The Madhouse Update

On 26 April 2009, The Daily Express quoted New Labour MP, Frank Field, thus:

"FOR MANY YEARS, PROBABLY A GENERATION, IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN A NO-GO AREA TO BRITISH POLITICS. THOSE WHO HAVE RAISED THE SUBJECT HAVE BEEN INSULTED, ABUSED AND, ALL TOO OFTEN, SILENCED. Net migration – the number of people coming to the UK minus the people leaving – has more than quadrupled since 1997. Our population is officially projected to reach 70 million by 2028 and 80 million in mid-century, with immigration the main driver...

Cold statistics do not paint the whole picture. Delve beneath ‘seven new Birminghams’ and we see that in the next 20 years, one third of projected household formations will be a result of immigration, meaning WE WILL NEED TO BUILD 260 HOUSES A DAY FOR THE NEXT 20 YEARS.

If the Government does not adopt the policy of balanced migration OUR POPULATION IS SET TO RISE TO A LEVEL TO WHICH THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE STRONGLY OPPOSED."

Those who have been giving away our housing stock to this Blog's Rogues' Gallery inhabitant for more than 40 years now, have been at pains to keep his malign effect upon British society hidden for all that time.

You can be certain sure, ladies and gentlemen, that the “seven new Birminghams” will contain many more Rogues than appear in the Gallery at present.



On 25 April 2009, Peter Oborne said this in The Daily Mail:

“When Gordon Brown became Prime Minister he promised to end the squalor, sleaze and dreadful culture of cronyism that disfigured Tony Blair’s government...

I must admit that I believed him at the time... Now, however, two scandals which emerged over the past fortnight have finally, I must admit, destroyed any pretence that Gordon Brown is an honourable politician. The first of these concerned the foul smear campaign which DAMIAN MCBRIDE, THE PM’S MOST TRUSTED PUBLIC RELATIONS AIDE, sought to launch against Tory leader David Cameron and his colleagues.

The second scandal centres on the abuse of taxpayers’ money through MPs’ allowances system.” More...



On 22 April 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

"LABOUR SHOWS MORE GENEROSITY TOWARDS FOREIGNERS THAN TOWARDS ITS OWN PEOPLE. The right to welfare used to be related to British citizenship and contributions towards society but that SPIRIT OF MORAL JUSTICE HAS EVAPORATED UNDER BLAIR AND BROWN. IMMIGRANTS ARE NOW AT THE FRONT OF THE QUEUE, OFTEN ENJOYING PRIORITY OVER PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED AND WORKED IN BRITAIN ALL THEIR LIVES...

The absurd extravagance of our welfare system and the laxity of our borders were high-lighted recently by the case of an Iraqi Kurdish family headed by Faradh Maruj. Claiming to be in flight from Islamic fundamentalists, they travelled right through continental Europe until they reached Calais, where the lorry carrying them was wavedthrough by officials after Mr Maruj uttered the single word ‘family’. ON THEIR ARRIVAL IN BRITAIN, THEY WERE GIVEN A HOME IN BIRMINGHAM AND £170 A WEEK IN BENEFITS, MORE THAN MOST PENSIONERS RECEIVE.

No matter how illegal their status, immigrants know that the British Government lacks the will to deport them. BENT ON CREATING A MULTI-CULTURAL SOCIETY, MINISTERS REGARD THE TIDAL WAVE OF MIGRANTS AS A WELCOME ALLY IN THEIR PROJECT OF DESTROYING THE TRADITIONAL IDENTITY OF OUR COUNTRY...

THE GOVERNMENT HAS PRESIDED OVER THE CREATION OF A VAST PUBLIC-FUNDED INDUSTRY DESIGNED TO PROTECT THE SUPPOSED ‘RIGHTS’ OF MIGRANTS. Made up of AN EXPENSIVE ARMY OF LAWYERS, LOBBYISTS AND OUTREACH WORKERS, THIS INDUSTRY HAS AGGRESSIVELY PROMOTED THE STATE IDEOLOGY OF MASS IMMIGRATION. Some £75 MILLION HAS BEEN GIVEN BY THE NATIONAL LOTTERY, FOR INSTANCE, TO SUPPORT THE CAUSE OF ASYLUM CAMPAIGNERS AND FIGHTING DEPORTATIONS...

We are constantly told that mass immigration is a huge gain to Britain, since new arrivals allegedly do the work that ordinary Britons will not. BUT THIS IS A LIE. IN FACT, IMMIGRANTS, PARTICULARLY THOSE FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES, ARE FAR MORE LIKELY TO BE UNEMPLOYED THAN ARE ORDINARY BRITONS...

WE ARE LED BY A BUNCH OF TRAITORS FILLED WITH LOATHING FOR THEIR NATION.”

More... Scroll down to 22 April



On 21 April 2009, The Daily Mail quoted Natacha Bouchart, the Mayor of Calais, thus:

"Requesting asylum is easier with THEM (we Brits) than in France. The asylum seeker is given accommodation and receives up to £40 a week according to their case, when the annual income of the average Eritrean is around $200. THAT SEEMS ENORMOUS AND IT'S ATTRACTIVE TO THEM.”



On 21 April 2009, the Hal Colebatch article, “Thought Police Muscle Up in Britain” was seen in The Australian.

This is it:

"In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including THE ARREST AND CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF CHILDREN, for thought-crimes and OFFENCES AGAINST POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

Countryside Restoration Trust chairman and columnist Robin Page said at a rally against the Government's anti-hunting laws in Gloucestershire in 2002:

‘IF YOU ARE A BLACK VEGETARIAN MUSLIM ASYLUM-SEEKING ONE-LEGGED LESBIAN LORRY DRIVER, I WANT THE SAME RIGHTS AS YOU.’

Page was arrested, and after four months he received a letter saying no charges would be pressed, but that: 'If further evidence comes to our attention whereby your involvement is implicated, we will seek to initiate proceedings.' It took him five years to clear his name.

Page was at least an adult. In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher's first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her:

‘IT'S RACIST, YOU'RE GOING TO GET DONE BY THE POLICE!’

Upset and terrified, the schoolgirl went outside to calm down. The teacher called the police and a few days later, presumably after officialdom had thought the matter over, SHE WAS ARRESTED AND TAKEN TO A POLICE STATION, WHERE SHE WAS FINGERPRINTED AND PHOTOGRAPHED. According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge. The school was said to be investigating what further action to take, not against the teacher, but against Stott.

Headmaster Anthony Edkins reportedly said:

‘An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark. We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form.’

This campaign seems to come from UNELECTED or QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL BODIES controlling various institutions, which are more or less UNANSWERABLE TO ELECTORS, more than it does directly from the Government, although THE GOVERNMENT HELPS DRIVE IT AND CONDONES IT IN A FUDGED AND DENIABLE MANNER.” More...



On 20 April 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“IN RECESSION-HIT BRITAIN, POLITICAL CORRUPTION SEEMS TO HAVE BECOME THE NATION’S ONLY GROWTH INDUSTRY. WE NO LONGER HAVE A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT. INSTEAD, WE HAVE RULE BY A SLEAZY, AUTHORITARIAN CABAL THAT CONTINUALLY ABUSES BOTH PUBLIC MONEY AND PUBLIC OFFICE.

THIS GANG OF SWINDLERS WILL GO TO ANY LENGTHS TO CLING ON TO POWER, FROM LOCKING UP OPPONENTS TO SUBVERTING THE VOTING PROCESS. In all its reckless, rotten viciousness, GORDON BROWN’S CABINET INCREASINGLY RESEMBLES A TINPOT REGIME, ITS MEMBERS CHARACTERISED BY THEIR DETERMINATION TO ENRICH THEMSELVES AND REPRESS DISSENT...

THE TOP RANKS OF THE POLICE HAVE BEEN POLITICISED, THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CIVIL SERVICE DESTROYED. A VAST SPIN OPERATION HAS BEEN CREATED WITHIN DOWNING STREET, THROUGH WHICH BROWN CAN RUTHLESSLY TRADUCE HIS ENEMIES AND ATTEMPT TO MISLEAD THE PUBLIC.

IT WAS STALIN WHO SAID: ‘THOSE WHO CAST THE VOTES DECIDE NOTHING. THOSE WHO COUNT THE VOTES DECIDE EVERYTHING.’ THAT IS THE SPIRIT THAT MOTIVATES THE BROWN REGIME.” More... Scroll down to 20 April



On 19 April 2009, Alice Mahon, MP for Halifax between 1987 and 2005, told us why she was resigning from the New Labour Party.

“I can no longer be a member of a party THAT AT THE LEADERSHIP LEVEL HAS BETRAYED MANY OF THE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES THAT INSPIRED ME as a teenager to join… I've reached the end of the road with the Labour Party. I'VE LOST FAITH IN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE DIRECTION THEY ARE TAKING US IN… What is the point in being in a party when you don't believe in most of the policies that they are pursuing”.

Speaking of the Damien McBride/Derek Draper email scandal, Ms Mahon added:

“Most decent people in the party would be shocked and absolutely scandalised by the smears that were about to be launched on our behalf. I cannot imagine what kind of person would think it is a good idea to smear a couple who have just lost a loving son – I really can't…

THIS LABOUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD HANG ITS HEAD IN SHAME FOR INFLICTING THIS ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC JUST AS WE FACE THE MOST SEVERE RECESSION ANY OF US HAVE EXPERIENCED IN A LIFETIME."



On 19 April 2009, John McDonnell, MP, was quoted thus by The Morning Star:

"THE LABOUR LEADERSHIP MUST APPRECIATE THE POLITICAL CATASTROPHE THAT IS EMERGING. We need the Prime Minister to immediately launch an inquiry into the operation of the party WITH THE AIM OF RESTORING DEMOCRACY."



On 16 April 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“OUR COUNTRY, once famous for its respect for individual freedom, IS RAPIDLY SLIDING TOWARDS THE NIGHTMARISH WORLD OF THE THOUGHT POLICE. FREEDOM IS DYING IN LABOUR’S ORWELLIAN STATE AS OFFICIAL BUREAUCRACY BECOMES EVER MORE INTRUSIVE AND POWERFUL…

IN ITS DETERMINATION TO ENFORCE ITS POLITICALLY CORRECT AGENDA, LABOUR HAS CREATED A CLIMATE OF FEAR where personal trust has broken down and where certain COMPLIANT STAFF FEEL THEIR FIRST LOYALTY IS TO THE STATE’S IDEOLOGY rather than to workplace colleagues. IN THE NAME OF FIGHTING HOMOPHOBIA OR RACISM THE PUBLIC SECTOR HAS BECOME OUTRAGEOUSLY INTOLERANT. THE GOVERNMENT MIGHT SCREECH ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ BUT ITS INSTITUTIONS SHOW NOTHING BUT CONTEMPT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS OF ANYONE ACCUSED OF OFFENDING THE OFFICIAL STATE CREED OF DIVERSITY AND EQUALITY.

Already, thanks to the forest of CCTV cameras across the country and secret cameras even in our wheelie bins, WE ARE THE MOST HEAVILY MONITORED PEOPLE IN THE WORLD. The bitter irony is that AMID ALL THIS OFFICIAL BULLYING OF THE LAW-ABIDING PUBLIC THE STATE IS SO USELESS AT DEALING WITH GENUINE CRIME.”



On 6 April 2009, The Daily Mail quoted Tony Blair thus:

"POLITICIANS ARE A VERY STRANGE PEOPLE".

Strange, Tony?

Well, yes but I think most of us would utilise epithets like "corrupt", "dishonest", immoral, "self-serving" and "traitorous" before we got round top the "S" word.

The Mail added:

“TONY BLAIR HAS EMERGED AS THE WORLD'S HIGHEST PAID PUBLIC SPEAKER COMMANDING FEES OF UP TO £6,000 A MINUTE on the international lecture circuit. Despite a global recession, THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER WAS PAID £364,000 FOR TWO HALF-HOUR SPEECHES in the Philippines... Since leaving Downing Street less than two years ago, Mr BLAIR HAS BANKED A STAGGERING £15MILLION, much of it from public speaking, but also helped by a £5 million book deal and SALARIES TOTALLING £2.5 MILLION FROM AMERICAN INVESTMENT BANK JP MORGAN CHASE AND SWISS FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY ZURICH.”

The Mail also informed us that "audience members, who paid up to £350 a ticket to attend the event, heard the 55-year-old politician observe... 'HELPING PEOPLE IS A NOBLE PROFESSION'."

“HELPING PEOPLE IS A NOBLE PROFESSION”?

And what, precisely, would the trough-guzzling bumsniff-in-chief know about "helping people”, I wonder?

He helped out a lot of David Icke-type lizards in his time but “people”?

Nah! People were the ones you were dropping bombs and bankers on, Tony!

He can’t hear me. He’s got his ears stuffed full of our tenners.



On 2 April 2009, Gordon Brown said this at the G20 summit:

"A NEW WORLD ORDER IS EMERGING".

He's taken to boldness, has our Gordon, in respect of this particular bogey phrase.

He's used it quite a few times recently. Not as often as "globalisation", "global" and the various derivatives of these words but enough to let us all know that the NWO elite don't think much of those who would put their country before a World Government owned and run by THEM.

Oh yes, despite outnumbering THEM by tens of millions to one, THEY have ninety nine percent of the power. And THEY can, therefore, afford to take the p*** out of the rest of us whenever THEY wish.



On 30 March 2009, Kenneth Minogue, Emeritus Professor of Political Science at the London School of Economics, wrote this in The Daily Mail:

“There is a fundamental paradox at the heart of British society. Never before in history have our civic institutions laid such emphasis on compassion. The eagerness to show empathy and concern is a central theme of the state, running through everything from the justice system to the Armed Forces.

YOUNG OFFENDERS ARE GIVEN COUNSELLING RATHER THAN PUNISHMENT. OUR TROOPS ARE SENT OVERSEAS, NOT TO FIGHT BUT TO 'WIN HEARTS AND MINDS'.

In large swathes of the public sector, the fashionable concept of 'EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE' HAS REPLACED EFFICIENCY AS THE CENTRAL GOAL OF THE WORKFORCE.
Yet IN THE FACE OF THIS SWEEPING TIDE OF OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED BENEVOLENCE, BRITAIN IS INCREASINGLY VIOLENT AND DEGRADED.

'The gentleness of English civilisation is its most marked characteristic,' George Orwell once wrote.

HOW HOLLOW THOSE WORDS SOUND TODAY, AS THE SHADOWS OF AGGRESSION AND DISORDER LOOM OVER OUR SOCIETY. THE 'NICENESS' MOVEMENT IS ACHIEVING THE VERY OPPOSITE OF ITS PROFESSED AIM. THE RELUCTANCE TO PUNISH WRONG-DOERS ALLOWS THEM TO ESCAPE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS, SO DISCIPLINE COLLAPSES AND THUGGERY TRIUMPHS.”

Anyone but the PC Crowd, the media darlings, New Labour, the Lib Dems, the Health and Safety Nazis, the bought-and-paid-for jobsworths with gold-plated pensions, the immigrants and the criminals disagree with this?

Thought not.



On 28 March 2009, Peter Oborne informed us thus in The Daily Mail:

“At the end of 2006, the Bank of England pension fund made a sudden and very extraordinary decision. IT SOLD ALL THE EQUITIES IN ITS PORTFOLIO AND INVESTED THEM IN INDEX-LINKED GILTS - even though it realised that such a move would increase the annual cost of the pension fund by some £45million.

Looking back, THIS WAS A BRILLIANTLY FARSIGHTED DECISION BECAUSE SHARES HAVE SINCE FALLEN IN VALUE BY ALMOST 50 PER CENT. It seems clear THE BANK OF ENGLAND FUND MANAGERS UNDERSTOOD THE NATURE OF THE LOOMING ECONOMIC CRISIS WELL BEFORE ANYONE ELSE. At the time, they said their decision was based on concerns about 'unsustainable' positions in credit markets and the consequences of a possible credit crunch…

The move from equities to gilts raises a very awkward question:

Did the Bank of England foresee what was coming as early as 2006 - YET DID LITTLE ABOUT THE IMPENDING CRASH, APART FROM PROTECT ITS STAFF'S OWN PENSION FUND?”



On 28 March 2009, Simon Walters, Political Editor of The Mail on Sunday said this:

“Most Church of England bishops show little or no interest in the idea of celebrating St George's Day by asking all churches to ring their bells.
ONLY FIVE OUT OF THE CHURCH'S 44 BISHOPS ENTHUSIASTICALLY BACK THE PLAN - AND SEVERAL ARE HOSTILE, CLAIMING IT COULD BE 'DANGEROUS' AND CAUSE A BACKLASH FROM OTHER RELIGIOUS GROUPS.”

By my reckoning that makes 39 out of 44 Bishops are anti-English.

As for those that are “hostile”, they’d be traitors by the same Anglophile reckoning.



On 23 March 2009, New Labour MP, Frank Field, said this on Panorama:

"I CAN'T UNDERESTIMATE HOW TERRIBLE THE FINANCIAL CRISIS IS even if it doesn't get a penny worse. No sensible person would sit in front of this camera and tell you there is no possibility whatsoever of disorder... The pension crisis is part of a bigger crisis of public finance. We can either try and get in first by leading the way about getting out accounts into order or WE'LL BE FORCED TO DO SO BY UNREST".



On 9 March 2009, Ross Kaniuk wrote the following in The Daily Star:

“BRITAIN’S IMMIGRATION CHAOS IS DOWN TO DISASTROUS LABOUR POLICIES AND NOT GLOBAL POPULATION MOVEMENT. A DAMNING NEW REPORT ACCUSES THE GOVERNMENT OF A ‘SMOKESCREEN’ TO COVER UP ITS OWN FAILURES. LABOUR’S DISMANTLING OF BORDER CONTROLS AND ENCOURAGING FOREIGNERS TO ARRIVE EN MASSE HAS SEEN IMMIGRATION TREBLE.

Meanwhile, separate research by the BBC’s Panorama reveals UP TO 947,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COULD BE IN THE UK – TWO-THIRDS MORE THAN A HOME OFFICE ESTIMATE IN 2001…

WORLDWIDE, 3% OF THE POPULATION WERE MIGRANTS IN 2005, BUT IN BRITAIN THAT FIGURE WAS 11% IN 2008.

EMBARKATION CONTROLS WERE SCRAPPED IN 1998, SO FOREIGNERS ON TIME-LIMITED VISAS REALISED THAT THERE WERE NO CHECKS TO SEE THAT THEY EVER LEFT.

IN 1997 THE PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE – WHERE APPLICANTS HAD TO SHOW THEIR MARRIAGE WAS NOT ‘PRIMARILY TO OBTAIN ADMISSION TO THE UK’ – WAS SCRAPPED, LEADING TO A 50% INCREASE IN SPOUSES ARRIVING.

The report says that since about 2000 THE GOVERNMENT HAS SPECIFICALLY ENCOURAGED THE ARRIVAL OF ECONOMIC MIGRANTS.

And unlike most EU partners, LABOUR FAILED TO IMPOSE CONTROLS OVER NUMBERS.

MigrationWatch chairman Sir Andrew Green said:

‘Many people are at a loss to know how all this was allowed to happen. THE TRUE STORY IS THE GOVERNMENT HAS HELD PUBLIC OPINION IN CONTEMPT FOR YEARS. DESPITE HAVING DISMANTLED BORDER CONTROLS, THEY DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED IMMIGRATION, partly to make the economic growth figures look better. THE CONSERVATIVES HANDED OVER BORDER CONTROLS TO THE EU BUT ALL THE OTHER FACTORS ARE DOWN TO NEW LABOUR…

The Government seems to make a habit of blaming ‘global forces’ but OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS THIS PROBLEM IS ALMOST ENTIRELY HOME GROWN’…

Meanwhile, the London School of Economics calculation for Panorama said around 725,000 illegals are in the UK, but THE FIGURE COULD BE AS HIGH AS 947,000. Home Office figures in 2001 estimated the number to be between 310,000 and 570,000. IT IS ESTIMATED IT WOULD TAKE 34 YEARS AND £8BILLION TO REMOVE ALL THOSE WHO ARE CURRENTLY IN THE UK ILLEGALLY.”



On 8 March 2009, Gordon Brown responded to political allies, who wanted him to apologise for the role he and New Labour played in the world-wide recession.

The Daily Mail quoted him thus:

“You want me to go on television and apologise, but I AM NOT GOING TO DO IT. I HAVE NOTHING TO APOLOGISE FOR. IT IS NOT MY FAULT. Get in the real world”.



On 7 March 2009, Stephen Glover said this in The Daily Mail:

"Twice this week I have been reminded of a peculiar quality of the British. WE LOVE TO PRAISE, HONOUR AND REWARD THOS WHO DON'T REALLY LIKE US - WHO MAY INDEED HATE US.

While Gordon Brown was sweet-talking the Americans, it was announced that an honorary knighthood is being conferred on 77-year-old Senator Edward Kennedy...

One might suppose that Mr Kennedy - who was notoriously involved in the terrible death of Mary Jo Kopechne - was an old friend of this country. BUT HE ISN'T... During the Seventies he portrayed the British role in Northern Ireland as one of virtual occupation, and even suggested that the majority Protestant population be encouraged to 'return' to Britain...

91-year-old historian Eric Hobsbawm... has lived in this country since 1933... One might suppose that Mr Hobsbawm was a kindly old gentleman who would never harm a flea.

A panegyric by Seumas Milne in The Guardian newspaper called him Britain's 'greatest living historian'. HE IS ALMOST INVARIABLY SO DESCRIBED... The truth about Mr Hobsbawm is almost the exact opposite of what has been stated. For most of his adult life Mr HOBSBAWM SUPPOTED THE SOVIET UNION, whose methods made MI5 look like a bunch of amateurs.

It is not even true that he always opposed fascism. In 1939 he co-wrote a pamphlet justifying, from a communist standpoint, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact between Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia. Only after Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 did the Nazis revert to being the bad guys...

He either turned a blind eye to Soviet atrocities, OR JUSTIFIED THEM. He defended... the Russian invasion of Hungary in 1956. He deprecated Nikita Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin's totalitarian methods. Long after decent fellow communists had disowned Soviet communism, Mr HOBSBAWM REFUSED TO CONDEMN IT. In his book On History, published in 1997, he wrote:

'Fragile as the communist systems turned out to be, only a limited, even minimal, use of force was necessary to maintain them from 1957 until 1989.' Somehow, he had forgotten about the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.

Asked whether 'the radiant tomorrow' promised by Stalin would have justified 'the loss of 15 to 20 million people', Mr HOBSBAWM SIMPLY REPLIED: 'YES'...

Despite all this - despite his well-publicised support for an inhumane regime - HE IS WIDELEY TEATED AS A GRAND, AS WELL AS A DELIGHTFUL OLD MAN, WHOSE VIEWS DESERVE TO BE VENERATED.

One may wonder why Hobsbawm should seek an honour from a country for which he has never shown much affection, and whose interests he undermined during the Cold War through his support for the Soviet Union...

It would be as pointless to demand that he be stripped of his Companion of Honour as it would be to ask Gordon Brown to think again about Senator Kennedy's honorary knighthood. NEW LABOUR HAS EMBRACED BOTH THESE GHASTLY MEN WITH OPEN EYES."

"We love to praise, honour and reward those who don't really like us - who may indeed hate us", says Glover.

This, of course, is not true. We have never wanted anything to do with "those who don't really like us", much less anyone who "hates" us.

Those we vote for, those who rule our lives "love to praise, honour and reward those... who may indeed hate us".

The better to dismay and demoralise those THEY are at war with.



On 5 March 2009, Schools Minister, Ed Balls apologised thus on Sky News:

"It is important to look back at the history and see what happened. You have got to say, yes, REGULATION WASN'T RIGHT... In retrospect, WE ALL UNDERESTIMATED THE RISKS AND WE WERE NOWHERE NEAR TOUGH ENOUGH. Completely right. We need to learn from that and do it better in the future."

So, Balls offered a bit of an apology to the British people for pandering to the richest, greediest, most corrupt people on the planet for over ten years whilst they ignored those the Labour Party was formed to represent.

Gordon Brown would not have been pleased. He is still, even now, blaming the current catastrophe on everybody else.

Don't you find the fact that the world's most ardent proponent of "globalism" had the bare-faced cheek to blame sub-prime, the credit crunch and the world-wide recession that followed on "global" forces, ladies and gents?



On 2 March 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“AS THE NATION CRUMBLES, THE ARROGANCE OF OUR RULING CLASS HAS BECOME AN AFFRONT TO JUSTICE. WE ARE GOVERNED BY A SELF-SERVING, UNPATRIOTIC, INCOMPETENT ELITE WHICH REFUSES TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TERRIBLE DAMAGE IT HAS INFLICTED ON OUR COUNTRY.

OUR RULERS HAVE GLEEFULLY ENRICHED THEMSELVES WHILE TEARING APART THE FABRIC OF OUR SOCIETY. OUR ECONOMY HAS BEEN WRECKED, OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM DEBASED, OUR INDEPENDENCE DESTROYED, OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT WEAKENED AND OUR SOCIAL COHESION SAVAGED.

SO ORDINARY BRITISH CITIZENS ARE NOW IN THE CRUELLY UNFAIR POSITION OF PAYING TAXES FOR THE SOLE PRIVILEGE OF BEING PUNISHED BY A GANG OF CHARLATANS, CONTROL FREAKS, GREED MERCHANTS AND IDEOLOGUES.”



On 20 February 2009, Manzoor Moghal, Chairman of the Muslim Forum was quoted thus by BBC News:

"Why would you not allow Muslims to conduct their affairs in their cultural, religious framework, WITHOUT INTERFERENCE FROM THE STATE? WHY SHOULD WE TAKE THEM TO TASK FOR HAVING A SECOND, THIRD AND A FOURTH NIKAH”?

A “nikah” is a Muslim marriage.

Professor Haleh Afshar, of The University of York, said:

"It is increasing on the part of British-born men who... sometimes marry British-born girls, but more often... GO BACK AND ABANDON WIFE NUMBER ONE and take wife number two."

And there’s me thinking that British-born men who marry more than once are guilty of bigamy.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said:

"It is government policy to prevent the formation of polygamous households in the United Kingdom”.

That’s what I thought! Being married to more than one woman at a time is bigamy!

The spokesperson continued:

"POLYGAMOUS MARRIAGES THAT HAVE BEEN CONTRACTED IN OVERSEAS COUNTRIES ARE LEGALLY RECOGNISED”.

What?

But you just said… The spokesperson added.

"IT IS NOT THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT TO TAKE A POSITION ON THE RITES, BELIEFS OR PRACTICES OF ANY PARTICULAR RELIGIOUS FAITH."

And there you have it.

The official New Labour position of the ancient law of bigamy is… ONE LAW FOR THEM AND ANOTHER FOR US!

The maximum sentence for the crime of bigamy in the UK is 7 years or a fine or both. But not for those who practice “rites, beliefs or practices of any particular religious faith" that are different to ours.

It is war, ladies and gentlemen.

THEY are at war with us.



On 17 February 2009, The Daily Telegraph quoted Dame Stella Rimmington, former head of MI5, following in an interview with La Vanguardia newspaper.

“Since I have retired I feel more at liberty to be against certain decisions of the Government, especially the attempt to pass laws which interfere with people’s privacy… It would be better that the Government recognised that there are risks, rather than FRIGHTENING PEOPLE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO PASS LAWS WHICH RESTRICT CIVIL LIBERTIES, precisely one of the objects of terrorism: that WE LIVE IN FEAR AND UNDER A POLICE STATE”.

The Telegraph adds:

“In 2005, she said the Government’s plans for ID cards were ‘absolutely useless’ and would not make the public any safer… Her latest remarks were made as THE HOME OFFICE PREPARES TO PUBLISH PLANS FOR A SIGNIFICANT EXPANSION OF STATE SURVEILLANCE, WITH POWERS FOR THE POLICE AND SECURITY SERVICES TO MONITOR EVERY EMAIL, AS WELL AS TELEPHONE AND INTERNET ACTIVITY…

In a further blow to ministers, an international study by lawyers and judges accused countries such as BRITAIN AND AMERICA OF ‘ACTIVELY UNDERMINING’ THE LAW through the measures they have introduced to counter terrorism. The report, by the International Commission of Jurists, said:

‘The failure of states to comply with their legal duties is creating a dangerous situation wherein terrorism, and the fear of terrorism, are undermining basic principles of international human rights law’…

Arthur Chaskelson, the chairman of the report panel, said:

‘In the course of this inquiry, WE HAVE BEEN SHOCKED BY THE DAMAGE DONE OVER THE PAST SEVEN YEARS BY EXCESSIVE OR ABUSIVE COUNTER-TERRORISM MEASURES IN A WIDE RANGE OF COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD. Many governments, ignoring the lessons of history, have allowed themselves to be rushed into hasty responses to terrorism that have UNDERMINED CHERISHED VALUES AND VIOLATED HUMAN RIGHTS’.”

Welcome to the world of Bush, Blair, Brown and those who own them, Arthur.



On 9 February 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“TOP BANKERS AND LABOUR POLITICIANS ARE MADE FOR EACH OTHER. ARROGANT, HYPOCRITICAL AND INCOMPETENT, THEY ARE BOTH GROUPS OF MONEY-GRABBING PARASITES. The bankers have their endless bail-outs, the politicians their flood of generous expenses. It is nauseating that ORDINARY TAXPAYERS ARE FORCED TO HAND OVER A SIZEABLE CHUNK OF THEIR INCOMES TO MAINTAIN THE PRIVILEGED LIFE-STYLES OF THESE LEECHES while the rest of the country sinks deeper into recession and mass unemployment.

What is even more offensive is that THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING TO DESERVE A PENNY FROM THE PUBLIC. Instead, with their disastrous policies, THEY HAVE DRAGGED BRITAIN TO THE BRINK OF RUIN.”



On 9 February 2009, Peter Oborne said this in The Daily Mail:

“FAR TOO MANY BRITISH MPS ARE, QUITE SIMPLY, CORRUPT. (Jacqui Smith) is claiming tens of thousands of pounds to which she is not entitled. In doing so, THE HOME SECRETARY IS SURELY BEHAVING NO BETTER THAN A COMMON THIEF...

AT WESTMINSTER, THOUGH, SHE'S AN OBJECT OF SYMPATHY RATHER THAN DISGUST. THERE WAS NOT A SQUEAK OF PROTEST FROM DAVID CAMERON'S TORY PARTY YESTERDAY. The reason is obvious. CAMERON KNOWS THAT HIS OWN SHADOW CABINET ARE EVERY BIT AS CORRUPT AS JACQUI SMITH. SO THERE'S A CONSPIRACY BETWEEN THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO STEAL FROM THE POCKETS OF THE TAXPAYER.”



On 9 February 2009, the Liberal Democrat MP, Vince Cable said this in The Daily Express:

"This is unbelievably crass and irresponsible behaviour by people who have learned absolutely nothing and appear to have NO STANDARDS OF HONESTY WHATSOEVER... THEY HAVE BROUGHT THIS COUNTRY TO THEIR KNEES. WHATEVER CONTRITION WHICH HAS BEEN EXPRESSED IN THE PAST IS COMPLETELY UNDERMINED BY THIS GREED.”

The Express explained what had upset Vince thus:

"BOTH THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND AND LLOYDS TSB ARE SET TO HAND STAFF AT LEAST £1BILLION DESPITE HAVING TO TURN TO TAXPAYERS FOR MORE THAN £25BILLION IN HAND-OUTS.

Some top staff are in line to collect payouts that could be worth MORE THAN £1 MILLION EACH".



Ed Balls, the Children’s Secretary, a speech to Labour activists in Yorkshire on 6 February 2009:

"THE ECONOMY IS GOING TO DEFINE OUR POLITICS IN THIS REGION AND IN BRITAIN IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, THE NEXT 10 YEARS AND EVEN THE NEXT 15 YEARS. THESE ARE SEISMIC EVENTS THAT ARE GOING TO CHANGE THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE. I THINK THIS IS A FINANCIAL CRISIS MORE EXTREME AND MORE SERIOUS THAN THAT OF THE 1930S AND WE ALL REMEMBER HOW THE POLITICS OF THAT ERA WERE SHAPED BY THE ECONOMY. WE ARE NOW SEEING THE REALITIES OF GLOBALISATION... THIS IS BECOMING THE MOST SERIOUS GLOBAL RECESSION FOR, I'M SURE, OVER 100 YEARS.”

Balls is almost as much to blame as Brown for the mess we’re in.

He is, of course, implying that MORE globalisation is the answer. For globalisation read world government, with those who gave us sub prime, the credit crunch and “a financial crisis more extreme and more serious than that of the 1930s” still in charge.



On 6 February 2009, Peter Oborne said this in The Daily Mail:

“The Foreign Secretary's very public denunciation of George W Bush's so-called war on terror may be exploding in his face. For it appears that the very youthful David Miliband may become part of a conspiracy to cover up evidence that suggests that British intelligence agents agreed to the torture of terrorist suspects.

THIS IS AS FOUL AS IT GETS - for one of the most important distinguishing mark of a civilised society is the refusal to countenance torture. The British authorities hold key American documents that cast a very disturbing light on this cruel and illegal mistreatment, and the British courts want to publish this material.

It is over this that DAVID MILIBAND HAS INTERVENED TO STOP PUBLICATION, citing 'national security'. The judges had no choice but to comply with this edict - although they made clear their fury, insisting that there was 'very considerable public interest' in publication'.“



On 4 February 2009, Melanie Philips said this in The Daily Mail:

“Sometimes you have to pinch yourself to remember that Britain has historically always been the cradle of liberty. For TODAY WE SEEM TO BE SLIDING INEXORABLY INTO A CULTURE OF CONTROL WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY FAMILIAR TO THE STASI OR THE KGB...

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS NOW THE GOVERNING CHARACTERISTIC OF PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS THE BBC AND THE NHS, ALONG WITH AN INTELLIGENTSIA DETERMINED UPON A DRACONIAN PROCESS OF SOCIAL ENGINEERING AIMED AT CHANGING NOT JUST SOCIETY BUT HUMAN NATURE ITSELF...

BEHAVIOUR SUCH AS THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN A KEY FEATURE OF POLICE STATES AND TOTALITARIAN REGIMES. THE STASI OR THE KGB GAINED MUCH OF THEIR POWER OVER THE POPULATION THEY TYRANNISED BY GETTING PEOPLE TO INFORM ON EACH OTHER, USING SUCH INFORMERS TO BRING FORWARD EVIDENCE OF 'THOUGHT CRIMES' from private or overheard conversations. Such use of informers SETS PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER in a climate of permanent and corrosive suspicion.

Destroying the trust which is the basis of relationships, it is thus A PRINCIPAL MEANS OF CONTROLLING THE POPULATION...

It is THIS COMBINATION OF LUNACY AND COERCION which leads one to think that the land of those great apostles of free thinking, John Milton and John Locke, is fast TURNING INTO A NIGHTMARE STRAIGHT OUT OF THE PAGES OF GEORGE ORWELL OR FRANZ KAFKA." More...



On 3 February 2009, George Monbiot said this in The Guardian:

"For the first time in my life I resent paying my taxes... Suddenly I see it as an imposition. Its purpose has reverted to that of the middle ages: subsidising the excesses of a parasitic class...

Almost everyone I speak to says the same thing – ‘WHAT'S THE POINT? THEY'RE ALL AS BAD AS EACH OTHER’ - and I can find no argument to refute it. Had their forebears been told that, 125 years after the first agricultural workers got the vote, the poor would be bailing out the rich and (thanks to the first-past-the-post system) the votes of only a few thousand citizens would count, I doubt they would have bothered...

Politics isn't working for us, so we leave it to the politicians. THE POLITICAL VACUUM IS THEN FILLED WITH HEARTLESS, SOULLESS, GUTLESS TECHNOCRATS: UNDER WHAT OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES COULD POLITICAL GHOSTS LIKE JACK STRAW, GEOFF HOON, ALISTAIR DARLING, HAZEL BLEARS, PETER MANDELSON OR JOHN HUTTON REMAIN IN OFFICE? UNMOLESTED BY THE PUBLIC, CORPORATE LOBBYISTS COLLABORATE WITH THIS EMPTY POLITICAL CLASS TO TURN PARLIAMENT INTO A CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PUBLIC...

THE AFFILIATED TRADE UNIONS HAVE TURNED INTO THE GOVERNMENT'S NODDING DOGS, CONTINUING TO FUND THE LABOUR PARTY EVEN AS IT DESTROYS EVERYTHING THEY CLAIM TO STAND FOR.” More...



On 3 February 2009, Bel Mooney, Jonathan Dimbleby's former wife, posed this question in The Daily Mail:

“WHY DO THE LEFT HATE THE FAMILY?"

Citing evidence of the claim above in a study commissioned by the Children’s Society, she continued:

"What will offend liberal Leftwingers most of all is the conclusion that CHILDREN THRIVE BEST OF ALL WITHIN WHAT USED TO BE CALLED THE ‘NUCLEAR FAMILY’, WITH A FATHER AND A MOTHER. The figures are inarguable: 50PER CENT MORE CHILDREN FROM BROKEN FAMILIES DEVELOP PROBLEMS IN THEIR LIVES THAN CHILDREN FROM TWO-PARENT FAMILIES; THREE TIMES AS MANY THREE-YEAR-OLDS LIVING WITH SINGLE OR STEPPARENTS HAVE BEHAVIOURAL PROBLEMS COMPARED WITH THOSE LIVING WITH MARRIED PARENTS; 70 per cent of mothers with babies under one year old do paid work; 60 per cent of the young people polled think parents do not spend enough time with their children. And so on.

What’s more, this eminent panel goes even further… THEY JUDGE ‘EXCESSIVE INDIVIDUALISM’ AND SELFISH MATERIALISM TO BLAME FOR MANY OF THE PROBLEMS CHILDREN FACE, SAYING THIS MODERN DISEASE NEEDS TO BE REPLACED BY A VALUE SYSTEM BASED ON HELPING, GIVING AND LOVE.

I can hear the snorts. Reading some of the feedback on internet sites yesterday I noticed, sadly, how people find it hard to imagine any truth outside their own.
So the single mother or widow says the report is nonsense because her children are well-brought up. The gay man says the report is nonsense because two stable gay men are better parents than sink-estate ‘slags’. THE ANTI-FAMILY LEFTIST SAYS THE REPORT IS NONSENSE BECAUSE ALL LIFESTYLES ARE EQUAL AND THE NUCLEAR FAMILY WAS ALWAYS AN INSTRUMENT OF OPPRESSION.

Ironically, such responses only serve to prove one of the key issues raised by the report — that PEOPLE ARE TOO OBSESSED WITH THEMSELVES… Having children is about making sacrifices. End of story. If you can’t hack it, don’t have them…

New Labour… its doctrinaire insistence that marriage is just one of many equally valid relationship choices has been destructive. It’s time to admit that FAMILY AND BENEFITS POLICIES WHICH ENCOURAGED SINGLE-PARENTHOOD AS A LIFESTYLE CHOICE FOR YOUNG GIRLS HAVE ACTIVELY HELPED TO RAISE A LOST GENERATION”.



New Labour MP, Chris Mullins, a junior Minister between 1999 and 2005, released an edition of his political diaries, A View From the Foothills, in February 2009.

Here are some of the things that were said:

"GEORGE W BUSH, AN INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY DEFICIENT SERIAL KILLER IS TO BE THE NEXT US PRESIDENT. Just what the human race needs."

On the decision to go to war in Iraq:

"THE MAN (BLAIR) HAS TAKEN A RECKLESS, FOOLISH GAMBLE. HE'S BET THE WHOLE SHOP, not just his future, but that of the Labour party and everything we have achieved in government, on a single throw of the dice."

"Derek Draper, once a friend of Peter's (Peter Mandelson) put his finger on the problem … 'PETER GOES GAGA IN THE PRESENCE OF RICH PEOPLE.' NOT ONLY PETER'S PROBLEM. NEW LABOUR'S, TOO... Why can't Peter keep his trap shut? HE CAN'T BEAR NOT BEING THE CENTRE OF ATTENTION. The only reason anybody listens to him is because they assume he is speaking for The Man.”

"This wretched (Millenium) dome has become an albatross. A symbol of ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH NEW LABOUR: SHALLOW, OVER-HYPED, NAFF."

"Shaun Woodward (Gordon Brown's Northern Ireland Minister, the richest man in parliament and a defector from the Tories) has been selected in St Helens. HEARING HIM ON THE RADIO THIS MORNING PROMISING TO BE A CHAMPION OF THE POOR AND DOWNTRODDEN MADE MY FLESH CREEP. THIS IS ONE OF NEW LABOUR'S VILEST STITCH-UPS."

Describing John Prescott, Tony Blair’s Deputy PM, Mullins says:

"JOHN IS HOPELESSLY INSECURE, EVER AFRAID OF BEING SHOWN UP BY ONE OF HIS UNDERLINGS, constantly interfering in matters best left to junior ministers."

On Gordon Brown's office (when Chancellor of the Exchequer)

"It's a complete tip. Paper everywhere. Stacked on seats, tables, the floor, everywhere. And in the inner sanctum, against the wall, three huge piles – two about four feet high and the other five feet. Gordon's filing system."

Mullin also quotes Clare Short as having said Brown was a “MEGALOMANIAC” and a Blair aide as saying:

"HE'S MAD, QUITE MAD. GORDON IS OBSESSIVE, PARANOID, SECRETIVE AND LACKING IN PERSONAL SKILLS“.

Mullins, himself, describes Brown as “MIRTHLESS“, “OBSESSIVE” and “PARANOID”, adding:

“He should not be given a free run. THE TRAIL OF MANY OF OUR DIFFICULTIES LEADS BACK TO HIM.”

And:

“If it all goes wrong he’ll be nowhere to be seen”.

On Keith Vaz's promotion to Minister for Europe in 1999:

"The most inexplicable appointment is Keith Vaz … AN UTTER LIGHTWEIGHT. HOW ON EARTH DOES HE FIT INTO THE NEW LABOUR MASTERPLAN?"

This was Tony Blair's idea of the ultimate PC p***-take, Chris.

An African Asian representing Britain in Europe? As Europe Minister? Get it? I mean, he was bound to speak up for what the indigenous British majority wanted, now wasn't he?



On 1 February 2009, Frank Field, former New Labour Welfare Minister and co-Chairman of the cross-party parliamentary group on immigration, was quoted thus in The Daily Express:

"HIS (Gordon Brown's) CLAIM TO HAVE PROVIDED BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS IS AS HOLLOW AS IT COULD BE... Foreign firms can win a contract and import their own labour TO THE EXCLUSION OF BRITISH WORKERS.

I have been calling on ministers for years to cut down on the number of people coming here to work. NO GOVERNMENT HAS HAD MORE WARNINGS. OF THE THREE MILLION JOBS CREATED IN THE LAST DECADE, NINE OUT OF 10 HAVE GONE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT BRITISH.”

You and Tony weren’t running the country for us, were you, Gordon?

You were running it for the multinational corporation owners, the New World Order globalists, the international financiers, the bankers and, of course, the immigrants.

Everybody’s catching on now, Gordon. Everybody’s waking up to what you, and those who own you, have done to our country and its people.

Get your hat and coat, pal. This country won't be a safe place for traitors for very much longer.



On 1 February 2009, Simon Walters said this in The Daily Mail:

"THE LABOUR PEER LORD TRUSCOTT, AT THE HEART OF THE LORDS SLEAZE ROW, HAS SECRET LINKS TO SOVIET RUSSIA, a Mail on Sunday investigation has uncovered. The party faced calls for a new inquiry into Lord Truscott in the face of fresh information about his astonishing rise to power, which throws new light on the 'love at first sight' account of how he met his Russian wife Svetlana in the former Soviet Union.

At the time they married, LADY TRUSCOTT WAS AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY AND HER FATHER WAS A SENIOR RED ARMY OFFICER AT A SECRET MILITARY INSTITUTE CONNECTED TO THE SOVIET EQUIVALENT OF THE SAS.

The Mail on Sunday has also obtained new details about THE COUPLE'S PRIVATE FORTUNE, WHICH INCLUDES A £1MILLION HOME IN MAYFAIR, A COUNTRY HOME IN BATH AND PROPERTY INTERESTS IN RUSSIA. This newspaper has been told that LORD TRUSCOTT WAS AWARDED HIS PEERAGE BY TONY BLAIR IN 2004 AFTER OFFERING PRIVATE ADVICE ON RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA."

That's who rules our lives, folks.

That's who pays no attention to what we want. That's who lies and spins and screws everything up and that's who won't ever take any of the blame.

I keep telling you that THEY are at war with us.

And I'm right, aren't I?



On 31 January 2009, Peter Hitchens opined thus in The Daily Mail:

“We are forced to say that we think homosexuality is a good thing, that homosexual couples are equal in all ways to heterosexual married couples. Most emphatically, we are compelled to agree that homosexual couples are just as good at bringing up children as the children's own grandparents. BETTER, IN FACT!

Many people who believe nothing of the kind now know that THEIR CAREERS IN POLITICS, THE MEDIA, THE ARMED SERVICES, THE POLICE OR SCHOOLS WILL BE RUINED IF THEY EVER LET THEIR TRUE OPINIONS SHOW. I AM SURE THAT MANY OF THEM REGULARLY LIE ABOUT THEIR VIEWS, to avoid such trouble.

WE CRINGE TO THE NEW THOUGHT POLICE, LIKE THE SUBJECTS OF SOME INSANE, SEX-OBSESSED STALINIST STATE, compelled to wave our little rainbow flags as the 'Gay Pride' parade passes by. And that's another thing. We can't even call homosexuals 'homosexuals' any more. This neutral word is not considered enthusiastic enough. We have to say 'gay'. But what about a powerless pair of grandparents in Edinburgh, THEIR GRANDCHILDREN'S LIVES SHIPWRECKED BY THE MULTIPLE HORRORS OF OUR 'LIBERATED' SOCIETY?

They are first insultingly informed that they are too old, and that their minor illnesses disqualify them from the task. Heaven help any employer who dared 'discriminate' in this fashion. BUT THE NEW THOUGHT POLICE ARE ODDLY EXEMPT FROM THEIR OWN RULES. Next, the grandparents are informed that the children are to be put into the care of a homosexual couple. And - this is the crucial moment - THEY ARE WARNED IN THE MOST TERRIFYING TERMS THAT IF THEY OBJECT TO THIS ARRANGEMENT THEY WILL NEVER SEE THEIR GRANDCHILDREN AGAIN.

THIS IS THE ACTION OF A TYRANNY IN OPERATION, especially the use of children to blackmail their parents and grandparents. PEOPLE WHO CAN DO THIS CAN DO ANYTHING.

Isn't it amazing to reflect that this campaign began in the name of tolerance?”



On 30 January 2009, Gordon Brown said this at the economic summit in Davos:

“This is a time not just for individual, national measures to deal with the global financial crisis. This is the time ... FOR THE WORLD TO COME TOGETHER AS ONE.”

A world government, eh Gordon?

Run by people like you for the benefit of foreigners, big business and the greedy, greedy bankers?

Nope. Not my idea of heaven.



On 28 January 2009, the former head of the Royal Navy, Lord West, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"TONY BLAIR WOULD NEVER ACCEPT THAT OUR FOREIGN POLICY ACTUALLY HAD ANY IMPACT ON RADICALISATION... WELL THAT IS CLEARLY BULLS***, ‘THAT’S CLEARLY RUBBISH...

TO PRETEND WHAT HAPPENS ABROAD HAS NO IMPACT IS NONSENSE. For example, this business in Gaza has not helped us at all in our counter-radicalisation policy. There is no doubt about that, it would be wrong to say that it has.”



On 26 January 2009, Gordon Brown said this to the Foreign Press Association in London:

“We could allow this crisis to start a retreat from globalisation… We could close our markets – for capital, financial services, trade and FOR LABOUR – and therefore REDUCE THE RISKS OF GLOBALISATION… Or we could view the threats and challenges we face today as THE DIFFICULT BIRTH-PANGS OF A NEW GLOBAL ORDER - and our task now as nothing less than making the transition through A NEW INTERNATIONALISM to the benefits of an expanding GLOBAL SOCIETY… SETTING THE NEW RULES FOR THIS NEW GLOBAL ORDER."

Well, THEY don’t try to hide it any more do they ladies and gents?

The nation state is the enemy of those who rule our world. Our rulers, if you remember, spent decades cuddling up to the greedy bankers and businessmen of the “global society” and went a-slaughtering for US imperialism and, presumably, the New Global Order, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

That’s why THEY have spent the last 40-odd years giving our council houses to immigrants. That’s why THEY have flooded our country with these against our will. That’s why THEY are giving our jobs to foreigners as we speak. That’s why so many of our formerly Nationalised industries, which once belonged to all the British people, now belong to a few mega-rich “new global order” foreigners.

That’s why THEY have covered up non-native criminality and trumpeted the reverse. Did it never occur to you that, the “new global order” would be that much easier to achieve if THEY could convince the most gullible to believe that the lovely, fluffy alien hordes were preferable to the awful white folks who resembled the alleged killers of Stephen Lawrence?

Ladies and gents, Gordon Brown’s New Global Order was planned for long ago. Those who own the Gordons and the Tonies made it all happen. THEY oversaw their effortless slither up all the greasy poles.

Those who run the Global Order need never be elected. The plebs need never know who THEY are. The Gordons and the Tonies of the future will be the public face of this Order. The Gordons and the Tonies of the future will, as they do now, resemble us in speech, manner and appearance, but they will never represent us.

Just as they don't represent us now.

On the same day, when Fred-the-Shred Goodwin refused to give up any of his £693,000-a-year pension from the Royal Bank of Scotland, Gordon Brown was moved to say this:

"I am determined that we pursue, if necessary by LEGAL ACTION, cases where too much money has been taken out in cases where there is less justification that has been claimed for remuneration. FAILURE SHOULD NOT BE REWARDED. Practices are coming to light which have GOT TO BE DEALT WITH."

Almost all of us would agree that the greedy bankers should cough up their ill-gotten gains and “legal action” should be taken if they don’t. Almost all of us would agree that “failure should not be rewarded”. Almost all of us would agree that the bad guys’ shady practices “have got to be dealt with”.

Which is why Gordon Brown said what he said. He wanted us to think he would be doing something about the bad guys’ behaviour. He wanted us to think that he agreed with what we wanted.

Question: Since the Prime Minister said what he said, has any “legal action” been taken against Fred-the-Shred et al?

Question: Has their "failure" been punished in any way?

Question: Have their sharp “practices” been “dealt with”?

Question: Since we bailed out the bankers, have they been enriching themselves with obscenely bloated bonus payments, just as they always have?

Gordon Brown is the type of politician who says what he thinks we want to hear and then does absolutely nothing about it. Especially when those he most admires will lose out if he does.



On 26 January 2009, David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party said the following as he was being innterviewed by Jeff Randall for Sky News:

“WE BELIEVE IN A MULTIRACIAL BRITAIN. WE BELIEVE IT’S A SUCCESS. WE THINK IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN GOOD FOR BRITAIN IN THE PAST. WE THINK IMMIGRATION WILL CONTINUE.”



On 22 January 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

"For years we were told by Labour ministers that the destruction of our borders was the route to prosperity. Those of us who warned that the uncontrolled migration would cause not only social dislocation but also economic catastrophe were condemned as blinkered xenophobes unwilling to embrace the exciting prospects of ultra-globalised Britain... Far from boosting growth, UNFETTERED IMMIGRATION HAS BROUGHT ONLY MISERY TO OUR COUNTRY. AS WELL AS ADDING AN IMMENSE NEW BURDEN TO OUR TAXES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES, THE VAST INFLUX OF FOREIGNERS TO OUR SHORES HAS GROTESQUELY DISTORTED THE LABOUR MARKET, THROWING MILLIONS OF BRITONS ON TO THE SCRAPHEAP... WHILE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF BRITISH PEOPLE ARE BEING FORCED OUT OF WORK EVERY MONTH, THE MIGRANTS ARE STILL FLOCKING HERE...

It is a bit late for the unions to start bleating now. IF THEY HAD BEEN MORE ROBUST IN PROTECTING THEIR MEMBERS’ INTERESTS RATHER THAN ACTING AS PROPAGANDISTS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR NATIONHOOD, WE MIGHT NOT BE IN SUCH A MESS...

It is remarkable that THE LABOUR PARTY, WHICH WAS FOUNDED IN THE EDWARDIAN AGE TO REPRESENT THE WORKING CLASS, SHOULD BE INDULGING IN THIS BETRAYAL OF THE VERY PEOPLE WHO FORM THE BACKBONE OF BRITAIN. Great Labour figures of the past, such as post-war foreign secretary and former union boss Ernie Bevin, saw their job as protecting British workers, not SUBJECTING THEM TO EXPLOITATION AND MARGINALISATION.

Today, on the contrary, LABOUR PRACTISES OPEN PREJUDICE AGAINST THE INDIGENOUS WORKING CLASS IN ITS EAGERNESS TO ENFORCE GLOBALISATION AND DIVERSITY, WHAT LABOUR’S DEPUTY LEADER HARRIET HARMAN HAS DESCRIBED AS 'A NEW SOCIAL ORDER'. In fact, under Harman’s misnamed Equalities Bill, DIRECT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WHITE MEN IS TO BE BECOME LEGAL, AS FIRMS WILL BE ALLOWED TO RESERVE JOBS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITY ETHNIC GROUPS.

IF WE HAD A GOVERNMENT THAT CARED AT ALL ABOUT THE WORKING CLASS, WE WOULD BE HELPING THE BRITISH PEOPLE INSTEAD OF DISCRIMINATING AGAINST THEM." More... Scroll down to 22 January



On 19 January 2009, Trevor Phillips, Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, opined thus in The Daily Telegraph:

“I believe that Britain is by far - and I mean BY FAR - THE BEST PLACE TO LIVE IF YOUR NOT WHITE... Integration works for us because at heart we believe that everyone should be treated with fairness.”

NO, TREVOR, Get it right!

Integration works for YOU, not US!

And YOU, along with the rest of the PC Crowd, do NOT believe everyone should be treated fairly! You think that those with an immigrant pedigree should be afforded every advantage and the native Brit should have the mickey taken out of him on a regular basis.



On 18 January 2009, the politically correct media darling, Liz Jones, said this in The Independent:

"I’VE NEVER HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH A WHITE MAN. I’VE NEVER HAD SEX WITH A WHITE MAN…
UNLESS YOU ARE BLACK OR ASIAN YOU CANNOT KNOW WHAT RACISM FEELS LIKE… RACISM IS STILL THERE... WE HAVEN’T STAMPED IT OUT, we have merely buried it...

I think IN THE NINETIES I FELL IN LOVE WITH THREE BLACK MEN PARTLY BECAUSE IT WAS FASHIONABLE AND GAVE ME A VENEER OF ‘COOL’ THAT, AS A BORING ESSEX GIRL, I DIDN’T POSSESS. I MARRIED, ON THE WAVE OF ASIANS BEING THE NEW BLACKS, WITH LOTS OF HOT NEW BOOKS IN THE BESTSELLER LISTS, AN INDIAN...

WHITE PEOPLE, no matter how many community projects we might fund or months we might serve fighting for a foreign cause, ARE CAPABLE OF RACIST THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS THAT NEED TO BE STAMPED ON, HARD... RACISM CAN BE IN OUR DNA. We need to examine ourselves more deeply.”

No Liz, you need to examine yourself more deeply.

You need to examine why you wanted your children to look like no one else in the family album. You need to examine why you were such a silly, vacuous airhead in your youth and why you have never grown up. You need to examine why a juvenile desire to be “cool” and not “boring” entitles you, in middle age, to inflict your still juvenile beliefs upon the British people.

A white woman who marries, “on the wave of Asians being the new blacks, with lots of hot new books in the best-seller lists” is an unthinking, undoubtedly brainwashed airhead. The immature certainty of your youth, is still, even now, wagging its finger at those whose attitudes do not correspond precisely to yours, just as they were when you married your “new black” Indian.

Once upon a time, Liz, I may have found your fashionable political correctness irritating.

Nowadays, it smacks of treachery.



On 17 January 2009, The French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, demonstrated his desire to breed the white European out of the pages of history in an address to the students of the École Polytechnique in Palaiseau.

Early on in his speech he uses a form of the noun "métissage" seven times within a minute. This word can mean mixing of cultures and/or interbreeding.

Here is a translation of Sarkozy’s words:

"The objective is to meet the challenge of the mélange - the challenge of coming together that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of the melting pot, France has always been familiar with it and, by meeting the challenge of the mix, France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, IT IS CONSANGUINITY THAT HAS ALWAYS PROVOKED THE END OF CIVILISATIONS AND SOCIETIES… In the course of centuries, FRANCE HAS ALWAYS UNDERSTOOD ‘INTER-BREEDING’, FRANCE HAS ALWAYS BEEN MIXED RACE.

France has mixed cultures, ideas and histories. France, who was able to blend these cultures and these histories, constructed a universal language, because FRANCE HERSELF IS UNIVERSAL IN THE DIVERSITY OF HER ORIGINS…

Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: if republican will power does not function, IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE REPUBLIC TO RESORT TO EVEN MORE FORCIBLE METHODS…

We don't have a choice. DIVERSITY AT THE BASE OF THE COUNTRY MUST BE REFLECTED BY DIVERSITY AT THE HEAD OF THE COUNTRY… IT IS NOT A CHOICE. IT IS AN OBLIGATION. IT IS AN IMPERATIVE. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems.

WE MUST CHANGE, SO WE WILL CHANGE."



On 14 January 2009, Fatima Hajaig, South Africa's Deputy Foreign Minister, said this at a rally in Lenasia on 14 January 2009:

“JEWISH MONEY CONTROLS AMERICA AND MOST WESTERN COUNTRIES... NO MATTER WHICH GOVERNMENT COMES IN TO POWER, WHETHER REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRATIC, WHETHER BARACK OBAMA OR GEORGE BUSH… THE CONTROL OF AMERICA, JUST LIKE THE CONTROL OF MOST WESTERN COUNTRIES, IS IN THE HANDS OF JEWISH MONEY." (Reported by the Israeli daily newspaper, Ha’aretz, on 28 January 2009)



In the 10 January 2009 edition of The Daily Mail, New Labour MP Frank Field said this:

"SLOWLY, BUT DETERMINEDLY, THE WHITE ENGLISH WORKING CLASS - AND I GUESS, SOME BLACK BRITONS, TOO - ARE VOTING AGAINST UNLIMITED IMMIGRATION BY EMBRACING THE BNP".



Robert Whelan, a director of the think-tank Civitas, was quoted thus in the 10 January 2009 edition of The Daily Mail:

"THE WHITE WORKING CLASS IS GROWING BITTER… They loyally supported Old Labour, but NEW LABOUR HAS IGNORED THEM.

Ministers have shut down the debate on mass migration. If the working class object to what is happening, they are called racist. They are not allowed to discuss their concerns publicly… The working classes feel there has been a huge unfairness, particularly when it comes to housing… They feel they have paid into the system, and should get something out. That was how it used to work right up to the 1990s. Then New Labour dismantled the system."



On 6 January 2009, Yonotan Shapira, a former captain in the Israeli Air Force, spoke out as follows against his country's invasion of Gaza:

"MY GOVERNMENT IS NOW ENGAGED IN A MASSIVE WAR CRIME KILLING HUNDREDS OF INNOCENTS…
On behalf of thousands of Israelis that are demonstrating right now in the streets of Tel A Viv and Jerusalem and many other places, with Palestinians with Internationals, people from all kinds of backgrounds… are completely, completely ashamed and against this crazy assault… As Jewish people we know that YOU CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE.

As a Jewish person that was raised on all these values of federation and humanity and freedom…

WE CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE PEOPLE TO LIVE IN FREEDOM…

I want to call the international community, the Jewish community in the world and every one that is listening to me now, please join our force to stop THIS MASSIVE KILLING… please, for the sake of Israel for the sake of Palestine and for the sake of the world. I want to cry and to shout and ask you people dying right now…
It’s crazy that my government, at the same time that people are being killed on our side, is continuing this crazy assault thinking that they can kill THE DESIRE OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE…

The Palestinians… THEY ARE BEING TRAPPED IN THIS OPEN-AIR PRISON FOR DECADES AND THEY CANNOT EAT, THEY CANNOT HAVE THEIR MEDICINE, THEY CANNOT GO IN, THEY CANNOT GO OUT. WE LOCK THEM THERE IN A DEEP GHETTO… WE ARE LOCKING ONE AND A HALF MILLION PEOPLE FOR SO LONG AND WE TREAT THEM AS ANIMALS AND THIS IS THE RESULT."



On 5 January 2009, the ubiquitous PC journalist, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, said this in The Independent:

“SPARE ME THE TEARS OVER THE WHITE WORKING CLASS. Their kith and kin, it seems, have turned against incomers AS SELF PITY OVERWHELMS THEM. A new government report finds that they feel ‘betrayed’ and abandoned. Ruined by 'ethnic minorities' THEY CRY INTO THEIR ANTIMACASSARS AND THREATEN TO VOTE FOR FASCISTS...

Parliamentarians, the media, even the people who claim to speak for immigrants… are flocking TO INDULGE THE ALWAYS-WRETCHED AND COMPLAINING CLASSES...

Criticise them and they, who detest PC, bring down the wrath of Alf Garnett on your head... What they believe – HOWEVER STUPID OR VICIOUS – must be awesome...

I hope one day we can truly belong, our rights and responsibilities no different from those who arrived and laid claims long before us on these MONGREL, OFT-INVADED ISLES". More...

The last significant invasion of these islands, other than the recent invasion of the immigrant hordes, took place in 1066.

William the Conqueror declared war on us back then. Our own government declared war on us in 1948 when the Windrush colonists were not sent straight back where they came from.

THEY have been at war with us ever since.

Ladies and gentlemen, Ms Alibhai-Brown’s snarling, insanely ungrateful and hate-filled dismissal of the plight of the indigenous Brit might give you a bit of a clue as to why some of us are so disenchanted with the Multicult.

And, for those of you who are not yet convinced, consider this: during the 4 June 2006 edition of Dateline London, Alibhai-Brown, who arrived here as a refugee from Idi Amin's Uganda in 1972, was asked this question by presenter, Gavin Essler:

"What's wrong with white guys, by the way?"

To which Alibhai-Brown replied:

"I don't like them. I WANT THEM TO BE THE LOST SPECIES IN 100 YEARS".

No one, as far as I'm aware, has ever questioned her absolute, totally non-racist right to want the white man gone.



On 5 January 2009, New Labour’s Frank Field and Conservative Nicholas Soames issued this joint statement:

“As a nation, we cannot afford to let our population grow at the extraordinary pace now officially forecast. The pressures on our public services and communities would be too great to bear. This timebomb must be defused and that requires radical action, now. GOVERNMENT CLAIMS THAT THEY ARE TAKING EFFECTIVE ACTION ARE NO MORE THAN A GIGANTIC BLUFF.”



On 4 January 2009, David Leppard, former editor of The Sunday Times' Insight team, was quoted thus in The Times:

“THE HOME OFFICE HAS QUIETLY ADOPTED A NEW PLAN TO ALLOW POLICE ACROSS BRITAIN ROUTINELY TO HACK INTO PEOPLE’S PERSONAL COMPUTERS WITHOUT A WARRANT. The move, WHICH FOLLOWS A DECISION BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S COUNCIL OF MINISTERS IN BRUSSELS, has angered civil liberties groups… They described it as a sinister extension of the surveillance state.”


On 15 September 2008, Fox News quoted Dominic Grieve, the shadow Home Secretary, thus:

“If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so.”

Fox News explained:

"ISLAMIC LAW HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY ADOPTED IN BRITAIN, WITH SHARIA COURTS GIVEN POWERS TO RULE ON MUSLIM CIVIL CASES. The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through county courts or the country's High Court, a part of its Supreme Court system. Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.”



On 8 December 2008, The Daily Mail quoted the Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, thus:

“I fully understand that Mail readers have concerns about the Human Rights Act. THERE IS A SENSE THAT IT'S A VILLAINS CHARTER OR THAT IT STOPS TERRORISTS BEING DEPORTED…

The fact is that we've had in this country in the last 25 years AN ASTONISHING GROWTH IN THE NUMBER OF LAWYERS and also in LEGAL AID. I'm concerned, and so are many senior lawyers, about THOSE OPERATING AT THE MARGINS OF ACCEPTABILITY, THE 'AMBULANCE CHASERS' AND THOSE USING NO-WIN, NO-FEE… Legal aid rose further and faster in the 80s and 90s than any other social service. We now spend as much on legal aid as we do on prisons.”

Jack Straw is “concerned?”

I wonder why such concern didn’t feature in his public pronouncements when he was Home Secretary? I wonder why he waited until New Labour had been in power for eleven and a half years to express his concern? I wonder why he waited until the New Labour project was just a year and a half away from being booted into the long grass to say what he says here?

The Daily Mail added:

“Is he surprised that ten years on, the Human Rights Act WHICH HE BROUGHT IN is so unpopular? For a moment HE STRUGGLES TO ANSWER… HE IS LONG ACCUSTOMED TO BEING BLAMED FOR UNPOPULAR LAWS.

HE IS QUICK TO DEFEND WHAT IS ARGUABLY ONE OF THE MOST FAR-REACHING, MANY WOULD SAY DAMAGING, PIECES OF LEGISLATION INTRODUCED BY LABOUR… ISLAMIST MILITANTS HAVE USED IT WITH GREAT SUCCESS TO AVOID DEPORTATION…

THE INCORPORATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS INTO BRITISH LAW IN THE 1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT SPAWNED AN ARMY OF EXPERTS WHO CAN BE EXPECTED TO FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL AGAINST ANY ATTEMPT TO DILUTE WHAT THEY SAY IS NOW AN UNTOUCHABLE PART OF OUR UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION.

Critics are more likely to dismiss their protests as THE PREDICTABLE COMPLAINTS OF THOSE WHO SEE A THREAT TO A LUCRATIVE SOURCE OF FEES AND BUSINESS.”

In 1998, the Home Secretary, Jack Straw, introduced “the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.”

At that time, he had no reservations at all about doing so.



On 8 December 2008, at the savethemales web site, Dr Henry Makow told us that, on March 20 1969, Dr. Richard Day, the National Medical Director of 'Planned Parenthood', made this statement to an audience of elite medical personnel:

"The stated plan was that different parts of the world would be assigned different roles of industry and commerce in a unified global system… 'Each PART OF THE WORLD WILL HAVE A SPECIALTY AND THUS BECOME INTERDEPENDENT".

Dr Makow continued:

"THEY ARE WEANING US OFF NATIONAL ALLEGIANCE AND WILL RESORT TO TERRORISM TO WIN OUR ASSENT TO THEIR GLOBAL POLICE STATE...

THE CENTRAL BANKERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MOST TERRORISM, USING MI-6, MOSSAD AND THE CIA. Dr. Day also said that 'war is obsolete' given the danger of nuclear exchange so TERRORISM WOULD BE USED INSTEAD. This was 1969.

He said that there are always two reasons for anything... THE PRETEXT WHICH MAKES IT PALATABLE TO THE GULLIBLE PUBLIC AND THE REAL REASON...

Dr. Day said sex will be separated from marriage and reproduction to break up the family and reduce population. Abortion, divorce and homosexuality will be made socially acceptable...

PORNOGRAPHY, VIOLENCE AND OBSCENITY ON TV AND IN MOVIES WILL BE INCREASED. People will be desensitized to violence and porn... THERE WILL BE UNEMPLOYMENT AND MASS MIGRATION IN ORDER TO UPROOT LONG ESTABLISHED COMMUNITIES...

He said PEOPLE ARE CONTROLLED BY MEANS OF THE INFORMATION THEY ARE GIVEN. THUS, INFORMATION WILL BE SELECTIVE... PEOPLE WILL SPEND LONGER IN SCHOOL BUT NOT LEARN ANYTHING…

OUR POLITICAL AND CULTURAL 'LEADERS' ARE ACCOMPLICES IN A PLOT TO RE-ENGINEER HUMANITY... WARS, TERRORISM, DEPRESSIONS, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CHANGE, ENTERTAINMENT AND FADS ARE ALL CONTRIVED TO GRADUALLY BRING ABOUT AN ORWELLIAN POLICE STATE.

DR. DAY SAYS POLITICIANS ARE MANIPULATED 'WITHOUT THEIR EVEN KNOWING IT'. Their failure to protect us from this Satanic conspiracy IS A BETRAYAL OF THE FIRST ORDER." More...



On 22 November 2008, David Attenborough was quoted thus by The Independent:

"THERE ARE THREE TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE LIVING ON EARTH AS WHEN I STARTED MAKING TELEVISION PROGRAMMES, AND THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO NOW TO STOP THAT GROWTH. WE ARE PUTTING HUGE PRESSURE ON EVERYTHING, EVERY SYSTEM, ON LIVING SPACE, ON SPACE FOR GROWING FOOD, ON TRANSPORT, ON GLOBAL WARMING AND ALL THOSE THINGS.

The natural world is becoming increasingly hemmed in and reduced."

Tell me about it, Dave.

That part of the human race inhabiting England has been “hemmed in and reduced” by all manner of fast breeding aliens “putting huge pressure on everything” in recent times.

The politicians that the English routinely vote for did this to them. Politicians do seem to be rather good at conjuring up catastrophe, don’t they?

A conspiracy theorist might get to wondering if the politician does it on purpose. Someone who only ever dealt with rock solid fact, however, would be certain he did.

Why, we wonder? What’s in it for him?

Well, take Blair, for example. What’s he been doing since he involved us Iraq on the back of half-truths, spin and downright lies?

He’s been making money hand over fist. All the Iraqs and Afghanistans and the eager obeisance to the greedy bankers and the global villagers and the Multicult, it’s already in the bag, isn‘t it? He’s just cashing in the New World Order’s IOU right now.

I suppose you could say there many less “people living on Earth” since Blair and his paymasters started making war upon them. However, seeing as our crowded little island will continue to get more and more crowded because of the mass migrations his government actively encouraged and, behind the scenes, connived at, I don’t think we’ll be acclaiming him as an ecological superhero any time soon.

Anyway, it’s often for the most prosaic of reasons that the grubby politician creates the messes we must endure and, eventually, clean up.

It’s mostly about money.

The fanatical abuse of power and “huge pressure on everything” legacy generally come tumbling after.



On 26 September 2008, The New York Sun quoted Vice-Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, thus:

"A surge in Afghanistan also will lead us to victory there as it has proven to have done in Iraq... We cannot afford to retreat, to withdraw in Iraq."

Sarah Palin

We all know you're an idiot, Sarah. Those who got Bush jnr. elected must be ecstatic.

Upon meeting Israeli President, Shimon Peres, Alaska's governor also said this:

"The only flag at my office is an Israeli flag and I want you to know and I want Israelis to know that I am a friend."

Not just an idiot then.

Bought-and-paid-for too.



On 8 August 2008, Deputy Chief Constable Jon Murphy was quoted thus in The Times:

“Some 60 per cent of criminal groups are involved in drug trafficking...

WHEN THE GOVERNMENT TOOK A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO CANNABIS THERE WAS A BIG SHIFT BY ORGANISED CRIMINALS INTO CANNABIS... THE PROFITS WERE HIGH BUT THE PENALTIES WERE LESS...

What we’re talking about here is a continuum of harm from a poppy field in Kandahar to a burglary on an estate or somebody getting shot here. The two things are linked.”

So, the idiocy (or intent) of the politicians caused a “big shift by organised criminals into cannabis”.

Don’t you think that they might have guessed that if “the profits were high but the penalties were less”, criminality in this area might increase?

Perhaps the politicians behind the “different approach” (the law was changed so that cannabis usage and possession was no longer an arrestable offence in most cases) weren’t being stupid. Perhaps they weren’t just being ultra PC and lessening the criminal load for their immigrant pets.

Perhaps some of them were, actually, HAPPY to inflict the damage upon our society that was always going to follow from the relaxation of the law.



On 12 July 2008, The Sunday Express quoted the Reverend Les Isaacs, speaking at the Bite the Bullet conference in Brixton, thus:

"What people are looking for is to know that they are valued and that they are loved. If we could go out and say to young people, 'you are worth something, we love you, we want to help', young people will look at their lifestyle and begin to rethink what they are doing…

DRUG DEALERS ARE USING THEIR ENTREPENEURIAL SKILLS. Some of them are controlling three mobile phones at once. IF WE CAN HELP THEM TO RECOGNISE THEY HAVE SOMETHING OF VALUE and if we can help them to develop that skill, it will be one of the greatest things we can do for this generation."

Les Isaacs is black.

I guess he must have been talking about young black people, young black drug dealers. According to The Sunday Express, the gentleman showing us the way here is "himself a former gang member and street fighter".



On 9 July 2008, Esther Rantzen's article, I Launched Childline To Protect The Most Vulnerable - But Unleashed A Politically Correct Monster was published by The Daily Mail.

This, in part, is what she said:

"Winning is against the rules for many children these days; even competing has become a sin. I have a godson, one of three brothers who until recently attended their local state primary school in Berkshire.

They were not permitted to play football there. In fact, they were forbidden to play any competitive sports. The head teacher takes the view that it is morally wrong for children to experience losing...

The school didn't just over-protect the children, they protected the staff as well, to a lunatic extent. One day my friend was rung up and asked to come to the school urgently with a pair of tweezers… When he arrived, he found one of his sons had a splinter in his finger. None of the school staff was allowed to remove it because that would be an 'invasive operation'. My friend had brought the tweezers and took the splinter out in a few seconds. After that, exasperated, he moved his sons to a different (PRIVATE) school.

Last Friday, I had the pleasure of watching the boys enjoying the drama and suspense of sports day at their new school. The whole event was deeply politically incorrect. There were plenty of races, and loads of winners.

Since some of the races were in relays, every child ended up with a victory badge of some kind, but there was no doubt that the children who had the focus, determination and co-ordination to hurl themselves fearlessly to the winning line won more badges, and walked tall.

'Worse' was to come. I noticed one small girl crumpled in tears when she was told that she'd been disqualified for holding her potato on to her spoon with her thumb while she ran.

Her teacher cuddled her, and a smile broke through the sobs. Cuddling a pupil! WHAT WOULD THE THOUGHT POLICE HAVE SAID?… WHY SHOULD THIS KIND OF COMMON SENSE BE A PRIVILEGE ONLY AVAILABLE TO CHILDREN WHOSE PARENTS CAN AFFORD PRIVATE EDUCATION?…

To an extent, I BLAME MYSELF FOR THIS RUBBISH. BY REVEALING THE EXTENT OF CHILD ABUSE IN THE BBC TV PROGRAMME CHILDWATCH IN THE EIGHTIES, I WAS PART OF THE REVOLUTION IN CHILD PROTECTION WHICH CREATED THESE INSIDIOUS JOBSWORTHS...

I HAD NO IDEA THE RESULT WOULD BE SENSELESS OVER-PROTECTION WHICH PRETENDS TO SEE DANGER WHERE THERE IS NONE... I NEVER FOR A MOMENT IMAGINED WE WOULD EVER REACH THIS INSANE STATE OF AFFAIRS.”



On 6 August 2008, The Daily Mail quoted Adam Sampson, of the housing charity Shelter, regarding the rate of home repossession in Gordon Brown's Cool Britannia:

"We have reached crisis point in the number of people at risk of repossession and alarm bells must be ringing in Government. These figures paint a terrifying picture showing real people living in the shadow of repossession and ultimately homelessness."

The Mail added:

"Mortgage lenders were criticised yesterday for rushing to evict families from their homes, as the number kicked out SOARED BY 41% IN A YEAR..

The Financial Services Authority said some lenders were 'too ready' to repossess customers' homes...

FROM JANUARY TO MARCH, 9,152 PEOPLE LOST THEIR HOMES, compared to 6,471 in the same period last year. The FSA also warns that 302,000 FAMILIES ARE IN 'THE LAST CHANCE SALOON', having not made repayments for at least three months."



On 4 July 2008, Tarique Ghaffur, Assistant Commissioner of the Met, was quoted thus in The Daily Mail:

"I WILL TEACH THOSE PIGS A LESSON ONE DAY".

He was castigating his fellow officers at the time.

Ghaffur’s former wife told us this in The Mail article:

"HE'S CRAZY. Unfortunately, when you are young, you don't see people for what they really are.

Either he was good enough to be promoted or he wasn't and I DON'T THINK HE WAS. I THINK HE HAS BENEFITED FROM POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION…

HE OWES AN ETERNAL DEBT OF GRATITUDE TO BRITAIN FOR ALLOWING HIM TO COME HERE, TO SAVE HIM FROM PERSECUTION, AND TOLERATING HIS RACE AND RELIGION. YET THIS IS HOW HE REPAYS SUCH KINDNESS.

You cannot take all the opportunities that have been given to you, all the promotions, and then not accept that one day perhaps you will not rise any further. To turn round just because things aren't going your way and accuse someone of racial discrimination, which is such a dreadful allegation, is cowardly and lazy…

The police wanted Asians in the force and those who joined were being pushed onwards and upwards. I DON'T THINK THERE WAS ANY DOUBT THAT TARIQUE BENEFITED FROM HAVING THE RIGHT COLOUR OF SKIN, IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME. FAST TRACKING IS WHAT I WOULD CALL IT…

I was expected to be a traditional wife, dressed in a sari, staying at home. It was one rule for him and another for me. I was never allowed out. He would go out to the pub, he didn't bother with prayers and, within six weeks of us marrying, I DISCOVERED HE HAD A MISTRESS… TARIQUE LATER TOLD ME HE NEVER WANTED TO GET MARRIED, HE DID IT ONLY BECAUSE HIS FATHER THREATENED TO KILL HIMSELF".



On 4 July 2008, the UK's first Muslim Minister, Shahid Malik, said this in The Independent:

"I think most people would agree that if you ask Muslims today what do they feel like, THEY FEEL LIKE THE JEWS OF EUROPE… Somehow there's a message out there that it's OK to target people as long as it's Muslims. And you don't have to worry about the facts… It makes Muslims feel like ALIENS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...pe-859978.html

I don’t think all Muslims would agree with you about the “aliens in their own country” bit, Mr Malik.

You see, I remember watching Who You Calling A Nigger in August 2004.

Shaja, a British born Pakistani living in the Burchill's area of Walsall, said this on that Channel 4 programme:

"For years it was a NO-GO ZONE FOR WHITE PEOPLE, black people, anyone, man... If you ain't a Paki, you ain't comin' in Burchills' man. You come fuck with us, YOU'RE DEAD...

Twenty years ago, there was no Pakis 'ere, no one was doin' nothin'. But now the Pakis have made a stamp, man. Now, think 20 years ahead, fuck knows, man, THIS IS GOING TO BE PAKISTAN, NOT ENGLAND, PAKISTAN! They're all fucking shipping over, know what I mean, man, fake passports."

I reckon Shaja thinks entirely differently to the way you do, Mr Malik. I should think that he’d be thinking I was more of an alien than your average Pakistani immigrant, wouldn’t you? And as for feeling like a Jew, well, Shaja said this a little later on:

"I don't like Jews. If I had the chance, I'd do one over, I'd break 'im, man. Jews are my enemies."



On 4 July 2008, Karen Williams, the parent of an 11-year-old child attending Alsager High School, Stoke-on-Trent, was quoted thus in The Daily Mail:

"I am absolutely furious MY DAUGHTER WAS MADE TO TAKE PART in it and I don't find it acceptable… Not only did they have to pray, the teacher had gone into the class and made them watch a short film and then SAID 'WE ARE NOW GOING OUT TO PRAY TO ALLAH'.

THEN TWO BOYS GOT DETENTION AND ALL THE OTHER CHILDREN MISSED THEIR REFRESHMENT BREAK BECAUSE OF THE TEACHER. NOT ONLY WAS IT FORCED UPON THEM, MY DAUGHTER WAS TOLD OFF FOR NOT DOING IT RIGHT…

MY CHILD HAS BEEN FORCED TO PRAY TO ALLAH IN A SCHOOL LESSON."

Sharon Luinen, another parent, added:

"This isn't right, it's taking things too far… It is taking it a step too far to be punished because they wouldn't join in Muslim prayer. MAKING THEM PRAY TO ALLAH... is wrong and what got me is that THEY WERE TOLD THEY WERE BEING DISRESPECTFUL"

The grandfather of one of the pupils said:

"IT'S ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING... MY DAUGHTER AND A LOT OF OTHER MOTHERS ARE FURIOUS ABOUT THEIR CHILDREN BEING MADE TO KNEEL ON THE FLOOR AND PRAY TO ISLAM. IF THEY DIDN'T DO IT THEY WERE GIVEN DETENTION…

IF MUSLIMS WERE ASKED TO GO TO CHURCH ON SUNDAY AND TAKE HOLY COMMUNION THERE WOULD BE WAR."

A statement from Cheshire County Council on behalf of the school said this:

"EDUCATING CHILDREN IN THE BELIEFS OF DIFFERENT FAITH IS PART OF THE DIVERSITY CURRICULUM on the basis that knowledge is essential to understanding."



On 21 June 2008, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:

"THIS IS THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT SINCE OLIVER CROMWELL, DEDICATED TO OVERTHROWING THE MORAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ORDER OF THIS COUNTRY… The truth is – and I know it because I was a Sixties Trotskyist myself – that THE BLAIR-BROWN LABOUR PARTY IS CRAMMED FULL OF UNREFORMED REVOLUTIONARIES. THAT’S WHY THE MI5 FILES OF THAT ERA HAVE BEEN SO ZEALOUSLY DESTROYED.

I tried to obtain my own docket and was refused on feeble grounds. The fact is that mine went in the incinerator ALONG WITH PETER MANDELSON’S, JOHN REID’S AND MANY OTHERS whose interesting pasts are much-rumoured around Westminster…

But now you don’t have to take my word for it. Last week, my lonely warnings were confirmed in an astonishing public statement by Tony McNulty, Minister of State at the Home Office… Believing that everyone there was a Leftist like him, he tried to win them over with these words:

'I KNOW IT’S TERRIBLY HARD TO BELIEVE BUT I USED TO BE RADICAL MYSELF… LIKE A LOT OF GOVERNMENT, I’M AN EX-TROT’…

Looking at the bland, prosperous faces of the Parliamentary Labour Party I see my generation, THE ONES WHO BETWEEN ABOUT 1965 AND 1975 LEARNED TO LOATHE PATRIOTISM, THE ARMED FORCES, PROPER POLICING, PROPER SCHOOLS, TRADITIONAL RELIGION, MARRIAGE, THE MONARCHY AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT ‘ALTERNATIVE’ COMEDIANS ARE PAID HANDSOMELY TO SNEER AT ON THE BBC...

TROTSKY WOULD HAVE APPROVED".

Though Lenin has been given the credit as leader of the Bolshevik revolution, Trotsky did more than any other to make it happen.

He raised many millions of dollars from American businessmen, without which there wouldn't have been a revolution, and, through the campaigns of terror he ordered and organised as Head of the Red Army, all resistance was crushed and Bolshevik rule established.



On 17 June 2008, the Scottish comedian Frankie Boyle said this on BBC Radio 4's Political Animal:

"I've been studying Israeli Army Martial Arts. I NOW KNOW 18 WAYS TO KICK A PALESTINIAN WOMAN IN THE BACK.

People think that the Middle East is very complex but I have an analogy that sums it up quite well. If you imagine that Palestine is a big cake, well... THAT CAKE IS BEING PUNCHED TO PIECES BY A VERY ANGRY JEW”.

After one person complained that Frankie's remarks were anti-Semitic, in December 2008, the BBC's editorial complaints unit said that the use of the word "Jew" was "inappropriate and offensive". The finding was endorsed by the editorial standards committee, which apologised.

However, as the BBC was not prepared to issue an online or on-air apology or correction, the complainant was not satisfied and, consequently, raised the matter with the BBC Trust.

On 28 April 2010, the Editorial Standards Committee of the Trust, ultimate arbiter in the BBC complaints process, apologised, saying that it endorsed the earlier finding about the use of the word "Jew", and added:

"As a result, the committee wished to apologise to the complainant on behalf of the BBC for any offence the remark may have caused him and other listeners to the programme".

Frankie Boyle was appalled that the BBC should have thought it necessary to apologise and, subsequently, said this:

“The show's producers will have thought that Israel, AN AGGRESSIVE, TERRORIST STATE WITH A NUCLEAR ARSENAL was an appropriate target for satire. The Trust's ruling is essentially a note from their line managers. It says that IF YOU IMAGINE THAT A STATE BUSILY GOING ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF AN ENTIRE PEOPLE IS FAIR GAME, YOU ARE MISTAKEN.

ISRAEL IS OUT OF BOUNDS.

The BBC refused to broadcast a humanitarian appeal in 2009 to help residents of Gaza rebuild their homes. It's tragic for such a great institution but IT IS NOW CRAVENLY AFRAID OF GIVING OFFENCE AND VULNERABLE TO ANY KIND OF WELL DRILLED LOBBYING…

The situation in Palestine seems to be, in essence, APARTHEID. I grew up with the anti apartheid thing being a huge focus of debate. It really seemed to matter to everybody that other human beings were being treated in that way. We didn't just talk about it, we did things, I remember boycotts and marches and demos all being held because we couldn't bear that people were being treated like that.

A few years ago I watched a documentary about life in Palestine.

There's a section where a UN dignitary of some kind comes to do a photo opportunity outside a new hospital. THE STAFF KNOW THAT IT COMMUNICATES NOTHING OF THE REAL DESPERATION OF THEIR POSITION, so they trick her into a side ward on her way out. She ends up in a room with a child who the doctors explain is in a critical condition because they don't have the supplies to keep treating him. She flounders, awkwardly caught in the bleak reality of the room, mouthing platitudes over a dying boy.

The filmmaker asks one of the doctors what they think the stunt will have achieved. He is suddenly angry…

‘SHE WILL DO NOTHING,’ he says to the filmmaker. Then he looks into the camera and says:

‘NEITHER WILL YOU’.

I cried at that and promised myself that I would do something. Other than write a few stupid jokes I have not done anything.

NEITHER HAVE YOU.”

Good for you, Frankie.

The more those with a public platform speak out, the sooner will the sleeping majority awaken from their media-driven, "out-of-bounds" slumber.

When the unflattering truths are being told, the censors may, for now, shut the door on the truth-teller. But, with a world of honest men banging on the door, it won’t stay closed forever.



On 5 June 2008, in front of hundreds of pro-Israel lobbyists, the Presidential hopeful addressed the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee Conference:

"I will do everything in my power to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, everything…

Let there be no doubt: I WILL ALWAYS KEEP THE THREAT OF MILITARY ACTION ON THE TABLE TO DEFEND OUR SECURITY AND OUR ALLY, ISRAEL."

Thus spake Barrack Obama.



On 27 May 2008, former Europe Minister and arch-Blairite, Denis MacShane, confessed thus in The Daily Telegraph:

“I do not know of a single minister who privately does not despair at THE WASTE OF MONEY ON POINTLESS PROJECTS, PUBLICATIONS, OR LEGIONS OF PRESS OFFICERS THAT ADD NO VALUE. THE TAXPAYER HAS GIVEN MORE THAN £1 BILLION OF AID TO INDIA, even though that great country has MORE BILLIONAIRES AND MILLIONAIRES THAN BRITAIN AND RUNS ITS OWN WELL-FINANCED DEVELOPMENT AID PROGRAMME.”

MacShane is the son of an Irish mother and a Polish father.

He was born Denis Matyjaszek.



On 28 January 2008, Peter Oborne said this in The Daily Mail:

"For centuries the Lords has been a beacon of integrity. Now it is a byword for sleaze. This is Blair's REAL legacy...

BLAIR INSTALLED AN ARMY OF PLACEMEN AND POLITICAL STOOGES ON A SCALE UNPRECEDENTED IN MODERN BRITISH HISTORY. Astonishingly, ALMOST HALF OF THE CURRENT 732 STRONG MEMBERSHIP OF THE LORDS WERE CREATED BY TONY BLAIR — A TOTAL OF SOME 357 PEERS IN ALL…

He rarely, if ever, appointed distinguished men and women who would add to the stock of national wisdom. Instead, SELECTED CRONIES WHO WOULD SERVE HIS OWN NARROW, SHODDY, PARTISAN INTEREST WERE REWARDED WITH A PLACE ON THE RED LEATHER BENCHES.
THE FIRST CATEGORY OF THESE CRONIES AND PLACEMEN WERE THOSE WHO PURCHASED THEIR PEERAGES WITH GENEROUS DONATIONS TO LABOUR PARTY FUNDS...

INSTEAD OF BEING LOOKED UP TO WITH ADMIRATION AND RESPECT, THE BRITISH POLITICAL SYSTEM IS TURNING INTO AN OBJECT OF INTERNATIONAL CONTEMPT. WE HAVE TONY BLAIR TO THANK FOR THAT.” More...



On 17 September 2007, Alan Greenspan, former head of the Federal Reserve in America, was quoted thus by The Daily Telegraph:

"Britain's evolution from one of the most ossified economies in the years following World War II to one of the most open economies in the world is reflected in the intellectual journey of Gordon Brown."

In his book Age of Turbulence, Adventures in a New World, Greenspan says wee Gordie was a strong ally when it came to sitting down with other finance ministers and bankers at the Group of Seven meetings of rich industrial countries. After praising him for his commitment to "globalisation and free markets", the fact that he "did not seem interested in reversing much of what Margaret Thatcher had changed" and turning Britain into "the most open economy in the world", Greenspan added:

"He was a great support in 'proselytising about flexibility'... You haven't had a taint of a recession for an extremely long period of time, and a good part of that is the flexibility that came out of the crush between Scargill and Thatcher. That was the defining moment, and to their credit Blair and Brown did not endeavour to unwind it. They recognised that there was something fundamentally good for British labour in having a flexible economy."

Tell that to the out-of-work, Alan.

Tell it to the futureless kids on drugs. Greenspan also said:

"It's like tough love, as we call it. It's unhappy-making, but in the end it works."

It's unhappy-making, Alan, and, in the end, it works for money-men like you, Blair and Brown, but for the futureless kids? - Bulls**t!

Greenspan finished his Telegraph conversation by saying:

"I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil".

Which is true.

However, the former head of the Fed Res wasn't inclined to point out that most of the Neoconservatives, who were responsible for encouraging the most intellectually challenged US President in history into making war upon Iraq, were Jewish. And thus it could be just as easy to point out what everyone also knows: the Iraq war is largely about Israel as well.

This is not something that a bloke like Greenspan was ever going to be likely to "acknowledge". You see, he is Jewish too.



On 13 September 2007, Franco Frattini, the European Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security and one of five vice-presidents of the 27-member Barroso Commission, said this at a conference in Lisbon, Portugal:

"WE HAVE TO LOOK AT IMMIGRATION AS AN ENRICHMENT AND AS A INESCAPABLE PHENOMENON OF TODAY'S WORLD, not as a threat.”

Tell that to the ghosts of those who have been murdered by your non-threatening enrichers in recent times, Franco.

Tell it to all of those who have been raped, prostituted, robbed, introduced to drugs, beaten up and otherwise abused by your deliberately created ‘inescapable phenomenon.’

Just in case you are not aware, ladies and gents, the ‘phenomenon’ was deliberately created by the global elite in order to entrench their one-world-ruled-by-THEM-forever vision. The immigrant is their foot soldier as they wage their never-ending war upon the indigenous peoples of the western world.

You and your ‘phenomenon’ are at war with us Franco. Some of us are aware of this now. Many more will come to know it in the future.



"I'm proud to welcome to Downing Street the most inspiring, the greatest and most courageous leader of our generation… I'm looking forward also to the statue being inaugurated in your honour tomorrow in London."

Prime Minister Gordon Brown welcoming Nelson Mandela to Downing Street – BBC News – 28 August 2007.

It followed a five-year row over the location of the statue. Ken Livingstone had wanted it to be put up in Trafalgar Square.

For an alternative appreciation of Mandela's impact upon history, go here:

http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=128&iParentId=19



"Is it any wonder if, heaven forbid, soldiers are killed in a war? They don't observe the Sabbath, they don't observe the Torah, they don't pray, they don't put on phylacteries every day. Is it any wonder that they're killed? It's no wonder. May the Almighty have mercy on them and bring them back to religion."

Rabbi Yosef, Ovadia Yosef, spiritual leader of the orthodox Jewish party Shas, and former Chief Rabbi of Israel - August 25 2007 - reported by BBC News - 27 August 2007.

In other words you Israeli lads, if you're not an observant Jew, you've had it. If you are, on the other hand, you won't get shot!



"There is still a majority of honest and hard-working MPs in the House of Commons. But it is also a refuge of last resort for an eclectic collection of creeps, cranks and careerists. I was permanently astonished by the willingness of so many to put their consciences into storage and vote for measures they did not believe in and against those they did."

Martin Bell - The Daily Mail - 25 August 2007.

Bell added:

"I sat in astonishment as I watched another MP trade his vote for a peerage. There was no doubt about it, he knew exactly what he was doing. He had a reputation for integrity and the issue was one on which his vote would carry some weight. The Whips were watching. The MP in question justified it on an argument of unity and the debt that he owed to his party. Now grandly titled, he sits in the House of Lords.

On becoming the independent MP for Tatton, Cheshire, in May 1997, I watched and listened to get the feel of the place and judge what kind of parliament it was. After a couple of months, the uneasy feeling dawned on me that it resembled nothing so much as the old East German Volkskammer, where the system counted for everything and the people for nothing; where the place was stuffed to the rafters with stooges and the parties were mere husks of what they pretended to be...

In May 1997, Labour swept into power on a tide of popular rebellion against Tory 'sleaze', both real and perceived, and on the offer of a different kind of politics. Its manifesto promised: 'We will clean up politics.'

Those words hang in the air to this day. Did New Labour's leaders really say that and did they mean it? The answer to the first is yes, to the second no...
Sir Alistair Graham, chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, was among those pushed overboard. On leaving office earlier this year, he said:
'My greatest regret has been the apparent failure to persuade the Government to place high ethical standards at the heart of its thinking and, most importantly, behaviour'...

Apart from the Iraq disaster, on the issue on which (the Blair government) was elected, public trust in public life, its record was wholly and unforgivably negative. It traded in patronage. It squandered a golden opportunity to draw people in and reinvent the entire culture of politics. It even dodged the effect of its own reforms on party funding. And this was the party that declared:
'Our mission in politics is to rebuild the bond of trust between government and the people'...

The Labour scandals reached right into the heart of Government, touching senior Ministers, some of whom were repeat offenders. Some survived, others did not. Blair was judge and jury on allegations of ministerial misconduct. He ruled like the Sun King, Louis XIV. He saw no reason, he said, to fine-tune the code. But when an MP was accused of breaking the rules of the House of Commons, then that was a matter for the House itself...

For three-and-a-half years I sat on the Standards and Privileges Committee as a parade of MPs came before us, including some Ministers of the Crown. It was instructive to see which of the committee's 11 members left their party allegiances at the door. There was a group who were consistently sympathetic to Labour MPs, especially those of Ministerial rank, accused of a breach of the code of conduct...
This was also the Parliament that undermined its own Standards Commissioner, Elizabeth Filkin, with a disgraceful whispering campaign against her by Ministers and backbenchers. She was eventually let go for doing her job too well. This also undermined trust in the House of Commons. I doubt if it can be restored under the present Speaker, Michael Martin...

Large sums of money flowed from wealthy individuals to political parties. The leaders of those parties nominated the donors and lenders for high honours. On the face of it, it was a clear case of corruption. So arise, Lord Megabucks. Step this way, Lady Cashpoint. The means are there to secure you a seat at the grander end of the Palace of Westminster...

The irony was that Blair was a most gifted apologiser. But he apologised only for the things he did not do, such as the slave trade or the shooting of Army deserters. He was unrepentant about the things that he did, such as trading in peerages or waging illegal wars. Here was a man who sent the Armed Forces to war on the basis of a grand self-deception...

To the end of his premiership he retained his faith – not a soldier's faith, but a civilian's – in the effectiveness of hard power. He never understood that the weapons of shock and awe, deployed in a war among the people, recruit more than they kill. And military commanders are not magicians: they are the managers of organised violence. The 15th Century Dutch scholar Desiderius Erasmus said war is sweet to those with no experience of it. Neither Blair nor anyone in his Government – not a single Minister at any level – has ever worn the Queen's uniform or known anything of the reality of warfare...

The untold story of the war in Iraq was the mood of unease that turned to anger among the soldiers sent to fight it. They were in the front line as the politicians were not. As soon as it was clear that the weapons of mass destruction did not exist, there was a groundswell of disquiet in the ranks of the Armed Forces, especially the Army...

On a visit to Basra last December, I met old friends from earlier conflicts I had covered for the BBC. They had the gravest doubts about this one and were well aware that their lives were on the line every day for no sufficient reason. Many were on their third or even fourth tour of duty in Iraq. One was an officer who had seen the conflict through all its phases, from liberation to occupation, and from shock and awe to hearts and minds to a qualified cut and run.

'I'll tell you what this feels like,' he said. 'It's like being a German in the Wehrmacht in France in the Second World War. We, too, are an occupation force. That's how it seems to me'...

Today's Army represents the best of British, as the House of Commons does not. Never in my lifetime has the Army been so overstretched and over-committed, undervalued and under-equipped, ill-directed and ill-used. This has happened on New Labour's watch.

The new politics that we were promised back in 1997 turned out to be the old politics redecorated with bells and whistles, Cool Britannia, surfeits of spin, glittering promises and a great cascade of peerages...

Step by step and surge by surge, the parallels between Vietnam and Iraq grow ever closer. But there is not yet a memorial wall to those who have died in Iraq. It is still too soon. We have no idea of the size of wall we shall need. We owe it to future generations to explain why. We cannot do so without a full accounting by those responsible."

Yeah, tw*ts, aren't they, Martin?



"This week it was announced that more Britons are leaving - or should that read fleeing? - the country than at any time since the great exodus to Australia in the 1960s. So much has now become hateful here that, for the first time in my life, I feel like joining them".

Philip Norman - The Daily Mail - 25 August 2007.

Norman also said this:

"When an 11-year-old boy is gunned down, you have to ask what kind of country Britain has become?... And what kind of people we have turned into. As 11-year-old Rhys Jones innocently kicked a football round the carpark of a Liverpool pub on Wednesday evening, he was shot in the neck by a teenager in a hoodie top, who then fled the scene on a BMX bike. Rhys died there in the car park, cradled in the arms of his mother, Melanie.

These horrific events come so thick and fast, and so surpass one another in pointless savagery, that their victims' names fade from the collective memory in days, even hours…

Twenty-odd years ago, I returned to live in Britain after spending 18 months in New York. I remember with what relief I left the Big Apple's supersized danger and hysteria for what seemed, by comparison, a quiet, wet, green little island in the Atlantic where nothing could really harm you. While discovering the fundamental heartlessness of American life, I had appreciated, as never before, the ancient British qualities of self control, politeness and kindness. And, believe it or not, in the Eighties they were all still largely intact. A few days after my homecoming, I remember stopping on a street in Central London, struck by how normal and civilised everyone looked. All of which set me thinking this week about just how much our national character has changed over the past 20 years; how we have lost, or deliberately discarded, so many of the qualities which once made us unique in every positive way; how Britishness is increasingly equated with brutishness. What we once watched in American films about New York's Lower East Side is now in our midst, wherever we live…

Teenage gang warfare - of which Rhys was probably an innocent victim - and gun and knife-crime, are steeply on the rise, and admitted by the Government to be so, even as we are simultaneously assured that crime figures are 'falling'. The hearts of major cities, even of once-tranquil country towns, are turned into no-go areas by drunken, rampaging hordes every weekend. Elderly people are afraid to venture out of their homes after dark.

The threat of mindless violence hangs over everyone who deals with the public, from shopkeepers, taxi-drivers and railway employees to schoolteachers and NHS workers. This is not just paranoia. Paranoia is unjustified. But no one can say that the fear most Britons live in today is without reason - and everyone has their own story to tell.

On New Year's Eve two years ago, in our North London neighbourhood, a teenage boy had to be hospitalised after being beaten up. His crime? Calling out 'Happy New Year' to a passing car…

Everywhere, there is a callousness, a contempt for human feelings, which was never there before. Nowadays, British visitors to New York return marvelling at the city's atmosphere of relative calm and the politeness and helpfulness of its inhabitants...

The most obvious cause of all this is the tide of alcohol swilling through the country, deepened by the Blair government's insane sanctioning of round-the-clock pub opening… Never in my lifetime has the country had a drink problem this obvious - the boozing crowds too big for most pubs to hold, and so have to spill out onto the pavement; the pretty young girls as well as silly-macho boys, screaming, fighting, puking, publicly urinating or passing out in the gutter…

Police, though plentiful enough in their sherbet lemon flak jackets during terrorist emergencies, have virtually disappeared from our streets on a daily basis, preferring to stay inside their dwindling number of stations occupied with paperwork or fatuous PR. Beat bobbies of the old school used to discourage much casual yobbery by their very presence, supplemented by the occasional judicious clip around the ear. Instead, they now give out referee's red cards or Asbos that the yobs regard as badges of honour, or attempt to gain street-cred by patrolling on skateboards.

Last weekend, yet another socalled "think tank" recycled the current wisdom that more police on the streets would not help. Everyone but ivory-tower academics and mindless cost-cutters knows this is nonsense. Near the spot where Rhys Jones was murdered, a mobile police station had been promised - but was then scaled down to yet another CCTV camera."

It's called war, Mr Norman.

THEY are at war with us. THEY being the PC Crowd, the politicians and the media darlings. You're a media darling, aren't you? How many times have you mentioned this stuff since you've been a journalist? I can assure you that this has been happening for a very long time now. I reckon you're writing about it at present because it's getting closer to the leafy suburb where you live.

Welcome to our world, Mr Norman.



"The father of Gordon Brown's new International Development Minister Baroness Shriti Vadera owns a Ugandan tea plantation where workers earn as little as 62p a day. Nicknamed 'Shriti the Shriek' for her vocal demands on civil servants, Lady Vadera, 45, was appointed by Mr Brown in the reshuffle after he became Prime Minister.

The former investment banker has worked for Mr Brown for the past eight years and been regarded as a key part of his 'magic circle' of advisers".

The Daily Mail - 25 August 2007.



"In light of the current international climate, it was insensitive and in bad taste. I cannot believe they thought people were going to laugh. No one would want to curtail freedom of speech, but it's hard to differentiate this from downright bullying."

The Reverend Chris McQuillen-Wright, of St Columb Minor parish church, venting his feelings towards the organisers and participants in the annual St Columb Major carnival - The Independent - 24 August 2007.

Taking part in the parade, some of the villagers had entered as the "Page Three Beauties from the Ramalama Ding-Dong Times", "Miss Hairyarmpitsbad", "Miss Slackistan", "Miss Notbadinbedabad", "Miss Reallyamanistan" and "the Burka Beauties".

As they walked the one-mile parade route, the group knelt down in mock prayer and used fake compasses to try to find Mecca. Their routine impressed carnival judges - a mayor, two district councillors and a parish councillor - and they were shortlisted for the "best entry" prize. But before any awards were handed out, police told the group to leave after complaints about racism.

Nina Brenton said:

"We were approached by about six students from out of the area and they thought it was disgusting and offensive to Muslims. They asked how we could allow it in our carnival... Everybody was having fun, but in the end the police got involved and moved them on."

Fareed Ahmad, President of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Association for Devon and Cornwall, said:

"With carnivals it's quite difficult to judge between humour and causing offence, and on this occasion it looks like they have that balance wrong."

Yep, I guess you would say that, wouldn't you, Fareed.

I'll tell you what I'd say:

"If you don't like it, leave. And take the Reverend Chris and the 6 students with you".



"Infectious diseases are spreading faster than ever before, the World Health Organization annual report says.

WITH ABOUT 2.1 BILLION AIRLINE PASSENGERS FLYING EACH YEAR, THERE IS A HIGH RISK OF ANOTHER MAJOR EPIDEMIC SUCH AS AIDS, SARS OR EBOLA FEVER.

In the report, A Safer Future, the WHO says new diseases are emerging at the 'historically unprecedented' rate of one per year. Since the 1970s, 39 new diseases have developed, and in the last five years alone, the WHO has identified more than 1,100 epidemics including cholera, polio and bird flu.

'It would be extremely naive and complacent to assume that there will not be another disease like Aids, another Ebola, or another Sars, sooner or later,' the report says…
The WHO report also URGES GOVERNMENT TO BE MORE OPEN ABOUT DISEASE OUTBREAKS, saying nearly half of all outbreak alerts it receives come from the media."

BBC News - 23 August 2007.



"Everyone at CBBC is either gay or childless and don't like kids".

Kirsten O'Brien, a BBC presenter - Daily Mail - 21 August 2007.



"Black boys go backwards when they get to secondary school. It's a cultural problem. It's the absence of fathers who are actively involved in parenting... There is a particular point in teenagers' development, of young men, where fathers are very important and they are more likely to be absent in the case of the Afro-Caribbean."

Jack Straw - BBC Radio 4's Today - 21 August 2007.

Thus spake a man who has always fiercely championed the rights of the black community and did his best to succour and promote black values throughout the whole of his career.



"The people of colour are under-represented at every level of government."

Reverend Jesse Jackson - BBC News - 21 August 2007.

Jackson was visiting the UK to launch Equanomics UK, a programme insisting that ethnics squeeze more out of us than they already have.



"The reality of crime and lawlessness is that there is anarchy on our streets. Unless we try to reverse this, the next two generations of children will be behaving even worse."

The Victims of Crime Trust - Daily Mirror - 20 August 2007.



"Redheads could be extinct in 100 years".

Daily Mail headline – 20 August 2007.



"Fear of antagonising the Muslim community has put the country's security at risk from Islamic terrorists...

The Balkanisation of our lives is happening on a national scale. Here, the most obvious disconnection is between the rich and the rest. An old story, but the difference today is that the fate of those at the top is divorced from those lower down...

Everything's geared to the needs of the drinker and consumer, and little to the couple with the buggy. On top of all this is the growing disconnection between politics and the people. And the more fractured we become, the greater our pretence of togetherness to cover it up. That's why the Government bangs on about 'community' and has tried so hard to ignore the problems caused by immigration.

Imagine my astonishment when the Minister responsible, Liam Byrne, actually admitted recently that large-scale immigration has profoundly unsettled the country - and that it's the poorest communities that have suffered the most. The influx was overwhelming public services, schools, the NHS and housing, he said. If Labour failed to address public concern, he concluded, it could lose the next election.

I couldn't have put what Byrne was plucky enough to say better myself. But what is extraordinary is the lack of reaction to his words. Where are the columns and editorials and BBC programmes saying that the Government has gone racist? To complete this outburst of honesty, Byrne should have acknowledged that it's the rich who stand to gain from the profits of low-paid labour. But it would have raised the cry:

'So why in God's name have you done it - and why are you letting more in?'

And now local councils are up in arms, saying the Office of National Statistics does not have a clue about the number of people - for whom local services are required - who are entering the country. Meanwhile, the Government continues to pour billions into the NHS. That's supposed to be another success story, but nobody can really explain where all the money's going, let alone why it's so hard to keep our hospitals clean.

It's a strange society we're building. You can't avoid the conclusion that the way to avoid all the inequities and social fractiousness is simple: be rich. Then you can flash those beneath you a benign, ingratiating smile - and have as little as possible to do with them.

There's a new brand of social selfishness about, a kind of 'Sod you Jack, I'm all right' attitude…

It's lunacy to go on promising free medical treatment for all-comers, but we do. It's against every tenet of common sense to have mixed-ability classes, but in the delirium of our class consciousness, we persist.

Doing away with most of our manufacturing base is reckless economic behaviour but the moderate British have done that, too. The income gap, house prices and mass immigration - they're all examples of national excess.

Wherever you look, crazy systems have replaced our old prudent-minded approach.
Look at families. Instead of beginning with the self-evident proposition that two parents are better than one, we start at the other end. The result is that we insist on individual rights to the exclusion of everyone else's interests, including the child's. As a result, we have more single parents, more teenage pregnancies, more adolescent misfits and more destitute families than anyone in Europe...

Politics or parenting, schools or Scotland, wherever you look, very little seems to be holding things together. People live side by side yet separately, in mental isolation, with their eyes fixed warily on one another.

When communities, races, classes and families become segregated to the degree they have, feelings of social solidarity erode. Society ends up like a shattered windscreen: holding together by the grace of God, even though it's all cracked to hell, so no one can see ahead or have any idea where they are going".

George Walden, former Minister in Margaret Thatcher's government, in the follow up to his book, Guy and Catherine - The Daily Mail - 17 August 2007.



"We have to prepare for the worst and the worst is war."

Bernard Kouchner threatening Iran - Le Figaro - 16 August 2007.

Kouchner added:

"Iran does whatever it pleases in Iraq ... One cannot find in the entire world a crisis greater than this one."

French President Nikolas Sarkozy chose Kouchner as his first Foreign Minister.
The fathers of both Sarkozy and Kouchner are Jewish.



"Life is not the same, to be honest with you, since I brought them back. I was subjected to threats. I was told they wanted to punish my family and make a horrible example of my son - they would do to him what they did to Kriss Donald. I received threats to my life, to murder my sons, to murder my grandchildren".

Mohammed Sarwar, the UK's first Muslim MP, describing why he resigned as an MP - Front Page Mag.com - 16 August 2007.

On 14 March 2004, when five Muslim men were cruising around Glasgow looking for someone white to kill. They chose 15-year-old schoolboy, Kriss Donald. Kriss was taken on a 200-mile round trip, subjected to indescribable torture, which included castration and repeated stabbing. Eventually, they drove to a garbage dump, doused him with petrol and set him on fire.

Within days the cops arrested two of the killers but the other three managed to flee to Pakistan. At this point that Mohammad Sarwar intervened. He traveled to Pakistan and used his contacts to arrange for the murderers to be sent back to Britain. Once returned, they were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Many of Sarwar's fellow Muslims did not appreciate his efforts. Fear of reprisals for helping to get three lovely, fluffy Paki murderers returned to Britain made Sarwar decide not to seek re-election.

Sarwar is the first MP in modern history to be forced out of office by death threat.



"The police have lost control of the streets. I see things every day where older people, who perhaps don't realise how things can escalate, tut at people when they shouldn't".

A London policeman – This is Local London – 16 August 2007.

The former detective spoke out during a television debate about the death of Evren Anil, who was attacked after he complained when a youth tossed a half-eaten chocolate bar into his girlfriend’s car.



"It has a rapidly changing population. Over the past few years it has changed from being a completely white area to a very multi-cultural society."

Councillor Barry Poulton, who represents the Barking ward where Congolese immigrant, Ntsimbi Galacia, stabbed her two-year-old daughter, Tricia, to death - 24dash.com - 14 August 2007.

Galacia had been reported to police several times just before she killed her daughter, indeed she was arrested by police last week for harassing Huseyin Alacayir with claims that he was the father of her daughter. Huseyin said:

"She was telling me I was her husband and I needed to go home because the kid needed me. She was shouting... She was barred from the shop about one and a half weeks ago because she kept coming in and acting like I'm her husband...

We told police that something was going to happen to the kid at the end of the day."

Ranjan Sinnathurai, manager of the Lucky Wines store, said the woman was always "making trouble" and locals were very worried for her daughter.

A local barber said he called the police after the woman turned up at his shop on Saturday. He added:

"In the end I had to call the police to get her removed."

The police had previously referred her to a mental health team who concluded just 5 days beforehand that she was not suffering from a mental health disorder and took no further action.

Earlier in the month another insane black woman was found guilty of killing her baby. Social services insisted that she be allowed to see her child even though the father had repeatedly warned them that she was not to be trusted.

"It has a rapidly changing population. Over the past few years it has changed from being a completely white area to a very multi-cultural society."

It is interesting that Barking should be chosen as a dumping ground for immigrants by the government. You see, there are more BNP councillors in Barking than anywhere else.



"Doctors and health workers have been banned from eating lunch at their desks - in case it offends their Muslim colleagues. Health chiefs believe the sight of food will upset Muslim workers when they are celebrating the religious festival Ramadan. The lunch trolley is also to be wheeled out of bounds as the 30-day fast begins next month."

Daily Express - 13 August 2007.

Na’eem Raza, a senior consultant with Meem, the firm that produced the PC, pro-Muslim guidance for distribution throughout the NHS in Scotland, said:

"In the current climate, people need to understand where communities are coming from and what people are feeling... This is about educating people and making them more aware... when dealing with issues surrounding the Muslim community... Faith is an important issue. Why not have guidance on all of the issues that affect us?"

NHS Lothian said:

"We have recently agreed a quality and diversity strategy and as a responsible and pro-active employer we will continue to promote a positive culture which recognises and respects diversity."

One senior consultant said:

“What next? Are we going to have advice on how to deal with Catholics during Lent? This kind of thing does more harm than good.”

Harm is what Na'eem Raza the PC Crowd are good at.

Harm is what they're after.



"Doctors and health workers have been banned from eating lunch at their desks - in case it offends their Muslim colleagues. Health chiefs believe the sight of food will upset Muslim workers when they are celebrating the religious festival Ramadan. The lunch trolley is also to be wheeled out of bounds as the 30-day fast begins next month."

Daily Express - 13 August 2007.

Na’eem Raza, a senior consultant with Meem, the firm that produced the PC, pro-Muslim guidance for distribution throughout the NHS in Scotland, said:

"In the current climate, people need to understand where communities are coming from and what people are feeling... This is about educating people and making them more aware... when dealing with issues surrounding the Muslim community... Faith is an important issue. Why not have guidance on all of the issues that affect us?"
NHS Lothian said:

"We have recently agreed a quality and diversity strategy and as a responsible and pro-active employer we will continue to promote a positive culture which recognises and respects diversity."

One senior consultant said:

“What next? Are we going to have advice on how to deal with Catholics during Lent? This kind of thing does more harm than good.”

Harm is what Na'eem Raza the PC Crowd are good at.

Harm is what they're after.



"The overseas students were generally less bad and the worst were UK raised and usually of British ancestry. There was little evidence of students being taught the relevant rules at school, or of the students having been corrected for obvious and frequent errors. Many did not even regard these errors as important.

The Government and the educational establishment need to be shaken out of their current complacency about standards of English by constant exposure to evidence such as that presented here from intelligent and highly-qualified undergraduates."

Dr Bernard Lamb, a reader in genetics at Imperial College London, commenting on the lack of understanding of basic English of many Blair-taught ("education, education, education") British students - Daily Mail - 13 August 2007.



"Scotland Yard has just completed the task of counting how many street gangs there are in London.

The results are staggering: there are more than 170, some of them up to 100-strong. It means on any given night, several thousand gang members are roaming the capital, many of them thirsting for violence. In other British cities, notably Manchester, Liverpool, Glasgow and Birmingham, there is a frighteningly similar picture".

Daily Telegraph - 12 August 2007.



"The enemy is managing to pick our troops off one by one.”

Tory MP, Patrick Mercer, a former lieutenant-colonel of the Worcestershire and Sherwood Foresters Regiment, describing the situation in Iraq after two more British soldiers had just been killed - Sunday Express - 10 August 2007.

Mercer added:

"We just don’t have enough troops. Every battalion that we do send out there is hideously under-strength."



"The doctor was simply unable to speak English well enough to do his job properly. He came in like a scared rabbit and couldn't get out of the house quick enough."

Renee Forrow, describing how a Polish doctor had her fill in her own husband's death certificate because he he could not speak or write adequate English - Daily Mail - 10 August 2007.

Renee also said that the doctor made clumsy remarks which suggested that she might have given her husband an overdose of morphine. She added:

"It should have been a dignified process, but then it turned into a Monty Python farce. It was just ridiculous".



“This makes a complete mockery of Gordon Brown’s claim... The real jobless total now exceeds four million and more young people are not in work.”

Philip Hammond, Shadow Chief Treasury Secretary - The Sun - 10 August 2007.

After the government pointed out that the number of people in full-time work has risen by 2.5 million since 1997 and 61 per cent of these full-time workers were newly-arrived foreigners, Hammond told us that Gordon Brown had promised, "British jobs for British workers”, just 2 months earlier.

These foreigners have been employed as FOUR MILLION Britons were left jobless or "inactive". This figure includes 1.3million people under the age of 25 not in work, training or full-time education.

"What, is the guy dead or something?"

Ebanezer Adesina's reply to commuters after beating up 62-year-old grandfather and charity worker, Roger Hare, and walking away - Daily Mail - 8 August 2007.

Roger had politely asked Adasina to move his legs, which were blocking the exit, as he went to get off a tube train at West Dulwich station.

When a woman asked him why he was going, Adesina replied:

"What's the point, he's dead already."

Roger's injuries were so serious he was on a life support machine for a week.



"It is estimated that about 1,000 people with a military background - most of whom were in the Army - are homeless in London on any given night... We are talking about people who have put their lives on the line for their country".

James Ward, a spokesman for the Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation, an organisation that cares for ex-servicemen - 24dash.com - 7 August 2007.

1-in-10 of Britain's homeless are ex-servicemen.



"People forget them, because they don't appear in the casualty figures. They are the forgotten victims."

Donna Mahoney, as she laid a wreath at the grave of her husband, a Territorial Army soldier who killed himself in 2004 after returning from Iraq - Daily Mail - 6 August 2007.

Psychiatrist Alan Penny, a senior trauma therapist for Assist, a charity helping servicemen and women with psychological problems, said this:

"There are no provisions at all in the Army for dealing with traumatic stress. These soldiers witness unthinkable horrors and then are expected to return to normal...

Thirty per cent of soldiers will suffer from traumatic stress or other related problems, so it is essential something is done. I have been urging the MoD for years to do something, but our organisation keeps getting fobbed off with letters. Not doing anything is dangerous for all the soldiers, as the longer it is left, the worse the symptoms become."



"Britain in the 21st century is best represented by a multicultural society, 'chavs' and Kate Moss, according to a survey".

News Shopper - 6 August 2007.



"Indigenous Brits are becoming more delightfully open when it comes to love and sex".

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown - The Independent - 6 August 2007.

YAB forgot to add, "and breeding themselves out of existence".

The above comment was made after she had described "our own dreadful Asian predjudices" as exemplified in an ICM survey of 18-to 34-year-olds for the BBC Asian Network. YAB stated:

"Most white Britons - a whopping 87 per cent - would happily marry out and between 78 and 83 per cent would date people from outside their own race. Depressingly, the same survey shows that only 53 per cent of Asians say they would marry outside their communities and between 44 and 53 per cent would date non-Asians".

Later in the article YAB gets down to the usual Brit-bashing:

"Miscegenation in the British colonies was often about control and power. Masters and mistresses used their slaves for violent sex and uptight colonials sought furtive sexual release with 'submissive' and obliging natives. The centuries of imperial domination left psycho-sexual damage on both sides."

And, of course, she pumps the melting pot message for all it's worth:

"White British women, mostly from the working classes, reached out to black and Asian men, who reciprocated. Explosive sexists and racists tried but couldn't stop transracial love and lust. In 1957, an academic, S F Collins, confidently asserted that the racially mixed family would soon be a normal feature of British life...
When, in 1961, The Rev Clifford Hill said on radio that he could accept a good black man for a son-in-law, he was deluged with furious letters...

In the Sixties a distinguished Caribbean scholar Fernando Henriques slammed biological and cultural protectionists: 'The notion here is that an ethnic group has an almost divine mission to maintain its racial purity. The consequences of this belief have produced immeasurable suffering in the world - Hitler's genocidal activities were only one of the manifestations of this delusion".

Remember the song? "A great big melting pot"? "Coffee coloured people by the score"?
However, YAB does let the "who are the real racists" cat out the bag in this article and we learn that: "Black and Asian Britons started objecting to what they saw as pollution of their race. Note that the outrage burst out as more black and Asian women chose white partners. Until then, that had been the prerogative of their men. All too soon, though, the chorus of disapproval spread. Black women accused black men of seeking trophy blondes; Asian women said Asian men had white lovers because the women were easy. Young black and Asian people moved into single-identity mental enclaves and sought marriage partners of exact specifications in terms that would never be accepted of whites".

Yab concludes with a round of applause for those Brits who are happy to breed their tribe out of existence:

"Let's hear it for the whities. They keep alive possibilities my brethren seem determined to destroy."

So, YAB now applauds the "whities" she has spent a journalistic lifetime demonising - because they are now on-message as regards the PC melting pot agenda. And yet, just over a year ago, during the 4 June 2006, edition of Dateline London, in answer to Gavin Essler's question:

"What's wrong with white guys, by the way?"

Alibhai-Brown replied:

"I don't like them. I want them to be the lost species in 100 years".

And we will be, if YAB's genocidal agenda rules the roost for much longer.



On 10 May 2007 Tony Blair gave his resignation speech in his Sedgefield constituency.

This, in part, is it:

“I was a young man in the social revolution of the 60s and 70s… I looked at my own country, a great country - wonderful history, magnificent traditions, proud of its past, but strangely uncertain of its future, uncertain about the future, ALMOST OLD-FASHIONED. I ask you to accept one thing. Hand on heart, I DID WHAT I THOUGHT WAS RIGHT. I MAY HAVE BEEN WRONG.”

You we’re wrong.

As for the heart bit, you have one?

“NONE OF IT MADE SENSE TO ME. It was 20th Century ideology in a world approaching a new millennium.”

None of it made sense?

You were Prime Minister for goodness sake, if it didn’t make sense why did you act with such certainty? More to the point, why didn’t you resign and let someone to whom it did make sense take over?

“Of course people want the best for themselves and their families, but in an age where human capital is a nation's greatest asset, they also know it is just and sensible to extend opportunities, to develop the potential to succeed, for all - NOT AN ELITE AT THE TOP.”

Not 'an elite at the top?'

The whole time you were in office you were kowtowing to and cultivating an anti-societal global elite and putting two fingers up at the majority!

“People are, today, open-minded about race and sexuality, averse to prejudice and yet deeply and rightly conservative with a small 'c' when it comes to good manners, respect for others, treating people courteously.“

As a general rule, the British people may be open-minded and averse to prejudice but that doesn’t mean they want their country swamped by millions of closed-minded, prejudiced aliens not the least bit like themselves!

You and your traitorous crew DELIBERATELY inundated the UK with all manner of unwanted folk!

“1997 was a moment for a new beginning, for sweeping away all the detritus of the past.”

Detritus?

So that’s what British history and tradition means to you? It begins to make sense all of a sudden.

“Now in 2007, you can easily point to the challenges, the things that are wrong, the grievances that fester.”

You sure can.

Iraq, mass immigration, political correctness, dumbing-down, drugging-up, 90 per cent of all the jobs taken up by Suleiman, Sanjay and Stanislaw and sweet bugger all for Tom, Dick and Harry. Did you really imagine that ‘grievance’ would never ‘fester’ when you were treating us so abominably?

“There is only one government since 1945 that can say all of the following: 'More jobs, fewer unemployed, better health and education results, lower crime and economic growth in every quarter,' - this one.”

Tony B Liar.

The pseudonym is appropriate to the power of n.

“Look at our economy - at ease with globalisation, London the world's financial centre. Visit our great cities and compare them with 10 years ago.”

I’m looking at the economy in 2011.

You and Gordon Brown cuddling up to the fat cats and international financiers wrecked it. You sacrificed a great nation on the altar of globalisation and greed, Tony. Globalisation, a one-world-ruled-by-them-forever concept. Demanded by a brutal and self-serving elite and despised by the decent majority.

“Think about the culture of Britain in 2007... I mean our values… equality for gay people… the global movement to support Africa in its struggle against poverty… the fight against terrorism.”

I’m thinking about our culture, Tony.

Trouble is, after eight years of New Labour, it’d all but disappeared by 2007.

“Britain is not a follower. It is a leader. It gets the essential characteristic of today's world - its interdependence.”

'Interdependence.'

Your favourite buzz word, Tony. Globalisation necessitates every country in the world being dependent on all the rest. Well, Tony, you sure did your best to make our country dependent all right. You carried on where the Thatcherites left off in that regard. Dependent on Russia and France for power, dependent on the third world for food, doctorsm nurses and skilled labour, dependent on the far east for technology and investment. Oh, you are the blue-eyed boy of the global franchise all right.

“This is a country today that for all its faults, for all the myriad of unresolved problems and fresh challenges, is comfortable in the 21st Century, at home in its own skin, able not just to be proud of its past but confident of its future.”

Come back and repeat this nonsense in 2011 and the confident-of-the-future people will string you up.

“As for my own leadership, throughout these 10 years, where the predictable has competed with the utterly unpredicted, right at the outset one thing was clear to me. WITHOUT THE LABOUR PARTY ALLOWING ME TO LEAD IT, NOTHING COULD EVER HAVE BEEN DONE.”

Fuck me, we all know you’re an egomaniac but ‘nothing could ever have been done’ without you? You’re completely and utterly barking, you preposterous slag!

“I knew my duty was to put the country first. That much was obvious to me when just under 13 years ago I became Labour's Leader.”

So, the millions of unwanted immigrants piling in, the lads that came home in body bags, 7/7/2005, jobs for foreigners and the Brit-bashing race laws, that was you putting the country first, was it?

“Everyone always says: 'Listen to the people.' The trouble is they don't always agree.”

They don’t, Tony.

They don’t. When you’re slicing up their world and parcelling it out to immigrants and greedy businessmen and bankers, the people are, indeed, somewhat liable to disagree with your preferred course of action.

“In time, you realise putting the country first doesn't mean doing the right thing according to conventional wisdom or the prevailing consensus or the latest snapshot of opinion. It means doing what you genuinely believe to be right. Your duty is to act according to your conviction.”

And you being a globalist flunkie, wholly owned by those who would, after your resignation, be paying your Faustian wages, your duty was to sell the British people down the river and wag your tail for ‘interdependence,' Yankee imperialism and the Israel lobby, is that right?

“All of that can get contorted so that people think you act according to some messianic zeal.”

‘Messianic zeal?’ Whichever speechwriter wrote those words, Tony, he sure knew his subject matter.

“Sometimes, like with Europe, where I believe Britain should keep its position strong, you know you are fighting opinion, but you are content with doing so.”

Oh, you were always content to do whatever ‘the people’ didn’t want, Tony.

We, the people, did notice that.

“Then came the utterly unanticipated and dramatic - September 11th 2001 and the death of 3,000 or more on the streets of New York.”

Excuse the pedantry, Tony, but it was a bit less than 3,000, actually.

“I decided we should stand shoulder to shoulder with our oldest ally. I did so out of belief. So Afghanistan and then Iraq - the latter, bitterly controversial.”

Afghanistan isn’t controversial?

News to me.

“Removing Saddam and his sons from power, as with removing the Taleban, was over with relative ease. BUT THE BLOWBACK SINCE, FROM GLOBAL TERRORISM AND THOSE ELEMENTS THAT SUPPORT IT, HAS BEEN FIERCE AND UNRELENTING AND COSTLY. FOR MANY, IT SIMPLY ISN'T AND CAN'T BE WORTH IT.”

From the mouth of Tony B Liar, an unusual honest summary of the monstrous actuality.

“For me, I think we must see it through. They, the terrorists, who threaten us here and round the world, will never give up if we give up.”

From the mouth of Tony B Liar, the usual b***ocks.

The ‘terrorists‘ will ‘give up’ just as soon as we stop slaughtering their innocent brethren in their own back yard.

“The British are special. The world knows it. In our innermost thoughts, we know it. This is the greatest nation on earth.”

I think so.

You don’t. You’re playing to a gallery of teletubbies here, Tony. I doubt whether anyone else would believe such crap.

“But, to be frank, I would not have wanted it any other way. I was, and remain, as a person and as a prime minister, an optimist.”

A million dead in Iraq and he’s an optimist.

“But I ask you to accept one thing. Hand on heart, I did what I thought was right.”

That’s like asking me accept that sh*t is sugary.

“I may have been wrong.”

You were.

“But believe one thing if nothing else. I did what I thought was right for our country.”

Nah.

You did what you thought was right for the US, Israel, big business, the international financier, the global elite, Scotland, Ireland and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair. However, you could not have given a monkey’s about the English.

“I came into office with high hopes for Britain's future. I leave it with even higher hopes for Britain's future.”

Fast forward to Murdoch, the riots and the financial meltdown of 2011 and it looks like your higher hopes were misplaced, doesn’t it, Tony?

“I give my thanks to you, the British people, for the times I have succeeded, and my apologies to you for the times I have fallen short.”

Apologies are not enough, Tony.

Most of us Brits want your head.



On 11 April 2007, Tony Blair gave the Callaghan Memorial lecture at Cardiff City Hall.

During the course of the lecture he said this:

“I have come to the conclusion that we are in danger of completely misunderstanding the nature of what we are dealing with… WE TEND TO SEE THIS AS A GENERAL SOCIAL PROBLEM WHICH, WITH THE RIGHT SOCIAL ENGINEERING, WE COULD CURE. More and more, I think THIS IS NOT JUST WRONG BUT MISLEADING...

What we are dealing with is not a general social disorder; but SPECIFIC GROUPS of people who for one reason or another, are deciding not to abide by the same code of conduct as the rest of us… at the recent summit I held on knife and gun crime, the black Pastor of a London church said bluntly: when are we going to start saying THIS IS A PROBLEM AMONGST A SECTION OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY AND NOT, FOR REASONS OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, PRETEND THAT THIS IS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT…

The black community… need to be mobilised in denunciation of this gang culture that is killing innocent young black kids. BUT WE WON'T STOP THIS BY PRETENDING IT ISN'T YOUNG BLACK KIDS DOING IT.

Those families known to the social services, health workers, often the law enforcement agencies, who are dysfunctional and whose children are being brought up in chaos, need to be identified early and put within a proper structured disciplined framework…

The years of underinvestment have gone. Business is thriving… But THE BEHAVIOURAL PROBLEMS OF THE MINORITY… BLIGHT THIS OTHERWISE OPTIMISTIC STORY OF RENAISSANCE. We need to stop thinking of this as a society that's gone wrong - it hasn't - but of SPECIFIC GROUPS that for specific reasons have gone outside of the proper lines of respect and good conduct towards others and need, by specific measures aimed at them, to be brought back within the fold.

The modern world is different. Our mores are different. The opportunities and also dangers present in the lives of our children different to the nth degree. What is acceptable, what goes, would, indeed does, shock older generations.”

Responding to the above, Lee Jasper, adviser on policing to London's mayor, said:

"For years we have said THIS IS AN ISSUE THE BLACK COMMUNITY HAS TO DEAL WITH… Every Home Secretary from Blunkett onwards has been pressed on tackling the growing phenomenon of gun and gang crime in deprived black communities, AND GOVERNMENT HAS FAILED TO RESPOND to what has been a clear demand for additional resources to tackle youth alienation and disaffection.”



On 24 March 2007, the Mail on Sunday exposé, ‘Lord Cashpoint, the bogus count and his porn star wife,’ by Dennis Rice and Ian Gallagher, focused largely on the relationship between Tony Blair, his chief ‘fundraiser’, Michael Levy, a former US ‘porn star’, Courtney Coventry, and her husband, a well-to-do ‘bogus Count.’

Ms Coventry, a guest at Labour’s annual fundraising gala, was quoted thus:

“Lord Levy… was like an animated cartoon, with large gestures and AN OVERBEARING PERSONALITY. He discussed donations and how appreciative the party would be, especially Mr Blair… We first met Jack Straw… HE SPENT MOST OF THE TIME SPEAKING TO MY CHEST.”

Ms Coventry then told The Mail on Sunday’s readership what happened when Blair interrupted Levy as he was talking on the phone:

“Lord Levy held up his hand and said, ‘Not now, Tony," and went back to his phone call. The Prime Minister turned to walk away and Lord Levy said, ‘Tony, wait, I need to speak to you.’ I thought, ‘My God, WHAT A WAY TO TALK TO A PRIME MINISTER.’ But Mr BLAIR STOOD THERE LIKE A PUPPET ON A STRING while Levy continued his phone call for at least a couple of minutes. Then he turned to the Prime Minister without apology for keeping him waiting and launched into a conversation about the importance of the evening.

HERE WAS THE LEADER OF YOUR GOVERNMENT BEING TREATED LIKE A CHILD. Jane Hogarth, Lord Levy and Tony Blair all acted like THIS WAS NORMAL. We were still getting over the shock of witnessing this when Lord Levy introduced us to Mr Blair… Levy told Mr Blair that we should be given a tour of 10 Downing Street…

One of his aides gave us a tour of both the Lords and the Commons and we sat down with Lord Levy for tea… He could not have tried harder. When we said we wanted to think about the donation, he made a call and told us to turn up at the gate of Downing Street the next day and just say our names. So we did and it was so sweet. We were shown in through the front door and there was a baby seat under a table…

The fact that I had this (the soft porn career) in my past and the fake aristocratic title should have showed up in the vetting procedure. But it was clear that Lord LEVY AND THE LABOUR PARTY WERE ONLY INTERESTED IN HOW MUCH MONEY I COULD GIVE THEM.”

On posing as the Count and Countess of Rozel, she said:

"It is not something we do any more. It started as a joke when John spotted the title for sale. Then we thought, why not use it as a marketing opportunity? I guess THE TITLE HELPED WHEN IT CAME TO MEETING THE PRIME MINISTER."

The ‘bogus Count’ had telephoned the Labour Party saying his wife was a Blair supporter and wanted to make a donation.

The Mail quoted him thus:

"I soon received calls from Jane Hogarth, who said she was head of public relations and fundraising. She invited us to the Hilton and when Courtney heard that Mr Blair would be there it was a done deal. I paid £1,000 for the tickets… Lord Levy said quite baldly that he would need £300,000 from us...

As far as I am concerned, ALL POLITICIANS ARE ROGUES AND ROBBERS. But I was prepared to make whatever donation Courtney wanted. Thankfully SHE SAW THE REAL LABOUR PARTY THAT EVENING AND WAS PUT RIGHT OFF.”

In the weeks that followed the top table telephone calls kept coming. Mr Coventry said:

"If it wasn't Lord Levy it was Jane Hogarth or the general secretary of the Labour Party, Lord Sawyer of Darlington. THE WHOLE EPISODE WITH MR BLAIR KOWTOWING TO LORD LEVY WAS THE MAIN TURNING POINT IN OUR DECISION.”

The Mail on Sunday added:

“It was his big night - Labour's annual fundraising gala at the Hilton Hotel on Park Lane - and he had just attached himself to a potential donor: a beautiful young blonde Californian called Courtney Coventry… She attracted more attention that night than Tony Blair, who, along with half the Cabinet, hovered nearby waiting to be introduced to her…

She is a former soft-porn actress whose low-budget film credits include DIRT MERCHANT. She is also A FORMER GIRLFRIEND OF PLAYBOY IMPRESARIO HUGH HEFNER. On that night in April 2004, she claims chief fundraiser Lord Levy, the man at the centre of the cash-for-honours scandal engulfing the Government, barely left her side. At one point he clasped her arm firmly - a little too hard, she says - and steered her towards the Prime Minister. Her husband John, a man even cagier about his past than his wife, was also at her side.

‘This is the Count and Countess of Rozel,' announced Levy, before adding less audibly: ‘They are thinking of making a sizeable donation to the Labour Party.’ Ironically, LIKE THE HONOURS ALLEGEDLY BESTOWED ON WEALTHY LABOUR DONORS IN EXCHANGE FOR CASH, THEIR TITLE WAS ALSO BOUGHT - but for a few hundred pounds rather than a few hundred thousand. And IT ENABLED THEM TO FOOL GULLIBLE AMERICANS INTO PARTING WITH THEIR CASH…

The story of how the counterfeit count and countess were wooed by Tony Blair's inner circle raises questions about THE DUBIOUS COMPANY LABOUR KEEPS AND EXPOSES THE PARTY'S RAVENOUS APPETITE FOR MONEY. It also shows how, WITH A 'BIG FISH' IN ITS SIGHTS, LABOUR'S JUDGMENT APPEARS TO BECOME DANGEROUSLY CLOUDED…

Photographs of them with the Prime Minister added to their myth. On their website they boasted of a jet-set lifestyle, homes in Beverly Hills, the South of France and Britain… They also sold expensive 'collectibles' such as blankets and mugs bearing their 'coat of arms'. Ludicrously, Mr Coventry, a former travel agent who was born in the Wirral, let it be known that the correct way to address him was ‘YOUR EXCELLENCY’…

They were even invited by Lord Sawyer to the Labour Party annual conference dinner at the Midlands Hotel, Manchester... But the couple severed all ties. Their brush with Labour had served its purpose. They were now able to mention their dinner with the Prime Minister on their website along with a number of other fanciful claims…

Mr Coventry says he is now retired.”

The sleaze merchants-in-chief taken in by a pair of grifter minnows and their own fanatic greed.

A most appropriate tale for our terrible times.

Michael Abraham Levy, the former boss of Magnet and M&G Records, was ennobled by Tony Blair as Baron Levy of Mill Hill in the London Borough of Barnet, on 23 September 1997, a few months after he came to power.

Wikipedia tell us this about Levy:

"A long-standing friend of former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, Lord Levy spent nine years from 1998 to 2007 as Tony Blair's special envoy to the Middle East… Blair has said Lord Levy carried out 'a perfectly excellent job as my envoy’…

Levy was arrested and questioned in connection with the ‘Cash for Honours’ inquiry by the Metropolitan Police on 12 July 2006 (whereby it was suggested that monies were paid to political parties for Honours in particular peerages). After six hours of questioning he was released on police bail.

On 20 September 2006, he was questioned a second time and again released on bail. On 30 January 2007 Lord Levy was arrested on suspicion of conspiring to pervert the course of justice. On 20 July 2007, the Crown Prosecution Service announced that Lord Levy was not to be prosecuted in connection with the so called ‘Cash for Honours’ affair…

Levy first met Tony Blair at a dinner party in 1994, hosted by Israeli diplomat Gideon Meir, (Jewish) the two having a common friend in Eldred Tabachnik, (Jewish) a senior barrister (now a QC and a former president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews) at 11 King's Bench Walk, the chambers founded by Derry Irvine where Blair had trained in the early 1980s. They soon became close friends and tennis partners.

Levy ran the Labour Leader's Office Fund to finance Blair's campaign before the 1997 general election and received substantial contributions from such figures as Alex Bernstein (Jewish) and Robert Gavron, (Jewish) both of whom were ennobled by Blair after he came to power…

He has been described by The Jerusalem Post as ‘undoubtedly the notional leader of British Jewry’. He was a founding member of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the leadership of UK Jewish community. Levy has close ties with Israeli political leaders. He has a home in Herzliya - Israel.

His son, Daniel Levy, (Jewish) was active in Israeli political life, and has served as an assistant to the former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak (Jewish) and to Knesset member Yossi Beilin. (Jewish) Daniel is now based in the USA and heads a think tank linked to the New America Foundation. Levy has praised Blair for his ‘solid and committed support of the State of Israel’…

Known as ‘Lord Cashpoint’ to some in the media and politics, he was the leading fundraiser for the Labour Party from 1994 to 2007...

In 2000, Levy was heavily criticised when it was revealed that he had paid only £5,000 tax during the financial year 1998-1999."

Levy is, of course, Jewish.



On 21 March 2007, New Labour bigwig, Harriet Harman, said this at Southwark Town Hall:

“This country has long benefited from migration... Understand to the full the advantage that immigrants give Britain in an increasingly globalised world… STRIP AWAY THE IMMIGRANTS AND YOU STRIP FROM LONDON MUCH OF ITS DYNAMISM AND ITS HOPE FOR THE FUTURE…

London can be the ‘world’s capital city… MIGRATION AND DIVERSITY offers us the prospect of being internationally literate, being able to look outward, having A HUGE ADVANTAGE OVER UNCHANGING HOMOGENOUS SOCIETIES…

The opportunity is there for us… TO CREATE A UNITED KINGDOM… OF DIFFERENT CULTURES AND COMMUNITIES… VALUING DIVERSITY must be part of defining our ‘Britishness’ in the 21st century.

To be a diverse, multicultural and peaceful community we must have equality and tackle discrimination and racism… We are a long way from equality… We have taken action but we still have further to go…

To bring about THE PROGRESSIVE CHANGE THAT WE WANT TO SEE, OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITY MUST BE REFLECTED IN OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM… our House of Commons is not representative or democratic until it represents, through its MPs and local councillors, the diversity of our country…

Labour is committed to equality and diversity… It is… important to enable us properly to… formulate policies fit for a diverse country in an interdependent world…

WE NEED POSITIVE ACTION to ensure more men and women from the black, Asian and minority ethnic community add to the contribution that my fellow MPs from the black, Asian and minority ethnic communities make in the Mother of Parliaments…

The work of TACKLING PREJUDICE AND RACISM IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE AND A DUTY… TO FIGHT PREJUDICE IS FIRST AND FOREMOST A MORAL IMPERATIVE…

My husband’s parents who came from Ireland…

The economic contribution of migrants is measured not just in our economy but IN THE ECONOMIES OF THEIR COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN AND THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT. The London Borough of Southwark has the largest community of African origin in the UK… MANY AFRICANS IN THE UK SEND MONEY BACK TO THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN…

THE GOVERNMENT HAS MADE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT A PRIORITY… more than doubling the UK overseas Aid Budget, setting up the Commission for Africa and making International Development a priority for other well-off countries in the meetings of the G8 and the European Union…

The last General Election saw a net increase of only two black Asian and minority ethnic MPs taking the total to just fifteen. But we still have further to go. If the chamber is to reflect the make-up of society, THAT FIGURE NEEDS TO INCREASE FOUR-FOLD… THIS MUST BE DONE…

Our black and Asian MPs are taking the change forward. The changing nature of my own constituency of Camberwell and Peckham since I have been the MP is reflected in Labour’s representation in our local council… In each ward, the candidates reflected the community… There were candidates from different African countries as well as from the Caribbean, and black candidates born here to migrant parents. They were all elected…

I have established… an advisory group of men and women local councillors from black Asian and minority ethnic groups drawn from across the country… Building on the strength our diversity offers, we need to ensure that that same voice is heard right across the country and at the highest levels of Government…

The task of ensuring proper levels of representation and inclusion goes beyond Parliament and councils and extends into all spheres of public life…

Our justice system is a classic example where DIVERSITY IS ESSENTIAL TO ENSURE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE… Black and minority ethnic victims and defendants will have more respect for a judiciary of black and white working together. That is why I have led the arguments for greater diversity in the legal profession and in the judiciary…

THE WORK OF TACKLING PREJUDICE AND RACISM IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE AND A DUTY for any modern political party. You cannot be ‘a bit’ against racism: you need to be standing up against it, identifying it in all its forms and eliminating it from the mainstream of political culture and public life… TO FIGHT PREJUDICE IS FIRST AND FOREMOST A MORAL IMPERATIVE.”



On 2 March 2007, ‘Democracy Now’ hostess, Amy Goodman, interviewed General Wesley Clark, the four-star general who was the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the Kosovo conflict.

WESLEY CLARK: “About TEN DAYS AFTER 9/11 I went to the penatagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfield and Deputy Secretary Wolfwitz. I went down stairs to see some of the staff who used to work for me and one of the Generals called me in and said, ‘Sir, you have got to come in. Come in, you have got to come in and talk to me a second.’ I said ‘Well, you’re too busy.’ He said, 'No, no, WE HAVE MADE THE DECISION TO GO TO WAR WITH IRAQ.’ This was on or about the 20th of September. I said 'We are going to war with Iraq? Why'. He said, 'I DON’T KNOW'. He said, 'I GUESS THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT ELSE TO DO'.

So I said, 'Well did they find some information connecting Saddam to Al-Queda?' He said, 'NO, NO. THERE IS NOTHING NEW THAT WAY, THEY JUST MADE THE DECISION TO GO TO WAR WITH IRAQ.' He said, 'I quess its like, WE DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO ABOUT TERRORISTS BUT WE GOT A GOOD MILITARY AND WE CAN TAKE DOWN GOVERNMENTS.’ And he said, ‘I GUESS IF THE ONLY TOOL YOU HAVE IS A HAMMER EVERY PROBLEM HAS TO LOOK LIKE A NAIL.'

So I came back to see him a few weeks later and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said 'Are we still going to war with Iraq?' And he said 'Oh, ITS WORSE THAN THAT.'

He reached over on his desk and picked up a piece of paper. He said, 'I just got this down from upstairs, meaning the SECRETARY OF DEFENSE’S OFFICE, This is a memo that describes how WE ARE GOING TO TAKE OUT SEVEN COUNTRIES IN FIVE YEARS. STARTING WITH IRAQ, THEN SYRIA AND LEBANON. THEN LYBIA, SOMALIA AND SUDAN. THEN FINISHING OFF IRAN”…

AMY GOODMAN: “Go Through the countries again.”

WESLEY CLARK: “Well starting off with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, and Lybia, Somalia and Sudan. and back to Iran. THE TRUTH IS, ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST IS, HAD THERE BEEN NO OIL THERE, IT WOULD BE LIKE AFRICA. NOBODY IS THREATENING TO INTERVENE IN AFRICA. The problem is the opposite. We keep asking for people to intervene and stop it. And THERE’S NO QUESTION THAT THE PRESENCE OF PETROLEUM THROUGHOUT THE REGION HAS SPARKED GREAT POWER INVOLVEMENT...

THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN THIS ATTITUDE THAT SOMEHOW WE COULD INTERVENE AND USE FORCE IN THE REGION.”

YouTube

Full transcript

In 2004, Wesley Clark was a Democratic candidate for the Presidency.



The first celebration of the festival of Eid in Trafalgar Square, organized by the Muslim Council of Britain with the support of Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, was held on 28 October 2006.

Livingstone said this at the festival:

"It is particularly important that we celebrate Islam in London today given the background of hysterical Islamophobia that we see so much of the British media. Here in this city we had never asked the Jews to remove his skull cap OR CHRISTIANS TO REMOVE THEIR CROSS and we shall not ask Muslim women to remove their veils."

As it happens, Christians have been ORDERED to remove their crosses quite a few times since Red Ken said this. He's right about the Jews and their skull caps though.

"It is an absolute nonsense that so much of the British media portrays Islam as the voice of a violent minority when THE WHOLE HISTORY OF ISLAM IS COMMITTED TO PEACE AND CO-EXISTENCE."

Ken said this less than sixteen months after four Muslims blew up themselves and fifty two others in London.

"Islam is one of the world's great cultures… Under our skin we are all part of one humanity race… LONDON'S PROSPERITY… AS WELL AS ITS SOCIAL HARMONY, ENTIRELY DEPENDS ON OUR ABILITY TO WELCOME AND RESPECT PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD."

I don't know about the prosperity but the 'social harmony' thing is a flat lie. Mix a load of different cultures, religions, races and tribes up in the same place and they will fight for supremacy. That is an absolute lesson of history. Ken is spouting schoolyard Marxism here.

"In London everyone is welcome to be themselves and to express their religious and cultural identity… London will not be diverted from this course of tolerance."

Ah yes, the wants and needs of the indigenous British community will not to be tolerated by those whose 'tolerance... will not be diverted."

Solicitor General, Mike O'Brien, said:

"Together with Christianity, Judaism and other religions, Islam has become one of the mainstream religions in our country… Muslims are contributing in sports, in culture, in public services, in police, in army, in public services, in trade and in commerce and we should acknowledge that contribution to this country… All of us can learn from some of the words of the holy Prophet."

President of Liberal Democrats, Simon Hughes, said:

"We need many more Muslims in politics, more Muslim women in politics… We have still far too much male-dominated society and… women need to take that place… People in this country should be entitled to wear the culture of their faith, whatever the faith… So have a wonderful day, love each other and Eid Mubarak louder, louder and louder as the days go on and COME BACK EVERY YEAR IN GREATER NUMBERS."

Sir Iqbal Sacranie, former Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain, said:

"The Muslim community is really taking a positive step in getting the message of Islam across the wider society. We are working together with the Mayor of London. This event is jointly organized by the Muslim Council of Britain and the Mayor of London… It is also a day when the message of Islam goes to the wider society… It is fantastic to see… gathering together for one purpose and celebrating and getting the message across."

Oh yes, Iqbal, you and your Muslim chums, together with the Red Kens, Solicitor Generals and homsexual Lib Dem Presidents are 'getting the message across' alright.

Or should I say, 'ramming it home.'



On 13 October 2006, General Sir Richard Dannat, the UK's top soldier, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

“I WANT AN ARMY IN FIVE YEARS TIME AND 10 YEARS TIME. DON'T LET'S BREAK IT ON THIS ONE. Let's keep an eye on time… We are in a Muslim country and Muslims' views of foreigners in their country are quite clear. As a foreigner, you can be welcomed by being invited in a country, but WE WEREN'T INVITED… Whatever consent we may have had in the first place… has largely turned to intolerance. THAT IS A FACT. I don’t say that the difficulties we are experiencing round the world are caused by our presence in Iraq but UNDOUBTEDLY OUR PRESENCE IN IRAQ EXACERBATES THEM…

I think history will show that THE PLANNING FOR WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE INITIAL SUCCESSFUL WAR FIGHTING PHASE WAS POOR…

The original intention was that we put in place a liberal democracy that was an exemplar for the region, was pro West and might have a beneficial effect on the balance within the Middle East. That was the hope, whether that was a sensible or naïve hope history will judge. I DON’T THINK WE ARE GOING TO DO THAT. I think we should aim for a lower ambition…

When I see the Islamist threat in this country I hope it doesn’t make undue progress because THERE IS A MORAL AND SPIRITUAL VACUUM IN THIS COUNTRY. OUR SOCIETY HAS ALWAYS BEEN EMBEDDED IN CHRISTIAN VALUES; once you have pulled the anchor up there is a danger that our society moves with the prevailing wind. There is an element of the moral compass spinning. I think it is up to society to realise that is the situation we are in.

WE CAN’T WISH THE ISLAMIST CHALLENGE TO OUR SOCIETY AWAY and I believe that the army both in Iraq and Afghanistan and probably wherever we go next, is fighting the foreign dimension of the challenge to our accepted way of life.

WE NEED TO FACE UP TO THE ISLAMIST THREAT, TO THOSE WHO ACT IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND IN A PERVERTED WAY TRY TO IMPOSE ISLAM BY FORCE ON SOCIETIES THAT DO NOT WISH IT.

It is said that we live in a post Christian society. I think that is a great shame… It underpins the British army…

I said to the Secretary of State the army wont let the nation down but I don’t want the nation to let the army down.

It is not acceptable for our casualties to be IN MIXED WARDS WITH CIVILIANS. I was outraged at the story of someone saying ‘take your uniform off‘... Our people need the privacy of recovering in a military environment - a soldier manning a machine gun in Basra loses consciousness when he is hit by a missile and next RECOVERS CONSCIOUSNESS IN A HOSPITAL IN THE UK.

He wants to wake up to familiar sights and sounds, he wants to see people in uniform. He doesn’t want to be in a civilian environment.

I am going to stand up for what is right for the army. HONESTY IS WHAT IT IS ABOUT. THE TRUTH WILL OUT. WE HAVE GOT TO SPEAK THE TRUTH."

Well said, sir.

It's nice to hear a top chap telling the truth for a change.



On 15 September 2006, David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party, said this to a Scots audience:

“Alex Salmond couldn’t ask for more effective allies in his campaign to break up the Union than SOUR LITTLE ENGLANDERS who cry ‘good riddance’ when independence for Scotland is suggested.

I’ll fight them all the way… BEING BRITISH ISN’T ABOUT ETHNICITY OR LOCAL IDENTITY...

Instead of deriding Scots as chippy or difficult, ISN’T IT TIME THAT ENGLISH PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL EDUCATED THEMSELVES?… Some English commentators don’t seem to know what to think of Scotland - WHEN THEY CAN BE BOTHERED TO THINK AT ALL… One moment they deride Scots as hopeless drunks and beggars... They complain that England is run by something called the Scottish Raj, a race of superhumans led by John Reid and Kirsty Wark.”



On 9 September 2006, the best-selling novelist, Martin Amis, said this in The Times:

“MUSLIMS ARE GAINING ON US DEMOGRAPHICALLY AT A HUGE RATE. A QUARTER OF HUMANITY NOW AND BY 2025 THEY'LL BE A THIRD… WE'RE JUST GOING TO BE OUTNUMBERED…

THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY WILL HAVE TO SUFFER UNTIL IT GETS ITS HOUSE IN ORDER…

Not letting them travel. DEPORTATION – further down the road. Curtailing of freedoms. Strip-searching people who look like they’re from the Middle East or from Pakistan… Discriminatory stuff, UNTIL IT HURTS THE WHOLE COMMUNITY AND THEY START GETTING TOUGH WITH THEIR CHILDREN.

They hate us for letting our children have sex and take drugs – well, THEY’VE GOT TO STOP THEIR CHILDREN KILLING PEOPLE. IT’S A HUGE DERELICTION ON THEIR PART…

It’s their own past they’re pissed off about; their great decline.”



On 28 August 2006, The New Statesman quoted Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones thus:

"Our parents established beachheads in the cities; it is now up to our generation to move out of those beachheads AND CLAIM THE REST OF BRITAIN AS OUR OWN.”

Emmanuel-Jones, who is black, was the Conservative candidate for the Chippenham constituency in the 2010 General Election.

He lost.



On 11 August 2006, Polly Toynbee said this in The Guardian:

"It's no surprise that THE CBI AND CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE STRONGLY SUPPORT IMMIGRATION, as do US neocons. Economists puzzle over why a 10-year unbroken burst of growth has not resulted in pay inflation. Near-full employment should mean pay rises - but CHEAP IMPORTED LABOUR HELPS KEEP IT LOW… THE ARRIVAL OF 14,000 POLES IN SOUTHAMPTON HAS CUT RATES FOR BUILDING WORKERS BY HALF...

MIGRATION CAN MAKE THE RICH RICHER AND THE POOR POORER. London, where migration is greatest, also has the highest unemployment… POOR FAMILIES IN THIS MOST EXPENSIVE CITY CAN'T PAY FOR CHILDCARE AND COMPETE FOR JOBS WITH SINGLE MIGRANTS WILLING TO TAKE LESS THAN A LIVING WAGE. BUT THE RICH PROSPER…

It is one of the gross dysfunctions of such an unequal society that the very concept of "GDP per capita" is a meaningless average THAT OFTEN DISGUISES THE FILLING OF POCKETS AT THE TOP WHILE THOSE AT THE BOTTOM ARE EMPTIED.

LABOUR ARE THE TRADITIONAL CELEBRATORS OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY, AND THE TREASURY GLEEFULLY SUPPORTS WEALTH-CREATING MIGRATION. BUT WHAT IF IT CREATES WEALTH ONLY FOR THE WEALTHY?”



On 1 July 2006, Lance Price, Tony Blair’s number 2 spin doctor (after Alistair Campbell) from 1998 to 2001, said this in The Guardian:

"There is no small irony in the fact that Tony Blair flew halfway round the world to address Mr Murdoch and his News International executives in the first year of his leadership of the Labour party and that he's doing so again next month in what may prove to be his last. I have never met Mr Murdoch, but at times WHEN I WORKED AT DOWNING STREET HE SEEMED LIKE THE 24TH MEMBER OF THE CABINET... NO BIG DECISION COULD EVER BE MADE INSIDE NO 10 WITHOUT TAKING ACCOUNT OF THE LIKELY REACTION OF THREE MEN - GORDON BROWN, JOHN PRESCOTT AND RUPERT MURDOCH. On all the really big decisions, anybody else could safely be ignored.

I was reminded just how touchy Downing Street is about Mr Murdoch when I submitted the manuscript of my book, The Spin Doctor's Diary, to the Cabinet Office. The government requested some changes, as is its right. When the first batch came through, it was no surprise that Tony Blair's staff were deeply unhappy. The real surprise was that NO FEWER THAN A THIRD OF THEIR OBJECTIONS RELATED TO ONE MAN… RUPERT MURDOCH.

In my first few weeks as Alastair Campbell's deputy, I was told by somebody who would know that WE HAD ASSURED MR MURDOCH WE WOULDN'T CHANGE POLICY ON EUROPE WITHOUT TALKING TO HIM FIRST. The Cabinet Office insisted that I couldn't say in my book that such a promise had been made because I did not know it for a fact… Every other request relating to Murdoch was rejected. It seemed to me that THE GOVERNMENT WAS SIMPLY TRYING TO AVOID POLITICAL EMBARRASSMENT ON A SUBJECT OF WHOLLY LEGITIMATE PUBLIC INTEREST.

All discussions… with Rupert Murdoch and with Irwin Stelzer, his representative on earth, were handled at THE VERY HIGHEST LEVEL… THE SUN AND THE TIMES, IN PARTICULAR, RECEIVED INNUMERABLE ‘SCOOPS’ AND FAVOURS. In return, New Labour got very sympathetic coverage from newspapers that are bought and read by classic swing voters…

THE INFLUENCE OF THE MURDOCH PRESS ON IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM POLICY would make a fascinating PhD thesis… In a close election the support of News International will be courted as never before… THEY WON'T DARE RISK LEAVING IT TO THE VOTERS.”



On 11 June 2006, The Sunday Times quoted senior military strategist, Rear Admiral Chris Parry, thus:

“Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries “EUROPE, INCLUDING BRITAIN , COULD BE UNDERMINED BY LARGE IMMIGRANT GROUPS WITH LITTLE ALLEGIANCE TO THEIR HOST COUNTRIES…

GLOBALISATION MAKES ASSIMILATION SEEM REDUNDANT AND OLD-FASHIONED… THE PROCESS ACTS AS A SORT OF REVERSE COLONISATION, where groups of people are self-contained, going back and forth between their countries, exploiting sophisticated networks and using instant communication on phones and the internet…

When you combine the lower prospects for communal life with macho youth and economic deprivation you tend to get trouble, typified by gangs and organised criminal activity. When one thinks of 20,000 SO-CALLED JIHADISTS CURRENTLY FLY-PAPERED IN IRAQ, ONE SHUDDERS TO THINK WHERE THEY MIGHT GO NEXT…

WESTERN CIVILISATION FACES A THREAT ON A PAR WITH THE BARBARIAN INVASIONS THAT DESTROYED THE ROMAN EMPIRE. At some time in the next ten years it may not be safe to sail a yacht between Gibraltar and Malta as pirates attack holidaymakers from fast boats."



On 10 June 2006, The Guardian reported thus:

"A secret high-level Metropolitan police report has concluded that MUSLIM OFFICERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BECOME CORRUPT THAN WHITE OFFICERS BECAUSE OF THEIR CULTURAL AND FAMILY BACKGROUNDS…

The document was written as an attempt to investigate why complaints of misconduct and corruption against Asian officers are 10 TIMES HIGHER THAN AGAINST THEIR WHITE COLLEAGUES.

The main conclusions of the study, commissioned by the Directorate of Professional Standards and WRITTEN BY AN ASIAN DETECTIVE CHIEF INSPECTOR, stated:

'ASIAN OFFICERS AND IN PARTICULAR PAKISTANI MUSLIM OFFICERS ARE UNDER GREATER PRESSURE FROM THE FAMILY, THE EXTENDED FAMILY ... AND THEIR COMMUNITY AGAINST THAT OF THEIR WHITE COLLEAGUES TO ENGAGE IN ACTIVITY THAT MIGHT LEAD TO MISCONDUCT OR CRIMINALITY'.

It recommended that Asian officers needed special anti-corruption training and is now being considered by a working party of senior staff. The report argued that British Pakistanis live in a cash culture in which 'assisting your extended family is considered a duty'…

Superintendent Dal Babu, Chairman of the Association of Muslim Officers, said…

'We are gravely concerned about its contents and the message it sends to recruits and potential recruits'."

Oh, yes, your top Muslim Policeman doesn’t want a message sending to the Muslim cops of the future that they’re going to get sorted if they get caught with their fingers in the till.

The Guardian continued:

"Ahmanrahman Jafar, vice-chairman of the legal affairs committee of the Muslim Council of Britain, said it was shortsighted of the Met to be alienating its Muslim officers at such a sensitive time...

George Rhoden, chair of the Metropolitan Black Police Association added:

'We have made it clear that we disagreed totally with the conclusions ... The whole thing needs to be researched in a much more comprehensive way'."

Yes, the whole thing needed to be researched in a politically correct, positively discriminatory kind of way. You know, the kind of comprehensive way where Johnny gets the blame even though Abdul did it.

The Guardian went on to say:

"THE FIRST VERSION (of the report) WAS CONSIDERED SO INFLAMMATORY WHEN IT WAS SHOWN TO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE STAFF ASSOCIATIONS FOR BLACK, HINDU, SIKH AND MUSLIM OFFICERS, THAT IT HAD TO BE TONED DOWN!"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/jun/10/race.topstories3



In June 2006, Defence Secretary, John Reid, said this:

"We hope we will leave Afghanistan without firing a single shot."



The following Muammar Gaddafi sentiment was, according to a Steven Stalinsky article in the 6 September 2009 edition of The New York Sun, first heard in 10 April 2006 speech.

"We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe—without swords, without guns, without conquest—will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades."



In the 2006 book, Without Roots; The West, Relativism, Christianity, Islam by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) and Marcello Pera, President of the Italian Senate, the latter writes:

“A FOUL WIND IS BLOWING THROUGH EUROPE...

Is there a war, perhaps? I answer, YES, THERE IS A WAR… In Afghanistan, Kashmir, Chechnya, Dagestan, Ossetia, the Phillipines, Saudi Arabia, the Sudan, Bosnia, Kosovo, the Palestinian Territories, Egypt, Morocco, and much of the Islamic and Arab world, large groups of fundamentalists, radicals, extremist--the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Jihad, the Islamic Armed Group, and many more, HAVE DECLARED A HOLY WAR, JIHAD, ON THE WEST…

I am not advocating a Western declaration of war or state of war. I am advocating something else that to me seems even more important. I AM URGING PEOPLE TO REALIZE THAT A WAR HAS INDEED BEEN DECLARED ON THE WEST.”



On 30 November 2005, as the battle for the leadership of the Tory Party was taking place, Jeff Randall said this in The Daily Telegraph:

“There is something faintly louche about Cameron. I WOULDN'T TRUST HIM WITH MY DAUGHTER'S POCKET MONEY… Watching Cameron pledge to make Britain ‘the best place in the world to do business’ reminded me just HOW SLIPPERY HE WAS during his seven-year spell as communications director of Carlton, the television company. To describe Cameron's approach to corporate PR as unhelpful and evasive overstates by a widish margin the clarity and plain-speaking that he brought to the job of being Michael Green's mouthpiece. In my experience, CAMERON NEVER GAVE A STRAIGHT ANSWER WHEN DISSEMBLANCE WAS A PLAUSIBLE ALTERNATIVE, which probably makes him perfectly suited for the role he now seeks: THE NEXT TONY BLAIR.”

“Louche,’ ‘wouldn't trust him,’ ‘slippery,’ ‘unhelpful,’ ‘evasive,’ ‘dissemblance,’ ‘the next Tony Blair.’

A perfect advertisement for the top job in a country where the average voter is a dumbed-down, drugged-up rabbit in the headlights of the political machine.

“Michael Green’s mouthpiece.”

Green is Jewish.

Anyone who isn’t dumbed-down and drugged up think “the next Tony Blair” might still be a mouthpiece for Jewish interests? As Blair, himself, most assuredly is?



On 23 August 2005, Australian politician, Peter Costello, said this in coversation with Tony Jones of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation:

"Our laws are made by the Australian Parliament. If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you. This is not the kind of country where you would feel comfortable".



On 16 January 2005, John Piper of Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis said this in his sermon:

"Interracial marriage is not only permitted by the Bible but is A POSITIVE GOOD IN OUR DAY. That is, it is not just to be tolerated, BUT CELEBRATED... We will not underestimate the challenges of interracial marriage or transracial adoption. WE WILL CELEBRATE THE BEAUTY, and we will embrace the burden. BOTH WILL BE GOOD FOR US AND GOOD FOR THE WORLD AND GOOD FOR THE GLORY OF GOD."



On 12 August 2004, The Daily Telegraph told us this:

“A Church of England bishop has called on churches to BAN THE SINGING OF I VOW TO THEE, MY COUNTRY, one of the best known hymns, because he says IT IS HERETICAL AND HAS RACIST OVERTONES. The Bishop of Hulme, the Rt Rev Stephen Lowe, said the hymn's popularity was A SYMPTOM OF A 'DANGEROUS' INCREASE IN ENGLISH NATIONALISM WHICH HAD PARALLELS WITH THE RISE OF NAZISM.”

Bishop Lowe was quoted thus:

"MY COUNTRY, RIGHT OR WRONG IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE SENTIMENT FOR CHRISTIANS TO UPHOLD… It (is) one example of my concerns about GROWING NATIONALISM… IT IS DANGEROUS FOR A NATION TO SUGGEST THAT OUR CULTURE IS SOMEHOW SUPERIOR TO OTHERS."

Thus does the modern churchman sneer at one of our most much-loved hymns and the patriotic urge of the average Englishman.

Don’t let anyone say that a goodly (not Godly) number of British clergymen and women aren’t wholly on board with the Brit-loathing ethos of the PC Crowd.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1469204/Ban-this-racist-hymn-says-bishop.html



The subscribers, editorial staff and journalistic contributors of the US-based Front Page Magazine are almost all Jewish.

On 22 June 2004, Lawrence Auster wrote the following extraordinarily illuminating article in the magazine:

“Mass Moslem immigration into America combined with world-wide Moslem Jew-hatred poses an unprecedented threat to American Jews, a ‘perfect storm’ that is forcing at least some Jews into an agonizing re-appraisal of their traditional support for open immigration. So says Stephen Steinlight in his hard-hitting essay, ‘High Noon to Midnight: Why Current Immigration Policy Dooms American Jewry,’ published by the Center for Immigration Studies.

A former director of national affairs at the American Jewish Committee and now an outspoken advocate of immigration reform, Steinlight tells his fellow Jews that they, along with the rest of America, face a momentous choice. If they turn away from THEIR EXTREME IMMIGRATION LIBERALISM and help move America toward sensible immigration restrictions, the growth of the Moslem community in this country can be slowed substantially and even stopped, and a decent existence for the Jews themselves can be preserved. But IF JEWS AND OTHERS CONTINUE IN THEIR EMBRACE OF OPEN BORDERS, in thirty years time the Jews will find themselves a besieged and powerless minority in an Islamic-dominated, anti-Semitic America.

That's what Steinlight is telling them. But will they listen? As he explains it, immigration to the U.S. in the early 20th century was literally a life or death matter for Jews, life for the immigrants, and death for those who stayed behind in Europe or who were closed out of America by the restrictive immigration policies of the 1920s and 1930s. For Jews, he says: ‘(T)he immigration debate pits the heart against the head. In their gut, many feel that substantially reducing immigration betrays the legacy of their parents and grandparents. But a growing number believes that maintaining this policy betrays their children and grandchildren. The danger arises because mass immigration means importing mass anti-Semitism.’

Yet, despite the dangers Moslem immigration poses to their security and their whole way of life, JEWS HAVE FOR THE MOST PART MAINTAINED THEIR SUPPORT FOR OPEN IMMIGRATION, and Steinlight by the end of his article does not seem very hopeful that they will change their minds, or at least that they will do so before it's too late to avoid disaster.

Loyalty to their ancestors' immigration ‘legacy’ hardly seems a sufficient explanation for Jews' adherence to a policy that, as Steinlight puts it, spells the ultimate eclipse and ruin of Jewish life in this country, NOT TO MENTION THE RUIN OF AMERICA ITSELF. After all, Jews in many cases betray without hesitation their grandparents' orthodox religious beliefs, and in other cases their grandparents' socialism, so why should their grandparents' immigrant history be so sacred to them? If we are to have any chance of converting THE JEWS FROM THEIR OPEN BORDERS IDEOLOGY, we must understand their own reasons for believing in it. From the following discussion, two basic perspectives on this problem will emerge, one pessimistic, the other optimistic.

First of all, as crazy as it may sound, there is something that many American Jews fear in their heart of hearts even more than they fear Moslem anti-Semitism, and that is WHITE CHRISTIAN ANTI-SEMITISM. Steinlight himself pointed to this phenomenon at a recent panel discussion hosted by the Center for Immigration Studies:

‘Every high profile Jewish institution, whether it's a national organization or a major synagogue, is surrounded by concrete barriers to prevent car bombs exploding too close to the buildings. If you go through the lobbies into those buildings you have to pass metal detectors and double-doors of bulletproof glass. You are then frisked by security guards, mostly retired New York City police or Israeli agents, and then are scanned again with metal detectors.

What is truly comic about this, were it not an instance in the theatre of the absurd, and were it not so appalling an indication of the kind of mass denial that is still governing major American Jewish organizations, including the one I used to work for that's currently meeting across the street, is that the staffs of these organizations pass the car bomb barriers, go through the double bulletproof glass lobbies, get frisked, then go upstairs into their offices AND SPEND THEIR DAYS TALKING ABOUT THE THREATS POSED BY EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS.’

Jews' risible obsession with non-existent evangelical Protestant anti-Semites, combined with their obliviousness to actual mass murdering Islamist anti-Semites (whom, moreover, THE JEWS' FAVORED IMMIGRATION POLICIES HAVE ALLOWED INTO THIS COUNTRY) is an amazing phenomenon that we should not dismiss as simply a bizarre ethnic idiosyncrasy. It expresses, rather, a central preoccupation of a significant number of Jews, namely THEIR CORROSIVE APPREHENSION OF WHAT THEY THINK THE GOYIM MIGHT ONE DAY DO TO THEM, a fear they entertain despite the fact that, apart from some social exclusions and other ethnic prejudices that existed up to the end of World War II, Jews have never faced serious anti-Semitism from the white Christian majority in this country.

Just the other week I was telling a secular, leftist Jew of my acquaintance, a man in his late sixties, about my idea that the only way to make ourselves safe from the specter of domestic Moslem terrorism is to deport all jihad-supporting Moslems from this country. He replied with emotion that if America deported Moslem fundamentalists, it would immediately start doing the same thing to Jews as well. ‘It's frightening, it's scary,’ he said heatedly, as if the Jews were already on the verge of being rounded up. In the eyes of this normally phlegmatic and easy-going man, America is just a shout away from the mass persecution, detention, and even physical expulsion of Jews. Given the wildly overwrought suspicions that some Jews harbor about the American Christian majority who are in fact the Jews' best friends in the world, it is not surprising that THESE JEWS LOOK AT MASS THIRD-WORLD AND MOSLEM IMMIGRATION, NOT AS A DANGER TO THEMSELVES, BUT AS THE ULTIMATE GUARANTOR OF THEIR OWN SAFETY, HOPING THAT IN A RACIALLY DIVERSIFIED, DE-CHRISTIANIZED AMERICA, THE WANING MAJORITY CULTURE WILL LACK THE POWER, EVEN IF IT STILL HAS THE DESIRE, TO PERSECUTE JEWS.

THE SELF-PROTECTIVE INSTINCT TO DIVIDE AND WEAKEN A POTENTIALLY OPPRESSIVE MAJORITY POPULATION MAY HAVE SERVED JEWS WELL AT CERTAIN TIMES AND PLACES IN THE PAST WHEN THEY TRULY WERE THREATENED. Under current circumstances, in AMERICA, THE MOST PHILO-SEMITIC NATION IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD, it both morally wrong and suicidal. NOT ONLY ARE THE OPEN-BORDERS JEWS URGING POLICIES HARMFUL TO AMERICA'S MAJORITY POPULATION, BUT, BY DOING SO, THEY ARE SURELY TRIGGERING PREVIOUSLY NON-EXISTENT ANTI-JEWISH FEELINGS AMONG THEM. The tragedy is that once a collective thought pattern gets deeply ingrained, as is the Jews' historically understandable fear of gentiles, it takes on a life of its own and becomes immune to evidence and reason.

This element of the Jewish psyche is further illumined by Norman Podhoretz in his memoir, My Love Affair with America:

‘[M]y own view is that what had befallen the Jews of Europe inculcated a subliminal lesson… The lesson was that anti-Semitism, even the relatively harmless genteel variety that enforced quotas against Jewish students or kept their parents from joining fashionable clubs or getting jobs in prestigious Wall Street law firms, could end in mass murder’…

For years, it's been a running joke among traditionalist conservatives, including those of Jewish background such as myself that ‘ANY CRITICISM OF JEWS IS EQUATED WITH AUSCHWITZ.’

The complaint, I confess, had always seemed a just a tad hyperbolic. But if Podhoretz's portrayal of Jews' beliefs is correct, then the old parody, ‘ANY CRITICISM OF JEWS IS A POTENTIAL AUSCHWITZ,’ TURNS OUT TO BE WHAT THE JEWISH COMMUNITY HAS BELIEVED ALL ALONG. What this means is that IN THE MINDS OF JEWS, ANY DESIRE ON THE PART OF GENTILES TO MAINTAIN AN ALL-GENTILE COUNTRY CLUB, OR ANY STATEMENT BY A CHRISTIAN, NO MATTER HOW MILD AND CIVILIZED, THAT SHOWS ANY CONCERN ABOUT ANY ASPECTS OF THE CULTURAL AND POLITICAL INFLUENCE OF SECULAR JEWS IN AMERICAN LIFE, IS AN EXPRESSION OF ANTI-JEWISH BIGOTRY THAT COULD EASILY LEAD TO MASS EXTERMINATION, AND THEREFORE IT MUST BE RUTHLESSLY SUPPRESSED…

WE MUST ALSO NOTE A TENDENCY ON THE PART OF MORE THAN A FEW JEWS TO DECRY AS ANTI-SEMITIC VIRTUALLY ANY RATIONAL CRITICISM OF JEWS, OR ANY NORMAL MANIFESTATIONS OF GENTILE ETHNOCENTRISM, OR EVEN ANY STRONG EXPRESSION OF CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS BELIEF. Think of the wild charges that were leveled against Mel Gibson's ‘The Passion of the Christ’ by such prominent Jewish commentators as Charles Krauthammer, who characterized the movie as ‘a singular act of interreligious aggression ... spectacularly vicious ... the pre-Vatican II story of the villainous Jews,’ and William Safire, who said that audiences would leave the theater with no other thought than to look for Jews to punish for the death of Jesus. There was also the disturbing fact that Commentary, which in the past had always defended Christians and Christianity from false charges of anti-Semitism, approvingly reviewed James Carroll's virulently anti-Christian book, Constantine's Sword, which argues that THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION IS INHERENTLY ANTI-SEMITIC AND THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF THE NAZI HOLOCAUST.

The significance of the JEWISH BELIEF IN A LURKING ANTI-SEMITISM AMONG WHITE CHRISTIANS is made clearer by another passage in My Love Affair With America:

‘Acting on the principle that 'all bigotry is indivisible,' JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE AND THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE, WHOSE PURPOSE WAS TO DEFEND JEWS AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND DEFAMATION, JOINED ENTHUSIASTICALLY IN THE CIVIL-RIGHTS MOVEMENT, OF WHICH INDIVIDUAL JEWS WERE FOR A LONG TIME LEADERS AND FUNDERS’…

So there it is. We have identified the core assumption that makes many liberal and neoconservative Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their mortal enemies. As these Jews see it, ANY IMMIGRATION RESTRICTIONS AGAINST MOSLEMS WOULD RELEASE A LATENT ETHNOCENTRISM IN THE WHITE AMERICAN MAJORITY THAT WOULD THEN TURN INSTANTLY AGAINST THE JEWS. To state this thought process in the baldest terms, THESE JEWS BELIEVE THAT IF PHILO-SEMITIC WHITE GENTILES EXCLUDE JEW-HATING MOSLEMS FROM AMERICA, IT WOULD LEAD THOSE SAME GENTILES TO COMMIT ANOTHER JEWISH HOLOCAUST.

Even if they don't take it to the absurd point of envisioning a Jewish Holocaust or some other anti-Jewish persecution in this country, various JEWISH WRITERS AND SPOKESMEN HAVE CONTINUED TO EXPRESS A DEEPLY SUSPICIOUS ATTITUDE TOWARDS WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICA. In the cover article of the November 1999 issue of Commentary, entitled ‘California and the End of White America,’ Ron Unz predicted that IF THE CURRENT NON-EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS FAIL TO ASSIMILATE, THE DANGER WILL NOT BE AN UPRISING OF UNASSIMILATED IMMIGRANT CULTURES, BUT AN ERUPTION OF WHITE NATIONALISM. ‘[W]e face the very real threat of future movements along the lines of Proposition 187, each worse than the last, and on a national scale,’ Unz wrote. ‘There are few forces that could so easily break America as the coming of white nationalism.’ [Emphasis added.] Amazing. MULTICULTURALISM AND MINORITY GROUP-RIGHTS MOVEMENTS ARE TEARING APART AMERICA'S ONCE UNITARY, INDIVIDUAL-RIGHTS-BASED POLITY, as Commentary itself has been lamenting for years, while AMERICA'S DECLINING WHITE MAJORITY HAS BEEN REACTING WITH WHAT CAN ONLY BE CALLED PUSILLANIMOUS PASSIVITY IN THE FACE OF THIS SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON THEIR COUNTRY.

But now it turns out that WHAT COMMENTARY MOST FEARS IS NOT THE MINORITY GROUP-RIGHTS MOVEMENT, BUT ANY POSSIBLE RESISTANCE BY WHITE AMERICANS TO IT, A RESISTANCE COMMENTARY DEMONIZES AS ‘WHITE NATIONALISM.’ In other words, OPEN-BORDERS JEWS FEAR A TOTALLY NON-EXISTENT WHITE DEFENSE OF AMERICA MORE THAN THEY FEAR THE ACTUAL REALITIES OF MASS LEGAL AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURALISM, MEXICAN IRREDENTISM, MOSLEM JIHADISM, AND ALL THE REST OF THE FORCES THAT ARE THREATENING OUR COUNTRY. For anyone who shares this view, it follows that THE QUICKER AMERICA'S WHITE MAJORITY IS REDUCED TO A MINORITY BY CONTINUED MASS IMMIGRATION, AND THE QUICKER AMERICA'S MAJORITY CULTURE IS PUSHED ASIDE BY IMMIGRANT CULTURES, THE BETTER OFF AMERICA WILL BE.

While THE DISTURBING ATTITUDES I HAVE BEEN DESCRIBING CONSTITUTE A DEFINITE STRAND IN THE AMERICAN JEWISH SENSIBILITY, AS WELL IN THE SENSIBILITY OF LIBERALS GENERALLY, I find it hard to believe that most Jews or even most politically active Jews are so paranoid about white gentiles' potential for committing anti-Jewish oppression that they are driven to the insane expedient of supporting mass Moslem immigration in order to forestall that oppression…

As Paul Johnson writes in his History of the Jews, the Jewish Communists of the 19th century ("non-Jewish Jews," as he calls them) saw in Communism the end of national and ethnic identities for all mankind, and thus the end of the Jewish ethnic identity, and thus the liberation of the Jews from the age-old curse of anti-Jewish prejudice. TO SEEK TO OVERTURN ENTIRE SOCIETIES IN ORDER TO GET RID OF ONE'S OWN ETHNIC IDENTITY MAY SEEM A RATHER DRASTIC APPROACH TO SOLVING THE JEWISH PROBLEM, YET IT REFLECTS, IN A UNIQUELY EXACERBATED AND DESTRUCTIVE FORM, JEWS' RECURRENT PATTERN OF FORMING SOME GLOBAL IDEOLOGY FOR REASONS RELATING TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATION AS JEWS…

Starting in the 1960s, Jews, and liberals generally, took the good idea of liberal individualism too far. The very idea of a common culture, which they had previously seen as the pathway to success and belonging in America, started to seem discriminatory to them, since it implied that some peoples and cultures could fit into the common culture while others couldn't. A common culture also implied the existence of common standards of behavior, derived from America's declining WASP majority, to which people were expected to conform; and Jews in particular, after having eagerly adopted those standards in previous generations, began, in the liberatory afflatus of the Sixties, to find them stifling. Jews and other liberals thus turned from the moderate tolerance of mid-twentieth century America to what might be called tolerance absolutism, an attitude that delegitimized any notion of a common American culture or moral tradition (other than the tradition of liberalism itself), because shared cultural allegiances and moral norms would place limits on the individual self or the ethnic group.

This radicalized liberalism made Jews feel even safer, and freer to express themselves as Jews, than before. Having realized the model of ‘pure-non-discrimination-and-individual-rights-without-a-majority-culture’ as the very basis of their unprecedented success, freedom, and happiness in America, Jews saw that model as not only advantageous to themselves personally, but as advantageous to everyone—indeed, as the highest political truth. It didn't occur to them that the radical individualist model worked so well for them because they are a uniquely high-achieving people operating IN A STILL INTACT WESTERN SOCIETY. It didn't occur to them that the model might not work so well for less capable or less assimilable people in a society without a cohesive common culture, such as America was now becoming due to the tolerance absolutism that was supported by the Jews themselves. IT DIDN'T OCCUR TO THEM THAT BOTH THE INTACTNESS AND THE LIBERALISM OF THE SOCIETY WOULD BE THREATENED IF THE LIBERALISM WERE TAKEN TOO FAR.

Their belief that radical individualism is true for all mankind is thus for liberal secular Jews a crux of faith, an emotional prop to make sense of the world, and a key component of their identity as a people. More than any pragmatic calculus, IT IS THE REASON THEY BITTERLY RESENT ANY CRITICISM OF THE LIBERAL IDEOLOGY AND VORACIOUSLY CRAVE ATTEMPTS TO VINDICATE IT, WHETHER BY ASSIMILATING THIRD-WORLD IMMIGRANTS, DEMOCRATIZING MOSLEM COUNTRIES, OR LIQUIDATING TRADITIONAL VALUES FOUNDED UPON THE RESTRAINT OF INDIVIDUAL DESIRE. (Consider, for example, THE JEWISH COMMUNITY'S EXTRAORDINARY DEGREE OF SUPPORT FOR HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE, far more extensive than that of any other ethnic or religious group—a uniquely ironic outcome for the first major people in history who saw homosexuality as an abomination to God.)

What the Jews need to see, what they can't help but see under the encroaching reality of jihad in America, is that, like any good idea, the good idea of non-discrimination can be carried too far. The moderate non-discrimination that allowed Jews to thrive in America did not have to be taken to THE POINT OF ABSOLUTE NON-DISCRIMINATION, WHICH REQUIRED US TO OPEN OUR BORDERS AND OUR CULTURE TO UNASSIMILABLE AND HOSTILE ALIENS, WHICH IN TURN MUST RESULT IN THE DISARMING AND DESTRUCTION OF THE SOCIETY ITSELF.

Notwithstanding the horrific problems created by the open-immigration ideology, I call this the optimistic view of Jewish support for open immigration because it assumes, not an endemic Jewish oppositionalism to America's majority culture, but a correctable misperception stemming from Jews' unique history. Having experienced the liberal paradigm of individual rights and non-discrimination as the recipe for their own earthly salvation after centuries of misery and persecution, Jews have, understandably though mistakenly, carried that ideology to an extreme where IT THREATENS THE VERY COUNTRY THAT PROVIDED THE JEWS THOSE PROTECTIONS AND BENEFITS IN THE FIRST PLACE. This is so patently irrational from the point of view of the Jews' own self-interest that they cannot help but eventually see it, if it is clearly and firmly pointed out to them…

So, while Stephen Steinlight is to be applauded for his efforts to convert his fellow Jews to a sane immigration policy, he needs to recognize that they are bound to their belief in open borders by a larger set of emotional and political attachments than a reluctance to ‘betray their grandparents.’ He also needs to recognize that even if, under the pressure of immediate fears of Islamism in America, Jews back off from their open borders ideology, their conversion is unlikely to be very deep. A full and principled abandonment of modern liberalism by liberals and especially by Jews is not to be expected…

LIBERALISM IS THE ORGANIZING IDEOLOGY OF MODERN SOCIETY, BUT FOR SECULAR JEWS (AND THE GREAT MAJORITY OF AMERICAN JEWS ARE ESSENTIALLY SECULAR), IT IS A SACRED TRUST TOWARD WHICH THEY FEEL THE SAME ZEALOUS DEVOTION THAT THEIR RELIGIOUS BRETHREN FEEL TOWARD THEIR COVENANT WITH GOD.”

Why Jews Welcome Muslims



Hazel Blears, former Chairperson of the Labour Party, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Minister of State for Policing and Counter Terrorism, gave us a bit of clue as to what New Labour was REALLY about in her 2004 pamphlet, The Politics of Decency, when she said:

“GOVERNMENTS SEEK TO MODIFY OUR BEHAVIOUR THROUGH COERCION on the one hand, and persuasion on the other, and THE LESSON IS THAT GOVERNMENTS CAN AND DO CHANGE THE WAY PEOPLE THINK AND BEHAVE.

In the Labour movement WE ARE ABOUT TRANSFORMING OUR SOCIETY AND CHANGING THE WORLD.”

I don’t think the coercive, thought-modifying teletubby meant to be quite so candid, do you?

But then again, maybe she thought that, in the dumbed-down, drugged-up, thought-policed nomansland that the transformers had created, the sheeple would not notice.

If that's what she thought, she might well have been right.



In 2004, The Italian journalist Oriana Falacci published her book, The Force of Reason.

In this she said:

"A MODERATE ISLAM DOES NOT EXIST. It does not exist because THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOOD ISLAM AND BAD ISLAM. There is Islam and that it the end of it. Islam is the Koran, and nothing other than the Koran. And THE KORAN IS THE MEIN KAMPF OF A RELIGION THAT DESIRES TO ELIMINATE OTHERS- NON–MUSLIMS - WHO ARE CALLED INFIDEL DOGS, AND INFERIOR CREATURES.

Read the Koran… and you will see that THE EVIL WHICH THE SONS OF ALLAH… HAVE PERPETRATED COMES FROM THAT BOOK."



On 18 August 2003, The Birmingham Evening Mail quoted the TV presenter Adrian Chiles thus:

“I WANT ALL THE SPECIES TO MARRY EACH OTHER SO THAT IN 300 YEARS' TIME WE ARE ALL THE SAME COLOUR... I WOULD LOVE MY DAUGHTER TO MARRY AN ASIAN OR BLACK MAN'."

So, Adrian Chiles wants us 'all to be the same colour' in 300 years time.

Well, we won’t be, pal. There will still be black, there will still be yellow and there will be many shades of brown but, if ghastly PC airheads like you get their way there will no longer be a white race for everyone else to blame their failings on.

On 2 December 2005, Jane Garvey, Adrian Chiles' wife at the time, put this extraordinary question to Chief Constable Peter Fahey on her Radio 5 Live show:

"HAS THER EVER BEEN A WHITE VICTIM OF A RACIST MURDER IN THIS COUNTRY?"

It isn't too difficult to seewhy the careers of this fine PC pair progressed so rapidly at the BBC, is it?

Adrian Chiles' mother, Ljerka, came to England in the 1950s to work as an au pair.

She is Croatian.



On 29 May 2003, The Times offered us Trevor Phillips' explanation of why a bust of Lenin sits upon his desk.

He said:

"It’s there as a reminder... Just because the Soviet experiment failed, we should not throw everything Lenin did out the window.”

Like the mass murder of millions of innocent people, Trev?

Should that little matter be left inside the Marxist window?



On 10 April 2003, three weeks after the US-led coalition invaded Iraq, the following Janet Daley piece appeared in The Age magazine.

“They got the Iraq war wrong, and they get America wrong. But no doubt the left will just move smartly on, writes Janet Daley.

So, something of a cakewalk after all, then. No major set-piece battles with the ‘elite’ Republican Guard. No massive numbers of civilian casualties - ‘millions of women and children killed.’ as British left-wing politician Shirley Williams, among many others, predicted. No relentless house-to-house street fighting. No insuperable problem with the desert heat - the Iraqi summer seems to have gone the way of the Afghan winter in that earlier impracticable American war effort. No uncontrollably burning oil fields in southern Iraq, leading to intractable environmental catastrophe. Nor has there been a great humanitarian disaster or a flood of refugees across the Iraqi borders…

The capital is being pounded, its civilians endangered and its infrastructure damaged more than the coalition would have preferred. That is because Saddam and his chief henchmen, if they are alive, are remaining true to the last to their wicked delusions. If Saddam is alive and hiding, with no sane hope of any sort of victory, then HE IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVASTATION OF HIS CAPITAL AND THE DEATHS OF CIVILIANS.”

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/04/09/1049567739103.html

Ah right.

So Bush, Blair, the Neocons and Janet the warmongering journalist will bear no responsibility for civialian casualties. You can shoot them, bomb them, torture them, rape them and drive them nuts but, according to Ms Daley, only Saddam will ever be to blame. Given the no-fault mindset of the Janets, I’m guessing such judgements will apply even after his death.

“With characteristically desperate cowardice, he scurries from his tunnels to his underground bunker while his city is battered and his people terrified. Listening to Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, the comically undaunted Iraqi Information Minister, can anyone be left in any doubt that this mad, bad and ultimately absurd despotism needed to be displaced?”

It wasn’t ever up to you to displace him, Janet.

That should have been the prerogative of the Iraqi people. But you are a willing footstool of the Great Satan and, as such, the mass slaughter of the innocent will never be the stuff of your nightmares.

“A spokesman for the allied forces was asked the quintessential left-wing question the other day: 'If you fail to find any weapons of mass destruction, will you apologise?' Given that Saddam was given such a generous amount of time by the United Nations Security Council to spirit any such weapons safely over the border to Syria, and that he would be very unlikely to have left them lying around where troops would stumble across them in the course of battle, ‘finding’ them in the past three weeks would have been hugely unlikely. But never mind that.”

‘Never mind’ the WMD, eh, Janet?

Never mind the stated reason for going to war. You’re in there now. The oil and the possibility of a greater Israel is yours!

“What I want to know is when THE PERPETRATORS OF THE MYTHS that I enumerated above can be expected to offer their apologies.”

Those who spoke out against the war and told the inconvenient truths = “The perpetrators of the myths,” according to Bush, Blair and the Janets.

“I have this delightful fantasy of left-wingers throughout the Western world putting their hands up and saying: ‘WELL, ACTUALLY WE GOT THAT A LITTLE BIT WRONG.’ And maybe even deciding THAT, SINCE THEIR ANALYSIS OF THE WAR WAS MISTAKEN, THEIR DIAGNOSIS OF THE PEACE MIGHT BE OPEN TO QUESTION TOO.”

Have you ever apologised for this fatuous gloat, Janet?

Have you ever said you’re sorry for the fact that your ‘analysis of the war’ was so unforgivably wrong? Don’t you think warmongering journalists like you and David Aaronovitch should stand trial for war crimes? I mean, you played your fanatically Hebrew-friendly part in the genocide, didn’t you?

“I am off to Washington at the end of the week, where a think tank has invited me to discuss European anti-American attitudes. What shall I say to them? That the obvious truth - America is resented because of its enormous power - is only a fragment of the picture? That the foundation of anti-Americanism lies deep in the pathology of a Europe that has never recovered from ITS OWN GUILT AND SELF-LOATHING over the two great wars of last century?

What a creepy anti-European slag, eh? Neville Chamberlain and the vast majority of the European peoples never wanted WWII. Chamberlain did his damnedest to keep us out of it. With Jewish-American money, Churchill and the Focus kept the fires of war burning until the great conflagration burst forth and secretly, behind the scenes, FDR and co. were fanning the flames.

And by the way, Janet, America isn’t resented because of its enormous power. It IS resented by some because of its enormous ABUSE of the power it has.

“How to make Americans, most of whom are descended from the most despised and wretched of the populations of the Old World - poor southern Italians, landless Irish peasants, ghetto Jews of eastern Europe - understand that MUCH APPARENTLY POLITICAL RESISTANCE TO THEM IS GROUNDED IN PURE SNOBBERY? The great American virtues - self-improvement, ambition, individualism - are, IN EUROPEAN ESTABLISHMENT EYES, THE CHARACTERISTICS OF VULGARITY.”

What deceitful and chauvinistic bulls***, this Brit-based Yank spouts.

Did you notice something about her partial list of New World folk, ladies and gents? The British, who would comprise the majority of the old world settlers, weren’t mentioned. Neither were the French, Germans and Scandinavians. Methinks old blue-eyes and Blondie might not be the favourite archetype of this close relative of ‘ghetto Jews’. Oh, and Janet, you forgot to mention the Black and Hispanic folk? Bit racist that, don’t you think?

"The consumer-led culture of America, so embarrassingly coveted by the poor peoples of the world, is crass, sentimental and socially gauche. Of course it is. It is the only popular culture there has ever been that is cosmopolitan and affluent, as opposed to the folk cultures of Europe, which dwell in provincial poverty but have their own ‘integrity’ in patronising terms.”

And sub-prime, the credit-crunch and the world-wide financial collapse of 2008 onwards?

Would that have anything to do with your consumer-led (fat Cat and finacier-led actually) culture?

It’s all gone quiet over there.

“The same people who ridicule American culture will tell you that The Sopranos is the best drama series on television and that Philip Roth is the greatest living novelist.”

I don’t know anyone who thinks Roth’s adolescent outpourings are ‘great.’

They’re self-indulgent and masturbatory and I shouldn't think they’d be all that interesting to anyone beyond their teenage years who wasn‘t Jewish.

“But how much reality can the ideologically committed be expected to digest? And when has self-contradiction and incoherence ever been a problem for the left?”

Ask yourself the same question, lady.

Trust me, you will find that the self-approving sneerer on the Neocon right is every bit as self-contradictory and incoherent as the self-approving sneerer on the lunatic Left.



On 21 April 2002, Antony Barnett, the Public Affairs Editor of The Observer told us this:

“The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct A SERIES OF SECRET GERM WARFARE TESTS ON THE PUBLIC.

A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979. MANY OF THESE TESTS INVOLVED RELEASING POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS CHEMICALS AND MICRO-ORGANISMS OVER VAST SWATHS OF THE POPULATION WITHOUT THE PUBLIC BEING TOLD.

While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments. The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any 'inquisitive inquirer' the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution…

One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how BETWEEN 1955 AND 1963 PLANES FLEW FROM NORTH-EAST ENGLAND TO THE TIP OF CORNWALL ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST COASTS, DROPPING HUGE AMOUNTS OF ZINC CADMIUM SULPHIDE ON THE POPULATION. THE CHEMICAL DRIFTED MILES INLAND, ITS FLUORESCENCE ALLOWING THE SPREAD TO BE MONITORED. IN ANOTHER TRIAL USING ZINC CADMIUM SULPHIDE, A GENERATOR WAS TOWED ALONG A ROAD NEAR FROME IN SOMERSET WHERE IT SPEWED THE CHEMICAL FOR AN HOUR.

While the Government has insisted the chemical is safe, CADMIUM IS RECOGNISED AS A CAUSE OF LUNG CANCER AND DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR WAS CONSIDERED BY THE ALLIES AS A CHEMICAL WEAPON.

In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how BETWEEN 1961 AND 1968 MORE THAN A MILLION PEOPLE ALONG THE SOUTH COAST OF ENGLAND, FROM TORQUAY TO THE NEW FOREST, WERE EXPOSED TO BACTERIA INCLUDING E.COLI AND BACILLUS GLOBIGII , WHICH MIMICS ANTHRAX…

The report also reveals details of the DICE trials in south Dorset between 1971 and 1975. These involved US AND UK MILITARY SCIENTISTS SPRAYING INTO THE AIR MASSIVE QUANTITIES OF SERRATIA MARCESCENS BACTERIA, WITH AN ANTHRAX SIMULANT AND PHENOL.

Similar bacteria were released in 'The Sabotage Trials' between 1952 and 1964. These were tests to determine the vulnerability of large government buildings and public transport to attack. IN 1956 BACTERIA WERE RELEASED ON THE LONDON UNDERGROUND AT LUNCHTIME ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE BETWEEN COLLIERS WOOD AND TOOTING BROADWAY. The results show that the organism dispersed about 10 miles. Similar tests were conducted in tunnels running under government buildings in Whitehall.

Experiments conducted between 1964 and 1973 involved attaching germs to the threads of spiders' webs in boxes to test how the germs would survive in different environments. THESE TESTS WERE CARRIED OUT IN A DOZEN LOCATIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY, INCLUDING LONDON'S WEST END, SOUTHAMPTON AND SWINDON. The report also gives details of more than a dozen smaller field trials between 1968 and 1977.

In recent years, the MoD has commissioned two scientists to review the safety of these tests. Both reported that there was no risk to public health, although one suggested the elderly or people suffering from breathing illnesses may have been seriously harmed if they inhaled sufficient quantities of micro-organisms. However, SOME FAMILIES IN AREAS WHICH BORE THE BRUNT OF THE SECRET TESTS ARE CONVINCED THE EXPERIMENTS HAVE LED TO THEIR CHILDREN SUFFERING BIRTH DEFECTS, PHYSICAL HANDICAPS AND LEARNING DIFFICULTIES...

The MoD report traces the history of the UK's research into germ warfare since the Second World War when PORTON DOWN PRODUCED FIVE MILLION CATTLE CAKES FILLED WITH DEADLY ANTHRAX SPORES WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN DROPPED IN GERMANY to kill their livestock. It also gives details of the infamous anthrax experiments on Gruinard on the Scottish coast WHICH LEFT THE ISLAND SO CONTAMINATED IT COULD NOT BE INHABITED UNTIL THE LATE 1980S.

THE REPORT ALSO CONFIRMS THE USE OF ANTHRAX AND OTHER DEADLY GERMS ON TESTS ABOARD SHIPS IN THE CARIBBEAN AND OFF THE SCOTTISH COAST DURING THE 1950S. The document states:

'TACIT APPROVAL FOR SIMULANT TRIALS WHERE THE PUBLIC MIGHT BE EXPOSED was strongly influenced by defence security considerations AIMED OBVIOUSLY AT RESTRICTING PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE. An important corollary to this was THE NEED TO AVOID PUBLIC ALARM AND DISQUIET ABOUT THE VULNERABILITY OF THE CIVIL POPULATION TO BW [biological warfare] attack.'

Sue Ellison, spokeswoman for Porton Down, said:

'Independent reports by eminent scientists have shown THERE WAS NO DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH FROM THESE RELEASES WHICH WERE CARRIED OUT TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC. The results from these trials will save lives, should the country or our forces face an attack by chemical and biological weapons.'

Asked whether such tests are still being carried out, she said:

'IT IS NOT OUR POLICY TO DISCUSS ONGOING RESEARCH'.”

“There was no danger to public health from these releases which were carried out to protect the public.”

In which case, Sue, in future, test this stuff on yourself, on our parliamentarians, on their children and their grandchildren and on yours.

DON’T TEST IT ON US!!!

“It is not our policy to discuss ongoing research”.

Anyone out there surprised by this?



On 28 July 2000, Jean-Pierre Chevènement, the French interior minister, said this at a meeting of EU ministers in Marseille.

"Public opinion must be told clearly that Europe, a land of immigration, will become A PLACE WHERE CROSS-FERTILISATION OCCURS. Public opinion needs to be enlightened and convinced, and more so in countries of recent immigration than others… ENSURING CROSS-FERTILISATION REQUIRES A CAREFUL AND CONTROLLING HAND.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/jul/28/immigration.immigrationandpublicservices

‘Métissage,’ the word used by Chevènement and translated as ‘cross-fertilsation’ here, may also be translated as ‘cross-breeding.’

Pretty categoric, wouldn’t you say? The above statement suggests that, at the highest level, European politicians are in the business of cross-breeding the white, indigenous populations of Europe into the melting pot and out of existence.

This is what the British voter votes for when they vote for the three mainstream parties, all of whom are intensely Europhilic and pro-immigration.



Michael Ryan interviewed the South African Boer leader, Eugène Terre'Blanche, for his 9 April 1990 article, Hope Meets Hatred in South Africa

Ryan quoted Terre'Blanche thus:

"The revolution is coming. We will defend ourselves, our women and our property; we will not lose the war. We are from fighting stock. Freedom for the blacks is freedom to steal and to maim and to rape, and I'm not a racist when I say that. What can we tell them? Just that you have to look after yourself. We cannot look after you. You must buy your own cars, build your own house. That is what people all over the world do. BUT THE COMMUNISTS TELL THEM, 'YOU CAN HAVE THIS MAN'S HOME; YOU CAN HAVE THE WHITE MAN'S MOTORCARS.' AND THE BLACKS BELIEVE IT."

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20117303,00.html

Wikipedia tells us this:

“Terre'Blanche spent three years in prison for assaulting a black petrol station worker and the attempted murder of a black security guard in 1996.

On 3 April 2010, TERRE'BLANCHE WAS HACKED AND BEATEN TO DEATH ON HIS FARM…

Terre'Blanche's supporters have said that THE MURDER IS PART OF A LARGER PATTERN OF ANTI-WHITE ‘FARM MURDERS’ IN SOUTH AFRICA.”

As of 25 August 2011, 3,150 members of South Africa’s white farming community had been murdered by marauding black gangs since Nelson Mandela came to power in 1994.


On 3 January 1997, The Evening Standard reported that Detective Chief Inspector Alan Hill, who heads the CID in London's Belgravia, was quitting the police.

Hill complained that the force was more interested in Public Relations and spin-doctoring, than catching criminals. He added:

"Conviction policing is taking a back seat to public image policing."

Upon his appointment Commissioner Paul Condon had stated that 'anti-racism' was the Met's main priority.



The following 21 February 2005 article can be found at John Pilger’s own web site.

“In our schools, children learn that the US fought the Vietnam war against a ‘communist threat’ to ‘us.’ Is it any wonder that so many don't understand the truth about Iraq?

How does thought control work in societies that call themselves free? Why are famous journalists so eager, almost as a reflex, to minimise the culpability of a prime minister who shares responsibility for the unprovoked attack on a defenceless people, for laying waste to their land and for killing at least 100,000 people, most of them civilians, having sought to justify this epic crime with demonstrable lies?

What made the BBC's Mark Mardell describe the invasion of Iraq as ‘a vindication for him?’ Why have broadcasters never associated the British or American state with terrorism? Why have such privileged communicators, with unlimited access to the facts, lined up to describe an unobserved, unverified, illegitimate, cynically manipulated election, held under a brutal occupation, as ‘democratic,’ with the pristine aim of being ‘free and fair?’ That quotation belongs to Helen Boaden, the director of BBC News.

Have she and the others read no history? Or is the history they know, or choose to know, subject to such amnesia and omission that it produces a world-view as seen only through a one-way moral mirror?

There is no suggestion of conspiracy. This one-way mirror ensures that most of humanity is regarded in terms of its usefulness to ‘us,’ its desirability or expendability, its worthiness or unworthiness: for example, the notion of ‘good’ Kurds in Iraq and ‘bad’ Kurds in Turkey. The unerring assumption is that ‘we’ in the dominant west have moral standards superior to ‘theirs.’

One of 'their' dictators (often a former client of ours, such as Saddam Hussein) kills thousands of people and he is declared a monster, a second Hitler. When one of our leaders does the same he is viewed, at worst, like Blair, in Shakespearean terms. Those who kill people with car bombs are 'terrorists'; those who kill far more people with cluster bombs are the noble occupants of a 'quagmire'…

Only ten years after the Vietnam war, which I reported, an opinion poll in the United States found that a third of Americans could not remember which side their government had supported. This demonstrated the insidious power of the dominant propaganda, that the war was essentially a conflict of 'good' Vietnamese against 'bad' Vietnamese, in which the Americans became 'involved', bringing democracy to the people of southern Vietnam faced with a 'communist threat'. Such a false and dishonest assumption permeated the media coverage, with honourable exceptions.

The truth is that THE LONGEST WAR OF THE 20TH CENTURY WAS A WAR WAGED AGAINST VIETNAM, NORTH AND SOUTH, COMMUNIST AND NON-COMMUNIST, BY AMERICA. It was an unprovoked invasion of the people's homeland and their lives, just like the invasion of Iraq. Amnesia ensures that, while the relatively few deaths of the invaders are constantly acknowledged, the deaths of up to five million Vietnamese are consigned to oblivion.

What are the roots of this? Certainly, 'popular culture', especially Hollywood movies, can decide what and how little we remember. Selective education at a tender age performs the same task. I have been sent a widely used revision guide for GCSE modern world history, on Vietnam and the cold war. This is learned by 14- to-16-year-olds in our schools. It informs their understanding of a pivotal period in history, which must influence how they make sense of today's news from Iraq and elsewhere.

IT IS SHOCKING. It says that under the 1954 Geneva Accord: 'Vietnam was partitioned into communist north and democratic south.' In one sentence, truth is despatched. The final declaration of the Geneva conference divided Vietnam 'temporarily' until free national elections were held on 26 July 1956. There was little doubt that Ho Chi Minh would win and form Vietnam's first democratically elected government. Certainly, President Eisenhower was in no doubt of this. 'I have never talked with a person knowledgeable in Indo-Chinese affairs,' he wrote, 'who did not agree that… 80 per cent of the population would have voted for the communist Ho Chi Minh as their leader.'

Not only did the United States refuse to allow the UN to administer the agreed elections two years later, but the 'democratic' regime in the south was an invention. One of the inventors, the CIA official Ralph McGehee, describes in his masterly book Deadly Deceits how a brutal expatriate mandarin, Ngo Dinh Diem, was imported from New Jersey to be 'president' and a fake government was put in place. 'The CIA,' he wrote, 'was ordered to sustain that illusion through propaganda [placed in the media].'

Phoney elections were arranged, hailed in the west as 'free and fair', with American officials fabricating 'an 83 per cent turnout despite Vietcong terror'. The GCSE guide alludes to none of this, nor that 'the terrorists', whom the Americans called the Vietcong, were also southern Vietnamese defending their homeland against the American invasion and whose resistance was popular. For Vietnam, read Iraq...

There is no sense that a national liberation movement existed in Vietnam, merely 'a communist threat', merely the propaganda that 'the USA was terrified that many other countries might become communist and help the USSR - they didn't want to be outnumbered', merely that President Lyndon B Johnson 'was determined to keep South Vietnam communist-free'.

This proceeds quickly to the Tet Offensive of 1968, which 'ended in the loss of thousands of American lives - 14,000 in 1969 - most were young men'. There is no mention of the millions of Vietnamese lives also lost in the offensive. And America merely began 'a bombing campaign': there is no mention of the greatest tonnage of bombs dropped in the history of warfare, of a military strategy that was deliberately designed to force millions of people to abandon their homes, and of chemicals used in a manner that profoundly changed the environment and the genetic order, leaving a once-bountiful land all but ruined.

This guide is from a private publisher, but its bias and omissions reflect that of the official syllabuses, such as the syllabus from Oxford and Cambridge, whose cold war section refers to Soviet 'expansionism' and the 'spread' of communism; there is not a word about the 'spread' of rapacious America. One of its 'key questions' is: 'How effectively did the USA contain the spread of communism?' Good versus evil for untutored minds.

'Phew, loads for you to learn here . . .' say the authors of the revision guide, 'so get it learned right now.' Phew, the British empire did not happen; there is nothing about the atrocious colonial wars that were models for the successor power, America, in Indonesia, Vietnam, Chile, El Salvador, Nicaragua, to name but a few along modern history's imperial trail of blood of which Iraq is the latest.

AND NOW IRAN? The drumbeat has already begun. HOW MANY MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE HAVE TO DIE BEFORE THOSE WHO FILTER THE PAST AND THE PRESENT WAKE UP TO THEIR MORAL RESPONSIBILITY to protect our memory and the lives of human beings?”



On 15 December 1944, Winston Churchill said this in the House of Commons:

"EXPULSION IS THE METHOD WHICH… WILL BE THE MOST SATISFACTORY AND LASTING. THERE WILL BE NO MIXTURE OF POPULATIONS TO CAUSE ENDLESS TROUBLE... A clean sweep will be made. I am not alarmed by the prospect of THE DISENTANGLEMENT OF POPULATIONS, nor even by these large transferences, which are more possible in modern conditions than they ever were before."

So, it’s OK for Britain’s no. 1 idol to advocate the ethnic cleansing of millions of Germans from their own ancient homelands.

Such advocacy is not racist. But it most certainly IS racist for anyone else to want the mass immigration of millions of alien peoples into western Europe to stop. And it’s just about as fascistic and bigoted as one can imagine for the white world to speak out against the ‘mixture of populations’ that, according to Churchill’s formula, was likely ‘to cause endless trouble.’

One could be forgiven for supposing that those who introduced the bogey word ‘racist’ to the lexicon of modern English usage would be solidly against the ‘disentanglement of populations’. Seeing as how such folk seem to be all for the entanglement of populations and the ‘endless trouble’ such entanglements bring to the entangled. However, if any of you have ever heard a PC activist bemoaning the fate of the civilian millions of East Prussia in the mid 1940s, I’d be very surprised.

The term 'racist' was first coined in English by a Mr. Max Eastman.

He was translating a word used by Leon Trotsky in his 1930 essay, The History of the Russian Revolution. Different translators have used the term to describe what was meant in other Trotsky articles. For example, Trotsky's 1933 essay, What is National Socialism? also contains the word ‘racism’.

The notorious ‘sexologist’ and self-styled 'Einstein of Sex,' Magnus Hirschfeld, published a book in 1934 which was translated into English three years later. The publisher Victor Gollancz titled Hirschfeld’s magnum opus, ‘Racism.’ The Cultural Marxists (intellectual ancestors of today’s PC activist) never looked back.

Though history tells us that Lenin was the leader of the Bolshevik revolution, Trotsky did more than any other to make it happen.

He raised many millions of dollars from American businessmen, without which there wouldn't have been a revolution, and, through the campaigns of terror he ordered and organised as Head of the Red Army, all resistance was crushed and Bolshevik rule established. Millions of innocent Russians lost their lives at this time.

Interesting, isn’t it, that a mass murderer of millions, a man as responsible as any other for imposing Communism upon eastern Europe, should have spawned a word that is, nowadays, used to prevent Western man from speaking out as his country is overrun by aliens?

Hirschfeld and Gollancz were Jewish. As was Jacob Schiff, the German-American businessman who invested most in the Russian Revolution. As was Trotsky and so many of his fellow revolutionaries. Most of the original Cultural Marxists were also Jewish.

http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=1127&iParentId=1097

I wonder, does my pointing out the racial origins of these gentlemen make me anti-Semitic?

The adjective ‘anti-semitic’ was seen in print as early as 1860. The bibliographer, Moritz Steinschneider, used it in the phrase ‘antisemitischen vorurtheile.’ (‘Antisemitic prejudices‘) Moritz, the son of Jacob Steinschneider, a Tamudic scholar and enthusiastic early Zionist, was, of course, Jewish.