONS INCREASINGLY FEEL LIKE ALIENS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.

Labour’s spectacular dishonesty on this issue has been highlighted again by a series of announcements from the Home secretary Alan Johnson... another hypocritical socialist politician bent on THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BRITISH HERITAGE…

He declares that more stringent tests will be set for the award of british citizenship, this from the head of A HOME OFFICE WHICH HAS DISHED OUT BRITISH PASSPORTS LIKE CONFETTI IN RECENT YEARS…

One of Johnson’s supposed new requirements will be that applicants for citizenship will have to prove their patriotic credentials.

On that basis, ALL OF THE CURRENT CABINET WOULD FAIL, SUCH IS THE LEVEL OF THEIR TREACHERY…

LABOUR’S OBSESSION WITH DIVERSITY MEANS THAT OUR CIVIC INSTITUTIONS HAVE TRADUCED OUR HISTORY, SMASHED OUR TRADITIONS AND TREATED OUR INSTINCTIVE NATIONAL PRIDE AS A DANGEROUS FORM OF RACISM.

With the same duplicity, Johnson declares that, in the spirit of ‘fair play’, migrants will be stopped from queue-jumping for state housing. If Labour really meant this, it would be an admission that THE WHOLE SOCIAL HOUSING SYSTEM IS BIASED IN FAVOUR OF MIGRANTS, SOMETHING THAT BRITISH TAXPAYERS HAVE KNOWN FOR YEARS THOUGH THE GOVERNMENT HAS ALWAYS TRIED TO DENY IT.

The same is true of Johnson’s promise to end the use of marriage as a means to gaining settlement in Britain and access to welfare. THIS IS A PRACTICE PARTICULARLY COMMON AMONG FAMILIES FROM INDIA, PAKISTAN AND NIGERIA, WHERE OPPRESSED, BULLIED WIVES ARE USED TO MILK THE BENEFITS.

That is sickening about Johnson’s announcement is that HIS LABOUR PARTY CYNICALLY ABOLISHED IN 1997 THE PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE, WHICH STOPPED IMMIGRANTS USING MARRIAGE AS A MEANS OF OBTAINING BRITISH RESIDENCY. Labour presented the rule’s abolition as a triumph for compassion and justice but in practice IT HAS OPENED THE FLOODGATES FOR MIGRATION FROM ASIA AND AFRICA, AS WELL AS IMPOSING A HUGE NEW BURDEN ON SOCIAL SECURITY…

Labour’s stance on immigration can now be seen as a gigantic lie. We were told that a mass influx of foreigners, currently running at over 500,000 a year, would be the engine of economic prosperity.
THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE. THE GREATER THE LEVELS OF MASS MIGRATION, THE DEEPER WE SINK INTO ECONOMIC MISERY.

OUR PUBLIC SERVICES ARE BUCKLING UNDER THE STRAIN OF OVER-CROWDING, OUR WELFARE SYSTEM HAS BECOME HOPELESSLY UNAFFORDABLE.

THE IDEA THAT ALL MIGRANTS COME HERE TO WORK HARD IS JUST A MYTH. IN FACT MIGRANTS ARE FAR MORE LIKELY THAN BRITISH PEOPLE TO BE UNEMPLOYED, IN RECEIPT OF BENEFITS OR HOUSED IN STATE-FUNDED ACCOMMODATION.
MEANWHILE OUR SOCIETY IS NOW BESET BY EXTREMISM, BARBARIC VIOLENCE, ETHNIC TENSIONS AND SUPERSTITION.

BUT FOR LABOUR, THIS IS NOT A BADGE OF SHAME. Mass immigration has achieved its goal. No matter what Johnson says today, HIS PARTY HAS SUCCEEDED IN RUINING OUR ONCE GENTLE, UNITED LAND."

Leo McKinstry - The Daily Express - 3 August 2009.



"THE COURAGE AND TENACITY OF MY FELLOW SOLDIERS HAS BECOME A TOOL OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY. I believe that when British military personnel submit themselves to the service of the nation and put their bodies into harm's way, THE GOVERNMENT THAT SENDS THEM INTO BATTLE IS OBLIGED TO ENSURE THAT THE CAUSE IS JUST AND RIGHT…

THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN IS NOT REDUCING THE TERRORIST RISK, far from improving Afghan lives IT IS BRINGING DEATH AND DEVASTATION TO THEIR COUNTRY. BRITAIN HAS NO BUSINESS THERE. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT OUR CAUSE IN AFGHANISTAN IS JUST OR RIGHT.

I implore you, sir, to bring our troops home."

Lance Corporal Joe Glenton, explaining his refusal to fight in Afghanistan, The Guardian - 3 August 2009.

Joe also said that the people we are fighting displayed "robustness, humour, utter determination and unwillingness to take a step backwards" and added:

"It is these qualities, on both sides, which I fear will continue to cause a state of attrition (which) will only lead to more heartbreak within both our societies."



"THE GOVERNMENT HAS HANDED OUT SIX TIMES MORE CASH TO BOGUS AFGHAN ASYLUM SEEKERS THAN TO OUR HEROES WOUNDED FIGHTING THE TALIBAN.

Shocking figures show £30million of taxpayers’ money has been squandered on food, shelter and legal aid for 2,500 refugees seeking asylum. During the same period, the Government handed out just £5.3million under the controversial Armed Forces Compensation Scheme to 560 British soldiers wounded in Afghanistan.

Of the 2,500 Afghans who sought asylum, ONLY 85 WERE GENUINE, MEANING 2,415 BOGUS APPLICANTS RECEIVED AN AVERAGE OF £12,000 EACH.

THE AVERAGE FOR WOUNDED SOLDIERS WAS JUST OVER £9,000."

The Daily Express - 2 August 2009.



"MPs are working fewer hours and fewer days at the Commons than ever – but they cost taxpayers more and more."

The Daily Mail - 2 August 2009.



"A TORY PEER RECEIVED MORE THAN £70,000 IN PARLIAMENTARY EXPENSES BY MAKING CLAIMS THAT WERE APPARENTLY BASED ON A ‘NON-EXISTENT’ MAIN HOME.

LORD TAYLOR OF WARWICK claimed he lived with his sick mother in the Midlands until 2007, allowing him to claim overnight expenses while attending the House of Lords.

However, inquiries by The Sunday Times have established that HIS MOTHER’S HOME WAS SOLD IN 2001 AND SHE DIED IN THE SAME YEAR.

The findings raise serious questions about the probity of Taylor’s expense claims and are likely to prompt an investigation by the House of Lords authorities or the police."

The Times - 2 August 2009.

The Times added:

"This weekend, Lord Oakeshott, a Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, said:

'THIS LOOKS LIKE THE WORST ABUSE YET OF THE DISCREDITED LORDS’ EXPENSES SYSTEM'."

The worst abuse yet, eh?

How statically unlikely is it that Lord Taylor should be guilty of the “worst abuse yet”, given that he was the first ever BLACK, Tory Peer, that is? And there aren't that many black, Tory Lords even now?

I bet I could name one trough-gobbler who won't be appearing on the Met's Most Wanted List:



"White, working-class estates are to be targeted by a government campaign to head off the threat from far-right extremism. A list of 'hot spots" considered susceptible to the far-right's messages is being drawn up by officials in the Department for Communities and Local Government. About 100 council wards will be identified by using crime, unemployment, and income data, supplemented by 'soft intelligence' from local sources.

EACH COMMUNITY WILL BE TARGETED WITH ‘TAILORED’ MEASURES DESIGNED TO STEER THEM AWAY FROM THE FAR RIGHT."

The Independent - 1 August 2009.

In other words, "each community" will be targeted with "tailored" bulls*it (dishonest promises, tweaked statistics and downright propaganda) which might “steer them away” from anyone who might put them first in the "communties" that their ancestors built for them.



“PEOPLE WHO WANT A COUNCIL HOUSE FACE A WAIT OF NEARLY THREE HUNDRED YEARS IN SOME AREAS…

And the problem could get WORSE as a record 750,000 people are on council house waiting lists. Worst hit is East Dorset where families face a 292-year wait. About 2,241 people are on the waiting list - but with just 23 affordable homes built in the last three years demand hugely outstrips supply. Next worst is East Yorkshire with a 280-year wait. And third is Newark and Sherwood, Notts, with a 183-year wait”.

The Sun - 1 August 2009.

The Sun added:

“NHF chief executive David Orr fears THE TREND IS KILLING OFF TRADITIONAL VILLAGE life as people are priced out.”

And THAT would be the point, I guess.

As regards the intentions of those who are at war with us, that is.



"MORE THAN 60,000 THIEVES, BURGLARS AND OTHER CRIMINALS HAVE BEEN GRANTED EARLY RELEASE FROM PRISON. Under measures aimed at reducing jail overcrowding, AROUND 2,500 ARE LET OUT 18 DAYS EARLY EVERY MONTH.

In the two years since the scheme was introduced, 10,000 MORE HAVE BEEN RELEASED THAN WAS PREDICTED. Around 25,500 were expected to walk free early every year, but THE TOTAL WAS 62,534 BY THE END OF LAST MONTH.

AMONG THEM WERE 12,000 VIOLENT OFFENDERS and nearly 6,000 burglars.

SOME 1,300 OF THOSE RELEASED EARLY HAVE GONE ON TO COMMIT FURTHER OFFENCES WHILE RELEASED, INCLUDING MUGGINGS, SEX OFFENCES AND THREE MURDERS."

The Daily Mail - 1 August 2009.



"IN THE PAST TWO YEARS OFFENDERS ON LICENCE HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF 105 RAPES ALONG WITH 94 MURDERS, 18 ATTEMPTED MURDERS AND 39 MANSLAUGHTERS.

A report also shows that there were 78 KIDNAPPINGS, 43 CONVICTIONS FOR ARSON WITH INTENT TO ENDANGER LIFE AND 657 OTHER VIOLENT OR SEXUAL OFFENCES PUNISHED BY A MAXIMUM JAIL SENTENCE OF TEN YEARS OR MORE.

The total number of convictions for criminals being monitored by probation staff in the two years to March 2009 was 1,394, or almost two per day. The vast majority of these - 1,034 - were classified as serious offences.

On top of this, LAST YEAR THERE WERE 429 CRIMINALS AWAITING TRIAL FOR OFFENCES COMMITTED WHILE ON PROBATION, COMPARED TO 57 THE YEAR BEFORE."

The Daily Mail - 1 August 2009.




"We're losing social skills, the human interaction skills, how to read a person's mood, to read their body language, how to be patient until the moment is right to make or press a point. Too much exclusive use of electronic information dehumanises what is a very, very important part of community life and living together…

Facebook and MySpace might contribute towards communities, but I'M WARY ABOUT IT. IT'S NOT ROUNDED COMMUNICATION SO IT WON'T BUILD A ROUNDED COMMUNITY. If we mean by community a genuine growing together and a mutual sharing in an interest that is of some significance then IT NEEDS MORE THAN FACEBOOK…

Among young people often A KEY FACTOR IN THEM COMMITTING SUICIDE IS THE TRAUMA OF TRANSIENT RELATIONSHIPS. THEY THROW THEMSELVES INTO A FRIENDSHIP OR NETWORK OF FRIENDSHIPS, THEN IT COLLAPSES AND THEY'RE DESOLATE.

IT'S AN ALL OR NOTHING SYNDROME that you have to have in an attempt to shore up an identity; a collection of friends about whom you can talk and even boast. But FRIENDSHIP IS NOT A COMMODITY, FRIENDSHIP IS SOMETHING THAT IS HARD WORK AND ENDURING WHEN IT'S RIGHT."

The Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols - The Telegraph - 1 August 2009.

The Archbishop said this following the death of 15-year-old schoolgirl, Megan Gillan, who took a fatal overdose of painkillers after being bullied on Bebo. Citing Emmanuel Adebayor, who was about to earn £170,000 a week following a move from Arsenal to Manchester City, the Archbishop also raised concerns about the rise of individualism, which he said was typified by the attitude of such footballers.

"What football spectators appreciate is a bit of loyalty and WE'RE SEEING THAT LESS AND LESS… SOME PLAYERS ARE CLEARLY MERCENARIES.

I REGRET… THAT SOMEHOW THE LOCAL IDENTIFICATION, THE LOCAL BONDING BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND ITS FOOTBALL TEAM HAS BEEN COMMERCIALISED TO SUCH AN EXTENT."

I wonder whether Vince realises his views are those of British Nationalism?




Sir Jimmy Young is an 88-year-old DJ and interviews politicians and celebs for BBC Radio.

He was also a pop star in the 1950s and had two number one hits.

On 9 August 2009, he wrote the following in The Sunday Express:

“GORDON BROWN PURSUES HIS POLICY OF OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION, INTENT ON BUILDING UP A CLIENT STATE OF VOTERS WHO WILL BE DULY GRATEFUL TO LABOUR.

Recently Home Secretary Alan Johnson infamously declared that he doesn’t lie awake at night worrying about immigration. Well perhaps he should. Huge numbers of ordinary people declare to pollsters and political activists that the level of immigration is near the top of their list of worries. They protest that allowing our present population of 61million to increase to the 70million predicted by Whitehall statisticians would be A GROSS ABUSE OF BRITISH HOSPITALITY…

But the Government is so traumatised by the public’s resentment of its open-door policy that IT VICIOUSLY ATTACKS ANYONE WHO DARES TO CRITICISE IT.”

Oh yes, Sir James, we are well aware of this.

Nice of you to point it out in the mainstream though.

On 12 August 2007, in the same newspaper, Jimmy analysed another less obvious but equally "vicious" attack thus:

“How long, I wonder, will the English continue to tolerate the fiction that they are an equal partner in a United Kingdom? Since it was elected in 1997, Labour’s policy has been to create a blatantly Disunited Kingdom. IT HAS WRENCHED THE UK APART THROUGH DEVOLUTION, A DEEPLY CYNICAL MOVE AIMED AT KEEPING HAPPY THE FIVE MILLION SCOTS WITHOUT WHOSE VOTES THERE WOULD NEVER BE ANOTHER LABOUR GOVERNMENT.

Devolution and a Scottish parliament mean that Scots are able to enjoy the best of all worlds. Because ENGLAND POURS BILLIONS OF POUNDS IN SUBSIDIES INTO SCOTLAND EVERY YEAR, SCOTS ENJOY PRIVILEGED TREATMENT IN HOSPITALS, SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES DENIED TO THE ENGLISH...

Do we believe that Mr Brown will make the necessary changes that would risk alienating five million Scots without whose votes he would be out on his ear?

Of course we don’t.”

More...

The Barnett formula was put in place secretly, without recourse to law, by the Callaghan government and is not, therefore, statutory.

As such, this grossly unfair confection could have been overturned at any time since its clandestine introduction by the country’s leaders. The fact that Blair chose to keep it in place even AFTER he had given the Scots the power to conduct their own affairs is deeply illustrative of the great traitor’s attitude to all things English.



On 8 August 2009, General Sir David Richards, the new head of the British Army, told us that the politicians might be putting the lives of our soldiers at risk in Afghanistan for the next forty years!

He was quoted thus by The Telegraph:

"This is nation building - not the starry-eyed type, but nation-building nonetheless. It is not just reconstruction: jobs and simple governance that works are key, and there has to be a strong reconciliation element to the latter...

The Army's role might evolve, but THE WHOLE PROCESS MIGHT TAKE AS LONG AS 30 TO 40 YEARS. There is absolutely no chance of NATO pulling out."

Long enough for tens of thousands of ours and hundreds of thousands of theirs to lose their lives for the Nation Builders, eh, Dave?

More...



On 8 August 2009, the Conservative political commentator, Peter Hitchens, who was, at one time, a Communist, said this in The Daily Mail:

“THEY HAVE BECOME THE UNIFORMED WING OF NEW LABOUR, not preventing crime or seeing that it is punished – but mediating neutrally between ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ and SPYING OUT POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS, in their own ranks and beyond. Sooner or later, millions of people will catch on to the fact that THE POLICE IN THIS COUNTRY AREN’T ON THEIR SIDE AND DON’T WANT TO DO WHAT WE PAY THEM FOR.

Those who can afford it will hire their own protection. Everyone else will just suffer. The three main political parties will do nothing."



On 6 August 2009, Martin Sixsmith, a former Head of Communications at the Department of Transport in the Blair Government, said this in The Daily Mail:

“When Mr Brown became Prime Minister he promised to clean things up - he was going to be 'Gordon, not Flash'. But, sorry to say, he has continued resolutely down the same road. HIS PROMISE OF AN END TO SPIN HAS ITSELF BEEN REVEALED AS SPIN OF THE MOST CYNICAL KIND. NOWADAYS CIVIL SERVICE NEUTRALITY IS NO MORE THAN A DISTANT MEMORY....

Instead of providing impartial, factual information, OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASES ARE STUFFED WITH TENDENTIOUS PARTY PROPAGANDA, MASSAGED STATISTICS AND DISINFORMATION against political opponents. THOSE IN THE MEDIA NO LONGER BELIEVE WHAT THEY READ AND NEITHER SHOULD THE PUBLIC. ....

It is quite unacceptable for GORDON BROWN'S GOVERNMENT TO TURN PUBLIC SERVANTS INTO A NEW LABOUR MOUTHPIECE. IT MEANS THAT, AS TAXPAYERS, WE ARE PAYING FOR OFFICIALS TO LIE TO US…

Quite simply, WE CAN NO LONGER BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD THAT COMES OUT OF OUR PRIME MINISTER'S MOUTH".



On 3 August 2009, a letter sent by Lance Corporal Joe Glenton, explaining his refusal to fight in Afghanistan, was published by The Guardian.

This is what, in part, it said:

"THE COURAGE AND TENACITY OF MY FELLOW SOLDIERS HAS BECOME A TOOL OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY. I believe that when British military personnel submit themselves to the service of the nation and put their bodies into harm's way, THE GOVERNMENT THAT SENDS THEM INTO BATTLE IS OBLIGED TO ENSURE THAT THE CAUSE IS JUST AND RIGHT…

THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN IS NOT REDUCING THE TERRORIST RISK, far from improving Afghan lives IT IS BRINGING DEATH AND DEVASTATION TO THEIR COUNTRY. BRITAIN HAS NO BUSINESS THERE. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT OUR CAUSE IN AFGHANISTAN IS JUST OR RIGHT.

I implore you, sir, to bring our troops home."

Joe also said that the people we were fighting displayed "robustness, humour, utter determination and unwillingness to take a step backwards" and added:

"It is these qualities, on both sides, which I fear will continue to cause a state of attrition (which) will only lead to more heartbreak within both our societies."



In the 3 August 2009 edition of The Daily Express, Leo McKinstry denounced New Labour for having "presided over the wilful collapse of our borders and THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BRITISH IDENTITY.”

He added:

“OUR ONCE WELL-ORDERED, COHESIVE NATION HAS BEEN TURNED INTO AN OVERCROWDED LAND FULL OF DISPARATE CULTURES. As the influx of foreigners continues at an unprecedented rate, MANY BRITONS INCREASINGLY FEEL LIKE ALIENS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY…

LABOUR’S OBSESSION WITH DIVERSITY MEANS THAT OUR CIVIC INSTITUTIONS HAVE TRADUCED OUR HISTORY, SMASHED OUR TRADITIONS AND TREATED OUR INSTINCTIVE NATIONAL PRIDE AS A DANGEROUS FORM OF RACISM...

The idea that all migrants come here to work hard is just a myth. In fact MIGRANTS ARE FAR MORE LIKELY THAN BRITISH PEOPLE TO BE UNEMPLOYED, IN RECEIPT OF BENEFITS OR HOUSED IN STATE-FUNDED ACCOMMODATION. MEANWHILE OUR SOCIETY IS NOW BESET BY EXTREMISM, BARBARIC VIOLENCE, ETHNIC TENSIONS AND SUPERSTITION...

MASS IMMIGRATION HAS ACHIEVED ITS GOAL. (LABOUR) HAS SUCCEEDED IN RUINING OUR ONCE GENTLE, UNITED LAND."



On 2 August 2009, Harriet Harman, the Deputy Leader of the New Labour Party, was quoted thus by The Sunday Times:

"MEN CANNOT BE LEFT TO RUN THINGS ON THEIR OWN. I THINK IT'S A THOROUGHLY BAD THING TO HAVE A MEN ONLY LEADERSHIP".

The oh-so PC Ms Harman would not, of course, be saying this if the "men" in question were non-white.



In the 2 August 2009 edition of The Times, the Liberal Democrat Treasury Spokesman, Lord Oakeshott, condemned the Tory Peer, Lord Taylor of Warwick, thus:

"THIS LOOKS LIKE THE WORST ABUSE YET OF THE DISCREDITED LORDS’ EXPENSES SYSTEM."

The The Sunday Times explained:

"A TORY PEER RECEIVED MORE THAN £70,000 IN PARLIAMENTARY EXPENSES BY MAKING CLAIMS THAT WERE APPARENTLY BASED ON A ‘NON-EXISTENT’ MAIN HOME. LORD TAYLOR OF WARWICK claimed he lived with his sick mother in the Midlands until 2007, allowing him to claim overnight expenses while attending the House of Lords. However, inquiries by The Sunday Times have established that HIS MOTHER’S HOME WAS SOLD IN 2001 AND SHE DIED IN THE SAME YEAR.

The findings raise serious questions about the probity of Taylor’s expense claims and are likely to prompt an investigation by the House of Lords authorities or the police."

The PC-promoted trough-gobbler sounds as if he ought to be on the Met's Most Wanted List.

He isn't, of course, on any such list. And he won't be until the British people stop voting for those who care for them the least.

You see, Lord Taylor is black.



On 1 August 2009, following the death of 15-year-old schoolgirl, Megan Gillan, who took a fatal overdose of painkillers after being bullied on Bebo, the Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, was quoted thus by The Telegraph:

"Too much exclusive use of electronic information dehumanises what is a very, very important part of community life and living together…

Facebook and MySpace might contribute towards communities, but I'M WARY ABOUT IT. IT'S NOT ROUNDED COMMUNICATION SO IT WON'T BUILD A ROUNDED COMMUNITY. If we mean by community a genuine growing together and a mutual sharing in an interest that is of some significance then IT NEEDS MORE THAN FACEBOOK…

Among young people often A KEY FACTOR IN THEM COMMITTING SUICIDE IS THE TRAUMA OF TRANSIENT RELATIONSHIPS. THEY THROW THEMSELVES INTO A FRIENDSHIP OR NETWORK OF FRIENDSHIPS, THEN IT COLLAPSES AND THEY'RE DESOLATE.

IT'S AN ALL OR NOTHING SYNDROME that you have to have in an attempt to shore up an identity; a collection of friends about whom you can talk and even boast. But FRIENDSHIP IS NOT A COMMODITY, FRIENDSHIP IS SOMETHING THAT IS HARD WORK AND ENDURING WHEN IT'S RIGHT."

Citing Emmanuel Adebayor, who was about to earn £170,000 a week following a move from Arsenal to Manchester City, the Archbishop also raised concerns about the rise of individualism, which he said was typified by the attitude of such footballers.

"What football spectators appreciate is a bit of loyalty and WE'RE SEEING THAT LESS AND LESS… SOME PLAYERS ARE CLEARLY MERCENARIES. I REGRET… THAT SOMEHOW THE LOCAL IDENTIFICATION, THE LOCAL BONDING BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND ITS FOOTBALL TEAM HAS BEEN COMMERCIALISED TO SUCH AN EXTENT."

I wonder whether Archbishop Vince realises his views are those of your average British Nationalist?



On 30 July 2009, Theodore Dalrymple - (Anthony Daniels) opined thus in The Daily Express:

“Ricardo Morrison finally killed his girlfriend Amy Leigh Barnes after months of brutal behaviour towards her. FAR FROM BEING EXCEPTIONAL HIS CASE WAS, IN MANY RESPECTS, TYPICAL. ABOVE ALL IT ILLUSTRATED, YET AGAIN, THE HEARTLESS LENIENCY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.

I USED TO HEAR ABOUT LIKE HIS ALMOST EVERY DAY AT THE HOSPITAL IN WHICH I WORKED... THE LEVEL OF SERIOUS VIOLENCE COMPLETELY DISREGARDED BY THE LAW ASTONISHED AND HORRIFIED ME...

The killing of Miss Barnes did not come out of the blue, far from it. In 2005, when Morrison was 18, HE LOCKED A GIRLFRIEND IN A CAR, PUT HIS HAND ROUND HER THROAT AND BIT HER ON THE FACE. For this he received the extremely harsh penalty of A REQUEST FROM THE POLICE, IN THE FORM OF A CAUTION, THAT HE DID NOT REPEAT THE BEHAVIOUR. But he did. FIVE MONTHS LATER HE PUNCHED HIS GIRLFRIEND and was arrested. A little while after that he had another row with her in the course of which HE PUNCHED HER AGAIN, PUT HIS HAND OVER HER MOUTH AND BIT HER IN THE FACE before leaving the scene...

Home Office research conducted in the eighties but assiduously suppressed by the cabal that has long reigned there, proved conclusively that sending people with first convictions to prison cut down the recidivism rate by more than half...

IF MORRISON HAD BEEN SENTENCED TO PRISON, as people such as he should be and AS THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS CONSISTENTLY, AND FOR MANY YEARS, STUBBORNLY REFUSED TO DO, AMY LEIGH BARNES WOULD HAVE BEEN ALIVE TODAY.

THERE WERE MANY OFFICIAL ACCOMPLICES TO THE TERRIBLE CRIME... SUCCESSIVE HOME SECRETARIES AND CHIEF JUSTICES, THOSE WHO ARE ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR SENTENCING POLICIES, ARE ACCESSORIES TO MURDER - AS WELL, OF COURSE, TO BURGLARY, ROBBERY AND ALL THE OTHER FORMS OF OFFENCES THAT MAKE BRITAIN THE MOST CRIME-RIDDEN COUNTRY IN THE WESTERN WORLD.”



On 28 July 2009, David Cameron said this in a radio interview:

‘Politicians do have to think about what we say… the trouble is, TOO MANY TWITS MIGHT MAKE A TW*T’… THE PUBLIC ARE ‘P*SSED OFF” WITH POLITICIANS.”



On 26 July 2009, Jade Sermon said this in The Sunday Express:

"The panic over swine flu has left a bad taste in my mouth. There’s too much hype, too much scare-mongering and, for me, it has all been overblown. Why would anyone overstate the prevalence of such an illness? The answer is clear. SOME INDIVIDUALS AND SOME ORGANISATIONS BENEFIT FROM SCARING THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS OUT OF US.

So who could those individuals and organisations be? Well, let me see, THE GOVERNMENT AND DRUGS GIANTS ROCHE HOLDINGS AND BRITISH-BASED GLAXOSMITHKLINE SURE DO... I cannot help thinking THE POLITICIANS AND DRUG MAKERS ARE TAKING US ALL FOR A RIDE. I simply do not believe swine flu is going to kill 65,000 of us as Government advisers predict. I do believe getting us all in a tizz about travelling on public transport and having us all obsess about how we can get hold of Tamiflu and being first on the list for the forthcoming vaccination is simply A MAGNIFICENT DISTRACTION FROM THE REAL ISSUES OF THE DAY...

THERE ARE TWO FABULOUS REASONS WHY SWINE FLU IS BEING TOUTED AS A FORTHCOMING ARMAGEDDON. First, IT IS A GREAT DIVERSION FROM THE DEBACLE OF MPS’ EXPENSES, THE RECESSION AND THE ABJECT FAILURES OF GORDON BROWN’S TAWDRY EXCUSE FOR A GOVERNMENT... CREATING PANIC AND CONFUSION IS A CLEVER POLITICAL MOVE FROM BROWN’S POINT OF VIEW AS IT ALLOWS HIM A SLIVER OF A CHANCE OF RETAINING HIS JOB COME NEXT SUMMER’S GENERAL ELECTION; ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY, THE MUNIFICENT BROWN WHO HAS SAVED US ALL FROM THE DREADED CLUTCHES OF SWINE FLU.

Second, there’s Swiss group Roche (Tamiflu) and Glaxo (Relenza) the makers of swine flu vaccines. THERE’S NO BETTER WAY FOR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES TO GET THROUGH THE RECESSION THAN TO CREATE A PANDEMIC. THE BIGGER THE PANDEMIC, THE BIGGER THE DEMAND FOR THEIR DRUGS AND THE BIGGER THEIR PROFITS... The fact that THE GOVERNMENT HAS ANNOUNCED IT WILL INDEMNIFY ROCHE AND GLAXO AGAINST PROSECUTION IN CASE THE HASTILY PRODUCED VACCINE CAUSES NASTIER SIDE EFFECTS THAN EXPECTED DOES NOT EXACTLY FILL ME WITH CONFIDENCE...

And that’s not to mention the fact that we have already been here before. If you do not remember back to 1976 then let me remind you; PANIC BROKE OUT IN AMERICA WHEN THE GOVERNMENT PREDICTED A SWINE FLU EPIDEMIC AFTER THE DEATH OF ONE SOLDIER. Well, the epidemic never materialised but THE FAST-TRACKED VACCINE THAT WAS INJECTED INTO 46 MILLION PEOPLE RESULTED IN LITIGATION FROM THOSE WHO SUFFERED SERIOUS SIDE-EFFECTS TO THE TUNE OF £3.5 BILLION. THE VACCINE WAS ALSO BLAMED FOR 25 DEATHS. TWO-THIRDS OF THE CLAIMANTS SUFFERED SEVERE NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE AND MANY WERE LEFT PARALYSED FOR MONTHS, NEVER FULLY RECOVERING…

Look at it this way, since January swine flu has claimed 429 lives worldwide, REGULAR FLU HAS KILLED 13,000 IN AMERICA ALONE…

I am more than confident that NEXT SPRING THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE CLAIMING ITS ACTION BEAT SWINE FLU AND PREVENTED A DEVASTATING LOSS OF LIFE; THAT THAT HUGE LOSS OF LIFE WAS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE WILL BE LOST IN THE POLITICAL SPIN.”

Watch out for the bull in April and May 2010, folks.

More...



On 24 July 2009, The Daily Mail quoted the former head of the SAS, Brigadier Aldwin Wight, thus:

"Here is a government that has committed the Armed Forces to two of the most serious recent campaigns... If you do commit people to that then they've got to be supported...

I JUST DON'T THINK THEY'RE BEING HONEST. I don't think they're being honest with themselves, with the Armed Forces or with the public. I do think actually the debate should be exposed...

THE GOVERNMENT SEES ITS JOB AS ACTUALLY TO SPIN THIS ISSUE RATHER THAN BE HONEST ABOUT IT. Even the man in the street can smell that, and therefore I don't think you have got the support."



On 24 July 2009, former US Air Force officer, Karen Kwiatkowski, was quoted thus at the Russia Today web site:

“Pressure from political opponents pushes Obama to increase troops in Afghanistan, to look like he understands war, to look like he cares about defense... It is a political gesture to his political opponents at home.

On a more strategic level we see a long-term trajectory of Middle East policy of manipulation and occupation that extends from the first George Bush to the second George Bush and now to Barack Obama... This administration is very hawkish on Iran, so THE REASON WHY WE ARE IN AFGHANISTAN IS IRAN, WE WANT TO BE IN AN OPERATIONAL MILITARY POSITION TO THREATEN IRAN FROM NEXT DOOR.

IRAN IS NOT A THREAT TO US IN ANY WAY… IRAN IS AN ANNOYANCE TO ISRAEL… ISRAEL IS AN ALLY.

WHAT WE ARE DOING IS A PART OF A LARGER MIDDLE EAST POLICY THAT NECESSARILY EMBRACES OUR INTERESTS IN SUPPORTING OR FACILITATING THINGS FOR ISRAEL.”

More...



On 20 July 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“The centrepiece of the Government’s legislative programme is the Equalities Bill, which Labour’s deputy leader Harriet Harman claims will ‘root out discrimination‘ and ‘blinkered prejudice’. In truth THE PREJUDICE LIES WITH LABOUR. The Government’s social agenda has nothing to do with genuine equality. Instead IT AMOUNTS TO A FORM OF IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION OF OUR COUNTRY. Obsessed with multiculturalism and notions of victimhood LABOUR SEEKS TO DIVIDE BRITAIN ALONG THE LINES OF CLASS, RACE AND GENDER... GORDON BROWN’S ADMINISTRATION WANTS TO CREATE A SOCIETY WHERE CERTAIN MINORITIES ARE FAVOURED BY THE STATE...

This is the nightmare world behind Harman’s declaration that through her Bill SHE AIMS TO BUILD ‘A NEW SOCIAL ORDER‘. In the name of combating racism or sexism, INSTITUTIONALISED BIAS AGAINST WHITE MEN WILL BECOME RAMPANT.”

More... Scroll down to 20 July



On 19 July 19 2011, an extract from Guy Walters’ Hunting Evil was published in The Sunday Times.

In this, Walters says:

“Simon Wiesenthal, famed for his pursuit of justice, caught fewer war criminals than he claimed and FABRICATED MUCH OF HIS OWN HOLOCAUST STORY.

Since the early 1960s Simon Wiesenthal’s name has become synonymous with Nazi hunting. His standing is that of a secular saint. NOMINATED FOUR TIMES FOR THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE, THE RECIPIENT OF A BRITISH HONORARY KNIGHTHOOD, THE US PRESIDENTIAL MEDAL OF FREEDOM, THE FRENCH LÉGION D’HONNEUR AND AT LEAST 53 OTHER DISTINCTIONS, he was often credited with some 1,100 Nazi 'scalps'. He is remembered, above all, for his efforts to track down Adolf Eichmann, one of the most notorious war criminals.

HIS REPUTATION IS BUILT ON SAND, HOWEVER. HE WAS A LIAR, and a bad one at that. From the end of the second world war to the end of his life in 2005, HE WOULD LIE REPEATEDLY ABOUT HIS SUPPOSED HUNT FOR EICHMANN AS WELL AS HIS OTHER NAZI-HUNTING EXPLOITS. He would also concoct outrageous stories about his war years AND MAKE FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT HIS ACADEMIC CAREER. There are so many inconsistencies between his three main memoirs and between those memoirs and contemporaneous documents, that it IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH A RELIABLE NARRATIVE FROM THEM. WIESENTHAL’S SCANT REGARD FOR THE TRUTH MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO DOUBT EVERYTHING HE EVER WROTE OR SAID…

It is partly THANKS TO WIESENTHAL THAT THE HOLOCAUST HAS BEEN REMEMBERED AND PROPERLY RECORDED AND THIS IS PERHAPS HIS GREATEST LEGACY. He did bring some Nazis to justice; but it was in nothing like the quantity that is claimed and Eichmann was certainly not among them…

His background was ideal for any aspiring fabulist. Like many from Galicia, Wiesenthal would have spent his childhood immersed in the Polish literary genre of tall stories told over the dinner table. In a place such as Buczacz in the 1920s, truth was a relatively elastic concept. At 19 he enrolled as an architectural student at the Czech Technical University in Prague, where he found his metier as a raconteur and appeared as a stand-up comedian.

His studies went less well. Although most biographies, including that on the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s website, say he graduated, HE DID NOT COMPLETE HIS DEGREE. Some biographies say he gained a diploma as an architectural engineer at Lvov polytechnic in Poland, but THE LVOV STATE ARCHIVES HAVE NO RECORD OF HIS HAVING STUDIED THERE AND HIS NAME IS ABSENT FROM POLAND’S PRE-WAR CATALOGUE OF ARCHITECTS AND BUILDERS. HE CLAIMED FRAUDULENTLY THROUGHOUT HIS LIFE THAT HE DID HAVE A DIPLOMA; HIS LETTERHEADS PROUDLY DISPLAY IT.

Similarly, THERE ARE LARGE DISCREPANCIES IN HIS DRAMATIC STORIES OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR. He was in Lvov when it fell to the Nazis in 1941. He claimed he and a Jewish friend called Gross were arrested at 4pm on Sunday July 6, one of the few dates that remain constant in his ever-shifting life story. Whenever he is so specific, however, HE IS USUALLY LYING.

Frogmarched to prison, they were put in a line of some 40 other Jews in a courtyard. Ukrainian auxiliary police started shooting each man in the neck, working their way down the line towards Wiesenthal. He was saved by a peal of church bells signifying evening mass. Incredibly, the Ukrainians halted their execution to go to worship. The survivors were led to the cells, where Wiesenthal claims he fell asleep. He was woken by a Ukrainian friend in the auxiliary police who saved him and Gross by telling them to pretend they were Russian spies. They were brutally questioned — Wiesenthal lost two teeth — but were freed after cleaning the commandant’s office.

The story of this sensational escape — one of the most famous of Wiesenthal’s war and one that has helped to establish the notion of his divine mission — is in all likelihood A COMPLETE FABRICATION. Certainly the Ukrainians carried out brutal pogroms in Lvov in early July 1941; but there was then a pause and they did not start again until July 25. According to testimony Wiesenthal gave to American war crimes investigators after the war, he was actually arrested on July 13 and managed to escape 'through a bribe'. By subsequently placing his arrest on July 6, his story fitted the timing of the pogroms.

By the end of the year Wiesenthal was in Janowska, a concentration camp outside Lvov. Given the task of painting Soviet railway engines with Nazi insignia, he made friends with Adolf Kohlrautz, the German senior inspector at the workshop, who was secretly anti-Nazi. On April 20, 1943, Wiesenthal was apparently selected for a mass execution again. The SS at Janowska picked him among some Jews to be shot in a grim celebration of Hitler’s 54th birthday. They silently walked towards a huge sandpit, 6ft deep and 1,500ft long. A few dead bodies were visible in it. Forced to undress, they were herded in single file down a barbed-wire corridor known as the hose to be shot one by one at the edge of the pit.

A whistle interrupted the gunshots, followed by a shout of 'Wiesenthal!' An SS man called Koller ran forward and told Wiesenthal to follow him. 'I staggered like a drunk,' Wiesenthal recalled. 'Koller slapped my face twice and brought me back to earth. I was walking back through the hose, naked. Behind me, the sounds of shooting resumed but they were over long before I had reached the camp.’ Back at the workshop he found a beaming Kohlrautz, who had convinced the camp commander it was essential to keep Wiesenthal alive to paint a poster that would feature a swastika and the words 'We Thank Our Führer'.

On October 2, 1943, according to Wiesenthal, Kohlrautz warned him that the camp and its prisoners were shortly to be liquidated. The German gave him and a friend passes to visit a stationery shop in town, accompanied by a Ukrainian guard. They managed to escape out the back while the Ukrainian waited at the front.

Yet again he had seemingly cheated death in a miraculous fashion. But we only have his word for it. According to Wiesenthal, Kohlrautz was killed in the battle for Berlin in April 1945. He also told a biographer, however, that Kohlrautz was killed on the Russian front in 1944. And in an affidavit made in August 1954 about his wartime persecutions, he neglects to include the story at all. In both this document and in his testimony to the Americans in May 1945, he mentions Kohlrautz without saying the German saved his life.

From this point in Wiesenthal’s war IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH A RELIABLE TRAIN OF EVENTS. With at least four wildly different accounts of his activities between October 1943 and the middle of 1944 — including his alleged role as a partisan officer — serious questions must be raised. Some, such as BRUNO KREISKY, THE FORMER AUSTRIAN CHANCELLOR, REPEATEDLY ACCUSED WIESENTHAL IN THE 1970S AND THE 1980S OF COLLABORATING WITH THE GESTAPO. KREISKY’S CLAIMS WERE SUPPORTED BY UNSUBSTANTIATED EVIDENCE FROM THE POLISH AND SOVIET GOVERNMENTS. Wiesenthal took him to court and won.

Whatever the truth, by November 1944 Wiesenthal was in Gross-Rosen, a camp near Wroclaw. He told Hella Pick, his biographer, that he was forced to work barefoot in the camp quarry and soon learnt that the team of 100 prisoners assigned to the work kommando shrank by one each day. After a few days he felt sure his turn was about to come. 'My executioner was behind me,' he recalled, 'poised to smash my head with a rock. I turned around and the man, surprised, dropped his stone. It crushed my toe. I screamed.'

Wiesenthal’s quick reactions and yell apparently saved his life because there was some form of inspection that day — he thought it may have been by the Red Cross — and so he was stretchered away to the first-aid station. His toe was cut off without anaesthesia while two men held him still. The following day, Wiesenthal said, he was in agony. 'The doctor came back and saw that I had a septic blister on the sole of my foot. So they cut it open and the gangrene spurted all over the room.'

YET AGAIN, ONE OF WIESENTHAL’S 'MIRACLES' IS OPEN TO DOUBT. First, the story appears in no other memoir or statement. Secondly, if the Red Cross really was inspecting Gross-Rosen that day, then the SS would have temporarily halted any executions. As it was, the Red Cross was not allowed access to concentration camps at that time. Thirdly, the medical consequences seem entirely implausible.

Soon afterwards, according to Wiesenthal’s account, he managed to walk 170 miles west to Chemnitz after Gross-Rosen was evacuated. Walking on a gangrenous foot with a recently amputated toe would have been hellish. Instead of a shoe, he had the sleeve of an old coat wrapped around his foot with some wire. For a walking stick he had a broomstick. Of the 6,000 prisoners who marched out, only 4,800 arrived in Chemnitz. With his infected foot, Wiesenthal was lucky to be among them.

From Chemnitz, the prisoners ended up at Mauthausen camp near Linz in Austria. Wiesenthal arrived there on the frozen night of February 15, 1945. In The Murderers Among Us, he tells how he and a fellow prisoner, Prince Radziwill, linked arms to make the last four miles uphill to the camp. The effort was too great and they collapsed in the snow. An SS man fired a shot that landed between them. As the two men did not get up, they were left for dead in the sub-zero temperature. When lorries arrived to collect those who had died on the march, the unconscious Wiesenthal and Radziwill were so frozen that they were thrown onto a pile of corpses. At the crematorium, however, the prisoners unloading them realised they were alive. They were given a cold shower to thaw out and Wiesenthal was taken to Block VI, the 'death block' for the mortally ill.

In 1961, when Wiesenthal was interviewed for the Yad Vashem archive by the Israeli journalist Haim Maas about his war years, Wiesenthal mentioned that the infection from his foot had now turned blue-green and had spread right up to his knee. He lay in the death block for three months until the end of the war. Too weak to get out of bed, he claimed he survived — incredibly — on 200 calories a day, along with the occasional piece of bread or sausage smuggled to him by a friendly Pole.

Mauthausen was liberated on May 5, 1945. Despite weighing just 100lb, Wiesenthal struggled outside to greet the American tanks. 'I don’t know how I managed to get up and walk,' he recalled. If he was able to walk, his severely infected leg must have been cured during the previous three months by either amputation or antibiotics. We know the former did not take place, and the latter was emphatically not a common treatment for ailing Jews in Nazi concentration camps. ONCE AGAIN, IT APPEARS AS THOUGH A MIRACLE HAD TAKEN PLACE.

The rapidity of Wiesenthal’s recovery is so astonishing that it is doubtful whether he was as ill as he claimed. Just 20 days after the liberation, he wrote to the US camp commander asking whether he could be involved in assisting the US authorities investigating war crimes. Claiming to have been in 13 concentration camps — HE HAD IN FACT BEEN IN NO MORE THAN SIX — Wiesenthal supplied a list of 91 names of those who he felt were responsible for 'incalculable sufferings'.

According to most accounts, Wiesenthal asked if he could join the American war crimes investigators, but they refused, telling him he was not well enough. After he had gained some weight, he returned and was assigned to a captain with whom Wiesenthal claimed to have captured his first 'scalp', a snivelling SS guard called Schmidt. 'There were many others in the weeks that followed,' Wiesenthal later wrote…

It was not until February 1947 that he formed the organisation that would make him famous, the Jewish Historical Documentation Centre in Linz. Its aim was to collate information on the final solution with a view to securing the indictments of war criminals. Wiesenthal claimed to have started it because of an anti-Semitic remark made by an American officer, which made him realise that the allies would never hunt down the Nazis to the extent that was required...

Wiesenthal died in 2005 at the age of 96 and was buried in Israel. The tributes and eulogies were many and fulsome and at the time it would have been churlish to have detracted from the many positive aspects of the role he played. He was at heart A SHOWMAN and when he found a role as the world’s head Nazi hunter, HE PLAYED IT WELL. As with so many popular performances, it was impossible for the critics to tell the public that THE GREAT WIESENTHAL SHOW WAS LITTLE MORE THAN AN ILLUSION.

Ultimately, IT WAS AN ILLUSION MOUNTED FOR A GOOD CAUSE.”

For sixty years, those who would have dared to call Wiesenthal a liar would have been pilloried and demonised by the politicians, the press and the PC Crowd of the Western World.

And, of course, by the Jews themselves.

And now, this Eton Johnny tells us that an “illusion” created by a self-serving, Jewish “showman”, and backed to the hilt by the establishment, was all in “a good cause”. Thus does the elite hack dismiss an official deceit that held three generation of trusting folk in thrall.

Appreciate the research and the belated broadcasting of the facts, Guy. The on-message, wagtail conclusion we could have done without.



On 16 July 2009, Patrick O'Flynn said this in The Daily Express:

"Alan Johnson has only been home secretary for a month but he has already secured his place as the most radical occupant of the post in the Blair-Brown years. He has achieved this status by taking one simple step. HE HAS STOPPED LYING TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE ABOUT HIS PARTY’S REAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS IMMIGRATION…

The truth is on the record now: LABOUR LOVES MASS IMMIGRATION AND LOOKS FORWARD TO PROMOTING LOTS MORE OF IT. IT DOES NOT FEAR THE CONSEQUENCES FOR OUR ALREADY OVERCROWDED ISLAND OF HOSTING A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION, NEITHER DOES IT WORRY ABOUT THE CREATION OF A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY where different ethnic enclaves holding rival cultural values compete with each other for public resources.

Where ministers have previously claimed to feel our pain and nodded sagely at cohesion panel reports warning that the ‘pace of change’ has been too fast and the pressure on public services too great, the truth is that THEY DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DOWNSIDE TO MASS IMMIGRATION AND DO NOT WANT IT TO STOP. MANY OF THEM DESPISE TRADITIONAL BRITISH VALUES AND BRITAIN’S STORY, especially its imperial past. THEY ACTUALLY WANT TO OBLITERATE ALL OF THESE AND PUT IN THEIR PLACE A MELTING-POT SOCIETY WHERE CULTURES FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE EQUALLY REPRESENTED AND ENJOY PARITY OF ESTEEM.

On Tuesday Mr Johnson told the Commons home Affairs select committee:

‘I DO NOT LIE AWAKE AT NIGHT WORRYING ABOUT A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION. I’M HAPPY TO LIVE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY. I’m happy to live in a society where we not only welcome those coming to live and work in this country, but where we can go and live and work in other countries.’

This was no casual slip of the tongue. THIS WAS THE NEW HOME SECRETARY’S FIRST PUBLIC PRONOUNCEMENT ABOUT THE BROAD DIRECTION OF IMMIGRATION POLICY and he clearly decided to take his courage in his hands and present Labour’s true intentions to the British public.

It always stretched credulity to believe that Labour’s lax immigration policy was purely a consequence of ministerial incompetence, much though that has been in evidence these past 12 years. LABOUR DID NOT FAIL TO HONOUR ITS PLEDGE TO DEPORT 30,000 FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS A YEAR BY ACCIDENT. NEITHER, SURELY, DID IT EVER REALLY BELIEVE IN ITS PREPOSTEROUS PROJECTION OF AN INFLUX FROM EASTERN EUROPE OF ONLY 5,000-13,000 A YEAR AS A CONSEQUENCE OF EU ENLARGEMENT. It simply used that figure as a basis for arguing against the imposition of transitional controls on access to the British labour market. It cannot really have been surprised by THE RESULTING INFLUX OF A MILLION MIGRANT WORKERS – THAT WAS DELIBERATE, TOO.

Likewise, LABOUR MUST HAVE KNOWN WHEN IT ABOLISHED THE OLD PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE THAT CONTROLLED THE FLOW OF NEW SPOUSES INTO BRITAIN FROM THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT WHAT THE CONSEQUENCES WOULD BE: A DOUBLING OF IMMIGRATION BY YOUNG ADULTS FROM INDIA, PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH, a rise in the number of young British Asians bullied by their parents into marrying people they had never met WITH A CONSEQUENTIAL RISE IN THE BIRTHRATE AMONG SEVERAL ETHNIC MINORITY GROUPS.

Once one appreciates that Mr Johnson was articulating THE REAL VIEWS OF HIS PARTY, THE UNPRECEDENTED LEVELS OF IMMIGRATION PRESIDED OVER BY TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN BEGIN TO MAKE SENSE. But THE DEPTH OF MENDACITY THEY PLUMBED IN DISGUISING THEIR INTENTIONS BECOMES TRULY BREATHTAKING.

‘British jobs for British workers’ can be seen for what it is – THE MOST DISHONEST SLOGAN PUT BEFORE THE VOTERS IN LIVING MEMORY. ‘BRITISH HOMES FOR BRITISH FAMILIES’ IS ALSO BALONEY, an aspiration made illegal by Labour’s own equality laws...

The canny home secretary will know that TWO THIRDS OF IMMIGRANTS VOTE FOR THE PARTY THEY HAVE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AS OFFERING THEM THE MOST GOODIES IN TERMS OF WELFARE BENEFITS – LABOUR. HE WILL ALSO KNOW THAT MANY CONSTITUENCY LABOUR PARTIES ARE NOW DOMINATED BY ETHNIC MINORITY MEMBERS. THUS OPENLY SPEAKING UP FOR IMMIGRATION WILL DO HIS PARTY LEADERSHIP HOPES NO HARM WHATEVER...

The British public, MORE THAN TWO THIRDS OF WHOM SAY THEY STRONGLY SUPPORT MUCH TIGHTER IMMIGRATION CONTROLS, can no longer honourably claim to have been bamboozled by Labour on migration policy. Anyone who votes for the party at the next election must surely now understand THEY WILL BE VOTING FOR THE FLOODGATES TO STAY OPEN.

NONE OF THE MAINSTREAM POLITICAL PARTIES IS RESPONDING TO THE DOMINANT PUBLIC VIEW THAT MASS IMMIGRATION MUST CEASE. The Tories say they will impose an annual limit but will not say what that limit should be. Yesterday THEY CHOSE NOT TO TAKE ISSUE WITH MR JOHNSON’S SENTIMENTS. It is therefore hardly surprising that PARTIES WHICH HAVE HITHERTO BEEN CONSIGNED TO THE FRINGES OF BRITISH POLITICS ARE RAPIDLY GROWING IN POPULARITY AND APPEAL.”



On 16 July 2009, Don Monkerud opined thus in The Capital Times:

“During eight years of the Bush administration, THE 400 RICHEST AMERICANS, WHO NOW OWN MORE THAN THE BOTTOM 150 MILLION AMERICANS, INCREASED THEIR NET WORTH BY $700 BILLION. In 2005, THE TOP 1 PERCENT CLAIMED 22 PERCENT OF THE NATIONAL INCOME, WHILE THE TOP 10 PERCENT TOOK HALF OF THE TOTAL INCOME...

In 1955, IRS records indicated the 400 richest people in the country were worth an average $12.6 million, adjusted for inflation. IN 2006, THE 400 RICHEST INCREASED THEIR AVERAGE TO $263 MILLION, REPRESENTING AN EPOCHAL SHIFT OF WEALTH UPWARD IN THE U.S.

In 1955, the richest tier paid an average 51.2 percent of their income in taxes... BY 2006, THE RICHEST PAID ONLY 17.2 PERCENT OF THEIR INCOME IN TAXES. In 1955, the proportion of federal income from corporate taxes was 33 percent; BY 2003, IT DECREASED TO 7.4 PERCENT. TODAY, THE TOP TAXPAYERS PAY THE SAME PERCENTAGE OF THEIR INCOMES IN TAXES AS THOSE MAKING $50,000 TO $75,000...

Between 2002 and 2004, inflation-adjusted median household income declined $1,669 a year. TO MAKE UP FOR LOST INCOME, CREDIT CARD DEBT SOARED 315 PER CENT between 1989 and 2006...

TODAY, CEOS DON'T SPEND THEIR TIME TRYING TO MAKE BETTER PRODUCTS: THEY MANEUVER TO TAKE OVER OTHER COMPANIES, STEAL THEIR CUSTOMERS AND FIRE THEIR WORKERS... REAGAN... CUT THE TOP INCOME TAX RATES, AND SAW THE CREATION OF RIGHT-WING THINK TANKS THAT SPENT $30 BILLION OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS PROPAGANDIZING FOR DEREGULATION, PRIVATIZATION AND WEALTH WORSHIP".”

More...



On 15 July 2009, The Daily Telegraph quoted a statement from the Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration co-chaired by the New Labour MP, Frank Field and the Tory, Nicholas Soames.

This is what was said:

"The need to increase funding for primary schools is a direct result of mass immigration feeding into our population. The number of births to foreign mothers has risen by 65 PER CENT while the number of births to UK born mothers has only risen by 6.4 PER CENT. This is a major reason for the pressure on our primary schools but the Government remain in denial about the consequences of their losing control of our borders. Instead they refer to 'local circumstances'.

THIS IS DELIBERATELY MISLEADING."



On 15 July 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“Thomas Jefferson, the great American statesman and philosopher, once described politicians as ‘PARASITES ON THE LABOUR ON THE INDUSTRIOUS‘. THOSE WORDS CERTAINLY APPLY TO BROWN’S BRITAIN, WHERE THE UK GOVERNMENT HAS ERECTED A VAST POLITICAL BUREAUCRACY WHICH COSTS US A FORTUNE AND PARALYSES THE EFFECTIVE RUNNING OF THE COUNTRY.

New research by the BBC shows that THERE ARE 30,000 PAID POLITICIANS HERE, COMPARED TO JUST 3000 IN 1980... THE TOTAL BILL FOR ALL THIS SUBSIDISED POLITICAL CAREERISM NOW REACHES OVER £500MILLION...

It says something about the warped priorities of New Labour that BRITAIN CURRENTLY HAS MORE PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS THAN AMBULANCE STAFF.”

More... Scroll down to 15 July



On 14 July 2009, The UK's Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, said this to other MPs on the Home Affairs Committee:

"I DO NOT LIE AWAKE AT NIGHT WORRYING ABOUT A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION. I’M HAPPY TO
LIVE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY. I’m happy to live in a society where we not only
welcome those coming to live and work in this country, but where we can go and live
and work in other countries."

In response to Johnson's statement, Sir Andrew Green, the Chairman of Migrationwatch, said:

"This shows the Government are in denial about the effects of mass immigration that they are promoting, even encouraging. The minister should be having nightmares about the impact on our schools, hospitals, environment and quality of life as a result of another 10 million people in England in just 20 years. Instead he has just given up."



On 14 July 2009, New Labour’s "Cohesion" Minister, Shahid Malik, said this in The House of Commons:

“Fairness is what the Department for Communities and Local Government, my Department, and the Government are all about, BUT FAIRNESS DOES NOT MEAN TREATING EVERYBODY EQUALLY; it means addressing the different needs of different people”.

Malik commented as he did in a debate about the contrast between the preferential treatment doled out to the Gypsy and Traveller communities at the expense of local people.

Remember what George Orwell said?

“All animals are Equal but SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS”.

I think you’ll agree that this New Labour lot are nothing if not Orwellian.



On 13 July 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“IT IS AN OUTRAGE THAT OUR SOLDIERS SHOULD BE TREATED AS NOTHING MORE THAN POLITICAL FODDER BY A GANG OF SLEAZY, UNPATRIOTIC LEFT-WING MEDIOCRITIES WHO HAVE NO CONCEPT OF BRITAIN’S NATIONAL INTEREST...

DESPERATE TO CURRY FAVOUR WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA’S US ADMINISTRATION AND TOO COWARDLY TO ADMIT THE FAILURE OF ITS FLAWED STRATEGY, BROWN’S REGIME PRESIDES OVER A MOUNTING DEATH TOLL WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO GIVE ANY COHERENT EXPLANATION FOR THE PRESENCE OF OUR ARMED FORCED IN THIS TRIBAL WASTELAND…

IT IS NONSENSE TO PRETEND THAT THE FIGHT AGAINST ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN BRITAIN IS PREDICATED ON SUCCESS IN THE AFGHAN WAR… ACROSS THE WORLD, BRITAIN IS NOW RECOGNISED BY SECURITY AGENCIES AS A HOTBED OF DANGEROUS ISLAMIC RADICALISM…

OUR TROOPS ARE DENIED THE HELICOPTERS, EQUIPMENT AND NUMBERS THEY NEED TO BE EFFECTIVE BECAUSE OF TREASURY CUT-BACKS, YET TAXPAYERS’ CASH IS LAVISHED ON GRANTS FOR MUSLIM COMMUNITY GROUPS IN A CRAVEN BID TO APPEASE HARDLINERS.”

More... Scroll down to 13 July



On 12 July 2009, Vince Cable said this in The Daily Mail:

“A strange breed of hybrid creatures – half-government but half-business – rules much of Britain. THE QUANGOS... WE DON’T KNOW WHY THEY WERE PICKED AND WHAT THEY ARE FOR. WE HAVE LITTLE CONTROL OVER WHAT THEY DO AND THE MONEY THEY SPEND... These states within a state have too much power and use too much taxpayers’ money…

LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS OVERSEEN BY A WHOLE, WRITHING, HEAVING NEST OF QUANGOS WHOSE UNELECTED BUREAUCRATS AWARD STARS, FOR MERIT, TO ELECTED COUNCILLORS. Who do they think they are! Where did these creatures come from?...

Agencies have become the dominant creatures in Quangoland. THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT LOVED THEM AND CREATED LOTS MORE...

We are heading for difficult financial times with severe restraint on public spending, threats of cuts in public services and pay freezes. Yet THE QUANGOS HAVE CREATED PROTECTIVE WALLS ROUND THEMSELVES – AND A PUBLIC-SECTOR FAT-CAT CULTURE HAS DEVELOPED...

WE MUST ALSO RECLAIM THE LARGE AREAS OF THE BRITISH STATE WHICH ARE NO LONGER ACCOUNTABLE… WE MUST TAME AND CULL THESE BUREAUCRATIC CREATURES TO STOP THEM DECIDING HOW WE LIVE OUR LIVES.”



On 11 July 2009, The Daily Record quoted Lord Guthrie, the former Chief of the Defence Staff, thus:

"I spoke to an officer the other day who said that THE TREASURY HAD AFFECTED THE OPERATIONAL SAFETY OF OUR SOLDIERS BY PREVENTING AN UPLIFT IN OUR NUMBERS…

They were prepared to give very large amounts of money to other departments, but THE MINMUM THEY COULD GET AWAY WITH TO DEFENCE."



On 10 July 2009, Commenting on New Labour's reaction to the embarassing honesty of Judge Ian Trigger, Richard Littlejohn wrote this in The Daily Mail:

"THE FULL APPARATUS OF GOVERNMENT IS DEPLOYED TO DESTROY DISSENTERS. ENTER THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY, STEAL, SELL DRUGS, FORGE PASSPORTS AND YOU'LL BE LAVISHED WITH UNLIMITED LEGAL AID, BENEFITS AND SYMPATHY. SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND THEY WILL TRY TO RUIN YOU. UNDER NEW LABOUR, THE MOST HEINOUS CRIME ANYONE CAN COMMIT IS TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE WICKEDNESS OF THE PAST 12 YEARS."



On 10 July 2009, John Denham, New Labour's Communities Secretary was quoted thus in The Daily Express:

“When people feel that population change is leaving them competing for jobs or access to services, the upsides of migration become less apparent."

Which upsides would they be, John?

Upsides for Big Business, multiculturalising Big Brother and the immigrants themselves, perhaps.

Downsides for the rest of us.



On 9 July 2009, Fay Maxted of The Survivors Trust was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"IT IS BEYOND OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVITED TO SHAKE HANDS WITH LEADING OFFICIALS at the memorial service... THE SUFFERING OF HOLNESS'S YOUNG VICTIMS SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN FORGOTTEN".

The Mail explained:

"David Cameron was criticised yesterday after HE WAS PICTURED CHATTING TO A VIOLENT GANG RAPIST at the memorial to the July 7 victims. THE CONSERVATIVE LEADER ALSO SHOOK THE HAND OF GARRI HOLNESS, 42, who lost a leg in the London bombings.

In the weeks after the 2005 attacks, which claimed 52 lives, it emerged HOLNESS HAD BEEN JAILED FOR HIS PART IN THE HORRIFIC RAPE OF TWO 16-YEAR-OLD GIRLS IN 1985. HE WAS PART OF A GANG KNOWN AS THE YOUNG RAIDERS WHO DRAGGED THE SCHOOLGIRLS INTO AN UNDERGROUND GARAGE IN BRIXTON, SOUTH LONDON, WHERE THEY WERE RAPED MORE THAN 40 TIMES AT KNIFEPOINT...

IN JANUARY 2007 IT EMERGED HOLNESS HAD BEEN AWARDED MORE THAN £100,000 IN COMPENSATION FOR HIS INJURIES... IT IS MORE THAN TEN TIMES THAT GIVEN TO HIS TWO TEENAGE VICTIMS, WHO RECEIVED JUST £7,000 EACH."



After the backbench revolt over abolition of 10p tax rate, which hit the poorest hardest, was defeated, Frank Field, MP, the leader of the revolt, was quoted thus in the 8 July edition of The Times:

“The golden thread that knits us all together is that we came into this place not only to protect but to advance the interests of those who get the least from life. THE 10P IS A DENIAL OF ALL THAT WE HAVE COME INTO PUBLIC LIFE ABOUT…

Getting back into order now involves such change of such magnitude that for the first time for generations ISSUES OF PUBLIC ORDER WILL BE A KEY PART OF THE POLITICAL PROCESS... If we are quick enough we will start to get the changes through and a commitment made to our voters before we have quite WIDESPREAD DISORDER. There will be change, it's whether we lead the change or whether we're actually pushed into the change."

"We came into this place not only to protect but to advance the interests of those who get the least from life"?

This may have been your raison d'etre, Frank, but it's not most of them.

Most MPs enter parliament in order to "advance the interests" of themselves and those who own their dirty behinds.



On 5 July 2009, Judge Ian Trigger, said this to Lucien McClearley, a Jamaican drug dealer, before jailing him for two years:

“Your case illustrates all too clearly the completely LAX IMMIGRATION POLICY that exists and has existed over recent years. People like you, and THERE ARE LITERALLY HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU, COME TO THESE SHORES TO AVAIL THEMSELVES OF THE GENEROUS WELFARE BENEFITS THAT EXIST HERE.

In the past ten years THE NATIONAL DEBT OF THIS COUNTRY HAS RISEN TO EXTRAORDINARY HEIGHTS, LARGELY BECAUSE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HAS WASTED BILLIONS OF POUNDS. MUCH OF THAT HAS BEEN WASTED ON WELFARE PAYMENTS.

For every £1 that the decent citizen, who is hard-working, pays in taxes, nearly 10 PER CENT GOES ON SERVICING THAT NATIONAL DEBT. THAT IS TWICE THE AMOUNT IT WAS IN 1997 WHEN THIS GOVERNMENT CAME TO POWER… The fact that it took nearly two years to process your claim shows how desperate the situation in this country has become.”

Sir Andrew Green, founder of think-tank Migrationwatch, applauded Judge Trigger‘s outburst thus:

“HE IS EXPRESSING A SENSE OF FRUSTRATION WHICH IS VERY WIDELY FELT AMONG THE PUBLIC. And it is courageous of him to do so… I HAVE LOST COUNT OF THE NUMBER OF MAGISTRATES WHO HAVE TOLD ME PRIVATELY OF THEIR CONCERNS ABOUT THE NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS COMING BEFORE THEM and the difficulties in finding an appropriate penalty, if convicted, when they have no money and our jails are full.”

Susie Squire, campaign manager of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, concurred, saying:

“JUDGE TRIGGER HAS VOICED THE CONCERNS OF MANY TAXPAYERS AROUND THE COUNTRY. THEY ARE FED UP WITH SEEING THEIR MONEY DOLED OUT TO ANYONE WHO ASKS FOR IT WHILE ALL THE TIME BEING PLUNGED DEEPER INTO DEBT BY THE GOVERNMENT’S BAD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.”

On 5 August 2009, The Times reported thus:

"A senior judge who described Britain’s immigration system as 'completely lax' IS TO FACE AN INVESTIGATION. Judge Ian Trigger said last week that 'hundreds and hundreds of thousands' of illegal immigrants were abusing the benefits system. The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, has asked the Office for Judicial Complaints to rule on whether the comments were too political. The decision will be made jointly by Lord Judge and the Lord Chancellor, Jack Straw."

If a traitorous, PC Champion like Jack Straw is to decide Judge Trigger's fate it looks like yet another off-message truth-teller is for the high jump.

More...



On 5 July 2009, Vice President Joe Biden said the following in conversation with George Stephanopoulos during the This Week programme.

"Israel can determine for itself—it's a sovereign nation, what's in their interest and WHAT THEY DECIDE TO DO RELATIVE TO IRAN AND ANYONE ELSE… If the Netanyahu government decides to take a course of action different than the one being pursued now, that is their sovereign right to do that…

We cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do when they make a determination, if they make a determination that they're existentially threatened and their survival is threatened by another country…

ISRAEL HAS A RIGHT TO DETERMINE WHAT'S IN ITS INTERESTS, and we have a right and we will determine what's in our interests.”



On 4 July 2009, The Guardian quoted Bernie Ecclestone, the Formula One supremo, thus:

"Hitler... was, in the way that he could command a lot of people, able to get things done. I prefer strong leaders... All these guys, Gordon and Tony are trying to please everybody all the time ... Max (Max Mosley, son of Sir Oswald Mosley, leader of the British Union of Fascists) would do a super job, he's a good leader. POLITICIANS ARE TOO WORRIED ABOUT ELECTIONS. We did a terrible thing when we supported the idea of getting rid of Saddam Hussein, he was the only one who could control the country. It was the same with (the Taliban)".

On 6 July 2009, The Guardian showed Ecclestone backtracking from his previous statement.

"I did not put Hitler forward as a positive example... Many of my closest friends are Jews," he said. However, he managed to blot his copybook once more, adding:

"(I) simply noted that, before his appalling crimes, HE ACTED SUCCESSFULLY AGAINST UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE ECONOMIC CRISIS."

Hitler did just that.

Despite what came later, he put Germany back to work and no German starved to death after he came to power. In the Weimar years, 700,000 Germans lost their lives in this way.

After Ecclestone said what he said, Dieter Graumann, Vice-President of the Central Council of German Jews was quoted thus in Handelsblatt, a daily newspaper:

"No team should work with him any more. A boycott would now be more than appropriate."

The Jews like their boycotts.

They tried to impose a world-wide boycott of German goods in 1933, the year Hitler came to power. This is how the front-page headline of the 24 March 1933 edition of The Daily Express put it:

"JUDAEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY".

The sub-heading said:

"Jews of all the world unite against Germany".



On 3 July 2009, Gordon Brown was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"I'm very proud of all that this Government has achieved on LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] rights these last 12 years - often in the face of fierce opposition"

The Mail added:

“MR BROWN'S WIFE SARAH IS EXPECTED TO JOIN ONE MILLION LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER MARCHERS.

The Prime Minister… CLAIMED CREDIT ON BEHALF OF THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT FOR THE CREATION OF CIVIL PARTNERSHIPS, which he hailed as an example of the 'massive strides towards equality' for the gay community over the last decade…

He told campaigners THEY HAD 'CHANGED THE WORLD' by fighting for homosexual equality.”

Changed the world?

Oh, yes, Gordon. You and Tony changed our world, alright. We used to love it. Now many of us do not. Because of what you both did “in the face of fierce opposition”.



On 2 July 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

"NEW DEPTHS OF MENDACITY HAVE BEEN PLUMBED THIS WEEK WITH GORDON BROWN’S PROMISE TO GIVE BRITISH FAMILIES PREFERENCE IN STATE-FUNDED HOUSING rather than allow immigrants to have priority. THIS PLEDGE COULD NOT BE MORE HOLLOW OR UNTRUTHFUL. THE GOVERNMENT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF IMPLEMENTING SUCH A MEASURE.

For a start this move would be unlawful under a raft of legislation imposed by the Labour Government, such as the 1998 human Rights Act or the 2000 Race Discrimination Act, WHICH STATUTORILY ENSHRINE THE SOCIALISTS’ CONTEMPT FOR THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION OF BRITAIN. Moreover HARRIET HARMAN’S NEW ‘EQUALITY’ BILL REQUIRES PUBLIC BODIES TO PRACTISE OVERT DISCRIMINATION IN FAVOUR OF ETHNIC MINORITIES...

THE IDEA THAT ANY COUNCIL OR HOUSING ASSOCIATION IS SUDDENLY ABOUT TO START FAVOURING LOCALS OVER MIGRANTS IS ABSURD. DURING 12 YEARS OF LABOUR RULE THE CULTURE OF BIAS TOWARDS THE NON-BRITISH HAS BEEN DEEPLY EMBEDDED ACROSS THE PUBLIC SECTOR. BROWN’S PROMISE OF ‘BRITISH HOMES FOR BRITISH FAMILIES’ IS AS MEANINGLESS AS HIS CLAIM TO BE CREATING ‘BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS‘... UNDER BROWN AND BLAIR, BRITISH-BORN FAMILIES HAVE BEEN RUTHLESSLY MARGINALISED BY A HOUSING SYSTEM THAT IS LOADED AGAINST THEM...

In 2007 the Government claimed that only one per cent of taxpayer-funded homes are handed to immigrants. THIS WAS A BLATANT LIE. ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL STATISTICS PUBLISHED IN APRIL 2008, ONE-IN-NINE, MORE THAN 11 PER CENT, OF ALL SUBSIDISED HOMES ACROSS BRITAIN ARE OCCUPIED BY MIGRANTS... Only last year research by Channel 4... found that 80 PER CENT OF SOMALIS LIVE IN SOCIAL HOUSING, 49 PER CENT OF TURKS AND 41 OF BANGLADESHIS, COMPARED TO JUST 17 PER CENT OF BRITISH-BORN PEOPLE...

IDEOLOGICAL SOCIALISTS ARE ALMOST PSYCHOTIC IN THEIR DETERMINATION TO UPHOLD THE INTERESTS OF FOREIGNERS WHO HAVE CONTRIBUTED NOTHING TO OUR COUNTRY, AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIGENOUS WORKING-CLASS. I saw this myself when I was a Labour councillor in Islington in the early Nineties. In my ward THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT HAD DECIDED THAT A CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE RESERVED MAINLY FOR REFUGEES. AT ONE PARTY MEETING, WHEN SOME WORKING-CLASS MEMBERS JUSTIFIABLY OBJECTED TO THIS ON THE GROUNDS THAT LOCAL PEOPLE WERE BEING EXCLUDED, THEY WERE HOWLED DOWN AS ‘RACISTS’ BY MIDDLE-CLASS LABOUR MEMBERS WHO OWNED THEIR OWN PROPERTIES.”

More... Scroll down to 2 July

As I keep telling you, ladies and gentlemen, THEY are at war with us.



On 30 June 2009, John Denham, Gordon Brown’s Communities Secretary, said this in The Guardian:

"The number of people who sign up to a traditional egalitarian view of society is simply too small to construct a strong, viable and inclusive electoral coalition. And the extent that those who do, are older, more traditionally working class, suggest that this task will get harder not easier…

THE LEFT NEEDS TO STOP HOLDING UP EGALITARIANISM AS THE IDEAL. If we continue to believe that the egalitarian approach is really the right one, and we, somehow, have to find more cunning ways of getting there, we will fail…

If you think you are in the middle, policies and language aimed at 'the poor' leave you out. AND IF YOU ARE IN THE MIDDLE, YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT WHETHER 'THE TOP' IS DOING BETTER THAN YOU, THAN YOU ARE ABOUT THE 'THE BOTTOM'."

If Denham is trying to say that we should stop putting the third world before the British in Britain, I’d like a bit of that.

He isn’t though, is he? He wants the “older, more traditionally working class” to remain every bit as marginalised as they have been since 1979, I fear.

As for the “middle” being “more likely to be concerned about… the top” than “the bottom", it doesn’t say much for the way we are now, does it?

Or, should I say, it doesn’t say much for what the Blairites and the Brownites and the Thatcherites have turned us into.



On 29 June 2006, the former Chief of the Defence Staff, Field Marshal the Lord Inge of Richmond, said this in the House of Lords:

“Britain's Armed Forces have to face not only, in Iraq and Afghanistan, probably the most demanding, dangerous and complex operational challenges that they have faced for many years, but MAJOR FUNDING PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE SHORTCOMINGS OF EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY IN SERVICE on operations and, in particular, the vulnerability of the old Northern Ireland Snatch Land Rovers... This is not a new problem which has suddenly arisen.

THE FUTURE EQUIPMENT PROGRAMME IS IN A MUDDLE AND IS SIGNIFICANTLY UNDER-FUNDED… The Defence Logistics Organisation, set up under the Strategic Defence Review, needs sorting out to make it, to use modern jargon, fit for purpose…

THERE ARE PARTS OF THE ARMY THAT FEEL BATTERED BY THE LAWYERS…

The political and security situation in Iraq has become increasingly challenging and dangerous… It does not help that THE WAR HAS BECOME INCREASINGLY UNPOPULAR and no longer commands the support which it did… I PERSONALLY AM NOT CLEAR WHAT THE COALITION'S STRATEGIC SECURITY OBJECTIVES ARE IN IRAQ OR HOW IT PLANS TO ACHIEVE THEM… I say that because I have a real sense of drift and confusion about where we are going in Iraq…

I have very serious reservations about the size and fighting capability of our deployment, and about our operational objectives in Afghanistan… Even from a cursory glance at our force levels in Helmand province, we do not have an adequate reserve in theatre ready and available. Helmand province… is a very dangerous area, and very exposed. In addition, it is exposed to the turbulent tribal areas of Pakistan and to infiltrators from Iran. It does not make military sense, to me, for a reserve to be in the United Kingdom or, say, Cyprus. It needs to be readily available, in theatre, acclimatised and aware of local conditions, and not some hundreds of miles away.

Even more worrying is the fact that there is no adequate reserve at the theatre level available for General Richards, who commands the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps… WE ARE BREAKING THE BASIC RULES OF MILITARY TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL LEVEL PLANNING. THE COALITION FAILED TO THINK THROUGH THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF THE WAR IN IRAQ, AND I HAVE A NASTY FEELING WE MAY BE DOING THE SAME IN AFGHANISTAN…

Frankly, I get a real sense that THE ARMY, IN PARTICULAR, IS TOO SMALL… When the planning guidelines were issued, I do not believe that the planners really contemplated this intensity and this tempo of operational service.”



On 26 June 2009, Frederick Forsyth, author of The Day of the Jackal, wrote this in The Daily Express:

“Not for the first time I am almost speechless at THE CYNICISM AND MENDACITY OF THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT IN SEEKING TO COVER SOMETHING UP WHILE PRETENDING TO BE HONEST...

I refer to the so-called commission of enquiry into why we went to war in 2003 when we invaded Iraq. It purports to be a most complex matter needing a full year before the results of the enquiry can emerge. In fact it is an affair of depressing simplicity relying on just four simple questions which can be asked in seconds, answered in minutes and proved before sundown...

Question - Why did this country launch a war against the Republic of Iraq on March 20, 2003?

Answer - Because two days earlier in a historic debate the House of Commons by a rather slim majority voted to do so...

Question - Why did the Commons so vote?

Answer - BECAUSE IT HAD BEEN CONVINCED BY THE PRIME MINISTER TONY BLAIR THAT HE HAD SEEN (BUT COULD NOT DIVULGE) COMPREHENSIVE AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT WITHIN IRAQ WERE STOCKS OF HIGHLY DANGEROUS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION WHICH HAD TO BE CAPTURED AND DESTROYED LEST THEY BE USED.

Question – Had Tony Blair seen such evidence?

Answer - NO HE HAD NOT.

Question - Why not?

Answer - BECAUSE NO SUCH EVIDENCE EXISTED AND THE CHIEF OF THE SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (MI6) REFUSED POINT BLANK TO INVENT IT FOR HIM.

And that is it. EVERY OTHER QUESTION AND EVERY OTHER ANSWER THAT SIR JOHN CHILCOT WILL WEARILY LISTEN TO (BECAUSE THIS MANDARIN ALREADY KNOWS THE TRUTH) IS PADDING.

WHEN A PRIME MINISTER, HAVING TAKEN THE OATH OF A PRIVY COUNSELLOR, GOES TO THE DESPATCH BOX AND LIES, THAT IS NOT SIMPLY AN UNTRUTH; IT IS PERJURY. AND PERJURY IS AN INDICTABLE, EVEN AN IMPEACHABLE, OFFENCE…

IN CLAIMING THERE WAS PROOF ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY WAR, BLAIR LIED; AND 179 YOUNG SOLDIERS NOW IN THEIR GRAVES CRY FOR JUSTICE.

It is extremely unlikely they will ever get it. POWERFUL FORCES ARE NOW TRYING TO CREATE THIS MULTI-MILLIONAIRE PRESIDENT OF EUROPE.”



On 25 June 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“The grotesquely mismanaged asylum system created by the Labour Government is an affront to justice. RIDDLED WITH ABUSES, IT PROVIDES BOTH LUCRATIVE OPPORTUNITIES TO GREEDY LAWYERS AND A POLITICAL CAUSE FOR LEFT-WING ZEALOTS WHO LOATHE THEIR OWN COUNTRY. But for the rest of us, the asylum racket means HIGHER TAXES, A GREATER STRAIN ON PUBLIC SERVICES AND THE ACCELERATING BREAKDOWN IN SOCIAL COHESION…

THE WHOLE ASYLUM SYSTEM HAS BECOME SYNONYMOUS WITH FRAUD, INCOMPETENCE AND CONTEMPT FOR THE RIGHTS OF BRITISH CITIZENS... So enfeebled is the British state that JUST 10 PER CENT OF FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS ARE EVER DEPORTED WHEN THEIR CLAIMS ARE REJECTED...

THE TOTAL COST OF HOME OFFICE SUPPORT FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS IS RUNNING AT MORE THAN £500 MILLION-A-YEAR AND OVER THE LAST EIGHT YEARS THE GOVERNMENT HAS SPENT NO LESS THAN £6.6 BILLION ON SUCH ASSISTANCE...

THE ASYLUM MESS IS ANOTHER PART OF THE CIVIC ORDER’S DRIVE TO DESTROY OUR NATIONHOOD. THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR TRADITIONAL BRITISH IDENTITY THROUGH THE PROMOTION OF ASYLUM AND MASS IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN A FUNDAMENTAL THEME OF SOCIALISM OVER THE LAST TWELVE YEARS. THE CHAOS IS NOT A MISTAKE. IT IS A DELIBERATE POLICY AIMED AT TRANSFORMING OUR SOCIETY.” More... Scroll down to 25 June



On 25 June 2009, Geoffrey Alderman said this in The Jewish Chronicle:

“Did you know that DAVID CAMERON HAS JEWISH ROOTS? I must confess I didn’t until I read an item in last week’s Jewish Tribune. I was aware of Cameron’s direct descent from William IV and William’s fecund mistress Dorothea Jordan, and that Cameron is therefore a distant cousin of our present Queen…

What I had missed, and what the Tribune dwelt upon at length, was the fact that CAMERON’S PATERNAL GREAT-GREAT-GRANDFATHER WAS EMILE LEVITA, A GERMAN-JEWISH BANKER who, with his non-Jewish wife came to these shores 150 years ago and USED HIS WEALTH TO DIG HIMSELF DEEP INTO THE ARISTOCRACY, sending his four sons to Eton in the process.

What the Tribune did dwell upon at great length, however, was the Levita ancestry, which includes some illustrious Hebraic scholars in 16th-century Europe…

There was the sad news of the murder, in Afghanistan, of Lieutenant Paul Mervis, reportedly the first British-Jewish serviceman to be killed in action since the Falklands conflict 27 years ago…

Frankly, one part of me wishes that Emile Levita had not ‘married out.’ But it says something for our charitable instincts, as Jews, that a newspaper as strictly Orthodox as the Tribune can feel comfortable running the story of David Cameron and his colourful Jewish ancestry.

Was it mere coincidence, then, that Cameron, alone of the party leaders, drew favourable attention to Speaker Bercow’s Jewish identity in his laudatory formal welcome minutes after the vote had been announced?…

As we reflect upon these truths with justifiable pride, a word of warning. If we, of our own volition, publicise the Jewish identities of the good and the great, surely we cannot complain if the media reveal the Jewish identities of the not-so-good and the far-from-great.”

Mr Alderman should be too concerned about Emile Levita being “married out“ to a “non-Jewish” wife.

As Wikipedia tells us: “Cameron's great-great grandmother, was a descendant of the wealthy Danish-Jewish Rée family on her father's side.”



On 25 June 2009, John Kampfner wrote this in The Daily Mail:

“Mandelson – on Blair’s behalf – set down specific conditions for the Iraq war inquiry. The deal, I am told, was explicit. NOT ONLY WOULD THE HEARINGS BE FULLY IN PRIVATE, BUT THE COMMITTEE WOULD, AS WITH HUTTON, BE MANAGEABLE. BROWN WAS INSTRUCTED TO ENSURE THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE INQUIRY WOULD, IN THE WORDS OF ONE OFFICIAL ‘NOT STIR THE HORSES’. BROWN READILY ACQUIESCED.”

The Mail continued:

“LORD MANDELSON STITCHED UP A DEAL WITH GORDON BROWN FOR A TAME IRAQ INQUIRY TO PROTECT TONY BLAIR... THE BUSINESS SECRETARY PERSUADED THE PREMIER TO PICK A PANEL OF ESTABLISHMENT FIGURES WHO WOULD PROBE THE CONFLICT IN SECRET – IN EXCHANGE FOR HIS SUPPORT HEADING OFF A CABINET COUP AGAINST MR BROWN."



On 24 June 2009, The Daily Mail quoted the former Chief of the Defence Staff, Lord Guthrie, thus:

"Initially and subsequently in Iraq, IT WAS VERY POOR, AND IF GORDON BROWN AS CHANCELLOR HAD BEEN MORE SYMPATHETIC, IT WOULD HAVE KEPT PEOPLE ALIVE".

The "it" Lord Guthrie alludes to is the military equipment our boys should have had but often didn't.



On 24 June 2009, Ann Widdecombe wrote this in The Daily Express:

“I thought it was a joke but it wasn’t. A-LEVEL STUDENTS HAVE PROTESTED THAT THE TERM ‘DESPOTIC’ WHEN APPLIED TO HITLER IN A QUESTION WAS TOO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.

Eh? History students who have reached A-level do not understand the meaning of despot? What exactly do they read that they manage never to have come across this word? Postman Pat?

It reminds me of the university lecturer who told me that a student had complained that the textbook he set was impossible to understand because it was riddled with Latin. THE LATIN IN QUESTION CONSISTED OF COMMON WORDS SUCH AS ET CETERA...

ANY STUDENT WHO CANNOT RECOGNISE ET CETERA SHOULD NOT BE AT UNIVERSITY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND IF AN A-LEVEL STUDENT CANNOT UNDERSTAND A WORD SUCH AS DESPOTIC, HE SHOULD FAIL. INSTEAD THE SPOKESMAN FOR THE EXAMINATION BOARD WHIMPERS THAT THE COMPLAINTS WILL ‘BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION’. No wonder the A-level, once the gold standard of education, is now taken with a pinch of salt by so many universities…

Students are fooled by grades and assessments that bear no relationship to reality. TOO MANY LEAVE HIGHER EDUCATION WITH MICKEY MOUSE DEGREES, LIMITED PROSPECTS AND EXTENSIVE DEBT. THEY ARE THE CASUALTIES OF A DECEITFUL SYSTEM THAT OPERATES TARGETS AND QUOTAS RATHER THAN RIGOROUS SELECTION. TO FAIL HAS BECOME AN UNACCEPTABLE CONCEPT AND ALL MUST PASS.

Unfortunately the real world works rather differently. Employers look for competence and will not indulge the poor performers by telling them how wonderfully brilliant they are. If people do not measure up they will not survive the competitive rigours of the workplace, yet THEY ARE NOT PREPARED FOR THIS BY OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM THAT HEAPS PRAISE AND OPTIMISTIC MARKS ON SECOND AND THIRD-RATE PERFORMANCES.”



On 23 June 2009, General Sir Richard Dannat, the UK's top soldier, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"In Iraq... we had a window of consent to address the security and basic needs of the Iraqi people: reconstruction, development and developing the capacity of indigenous security forces... OUR FAILURE TO DELIVER this through proper investment and a comprehensive approach, and our early switch to an economy of force operation in favour of Afghanistan, sowed the seeds for the dissatisfaction that followed and THE RISE OF THE MILITIAS…

WE FAILED TO MAINTAIN THE FORCE LEVELS REQUIRED, either of coalition forces or Iraqi forces… by which time we were already committed to a new operation in Afghanistan."



On 23 June 2009, Patrick O'Flynn wrote this in The Daily Express:

“The growing estrangement between the Labour Party and working people, one effect of which has been the rise of the BNP, is rapidly turning into a formal separation. In a speech to the GMB trade union – the very body organising the Lindsey protests – in June 2007, on the very cusp of starting his premiership, Gordon Brown said:

‘It is time to train British workers for the British jobs that will be available over the coming few years and to make sure that people who are inactive and unemployed are able to get the new jobs on offer.’

WHAT BROWN DID WAS THE PRECISE OPPOSITE. He failed to impose Labour market controls on people from the new European Union member states, scattered around work permits for foreign nationals like confetti and generally acted as if his claim to have ‘abolished the cycle of boom and bust’ was indisputable fact. But the new jobs Brown predicted have not materialised. INSTEAD WE ARE SEEING THE FASTEST INCREASE IN UNEMPLOYMENT FOR A GENERATION WHILE FOREIGN WORKERS CONTINUE TO ARRIVE IN THEIR THOUSANDS. Rather than British workers being trained to match the vacancies on OFFER WE NOW HAVE ONE IN SIX BRITISH 18-YEAR-OLDS CATEGORISED AS ‘NEETS’ – NOT IN EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT OR TRAINING.

YOUNG PEOPLE AT A FORMATIVE STAGE OF THEIR LIVES ARE DRIFTING INTO DRUG DEPENDENCY, CRIME AND THE SORT OF CHAOTIC LIFESTYLES THAT WILL MITIGATE AGAINST THEM EVER HAVING A SUCCESSFUL WORKING LIFE.

The Government’s failure to reserve powers to shield our Labour market from foreign workers in a recession is symptomatic of ITS ELEVATION OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP ABOVE BRITISH CITIZENSHIP…

Until the recession began to bite about a year ago THE PRIMARY IMPACT OF THE FLOOD OF PLUMBERS, CARPENTERS, ELECTRICIANS, PRODUCTION-LINE WORKERS AND AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS FROM EASTERN EUROPE WAS TO DEPRESS PAY RATES IN THESE OCCUPATIONS.

BRITISH WORKERS DERIDED BY METROPOLITAN SOCIALISTS AS BELONGING TO THE ‘WHITE VAN MAN’ FRATERNITY BECAME INCREASINGLY DISILLUSIONED WITH LABOUR AND FED UP WITH BEING ACCUSED OF RACISM FOR WISHING TO PROTECT EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS. But at least they were still in work.

Labour’s guilty secret was that the bulk of those out of work were not actively looking for jobs. Most were either on incapacity benefit or women following the Karen Matthews template of bringing children into the world for the sake of an endless stream of benefits.

What has happened over the past 12 months is THAT THOUSANDS OF SELF-RELIANT, HARD-WORKING PEOPLE HAVE LOST JOBS THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN. They are desperate for work and willing to accept positions below those they have lost. This rapid change in labour market conditions is seen in the thousands of applications received for seasonal jobs at zoos and theme parks.

DISPLACED BRITISH WORKERS HAVE FOUND TO THEIR HORROR THAT THE JOBS MARKET, ESPECIALLY AT THE LOWER END, HAS BEEN STITCHED UP BY EASTERN EUROPEANS. For companies whose production lines are now entirely staffed by Poles it makes for an easy life to fill any vacancies with friends of their existing foreign workers.

IN BOSTON, ALSO IN LINCOLNSHIRE, HUNDREDS OF JOBS AT A VEGETABLE PACKING PLANT WERE OFFERED TO EASTERN EUROPEANS LAST WEEK WITHOUT LOCALS BEING INVITED TO APPLY…

Thanks to the arrogance of Gordon Brown, the man who claimed he had abolished the Trade cycle, OUR JOBS MARKET IS OPEN TO ALL-COMERS.

IT IS A BITING IRONY THAT PEOPLE PROTESTING FOR THE ‘RIGHT TO WORK’ – A SLOGAN ONCE USED IN A BID TO MOBILISE THE WORKING-CLASS AGAINST MARGARET THATCHER – MUST NOW DIRECT THEIR RAGE AGAINST A LABOUR REGIME.”



On 22 June 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“Like the Soviet Union, OUR RULERS IN BRUSSELS WANT ABSOLUTE SUBSERVIENCE. AT A POLITICAL LEVEL THIS MEANS BREAKING UP NATIONS INTO REGIONS AND REDUCING NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS TO THE STATUS OF MUNICIPALITIES.

At the same time, the EU itself is now taking on the trappings of nationhood, with its own Parliament, laws, currency, executive, flag and, if Lisbon is ratified, Presidency and Foreign Office. On a demographic level, THE POPULATIONS OF EUROPE HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY TRANSFORMED BY MASS IMMIGRATION AND THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BORDERS.

THE NATION STATE IS THE GREATEST VEHICLE FOR UPHOLDING DEMOCRACY YET DEVISED BY MAN. UNDER THE EU’S TYRANNY, BOTH NATIONHOOD AND DEMOCRACY ARE NOW DYING.”



On 21 June 2009, the African immigrant Sorious Samura wrote the following in The Sunday Independent:

“In 1999 I witnessed a gang rape in Sierra Leone. I was forced to watch a group of rebel soldiers taking it in turns to rape a young girl in front of an audience of jeering men. It was the height of the civil conflict and rape had become a devastating weapon of war…

When I moved to Britain I believed I had escaped such horrific sexual violence. As my Dispatches investigation tomorrow night shows, I was mistaken. Gang rape is happening here – and what I have found most disturbing as an African is that A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF THESE ATTACKS ARE BEING CARRIED OUT BY BLACK OR MIXED-RACE YOUNG MEN…

In December, nine schoolboys, (8 of them black) some as young as 13 at the time of the attack, were convicted of raping a 14-year-old (white) girl. She was dragged between tower blocks in Hackney where she was threatened with a knife, hit and raped during an ordeal that lasted an hour and a half – some of which was filmed on mobile phones. In January, three (black) men were convicted of gang raping a 16-year-old with learning disabilities for two hours BEFORE DOUSING HER WITH CAUSTIC SODA in an effort to get rid of the evidence…

Despite the seriousness of the crime, I was amazed to discover that NO NATIONAL STATISTICS EXIST: gang rape is simply not recorded as a separate crime category…

One of the few police forces to have begun recording the figures of reported gang rape is the Metropolitan Police. In 2008 alone, they received reports of 85 gang rapes. Using the Met's definition of gang rape – those involving three or more perpetrators – we began to look at the number of convictions. We tracked down 29 cases, from January 2006 to March 2009, in which a total of 92 young people were convicted of involvement in gang rape. One fact stood out. Of those convicted, 66 WERE BLACK OR MIXED RACE, 13 were white and THE REMAINDER WERE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES INCLUDING AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ AND LIBYA…

The groups of young men I met in London expressed some profoundly disturbing attitudes towards girls and sex. The boys explained how they make arrangements for ‘line-ups’ in which one girl has oral sex with up to six or seven of them at one time…

One boy told me: ‘If she wants to go and meet a bag of boys then she's probably a jezzie [slut], and if she's going to a house it's over – she's going to get beaten [have sex]’…

In other instances, as some of the victims in our film describe, girls can unwittingly walk into a trap, innocently visiting someone's house to listen to music or watch a film only to discover that A GROUP OF BOYS ARE LYING IN WAIT. Or they might be hanging out with friends in a park and suddenly realise they have become surrounded by A GROUP OF BOYS INTENT ON SEX…

Occasionally gang rape is used to punish a girl for minor transgressions against gang members. In one of my most shocking interviews, I met A GIRL WHO ADMITTED SHE HAD HELPED TO SET UP GIRLS FOR GANG RAPE. As the girlfriend of a gang member, SHE ORGANISED THESE RAPES, partly out of fear and PARTLY TO FIT IN. She admitted she was terrified of being raped herself and had walked away when witnessing a girl being gang-raped at a party because she feared she might be next:

‘There was just loads of boys and the girl's tights were ripped up, like, she was bleeding as well, because I THINK SHE WAS A VIRGIN, and they were just taking turns on her basically, and SHE WAS CRYING, and I didn't get involved because I thought if I get involved they're gonna turn on me.’

The victims' descriptions of their attacks are horrific. One young victim likened her attack to being ‘pulled and pushed around like a rag doll’, while another 14-year-old girl described her ordeal when she was gang raped by a total of nine boys who told her that she was not the only girl they had attacked. In that case, nine boys were subsequently convicted of raping her. The youngest perpetrator was just 12 years old...

The Rev Joyce Daley, from the Black Parents Forum in Hackney, told me that gang rape is not a rare or one-off phenomenon. IT IS HAPPENING ON A REGULAR BASIS…

Sheldon Thomas, a youth worker in Brixton, said:

‘WE'VE GOT A GENERATION THAT LOOKS AT SEX AS IF IT'S NOTHING, AND TREATS DISRESPECTING WOMEN AS IF IT'S NOTHING. These guys are like 13, 14 and 15, and their actual attitudes towards young girls – towards sex – is mind-blowing. It's actually leaving you asking: WHERE ARE THEIR MORALS, WHERE ARE THEIR VALUES?"

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/gang-rape-is-it-a-race-issue-1711381.html

Morals?

Values? They were not imported to be be moral or to value those who gave them sanctuary here. They were brought over to destroy. The “black or mixed race” gang rapists, those from “Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya”, and all the rest of the foreigners imported into our world in recent times, are the foot soldiers in the war being waged by the elite belligerents of the New World Order upon the working-class communities of the white world.

Hey! All you New Labour and Lib Dem voters! All you PC Crowd “pity the poor immigrant” types! THIS IS WHAT YOU VOTED FOR! YOU DID THIS!

As for you who voted for Old Labour and the Tories, you did it as well. This has been happening ever since they started coming over here in droves. Like the man says, “no national statistics exist.” Immigrant-upon-indigenous gang rape was brushed under the carpet by ALL the mainstream parties. It still is.

THEY are at war with our little girls, ladies and gentlemen. Why are you still voting for THEM?

Are you at war with our little girls as well?



Upon hearing that the enquiry into the Iraq War trumpeted by Gordon Brown was to be held in secret, Air Marshal Sir John Walker, former Head of Defence Intelligence, said this in the 21 June 2009 edition of The Sunday Express:

"There is only one reason that the inquiry was to be heard in private and that is TO PROTECT PAST AND PRESENT MEMBERS OF THIS GOVERNMENT.”



In Cole Morton’s 21 June 2009 Daily Mail exposé of Nick Clegg, he subtitles his article thus:

“Cross-dressing, drugs, that remark about his 30 lovers and - finally - the truth about his criminal past: the hilariously indiscreet confessions of Nick Clegg, the Lib Dem leader who tries hard not to embarrass himself - but (happily) just can't help it.”

The Lib Dem leader confesses to the criminality of his 16-year-old self thus:

“Oh, the cactus… I just behaved very, very badly. I was on an exchange in Germany and I DRANK FAR, FAR, FAR TOO MUCH. I was a teenager. I lost it, really…. What I mean is I WAS DRUNK...

I was at a party and I drifted into a greenhouse with a friend, SAW IT WAS FULL OF CACTI AND LIT A MATCH to find our way, as there were no lights on. THE FLAME ACCIDENTALLY TOUCHED ONE OF THE CACTI, WHICH GLOWED RATHER BEAUTIFULLY…

WE DID THAT TO A FAIR NUMBER OF THE CACTI. Not really knowing what we'd done…

IT WAS THE LEADING COLLECTION OF CACTI IN GERMANY… He'd been to the jungles of Brazil and stuff to find these cacti… WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT WE WERE DOING. We were teenagers, we'd drunk too much - frankly, WE DID BEHAVE APPALLINGLY, IRRESPONSIBLY, CRIMINALLY…

I spent the summer with my mum, going round one specialised garden centre after another, trying to replace some of the cacti. Of course they were tiny, and his were all large.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1193693/Id-drunk-I-irresponsible-Criminal-Nick-Clegg-regrets.html#ixzz1XvYuh9jX

“We didn’t know what we were doing.”

I wonder if he know what he’s doing now?

Of the smaller political parties, Clegg said this:

“The BNP believe in giving every 18-year-old an automatic rifle. (Not true) The Greens believe in abolishing land-ownership rights. Full stop. They're crackers… THE BNP ARE FASCISTS, (on the side of the British people) and the Greens - well, I'm not… People voted out of anger, out of frustration… but I don't think they were voting for what these parties stand for.”

I should think those who voted Green would be rather more concerned about the environment than those who voted for the three mainstream parties.

As regards not voting for what the BNP 'stand for,' I guess those who voted for them would be sick to death of politicans who kept on putting the foreigner first in the land that they made. Politicans like the ¾ foreigner, Nick Clegg.

Morton adds:

“Clegg has also been lucky that his MPs have, on the whole, behaved themselves over expenses... His own claims fall within the rules, but they still make me wonder: why on earth should we pay for his gardener, or to have his floors sanded?

'As it happens, the property was not in a habitable state when I bought it,' he says, insistently…

While Cameron went to Eton, Clegg was educated at Westminster School in London… Clegg is also something no Conservative leader could get away with being: A FERVENT EUROPEAN. HIS MOTHER WAS DUTCH, THOUGH SHE WAS BORN IN INDONESIA…. HIS FATHER IS HALF-RUSSIAN, THE SON OF AN ARISTOCRAT who fled the revolution with her aunt - who was the lover of both Maxim Gorky and HG Wells and A SUSPECTED SPY. 'SHE'S STILL ACCUSED IN THE PRESS OF BEING A DOUBLE AGENT. My dad gets very upset.'

Clegg worked as a journalist at first, but THEN AT THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IN BRUSSELS, and later alongside trade commissioner LEON BRITTAN. He met his wife, COMMERCIAL LAWYER MIRIAM GONZALEZ DURANTEZ, while they were both studying at the College of Europe in Bruges, and they married in 2000. Their three young sons, ANTONIO, ALBERTO AND MIGUEL, are bilingual. 'WE HAVE A BIG, ALMOST MEDITERRANEAN FAMILY,' he says…

He doesn't give the impression of regretting much in life, except perhaps what happened with Piers Morgan, who interviewed him for GQ magazine last year and asked about his number of lovers… (more than 30)

Clegg was A SKI INSTRUCTOR IN AUSTRIA DURING HIS GAP YEAR…

Has he ever taken drugs? 'I have always cast a veil over this,' Clegg says quickly. 'If I was a drug-taker when I was in public offi ce, or seeking it, that's one thing, but how far am I supposed to go back to explain WHAT I DID OR DIDN'T DO?'…

This is the first time he has clammed up, I say, WHICH SUGGESTS SOMETHING TO HIDE. His eyes flash. They say he has a temper…

'You do imagine that you could be a politician. That's the problem, actually: POLITICS DOESN'T LOOK LIKE SOMETHING THAT NORMAL PEOPLE DO'…

He hung out with people who would one day be famous, acting alongside Helena Bonham Carter in a play directed by Sam Mendes.”

Those the ¾ foreign, ex-ski instructor-cum-cactus arsonist hung out with, Helena Bonham Carter and Sam Mendes, and Leon Brittan, the Trade Commissioner he worked for, are Jewish.



On 21 June 2009, upon hearing that the Government would not publish the findings of the inquiry until after the next General Election, the former Cabinet Secretary, Lord Butler, was moved to say this in The Sunday Express:

“I reluctantly conclude that THE FORM OF THE INQUIRY PROPOSED BY THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN DICTATED MORE BY THE GOVERNMENT’S POLITICAL INTEREST THAN THE NATIONAL INTEREST and it cannot achieve the purpose of purging mistrust.”



On 19 June 2009, Frederick Forsyth said this in The Daily Express:

“Lord Guthrie, Chief of Defence Staff until retirement in 2001... repeatedly appealed to Tony Blair for emergency funding as the popinjay threw us into one war after another. Each time Blair said yes, AND EACH TIME WAS OVERRULED BY THEN CHANCELLOR GORDON BROWN WHO REFUSED POINT BLANK. ALAS, BLAIR WAS WEAK, DIM, MENDACIOUS AND VAIN. HE JUST FLOUNCED OFF TO THE NEXT PHOTOCALL AND COMMITTED OUR UNDERFUNDED FORCES TO MORE WARS... HE JUST SENT THE LADS TO DIE FAR AWAY UNDERMANNED, UNDERPAID AND DISASTROUSLY UNDEREQUIPPED...

My own estimate is that 70 YOUNG MEN ARE DEAD WHO WOULD HAVE LIVED WITH EQUIPMENT THAT CAN BE BOUGHT RIGHT OFF THE PARKING LOT, MAINLY BATTLE-TESTED AMERICAN KIT...

OFFICIAL FIGURES JUST RELEASED PROVE LABOUR HAS CUT OUR FORCES BY A FIFTH WHILE BLAIR LAUNCHED US INTO FIVE CONSECUTIVE WARS.

THERE ARE NOW 46,000 FEWER SERVICE PERSONNEL THAN IN 1997. WE HAVE LOST A THIRD OF OUR ATTACK SUBMARINES, WARSHIPS AND CARRIERS, 479 ARMOURED VEHICLES AND 169 FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT...

SINCE THE COLLAPSE OF THE USSR IN 1991, SUCCESSIVE REGIMES HAVE CUT AND CUT AND CUT AS IF THERE WERE NO THREATS LEFT IN THE WORLD. IN FACT THERE ARE MORE. BUT THE BLAIR/BROWN NEXUS OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS HAS LITERALLY CRIPPLED WHAT WAS ONCE A FORMIDABLE WESTERN POWER INTO A SCRIMP-AND-MAKE-DO TASK FORCE, CONSTANTLY BEGGING AND BORROWING OFF THE AMERICANS.” More...



On 18 June 2009, Stephen Glover wrote this in The Daily Mail:

"Most of us thought Tony Blair had strayed off our radar screens to earn millions of pounds delivering tedious speeches around the world, and to hover ineffectually over the Middle East peace process. Now it appears HE IS A SERIOUS CONTENDER FOR THE NEW ROLE OF PRESIDENT OF EUROPE, which will be created if the Lisbon Treaty is ratified by the European Union's 27 member states. Though not openly campaigning for the job, he is said by friends to want it quite badly. So it is a great shock to read in a respectable newspaper that DAVID CAMERON IS PREPARED TO GIVE MR BLAIR A FREE RUN SHOULD THE PRESIDENCY COME HIS WAY…

TONY BLAIR PROVED HIMSELF SUCH AN UNTRUSTWORTHY AND SELF-SERVING PRIME MINISTER of Great Britain that the thought of him sitting in Brussels with a European flag plonked on his desk is almost more than the heart can bear... I DON'T WANT A DODGY FORMER PRIME MINISTER OF BRITAIN WHO PROVED HIMSELF SLIPPERY WITH THE TRUTH IN MATTERS OF WAR, a virtuous Luxembourger, an agreeable Spaniard or anyone else.

Very few of us ever asked for a President of Europe, though WE WERE PROMISED BY MR BLAIR WHEN HE WAS PRIME MINISTER THAT THERE WOULD BE A REFERENDUM ON A NEW EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION.”



In The Hilligdon & Uxbridge Times of 17 June 2009, Paul Goodman, Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion, opined thus:

“THE WYCOMBE OF THE FUTURE, LIKE A LOT OF BRITAIN OF THE FUTURE, IS GOING TO LOOK VERY DIFFERENT… Wycombe has a marvellous opportunity given its relative prosperity, employment rates and so on, to be A BEACON FOR CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM RELATIONS.”

The Times added:

“One in four Wycombe residents will one day be Muslim district MP Paul Goodman has predicted.” More...



On 15 June 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

"At the recent European elections, LABOUR RECEIVED JUST 15 PER CENT OF THE VOTE. THE PARTY HAS ALMOST BEEN DRIVEN OUT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, HOLDING NOT A SINGLE COUNTY COUNCIL ACROSS ENGLAND... UNDER BROWN’S LEADERSHIP, THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAS BECOME ONE OF THE MOST DISHONEST, SLEAZY, UNDEMOCRATIC, AND RUTHLESS IN BRITISH HISTORY…

A REGIME THAT ENCOURAGES THE ARREST OF AN OPPOSITION MP, CREATES THE WORLD’S LARGEST DATABASE TO SPY ON ITS PEOPLE AND GOES TO WAR ON THE BASIS OF LIES WILL STOP AT NOTHING TO CLING TO POWER.

Gordon Brown... IS UTTERLY DEVOID OF MORALITY. IN HIS DETERMINATION TO FURTHER HIS OWN CAUSE, HE WILL SPOUT ANY LIE, FIDDLE ANY STATISTIC AND SMEAR ANY OPPONENT.

LABOUR WILL BE HELPED IN THIS TASK BY A DELUGE OF GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA... THE STATE IS BY FAR THE COUNTRY’S BIGGEST ADVERTISER, SPENDING MORE THAN £400MILLION A YEAR ON SPIN. OVER THE NEXT 12 MONTHS WHITEHALL DEPARTMENTS AND QUANGOS WILL PRODUCE A BARRAGE OF PRO-GOVERNMENT PUBLICITY dressed up as public information...

Much of the propaganda and fraudulent language about ‘cuts’ will be aimed at LABOUR’S THREE KEY BLOCS OF VOTERS: BENEFIT CLAIMANTS, PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS AND ETHNIC MINORITIES.

OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS LABOUR HAS INDULGED IN SOCIAL ENGINEERING ON AN EPIC SCALE, massively widening the scope of the welfare system, expanding the public sector workforce and PROMOTING IMMIGRATION AT A RATE OF 600,000 NEW ARRIVALS A YEAR. CRUDE POLITICAL MOTIVATION HAS PLAYED A KEY PART IN THIS DRIVE TO TRANSFORM OUR SOCIETY, CREATING AN ELECTORATE THAT IS INCREASINGLY DEPENDENT ON THE GOVERNMENT...

SPENDING ON CAPITAL PROJECTS WILL BE DIRECTED AT MARGINAL SEATS. THE OVERTLY POLITICISED CIVIL SERVICE WILL COLLUDE IN LABOUR’S PARTISAN INITIATIVES. TRADE UNION FUNDS WILL BE POURED INTO THE KEY SEATS. MORE BLATANT CORRUPTION WILL BE SEEN IN THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF POSTAL VOTING IN LABOUR AREAS. INDEED, THE EASE WITH WHICH POSTAL VOTES CAN BE MANIPULATED BY PARTY AGENTS IS WHY LABOUR WAS KEEN TO IMPOSE THEM.” More... Scroll down to 15 June



On 11 June 2009, Detective Chief Inspector John Macdonald made the following statement outside the court after Ben Kinsella’s murderers had been found guilty:

“Instead of punching, or using verbal means, they decided to stab someone many times…

Ben ran into three cowards. THEY WERE OLDER THAN HIM, BIGGER THAN HIM, THEY WERE ARMED WITH KNIVES. HE HAD NO CHANCE AT ALL… IT IS DONE OUT OF PURE IGNORANCE… THEY ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE IGNORANT AND SOCIALLY INEPT… THEY HAVE NO SOCIAL ABILITIES WHATSOEVER TO INTERACT WITH PEOPLE. This was a non-event in a pub and they resorted to violence straight away."

On 11 June 2009, George Kinsella made the following statement outside the court after his son’s murderers had been found guilty:

"Almost one year ago, our precious gentle son, Ben was brutally murdered on the streets of London. How many more families will have to stand outside the Old Bailey to get justice for their child. Our son's only crime was to be the last one, running away, from THOSE ANIMALS.

KNIFE CRIME IS NOW SADLY EMBEDDED IN THE VERY HEART OF GREAT BRITAIN. Parents live in fear until their children are safely home. IT CAN BE FOR A WRONG WORD, A WRONG LOOK, OR A WRONG POST CODE… In Ben's case it was simply nothing to do with him at all."

In court, Jade Braithwaite, a convicted thief, named Michael Alleyne as the killer. Alleyne named Braithwaite.

They, along with Juress Kika, were jailed for life.

“Animals”; “ignorant and socially inept”; “armed with knives”.

Behold the foot-soldiers of the Multicult.

When you hear the politicians and the PC Crowd speak of “cohesion”, ladies and gentlemen, please be aware that it is the Braithwaites, the Kikas and the Alleynes they wish us cohere with.



On 11 June 2009, The Morning Star quoted Harriet Harman, the Deputy Leader of New Labour, thus:

"WE HAVE ALL BEEN SHOCKED AND HORRIFIED BY THE FACT THAT TWO REGIONS OF THIS COUNTRY, THE NORTH-WEST AND YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE ARE REPRESENTED BY THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY...

In the Equality Bill, THAT CONSTITUTION WILL BE UNLAWFUL... All of us should agree THAT THERE IS NO PLACE FOR A POLITICAL PARTY IN THIS COUNTRY TO HAVE AN APARTHEID CONSTITUTION AND THE EQUALITY BILL WILL PREVENT THAT BEING THE CASE."

Oh yes, the New World Order’s global message mustn’t be diluted by allowing the masses too much access to the unfortunate truth from the patriotic wing of British politics.

The diverse, inclusive and enriching status quo must be maintained. Harriet Harman and New Labour’s leafy suburbian more-equal-thans will see to it.



On 9 June 2009, Patrick O'Flynn opined thus in The Daily Express:

“THE LABOUR PARTY THAT HAS ABANDONED THE BRITISH WORKING CLASS in a process of disengagement that has taken place over decades… Labour is to blame because ITS POLICIES HAVE UNDERMINED WORKING-CLASS AMBITION, REFUSED TO PUNISH PROPERLY THE CRIMINALITY THAT PLAGUES WORKING-CLASS NEIGHBOURHOODS, RIGGED THE JOBS MARKET AGAINST INDIGENOUS WORKERS, ENCOURAGED EXCESSIVE IMMIGRATION AND DOWNGRADED PATRIOTISM – REPLACING IT WITH THE DISASTROUS IDEOLOGY OF MULTICULTURALISM...

FOR MILLIONS, SOCIAL HOUSING AND BENEFITS PAYMENTS OFFER A MORE ATTRACTIVE DEAL THAN WHATEVER POORLY PAID, HEAVILY TAXED EMPLOYMENT IS ON OFFER LOCALLY. SINGLE MOTHERHOOD HAS BECOME THE GATEWAY TO A PLETHORA OF BENEFITS THAT RENDER WORKING-CLASS FATHERS MORE TROUBLE THAN THEY ARE WORTH, PRODUCING A 'KAREN MATTHEWS' EFFECT WHEREBY TRIBES OF FERAL CHILDREN ARE PRODUCED WHOSE LACK OF LOVE AND GUIDANCE SETS THEM ON A PATH TO DRUG ABUSE AND CRIME.

THE ABOLITION OF GRAMMAR SCHOOLS, THE DILUTION OF HEADTEACHERS’ DISCIPLINARY POWERS, THE APPLICATION OF ‘TRENDY’ TEACHING IN UNSTREAMED CLASSES AND LABOUR’S REFUSAL TO COUNTENANCE AN EXTENSION OF PARENTAL CHOICE HAS TURNED MANY URBAN STATE SCHOOLS INTO EDUCATIONAL WASTELANDS.

How telling that the day the BNP’s election success was announced, a study showed that white working-class boys achieve the worst educational outcomes of any social group…

Many of the areas that saw a rise in the BNP vote have also borne the brunt of excessive immigration. LABOUR’S BELIEF IN MULTICULTURALISM HAS LED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF GHETTOS POPULATED BY NON-INTEGRATED ETHNIC GROUPS FROM THE THIRD WORLD. THEY HAVE PROVIDED UNWELCOME COMPETITION FOR PUBLIC RESOURCES WHILE PROMOTING COMPETING BELIEFS AND VALUES. IN RECENT YEARS ELEMENTS WITHIN THEM HAVE TURNED TO TERRORISM IN A BID TO DESTROY THE BRITISH WAY OF LIFE. THOSE WHO WARNED OF THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF MULTICULTURALISM A GENERATION AGO, LIKE THE FORMER BRADFORD HEAD TEACHER RAY HONEYFORD, WERE HOWLED DOWN AS ‘RACISTS’, A TACTIC LABOUR HAS USED AGAINST MIGRATION SCEPTICS EVER SINCE.

Meanwhile, Gordon Brown’s refusal to impose transitional controls on immigrants from the European Union accession countries has led to a catastrophic loss of jobs and falling pay rates for British tradesmen despite his promise of ‘BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS’. Indigenous workers have had to compete with hordes of young Eastern Europeans who are content to live six to a room to minimise housing costs, while being available for unlimited overtime because their families are back home east of the Rhine...

To add insult to injury, LABOUR PARTY INTELLECTUALS HAVE ALL BUT ABANDONED BELIEF IN THE NATION STATE, PURSUING INSTEAD A DOCTRINE OF ‘GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP’ THAT HOLDS THAT WE ARE AS OBLIGED TO FIGHT POVERTY IN AFRICA AS IN BRITAIN. This has led to THE FETISHISING OF FOREIGN AID – A MEANS OF TRANSFERRING MONEY FROM POOR PEOPLE IN RICH COUNTRIES TO RICH PEOPLE IN POOR COUNTRIES...

Labour has also downgraded its fight against class inequalities, preferring to concentrate on rooting out ‘oppression’ BASED ON GENDER OR RACE. THE DAUGHTER OF AN AFRICAN PRINCE, AFTER BEING PUT THROUGH A BRILLIANT PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ENGLAND, WILL FIND THAT ‘AFFIRMATIVE ACTION’ OPENS ALL KINDS OF CAREER DOORS THAT REMAIN SHUT TO THE WHITE SON OF A WORKING-CLASS FAMILY FROM A COUNCIL ESTATE.”



On 9 June 2009, Frank Field, MP, said this in The Daily Express:

“LABOUR CANNOT WIN WITH THE PRESENT PRIME MINISTER. I was one of the seven who would not support his coronation after Tony Blair was shoehorned out of Number 10. But even I didn’t think a Brown administration would be as inept as this one. LABOUR SUPPORTERS CLAIMING THAT THE EUROPEAN RESULTS WERE NOT A CATASTROPHE FOR THE PARTY CAN DO SO ONLY BY INVENTING A NEW MEANING FOR THE WORD CATASTROPHE. Whether one looks at them on a national, regional or local level, THE PICTURE IS PITIFUL."



On 9 June 2009, New Labour MP, Jane Kennedy, was quoted thus by The Daily Express:

“He himself (Gordon Brown) has said in press conferences on Friday that he wants to fight on. My fear is that IT WILL BE TO THE BITTER END OF THE LABOUR ...

I’ve been unhappy about briefings against individuals, leaks, SMEARS AGAINST COLLEAGUES. It’s a style of politics I have fought against all my working life since battling against the Militant Tendency here in Liverpool… One of the reasons I did that was because I WAS APPALLED AT THEIR CONDUCT OF POLITICS – THE BULLYING, THE THREATS AND INTIMIDATION. I can’t stand by any longer and say that I am content when that is happening.”



On 8 June 2009, an unnamed patrol officer at Heathrow Airport, whose fraternity had been banned from wearing Union Jack badges in support of British troops, was quoted thus by The Sun:

“How can the Union Jack be offensive? THIS RULING IS EVEN MORE ABSURD COMING THIS WEEKEND ON THE 65TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE D-DAY LANDINGS. WE MUST BE THE ONLY COUNTRY ASHAMED TO DISPLAY OUR NATIONAL FLAG."

The Sun added:

“Armed cops patrolling Heathrow Airport have been banned from wearing tiny Union Jack badges in support of British troops. TOP BRASS CLAIMED THE TIE-PIN BADGES - WHICH COST £1 WITH PROCEEDS GOING TO THE HELP FOR HEROES CHARITY - WERE OFFENSIVE.”



On 6 June 2009, Peter Oborne opined thus in The Daily Mail:

“The brutal truth is that THE CHANCELLOR IS THE MOST SENIOR MEMBER OF THE ARMY OF EXPENSES CHEATS - from all parties - who have destroyed trust in politics...

Besides double-claiming his expenses, Darling has 'flipped' his main residence no less than four times in four years, enabling him to claim thousands of pounds towards the cost of his family home in Edinburgh, as well as to purchase a flat in London...

So Gordon Brown was agonisingly aware that keeping Darling in the pivotal job of Chancellor meant that HIS GOVERNMENT WOULD REMAIN DESPERATELY IMPLICATED IN THE SHAMEFUL PARLIAMENTARY EXPENSES SCANDAL that has caused public outrage...

At his press conference yesterday, Gordon Brown said his primary mission was to 'clean up politics'. But SUCH AN OBJECTIVE IS A BAD JOKE WHILE THE KING OF EXPENSE CHEATS REMAINS IN CHARGE OF THE NATION'S FINANCES.” More...


On 5 June 2009, New Labour MP, Alan Sheerman, said this:

“To get moving again we need to have a vote of confidence… A VOTE OF CONFIDENCE IN THE PRIME MINISTER… WE SHOULD TREAT PEOPLE DECENTLY, OPENLY AND HONESTLY.”

Thus, whilst calling for a vote confidence in Gordon Brown, did Sheerman imply that Brown does not “treat people decently, openly and honestly”.



On 5 June 2009, Lieutenant Colonel Rupert Thorneloe, Commander of the 1st Battalion Welsh Guards sent in his his weekly report to the Ministry of Defence.

Titled "Battle Group Weekly Update - Nato Secret", this, in part, is what he said:

"I have tried to avoid griping about helicopters - we all know WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH. We cannot not move people, so THIS MONTH WE HAVE CONDUCTED A GREAT DEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOVEMENT BY ROAD. THIS INCREASES THE IED THREAT AND OUR EXPOSURE TO IT... The current level of... (helicopter) support is therefore unsustainable."

Thorneloe concluded by saying that helicopter operations in Afghanistan were "very clearly NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE".

Less than a month after telling his Westminster superiors that British troops would die because they were being forced to make trips by road, Lieutenant Colonel Thorneloe lost his own life, alongside Trooper Joshua Hammond, when their convoy set off a roadside bomb during a patrol north of the town of Lashkar Gah.

He was the most senior military man to die thus far in Tony Blair's immoral wars.

A 10 July leaked report, from another senior officer in Afghanistan, says this:

"Aviation has been erratic throughout this week. This has forced us to conduct MORE ROAD MOVES THAN I WOULD LIKE. I understand the strains in the fly programme but any improvement would greatly assist."

Just two weeks later, on 22 July, Gordon Brown commented thus in the Commons:

"In the operations we are having at the moment IT IS COMPLETELY WRONG TO SAY THAT THE LOSS OF LIVES HAS BEEN CAUSED BY THE ABSENCE OF HELICOPTERS."

The memos were leaked by an MoD official, who, himself, dared to say this in a subsequent email:

"As you can see, situation: no change, despite Rupert Thorneloe's death. STILL NO AVIATION, STILL UNNECESSARY ADMINISTRATIVE ROAD MOVES WHICH ARE KILLING PEOPLE. STILL CLAIMS BY THE GOVERNMENT THAT THE MILITARY HAVE GOT ENOUGH HELICOPTERS AND ALL THE TOOLS THEY NEED.

LIES."

In a statement 30 October 2009, Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth said this:

"My thoughts remain with the family and friends of Lieutenant Colonel Rupert Thorneloe, who was a courageous soldier and a fine man. Our brave forces deserve the very best equipment and we remain determined to provide it."

THEY are at war with us, ladies and gentlemen.

THEY REALLY ARE.


On 5 June 2009, James Purnell resigned from Gordon Brown's government.

The Times of 5 June 2009 quoted his resignation letter thus:

“Dear Gordon, I NOW BELIEVE YOUR CONTINUED LEADERSHIP MAKES A CONSERVATIVE VICTORY MORE, NOT LESS LIKELY... This moment... calls for a Government that measures itself by how it treats the poorest in society.”

Suggesting that New Labour wasn't giving us these things before?

Purnell continued:

“We therefore owe it to our country to give it a real choice... We need to show that we are prepared to fight to be a credible Government. I am therefore calling on you to STAND ASIDE to give our Party a fighting chance of winning.”

I like the “stand aside” bit.

Not so keen on the “chance of winning” scenario, though. A few more years of the traitorous immigrant-first, banker-cuddling from the Brit-bashing walletstuffs of New Labour would see a civil war break out in this country.



On 4 June 2009, the following email was circulating among New Labour MPs:

“We are writing now because WE BELIEVE THAT IN THE CURRENT POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES YOU (Gordon Brown) CAN BEST SERVE THE INTERESTS OF THE LABOUR PARTY BY STEPPING DOWN.”



On 4 June 2009, Business Secretary, Peter Mandelson, the architect of New Labour, was quoted thus by the BBC:

"BRITISH POLITICS IS IN A BAD OLD STATE. NOBODY IS HAPPY".



On 3 June 2009, Peter Oborne said this in The Daily Mail:

“The total administrative paralysis is a direct result of THE MORAL SHAMBLES OF THE BROWN GOVERNMENT.

Yesterday, it became public that the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, who was caught claiming for her husband's porn movies at taxpayers' expense, has asked to be relieved of her duties. MS SMITH WILL GO DOWN AS THE LEAST COMPETENT HOME SECRETARY OF ALL TIME... Meanwhile, ALISTAIR DARLING, CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, HAS BEEN REVEALED AS A SERIAL 'FLIPPER' AND AN EXPENSES CHEAT... In other words, TWO OF THE FOREMOST HIGH OFFICES OF STATE - HOME SECRETARY AND CHANCELLOR - ARE OCCUPIED BY DISGRACED POLITICIANS.“ More... Scroll down to 3 June



During the 3 June 2009 edition of Channel 4 News, anchorman Jon Snow put this question to veteran Labour left-winger, Tony Benn:

“What does it say about your party, Labour, that, in this Autumn of it’s time in power, it is loved by big business and hated by the unions”?

Benn replied thus:

“BLAIR WAS A TORY. HE TOOK OVER MRS THATCHER’S ECONOMIC POLICY AND TRIED TO FOLLOW IT. THIS CRISIS IS A CRISIS OF THATCHERISM AND BLAIRISM COMBINED. There‘s a lot of anger about that”.

Benn also said:

“People are really, really angry about the expenses and about a lot of other things… There was no referendum on Lisbon, WHICH WAS PROMISED. They’re privatising part of the post office, WHICH THEY PROMISED NOT TO DO. There’s a war in Afghanistan which WE WERE NEVER CONSULTED ABOUT. THERE A LOT OF MONEY FOR THE BANKERS BUT NO HELP FOR THE PEOPLE.”

We vote them into power after they promise us the earth and then they pay zero attention to what we want and need and end up doing the precise opposite.

Tell me the old, old story.



On 1 June 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“THE ENTIRE POLITICAL CLASS ACROSS ALL THREE MAJOR PARTIES APPEARS TO HAVE THE ETHICAL STANDARDS OF A SWARM OF SEWER RATS...

WESTMINSTER HAS BEEN TURNED INTO A CESSPIT, ITS FOUL STENCH POLLUTING THE WHOLE POLITICAL SYSTEM. In an interview with the BBC at the weekend, Gordon Brown had the nerve to say that that the expenses scandal ‘offends my Presbyterian conscience’.

HIS HYPOCRISY IS QUITE MIND-BLOWING. FOR IT IS BROWN WHO HAS PRESIDED OVER THE COLLAPSE OF INTEGRITY IN BRITISH POLITICS, HEAVILY CONTRIBUTING TO THIS BREAKDOWN WITH HIS OWN BULLYING PARTISANSHIP, DIRTY TRICKS AND CHARACTER ASSASSINATION.” More...



On 15 July 2009, Radio 2 presenter Sarah Kennedy described Enoch Powell as:

"THE BEST PRIME MINISTER THIS COUNTRY NEVER HAD".

One of us then!

On 19 July 2009, a BBC spokesperson said:

"It was inappropriate for Sarah to offer an off-the-cuff political opinion. We have spoken to her and made that clear."

The BBC said a grand total of 25 listeners had complained about the comment. I wonder why they didn't tell us how many had rung up to offer their congratulations?

As regards Enoch, even though I've always been on the side of the decent working-class folk I grew up with, knowing what I know now I'd have voted for the true, blue Conservative gentleman in 1968. Unfortunately, I was 18 years old at the time and a bit of an airhead. So I would, probably, have thought what political correctness required me to think and dismissed him a "racist" or something.

Come to think of it, I don't think the PC Crowd's favourite bogey word had reached my little village back then, so the speech probably went the way of all good things as I got on with the altogether more important business of trying, unsuccessfully, to lose my virginity.



On 30 May 2009, Jeremy Clarkson, presenter of Top Gear, said this in The Sun:

"THE MAIN PARTIES SEEM TO HAVE COMPLETELY LOST TOUCH WITH WHAT THEIR SUPPORTERS ACTUALLY WANT OUT OF LIFE…

THERE'S THE QUESTION OF IMMIGRATION. Of course, I can quite understand why the champagne socialists are worried about the plight of poor Ndjama. His village has been sacked by rebels, he has nowhere to live and nothing to eat. Of course they would want him to have a home in Britain… THEY WANT NDJAMA TO COME HERE BECAUSE WHEN HE DOES, HE'S NOT GOING TO BE LIVING IN THEIR STREET. SO, NDJAMA WILL GO AND LIVE IN SOMEONE ELSE'S STREET and that person will be quite cross. ESPECIALLY WHEN HE GOES TO WORK ONE DAY AND FINDS NDJAMA AT THE WHEEL OF HIS FORKLIFT TRUCK.

THE LABOUR PARTY SAY THAT IMMIGRATION IS GOOD FOR BRITAIN AND MORALLY THE RIGHT POLICY TO PURSUE… BUT THOSE WHO PUT THEM IN POWER, EMPHATICALLY, DO NOT THINK THIS WAY.

We are all tribal. WE LIKE BEING IN A GROUP AND WE DISTRUST OUTSIDERS. WE HAVE OUR FAMILY UNIT, OUR BUNCH OF FRIENDS, THE TOWN WHERE WE LIVE… the country of which we are proud.

THE BIG-HEARTED, LIBERAL-THINKING CHAPS AND CHAPESSES WHO ADVISE BROWN AND HIS GANG OF FIDDLERS MAY THINK THIS IS BACKWARD AND PRE-HISTORIC… But… IF YOU LET HALF OF AFRICA COME TO BRITAIN… YOU'RE GOING TO WIND PEOPLE UP."



On 29 May 2009, the Bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, was quoted thus by The Daily Telegraph

“If we are looking for moral and spiritual renewal, this will mean that new people, and new kinds of people, will appear in the political life. Decent people are needed in politics. Get rid of the self-servers and the politically correct and, for once, get someone in who is on the side of the British people!

A CHRISTIAN MORAL AND SPIRITUAL FRAMEWORK WOULD LEAD, INSTEAD, TO GENUINE HOSPITALITY TOWARDS THOSE ARRIVING TO SHARE OUR FREEDOMS. So when we ask ‘What would Jesus actually do?’, the answer is clear. He would INCLUDE ALL in the embrace of his Father's love, and so change them that they BEGIN TO LIVE FOR OTHERS, TO MEET THE NEEDS OF STRANGERS and to work for a just and compassionate society...

THE POLICIES ADVOCATED BY THE BNP ARE CONTRARY TO OUR BELIEF that all human beings, regardless of race or colour, have a common origin and are made in God's image… There can be no compromise about such values… The Christian value of hospitality DEMANDS that those who come LEGALLY ARE WELCOMED. Providing refuge for the genuinely persecuted is also a long-standing British tradition, and must be upheld.” More...

How about providing some refuge for the poor, downtrodden, unrepresented British, Mike?

No one ever seems to bother about their wants and needs.

Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester, is an immigrant himself.

He was once a Pakistani Muslim.



On 28 May 2009, Brendan Barber, the General Secretary of the TUC was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

“THOSE ON MIDDLE INCOMES GOT LEFT BEHIND UNDER THE CONSERVATIVES, WERE LEFT OUT OF LABOUR'S BOOM THAT HAS NOW ENDED IN RECESSION, AND ARE NOW FEARING FOR THEIR JOBS AND HOMES AS UNEMPLOYMENT BITES”.



On 28 May 2009, Peter Oborne wrote this in The Daily Mail:

“THANKS TO GORDON BROWN'S TAX BREAKS, NEW LABOUR'S ELECTION LANDSLIDE OF 1997 PRODUCED PRIVATE WEALTH ON A SCALE NOT SEEN SINCE THE PLUTOCRATS BESTRODE EDWARDIAN ENGLAND ON THE EVE OF WORLD WAR 1...

But… those men and women who are neither poor enough to benefit from New Labour handouts, nor wealthy enough to exploit GORDON BROWN'S TAX GIVEAWAYS FOR THE RICH, SUCH AS SLASHING CAPITAL GAINS TAX TO 10P IN THE POUND FOR PRIVATE EQUITY INVESTORS, THEY HAVE LOST OUT MASSIVELY...

THANKS TO 12 YEARS OF NEW LABOUR GOVERNMENT, THE BRAVE PEOPLE OF MIDDLE BRITAIN ARE NOW STRUGGLING JUST TO SURVIVE… THEY ARE THE ONES THAT PAY THEIR TAXES, OBEY THE LAW, DO THE RIGHT THING, CARE FOR THEIR FAMILIES AND WORK THE LONGEST HOURS. THEY ARE THE VERY PEOPLE WHO ARE MOST LIKELY TO BE FOUND DEVOTING WHAT LITTLE SPARE TIME THEY HAVE TO SERVING THEIR COMMUNITIES. AND THEIR REWARD HAS BEEN TO BE TAXED ALMOST OUT OF EXISTENCE BY A GREEDY AND AMORAL POLITICAL CLASS INTENT ON FEATHERING ITS OWN NEST AT THE EXPENSE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC...

WE ARE A SOCIETY THAT PUNISHES ITS MOST CONSCIENTIOUS AND HARD-WORKING MEMBERS, WHILE REWARDING THE VENAL, THE CRIMINAL, THE GREEDY AND THE INDIGENT." More...



On 27 May 2009, the alternative "comedian", Eddie Izzard was quoted thus by The Daily Mirror:

"Last time, 65 years ago, people from around the world got together to fight fascism. But this time, UNLESS WE STOP THEM, THE FASCISTS WILL BE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED. THE RACIST BNP needs only a small swing in some areas...

WE ALL KNOW THE BNP IS A RACIST PARTY AND RACISM IS ACTIVE HATRED... IF THE SAME GENETIC PEOPLE HAVE KIDS WITH EACH OTHER, WE ALL KNOW WHERE THAT LEADS. IT'S CALLED IN-BREEDING. IT IS THE BLEND OF YOUR GENES THAT MAKES YOU POWERFUL AND MAKES US, AS A COUNTRY, STRONG. IF YOUR MUM'S FROM ENGLAND AND YOUR DAD'S FROM UKRAINE, THAT'S A GOOD THING. IF YOU'RE BORN IN HAWAII, YOUR MUM'S A WHITE WOMAN FROM KANSAS AND YOUR DAD'S A BLACK MAN FROM KENYA, YOU COULD BE PRESIDENT OF THE US…

I AM TAKING MY INSPIRATION FROM BARACK OBAMA...

I WAS BORN IN YEMEN but, whatever the place of my birth, I FEEL I AM A BRITISH EUROPEAN...

On election day, I WILL BE VOTING LABOUR.”



On 26 May 2009, Richard Littlejohn said this in The Daily Mail:

"I've tried to keep you focused on the main event. And that is THE WHOLESALE ABUSE OF THE EXPENSES SYSTEM BY MINISTERS AT THE VERY TOP, FROM THE PRIME MINISTER DOWNWARDS. I'VE YET TO SEE GORDON BROWN GIVE A CONVINCING EXPLANATION OF WHY HE FOUND IT NECESSARY TO CLAIM FOR TWO DIFFERENT SECOND HOMES, WHILE LIVING IN THE SAME GRACE-AND-FAVOUR FLAT AT PUBLIC EXPENSE FOR THE PAST 12 YEARS...

WHY HAS HE PUT THE FLAT HE BOUGHT FROM THE ROBERT MAXWELL FIRE SALE IN HIS WIFE'S NAME AND SWITCHED HIS SECOND HOME DESIGNATION TO SCOTLAND, IF NOT AS PART OF A PLOY TO AVOID PAYING CAPITAL GAINS TAX? HOW DARE BROWN STAND UP AND CONDEMN OTHERS WHEN HIS OWN STICKY FINGERS ARE ELBOW-DEEP IN THE TILL?

WHAT THE HELL WAS HIS SIDEKICK DARLING DOING BUYING FOUR HOMES IN FOUR YEARS, ALL OF WHICH HE CHARGED TO THE TAXPAYER? WHY DID DARLING THINK WE SHOULD HAVE TO PAY HIS STAMP DUTY? WHY DID HE HIRE AN ACCOUNTANT TO MINIMISE HIS TAX BILL AND THEN STICK IT ON HIS EX'S? HE'S THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE. HE MAKES THE RULES. WHY DOES HE THINK THEY DON'T APPLY TO HIM?…

IF ANY OF US WERE CAUGHT STEALING AT WORK, OUR FEET WOULDN'T TOUCH... THESE PEOPLE ARE BEYOND SHAME.” More...



On 23 May 2009, John Burton, Tony Blair’s political agent in his Sedgefield constituency for 24 years, described his former boss thus in The Telegraph:

“It's very simple to explain the idea of Blair the Warrior. IT WAS PART OF TONY LIVING OUT HIS FAITH… Tony's Christian faith is part of him, down to his cotton socks. He believed strongly at the time, that INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO, SIERRA LEONE, IRAQ TOO, WAS ALL PART OF THE CHRISTIAN BATTLE; GOOD SHOULD TRIUMPH OVER EVIL… HIS RELIGION GAVE HIM A TOTAL BELIEF IN WHAT'S RIGHT AND WHAT'S WRONG”.

That's the shiny-eyed Messiah responsible (along with his best pal, George) for creating hell on earth in Iraq and Afghanistan this twit is talking about.

"Living out his faith"?

Whilst so many others were dying from it?

Not my kind of Christianity, Johnny. And not Jesus Christ's either.



On 22 May 2009, Peter Oborne opined thus in The Daily Mail:

“THE POLITICAL CLASS FINDS ITSELF LITERALLY UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE VALUES THAT APPEAR ADMIRABLE TO MOST PEOPLE, SUCH AS HONESTY, PATRIOTISM AND RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE...

British democracy now faces an historic crisis. THE GULF BETWEEN THE CORRUPT RULING ELITE AND THE GREAT MASS OF ORDINARY BRITISH CITIZENS IS TODAY GREATER THAN AT ANY TIME SINCE THE EARLY 19TH CENTURY. This means there is one great burning question in our public life... Will there BE SOME KIND OF REVOLUTION?” More...



On 21 May 2009, the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband said this in The Times:

“The invasion of Iraq, and its aftermath, aroused a sense of bitterness, distrust and resentment.”

Dave's analysis, unusually for an arch-Blairite, is spot on.

The Times added:

“David Miliband will reach out to Muslim states, PLACING THE IRAQ WAR ALONGSIDE THE CRUSADES AND COLONIALISM IN A LIST OF ‘PREJUDICES THAT BRITISH HISTORY GENERATES’.

Having previously apologised for using the phrase War on Terror, The Foreign Secretary will acknowledge THE DAMAGE THAT THE IRAQ WAR CAUSED TO BRITAIN’S STANDING.”

Thus does our Foreign Secretary sneer at and subvert British history, attempting to equate the decision to invade Iraq with “the Crusades and colonialism”.

The implication being that these are things we nasty Brits should be ashamed of. Well, I didn’t get the chance to vote for the Crusades and colonialism and neither did the common men of those times. The vast majority of the ordinary citizens did as their superiors bid and had no choice in the matter. Those who ruled made the decisions and the rest followed.

Nothing much has changed, has it? Except for this: those who rule are still making rotten decisions but now they attempt to make the rest of us feel guilty about things we never did, never wanted and, in some cases, spoke out strongly against.

David Miliband voted for war with Iraq.

I didn’t. Nor did you. The bloodthirsty warmongers in Westminster and their Neoconservative masters in Washington forced that immoral war upon the world against the will of the vast majority.

That’s the reality.

“Crusades”, “colonialism” and “prejudices that British history generates”.

That’s the spin.



On 21 May 2009, Tory Grandee, Anthony Steen, an MP for a quarter of a century, insisted that he had nothing to apologise for in a BBC Radio 4 interview.

This after spending almost £90,000 on trees and gardeners for his second home (the one that looks like Balmoral) in the last four years. This what was said:

"I maintain that I have done nothing wrong and have acted in good faith and with absolute transparency… I THINK I BEHAVED, IF I MAY SAY SO, IMPECCABLY. I’VE DONE NOTHING CRIMINAL, that’s the most awful thing, and DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT’S ABOUT? JEALOUSY… I’VE GOT A VERY, VERY LARGE HOUSE. SOME PEOPLE SAY IT LOOKS LIKE BALMORAL… It’s not particularly attractive, IT JUST DOES ME NICELY…

WHAT RIGHT DOES THE PUBLIC HAVE TO INTERFERE WITH MY PRIVATE LIFE? NONE!
Do you know what this reminds me of? AN EPISODE OF CORONATION STREET... THIS IS A KANGAROO COURT GOING ON… I STILL DON’T KNOW WHAT ALL THE FUSS IS ABOUT.”

Steen doesn’t “know what all the fuss is about”.

Very soon now the British people will be explaining it fully to him and his over-privileged ilk.



On 18 May 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“NEVER BEFORE HAS THE POLITICAL CLASS OF THIS COUNTRY BEEN HELD IN SUCH UNIVERSAL CONTEMPT… FOR TOO LONG OUR RULERS HAVE PATRONISED, BULLIED AND DECEIVED US WHILE WRECKING OUR COUNTRY... Voters are incensed by a gang of AMBITIOUS CAREERISTS WHO APPEAR TO HAVE NEITHER PATRIOTISM NOR ANY ETHIC OF PUBLIC SERVICE... OUR POLITICIANS HAVE PRESIDED OVER THE DRASTIC DECLINE IN OUR ECONOMY, LEADING TO PAY CUTS, MASS UNEMPLOYMENT AND SPIRALLING REPOSSESSIONS…

WE NO LONGER HAVE A FUNCTIONING DEMOCRACY. Instead WE HAVE RULE BY A DIRTY CABAL, headed by an unelected Prime minister, WHICH FOISTS ITS DESTRUCTIVE IDEOLOGY ON THE COUNTRY AGAINST THE WILL OF THE VAST MAJORITY.

OUR INDEPENDENCE HAS BEEN DESTROYED AND OUR SOCIAL FABRIC TRANSFORMED WITHOUT ANY OF US HAVING ANY SAY. WE WERE NEVER GIVEN A VOTE AS TO WHETHER WE WANTED BRITAIN TO BECOME A REGION OF A NEW POLITICAL ENTITY CALLED THE EU, WITH 80 PER CENT OF OUR LAWS DICTATED BY BRUSSELS. POLITICIANS IGNORED THEIR PLEDGES TO GIVE US A REFERENDUM ON THE EU CONSTITUTION.

THE PUBLIC WASN’T ALLOWED A VOTE ON MASS IMMIGRATION. THE CREATION OF A MULTI-CULTURAL SOCIETY WAS IMPOSED USING PROPAGANDA, LIES AND INSTITUTIONALISED OPPRESSION. THOSE WHO OBJECTED WERE OSTRACISED AS RACISTS, while the prime duty of key public services became CELEBRATION OF DIVERSITY NOT DELIVERY OF SERVICES.”



Police Federation Chairman, Paul McKeever, was quoted as follows by the 13 May 2009 edition of The Daily Mail:

"THE GOVERNMENT HAS CREATED THE HOKEY COKEY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM... IT’S IN OUT, IN OUT, LET ALL THE PRISONERS OUT. IN OUT, IN OUT, SHAKE THE SYSTEM ABOUT… OFFICERS ARE SICK TO DEATH OF SEEING THE SAME CRIMINALS AGAIN AND AGAIN.”

McKeever said what he said in the presence of the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, at the Police Federation’s annual conference in Bournemouth.



On 13 May 2009, Immigration Minister, Phil Woolas, admitted New Labour got their estimates of how many Eastern Europeans would come here after accession.

This is how he put it:

"The lesson from the A8 accesson is that THE DISRUPTIVE EFFECTS WE GOT WRONG, WE DIDN’T PREDICT THAT PROPERLY. And the reason why we got it wrong was because we didn’t reckon on the decisions of other European countries. We based our assumptions, or the London School of Economics based their assumptions, on the idea of A LEVEL PLAYING MARKET AND OF COURSE IT TURNED OUT NOT TO BE. AND THAT TURNED OUT TO HAVE A VERY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, AND IS STILL HAVING A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, ON OUR PUBLIC SERVICES.”

In the same debate, Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of Migrationwatch, told us just how badly Woolas and co had been wrong:

“THERE WAS A MAJOR MISCALCULATION MADE, AS THE MINISTER RECOGNISED. AT THE TIME THEY SAID 5,000 TO 13,000 A YEAR… The Government was 10 times wrong.”

Actually, Sir Andrew is being generous.

The government was much more wrong than that. More than a million immigrants have arrived in the UK since Britain gave the citizens of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia every bit as much right to live and work here as we have.



On 12 May 2009, Norman Tebbit said this in The Daily Mail:

“DON'T VOTE FOR THE MAJOR PARTIES... THE MAJOR PARTIES ARE GETTING AWAY FROM THEIR PUBLIC SUPPORTERS…

The leaders of the major parties would be reminded that THE ELECTORS COULD QUITE EASILY SHOW THEIR DISPLEASURE. 'There is nothing wrong with the House of Commons – what is wrong is THAT THE PEOPLE IN IT ARE MISBEHAVING. THEY NEED A PRETTY POWERFUL SHOT ACROSS THEIR BOWS.”



On 12 May 2009, Quentin Letts said this in The Daily Mail:

“The mask came off Commons Speaker Michael Martin at 3.30pm and THE COUNTRY HAD A CHANCE TO SEE THIS BENT, BULLYING BERK FOR WHAT HE IS: A PURPLE-FACED DISASTER FOR DEMOCRACY…

The House had gathered to hear his wisdom on the expenses scandal… What followed was a PUCE-CHEEKED, FINGER-WAGGING, DOOON'T-YOU-CROSS-ME-JIMMY TANTRUM, IMPROPER FROM ANY CHAIRMAN OF ANY PARISH MEETING LET ALONE THE SPEAKER OF A COMMONS IN CRISIS. He cut off dissidents, PREVENTING THEM FROM VOICING EVEN LIGHT CRITICISM OF HIS ROTTEN REGIME. HE HECTORED THEM AND SNEERED AT THEIR SUGGESTIONS.

This was not an objective, calm handling of the assembly by a veteran convener. It was THE CONVULSIVE PANIC OF A POOH-BAH MARTINET… He told MPs they must bear in mind 'the spirit of what is right'... This from A QUIVERING INCOMPETENT WHO HAS HIRED SOME OF LONDON'S MOST EXPENSIVE LIBEL LAWYERS TO ACT AS HIS SPOKESMEN...

THIS WAS AS RUDE AND IMPOLITIC A DISPLAY AS CAN EVER HAVE BEEN SEEN FROM A MODERN SPEAKER... HE DESERVES EVERY SHOVEL OF MANURE THAT WILL NOW NO DOUBT BE HURLED AT HIM.”



On 11 May 2009, Leo McKinstry opined thus in The Daily Express:

"THE CURRENT PARLIAMENT IS ROTTEN TO THE CORE. There is probably more integrity inside Wormwood Scrubs prison than inside the Commons. THE TRADITIONAL ETHIC OF PUBLIC SERVICE HAS BEEN REPLACED BY THE NEW CREED OF FLEECING THE PUBLIC, as self-enrichment becomes the key political activity of far too many members.

So widespread is this culture of grubby avarice that MPS EXPECT TAXPAYERS TO UNDERWRITE their purchase of chocolate, Christmas trees, soft furnishings, televisions, and even lavatory seats…

Most outrageous of all is the fraudulent practice known as ‘flipping’, where MPS PERSISTENTLY CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF THEIR SECOND HOME IN ORDER TO EXPLOIT ALLOWANCES TO THE HILT AND AVOID PAYING CAPITAL GAINS TAX...

THEY FOUGHT FOR YEARS TO KEEP THESE CLAIMS SECRET and now, as the full extent of their venality becomes apparent, they bleat about invasion of privacy, even calling in the police to investigate the leak of this information to the press.

WHAT POLICE SHOULD BE INVESTIGATING IS THE GROSS MISAPPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS BY A GANG OF POLITICAL SHYSTERS.” More... Scroll down to 11 May



On 9 May 2009, author and journalist, Jeremy Seabrook, wrote the following in The Guardian:

“NEW LABOUR COULD NOT WAIT TO REPUDIATE EVERYTHING THE LABOUR PARTY HAD EVER STOOD FOR AND THIS LEFT ITS FORMER HEARTLAND A POLITICAL DESERT...

THE WHITE WORKING CLASS... COULD BE LEFT TO THEIR FATE IN FORLORN ESTATES OF LIQUOR SHOPS COVERED WITH CHICKEN WIRE, LEAKY DRAINPIPES, SEMI-WILD DOGS AND TATTERED FLAGS OF ST GEORGE – EVERYTHING THAT SYMBOLISED THE LAST GASP OF A DISAPPEARING WORKING CLASS...

It is significant that the term ‘working class’ was expunged from the political vocabulary after Margaret Thatcher had demonstrated the transforming power of GLOBALISM. She understood that THE BEST WAY TO BE RID OF TROUBLESOME ORGANISED LABOUR WAS TO DESTROY THE ECONOMIC BASE ON WHICH IT DEPENDED AND SHE WAS AN EARLY PROPONENT OF OUTSOURCING MANUFACTURED GOODS. SHE SET ABOUT THE DEMOLITION OF INDUSTRY WITH GUSTO, AND WITH IT, THE UNMAKING OF THE WORKING CLASS, HER ALLIES THE INVISIBLE ARMY OF APPARENTLY INVINCIBLE GLOBAL ECONOMIC FORCES.

A LABOUR PARTY THAT SAW ITS ORIGINAL CONSTITUENCY ERASED FROM THE POLITICAL MAP READILY ABANDONED THE VICTIMS OF THESE PROCESSES, THOSE IT HAD ALWAYS TAKEN FOR GRANTED. ‘OUR OWN PEOPLE’, THEY POSSESSIVELY CALLED THEM, ADDING THAT, NO MATTER WHAT LABOUR DID, ‘THEY HAD NOWHERE ELSE TO GO’...

You don't have to agree with what the British National Party stands for TO RECOGNISE THE LEGITIMACY OF ITS CONCERN FOR 'THESE PEOPLE', THOSE WRITTEN OFF BY A PARTY WHICH, ASSUMING SEIGNEURIAL RIGHTS OVER THEIR VOTE, HAD EXILED THEM TO THE PERIPHERY NOT ONLY OF ITS OWN CONSCIOUSNESS, BUT ALSO OF THE DECLINING INDUSTRIAL TOWNS AND CITIES THEY INHABITED.” More...



On 7 May 2009, the former Health Secretary, arch Blairite and New Labour MP for Darlington, Alan Milburn opined thus in The Independent:

“Governments, whether right or left, are dusting down powers that for decades they have felt unable to use... For decades it was that the state had little role in the market. Now THE STATE IS BACK. REGULATION IS IN. MARKETS NEED TO BE APPROPRIATELY MANAGED AND PROPERLY REGULATED. AND WHEN THEY ARE, THEY WORK…

IT IS ONLY THE STATE THAT CAN EQUALISE OPPORTUNITIES throughout life and empower its citizens…

It is a moment for A NEW FORM OF PROGRESSIVE POLITICS… In a world of RAMPANT INSECURITY and CONSTANT CHANGE PEOPLE ARE LOOKING FOR GREATER CONTROL IN THEIR LIVES...

The problem is that ours remains a ‘THEM AND US’ POLITICAL SYSTEM. IT WAS FRAMED IN AN ERA OF ELITISM. RULERS RULED AND THE RULED WERE GRATEFUL”.

You grateful, ladies and gents?

Are you grateful for "mass migration", "global terror", "community insecurity", "rampant insecurity" and "constant change"? Are you grateful for "progressive politics" and "a THEM and US political system framed in an era of elitism"?

Are you grateful to an elite comprised of characters like Milburn, Blair, Brown and the creatures behind the scenes who paid their real wages and saw that such "progressive", on-message, New World Order anti-Brits got to slither to the top of the greasy pole in the first place?

What's that, you're not grateful at all?

Now why am I not surprised?



On 7 May 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Mail:

"THE LONGER LABOUR REMAINS IN POWER THE MORE THE GOVERNMENT RESEMBLES A CORRUPT EASTERN EUROPEAN REGIME OF THE EIGHTIES. OUR ONCE FREE NATION IS BEING TURNED INTO THE PEOPLE’S SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF BRITAIN, PRESIDED OVER BY A SINISTER POLITBURO WHICH WORSHIPS THE POWER OF THE STATE...

IN THE GRIM NEW WORLD CREATED BY LABOUR WE ARE ALL TO BE TREATED AS SUSPECTS BY THE AUTHORITIES. Allied to MASS SURVEILLANCE OF THE POPULATION, MONITORING OF ALL TELEPHONE CALLS, E-MAILS, INTERNET TRAFFIC AND THE POLITICISATION OF THE POLICE, the introduction of ID cards represents another milestone on our descent into SOCIALIST TOTALITARIANISM...

THE BROWN REGIME HAS WRECKED THE ECONOMY AND NOW IT IS DESTROYING OUR LIBERTY." More... Scroll down to 7 May



On 3 May 2009, Julia Hartley-Brewer said this in The Daily Express:

"James Purnell... IS THE LATEST IN A LONG LINE OF PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO HAVE, QUITE FRANKLY, BEEN TAKING THE PROVERBIAL OUT OF US TAXPAYERS FOR FAR TOO LONG.

Claiming vast mortgages and rents, expecting us to fork out for expensive furniture, flatscreen TVs, the weekly supermarket shop and even 80p bath plugs, when it comes to spending their own money THESE PEOPLE MAKE SCROOGE LOOK LIKE LADY BOUNTIFUL.

Tony Blair famously said in 1997 that, after the long years of Tory sleaze, a Labour Government had to be ‘purer than pure’. Pure greed more like. But this isn’t just about greed, it’s about POLITICIANS WHO HAVE A TOTAL AND UTTER DISDAIN FOR TAXPAYERS...

The mentality at Westminster is that ‘Everybody does it so why shouldn’t I?’… If only they put as much effort into governing the country as they did into filling out their expense claims, eh? What really rankles with taxpayers is that THERE IS ONE RULE FOR POLITICIANS AND ANOTHER FOR THE REST OF US LOWLY MORTALS.

After all, if you play the benefits system for every penny then you’re a scrounger; if you play the Parliamentary expenses system to the absolute limit then you get promoted. Funnily enough, IT WAS JAMES PURNELL WHO BROUGHT IN LIE-DETECTOR TESTS TO CATCH BENEFITS CHEATS.”


On 3 May 2009, Leo McKinstry wrote this in The Sunday Express:

"Never has a piece of legislation been more badly misnamed than the so-called ‘Equalities’ Bill, introduced in Parliament last week by Labour’s Deputy Leader Harriet Harman. Far from promoting equal opportunities, Harman’s scheme will achieve the very opposite. IT WILL ADVANCE DIRECT RACIAL AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION BY THE BRITISH STATE, INSTITUTIONALISING BLATANT PREJUDICE AGAINST WHITE MEN...

It might surprise some readers to know that I actually worked for Harriet Harman as Parliamentary aide in the early nineties, so I think I have some insight into her political character. In this Equalities Bill, I recognise so many of her traits. There is HER SIMPLISTIC OBSESSION WITH MULTICULTURAL DIVERSITY and a neo-Marxist brand of feminist victimhood, where ANY PROBLEMS FACED BY WOMEN OR BLACKS IN THE WORKPLACE CAN BE ENTIRELY BLAMED ON A NASTY, WHITE MALE POWER ELITE...

Harman explained the real spirit of the Bill at a left-wing gathering in January. IT WAS THE GOVERNMENT’S TASK, SHE SAID, TO PLAY ITS PART IN ‘FASHIONING A NEW SOCIAL ORDER’. THE PHRASE IS ONE USED BY SOCIALIST DICTATORS THROUGHOUT THE 20TH CENTURY, INCLUDING CHAIRMAN MAO AND POL POT...

HARMAN’S NEW BRITAIN WILL BE THE MOST RACIALLY OBSESSED COUNTRY IN THE WESTERN WORLD, WITH THE GOVERNMENT DEFINING CITIZENS BY THE COLOUR OF THEIR SKIN. THE CIVIL SERVICE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL BE BRIMMING WITH EQUALITY ZEALOTS THRILLED AT THE OPPORTUNITY TO THROW THEIR WEIGHT AROUND...

THE MOST DISTURBING ELEMENT OF THIS LEGISLATION, THOUGH, IS THE PLAN TO PUSH EMPLOYERS TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST WHITE MEN...

REAL FAIRNESS IS AN IRRELEVANCE FOR LABOUR. THIS BILL, JUST LIKE THE PROMOTION OF MASS IMMIGRATION, IS PART OF THE GOVERNMENT’S IDEOLOGICALLY BIGOTED DRIVE TO TRANSFORM SOCIETY. TRADITION, MASCULINITY, SOCIAL COHESION, HERITAGE AND PATRIOTISM ARE ALL SOURCES OF SHAME IN LABOUR’S BRAVE NEW WORLD.”

More... Scroll down to 3 May



On 1 May 2009, the New Labour MP, Bob Marshall-Andrews said this in The Daily Mail:

“We are inevitably going to lose the next General Election. THE PRIME MINISTER IS COMPLETE BLOWN CHAFF. All my colleagues think so too. For the first time in my life I've seen them united. THEY ARE UNITED IN DESPAIR. He's gone, he's gone. I don't think there is any doubt about that at all… He's a spent political force… His authority has gone.”



On 1 May 2009, Charles Clarke, former Home Secretary was quoted thus by the BBC:

“There have been things done recently that have made me feel ashamed to be a Labour MP. I worked over my whole political life to get Labour into a position where it could be a good government and I do see that fading away. It feels absolutely appalling… Gordon will be thinking about his own position, as he rightly should.”



On 1 May 2009, Ken Livingstone said this on LBC Radio:

“I wouldn't bet my own money on Labour winning.”


Go here for more Chronological Quotations 11


.