On 6 November 2009, Kevin Toolis opined thus in The Daily Express:
"NO WESTERN POLITICAL LEADER CAN ACTUALLY EXPLAIN WHAT OUR TROOPS ARE FIGHTING FOR. Instead WE HAVE BEEN TOLD AN EVER-CHANGING SERIES OF LIES BY BLAIR, BROWN AND BUSH THAT THE TROOPS WERE DYING FOR 'DEMOCRACY, WOMEN’S RIGHTS, DEVELOPMENT AND THE WAR ON TERROR'…
Our very presence as ‘foreign crusading invaders‘ is a rallying call for the Taliban’s recruiters and their brain-washed followers. IT IS TIME TO STOP PRETENDING WE CAN TURN AFGHANISTAN INTO A DEMOCRATIC STATE…
We should leave the Afghans to get on with their own wars.”
Anyone out there disagree with Mr Toolis?
Ah yes, the usual globalist suspects.
The ones who never seem to do any of the fighting and dying.
No one else.
On 6 November 2009, the actress, Emma Thompson. said this at an event she organised at Exeter University:
"EXETER IS VERY WHITE AND MIDDLE-CLASS AND NEEDS TO BE CRACKED OPEN A BIT".
The 7 November 2009 edition of The Daily Mail clarified matters thus:
"Emma said it was up to staff and students to encourage more people from ethnic minorities... During her talk she drew on the experiences of her 22-year- old Rwandan son Tindyebwa Agaba... The former child soldier was sleeping rough in London before being taken in by Miss Thompson and her family six years ago. She paid for his education and he learnt to speak English before going on to take his GCSEs and Alevels and then winning a place at Exeter to study politics...
At the lecture on Thursday, a member of the audience asked Miss Thompson about the BNP and Mr Griffin, to which the 50-year-old actress replied:
'He'd love Exeter, he would feel very comfortable here'...
The 22-year-old was unofficially 'adopted' by Miss Thompson in 2003. His father had died from Aids when he was just nine and his mother and sister were listed as missing during the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
He has previously attacked his university experience complaining about the 'complete death of politically and socially stimulating activism which has been replaced by the pathetic celebrity culture and living a pretentious life'. He has also claimed his college had made too little effort to attract students from ethnic minorities."
Ah the celebs and their adoptive pets, how they love to sneer at Whitey.
Emma Thompson lives in a leafy suburbian part of West Hampstead, London. It isn't exactly Brixton, Tottenham or Hackney.
She also has a second home in the exclusive resort town of Dunoon in Scotland. If there are any ethnics at all living there, other than the odd Arab multimillionaire and the occasional former child soldier, I'd be very surprised.
Perhaps our Emma should try living in Rwanda for a while. On second thoughts, I don't think she be around very long if she tried to patronise them as she patronises us.
On 6 November 2009, a few days before Remembrance Day, Gordon Brown delivered a speech at the Royal College of Defence Studies in London.
This came in the wake of the deaths of five British soldiers, assassinated by a member of the Afghan security forces, whom they were "training and mentoring".
“When people ask why we are in Afghanistan… I ask them to look at this list of terrible atrocities, and I ask them to remember that in Britain alone since 2001, MORE THAN 200 PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF PLANNING TERRORIST PLOTS."
'Atrocities' and 'plots' that would never have materialised if a treacherous, governmental establishment hadn't, over the course of many decades, conspired to flood our country with foreigners against the stated will of its native, British inhabitants.
"When the main terrorist threat facing Britain emanates from Afghanistan and Pakistan... when we know that they (Al-Qaeda) continue to train and plot attacks on Britain from the region, our mission must not fail... That is the responsibility of leadership, of government, and of our armed forces: to do what is necessary, however difficult, TO KEEP THE BRITISH PEOPLE SAFE. We cannot, must not and will not walk away.”
You and Tony Blair were trying 'to keep the British people safe?'
Forgive me, Gordon, I thought you and Tony were just trying to butter up Gerge Bush and his Neoconservative mentors. Remind me again, who was it that imported all the Germaine Lindsays, Mohammed Siddique Khans, Shehzad Tanweers and Hasib Hussains into our country? Who has imported millions more since 52 innocent people got blown to bits on 7/7/2005? Who created all the Brit-bashing race laws to encourage and promote such people and cow a disenfranchised majority into saying and doing nothing as their country was taken from them? Who is it, even now, that a vicious, name-calling PC elite seek to demonise if they ever dare say "boo" to the immigrant goose?
You've always known the answers to these questions, Gordon. When the majority have figured out what you and yours have known all along, when they realise that "the main terrorist threat facing Britain emanates" from Westminster, Washington, Wall Street and the City of London, I doubt that they‘ll be thinking that you were trying to keep them safe, Gordon.
“The biggest domestic threat continues to come from the mountains of Pakistan and Afghanistan, so it is right that our first line of defence is there.”
Our invasions of Afghanistan upset, and are still upsetting, the Muslim populations of the planet. The sooner we leave, those already here, along with those planning to come, will have less to be upset about. The first line of defence, Gordon, if you were truly interested in protecting us, would be the Schengen Agreement, the tearing up thereof, and the renunciation of globalism. Schengen ensures that our borders are porous, globalisation ensures that there will always be more who are willing and able to come here and, once here, to ratchet up the “domestic threat“.
“Nowhere is democracy a perfect system.”
Least of all here.
If democracy worked the politicians whom the majority elect would do what suited that majority instead of routinely ignoring what they want.
"WHAT PEOPLE HERE IN BRITAIN ASK FOR is the same as our forces on the ground ask for – IT’S A CLEAR SENSE OF WHAT SUCCESS IN AFGHANISTAN WOULD LOOK LIKE, AND HOW WE WILL GET THERE."
I'm afraid that's nonsense, Gordon.
What most of the people here in Britain want is for you to pull the troops out!
On 15 November 2009, The Independent on Sunday reported thus:
"SEVEN OUT OF 10 BRITONS BACK THE INDEPENDENT ON SUNDAY'S CALL FOR A PHASED WITHDRAWAL OF TROOPS FROM AFGHANISTAN as a landmark report by Oxfam this week exposes the real human cost of the war.
The powerful dossier by the aid agency reveals how WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN AFGHANISTAN ARE BEARING THE BRUNT OF THE ONGOING CONFLICT, undermining the international community's claims that they are the very people being helped by the West's activities.
Its contents will add to mounting concerns… that THE US AND THE UK ARE FIGHTING AN ILL-CONCEIVED AND ILL-JUDGED WAR THAT HAS LEFT AS MANY AS 32,000 AFGHANS DEAD AND 235,000 DISPLACED.
In a ComRes poll for the IoS this weekend, an overwhelming proportion – 71 PER CENT – SUPPORTED THIS NEWSPAPER'S CALL FOR A PHASED WITHDRAWAL OF BRITISH FORCES FROM AFGHANISTAN within a year or so, while JUST 22 PER CENT DISAGREED. NEARLY HALF – 47 PER CENT – THINK THAT THE THREAT OF TERRORISM ON UK SOIL IS INCREASED BY BRITISH FORCES REMAINING IN AFGHANISTAN".
Another Independent poll in December told us that “of 1,000 voters, only 21% backed the argument that the UK was safer as a result” of our being in Afghanistan.
That’s 47 per cent v 21 per cent, Gordon.
With 71 per cent wanting our lads out of there!
The percentages tell us that your presumption of “what people here in Britain” actually want is mistaken. Of course, it’s not a mistake really. You know what we want. It's just that, as usual, you, and those who pull your strings, are not in the business of giving it to us.
On 6 November 2009, Sue Reid’s remarkable exposé, ‘How the Kremlin hijacked Labour: Diary of a Kremlin insider reveals the hold Soviets had over Labour politicians’, appeared in The Daily Mail.
This is it:
“The leader of the Communist Party of Great Britain stood in front of the group of high-flying young Left-wingers at Cambridge University. Harry Pollitt told them:
'Don't join us. Work hard, get good degrees, JOIN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND SERVE OUR CAUSE FROM WITHIN'...
Within a decade, the Communist Party foundered (its membership peaked at 60,000 in 1945) as Pollitt's bright young devotees infiltrated the Establishment.
THEY WERE SOON EXERCISING CONSIDERABLE INFLUENCE IN UNIVERSITIES, THE STATE EDUCATION SYSTEM, PUBLISHING HOUSES, THE LEGAL HIERARCHY AND THE CIVIL SERVICE. BUT IT WAS IN POLITICS THAT THESE HIGH-FLYING MEMBERS OF THE LEFT ESTABLISHED THEIR GREATEST POWER-BASE, BOTH IN THE LABOUR PARTY AND THE TRADES' UNION MOVEMENT.
Just how deep the tentacles of communism reached into the heart of British government has now been revealed with the emergence of an extraordinary diary by Anatoly Chernyaev, the Soviet Union's contact man with the West at the icy height of the Cold War... IT TELLS THE STORY OF A 'SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP'… BETWEEN THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND SOVIET COMMUNISTS...
One of the most shocking of the diary's many revelations is how LABOUR LEADERS MICHAEL FOOT AND NEIL KINNOCK COLLUDED WITH THE SOVIET COMMUNISTS to try to beat their 'common enemy', Margaret Thatcher. But more worrying, perhaps, is the fact that the document shows in stark detail how THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF SO MANY OF THOSE WHO GOVERN US TODAY WAS SHAPED BY THE UNSPEAKABLE COMMUNIST CREED OF THE SOVIET UNION.
The unpalatable truth is that many ministers in Government today rose through the ranks of A BRITISH SOCIALIST MOVEMENT THAT WAS HEAVILY INFLUENCED - AND EVEN CONTROLLED - BY THE KREMLIN IN MOSCOW...
TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION LEADER JACK JONES - WHO RECEIVED EFFUSIVE PRAISE FROM PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN WHEN HE DIED IN APRIL THIS YEAR - WAS A PAID AGENT FOR THE USSR. In exchange for information, he used to take cash handouts from his Soviet handler in London, Oleg Gordievsky, even as late as the 1980s...
One of the key figures in this murky affair was RON HAYWARD, THE LABOUR PARTY'S GENERAL SECRETARY between 1972 and 1982, who died in 1996...
It is clear from the diary that HAYWARD ENVISAGED A REAL SOVIET-STYLE SYSTEM IN BRITAIN, with the Party General Secretary (ie Hayward himself) - not a Prime Minister selected by MPs - at the very top. He would refer to himself openly as the 'party leader'. More specifically, he informed the Soviets that HE WANTED TO DEVELOP A CADRE OF YOUNG ACTIVISTS TO PREPARE FOR COMMUNIST RULE.
'I AM THE FIRST LABOUR LEADER IN BRITISH HISTORY WHO IS NOT AFRAID TO COME OUT ALONGSIDE COMMUNISTS WITH THE SAME AGENDA', he said...
It was in the unions where Chernyaev's International Department aimed to infiltrate the deepest. THE REGULAR TO-ING AND FRO-ING BETWEEN UNION LEADERS AND MOSCOW WAS COMMONPLACE - even in 1980 after Mrs Thatcher's Tories were in Government.
That year, the diary says, the TGWU's deputy leader Alec Kitson turned up drunkenly at a meeting with Chernyaev in the Russian capital. He had been drinking with his Soviet trade union counterparts for hours beforehand. 'There was a f*** in every sentence that came out of Kitson's mouth,' the diary records. But when Kitson sobered up, he and Chernyaev concocted a plan to send a team of Russians to the Scottish TUC conference 'TO DELIVER THE SOVIET POINT OF VIEW'. They arranged another brainwashing session with union leaders in London. Later in 1980, in Blackpool in October, Chernyaev openly attended a TGWU-sponsored drinks reception on the eve of the Labour Party conference...
Party leaders such as the donkey-jacketed MICHAEL FOOT AND THE WELSHMAN NEIL KINNOCK WERE AT TIMES DEEPLY REVERENTIAL TO THEIR RUSSIAN 'COMRADES', the diary reveals...
IN DECEMBER 1984, KINNOCK WENT TO MOSCOW ACCOMPANIED BY, AMONG OTHERS, THE YOUNG CHARLES CLARKE AND PATRICIA HEWITT - both to become ministers in Blair's government - to see Brezhnev's successor, the senile Constantin Chernenko. Chernenko read his brief to them and listened indifferently to Kinnock's verbose response. However, the Russian promised he would help in the Labour Party's attempts to oust Margaret Thatcher from power...
IN 1985, KINNOCK AGAIN TURNED TO MOSCOW FOR SUPPORT, sending a shadow minister to the Kremlin for advice on how to topple Thatcher, who was in her second term in office. The diarist recorded: 'WE HAVE DISCUSSED EVERYTHING WITH HIM. I TOOK IT UPON MYSELF TO PROMISE HIM EVERYTHING THEY WANTED FROM US, to beat Thatcher and get to power'...
ONE OF JACK JONES'S BRIGHTEST PROTEGES... WAS GORDON BROWN. THE DECISION TO GIVE THE YOUNG SCOTSMAN HIS FIRST AND ONLY SAFE SEAT, DUNFERMLINE EAST, WAS MADE BY TWO TGWU SENIOR OFFICIALS - ONE OF THEM WAS JACK JONES, THE OTHER THE DRUNKEN ALEC KITSON. BOTH WERE FRIENDS OF THE KREMLIN.
THE UNION'S PATRONAGE WAS UBIQUITOUS. NEIL KINNOCK AND TONY BLAIR, AS WELL AS CABINET MINISTERS MARGARET BECKETT, HARRIET HARMAN AND JOHN REID, WERE ALL SPONSORED BY TGWU AND MADE THEIR LABOUR PARTY CAREERS THANKS TO IT.
The control the Soviets had over Labour, its leadership and aspiring politicians, is still having a profound impact on Britain. As the Spectator says: 'Indeed, NEW LABOUR, WHICH HAS GOVERNED SINCE 1997, CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD UNLESS THESE COMMUNIST INFLUENCES ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. Many of New Labour's characteristics - its deep suspicion of outsiders, its STRUCTURAL HOSTILITY TO DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, ITS SECRECY, ITS FAITH IN BUREAUCRACY, THE EMBEDDED PREFERENCE FOR STRIKING DEALS OUT OF THE PUBLIC EYE, AND ITS RUTHLESS RELIANCE ON A SMALL GROUP OF TRUSTED ACTIVISTS, RESULT FROM THE LENGTHY DETENTE WITH THE KREMLIN'...
Yet even with the emergence of this diary, we still do not possess a full picture of how deep the dangerous Moscow penetration really went. Only as more truths trickle out of Russia will we learn the entirety of the betrayal.
As for Harry Pollitt, the British communist who played such a vital role in the Soviet infiltration of this country... he is better known in Moscow, where he is proclaimed as a hero, than here. In 1970, some years after his death, THE USSR ISSUED A POSTAGE STAMP WITH POLLITT'S PICTURE ON IT. A year later, IN 1971, HIS DEVOTION TO THE SOVIET CAUSE AND TO THE SPREAD OF 'INTERNATIONAL COMMUNISM' WAS FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGED BY MOSCOW. THE SOVIET NAVY LAUNCHED A NEW BATTLESHIP AND NAMED IT AFTER HIM.
MEANWHILE, HIS MANY DISCIPLES IN THE FIFTH COLUMN HE CREATED IN BRITAIN CONTINUE TO EXERT THEIR MALIGN INFLUENCE.” More...
THEY are at war with us, Ladies and gentlemen.
And THEY have been at war with us for some considerable time.
On 5 November 2009, Karla Ellis, sister of Private Lee Ellis, who was killed by a roadside bomb in 2006, put this question to Gordon Brown, in a question and answer session hosted by Key 103, a radio station in Manchester:
"HOW MANY OF OUR UNDER-EQUIPPED SOLDIERS HAVE TO DIE BEFORE THE POWERS-THAT-BE DO THE RIGHT THING, INSTEAD OF TRYING TO SAVE FACE, AND BRING THEM HOME"?
The Prime Minister replied:
"The Taliban have access to weapons they can use indiscriminately against you or me ON THE STREETS OF CITIES IN BRITAIN."
Which is deeply dishonest bulls***. The Taliban want their own country back, I doubt they're remotely interested in ours.
The PM also said:
"I want to get our troops home as quickly as possible... (more bulls***) The way we can do it is to train up the Afghans themselves."
"I don't think that strategy will work. YOU CAN'T TRUST THESE PEOPLE."
"These people", eh Karla?
You want to watch that honesty, sweetheart. The PC Crowd will have you up on a "racism" charge if you start calling lovely, fluffy foreigners "these people"!
On 5 November 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:
"Just how deep THE TENTACLES OF COMMUNISM REACHED INTO THE HEART OF BRITISH GOVERNMENT has now been revealed with the emergence of an extraordinary diary by Anatoly Chernyaev, the Soviet Union's contact man with the West at the icy height of the Cold War.
Meticulously detailed and written by hand on lined notepaper, the diary has come to light in the U. S. National Security Archive. It tells the story of a 'special relationship' not between Britain and America - but BETWEEN THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND SOVIET COMMUNISTS. It WAS A RELATIONSHIP THAT LASTED MORE THAN 30 YEARS, right up to Margaret Thatcher's arrival as Prime Minister in 1979 and beyond. Indeed, one of the most shocking of the diary's many revelations is how LABOUR LEADERS MICHAEL FOOT AND NEIL KINNOCK COLLUDED WITH THE SOVIET COMMUNISTS to try to beat their 'common enemy', Margaret Thatcher.
But more worrying, perhaps, is the fact that the document shows in stark detail how THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF SO MANY OF THOSE WHO GOVERN US TODAY WAS SHAPED BY THE UNSPEAKABLE COMMUNIST CREED OF THE SOVIET UNION. The unpalatable truth is that MANY MINISTERS IN GOVERNMENT TODAY ROSE THROUGH THE RANKS OF A BRITISH SOCIALIST MOVEMENT THAT WAS HEAVILY INFLUENCED - AND EVEN CONTROLLED - BY THE KREMLIN IN MOSCOW. As the Mail revealed last month, TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION LEADER JACK JONES - WHO RECEIVED EFFUSIVE PRAISE FROM PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN WHEN HE DIED IN APRIL THIS YEAR - WAS A PAID AGENT FOR THE USSR…
One of the key figures in this murky affair was RON HAYWARD, THE LABOUR PARTY'S GENERAL SECRETARY BETWEEN 1972 AND 1982... It is clear from the diary that HAYWARD ENVISAGED A REAL SOVIET-STYLE SYSTEM IN BRITAIN…
In those years, the Labour Party was tightly controlled (and largely financed) by its affiliated trades unions, which chose dozens of candidates for safe Labour seats… In 1980, in Blackpool in October, Chernyaev openly attended a TGWU-sponsored drinks reception on the eve of the Labour Party conference.
The diary says that Jenny Little, then secretary of the international group of the Labour's National Executive Committee, which oversees policy-making, played a pivotal role in Chernyaev's extraordinary access. Party leaders such as the donkey-jacketed MICHAEL FOOT AND THE WELSHMAN NEIL KINNOCK WERE AT TIMES DEEPLY REVERENTIAL TO THEIR RUSSIAN 'COMRADES'… Neil Kinnock and Tony Blair, as well as Cabinet ministers Margaret Beckett, Harriet Harman and John Reid, were all sponsored by TGWU and made their Labour Party careers thanks to it.
THE CONTROL THE SOVIETS HAD OVER LABOUR, ITS LEADERSHIP AND ASPIRING POLITICIANS, IS STILL HAVING A PROFOUND IMPACT ON BRITAIN. As the Spectator says:
'Indeed, New Labour, which has governed since 1997, cannot be understood unless these communist influences are taken into account. MANY OF NEW LABOUR'S CHARACTERISTICS - ITS DEEP SUSPICION OF OUTSIDERS, ITS STRUCTURAL HOSTILITY TO DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, ITS SECRECY, ITS FAITH IN BUREAUCRACY, THE EMBEDDED PREFERENCE FOR STRIKING DEALS OUT OF THE PUBLIC EYE, AND ITS RUTHLESS RELIANCE ON A SMALL GROUP OF TRUSTED ACTIVISTS, RESULT FROM THE LENGTHY DETENTE WITH THE KREMLIN’.”
That's who has been in charge for almost half a century now, folks.
'Bout time for another civil war, methinks.
On 5 November 2009, Max Hastings opined thus in The Daily Mail:
“The first big American mistake was to give unqualified backing to the Pakistani government, HEEDLESS OF THE FACT THAT THE PAKISTANI ARMY WAS SUPPORTING THE TALIBAN, AND EVEN SENDING AIRCRAFT TO RESCUE ITS LEADERS FROM AFGHANISTAN…
Thanks to U.S. Army bungling in the mountains around Tora Bora, Osama Bin Laden and much of the Al Qaeda leadership escaped over the border, taking refuge in Pakistan's anarchic tribal areas.
Then, MUCH MORE DISASTROUSLY, BUSH AND THE WASHINGTON NEO-CONS, SUPPORTED BY TONY BLAIR, DECIDED TO SEIZE THE EXCUSE OFFERED BY 9/11 TO TOPPLE SADDAM HUSSEIN. I remember a conversation with General Sir Mike Jackson, then head of the Army, in October 2002, months before Blair sought Parliament's endorsement for joining the Iraq invasion. Mike had just returned from talks in Washington about the military planning.
'Getting to Baghdad won't be hard,' he told me. 'But THEY HAVEN'T THE SLIGHTEST IDEA WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO WHEN THEY GET THERE.'
So it proved, of course. Iraq BECAME A QUAGMIRE WHICH HAS COST HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF LIVES. In recent months, the country has seemed relatively quiet as the U.S. Army has pulled back. But the Americans are desperately apprehensive that the place is a powder keg, where CIVIL WAR COULD ERUPT AT ANY MOMENT...
As for Afghanistan, in 2006 the allies belatedly realised that THE COUNTRY WAS LAPSING INTO A SHAMBLES WHERE ONLY OPIUM-GROWING FLOURISHED. Nato committed troops - pathetically few in number - to stabilise the country and promote democracy…
We entered Afghanistan to evict Al Qaeda. Today, Al Qaeda has moved to Pakistan. But we are still attempting to achieve wholly different and ill-defined objectives in Afghanistan, IMPOSING CENTRALISED ORDER WHERE THERE HAS NEVER BEEN SUCH A THING.
We have got into a situation in which we are there because we are there, and NOBODY WANTS TO ACKNOWLEDGE DEFEAT. Far from building support for Western purposes, IN AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN WE ARE TODAY VASTLY MORE UNPOPULAR THAN WE WERE IN 2001, chiefly because of our military operations.
A Pakistani journalist called Ansar Abbasi told the visiting U.S. Under-Secretary of State in August this year: ‘YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT WE HATE ALL AMERICANS. FROM THE BOTTOM OF OUR SOULS, WE HATE YOU.'
Tens of millions of his fellow countrymen feel the same way - and WE, THE BRITISH, ARE INCLUDED IN THEIR BLIND RAGE… We, the British… must stand square with the Americans on the battlefield until they make their own decision, because WE ARE AN ENTIRELY SUBORDINATE PARTNER…
THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN IS UNWINNABLE… The sooner President Obama acknowledges this, the sooner our soldiers can come home. We can then pursue new policies towards the Muslim world, in place of THE HUGE FOLLIES WHICH THE U.S. AND ITS ALLIES HAVE PERPETRATED SINCE 9/11.”
On 5 November 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
“THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT PROMISED THE BRITISH ELECTORATE A REFERENDUM BUT DISGRACEFULLY RENEGED ON THAT PLEDGE.
Hugh Gaitskell would have been outraged by Brown’s refusal to keep his word. In his great 1962 speech he said that British people had to be consulted about their future in Europe. THE BELIEF THAT THE POLITICAL ÉLITE KNEW BEST, HE ARGUED, ‘WAS AN ODIOUS PIECE OF HYPOCRITICAL, SUPERCILIOUS, ARROGANT RUBBISH’.
WE WILL LOSE ANY VESTIGE OF CONTROL OVER OUR BORDERS, OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM AND OUR FOREIGN POLICY. Britain will become nothing more than an outlying province of the European empire. Our national embassies will be soon be superseded by those of the EU, while our Army will be subsumed within the new European Defence Force… For the first time the EU will have the power to raise its own taxes, bringing another heavy financial burden on the already oppressed British public.
The most inspiring moments in our history have involved the defeat of threats to our freedom, such as victory over the Spanish Armada in 1588, the rout of napoleon at Waterloo in 1815 or the Battle of Britain in 1940. But now, without even a whimper, OUR POLITICIANS HAVE THROWN AWAY OUR DEMOCRATIC LIBERTIES.”
On 4 November 2004, Patrick O’Flynn opined thus in The Daily Express:
“When the Tories left office net immigration was running at a manageable 60,000 a year. UNDER LABOUR IT HAS QUADRUPLED TO 240,000.
A SERIES OF DELIBERATE POLICY DECISIONS HAVE LED TO THIS.
LABOUR’S SCRAPPING OF THE PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE THAT LIMITED THE NUMBER OF NEW FOREIGN SPOUSES COMING TO BRITAIN, ITS REFUSAL TO IMPOSE TRANSITIONAL LABOUR MARKET CONTROLS ON EASTERN EUROPEAN MIGRANTS AND ITS READINESS TO ISSUE NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBERS TO ILLEGAL WORKERS are among the factors that have fuelled the immigration boom. SO HAS ITS REFUSAL TO PLACE AN OVERALL CAP ON MIGRANT NUMBERS, THE ISSUING OF RECORD NUMBERS OF WORK PERMITS AND BRITISH PASSPORTS TO FOREIGNERS, UNWILLINGNESS TO TACKLE THE BOGUS STUDENT VISA RACKET AND ITS FAILURE TO SET UP A DEDICATED BORDER POLICE FORCE.
Then there has been its pathetic inability to fulfil a 2001 manifesto promise to deport 30,000 failed asylum seekers a year. IT QUIETLY DROPPED THAT POLICY AFTER IT COULDN’T EVEN ACHIEVE A THIRD OF THAT TARGET. Time and again Labour has been warned – sometimes by its own experts – that THE PACE OF CHANGE HAS PLACED A MASSIVE STRAIN ON LOCAL COMMUNITIES. It has ignored all the warnings, HAPPY IN THE KNOWLEDGE THAT MOST INCOMERS WILL VOTE LABOUR.
LABOUR, WHICH WAS ONCE THE PARTY OF THE WHITE WORKING CLASS, IS NOW LARGELY RUN IN THE INTERESTS OF TWO LARGE GROUPS. THE FIRST IS THE WELFARE-DEPENDENT UNDERCLASS, THE SECOND IS POWERFUL ETHNIC MINORITY PRESSURE GROUPS WHO WISH TO FACILITATE FURTHER MIGRATION FROM THEIR COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN.
MR JOHNSON DOES NOT WANT US TO KNOW THIS. THE TRUTH IS THAT LABOUR HAS NOT BEEN MALADROIT BUT MALIGNANT ON IMMIGRATION."
On 4 November 2009, Peter Oborne told us this in The Spectator:
“Judging only by its electoral performance, the Communist Party of Great Britain was a near-total failure in the 20th century. It only secured a tiny number of MPs at Westminster, while the party membership peaked at just over 60,000 at the height of Soviet popularity during the second world war. But this public lack of success was misleading. THE COMMUNISTS EXERCISED CONSIDERABLE SECRET INFLUENCE IN UNIVERSITIES, PUBLISHING HOUSES, JOURNALISM AND EVEN THE CIVIL SERVICE FOR DECADES AFTER 1945.
ITS GREATEST POWER, HOWEVER, LAY INSIDE THE LABOUR PARTY AND THE TRADE UNIONS. It was perhaps especially strong in the National Union of Mineworkers and the Amalgamated Union of Engineering Workers. This strength survived long after the catastrophic Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. WE KNOW THAT THE TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION LEADER JACK JONES — WHO RECEIVED EFFUSIVE PRAISE FROM PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN WHEN HE DIED IN APRIL THIS YEAR — WAS A PAID AGENT FOR THE USSR, AND IN RECEIPT OF CASH HANDOUTS FROM HIS SOVIET HANDLER OLEG GORDIEVSKY AS LATE AS THE 1980S.
The merit of Anatoly Chernyaev’s diaries is that they show that… by the 1970s, AN ALTERNATIVE GOVERNMENT WAS IN PLACE, HANDPICKED BY MOSCOW TO TAKE OVER THE APPARATUS OF THE BRITISH STATE ONCE THE COLD WAR WAS LOST. THERE WOULD BE A SOVIET-STYLE POWER SPLIT: REAL POWER WOULD REST IN THE CHAIRMANSHIP AND THE BUREAUCRACY, WITH THE POLITICIANS SIMPLY THE FRONT MEN. Some of the Labour men the Soviets were grooming were paid agents, others fellow travellers. Yet EVEN FRONT-RANK POLITICIANS WERE PATHETICALLY ANXIOUS TO REACH SOME KIND OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE SOVIET REGIME.
Even today we still do not possess anything like a clear picture of how far this penetration stretched… It remains quite staggering how many aspirant Labour politicians were either members of the communist party or, like the Justice Secretary Jack Straw, influenced by the CP at a time when it was controlled by Moscow. The former defence secretary John Reid, for example, was a CP member well into the 1970s, while Peter Mandelson was an influential Young Communist.
Indeed THE NEW LABOUR GOVERNMENT WHICH HAS GOVERNED BRITAIN SINCE 1997 CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD UNLESS THESE COMMUNIST INFLUENCES ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. MANY OF NEW LABOUR’S CHARACTERISTICS — ITS DEEP SUSPICION OF OUTSIDERS, ITS STRUCTURAL HOSTILITY TO DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, ITS SECRECY, ITS FAITH IN BUREAUCRACY, EMBEDDED PREFERENCE FOR STRIKING DEALS AWAY FROM THE PUBLIC EYE, ITS RUTHLESS RELIANCE ON A SMALL GROUP OF TRUSTED ACTIVISTS — RESULT FROM THE EARLY CP TRAINING OF REID, MANDELSON AND OTHERS…
Soviet infiltration of the Labour movement remains a neuralgic subject on the left. ONE OF JACK JONES’S BRIGHTEST PROTÉGÉS WAS GORDON BROWN. And WHEN I APPROACHED DOWNING STREET TO ASK THE PRIME MINISTER WHETHER HE WOULD WITHDRAW HIS OUTSPOKEN PRAISE FOR JONES IN THE LIGHT OF THE RECENTLY DISCLOSED FACT THAT HE WAS A KGB ASSET AND LONG-TERM TRAITOR, THE PRIME MINISTER DITHERED AND DAWDLED.
At length Downing Street came back with a robust ‘no comment’.”
On 4 November 2009, Immigration Minster, Phil Woolas, said this to the Home Affairs Select Comittee:
“If this country and others did withdraw their troops from Afghanistan and the Taliban were able to take control of Afghanistan, our evidence is that THE NUMBER OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS COMING TO THE EU WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE. An argument that is not aired strongly enough in my view in public is the benefit of THE PRESENCE OF OUR ARMED FORCES AND OTHER COUNTRIES’ IS TO HELP US CONTROL MIGRATION.”
Thus did a truly stupid man make the case for pointless slaughter of ours and theirs.
Kill ‘em in their own country or they’ll come pouring in here, eh Phil?
Well, in case you haven’t noticed, they’ve been pouring in anyway. Mostly because of the benefits and the traitorous encouragement from you New Labour melting-potters, I confess. However, the murderous instability in their own lands, that the Western warmonger has created, hasn‘t done much to make any but the most death-hungry jihadis want to stick around in their own back yards.
In other words, the exact opposite of the moronic case Woolas was trying to make happens to be true.
On 4 November 2009, Victoria Fletcher warned us about an oft used drug in The Daily Express:
"Drugs firms were told to add an alert to advice for patients after data showed THE PILLS CAN TRIGGER DEPRESSION, MEMORY LOSS, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION AND SLEEP DISTURBANCE.
BUT MORE THAN A YEAR LATER THE WARNINGS HAVE STILL NOT BEEN ADDED AFTER A DRUGS FIRM SAID THEY DID NOT LIKE THE WORDING...
Medical groups have said they are outraged by the delay because IT IGNORES PATIENT WELFARE. The leading medicines journal, the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, says IT IS FURIOUS THAT A DRUGS FIRM CAN DERAIL PATIENT SAFETY…
STATINS ARE TAKEN BY FOUR MILLION BRITONS to lower cholesterol... THE GOVERNMENT’S DRUG RATIONING BODY HAS SAID… A FURTHER 1.4MILLION COULD BENEFIT FROM TAKING THEM.
And GPS ARE BEING TOLD TO ASSESS ANYONE BETWEEN 40 AND 75 TO SEE IF THEY TOO SHOULD BE PRESCRIBED THE DRUG.
Statin makers had been told to add new warnings to all pill packets by European health rules. It came after NEW RESEARCH SHOWED THAT SOME PATIENTS WOULD SUFFER PROBLEMS. At the time, THE EU SAID THEY WOULD NOT REVEAL HOW MANY PATIENTS ARE AFFECTED OR WHICH BRANDS TRIGGER THE WORST SIDE-EFFECTS AS THE DATA WAS SECRET.
An investigation by the Daily Express revealed that GPs had told the Government’s drugs safety watchdog that ONE IN 20 PATIENTS HAD SUFFERED ONE OF THE FOUR SIDE-EFFECTS.”
However, The Express then goes on to say:
“Estimates suggest that BETWEEN 25 AND 50 PER CENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEART DISEASE STOP TAKING STATINS WITHIN A YEAR, OFTEN BECAUSE OF SIDE-EFFECTS."
My mother's general well-being deteriorated rapidly after she began taking the statin, Simvastin, and she stopped taking it a matter of weeks after she took her first pill.
Six months later, she still hasn’t got her short-term memory back.
Aurobindo Pharma manufactures Simvastin. The company's headquarters are located in Hyderabad, India.
On 3 November 2009, the New Labour MP, Kim Howells, wrote the following in The Guardian:
“Seven years of military involvement and civilian aid in Afghanistan have succeeded in subduing al-Qaida's activities in that country, BUT HAVE NOT DESTROYED THE ORGANISATION OR ITS LEADER, Osama bin Laden. Nor have they succeeded in eliminating al-Qaida's protectors, the Taliban. THERE CAN BE NO GUARANTEE THAT THE NEXT SEVEN YEARS WILL BRING SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER SUCCESS…
It would be better… TO BRING HOME THE GREAT MAJORITY OF OUR FIGHTING MEN AND WOMEN... to secure our own borders, gather intelligence on terrorist activities inside Britain, EXPAND OUR INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS ABROAD, CO-OPERATE WITH FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICES...
WE WOULD NEED TO REINVENT OURSELVES DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY... In particular, relationships with our Nato partners, ESPECIALLY WITH THE AMERICANS – our most trusted and valued allies – would alter fundamentally.
LIFE INSIDE THE UK WOULD HAVE TO CHANGE. THERE WOULD BE MORE INTRUSIVE SURVEILLANCE in certain communities, MORE POLICE OFFICERS ON THE STREETS...
THE SIZE OF THE AFGHAN CONFLICT MIGHT GROW, RATHER THAN DECREASE… Recent attacks in Kabul and other centres suggest that THE PRESENT BALANCE OF TERRITORIAL CONTROL IS AT BEST LIKELY TO REMAIN – OR, MORE LIKELY, TO SHIFT IN FAVOUR OF THE TALIBAN…
I ASSUMED, WRONGLY, THAT A DESIRE AMONG ORDINARY AFGHANS FOR PEACE WOULD PREVAIL over the prospect of continued war...
A deadly combination of ANTI-DEMOCRATIC ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM, CORRUPTION AND THE PROXIMITY OF SAFE PAKISTANI HAVENS FOR TERRORISTS ALL MILITATED AGAINST THE NOTION THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE CONVINCING THE BRITISH PEOPLE THAT THEY SHOULD PREPARE THEMSELVES FOR A ‘30-YEAR’ CAMPAIGN...
Sooner rather than later A PROPERLY PLANNED, PHASED WITHDRAWAL OF OUR FORCES FROM HELMAND PROVINCE HAS TO BE ANNOUNCED. If it is an answer that serves, also, to focus the minds of those in the Kabul government who have shown such A POVERTY OF LEADERSHIP OVER THE PAST SEVEN YEARS, then so much the better." More...
Who installed the “Kabul government”?
The Bushes, the Blairs, the bought media and the US-Jewish Neoconservatives who instigated and guided the whole process.
Kim Howells is a former representative of the Communist Party of Great Britain. He now chairs the Intelligence and Security Committee.
In February 2009, the former Communist was appointed to the Privy Council.
On 2 November 2009, "Is it Better to be Mixed-Race" was seen on Channel 4.
During the programme, the presenter, Aarathi Prasad, said this:
“MANY MIXED-RACE PEOPLE SEEM TO BE SO GIFTED... MIXED-RACE PEOPLE MIGHT HAVE A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE. Could there be something happening at the level of their genes that MAKES THEM SO SPECIAL? IS IT BETTER TO BE MIXED-RACE?...
There’s a controversial new idea that's not going to please the BNP one little bit. It's a theory outlined in a book called, ‘BREEDING BETWEEN THE LINES’ by science writer, ALON ZIV. It claims that MIXED-RACE PEOPLE ARE BORN WITH A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE, THE RESULT OF THEIR GENETIC DIVERSITY."
Here are a few examples of the standard of Mr Ziv’s “Between the Lines”:
“After 18 holes, Tiger Woods probably SMELLS BETTER than Phil Mickelson”.
“Julia Roberts was MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AN ORGASM with Benjamin Bratt than with Lyle Lovett”.
“Odds are, Lenny Kravitz LOST HIS VIRGINITY EARLIER than Justin Timberlake.”
And the concluding sentence:
“Our DIVERSITY IS A GIFT, and TO KEEP OURSELVES SEPARATED AND COMPARTMENTALIZED WOULD BE TO WASTE THAT GIFT.”
Ms Prasad continued:
“Heterozygosity (increased genetic diversity) is good - AND THE KEY TO THAT IS TO HAVE PARENTS WHO ARE GENETICALLY AS DIFFERENT AS POSSIBLE. Does that mean it would help to have PARENTS FROM DIFFERENT RACES... It's looking like racial purity can be really bad for your health...
THE GENETIC MAKEUP OF THE WORLD IS CHANGING. WITH AIR TRAVEL SO EASY AND RELATIONSHIPS FORMING ACROSS THE GLOBE we're all going to be mixed-race one day.”
The genetic makeup of the world has changed alright. In 1900, we white folks comprised 30 percent of the world’s population.
It’s down to around 14 percent now and, by 2100, it’s scheduled to be 3 percent or thereabouts.
Ms Prasad continued:
“If you want to know what that future looks like, take a look at Brazil. I've come here to continue my hunt for mixed-race advantage... THERE REALLY COULD BE A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE TO BEING MIXED-RACE… MIXED-RACE PEOPLE COULD HAVE MORE ROBUST MENTAL HEALTH...
I've learnt that... if you're mixed race your DNA is more likely to be heterozygous and that might lead to possible benefits in physical health and mental health AND MIGHT MAKE YOU MORE ATTRACTIVE...
Being mixed race doesn't have to dilute culture, I've discovered it might just dilute disease...
DIVERSITY IS ALWAYS BETTER. I've always felt that culturally but now I've found out that it just might be true genetically as well.”
“Diversity is always better”.
Well, you heard it here, folks. Big Brother and the alien hordes have been after diversifying the greatest race out of the history books since time immemorial and Aarathi Prasad is intent on carrying on the good work.
I wonder whether, when she’s back in India, Ms Prasad is inclined to preach the case for diversity quite so zealously? Given that her fellow caste members might have to admit the odd, extra-lowly Dalit into their hearts, minds, sitting-rooms, ivory towers, whited sepulchres and gaudy boudoirs if they do.
I wonder if it has ever occurred to Ms Prasad that the fact that she was drawn to mate with a blonde, blue-eyed Englishman is really a bit of giveaway? I mean, why didn’t she get it together with one of those super-diverse Brazilians? Should hubbie be feeling a bit insecure now that his Indian paramour has discovered there are better genetic prospects out there? Nah, little Ms India nabbed Mr England because she wanted to better herself.
Let’s face it folks, she chose one of us, she didn’t choose any of those she's advocating here. She didn’t want an Untouchable, a Pakistani, an African, a Jew, a Chinese chap, an Australian aborigine or, for that matter, a high caste Hindu or a mixed-race superman.
What she wanted was Whitey.
She just doesn’t want our girls to want him as well.
On 2 November 2009, at a Royal Society for the Arts gathering: the Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, admitted that New Labour had been "maladroit" in handling the immigration issue.
Here are some of the apologetic truths Johnson told:
"I accept that governments of both persuasions, including this one, have been maladroit in their handling of this issue."
"Our record is not perfect".
"There are communities which have been disproportionately affected by immigration, where PEOPLE HAVE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT THE STRAIN THAT THE GROWTH IN THE LOCAL POPULATION HAS PLACED ON JOBS AND SERVICES."
"Unreturned national prisoners and asylum seekers may have accumulated under previous administrations but THEY CONTINUED TO BE IGNORED FOR FAR TOO LONG ON OUR WATCH."
This is all a bit of a turnabout since Johnson made the following blasé comment a little over three months ago:
"I DO NOT LIE AWAKE AT NIGHT WORRYING ABOUT A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION. I’M HAPPY TO LIVE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY."
Most political commentators are putting Johnson's new-found humility down to the popularity of the BNP.
In other words, he's trawling for lost votes.
Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of think tank Migrationwatch UK, responded thus to Johnson's partial climbdown:
"THIS APOLOGY IS THREE MILLION IMMIGRANTS TOO LATE...
We now know that SOME OF HIS COLLEAGUES DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED MASS IMMIGRATION SO AS TO ENGINEER A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY WERE FLYING IN THE FACE OF PUBLIC OPINION, ESPECIALLY THEIR OWN WORKING CLASS SUPPORTERS... LABOUR HAVE SECRETLY ENCOURAGED MASS IMMIGRATION SO AS TO ENGINEER A HUGE CHANGE IN OUR SOCIETY IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT IT WOULD BE TOTALLY AGAINST PUBLIC OPINION."
And that, ladies and gents, is the plain truth.
Here a Johnsonian fib:
"WE STRUGGLED TO CONTAIN THE HUGE SURGE IN MIGRATION, Legal and illegal, that emerged from countries such as Kosovo, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka and Somalia."
Anyone who thinks New Labour "struggled" to do anything other than open the floodgates as wide as they'd go is a brainwashed airhead or a bought-and-paid-for quangocrat.
Here's a misleading half-truth:
"When we came in to government in 1997, THERE WAS NO MAGIC BUTTON we could push immediately to resolve all the historic, political and operation problems associated with immigration."
The "magic button" would have involved New Labour raising the drawbridge and lowering the benefits, so I guess, for them, there was, indeed, "no magic button".
As they always intended to do precisely the opposite.
During the course of Johnson's speech he told one great, big porkie:
"THIS GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER PURSUED AN OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION POLICY."
Lied the Home Secretary.
Proof of Johnson's dishonesty can be seen in Andrew Neather's 23 October Evening Standard testimony on this page:
On 2 November 2009, Former Lance Corporal, Christopher Finney, told us that he felt “betrayed and let down” by New Labour in The Times:
“What makes me furious is the demonstrable lack of respect shown by the Government to those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice — the war dead...
I couldn’t believe it when I read that Gordon Brown had phoned Simon Cowell to ask how Britain’s Got Talent contestant Susan Boyle was when she had a breakdown. HE DOESN’T PHONE ANY OF THE BEREAVED MILITARY FAMILIES... I thought it was absolutely disgusting, a real slap in the face for the parents of the hundreds of soldiers killed...
My medal says I am a hero of the Iraqi conflict, a man of outstanding valour and strength of character. But NOW I WORK IN A CALL CENTRE ON HALF MY ARMY PAY."
The Times added:
"Meanwhile, a former senior civil servant has disclosed that he had been critical of the safety of Sea King helicopters used in the Iraq war. Two of the helicopters collided in mid-air in 2003, killing six Royal Navy personnel and one American serviceman. The former civil servant told The Sunday Times that HE HAD WARNED THEY WERE UNAIRWORTHY BUT HAD BEEN OVERRULED BY SUPERIORS, WHO WERE TRYING TO CUT COSTS."
Christopher Finney is the Army’s youngest holder of the George Cross.
He won it at the age of 18 in Iraq in 2003 when he saved the life of a comrade, Lance Corporal Alan Tudball, after two American A10 Warthog aircraft attacked his Scimitar reconnaissance vehicle in a friendly fire incident that killed Lance Corporal of Horse Matty Hull.
On 1 November 2009, Lucy Johnston said this in The Sunday Express:
"LONG-TERM MOBILE PHONE USE COULD LEAD TO 1,500 NEW CASES OF BRAIN TUMOURS A YEAR OVER THE NEXT TWO DECADES a study shows... It involved more than 12,000 patients who had developed brain tumours and 25,000 who had not.
It concluded MOBILE PHONE USE OF 10 YEARS OR LONGER WAS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INCREASED RISK OF TUMOURS OF UP TO 34 PER CENT."
On 1 October 2009, Lord Pearson was quoted thus by The News of the World:
"THE MUSLIMS ARE BREEDING TEN TIMES FASTER THAN US... I don't know at what point they reach such a number we are no longer able to resist the rest of their demands. We must be looking at somewhere between 10 or 20 years.
If we don't do something in the next year or two we have in effect lost...
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THE THREAT THAT FACES US FROM VIOLENT ISLAM."
Pearson can be seen saying what he said
On 31 October 2009, John Bercow, the Speaker of the House of Commons said this to the "youth parliament" that had been convened for the first time:
"The Nazis in Germany in the 30s, and the neo-Nazis today, seek to scapegoat whole communities as they peddle their message of hate and scurrilously appeal for support. They depend on either ignorance, or apathy. And THE COUNTER TO IGNORANCE AND APATHY IS EDUCATION…
I'M UNDER ABSOLUTELY NO OBLIGATION WHATSOEVER TO BE IMPARTIAL as between the forces of democracy on the one hand and the forces of evil on the other. I do feel very, very, very strongly AS SOMEONE FROM A JEWISH BACKGROUND that the evil of the BNP is that its whole politics is based upon and driven by hate. That is a poison which we could well do without."
The Independent commented thus:
"CENTURIES OF POLITICAL IMPARTIALITY DEMANDED OF THE SPEAKER WERE ROLLED BACK IN SPECTACULAR FASHION BY MR BERCOW YESTERDAY. IT IS THOUGHT TO BE THE FIRST TIME THAT A SPEAKER HAS EVER LAUNCHED SUCH AN ASSAULT ON A LEGAL PARTY."
On 30 October 2009, Tony Travers, Director of the Greater London Group at the LSE, said this in The Evening Standard:
"IN 2009, TWO AND A HALF MILLION OF LONDON'S EIGHT MILLION INHABITANTS WERE BORN OVERSEAS... The rate of absorption since the mid-nineties has been extraordinary... MIGRATION TO LONDON AND THE UK WILL CONTINUE.
In this year's European elections, the BNP... won two seats in those elections. In Yorkshire & Humberside, its vote came close to 10 per cent. In London, 12 BNP councillors were elected in Barking & Dagenham in the 2006 borough elections. Last year Richard Barnbrook won a seat on the London Assembly. In the same elections, more than 24 per cent of voters in Barking & Dagenham opted for the BNP; 16.8 per cent in Havering and 12.7 per cent in Bexley did the same.
Privately, THE POLITICAL CLASSES ARE SPOOKED BY THE GROWING IMPACT OF THE BNP...
THE TOTAL LABOUR-PLUS-CONSERVATIVE SHARE OF THE VOTE HAS FALLEN FROM MORE THAN 98 PER CENT IN GENERAL ELECTIONS DURING THE FIFTIES TO BARELY 68 PER CENT IN 2005.
LABOUR AND THE TORIES HAVE LOST VIRTUALLY ALL THEIR ACTIVIST BASE...
Overwhelmingly, the BNP's most fertile territory is in the white working class. So how did the mainstream parties manage to lose these voters? The massive vote for Boris Johnson in many outer boroughs in the 2008 mayoral election almost certainly resulted from VOTERS IN BOROUGHS SUCH AS BEXLEY, BROMLEY AND HAVERING FEELING LEFT OUT OF KEN LIVINGSTONE'S LONDON...
LABOUR, AS THE PARTY OF GOVERNMENT SINCE 1997, CANNOT ESCAPE RESPONSIBILITY... THE INCREASE IN IMMIGRATION SINCE THE MID-NINETIES WAS NEVER PROPERLY EXPLAINED TO THE PUBLIC. MINISTERS DID NOT TELL PEOPLE WHY A MAJOR INCREASE IN OVERSEAS-BORN RESIDENTS WAS OCCURRING...
As recently as the early seventies, many on the left saw the working class as noble, expressing a culture to be celebrated... Today, THE LEFT IS OFTEN SUSPICIOUS OF SUCH PEOPLE, SEEING THEM AS A THREATENING, RACIST 'UNDERCLASS'."
This last paragraph is very illuminating, coming as it does from a top bloke at the London School of Economics, which has long been a hotbed of radical thought and Marxist philosophy.
What Tony Travers is admitting to here is this: thirty-odd years ago, many on the left were happy to “celebrate” working-class culture and aspirations. This, of course, was just as it should be, seeing as how the Labour party, spiritual home of most left-wingers, was formed to represent the lowly. Nowadays, however, the left has changed so much that it is often wary of such folk.
Thus did a politically correct insider, a highly placed member of the left-wing elite, point out that, where once the left wing of the Labour party was happy to represent the "noble" British worker, now they despise him and consider him to be part of a "threatening, racist underclass".
If you want your country back, ladies and gentlemen, you're going to have to stop electing people to parliament who, for the last forty years, have been "suspicious" of you. If you care to vote for anyone next time around, make sure you put your cross against someone who doesn't see you as threatening, racist or belonging to some despised, unconsidered underclass.
Do yourselves a favour, vote for someone who will put you first in the land that your ancestors made.
On 30 October 2009, Gordon Brown was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
“There is a general view that TONY BLAIR IS A GOOD CANDIDATE AND WOULD BE AN EXCELLENT PRESIDENT. People would be pleased if a British person became President. I think most people would prefer a British person taking this job rather than citizens of other countries.”
I think most folks would like to see Tony Blair jump off a cliff, Gordon.
Come to think of it, there was a time when you would have given him a push!
On 30 October 2009, the Schools Minister, Diana Johnson, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"IF RACIST BULLYING IS NOT DEALT WITH IN SCHOOLS, THEN THIS WILL SEND A POWERFUL MESSAGE TO CHILDREN THAT RACISM IS ACCEPTABLE - NOT ONLY IN SCHOOLS BUT IN SOCIETY AS A WHOLE".
The Mail explained:
"As many as 40,000 YOUNGSTERS A YEAR ARE BEING WRONGLY BRANDED RACISTS as new rules force schools to investigate every playground spat. CHILDREN IN NURSERIES AND PRIMARY SCHOOLS ARE BEING DISCIPLINED OVER RACIST INSULTS EVEN BEFORE THEY KNOW WHAT THE TERMS MEAN."
On 30 October 2009, Kevin Myers bravely dared to say this in The Irish Independent:
“There should be nothing quite as offensive to Africans -- here or anywhere -- as Africans starving to death in Africa, by their tens of millions, as they will certainly be, unless Africa's headlong rush to Armageddon is halted. That means Africans having to learn simple things like SEXUAL CONTINENCE, AND LONG-TERM PLANNING, AND DEFERRED REWARD.
We cannot teach them. THEY MUST TEACH THEMSELVES THESE LESSONS, the hard way if necessary. They have not yet known the hard way. ETHIOPIA WAS RESCUED BY OUTSIDERS FROM ITS SELF-MADE FAMINE 25 YEARS AGO, AND IT THEN REWARDED THIS KINDNESS BY PROMPTLY DOUBLING ITS POPULATION, BUT WITHOUT DOUBLING ITS OWN FOOD SUPPLY OR ITS ECONOMIC BASE.
THIS IS STUPIDITY ON AN EPIC SCALE, FOR WHICH ONLY ETHIOPIA IS ANSWERABLE.
Furthermore, it's long overdue that the Irish people abandoned their patronising and racist conceit that we can save Africa. We can't. ONLY AFRICANS CAN SAVE AFRICA, and THE LONGER WE INTERFERE IN THEIR BUSINESS, AND THE LONGER WE CONTINUE TO REWARD THE OUTSTRETCHED BEGGING BOWL, THEN THE LONGER IT WILL TAKE AFRICA TO LEARN THAT BASIC LESSON.”
On 30 October 2009, Frederick Forsyth opined thus in The Daily Express:
"IN 70 YEARS I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE ESTABLISHMENT HELD IN SUCH LOATHING BY THE BROAD MASSES OF THE PEOPLE. And I HAVE NEVER SEEN OUR GOVERNORS TREAT THE GOVERNED WITH SUCH CONTEMPT... I HAVE NEVER SEEN OUR PEOPLE SO UTTERLY DISILLUSIONED, DISENCHANTED AND DEMORALISED, SO DEVOID OF SELF-CONFIDENCE, SELF-ESTEEM, QUIET PRIDE AND SENSE OF SELF-WORTH...
We seem to head every league table of shame. The most violent, the most abusive, the most foul-mouthed, the most drunk, the most drug-abusing people in Europe. Add top of the division for teenage pregnancies; teen abortions; teenage single mothers; venereal disease; divorce; child abuse; yobbery and vandalism without hindrance.
THIS NADIR OF OUR FORTUNES DERIVES FROM 20 YEARS OF BAD GOVERNMENT...
BETRAYAL OF OUR SOLDIERY, DEDICATION TO SELF, GROTESQUE ENRICHMENT WHILE IN PUBLIC OFFICE AND DELIBERATE NO-LIMITS MASS IMMIGRATION. THE PAST 12 YEARS HAVE BEEN THE WORST IN A CENTURY, DIE-STAMPED BY THE PERSONALITY OF THE MOST SHAMELESS LIAR WHO EVER ENTERED DOWNING STREET AND WHO IS NOW TIPPED TO BECOME EU PRESIDENT."
On 30 October 2009, James Kirkup and Bruno Waterfield reported the results of a YouGov poll for The Daily Telegraph thus:
"The Daily Telegraph poll shows that British voters are also far from convinced by Mr Blair’s candidacy. Only 31 per cent of voters want to see him become president of the European Council. Another 31 per cent are opposed, and 38 per cent said they are undecided."
The 31 per cent who believe that a great traitor like Tony B Liar ought to be the President of Europe, should NOT vote for this Independent candidate in the General Election.
The "undecideds", and those who do not want him to be President, might, perhaps, consider it.
On 28 October 2009, Melanie Phillips opined thus in The Daily Mail:
"THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN ENGAGED UPON A DELIBERATE AND SECRET POLICY OF NATIONAL CULTURAL SABOTAGE…
A deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate. There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process.
Now, however, we learn that THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT DID HAPPEN. This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett…
The Government's 'driving political purpose', wrote Neather, was 'TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL'. It was therefore A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED ATTEMPT BY MINISTERS TO TRANSFORM THE FUNDAMENTAL MAKE-UP AND IDENTITY OF THIS COUNTRY. IT WAS DONE TO DESTROY THE RIGHT OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE TO LIVE IN A SOCIETY DEFINED BY A COMMON HISTORY, RELIGION, LAW, LANGUAGE AND TRADITIONS. IT WAS DONE TO DESTROY FOR EVER WHAT IT MEANS TO BE CULTURALLY BRITISH AND TO PUT ANOTHER 'MULTICULTURAL' IDENTITY IN ITS PLACE. AND IT WAS DONE WITHOUT TELLING OR ASKING THE BRITISH PEOPLE WHETHER THEY WANTED THEIR COUNTRY AND THEIR CULTURE TO BE TRANSFORMED IN THIS WAY.
Spitefully, ONE MOTIVATION BY LABOUR MINISTERS WAS 'TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date'. Even Neather found that particular element of gratuitous Left-wing bullying to be 'a manoeuvre too far'. Yet apart from this, Neather sees nothing wrong in the policy he has described. Indeed, THE REASON FOR HIS ASTONISHING CANDOUR IS HE THINKS IT'S SOMETHING TO BOAST ABOUT. Mass immigration, he wrote, had provided the 'foreign nannies, cleaners and gardeners' without whom London could hardly function. WHAT ELITIST ARROGANCE! AS IF MOST PEOPLE EMPLOY NANNIES, CLEANERS AND GARDENERS. AND WHAT IGNORANCE. THE ARGUMENT THAT BRITAIN IS BETTER OFF WITH THIS LEVEL OF IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN CONCLUSIVELY SHOWN TO BE ECONOMICALLY ILLITERATE.
Neather gave the impression that most immigrants are Eastern Europeans. But these form fewer than a quarter of all immigrants. And the fact is that, despite his blithe assertions to the contrary, SCHOOLS IN AREAS OF VERY HIGH IMMIGRATION FIND IT DESPERATELY DIFFICULT TO COPE WITH SO MANY CHILDREN WHO DON'T EVEN HAVE BASIC ENGLISH. OTHER SERVICES, SUCH AS HEALTH OR HOUSING, ARE SIMILARLY BEING OVERWHELMED BY THE SHEER WEIGHT OF NUMBERS. But the most shattering revelation was that this policy of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the likes of Neather. It was TO DESTROY BRITAIN'S IDENTITY AND TRANSFORM IT INTO A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY where British attributes would have no greater status than any other country's.
No wonder JACK STRAW WAS SO SHIFTY on last week's Question Time when he was asked whether it was the Government's failure to halt immigration which lay behind increasing support for the BNP. Now we know IT WAS NO SUCH FAILURE OF POLICY. IT WAS DELIBERATE. FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF WHICH STRAW IS SUCH A LONG- STANDING MEMBER HAD SECRETLY PLOTTED TO FLOOD THE COUNTRY WITH IMMIGRANTS TO CHANGE ITS VERY CHARACTER AND IDENTITY.”
Who thinks Blair, Brown, Harman, Straw, Mandelson et al have betrayed the British people?
Who thinks they should be put up against a wall and shot?
By the way, I'm not one of those who thinks they ought to be shot.
I'd rather see them boiled.
On 27 October 2009, Patrick O'Flynn said this in The Daily Express:
"LABOUR HAS BEEN EXPOSED ON TWO FRONTS AS THE MOST ANTI-DEMOCRATIC REGIME TO HOLD POWER IN BRITAIN SINCE THE ADVENT OF UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE MORE THAN 80 YEARS AGO. If its disgusting conduct is properly explained to the voting public IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE IT EVER BEING ELECTED INTO POWER AGAIN.
THE TWO ISSUES UPON WHICH THE CURTAIN HAS BEEN LIFTED TO EXPOSE UGLY GOINGS-ON BACKSTAGE ARE EUROPE AND IMMIGRATION.”
On 27 October 2009, Amnesty' International's Donatella Rovera was quoted thus by the BBC News:
“Water is a basic need and a right, but FOR MANY PALESTINIANS OBTAINING EVEN POOR-QUALITY, SUBSISTENCE-LEVEL QUANTITIES OF WATER HAS BECOME A LUXURY THAT THEY CAN BARELY AFFORD."
The BBC added:
“ISRAEL IS DENYING PALESTINIANS ACCESS TO EVEN THE BASIC MINIMUM OF CLEAN, SAFE WATER, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SAYS. While Israeli settlers in the West Bank enjoy lush gardens and swimming pools, Amnesty describes a series of Israeli measures it says are discriminating against Palestinians:
ISRAEL HAS 'ENTIRELY APPROPRIATED THE PALESTINIANS' SHARE OF THE JORDAN RIVER' AND USES 80% OF A KEY SHARED AQUIFER. West Bank Palestinians are not allowed to drill wells without Israeli permits, which are 'often impossible' to obtain. Rainwater HARVESTING CISTERNS ARE 'OFTEN DESTROYED BY THE ISRAELI ARMY'. Israeli soldiers confiscated a water tanker from villagers who were trying to remain in land Israel had declared a 'closed military area'."
On 25 October 2009, William Rees Mogg said this in The Daily Express:
“We had Blair as Prime Minister for ten years. We never thought we would get him back as an unelected President of Europe. HE LET US DOWN TOO OFTEN. WE DO NOT TRUST HIM, WE NO LONGER LIKE HIM, WE DO NOT WANT HIM.”
On 24 October 2009, Ben Summerskill, the Chief Executive of Stonewall, the gay rights group, was quoted thus by The Telegraph:
“The key reason why I resigned was as chair of the commission’s Audit committee, I FELT UNABLE TO OFFER APPROPRIATE ASSURANCE TO THE NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE THAT THE COMMISSION WAS BEING LED WITH PROBITY. My understanding is that the National Audit Office was understanding of my having taken that view…
Trevor as Chairman has at least twice interfered inappropriately in the appointment of commissioners TO PROMOTE THE CANDIDACY OF EITHER INAPPROPRIATE OR LESS WELL QUALIFIED PERSONAL FRIENDS OF HIS”
The Telegraph added:
“Only days after Mr Phillips was controversially reappointed to his £120,000-a-year role BY HARRIET HARMAN THE NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REFUSED TO SIGN OFF THE EHRC ACCOUNTS. The NAO had objected to the fact that the commission had paid £325,000 to seven senior staff WHO WERE RE-EMPLOYED AS CONSULTANTS DAYS AFTER TAKING GENEROUS EARLY SEVERANCE PACKAGES…
When the NAO criticised the rehiring of the consultants, Mr Phillips insisted that he was not told they were back on the payroll. Three are senior figures at Dignity Management Consultancy, a business partner of Equate Organisation which is A PRIVATE COMPANY IN WHICH MR PHILLIPS OWNS 70 PER CENT OF THE SHARES.
Asked by an MP on the committee IF THE COMMISSION WAS DOMINATED BY FRIENDS AND CRONIES OF MR PHILLIPS, Mr Summerskill replied:
'DID YOU SAY TOADIES AND CRONIES? I THINK WE WOULD AGREE WITH BOTH’.”
On 23 October 2009, The Daily Mail quoted unemployed carpenter, Adam Bull, responding to an ad placed by pet food producer, Supreme Nutrition Ltd., which insisted that the required “factory operative” be “Polish-speaking”.
This is what he said:
“It's outrageous. The condition should be that people have to speak English, not Polish. I have lived in this area my entire life, so where am I going to learn Polish? IT'S TOTALLY DISCRIMINATORY.”
The Mail added:
“Another 32-year-old man, struggling to find work after he was made redundant from his job in the building trade, said: ‘It doesn’t seem right or fair - THERE ARE PLENTY OF LOCAL PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE MORE THAN WILLING TO FILL THOSE JOBS. BUT THEY DON’T STAND A CHANCE OF BEING TAKEN ON because the only people who speak Polish around here are the Poles who have moved here in recent years’…
The advert for pet food producer Supreme Nutrition Ltd read:
'Factory operative required to work in busy manufacturing plant in Acton, near Sudbury. MUST BE POLISH SPEAKING.'
Details of the minimum wage £5.80-an-hour vacancies were displayed at a Jobcentre Plus but were taken down following a flood of complaints in the Suffolk town, where 1,500 ARE OUT OF WORK.”
On 23 October 2009, Andrew Neather, a former government advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, dropped this revelatory bombshell in The Evening Standard:
“THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION…
The PIU's reports were legendarily tedious within Whitehall BUT THEIR BIG IMMIGRATION REPORT WAS SURROUNDED BY AN UNUSUAL AIR OF BOTH ANTICIPATION AND SECRECY. DRAFTS WERE HANDED OUT IN SUMMER 2000 ONLY WITH EXTREME RELUCTANCE: THERE WAS A PARANOIA ABOUT IT REACHING THE MEDIA.
Eventually published in January 2001, the innocuously labelled ‘RDS Occasional Paper no. 67’, ‘Migration: an economic and social analysis’ focused heavily on the labour market case. But THE EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL.
I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date…
THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS…
The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”.
You might think, from the astounding revelations Andrew Neather apprises us of above, that he is a whistleblower.
Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't Listen to the Whingers - London Needs Immigrants, suggests, he is still four square behind the imposition of the Multicult.
Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, responded to Neather's article thus:
"Now at least the truth is out, and IT'S DYNAMITE. Many have long suspected that MASS IMMIGRATION UNDER LABOUR WAS NOT JUST A COCK UP BUT ALSO A CONSPIRACY. THEY WERE RIGHT. THIS GOVERNMENT HAS ADMITTED THREE MILLION IMMIGRANTS FOR CYNICAL POLITICAL REASONS concealed by dodgy economic camouflage."
The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, issued a statement saying this:
‘We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true. IT IS THE FIRST BEAM OF TRUTH THAT HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN SHONE ON THE IMMIGRATION ISSUE IN BRITAIN.’
On 22 October 2009, the Reverend Mike Slade, Vicar of Winscombe and Sandford, was quoted thus by The Telegraph:
“I feel sorry for the Christian councillors who have been discriminated against in this way.”
The Telegraph added:
"A council has scrapped its 115-year-old tradition of saying Christian prayers before meetings after one complaint that it may offend other faiths. Reverend Mike Slade, Vicar of Winscombe and Sandford, feels IT IS THE CHRISTIAN COUNCILLORS WHO ARE BEING ‘DISCRIMINATED AGAINST' AND NOT MEMBERS OF OTHER FAITHS.”
On 22 October 2009, Voltaire.Net told us that the EU President, Javier Solana, speaking at the Facing Tomorrow conference convened by Israeli President, Shimon Peres, had said this:
"Allow me to say that ISRAEL IS A MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION without being a member of its institutions… an INTEGRAL PART OF ALL EU PROGRAMMES".
On 19 October 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
"This is a Government that can put spy cameras in our bins but cannot be bothered to control the number of people who actually settle here… The Government has admitted that it ‘doesn’t have a clue’ how many illegal migrants are living here, while – for all Labour’s aggressive talk of action – WORK PERMITS, BRITISH PASSPORTS AND VISAS ARE DISHED OUT LIKE CONFETTI.
Last year alone no fewer than 733,000 NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBERS WERE HANDED OUT TO NEWLY ARRIVED FOREIGNERS, making a mockery of Government claims that net migration is on the decline. At least 10 per cent of the workforce comes from overseas, while THE MAJORITY OF CHILDREN IN MANY OF OUR CITIES, INCLUDING THE CAPITAL, ARE BORN TO MIGRANT FAMILIES.
This transformation in our society points to a more fundamental lie at the heart of government. Throughout the past 12 years, ministers have loudly claimed that mass immigration is an unalloyed benefit to our economy and our wider society. But THIS NOW STANDS EXPOSED AS NONSENSE. THE DRAMATIC RISE IN IMMIGRATION HAS COINCIDED WITH THE DEEPEST RECESSION SINCE THE THIRTIES.
Moreover, THE MASS ARRIVAL OF FOREIGNERS HAS IMPOSED AN INTOLERABLE STRAIN ON PUBLIC SERVICES, ESPECIALLY THE NHS, SOCIAL SECURITY, HOUSING AND EDUCATION, AS WELL AS CREATING A HUGE BURDEN FOR THE TAXPAYER, COSTING MORE THAN £30BILLION A YEAR…
Economies can be rebuilt but nations cannot. PATRIOTISM, ONE OF THE MOST NATURAL OF ALL HUMAN IMPULSES, IS DENOUNCED AS RACISM. Lacking a shared heritage, Britain has become a place of apprehension, fear and suspicion.
But THE LABOUR LIE MACHINE GOES ON REMORSELESSLY, BULLYING US INTO ‘CELEBRATING’ OUR NATION’S OWN DEMISE. NEVER IN MODERN HISTORY HAS ANY COUNTRY BEEN GOVERNED BY SUCH A BUNCH OF MENDACIOUS TRAITORS."
On 17 October 2009, The Daily Mail quoted Abu Mousa thus:
“What he says DESERVES THE DEATH SENTENCE UNDER ISLAM.'
And Sayful Islam thus:
“WE NEED TO PUT THIS DOG ON A LEASH.”
Geert Wilders responded thus:
“I have a problem with the Islamic ideology, the Islamic culture, because I feel that THE MORE ISLAM WE GET IN OUR SOCIETIES, THE LESS FREEDOM WE GET.”
“Dog on a leash”?
Yep. If they treated me like a dog, led me around on a leash and sentenced me to death I think I’d feel as though my freedom was being restricted somewhat.
On 15 October 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
"Thanks to the lucrative array of handouts on offer, SPONGING IS PROMOTED AND CHEATING IS REWARDED.
Meanwhile, HONEST, HARD-WORKING TAXPAYERS ARE FINANCIALLY PUNISHED SO THAT THE FECKLESS CAN CARRY ON ABUSING PUBLIC MONEY... THREE QUARTERS OF CLAIMANTS ON INCAPACITY BENEFIT ARE PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF HOLDING DOWN JOBS. NO LESS THAN £11BILLION A YEAR IS NOW DRAINED FROM THE PUBLIC PURSE BY ALMOST TWO MILLION SPONGERS WHO ARE FAKING THEIR ILLNESSES OR DISABILITIES SO THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE TO LOOK FOR WORK.
That colossal sum is more than four times the amount the Government spends every year on prisons. We are constantly told by Ministers that we cannot lock up more criminals because of ‘lack of resources‘ yet Gordon Brown’s disastrous state machine seems to have plenty of resources to keep skivers in the lifestyle which they are accustomed…
One of the remarkable achievements of modern British social security is to have created more apparently disabled people in this country than the blood-stained carnage of the First World War. The idea that incapacity claims have dramatically risen because of a decline in the nation’s health is ridiculous… BY FAR THE GREATEST OUTRAGE IS THE MONEY DISHED OUT TO MORE THAN 100,000 ALCOHOLICS AND DRUG ADDICTS. IT IS THE HEIGHT OF LUNACY AND IMMORALITY FOR THE STATE TO PAY PEOPLE TO CONTINUE WITH THEIR DANGEROUS HABITS. AWARDING ‘DISABILITY’ HANDOUTS TO DRUG ABUSERS MAKES A COMPLETE MOCKERY OF THE LAW, GIVEN NOT ONLY THAT NARCOTICS ARE ILLEGAL BUT ALSO THAT A SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF CRIME IS COMMITTED BY ADDICTS.
THESE PEOPLE DESERVE SPELLS IN PRISONS, NOT AN EASY LIFETIME ON THE DOLE…
The Tories did nothing to tackle these abuses during their last spell in office, because the unemployment figures could be massaged by categorising claimants as ‘disabled.’ Labour has been even more cynical, because THE PARTY HAS SEEN ELECTORAL ADVANTAGE IN THE CREATION OF A VAST CLIENT ARMY WHICH OWES ITS LIVING TO THE SOCIALIST STATE.
Labour has failed woefully in its 12 years in power and has no belief in the radical surgery that is required. So THE MORAL DECLINE OF BRITAIN WILL CONTINUE UNTIL THE ERA OF BROWN IS ENDED."
At the Islam4UK web site a request for Muslims to march on the House of Commons on 31 October 2009 is presented thus:
“We hereby request all Muslims in the United Kingdom, in Manchester, Leeds, Cardiff, Glasgow and all other places to join us and collectively declare that as submitters to Almighty Allah, WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF DEMOCRACY AND MAN-MADE LAW AND THE DEPRAVITY OF THE BRITISH CULTURE.
On this day WE WILL CALL FOR A COMPLETE UPHEAVAL OF THE BRITISH RULING SYSTEM ITS MEMBERS AND LEGISLATURE, AND DEMAND THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF SHARI’AH IN BRITAIN.”
Anjem Choudary, the Judge of the Sharia Court of the UK and Principal Lecturer at the London School of Sharia, seems to be the host of the Islam4UK web site.
On 20 October 2009, a black youth variously described as Mick/The Punisher/Headcase Mick explained what young, black gang members think of doing time in Feltham Young Offenders Institution in The Evening Standard.
This is what he said:
"I wanted to go to Feltham, bruv... By the time I was 16, I COULDN'T WAIT TO GET BANGED UP. EARN MY STRIPES...
I had three meals a day, my own private bedroom with a nice TV, a nice Sony stereo radio, and I got a PlayStation 2 after two months for good behaviour. I got to work out in the gym, shoot pool, table-tennis. And most of my friends were there. To me, FELTHAM WAS HOLIDAY CAMP...
A lot of the youngers I meet want to go to jail, too. THEY THINK IT'S A BADGE OF HONOUR. To them, it's more of a test than GCSEs. THEY SEE IT AS A PLACE WHERE THEY CAN WORK OUT, GET MUSCLY, MAKE FRIENDS, AND ALL THE GIRLS GONNA FALL OVER THEM WHEN THEY GET OUT. And it's a break from the grind.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO HUSTLE FOR A LIVING WHEN YOU BANGED UP…
TO ME, LIFE'S LIKE A VIDEO GAME…
EDUCATION IS NOTHING THESE DAYS. IT DOESN'T EVEN GET YOU A JOB.”
The Standard's reporter, David Cohen continued:
“Mick… exudes confidence and charisma. HE IS BLACK OF CARIBBEAN DESCENT, born in London, the third of SIX SIBLINGS FROM A BROKEN HOME and 'admires' his hard-working SOCIAL WORKER MOTHER… He was… 15 when he started dealing drugs…
Since he was 13, he explains, when he saw a Channel 4 musical documentary called Feltham Sings - WHICH SHOWED THE INMATES OF FELTHAM YOUNG OFFENDERS INSTITUTE IN HOUNSLOW RAPPING THEIR STUFF AND STRUTTING AROUND LIKE PEACOCKS - he wanted to go there. Two weeks after leaving school, Mick got his wish: he was sentenced to 14 months FOR 23 ARMED ROBBERIES AT KNIFEPOINT ACROSS EAST LONDON…
Some teenagers regard the biggest young offender prison in Europe not with dread BUT AS A GLAMORISED RITE OF PASSAGE. How representative is he?
‘Very,’ says Ray Lewis, whose Eastside Academy in Plaistow for wayward black youths is regarded as a model by Boris Johnson. (Lewis stepped down as deputy mayor last year AFTER BEING ACCUSED OF DISHONESTY IN A 10-YEAR-OLD CHURCH FILE…
‘For a growing number of boys growing up on the estates, GOING TO FELTHAM REPRESENTS THE PINNACLE OF THEIR LIVES. For these boys, FELTHAM IS A SUBSTITUTE FAMILY. It replaces their chaotic home life with routine, structure AND STATUS. THE POLITICIANS HAVE NOT GRASPED THIS because it's too frightening to contemplate. If our prisons are no longer a deterrent, what is’?”
Oh, the politicians have grasped it, Ray.
They know what’s happening alright. Those who "strut around like peacocks" in Feltham are their foot soldiers. They make war upon the world on the politicians' behalf.
“Within minutes of my meeting Mick, he sells a wrap of cocaine and uses the proceeds to score weed from a 14-year-old kid on a bicycle. His volatile personality is also instantly to the fore. When I refuse to hand over £20 for his cannabis, he casually tells the dealer: ‘Slap him man, he's acting up, give him a slap’…
The dealer we just saw is a member of AN ASIAN GANG, THE BLACKHAWK BOYS, whose ‘boss‘, Raffique, knows Mick because he ‘also graduated from Feltham‘. Mick's gang (whose name we have agreed to withhold) is about 30-strong, aged 18 upwards, and is one of the most feared in east London…
How does he spend his day?…
‘I wake late morning, visit my supplier then get the stuff sold fast as possible. I got my regulars: business guys, City guys who need a fix. I keep my shit upbeat. I do home deliveries, pick-ups, whatever. Nights, I'm with my girl. Last night we were up until 5am. WE WATCH PORN‘...
He outlines his business strategy.
‘Selling weed is easy but it's not what makes money. COCAINE AND HEROIN, YOU MAKING ABOUT TWO GRAND A DAY, MATE, ESPECIALLY IF YOU GO SELL IN FUNNY PLACES IN THE COUNTRYSIDE LIKE BASILDON AND PORTSMOUTH’…
How does he see his future?
‘I WANT A BIG HOUSE WITH THREE CARS: A MERCEDES, A RANGE ROVER, AND A LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO’…
The next time I meet Mick is a week later: he is nursing a painfully swollen gashed lip with three stitches. He'd been hit with a knuckle-duster, he says, part of a long-running tit-for-tat feud with another boy. It started about two years ago, he says, when a girl ‘grassed up HIS COUSIN WHO THEN GOT DONE ON A MURDER CHARGE‘. MICK ‘FLIPPED OUT’ AND BEAT HER UP SO BADLY THAT SHE WAS HOSPITALISED and he, in turn, was charged with assault and sent, once again, to Feltham. His second spell inside was SIX MONTHS...
Mick doesn't stray far from his estate without ‘tooling up’ - carrying a weapon.
‘Youngers carry knives but I prefer to roll with a strap,’ he says, referring to HIS 9MM GLOCK PISTOL which HE ONCE USED TO SHOOT SOMEBODY in the leg in a fast-food restaurant.”
Ray Lewis adds:
'WE ESPECIALLY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH BLACK BOYS. It's the elephant in the room, THE THING POLITICIANS ARE TOO AFRAID TO ADMIT but WE FACE A CRISIS OF MASCULINITY IN BLACK FAMILIES WHERE FATHERS ARE ABSENT’…
Trig, who has also started dealing class-A drugs and has known Mick since he was 10 years old, looks only to emulate his role model. ‘I ain't afraid of Feltham,’ he says. ‘Mick handled it, I can, too’…
We all fear crossing the paths of teenage hoodlums like Mick and Trig, SYMBOLS OF BROKEN BRITAIN.” More...
We fear them because the powers-that-be are on their side.
If we were to take the one or two common sense steps necessary to prevent their alien pets from making our lives hell, they would be down on us like a ton of bricks, that‘s for sure.
For more than forty years now those who rule our lives have given such murderously anarchic “symbols” as these the green light to build the “Broken Britain” that so many of us must now endure.
If the British people want their country back from those who see prison as a holiday camp and Feltham, in particular, as a “badge of honour”, they will have to stop voting for the politicians who made it all happen.
It's as simple as that.
On 19 October 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
"This is a Government that can put spy cameras in our bins but cannot be bothered to control the number of people who actually settle here… The Government has admitted that it ‘doesn’t have a clue’ how many illegal migrants are living here, while – for all Labour’s aggressive talk of action – WORK PERMITS, BRITISH PASSPORTS AND VISAS ARE DISHED OUT LIKE CONFETTI.
Last year alone no fewer than 733,000 NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBERS WERE HANDED OUT TO NEWLY ARRIVED FOREIGNERS, making a mockery of Government claims that net migration is on the decline. At least 10 per cent of the workforce comes from overseas, while THE MAJORITY OF CHILDREN IN MANY OF OUR CITIES, INCLUDING THE CAPITAL, ARE BORN TO MIGRANT FAMILIES...
Throughout the past 12 years, ministers have loudly claimed that mass immigration is an unalloyed benefit to our economy and our wider society. But THIS NOW STANDS EXPOSED AS NONSENSE. THE DRAMATIC RISE IN IMMIGRATION HAS COINCIDED WITH THE DEEPEST RECESSION SINCE THE THIRTIES.
Moreover, THE MASS ARRIVAL OF FOREIGNERS HAS IMPOSED AN INTOLERABLE STRAIN ON PUBLIC SERVICES, ESPECIALLY THE NHS, SOCIAL SECURITY, HOUSING AND EDUCATION, AS WELL AS CREATING A HUGE BURDEN FOR THE TAXPAYER, COSTING MORE THAN £30BILLION A YEAR…
Economies can be rebuilt but nations cannot. PATRIOTISM, ONE OF THE MOST NATURAL OF ALL HUMAN IMPULSES, IS DENOUNCED AS RACISM. Lacking a shared heritage, Britain has become a place of apprehension, fear and suspicion.
But THE LABOUR LIE MACHINE GOES ON REMORSELESSLY, BULLYING US INTO ‘CELEBRATING’ OUR NATION’S OWN DEMISE. NEVER IN MODERN HISTORY HAS ANY COUNTRY BEEN GOVERNED BY SUCH A BUNCH OF MENDACIOUS TRAITORS."
On 14 October 2009, Simon Duke wrote the following in The Daily Mail:
"City bank Goldman Sachs is expected to confirm tomorrow that BONUSES WILL SMASH ALL RECORDS IN 2009, JUST A YEAR AFTER THE GOVERNMENT RESCUED THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM OBLIVION...
The return to business as usual for the so-called 'Masters of the Universe' of the Square Mile will anger the MILLIONS OF FAMILIES whose finances have been devastated by the financial crisis...
THE WALL STREET GIANT IS ON COURSE TO LAVISH £14 BILLION ON PAY AND BONUSES ON STAFF THIS YEAR following a surge in profits between July and September… GOLDMAN'S 5,500 UK WORKERS ARE NOW SET TO POCKET AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST £500,000 EACH for this year - the highest rewards in the firm's 140-year history...
High-flyers, such as UK boss MICHAEL SHERWOOD, COULD EARN BONUSES STRETCHING INTO EIGHT FIGURES."
Sherwood, one of two "Masters of the Universe" working for Goldman Sachs cited in Simon Duke's article, is Jewish.
The other, Peter Sutherland, is, truly, a credit-crunching wallet-stuffer of the highest international order. His "Father of Globalisation" CV suggests he would rank much higher in the NWO hierarchy than ubiquitous factotums like Blair or Brown, for example.
Check out what Wikipedia has to say about him here...
Here’s a novel idea:
Instead of putting the price of everything up and taxing the innocent majority up to the hilt, tax the greedy bankers, the hedge fund managers; the private equity wallahs and the biggest of trough-gobbling big businessmen up to the hilt. Let's have 90 PER CENT OF THEIR INCOME off them! And make the tax retrospective - all the way back to 1979, when Margaret Thatcher began institutionalising fat cat greed!
That’d get rid of the national debt in a flash. And the process would be a just one - As opposed to the injustice of making the decent majority pay for the crimes of an amoral elite minority, that is.
Besides, THEY would still have their 10 per cent, wouldn’t THEY? 10 percent of a billion is still a hundred mil.
99.999 per cent of us would be happy enough with that, I reckon.
On 14 October 2009, Deirde Gover, mother of Flight Lieutenant Kristian Gover, was quoted thus by The Times:
“I HOLD TONY BLAIR PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATH OF MY SON. There’s a lot of anger here, and I WOULD LIKE TONY BLAIR TO BE INDICTED AS A WAR CRIMINAL… I’d like someone to apportion blame for what happened in Iraq. TONY BLAIR LIED TO HIS CABINET, HE LIED TO THE GOVERNMENT, HE LIED TO THE COUNTRY. HE DECEIVED THE COUNTRY ABOUT IRAQ’S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BECAUSE HE HAD AN AGENDA WITH GEORGE BUSH.”
Kristian was killed in Iraq.
According to The Times, at the official inquiry into Gulf War II, the families of servicemen killed in the conflict were saying:
"TONY BLAIR SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH WAR CRIMES FOR ORDERING BRITISH TROOPS TO INVADE IRAQ”.
Amen to that.
On 12 October 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
"THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS FAST BECOMING AN INSTRUMENT OF OPPRESSION RATHER THAN A BULWARK OF CIVILISATION. Such is the grip of Left-wing thinking on our so-called law enforcers that they are no longer willing to protect society from violence and thuggery.
Instead, they prefer to hound ordinary citizens over offences such as thought crimes or breaches of their myriad environmental regulations. Similarly, infringements of traffic rules are pursued with far more authoritarian zeal than is ever applied to burglary, assault, theft, drug abuse or vandalism. In this process of politicisation, COMMON SENSE HAS DISAPPEARED AND BASIC FREEDOMS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED.
IN THE BIG BROTHER CULTURE CREATED BY LABOUR, full of vast databases, surveillance cameras, state-employed spies and intrusive questionnaires, ALL OF US ARE NOW TREATED AS POTENTIAL CRIMINAL SUSPECTS FOR BEING INSUFFICIENTLY ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT CULTURAL DIVERSITY…
Yet the real enemies of our society, like crack-addicted thieves, drunken yobs, benefit swindlers or Islamic terrorists, have little to fear from our enfeebled courts, which wallow in leniency and excuse-making. THE ONLY PEOPLE WHOSE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNT ARE THOSE OF OFFENDERS, NOT THEIR VICTIMS...
UNDER LABOUR MORE THAN 3,600 NEW OFFENCES HAVE BEEN CREATED SINCE 1997 AT A RATE OF 320 A YEAR, including such major crimes as holding an unlicensed concert in a church hall."
On 11 October 2009, Haras Rafiq, co-founder of the Sufi Muslim Council, was quoted thus by The Times:
“This has been a huge problem for the last decade. SOME OF THE BIGGEST MOSQUES AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE UK HAVE BEEN FUNDED BY FOREIGN MONEY AND HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE PORTRAYING EXTREMIST VIEWPOINTS.”
The Times added:
“Salim Lorgat, a Lib Dem councillor in Blackburn, said Straw was widely credited among Muslims with securing the funding for the Bicknell Street mosque.
‘The Labour party said it was because of Jack that we had got this money,’ Lorgat said."
On 10 October 2009, The Daily Mail quoted Peter Brierley thus as he refused to shake Tony Blair's hand:
“DON’T YOU DARE. YOU HAVE MY SON’S BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS!”
The men met at the reception that followed a service at St Paul’s to commemorate the dead of the Iraq war.
Peter also said this:
“AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED THAT MAN IS A WAR CRIMINAL. I can’t bear to be in the same room as him. I cannot believe he’s been allowed to come to this reception. I sat through that service listening to people preaching to me about tolerance but I DON’T THINK ANYONE SHOULD BE FORCED TO TOLERATE BEING IN THE SAME ROOM AS HIM.
HE HAS MADE £14MILLION ON THE BACK OF TAKING US TO WAR AND THEY ARE NOW TALKING ABOUT MAKING HIM PRESIDENT OF THE EU. But I BELIEVE HE’S GOT THE BLOOD OF MY SON, AND ALL OF THE OTHER MEN AND WOMEN WHO DIED IN THAT WAR, ON HIS HANDS.
The truth is that WE WENT TO WAR ON THE LIES OF BLAIR AND HIS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. HE SENT OUR FINE MEN AND WOMEN TO FIGHT WITHOUT PROPER TRANSPORT, KIT OR ARMS. And as a result of that decision, I have lost my son."
Citing an interview in the magazine, Lettre International, Thilo Sarrazin, a board member of the Bundesbank, was quoted thus by Reuters news agency on 9 October 2009:
"I DON'T NEED TO ACCEPT ANYONE WHO LIVES OFF THE STATE, REJECTS THIS COUNTRY ... AND IS ALWAYS PRODUCING LITTLE GIRLS WITH HEADSCARVES. This is true of 70 percent of the Turkish and 90 percent of the Arab population of Berlin.
THE TURKS ARE CONQUERING GERMANY JUST LIKE KOSOVARS ONCE DID KOSOVO -- THROUGH A HIGHER BIRTH RATE'."
"A central banker's attack on Turks and Arabs living in Germany has attracted a flood of popular support and sparked warnings that RACIAL TOLERANCE IS ON THE WANE, EXPOSING A DEEP RIFT IN THE COUNTRY OVER INTEGRATION...
The comments... have been CRITICISED BY HIS EMPLOYER... and inspired thousands of Germans to take a public stand on the issue...
SARRAZIN CALLED FOR A CRACKDOWN ON IMMIGRATION, ARGUING THAT TOO MANY MUSLIMS WERE SPONGING OFF GERMANY."
It's happening everywhere you know.
The Muslims presence in Europe is increasing dramatically, the powers-that-be threaten us if we complain about it and yet more and more of us are daring to make our feelings known anyway.
If we complain long enough, loudly enough and refuse to be cowed by the threats of the globalising elite, things WILL change, ladies and gentlemen.
The one thing THEY are afraid of is US. And the possibilty that, once day, we may exact revenge upon THEM for what THEY have done.
On 8 October 2009, The Daily Mail quoted Dr Victoria Manning, of the National Addiction Centre, thus:
"3.4 MILLION CHILDREN (are) LIVING WITH BINGE DRINKERS AND ALMOST ONE MILLION LIVING WITH DRUG USERS...
Parental substance misuse can lead to inadequate child monitoring, modelling behaviour and poor standards of child care... The number of children living with substance misusing parents exceeds earlier estimates…
Widespread patterns of binge drinking and recreational drug use MAY EXPOSE CHILDREN TO SUB-OPTIMAL CARE."
Bit of an old understatement there, Victoria.
As I keep telling you, ladies and gentlemen, THEY really are at war with our world.
On 5 October 2009, The Telegraph quoted Andrew Grant, Chairman of the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference, as follows, after he compared the Government’s crackdown on independent schools’ charitable status to Henry VIII’s seizure of land and property in the 1500s:
“What hypocrisy we have heard from some moralising, mealy-mouthed politicians…
How dare you criticise our parents for footing the bill to educate their own children or seek to make it more difficult for them to do so? Our parents’ taxes have not only funded a state education… but have paid for YOUR MORTGAGES, YOUR MOATS AND YOUR MINT IMPERIALS… This would indeed be a spectacularly stupid cutting off of a useful, elegant and extremely efficient nose TO SPITE A FACE THAT DOESN’T FIT IDEOLOGICALLY AND POLITICALLY…
Let’s be clear: the threat that currently underlies the Charity Commission’s guidance is the well-tried mediaeval one of confiscation of land and property and IT LOOKS NO LESS CRUDE AND UGLY UNDER THE ROSE OF LABOUR THAN IT DID UNDER THE ROSE OF TUDOR.”
On 5 October 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
“The EU juggernaut grinds on remorselessly, crushing the last gasps of independence from the member nations. Now that THE PEOPLE OF IRELAND HAVE BEEN BULLIED AND BRAINWASHED INTO VOTING FOR THE LISBON TREATY, the Euro-fanatics’ plans for a united superstate can be fully enacted.
The centrepiece of this drive for European political unity is the creation of a new post of EU president. As if the destruction of our national freedoms were not depressing enough, it is clear that THE OVERWHELMING FAVOURITE FOR THE PRESIDENCY IS NONE OTHER THAN TONY BLAIR, OUR SHALLOW, DISCREDITED FORMER PRIME MINISTER.
Having wrecked our country once with his destructive brand of messianic socialism, now he wants to come back for another go... IT WOULD BE AN OUTRAGE IF BLAIR WAS FOISTED ON US AS EU PRESIDENT. SUCH A MOVE WOULD MAKE A MOCKERY OF DEMOCRACY, for he would have not the slightest mandate to govern us. For a start, the British people have never been allowed to vote on the establishment of the EU Presidency, THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAVING RENEGED ON ITS PROMISE TO HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE NEW TREATY.
Just as importantly, BLAIR WILL BE ABLE TO TAKE POWER WITHOUT HAVING BEEN VOTED INTO OFFICE BY ANY OF THE ELECTORATES OF EUROPE SINCE, AS IN THE OLD SOVIET UNION, THE PRESIDENT WILL BE APPOINTED BY THE EU’S RULING COUNCIL. The European Union’s bosses are fond of lecturing the rest of the world about the importance of democracy but THEIR SPECTACULAR ELITISM MEANS THAT THEY NEVER APPLY SUCH PRINCIPLES TO THEIR OWN CLOSED, UNACCOUNTABLE REGIME.
THE IDEA OF AN UNELECTED PRESIDENT BLAIR IS ENOUGH TO PROVOKE THOUGHTS OF REVOLUTION. In the past, we were always able to throw out our rulers if they became too arrogant or incompetent but THAT BECOMES AN IMPOSSIBILITY IN THE NEW EUROPE CREATED BY LISBON. WITHOUT THE SAFETY VALVE OF THE BALLOT BOX, WE ARE STUCK WITH THIS GRINNING, PATRONISING, WAR-MONGERING SOCIALIST, WHOM MOST OF US WERE SICK OF YEARS AGO. What is more, with Labour still in office, WE ARE FACED WITH THE DIRE PROSPECT OF BEING GOVERNED FOR MONTHS BY THE GRISLY CABAL OF BLAIR, GORDON BROWN, AND THE PUPPET-MASTER LORD MANDELSON, NONE OF WHOM WERE ELECTED TO THEIR POSITIONS BY THE BRITISH PEOPLE.
It is obvious why Blair is so desperate for the job of EU President. Money, power and ideology are the reasons. While keen on lecturing us about the importance of fairness, BLAIR AND HIS WIFE HAVE AMASSED VAST PERSONAL ENRICHMENT. THE LAVISH REWARDS OF THE EU PRESIDENCY WILL ONLY ENHANCE THEIR FORTUNE…
The enormous international status of the job adds to its attraction for Blair, who has always been a man of overweening ambition. An actor and an egotist, he loves to be the centre of attention, the bigger the stage the better. Even when he was prime minister he exuded the grandiosity of a president, LARGELY IGNORING THE HOUSE OF COMMONS AND APPOINTING HIMSELF THE GLOBAL AMBASSADOR FOR THE SO-CALLED WAR ON TERROR.
AS EU PRESIDENT, BLAIR WILL REVEL IN THE CHANCE TO COMPLETE THE DESTRUCTION OF BRITAIN’S TRADITIONAL NATIONAL IDENTITY, THE PROJECT HE BEGAN IN 1997. A FERVID, LEFT-WING INTERNATIONALIST, HE HAS NOT A PATRIOTIC BONE IN HIS BODY. THAT IS WHY HE USED MASS IMMIGRATION, EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND THE DOGMA OF MULTI-CULTURALISM AS BATTERING RAMS AGAINST OUR HERITAGE.
Through his new office, Blair will continue where he left off in 2007. There will MORE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BORDERS AND MORE PROPAGANDA FOR DIVERSITY. THE ISLAMIFICATION OF EUROPE WILL ACCELERATE AS BLAIR PUSHES THROUGH THE ACCEPTANCE OF TURKEY INTO THE EU, LONG ONE OF HIS PET PROJECTS... He will ratchet up the pressure for Britain to join the Euro, thereby obliterating the last remnants of our economic sovereignty. The man whose government became infamous for its financial scandals will not be worried to head AN ORGANISATION WHOSE ACCOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR 14 YEARS BECAUSE OF FRAUD.
Hugh Gaitskell, one of Blair’s predecessors as Labour leader, said in 1962 that European integration would mean ‘the end of a thousand years of history’ of British independence. The presidency of Tony Blair could mark the final page in that glorious, but fading history."
On 3 October 2009, Mark Rimmer, Service Director for Registrations of Marriages at Brent Council in north-west London, said this in The Daily Express:
"WE ARE SEEING A STEADY INCREASE IN THE NUMBERS COMING THROUGH OUR DOORS WHO ARE PRODUCING CERTIFICATES OF APPROVAL FROM THE HOME OFFICE WHO HAVE NO CONNECTION WITH THEIR PARTNER – SOMETIMES THEY DON’T EVEN SHARE THE SAME LANGUAGE.”
The Express added:
“THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE USING SHAM MARRIAGES TO STAY IN THE UK AFTER A CRACKDOWN WAS ‘SCANDALOUSLY’ RULED UNLAWFUL. Registrars around the country are reporting a surge in bogus weddings following a House of Lords ruling which lifted restrictions. One registrar said:
‘You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to think these are not love matches. THESE ARE PURELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMMIGRATION AVOIDANCE.’
Campaign group Migrationwatch’s chairman Sir Andrew Green said last night:
‘This situation is scandalous. EACH SUCCESSFUL SHAM MARRIAGE OPENS THE DOOR TO FULL ACCESS TO THE WELFARE STATE. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE’.”
On 2 September 2009, BBC 2’s This World featured Liviu Tipurita’s “Gypsy Child Thieves”.
One Gypsy interviewed by Tipurita said he’d sold his daughter and made a tidy sum in the process.
“I got 25 million lei for my daughter in 2004. THIS IS OUR GYPSY CUSTOM; IF SHE’S A VIRGIN, IF SHE’S UNTOUCHED, SHE’S VALUABLE.”
In an attempt to trace the roots of the problem and the origins of this exploitation within the Gypsy community, Tipurita travelled to his native Romania, home to the largest Gypsy population in the world, where he interviewed one of the most powerful leaders of the Gypsy underworld in some depth.
Here are a few excerpts from Liviu Tipurita’s film:
Tipurita: "I’ve come to one of the Gypsy crime strongholds, the city of Cryova. MOST OF THOSE IN PRISON FOR CHILD ENSLAVEMENT... COME FROM HERE. This is a dangerous place…
I’m here to meet up with the powerful leader of the Gypsy underworld. (Brillian) The neighbourhood where he lives is home to over ten thousand Gypsies. Most of them belong to one clan - THE THIEVES.”
Brillian: “That’s my father, one of the greatest Gypsy leaders of Cryova. And HE WAS PART OF THE CLAN OF THE BEST THIEVES. I AM PART OF THIS FAMILY THAT OCCUPIES ITSELF WITH STEALING.”
Tipurita: “FOR HIM STEALING IS A PROFESSION THAT HAS BEEN PASSED ON FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION… Having come from a long line of thieves Brillian has a special insight into the history of Gypsy crime…
When did the Romany Gypsies from Romania start going West?”
Brillian: “Between 1980 and 1989. They earned quickly because, HAVING ESCAPED A COMMUNIST COUNTRY, THEY HAD THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM AND RESIDENCY IN THESE COUNTRIES and they came back with special cars and built outstanding houses and they came back to use the power that they had and they said WHOEVER GOES TO THESE COUNTRIES GETS RICH!”
Tipurita: “When Brillian was a child this district was dirt poor. But at the beginning of the nineties, when THE GYPSIES FROM HERE WENT TO THE WEST TO STEAL AND BEG, the neighbourhood started to pick up.”
Brillian: “When they saw the possibility of making money, at a certain point they no longer wanted to go BEGGING themselves… Then, IN ORDER TO KEEP MAKING MONEY, UNDER THE PRETENCE THAT THEY WANT TO HELP OTHERS, THEY TRY TO PERSUADE THEM TO GO AND BEG”.
Tipurita: “In the last twenty years the neighbourhood has flourished. And nowadays EVERY STREET HERE HAS DOZENS OF IMPOSING VILLAS THAT BRILLIANT SAYS ARE BUILT ON THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME ABROAD.”
Brillian: “Look at this house… now there’s a guy who stayed for a long time in Italy… HE BEGGED HE STOLE, HE MADE A LOT OF MONEY. And he sent it home and started lending at interest…
These two houses belong to Merisi and Calistrada. Calistrada is my first cousin… THEY SORTED THEMSELVES OUT IN ENGLAND. A LARGE PART OF HIS FORTUNE WAS MADE FROM STEALING… IN ENGLAND...
THE THIEVING, what they’re doing now, it’s no longer a national problem. IT’S HAPPENING ON AN INTERNATIONAL SCALE. Now the whole of Europe, the whole of the world talk about the Gypsies… If the new generations growing up now continue in the same way NO ONE WILL HAVE US! THE WESTERN COUNTRIES WILL CHASE US AWAY”.
Tipurita: "Over the last twenty years I've seen the anti-Gypsy feeling getting stronger, not only in Romania but across Europe. I'VE ALSO SEEN GYPSY PETTY CRIME TURN INTO SERIOUS CRIME, INTO INTERNATIONAL ORGANISED CRIME. Most Gypsies in Romania still live in shacks but THERE ARE ALSO MANY WHO NOW LIVE IN PALACES!"
We are all aware that, with a good deal of multicultural relish, New Labour has been importing lots and lots of lovely, fluffy, non-indigenous "organised crime" types into the UK in recent times.
If ever you thought that they were doing so for the greater good, what you see in Liviu Tipurita's film, which can be seen here may just change your mind.
On 2 October 2009, Frederick Forsyth said this in The Daily Express:
“The expenses system... only dates back to 2002 AND WAS DEVISED BY – YES, HIM AGAIN – TONY BLAIR, A ROGUE WHOM I BELIEVE WILL GO DOWN AS THE MAN WHO DIRTIED OUR POLITICS ALMOST BEYOND CLEANSING...
The system itself was so appalling that it might as well have had a placard round its neck saying: ‘Embezzle me. it’s what I was designed for'...
TONY BLAIR’S OWN RECORDS AND CLAIMS WERE ALL SHREDDED WHEN HE LEFT OFFICE: another convenient accident. It is extremely hard to look back on the 10 years he sat in Downing Street and discern one single issue he masterminded that has not turned out A CATASTROPHE FOR OUR COUNTRY. Five wars: Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan (first time), Iraq and Afghanistan again. All on a peace-time defence budget.
Even if you disregard the Ecclestone scam, ALL THE LIES DAY AFTER DAY, THE DEBAUCHING OF OUR COMMONS, LORDS, CIVIL SERVICE AND JUDICIARY, THE GREEDY FREELOADING, THE POSTURING ABROAD, THE SANCTIMONIOUS BEAMING, IT IS STILL THE IMAGE OF THOSE SERRIED ROWS AND COLUMNS OF FINE YOUNG MEN THAT STICKS IN THE CRAW.
Guilty though Gordon Brown was, as Chancellor blocking the funds for soldiers’ wages, barracks, houses, compensations and kit, BLAIR WAS THE MAN AT THE TOP. Brown was always his subordinate. Subordinates do what they are told. Now, still grinning away, HE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE ENTIRE CONTINENT OF EUROPE.
What he deserves is to be impeached. As Voltaire remarked, to encourage the others:
‘FOR NO NATION WILL EVER BE WELL SERVED THAT SHRINKS FROM RETRIBUTION FOR ROTTEN CONDUCT’.”
Give that best-selling author a knighthood!
To tell such truth these days is not without its risks.
On 2 October 2009, the BBC quoted Dr Martin Scurr thus:
“Once, doctors knew that their primary duty was to protect their patients. Today, however, THE DOGMA OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS HAS OBLITERATED SUCH CERTAINTIES.
Miss Wooltorton, a severely depressed young woman, committed suicide by swallowing poison. Having embarked on this agonising suicide bid, she phoned for an ambulance and was rushed to the Accident and Emergency Department of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Here doctors refused to take any action to save her life because they said she had drawn up a so-called living will in which she had expressed the wish to die and claimed to be '100 per cent aware of the consequences.'
It has been reported that, having taken legal advice, the consultant renal physician Dr Alexander Heaton took the view that she was mentally capable of reaching this decision and therefore he had to respect her wishes. He even told an inquest into Miss Wooltorton's death that HE FEARED HE MIGHT BE CHARGED WITH ASSAULT IF HE TRIED TO INTERVENE...
The acceptance of the 'right' to commit suicide IS A FORM OF PASSIVE AGGRESSION, utterly contradictory to the ethics of our profession… The claim that Miss Wooltorton was in a balanced state of mind and therefore her wishes were paramount seems to me ALMOST SURREAL IN ITS ABSURDITY…
If we really have to respect the wishes of potential suicide victims, then WHY BOTHER WITH THE WHOLE PANOPOLY OF PSYCHIATRIC CARE FOR THE DISTRESSED? According to this logic, we should abolish the Samaritans, sack the counsellors for the self-harmers and just leave the anguished to their pre-ordained fate. The whole concept of 'suicide watch' for prisoners and young offenders is obviously redundant…
In the brave new world envisioned by the Wooltorton case, a successful medical intervention is one in which the patient ends up killing herself, whereas failure is the prevention of suicide. Taken to its philosophical conclusion, this approach would rule out a vast swathe of medical interventions. So we should not treat alcoholics or smokers, respecting their desire not to heed medical advice about the dangers of tobacco or excessive drinking. The same is true of promiscuous gay men who deliberately put themselves at risk of HIV infection, or the overweight who refuse to curb the carbs, or drug addicts who inject themselves with dirty needles.
In the context of using legislation as a defence for this decision, it might also be asked why Miss Wooltorton was not sectioned under the Mental Health Act to protect her own safety... In one extraordinary case, I had a patient standing on a window still, claiming to be Jesus and purporting to have the ability to fly. Even then, THE SOCIAL WORKER REFUSED TO HAVE THEM SECTIONED.
In the coverage of this case, I was also astonished to read that LIVING WILLS ARE SUPPOSEDLY LEGALLY BINDING UNDER THE MENTAL CAPACITY ACT. If that is really case, it renders irrelevant the whole debate about assisted suicide…
According to the outlook of Norwich hospital's advisers, ALL THE HAND-WRINGING FROM LAW-MAKERS, CAMPAIGNERS, AND POLITICIANS OVER ASSISTED SUICIDE IS JUST A WASTE OF TIME… The impulse to give doctors the power of life and death, dependent on a patient's mental state, is a step too far. IT IS A CLIMATE OF LETHAL AUTHORITARIANISM THAT ANYONE WITH A SHRED OF HUMANITY SHOULD OPPOSE.”
On 2 October 2009, Michael Palin said this in The Daily Mail:
“If we say that all of our past involvement with the world was bad and wicked and wrong, I think WE'RE DOING OURSELVES A GREAT DISSERVICE.”
The Mail added:
“BRITONS SHOULD STOP APOLOGISING FOR THEIR COLONIAL PAST AND BE PROUD OF OUR EMPIRE'S ACHIEVEMENTS…
The travel show presenter and former Monty Python star said we should… remember the good that arose from Britain's days at the helm of a global empire. Palin's feelings are in contrast to THE TENDENCY OF MODERN POLITICIANS TO BEND OVER BACKWARDS TO APOLOGISE FOR BRITAIN'S IMPERIAL PAST.”
On 1 October 2009, Frank Field, Tony Blair's first Minister for Welfare Reform, was quoted thus by The Daily Telegraph:
“Come the election, Labour will have been in office for 13 years. Voters are entitled to ask why, if crisis moves are required now, the Government didn't act sooner to counter the hothouse in which neighbours from hell are so easily bred…
All the crime figures over the past 50 to 100 years show how anti-social disorder has gradually taken over. In my constituency of Birkenhead, THERE ARE NOW MORE VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON THAN THERE WERE IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY 50 YEARS AGO…
THIS IS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY, and IT IS TIME FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO EMPOWER DECENT CITIZENS TO RECLAIM THE STREETS.”
On 1 October 2009, The Jewish Chronicle told us that "Schools Secretary, Ed Balls has said the money put into Holocaust education is the 'best investment' his department has made" before quoting Balls thus:
“THE MONEY WE ARE INVESTING IS PROBABLY THE BEST INVESTMENT OUR DEPARTMENT MAKES FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUNG PEOPLE. To learn about the Holocaust is firmly part of the curriculum and HET (the Holocaust Education Trust) brings it alive FOR YOUNG PEOPLE WITH MESSAGES THAT ARE VERY POWERFUL FOR OUR COUNTRY TODAY.”
The JC added:
"Mr Balls and his wife Yvette Cooper, the Work and Pensions Secretary, were among the 300 guests at the Holocaust Educational Trust dinner in central London... THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES IS GIVING THE HET £1.5 MILLION ANNUALLY FOR ITS LESSONS FROM AUSCHWITZ PROJECT, through which sixth-formers visit the death camp site. HET ALSO AIMS TO RAISE AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING THROUGH TEACHER TRAINING and has taken more than 7,000 staff and pupils to Auschwitz. But HET chairman LORD JANNER SAYS THERE IS MORE TO BE DONE... He was concerned at rising antisemitism and the ever-dwindling number of survivors to relay their stories to new generations.
'WE WORK AGAINST RACISM OF ALL KINDS AND WE CAN’T LET PEOPLE FORGET ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED. We’ve been very lucky to hear survivors’ stories but they are dying off, so WE HAVE TO TRAIN MORE PEOPLE'."
I wonder if the "Lessons from Auschwitz" project will be pointing out that the original memorial stone erected at Auschwitz in 1948, stipulated that 4,000,000 people had died there, whereas the stone that replaced it in 1990 said 1,500,000 had died?
Nowadays, the Auschwitz site cites figures that add up to 1,069,000 Jews having been "deported" to the camp at some point.
Not all of whom will have died there, I imagine.
Anyway, 4,000,000 in 1948, 1,500,000 in 1990. It doesn't take a genius to work out that if 2,500,000 was lopped off the Auschwitz total in 1990, 2,500,000 should have been taken away from the 6 million overall figure at the same time.
That never happened, did it? Oh, the historians knew but the rest of us? Nope. The rest of us were instructed to carry right on believing the officially sanctioned 6-million-died lie.
Right up to the present day we have been so instructed.
Right up to when Ed Balls said that the money the government was investing in the Holocause Educational Trust was the "best investment our department makes for the future of young people".
Ed Balls is the kind of person who would call you a "Holocaust Denier" if you said that the overall total of Jewish dead, killed by the Nazis in WWII, couldn't possibly have exceeded 3,500,000.
No matter what proofs you put before him.
No matter how incontrovertible the truth was that you introduced him to.
As for the "HET (aiming) to raise awareness and understanding", well, has anyone out there ever heard this bunch admitting that the 6 mil figure is an exaggeration?
You have not.
But you will have heard them remorselessly insisting that the "Holocaust", and the "six million" that died because of it, be remembered forever and ever, Amen.
That's not what I call raising "awareness and understanding".
That's what I call a lie. A State sponsored lie.
Six million Jews did not die at the hands of the bad guys in WWII.
Many died but six million did not. And the powers-that-be, those who see to it that you get called nasty names if you dare utter a figure less than the one THEY insist upon, know it.
THEY know it.
THEY just don't want you to know it.
I'll tell you what Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper know.
They know which side their bagel is buttered on.
And it isn't on the side of the inconvenient facts, that's for sure.
Pictured below is the memorial stone that commemorated the Auschwitz dead from 1948 to 1990:
The plaque below replaced the 1948 plaque in 1990.
Just in case you haven't got it yet, here is the math:
4,000,000 - 1,500,000 = 2,500,000.
6,000,000 - 2,500,000 = 3,500,000.
On 1 October 2009, Boy George (who has a star of David tattooed on his head) was quoted thus by Totally Jewish News:
“I JUST WANT TO BE JEWISH. My manager's Jewish and I have a lot of Jewish people in my life. They don‘t judge me."
Jews like their Gentiles gay.
And hysterically inclined.
That’s why they don’t judge him.
On 1 October 2009, David Miliband, the UK's Foreign Secretary was quoted thus by the Totally Jewish News:
"This will never become a country where ministers of Israel are unable to come and have proper dialogue with the government of the United Kingdom."
Totally Jewish added:
“Foreign Secretary David Miliband this week insisted Britain would never be a country Israeli ministers would be unable to visit for talks, hours after Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak narrowly avoided arrest over war crimes allegations.
Palestinian groups, the Mezan Center for Human Rights in Gaza City and Ramallah-based al-Haq, called for an arrest warrant to be issued for the veteran politician during his visit to the UK to meet Miliband and Gordon Brown and to address the annual Labour Friends of Israel reception at the party's Brighton conference. But on Tuesday afternoon, Westminster Magistrates Court Deputy District Judge Daphne Wickham accepted the arguments of the British Foreign Office and stated that Barak 'has immunity from prosecution as he would not be able to perform his functions efficiently if he were the subject of criminal proceedings in this jurisdiction'."
On 1 October 2009, Michele Elliott, founder of children's charity Kidscape, was quoted in The Daily Mail, after she criticised the Tate Gallery’s decision to exhibit a nude picture of 10-year-old Brooke Shields.
“I can't think anyone would want their child portrayed this way and I think it is obscene to do so… To masquerade under the guise of edgy art is ridiculous. It is soft kiddy porn. Putting a sign on the door like that means every paedophile in the land will head straight to that room.”
Simon Calvert, a spokesman for The Christian Institute, added:
“I think that any parent of young girls would just be so shocked to hear that A TAX-PAYER FUNDED GALLERY THINKS IT IS ALRIGHT TO SHOW PHOTOGRAPHS OF A NUDE TEN-YEAR-OLD IN THE MIDDLE OF A PORNOGRAPHY EXHIBITION. How far do things have to go before we eventually say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. They took legal advice to see what they could get away with. WHY DIDN'T THEY TAKE ADVICE FROM ORDINARY PARENTS AND THE PUBLIC AS TO WHAT'S APPROPRIATE.”
The Mail also said:
“Child abuse campaigners are furious at Tate Modern gallery's decision to show an 'obscene' picture of a naked 10-year-old Brooke Shields… Gallery chiefs themselves admit they sought legal advice before including the picture, titled Spiritual America, in the Pop Life: Art In A Material World show. The exhibition also features HUGE SEXUALLY EXPLICIT IMAGES OF PENETRATION AND WORKS MADE FROM THE PAGES OF PORNOGRAPHIC MAGAZINES.
Richard Prince's image of Shields shows her from the knees up, naked, oiled and wearing make-up, looking directly at the viewer… The artist himself described the 1983 work, which is in fact a photograph of a photograph taken by another artist, Gary Gross, as 'an extremely complicated photo of a naked girl who looks like a boy made up to look like a woman'…
Jack Bankowsky, the exhibitions co-curator, said he hoped the artistic interest in Spiritual America would not be overshadowed by controversy over its content. He said:
'I hope that people respond to what is provocative and understand what the artist was trying to achieve’.”
Richard Prince was trying to achieve what most of us think he was trying to achieve, Bankovsky, old bean.
Another brick in the pervert wall.
On 30 September 2009, Peter Oborne said this in The Daily Mail:
“Several years of Labour government has again left Britain in a financial shambles. Like in 1978, a general election is just around the corner – and again it is one that the nation expects Labour to lose.
But there the similarity ends. Compared with Callaghan’s responsible approach, Brown placed short-term party political advantage ahead of the long-term British interest. In other words, HE CHOSE TO SAVE HIS OWN SKIN RATHER THAN DO THE RIGHT THING BY BRITAIN.
An honest speech would have set out the grave economic problems this country faces and spelt out the true size of the financial shortfall – some £200 billion next year, representing a terrifying 14 per cent or more of national output. He would have then explained the painful but necessary measures needed to rein back this spiralling national debt and warned about the level of future public spending cuts and the prospect of painful job losses. Such candour would have been the statesmanlike act of a politician with integrity – preparing the country for the dark days that lie ahead. Instead, though, BROWN CHOSE TO IGNORE THE TRUTH AND DELIVERED A CYNICAL DECEPTION. He claimed he could make the swingeing cuts in spending without reducing front-line services in health, education, and law and order.
For someone who was Chancellor for ten years and is well versed at handling departmental budgets, BROWN MUST KNOW THAT THESE CLAIMS ARE NOT EVEN REMOTELY TRUE. Indeed, he failed to outline a single spending cut – an omission which reeks of personal cowardice and a culpable refusal to deal with the dire circumstances created by the worst recession in 60 years. Nor was that all. With reckless irresponsibility, Brown then launched himself into a long list of spending commitments as if Britain were enjoying an economic boom.”
On 30 September 2009, The Daily Mail quoted Daniel Blake, of Action Against Elder Abuse.
Daniel was commenting upon an official NHS study which had determined that “more than half of care home residents have been the victim of prescription blunders” when he said:
"When you look at the size of the sector, the numbers of patients involved, this is an extremely big problem and I think the report has only touched the tip of the iceberg."
The Mail added:
“Slip-ups ranging in severity from clerical errors to LIFE-THREATENING MISTAKES AFFECTED MORE THAN 50 PER CENT OF THE PENSIONERS surveyed for the Department of Health. Some of the mistakes were made by the care or nursing home staff, some by pharmacists and others by GPs.
Even apparently MINOR ERRORS COULD HAVE A DREADFUL EFFECT, doctors and campaigners have warned… Researchers visited 55 residential and nursing homes for the elderly over a period of two-and-a-half years and surveyed 256 residents…
In some cases GPs prescribed the wrong drug. In others, they failed to consider how a newly-prescribed medicine might interfere with one the patient was already taking.
Dr (Duncan) Forsyth said the failure of GPs to monitor medication of care home residents could be caused by many factors.
‘It may be that they don’t have adequate information when someone is discharged (from hospital) to a care home. If may be that they don’t have the competencies to look after such frail, vulnerable elderly people. Sadly, in some circumstances, IT MAY BE THAT THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THIS VERY COMPLEX WORK’…
Eighty-year- old Florence Bell spent her final weeks in agony after SHE WAS GIVEN TEN TIMES THE CORRECT DOSE OF THE BLOOD-THINNING DRUG WARFARIN IN A PORTSMOUTH NURSING HOME. Her daughter May Goodale tells tonight’s Channel 4 News:
“It caused her extreme pain. She couldn’t walk without being helped. She was bleeding profusely. She was bleeding from her cheeks and she had really serious nosebleeds. SHE HAD A TERRIBLE DEATH AND IT WAS SOMETHING YOU WOULDN’T WANT TO WISH ON ANYONE’.”
On 30 September 2009, Calais MP, Jack Lang, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
“THE MIGRANTS MAKE IT TO BRITAIN WHATEVER THE OBSTACLES. POLICE OPERATIONS WILL DO NOTHING TO STOP THEM.”
On 30 September 2009, Susie Squires of the TaxPayers’ Alliance was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
“It is no secret that OUR WELFARE SYSTEM IS SO BLOATED IT ATTRACTS IMMIGRANTS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD”.
The Mail added:
“France last night admitted it was fighting a losing battle against illegal migrants – AND DEMANDED BRITAIN SHOULD OPEN ITS DOORS TO THEM. A week after being forced from their shanty town, (the Jungle) the asylum seekers were back, still seeking a passage to the UK…
Last night Calais mayor Natacha Bouchard said the Channel port would remain an immigrant dumping ground UNTIL BRITAIN OPENED ITS BORDERS and stopped asking France to do its dirty work.
She insisted that THE BRITISH SHOULD SIGN UP TO THE SCHENGEN AGREEMENT, A EUROPEAN UNION ACCORD THAT ALLOWS FREE MOVEMENT OF ALL PEOPLE BETWEEN EUROPEAN MEMBER STATES WITHOUT THE NEED FOR PASSPORTS OR VISAS.
‘BRITAIN IS UNABLE TO CONTROL ITS BORDERS, so we’re doing the job for them because they’re not part of the agreement. There are still some 20 squatter camps in Calais alone’.”
On 29 September 2009, a Sun article by Dulcie Pearce quoted an unnamed 12-year-old girl, who told us what “shag bands”, the latest craze in Britain’s schools, are.
"If a boy breaks a pink band, a girl has to flash her boobs, a red band means you have to give him a lap dance and A BLUE IS SOME SORT OF ORAL SEX. THE BLACK MEANS YOU HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY WITH A BOY. A GOLD BAND IS THE MOST IMPORTANT AND MEANS YOU HAVE TO DO ALL OF THE ABOVE…
I don't think parents have any idea what the bracelets mean because ALL THE KIDS AT MY SCHOOL WEAR THEM and don't get told off…
In my group at school, THE LEADER - WHO EVERYBODY LOOKS UP TO - WEARS ONLY BLACK AND GOLD BANDS. All the boys in my class wear black ones and if a girl wears a black bracelet, all the boys fancy her…
For a while I DIDN'T WEAR ANY BRACELETS AND PEOPLE WOULDN'T HANG AROUND WITH ME. AT MY SCHOOL, YOU HAVE TO WEAR A BAND TO BE PART OF THE COOL CROWD…
My SEVEN-YEAR-OLD cousin came to stay with us - and she lives miles away. She said a green band at her school meant fondling a boy and that pink meant sucking his neck until you draw blood”.
The Sun added:
“At first sight the cheap coloured plastic bracelets worn by children seem a bit of innocent fun. But in reality they are a shocking new craze for children as young as seven, and it will horrify parents across the country.
THEY ARE ‘SHAG BANDS‘, WHICH ARE WORN IN THOUSANDS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL PLAYGROUNDS… THE DIFFERENT COLOURS - BLACK, BLUE, RED, PINK, PURPLE, ORANGE, YELLOW, GREEN AND GOLD - SHOW HOW FAR THE LITTLE PUPILS WILL ‘GO’ IF PROPOSITIONED, FROM A KISS TO FULL SEX.
Kids chase each other around schools and, IF THEY BREAK THE BAND OFF THE WEARER'S WRIST, THE WEARER HAS TO OFFER THE PHYSICAL ACT THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE COLOUR OF THE BAND. It is the latest in A TERRIFYING WAVE OF PROMISCUOUS BEHAVIOUR WHICH SUGGESTS THAT CHILDHOOD INNOCENCE COULD BE A THING OF THE PAST.
Just as shocking are ‘rainbow parties’ - booze and drug-fuelled gatherings where girls wear bright lipstick of different colours TO LEAVE THEIR ‘MARK’ ON BOYS WHILE GIVING THEM ORAL SEX...
One teen blogger wrote:
'I love sex parties and try to arrange a rainbow party at least once a month. It's all we talk about at school and we always find a free house where we can get together. I'm a champion at rainbow parties and always try my best to leave my mark on the most boys. It's fun and the blokes love it - obviously.’
‘Some people think rainbow parties are an urban myth - but if they came to some of the parties I have been to, they would know this isn't true. They are awesome. Everyone gets drunk and THERE ARE USUALLY PLENTY OF CLASS A DRUGS AROUND. IT GETS EVERYONE GOING.’
One parent who overheard her 14-year-old daughter talking about attending a rainbow party was heartbroken to discover what she had been doing.
She said… ‘It breaks my heart to think my lovely little girl is behaving in this way‘."
“It breaks your heart”?
Who did you vote for at the last election?
Which political party do you think it’s OK to sneer at?
That’s why your “lovely little girl is behaving in this way”!.
When the great traitor who is soon to be the President of Europe was saying “education, education, education”, what he really he meant was “shag bands“ for your "lovely, little girl"!
You can be sure, ladies and gents, when Tony B Liar gets to be our overlord once again, there will be lots more stories as jaw-dropping as this one.
On 28 September 2009, film writer, Patrick Goldstein, spoke out against the arrest and possible extradition from Switzerland of film director, Roman Polanski in the LA Times.
He put it like this:
"You'd hope that LA County prosecutors had BETTER THINGS TO DO THAN CAUSE AN INTERNATIONAL FUROR BY HOUNDING A FILM DIRECTOR for a 32-year-old sex crime…
Whether the LA County district attorney's office has its way or not, it is not a story that can have a happy ending. I THINK POLANSKI HAS ALREADY PAID A HORRIBLE, SOUL-WRENCHING Price for the infamy surrounding his actions. THE REAL TRAGEDY is that he will always, till his death, be snubbed and stalked and confronted by people who think the price he has already paid isn't enough."
I don’t think that’s a tragedy, Mr Goldstein.
I think that’s justice.
On 28 September 2009, columnist, Anne Applebaum said this in The Washington Post:
"To put him on trial or keep him in jail does not serve society in general or his victim in particular."
I beg to differ, Ms Goldstein.
I think putting Polanski on trial and jailing him would, indeed, “serve society in general” by sending out a powerful message that a creepy, untouchable elite was as subject to the law as the rest of us.
Particularly when a minor had been raped by the creep in question.
On 28 September 2009, film mogul Harvey Weinstein said this in The Guardian:
"We're calling on every film-maker we can to help fix this terrible situation.”
It was a “terrible situation” that would have been fixed in 1978, Mr Weinstein, if Polanski hadn’t fled the wrath of the American authorities.
Now he should, but probably won’t, pay the price of the crime he committed.
Where do you think Polanski fled to all those years ago?
Wonder why we didn't send him straight back?
PS. Polanski, Weinstein, Goldstein and Applebaum are Jewish.
Anyone out there think it's anti-semitic to mention that?
Hands down you PC Crowders.
On 28 September 2008, Melanie Phillips said this in The Daily Mail:
“WHY ARE BULLIES BEING LET OFF AND INNOCENT PEOPLE BEING BULLIED IN THIS WAY? IT IS SURELY THE OUTCOME OF A CULTURE DISTORTED BY THE WARPED VALUES OF OUR INTELLIGENTSIA AND POLITICAL CLASS. Obsessed by the impossible aim of eradicating all forms of prejudice or discrimination, it is also gripped by the belief that all punishment or retribution is a form of vengeance and must be avoided at all costs. The combination of these two beliefs has meant that YOBS WHO TERRORISE PEOPLE TO DEATH MUST NEVER BE JAILED, WHILE THOSE WHO CAUSE OFFENCE TO GROUPS THAT TICK THE RIGHT BOXES MUST BE PROSECUTED.
It is also a means for the incompetent to avoid being held accountable for the failings on their watch. RIGHT AND WRONG, VICTIM AND BULLY ARE BEING TURNED UPSIDE-DOWN - AND THE POLICE, WHO HOLD THE LINE FOR A SOCIETY'S VALUES, ARE NOW IN THE VERY FRONT OF THE CHARGE.”
On 26 September 2009, Harry Redknapp vented his anger in The Sun after Blackpool footballer Jason Euell was racially abused in a Carling Cup clash.
"That is disgusting - there's no place for that in the game... Surely we can't have that sort of behaviour now? Anyone who does it should be put in prison... Stick them where they belong, in the nut-house...
I listen to the radio people talking about chants and singing songs to people at different clubs that just turn me over, I can't believe it. You've got to be some kind of nutter to do that... They are sickos who have got to be locked up somewhere. Put them away and don't let them come to football... Without the fantastic black players you wouldn't have teams"?
Oh, you'd still have teams, Harry.
If there weren't any "fantastic black players" there'd just be more native, white, British lads gaining all the plaudits and pocketing all the dosh, that's all.
Harry Redknapp lives in Dorset, the whitest county in England.
Actually, he lives in a waterfront villa in the "millionaires’ playground" of Sandbanks, the poshest part of ultra-posh Poole.
Awarded the accolade of Britain's “Monte Carlo”, Sandbanks is home to Redknapp's footballer son Jamie and pop-star wife Louise, who live in a penthouse nearby. Geoff Boycott, Max Bygraves, footballer David Seaman, DJ Ed Stewart and rock star Greg Lake all live just around the corner.
As the 14 April 2009 edition of The Daily Mail put it:
"At the last count, there were more millionaires in this small Dorset town than in Islington or Notting Hill in London."
As Wikipedia puts it:
"Sandbanks has, by area, the fourth highest land value in the world".
I wonder if the bloke who doesn't live in Brixton, Tottenham or anywhere else we white Brits have been ethnically cleansed out of, is angling for the England job?
The powers-that-be do love an I'm-all-right-Jack wide boy made good, who sneers in all the right places.
On 25 September 25 2009, The Sun quoted Michael Jackson (as related by his close friend, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach) thus:
"Hitler was a genius orator. To make that many people turn and change and hate, he had to be a showman and he was."
On 24 September 2009, Erin Pizzey was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
“FEMINISM IS A CYNICAL, MISGUIDED PLOY… FEMINISTS STARTED DEMONISING ALL FATHERS… FEMINISM, I REALISED, WAS A LIE. Women and men are both capable of extraordinary cruelty. Indeed, the only thing a child really needs - two biological parents under one roof - WAS BEING UNDERMINED BY THE VERY IDEOLOGY WHICH CLAIMED TO SPEAK UP FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS.
THIS COUNTRY IS NOW ON THE BRINK OF SERIOUS MORAL COLLAPSE. WE MUST STOP DEMONISING MEN and start healing the rift that feminism has created between men and women. HARRIET HARMAN'S INSIDIOUS AND MANIPULATIVE PHILOSOPHY THAT WOMEN ARE ALWAYS VICTIMS AND MEN ALWAYS OPPRESSORS CAN ONLY CONTINUE THIS UNSPEAKABLE CYCLE OF VIOLENCE. AND IT'S OUR CHILDREN WHO WILL SUFFER.”
Erin set up the world's first refuge for battered women in 1971 and went on to establish an international movement for victims of domestic violence.
On 24 September 2009, Max Hastings said this in The Daily Mail:
“The Supreme Court, CREATED BY TONY BLAIR, will open for business at the expensively revamped Middlesex Guildhall in Parliament Square. IT REPLACES THE HOUSE OF LORDS AS THE HIGHEST JUDICIAL APPELLATE BODY IN THE LAND. Twelve judges chosen by an appointments commission will hear cases which, unprecedentedly, will be recorded on film.
Even before the first words have been spoken in its chamber, fierce controversy attends the new creation. Many judges are furious about the manner in which this momentous change has been introduced, IN FURTHERANCE OF A DOWNING STREET WHIM.
Back in 2003, Blair's aggressively assertive old mentor, windbag and claret lover, the Lord Chancellor Derry Irvine, allowed his conceit to overreach itself. Irvine believed that his relationship with the Prime Minister empowered him to say what he liked, including expressing views on sentencing policy that were completely at odds with those of the then Home Secretary, David Blunkett.
Blair astonished not only Irvine but the legal world by sacking his Lord Chancellor and decreeing a wholly new dispensation for the top tier of Britain's judiciary. None of the law's grand panjandrums was consulted. Nobody, as far as is known, gave serious thought to the consequences for Britain's political system of wrenching a centuries-old system onto a new template. The outcome, six years later, is that THE BRITISH PEOPLE ARE GETTING A SUPREME COURT WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT.
The danger with inventing a body which is titled 'Supreme', such as Britain has never before possessed, is that SOONER OR LATER IT WILL BEGIN TO ACT IN A SUPREME FASHION. For centuries, the nation has been governed on the basis of a fundamental principle: our elected Parliament makes law, and represents the highest arbitrator of the public interest. Yet OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS, AND ESPECIALLY SINCE THE COMING OF THE 1997 LABOUR GOVERNMENT, REAL POWER IN BRITAIN HAS SHIFTED. PRIME MINISTERS BEHAVE EVER MORE LIKE PRESIDENTS. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS HAS EBBED, AS MPS BECOME MERE LOBBY-FODDER, FULFILLING DOWNING STREET'S BIDDING.
LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF MOST OF THEIR HISTORIC RIGHTS. GLOBALISATION HAS SHRUNK THE AUTHORITY OF NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS. DEVOLUTION HAS TRANSFERRED MANY WESTMINSTER RESPONSIBILITIES TO EDINBURGH AND CARDIFF. THE EU HAS ASSUMED POWERS WHICH OVERRIDE THE SOVEREIGNTY OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS. And, as a consequence, the role of judges has dramatically expanded, as interpreters of European law.
Most conspicuously in human rights and immigration cases, MORE AND MORE JUDGES HAND DOWN DECISIONS THAT ESTABLISH PRECEDENTS AND DEFY THE EXPRESSED VIEWS OF ELECTED MINISTERS - AND, INDEED, MUCH OF THE ELECTORATE.
Judge-made law, as distinct from measures endorsed by Parliament, has been playing a growing part in all our lives for a generation. THE ELECTORATE HAS NEVER BEEN ASKED WHETHER THIS IS AN INNOVATION IT WELCOMES, OR EVEN WISHES TO ACCEPT; WE ARE MERELY TOLD THIS IS THE WAY THINGS ARE. EVEN BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT WAS THOUGHT OF, JUDGES HAVE BEEN EXTENDING THEIR DISCRETIONARY POWERS TO THE LIMITS, AND SOMETIMES BEYOND.
The full cost of Blair's follies will only become apparent in the years ahead. The Supreme Court already looks like one of them.”
On 24 September 2009, Leo McKinstry opined thus in The Daily Express:
“The warped values of the modern police are a graphic indicator of Britain’s decline. WE ONCE HAD THE FINEST FORCE IN THE WORLD, A BULWARK OF CIVILISATION THAT PROTECTED SOCIETY AND PUNISHED CRIMINALITY BUT THAT SENSE OF MORAL PURPOSE HAS EVAPORATED.
TODAY’S POLICE DO NOT REGARD THE MAINTENANCE OF ORDER AS THEIR CENTRAL DUTY. OBSESSED WITH SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY, THEY NO LONGER KNOW WHOSE SIDE THEY ARE ON. TOO MANY POLICE CHIEFS SEE THEIR CONSTABULARIES AS THE SHOCK TROOPS OF NEW LABOUR, PROMOTING MARXIST ORTHODOXIES RATHER THAN FIGHTING CRIME. The results of this change have been disastrous. VIOLENT CRIME IS AT RECORD LEVELS. ASSAULT, FRAUD, BURGLARY AND GANG WARFARE ARE ALL RIFE. WHILE OFFICERS PLAY THEIR POLITICAL GAMES OR BECOME SWAMPED BY THEIR USELESS BUREAUCRACY, THE VERY PEOPLE WHO RELY MOST ON THE POLICE FOR PROTECTION ARE LEFT PREY TO THE THUGS.
THIS GOVERNMENT HAS LONG BEEN CONTEMPTUOUS OF FREE SPEECH. MINISTERS APPEAR EAGER TO SIDE WITH MUSLIM GRIEVANCE MONGERS. THEY ARE INSTINCTIVELY HOSTILE TOWARDS CHRISTIANITY. Their political correctness has influenced the pattern of modern policing. FORTY PER CENT OF VICTIMS OF CRIME ARE NEVER VISITED BY THE POLICE, yet there were more than 50 officers available to arrest Tory spokesman Damien Green last year FOR DARING TO QUESTION LABOUR’S IMMIGRATION POLICIES.
DETECTION RATES FOR VIOLENT CRIME ARE AT THEIR LOWEST EVER LEVEL, REACHING JUST 47 PER CENT, YET THE WEST MIDLANDS POLICE WASTED ITS TIME SEEKING THE PROSECUTION OF CHANNEL FOUR TV PRODUCERS FOR HIGHLIGHTING HATE PREACHERS IN BIRMINGHAM’S MOSQUES.
THE POLICE FORCE IS NOW BUILT IN NEW LABOUR’S IMAGE: A HUGE, MISMANAGED BUREAUCRACY THAT GRIEVOUSLY FAILS TO DELIVER WHAT THE PUBLIC PAY FOR; PROTECTION AGAINST CRIME.
THE VERY PEOPLE WHO RELY MOST ON THE POLICE FOR PROTECTION ARE LEFT PREY TO THE THUGS.”
On 21 September 2009, Stephen Glover said this in The Daily Mail:
“A new and swanky European Union headquarters is being planned in Brussels at a cost of £280million. Named the Residence Palace, it will contain the no doubt sumptuous offices of the first President of the EU, as well as of its first Foreign Minister.
The man who hopes to become President of Europe is none other than OUR OWN TONY BLAIR. According to an authoritative new book, THE SOLE REMAINING RAISON D'ETRE OF THIS GOVERNMENT IS TO SEE MR BLAIR SAFELY INSTALLED AS PRESIDENT, picking up the telephone as Europe's number one politician to chew the cud on equal terms with Barack Obama.
The book is by the political journalist Adam Boulton, a New Labour insider married to Anji Hunter, a former close aide of Mr Blair's. If anyone has worthwhile insights into what is going on in the ex-Prime Minister's mind, it is Mr Boulton. He says LORD MANDELSON IS PROPPING UP GORDON BROWN ONLY SO THAT HIS FRIEND TONY BLAIR CAN BECOME PRESIDENT OF EUROPE.
WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A NASTY LITTLE PLOT, CHIEFLY ORCHESTRATED BY LORD MANDELSON, WHOSE OVERWHELMING PURPOSE IS TO SEE THE RATIFICATION OF THE LISBON TREATY AND, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, SECURE THE CORONATION OF TONY BLAIR AS PRESIDENT. Even the timing of the General Election is part of the plot. This is how it works. In less than two weeks, on October 2, the Irish will vote on the Lisbon Treaty. In June last year, they voted against it. That was not what Brussels wanted, since until the treaty is ratified by all member states, it cannot become law and there can be no European President, no European Foreign Minister and no other integrationist measures. Which is why the Irish are being made to vote again.
SO MUCH FOR DEMOCRACY! This time they are expected to say 'Yes'. Battered by a recession far worse even than ours, and in dire need of financial support from other member states, they are unlikely to stand up to Europe this time.
The reason Lord Mandelson wants the General Election to be held next June, which is the latest possible date, is not because he seriously believes that Gordon Brown has an earthly chance of winning by leaving it until then. HE WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE AS MUCH TIME AS POSSIBLE FOR THE TREATY TO BE RATIFIED BEFORE DAVID CAMERON ARRIVES IN NO 10...
Our real concern should not be whether Tony Blair becomes the first President of Europe, with Lord Mandelson's snout no doubt deeply embedded in a neighbouring trough. The most important issue is WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE A EUROPEAN PRESIDENT AND A LISBONE TREATY AT ALL - and, to that prospect, the overwhelming verdict of the British people would appear to be a resounding 'NO'!”
On 21 September 2009, General Stanley McChrystal, the top American military man in Afghanistan, said this:
"FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESOURCES ... RISKS A LONGER CONFLICT, GREATER CASUALTIES… Any of these risks, in turn, are likely to result in MISSION FAILURE...
Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near term... risks an outcome where DEFEATING THE INSURGENCY IS NO LONGER POSSIBLE...
Preoccupied with protection of our own forces, WE HAVE OPERATED IN A MANNER THAT DISTANCES US PHYSICALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY FROM THE PEOPLE WE SEEK TO PROTECT ... the insurgents cannot defeat us militarily, but we can defeat ourselves...
IT IS REALISTIC TO EXPECT THAT AFGHAN AND COALITION CASUALTIES WILL INCREASE…
THE WEAKNESS OF STATE INSTITUTIONS, MALIGN ACTIONS OF POWERBROKERS, WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION AND ABUSE OF POWER BY VARIOUS OFFICIALS AND ISAF’S OWN ERRORS HAVE GIVEN AFGHANS LITTLE REASON TO SUPPORT THEIR GOVERNMENT… ISAF does not sufficiently appreciate the dynamics in local communities, nor how the insurgency, corruption, incompetent officials, powerbrokers and criminality all combine to affect the Afghan population...
THE INSURGENTS CONTROL OR CONTEST A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE COUNTRY".
On 18 September 2009, The Daily Mail published a letter sent by Stephen Minter, the father-in-law of Sergeant Paul McAleese, to Gordon Brown.
This is it:
"Paul came home for a week’s R and R in July and I learned more about the situation in his base.
THERE ARE NO ARMOURED VEHICLES THERE.
HELICOPTERS ARE NOT WIDELY AVAILABLE…
THE INSURGENTS HAVE THE SAME METAL DETECTORS THAT OUR TROOPS HAVE AND USE THEM WHEN PLANTING THEIR IEDS, MAKING THEM VIRTUALLY UNDETECTABLE TO OUR TROOPS.
ANY GROUND CLEARED BY OUR TROOPS IS LEFT UNPROTECTED WHEN THEY RETURN TO BASE AND THE INSURGENTS JUST PLACE MORE IEDS IN THE SAME AREA.
THE IEDS ARE PLANTED WITHIN METRES OF THE BASE AND THERE IS NO EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE TO MONITOR THE AREA AND NOT ENOUGH TROOPS AVAILABLE TO MAINTAIN OBSERVATION POSTS ON THE GROUND.
Considering the number of soldiers killed from FOB Wishtan, it must be the most dangerous place in the whole of Afghanistan. I was already aware of the debacle concerning the purchase of CHINOOK HELICOPTERS THAT HAVE BEEN UNAVAILABLE FOR OVER TWO YEARS AS VITAL EQUIPMENT TO OPERATE THEM WAS NOT PURCHASED.
THE CLAIMS THAT OUR TROOPS ARE PROVIDED WITH THE BEST EQUIPMENT AND THAT WE HAVE ENOUGH HELICOPTERS IS CLEARLY UNTRUE AND SUPPORT OF THESE CLAIMS BY MPS OR SENIOR OFFICERS CONCERNED FOR THEIR CAREERS DOES NOT STAND UP TO THE FACTS.
On August 20, Paul and another soldier called John were killed by IEDs while on foot patrol from FOB Wishtan. IT TOOK NEARLY THREE HOURS FOR A HELICOPTER TO BECOME AVAILABLE TO FLY PAUL TO CAMP BASTION AND THIS WAS THEN PROVIDED BY THE US AS THERE WERE NO BRITISH CRAFT AVAILABLE.
THEY DIED BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT PROVIDED WITH THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT OR A SAFE SYSTEM OF WORK. THEY DID NOT HAVE DOGS OR SUITABLE EQUIPMENT TO DETECT THE IEDS THAT KILLED THEM. THERE WERE NO ARMOURED VEHICLES FOR THEM TO TRAVEL IN WHICH MAY HAVE ENABLED THEM TO SURVIVE THE EXPLOSIONS. IF THEY WERE NOT SENT OUT ON FOOT THEY WOULD STILL BE ALIVE.
I believe that Paul and John were not killed by the Taliban or the insurgents; THEY WERE KILLED BY WHOEVER SENT THEM OUT THERE KNOWING THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE THE EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO DO IT WITH ANY DEGREE OF SAFETY. THE SIX SOLDIERS ALREADY KILLED IN THE SAME AREA CLEARLY BEING PROOF THAT THEY WERE ILL-EQUIPPED TO DEAL WITH THE THREAT.
Any killing of our troops should be because of the actions of our enemies AND NOT BY THE INACTIONS OF OUR MPS.
BECAUSE OF YOU, I NOW HAVE A 26-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER WITH NO HUSBAND AND A FIVE-MONTH-OLD GRANDSON WITH NO FATHER… THE FACT THAT PAUL’S DEATH WAS NEEDLESS AND AVOIDABLE MAKES US EXTREMELY ANGRY.
AS THE PRIME MINISTER, YOU MUST ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF YOUR TROOPS. YOU HAVE A DUTY TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE PROVIDED WITH THE BEST EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE AND THE OPERATIONAL TACTICS THAT ARE USED ARE SOUND AND SENSIBLE. FAILING TO ENSURE THIS WILL BE SEEN AS AN ACT OF NEGLECT AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO GO UNANSWERED.”
On 17 September 2009, the Israeli daily, Yedioth Ahronoth, quoted former Israeli leader, Ehud Barak, as saying:
"I am not among those who believe Iran is an existential issue for Israel... ISRAEL IS STRONG, I DON'T SEE ANYONE WHO COULD POSE AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT."
And yet, on the same day, The Telegraph quoted Ephraim Sneh, Israel's former Deputy Defence Minister, thus:
"The Israeli government is the only entity that is responsible for the existence of the Jewish people. Iran has been explicit in its hostility to Israel time and again. They would use these weapons… We believe that Iran has the capacity and the delivery capability for nuclear weapons. They can proceed to production.
WE HAVE GOT TWO MONTHS TO ACT, BEFORE THE END OF 2009... WE CANNOT TAKE THE RISK."
On 17 September 2009, Richard Goldstone, South African Judge and head of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, said this in The New York Times:
"In the fighting in Gaza... many civilians unnecessarily died and even more were seriously hurt.
In Israel, THREE CIVILIANS WERE KILLED and hundreds wounded by rockets from Gaza fired by Hamas and other groups... In Gaza, HUNDREDS OF CIVILIANS DIED. (B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said 1,387 Palestinians died, over half of them civilians and 252 of them children) They died from disproportionate attacks on legitimate military targets AND FROM ATTACKS ON HOSPITALS AND OTHER CIVILIAN STRUCTURES. They died from precision weapons like missiles from aerial drones as well as from heavy artillery. REPEATEDLY, THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COMBATANTS AND CIVILIANS…
Our fact-finding team found that IN MANY CASES ISRAEL COULD HAVE DONE MUCH MORE TO SPARE CIVILIANS without sacrificing its stated and legitimate military aims. IT SHOULD HAVE REFRAINED FROM ATTACKING CLEARLY CIVILIAN BUILDINGS, and from actions that might have resulted in a military advantage but at the cost of too many civilian lives. In these cases, Israel must investigate and Hamas is obliged to do the same. They must examine what happened and appropriately punish any soldier or commander found to have violated the law.
Unfortunately... while Israel has begun investigations into alleged violations by its forces in the Gaza conflict, THEY ARE UNLIKELY TO BE SERIOUS AND OBJECTIVE...
Pursuing justice in this case is essential because NO STATE OR ARMED GROUP SHOULD BE ABOVE THE LAW. Western governments in particular face a challenge because they have pushed for accountability in places like Darfur, but NOW MUST DO THE SAME WITH ISRAEL, AN ALLY and a democratic state.
FAILING TO PURSUE JUSTICE FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS DURING THE FIGHTING WILL HAVE A DEEPLY CORROSIVE EFFECT ON INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE, AND REVEAL AN UNACCEPTABLE HYPOCRISY. As a service to the hundreds of civilians who needlessly died and for the equal application of international justice, THE PERPETRATORS OF SERIOUS VIOLATIONS MUST BE HELD TO ACCOUNT."
If anyone out there wishes to accuse this gentleman of anti-semitism I'm afraid you're out of luck.
Goldstone is Jewish himself.
On 16 September 2009, Vince Cable, the most respected British politician, said this in The Independent:
"We simply cannot have a position where BANKS THAT ENGAGE IN HIGH-RISK CASINO-TYPE OPERATIONS ARE UNDERWRITTEN BY THE TAXPAYER…
What I thought was odd about Mervyn King's role is that TWO OR THREE YEARS BEFORE THE CRASH HE WAS WARNING IN VERY PUBLIC TERMS ABOUT THE ASSET BUBBLE AND HOUSE PRICES… There was a serious flurry of concern, which he expressed with all the authority of his position. The bubble got bigger – BUT THEN HE DIDN'T SAY ANY MORE. Either he was told this was none of his business, or he calculated that it wasn't having any impact and he didn't have any authority to act on it."
On 15 September 2009, Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, said this in The Daily Mail:
“A recent report by The Centre For Social Justice, entitled Every Family Matters, called upon Parliament and parties across the political spectrum to recognise that HEALTHY MARRIAGES BUILD HEALTHY FAMILIES, AND HEALTHY FAMILIES BUILD A HEALTHY SOCIETY.
The report highlighted that while approximately HALF OF ALL COHABITING COUPLES WITH CHILDREN WILL SPLIT BY THE TIME THE CHILD IS FIVE, THE EQUIVALENT FIGURE FOR MARRIED COUPLES IS ONE IN 12.
AS A SOCIETY, WE HAVE ALLOWED MARRIAGE TO BECOME DEVALUED AND APART FROM THE FINANCIAL COST OF FAMILY BREAKDOWN, THE IMPACT UPON YOUNG PEOPLE IS INCALCULABLE. MARRIAGE HAS SUFFERED IN TERMS OF CENTRAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING, FISCAL OPPORTUNITIES, WELFARE BENEFITS AND LEGAL REFORMS.
In terms of finance alone, the report estimated that FAMILY BREAKDOWN FUELS CRIME, ADDING £60BILLION TO ITS ANNUAL COST; DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE ADDING £40BILLION AND EDUCATIONAL FAILURE A FURTHER £20BILLION...
Polling carried out by YouGov that showed 57 per cent believed the law should promote marriage in preference to other kinds of family structure. An overwhelming 85 per cent backed a tax break to promote marriage...
I AM FED UP TO THE BACK TEETH WITH THE BANKRUPT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS which refuses to recognise the distinctive impact made on this country by the Church of England and other churches. More people do unpaid work for church groups than any other organisation, with churchgoers contributing 23.2 million hours of voluntary service each month in their local communities outside the church.
The Church of England alone provides activities outside church worship in the local community for more than half-a-million under-16-year-olds…
In March this year it was revealed that THE DEPARTMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES HAS GIVEN £25,000 TO THE BRITISH HUMANIST ASSOCIATION TO RUIN LOCAL CAMPAIGNS PROMOTING ATHEISM. Meanwhile, THE EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HAS GIVEN THEM £35,000 OF TAXPAYERS’ MONEY TO PROMOTE SECULARISM IN THE PUBLIC SERVICES UNDER EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS.”
On 14 September 2009, the BBC quoted Bob Crowe, the Rail Maritime and Transport Union's General Secretary, thus:
"If Labour are serious about re-engaging with their core supporters, they can prove it by making a bold statement on PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF THE RAILWAYS."
The BBC added:
"MOST PEOPLE ARE IN FAVOUR OF RETURNING THE RAILWAYS TO PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, with just 23% supporting privatisation… Seven out of 10 of those questioned backed re-nationalisation...
RMT General Secretary Bob Crow said the poll showed the government is 'out of step with the voters" on who owns and runs the rail network'."
On 14 September 2009, The Mail on Sunday quoted Dr Arik Sigman, author of The Spoilt Generation, thus:
“AUTHORITY IS A BASIC HEALTH REQUIREMENT IN CHILDREN'S LIVES. Children of the spoilt generation are used to having their demands met by their parents and others in authority, and that in turn makes them unprepared for the realities of adult life. This has consequences in every area of society, from the classroom to the workplace, the streets to the criminal courts and rehabilitation clinics.
Being spoilt is now classless - from aristocracy to underclass, children are now spoilt in ways that go far beyond materialism… The consequences are measurable - BRITAIN NOW HAS THE HIGHEST RATES OF CHILD DEPRESSION, CHILD-ON-CHILD MURDER, UNDERAGE PREGNANCY, OBESITY, VIOLENT AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR AND PRE-TEEN ALCOHOLISM SINCE RECORDS BEGAN.”
The Mail added:
"Dr Sigman, a fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine, said nursery-age children are becoming increasingly violent and disrespectful towards their teachers, 'parent battering' is on the rise and the number of policemen attacked by children is soaring."
On 14 September 2009, Al-Qaeda’s media arm, the As-Sahab Foundation, released a video titled, “An Address to the American People“.
In the video, Osama Bin Laden said this:
“The reason for our dispute with you is YOUR SUPPORT FOR YOUR ALLY ISRAEL… If Americans want to end their confrontation with Al-Qaeda they must reconsider their attitude toward the Jewish state…
Ask yourselves to determine your position: IS YOUR SECURITY, YOUR BLOOD, YOUR CHILDREN, YOUR MONEY, YOUR JOBS, YOUR HOMES, YOUR ECONOMY, AND YOUR REPUTATION DEARER TO YOU THAN THE SECURITY OF THE ISRAELIS, their children and their economy?…
It will become clear to you in days that all you have changed in the White House are faces… The bitter truth is that THE NEO-CONSERVATIVES CONTINUE TO CAST THEIR HEAVY SHADOWS UPON YOU.”
On 14 September 2009, an unnamed teacher was quoted thus in a Melanie Philips’ Mail on Sunday article:
“PATRIOTISM ABOUT BEING BRITISH DIVIDES GROUPS ALONG RACIAL LINES WHEN WE AIM TO BRING PUPILS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT MAKES US THE SAME.”
Melanie Philips, herself, responded:
“What this teacher seemed to be saying was that children from immigrant backgrounds can't have that shared sense of belonging because they are not really British. Is that not itself a racist attitude? And if such children really are merely foreign visitors, IT IS EVEN MORE EXTRAORDINARY THAT TEACHERS SHOULD TAILOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WHO ARE BRITISH TO SUIT THE FEW WHO ARE NOT…
Teachers should not set out to put across one point of view, WHICH REPLACES EDUCATION WITH PROPAGANDA… ON THE GROUNDS THAT LOVE FOR YOUR COUNTRY IS WRONG, MANY TEACHERS HAVE LONG STOPPED PASSING ON TO CHILDREN THE KNOWLEDGE THEY NEED IF THEY ARE TO ADMIRE AND IDENTIFY WITH BRITAIN.”
Ms Philips continued:
“A recent survey of teachers by London University's Institute of Education found that some THREE-QUARTERS OF THEM BELIEVED IT WAS THEIR DUTY TO WARN THEIR PUPILS ABOUT THE DANGERS OF PATRIOTISM. Once upon a time, loving your country enough that you were prepared to die for it was held to be the highest virtue. Indeed, without patriotism there would be no one serving in the Armed Forces. For the past 1,000 years, it has given the people of these islands the strength and courage to repel invaders and defeat the enemies of liberty.
IS IT NOT EXTRAORDINARY THAT SUCH AFFECTION FOR YOUR COUNTRY SHOULD NOW BE CONSIDERED SO OBJECTIONABLE THAT CHILDREN SHOULD BE TOLD IT IS POSITIVELY DANGEROUS?…
PATRIOTISM IS WHAT BINDS US TOGETHER THROUGH A SHARED SENSE OF BELONGING AND A DESIRE TO DEFEND WHAT WE ALL HAVE IN COMMON…
BACK IN THE EIGHTIES AND NINETIES, HISTORY TEACHING WAS AT THE CENTRE OF A TREMENDOUS BATTLE OVER BRITISH NATIONAL IDENTITY. In one camp were those who believed that it meant transmitting to pupils the story of this nation and its institutions; IN THE OTHER CAMP WERE THOSE WHO SAID THAT TO DO SO WAS RACIST. That was because THEY SUBSCRIBED TO THE VIEW THAT BRITAIN WAS ITSELF INTRINSICALLY RACIST… and that A NEW SOCIETY HAD TO BE CREATED THAT WOULD TREAT THE CULTURE OF EVERY INCOMER AS EQUAL TO THE CULTURE OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH. More fundamentally even than that, THEY BELIEVED THE VERY IDEA OF A NATION WITH A DISTINCT IDENTITY AT ALL WAS RACIST.
According to their reasoning, THE NATION LED TO NATIONALISM, AND NATIONALISM LED TO PREJUDICE AND WAR. SO DESTROYING NATIONAL IDENTITY WOULD ERADICATE ALL SUCH HORRORS AND CREATE THE BROTHERHOOD OF MAN ON EARTH.
Of course, this was ridiculous. SUCH A UTOPIAN VISION WAS LIKELY TO RESULT IN MORE PREJUDICE AND WAR, SINCE WITHOUT THE GLUE OF SHARED NATIONAL IDENTITY A SOCIETY FRAGMENTS INTO WARRING FACTIONS. MOREOVER, THE POSE OF 'NEUTRALITY' THAT TEACHERS ADOPTED IN DENOUNCING PATRIOTISM DID NOT PREVENT THEM FROM TELLING CHILDREN THAT BRITAIN HAD A PAST OF WHICH IT SHOULD BE ASHAMED.
DESPITE THEIR FAR LEFT PROVENANCE, THESE DESTRUCTIVE, EVEN NIHILISTIC VIEWS CAPTURED THE EDUCATION WORLD…
NATIVE-BORN CHILDREN HAVE BEEN LEFT… BEREFT OF ANYTHING IN THEIR COUNTRY WITH WHICH THEY CAN FEEL A PROUD SENSE OF IDENTIFICATION. THESE TEACHERS HAVE PRODUCED EQUALITY, ALL RIGHT: AN EQUALITY OF ROOTLESSNESS. THEY HAVE ALSO PRODUCED WIDESPREAD IGNORANCE...
Professor Derek Matthews, an economics lecturer at Cardiff University, was so concerned at his students' lack of historical knowledge that he set them four simple questions. He discovered that ONLY ONE IN SIX KNEW THAT THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON LED THE BRITISH ARMY IN THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO; ONLY ONE IN TEN COULD NAME A SINGLE 19TH-CENTURY BRITISH PRIME MINISTER; SOME OF HIS STUDENTS HAD NEVER HEARD OF THE REFORMATION; AND ONE THOUGHT MARTIN LUTHER WAS AN AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER. YET THESE STUDENTS WERE PROBABLY IN THE TOP 15 PER CENT OF THEIR AGE GROUP FOR EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS…
People are usually desperate if they cannot root themselves. Yet FOR IDEOLOGICAL REASONS, THE TEACHING WORLD DECIDED UNILATERALLY TO DEPRIVE CHILDREN OF THE ABILITY TO DO SO.
Gordon Brown has spoken in favour of encouraging pupils to be patriotic, calling for 'Britishness' lessons to be part of the curriculum. HE IS RIGHT TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE EROSION OF NATIONAL IDENTITY. What he is reluctant to acknowledge, however, is that THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS IS THE PROMOTION OF MULTICULTURALISM, WHICH HAS TURNED PATRIOTISM INTO A DIRTY WORD… WITHOUT PATRIOTISM, A SOCIETY STARTS TO DIE. If the core purpose of education is to transmit a culture down through the generations, IT IS NOT PATRIOTISM THAT IS A MENACE TO THIS COUNTRY, BUT THE TEACHERS WHOSE REAL TARGET IS BRITAIN'S IDENTITY ITSELF.”
In their book, “Fleeced! How We've Been Betrayed by the Politicians, Bureaucrats And Bankers and How Much They've Cost Us”, Matthew Elliott and David Craig scrutinised official Government spending to calculate what Gordon Brown had cost the UK.
They arrived at a figure of £3.25 TRILLION!
On 14 September 2009, The Mail on Sunday quoted Matthew Elliott, the Chief Executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, thus:
“It would be easy to dismiss the figure of £3trillion as being too big to contemplate or unreasonably high. But to do so would be to ignore THE SHEER SCALE OF THE FINANCIAL DISASTER THAT 12 YEARS OF GORDON BROWN'S TAX-A-LOT AND SPEND-MORE POLICIES HAVE DONE TO THE BRITISH ECONOMY… Had this Government not spent at levels far beyond our means while the economy was booming, the UK would have been in a much better condition to withstand the collapse in the US markets.”
On 14 September 2009, Peter Hitchens said this in The Mail on Sunday:
“GROWING NUMBERS OF CHILDREN ARRIVE AT SCHOOL UNABLE TO HOLD A KNIFE AND FORK. I wonder what else they cannot do. I suspect that, if anyone measured it, we would also find that a lot of them can’t listen or speak as they should be able to because they have spent so much time in front of glowing screens that mesmerise them, but don’t respond to them or care about them. If we looked further, we would discover that many of them have no manners to speak of, do not understand different tones of voice, have trouble obeying instructions or settling to any serious task…
As they grow older, LARGE NUMBERS OF THESE CHILDREN, ESPECIALLY THE BOYS, WILL BE DRUGGED WITH POWERFUL STIMULANTS BECAUSE IT IS CLAIMED THEY ARE SUFFERING FROM SYNDROMES OR DISORDERS…
Later still THEY WILL FORM A SOLID, UNTEACHABLE, DISORDERLY MASS AT THE BACK OF SCORES OF SECONDARY-SCHOOL CLASSROOMS, TEXTING (IF THEY CAN READ ENOUGH) DURING LESSONS, OR SIMPLY IGNORING OR INSULTING THEIR TEACHERS, UNINTERESTED IN LEARNING AND UNABLE TO DO SO, AND PREVENTING OTHERS FROM LEARNING, TOO.
Then, released on to the streets, they will frighten us all with their blank, pitiless faces and their inability to understand things we take for granted. CONSIDERATION FOR OTHERS? What’s that? RESTRAINT? Never heard of it. MANNERS? What are they? PATIENCE? Who needs it?…
We were not born with these blessings. We learned them in thousands of tiny steps, from parents who were present in our lives from our earliest moments, not for a brief few months before everyone had to go back to the grindstone.
OUR SCHOOLS ARE TERRIBLE, AND HAVE BEEN FOR YEARS – so terrible that even the authorities are beginning to admit it. But the teachers are right when they say that THE REAL PROBLEM IS IN THE HOME. AND THE PROBLEM OF THE HOME IS ACTUALLY THE PROBLEM OF AN UNHINGED SOCIETY THAT DECIDED TO TRY TO CHANGE HUMAN NATURE.
Women, it said, had to work outside the home to be fulfilled. Raising children was something that would just get done in the intervals between work and sleep. THIS IDEA CAME FROM A WILD, LEFTIST COVEN WHOSE MEMBERS LONG AGO GREW UP AND GOT RICH. But it just happened to suit a lot of businesses which find women cheaper and more reliable than men, and so it took off. And IT HAS DONE LIMITLESS DAMAGE.
And it is time that it was reversed. And NOBODY WILL DO ANYTHING. But comfort yourselves. CHILDREN MAY NOT KNOW HOW TO HANDLE CUTLERY, BUT IF UNESCO HAS ITS WAY THEY WILL SOON BE INSTRUCTED, FROM THE AGE OF FIVE, IN THE JOYS OF MASTURBATION.
Thus do we make progress.”
Thus does the PC Crowd make progress, Pete.
In its war against the West.
On 14 September 2009, Judge Anthony Goldstaub QC was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"You have turned to Islam and THIS PROMISES WELL FOR YOUR FUTURE, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”
The Mail added:
"Goldstaub strongly criticised Wood, 34, for pleading not guilty at his trial which meant his victim was put through the ordeal of having to tell 12 strangers 'the most intimate details'...
'This she did with dignity and courage,' said Judge Goldstaub. 'You, through your counsel, called her a liar and suggested she had invented rape.'
The judge added that Wood, who had previous convictions for indecent assault on underage girls and for violence, had shown no remorse and still protested his innocence about the attack."
Yep, commend a lying rapist, with previous convictions, for becoming a Muslim.
That'll turn him into a nice person alright. Like the Muslims that blew us up on 7/7/2005 perhaps, or the paedophiles who groom our little girls up North, or the drug dealers who bring the heroin into the coutry from Afghanistan and sell it on our streets.
Such attitudes as Goldstaub's really do "promise well" for the "future" of the bad guys, I reckon.
As for ours now, that'd be something else entirely.
On 13 September 2009, Google News informed us of a video titled, ‘Message to the American People'.
In this video, Osama Bin Laden was heard saying this:
"If you think about your situation well, you will know that THE WHITE HOUSE IS OCCUPIED BY PRESSURE GROUPS… The bitter truth is that THE NEO-CONSERVATIVES CONTINUE TO CAST THEIR HEAVY SHADOWS UPON YOU…
All we will do is to continue the war of attrition against you on all possible axes, like we exhausted the Soviet Union for ten years until it collapsed with grace from Allah the Almighty and became a memory of the past…
Obama and his administration have sowed new seeds of hatred against America…
Let the American people prepare to harvest the crops of what the leaders of the White House plant in the next years and decades."
On 13 September 2009, Paul Flynn, Labour MP for Newport West, wrote the following at his own blog, which may be found here: http://paulflynnmp.typepad.com/
“On many occasions I have criticised former Minister John Hutton… Personality free, he is a blank page who always bears the imprint of the last lobbyist who sat on him. The answers he has given to all the questions I have asked him prove that he is stupid. Now there are allegations that he is greedy. Of course. That's in fashion now.
Today IT IS REPORTED THAT MR HUTTON WILL BE APPOINTED TO NUCLEAR POWER COMPANY EDF’S STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY PANEL, which advises the firm’s senior management, and includes Lord Patten, the former Tory Cabinet Minister and last Governor of Hong Kong…
The Public Administration Committee gave Richard Caborn and Lord Warner a roasting about taking vast sums in exchange for their ministerial contacts and 'expertise.' We pointed out in our report that MINISTERS SETTLING CONTRACTS MIGHT HAVE AN EYE ON THE POSSIBILITY OF A FAT SALARY WHEN THEY STEP DOWN AS MINISTERS. WE THOUGHT THAT THERE IS A GRAVE DANGER THAT CONTRACTS COULD BE AWARDED FOR THE WRONG REASONS…
THE CONTRACT THAT JOHN HUTTON BESTOWED ON EDF WAS FOR £13 BILLION... He fell head over heels in love with nuclear power and said, ‘Nuclear is UK's new North Sea oil’. We may wait to hear HOW MUCH MONEY JOHN HUTTON WILL GET FROM HIS NUCLEAR FRENCH MASTERS…
THE PRESENT ARRANGEMENTS ALLOW THE INFLUENCE OF MPS (AND PEERS) TO BE BOUGHT, WHICH IS POTENTIALLY CORRUPTING – OR WORSE. This is unacceptable, PARTICULARLY WHERE THE FORMER MINISTERS CONTINUE TO BE PAID AS SITTING MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT."
On 8 May 2009, The Telegraph told us that Gordon Brown’s brother, Andrew, swapped jobs in 2004...
“... TO BECOME THE HEAD OF MEDIA RELATIONS AT EDF, the French utility company. He is now the director of corporate communications. When he took the job, Andrew admitted that ‘the energy industry is not something I knew much about before‘. Nevertheless, HE HAS BEEN AT THE FOREFRONT OF EDF’S EXPANSION IN BRITAIN AFTER IT BOUGHT LONDON ELECTRICITY, SWEB AND SEEBOARD.”
"Globalism" was always New Labour's favourite buzz-word.
Actually, the globalists have been in charge since the Tories freed up the markets and started privatising what once belonged to all of us. Gordon Brown, his brother and arch-Blairite, John Hutton, really do believe in selling off the family silver to everyone else on the planet as well.
Enriching oneself at the same time is, of course, a welcome bonus for a globalist job well done.
On 7 September 2009, the article, The BNP Doesn't Deserve Political Respect, by Sunny Hunadal, a second-generation Indian immigrant, appeared in The Observer:
Hundal, who is the editor of Asians in Media magazine, founder of the think tank, New Generation Network and host of the Pickled Politics weblog, was critical of the BBC's decision to allow the BNP to participate on Question Time. This is what he said:
“Myth 1: The BNP's arguments can be defeated through rational argument. This argument ignores the reason why most people vote BNP: because they're angry. THE IDEA THAT THEY'VE SPENT TIME PORING OVER POLICY POSITIONS OF EACH OF THE PARTIES AND COME TO A CONSIDERED DECISION IS NONSENSICAL. And so THE IDEA THE BNP CAN BE DEFEATED VIA RATIONAL ARGUMENTS AND 'EXPOSING THEM' IS EQUALLY DELUDED...
The BNP's core support is derived from PEOPLE WHO THINK THE ENTIRE NATION IS UNDER THE CONTROL OF A VAST CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE HONEST PEOPLE OF BRITAIN...
'No Platform' worked quite well in sidelining the BNP in mainstream conversation. It wasn't that long ago that the National Front and its affiliates were fearlessly marching through various streets in Britain and expressing support for the National Front was something to be proud of. 'NO PLATFORM' CHANGED THAT BY ACTIVELY TRYING TO PAINT THE BNP ET AL AS EXTREMIST MOVEMENTS THAT RIGHT-THINKING PEOPLE SHOULD SHUN…
The party has grown thanks to a mixture of: THE LABOUR PARTY ABANDONING GRASSROOTS POLITICS IN KEY AREAS, FEARS OVER MULTICULTURALISM, IMMIGRATION, AND ECONOMIC COLLAPSE in many towns across England".
On 7 September 2007, Leo McKinstry said this in The Sunday Express:
“THE EDIFICE OF OFFICIAL LIES OVER THE RELEASE OF THE LOCKERBIE BOMBER HAS COLLAPSED. Amid the rubble we can now see the full extent of Labour’s deceit and hypocrisy. What has been presented as a noble act of ‘compassion’ is in fact AN ABJECT SURRENDER…
LABOUR IS SO DESPERATE TO APPEASE ISLAMIC SENTIMENT THAT IT CAVES IN AT THE FIRST HINT OF PRESSURE. The impulse that led to the release of Megrahi is the same mentality that presides over THE ISLAMIFICATION OF OUR COUNTRY, THAT DERIDES OUR HERITAGE AND THAT SENDS TROOPS TO DIE TO PROP UP THE CORRUPT REGIME OF PRESIDENT KARZAI.
We once had rulers who saw it as their duty to protect the British public. TODAY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT COLLUDES WITH THE ENEMIES OF OUR SOCIETY. The release of Megrahi… is in line with Britain’s enfeebled policy on crime, WHERE ALL COMPASSION IS GEARED TOWARDS THE PERPETRATORS NOT THE VICTIMS.
WE WERE ONCE ONE OF THE GREATEST NATIONS ON EARTH. TODAY, THANKS TO LABOUR, WE HAVE BEEN PROSTITUTED IN THE LIBYAN DESERT.”
On 6 September 2009, John Mann, New Labour MP for Bassetlaw, was quoted thus by The Times:
"It’s absurd to give the BNP any space. This is how Hitler came to power and these people have got the same objectives. It’s typical BBC intellectualism giving them airtime."
This was said after the BBC had suggested that it would only be fair to give the BNP a spot on the current affairs programme Question Time.
I wonder, Mr Mann, at what point would a party that won 6.2 per cent of the vote in the EU election become eligible to be treated precisely the same as all the others? Are you one of these democracy-but-not-for everyone types? Are you one of these “some animals are more equal than others” politicians?
Are you a fan of Joseph Stalin, Mr Mann? Napoleon, the sinister boss pig in Animal Farm, was responsible for the preceding quotation and he represented Uncle Joe in Orwell’s great book.
You know, almost all of the 6.2 per cent will have been native Britons. My guess is a good few will have cast their vote this way because your party has, very ostentatiously, championed the immigrant over the last 45 years or so. Whereas the British working man, particularly since 1997, has been left in the lurch.
John Mann is the Chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Anti-semitism.
The Jewish community that Mann is happy to stand up for represents 0.5 per cent of the British population. This particular percentage contains a good many of the richest and most powerful people in the UK.
Most of the 6.2 per cent (943,598) who voted for the BNP in the EU elections will have been comparatively poor and powerless. The poor and powerless are the very people the Labour Party was formed to represent.
On 5 September 2009, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman said this in Newsweek:
"It was no surprise that in a liberal city like Austin, EVERY PARENT WAS A WELCOMING MULTICULTURALIST, EMBRACING DIVERSITY… THEY WANTED THEIR CHILDREN TO GROW UP COLORBLIND... THEY DIDN'T WANT THE WRONG THING COMING OUT OF THE MOUTH OF THEIR KIDS…
MINORITY PARENTS ARE MORE LIKELY TO HELP THEIR CHILDREN DEVELOP A RACIAL IDENTITY... April Harris-Britt, a clinical psychologist and professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, found that… some PREPARATION FOR BIAS was beneficial… But if children heard these preparation-for-bias warnings often… they were… MUCH MORE LIKELY TO BLAME THEIR FAILURES ON THEIR TEACHERS…
Preparation for bias is not, however, the only way minorities talk to their children about race. The other broad category of conversation, in Harris-Britt's analysis, is ethnic pride. FROM A VERY YOUNG AGE, MINORITY CHILDREN ARE COACHED TO BE PROUD OF THEIR ETHNIC HISTORY. She found that THIS WAS EXCEEDINGLY GOOD FOR CHILDREN'S SELF-CONFIDENCE…
That leads to the question that everyone wonders but rarely dares to ask. IF ‘BLACK PRIDE’ IS GOOD FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN CHILDREN, WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE WHITE CHILDREN? IT'S HORRIFYING TO IMAGINE KIDS BEING ‘PROUD TO BE WHITE’…
A PRIDE MESSAGE WOULD NOT JUST BE ABHORRENT — IT'D BE REDUNDANT.”
And that, ladies and gents, is what the PC Crowd has been after all along; one rule for THEM, another, completely different rule for us.
It is war, folks.
It really is.
On 4 September 2009, Douglas Murray, the Director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, wrote the following in The Daily Express:
“Exactly one month ago at the beginning of August, our immigration Minister, Phil Woolas trumpeted another plan to control immigration into the UK... A Home Office Minister declared: 'We are going to be tougher about people becoming citizens. There won't be an automatic right any longer'... But now it is September and it turns out that Phil and his friends could have saved the paperwork... because YESTERDAY IT BECAME CLEAR THAT DECISIONS DON'T GET MADE IN WESTMINSTER BUT IN BRUSSELS.
On Wednesday the Brussels Commissioner for Freedom, Security and Justice, JACQUES BARROT, URGED ALL 27 EU COUNTRIES TO VASTLY EXPAND THEIR ASYLUM SYSTEMS to prepare an EU-wide 'Joint Resettlement Programme'. THE PLAN IS TO SPREAD REFUGEES FROM WAR-TORN COUNTRIES, MOSTLY FROM AFRICA, AROUND THE EU. FIGURES SUGGEST THAT BRITAIN WOULD HAVE TO TAKE AROUND 5,300 REFUGEES. The Government claims that the scheme is voluntary. NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM REALITY. WHAT THE EU SAYS GOES. WE SIMPLY DON'T HAVE POLITICIANS WILLING TO STAND UP TO THEM...
WHEN THE UK STATISTICS AUTHORITY RELEASED FIGURES SHOWING THAT ONE IN NINE CURRENT UK RESIDENTS WAS BORN OVERSEAS, PHIL WOOLAS ATTACKED THE MESSENGER, CLAIMING THAT ITS RELEASE OF SUCH FIGURES, RATHER THAN BEING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, WAS 'SINISTER'.
It is increasingly clear that the Government not only doesn't know what's happening to this country, IT WANTS TO PREVENT US FROM KNOWING… While the Home Secretary doesn't seem to worry about immigration, it is increasingly clear that THE VOTERS WHO PUT HIM IN OFFICE DO. IN POLL AFTER POLL THE PUBLIC SITE IMMIGRATION AS THEIR TOP, OR NEXT-TO-TOP CONCERN. YET THE POLITICAL CLASS IGNORES IT...
AN AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WOULD COST THE TAXPAYERS AN AVERAGE OF £1MILLION OVER THE LIFETIME OF EACH IMMIGRANT... And THANKS TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS FORCED ON US BY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE FORCING IMMIGRANTS ON US, ONCE THEY ARE HERE THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO...
OUR ENTIRE POLITICAL CLASS AT WESTMINSTER, AND MUCH OF IT IN BRUSSELS, SEEMS TO LABOUR UNDER THE BELIEF THAT WE ARE A COUNTRY YOU CAN PERFORM ANY EXPERIMENT ON. YOU CAN DESTROY OUR SOVEREIGNTY, CHANGE THE FACE OF OUR NATION AND TELL PEOPLE WHO OBJECT THAT THEY ARE BACKWARD RACISTS.
YET SUCH PEOPLE HAVE NO ANSWERS TO THE EVIDENCE BEFORE OUR VERY EYES. ONE IN FIVE MURDERS IN THE UK IS COMMITED BY A FOREIGNER... SOMALI GANGS AND OTHERS BRING GENUINELY DISGUSTING, BACKWARD BEHAVIOUR TO OUR STREETS. YET OUR POLITICAL CLASS WON'T FACE UP TO THE FACT THEY ARE IMPORTING MORE OF THIS...
THEY ARE DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY.”
On 4 September 2009, Reuters reported thus:
"LIVING IN A NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A LOT OF PEOPLE OF SIMILAR ETHNIC BACKGROUND MAY HAVE SOME HEALTH BENEFIT, hints a new study from the United Kingdom.
In the study, FEWER ACTIVITY-LIMITING LONG-TERM ILLNESSES WERE REPORTED BY PEOPLE WHO LIVED IN NEIGHBORHOODS THEY FELT WERE MORE THAN HALF MADE UP OF PEOPLE WITH WHOM THEY SHARED A COMMON ETHNICITY.
This effect was seen among white (primarily of British and Irish ancestry), Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and African race and ethnic groups… Dr. Mai Stafford, from University College London, told Reuters Health in an email correspondence.
A HEALTH BENEFIT OF LIVING IN NEIGHBORHOOD WITH PEOPLE OF THE SAME ETHNIC BACKGROUND WAS EVIDENT FOR ALL ETHNIC GROUPS - except those of Caribbean ethnicity."
“Except those of Caribbean ethnicity”.
Perhaps this is why, over the last 61 years, the West Indian has proved so determined to live alongside us? As opposed to living alongside their own, that is?
Anyway, it looks like the indigenous, white “racists”, “Nazis”, “Fascists”, “bigots”, “dinosaurs” and “little Englanders” were right all along, doesn’t it? No one actually wants to be enriched by all manner of other peoples and cultures. We all want to live amongst our own kind.
And yet, over the last 44 years, the politicians have built up an enormous body of race law to ensure that the possibility of so living, for the native, white majority of these islands, was diminished to the point of impossibility. At the same time, of course, all the governmental and most of the media propaganda has been of the happy-clappy, cohere-with-the-alien, be-enriched-by-the-Multicult, variety. Oh yes, the politicians and the bought media have been playing a very sinister game with the British people over the course of the last fifty years.
On 4 September 2009, Kevin Myers opined thus in The Irish Independent:
“There is every sign that THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT, AND THE CIVIL SERVICE WHICH ANSWERS TO IT, IS RIPE FOR BEING SECTIONED UNDER SOME MENTAL HEALTH ACT… Any index of governmental performance gives the same reading of certifiable lunacy…
THE IMMIGRATION FIGURES FROM BRITAIN ARE EVEN MORE TERRIFYING THAN THE ALREADY STUPEFYING ONES FOR IRELAND. ALMOST A QUARTER OF ALL BABIES BORN IN BRITAIN LAST YEAR WERE TO FOREIGN-BORN MOTHERS...
HOW DOES ONE INCULCATE A SENSE OF ENGLISHNESS AMONGST SCHOOLCHILDREN IN ENTIRE CITIES WHERE THE MAJORITY OF THEIR MOTHERS ARE FOREIGN?…
MANY YOUNG ENGLISH-BORN MOTHERS HAVE BEEN RAISED IN ALIEN CANTONMENTS… THEY ARE AS MUCH PART OF ENGLAND AS ONE OF SOMERSET MAUGHAM'S TEA-PLANTERS WAS CULTURALLY MALAY.
Moreover, for the first time in decades, a straightforward increase in fertility, rather than immigration, was a prime mover in the overall growth of population in Britain, by some 408,000 people. BUT THIS WAS NOT OF BRITISH PEOPLE. NEARLY 60PC OF THE INCREASE WAS DUE TO THE FECUNDITY OF FOREIGN-BORN MOTHERS. More births in Britain does not necessarily mean more Britons. BRITAIN DOESN'T NEED IMMIGRATION TO HAVE LOTS OF FOREIGNERS ANY MORE, BECAUSE NOW IT'S GROWING THEM AT HOME.
Just about every single statistic in the British birth survey should be ringing action stations in the British media, but INSTEAD THERE IS MERELY THE WHITE FLAG OF MUTE SURRENDER TO POST-POWELLITE POLITICAL CORRECTNESS…
The population of Britain rose by two million in seven years, to reach 61.4 million. That is more than one fifth the population of the US, but IN JUST ONE-FORTIETH OF THE LAND MASS. And THERE'S ALMOST NOTHING TO STOP ANY PART OF THAT MULTINATIONAL, CULTURALLY-INCHOATE MASS MOVING TO IRELAND“.
Given that The Independent is the biggest selling newspaper in Ireland, Kevin Myers' article would suggest that the first world's mainstream media is some way beyond the "end of the beginning" stage.
As regards what the PC Crowd has done to us, that is. The New World Order pushed too far, too fast, I reckon.
Roll on the beginning of the end.
On 4 September 2009, Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, encouraged people to undergo a day of fasting to help them gain a better understanding of their 'Muslim neighbour'.
The Daily Mail quoted him thus:
“Whether it's in theatre, comedy, sports, music or politics, Muslims are challenging the traditional stereotypes and showing that they are, and want to be, a part of the mainstream community. 'That's why I URGE PEOPLE, PARTICULARLY DURING RAMADAN, TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT ISLAM, INCREASE YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND LEARNING, EVEN FAST FOR A DAY WITH YOUR MUSLIM NEIGHBOUR AND BREAK YOUR FAST AT THE LOCAL MOSQUE.
I would be very surprised if you didn't find that you share more in common than you thought…
MUSLIMS ARE AT THE HEART OF EVERY ASPECT OF SOCIETY. THEIR CONTRIBUTION IS SOMETHING THAT ALL LONDONERS BENEFIT FROM. MUSLIM POLICE OFFICERS, DOCTORS, SCIENTISTS AND TEACHERS ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE FABRIC OF LONDON.
Islamic finance is contributing to the economy by changing the way Londoners invest, save, borrow and spend. THERE ARE VALUABLE LESSONS THAT PEOPLE OF ALL BACKGROUNDS CAN LEARN FROM ISLAM SUCH AS THE IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNITY SPIRIT, FAMILY TIES, COMPASSION AND HELPING THOSE LESS FORTUNATE, ALL OF WHICH LIE AT THE HEART OF THE TEACHINGS OF RAMADAN'.”
Boris Johnson's Turkish great-grandfather was a Muslim.
On 4 September 2009, Frederick Forsyth said this in The Daily Express:
“Before the US invasion of March 2003 some very shrewd heads who knew that weird country well tried to advise Washington that it would not work simply to invade, conquer and then presume all problems would be over. In fact, the White House was informed, the problems would just be beginning.
But those two MALIGN IDIOTS DONALD RUMSFELD AT DEFENCE AND DICK CHENEY AS VICE-PREZ KNEW BETTER. The invasion and conquest was textbook but with the massive superiority in firepower why would it not be? THEN CAME UTTER CHAOS.
Without a clue what to do next the terrible twins fired the entire Iraqi army who, unemployed but armed to the teeth, promptly became insurgents. Also fired en masse was the Baath Party and with them went any chance of administering the conquered country. Al Qaeda had a field day. Previously proscribed by Saddam Hussein, who was a secular monster, not a religious one, THE RELIGIOUS NUTTERS FORMED COMMON CAUSE WITH THE REBELLIOUS IRAQIS AND THE DEATH TOLL OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH TROOPS BEGAN. That lasted for six years, LONGER THAN THE SECOND WORLD WAR.
As for the cost, don’t even ask. THE AFGHAN MISCALCULATION HAS BEEN JUST AS BAD…
It is a simple fact that you cannot defeat a fanatical terrorist movement if it has four things. LIMITLESS FUNDS (THE HEROIN CROP), LIMITLESS RECRUITS (THE MADRASSAH SCHOOLS), A FRIENDLY BORDER (THE PAKISTAN SANCTUARY) AND A DISCREDITED AND CORRUPT SPIV AS THE NATIONAL PRESIDENT (KARZAI).
Now General McChrystal expresses the hope he can persuade the Taliban to return to their villages and join the struggle to rebuild Afghanistan. As what? Why, AS A SECULAR DEMOCRACY. But that is exactly what the Taliban loathe. THEY WANT AN ULTRA-HARSH SHARIA-GOVERNED CALIPHATE...
Maybe our Yankee allies should listen a bit more. We have a lot of experience and superb fighting men and women.
TROUBLE IS WE ALSO HAVE A RUBBISH GOVERNMENT".
On 4 September 2009, Dr Lee Rotherham, EU Policy Analyst at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said this in The Daily Express:
"WHILE THE FOREIGN OFFICE TALKS ABOUT THE EU SERVING BRITAIN'S NEEDS, WELL-PAID EMPLOYEES OF BRUSSELS ARE PROMOTING A COUNTRY CALLED EUROPE AROUND THE GLOBE. It is astonishing that British ministers are still in denial about the way this harms our international standing.”
On 3 September 2009, the BBC published the resignation letter of Eric Joyce, New Labour MP and Personal Private Secretary of the Defence Minister, Bob Ainsworth.
Joyce addressed Gordon Brown thus:
“There seem to me to be some PROBLEMS WHICH NEED FIXING WITH THE GREATEST URGENCY… I DO NOT THINK THE PUBLIC WILL ACCEPT FOR MUCH LONGER THAT OUR LOSSES CAN BE JUSTIFIED BY SIMPLY REFERRING TO THE RISK OF GREATER TERRORISM ON OUR STREETS...
The British people… would appreciate more direct approach by politicians. We also need to make it clear that our commitment in Afghanistan is high but time limited. It should be possible now to say that we will move off our present war-footing and reduce our forces there substantially during our next term in government…
For many, Britain fights; Germany pays, France calculates; Italy avoids. ..
I DO NOT THINK THE BRITISH PEOPLE WILL SUPPORT THE PHYSICAL RISK TO OUR SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN UNLESS THEY CAN BE GIVEN CONFIDENCE THAT AFGHANISTAN'S GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN PROPERLY ELECTED AND HAS A CLEAR INTENT TO DEAL WITH THE CORRUPTION THERE WHICH HAS CONTINUED UNABATED IN RECENT YEARS…
Most important of all, we must make it clear to every serviceman and woman, their families and the British public that WE GIVE THEIR WELL-BEING THE HIGHEST POLITICAL PRIORITY. Behind the hand attacks by any Labour figure on senior service personnel are now, to the public, indistinguishable from attacks on the services themselves. Conversely, in my view we should allow our service personnel greater latitude to voice their views…
Above all, LABOUR MUST REMEMBER THAT SERVICE FOLK AND THEIR FAMILIES ARE OUR PEOPLE.”
This Blairite toady was just about the most strident of New Labour’s backbench warmongers in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack upon the World Trade Centre.
On 3 September 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
“Like an alcoholic hooked on the bottle, Gordon Brown is addicted to grabbing our cash... STATE-ORGANISED LARCENY IS DRESSED UP AS FAIRNESS, VICIOUS CLASS WAR AS A PUBLIC DUTY.
When Lord Beveridge announced the creation of the welfare state in 1942, he promised that it would not provide 'some-thing for nothing' but that is precisely what it does. THOSE WHO RECEIVE THE MOST IN HAND-OUTS, LIKE TEENAGE SINGLE MOTHERS, HAVE CONTRIBUTED THE LEAST. THE SYSTEM PROVIDES PERVERSE INCENTIVES TO IRRESPONSIBILITY. Under Labour, we now have six million living on benefits, while 60 per cent of council tenants pay no rent. THIS EPIC LAXITY ALSO ACTS AS A MAGNET FOR IMMIGRANTS WHO, CONTRARY TO SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA, FREELOAD OFF THE BRITISH TAXPAYER. IT IS A MORAL OUTRAGE THAT BRITONS IN WORK HAVE TO FORK OUT FOR THE HOUSING BENEFITS OF AFGHAN SINGLE MOTHERS OR THE LEGAL AID OF SOMALIAN ASYLUM SEEKERS.”
At a 2 September 2009 conference in Paris, Richard Holbrooke, Barack Obama's "Special Representative" to Aghanistan and Pakistan, dismissed the evidence of widespread corruption in the Afghan elections thus.
"Our advocacy is for a fair process overseen by the Independent Election Commission, taking into account the decisions of the Election Complaints Commission, a process which then elects a government that is legitimate and reflects the will of the people who voted...
During that process there are going to be many claims of irregularities; THAT HAPPENS IN EVERY DEMOCRACY. We recently had a senatorial election in Minnesota which took seven months to determine the outcome, THERE WERE SO MANY CHARGES OF IRREGULARITIES... THAT HAPPENS IN DEMOCRACIES, EVEN WHEN THEY ARE NOT IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR."
On 1 September 2009, the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, was quoted thus by The Mirror:
“In 1951, six countries gathered together with the aim ‘to make war unthinkable‘. Since then, the European Union has helped to build peace and security across 27 countries… THE BIG CHALLENGES OF THE MODERN WORLD NEED MORE, NOT LESS, INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION.
POLAND IS THE COUNTRY MY MOTHER CAME FROM… Poles are proud of their history, heritage and national identity. But they rightly see no conflict between pride in their country and wanting to be part of European co-operation. NOR SHOULD WE…
EXTREMISTS LIKE THE BNP OPPOSE WHAT EUROPE STANDS FOR - it goes against their xenophobia and hatred. THEY ARE OUT OF STEP WITH MODERN BRITAIN.”
"Xenophobia and hatred".
Most British Nationalists would, I presume, feel something akin to "hatred" for our treacherous politicians and the PC Crowd. But then, as these have been at war with the British people for quite some time now, why wouldn't we be?
As for the "xenophobia" bit, the Miliband types fear and despise the Brit who dares to stick up for his own far more than that Briton fears and despises the foreigner. That's why they call us nasty names and do their damnedest to convince the foolish that those who would put the downtrodden Brit first in his own land are the bad guys.
Our Foreign Secretary is a second-generation Jewish immigrant.
Figure it out.
Fining Matthew Single just £200 for publishing the BNP membership list, (Single leaked the names, addresses, phone numbers and e-mail addresses of party supporters in November 2008) Judge John Stobart said this:
"THERE MAY BE SOME MEMBERS IN THIS ORGANISATION WHO DO NOT DESERVE TO BE PROTECTED BY THE LAW".
Which is an interestingly partizan thing for a supposedly impartial British judge to say in a British court of law, don't you think? (BBC News - 1 August 2009)
On 30 August 2009, Minette Marrin responded thus to a report from the Patients Association in The Sunday Times:
"The stories are horrifying — OLD PEOPLE NEGLECTED, LYING IN THEIR OWN FAECES AND URINE, HUNGRY, THIRSTY AND AFRAID, WHILE NURSES CHAT CALLOUSLY AT THE NURSING STATION, INDIFFERENT TO THE SUFFERING AROUND THEM...
NONE OF THIS IS REMOTELY NEW... FOR MANY YEARS PAST, A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF THEM HAVE BEEN EVERY BIT AS BAD AS THIS REPORT NOW CLAIMS...
There is no shortage of nightmare nurses... NHS NURSING HORROR STORIES ARE LEGION. Whenever I’ve written an article about them, I get in response a collection of anecdotes that would disgrace a Third World country... MOST OF THESE STORIES ARE ABOUT OLD PEOPLE...
Why has everyone been so determinedly deaf to the obvious truth? Nearly 12 years ago I wrote an article for another newspaper headlined 'The devil nurses of the health services'… NURSES’ PERSONAL STANDARDS WOULD HAVE HORRIFIED FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE. IT struck me forcibly HOW SLOVENLY MANY NURSES WERE, with loose hair trailing and hanging over patients’ wounds, with unkempt nails and hands all too rarely washed between patients. MANY WERE JUST MEAN: THEY IGNORED AND PATRONISED THE PATIENTS.
'THEY BRING THEM TO THE OPERATING TABLE UNWASHED, LEAVE THEM FRIGHTENED AND UNFED, DISTRESSED BY LOUD MUSIC, OVERFLOWING CATHETER BAGS AND BED SORES, BY DIRTY SHEETS AND FILTHY LAVATORIES WITH BLOOD IN THE SINKS AND EXCREMENT ON THE FLOOR,' I wrote. 'THESE ARE HORRORS CAUSED NOT BY SHORTAGE OF MONEY, BUT BY PERSONAL LAZINESS, INDIFFERENCE, LACK OF SELF-DISCIPLINE OR OF ANY DISCIPLINE AT ALL'...
THERE WAS TOTAL SILENCE FROM THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING AND THE GENERAL NURSING COUNCIL...
POOR BASIC HYGIENE WAS A FACTOR IN THE RECENT DISASTER AT THE MID STAFFORDSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST HOSPITAL WHERE AT LEAST 400 PATIENTS DIED NEEDLESSLY; the official report of 2007 blamed 'shocking and appalling' standards of care. But TWO YEARS ON, IT EMERGED EARLIER THIS YEAR THAT 10 NHS HEALTH TRUSTS HAVE EVEN WORSE DEATH RATES THAN MID STAFFORDSHIRE HAD...
ANY NURSE OR DOCTOR BRAVE ENOUGH TO BLOW THE WHISTLE RUNS THE RISK OF NEVER WORKING IN MEDICINE AGAIN... Another problem may, sadly, BE A WIDESPREAD FEAR AND DISLIKE OF OLD PEOPLE."
Welcome to a world socially engineered by Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Thatcher, the Fat Cats, sub-prime, greed-is-good and the creatures behind the scenes who gave all of these the office to create a system that despises vulnerable old age.
Tony Philippson, whose son James was the first British soldier killed in Afghanistan, accused Bob Ainsworth, the Defence Secretary, of trying to deflect blame for his son’s death onto Major Jonny Bristow, his son’s commander.
On 30 August 2009, The Times quoted Tony thus:
“BOB AINSWORTH IS NOT FIT TO BE SECRETARY OF STATE AND LEAD THE ARMED FORCES. Blaming a commanding officer for the MoD’s failings is outrageous. He should resign his post with immediate effect…
BOB AINSWORTH WAS TRYING TO COVER UP THE REAL REASON FOR JAMES’S DEATH. HE WAS TRYING TO SHIFT BLAME AWAY FROM THE LACK OF EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH THE MOD WAS RESPONSIBLE AND NEGLIGENT…
James was a friend of Major Bristow and the suggestion that he played a part in my son’s death is despicable. He would have wanted me to pursue this until his commanding officer was exonerated.”
The Times added:
“Surviving colleagues said there were only three or four night-vision kits between as many as 40 men. They also lacked Minimi machineguns and under-slung grenade launchers, leaving them ‘totally outgunned’ as they faced Taliban forces armed with multiple rocket-propelled grenade launchers...
In an interview just hours after the inquest, AINSWORTH, THEN THE ARMED FORCES MINISTER, ATTEMPTED TO SHIFT THE BLAME ONTO BRISTOW…
AT THE TIME OF THE INQUEST, AINSWORTH INSISTED THAT EQUIPMENT SHORTAGES IN HELMAND HAS BEEN RESOLVED AND BRITISH TROOPS WERE AMONG THE ‘BEST EQUIPPED’ IN THE WORLD.”
At the inquest into James Philippson’s death, the Coroner, Andrew Walker, said that "totally inadequate" resources led to Major Bristow’s patrol being "outgunned by a bunch of renegades". He added:
"The soldiers were defeated not by the terrorists but BY THE LACK OF BASIC EQUIPMENT. TO SEND SOLDIERS INTO A COMBAT ZONE WITHOUT BASIC EQUIPMENT IS UNFORGIVABLE, INEXCUSABLE AND A BREACH OF TRUST BETWEEN THE SOLDIERS AND THOSE WHO GOVERN THEM."
On 29 August 2009, The Daily Express quoted Andrea Bilbow, Chief Executive of the National Attention Deficit Disorder Information and Support Service, thus:
“CHILDREN WITH ADHD ARE VERY IMPULSIVE AND JUST CAN’T COPE IN A QUEUE OR WHEN THERE IS A DELAY IN GRATIFICATION.”
The Express added:
"So they are to be given special wristbands permitting them and their friends to walk to the front of the queue when visiting some of the country’s top theme parks. However, some teachers have criticised the scheme, saying it would be better for the children to be taught how to wait.”
I like the bit about the selfish, me-first, delay-in-gratification kiddies being “taught how to wait”, don't you?
As regards the poor, “impulsive” dears, who “just can’t cope in a queue”, how about a clip round the ear or six of the best?
It worked in my day.
But then, what worked in times gone by is anathema to the bad guys nowadays, isn’t it?
On 28 August 2009, Phil Woolas, the New Labour Immigration Minister, was quoted thus in The Daily Express:
“THE BRITISH PEOPLE CAN BE CONFIDENT THAT IMMIGRATION IS UNDER CONTROL.”
And yet the following statistics (as quoted in The Express article) had just been released:
“A baby boom among immigrant families has helped send Britain’s population soaring over 61 million for the first time in history. LAST YEAR’S INCREASE OF 408,000 IS THE BIGGEST FOR NEARLY HALF A CENTURY, Government figures revealed. IMMIGRANT MOTHERS NOW GIVE BIRTH TO ONE IN EVERY FOUR BABIES BORN IN THE UK. IN LONDON, MORE THAN HALF OF ALL BIRTHS – 55 PER CENT – ARE TO MOTHERS BORN OVERSEAS.
HALF A MILLION NEWCOMERS CAME TO LIVE IN BRITAIN DURING 2008 while asylum claims increased by four per cent between April and June this year, the Office for National Statistics revealed.
OF THE 791,000 BABIES BORN IN THE UK LAST YEAR, 24 PER CENT HAD IMMIGRANT MOTHERS. Overwhelmingly, they were from Pakistan, India or Poland.”
And the New Labour nodding dog in charge assures us "immigration is under control".
As I say, ladies and gents, THEY are at war with us.
On 27 August 2009, the Agony Aunt, Claire Rayner, President of the Patients Association and a former nurse herself, said this:
“For far too long now, the Patients Association has been receiving calls on our helpline from people wanting to talk about THE DREADFUL, NEGLECTFUL, DEMEANING, PAINFUL AND SOMETIMES DOWNRIGHT CRUEL TREATMENT THEIR ELDERLY RELATIVES HAD EXPERIENCED AT THE HANDS OF NHS NURSES. I am sickened by what has happened to some part of my profession of which I was so proud.
These bad, cruel nurses may be – probably are – a tiny proportion of the nursing work force, but even if they are only one or two percent of the whole THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AND STRUCK OFF THE REGISTER.”
I wonder, Clare, might it be political correctness that is keeping so many the bad and the cruel in place?
On the eve of the Battle of Britain in 1940, Spitfire pilot, Bill Millington, wrote to his parents:
“Being British, I AM PROUD OF MY COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLES, proud to serve under the Union Jack AND REGARD IT AS AN ENGLISHMAN’S PRIVILEGE TO FIGHT FOR ALL THOSE THINGS THAT MAKE LIFE WORTH LIVING: FREEDOM, HONOUR AND FAIR PLAY.” (The Daily Express - 27 August 2009)
Bill made the ultimate sacrifice.
His plane was shot down during the conflict.
Leo McKinstry commented thus on the patriotic statement above:
“PATRIOTISM IS ONE OF MAN-KIND’S MOST NOBLE IDEALS, an extension of THE NATURAL LOYALTY WE FEEL TO OUR FAMILIES, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD. In its highest form, it requires us TO LAY DOWN OUR LIVES TO PROTECT OTHERS...
But IN OUR MODERN AGE, PATRIOTISM IS DESPISED RATHER THAN ADMIRED. FOR THE MARXIST IDEOLOGUES WHO NOW RUN BRITAIN, LOVE OF COUNTRY IS A VICE, NOT A VIRTUE...
It is a bizarre paradox of our times that, THANKS TO THE PREDOMINANCE OF MULTI-CULTURAL DOGMA, THE PATRIOTIC INSTINCT THAT LED TO NATIONAL SALVATION IN 1945 IS NOW TREATED AS A THOUGHT CRIME.
THE SENSE OF UNIFYING NATIONAL IDENTITY THAT ONCE MOTIVATED MILLIONS OF BRITONS TO DEFEND THEIR HOMELAND IS HELD TO BE SUSPECT BY A POLITICAL ELITE OBSESSED WITH CULTURAL DIVERSITY. WE ARE TOLD THAT OPPOSITION TO MASS IMMIGRATION IS THE EQUIVALENT OF SIDING WITH THE NAZIS...
The Second World War has been dragooned into service by the political zealots as a battering ram against our national identity. The Government’s own educational quango, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, boasts that HISTORY TEACHING SHOULD BE A TOOL FOR ‘VALUING DIVERSITY AND CHALLENGING RACISM’ BY GAINING INSIGHTS ‘INTO ISSUES AROUND HUMAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY AND MIGRATION...
I recently spoke to a D-Day veteran from the West Midlands. With anger and regret, he told me that HE DID NOT FIGHT IN ORDER TO END UP AS AN ALIEN IN HIS OWN COUNTRY. Even more insulting, he said, was BEING TOLD BY POLITICIANS THAT THE DESTRUCTION OF HIS SOCIETY WAS THE IDEAL FOR WHICH HE HAD GONE INTO BATTLE.”
On 27 August 2009, The Daily Express quoted Jim Chanos, an American hedge-fund manager thus:
“WE WERE COMPLETELY AND OFFICIALLY IGNORED.”
Jim had addressed a meeting of G7 finance ministers at a closed session in Washington in April 2007.
At that meeting he warned Gordon Brown that “toxic loans” could send the global banking system into meltdown.
The Express added:
"Gordon Brown faced huge embarrassment yesterday when A LEADING US FINANCIER SAID THE PREMIER HAD BEEN WARNED THAT THE WORLD’S BANKS WERE HEADING FOR A CRISIS.
Mr Chanos, who made his name predicting the downfall of US energy-trading giant Enron, said that Mr Brown was told of the ‘canary in the coal mine’ BUT CHOSE TO CARRY ON REGARDLESS. Just 18 months later, US investment bank Lehman Brothers collapsed – taking dozens of others with it…
There was more embarrassment for Mr Brown last night when a damning report showed LABOUR’S £12.5BILLION CUT IN VAT HAD DONE NOTHING TO LIFT BRITAIN OUT OF RECESSION.”
Tory MEP, Daniel Hannan, cited Enoch Powell as his political hero on the US internet channel reason.tv.
The Daily Mail quoted this exchange thus on 27 August 2009:
“In the British context, Enoch Powell ... as somebody who understood the importance of national democracy, who understood why you need to live in an independent country and what that meant.”
Nanette Ecker co-authored a UNESCO report which recommended "children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach (them) about masturbation". (Fox News - 26 August 2009)
Asked if five was “a little early to understand the concept of sexuality”, Ms Ecker replied:
“CHILDREN ARE BORN SEXUAL BEINGS and as adults, die sexual beings. Sexuality extends from birth to death…
Using a building-block approach, WE THEREFORE NEED TO START SEXUALITY EDUCATION YOUNG, such as teaching 5-to-8-year olds the correct terminology about their bodies and how they work so they have the language to ask questions or report abusive, coercive behavior or sexual violence...
WE CANNOT WAIT FOR THE EVIDENCE FOR COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAMMES AT AN EARLY AGE.”
Positive evidence, Ms Ecker?
Interesting how sexual irresponsibility, of the kind that produced a system where to be a husbandless mother is almost the norm and pays better than being married, started to infect our world at about the same time that sex education was becoming fashionable in our schools, isn’t it?
It is war, folks. THEY really are at war with our world.
If you don't believe me check out the other stuff we were told byFox News :
“The United Nations is recommending that CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS FIVE RECEIVE MANDATORY SEXUAL EDUCATION THAT WOULD TEACH EVEN PRE-KINDERGARTENERS ABOUT MASTURBATION...
UNESCO released a 98-page report in June offering a universal lesson plan for kids ranging in age from 5-18, AN 'INFORMED APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE SEX... that they say is ESSENTIAL FOR 'ALL YOUNG PEOPLE...
KIDS JUST 5-8 YEARS OLD WILL BE TOLD THAT 'TOUCHING AND RUBBING ONE'S GENITALS IS CALLED MASTURBATION' AND THAT PRIVATE PARTS 'CAN FEEL PLEASURABLE WHEN TOUCHED BY ONESELF'. BY THE TIME THEY'RE 9 YEARS OLD, THEY'LL LEARN ABOUT 'POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF APHRODISIACS,' AND WRESTLE WITH THE IDEAS OF 'HOMOPHOBIA, TRANSPHOBIA AND ABUSE OF POWER'.
When they're 15, they'll be exposed to DIRECT 'ADVOCACY to promote the right to and access to safe abortion'.”
On 22 August 2009, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:
“I cannot forgive any of them who do not now begin to demand our immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan. THE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR OUR PRESENCE THERE, WHERE THEY ARE NOT DRIVEL, ARE LIES. If you doubt it, LOOK AT THE BITTERLY COMICAL ‘ELECTION’ WHICH HAS JUST TAKEN PLACE. NOBODY CAN CONCEAL THE TRUTH. HUGE NUMBERS OF VOTERS STAYED AWAY OUT OF FEAR.
REVOLTING WAR CRIMINALS SUCH AS ‘GENERAL’ DOSTUM ARE OFFICIALLY ON ‘OUR’ SIDE, IN WHICH CASE I CAN SEE NO MORAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ‘OUR’ SIDE AND THE TALIBAN.
VOTES WERE BOUGHT, BALLOT BOXES STUFFED, FIGURES FIDDLED.”
On 20 August 2009, Sir Patrick Cormack, Tory MP for South Staffordshire, preposterously opined thus in The Daily Express:
“I have reluctantly become convinced, over the last few weeks, that THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY OF RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN PARLIAMENT IS FOR THERE TO BE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN MEMBERS’ SALARIES…
In order to ensure that Members could perform their parliamentary and constituency duties effectively, and have, where necessary, a second home, THE SALARY OF MEMBERS WOULD HAVE TO BE DOUBLED AT LEAST.”
In the same article, the inanely pompous, moat-claiming Tory MP for Sleaford and North Hykeham, Douglas Hogg, whined thus:
“THE SALARY OF MPS IS NOW SO LOW IN BOTH ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE TERMS AS TO DETER MEMBERS OF PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLASSES FROM ENTERING PARLIAMENT. A PARLIAMENTARY SALARY DOES NOT SUPPORT THE LIFESTYLE TO WHICH MOST PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLASSES ASPIRE.
My own conclusion is that IN ORDER NOT TO DETER THE PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLASSES FROM COMING INTO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, MPS SHOULD BE PAID A SALARY OF AROUND £100,000 TOGETHER WITH APPROPRIATE EXPENSES.”
On 23 August 2009, Ian Ferguson, co-author of the book Cover-up of Convenience - The Hidden Scandal of Lockerbie, was quoted thus by The Mail on Sunday:
"FROM THE START THERE WAS A DETERMINATION TO TRY TO PREVENT THIS APPEAL BEING HEARD. It opened but never got off the ground, with stall after stall as each month Megrahi weakened with the cancer that was killing him. THERE WAS REJOICING IN THE CROWN OFFICE IN EDINBURGH WHEN HE WAS RELEASED AND THE APPEAL ABANDONED.
There may well be political manoeuvres behind his release but AT THE HEART WAS A DECISION TO SAVE THE FACE OF THE SCOTTISH JUDICIARY - IN PARTICULAR THE CROWN PROSECUTION, WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN AN ABUSE OF PROCESS BY NON-DISCLOSURE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS."
The Mail on Sunday added:
"It took the use of the U.S. Freedom of Information Act to unlock the full intelligence documents which are now highlighted in the appeal submission. They show memos from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) which suggested THE DOWNING OF PAN AM FLIGHT 103, WHICH KILLED 270 PEOPLE IN 1988, WAS IN RESPONSE TO THE SHOOTING DOWN OF AN IRANIAN AIRBUS BY THE AMERICAN WARSHIP USS VINCENNES FIVE MONTHS EARLIER.
In a memo dated September 24, 1989, and reproduced in the appeal submission, the DIA states:
'THE BOMBING OF THE PAN AM FLIGHT WAS CONCEIVED, AUTHORISED AND FINANCED BY ALI-AKBAR MOHTASHEMI-PUR, IRAN’S FORMER INTERIOR MINISTER. THE EXECUTION OF THE OPERATION WAS CONTRACTED TO AHMAD [JIBRIL], POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE GENERAL COMMAND LEADER, for a sum of $1million [£600,000'.
Another DIA briefing - PAN AM 103, Deadly Co-Operation - in December 1989 named IRAN AS THE COUNTRY MOST LIKELY TO BE BEHIND THE OUTRAGE. DISCOUNTING LIBYA’S INVOLVEMENT ON THE BASIS THAT THERE WAS ‘NO CURRENT CREDIBLE INTELLIGENCE', it added:
'Following a brief increase in anti-U.S. terrorist attacks after the U.S. airstrike on Libya, GADDAFI HAS MADE AN EFFORT TO DISTANCE LIBYA FROM TERRORIST ATTACKS'.
THE MEMOS AND REPORTS, DENIED IN FULL TO THE ORIGINAL TRIAL, WERE AVAILABLE TO THE SCOTTISH CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION WHICH, TWO YEARS AGO, CAST DOUBT ON THE SAFETY OF MEGRAHI’S CONVICTION based on six separate counts of the legal argument."
That's the powers-that-be for you, ladies and gentlemen, dishonest to the core.
On 21 August 2009, Frederick Forsyth opined thus in The Daily Express:
"The truth is the NHS divides into two. The surgeons are world class, the physicians excellent and the nurses beyond praise. So what is wrong? THERE ARE MORE BUREAUCRATS WITH THE WORD ‘MANAGER’ IN THEIR JOB TITLE THAN THERE ARE DOCTORS.
AS EVER WITH MODERN BRITAIN WE ARE LET DOWN BY A VAST, OVERMANNED, OVER- FUNDED, HIDEBOUND, OBSTRUCTIVE, BOX-TICKING AND INCOMPETENT BUREAUCRACY.
Keeping the hospitals deep-cleaned with disinfectant at all times is not the job of the surgeons, physicians or nurses. IT IS THE JOB OF THE BLOATED ADMINISTRATOR CASTE WHO NOW SWALLOW HALF THE BUDGET."
On 18 August 2009, James Delingpole said this in The Daily Express:
"When we think of the Islamist war on Western civilisation, we usually think of 9/11, of home-grown suicide bombers on London buses, of the flower of British youth being blown up in Basra and Helmand. What we often forget, though, is there’s another equally important strand to the Islamist movement’s political campaigning... what you might call war by stealth...
You see it, for example, WHEN THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY ACTS AS THE ISLAMISTS’ USEFUL IDIOT BY SAYING THAT THE PARTIAL ADOPTION OF SHARIA LAW IN BRITAIN IS ‘INEVITABLE’; when 16-year-old Muslim girls fight court cases (AIDED BY CHERIE BLAIR) for their inalienable right to go to school dressed in a sack (the jilbab); when, IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, SHOP WORKERS ARE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO DICTATE THE TERMS OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT (REFUSING TO SELL ALCOHOL OR BIBLES; FAILING TO SEE THAT MUSLIM HEADGEAR ISN’T THE MOST APPROPRIATE DRESS FOR A GROOVY, URBAN HAIRDRESSING SALON); AND WHEN LOCAL COUNCILS DREAM UP A KIND OF RELIGIOUS APARTHEID IN PUBLIC SWIMMING BATHS.
Islamism… is a political movement – AS DANGEROUS IN ITS WAY AS STALINISM OR NAZISM – WHICH SEEKS TO IMPOSE ON THE WHOLE WORLD A PARTICULARLY EXTREME FORM OF ISLAM – WAHHABISM – born in the deserts of Saudi Arabia and now being exported through A MIX OF TERROR, BIG MONEY AND AGGRESSIVE PROSELYTISING."
On 16 August 2009, Jamie Doward, the Home Affairs editor of The Observer, told us this:
“EXCESSIVE DRINKING HABITS HAVE LED TO A SHARP RISE IN ALCOHOL-RELATED DISEASE IN ENGLAND OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS, WITH CASES OF CIRRHOSIS INCREASING BY 42% SINCE 2004, TO ALMOST 5,000 CASES A YEAR...
Apart from the cirrhosis figures… SINCE 2004 THERE HAS BEEN A 17.2% INCREASE IN ALCOHOLIC-RELATED LIVER DISEASE, TO 14,500 CASES LAST YEAR. THERE WAS A 41% INCREASE IN ALCOHOLIC HEPATIC FAILURE – TO 1,200 CASES A YEAR. A QUARTER OF PEOPLE IN ENGLAND AGED 16 AND OVER CAN NOW BE CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS DRINKERS…
Last week Cancer Research UK published statistics that showed oral cancer rates for men in their 40s have risen by 28% since the mid-1990s, and rates for women in their 40s have increased by 24% over the same period. The rise was attributed to the increase in heavy drinking.”
On 11 August 2009, the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, appeared on Radio 4's "Great Lives" to pay tribute to his own choice of a "great life", the former leader of both the South African Communist Party and the ANC's military wing, Jo Slovo.
At one point, Matthew Parris asked Miliband whether there were any circumstances in which terrorism was justified. This was Miliband's reply:
"YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS JUSTIFIABLE, AND YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS EFFECTIVE."
I guess our Foreign Secretary must believe that terrorism is "justifiable" when Communists like Jo Slovo are doing the terrorising.
And/or the terrorism in question happens to be black-on-white.
Wake up, Bassetlaw!
On 14 August 2009, Leo McKinstry, who was once a Labour Councillor and an aide to New Labour's Deputy Leader, Harriet Harman, said this in The Daily Express:
“Labour came to power 12 years ago promising a new dawn for our country. Instead THEY HAVE PLUNGED BRITAIN INTO A DARKENING NIGHTMARE OF ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, MASS UNEMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL DIVISION AND UNPRECEDENTED DEBTS...
Around one in five of those aged under 25 are now on the dole. HALF OF ALL THE JOBS LOST OVER THE PAST YEAR HAVE BEEN THOSE OF YOUNGSTERS, A TERRIBLE INDICTMENT OF LABOUR’S POLICIES...
20 PER CENT OF PRIMARY SCHOOL-LEAVERS ARE FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE AND INNUMERATE, WHILE 40 PER CENT OF THEM LACK BASIC SKILLS... Extra funding is worthless because of THE EDUCATIONAL DOGMA THAT CONTINUES TO PREVAIL, A PREFERENCE FOR MARXIST SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND MULTICULTURALISM OVER GAINING KNOWLEDGE.”
On 13 August 2009, the homosexual Tory MP and Shadow Leader of the House, Alan Duncan, who is supposed to be the Tories' most prominent pro-active apologist regarding the expenses scandal, opined thus on the Commons terrace:
"I'm afraid the world has gone mad. No one who has done anything in the outside world, or is capable of doing such a thing, will ever come into this place again, the way we are going".
When questioned about the expenses system as it is now, Duncan added:
"Basically, it's being nationalised. YOU HAVE TO LIVE ON RATIONS AND ARE TREATED LIKE SH**!”
The impoverished, sh**-treated multi-millionaire is, as we speak, paying back £4,000 of the expenses he claimed for his garden.
On 12 August 2009, Peter Mandelson wrote this in The Guardian:
“To be a progressive is to believe that we can make a better society… by challenging PREJUDICE* and helping the disadvantaged**… A CENTURY OF PROGRESSIVE THOUGHT… has focused on humanising the market and GLOBALISATION...
The benches of the European parliament... a motley collection of FAR RIGHTISTS, NATIONALISTS AND HOMOPHOBES.”
Thus “far rightists, nationalists and homophobes” would appear not to be progressive. Whereas, homosexual half-Jews*** are, one presumes.
Any straight Gentiles out there up for even more Mandlesonian progression?
* “Prejudice” in PC World = White pride in one’s own identity, culture and heritage.
** “The disadvantaged” in PC World = Any person of non-indigenous origin living in a nation built by white folk.
*** Peter Mandleson is gay. His father was the editor of The Jewish Chronicle.
Go here for more Chronological Quotations 10