16.9.09

Chronological Quotations 1.1

In the January/February edition of Foreign Affairs, Matthew Kroenig’s essay, ‘Time to Attack Iran: Why a Strike Is the Least Bad Option’, was seen in 'Foreign Affairs’, the in-house magazine of the enormously powerful international organisation, The Council on Foreign Affairs.

This said:

“In early October, U.S. officials accused Iranian operatives of planning to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States on American soil. Iran denied the charges, but the episode has already managed to increase tensions between Washington and Tehran…

Skeptics of military action fail to appreciate the true danger that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose to U.S. interests in the Middle East and beyond… The truth is that a military strike intended to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, if managed carefully, could spare the region and the world a very real threat and dramatically improve the long-term national security of the United States.”



On 31 January 2012, Mac Slavo told us this at Intel Hub:

"While President Obama’s supporters hailed his withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq as the end of the war in the middle east, BEHIND THE SCENES THE PENTAGON HAS BEEN QUIETLY MASSING TROOPS AND ARMAMENTS ON TWO ISLANDS LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ, AND WITHIN EASY STRIKING DISTANCE OF IRAN.

In addition to some 50,000 U.S. troops currently in the region waiting for orders (apparently they won’t be home by this past Christmas as was originally promised), Nobel Peace Prize winner President Barack Obama is deploying an additional 50,000 soldiers to be ready for ‘any contingency’ by March.

President Barack Obama is reported exclusively by DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s military and Washington sources to have secretly ordered US air, naval and marine forces to build up heavy concentrations on two strategic islands, Socotra, which is part of a Yemeni archipelago in the Indian Ocean, and the Omani island of Masirah at the southern exit of the Strait of Hormuz.

Since 2010, the US has been quietly building giant air force and naval bases on Socotra with facilities for submarines, intelligence command centers and take-off pads for flying stealth drones, as part of a linked chain of strategic US military facilities in the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf. The Socotra facilities are so secret that they are never mentioned in any catalogue listing US military facilities in this part of the world, which include Jebel Ali and Al Dahfra in the United Arab Emirates; Arifjan in Kuwait; and Al Udeid in Qatar – all within short flying distances from Iran.

Additional US forces are also being poured into Camp Justice on the barren, 70-kilometer long Omani island of Masirah, just south of the Hormuz entry point to the Gulf of Oman from the Arabian Sea.

Western military sources familiar with the American buildup on the two strategic islands tell DEBKA-Net-Weekly that… they are witnessing the heaviest American concentration of might in the region since the US invaded Iraq in 2003...

US air transports are described as making almost daily landings on Socotra and Masirah… The US military presence in the region will further expand in the first week of March when three US aircraft carriers and their strike groups plus a French carrier arrive in the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea… A fourth US carrier will be standing by in the Pacific Ocean, a few days’ sailing time from the water off Iran’s coast.

LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN BEFORE THEM, IRAN’S LEADERSHIP IS ATTEMPTING TO TRADE THEIR OIL WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE PROPER CHANNELS – IN ESSENCE ATTEMPTING TO BYPASS THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE BY STRIKING DEALS WITH CHINA, INDIA, AND RUSSIA THAT WILL NOT REQUIRE THE EXCHANGE OF OIL FOR US DOLLARS, BUT RATHER, YUAN, RUPEES AND GOLD.

It may very well be that NUCLEAR WEAPONS, LIKE WMD IN IRAQ, ARE SIMPLY THE PRETEXT, RATHER THAN THE REAL REASON, THAT WILL BE USED TO CRUSH THOSE WHO OPPOSE THE FINANCIERS, POLITICIANS AND INFLUENCERS BEHIND THE NEW WORLD ORDER PARADIGM.

Make no mistake: this is serious business. THEY WILL KILL AS MANY AS IS NEEDED (ON OUR SIDE AND THEIRS) IN ORDER TO PUSH THE AGENDA FORWARD.

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU MESS WITH THE MEN."



On 31 January 2012, head teacher, Charlie Taylor, the Government’s ‘Behaviour Tsar,’ claimed that an ‘educational underclass’ had contributed largely to last summer’s riots.

He added:

“We know who these children are. Many come from homes where THEIR MOTHERS AND FATHERS HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO PERFORM THE MOST BASIC OF PARENTING DUTIES.

I recently met with a mother at my own school and asked her about the routines for her eight-year-old… Let’s call him Luke…

‘What sort of thing does he eat?’

‘I don’t really know, he just helps himself from the fridge when he is hungry and puts it in the microwave,’ she answered.

‘And what time does he go to bed?’

‘I don’t know, he has an XBox in his room and switches it off when he gets tired.’

No meals, no bedtimes. It is CHILDREN LIKE LUKE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES AND OFTEN WITHOUT LOVE WHO END UP OUT ON THE STREETS BY THE TIME THEY ARE IN THEIR EARLY TEENS…

With a lack of incentive or direction from schools, THE WORST ALTERNATIVE PROVIDERS ARE LITTLE MORE THAN HOLDING PENS TO KEEP CHILDREN QUIET UNTIL THEY LEAVE SCHOOL… They become prolific at pool or sit on Facebook all day, without making academic or any other meaningful progress.”

And these kids, Charlie, most of them, they and/or their parents would be immigrants, right?

Who shipped them over, Charlie? Was it the BNP or the National Front? Was it the British people?

Never mind, Charlie, we know who brought over the ‘educational underclass,’ the ‘children without boundaries’ and the ‘mothers and fathers’ who can’t be bothered to ‘perform the most basic of parenting duties.’

Oh yes, Charlie, we’ve been keeping count for ever such a long time now.

We know who the traitors are.



On 30 January 2012, The Daily Mail quoted Jean Taylor of Families Fighting for Justice, thus:

“These perpetrators should not be able to have access to mobile phones in prison. THEY ARE GETTING AWAY WITH TORTURING THEIR VICTIMS.”

Javed Khan, chief executive of Victim Support, said this:

“Offenders using Facebook from prison makes a mockery of the idea that they are being punished. It adds insult to injury when THEY USE IT TO INTIMIDATE VICTIMS AND WITNESSES. Victim Support would like to see this more tightly controlled and monitored.”

The Mail added:

"VIOLENT CRIMINALS, INCLUDING MURDERERS, HAVE BEEN USING FACEBOOK TO TAUNT VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES FROM BEHIND BARS. OTHER PRISONERS HAVE BEEN MAINTAINING THEIR CRIMINAL EMPIRES VIA THE SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE.”



On 29 January 2012, French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, sneereed thus on French TV:

"The United Kingdom has no industry any more."

The following day, Le Monde replied:

"Industrial decline is stronger in our country... In 2007, industry accounted for 16.7 per cent of (the UK's) GDP against 14.1 per cent for France: a statistic that did not change in 2011."

Nevertheless, Sarkozy's little dig remains substantially true.

16.7 per cent is sweet FA.



On 1 December 2011, The BBC quoted a resignation email sent by David Goodier, an orthopaedic surgeon at the Royal London Hospital.

Dr Goodier wrote:

"The supplies situation is dangerous. WE ARE REGULARLY OUT OF KIT, OUT OF NURSES, AND ALWAYS OUT OF BEDS. We have become so used to this situation it is no longer seen as a crisis, IT IS THE NORM.

I did an operation last week on a fracture that kept getting bumped by more urgent cases. It was three weeks down the line and healed in a bad position. THERE WAS NOTHING I COULD DO FOR HIM.

I look patients in the eye and tell them they might sit around for five or even six days of starving for an operation that might get cancelled at the last minute. I HAVE BEEN COMPLICIT IN A POOR STANDARD OF TRAUMA CARE AND AM GUILTY OF NEGLIGENCE BY ASSOCIATION. I can no longer stand idly by when patients are at best having their human rights breached, and at worst PHYSICALLY HARMED BY THE CARE THEY RECEIVE."

Professor Norman Williams, President of the Royal College of Surgeons, said there had been an ‘APPALLING DETERIORATION’ IN THE QUALITY OF CARE, adding:

"Clearly there are concerns about the care some patients are receiving, particularly on the emergency surgical side. It worries me and it would worry any caring surgeon.”

The BBC added:

“The BBC understands STAFF HAVE BEEN RAISING CONCERNS ABOUT TRAUMA PROVISION FOR FOUR YEARS… The resignations, which all happened in recent months, mean almost half the hospital's 12 orthopaedic surgeons have now handed in their notice…

A medical professional currently working at the hospital said infection rates on complicated leg operations were between 70% to 80% instead of the expected 30% to 40%. He said:

‘They simply don't fund enough theatre sessions. Patients get fantastic treatment for the first few hours - but then THEY ARE LEFT TO FESTER WITH AN OPEN WOUND. This can go on for weeks… When we finally get into theatre the wounds are mucky looking. It means THERE IS A RISK OF LOSING THE WHOLE LEG… PEOPLE HAVE BEEN LEFT WITH WORSE OUTCOMES THAT HAVE AFFECTED THEIR WHOLE LIVES’…

Another medical professional at the hospital said:

‘When we've raised our concerns, WE ARE SEEN AS THE ENEMY - THEY [MANAGEMENT] ARE A BUNCH OF BULLY BOYS. DANGEROUS THINGS ARE HAPPENING BUT THEY DON'T CARE. They just say look at the spreadsheet - IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY.”

The way we live now, eh?

The kind of amoral automatons imposed upon us by the Camerons, Cleggs, Milibands, Browns, Blairs and Thatchers really does defy belief.

When you consider what we were, in the decades leading up to and following WWII, and what we are now, the legacy of this traitorous breed is beyond criminal, beyond treachery.

Our own stupid complicity in this great betrayal, as we continue to vote for those who so despise us, defies any rational explanantion.



On 27 January 2012, Pavan Amara reported thus in The Islington Tribune:

“An alarming number of UNDER-AGE GIRLS – SOME AS YOUNG AS NINE – ARE BEING FORCED INTO MARRIAGE in Islington, according to a leading campaign group. The Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation… which made headlines last month when they revealed THERE HAD BEEN ALMOST 3,000 ‘HONOUR-BASED’ VIOLENCE CASES IN 2010, has shown the Tribune records which revealed AT LEAST THREE 11-YEAR-OLD GIRLS AND TWO NINE-YEAR-OLDS HAD BEEN FORCED INTO MARRIAGE WITH OLDER MEN WITHIN ISLINGTON. The oldest girls involved were 16.

They have warned that HUNDREDS OF ISLINGTON GIRLS COULD BE SUFFERING SEXUAL, EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL SCARS AS A RESULT OF THE CHILD MARRIAGES EVERY YEAR…

In most cases, THE CHILDREN FEAR THEY WILL BE KILLED IF THEY REVEAL THE TRUTH TO ANYBODY, while others believe they will be separated from their families and taken into social services’ care.

Dianna Nammi, director of IKWRO, explained that the girls are married in a mosque’s sharia court. This means they are not legally married according to British law…

‘They are still expected to carry out their wifely duties, though, and THAT INCLUDES SLEEPING WITH THEIR HUSBAND,’ she said. ‘They have to cook for them, wash their clothes, everything. THEY ARE STILL ATTENDING SCHOOLS IN ISLINGTON, STRUGGLING TO DO THEIR PRIMARY SCHOOL HOMEWORK, AND AT THE SAME TIME BEING PRACTICALLY RAPED BY A MIDDLE-AGED MAN REGULARLY AND BEING ABUSED BY THEIR FAMILIES. SO THEY ARE A WIFE, BUT IN A PRIMARY SCHOOL UNIFORM.

The reason it doesn’t get out is because THEY ARE TOO TERRIFIED TO SPEAK OUT, and also THE CONTROL THEIR FAMILIES HAVE OVER THEM IS IMPOSSIBLE TO IMAGINE if you’re not going through it. The way it is covered up is so precise, almost unspeakable.’

Ms Nammi said that one 13-year-old had to sneak out of a maths lesson to contact the group, because she was being monitored so closely by her family.‘Her teacher didn’t notice because she said she’d gone to the toilet, but when she got home that day she was beaten,’ she said. ‘Her father knew she hadn’t been in maths because HE HAD SENT AN UNCLE TO SPY ON WHO SHE WAS TALKING TO THROUGH THE CLASSROOM WINDOW.’

Ms Nammi said that the girls are married off to family friends or family members to stop them from losing their virginity to anyone not chosen by their father…

‘Who are girls going to tell? Often they feel like teachers at school won’t understand what their families are like. THEY WILL THINK THEY’RE LIKE WESTERN FAMILIES, and won’t understand that IF THEY PASS ON ANYTHING AT ALL THAT THEY’VE BEEN TOLD TO THE FAMILY, THEN THE GIRL WILL BE KILLED. So they just chose not to tell at all.’

Finsbury Park Mosque imam Ahmed Saad said he was glad the issue was being highlighted, and stressed that it was not an Islamic problem, but a cultural one.

‘THIS IS DOWN TO IGNORANCE, and IGNORANT PEOPLE will use any excuse they can to do this to their children,’ he said. ‘It is the practice in their home countries and THEY DON'T WANT TO STOP THAT HERE, so they will say it’s in the Koran, when it is not’.”

'Ignorant people.'

That’d be the fabulously ‘diverse’ bunch the PC Crowd have been insisting we ‘cohere’ with for more than five decades now, wouldn't it? You know, the ‘girl-will-be-killed’ types, whom the government has been promoting, encouraging and legislating on behalf of for just as long.

The ‘control’ these folk have over their families is, apparently, ‘impossible to imagine’, according to Ms Nammi.

Maybe. Athough, once upon a time, the thought that the British people would ever have allowed themselves to be herded them an acceptance of all the b***ocks cited above would have been even more unimaginable.

Why is it, do you think, that non-natives who are so unconcerned to behave according to British societal norms are tolerated here? Are any of you so naive that you imagine the powers-that-be haven't known about all of the above for ALL the time it has been happening?

The 'ignorant' are here, ladies and gents, to discomfit us. To demoralise us. To destroy us. If those who rule had ever wanted to protect and nurture the British way they would never have allowed such people into our country in the first place. THEY knew what the 'honour'-killers were like before they got here. THEY knew how they would behave once established. And yet, THEY shipped them over anyway.

THEY are at war with us, ladies and gentlemen.

Such immigrants as these are their footsoldiers.

Diana Nammi speaks about the impact of Sharia Law



On 24 January 2012, the BBC quoted Tottenham MP, David Lammy, thus:

"Over the last few decades, Westminster has spent more time telling them what not to do as opposed to offering them practical support. The endless back and forth about smacking in the early 2000s exemplified this…

Parents in Tottenham continually raise with me the real pressures of raising children for example on the 15th floor of a tower block with knives, gangs and the dangers of violent crime just outside the window. They say THEY NO LONGER FEEL SOVEREIGN IN THEIR OWN HOMES AND THE ABILITY TO EXERCISE THEIR OWN JUDGEMENT IN RELATION TO DISCIPLINE AND REASONABLE CHASTISEMENT HAS BEEN TAKEN AWAY FROM THEM.

It's too easy for middle class legislators to be far removed from the realities of the typical single mum struggling with these issues… I do say that WE SHOULD RETURN TO THE LAW AS IT EXISTED FOR 150 YEARS BEFORE IT WAS CHANGED IN 2004."

Well said, Dave. About time we heard a New Labour type say something sensible. Although it would have been nice to hear it before you got booted out of office.

How about all the race law? Harold Wilson and his Russian Home Secretary introduced the first one back in 1965. Successive governments have been adding to it ever since and its grown to such an extent that now, if a brown footballer calls a black footballer a negro, he gets banned for eight weeks and kicked from pillar to post by the PC Crowd for months on end. Trust me, the British people never wanted to be saddled with all that Brit-bashing nonsense either. It's so nice to know you're in favour of returning to the common sense of yesteryear on that as well?

Elsewhere, Lammy added:

“MANY OF MY CONSTITUENTS CAME UP TO ME AFTER THE RIOTS AND BLAMED THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT, saying, ‘You guys stopped us being able to smack our children… These parents are scared to smack their children and paranoid that social workers will get involved and take their children away.”

I blame the Labour government for all sorts of stuff, Dave.

Most of the governmental types are a…holes who couldn’t give a damn about the British people. So I’m definitely with you on returning to ‘the law as it existed for 150 years before it was changed in 2004.’

Yeah. Bring back the old ways. Nowadays, if you want to know how it used to be before the ‘middle-class legislators’ screwed everything up you’d have to go to a museum! Speaking of which, do you remember that Culture Minister threatening to fine the country's 1,400 museums and galleries if they didn’t put more black and ethnic minority figures on their management boards? He said there was a ‘whiff of institutional racism’ about the arty types and their boards were ‘pale, male and stale!'

I mean, how 'racist' was that? What an a***hole, eh?

What’s that, Dave?

You were the New Labour Culture Minister at the time?

Oops.

David Lammy is black.



On 24 January 2012, Macer Hall, political editor of The Daily Express, told us this:

"LABOUR WAS ONE DAY AWAY FROM HANDING GIBRALTAR TO SPAIN IN A DEAL KEPT HIDDEN FROM RESIDENTS OF THE ROCK…

Former Europe Minister Peter Hain’s memoirs disclosed details of secret talks with Spain. He admitted being desperate to sweep away the ‘colonial nonsense’ of British rule over the Rock and agreed a deal WITHOUT LETTING THE PEOPLE OF GIBRALTAR KNOW’…

In his book Outside In, he also revealed Mr BLAIR AND FOREIGN SECRETARY JACK STRAW ENTHUSIASTICALLY BACKED A PLAN FOR SHARING SOVEREIGNTY OF GIBRALTAR THAT WOULD HAVE BROUGHT 300 YEARS OF BRITISH RULE TO AN END.

‘JACK’S DESIRE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT GIBRALTAR COINCIDED WITH MY GUT INSTINCT that it was ridiculous in the modern age for Britain to have a colony on the tip of Spain nearly 2,000 miles away,’ Mr Hain wrote.

Mr BLAIR SUPPORTED THE PLAN ‘because he attached great importance to a close relationship with Spain and Italy in that order,’ said Mr Hain, adding:

‘I DON’T REGRET WHAT WE DID’."

Of course he doesn't.

Would there be anyone within New Labour's elite corps of Brit-bashing globalists who might regret doing things that we never wanted? Would there be any who regretted 'keeping' those 'things hidden' from us that they knew we wouldn't like?

Keeping things hidden is how you get things done in Trot Town. It's how the corrupt and disgusting get to change the world for the worse.

The Traitor Within.

An appropriate phrase.

Except for this: Jack Straw is 'third generation Jewish.' And Peter Hain is a Kenyan-born South African. Would such as these be inclined to care for, understand or love the British in the way that a true Brit should?

Not traitors then. Just plain old-fashioned enemies of the British people.

What about Blair, he'd be a traitor, wouldn't he? Oh yes, he'd be a traitor to the British as a whole. However, seeing as he is Scots-Irish, the English might have just cause to describe him as a 'plain old-fashioned enemy', particularly when one investigates his anti-English policies and the composition of his Cabinets and Ministries.

Let's check out Tony Blair's Europe Ministry.

Well, the Kenyan born South African was in there representing our best interests for 28 months all told. 28 months representing our best interests and doing what the British people wanted him to do. You know, just like he was when he was after giving away Gibraltar to Spain?

Doug Henderson was Blair's first Europe Minister. The Scottish chap ruled the roost for 14 months. The LSE-(hotbed of Marxist activity since the twenties)-educated, Joyce Quin, an English woman with an Irish name was in there for 12 months.

Then came the bash-Iraq and lie-through-your-teeth-to-do-so zealot, Geoff Hoon. This great traitor (English) was in place for nine months.

Then came Keith Vaz. An ideal choice for Europe Minister. Seeing as how our Keith is an African-Asian. He was the boss for 8 months.

Then it was the Kenyan South African's turn. After him came the A1 Anglo-loather, Denis MacShane a.k.a. Denis Matyjaszek (his original name). He was born in Scotland to an Irish mother and a Polish dad. He was top of the pile for 31 months.

The elite Scot, Douglas Alexander, was in place for 12 months, then it was back to tried and tested treachery in the shape of Geoff Hoon for the next 13 months.

Under Gordon Brown things didn't change much. A Scot with an Irish name, Jim Murphy, was his first choice. Murphy was part-raised in South Africa and was once top poodle at New Labour Friends of Israel. He was in situe for 16 months.

The tawnily sha**able sneerer, Caroline Flint, who was, at one time, married to a Tunisian whose violent behaviour saw him deported from these shores, was our Europe Ministress for nine months.

Baroness Kinnock, top bitch of the Euro-guzzling, Labour-leading clan, was parachuted nepotistically in for four months, to be followed by another Welsh personage in the shape of the underpant fairy, Chris Bryant, who was our pink and fluffy representative in Europe for the last seven months of New Labour.

British traitors, enemies of the English or both? You decide.

Whatever the aforementioned Europe Ministers are, if they, along with Brown, Blair, Mandelson, Straw, Harman and the Milibands, aren't all dangling from a rope at some point in the next decade or two, I will die an unhappy man.



In November 2011, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation published the startlingly truthful document from which the following quotes were extracted.

It was written by a died-in-the-wool member of the PC Crowd named Harris Beider, a Professor in Community Cohesion at Coventry University.

“Community cohesion has been influential in shaping government policy since the 2001 disturbances in Burnley, Oldham and Bradford. During this period, few studies have assessed the contribution of white working-class communities to cohesion… A literature review was undertaken of secondary material about white working-class communities and community cohesion… COMPARED TO THE RICH AND VARIED LITERATURE ON MINORITY COMMUNITIES, ANALYSIS OF WHITE COMMUNITIES AND ETHNICITY IS LARGELY ABSENT except for rather fleeting mentions. In much of the literature, INDIVIDUALS BELONGING TO WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES ARE VARIOUSLY DESCRIBED AS PERPETRATORS OF RACIAL HARASSMENT, HOSTILE TO IMMIGRATION AND INFLEXIBLE…

TYPICALLY COMMUNITIES ARE VIEWED AS BEING PROBLEMATIC, DYSFUNCTIONAL… DEVIANCE AND THREAT POSED BY WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES PEPPER MOST ACADEMIC AND POLICY NARRATIVES.

In contrast to the limited material on white working-class communities, community cohesion has generated a variety of responses. Initially a number of reports were published from inquiries into the serious disturbances of 2001... IN THE TEN YEARS SINCE THE DISTURBANCES THERE HAS BEEN VERY LITTLE FOCUS ON WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES IN THE COMMUNITY COHESION LITERATURE…

RESIDENTS’ CONCERNS WERE NOT BEING HEARD BY POLICY-MAKERS AT LOCAL OR NATIONAL LEVELS… IN GENERAL RESIDENTS FELT THAT THEY WERE CONSTRAINED AND THEIR VIEWS IGNORED…

THERE WAS A SENSE THAT GOVERNMENT WAS NOT LISTENING TO THE CONCERNS OF WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES AND NOT INTERESTED IN ENGAGEMENT. POLICY WAS SEEN IN THE CONTEXT OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, WHICH HAD BECOME A PEJORATIVE TERM MEANING BENEFICIAL TREATMENT TO ANYONE WHO WAS NOT WHITE WORKING-CLASS...

WHITE WORKING-CLASS RESIDENTS DID NOT FEEL THEY HAVE BEEN TREATED FAIRLY BY GOVERNMENT. THE SENSE OF UNFAIRNESS WAS MOST ACUTE IN TERMS OF ACCESS AND ALLOCATION OF SOCIAL HOUSING…

RESIDENTS FELT THAT THEIR VIEWS WERE NOT BEING ACKNOWLEDGED and that there was no space for discussions about change, immigration and access to public resources…

THE RESEARCH LITERATURE IN RECENT DECADES HAS FOCUSED LARGELY ON MINORITY COMMUNITIES. Consequently, studies of white working-class communities and race, and more recently community cohesion, are inadequate, ALLOWING CULTURAL AND NEGATIVE STEREOTYPES TO POPULATE THE GAP…

The research findings demonstrate that WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES DO NOT FEEL THEY HAVE A VOICE…

THE VIEWS OF WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES ON COHESION HAVE BEEN LARGELY IGNORED IN THE ACADEMIC AND POLICY LITERATURE… The challenge was to build credibility and trust TO ENABLE PEOPLE TO SPEAK FREELY ABOUT THESE ISSUES...

London has been described as THE ‘MOST DIVERSE CITY EVER’ ( Benedictus and Godwin, 2005) and as HAVING MORE IN COMMON WITH NEW YORK AND TOKYO THAN CITIES IN THE UK…

The report will contend that studies of the white working-class and its relationship to race and latterly community cohesion in the UK HAVE PALED INTO INSIGNIFICANCE COMPARED TO THOSE ON MINORITY GROUPS…

During the 1950s and 1960s, the leading publications on race during this phase suggested that CULTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN IMMIGRANT AND HOST COMMUNITIES LED TO CONFLICT… During the 1960s and 1970s the focus shifted towards understanding discrimination operating within the state and wider society. DEBATES WERE ANCHORED IN ADDRESSING RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AND CHANGING POLICIES THAT PREVENTED MINORITY COMMUNITIES FROM GAINING ACCESS TO SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT AND PUBLIC GOODS SUCH AS HOUSING…

Academic literature has vicariously viewed immigrants as being problematic, victims and the most radical points of political organisation in society. In contrast, analysis of white communities has been very limited. THEY ARE VARIOUSLY VIEWED AS PERPETRATORS OF HARASSMENT OR SEEN AS HOSTILE TO IMMIGRATION BECAUSE OF A COMBINATION OF RACISM AND LABOUR PROTECTION…

Typically, WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES ARE VIEWED AS BEING PROBLEMATIC, DYSFUNCTIONAL… THERE IS A SENSE THAT THESE GROUPS ARE HOSTILE TO CHANGE AND IN THE VANGUARD OF SUPPORT FOR EXTREMIST PARTIES…

BEING WHITE AND WORKING-CLASS IS VIEWED AS BEING PROBLEMATIC… Charles Murray popularised the term ‘underclass’ in his polemical but influential article in the Sunday Times. He suggested that BRITAIN WAS EXPERIENCING A WHITE WORKING-CLASS PROBLEM THAT WAS GETTING WORSE. This was the result of an over generous welfare state, reduction in common norms and increasing crime...

The establishment of the Social Exclusion Unit was deemed in part a spatial and joined up response to the challenges in some white working-class neighbourhoods. Peter Mandelson was explicit in his analysis of the challenges in Britain. In the quote below he seems to be suggesting (using ‘we’ in a rather ironic way) that WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES ARE PROBLEMATIC AND A BARRIER AGAINST PROGRESS.

‘We are people who are used to being represented as problematic. We are the long term, benefit-claiming, working-class poor, living through another period of cultural contempt. WE ARE LOSERS, NO HOPERS, LOW LIFE SCROUNGERS. OUR CULTURE IS YOB CULTURE. The importance of welfare provisions to our lives has been denigrated and turned against us; we are welfare dependent and our problems won’t be solved by giving us higher benefits. WE ARE PERVERSE IN OUR FAILURE TO SUCCEED, DRAGGING OUR FEET OVER SOCIAL CHANGE, wanting the old jobs back, still having babies instead of careers, stuck in outdated class and gender moulds. WE ARE THE CHALLENGE THAT STANDS OUT ABOVE ALL OTHERS, THE GREATEST SOCIAL CRISIS OF OUR TIMES’…

MURRAY AND MANDELSON SEEM TO MAKE A DIRECT CORRELATION BETWEEN SOCIAL EXCLUSION, PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH WHITE WORKING-CLASS AND DEVIANT PLACES loaded within a problematic cultural construction. Recent interventions, such as the term ‘chav’6, has helped to shape the conventional view of white working-class communities through cultural concerns (normative) rather than social inequality (objective). These communities are thus located as being outside accepted norms within society…

The absence of a coherent academic literature on community cohesion and whiteness has created a vacuum that has been filled by stereotypes in popular culture. In the main THESE HAVE BEEN NEGATIVE WITH THE REPRESENTATION OF WHITENESS IN POPULAR CULTURE EITHER AS A LUMPEN PROLETARIAT, DYSFUNCTIONAL, OR DANGEROUS; OR A COMBINATION OF ALL THREE…

The Jeremy Kyle Show has been described as ‘proletarian porn’ and again emphasises a cultural gulf between NORMS OF BEHAVIOUR OF WHITE WORKING-CLASS AND THE REST OF SOCIETY. Taking this further, some theorists have suggested that that THE WHITE WORKING-CLASS HAS BECOME A DISTINCT ‘OTHER’ WITHIN BRITAIN… THE WHITE WORKING-CLASS CAN BE VIEWED AS DIFFERENT TO MAINSTREAM, COMMON AND SHARED NORMS... Mockery in popular culture is viewed as part of this ‘othering’…

CULTURE CAN BE USED TO EXCLUDE COMMUNITIES AND ENCOURAGE THE FORMATION OF HIERARCHIES OF DOMINANCE IN OWNERSHIP OF KNOWLEDGE, NETWORK AND ACCESS TO POWER…

THE CULTURAL CONFIGURATION OF WHITE WORKING-CLASS CULTURE AS BEING PROBLEMATIC HAS BEEN PROMINENT IN THE MEDIA… THE POPULAR PRESS LED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DEVIANT GROUP WHICH WAS TAKEN UP BY COMMENTATORS IN BROADSHEETS AND THE POLITICAL CLASS…

The intervention of leading politicians such as Peter Mandelson, or more explicitly the writing of Murray is that SOCIETAL PROBLEMS CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES…

A Community Cohesion Unit was established in 2002 to co-ordinate national work and implement practice where necessary. This was supported by an independent panel of practitioners who helped to develop guidance and best practice on cohesion… Much of this thinking was brought together in the Home Office publication Improving Opportunity, Strengthening Society (2005)...

Building community cohesion was one of the four key themes alongside addressing inequality, promoting inclusiveness and tackling racism and extremism. There is also continuity, in that YET AGAIN, VERY LITTLE ATTENTION IS GIVEN TO WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES IN THESE POLICIES. In fact, there are fewer than five references to this group in the entire report. POLICY-LED COMMUNITY COHESION PERSISTS WITH THE FOCUS ON MINORITY COMMUNITIES…

The third phase of community cohesion has concentrated on the importance of integration and identity...

Again, THE CIC REPORT FOCUSED ON MINORITIES RATHER THAN THE ROLE OF WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES. There is discussion of poor educational performance of white working-class boys and of concerns about immigration being shared by most groups, but very little analysis is devoted to community cohesion and white communities…

Some CRITICS OF COMMUNITY COHESION VIEW IT AS A NEW MODEL OF FORCED ASSIMILATION… Despite the criticism levelled at community cohesion there is little doubt that it has been an important driver of policy and practice since the 2001 disturbances. However, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT COMMUNITY COHESION HAS SPECIFICALLY SPOKEN ABOUT WHITE WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE SINCE THIS POINT…

THE DEBATE HAS BEEN VERY ONE-SIDED ON NORMS, BEHAVIOURS AND INTERACTION, AND FIXED ON MINORITY COMMUNITIES. The focus is on these groups WITH WHITE COMMUNITIES (AT BEST) BEING MENTIONED ON THE MARGINS…

The key focus was on culture rather than disadvantage. This emphasis deepened and largely fixed on Muslim Britons after the 11 September 2001 attacks in New York City and Washington DC and the 7 July 2005 bombings of the London transport system. THERE WAS NO POLITICAL INCLINATION TO DISCUSS THE ROLE OF WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES IN DELIVERING COMMUNITY COHESION when the focus was on Muslim communities…

In 2009 the terms of reference on white working-class communities changed with announcement of the Connecting Communities programme. This was a £12 million government initiative targeted at more than 160 neighbourhoods across the country that were badly hit by the 2007 recession…

At its core Connecting Communities focused attention on the needs of white working-class communities AND ON PREVENTING THE RISE OF SUPPORT FOR FAR RIGHT ORGANISATIONS SUCH AS THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY (BNP). In this way it was hoped that cohesion and resilience would be increased.

In part THIS SEEMED TO BE AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT GOVERNMENT POLICIES ON RACE, COHESION AND RELATED AREAS HAD IGNORED THE WHITE WORKING-CLASS CONSTITUENCY…

The association of the white working-class with the Far Right follows an established (and false) narrative going back to the rise of Oswald Moseley in the East End of London. Since
this point, THE WHITE WORKING-CLASS HAS BEEN LABELLED AS HOSTILE TO RACE AND IMMIGRATION (Teddy Boys in the 1950s; Dockers in the 1960s; Skinheads in the 1970s; and the rise of the BNP since 2000). As Goodwin points out, support for the Far Right covers a gamut of issues including social disadvantage, ineffective leadership and representation result which all lead to scepticism on the role of the state.

Connecting Communities arrived rather belatedly after 13 years of Labour government and now seems to have disappeared or be disappearing with the new Coalition administration. During this period we have noted how WHITE WORKING-CLASS COMMUNITIES HAVE BEEN SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTED BY POLICY AND POPULAR CULTURE AS A PROBLEMATIC GROUP…

IN COMPARISON TO STUDIES ON MINORITY COMMUNITIES AND RACE, THERE HAS BEEN RELATIVELY LITTLE DISCUSSION ON THE TOPIC… PATHOLOGIES OF WHITE CULTURE ARE DEVELOPED WHICH EMPHASISE EXCLUSION FROM MAINSTREAM SOCIETY IN TERMS OF NORMS AND SPACE…

In conclusion… THERE IS A NEED TO CHALLENGE THE EVIDENCE GAP, MYTHS AND COLLECTIVISED PATHOLOGY THAT THESE COMMUNITIES HAVE HAD TO ENDURE FOR FAR TOO LONG.” MORE



On 30 November 2011, The Telegraph quoted Christian Noyer, Governor of France's central bank and a governor of the European Central Bank, thus:

"THE SITUATION IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD HAS SIGNIFICANTLY WORSENED over the past few weeks. Market stress has intensified."

Gerald Lyons, Chief Economist at Standard Chartered, said this in his Economic Outlook for November:

"THE EURO CANNOT SURVIVE IN ITS PRESENT FORMAT. Throughout the year I have stressed that the world economy could suffer a double-dip if it was hit by one of three factors: an external shock, a policy mistake or a loss of confidence. Unfortunately, in recent months, the euro area has been hit by all three. And that is why the euro area will slip back into recession in 2012,"

On 30 November 2011, at a meeting of EU finance ministers in Brussels, the Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner, Olli Rehn, said this:

"We are now entering THE CRITICAL PERIOD OF 10 DAYS TO COMPLETE AND CONCLUDE THE CRISIS RESPONSE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.”

Ten days to save the euro then.

Trust me, it isn’t going to happen.



In November 2011, the Riots Communities and Victims Panel (Simon Marcus, Heather Rabbats, Baroness Maeve Sherlock, Chaired by Darra Singh and ‘set up' by Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg) produced an interim report into the riots which bedevilled England in August 2011.

This said:

“Between 6-10 August 2011, we estimate that 13,000 - 15,000 people were actively involved in the riots. More than 4000 suspected rioters have been arrested. NINE OUT OF TEN WERE ALREADY KNOWN TO THE POLICE.

In total, MORE THAN 5000 CRIMES WERE COMMITTED, INCLUDING FIVE FATALITIES, 1860 INCIDENTS OF ARSON AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE, 1649 BURGLARIES… AND 366 INCIDENTS OF VIOLENCE AGAINST THE PERSON.

The overwhelming majority of those brought before the courts so far have been male and had a previous conviction. AT LEAST EIGHTY-FOUR PEOPLE HAD COMMITTED 50 OR MORE PREVIOUS OFFENCES EACH. Three-quarters were aged 24 or under. Of children brought before the courts, TWO THIRDS HAD SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS…

The riots which began in Tottenham spread across the country with unprecedented speed… The vast majority of people we spoke to believed that THE SOLE TRIGGER FOR DISTURBANCES IN THEIR AREAS WAS THE PERCEPTION THAT THE POLICE COULD NOT CONTAIN THE SCALE OF RIOTING IN TOTTENHAM AND THEN ACROSS LONDON.

LACK OF CONFIDENCE IN THE POLICE RESPONSE TO THE INITIAL RIOTS ENCOURAGED PEOPLE TO TEST REACTIONS IN OTHER AREAS. Most of the riots began with some trouble in retail areas with a critical mass of individuals and groups converging on an area. RIOTERS BELIEVED THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO LOOT AND DAMAGE WITHOUT BEING CHALLENGED BY THE POLICE. IN THE HARDEST HIT AREAS, THEY WERE CORRECT...

Significantly, PEOPLE IN MANY AREAS FELT THEY TOO WOULD HAVE EXPERIENCED RIOTING IF THE DISTURBANCES IN OTHER AREAS HAD CONTINUED FOR MUCH LONGER. FEW PEOPLE RULED OUT THE PROSPECT OF RIOTS IN THE FUTURE...

We heard some harrowing stories on our visits to areas affected by rioting. Lives were lost. PARENTS HAD TO CARRY CHILDREN OUT OF BURNING HOMES LEAVING A LIFETIME OF POSSESSIONS BEHIND TO BE DESTROYED. Shopkeepers lost everything they had built up over many years.

The consequences of the riots are still being felt. In many areas, there is an overriding sense of despair that people could destroy their own communities…

We heard a range of motivations from THE NEED FOR NEW TRAINERS TO A DESIRE TO ATTACK SOCIETY… Many people asked how a wider collapse in values may have contributed to this situation. They were shocked to see so many of their fellow citizens engaged in criminal, sometimes violent behaviour, apparently oblivious to the consequences for themselves and for others. They questioned whther the issues of BANKERS’ BONUSES, MPS’ EXPENSES, AND A LACK OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY HAD CREATED A MORAL VACUUM IN SOCIETY…

We know from rioters’ criminal histories that MOST RIOTERS HAD COMMITTED OFFENCES BEFORE. THE CHANCE TO DO SO EN MASSE, APPARENTLY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF OPPORTUNITIES AND REDUCING THE CHANCES OF BEING CAUGHT, SEEMS TO HAVE REPRESENTED A SIGNIFICANT MOTIVATING FACTOR FOR MANY...

The fact that many people abused society’s moral and legal codes when the opportunity arose paints a disturbing picture. Most disturbing to us was A WIDESPREAD FEELING THAT SOME RIOTERS HAD NO HOPE AND NOTHING TO LOSE…

THE POLICE DECISION TO WITHDRAW TO THE PERIPHERY OF RIOT-HIT AREAS LEFT MANY COMMUNITIES FEELING THEY HAD BEEN ABANDONED. All the seriously affected communities felt that POLICE NUMBERS WERE NOT HIGH ENOUGH and that THE POLICE DID NOT ACT QUICKLY ENOUGH TO ENGAGE WITH THE RIOTERS. THERE IS STILL MUCH DISTRESS AND ANGER IN COMMUNITIES ABOUT THE POLICE RESPONSE...

We were concerned at the level of DESPONDENCY AND ANXIETY AMONGST THE YOUNG in particular… We heard a lot about THE SENSE OF HOPELESSNESS FELT BY YOUNG PEOPLE in many areas… We were frequently told by communities that POOR PARENTING WAS THE UNDERLYING CAUSE OF THE RIOTS…

Ministry of Justice data shows that by 12 October 2011, 1,984 defendants had appeared before the courts for crimes committed during the riots. They were: 90% males; 26% aged 10–17; 27% aged 18–20; 21% aged 21–24; 5% aged over 40; 42% were White, 46% WERE BLACK (including mixed Black background), 7% were Asian and 5% were Other.”

5 Days in August

Subsequently, Darra Singh said this:

“Our findings support the view that, HAD THE POLICE RESPONSE IN TOTTENHAM AND MORE WIDELY IN LONDON BEEN MORE ROBUST, THE RIOTS WOULD NOT HAVE SPREAD ELSEWHERE IN ENGLAND. Our research has also led us to conclude that RIOTS OF THIS NATURE WILL HAPPEN AGAIN."

The report seems as straightforwardly descriptive of events and critical of the establishment as it ought to be.

However, I must say that Nick Clegg’s Lib Dem fingermarks were all over the selection of those who produced it.

Bradford-born Darra Singh is the Chief Executive of Job Centre Plus and former Chief Executive of Ealing and Luton Councils. He has been a director of the North British Housing Association and was later appointed Chief Executive of the Asra Greater London Housing Association (which specialises in housing ethnic minority tenants).

Simon Marcus has worked for the British Chamber of Commerce in Brussels. He has also tried, unsuccessfully, to enter parliament as a Tory MP in 2010, standing against Margaret Hodge and, amongst others, Nick Griffin, in Barking. He is Jewish, as is Margaret Hodge.

Interesting that the major parties should both be represented by Jews in this constituency, don’t you think? Especially when you consider that just 0.05 percent of the British population is Jewish.

Baroness Maeve Sherlock was appointed a life peer in 2010. She served as Chief Executive of the National Council for One Parent Families from 1997-2000 and was the Chief Executive of the Refugee Council from 2003-2006.

Despite having left school with next to no GCSEs, Jamaican immigrant, Heather Rabbats, went on to become a BBC Governor, a qualified barrister, the youngest ever CEO of Merton and Lambeth Council, Head of Education at Channel 4, a Governor of the London School of Economics, a Director of the Bank of England and the Royal Opera House, a Board Member of the UK Film Council, a Trustee of the British Council and Deputy Chairman of Millwall Football club despite knowing next to nothing about football.

Which does rather smack of positive discrimination and jobs for the girls (of the West Indian, class dunce variety), don’t you think?

So, Nick Clegg appoints a second-generation subcontinental, a Jew, a Jamaican immigrant and an A1 do-gooder to figure out why the riots occurred. As previously stated, this is no reflection upon them, the interim report seems balanced enough, but what it tells you about Nick Clegg (75 percent immigrant himself) is instructive.

As regards the ethnic breakdown of the rioters presented by the panel, here are a few extrapolations:

According to 2009 governmental estimates, 87.5 percent of the people living in England were white; 6 percent were of Asian origin, 2.9 percent were Black and 1.9 percent were mixed-race. Most of this latter group will have been mixed-race Blacks so, for the sake of the forthcoming extrapolation, let’s say 1.6 percent would have been of ‘mixed Black background’.

It can be seen from the statistics presented that Blacks were 46/42 times more likely to riot than Whites. However, as Whites outnumber Blacks in England by a ratio of 87.5/(2.9 + 1.6) = 19.44, then an individual black person is somewhere in the region of 19.44 x 46/42 = 21.3 times more likely to riot in this country than an individual white person.

Using the same extrapolation, an individual Asian person, despite the governmental and media propaganda insisting that the Asian community did not participate in the riots, is 7/42 x 87.5/6 = 2.43 times more likely to riot than an individual white person.

I’ll say that again, according to an ethnic breakdown of the statistics produced by the August riots: black people are around 21.3 times more likely to riot in this country than white people and Asian are about 2.4 times more likely.

And, of course, the black folks started it.



On 28 November 2011, The Daily Mail reported thus:

“Almost 50 percent of youngsters who passed grammar school entrance exams were rejected because there were not enough places for them, it emerged today. New figures show that of the 29,500 children who took the 11-plus, 13,800 passed, but 6,100 of those youngsters were not offered places.

They failed because they did not meet entry criteria as closely as children, for example, who had siblings at the school or lived further away.

The survey by the Grammar Schools Association revealed 30,000 children competed for places at the 56 grammars - out of 164 nationally - that responded to the study. If a similar number of eligible pupils were ejected from the other 108 grammars, it would mean nearly 20 more establishments would be needed to meet the demand for places.”



On 28 November, BBC News reported thus:

“WORKING CLASS WHITE COMMUNITIES FEEL ALIENATED, DISENFRANCHISED AND LAST IN LINE FOR RESOURCES SUCH AS SOCIAL HOUSING, according to research published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. The study interviewed people in Birmingham, Coventry and London and found THEY FELT DISCONNECTED FROM THE POLITICAL PROCESS…

PEOPLE LIKE THIS FEEL STIGMATISED. THEY BELIEVE THAT THEIR VOICES AREN’T HEARD BY THE POLITICIANS AND THE POLICY MAKERS.”

“Alienated?”

“Disenfranchised?” “Last in line for resources?” “Disconnected from the political process?” “Voices not heard?” “Stigmatised?”

Racist, Nazi, Fascist bigots, obviously. Alienate, disenfranchise and stigmatise them some more!



On 27 November 2011, Brian Brady said this in The Sunday Independent:


“Liam Fox, Adam Werritty and the curious case of Our Man in Tel Aviv... The curious duo was in fact, at times, a trio. They had had two meetings with Matthew Gould, Britain's ambassador to Israel, adding to claims that THEY WERE RUNNING A PIRATE (PRO-ISRAEL, OR ANTI-IRANIAN?) FOREIGN POLICY… Liam Fox and his adviser met Britain's ambassador at least four times more than was previously admitted. So why were we not told this before? Isn't this yet more evidence that THEY WERE OPERATING OUTSIDE THE CONTROL OF THE FOREIGN OFFICE?…

THE THREE MEN MET IN TEL AVIV AT ‘A PRIVATE DINNER WITH SENIOR ISRAELIS’ and, BEFORE Mr Gould took up the ambassador's post in Tel Aviv, FOR ‘A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF INTERNATIONAL DEFENCE AND SECURITY MATTERS’…

The IoS revealed last month that Mr Werritty had visited Iran on several occasions and was SO HIGHLY REGARDED BY THE ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE SERVICE MOSSAD THAT HE WAS ABLE TO ARRANGE MEETINGS AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT…

Craig Murray submitted a Freedom of Information request to the Foreign Office very late one night last week, asking for all communications between Mr Gould and Mr Werritty; barely an hour later, HE RECEIVED A REJECTION, explaining that his request was ‘likely to exceed the cost limit’…

‘It is plainly nonsense that to gather correspondence between two named individuals would be too expensive,’ Mr Murray said. ‘They could just ask Gould’.”



On 27 November 2011, a Katherine Birbalsingh article in the The Telegraph featured the following conversation between Gordon Brown and David Lammy, MP for Tottenham, noted in Lammy’s book, ‘Out of the Ashes: Britain After the Riots’:

“Gordon came over to ask if there was anything in particular that I would like to raise. ‘Actually, there is,’ I said, noticing him look alarmed that I might be about to launch into a long speech. ‘I’M REALLY WORRIED ABOUT KNIFE CRIME.’ It was still a big concern in Tottenham AND WAS SHOWING THE SIGNS OF MORPHING FROM AN INNER CITY PROBLEM TO A NATIONWIDE CONCERN. More and more mothers were turning up at my weekly advice surgeries and telling me that they felt scared and HELPLESS TO STOP THEIR SONS DRIFTING INTO TROUBLE. ‘What are we doing for these women?’ I asked. ‘OFTEN THE FATHER ISN’T AROUND, AND THEIR OWN PARENTS MIGHT BE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WORLD. They’re not coping and we’ve got to find a way of helping them.’

Gordon looked at me quizzically while I spoke, as if I was missing something obvious. ‘TAX CREDITS,’ he responded, as soon as I finished. ‘If they’re single parents and they’re working, they’ll be entitled to them.’ With that there was a pat on the arm. 'Thanks, David.’ On to the next conversation.”

Now there’s a Prime Minister who knew what was happening down there on the street.

There’s a bloke who could have predicted the riots.

NOT!



On 26 November 2011, The Telegraph's Christopher Booker posed the question, 'is the global warming scare the greatest delusion in history?'

I replied thus:

"NO. The '6 Million Jews lost their lives at the hands of the Nazis in WWII' lie is the 'greatest delusion'. Anywhere between 300,000 and ten times that number died during the course of the war. But not 6 million.

AND THE MAIN PLAYERS KNOW IT! But they will not back off from the lie. Why should they? They managed to make it an unquestionable religion for many.

The truth doesn't figure in the moral vocabulary of those who sold us what some are minded to call the Holohoax."

To which alan_c responded:

"If you have seen the images of the pile of dead bodies awaiting cremation in the death camps why would you quibble over numbers? You're sick friend, go get help."

I replied:

"That's what the PC Crowd always does. It sneers at the truth-teller and the truth when the truth doesn't suit it. alan-c's 'sick' observation would suggest that a 'pile of dead bodies', say 100-strong, could legitimately be extrapolated into a pile dead bodies 6 million-strong at the whim of the establishment.

And, if one is in the business of being emotionally evocative, how would 'a pile of bodies awaiting cremation' compare with the shadows of the dead already cremated at Dresden and Hamburg? (Or Hiroshima/Nagasarki)

In practical terms, the German people have been forced over the years to pay reparations based on the 6 million figure. Fairness would suggest that they should have paid reparations based upon the ACTUAL figure, not a mythological one.

Anyway, what's wrong with the truth? If less than six million Jews died during the course of WW2, why should we not know the actual total? Why should we be strong-armed into believing a fashionable lie? If, say, three million died, why would you sneer at those who would have this figure known if it happens to be more accurate?

If 400,000 British people died during the course of WW2, should we have been told that a million died, just to reinforce our hatred of the Germans? If 35,000 died in the firebombing of Dresden, should we have been told that only 35 died, in order to make Churchill and co. look a little better?

You are a propagandist, Al. You prefer the spin and the lie. I prefer the truth. In many more minds than yours, in this Godforsaken day and age, that makes me 'sick.'

Thing is, this sicko can PROVE, beyond all question, that less than six million died. You do not know anyone who can PROVE the schoolroom mythology. In fact, when questioned upon the subject, the usual response from the powers-that-be is an alan_c sneer and, in some 'democratic' European countries, threats of prosecution and imprisonment if the myth-buster persists in his attempts to have the facts made known. There are, indeed, historians in jail as we speak for attempting to enlighten the multitudes.

Big Brother would have you imagine that I am 'sick' for suggesting that the most sacred tenet of a generally accepted quasi-religious belief is factually inaccurate. I would have us check out what he wants us to think a little more closely than we are wont to do.

As for Big Brother's most earnest disciples, there's a world that describes them very adequately.

Sheeple.

Unquestioning followers of the Shepherd."



On 25 November 2011, Phillip Blond, Director of the think-tank, ResPublica, known as David Cameron’s philosopher-king, said this at the Beyond Individualism conference organised by Christian Concern:

“LIBERAL INDIVIDUALISM HAS LED TO A MASSIVE CONCENTRATION OF WEALTH AND THE DISINTEGRATION OF FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS AND HUMAN ASSOCIATION: THIS REDUCTION IN 'SOCIAL CAPITAL' HAS DECREASED WELL-BEING, HEALTH, TRUST AND SUPPORT FOR THE MOST VULNERABLE…

Moral markets,and a return to civic association, REQUIRE CHRISTIAN VALUES: mutuality, subsidiarity, reciprocity, solidarity, mediation, both in the theological and institutional sense.”

We have to question whether the Prime Minister's right and noble ambitions for the Big Society will ever be realised IF WE AS A SOCIETY FAIL TO BREAK WITH LIBERAL INDIVIDUALISM AND RENEW OUR CIVIC ETHOS AND OUR SHARED PRINCIPLES."



On 25 November 2011, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown said this in The Daily Mail:

“In Britain in 2011, few shed any tears over the cruel way the elderly are treated in this country. A new and shocking report by the Equality and Human Rights Commission shows that thousands of old people are being appallingly abused in their own homes by the very individuals employed to care for them.

The report found that good carers are hopelessly over-stretched because of council cutbacks, while bad carers could not care less about their charges and are neglecting, starving, robbing and humiliating those who depend on them.

Invalids are roughly pushed on and off wheelchairs and insulted. Disabled pensioners have food put before them that they can’t reach. On and on it goes, case by harrowing case, a litany of abuse that amounts to a ‘systemic failure’ of care in the home.

The impact of this failure on vulnerable individuals hardly bears thinking about: they suffer depression, stress, tears, frustration; they feel they have been stripped of self-worth and dignity; some are so miserable they want to die. What makes it so much worse is that this report is just the latest in a shameful catalogue of cruelty.

Over the past year, secretly recorded TV films have revealed similar attitudes in care homes, while the Care Quality Commission reported last month that one in five hospitals was breaking the law over its neglectful treatment of the elderly.

The commission highlighted the case of a 77-year-old woman left to lie in her own urine for several hours after undergoing major surgery. She died weeks later, her body so full of infection that the funeral directors had to wear biohazard suits. How do these people who are employed to look after the old in our society sleep at night? Do they think they will never grow old themselves?

The sorry truth is that it is not just the professionals who have given up on the elderly. The maltreatment of pensioners by carers goes on only because there is widespread indifference to the fate of the old in society at large. Old people in our country today are seen not as individuals, but as a burden, a growing mass of drooling, incontinent, helpless and demanding parasites.

You may think I’m exaggerating, but there is no doubting the fact that the elderly are wholly cast as an economic drag on the young and the nation. Medical advances and population trends mean there are more and more old people having to be supported by younger generations.

The result is that society no longer acknowledges how much it owes to previous generations, and children no longer feel an obligation to look after their parents in old age…

We may claim that we are rushed off our feet, that our commitments at work don’t allow us the time to care for our elders. But it is simply not good enough to absolve ourselves of responsibility and contract out the care we owe the generations that preceded us.

Their neglect is made all the more poignant by the fact that they grew up in the age of the stiff upper lip, a time when people didn’t complain, didn’t expect much, were in awe of doctors, nurses and social workers and just got on with things. They cannot shed the habit of a lifetime and start demanding their rights now — it is up to us to help provide the care they need.

There are still countries — as well as communities in Britain — where families look after their aged relatives. Among British Asians, for example, it is considered a sin to abandon or neglect the needs of the people who gave you life. Parents expect to be with their families until the end.

Sadly, even in Asian communities, this is changing. The family breakdown associated with Western culture is being absorbed by Asians, who are also beginning to see nursing homes as convenient places to park granny…

Ageing dogs in kennels have more of a life than many of our oldest citizens. I really don’t know how we can call ourselves a civilised nation when we so badly fail those who made this country and gave us a future.”



On 25 November 2011, expenses cheat, Lord Haningfield, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

“I have had to remortgage my house. I am 70. I am pretty much destitute. I have never had that much money... I am now going to have real, real problems for the rest of my life surviving…

I didn't think I was doing anything wrong. I clearly was… I probably didn't have time to think because I was too busy trying to save money for the taxpayer… I thought I could vary between the categories, it was my mistake and I apologise for it. But I WOULD NEVER HAVE COMMITTED ANYTHING I THOUGHT WAS A CRIME. I WOULD NEVER HAVE COMMITTED ANYTHING I THOUGHT WAS A CRIME IN MY LIFE…

LOTS OF PEOPLE WHO MIGHT HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED HAVE JUST PAID MONEY BACK.... I don't think 85 per cent were staying all the nights in London. My name was well down the list of total amounts. I just think it was easy to prosecute me because of the fact that they were able to trace my movements in coming home. Because of the police prosecution I couldn't be dealt with the same way as the other people.

IT IS JUST BECAUSE THE HOUSE OF LORDS SYSTEM WAS SO CONFUSING AT THAT TIME THAT THEY WOULD HAVE CLAIMED THINGS THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE DONE. I feel obviously that I had a hard time by it. That is why it has hurt me so much. NO-ONE WOULD HAVE DREAMED IT WAS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AT THE TIME.

I think I have really paid my debt to society if I was wrong. I think people need to understand that. It has been absolute hell for the past two and a half years and I am sorry.”

No-one would have dreamed taking more than you were entitled to was a criminal activity? You're wrong their, Milord. Even now, most Brits would. But you are a member of the trough-gobbling elite. A slitherer up the greasy pole. You lot thought you were immune to British justice. For a few of you, amazingly, in this dreadfully corrupt age, this proved NOT to be the case.



On 24 November 2011, Jeremy Warner said this in The Telegraph:

"The prevailing view was that the German Chancellor didn't really mean what she was saying, or was only saying it to placate German voters. When finally she came to peer over the precipice, she would retreat from her hard line position and compromise. Self interest alone would force Germany to act.

But there comes a point in every crisis where the consensus suddenly shatters. That's what has just occurred, and with good reason. In recent days, it has become plain as a pike staff that the lady's not for turning. This has caused remaining international confidence in the euro to evaporate, and even German bunds to lose their ‘risk free’ status. The crisis is no longer confined to the sinners of the south. Suddenly, no-one wants to hold euro denominated assets of any variety, and that includes what had previously been thought the eurozone safe haven of German bunds.

Investors have gone on strike. The Americans are getting their money out as fast as they decently can. British banks have stopped lending to all but their safest eurozone counterparts, and even those have been denied access to dollar funding. The UK hardly has anything to boast of; it's got its own legion of problems, many of them not so dissimilar to those of the eurozone periphery. But almost anything is going to look preferable to a currency which might soon be assigned to the dustbin of history. All of a sudden, the pound is the European default asset of choice.

What we are witnessing is awesome stuff, the death throes of a currency. And not just any old currency either, but what when it was launched was confidently expected to take its place alongside the dollar as one of the world's major reserve currencies. That promise today looks to be in ruins.

Contingency planning is in progress throughout Europe. From the UK Treasury on Whitehall to the architectural monstrosity of the Bundesbank in Frankfurt, everyone is desperately trying to figure out precisely how bad the consequences might be. WHAT THEY ARE PREPARING FOR IS THE BIGGEST MASS DEFAULT IN HISTORY. There's no orderly way of doing this. European finance and trade is too far integrated to allow for an easy unwinding of contracts. IT'S GOING TO BE ANARCHY.

It's worth stressing here that for the moment the contingency planning is confined to officialdom. This week, for instance, we've had the Financial Services Authority's Andrew Bailey admit that he's asked UK banks to plan for A DISORDERLY BREAKUP OF THE EURO. He'd be failing in his duties if he hadn't. EUROPE'S POLITICAL ELITE, AS EVER SEVERAL STEPS BEHIND THE REALITY, STILL REGARDS THE PROSPECT AS UNIMAGINABLE.

They need to wake up fast; it's happening before their very eyes. In its current form, the single currency may always have been doomed, but it has been greatly helped on its way by an extraordinarily inept series of policy errors. First there was the disastrous suggestion from Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy that if Greece didn't buckle under it might be chucked out. Markets reacted logically, which was to sell bonds in any country that looked vulnerable and chase ‘safe haven’ assets, thereby making it much harder for governments to fund themselves...

The biggest sin of the lot was effectively to render all credit default swaps (a form of insurance against default) on sovereign debt essentially worthless, or void, by making the Greek default "voluntary". This has made it impossible to hedge against eurozone sovereign debt purchases, AND THEREBY DESTROYED THE MARKET. Worse, it's made investors believe that the EURO CANNOT BE TRUSTED, that it'll repeatedly find ways of reneging on contract. That's the point of no return. THIS IS NO LONGER A SERIOUS CURRENCY.”



On 24 November 2011, The Daily Mail displayed a letter written by a 16-year-old burglar, written as ‘an exercise in remorse and rehabilitation,’ to those living in a house he had burgled.

The letter (all grammatical and spelling mistakes are as originally written) said:

“Dear Victim.

I don’t no why I am writing a letter to you! I have been forced to write this letter by ISSP. To be honest I’M NOT BOTHERED OR SORRY ABOUT THE FACT THAT I BURGLED YOUR HOUSE. BASICLY IT WAS YOUR OWN FAULT ANYWAYS. I’m going to run you through the dumb mistakes you made. Firstly you didn’t draw your curtains which most people now to do before they go to sleep.

Secondly YOUR DUMB YOU LIVE IN STAINBURNS A HIGH RISK BURGLARY AREA AND YOUR THICK ENOUGH TO LEAVE YOUR DOWNSTAIRS KITCHEN WINDOW OPEN. I wouldnt do that in a million years. But anyways I DON’T FEEL SORRY FOR YOU AND IM NOT GOING TO SHOW ANY SYMPATH OR REMORES.”

The Mail added:

“The habitual offender, who has not been identified, was put on an Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme as punishment for his latest crime. Described as the ‘most rigorous’ form of non-custodial sentence available for young offenders, WRITING LETTERS TO VICTIMS IS PART OF THE PROGRAMME MEANT TO MAKE THEM CHANGE THEIR WAYS. IN THE CASE OF THIS TEENAGER, IT CLEARLY DIDN’T WORK.”

Hands up which of the following punishments you’d prefer inflicted upon this 16-year-old, ‘an Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme’ or the birch?

Which do you think would be more likely to stop him having to write unapologetic letters in the future? Yeah. We all think that. Except for those who profit from the mayhem that creatures like this impose upon our society. You know, the know-better, see-further tu*ds at the top of the tree who do not see it as part of their brief to pay any attention at all to what the vast majority want or need.

I’d birch them as well.



On 24 November 2011, Bill Blain, Head of the special situations group at Newedge financial services, was seen saying this on BBC's News 24 channel:

"The break-up of the Euro is something that many investors are planning for... INTERNATIONAL INVESTORS ARE WASHING THEIR HANDS OF EUROPE."



On 24 November 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Judge Alistair McCreath thus:

"Right-thinking people are revolted at people looking at this material. Understandably they think people looking at it should go to prison. ‘The difficulty is that the prison sentence I could pass on you would be really short and you would NO DOUBT COME OUT WORSE THAN WHEN YOU WENT IN… If there is one way of guaranteeing to make someone like you worse it is by locking you up with other people who are of that nature. YOU WOULD COME OUT WORSE and perhaps pose some danger to the public which I DON’T THINK YOU DO AT PRESENT."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ake-WORSE.html

The Mail clarified the above thus:

"A judge provoked outrage yesterday after SPARING A PAEDOPHILE JAIL BECAUSE IT WOULD ONLY ‘MAKE HIM WORSE’. Christopher Arno, 21, faced up to 18 months in prison after downloading more than 800 ‘revolting’ images of child abuse. Among them were hundreds of photographs graded as THE MOST SERIOUS, INCLUDING IMAGES OF RAPE, SADISM AND TORTURE. But JUDGE ALISTAIR MCCREATH ALLOWED HIM TO WALK FREE saying mixing with other perverts could make him a danger to the public."

Well, this judge is, obviously, one of those rehabillitators who cares not a jot for retribution and the value of it.

Listen up all you non-Nationalist types who pop in occasionally, this isn’t a message you hear very often in this damnably PC age of ours.

If a society revenges itself upon the bad, it is likely to make the bad more fearful of misbehaving in the future. On the other hand, Judge Alistair McCreath may, very likely, be sending precisely the opposite message to this pervert to the one he says he wishes to convey. You see, his leniency could be interpreted by the wrongdoer as ‘I got away with it. If I do it some more maybe another Judge Alistair type will let me get away with it again!’

Punish the bad! Make them afraid to be bad!

Simple, isn’t it? But not, of course, in the world of the do-gooding tenderheart. Not in the land of those who wish the bad to be converted to pseudo-goodness. They just don’t get it, I'm afraid.

Never mind. When the decent return to power in this country, the politically correct will be sacked, flogged and put in the stocks. That might concentrate the minds of the Judge Alistairs who, in behaving compassionately towards the bad, demonstrate a total lack of compassion for the good.

PS. If our prison system is as bad at rehabillitation as the learned judge implies, why are we still bothering? It’s a rhetorical question. I know the answer. I suspect the 'non-Nationalist types who pop in occasionally' do too.



On 23 November 2011, Children's Minister Tim Loughton was quoted thus by the BBC:

"This country has to wake up to the fact that CHILDREN ARE BEING SEXUALLY ABUSED IN FAR GREATER NUMBERS THAN WAS EVER IMAGINED. IT COULD BE GOING ON IN EVERY TYPE OF COMMUNITY AND IN EVERY PART OF THE COUNTRY. TOO MANY LOCAL AREAS HAVE FAILED TO UNCOVER THE TRUE EXTENT OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION IN THEIR COMMUNITIES AND FAILED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES.

Child sexual exploitation is child abuse, it is not good enough that some local areas don't recognise it as an issue. This is an extremely serious crime and must be treated as such, with the perpetrators pursued more vigorously.”

“This country has to wake up to the fact that children are being sexually abused in far greater numbers than was ever imagined.”

Can this prat be serious?

The parents of the children involved have been banging on about this, trying to get the police and the politicians to take notice, for decades now! And what notice did the Loughtons, WHO WERE IN A POSITION TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, take? And now they try to shuffle the blame for their inaction onto ‘this country’?

Oh no, Timothy, YOU are to blame. The politicians, the PC Crowd, the police and the media darlings did this to us. When these matters were originally, many years ago, brought to the attention of the aforementioned, they did nothing. They ignored it.

And, of course, the British Nationalist has been trying to shame them into doing something about it even longer than the parents of the abused children have. And what did he get for his pains? ‘Racist, Fascist, Nazi, bigot!’ That’s what he got. That’s what he got from the Tim Loughtons. Oh yes, you point out immigrant-upon-indigeous paedophilia in a politically correct age and you are a racist, boy!

It was never just 'some local areas' that didn’t ‘recognise it as an issue,’ Timothy. The elephant in the room ignorance was institutionalised. The ’see-no-immigrant-evil’ dictat came straight from the top. The politicians didn’t want to acknowledge the negative consequences of their pet project. The glories of the multicult and the melting must never be impugned! They didn’t want to have to have to own up up to the disaster that the mass migrations of millions of foreigners, whose culture, customs and behaviours were so at variance with ours, had wrought upon the British people. So they didn’t do so. they didn't acknowledge the obvious. They kept the alien-upon-Brit criminality to themselves. And now, when they can no longer keep the facts of the matter hidden, up pops a finger-pointing politician telling us it’s all our fault.

The last thing those who are at war with the British want is for us to ‘wake up.’ The longer we sleep, the more damage they will be able to inflict upon us without retribution. And the less we will be able to retalliate when we finally open our eyes.

Those who are still sleeping deserve everything that happens to them. It is down to them that their children and grandchildren are being drugged up, raped and prostituted as we speak.

Trouble is, their children and grandchildren do not deserve the fate their kinfolk's inertia has subjected them to.

Which is why people like me can never stop doing what we do.



In the 23 November 2011 edition of The Daily Express, Tom Morgan opined thus:

"Ignorance really is bliss, it seems, when it comes to politics and issues we can’t grasp. THE MORE COMPLICATED SOMETHING APPEARS, THE LESS WE WANT TO KNOW – even when we really should try to understand it.

Psychologists found MOST PEOPLE ARE HAPPIER TO TRUST GOVERNMENT TO GET ON TACKLING THE BIG ISSUES OF THE ECONOMY OR GLOBAL WARMING THAN TRY TO UNDERSTAND HEAVYWEIGHT ISSUES THEMSELVES. The study of more than 500 adults found THOSE HIT HARDEST BY THE RECESSION WERE MOST LIKELY TO AVOID NEGATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT IT EVEN IF THEY NEED IT THE MOST. And telling people they would be better off if they understood what was going on only MADE THEM DETERMINED TO AVOID THE ISSUE.

A Canadian study for the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found there was ‘a chain reaction’ FROM IGNORANCE ABOUT A SUBJECT TO DEPENDENCE ON, AND TRUST IN, THE GOVERNMENT TO DEAL WITH IT."

This is what we’re up against.

The determination of the sheeple to stay shorn. And all because it’s easier to submit to the shearer than it is to think for oneself. HOWEVER, Tom Morgan and the Canadian boffins did leave the optimists amongst us with a little cause for hope, saying:

"If problems were explained in a simple way they (the people) were more likely to get involved, the study found."

Thus, the next book I write will be titled:

"The Idiot’s Guide to The Enemy Within!"

No, no. That might be a bit too taxing. How about:

"Treachery at the Top for Tiny Minds!"

No. Your average lemming wouldn’t get beyond the T in Treachery. Wait a minute! I think I have it.

"THE BIG BOY'S BOOK OF BOGEY MEN!"

Sharpen your pitchforks, lads, I think we’re on a winner.



On 17 November 2011, Charlie Mullins, boss of Pimlico Plumbers, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

“We’re increasingly employing foreign workers. They have the right attitude and are prepared to work harder. The younger British generation who come in for interviews are often sent by the benefit people and have no desire to work. It’s a case of ‘won’t work,’ not ‘can’t work’. They feel as if the country owes them a living…

British workers are too picky and choosy and not prepared to work hard,’ he said. ‘They are demanding ridiculous money. Many of the young people who come in for interviews have never even been in a workplace. Many of them have degrees: I don’t need people with degrees – I need people with the right attitude.”

Keith Abel of the organic greengrocers, Abel and Cole, was quoted thus:

“People are not prepared to start with what they deem to be menial jobs… People who are in the benefits system struggle with the concept of getting out of bed at 5.30 to do a six o’clock until three o’clock shift on £7 an hour when the actual additional income they’d be taking home is initially very small.”

Hotel owner, Terry Rogers, said this:

“I have come to the sad conclusion that many young people simply do not want to work… When it comes down to hard graft, they are simply not interested. The truth is that young people think the state owes them a living. Underpinning everything is a welfare state which creates a culture where no one worries whether they have a job or not because there’s always free money from the Government to fall back on… It shames me to say this but it was often easier to teach English to foreign applicants than it is to try to instill the right work ethic in our own English-speaking youth.”

If what these British businessmen say is true, who made our young men and women this way.

Who turned the hard-working and conscientious British people into the useless bunch of indolent scroungers condemned here? Well, that's an easy one. The ‘education, education, education’ politicians did it. The politicians who send fifty percent of our young men and women to university now, despite the fact that they can’t spell, long divide or know who Horatio Nelson is, pumping them full of false expectation and hope, that's who did it. The politicians who, by opening up our borders and workplaces to all manner of non-native folk, ensure that there are no jobs waiting for the university-educated when they receive their often meaningless ‘qualification.’

It didn’t start with Blair, of course. It began when Thatcher destroyed British industry and the jobs and communities that relied upon it. As she demolished our productive capacity she also sowed the seeds of the fecklessness and disinterest that now prevails.



On 22 November 2011, the British Foreign Secretary, William Hague, eulogised thus in The Telegraph:

"Last year within three months of becoming Prime Minister, David Cameron arrived in Ankara. When asked ‘Why Turkey?’ and ‘Why so soon?’ he said: BECAUSE TURKEY IS VITAL FOR OUR ECONOMY, vital for our security and VITAL FOR OUR POLITICS and our diplomacy.

Turkey is one of the world’s fastest growing economies. A YOUNG, ENERGETIC AND ENTREPRENEURIAL WORKFORCE – over half the population is under 29 years old – is an integral part of the success story."

‘A young, energetic and entrepreneurial workforce.’ Just the kind of ‘workforce’ to do the jobs the aforementioned businessmen say our ‘picky and choosy’, workshy youngsters won't and CAN’T do any more, eh, William?

"THE CASE FOR A STRONG BILATERAL PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN BRITAIN AND TURKEY HAS NEVER BEEN STRONGER… Over the last 18 months we have laid firm foundations for that relationship through an ambitious Strategic Partnership which prompted the Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to say that relations with the UK had entered a ‘golden age’. Indeed they have.

Since the Partnership was signed, we have established a UK-Turkey CEO Forum, composed of around 25 of the most senior business figures from our two countries to discuss the strategic issues that will deliver profitable business for the future."

These would be the same ’business figures’ who’d prefer ‘a young, energetic and entrepreneurial workforce’ like Turkey’s than one that ‘struggles with the concept of getting out of bed at 5.30,’ one supposes.

"Turkey also shares our concerns on immigration. We have developed a number of joint projects to stem the flow of illegal migrants entering the EU from central and southern Asia."

And, in return, they get membership of the EU, eh, Billy? And then, instead of all the central and southern Asian invaders, we get the Turks, is that how it works?

"Turkey, a very successful example of modern democracy in a largely Muslim country."

And why on earth wouldn’t we want to cuddle up to all those ‘very successful examples’ who just happen to be Muslim, eh Billy?

"It’s clear that THE UK AND OUR FELLOW MEMBER STATES IN THE EU WILL HAVE TO CONTEND WITH RAPID CHANGE AND UNCERTAINTY IN OUR NEIGHBOURHOOD… in the coming years."

It’s ’clear’ to me that the global elite has mapped out its next big thing. ‘Rapid change’ and even more ’uncertainty in our neighbourhood,’ courtesy of yet another wave of unwanted foreigners.

"My Turkish counterpart, AHMET DAVUTOGLU, IS MAKING ACTIVE AND ASTUTE CONTRIBUTIONS ON ISSUES AT THE HEART OF THE EU’S FOREIGN POLICY AGENDA."

Anyone out there surprised by this?

"Since the launch of EU ACCESSION negotiations in 2005, Turkey has taken important strides towards meeting EU standards on human rights, democracy and governance… The Turkish Government has committed itself to further progress through a new constitution that will meet the aspirations and demands of a modern democracy... AND WE WANT TO SEND A MESSAGE OF A FULL SUPPORT FOR ENERGETIC TURKISH NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EU…

It is deeply disappointing that these have been grindingly slow. If they continue with the same tempo the risk is that Turkish public opinion, traditionally in favour of ENTRY INTO THE EU, will turn against it and an historic opportunity will have been spurned. THIS IS IN NO-ONE’S INTEREST."

Well, that’s a lie, Billy. If the Turks ‘turn against’ the idea of swamping us with yet more job and space-taking millions then the day when we get to be a minority in our own country is delayed that bit longer. And there aren’t many Brits who are going to complain about that.

"I call on Turkey to keep its patience AND DETERMINATION TO JOIN THE EU, AND ALSO ON OUR EU PARTNERS TO KEEPING WORKING TOWARDS A GOAL THAT IS IN OUR COMMON INTERESTS."

I call on the British people to hate the political class with all their heart and soul. The William Hagues, the Camerons, Cleggs and Milibands, the Blairs, the Browns, the Mandelsons, Straws and Harmans are at war with us.

I preach hatred of those who are ‘working towards a goal’ that will only ever be in the interests of the one-world-ruled-by-the financial-political-and-business-elites-forever crowd. I preach hatred of those who, even now, are plotting to flood our already overcrowded country with a million more Muslims and then some.

I preach hatred of those that you, in your grotesque and suicidal foolishness, carry on voting for.

"Economic uncertainty within the EU and political uncertainty on the continent’s southern and eastern borders SHOULD BE PULLING THE EU AND TURKEY TOGETHER, NOT PUSHING THEM APART. Turkish accession would bring fresh energy to the Single Market."

'Turkish accession' will bring the day when the white race disappears from the pages of history that bit closer.

Does anyone out there really think that the Turkish Muslims who, as we speak, will be preparing to join their religious brethren as soon as EU accession allows them to do so, will treat us with respect, affection and gratitude when they get here? You do? Well, then you'd better check out the respect, affection and gratitude shown by just one former asylum-seeking Muslim who piled in with the Ugandan Asian hordes in 1972. In an infamous June 2006 edition of Dateline London, Gavin Esler posed this question:

"What's wrong with white guys, by the way?"

To which Yasmin Alibhai-Brown replied:

"I DON'T LIKE THEM. I WANT THEM TO BE THE LOST SPECIES IN 100 YEARS."

Now that genocidal, little acid drop, ladies and gentlemen, was uttered by someone who has been richly rewarded by our godforsaken ‘white guy’ society. When the Turks come a-colonising, expecting the streets to be paved with gold only to find they are competing with a hundred other nationalities and religions for the few scraps left, what do you imagine their reaction will be? What do you think the ‘young, energetic and entrepreneurial’, whose dreams and aspirations are thwarted by an increasingly inward-looking, suspicious and desperate British society, are going to make of us then?

And how do you think the Turkish criminal is going to behave? In April 2011, The Daily Mail informed us that, in 2010, in just nineteen of the fifty two British police forces, 91,234 immigrants had been arrested on their patch! If one extrapolates this figure across the whole country, almost 250,000 immigrants will have been arrested! Does anyone out there imagine the Turkish criminal will suddenly see the law-abiding light when he gets here and begin to behave in an ‘enriching’ and ‘cohesive’ way?

As I said, ladies and gentlemen, it is war. THEY, the Hagues, Camerons, Cleggs and Milibands are at war with us. Just as the Wilsons, Jenkinses, Heaths, Thatchers, Lawsons and Brittans were before them. If you want your country back, you must break free from globalism’s grip on your lives. You must insist that our politicians make good on their pledges and give you the EU referendum they promised. At which point we can get the hell out of there and the Turkish multitudes don't get a free pass to the land of immigrant plenty.

If we don’t get that referendum, you’d better believe that it won’t be long before Yasmin Alibhai-Brown’s dearest wish comes true.



On 22 November 2011, The Daily Mail quoted thusly from the first report of the Independent Commission for Aid Impact.

"This focus on fragile states, together with the planned increase of the aid budget, WILL EXPOSE UK AID TO HIGHER LEVELS OF CORRUPTION RISK… The Department for International Development’s monitoring of these partners requires improvement. There is a need for more articulated processes for managing the corruption risks associated with particular aid types… Taxpayers have the right to expect that the aid budget not only maximises impact but also delivers value for money.”

Graham Ward, ICAI Chief Commissioner, added:

“In order to manage the increasing risks presented by DFID’s focus on fragile states, DFID MUST GIVE MORE ATTENTION TO THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION. DFID NEEDS TO INVEST MORE IN ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION RISKS AND A MORE STRATEGIC APPROACH TO TACKLING CORRUPTION PROACTIVELY.’

The Mail said this:

“Figures reveal THE BIGGEST SINGLE AID WINNER WILL BE SOMALIA, which has been riven by civil war for years and is rated THE MOST CORRUPT NATION ON EARTH. Other winners include Burma, Zimbabwe and Yemen, all of which will receive double-digit percentage rises.”

That’s where our billions are being squandered, folks.

Out there in ‘the most corrupt nation(s) on earth.’ That’s what anyone who voted Tory, Labour or Lib Dem last time round voted for. Seeing as they’re all equally as keen on the Big global foreigner-first Game.



On 22 November 2011, The Daily Mail quoted prosecuting cousel, Stuart Lody, thus:

“The court may be astonished to know the BRITISH AUTHORITIES HAD NO WAY OF KNOWING IF A FOREIGN NATIONAL CONVICTED OF MURDER IS IN THE COUNTRY UNTIL THAT PERSON IS CHARGED UNDER AN ENGLISH LAW AND THEY CAN DO A CHECK. Lincolnshire Police had no idea a man such as this was living among the good people of Boston.”

Judge Sean Morris replied:

“I am not surprised… Members of the jury, WELCOME TO OUR WORLD.”

No, Sean, welcome to OURS!

The Mail explained:

“Police had ‘no idea’ an Eastern European axe murderer was living in the country until he killed an innocent woman while drink-driving. LATVIAN INTARS PLESS, 34, CAME TO BRITAIN LAST YEAR AFTER SERVING SIX YEARS FOR MURDERING A FRIEND. But THE AUTHORITIES WERE UNAWARE OF HIS CRIMINAL PAST UNTIL FEBRUARY THIS YEAR WHEN HE RAN HIS CAR STRAIGHT INTO VALENTINA PLANCIUNENE. He then drove away from the scene – leaving the 37-year-old moped rider from Belarus to die on the road in Boston, Lincolnshire...

The court heard that Miss Planciunene took safety very seriously and had been wearing a white helmet and a fluorescent yellow coat. She was knocked into an oncoming people carrier by Pless, WHO WAS DRIVING WHILE TWO-AND-A-HALF TIMES OVER THE LIMIT AFTER DRINKING WHISKY ALL NIGHT.

A year earlier, Pless had been released from a Latvian prison after serving time for his murderous attack on a drinking companion. He slashed the man with an axe, fatally slicing through his jugular vein, then tried to destroy the evidence by setting fire to the house where the crime was committed.

Previously, he had been sentenced to three years’ jail for a serious theft in Latvia. But DESPITE THESE OFFENCES, AS AN EU NATIONAL HE WAS ABLE TO COME TO THE UK WITH ONLY MINIMAL CHECKS...

The ‘free movement’ directive means it is virtually impossible to stop EU citizens with criminal convictions from entering Britain.”

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is globalism.

A concept that the elite and the immigrants love and the rest of us detest.



On 22 November 2011, InsideIreland.ie quoted Councillor Darren Scully, the Mayor of Naas, Co Kildare, thus:

“I HAVE BEEN MET WITH AGGRESSIVENESS AND BAD MANNERS. I HAVE ALSO BEEN MET WITH THE RACE CARD, with people saying ‘Oh yeah, you will help white people, but you don’t help black people’... So after a while I made a decision that I WAS JUST NOT GOING TO TAKE ON REPRESENTATIONS FROM BLACK AFRICANS!”

Way to go, Darren!

Say it how it is, why don't you? My guess is poor, old plain speaking Darren will be looking for another job shortly.



On 21 November 2011, David Willets, the Universities Minister and architect of the new tuition fees system, justified his creation thus:

“It's not like leaving with £25,000 on your credit card or something. If someone said your child was leaving university with £25,000 on a credit card, you'd be quite rightly horrified. If someone said they're leaving university and during their working lives they're going to pay half a million pounds of income tax, you'd be completely relaxed. And our graduate repayment scheme is closer to, it's not exactly the same, but it's closer to the income tax end of the scale than the credit card end of the scale.

It's a graduate repayment scheme that has many of the features of income tax. IT'S NOT LIKE SOME DEBT AROUND THEIR NECKS.”

Leave university owing £70,000 and ‘it’s not like some debt around their necks?’

Not for the son or daughter of a Tory millionaire, perhaps, but for your average working-class youngster living in the real world?

They would, I’m sure, beg to differ.



On 21 November 2011, the mother of a Leeds girl, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"Everyone failed her. There was no sharing of information. 'They (police) had the names and knew where they (abusers) worked yet THE MEN WHO DID THIS HAVE NEVER ONCE BEEN ARRESTED OR SPOKEN TO BY THE POLICE.“

The Mail added:

"Government has finally answered the call to protect vulnerable children in danger of sexual exploitation… The news comes amid a devastating report into the failures of police and care agencies to protect teenage girls who have been groomed, raped and sold by male gangs, MOST OF WHOM ARE ASIAN...

Other caregivers have also suggested that POLITICAL SENSITIVITIES ARE TO BLAME FOR A NEAR PARALYSIS OF THE SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO KEEP CHILDREN SAFE...

At 13, the teen from Keighley, West Yorkshire, was given a laptop and quickly became addicted to Facebook. Her father was then warned HIS DAUGHTER WAS SPENDING A LOT OF TIME WITH OLDER ASIAN MEN. ONE EVEN TOLD THE FATHER HE WOULD 'SLIT HIS THROAT' when he answered the phone to him...

Josie started disappearing overnight and began drinking. Yet, WHEN HER FATHER LOCKED HIS DAUGHTER IN HER ROOM TO PROTECT HER, IT WAS HE WHO GOT INTO TROUBLE WITH THE POLICE for false imprisonment…

'The police kept saying THAT THEY'RE WAITING UNTIL JOSIE REALISES IT'S WRONG,' he said. 'Is that really the best they can do?

When the father of 14-year-old Charlotte looked at his daughter's Facebook profile, he discovered 'loads of male, Asian friends.' Concerned, he started to restrict his daughter's activities… He tracked down all the names and addresses of her friends he believed were involved and passed them on to police. Meanwhile her school was reporting Charlotte had begun arriving looking 'dirty and extremely thin'. She was going missing for days at a time…

By October last year she 'admitted she has slept with different Asian males.' The police told Charlotte's father THEY HOPED TO TAKE ACTION against the men. THAT WAS 17 MONTHS AGO AND HE IS STILL WAITING.

'There's no will to deal with this issue in Keighley' he said. 'WHAT CHANCE HAVE THESE KIDS GOT IF THAT'S THE ATTITUDE OF THE POLICE?'…

Police and care agencies often say that they cannot take action against suspects without the victim's co-operation. However, a 2008 protocol established by the force and West Yorkshire's five local authorities states: 'ADULTS INVOLVED IN CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION... SHOULD BE TREATED AS CHILD SEX ABUSERS AND SUBJECTED TO THE FULL RIGOUR OF THE CRIMINAL LAW.'

Nicola is the only case in six who was groomed by a gang of white men. The abuse began when she was 12 after a visit to Leeds from her family home in Bradford. Nicola had thought they were 'really nice people' but by 13 she was doing drugs - 'everything but heroin'.

She was raped twice. The first time she was 'drugged up to the eyeballs' and remembers being dragged into a bedroom and gang raped. Afterwards her mother took Nicola to the police station, only to be told that 'WE DON'T DEAL WITH THAT HERE'. In desperation Nicola's mother took her daughter to New Zealand and away from the gang…

As well as the gang rape case of the girl in Leeds, five new cases have been highlighted by The Times' investigation. NO ONE HAS BEEN PROSECUTED FOR SEX EXPLOITATION IN ANY OF THEM… One was groomed by white students, but IN ALL THE OTHER CASES, THE PERPETRATORS WERE ASIAN, MOSTLY OF PAKISTANI ORIGIN.

This pattern of ABUSE AT THE HANDS OF MALE ASIAN GANGS in the West Yorkshire area has been highlighted before, BUT NEVER FORMALLY ACKNOWLEDGED.

In January the Asian ringleaders of a gang in Derby, who brought a ‘reign of terror’ to a city’s streets, targeting and grooming young girls for horrific sexual abuse, were jailed. Abid Saddique and Mohammed Liaqat were told they would serve a minimum of 11 years and eight years respectively.”



On 21 November 2011, The Daily Mail told us that ‘the agent of Labour MP Chris Bryant has been imprisoned after he was caught with A HUGE STASH OF 'THE MOST SERIOUS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY POLICE HAVE EVER SEEN'.’


The Mail then quoted Judge John Curran thus:

“THIS IS NOT A VICTIMLESS CRIME. SMALL CHILDREN ARE SUBJECTED TO THE MOST APPALLING ABUSE FOR THESE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS TO BE MADE. Anyone who is TWISTED ENOUGH TO TAKE PART IN THIS ACTIVITY is going to be severely dealt with... This has been ONE OF THE LARGEST NUMBER OF IMAGES AND MOVIES I'VE EVER HAD TO DEAL WITH.”

The Mail added:

“Stephen Carnell, who was A CHAIRMAN ON A PRIMARY SCHOOL BOARD OF GOVERNORS in Mr Bryant's south Wales constituency, was sentenced to three years in jail. The 58-year-old was found with 12,130 PORNOGRAPHIC IMAGES, AS WELL AS MATERIAL SHOWING SADISM AND BESTIALITY…

He had worked as a LABOUR COUNCILLOR in Tonypandy in Rhondda and also SAT ON THE BOARD AT ANOTHER SCHOOL…

Carnell began downloading paedophilic images eight years ago - and became obsessed with the 'disturbing and appalling' scenes... David Pugh, prosecuting… said: 'HE WAS ALSO DISTRIBUTING THE IMAGES THROUGH INTERNET FILE-SHARING TO SWAP WITH OTHER PAEDOPHILES.'

The prosecutor said many of the images were of THE MOST SERIOUS CATEGORY’… He said Carnell had admitted to being 'sexually interested in both male and female images on his computer'…

THERE WERE 12,130 IMAGES AND 453 FILMS OF PAEDOPHILIA SHOWING THE ABUSE OF BABIES AS YOUNG AS 12 MONTHS AS WELL AS BOYS AND GIRLS UP TO THE AGE OF 11.”



On 21 November 2001, The Daily Mail quoted Charlie Mullins, founder of Pimlico Plumbers, thus:

“WE’RE INCREASINGLY EMPLOYING FOREIGN WORKERS. They have the right attitude and are prepared to work harder. The younger British generation who come in for interviews are often sent by the benefit people and have no desire for work. They feel as if the country owes them a living.”

He also said that the British would “rather be footballers than do an honest day’s work.”

The Mail added:

“Last week the Office for National Statistics revealed that the number of British-born workers had fallen by 311,000 in a year, equal to more than 850 a day. In the same period, the number of foreign employees jumped by 181,000, or 495 a day.”

With a never-ending succession of foreigner-first governments and Brit-despising businessmen like Charlie Mullins in charge, the unfortunate statistics quoted have become the norm.

If the British ever get to wanting their country back from those who stole it, it’s not just the foreigners who are going to have to push off, they’ll have to ditch the unpatriotic fat cats and politicians as well.



On 21 November 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Colin Barrow, Leader of Westminster Council, thus:

"After four years of work supposedly improving migration estimates, the ONS apparently still has little idea how many migrants are in this country or where they live and work. Our incoming migrant population appears to have dropped by 17 per cent over four years; you only have to go out into the bars and restaurants in the West End to see that MIGRANTS COME TO WESTMINSTER TO LIVE AND WORK IN MUCH GREATER NUMBERS THAN THIS.

We would seriously question the estimate that fewer than 4,000 migrants came to Westminster in the 2009 financial year to seek work. We have seen more people registering with doctors and paying council tax in Westminster, so WE FAIL TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE GOVERNMENT STATISTICIANS CAN BE SO WRONG.”

The Mail added:

“Hundreds of thousands of migrants have ‘disappeared’ at the stroke of a pen under A NEW OFFICIAL COUNTING SYSTEM. The method has led to apparent large falls in the numbers of migrants thought to live in London and other major cities. The change has provoked fury among council leaders who say THE IMMIGRANT POPULATIONS OF THEIR DISTRICTS HAVE BEEN GROSSLY UNDERESTIMATED BY GOVERNMENT STATISTICIANS.

Westminster and Kensington in London, Manchester, Bristol, Oxford and Cambridge are among places thought to have had their ESTIMATED POPULATIONS REDUCED BY MANY THOUSANDS by the Office for National Statistics.”

The ONS has fixed the stats on behalf of its paymasters, Colin.

Or, to put it another way, ‘government statisticians' have ‘grossly underestimated… the immigrant populations of their districts’ in order to make the Conservative ‘government’ look as though they are making good on their Manisfesto pledge to do something about immigration.



After three Asian peers were banned from Parliament in the wake of the expenses scandal, Labour peer Lord Alli hired human rights lawyer, Imran Khan, to review the Privileges and Conduct Committee judgement.


He said:

“Something is not right about the way these three peers were treated. There were at least 12 members of the House of Lords who were accused of abusing their second home allowances. Yet only these three were singled out to be disciplined. Look at them. ALL THREE ARE ASIAN. It does not look right. This process was flawed.

At one point, when Lady Uddin was before the sub-committee she was reduced to tears by the questioning. She excused herself, and went to the lavatory, but within three minutes they were bashing on the door demanding she come out… I felt I had no choice but to ask Imran Khan to conduct an independent review.”

Racism then, bound to be.

Baron Waheed Alli used to be an investment banker, he set up the Planet 24 broadcasting company with Bob Geldof, no less and he’s a multi-millionaire who was ennobled by Tony Blair at the tender age of 34! And besides, he’s a gay Muslim! Whoever such a fabulous New World Order pin up boy accuses of racism simply must be a Fascist, Nazi, racist, bigot!

One member of the undoubtedly racist Privileges and Conduct Committee, Tanzanian-born Lord Dholakia, a former president of the Lib Dems and, for 25 years, head of the Commission for Racial Equality, responded thus:

“I reject any suggestion that race played a role in the deliberations of the relevant committees and House officials. I have spent almost 30 years in the race relations industry. It is unthinkable I would be involved in anything that smacks of racism.”

P*** off, Adolf!

B*gger off back to Bavaria where you belong!

The sanctions against Lady Uddin, Lord Paul and Lord Bhatia were the most draconian imposed upon peers of the realm in 300 years.



On 20 November 2011, at a meeting of the Socialist Education Association, a group formed in the 1920s for left-wing, Labour-supporting teachers, Patrick Roach, Deputy General Decretary of the NASUWT, said this:


"The Education Act is a crime against humanity, a smash and grab raid that will tear apart our schools and our communities."

A ‘crime against humanity’, Pat? What you mean like what Israel does to the Palestinians? Or we and the Yanks did to the Iraqis and are still doing to the Afghans? Like what the Hutus did to the Tutsis in Rwanda? Or Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Kaganovitch and co did to the people of Eastern Europe in the 1920s and 30s?

Nicking a bit off your pension in tough times like these is a ‘crime against humanity’? Really? Bit strong that, don’t you think? Bit over the top?

Never mind.

Roache’s comment came the day after his union successfully urged its members to strike over proposed changes to their pension schemes.



On 20 November 2011, John Cridland, Director General of the CBI, was seen saying this on BBC News:

“We need a skilled workforce. We don’t want people scarred by unemployment in the early years of their lives. THIS IS AS MUCH A MORAL AND SOCIAL QUESTION AS AN ECONOMIC ONE.

It has really impressed me that at a time when business has got its back to the wall, at a time it could be forgiven for thinking just about paying the wages of those already in work, it is really worried about teenage unemployment.

Think back to the riots in the summer, think back to what happened in the Eighties, and business is saying, ‘Youth unemployment is something we must not let get out of hand.’

If we gave employers £1,500 as a cash subsidy to take on a 16-year-old, THEY MIGHT TAKE ON A 16-YEAR-OLD WITH LACK OF WORK EXPERIENCE AND SOMETIMES POOR QUALIFICATIONS RATHER THAN A MIGRANT WORKER or a mature worker who has got those skills. So let’s get that young person up the beauty parade, LET’S GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO GET A JOB TODAY, NOT IN FIVE YEARS.”

Unbelievable!

A businessman who seems to be on the side of the British. Wonders will never cease.



On 13 November 2011, Simon Walters and Glen Owen said this in The Sunday Mail:

“Tony Blair is facing questions after ONE OF HIS CHARITIES LAUNCHED A BID TO GRAB A SLICE OF BRITAIN'S £8BILLION FOREIGN AID BUDGET. His organisation has taken the first steps to become eligible for grants awarded by the Department for International Development to rebuild war-torn countries.

The highly sensitive move has prompted concerns over a possible conflict of interest with Mr Blair's complex business dealings. OF HIS ESTIMATED £7M-A-YEAR EARNINGS, ABOUT £2M COMES FROM MERCHANT BANK JP MORGAN, WHICH HAS MAJOR INTERESTS IN MANY OF THE COUNTRIES RECEIVING BRITISH AID...

Blair's charity has applied to join the tendering process for the Department for International Development (DfID) 'security and governance' scheme, which undertakes 'peace-building' work in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan. The remit has raised eyebrows given THE FORMER PREMIER'S DISASTROUS DECISION TO BACK THE IRAQ WAR.”



On 13 November 2011, senior Tory MP and former Colonel, Patrick Mercer, was quoted thus by The Sunday People, as he attended the annual party of The London Magazine:

“If the Prime Minister expresses his utmost confidence in you that means pack your bags. It always has done, especially with Cameron...

I THINK HE’S THE WORST POLITICIAN IN BRITISH HISTORY… HE’S A MOST DESPICABLE CREATURE WITHOUT ANY REAL REDEEMING FEATURES. If I can think of one ... he’s very rich, how’s that? That’s a redeeming feature.

WE’LL SACK HIM… WE’LL GET RID OF HIM… IF I DON’T KILL HIM… I probably will out of fun... I’ve never, ever come across anyone less suited to the job in my life. I would take a beggar off the streets and put him in that position rather than have Cameron. I loathe him...

WHY ARE OUR SOLDIERS DYING IN AFGHANISTAN. TELL ME WHY? Broadly, our soldiers are in Afghanistan and Pakistan so the countries don’t fall to bits… We shouldn’t have backed them at all (‘shouldn’t have backed’ New Labour’s call for the invasion of Afghanistan) ... CAMERON WAS AN ARSE. THAT’S A MATTER OF FACT, NOT POLITICS…

He’ll go in the Spring. He’ll resign in the Spring.”

Fingers crossed, Patrick.

And then? Mercer for PM? He’s an impolitic fool for letting the sauce loosen his tongue to such an extent but his passion, honest acknowledment that our troops should not be in Afghanistan and thoroughgoing dislike of the Blair clone deserves the utmost commendation.



On 12 November 2011, Tim Lee, a former intelligence officer with the Serious Organised Crime Agency, (Tony Blair’s answer to the FBI) blew the whistle thus in The Daily Mail:

“When SOCA opened for business the directors made bold statements about how they were going to tackle a ’list’ of top crime barons. In my time, they went after three who weren’t even on the top tier AND GAVE UP ON ALL OF THEM BECAUSE THEY FELL INTO THE ‘TOO DIFFICULT’ BOX…

Security was always an issue. Eventually, the operation was passed to a senior intelligence officer… He was understood to have employed tradesmen also used by the subject of the operation… He fought hard to take charge of the investigation… WITHIN A SHORT TIME OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THIS SIO AND DESPITE A WEALTH OF INTELLIGENCE, ACTIVE CONNECTIONS TO VERY SERIOUS CRIMINALS AND THE CORRUPTION CONCERNS, THE OPERATION WAS WOUND UP…

If you needed to run any surveillance, it went to a committee where they talked and discussed the purpose but NOTHING WAS EVER DECIDED IN TIME.”

The Mail’s Robert Verkaik added:

“The Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) is supposed to be Britain’s answer to the FBI. When it was launched, TONY BLAIR PLEDGED THE ORGANISATION WOULD ‘MAKE LIFE HELL’ FOR THE COUNTRY’S ‘MR BIGS’.

It recruited from the cream of the police, immigration, customs and MI5 and had more than 4,000 staff in offices all over the world. But Tim Lee, a former intelligence officer with SOCA, claims the agency has been blighted by corruption and bureaucracy…

Mr Lee claims that an investigation into a suspected Nottingham crime boss in 2007 was halted because THE SUSPECT MAY HAVE HAD CONTACTS INSIDE SOCA... The alleged criminal was named in a tape played at an inquest of a murdered man who alleged that THE BUSINESSMAN HAD USED HIS CONTACTS IN THE POLICE TO RUN A DRUG-DEALING EMPIRE… The officer, who owns properties in Nottingham, has since left SOCA and IS NOW BELIEVED TO BE IN AFRICA…

In one case, a female SOCA officer made an allegation of serious sexual misconduct against a male colleague... When the female officer complained of ‘inappropriate sexual behaviour’, SHE WAS PERMANENTLY TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER SOCA DIRECTORATE...

BULLYING AND ABUSE CLAIMS WERE NOT PROPERLY INVESTIGATED, AND WHEN OFFICERS SPOKE OUT THEY WERE VICTIMISED…

Mr Lee describes SOCA as AN ‘UNACCOUNTABLE, SECRETIVE ORGANISATION’… He says that in one recruitment exercise, A WHITE ACTOR ‘BLACKED’ UP AS THE SUSPECT…

He also claims that the former head of SOCA, Bill Hughes, had complained about officers who took part in ‘industrial tourism’, spending weeks following the drug routes into Britain. ‘For example, THEY WOULD FLY OUT TO TURKEY AND THEN SPEND WEEKS DRIVING BACK THROUGH EUROPE ON A SORT OF EXTENDED HOLIDAY,’ he says.”

Another Tony Blair disaster.

Is anyone out there surprised?



On 12 November 2011, Dr Peter Lee, an army Chaplain during the Iraq War said this in The Daily Mail:

“I was a military chaplain at The Princess Mary’s Hospital, RAF Akrotiri, in Cyprus... I spent my days as part of the medical and welfare network providing support to wounded and injured soldiers who only hours earlier had been engaged in battle as the American and British-led Coalition stormed into Iraq...

During the initial invasion of Iraq, questions were asked of me every day by those whose lives were now scarred or maimed, mentally as well as physically: Should I have fought? How do I live with myself? Will my partner still love me with my injury? These questions will be asked over and over again on a daily basis, possibly for ever, by those whose limbs are missing, by those whose faces will cause others to turn away in the street and by those whose relationships have ended or are altered.

Perhaps most discomfiting were the questions about Blair and Christianity, the myth that Tony Blair did not ‘do God’ has long since been recognised as a presentational fabrication, and how that squared with the way he sent troops off to war. Several soldiers seemed surprised when I did not offer the then Prime Minister the unequivocal support they somehow expected me to give. Furthermore, in recent years, to the many questions I have already mentioned has been added another, often by people who initially supported military action in 2003: Why did I go along with it?…

For months before the outbreak of war I was unconvinced by Blair’s arguments, though at the time my focus was on supporting those who had no choice about whether or not they would be going to fight, and the anxious families that would be left behind. To this day it is impossible for me to forget the look in one young mother’s eyes at the instant she learned that she was now a widow, that her children no longer had a father and that his body would be returned to her in a flag-draped coffin…

In light of all that I have seen and done and all the human miseries I have encountered, my suspicions are quickly aroused whenever I come across anyone using or abusing religious or moral imperatives for their own ends. Whether that person is a corrupt televangelist, a misguided Al Qaeda suicide bomber or an opportunist politician…

I have analysed Blair’s words and actions meticulously, never quite able to separate them from THE WHIFF OF HYPOCRISY AND INSINCERITY. I followed the Hutton and Butler inquiries into intentionally narrow aspects of the war with interest and read carefully what legal experts and political commentators had to say about the procedures and policies that were followed in taking Britain to war… For Blair, the legal, political and procedural issues were all subsumed within the real basis of his case for war: HIS PERSONAL MORAL IMPERATIVE, FUELLED BY AN UNSHAKEABLE BELIEF IN HIS OWN RECTITUDE.

A distinct pattern emerged in the final months leading up to the invasion of Iraq. Blair’s legal case, based on Iraq holding weapons of mass destruction, was disintegrating rapidly as UN weapons inspectors repeatedly came up empty-handed at the high-value sites to which they were directed by British and American intelligence agencies. In an attempt to win public support HE BEGAN TO RELY ON MORAL ARGUMENTS, part of what his office called a ‘Rolls-Royce information campaign’ to convince a sceptical public. However, FROM HIS DISTORTION OF THE ANCIENT PRINCIPLES OF THE CHRISTIAN ‘JUST WAR’ TRADITION IN HIS ARGUMENTS, TO KEEPING HIS OWN CABINET MEMBERS IN THE DARK, TO SENDING SOLDIERS INTO BATTLE ILL-EQUIPPED BECAUSE OF HIS UNWILLINGNESS TO ALLOW THE ARMED FORCES TO PREPARE EARLY AND THOROUGHLY ENOUGH, BLAIR’S WORDS AND ACTIONS WERE, CONTRARY TO HIS INSISTENCE, THE ANTITHESIS OF MORAL...

In most cases he is damned by his own inconsistencies. Take, for example, the matter of regime change. Setting out his interventionist policy in 1999 he stated: ‘Intervention to bring down a despotic dictatorial regime could be justified on grounds of the nature of that regime, not merely its immediate threat to our self-interests.’ However, in January this year he contradicted that earlier view: ‘Well, again as I have said many, many times on this, the nature of the regime could not justify in itself the intervention.’ THESE ARE TWO UTTERLY OPPOSING POSITIONS ON REGIME CHANGE…

In desperation Blair increasingly incorporated into his speeches language that sits at the heart of his Christian faith: good versus evil. His remarkably simplistic reasoning can be summed up as: I am good; Saddam is evil; if you, the listener, are good you will support my fight against that evil. Correspondingly, ANYONE WHO DID NOT SUPPORT BLAIR WAS, BY THIS LOGIC, SIDING WITH EVIL, a divisive approach that has been used by leaders throughout history to increase the flammability of political discourse.

On September 11, 2001, as New York’s Twin Towers smouldered where they fell, Blair committed himself and Britain to this battle: ‘We, therefore, here in Britain stand shoulder to shoulder with our American friends in this hour of tragedy, and we, like them, will not rest until this evil is driven from our world.’ He would subsequently state in 2003: ‘Our ultimate weapon is not our guns, but our beliefs.’

Blair’s only real consistency over the years has been his response to the various pseudo-judicial inquiries that have taken place since 2003: that HE DID THE RIGHT THING...

HE NOW OPERATES A HIGHLY LUCRATIVE MONEY-MAKING MACHINE…

The brief examples I have presented here… expose BLAIR’S MORAL BASIS FOR THE IRAQ WAR FOR WHAT IT IS: AN ILLUSION…

If a British Prime Minister sends our Armed Forces into battle without a compelling and immediate moral case, AS BLAIR DID IN IRAQ, THE VALUES OF OUR SOCIETY ARE VIOLATED AS SURELY AS THE BROKEN BODIES OF THOSE SOLDIERS I wept over back in that military hospital. THE BONDS OF TRUST THAT NECESSARILY EXIST BETWEEN GOVERNMENT, THE PEOPLE AND THOSE WHO BEAR ARMS TO PROTECT THEM ARE UNDONE.

On this Remembrance Sunday we recall the selfless sacrifices made by generations of military men and women – past and present – to bequeath to us the freedoms and peace we enjoy today. We can best pay tribute to their sacrifices by ensuring that IN THE FUTURE NO BRITISH SAILOR, SOLDIER, MARINE OR AIRMAN IS ASKED TO LAY DOWN THEIR LIFE EXCEPT FOR THE MOST URGENT AND HONOURABLE OF CAUSES.”



On 11 November 2011, Channel 4 News told us this:

“A US army sergeant is convicted by court martial of murdering unarmed civilians and cutting fingers from their corpses as ringleader of a rogue platoon in Afghanistan's Kandahar province.

The guilty verdict on all counts, returned after five hours of deliberations, carried an automatic life prison sentence, but the five-member jury panel then decided that Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs, 26, would be eligible for parole in eight and a half years.

Pentagon officials have said the misconduct exposed by the case, which evolved from a probe of drug abuse within Gibbs' Stryker Brigade infantry unit, damaged the image of the United States around the globe.

Photographs entered as evidence in the case showed Gibbs and other soldiers casually posing with bloodied Afghan corpses, drawing comparisons with the inflammatory Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal in Iraq in 2004...

Military prosecutor Major Dre Leblanc argued against parole, reminding the panel that Gibbs had often said of the Afghan people he terrorised: ‘These people are all savages, look at how they live.’

Gibbs was convicted on three counts of premeditated murder in the slayings of Afghan villagers last year that were disguised as legitimate combat engagements. Prosecutors said he acted as the chief instigator behind those killings and other assaults by members of his self-described ‘kill team.’

Besides charges of murder, conspiracy and other offences, he was found guilty of beating a soldier who reported hashish use to superiors and of military code violations for cutting fingers off bodies as war trophies… Prosecution witnesses portrayed Gibbs as a blood-thirsty renegade who intimidated fellow soldiers and harbored a deep, ethnic hatred of the very people US troops were sent to protect from Taliban forces.”

The Great Satan at work.



On 10 November 2011, Tom Watson, MP, put these questions to James Murdoch, son of Rupert and Chairman of News International, when he appeared before the Home Affairs select committee:

“Have you ever heard the term omerta? The Mafia term that they use for the code of silence?… Would you agree that it means a group of people who are bound together by secrecy who together pursue their group’s business objectives, with no regard for the law, using intimidation, corruption and general criminality? WOULD YOU AGREE WITH ME THAT THIS IS AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF NEWS INTERNATIONAL IN THE UK?…

THERE ARE ALLEGATIONS OF PHONE HACKING, COMPUTER HACKING, CONSPIRING TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, PERJURY FACING THIS COMPANY and all this happened without your knowledge?"

He added:

“MR MURDOCH, YOU MUST BE THE FIRST MAFIA BOSS IN HISTORY WHO DIDN’T KNOW HE WAS RUNNING A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.”



On 10 November 2011, The President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, said that if the euro area or the wider 27-country EU broke apart 'it will jeopardise the future prosperity of the next generation.'

He added:

“That is the threat that hangs over us. And it is that threat that guides our commitment to resolving the situation in Greece and elsewhere - provided that those countries play their part as well.

The EU does not promise paradise, but it is… the single greatest achievement of our time. Our best means to use the crisis as AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CREATIVITY OUT OF DESTRUCTION…

The challenge is HOW TO FURTHER DEEPEN EURO-AREA INTEGRATION… The world needs a stronger Europe: MORE EUROPE, NOT LESS… POPULISM AND SOMETIMES EVEN NATIONALISM RAISES ITS HEAD ACROSS OUR CONTINENT, claiming that too much Europe is the cause of our current difficulties; claiming that less Europe, or even non-Europe would bring solutions…

This is ignoring the global realities as well as our common history that teaches us that this continent is simply too small and too INTERDEPENDENT for us to stand apart. To turn our backs to each other…

All responsible leaders must now make the case for Europe. Make the case for STRENGTH THROUGH UNITY. We must engage our citizens in an honest and frank debate about Europe…

We must show our citizens what is at stake. WE MUST CHOOSE THE PATH OF STRENGTH OVER WEAKNESS. UNITY OVER FRAGMENTATION…

We are witnessing fundamental changes to the economic and geopolitical order that have convinced me that EUROPE NEEDS TO ADVANCE NOW TOGETHER or risk fragmentation. Europe must either transform itself or it will decline. We are in a defining moment where WE EITHER UNITE OR FACE IRRELEVANCE…

Just as the founding fathers had a vision of Europe after two devastating world wars, we must also now act with resilience and with vision towards a Europe that is strong but open… Now is Germany’s time to show that it is fighting the cause of a strong, INTEGRATED and competitive Europe.”

Proper little Portuguese threatener, isn't he?

In his younger day, Barroso, was a leader of a Maoist group, calling itself (the Communist Party of the Portuguese Workers/Revolutionary Movement of the Portuguese Proletariat).

That's what's been our boss since 2004.



On 10 November 2011, Kirsty Walker said this in The Daily Mail:


"Almost 200,000 people were granted a disability benefit last year without ever having a face-to-face assessment.

A staggering 94 per cent of new claimants for Disability Living Allowance started receiving their payments after only filling out paperwork.
Official figures released last night revealed that 16 per cent of new claimants received the benefit – worth £70 a week – after merely filling out a claim form."



On 10 November 2011, The Daily Mail told us that 'ministers have been told to expect Israeli military action' against Iraq and quoted a ‘senior Foreign Office figure’ thus:

“We’re expecting something as early as Christmas, or very early in the new year.”

The Mail added:

“ISRAEL WILL LAUNCH MILITARY ACTION to prevent Iran developing a nuclear weapon as soon as Christmas, intelligence chiefs have warned… Sources say the understanding at the top of the British Government is that ISRAEL WILL ATTEMPT TO STRIKE AGAINST THE NUCLEAR SITES ‘SOONER RATHER THAN LATER’, WITH LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FROM THE US…

Officials believe President Barack OBAMA WOULD HAVE TO SUPPORT THE ISRAELIS OR RISK LOSING VITAL JEWISH-AMERICAN SUPPORT IN THE NEXT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.”

Oh yes.

Jewish support for a second Presidential term is much more important than lighting the blue, nuclear touch paper of World War III.



On 9 November 2011, after telling us that ‘THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN, SOME AS YOUNG AS FIVE, BEING PRESCRIBED POWERFUL ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS HAS DOUBLED IN THE PAST 10 YEARS, Channel 4 News quoted Professor Tim Kendall thus:

"As far as I am aware THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THERE HAS BEEN A DOUBLING IN THE RATE OF PSYCHOSIS. SO IF THERE IS A DOUBLING IN THE RATE OF CHILDREN BEING GIVEN ANTI-PSYCHOTICS, THAT IS A WORRY…

MY WORRY IS THAT THESE DRUGS ARE BEING USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES.”

When Professor Kendall asked America's Food and Drug Administration for data on trials conducted on anti-psychotics, instead of it being handed over, he was told to put in a freedom of information request. His response was as follows:

"I am appalled, absolutely appalled. This data should be available for people such as us who are working on behalf of the NHS, patients and parents… If there are trials that are unpublished, what that means is there will either be trials which show the drugs work as well as we think or in fact they might be even more harmful than we think.”

Victoria McDonald, Health and Social Care Correspondent at Channel 4, added:

“As many as 15,000 CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE UNDER THE AGE OF 18 WERE PRESCRIBED THIS MEDICATION LAST YEAR. But these figures are only from GP surgeries and primary care trusts and do not include hospital prescribing, which suggests THE TRUE NUMBER COULD BE FAR HIGHER. Astonishingly, NO OFFICIAL DATA IS KEPT ON THE NUMBER OF YOUNGSTERS BEING GIVEN ANTI-PSYCHOTICS…

The government announced that GPs could face jail if they are found to be ‘chemically coshing’ elderly patients with dementia. But no mention was made of children and young people in the announcements. Anti-psychotics are meant for patients with serious mental conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and psychosis. But mental health experts now say that THEY WOULD ALSO APPEAR, IN SOME INSTANCES, TO BE BEING USED TO CONTROL CHILDREN'S BEHAVIOUR.

The investigation also found CHILDREN ARE BEING LEFT ON THE DRUGS FOR YEARS AT A TIME AND ARE NOT BEING PROPERLY MONITORED…

What is also alarming experts is that these drugs are being used for the wrong reasons. While nobody disputed that they are sometimes needed and can, indeed, save lives, there is the fear that TOO OFTEN THEY ARE BEING USED AS A CHEMICAL COSH.”



On 9 November 2011, Jeremy Warner said this in The Telegraph:

"Outside a few diehard zealots, IT’S HARD TO FIND ANYONE OF SOUND MIND WHO NOW THINKS THAT THE SINGLE CURRENCY WAS A GOOD IDEA...

A eurozone implosion would amount to THE BIGGEST BANKRUPTCY IN HISTORY... Banking systems would collapse, credit would dry up, and world trade would go into freefall. The consequences would be felt everywhere... BUT FOR BRITAIN, WHICH IS ON THE FRONT LINE, IT WOULD BE MUCH WORSE."

Ain't globalism grand?

Ain't the globalists, who always knew so much better and saw so much further, even grander? Rest assured, ladies and gentlemen, whatever the future holds for us, THEY will still have their well stocked bunkers to fall back on.

Cancel the debts, all of them, (except those of the bankers and politicians) at the same time, and start again. Making sure that the bunker-bound stay where they are.



George Taylor, 83, was admitted to Chase Farm Hospital in August 2011.

On 9 November 2011, his daughter, Gaynor Marshall, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

“On one occasion during his time on the ward dad was sat in a chair by his bed and needed the toilet. He asked a nurse to assist him, but was told that SHE WAS TOO BUSY AND THAT IT WOULD BE EASIER FOR HER IF DAD RELIEVED HIS BOWELS IN THE CHAIR. She promised to clean it up later… My mother… discovered dad sat beside his bed, quite literally, SITTING IN HIS OWN FAECES. What makes matters worse is that THE NURSE DIDN'T COME AND CLEAN DAD UP AS PROMISED…

For most of his time on the ward dad, who previously always looked after his appearance and hygiene, was not given a wash or a shave. Over time the smell around his bed became overpowering. On another day I noticed a strong smell coming from my father's cupboard. When I investigated the source of the smell, I FOUND A PAIR OF URINE SODDEN PYJAMAS STUFFED AT THE BOTTOM.

Dad was an insulin dependent diabetic. However, despite this we never felt his insulin levels were monitored properly, and as a result of this we believe that he didn't receive the right amount of insulin throughout his time in hospital. NURSES WERE OFTEN VERY BRUSQUE WITH HIM, and would carry out medical procedures without either asking for his permission or telling him what they were doing.”

The Mail added:

"Last year, a joint campaign with the Mail and the Patients Association triggered hospital inspections by the Care Quality Commission, which last month reported that IN A FIFTH OF THEM THE CARE WAS SO BAD THEY WERE BREAKING THE LAW...

One family revealed how THEIR DYING MOTHER WAS TREATED LIKE A ‘SLAB OF MEAT’… Nurses at Central Middlesex Hospital in North London ‘treated her roughly and left her covered in bedsores and bruises’…

In another case at York hospital, Sheila Wood said she believed her husband Bill was sent home on December 22 last year, when he was so breathless from pneumonia he could not speak, TO EASE STAFF WORKLOAD IN THE FESTIVE PERIOD. He died on Christmas Day.

And relatives of Sally Abbott-Sienkiewicz were told by nurses at Glenfield Hospital in Leicester days before her death that she could not have sedatives because SHE ‘WASN’T A PRIORITY’. When they resorted to fetching from home the painkillers prescribed by her GP, THE NURSES CONFISCATED THEM.”

Why would you vote for those who created this nightmare?

Why would you vote for a politician who inflicts it on our loved ones?

There’s a simple answer to these questions: those who are prepared to treat the vulnerable like ‘a slab of meat’ vote. Such voters have been educated to perform poorly and behave badly. They have been educated not to care. Such an education encourages those it educates to elect politicians who perform poorly, behave badly and do not care.



On 9 November 2011, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard said this in The Telegraph:

"One can only guess what is happening in the great global centres of power but it would not surprise me if US President Barack Obama and China's Hu Jintao start to intervene very soon, in unison and with massive diplomatic force. One can imagine joint telephone calls to Chancellor Angela Merkel more or less ordering her country to face up to the implications of THE MONETARY UNION THAT GERMANY ITSELF CREATED AND RAN (BADLY)...

Having followed the German political scene closely for the last five months, it is clear to me that almost the entire German political establishment is out of its depth… lacking in deep understanding of what it has got itself into…

As for the EU authorities with THEIR MAD, CONTRACTIONARY FISCAL AND MONETARY POLICIES in an accelerating slump, they seem to have achieved little by toppling two elected governments in one week… IMMENSE DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE TO DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY.

THE EU PROJECT HAS BECOME BOTH DANGEROUS AND INSANE."



On 8 November 2011, The Daily Mail told us this:

"A teenage ballet dancer was fighting for his life today and feared paralysed from the neck down after being mugged in a street attack. Talented Jack Widdowson, 19, suffered a suspected broken neck in the brutal late-night assault...

Police want to speak to a man described as of mixed race and wearing a white-striped polo shirt with a dark-coloured motif on the left breast, blue jeans and white trainers."



On 8 November 2011, Tory MP, Louise Mensch, said taking class A drugs was a 'natural part of growing up' in The Sunday Times.

She continued:

“It was very damaging and I wish I had not done it. I DO BLAME THEM FOR DISTURBING MY LONG-TERM HAPPINESS. I BLAME DRUG USE IN MY TWENTIES FOR MAKING ME JUMPIER AND MORE NERVOUS THAN I NEEDED TO BE.”

Questioned as to whether she had had a facelift to enhance her looks, Mensch said this:

“My God. Um… OK… I’ve always wondered what I would say the first time somebody asked me this question. And without denying it, I’m going to refuse to answer.”

On 26 August 2008, Judith Woods said this in The Telegraph:

“In 1998, she memorably penned a piece for The Daily Telegraph BULLISHLY FLAGGING UP HER INTENTION TO FIND A HUSBAND IN THE UNITED STATES, where she was pitching scripts, while writing her next book, Venus Envy. Surely the very height of hubris? Not for Bagshawe, who duly bagged Anthony LoCicero, a dashing property developer of Italian origin... They have four properties they rent out in the US, and BAGSHAWE PLANS TO HAVE A TOTAL OF 15 BY THE TIME SHE RETIRES…

With three children, ranging in age from one to five, the couple live in a four-bedroom Georgian cottage in the Northamptonshire village of Lowick.”

On 24 July 2011, in an Anthony Andrews article in The Observer, Mensch characterised LoCicero as ‘A TOUGH GUY FROM THE BRONX’.

Andrews added:

“They separated in 2009. While together, the pair bought a number of apartments to rent in New York, and in an interview she gave in 2003 MENSCH BOASTED OF EARNING ENOUGH RENTAL INCOME TO ‘RETIRE BY THE TIME I'M 35.’ In what may have been a playful aside, she went on to say that ‘passive income’ was everyone's dream. ‘YOU SIT ON YOUR BUTT AND SOMEONE ELSE PAYS YOU MONEY’.”

Bagshawe-Mensch has also said these things:

"I'M PROUD TO SAY I WAS ONCE IN THE LABOUR PARTY… Blair seemed to talk the right talk. But the scales fell from my eyes within months. “

“I'm not embarrassed about the novels I wrote when I was younger.”

Cameron A-lister and ‘chick-lit’ authoress, Louise Bagshawe, who once enternained the notion of converting to Judaism, married Peter Mensch, manager of Metallica, Jimmy Page and the Red Hot Chili Peppers, in June 2011.

He is Jewish.

She would appear to be a Tory gold digger made good.

And a former druggie.



On 8 November 2011, the Labour MP, Frank Field, and the Tory, Nicholas Soames, co-Chairmen of the Cross-Party Group on Balanced Migration, issued a joint statement in The Telegraph:

This said, in part:

“The latest projections show that our population will reach… 70 million figure in just 16 years. TWO THIRDS OF THE INCREASE, EQUIVALENT TO FIVE MILLION PEOPLE, WILL COME FROM FUTURE IMMIGRANTS AND THEIR CHILDREN. To put that in perspective, IT’S THE SAME AS ADDING FIVE CITIES THE SIZE OF BIRMINGHAM, OR 10 NEW BRISTOLS OR MANCHESTERS…

These are not freak figures. They point to a truth that must be faced. Either we bring the level of net immigration sharply down, OR WE ACCEPT THAT OUR POPULATION WILL CONTINUE TO INCREASE AT A RAPID RATE, IN THE TEETH OF STRONG AND GROWING PUBLIC OPPOSITION, PUTTING ENORMOUS PRESSURE ON OUR HOUSING, SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS.

ENGLAND… IS THE MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE… the only places with a denser population are Bangladesh, South Korea, Taiwan and Lebanon…. A RECENT YOUGOV POLL FOUND THAT 80 PER CENT OF PEOPLE IN ENGLAND CONSIDERED THE COUNTRY TO BE CROWDED. A TEXT POLL ON THE BBC LAST SUNDAY FOUND 94 PER CENT AGREEMENT WITH THE PROPOSITION THAT ‘BRITAIN IS FULL’…

IN RECENT YEARS, WE HAVE ADMITTED ABOUT HALF A MILLION NON-EU STUDENTS AND STUDENT VISITORS WITH NO INTERVIEW AT ALL. THE SCOPE FOR ABUSE IS ENORMOUS, and must be tackled…

In order to avoid the population reaching that 70 million, we have to get immigration down to 40,000 a year or less. That will require real political will on behalf of the Government, WHICH SOMETIMES SEEMS TO BE STYMIED BY THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS.”



On 8 November 2011, The Daily Mail told us this:

“A teenage ballet dancer was fighting for his life today - and feared paralysed from the neck down - after being mugged in a street attack. Talented Jack Widdowson, 19, suffered a suspected broken neck in the brutal late-night assault...

Police want to speak to a man described as of MIXED RACE."



On 8 November 2011, the Justice Secretary, Ken Clarke, told the House of Commons that the 'problem' of repatriating foreign prisoners to their countries of origin was 'very serious.'

He added:

“We need to find a way of reducing the foreign prisoner population. At the moment, we have ONLY ONE international bilateral agreement near to conclusion, but we are continuing to work on it, because FOREIGN PRISONERS TAKE UP MORE THAN 10% OF PLACES IN OUR PRISON SYSTEM.”

In other words, ladies and gentlemen, since the Coalition government came to power, not one immigrant jailbird has been deported!

Hey, Ken! I know how you can reduce 'the foreign prisoner population'!

Don’t let them in in the first place!



On 8 November 2011, subsequent to the accusation that the Border Agency was covering up a secret relaxation of immigration controls, the Shadow Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, said this in the House of Commons:

“THE SHREDDERS ARE ON AND THERE IS A BAN ON INTERNAL EMAILS.”

On the same day, The Daily Mail added:

“The Home Secretary admitted that we will never know how many terrorists and criminals entered Britain in the latest borders blunder. Mrs May made the admission yesterday as she explained to MPs her role in the relaxation of controls. The Home Secretary said SHE ORDERED A ‘PILOT’ SCHEME TO WATER DOWN PASSPORT CHECKS IN JULY FOR BRITONS AND OTHER EU NATIONALS WITHOUT TELLING PARLIAMENT.

UP TO FIVE MILLION FOREIGN NATIONALS MAY HAVE ENTERED THE UK DURING THE DOWNGRADE, which applied at every port and airport. It will never be known how many were illegals.”

The Telegraph commented thus the previous day:

“It ill behoves Labour to make such a song and dance about this affair, given that it was the last government that so lost control of our borders that HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE ENTERED THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY AND WILL NEVER BE REMOVED. In the fight against terrorism, our borders are the first line of defence and they need to be as secure as possible. Yet, IN AN UNFORGIVABLE ACT OF NEGLECT, THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION SCARCELY HAD A CLUE ABOUT WHO CAME AND WHO LEFT. Labour’s time in office was characterised by a porous frontier, shambolic administration and abandoned promises. While we may not yet be entirely clear who is to blame for the latest mess, WE CERTAINLY KNOW WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAST ONE.”



On 7 November 2011, Fiona Macrae told us this in The Daily Mail:

"MORE THAN 8,000 PATIENTS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY NHS ERRORS IN 13 YEARS. Some 903 negligence claims involving deaths were made against the Health Service in 2009-10, official figures show – a 300 per cent rise on 1997-98...

THE TRUE NUMBER OF PATIENTS WHO DIED NEEDLESSLY AT THE HANDS OF BUNGLING DOCTORS, NURSES AND AMBULANCE STAFF IS LIKELY TO BE EVEN HIGHER, as not every family will have sued. The period studied includes the NHS’s worst-ever hospital scandal, in which UP TO 1,200 PEOPLE LOST THEIR LIVES BECAUSE MID STAFFORDSHIRE NHS TRUST PUT WHITEHALL TARGETS AND COST-CUTTING AHEAD OF CARE.

The devastating report into the Stafford Hospital ‘shambles’ found that PATIENTS WERE LEFT UNWASHED IN THEIR OWN FILTH FOR UP TO A MONTH AS NURSES IGNORED THEIR REQUESTS TO USE THE TOILET OR CHANGE THEIR SHEETS.

The maternity unit at Furness General Hospital in Cumbria is under investigation after the death of seven mothers and babies between April and November 2008...

The figures show a steady rise in cases involving deaths during Labour’s years in power from 223 in 1997-98, to 903 in 2009-10... Joyce Robbins, of campaign group Patient Concern, said the deaths had come despite Labour initially ‘swamping’ the NHS with money…. ‘Everything was rushed in order to meet the targets… They sound good in theory but PEOPLE WERE CLEARED OUT BEFORE THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN AND NOT CARED FOR PROPERLY’.”



On 6 November 2011, Nick Dorman informed us thus in The People:

"The grandmother hailed as the Heroine of Hackney for standing up to rioters is today EXPOSED AS A SECRET DRUG FIXER. Pauline Pearce, 45, who became a national celebrity after lashing into looters, ARRANGED THE PURCHASE OF THREE BAGS OF CANNABIS during a People undercover investigation last week.

Pauline, WHO NOW MIXES WITH HIGH-PROFILE POLITICIANS AND APPEARS REGULARLY ON TV, ALSO REVEALED SHE USED TO SELL THE CLASS A DRUG CRACK COCAINE. Less than 24 hours before the mum of four sorted the drugs deal, SHE HAD A FORMAL MEETING WITH LABOUR LEADER ED MILIBAND AND HER LOCAL MP MEG HILLIER.

Pauline, who became an internet sensation after berating yobs during the August riots, also lectured Welfare Minister Iain Duncan Smith at the Tory Party conference about the problem of drug addicts...

The People also pointed out that, on 2 October, Pearce ‘proudly wrote on her Twitter page how she had just met Labour chief Miliband and was about to watch Channel 4’s Top Boy, a drama about drug dealers in Hackney.’



On 6 November 2011, Simon Walters and Glen Owen said this in The Daily Mail:

"Ed Miliband's controversial new MULTI-MILLIONAIRE BACKER made a series of attempts to perform a similar role for the Tories over a ten-year period, it has emerged. PROPERTY TYCOON ANDREW ROSENFELD, SAID TO BE WORTH MORE THAN £100 MILLION, bombarded Conservative HQ with phone calls and emails promising money and other support. But he was rebuffed after worried Tory officials learned he was making similar approaches to Labour, who were also considering giving him a peerage.

Mr Rosenfeld came under fire last week after The Mail on Sunday told how he bought an £8.5 million house in cash, while HIS FORMER HOME IN A TAX HAVEN CAN BE RENTED FOR MORE THAN £16,000 A MONTH. Tory MPs claimed it made a nonsense of Mr Miliband’s attacks on capitalist ‘predators."

Rosenfeld is Jewish.

As is Miliband.



On 6 November 2011, Jin Liqun, former Vice President of the Asian Development Bank, Chairman of China's sovereign wealth fund and a former Deputy Minister of Finance, said this in an interview with the Al Jazeera TV station.

“I think if you look at the troubles which have happened in European countries, this is purely because of the accumulated troubles of their worn-out welfare societies. Labour laws are outdated, THE LABOUR LAWS INDUCE SLOTH, INDOLENCE RATHER THAN HARD WORKING. The incentive system is totally out of whack… The welfare system is good for any society to reduce the gap, to help those who happen to have disadvantages, to enjoy a good life, BUT A WELFARE SOCIETY SHOULD NOT INDUCE PEOPLE NOT TO WORK HARD.

If you look at the European countries over the last five or six decades, you will find this system will have to be adjusted. Why should for instance, within eurozone, why should some members’ people have to work to 65, even longer, WHEREAS IN SOME OTHER COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPILY RETIRING AT 55, LANGUISHING ON THE BEACH. THIS IS UNFAIR.”

Well, Jin, many over here will think your remarks are bang on and, superficially, they are.

However, what you’re not taking into account is this: the British people have been DELIBERATELY consigned to the scrap heap.

Beginning in Thatcher’s time, privatisation and the subsequent downsizing insisted upon by the various corporate raiders, devasted working-class communities. Huge numbers of jobs were lost at this time that have never been adequately replaced. Along the way, the hard-working grew used to grubbing along on the dole and many of those who came along afterwards never got the chance to play Saturday's child and ‘work hard for a living.’

Add the disgraceful behaviour of the Blair/Brown governments, where 90 percent of all the jobs created between 1997 and 2010 went to foreigners and you can see that something else has been going on here over and above sloth and indolence.

No, Jin, worthy though your summary of the situation appears to be, the most important piece of the puzzle is missing. The politicians the British people have been allowed to elect over the course of the last fifty years have been at war with them for all of that time.

They dumbed us down, drugged us up and made porn and cheap alcohol readily available. They elevated the immigrant and disenfrachised us, establishing race laws and the soul-destroying concept of political correctness to cement their anti-indigenous treachery.

After eighteen years of job and community-pillaging Thatcherism, the Labour politicians that took over in 1997 spent the next thirteen years ignoring those the movement was founded to represent as they fawned over and kow-towed to the same untouchable financiers and fat cats their predecessors had been so fond of. With the disastrous results we are all experiencing now.

Cameron has presented around £12billion of our much-needed cash to ‘worthy causes’ abroad. In the past at least, the worthy cause and the Swiss bank account of the African and Asian dictator was often synonymous. And now he makes another £40billion available to an organisation most of us want shut of. The EU has been sucking the blood of the British and imposing its anti-democratic will upon us for almost forty years now.

Forty years of Brit-loathing globalism at one end of the spectrum and fifty-plus years of Brit-bashing, foreigner-first treachery at the other. That’s where the ‘sloth,’ the ‘indolence’ and the ‘welfare system’ came from, Jin. We never wanted to end up as pathetic as so many of us are now. THEY made us this way. They’re at war with us, you see. They want us gone.

If the slothful and indolent don’t pull their fingers out sometime soon, the dearest wish of those who’ve been at war with us since 1914, may well come to pass.



On the 6 November 2011 edition of the Andrew Marr Show, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, appearing on the same programme, said this:

"It is very important that... we do get away from an economic culture thats been based on excess, which it has been for the last 20 or 30 years."

Oh, it’s important all right.

Thing is, it was as important in 1979, when Thatcher’s crew got in, as it is now, thirty two years later. If we allow the trough-gobbling hogs to take charge of our society, they will gorge and there will always be less to share out amongst the rest.

It’s just that simple.

As for Danny Alexander, it would be nice to think that his acknowledgement of long-standing financier self-service meant that the politicians who tacitly encouraged that ‘excess’ now intended to rein it in.

But we don’t think they will, do we?

How about it, Danny? Are you the man for the job?

Time will tell.



On 5 November 2011, The Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, said this in The Yorkshire Post:

“With renewed public outrage at THE EXCESSES OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR AND THE HUGE INEQUALITIES IN WEALTH IT HAS HELPED TO GENERATE, we are being confronted daily with new evidence of extremes of wealth and poverty, demonstrating HOW SCANDALOUSLY UNFAIR OUR SOCIETY IS…

CHIEF EXECUTIVES OF THE FTSE 100 COMPANIES… RECEIVE 300 TIMES AS MUCH AS THE LEAST WELL PAID BRITISH EMPLOYEES IN THEIR COMPANIES. If they have a responsibility to their staff, it is hard to imagine a more powerful way of telling some people that they are of little value than to pay them one-third of one percent of your own salary…

Among the ill effects of very large income differences between rich and poor are that THEY WEAKEN COMMUNITY LIFE AND MAKE SOCIETIES LESS COHESIVE… Over the last few decades, THE GAINS FROM ECONOMIC GROWTH HAVE GONE DISPROPORTIONATELY TO THOSE WHO ALREADY HAVE MOST. In contrast, forecasts suggest that child poverty will increase.”



On 5 November 2011, Matthew D’Ancona said this in The Telegraph:

“It is extraordinary to recall that, until June last year, HM Treasury still had a ‘euro preparations unit’… This was the last, fossilised remains of the ‘prepare and decide’ strategy adopted by New Labour, the premise of which – at least in the Blair years – was that BRITAIN SHOULD AND WOULD JOIN THE SINGLE CURRENCY AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE…

How far Europe has travelled since Tony Blair unveiled his National Changeover Plan in February 1999, the preparatory campaign to make Britain’s businesses, banks, retailers, public authorities, and media ready for the referendum that he assumed would take place in his second term – and if not then, eventually. In his 2002 party conference speech, Blair referred to the euro as ‘NOT JUST ABOUT OUR ECONOMY, BUT OUR DESTINY.’

Looking up at the huge modern edifice of the euro tottering, tilting and melting – a Corbusian nightmare as imagined by Dalí – it is easy to forget how prevalent was the view that Britain would condemn itself to a second-class status in Europe and a lesser role on the global stage if it stayed out of the shiny new currency…

Though its internal contradictions may yet have appalling economic consequences, THE EURO WAS ALWAYS A POLITICAL PROJECT, AND ONE BASED ON A QUASI-RELIGIOUS, PROVIDENTIAL VIEW OF HISTORY AND EUROPE’S DESTINY. After 1989, the EU and THE IDEA OF THE EURO FILLED THE MARX-SHAPED HOLE IN THE WORLD-VIEW OF THE LEFT and presented a new teleology in which a whole continent was going to be bound together, inexorably, by a single currency…

One of the many errors the Founding Fathers of the euro made was to underestimate the resilience of the nation state. Yes, we live in a world in which technology, money and people flow across borders with greater ease than ever before. Globalisation makes the planet dramatically interdependent… Even so, the nation has retained much of its cohesion, its significance and its grip on popular loyalty…

As nation states have survived more than five decades of euro-bombast, so supra-national politicians are finding themselves increasingly at odds with what might be called ‘referendal’ politics. Direct democracy, plebiscites, e-petitions, the ‘Occupy’ protests around the world, even the culture of phone voting in television shows: it is here that the impetus and the energy lie... The entire Cannes summit was nearly thrown off course by the wild-card threat of a referendum in Greece on the latest rescue plan.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE EU, A POSTWAR ELITE BUREAUCRACY, IS ENTIRELY OUT OF KILTER WITH THIS VERY MODERN SURGE OF POPULAR PROTEST.”



On 4 November 2011, former MP, Tony Benn, said this to the Occupy Movement protesters camping outside St Paul’s Cathedral:

"The first thing they do is ignore you. If that doesn't deal with you, they say you are mad. If that doesn't work, they say you're dangerous. Then there is a pause, and then you can't find anyone at the top who doesn't claim they thought of it in the first place. That's how you get change."



On 4 November 2011, Daniel Kalder told us this in The Spectator:

“Ah, Tony Blair, you can’t keep a good hustler down. One minute he’s singing the praises of formaldehyde at the opening of a methanol power plant in Azerbaijan (£90,000 for a 20-minute talk), the next he’s accepting a gig ‘consulting’ in Kazakhstan. For his advice on ‘issues connected with policy and the economy’, he could reportedly make as much as £8 million a year.

In May, Blair and a gang of his associates were spotted at a meeting of the Foreign Investors’ Council in Kazakhstan. Among them was Lord Renwick of Clifton, vice-chairman of JP MORGAN, WHICH (COINCIDENTLY) PAYS MR BLAIR £2 MILLION A YEAR FOR ADVICE, AND LAKSHMI MITTAL, BRITAIN’S RICHEST MAN, A GENEROUS LABOUR DONOR, AND THE LARGEST EMPLOYER IN KAZAKHSTAN. Blair praised the nation’s ‘wonderful’ achievements.

How things have changed. Ten years ago an authoritarian leader of an ex-Soviet state would get excited if Vanessa Mae came to town. These days, they find that IF THEY TOSS ENOUGH COINS AND CRANK UP THE ORGAN, FORMER LEADERS OF WESTERN GOVERNMENTS WILL DANCE FOR THEM LIKE PERFORMING MONKEYS.

BLAIR HAS NOW JOINED THE SELECT GROUP OF EX-STATESMEN FROM LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES WHO WORK FOR AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES. Tony Blair Associates has been building its foreign contacts book for some time: the government of Kuwait is among its high-paying clients…

KAZAKHSTAN… HAS NEVER HAD A FREE ELECTION; NO MAN CRITICISES THE PRESIDENT VERY LOUDLY IF HE KNOWS WHAT’S GOOD FOR HIM; AND THERE ARE MANY REPORTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES.

Blair wasn’t the only former European leader in Kazakhstan in May: ROMANO PRODI, FORMER EU COMMISSION PRESIDENT and ex-Italian prime minister, was also lurking about… CONSULTING FOR DESPOTS, INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION LAUNDERING AS IT IS OTHERWISE KNOWN, IS A BOOMING TRADE.

It used to be the Americans who made the biggest bucks when dealing with despots. Until 2008, for instance, an organisation founded by Harvard academics called the Monitor Group netted $250,000 a month for providing Colonel Gaddafi with advice and face-to-face meetings with celebrity­academics. But THE BUSINESS OF REPUTATION LAUNDERING FOR TYRANTS NOW GRAVITATES TOWARDS LONDON. It is increasingly common for the capital’s top public relations firms to work for dubious countries, rather than dodgy people. Many of these firms have nice, shiny, anodyne names, Chime plc, for instance, is headed by the former No. 10 adviser Lord Bell, and includes Zambia among its clients.

Portland PR, run by Blair’s former press secretary Tim Allan, advises the Kremlin on its dealings with the British government… Bell is… candid: ‘I am not an international ethics body,’ he told the Guardian. ‘We do communications work. If people want to communicate their argument, we take the view that they are allowed to do so.’

Indeed, PR is a business… that requires you TO MANAGE, OR DISTORT, THE PUBLIC’S PERCEPTION TO YOUR CLIENT’S BENEFIT. Extending the service from making celebrities look slightly less odious to providing puffery for repressive regimes is a logical, albeit unscrupulous step… But the ethical calculus must change WHEN STATESMEN SUCH AS BLAIR BECOME INVOLVED. These, after all, are MEN WHO HAVE PONTIFICATED AT GREAT LENGTH ABOUT GOOD AND EVIL, AND DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM. MAYBE THEY’VE EVEN FOUGHT A WAR OR TWO IN THE NAME OF THOSE NOBLE CAUSES. Surely they mean some of that stuff they said? NO? Oh, all right then.

But if western statesmen are in it for the money, access to power and a continued sense of their own importance, what do their clients get? Valuable business and political contacts of course… Many dictators just pine for acceptance in the prosperous, democratic West… Kazakhstan’s president, however, seems to be aiming for something greater than mere social standing. HE ALLEGEDLY BELIEVES THAT BLAIR WILL BE ABLE TO SECURE HIM A NOMINATION FOR NEXT YEAR’S NOBEL PEACE PRIZE, to mark the 20th anniversary of his reign. Nazarbayev does appear to have a strong desire to be viewed as a Great Man in the world… A Nobel Peace Prize would be the ultimate PR coup, however undeserved.

When foreign statesmen can’t satisfy an authoritarian leader’s vanity, celebrities are still called in to help. Last month, Ramzan Kadyrov, the brutal head of Chechnya, celebrated his 35th birthday with a lavish theatrical extravaganza that featured tributes from 1980s action hero Jean-Claude Van Damme and the Oscar-winning actress Hilary Swank… And what is Tony Blair these days but a high-end version of Van Damme? He offers Mr Nazarbayev a propaganda triumph: ‘BEHOLD, CITIZENS! THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER OF THE OLDEST PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY IN THE WORLD IS WORKING FOR US!’…

Gone are the days when former prime ministers returned to the back benches and lived out their days on an MP’s salary… By acting as international consultants, today’s ex-statesmen can continue leading the lifestyle of a world leader, with the limos and security teams and the other perks…

THE LEADERS OF WESTERN DEMOCRACIES HAVE ALWAYS SCHMOOZED WITH TYRANTS, STRUCK DEALS WITH FASCISTS AND CROOKS... But the new, younger generation of western leaders seem to believe the same ethical standards apply to questions of self-interest. THEY’LL SHILL FOR JUST ABOUT ANYONE, SO LONG AS THE MONEY IS GOOD AND IT GIVES THEM A GROOVY FEELING OF SELF-IMPORTANCE.”



On 3 November 2011, the French Prime Minister, Nicolas Sarkozy, was overheard saying this to the US President, Barack Obama:

“NETANYAHU, I CAN'T STAND HIM. HE'S A LIAR.”

Obama responded thus:

“You're sick of him but I HAVE TO DEAL WITH HIM EVERY DAY.”

When the rats begin to eat each other in public you know the Plague Year is almost over.



On 3 Nov 2011, Damian Reece said this in The Telegraph:

“How do banks restore trust? That was the problem Bob Diamond, chief executive of Barclays, tried to address… in the inaugural Today Programme Business Lecture... Diamond was… positioning banks as part of the solution, rather than the problem, and recognised that simply making money by fuelling recovery is not enough. BANKS HAVE TO CHANGE…

To re-enter polite society, BANKS NEED TO TAKE SOCIETY INTO ACCOUNT WHEN FACED WITH BUSINESS DECISIONS… Diamond is now saying that… SHORT-TERMISM, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS GREED, WILL CHANGE… BECAUSE SHORT-TERMISM CREATES CRISES OF THE SORT WE'RE ALL SUFFERING FROM NOW.

ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS, however, and the biggest challenge of all of this will be how banks prove they've changed. How can we measure if banks are becoming better citizens? NOT SCREWING CLIENTS IS ONE, TAKING LESS PAY IS ANOTHER AND LENDING MORE TO SMALL BUSINESSES ANOTHER… If banks don't change themselves, SOCIETY WILL EXPECT OTHERS TO DO IT FOR THEM.”



On 3 November 2011, Jo Jacques, a former nurse and Prison Chaplain, was quoted thus in The Daily Mail:

“I’d assumed basic details… would have been passed on when my 87-year-old mother was admitted to the West Suffolk Hospital in Bury St Edmunds the previous week with a broken leg. But then I’d also assumed she was in good hands and would be treated with kindness and respect, as I had been trained to treat the elderly during my nurse’s training at what is now St Thomas’s Hospital in London 40 years ago. WRONG ON BOTH COUNTS. What I witnessed during my mother’s four-week stay in the hospital’s rehabilitation unit earlier this year TRULY HORRIFIED ME.

LEFT DEHYDRATED AND STRANDED FOR HOURS SITTING ON AN UNCOMFORTABLE, CREASED INCONTINENCE MAT; FORCED TO LISTEN TO POP MUSIC AS ILL-MANNERED AND POORLY-TRAINED CARE ASSISTANTS AND NURSES GYRATED AROUND THE WARD; SCOLDED AND BELITTLED LIKE A NAUGHTY CHILD… It was no way to treat an old lady, or anyone, for that matter.

After I gave up nursing in 1992, I worked for a number of years as a chaplain at Category C male prison Coldingley in Woking, Surrey. I can honestly say PRISONERS ARE TREATED WITH GREATER RESPECT THAN OUR ELDERLY…

It’s a subject that was brought to the fore last month when a damning report from healthcare regulator, the Care Quality Commission, found that CARE OF THE ELDERLY WAS SO POOR IN ONE IN FIVE HOSPITALS THAT THE LAW WAS ACTUALLY BEING BROKEN. Patients in 20 of the 100 hospitals inspected were being denied help in the basics in life, SUCH AS EATING, DRINKING AND GOING TO THE TOILET, in breach of the Health And Social Care Act 2008... Though the West Suffolk Hospital was not among those inspected for the report, from what I saw on that ward during my mother’s four-week hospitalisation in February, I feel WE AS A NATION ARE LETTING DOWN OUR ELDERLY APPALLINGLY.

To the staff on that six-bed unit SHE WAS ANOTHER ANONYMOUS FACE, ANOTHER MOUTH TO FEED, ANOTHER BAG TO EMPTY AND ANOTHER SET OF PHARMACEUTICAL INSTRUCTIONS TO BE BEGRUDGINGLY ADMINISTERED… No one knew, or even seemed interested, in the life behind her tired old eyes.

Did they know, for example, that my mother held a unique place in history and in her own, small way, contributed to securing the way of life everyone working on that ward held so dear? For as a young Wren during World War II, my mother played an instrumental part in the Enigma code-cracking team, based in Stanmore, an outstation of the now famous Bletchley Park… I always knew Mum did something special during the war, but never what. It was only when the whole Enigma story broke in the Seventies that we finally understood how special she was…

She moved into a private residential home in 2005... She was very happy living there… One morning this February, her carers reported she had slipped to the floor and broke her leg… We weren’t unduly alarmed as she’d been in hospital many times before. But when I walked on to the ward, I was struck by the noise: call bells going off incessantly, and mostly ignored, and old people sitting around, listless and bored. My nurse’s training kicked in immediately and I looked at Mum’s notes. I was horrified to see SHE HADN’T HAD A DRINK FOR SEVEN HOURS, the little plastic cup and straw on her bed-stand were out of reach and simply too difficult for her to handle… I grimaced at the way the staff talked to her, if they talked at all… Snippets of gossip and staff rotas were discussed as if she were furniture. I heard one staff nurse snap at her ‘Please is a word, you know’, as if addressing a naughty child…

Mum didn’t like to complain, she’d already retreated mentally, but even she had spoken out about ‘Radio 1 style’ music imposed on the ward one afternoon. Mum had described how some of the nurses had been ‘gyrating around’ as the music blared out…

When she was finally discharged I TOOK HER TO MY HOME AND FELT AS IF I HAD RESCUED HER… She died five weeks later, of a chest and bladder infection, probably exacerbated by the prolonged use of the catheter… I didn’t want compensation or heads to roll, I just wanted an apology and an undertaking that steps would be taken to restore some compassion, respect and dignity into the care of old people. I finally received an apology from Stephen Graves, the chief executive of West Suffolk hospital, in July…

I did what I did not only as a daughter who loves her mother, but as a nurse who loves her profession and who wants nothing more than TO SEE IT RESTORED TO THE STANDARDS OF OLD.”



On 3 November 2011, The Daily Mail's Sophie Borland told us this:

"ALMOST 500 CASES OF ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF THE ELDERLY ARE BEING REPORTED EVERY WEEK.

Social services were called in to investigate 25,240 INCIDENTS LAST YEAR including some where CARE HOME RESIDENTS HAD BEEN LOCKED IN BEDROOMS, TIED TO CHAIRS OR LEFT TO GO HUNGRY OR THIRSTY…

Forty-three per cent of incidents were in care homes at the hands of nurses or other staff. Four in ten complaints related to incidents at home and were blamed on visiting care workers or nurses. Hospitals and day care centres were the location for around 15 per cent of cases.

The report from the NHS Information Centre shows that ONLY 5 PER CENT OF INCIDENTS OVERALL RESULTED IN STAFF EITHER BEING SACKED OR SUSPENDED."



On 3 November 2003, The Independent's John Walsh pointed out how the Dodo used to behave towards the new arrivals in its domain.

“Three feet tall, plump, flightless and unafraid of humans, they used to greet the arrival of ships full of hungry sailors by running down the beach calling out the dodo equivalent of ‘Hello!’ and ‘Welcome!’ and ‘Fancy some lunch?’ They died, poor things, from excessive friendliness.”

A very metaphor for today’s happy-clappy, wagtail airhead, who sees absolutely nothing wrong with the mass migration of millions of ‘hungry’ aliens into our excessively friendly society.

The bought politicians and the nastier members of the PC Crowd, of course, have always known what the results of their genocidal machinations would be.



On 3 November 2003, The Daily Mail quoted Consumer Credit Counselling Service spokesperson, Una Farrell, thus:

"There is a new generation of female bankrupts. Women used to only become insolvent as a result of a major life event, such as marriage breakdown or ill health. Now household budget pressures such as inflation, welfare benefit changes, wage freezes and reduced working hours, are pushing them into bankruptcy. IT IS INSOLVENCY BY A THOUSAND BUDGET CUTS.”



On 3 November 2011, Jean-Claude Piris, former Director General of the Legal Service of the Council of the European Union and ‘architect’ of the Lisbon treaty, Maastricht and sundry predecessors, made this remarkable confession in The Financial Times:

“It is the entire European Union that is becoming less efficient and LESS RELEVANT… THE COMMISSION IS WEAK. The one-size-must-fit-all decision-making system does not suit a heterogeneous union. Rather than responding swiftly and decisively to events, the EU is more likely to produce a mouse. IRRELEVANCE LOOMS...

EUROPE’S CITIZENS NO LONGER UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF THE EU… THEY ARE LOST. For all its increased powers, granted through treaties since Maastricht, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE SUPPOSED REPOSITORY OF DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY IN EUROPE, IS A RELATIVE FAILURE…

The EU… must offer A BROADER POLITICAL PROJECT, capable of giving hope of a better future. To continue on the current path is fraught with danger. It runs the risk of a union becoming more enfeebled, EVEN OF SPLITTING at the next crisis. Far better would be to consider a two-speed EU, which would include an avant-garde group, probably based on the current 17 members of the euro area…

Under the control of the EU court of justice, PARTICIPATING STATES WOULD CONTINUE TO BE BOUND BY EU LAW...

THE PRESENT EU SET-UP IS NO LONGER TENABLE. Trying to solve the problems within the current rules and with the participation of all member states appears impossible.”



On 3 November 2003, Andreas Whittam Smith said this in The Independent:

“CAPITALISM WILL ALWAYS GO OFF THE RAILS UNLESS CERTAIN CONTROL MECHANISMS ARE IN PLACE… We really cannot go on like this. There is now an urgent need to rediscover and implement the checks and balances that allow the system to operate safely... The big underlying problem is THE GROWING DISPARITY BETWEEN THE INCOME AND CAPITAL OF THE TOP 10 PER CENT OF PEOPLE COMPARED WITH THE BOTTOM 10 PER CENT…

Some figures just published in the US reveal that between 1979 and 2007, the top fifth of the population saw a 10 percentage point increase in their share of after-tax income, that MOST OF THAT GROWTH WENT TO THE TOP 1 PER CENT OF THE POPULATION AND THAT ALL OTHER GROUPS SAW THEIR SHARES DECLINE BY 2 TO 3 PERCENTAGE POINTS. And in the UK last week, a report on directors' pay… showed that last year, DIRECTORS OF BIG COMPANIES ENJOYED AN INCREDIBLE 49 PER CENT INCREASE IN THEIR AVERAGE PAY that in turn gave them a colossal total reward of £2,697,664 PER ANNUM…

The remedy for the widening gap between rich and poor isn't going to be found in a series of small measures... Shareholders should be active, governments should be vigilant and THE HIGHLY PAID SHOULD BREAK OUT OF THEIR BUBBLES AND CONSIDER WHAT DAMAGE THEIR GREED CAN CAUSE.”



On 3 November 2011, The Telegraph’s Will Heaven reported thus:

“Mossad was ecstatic when the Stuxnet computer worm infiltrated Iran’s nuclear programme almost two years ago. According to Der Spiegel, Israeli spies viewed it as ‘comparable to the cracking of Germany’s Enigma cipher machine’…

The virus, almost certainly engineered jointly by the US and Israel, appeared to have ‘wiped out roughly a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges’ when it hit the country's enrichment facilities, said the New York Times…

But things aren't looking so rosy today. Con Coughlin notes that THE DRUMBEAT OF WAR AGAINST IRAN IS BEATING LOUDER, and all the evidence supports that. BENJAMIN NETANYAHU HAS BEEN SEEKING CABINET SUPPORT FOR A MILITARY STRIKE ON IRAN; BRITAIN'S ARMED FORCES ARE STEPPING UP THEIR CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR POTENTIAL MILITARY ACTION (THE MOD REPORTEDLY THINKS THE US MAY FAST-FORWARD PLANS FOR MISSILE STRIKES…

It appears that the success of Stuxnet was vastly overstated…

RECENT POLITICAL MOVES FROM THE US, ISRAEL AND BRITAIN, WHICH HAVE ALL EXPLICITLY MENTIONED MILITARY ACTION, would suggest that the West will no longer rely heavily on clever computer viruses to counter this kind of threat. Instead, IN THE CASE OF WAR, IT LOOKS LIKE THEY'LL OPT FOR OLD-FASHIONED BOMBS AND MISSILES.”

I wonder how many tens of millions of ordinary household computers were infected by Stuxnet world-wide? As Wikipedia tells us, ‘It targets Siemens industrial software AND equipment running Microsoft Windows.’

On 2 November 2011, Matt Liebowitz of told us this at Microsoft’s Security News:

“Security experts have dug deeper into the Duqu Trojan and discovered a scary shared characteristic between the newly discovered piece of malware and last year's infamous Stuxnet worm, supporting the theory THAT THE SAME AUTHORS ARE BEHIND BOTH. The Hungarian security firm CrySyS, which discovered Duqu in October, found that IT HIDES IN A MICROSOFT WORD DOCUMENT and contains something astonishing: a zero-day exploit of A VULNERABILITY IN THE WINDOWS KERNEL, THE VERY HEART OF THE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Zero-day exploits are the Holy Grail for hackers. Unknown flaws in software are few and far between, and when one is found, CYBERCRIMINALS EXPLOIT IT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE during the brief precious window before the software maker patches it. The fact that Duqu contains one zero-day, and Stuxnet four, yet both programs steal nothing, indicates that THEIR MAKERS ARE BOTH HIGHLY SKILLED, MOTIVATED BY SOMETHING OTHER THAN MONEY AND WILLING TO SQUANDER KNOWLEDGE THAT COULD BE WORTH MILLIONS TO SECURE THEIR OBJECTIVES…

Stuxnet was designed to sabotage nuclear facilities in Iran, BUT ALSO INFECTED SYSTEMS IN INDIA AND INDONESIA. DUQU INFECTIONS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED IN IRAN AS WELL AS IN SUDAN, INDIA, VIETNAM, FRANCE, THE NETHERLANDS, SWITZERLAND AND UKRAINE.”

But not us?

Not my computer or yours? I’m sceptical to say the least.



On 2 November 2011, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, was quoted thus by The Financial Times:

“The protest at St Paul's was seen by an unexpectedly large number of people as THE EXPRESSION OF A WIDESPREAD AND DEEP EXASPERATION WITH THE FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT THAT SHOWS NO SIGN OF DIMINISHING… Many people are frustrated beyond measure at what they see as THE DISASTROUS EFFECTS OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM…

There is still a powerful sense around, fair or not, of A WHOLE SOCIETY PAYING FOR THE ERRORS AND IRRESPONSIBILITY OF BANKERS; of messages not getting through; of impatience with a return to 'business as usual', represented by STILL SOARING BONUSES AND LITTLE VISIBLE CHANGE IN BANKING PRACTICES."



On 2 November 2011, Sky News Middle East correspondent, Emma Hurd, reported thus:

"ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU IS TRYING TO RALLY SUPPORT IN HIS CABINET FOR AN ATTACK ON IRAN, according to government sources. THE COUNTRY'S DEFENCE MINISTER EHUD BARAK AND THE FOREIGN MINISTER AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN ARE SAID TO BE AMONG THOSE BACKING A PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE TO NEUTRALISE IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS...

Mr Lieberman responded to the reports of a push to gain cabinet approval by saying that ‘IRAN POSES THE MOST DANGEROUS THREAT TO WORLD ORDER.’ But he said ISRAEL'S MILITARY OPTIONS SHOULD NOT BE A MATTER FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.”



On 2 November the Jewish-American journalist, Ben Shapiro, said this at Townhall.com

“Benjamin Netanyahu… has been bringing home hostages such as Gilad Shalit in anticipation of an attack on Iran. When that attack takes place, Netanyahu knows, every Jew in Muslim territory will be endangered.

Why the sudden urgency from Israel?… The answer lies in President Obama's support for Islamist regimes across the Middle East. The Arab Spring… was an Islamist revolution of the worst sort, toppling BRUTAL DICTATORS WITH WHOM WE COULD DEAL with in favor of POPULIST Islamist movements that we cannot. And Obama stands behind all of it.

It started with his invitation to members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the supposedly moderate group that stands behind Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaida and virtually every other terrorist entity in the region, to attend his speech in Cairo in 2009. His words in Cairo emboldened Islamists; his appeasement rhetoric suggested that the conflict between Western civilization and radical Islam is a mere misunderstanding, and just a few days before that, his statements calling America ‘one of the largest Muslim countries in the world,’ told Islamists that they had nothing to fear from the United States.

That was doubly true for Iran. America's policy on Iran has been feckless for the better part of three decades… Obama made clear from the outset that he would do nothing about Iran. In the presidential debates, he said he would meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; since Obama's ascendance to the White House, Ahmadinejad has visited the United States repeatedly… The United States will do nothing to prevent Iran, THE MOTHER LODE OF EVIL IN TODAY'S WORLD, from going nuclear.

Perhaps if Obama had shown half as much worry about the turn of the Middle East towards Islamism that he now shows towards AN ATTACK ON ISLAMIST NUCLEAR FACILITIES, we wouldn't be in this situation. Israel wouldn't stand alone. But it does, and it will, against all odds. MAY THE HITLERIAN ARAB SPRING END THE SAME WAY AS HITLER'S EMPIRE DID: IN UTTER FAILURE, BURIED BENEATH ITS OWN ASHES.”

Not much room for doubt as to whose side Benny is on, is there?

Nope. There’s no equivocation at all here. This guy is for ’brutal dictators,’ an ’attack on Iran’ and the ‘Arab Spring… buried beneath its own ashes.’

As for what the people want, if their democracies don’t suit the Jew, ‘populist… movements’ can go to hell. And, of course, if you disagree with Benny’s appraisal, it is almost certain that you will be a ‘racist’, a ’hater’, a ‘Hitlerian’ Nazi whose outlook needs adjustment.

Hey, Benny! I’m guessing that if ‘who is the mother lode of evil in today’s world’ was a quiz question, a whole lot more people would answer ‘Israel’ than ‘Iran’! Oops! Here’s me, a Nazi, (according to the Benny type) indulging in ‘appeasement rhetoric’ just like Obama. Who is, according to Benny, an Islamist.

It’s a funny, old ‘Western civilisation,’ isn’t it?

The above is pretty typical of Ben Shapiro’s output.

Check out what he was saying at the same web site on 27 August 2003:

“The time for HALF MEASURES has passed. BULLDOZING HOUSES of homicide bombers is useless. Instituting ONGOING CURFEWS in Arab-populated cities is useless. ROADBLOCKS, TOUCH FENCES, midnight negotiations and cease-fires are useless.

Some have RIGHTLY suggested that Israel be allowed to DECAPITATE THE TERRORIST LEADERSHIP OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY. But this too is ONLY A HALF MEASURE. The ideology of the Palestinian population is indistinguishable from that of the terrorist leadership. Half measures merely postpone our realization that the Arabs dream of Israel's destruction. Without drastic measures, the Arab dream will come true…

Here is the bottom line: If you believe that the Jewish state has a right to exist, then YOU MUST ALLOW ISRAEL TO TRANSFER THE PALESTINIANS AND THE ISRAELI-ARABS FROM JUDEA, SAMARIA, GAZA AND ISRAEL PROPER…

There is certainly room in the spacious Muslim states of the Middle East for 5 million Palestinians and Israeli Arabs… PALESTINIANS, whose claim to Judea, Samaria and Gaza is dubious at best, CAN BE EXPELLED. IT'S TIME TO STOP BEING SQUEAMISH. Jews are not Nazis. Transfer is not genocide. And ANYTHING ELSE ISN'T A SOLUTION.”

Like I said, there’s no equivocation in our Benny.



On 2 November 2011, Tom Chivers opined thus in The Telegraph:

“If you promise a perfect world for all, whether a socialist paradise, a thousand-year Reich, or a verdant afterlife filled with virgins and sherbet, then anyone who stands in the way of it is clearly evil, and unlimited violence can be justified in pursuing it. 'HE WHO CAN MAKE YOU BELIEVE ABSURDITIES CAN MAKE YOU COMMIT ATROCITIES,' as Voltaire said.

Luckily, most of these utopian ideologies have been discredited or defanged. Few people defend the ideas of racial purity or Marxist historical progress any more. Christians rarely break people upon the wheel or cut people in half for blaspheming. But one ideology seems not to have received this message.

In today's paper, we reported that a French satirical newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, was crediting 'the Prophet Mohammed' as its guest editor. It's an insensitive thing to do, since Muslims hold the Prophet sacred, and many would be offended. But it's not a provocation to violence. Nonetheless, it was a reasonably safe bet that the Charlie Hebdo offices would be threatened with reprisals: and, lo and behold, this morning we report that THEY HAVE BEEN FIREBOMBED. Its website was also hacked, to display the message: 'You keep abusing Islam's almighty Prophet with disgusting and disgraceful cartoons using excuses of freedom of speech. BE GOD'S CURSE UPON YOU!'

No one was hurt, luckily, and the newspaper's editor reckons it will only miss one issue. But the point is this: Hebdo is an anti-clerical paper. Its usual targets are French Roman Catholics. How often do you imagine it is threatened by Catholic fanatics?

I bow to no one in my distrust of all religious morality, especially in politics. As Charlie Hebdo itself put it, in response to the Tunisian Islamist party taking power, which inspired their Mohammed guest-editing joke: 'WHAT WOULD BE THE POINT OF A RELIGIOUS PARTY TAKING POWER IF IT DIDN’T APPLY ITS IDEAS?

Hello, we are the Bolshevik party and if you vote for us we promise never to speak of Communism.' But it would be blinkered of me not to admit that, nowadays, THERE IS ONLY ONE RELIGION WHOSE FOLLOWERS REGULARLY DISH OUT VIOLENCE OVER PERCEIVED OFFENCES. I can all too easily imagine a lot of hissy-fits around Britain at the news that churches are to be allowed to carry out civil partnerships, but I seriously doubt any Anglicans will be firebombing churches.

In a world that has been getting safer, ONE RELIGION IS STUBBORNLY HOLDING ON TO A VIOLENT PAST… It would be nice to think that one day in the not-too-distant future WE IN THE NEWSPAPER INDUSTRY CAN MAKE BAD JOKES ABOUT MOHAMMED AS OFTEN AS WE DO ABOUT CHRIST, WITHOUT FEAR OF BRUTAL REPRISALS.”

"Few people defend the ideas of... Marxist historical progress any more."

Political correctness is alive and well and kicking out with as much evangelical hatred of those who do not bow down before it as ever. What do you imagine it to be? Have you never heard of Cultural MARXISM? (Born - Frankfurt School - 1923)

The blank-minded teletubbies who sucked in Ralph Miliband's Marxist philosophy back in the day have since slithered all the way to the top of the greasy pole.

40 years on, they set the political and media agenda.
As for the Muslims, what are they but the pet footsoldiers of the above?

Marx, Trotsky, Lenin and co. would be entirely happy with the 'progress', I assure you.



On 1 November 2011, The Guardian quoted Palestinian Authority spokesman, Ghassan Khatib, thus:

"There has been a sustained attack since the morning from many sources in many countries. IT IS DELIBERATE AND CONTINUOUS."

The Palestinian Telecoms Minister, Mashour Abu Daqqa, told Reuters:

"All Palestinian IP addresses have been exposed to a focused, organised attack from abroad. I THINK THIS IS ORGANISED BY A STATE".

The Guardian explained:

“Internet services in the West Bank and Gaza have come under ‘sustained attack’ by unknown hackers in multiple locations... The attack came the day after THE PALESTINIANS WON A SYMBOLICALLY SIGNIFICANT VICTORY AT UNESCO, which voted overwhelmingly on Monday to admit the Palestinian Authority as a full member. THE MOVE TRIGGERED PUNITIVE FINANCIAL SANCTIONS AGAINST THE UN AGENCY BY THE US.”

Hands up who thinks they know which state ‘organised’ the attack?

Yep, that’s what I think too.



On 1 November 2011, Dr Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted thus by The Financial Times:

“Many people are frustrated beyond measure at what they see as THE DISASTROUS EFFECTS OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM… The protest at St Paul’s was seen by an unexpectedly large number of people as the expression of A WIDESPREAD AND DEEP EXASPERATION WITH THE FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT that shows no sign of diminishing.

THERE IS STILL A POWERFUL SENSE AROUND… OF A WHOLE SOCIETY PAYING FOR THE ERRORS AND IRRESPONSIBILITY OF BANKERS; OF IMPATIENCE WITH A RETURN TO 'BUSINESS AS USUAL’ – REPRESENTED BY STILL-SOARING BONUSES AND LITTLE VISIBLE CHANGE IN BANKING PRACTICES. The best outcome from the unhappy controversies at St Paul’s will be if the issues raised… can… effect CREDIBLE CHANGE IN THE FINANCIAL WORLD.”

"A whole society paying for the errors and irresponsibility of bankers".

Thus spake the country's religious figurehead.

Not before time.



On 1 November 2011, subsequent to the UNESCO vote recognising a Palestinian state, Republican Congresswoman, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, called UNESCO’s behaviour ‘ANTI-ISRAEL AND ANTI-PEACE.’

She added:

“This is only the beginning. THE PALESTINIANS WILL NOW SEEK FULL MEMBERSHIP IN OTHER U.N. BODIES.”

Wow!

That’s not on, is it? Can’t allow the Palestinians the democracy the ret of us supposedly enjoy! Dearie me, no.

Ros-Lehtinen continues:

“EXISTING U.S. LAW MANDATES THAT WE CUT OFF FUNDING TO ANY U.N. BODY THAT APPROVES SUCH A REQUEST.”

Really?

There’s a US law saying that any UN body that encourages the same democracy for Palestine must be deprived of funds? WOW!

Ros-Lehtinen continues:

“The Administration must stop trying to find ways not to fully implement this law, and instead CUT OFF FUNDING TO UNESCO IMMEDIATELY. And CONGRESS MUST PASS PENDING U.N. REFORM LEGISLATION TO CUT OFF FUNDING TO ANY U.N. ENTITY THAT GRANTS ANY UPGRADED STATUS TO ‘PALESTINE.”

On the same day, Republican Congressman, Tom Price, Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee, said:

“THE UNITED STATES HAS SHOWN OUR DISAPPROVAL OF THIS ACTION BY CUTTING OFF FUNDING FOR UNESCO. We must continue to show strength as the Palestinian leadership attempts to undermine negotiations and circumvent the peace process. ISRAEL REMAINS A CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT ALLY TO THE UNITED STATES…

The United States is ready and willing to work with those who seek peace and must show interested parties that WE WILL NOT STAND FOR SUCH RECKLESS AVOIDANCE OF THE PATH TO PEACE.”

Former UN ambassador, John Bolton, said:

“UNESCO, true to form, has voted today to admit the Palestinian Authority as a member… France voted in favor of Palestinian membership, and Britain and Japan abstained…

US STATUTES, DATING FROM 1990, NOW REQUIRE A FULL CUTOFF OF US FUNDING, which Congress should insist occur immediately. Should the Administration seek changes in the applicable statutory provisions, would eliminate or weaken the funding cutoff, CONGRESS SHOULD REJECT THEM… UNESCO has made its decision: IT PREFERS PALESTINIAN MEMBERSHIP TO AMERICAN PARTICIPATION. Now let the rest of the U.N. specialized agencies make their choice.”

These Great Satan types don’t mince words, do they? They’re not exactly interested in nuance and subtlety. Messrs Ros-Lehtinen, Price and Bolton tell it how it is. No diplomats they. ‘Israel remains a crucially important ally’! Consequently the Palestinians and their democratic ambitions may go forth and multiply strenuously!

I really do think the ‘world’s policeman’ b*llocks is now a busted flush. The US polices the world alright but not on behalf of the decent. Not on behalf of the righteous or good. The US polices the world on behalf of the Ros-Lehtinens, Prices, Boltons and those who pay their wages.

The US and its best mate Israel are out of control, to say the least. Time we got our own bought-and-paid-for politicos to associate with a better class of contabulary self-server, methinks.

As regards to the loss of Yankee cash, well, the US isn’t exactly solvent right now, is it? How much longer do you think the piggy bank piggies would be able to carry on forking out anyway?

Better a less bribable, more honourable world, eh? Better that the bully be deprived of his power evn if it means the bullied end up with a little less pocket money.

Let’s hope, as Ms Ros-Lehtinen says, that ‘this is only the beginning.’



In October 2011, the Centre for Social Justice produced a report which said:

“There is an unfinished revolution in mental health care in the UK that began half a century ago when the mentally ill were moved out of asylums… Realising the full potential of this shift required a far-reaching cultural change THAT HAS STALLED AND MANY NEEDS CURRENTLY GO UNMET…

HOSPITALS TEND TO BE UNTHERAPEUTIC AND DANGEROUS PLACES… Psychosocial interventions and meaningful activity are often unavailable for patients who also have to cope with the fear of attack from fellow patients…

CERTAIN GROUPS IN SOCIETY APPEAR TO HAVE A HIGHER PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS… SUCH AS PEOPLE IN SOME BLACK AND MINORITY ETHNIC COMMUNITIES... FAMILY BREAKDOWN AND EARLY SEPARATION AS WELL AS UNEMPLOYMENT, LIVING ALONE AND LIMITED SOCIAL NETWORKS, AFFECT RATES OF PSYCHOSIS IN THE AFRICAN-CARIBBEAN POPULATION…

Childhood mental disorder in the UK is closely related to poverty: CHILDREN FROM THE POOREST 20 PER CENT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME ARE THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY THAN THOSE IN THE RICHEST 20 PER CENT TO HAVE COMMON MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND NINE TIMES AS LIKELY TO HAVE PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS.”



On 31 October, Professor Arnon Soffer of the University of Haifi said this in a CNN interview:

“We have two alternatives. To keep the majority, the rule within the Jewish majority, WHICH WILL MEAN APARTHEID. OR FREE ELECTIONS, which will mean a Palestinian majority and the end of the Jewish state.”

No free elections in the Professor's 'democracy' then.



On 30 October 2011, Jamie Welham and Russell Myers told us this in The Daily Mail:

"Former US gang member Derrick ‘Anthony’ Mitchell was held at Heathrow this month after UK Border Agency officers allegedly discovered 3kg of drugs in his luggage. MITCHELL IS A DUTY MANAGER AT THE SOUTH LONDON-BASED KIDS COMPANY founded by charity boss Camila Batmanghelidjh…

THE AWARD-WINNING AUTHOR AND CAMPAIGNER WAS INVITED TO 10 DOWNING STREET LAST YEAR. SHE ALSO ADVISES FORMER TORY LEADER IAIN DUNCAN SMITH AND IS THOUGHT TO BE ONE OF THE INSPIRATIONS BEHIND MR CAMERON’S PLEDGE TO ‘HUG A HOODIE’.”

Batmanghelidjh was quoted thus by The Mail:

“As a worker, he gave exceptional commitment to the kids over a number of years and I can never take that away from him. As an organisation, WE EMPLOY A RANGE OF PEOPLE AND A LOT OF THEM HAVE HAD CHALLENGING BACKGROUNDS AS CHILDREN and we have given them chances.”

Welham and Myers added:

“Mitchell, of Camberwell, south London, was arrested at Heathrow on October 6... The university undergraduate has previously spoken of deciding to rebuild his life AFTER LEAVING A VIOLENT STREET GANG IN MIAMI. HE CLAIMED HE HAD EARLIER SOLD DRUGS and lost a family member to violence at the age of 19 when his sister bled to death after being stabbed in a leg.

After coming to Britain in his 20s, he began working with the charity about five years ago, ATTEMPTING TO CONVINCE YOUTHS IN GANGS TO TURN THEIR BACK ON CRIME.

Kids Company operates from three centres in Southwark, Lambeth and Camden in London, as well as working in 37 inner-city schools. It employs more than 600 people in full and part-time roles to reach out to 14,000 children from the capital’s most deprived and crime-ridden areas. Many of the youngsters live with PARENTS WHO ARE UNABLE TO CARE FOR THEM and have had severely troubled lives.”



On 30 October 2011, the David Blunkett article, 'This fear of foreigners is behind modern-day slavery' appeared in The Observer:

This, in part, is it:

"WE ARE MOVING INTO AN ERA WHEN IT IS ALMOST FASHIONABLE ON THE LEFT TO BE XENOPHOBIC. We are in danger of moving from one extreme to another. The pendulum is swinging too far. You can't outdo the Conservatives in relation to immigration… To talk as though ANY INFLUX FROM ABROAD IS BOTH DANGEROUS POLITICALLY AND UNWISE SOCIALLY… SOME PEOPLE SEEM TO BE SAYING THAT BRITAIN IS FULL.

The government's policy is frankly bonkers. It seeks to reduce net migration below 100,000 by 2015!"

NET migration is the product of immigrants IN and, for the most part, Brits OUT.

So, as 371,000 of us ethnically cleansed ourselves from our own ancient stamping grounds two years ago and 336,000 left last year, what our former Home Secretary is actually saying is this: 'reducing inward immigration of the alien hordes to below 450,000 is 'frankly bonkers'!'

Blunkett continues:

"I understand perfectly well the arguments about the reaction of those whose jobs are threatened, for whom the global meltdown has created insecurity and downright fear of change."

Oh, we know you understand it, Dave.

But we also know that you don’t give a flying f*** what happens to any of the insecure folks who happen to be native Britons.

"But the idea that ‘getting tough’ on anyone seeking to enter Britain is the answer is a message of despair."

‘Despair’ is right.

We’re desperate for those we vote for to do what we want for a change and ‘get tough’ on the invaders.

"Let us be clear. When we had a substantial increase in work permits… PEOPLE WERE WELCOMED INTO THE COUNTRY LEGITIMATELY, LEGALLY AND OPENLY… And if anyone has any doubts about this balance between those here legally and those surviving clandestinely they only need to look at the statistics back in May 2004. New European citizens entering from the A8 countries, who were entitled to be here, were now empowered to register to work, and 40% OF THEM EMERGED FROM THE SHADOWS. Yes, 40% DID NOT FLOOD’ INTO THE COUNTRY BUT WERE HERE ALREADY."

Yep.

Always remember, folks, that when THEY publish ’official statistics’ insisting that that foreigners make up such and such an unworrying percentage of the population, in reality, there are a hell of a lot more of them here than the Blunketts will ever admit to.

"So by all means let's hear and respond to the cries for help of people whose livelihoods are threatened and whose way of life seems to be undermined by both change and the emergence of difference in lifestyle, in language and, yes, in faith. But ABOVE ALL, LET'S COMBAT THIS FEAR OF FOREIGNERS’ AND THE UNDOUBTED XENOPHOBIA THAT ACCOMPANIES IT."

'Above all,' we must keep on putting the foreigner first!

Just as, since Labour came to power in 1964, those who occupy the corridors of power always have. Just as the 'left-wing intellectuals’ have since the time of the Russian Revolution, when they never had a bad word to say about the genocidal behaviours of Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Sverdlov, Kaganovitch, Sokolnikov, Radek, Uritsky, Kamenev and co.

In August 1941, George Orwell wrote this:

"What has kept England on its feet during the past year? In part, no doubt, some vague idea about a better future, but chiefly the atavistic emotion of patriotism, the ingrained feeling of the English-speaking peoples that they are superior to foreigners. FOR THE LAST TWENTY YEARS THE MAIN OBJECT OF ENGLISH LEFT-WING INTELLECTUALS HAS BEEN TO BREAK THIS FEELING DOWN, and if they had succeeded, we might be watching the SS men patrolling the London streets at this moment."

According to Orwell, then, the liberal intelligentsia began doing what they do in 1921. In that year, Israel Zangwill, a member of the Fabian Society (spiritual home of Orwell's 'left-wing intellectuals'), published the book, 'The Voice of Jerusalem.' In this, Zangwill wrote:

"Men form one universal brotherhood… their individual lives, their nations and races, INTERBREED AND BLEND and go on to merge again at last in one common human… This conclusion was, in fact, THE STARTING-POINT OF HEBREW LITERATURE… The co-existence of this covenant of co-operation, THIS NEW WORLD ORDER, would… reduce racial frictions to a minimum by THE WORLD-POLICY OF THE OPEN DOOR… In particular, BOUNDARY QUESTIONS COULD BE DENUDED OF THEIR SIGNIFICANCE…

BOLSHEVISM MAY BE GOOD or bad, but the United States of Russia would be in greater congruity with World-Peace than a swarm of conflicting nationalities; and IF THE BOLSHEVISTS CAN SUCCEED IN RE-UNITING THEM, THEY WILL TO THAT EXTENT BE PROMOTING THE LARGER AND TRUER IDEAL."

"One universal brotherhood", "interbreed and blend", "New World Order", "world-policy of the open door", "boundary questions denuded of their significance", "Bolshevism may be good", "United States of Russia".

That's what the intellectual elite has been after, according to Orwell, since 1921, when the ’interbreed and blend’ fellow’s book was published.

In 1908, Zangwill created a storm in America. He was the author of the most popular play of that year. It was called 'The Melting Pot.' The plot of the play did not contradict its title.

Apart from Israel Zangwill’s his literary output, he founded the Jewish Territorial Organisation and was one the leading Zionists of his time.

Of the Russian Revolutionary leaders mentioned above, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Sverdlov, Kaganovitch, Sokolnikov, Radek and Uritsky were as Jewish as Zangwill. Kamenev’s father was a Jew and Lenin’s grandfather was Jewish also. Stalin was a Georgian Asiatic.

1921 was, coincidentally, the year the Council on Foreign Relations, just about the leading corporate advocate of the globalist, elite-driven New World Order, was founded in the USA.

'Above all,' according to Blunkett, we must put the foreigner before 'the cries for help of people whose livelihoods are threatened and whose way of life seems to be undermined by both change and the emergence of difference in lifestyle, in language and… faith.'

Of course, some of us have known for a long time now whose side Blunkett was on. His intentions have been as clear as crystal since the Home Secretary of the time responded thus to criticism of New Labour’s open-door immigration policy in a BBC interview on 13 November 2003:

"It is a crowded island, we’ve always been a crowded, vigorous island… A NET INCREASE OF 200,000 PEOPLE PER YEAR IS PERMANENTLY SUSTAINABLE."

David Blunkett: a name that should appear high up on the first page of your little, black book of traitors to remember.



On 29 October 2011, deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg was quoted thus by The Guardian:

"So far the debate has been dominated by two extremes. On the one hand, there are some who see an opportunity for a more centralised EU, built around a tighter, quasi-federalist core. On the other are those who imagine a chance for the UK to draw away from the union. They relish the prospect of a unilateral raid on Brussels' powers. The irony is that both options require treaty change: Europhiles and Europhobes are clamouring for the same thing.

As always, neither extreme of the argument is right. Both would have the UK give up our place at the European top table, sacrificing the influence essential to our prosperity. It is only by having a loud voice in a united Europe that we can promote the open economy that will deliver growth. Being shoved to the margins, or retreating there voluntarily, would be economic suicide: a sure-fire way to hurt British businesses and lose jobs."

Like Switzerland, Nick? Over which country the EU bureaucracy has almost no control? Thing is, Nicky, per capita, the Swiss sell more of their goods to European Community markets than us! They don’t have “a place at the European top table”, they linger “voluntarily” at the “margins” and yet they get more out of the EU than we do! Is this what “sacrificing influence” will mean for us?

You’re full of it, Nick. You know the score. You know we’d manage perfectly well outside of the EU. Thing is, if we left, others might follow suit and the one-world order, run by the Clegg-like few, might just go bang. And a century of meticulously malign, nation-destroying propaganda and planning will be up the spout.

Nadine Dorries, MP for Mid Bedfordshire, responded thus to Clegg’s outburst:

"Nick Clegg is demonstrating HOW TOTALLY DIVORCED AND REMOTE HE IS FROM THE OPINION OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE COUNTRY which may indicate actually why the vast majority of the country don't vote Liberal Democrat."

Philip Davies, Tory MP for Shipley, described Clegg as "a little European", adding:

"If Nick Clegg wants to wed his party to the European project, that is fine: HE HAS ALREADY PRESIDED OVER THE BOMBING OF HIS PARTY IN THE OPINION POLLS… but I will be damned if he is going to drag us down with him."

Nick de Bois, Tory MP for Enfield North, said:

"I hope we have learned at least one thing from last week, that THERE IS A GROWING NEED FOR AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE CASE FOR REPATRIATION OF POWERS FROM EUROPE."



On 29 October 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Tony Blair thus:

"The vision of a country of different cultures and different faiths mixing together is the right one. That is not to say you don’t have problems at certain points, but those problems are to be overcome without losing the essence of what has actually allowed this country’s people to get on and do well…

IT’S BEEN A VERY POSITIVE THING AND THERE IS NO WAY FOR A COUNTRY LIKE BRITAIN TO SUCCEED IN THE FUTURE UNLESS IT IS OPEN TO PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT COLOURS, FAITHS AND CULTURES…

I think the majority of people in Britain today are not prejudiced and can understand the benefits of migration. I think what people worry about is where they feel there is no control over who comes in and there are no rules governing who comes in or not and that is a different issue altogether. It would be very unfortunate if by putting those rules into place, we view that immigration was a somehow bad thing for the country, because IT IS NOT."

So, immigration has “been a very positive thing.”

And yet, according to information supplied by the 5 April 2011 edition of The Daily Mail, in just 19 of the UK's 52 police districts, 91,234 foreigners were arrested in 2010!

If we extrapolate the 91,234 figure across the whole of the UK, we arrive at a grand total of 249,593 immigrants arrested in the UK last year! Which is so “positive” don’t you think? So inclined to produce a “vision” of the future that is “right” and not the least bit “prejudiced" against the 250,000 or so lovely, fluffy aliens who, annually, wreak criminal havoc upon the British people.

I wonder how many politically correct folk would have nodded their heads in agreement with Tony Blair’s unworldly-wise words. I wonder how many actually believe that mass immigration has “enriched” the lives of the indigenous majority? I wonder how many truly imagine that the traitorous “vision” the few inflicted upon the many is a “very positive thing”?

If you’re an active member of the Labour Party, the Lib Dems or the Greens, or you are happy to belong to the hug-a-hoodie wing of the David Cameron’s Tory Party, I suppose you'd be duty-bound to think it a good thing. If you are a PC activist, a bought and paid for government jobsworth or an immigrant yourself, I guess you wouldn’t be in any hurry to point out all the murders and rapes committed by first and second-generation foreigners in recent times.

And, of course. if you dare to speak out about the damage the 249,593 are doing, the above will gleefully condemn you as “prejudiced.” You must be a "racist", a "fascist", a "Nazi", a "dinosaur", a "little Englander" or, in Gordon Brown’s eyes at least, a "bigot", no matter what the statistics actually tell us about the multicultural experiment.

The Mail added:

"Tony Blair has defended Labour’s controversial mass immigration policy by claiming that BRITAIN CANNOT SUCCEED UNLESS IT OPENS ITS BORDERS to more people from different backgrounds… Blair added that MIGRANTS HAD MADE BRITAIN 'STRONGER’ and said those calling for greater curbs on foreigners entering the country were wrong.

His comments come just days after OFFICIAL FIGURES REVEALED THAT THE POPULATION IS EXPECTED TO SOAR BY THE EQUIVALENT OF A CITY THE SIZE OF LEEDS EVERY YEAR FOR THE NEXT DECADE… Under Labour, UP TO 5.5MILLION PEOPLE BORN OUTSIDE THE UK ARRIVED AS LONG-TERM MIGRANTS. Between 1997 and 2010, around 2.3million left the country…

His comments… are set to fuel claims that THE HUGE INCREASE IN MIGRANTS UNDER LABOUR WERE (sic) DUE TO A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED ATTEMPT BY MINISTERS TO CHANGE THE COUNTRY. Two years ago, Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, said that LABOUR’ S RELAXATION OF CONTROLS WAS A DELIBERATE PLAN TO ‘OPEN THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION’. He added that LABOUR WANTED TO RUB THE ‘RIGHT’S NOSE IN DIVERSITY."

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch, responded thus:

"This is completely shameless from THE PRIME MINISTER WHO BROUGHT MORE THAN THREE MILLION IMMIGRANTS INTO BRITAIN IN THE TEETH OF PUBLIC OPPOSITION."

Tory MP Priti Patel, a second-generation immigrant herself, said:

"What Tony Blair has failed to recognise is that WHILE HE WAS IN POWER, HE OPENED THE FLOODGATES OF MASS AND UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION WHICH HAS LEFT A DAMAGING LEGACY IN OUR TOWNS AND CITIES."

Fellow Tory, Dominic Raab, added:

"TONY BLAIR HAS LEFT BRITAIN WITH A LEGACY OF UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION THAT HAS PUT HUGE PRESSURE ON PUBLIC SERVICES AND UNDERMINED COMMUNITY COHESION."

“Community cohesion,” Dominic, is what we had when the country still belonged to us.

This is how the anthropologist, Geoffrey Gorer, described our world back in 1955:

"The English are certainly among the most peaceful, gentle, courteous and orderly populations that the civilised world has ever seen."

That is what we had before the Tony Blairs and the Andrew Neathers, the Brit-loathing social engineers and all of those who knew so much better and saw so much further than the rest of us, decided to change it all.

Eleven years earlier, in a 1944 essay titled "The English People," George Orwell wrote with affection of the “gentle-mannered, undemonstrative, law-abiding English.” He said that foreigners were amazed by our “gentleness… by the orderly behaviour of English crowds, the lack of pushing and quarrelling.” He also said that there was “very little crime or violence.” Despite the war, that’s how our world was in 1944.

By 2009, one uniquely honest Labour politician was admitting to this:

"In my constituency… THERE ARE NOW MORE VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON THAN THERE WERE IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY 50 YEARS AGO."

And now, in just one year, around 250,000 foreigners are arrested in this country.

And Tony Blair can still say what he says and think what he thinks. Ironically, The Mail featured the results of a poll of its readership on the same day Blair was telling us foreigners are fab. This told us that immigration was still the number one concern of the British people. This question was posed:

"In which areas would you like to see power returned?" (from the EU)

At 86 per cent, “immigration” ranked 15 percentage points higher than anything else that bothers us.

In the Have Your Say section underneath The Mail article, I said this:

"During Tony Blair's time in power, his favourite buzz-word was 'globalism', which should give you an idea of what and WHO was pulling his strings. His role as attack bitch for the one-world-ruled-by-THEM-forever crowd suits his shallow, deeply Machiavellian and self-serving nature admirably.

Tony Blair is the greatest traitor the UK has ever produced. If you are an indigenous Briton, you must hate him with all your heart. You must want him arrested, tried for treason, found guilty and executed.

If you do not want these things, if you would forgive those whose contempt for you is so profound that they would deliberately put the alien hordes first and you last in the land that your ancestors made, then you truly deserve the horror their warped visions and ideals have inflicted upon our nation.

Your children and grandchildren, however, do not deserve it. They should have had so much more than the terrible legacy your meek acceptance of Tony Blair's genocidal treachery leaves them."

The Mail’s censors do not allow my comments through.

Never mind, many more than me are saying similar things nowadays. Many more than me are figuring out that our politicians would rather spout b*llocks than tell the truth; would rather destroy a society that works if that society does not suit their “vision”.

In our age, the Tony Blairs pandered to the immigrant and the trough-gobbling fat cats on a massive, society-changing scale. At the same time they treated us with maximum contempt. As Blair’s latest self-justifying nonsense demonstrates, the political elite are, even now, still contemptuous.

I hope I’m still here when the British people wake up to what THEY have done. I hope I'm still here when political correctness is made a capital crime. I hope I'm still here when the “social engineers" are charged with treason, found guilty and strung up.



On 29 October 2011, Janet Daley said this in The Telegraph:

"This was the week that European democracy died. THE PLAN TO TACKLE THE EUROZONE CRISIS WILL ONLY RENDER ORDINARY PEOPLE MORE POWERLESS…

THE AGREED EU ‘STABILITY UNION’… WILL HAVE THE POWER TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE BUDGETS OF COUNTRIES IN THE EURO ZONE… BEFORE THEY ARE SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTED PARLIAMENTS OF THOSE COUNTRIES. In other words, PARLIAMENTS WHICH ARE DIRECTLY MANDATED BY, AND ANSWERABLE TO, THEIR OWN POPULATIONS WILL NOT CONTROL THE MOST ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT: DECISIONS ON TAXATION AND SPENDING… ACTUAL POWER OVER FISCAL POLICY WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE HANDS OF NATIONAL LEADERS."

Oh yes.

The gangster elite get a substantial part of what what they’ve always wanted: the abolition of financial democracy and absolute oligarchal control over the purse-strings of the people. The abolition of political democracy, which is, for the most part, fake in any case, will, of course, follow naturally in its wake.

"Since our own economic recovery relies so heavily on the stability of the euro… GEORGE OSBORNE HAS FOUND HIMSELF ENTHUSIASTICALLY SUPPORTING THIS RAPE OF DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLE."

Hardly surprising, seeing as Osborne is one of THEM.

"Among those hapless, soon-to-be-disenfranchised peoples, hatreds have been awakened that the EU was, ironically, designed to bury. The Greeks hugely resent what they consider to be the implicitly racist contempt of the Germans… Even their moderate spokesmen are beginning to characterise Germany’s economic impositions as a revival of its wartime attempt at conquest.

Through Greece’s historical perspective, it is not difficult to read German intentions as world domination by other means. INSTEAD OF BURYING THE OLD ENMITIES AND BLOOD FEUDS, THE ENFORCED CONDITIONS OF THE EU HAVE REINVIGORATED THEM…

When ANGELA MERKEL WARNED LAST WEEK ABOUT THE POSSIBLE END OF THE BLESSEDLY LONG POST-WAR PEACE IN EUROPE, she meant that the failure of the euro (and thus of the EU project) would precipitate economic chaos AND POSSIBLY LEAD TO WAR."

Oh yes.

If the gangster elite do not get their way THEY WILL make war upon us! Or, at least, that is what THEY want us to think.

Return the current European system to the status it had when the unmarried chap sold it to us in 1973. A collection of nation states trading equitably and most of the problems are solved in a trice. Greece et al get to devalue, the goods and services of the debtor nations become hugely attractive and, just like that, they are flooded with the filthy lucre of the more prosperous ones.

Simple, isn’t it? But simple solutions are not what the world-government-run-by-THEM-forever crowd are about. THEY want total control over us. And THEY are determined to have it by whatever means.

"THIS IS A SYSTEM THAT IS INHERENTLY FLAWED, AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE MADE TO WORK IN THE TERMS IN WHICH IT WAS ENVISAGED. Far from being an antidote to the ideological delusions of the past century, A TRANS-NATIONAL SUPERSTATE IS THE SAME SORT OF UTOPIAN, UNNATURAL, AHISTORICAL FOLLY THAT EARLIER GENERATIONS ATTEMPTED TO FOIST ON THE RECALCITRANT POPULATIONS OF EUROPE. ITS DOCTRINE OF ‘CO-OPERATION’ IS SIMPLY COERCION BY ANOTHER NAME. IT RELIES ON UNSWERVING BELIEF AND ENFORCED CONFORMITY, just like all the ‘year zero’ political movements that ended in totalitarianism and terror in the past. The one hope is that the great mass of the people, UNLIKE MOST OF THEIR POLITICAL LEADERS, seem to understand all this quite clearly."

Oh, we understand it alright, Janet.

However, I’m not at all sure awareness of what’s afoot is a cause for “hope.” The shiny-eyed types might protest a tad but the vast majority, in our country at least, will just continue to take it. As they always have.

It’s the sheeple way, I’m afraid.



On 29 October 2011, The Daily Mail’s Jason Groves and Rupert Steiner told us this:

“Sir Martin Sorrell, head of advertising giant WPP, rejected criticism of executive pay in the wake of a study showing it rose by almost 50 per cent in the past year… But Sir Martin, 66, said his bumper income, which rose by 83 per cent to £4.2million last year, was fully justified and was mostly linked to the firm’s performance. He added that HE CONSIDERED HIS BASIC SALARY, OF JUST OVER £1MILLION, TO BE 'VERY LOW’…

Labour education spokesperson, Karen Buck, described the huge rise in executive pay as 'grotesque’, adding: 'WHAT PLANET DO THESE PEOPLE LIVE ON?’… But in an interview with the Daily Mail, Sir Martin angrily defended his bumper pay packet…

'The only planet I am living on is looking at our company in terms of the competition, THAT’S THE PLANET… In 2009 it was a tough year for us and compensation across the board fell. In 2010 we delivered record profit… The value of the business has grown from £1million to £8.5billion over its life.’

Bob Crow, leader of the Rail, Maritime and Transport workers’ union, said:

‘THE SAME TOP BOSSES DEMANDING WAGE RESTRAINT AND ATTACKS ON WORKERS’ RIGHTS ON THE SHOP FLOOR HAVE BEEN CAUGHT STUFFING THEIR OWN POCKETS IN THE BOARDROOM’.”



On 29 Oct 2011, MP for Clacton, Douglas Carswell, said this in The Daily Telegraph:

“The Government should… make it clear that when, not if, the EU referendum comes, it will be a choice between any new deal that the Prime Minister is able to secure AND LEAVING COMPLETELY; rather than a choice between any new deal and the status quo. WITHOUT THE THREAT OF WITHDRAWAL, ANY BARGAIN IS LIKELY TO BE WINDOW DRESSING…

Only when the elites of Brussels and Whitehall realise that any agreement will have to gain the majority support of the British people, WITH WITHDRAWAL AS THE ALTERNATIVE, will they begin to drop THEIR INSTITUTIONAL OBSTRUCTIONISM and offer us the real change we need.”



On 28 October 2011, Sayeeda Warsi, co-chairman of the Conservative Party, Minister without Portfolio and the first female Muslim Minister, said this in The Telegraph:

"Earlier this year… Shahbaz Bhatti, THE ONLY CHRISTIAN IN THE PAKISTANI CABINET, WAS ASSASSINATED... When Shahbaz) was murdered, I said that the soul of Pakistan was not in these attacks. There is nothing in the vision laid out by Pakistan's founding father, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, that creates the space for such acts of hatred. THE IDEA OF UNITY THROUGH DIVERSITY RUNS THROUGH PAKISTAN'S HISTORY AND HELPS TO DEFINE ITS SOCIETY TODAY."

Actually, Sayeeda, we both know that a great many Pakistani souls exulted in Mr Bhatti's murder.

Just as a great many more Muslim souls have rejoiced as Christian communities throughout Asia (and Africa) have been attacked in recent times. As for ‘Pakistan's history’, I seem to remember there not being much ‘unity through diversity’ after we left the Indian subcontinent in 1947. The diverse Hindu and Muslim 'society' we left behind fell out with each other to the tune of a massacred million or so almost immediately. Oh yes, the two communities were so unified that around seven million Muslims upped sticks and moved to Pakistan and around the same number of Indians went the other way.

And then, in 1971, East Pakistan was so content with its unified, mostly Muslim lot that it seceded from the whole and became Bangladesh.

The Insight on Conflict web site tell us this:

"Casualty estimates vary greatly, with between 300,000 and 3 million conflict-related deaths, and between 200,000 and 400,000 female rape victims. Even accepting the lower figures, the war was exceptionally bloody."

Wikipedia adds:

"Estimates of those massacred throughout the war range from three hundred thousand to 3 million…

After Mujib declared independence of Bangladesh, Yahyah's brutal crackdown, including a virtual massacre of the intelligentsia in the universities of Bangladesh, was comparable in method to the war crimes of the Nazis… A tidal wave of hapless refugees, their number soon reaching 10 million, sought shelter in India.

On 15 August 1975, Mujib and most of his family members were assassinated by mid-level military officers. A series of bloody coups and counter-coups in the following three months culminated in the ascent to power of General Ziaur Rahman... Zia's rule ended when he was assassinated by elements of the military in 1981."

If there's one thing I would NOT call the diverse folk caught up in the above, Sayeeda, it's united.

Ms Warsi continued:

"It is a mistake to assume that you compromise your identity the more you try to understand others."

Ah right.

When you're the only one left in the street who doesn't look like Sayeeda Warsi you have to try harder to understand the positivity enshrined in the ethnic cleansing process.

Got it.

"The stronger your understanding of your neighbour, the stronger your own religious identity becomes."

Really?

The 7/7 bombers blew us up because their 'religious identity' was weak? I think you'd have a hard time convincing most Islamic folk of that one, Sayeeda.

"We need to create a country in which people can be unashamedly proud of their faith."

That was the country we had, Sayeeda, until folk like you decided to 'create' another.

"HERE IN BRITAIN, WE HAVE A PROUD HISTORY OF PLURALISM."

Oh?

I thought it was just the know-better, see-further social engineers who were 'proud' of the aggressive incursions of the alien hordes into our country in recent times.

Anyway, Sayeeda, I could say more but we both know that it wouldn't do any good. The gobby, unrepresentative and over-promoted foreigner isn't generally interested in what Joe Bloggs has to say. So, you'll forgive me if I take no 'inspiration' at all from Muslim politicians like you and Muhammad Ali Jinnah or, for that matter, decent, Christian folk like Shahbaz and Paul Bhatti, and get back to being inspired by Eric Bloodaxe, Sigurd the Dragon Slayer and various other Viking Berserkers.

We good-natured Brits could have done with a little of our ancestors' unapolgetic, warrior philosophy in recent times. It might have come in handy during the last six, increasingly ‘pluralist’ decades.



On 28 October 2011, after Vincent Tabak was found guilty of the murder of Jo Yeates, a statement written by her parents, David and Teresa, was read outside the court:

“There was never any doubt in our minds that Jo had been murdered and we fully expected him to lie when he went into the witness box… WE SAW NO EMOTION OR REMORSE OR REGRET FOR WHAT HE DID TO JO. WE FELT ALL EMOTION EXPRESSED BY HIM WAS FALSE. ALL WE HEARD WERE WORDS OF SELF-PITY…

We have still lost our daughter and our son has lost his sister. Our main sorrow is that Jo isn't allowed to start her own family, have children and achieve her potential. We will never get over our loss, how she was murdered and the total lack of respect with which her body was treated. We so miss hearing her happy voice and seeing her living life to the full…

FOR US, IT IS WITH REGRET THAT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS NOT A POSSIBLE OPTION FOR HIS SENTENCE. The best we can hope for him is that he spends the rest of his life incarcerated where HIS LIFE IS A LIVING HELL, BEING THE RECIPIENT OF ALL EVILS, DEPRIVATIONS AND DEGRADATIONS THAT HIS SITUATION CAN PROVIDE.”

Amen to that.

I have one question for all of those who think capital punishment barbaric: do you really think that if the death penalty had been in place, a creep like Tabak would have done what he did?

On 30 October 2011, Suzanne Moore informed us thus in The Mail Online:

“The police felt that once they had found that TABAK LIKED IMAGERY OF WOMEN, ESPECIALLY YOUNG BLONDE WOMEN, BEING STRANGLED, it should be brought up in court. THE JUDGE RULED THIS EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE.

The prosecuting QC argued that Tabak’s penchant for what has been called ‘STRANGULATION PORN’ might shed light on the case. The police also knew that JOANNA’S BODY HAD BEEN LEFT IN A POSE COPIED FROM A FILM FOUND ON HIS COMPUTER. Should this evidence have been admissible? Mr Justice Field said that… IT WAS NOT VALUABLE ENOUGH TO OUTWEIGH THE PREJUDICE IT WOULD CAUSE HIS DEFENCE.

There are those who say this is justice at its exemplary best; that criminal trials are often based on negotiations between lawyers and judges about what evidence can be put before a court. Then there are THE REST OF US WHO ARE LEFT SOMEWHAT MYSTIFIED BY THE METHODS USED BY THE LEGAL ESTABLISHMENT TO ENSURE JUSTICE.”

On 28 October 2011, The Mail had also told us this:

“When Jo Yeates’s body was found in the snow, her short pink top was pulled up and her bra had been moved to expose part of her right breast… The state of the corpse, according to her killer, was the result of manhandling it into the boot of his car before dumping her in a snow-covered country lane.

A plausible explanation perhaps, save for vital facts which, for legal reasons, never emerged during the three-week trial. The jury at Bristol Crown Court were not allowed to be told that when police examined the Dutchman’s laptop and computer hard-drives at home and work, they found three photographs downloaded from a porn website. They depicted a pretty, petite blonde BEARING A STRIKING PHYSICAL RESEMBLANCE TO JO, ALSO WEARING A SHORT PINK TOP, WHICH HAD BEEN RAISED TO EXPOSE HER BREASTS.”

The Judge ruled the above evidence inadmissible also.

There’s a big difference between law and justice in this country, isn’t there?

Jo’s killer was born in the Netherlands. The surname, Tabak, however, is most commonly found in Turkey.



On 28 October 2011, BBC economics editor Stephanie Flanders discussed the financial crisis with leading economic thinker, George Soros, and others.

During the course of the interview, Soros, who made $1bn in 1992 betting against the pound on Black Wednesday, said this:

“The thinking of the authorities is very much influenced by the economic theory and I think THERE IS SOMETHING FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG WITH THE ECONOMIC THEORY THAT HAS BEEN GUIDING US ALL THESE YEARS… THE WHOLE ECONOMIC THEORY IS SOMEHOW TRYING TO CREATE AN ARTIFICIAL WORLD WHERE… IMPERFECTIONS DON’T COME INTO PLAY…

THIS WHOLE IDEA THAT…. PEOPLE PURSUING THEIR SELF-INTEREST ACTUALLY RESULTS IN BEST ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES IS, IN MY OPINION, A FALSE CONCEPTION… FALSE DOGMAS PLAY A VERY IMPORTANT ROLE IN SHAPING THE COURSE OF EVENTS…

THE EURO WAS ACTUALLY MISCONCEIVED. It was based on a false understanding of how currencies work… It was flawed… It was built on the idea that imbalances only occur in the public sector… The trouble in the Eurozone came also from the private sector. THERE WAS NO PROVISION IN THE WHOLE CONSTRUCT FOR THAT POSSIBILITY… It’s really the construction of the whole thing and the Central Bank that caused the whole thing…

THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF BRITAIN ACTUALLY ARE MUCH WORSE THAN THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF SPAIN but the risk premuim on Spanish bonds is higher because Spain can’t print its own money. BRITAIN CAN PRINT ITS OWN MONEY…

Europe faces a big, big challenge. It either, the Eurozone, it either now MOVES CLOSER TO A COMMON FISCAL POLICY or it will fall apart AND IF IT FALLS APART THE CONSEQUENCES WILL BE DEVASTATING not only for the Eurozone but for Britain, for the USA and for China. In other words FOR THE WHOLE WORLD.”

So don’t let the globalist project ‘fall apart’, you sheeple!

Otherwise we’ll be devastated, eh George?

I know, why don’t we coalesce even more? Why don’t we just declare ‘the man who broke the Bank of England’, King of a one world government and be done with it? No more nation states, no more nationalism, just one, ‘great big melting pot’ full, one presumes, in short, Sorosian order, of ‘coffee coloured people by the score.'

Know what you mean, George. Know what you want and what you and you’re fellow trough gobblers are after. I guess that’d be a problem for the top table. Too many of the common herd knowing what THEY are really up to.

Trouble is, when THEY have a problem, it always ends up being a problem for us as well.

PS. Thanks for warning us about the and ‘false dogma’ people who have been ’shaping the course of events’ in their own ‘self interest’ recently.

One might be forgiven for wondering why the 80-year-old multi-billionaire didn’t warn us decades ago, when it might have made a difference.



On 28 October 2011, Rob Marchant's essay, ‘Anti-Semitism is the new black’ appeared in The New Statesman.

This, in part, said:

“A month ago, enfant terrible designer John Galliano was fined over an anti-Semitic tirade at a Paris restaurant. But his drug-addled ramblings were just the latest signs of a wider trend. THERE ARE NUMEROUS RECENT INCIDENTS, ranging from an unpleasant flavour of anti-Israeli activism to straightforward RACISM, that should sound alarm bells for the liberals among us…

But there's a new twist on the ideological catwalk. We can visualise FAR-RIGHT THUGS indulging in this kind of thing but somehow we don't expect it from our comrades on the supposedly liberal-left…

And which mainstream group is unthinkingly giving succour to this new vogue? Step forward, Britain's trade unions, once the reliable ballast of the Labour right, who are increasingly being influenced, in their wilder conference pronouncements at least, by the far left…

THE WORST CULPRIT OF ALL, IN THE PROPAGATION OF THIS TWISTED FASHION, IS US. YOU AND ME. We of the Labour Party and the labour movement, because we are content to sit back and let it happen. It blights our society… This fashionable tolerance of RACISM, in imagined support of a cause, is unacceptable and must not go unchallenged.”

A price must eventually be paid for the Iraqs, the nastiness in Palestine, the monumental greed of the fat cats, the political correctness, the media propaganda and the mass immigrations.

It was only a matter of time before Jewish over-representation in these areas became generally known. What goes around comes around, Rob. In the end, if you sh*t down its throat for long enough, even a dumbed-down, drugged-up world is liable to figure out that you're taking the mickey.

‘Anti-Semitism is the new black?’ Nah. It's the old, present-day and future dislike of Jewish misbehaviour, manipulation and dishonesty, bottled up and condensed over the last six-and-a-half truth-censored decades to something approaching international boiling point.

So, now, we are told that ‘the supposedly liberal-left’ is complaining. Thing is, Rob, if the elephant in the room treads on their toes often enough, even its most fervent apologists are liable to squeal.



On 28 October 2011, Rob Davies told us this in The Daily Mail:

“BUSINESS CHIEFS AT THE UK’S TOP 100 COMPANIES CAN NOW EXPECT TO TAKE HOME AN AVERAGE £2.7MILLION AS HOUSEHOLDS SUFFER THE BIGGEST SQUEEZE ON INCOMES SINCE THE 1920S, according to new figures. THE MASSIVE SALARIES ARE 113 TIMES THE NATIONAL AVERAGE OF £24,000 FOR A WORKER IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR…

The average chief executive saw their total payout increase by 43.5 per cent to £3,855,172, while the rise for a finance director was up 34.1 per cent to £2,001,515. Other directors enjoyed the largest rise, as they took home 66.5 per cent more in pay and perks, to the tune of £2,260,033 on average.

Former Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Lord Oakeshott said:

‘These GREEDY BOSSES SIT ON EACH OTHERS’ REMUNERATION COMMITTEES AND WAVE THROUGH EACH OTHERS’ OFFENSIVE PAY RISES. AN AVERAGE RISE OF 49 PER CENT INCLUDES VAST REWARDS FOR FAILURE WHILE EMPLOYEES, SHAREHOLDERS AND CUSTOMERS SUFFER. Many FTSE bosses then have the brass neck to whine about paying 50 per cent tax’…

The revelation on corporate pay comes as Shell reported bumper profits of £4.4billion in just three months, after reaping the benefit of the high oil prices hitting motorists at the petrol pumps. In a further insult to struggling families, a separate survey revealed CITY FIRMS WILL PAY OUT £4.2BILLION THIS YEAR IN BONUSES ALONE. The sum, revealed by City think tank the Centre for Economics and Business Research, will be handed out DESPITE PLEDGES BY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS TO CRACK DOWN ON THE CULTURE OF CORPORATE EXCESS.

Meanwhile, ORDINARY HOUSEHOLDS ARE AN AVERAGE OF £15 A WEEK WORSE OFF THAN A YEAR AGO, thanks to spiralling bills and pay squeezes. Earlier this week the governor of the Bank of England Mervyn King said workers in Britain had been hit by the biggest fall in living standards ‘in living memory’.”



On 27 October 2011, The Telegraph quoted Michelle Mitchell, Charity Director of Age UK, thus:

“We know THE CARE SYSTEM IS IN FINANCIAL CRISIS. We need the Government to show leadership and make the difficult but vital decisions to REFORM OUR BROKEN CARE SYSTEM.”

Emily Holzhausen, director of policy at Carers UK, said this:

“It is extremely worrying as we look at what the impact is on families’ lives. We know that families are already under an enormous amount of stress and THAT WILL ONLY GET WORSE WITH THESE CUTS.”

The Telegraph added:

“MORE THAN £1.3 BILLION HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM COUNCILS’ ANNUAL SPENDING ON HELP FOR THE OVER-65S SINCE THE COALITION CAME TO POWER, House of Commons analysis found…

In 2009-10, the last year of the Labour government, councils in England spent £7.6 billion on social care for the over-65s. This year, the inflation-adjusted figure is up to £1.3 billion lower, equivalent to a real term cut of 17 per cent... Further figures, from a survey of councils in England by the charity Age UK, found that TWO-THIRDS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES WERE INCREASING THE FEES THEY CHARGED FAMILIES FOR SERVICES such as meals on wheels... MOST ARE ALSO REFUSING TO PAY MORE FOR PLACES IN PRIVATE CARE HOMES.”



On 27 October 2011, Ed Howker said this in The Telegraph:

“Millions of households in Britain are struggling to make ends meet. They are victims not just of a low-growth economy, but of… New Labour’s stealth taxes, Gordon Brown’s raid on pensions, the abolition of mortgage interest relief, the Coalition’s cuts to child benefit. ALL WERE AIMED SQUARELY AT THOSE WHO CONTRIBUTE MOST TO OUR SOCIETY, so it’s no surprise that the Prime Minister’s claim last year that ‘we’re all in this together’ was greeted with such hollow laughter.

Worse, there is every reason to fear that the squeeze is set to tighten. For our problems are not just due to Gordon Brown being such a ghastly chancellor: GOVERNMENT AFTER GOVERNMENT HAS FAILED TO FACE UP TO THE COUNTRY’S LONG-TERM NEEDS.

In the coming decades, the Exchequer will be forced to meet vast unfunded liabilities, identified more than a decade ago, FOR WHICH ALMOST NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO PREPARE us. Never mind the debate over the deficit: to pay state pensions throughout the extraordinarily long lives of the 18 million baby boomers who will retire within the next 20 years we will have to find an extra £1.4 trillion – and a further £800 billion for public sector pensions. And if you think the NHS is too large and unwieldy now, consider the effect of that same demographic change. By 2020, the Treasury estimates that health care will demand 10 per cent of GDP – costs will have doubled from 1990...

THE SQUEEZE IS BEING PASSED ON DOWN THE GENERATIONS. Last year, the housing charity Shelter estimated that 2.8 MILLION PEOPLE ARE DELAYING HAVING CHILDREN BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO BUY A HOME: these are young couples who are in work and ready to start families, but have been caught out by our chronic housing shortage.

What of the generation after that? Thanks in large part to the recent tuition fee hike, THE CHILDREN OF THE SQUEEZED MIDDLE ARE BEING SQUEEZED BEFORE THEY HAVE EVEN BEGUN TO PAY TAX. FAMILIES WITH TEENAGERS ARE SCRABBLING AROUND TO AFFORD THE £9,000 A YEAR FEES: IF THEY CAN’T, THEIR CHILDREN WILL HAVE TO TAKE OUT LOANS, LEAVING THEM WITH DECADES OF PERSONAL AS WELL AS NATIONAL DEBTS TO SETTLE.

Even those who avoided the introduction of higher fees are far from home and dry. UNPRECEDENTED NUMBERS ARE UNEMPLOYED – the latest figures show that nearly 40 per cent of all those without jobs in Britain are under 25. LOCKED OUT OF THE WORKPLACE, MANY GRADUATES HAVE BEGUN LONG MONTHS OF UNPAID INTERNSHIPS, hoping that EMPLOYERS WHO SEE NO NEED TO PAY FOR THEIR LABOUR will eventually give them a permanent post, or at least the minimum wage…

It is no surprise that the political debate in Britain avoids these problems – because they yield uncomfortable solutions. But unless we start thinking seriously about them, the squeeze today will be nothing compared to the squeeze tomorrow.”



On 26 October 2011, David Kynaston told us this in The Telegraph:

"The stock market was deregulated 25 years ago today, reprising the City’s golden age, but THE 1980S BOOM IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR CURRENT BUST...

The eurozone unravelling, the governor of the Bank of England announcing the most serious financial crisis since the 1930s, Tent City dug in next to St Paul’s, it is piquant timing for today’s 25th anniversary of the City of London’s Big Bang…

Big Bang itself, on October 27, 1986... was essentially about deregulating the Stock Exchange. Above all, it enabled 100 per cent outside ownership of member firms – A MOVE ENFORCED BY THE THATCHER GOVERNMENT ON A LARGELY RELUCTANT CITY, so that London could operate on a modern, properly capitalised basis as an international financial centre.

For those with a historical perspective, UNDOUBTEDLY INCLUDING MARGARET THATCHER’S CHANCELLOR, NIGEL LAWSON, the gleam in the eye was the hope of reprising the City’s golden age, when London was the greatest financial centre the world had ever seen, disbursing capital and credit around the globe, before the guns of August 1914 changed everything.

The arrival of the Euromarkets in the 1960s, followed by the floating of exchange rates and abolition of exchange controls, began the RE-INTERNATIONALISATION of the City, but BIG BANG TOOK IT MUCH FURTHER: a legion of DEEP-POCKETED COMMERCIAL BANKS, OFTEN FOREIGN, BOUGHT UP LONG-ESTABLISHED BROKING AND JOBBING FIRMS… while simultaneously ambitious AMERICAN INVESTMENT BANKS SUCH AS GOLDMAN SACHS BEEFED UP THEIR LONDON PRESENCE AND WOULD RAPIDLY SUPPLANT THE BRITISH MERCHANT BANKS…

The gleam came to fruition. During the 1990s, neither Frankfurt nor Paris mounted a credible challenge to London as top European financial centre; by the new century, London was ahead of both New York and Tokyo in global terms; and for successive British governments, the City proved an almost miraculous (and relatively uncomplaining) cash cow…

I admire the energy and drive of the new City, in its human composition a FAR MORE DIVERSE and meritocratic place than the old City, where for so long whom you knew counted rather than what you knew. But at the same time, THE AMERICANISATION OF THE CITY, ABOVE ALL, THE DOMINANT INVESTMENT BANKING CULTURE , HAS HAD SOME SERIOUSLY CORROSIVE AND DAMAGING EFFECTS.

Long-term relationship banking has been replaced by short-term transactional banking, OFTEN INVOLVING OPPORTUNISTIC FINANCIAL ENGINEERING; the maximisation of profits, in pursuit of shareholder value, has meant AN INCREASING RELIANCE ON INTRINSICALLY RISKY PROPRIETARY TRADING; and, for the traders, the annual lure of the seven-figure bonus has seen them systematically engaged in ludicrously one-way bets, one-way because THEY ARE NOT PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOSSES (‘other people’s money‘), quite unlike the old City’s salutary partnership structure…

THE CITY REVOLUTION OF THE 1980S WAS PART OF A WIDER REVOLUTION, which in its totality raised the fundamental philosophical dilemma for the Right that still remains unresolved: how to reconcile the instincts of conservatism… and those of free-market capitalism (UNLEASHING NOSTALGIA-FREE FORCES OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION)...

Earlier this year The Daily Telegraph ran an illuminating interview with Mervyn King, WHO LAMENTED MODERN TRENDS IN FINANCIAL SERVICES: TOO MUCH EMPHASIS ON MAKING MONEY OUT OF CUSTOMERS, TOO LITTLE ON GIVING THEM A GENUINE SERVICE, AND THE MALIGN IMPACT OF CASINO TRADING. It was an arresting interview because of the almost unprecedented spectacle of THE GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND SO EXPLICITLY ATTACKING CITY VALUES (OR LACK OF THEM)…

Given all the anecdotal and other evidence about the deep unpopularity of the City since 2008 – when the banks had to be bailed out by the taxpayer, WHO GOT SO LITTLE IN RETURN BUT INSTEAD HAD TO WATCH NEW ROUNDS OF THE CITY PAYING ITSELF HANDSOME BONUSES – it is surely plausible that such a critique strikes a chord… After all, a generation ago, the social and financial position of, say, a solicitor in Northampton was not so utterly different from, say, a stockbroker in Sevenoaks; but now, THE CITY (INCLUDING CANARY WHARF) FEELS LIKE AN ABSURDLY PRIVILEGED OFFSHORE ISLAND, LIVING IN A BUBBLE FAR REMOVED FROM THE EVERYDAY CONCERNS OF MOST PEOPLE.”



On 26 October 2011, Peter Oborne said this in The Telegraph:

“The BBC is, by charter, expected to reflect the British values of fair-mindedness, decency and tolerance. Sadly… RATHER THAN REPRESENTING THE NATION AS A WHOLE, IT HAS BECOME A VITAL RESOURCE, AND SOMETIMES ATTACK WEAPON, FOR A NARROW, ARROGANT LEFT-LIBERAL ELITE.

BBC chiefs used to deny this charge outright, but in recent years even they have been forced to acknowledge the weight of evidence. The organisation… took New Labour to their heart. They have swallowed every progressive orthodoxy, WHILE VIEWING WITH NAKED CONTEMPT THE CONCERNS OF ORDINARY PEOPLE.

The BBC is doctrinally pro-European. DURING THE 1975 REFERENDUM CAMPAIGN, IT WAS THE PROPAGANDA WING OF THE PRO-BRUSSELS MACHINE, AND THIS ATTITUDE HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE. The ranking members of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten of Barnes and his deputy Diane Coyle, have never made any secret of their contempt for Eurosceptics, let alone the opinions of the very significant and growing minority of the British people who want us out of Europe altogether…

Thanks to this week’s uprising on the Tory benches, and the financial catastrophe now facing the 17 eurozone countries, it now looks very likely indeed that a further euro-referendum can be expected in due course. Given the abysmal record of BBC partisanship, and the unashamed pro-European bias of the corporation’s board, there is no hope that the debate when it comes will be treated in an even-handed way…

There are forces, LED BY RUPERT MURDOCH, that want to annihilate the BBC and destroy what remains such an essential and unifying part of our public domain. In recent years, ITS SENIOR MANAGEMENT SEEM TO HAVE BENT OVER BACKWARDS TO GIVE LEGITIMACY TO ENEMIES, ABUSING ITS UNIQUE PUBLIC TRUST BY PURSUING A FACTIONAL AGENDA AND RUBBISHING ITS OWN MAGNIFICENT VALUES.”



On 26 October 2011, The Daily Mail quoted “the solemn manifesto pledge made to the British people by every Lib Dem candidate” who stood for election in 2010:

“The European Union has evolved significantly since the last public vote on membership over 30 years ago. LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, THEREFORE, REMAIN COMMITTED TO AN IN/OUT REFERENDUM the next time a British Government signs up for fundamental change in the relationship between the UK and the EU.”

The Mail responded thus:

“Guess how many of the party’s 57 MPs stood by that promise and voted for a Commons motion approving the principle of an EU referendum that would include an in/out option? The shocking answer is just one — Adrian Sanders of Torbay — A SOLITARY HONOURABLE MAN IN A PARTY OF PUPPETS. As with tuition fees, THE OTHER 56 APPARENTLY THOUGHT NOTHING OF BREAKING THEIR WORD TO THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED THEM INTO POWER.

The Mail then quoted the Tories’ 2010 Manifesto pledge:

“We will be positive members of the European Union but we are clear that there should be no further extension of the EU’s power over the UK without the British people’s consent. We will ensure that by law, no future Government can hand over areas of power to the EU or join the euro without a referendum of the British people.”

The Mail responded:

“All praise to the 96 (out of 306) Tories who mounted the biggest rebellion in their party’s modern history on Monday night, keeping their word to their constituents and defying their leader’s orders to vote against the motion. But given that manifesto pledge, WHAT IN THE NAME OF INTEGRITY POSSESSED DAVID CAMERON TO IMPOSE A THREE-LINE WHIP IN THE FIRST PLACE?…

Truly, THERE IS SOMETHING HIDEOUSLY WRONG WITH THE STATE OF DEMOCRACY IN BRITAIN TODAY, WHEN CANDIDATES SAY ONE THING TO THE ELECTORATE, ONLY TO BE TOLD BY THEIR PARTY LEADERS TO DO THE DIRECT OPPOSITE WHEN THEY ARE VOTED INTO THE COMMONS.

The supreme irony of Monday’s debate is that it was called in answer to a mass public petition, in accordance with A PRE-ELECTION CONSERVATIVE PLEDGE THAT WAS MEANT TO PROVE THE PARTY’S DETERMINATION TO RECONNECT THE POLITICAL CLASS WITH THE PEOPLE. In the event, THE E-PETITION GIMMICK SERVED ONLY TO HIGHLIGHT AND DEEPEN THE YAWNING DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT BETWEEN THE RULERS AND THE RULED.

Nowhere, of course, has that deficit been more glaringly apparent over the years than in THE POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT’S CONTEMPT FOR VOTERS in all matters touching upon Europe. Indeed, THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE RELENTLESS EXPANSION OF THE EU’S POWERS SINCE WE JOINED WHAT WAS THEN THE COMMON MARKET IN 1973 HAS BEEN A TALE OF BRAZEN DECEIT, BROKEN PROMISES AND DISENFRANCHISEMENT OF THE ELECTORATE BY ALL THREE MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES.

Remember Labour’s 2005 manifesto pledge on the new European Constitution?

‘WE WILL PUT IT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM.’ Nothing, surely, could have been more unequivocal. Yet when it came to signing the Lisbon Treaty, in which the new constitution was enshrined, Gordon Brown conveniently forgot about it. Or, rather, HE FOBBED OFF THE PUBLIC WITH THE MONSTROUS LIE THAT LISBON WAS NOT, IN FACT, A EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION AT ALL.

The Tories and Lib Dems were no better. Both promised explicitly to put the Constitution to a referendum. But as soon as they were in a position to do so, they smirked and said: ‘No point now. Lisbon’s been signed.’

WHEREVER EUROPE IS CONCERNED, THERE’S ALWAYS SOME SNIVELLING SHYSTER’S EXCUSE, SOME WEASEL-WORDED LEGALISTIC TECHNICALITY SEIZED ON BY THE POLITICIANS TO WRIGGLE OUT OF THEIR COMMITMENT TO GIVE THE PUBLIC THEIR SAY…

So it is that, ONE BY ONE, THE ANCIENT POWERS OF BRITAIN’S ONCE SOVEREIGN PARLIAMENT, PAID FOR BY THE BLOOD OF OUR ANCESTORS, SLIP AWAY TO BRUSSELS — INTO THE HANDS OF UNACCOUNTABLE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, WHERE VOTERS WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO TOUCH THEM AGAIN...

How can we boast of the West’s belief in liberal representative government while that abomination against democracy holds increasing sway over every aspect of our lives, from immigration control to working hours?

Meanwhile in the Continent’s capitals, THE EUROPHILE POLITICAL CLASS PUSHES ITS AMBITIONS EVER FURTHER, ENMESHING ONE NATION AFTER ANOTHER IN ITS ANTI-DEMOCRATIC WEB.

Today, on the streets of Athens, Lisbon, Madrid, Rome and Dublin, we are seeing the disastrous consequences of those political ambitions. For the slow-motion car crash of the euro, long predicted by wiser heads who understood the economic madness of a one-size-fits-all single currency for countries as diverse as Germany and Greece, is bringing misery and unemployment to countless millions...

We believe, this will mean re-writing the EU constitution yet again, TO BRING THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROZONE UNDER A SINGLE ECONOMIC GOVERNMENT, with more uniform tax and spending policies — ALMOST CERTAINLY TO BE DICTATED BY GERMANY...

THE EURO EMPIRE-BUILDERS WILL SURELY SEEK TO EXTEND ANY NEW FISCAL AND REGULATORY POWERS BEYOND THE EUROZONE, with their eyes fixed firmly, as ever, on the wealth of the City of London…

THERE CAN BE NO MORE LIES, NO MORE DECEIT, NO MORE CREEPING FEDERALISM WITHOUT CONSENT. This time, those unequivocal manifesto promises must be honoured. Only then will our political class… begin to reconnect with the people they were elected to represent…

THE COUNTRY HAS HAD ENOUGH OF DECEPTION. IT'S TIME TO CLOSE THE YAWNING GAP BETWEEN THE RULING AND THE RULED.”



On 26 October 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Dr Matt Jones, lead author of a research study conducted at the University of Bristol, thus:

“CANNABIS IS MAKING NORMAL PEOPLE BEHAVE MORE LIKE SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS WHEN THEY TAKE IT… Previous studies have shown a link but we didn’t have this level of detail. What we have shown is that the BRAIN WAVES which process information and share it with other regions of the brain BECOME DE-SYNCHRONISED LIKE PARTS OF AN ORCHESTRA PLAYING OUT OF SYNCH.

Cannabis has a docile reputation in the drug world. Most people would accept that cannabis abusers are not at their sharpest and might have subtle impairments in memory or decision making but SOMETIMES SMALL DOSES OF THE INGREDIENT CAN CAUSE PSYCHIATRIC EPISODES SIMILAR TO SCHIZOPHRENIA… You might feel fine… but when asked to make rapid and accurate decisions following a joint of cannabis, THE CROSS-TALK BETWEEN THESE PARTS OF THE BRAIN WAS NOT NORMAL. Taking cannabis while sitting on the couch watching DVDs is one thing, but if you decide to drive to the shops, that’s when the cognitive impairments come out.”

The Mail’s journalist, Tamara Cohen, added:

“Smoking just one cannabis joint can bring on symptoms of schizophrenia, a study has found… The drug disrupts the same parts of the brain as the psychotic illness, those associated with memory and decision-making…

Super-strong versions of cannabis – known as ‘skunk’ – contain a higher proportion of the active ingredient THC and would most likely have an even more pronounced effect…

An analysis of 83 studies earlier this year involving 22,000 young people, concluded that smoking cannabis can accelerate the onset of psychotic illnesses by several years making them harder to treat successfully. Recently scientists in Germany and the Institute of Psychiatry in London found PEOPLE WHO USE CANNABIS ARE DOUBLING THEIR RISK OF DEVELOPING PSYCHOTIC PROBLEMS – INCLUDING SCHIZOPHRENIA AS WELL AS PARANOID IDEAS, HALLUCINATION AND HEARING VOICES.”

And a shabby variety of on-message government ‘czar’ wants to legalise these non-native mind and soul-destroyers.

THEY drug us up, THEY dumb us down. A drugged-up, dumbed down flock is less likely to notice it is being herded towards the slaughterhouse, I guess.



On 26 October 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Maryon Stewart, whose 21-year-old daughter Hester died after taking the legal high GBL before it was criminalised in 2009, thus:

“THESE CRAZY CHEMISTS ARE MAKING MILLIONS WHILE OUR KIDS ARE BEING HARMED. We need to raise awareness and educate children so they know JUST BECAUSE IT’S LEGAL DOESN’T MEAN IT’S SAFE.”

In the same article, The Mail also quoted Professor Les Iversen, Chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, thus:

“There is a whole group of people who have started using drugs who before would not have dreamed of doing that… USERS ARE PLAYING A GAME OF RUSSIAN ROULETTE. They are buying substances marked as research chemicals. The implication is that you should do the research on yourself to find out whether they’re safe or not. THIS IS A TOTALLY UNCONTROLLED, UNREGULATED MARKET.”

The Mail’s Jack Doyle added:

“At least ONE PERSON A WEEK DIES AFTER TAKING THE DANCE DRUG MEPHEDRONE, it emerged last night. Known as ‘meow meow’, it was legal until last April AND HAS BEEN LINKED TO NEARLY 100 DEATHS IN THE PAST TWO YEARS. The figure emerged in a report by government drug advisers, who warn that taking ‘legal highs’ is like playing Russian roulette because USERS OFTEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS IN THEM…

The report found MEPHEDRONE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO 42 DEATHS IN THE UK between late 2009 and October 20 this year. Tests are still being carried out in another 56 suspected cases. But THIS MAY UNDERESTIMATE THE TRUE SCALE OF THE PROBLEM as mephedrone leaves the body quickly after use... MEPHEDRONE HAS ALSO BEEN IMPLICATED IN A NUMBER OF DEATHS WHERE USERS HAVE BECOME DEPRESSED AND COMMITTED SUICIDE.

The report says CHILDREN UNDER 16 ARE MOST AT RISK OF SERIOUS HARM FROM LEGAL HIGHS… The report urges ministers to put pressure on COUNTRIES SUCH AS CHINA to crack down on websites known to be EXPORTING LEGAL HIGHS TO BRITAIN.”



On 26 October 2011, Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor of The Telegraph, told us this:

“More than half of young criminals believe nothing in prison will stop them from reoffending when they are released. Most convicted juveniles believe custody fails to rehabilitate them, according to the joint study by the prisons watchdog and the Youth Justice Board.

It also revealed that the number of serious young foreign criminals has increased by half in the last year. In 2009/10, they accounted for four per cent of all youngsters in detention but that has risen to six per cent. The proportion of black and minority ethnic young men, already over-represented, rose to 39 per cent…

Frances Done, chairwoman of the Youth Justice Board, said: ‘We are very concerned that in some areas young people's experience of custody has deteriorated although in some it has improved’.”

What?

‘Young people’ are supposed to enjoy ‘experience of custody’ now?

Jesus! Hasn't anyone figured out why ‘more than half of young criminals believe nothing in prison will stop them from reoffending when they are released’ yet?



On 26 October 2011, The Daily Mail quoted John Onyenaychi thus:

“LET ME FINISH HIM OFF!”

The Mail explained:

“A knifeman who tried to kill two police officers while on licence from prison was jailed for life yesterday. John Onyenaychi, described as one of Britain’s most dangerous men, slashed PC Paul Madden’s throat with a Stanley knife in front of terrified commuters near a bus stop… PC Madden, 23, collapsed with wounds to his neck, throat and face…

During his rampage in Ealing, west London, Onyenaychi stabbed Police Community Support Officer Piotr Dolata twice in the head as he tried to help… Another PCSO, Steven Constable, was slashed twice but escaped serious injury because the thickness of his high-visibility jacket saved him…

Four days earlier, ONYENAYCHI STABBED A MAN FIVE TIMES, causing serious wounds… after a failed robbery. And two days before that, he stole a laptop computer from a man in Fulham, west London, after threatening him with a knife…

Onyenaychi, WHO HAS COMMITTED VIOLENT OFFENCES SINCE THE AGE OF 12, was OUT ON LICENCE from a two-year prison sentence FOR CAUSING DEATH BY DANGEROUS DRIVING WHILE HIGH ON DRUGS.

The attack on the three officers last December was the culmination of A SIX-DAY ‘CRIME SPREE OF LETHAL AND EXTREME VIOLENCE’, said Brian Altman QC, prosecuting. He told the jury that 6ft 2in Onyenaychi ‘is a highly dangerous individual who thinks nothing of carrying a knife on him, A TOOL OF HIS TRADE, AND USES IT AS A LETHAL WEAPON WHEN HE WISHES TO DO SO’.”

On 23 October 2011, The Daily Mail told us that Jeremy Birch, the leader of Hastings Borough Council was 'committed to equality of opportunity and to community harmony.'

Birch added:

"We have no intention of providing financial subsidy to those who aim to undermine these principles."

He said this as a result of a village hall's intention to give Nick Griffin a platform to express his views.

The Mail added:

"Griffin is due to give a talk at Baldslow Memorial Hall in St Leonards, East Sussex, today. But Hastings Borough Council has told those who run the hall they will have to repay the £376 they received as a charity in rate relief if the speech goes ahead."

"Equality of opportunity"?

'Community harmony?' I wonder why he left 'cohesion,' 'diversity' and 'enrichment' out?

Hands up who thinks that John Onyenaychi should be given another 'opportunity' to wreak havoc upon the British people? Hands up who'd like their 'community' harmonised by the Onyenaychis of the future?

I have an idea. From now on, let’s send all the Onyenaychi types who wash up on our shores to live in the leafy suburbs and gated communities. You know, where all the Lib Dem, New Labour and Cameronian Tory MPs live? Alongside all the oh-so PC Jeremy Birch types? I mean, it is their foreigner-first, indigenous-last policies that encourage such lovely, fluffy enrichers to come here in the first place, isn’t it?

If this was done, immigration would be outlawed in a millisecond and we'd get back Trust me, ihe kind of REAL 'community harmony' our country was famous for before the Onyenaychis and Birches went to war with us.

Pigs might fly, I suppose.



On 25 October 2011, CBNC quoted former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan thus:

"At the outset of the creation of the euro in 1999, it was expected that the southern eurozone economies would behave like those in the north; THE ITALIANS WOULD BEHAVE LIKE GERMANS. THEY DIDN’T. Instead, NORTHERN EUROPE FELL INTO SUBSIDIZING SOUTHERN EUROPE’S EXCESS CONSUMPTION… THE EFFECT OF THE DIVERGENT CULTURES IN THE EUROZONE HAS BEEN GROSSLY UNDERESTIMATED…

The only way to have several currencies from divergent nations lumped together is IF THEY ARE CULTURALLY CLOSE, such as Germany, the Netherlands and Austria. IF THEY AREN’T, IT SIMPLY CAN’T CONTINUE TO WORK."

In other words, globalisation, the forcing together of ‘divergent’ bits of the whole for ideological reasons, ‘simply can’t continue to work.’ (It never has, Alan. Not for the indigenous working-classes of the West, it hasn‘t)

Nice admission, anyway. Northern Europe was forced to subsidize southern Europe’s ‘excess consumption’ at the behest of the international financiers, the globalists, the Greensapan types and their bought-and-paid-for politicians. It was they who, stupidly, ‘expected that the southern eurozone economies would behave like those in the north.’

Now, we are casually told THEY got it wrong.

What do think, ladies and gents? What price should the Greenspans pay for the financial meltdown? Do you, for example, believe that they should be allowed to keep their ill-gotten billions? More to the point, do you think they should be permitted to carry right on making more?

Greenspan was head of the Fed Res, the most powerful banking institution in the world, for the nineteen years that led up to the credit crunch of 2008. His laissez-faire, let-the-markets-rule, give-the-big-beasts-free-rein attitude to economics makes him, more than anyone else, responsible for the financial chaos and impoverishment we now face.

He is Jewish.



On 25 October 2011, Nick Clegg said this on ITV News:

“I think it is a monumental distraction from what is, in effect, an economic firestorm on our doorstep to tie ourselves up in knots late at night in Westminster…

Eurosceptics need to be quite careful what they wish for, because if they succeed, AND THEY WON’T SUCCEED, AS LONG AS I’M IN GOVERNMENT, to push this country towards the exit sign, let’s be clear: The people that will be damaged are British families, British businesses, British jobs, British communities, and I WON’T LET THAT HAPPEN.”

Thus does Lib Dem leader, Nick Clegg, reiterate his party’s determination to keep us in Europe, no matter what.

In case any of you have forgotten, here's what he said in the 25 February 2008 edtion of The Guardian:

“It's… time for a debate politicians have been too cowardly to hold for 30 years, TIME FOR A REFERENDUM ON THE BIG QUESTION. Do we want to be in or out? Nobody in Britain under the age of 51 has ever been asked that simple question. None of them were eligible to vote in that 1975 referendum. That includes half of all MPs. TWO GENERATIONS HAVE NEVER HAD THEIR SAY.

I know how I'd vote. I'm unashamedly pro-European. I believe the EU is the most sophisticated response to GLOBALISATION the world has seen. In previous generations it secured peace and prosperity for Europe. IN OUR GENERATION, IT'S OUR ONLY REAL HOPE IN TACKLING GLOBAL CHALLENGES LIKE… MASS MIGRATION, CROSS-BORDER CRIME AND TERRORISM… IT STRENGTHENS OUR REAL SOVEREIGNTY IN AN AGE IN WHICH NATIONAL BORDERS HAVE BECOME INCREASINGLY MEANINGLESS.

Pro-Europeans have got to face up to the truth: THE EU IS NOT POPULAR IN BRITAIN. It is perceived as distant, AND IS MISTRUSTED. And some of the allegations levelled against it are hard to deny. The EU could be a lot more liberal and democratic, and the Lisbon treaty would help it to do both. So LET'S TRUST THE PEOPLE WITH THE REAL QUESTION: IN OR OUT?…

There is a dilemma for the main parties. WE ALL PROMISED A REFERENDUM AT THE 2005 ELECTION ON A CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY. There is no constitutional treaty, so what do we do now? Does honouring our election pledge mean continuing with a referendum on whatever treaty has emerged from the ashes, however different, as the Conservatives say? Or does it mean THERE IS NO CASE FOR A REFERENDUM, AS LABOUR SAYS?…

WE WANT A REFERENDUM on Europe with substance. THIS GENERATION DESERVES ITS CHANCE TO SAY WHERE WE STAND ON EUROPE - IN OR OUT.”

Clegg promised us a referendum before the last election.

The Tories and New Labour promised us one too. Despite the promises, the leaderships of all three parties refused to let their MPs have a free vote on the matter. All were warned that the call for a referendum (by the British people as a whole) must be rejected.

Politicians lie. They lie to get into power and, once there, they do as they damn well please. As often as not, what pleases them does not please those they are elected to serve.



On 25 October 2011, The Telegraph quoted Charles Davis, managing economist at the Centre for Economics and Business Research, thus:

"Family spending power continues to be under significant pressure from the three-pronged threat of fragile wage growth, rising unemployment levels, and soaring consumer price inflation.

HOUSEHOLD DISPOSABLE INCOME HAS DROPPED CONSIDERABLY FROM A YEAR AGO. As utility price increases continue to feed through into erosions in family budgets, a tough couple of months lie ahead."



The international speculator, George Soros, ‘the man who broke the Bank of England’, said this 25 October 2011:

"WE NOW HAVE A DYNAMIC OF DISINTEGRATION AT WORK. The European Union was built up by a self-reinforcing process, WITH THE LEADERSHIP LEADING THE MOVE TOWARDS GREATER INTEGRATION… People are looking for NATIONAL SOLUTIONS and that then creates a political dynamic that reinforces the dissolution…

The leadership is trying preserve the status quo… It is really a demonstration HOW UNGOVERNABLE THE EUROPEAN UNION HAS BECOME… The euro is in the process of endangering the EU politically.”

And we don't want that, do we George?

The last thing folks like you want is for 'nationalist solutions' to jeopardise the globalist project.



On 25 October 2011, the Governor of the Bank of England said this before the House of Commons’ Treasury Select Committee:

“I certainly accept that WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE REAL ECONOMY NOW IS A VERY LARGE SQUEEZE ON HOUSEHOLD INCOME. REAL TAKE HOME PAY HAS FALLEN BY MORE IN THE PAST TWO YEARS THAN IN ANY TIME IN LIVING MEMORY… The causes of that fall in living statndards are real causes.”



On 25 October 2011, BBC Newsbeat quoted Alan Schneider, as he played host at one of his company’s ’sugar daddy’ parties, thus:

"Men, you know what to do. WOMEN, RECEIVE THEIR GENEROSITY. WE WILL TOUCH YOU WITH PASSION AND FIRE ALL NIGHT LONG."

Kind of makes your skin itch, doesn't it? Schneider, a sugar daddy himself, added:

"Traditional relationships of men being the provider and women being the caretaker of the family are coming back now. THEY'RE COMING BACK BECAUSE OF THE ECONOMY."

Is he saying that, ‘because of the economy,’ the traditionally unequal ‘relationship’ of rich to poor, the latter being at the beck and call of the former, are ‘coming back’, we wonder?

It was the first time at a ‘sugar daddy’ party for Mandy, 24. She says:

"I'm looking to find A BOYFRIEND WHO'S WILLING TO HELP ME OUT with what I'm doing right now. Like a regular boyfriend BUT RICHER. I'm studying at the moment and college is expensive. It works well for me if I start dating A GUY WHO I KNOW CAN TAKE CARE OF ME FINANCIALLY SO I NO LONGER HAVE TO WORRY."

Monique, who has already had one ‘relationship’ with a sugar daddy, added:

"I'm looking to advance myself to the next level. It's not just about the money, IT'S ABOUT WHAT A SUCCESSFUL PERSON CAN DO FOR YOU. IT'S ALMOST AN INSPIRATIONAL THING."

That’s one way of putting it, Monique. Newsbeat told us more:

“At first you could only find them on dating websites, now there are big budget sugar daddy parties. The events are becoming a regular fixture in New York with the company behind them planning to introduce them in the UK. At one event near Times Square the club is sold out and the dancefloor is lined with men, most of them over 40. They're far outnumbered by the number of young women…

At these parties, any couples who get together usually come to what is formally called ‘an arrangement‘. Often that will be as simple as the man buying expensive gifts for his partner or paying her a certain amount of money each time they meet. Many women there say they have a price that they're not willing to negotiate below.

The company behind these events now say THEY WANT TO BRING THEM TO THE UK…

ONE OF THE MAJOR CRITICISMS ABOUT THESE EVENTS IS THAT THEY ARE SIMPLY A FORM OF PROSTITUTION.”

Middle-aged rich men; struggling young women?

Yeah. I’d call it this particular ‘inspirational thing’ prostitution, wouldn’t you? I’d also say that Alan Schneider is playing the role of pimp and Porn Baron here and the BBC are in the business of advertising his wares.

The BBC describes Newsbeat thus:

“Newsbeat is produced by BBC News but differs from the BBC's other news programmes in its remit to provide news TAILORED FOR A SPECIFICALLY YOUNGER AUDIENCE.”

Alan Schneider, by the way, is Jewish.



On 24 October 2011, after 81 Tory and 19 Labour MPs defied the whip imposed by their party leaders to vote for the British people being given a Referendum on EU membership, UKIP’s leader, Nigel Farage, said this:

“Today was a bad day for Britain as the people of the UK have been denied the referendum they so desperately crave. POLL AFTER POLL SHOWS THE PEOPLE EITHER WANT OUT OF THE EU or to radically change the UK's relationship with the EU. Tonight THE UK'S POLITICAL ELITE HAS SNATCHED THAT OPPORTUNITY AWAY FROM THEM and denied people a vote. WE SHOULD NOT FORGIVE THEM.”

Lib Dem, MP, Adrian Sanders and 10 others also voted to allow a referendum.

31 Tories did not vote. Thus, apart from those who had been excused attendance, about 20 more Conservative MPs dared to defy the whip committing them to vote against the motion.

A similar number of Labour MPs did likewise.



On 24 October 2011, Simon Richards, Director of The Freedom Association, said this in The Daily Mail:

“Their decision to place 3-line whips against voting for an EU referendum demonstrates, more clearly than ever, the breathtaking contempt with which the Prime Minister, Clegg and Miliband treat their voters, their MPs and their country…

Clegg, the millionaire Eurofanatic… has form in this area… Yet again, the LibDems have put their slavish loyalty to the hated EU above the views of their own dwindling and disillusioned band of voters…

Miliband… is, let's be honest, NOT A MAN ONE WOULD TRUST in a millennium of Sundays. Faced with an opportunity to stand up for democracy and allow a free vote on an EU referendum, he, like Kinnock, another pitifully inadequate Labour leader before him, has shown where his true loyalties lie. I can at least understand his motivation, as he is probably already thinking about a a cushy job at the EU Commission and a fat pension to sustain him when his political career ends in ruins, as it surely will. BRUSSELS PROVIDES THE BEST RETIREMENT HOME IN EUROPE FOR FAILED POLITICIANS READY TO PUT THEIR OWN INTERESTS ABOVE THEIR COUNTRY'S.

But, as Prime Minister, it is, inevitably, Cameron who must shoulder the main blame for the quite disgraceful way in which he has behaved over the EU referendum. Remember that this vote has only come about as a result of his own agreement to allow discussion of issues supported by petitions of over 100,000 people. But, of course, Cameron has previous form. HIS 'CAST-IRON GUARANTEE' OF A REFERENDUM ON THE LISBON TREATY PROVED TO BE WORTHLESS…

Some have compared Cameron to Heath. That is unfair; Heath won a thumping General Election victory in 1970, whereas Cameron missed an open goal last year against the massively unpopular Gordon Brown. Heath never failed to proclaim his adherence to the EU; CAMERON, THE SERIAL LIAR, CLAIMS TO BE A EUROSCEPTIC WHILST ALWAYS PUTTING THE EU'S INTERESTS ABOVE THOSE OF HIS OWN COUNTRY.

The EU referendum vote this week will be lost, because CAMERON, CLEGG AND MILIBAND HAVE USED CHEATING AND BULLY BOY TACTICS TO RIG IT. But it will be only the first battle in what will be a long war TO REGAIN THE FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, INDEPENDENCE AND PROSPERITY THAT OUR GUILTY POLITICAL 'LEADERS' HAVE SIGNED AWAY TO BRUSSELS.”

Here's what Cameron was saying just before the last EU elections.

On 2 June 2009, this was his message to those about to vote:

“In 2005, all of the major political parties promised a REFERENDUM on the European Constitution. Why does this matter? Why do WE NEED A REFERENDUM and why do we need one now?…

The European Constitution, now called the Lisbon treaty, includes A MASSIVE TRANSFER OF POWERS FROM THE NATION STATES OF EUROPE TO BRUSSELS. IT ENDS OUR VETO. Our right to say no in about 60 AREAS. IT SETS UP A PERMANENT PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, A FOREIGN MINISTER, A DIPLOMATIC SERVICE. IT GIVES THE EUROPEAN UNION THE RIGHT TO SIGN TREATIES AND TO PASS NEW TREATIES, NEW CONSTITUTIONS, WITHOUT ASKING US AGAIN, THE PEOPLE OF EUROPE. That’s why it’s important, That’s why it matters…

I think we need powers to come back from Brussels to the nation states rather than the other was around. Why do we need a REFERENDUM? I think when our parliament is giving up powers, is passing powers to someone else, THEY SHOULD ASK US FIRST, THE PEOPLE, IN A REFERENDUM...

You can use June 4, the Euopean Elections, to DEMAND A REFERENDUM from Gordon Brown. THE REFERENDUM HE PROMISED, ALONG WITH EVERYONE ELSE, back in 2005. THE BEST WAY TO GET THAT REFERENDUM IS TO VOTE CONSERVATIVE...

Today we are publishing the bill, the parliamentary bill, that could go through parliament right now in the Autumn… That’s what should happen.

This is being done in your name. DON’T YOU THINK ALL OF US SHOULD HAVE A SAY IN THE REFERENDUM THAT WE WERE PROMISED?”

Cameron Lied

Oh, we do, Dave, we really do.

However, the best way to get that referendum is most definitely NOT to vote Conservative. Their leader is a liar, ‘along with everyone else’. Everyone else being the leadership of the Labour Party, the Lib Dems and 99 percent of the foreigner-fondlers who vote for them. They promised a referendum. When they had the chance to honour their promises, they did not do so.

Cameron offered us his unequivocal pledge immediately prior to the last European elections. Which is, of course, instructive. Before an election they will promise the earth, after it, that little bit of the earth you thought was already yours begins to disappear.

Believe the promises that ooze out of a mainstream politician at your peril. If you want to be bossed around by Brussels forever and ever, Amen, vote for the usual suspects. If you want a referendum, however, you should consider voting for UKIP, the BNP or any other Nationalist party.

In an interview for BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on the same day Cameron acknowledged the EU's ‘ENDLESS PROCESS OF BUILDING A SUPERSTATE’.

Just in case any of you imagined that the Camerons weren’t aware of what the project was always all about.




On 23 October 2011, Bernard Jenkin, Conservative MP for Harwich and North Essex and chairman of the Public Administration Select Committee, wrote the following in The Telegraph:

“The British economy is increasingly hobbled by a massive burden of regulation, MOST OF WHICH ORIGINATES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. The British Chambers of Commerce calculate that THE COST OF ADDITIONAL EU REGULATION INTRODUCED BETWEEN 1998 AND 2010 IS A STAGGERING £60.75 BILLION…

And that's before considering the direct costs: THE UK'S NET CONTRIBUTION TO THE EU HAS RISEN FROM £3 BILLION IN 2008/9 TO £9.2 BILLION IN 2010/11. This that means our subsidy to our wealthy partners far exceeds the aid budget. It is also more than a quarter of the defence budget and 40 times that of the BBC World Service.

Now, the regulators are moving into new areas crucial to the UK economy. The EU is the worst possible body to regulate the City of London, driven as its officials are by an antipathy to ‘Anglo-Saxon capitalism’ and a misplaced desire to promote Paris, Bonn and Frankfurt at the expense of London…

The EU is even moving in on the UK's highly successful defence industries, with a Defence and Security Procurement Directive aiming to establish ‘a truly European defence market’...

Disillusionment with the EU is growing apace. THE POLLS CONSISTENTLY SHOW THAT FEW WANT EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT... What Britain needs is… a fundamental change in our relationship with our EU partners, based on the basic democratic principle that THOSE PASSING LAWS SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE TO THOSE AFFECTED BY THEM...

Switzerland, Norway, Turkey, Iceland have each set different and useful precedents for a new kind of relationship with the EU, one that need not adversely affect our trading position within it.”



On 23 October 2011, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:

“Two Tory MPs are so scared of David Cameron’s pro-EU thought police that they have hidden their identities when giving radio interviews on the subject... So their words were spoken by actors, as if they were dissidents in some foreign dictatorship.

I have known since I first spotted him trying to weaken the anti-drug laws that Mr CAMERON WAS NOT A CONSERVATIVE. I have spoken to former colleagues who have concluded that he believes in nothing at all, but I think it is much worse than that. I think HE IS AN ACTIVE, MILITANT ELITE LIBERAL, WHO DESPISES OUR COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE, JUST AS MUCH AS ANY ISLINGTON MARXIST DOES.

What I could never understand was how so many men and women… managed to fool themselves so completely about him… HIS PERFORMANCE ON THE EU ISSUE HAS BEEN DISHONEST AND TREACHEROUS FROM THE START… HE IS IN FACT THE REINCARNATION OF TED HEATH, THE MAN WHO BETRAYED BRITAIN TO BRUSSELS AND GOT HIS WAY BY BULLYING AND SHAMELESS DISHONESTY.”

Hitchens also said:

“If you doubt the terrible dangers of illegal drugs, look at the miserable fate of Brian Dodgeon. Mr Dodgeon calls himself ‘an old hippie’. He is an academic and former social worker. He is all too typical of the demoralised English middle class, A TYPE OF LIBERAL BIGOT COMMON IN THE MEDIA AND AMONG TEACHERS AND SOCIAL WORKERS.

In their tens of thousands, THEY FRIED THEIR BRAINS WITH DOPE IN THE SIXTIES AND SEVENTIES, SO BECOMING EVEN MORE STUPID THAN THEY ALREADY WERE. Now they form a noisy, powerful lobby against proper enforcement of the drug law today, lying that there is a ‘war on drugs’. Ha ha. If only there were such a war, A SCHOOLGIRL MIGHT NOT HAVE DIED AFTER TAKING DRUGS MR DODGEON HAD LEFT IN HIS HOUSE DURING A TEENAGE PARTY…

I am rather sorry for Mr Dodgeon, whose pitiable attempt at suicide shows that he has suffered true remorse. But I am not sorry for the rest of his generation of idiots, who BY THEIR OWN BAD EXAMPLE AND IRRESPONSIBILITY, AND BY THEIR UNCEASING CALLS FOR WEAKER DRUG LAWS, ARE ENDANGERING THE HEALTH AND EVEN THE LIVES OF TODAY’S YOUNG.”



On 23 October 2011, The Daily Express told us this:

“A doctor who delivered a baby that died while he was banned from working unsupervised is still practising in the NHS… Dr Olufemi Dina… received the order from the General Medical Council after he falsified records and prescribed powerful drugs to a pregnant patient he had not seen.

Dr Dina, who qualified in Nigeria in 1988, was also named as a ‘negligent’ doctor in a High Court hearing in 2007 into the death of 20-year-old mother Elaine Carter, whom he failed to treat for a blood clot on the brain. The judge ruled she probably would have survived if Dina hadn’t sent her home with pain­killers for her severe headaches the previous day from Basildon Hospital, in Essex...

Dr Dina was unavailable for comment.”



On 22 October 2011, Amanda Platell said this in The Daily Mail:

“Women gipsies at Dale Farm yelled: ‘Protect the wee children!’ as riot police finally removed traveller families from their illegal camp this week. For a decade, these so-called traveller mothers have cynically used their children as shields to protect them against eviction..

When bailiffs and police with Taser guns moved into the camp in Basildon, Essex, groups of mothers with babies in their arms marched forward to confront them. Suffer the little children, they cried. Yet, the REAL VICTIMS IN THIS SORRY TALE ARE THE CHILDREN OF LAW-ABIDING FAMILIES WHO LIVE IN THE AREA. One of the ruses employed by travellers to remain on the site was to claim that their children had a human right to an education at the local school.

But the truth is that THE INFLUX OF TRAVELLER CHILDREN PUT SUCH A STRAIN ON CRAYS HILL PRIMARY THAT ALL THE OTHER LOCAL CHILDREN WERE WITHDRAWN BY THEIR PARENTS. THE HEADTEACHER AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS ALSO RESIGNED. TODAY, THE 110-STRONG SCHOOL REGISTER IS MADE UP ALMOST ENTIRELY OF TRAVELLERS… David McPherson-Davis, a former governor, says:

‘THEY WERE ILLITERATE. THEY NEEDED ALMOST ONE-ON-ONE ATTENTION.’ What’s more, THE SCHOOL HAS ONE OF THE WORST ATTENDANCE RECORDS IN THE COUNTRY, WITH MORE THAN HALF OF PUPILS PERSISTENTLY ABSENT LAST YEAR.

The tragedy is that while the gipsy children have been given their precious ‘human right’ to an education, THE CHILDREN OF BASILDON TAX- PAYERS HAVE SCANDALOUSLY BEEN DENIED THEIR RIGHT TO ONE.

Following their eviction, the travellers have moved on to desecrate another neighbourhood, AND CONTINUE TO RAISE THEIR CHILDREN IN FERAL CONDITIONS, NOT CARING WHETHER THEY CAN READ OR WRITE, AND NOT EVEN MAKING THEM ATTEND SCHOOL FOR THE EDUCATION WHICH THEY ARGUE IS THEIR RIGHT. Meanwhile, NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE ABOUT THE ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ OF THE MANY HUNDREDS OF CHILDREN OF HARD-WORKING TAXPAYERS WHO, OVER A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS, HAVE BEEN ROBBED OF A DECENT EDUCATION IN THEIR OWN LOCAL SCHOOL.”

Are you self-righteous do-gooders taking note?

Are you PC airheads paying attention? Those in the know and those at the aharp end have much to despise you for.



On 22 October 2011, Robert Verkaik informed us thus in The Daily Mail:

"Liam Fox's unofficial adviser Adam Werritty was warned by MI6 that his interventions in Iranian politics risked jeopardising British diplomacy in the Middle East. Senior Whitehall officials told Mr Werritty to rein in his political activities which included visits to the Iranian capital Tehran and REGULAR CONTACT WITH DISSIDENT GROUPS WHO WANTED REGIME CHANGE.

Dr Fox, who resigned as Defence Secretary ten days ago over his contacts with Mr Werritty, has been accused of USING HIS BEST MAN AND FORMER FLATMATE TO RUN A SEPARATE FOREIGN POLICY…

Last night there were also concerns over the role played by BRITAIN'S AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL, MATTHEW GOULD, WHO HELD A SERIES OF MEETINGS WITH DR FOX AND MR WERRITTY. The Foreign Office confirmed for the first time that Mr Gould had spoken to the two men while Dr Fox was a Shadow Defence spokesman and before Mr Gould was appointed to Tel Aviv last year…

Mr Werritty is a self-proclaimed expert on Iran and has made several visits. HE HAS ALSO MET SENIOR ISRAELI OFFICIALS, LEADING TO ACCUSATIONS THAT HE WAS CLOSE TO THE COUNTRY'S SECRET SERVICE, MOSSAD.

The Foreign Office declined to say whether Mr Gould had met Mr Werritty on his own. Nor would officials say what was discussed at the meeting with Dr Fox and Mr Werritty when Dr Fox was Shadow Defence spokesman. Of the second meeting between the three, after Dr Fox had taken up his Cabinet job, a spokesman said… ‘THERE IS NO SUCH POLICY TO OVERTHROW THE IRANIAN REGIME.'

Meanwhile, City of London Police last night confirmed that its OFFICERS WERE CONSIDERING INVESTIGATING MR WERRITTY FOR FRAUD.”



In a 22 October 2011 speech to the annual conference of the international charity, Church in Need, former MP, Anne Widdecombe, said this:

"David Cameron's Government have threatened to cut the overseas aid budget for countries which persecute homosexuals. Fair enough. But WHAT ABOUT CHRISTIANS? DO WE QUALIFY FOR SUCH PROTECTION OR DON'T WE? YOU STAND A BETTER CHANCE OF EARNEST REPRESENTATION IF YOU ARE A HEDGEHOG THAN IF YOU ARE A PERSECUTED CHRISTIAN! And I speak as a patron of the Hedgehog Protection Society."



In the 21 October edition of The Daily Mail, the Reverend Peter Mullen said this:

"Recently a seventy-five year old woman in Saudi Arabia was given forty lashes for socializing with her men friends. CHRISTIANITY IS ILLEGAL IN SAUDI, one of our most important middle-eastern allies with whom we do massive trade in weaponry. IF YOU ARE CAUGHT IN THAT COUNTRY WITH A BIBLE, OR WITH THE CROSS AROUND YOUR NECK, YOU WILL BE ARRESTED BY THE RELIGIOUS POLICE AND THROWN INTO PRISON.

In Pakistan, a thirteen year old girl was taunted for being a Christian by five Muslim youths who then raped her. THE RAPISTS WERE NOT CHARGED.

CHURCHES ARE BURNED DOWN EVERY WEEK IN PAKISTAN. A MAN IS ON TRIAL FOR HIS LIFE IN EGYPT FOR CONVERTING TO OUR FAITH. In China a church pastor has been slung into prison for utilising superstition to undermine the law.

There have been ancient and established Christian churches in the Middle East since the time of St Paul. Now THESE ARE BREAKING UP AS NEVER BEFORE IN 2000 YEARS AS HORDES OF CHRISTIANS TRY TO LEAVE TO ESCAPE PERSECUTION.

IN THE FACE OF ENDEMIC VIOLENCE FROM THE RADICAL ISLAMISTS, THE ARCHBISHOPS AND BISHOPS HAVE SET UP AN IMPOTENT, EVERLASTING TALKING SHOP TO PROMOTE CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM DIALOGUE and they issue vacuous communiqués from time to time. The uselessness of this project arises from the fact that IT IS ONLY ‘LIBERAL’ CHRISTIANS ENGAGING IN POLITE CHIT-CHAT WITH ‘MODERATE’ MUSLIMS. ALL IGNORED BY THE MILITANTS…

In England a Muslim girl who converted to Christianity from Islam has been removed from the home of her carer after she chose to be baptised. She was placed in a foster home because her father beat her and threatened to send her to Pakistan for a forced marriage. Her carer, who has fostered more than eighty children, did nothing to encourage her to convert.

In Sheffield, a primary school head teacher, described by her colleagues and pupils’ parents as marvellous, has resigned AFTER BEING ACCUSED OF RACISM BY PARENTS OF MUSLIM STUDENTS. The accusation comes after she proposed that the school stop holding separate assemblies for Muslim children and replace them with assemblies which would include all pupils.

Also in England, THREE COPTIC CHRISTIAN CHILDREN HAVE BEEN PLACED BY SOCIAL SERVICES WITH A MUSLIM FOSTER FAMILY AFTER THEIR PARENTS DIVORCED. THEY WERE ORIGINALLY PLACED IN THE CUSTODY OF THE CITY MOSQUE. THE AUTHORITY HAS REFUSED TO RETURN THE CHILDREN TO THE CUSTODY OF THE COPTIC CHURCH...

THE NURSE WHO OFFERED PRAYER TO A PATIENT, AS PART OF HER MINISTRY TO BODY AND SOUL, IS SACKED. THE AIRLINE WORKER WHO WEARS A DISCREET CROSS IS SACKED ALSO. A CHILD WAS REPRIMANDED FOR DISCUSSING GOD AT JUNIOR SCHOOL. PUBLIC LIBRARIES HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED TO PLACE BIBLES ON THE HIGHEST SHELF, as if they were some sort of pornography likely to deprave and corrupt…

WE ARE DOMINATED BY A SECULAR ELITE... THIS ELITE OF ATHEISTS… DARE NOT ATTACK ISLAM FOR FEAR OF GETTING ITS CORPORATE THROAT SLIT. But it finds it useful to invoke an allegedly outraged Islamic sensitivity IN ORDER TO PERSECUTE THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.

This secular elite, the Dawkins, Pullmans, Toynbees, Graylings and the BBC entire, targets Christianity because IT SEES CHRISTIANITY AS THE EMBODIMENT OF THOSE HISTORIC AND TRADITIONAL VALUES WHICH, UNTIL THE CONTEMPORARY REVERSAL, MADE THIS COUNTRY A PLACE WORTH LIVING IN.

A few years ago there was an obscene theatrical show called Jerry Springer: The Opera. In this – broadcast incidentally by the BBC whose Director General claims to be a Roman Catholic – there were some 3500 blasphemies of God and Jesus Christ and many insults directed at The Virgin Mary. Jesus wore a nappy. A case was brought and THE PROGRAMME WAS JUDGED TO BE INOFFENSIVE. I’ve written a few musicals in my time. How do you think I would get on if I were to submit my latest proposal to the BBC Mohammed: The High School Years – with Shi’ite nudity and a pulsating rock score?

WHY IS THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND’S HIERARCHY NOT OUT ON THE STREETS PROTESTING ABOUT THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS? Because, shocking as it sounds, MANY OF ITS MEMBERS ARE EFFECTIVELY NON-BELIEVERS WHO REJECT THE TRADITIONAL TEACHINGS OF THE CHURCH… THEIR IDEAL IMAGE OF JESUS CHRIST IS THAT OF A SOCIAL WORKER AND PREACHER OF THE MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY...

THE BISHOPS AND SYNOD HAVE SIDELINED THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER AND THE KING JAMES BIBLE… FOR THEM, CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE IS A SORT OF LONG-RUNNING METAPHOR FOR THE SOCIAL POLICIES OF THE SOFT LEFT… The Bishops and the Synod have also accommodated the church to the secular social agenda which gnaws away at the fabric of the family and public life…

Did you know IT IS AN OFFENCE TO TEACH CHRISTIANITY IN SCHOOLS AS SOMETHING THAT IS TRUE?... Christianity now must be taught only as one among many religions. The only way this can be done is from the secular perspective. THIS IS ATHEISM BY STATE DECREE... The secular assumption nowadays is that you can remove Christianity and all the other good things will stay in place. They won’t. If Christianity goes, the lot goes with it…

The appalling truth is that OUR CIVILIZATION HAS DEVELOPED A CULTURE OF SELF-HATRED, A DEATH-WISH... As in St Augustine’s day, THE REPRESSION OF FREEDOM IS ACCOMPANIED BY THE TAWDRIEST AND LEWDEST ENTERTAINMENTS AND PUBLIC SPECTACLES... We inhabit the electronic, techno-digital version of the bread and circuses of Augustine’s time. THE CELEBRATION OF LOW LIFE IN MASS ENTERTAINMENTS SUCH AS BIG BROTHER. THE DEBAUCHED WORSHIP OF CELEB-TRASH... CHRISTIANITY IN BRITAIN TODAY IS UNDER SEVERE PERSECUTION. AND IT WILL GET MUCH WORSE.”



On 21 October 2001, the BBC quoted Adolph Cameron, Secretary General of the Jamaican Teachers' Association, thus:

"Education... takes second place to notions of entrepreneurship as, predominantly OUR YOUNG MEN, GET INVOLVED IN the informality of what the University of the West Indies academics, Witter and Gayle, have called a 'HUSTLE CULTURE'…

That notion of masculinity says that, IF AS A MALE YOU ASPIRE TO PERFORM HIGHLY, IT MEANS YOU ARE FEMININE, EVEN TO THE EXTENT OF SAYING YOU ARE GAY. But in the context of Jamaica, which is so homophobic, male students don't want to be categorised in that way so that THEY WOULD DELIBERATELY UNDERPERFORM in order that they are not…

I would not be surprised if HERE IN ENGLAND THE SAME OR SIMILAR THINGS OCCUR in terms of how they feel about themselves and how they respond to and with respect to the society around them. BOYS ARE MORE INTERESTED IN HUSTLING, WHICH IS A QUICK WAY OF MAKING A LIVING, RATHER THAN MAKING THE COMMITMENT TO STUDY. THIS IS A SUPPOSED TO BE A STREET THING WHICH IS A MALE THING.

The influence of this attitude towards masculinity seems to be having a tremendous impact on how well African-Caribbean and Jamaican males do. THERE'S A FEAR OF BEING CATEGORISED AS GAY IN A SOCIETY WHERE HOMOPHOBIA IS SO STRONG."

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what the powers-that-be have forced an ever-increasing majority of our children to be educated alongside for the last sixty years. The PC Crowd have imposed ‘hustle culture’ upon all of us. This is what they have promoted and encouraged at our expense. This is what they have legislated on behalf of to an insane degree. As they legislated against us.

The BBC added:

“Mr Cameron said research had suggested that BOYS IN JAMAICA DELIBERATELY UNDERPERFORMED in literacy tests because the tests were carried out in standard English, and ‘TO SPEAK IN STANDARD ENGLISH IS CONSIDERED A WOMAN'S ACTIVITY.’ He went on to suggest THE SAME CULTURAL ATTITUDES AFFECTED THE LEARNING OF AFRICAN-CARIBBEAN BOYS IN ENGLAND.”




After Ed Miliband ordered Labour MPs to vote against a referendum on the EU, (David Cameron ordered his Tory backbenchers to do likewise) MP Kate Hoey said this on 20 October 2011:

“Labour voters across the country will be very angry that Labour is taking the same view as the Tory leadership on this issue. This just shows how THE ESTABLISHMENT COLLUDES TO ENSURE THAT THE VOICE OF THE ORDINARY BRITISH CITIZEN IS SHUT OUT OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AT WESTMINSTER.”

Confirming his decision to order his MPs to oppose the motion, Miliband said:

“We are going to be voting against a proposal for a referendum on getting out of Europe. IT’S NOT THE RIGHT THING FOR BRITAIN. IT IS NOT THE RIGHT THING FOR JOBS. IT IS NOT THE RIGHT THING FOR GROWTH.”

The 'jobs' thing is one enormous p***-take, seeing as how ninety percent of all the jobs created by New Labour were gobbled up by foreigners.

Miliband's parents were both immigrant Jews. His father spent his life here commentating on the benefits and advantages of Marxist Communism.



On 20 October 2011, the BBC quoted a comment from letter sent by Mark Rowley, Chief Constable of Surrey, to the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee.

In the letter, he admitted that Surrey Police knew Milly Dowler's phone had been hacked by someone working for the News of the World as long ago as April 2002. Rowley wrote:

"From that call it was apparent that person(s) working for, or on behalf of, the NoW had accessed Milly Dowler's voicemail. At that time, the focus and priority of the investigation was to find Milly, who had then been missing for over three weeks and significant resources were deployed to achieve this objective.

I can confirm that SURREY POLICE DID NOT LAUNCH A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO HOW THE NOW CAME BY THE INFORMATION it provided Operation Ruby with in April 2002 and that SURREY POLICE NEITHER ARRESTED NOR CHARGED ANYONE IN RELATION TO ACCESSING MILLY DOWLER'S VOICEMAIL The inquiry team is currently looking into why this was the case."


On 20 October 2011, the Public Accounts Committee of the House of Commons was quoted by the Mail Online as saying the Department of International Development had a ‘poor understanding’ of the scale and likelihood of aid being lost to fraud.

The Committee warned:

“Operating in high-risk environments means THE POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED RISK OF LEAKAGE THROUGH FRAUD AND CORRUPTION… Fragile and conflict-affected states… pose higher risks in terms of POOR SECURITY, DELIVERY CAPACITY, MEASUREMENT OF COSTS AND OUTCOMES AND LEAKAGE OF FUNDS THROUGH FRAUD AND CORRUPTION.”

Labour MP Margaret Hodge, Chair of the Committee, added:

“The department is going to be spending more in fragile and conflict-affected countries and THE DANGER TO THE TAXPAYER IS THAT THERE COULD BE AN INCREASE IN FRAUD AND CORRUPTION. However, THE DEPARTMENT COULD NOT EVEN GIVE US INFORMATION AS TO THE EXPECTED LEVELS OF FRAUD AND CORRUPTION AND THE ACTION THEY WERE TAKING TO MITIGATE IT. THE DEPARTMENT’S ABILITY TO MAKE INFORMED SPENDING DECISIONS IS UNDERMINED BY ITS POOR UNDERSTANDING OF LEVELS OF FRAUD AND CORRUPTION.”

David Cameron has pledged that foreign aid will rise from £8.4billion this year to £12.6billion in 2015; £479 for every household in Britain.

The aggressive and uncaring profligacy with the money of those who elect the Camerons, in the vain hope that they will, for once, put us first, is the “biggest danger to the taxpayers.”

Other than the wars they involve us in and mass immgration, that is.



On 20 October 2011, Amanda Platell said this in The Mail Online:

“Women and children first – it’s a practice that dates back to the self-sacrificing actions of soldiers during the sinking of HMS Birkenhead in 1852, made famous by the actions of men during the disaster of the Titanic – a time-honoured British tradition. And today we saw it again at Dale Farm, yet with a new twist. Instead of the men protecting their women and children as the missiles were flying when the eviction began, THEY USED THEM AS HUMAN SHIELDS.

Rocks, iron bars, bottles were pelted at the police the moment they entered the site from the travellers and their rent-a-mob professional protesters. And who was in the line of fire? Women and children.
Who took to the airwaves immediately crying police brutality? The women.

What kind of men place their mothers, wives, sisters, daughters in harms way while they cower behind the barricades, throwing missiles? MEN CYNICALLY SEEKING MAXIMUM MEDIA COVERAGE FOR THEIR ILLEGAL CAUSE, THAT’S WHO. The PR impact of a woman with blood flowing from a head garners much more public sympathy than the same image of a man… The women and children were placed in the line of fire – BY THEIR OWN PEOPLE - not because of the actions of the police who were just doing their job, but BECAUSE OF THE MASTERPLAN OF THE TRAVELLERS ORGANIZING THEIR RESISTANCE TO THE EVICTION…

Dale Farm resident and chief spokesman Kathleen McCarthy was quickly and hysterically onto Five Live, accusing the police of appalling brutality. I lost count of the times she described WOMEN WITH BLOOD POURING FROM THEIR WOUNDS WHILE THEY HELD THEIR BABES IN THEIR ARMS.”



On 20 October 2011, Stephen Glover said this in The Mail Online:

“The Intergenerational Foundation, which is described as a charity, believes older people should be encouraged to move into smaller homes as part of the solution to the ‘housing crisis’. It says that more than half of over-65s are in homes with two or more spare bedrooms, which could be pressed into greater use… Don’t panic, though, if you are an elderly homeowner, at least, not yet… The suggestion, given such sympathetic and extensive treatment by the BBC, is that THE AGED SHOULD BE COAXED, NOT FORCED, INTO GIVING UP THEIR SUPPOSEDLY LARGE HOUSES.

Everyone knows that, very regrettably, young people are finding it difficult to enter the housing market… There are simply not enough new homes… One aggravating factor, which is scarcely ever mentioned in polite circles, IS THE HIGH LEVEL OF NET IMMIGRATION INTO THIS COUNTRY. Last year, it amounted to 239,000. THE POPULATION OF THE UK IS EXPECTED TO INCREASE BY NINE MILLION TO 70 MILLION BY 2025, LARGELY BECAUSE OF IMMIGRATION. These people will have to live somewhere. Think of it. In little more than a decade, our population will grow by the equivalent of 20 CITIES THE SIZE OF SHEFFIELD OR LEEDS, in large measure because the last government did not control the influx of immigrants.

ENTER THE LEFT-LEANING INTERGENERATIONAL FOUNDATION WITH ITS SINISTER NEW PROPOSALS.

Instead of urging the Government to increase the supply of new homes or to do something about reducing the demand, IT FIXES ON ELDERLY HOMEOWNERS AND TRIES TO MAKE THEM FEEL GUILTY ABOUT OCCUPYING SO MUCH SPACE. A NASTY NEW CONCEPT IS ENTERING THE LEXICON: ‘BEDROOM BLOCKING’.

Isn’t this outrageous? If you own your own home and are in your 60s, the chances are that you have not long ago paid off your mortgage — or perhaps you haven’t yet managed to do so. You have saved, and probably sometimes gone without, in order to buy your own house, which, now that it is finally yours, interfering busybodies urge you to leave. It’s hardly your fault if it has risen sharply in value. The suggestion that you should up sticks is not merely terribly unfair. It is also a form of ageism. THE INTERGENERATIONAL FOUNDATION APPEARS TO THINK THE ELDERLY CAN AND SHOULD BE PUSHED ASIDE IN FAVOUR OF RISING GENERATIONS. They are not allowed to enjoy the fruits of a lifetime’s labour…

Here we come to the absolutely crucial point which the Intergenerational Foundation, in its bleak and utilitarian way, ignores, or simply does not understand. We live in an age of atomised families, where grown-up children increasingly work far from where their parents live. And so the enduring family home remains the thread that can still bind together disparate parts of a family. The second or third bedroom may sometimes, or even often, be unoccupied, but their existence allows children and grandchildren to come and stay, and the family to retain its sense of identity and unity in an otherwise splintered world.

In other words, the family home with its one or two spare bedrooms — we are not usually talking about mansions here — IS THE BEDROCK OF FAMILY LIFE. TAKE IT AWAY, AND THE FAMILY, ALREADY UNDER THREAT ON SO MANY OTHER FRONTS, WILL STRUGGLE EVEN HARDER TO SURVIVE…

What alarms me is that the Intergenerational Foundation’s ideas should have been treated so respectfully by the BBC, as though they had been brought down wholesale from Mount Sinai, and no one was given the opportunity to say they are discriminatory and coercive. Nor was it mentioned that SOME OF THE ‘BRAINS’ BEHIND THE FOUNDATION ARE THOSE OF THE LABOUR SHADOW MINISTER TESSA JOWELL. She, of course, was a leading light of the last Labour administration, which was mostly responsible for the pressure on housing…

GOVERNMENTS, NOT HOME-OWNERS, ARE TO BLAME — FOR PERMITTING THE POPULATION TO BALLOON AND FOR NOT ENCOURAGING, OR ALLOWING, ENOUGH HOUSES TO BE BUILT. HOW SICKENING THAT MS JOWELL AND HER FOUNDATION SHOULD BE TRYING TO BULLY THE ELDERLY INTO GIVING UP THEIR HOMES.”



Regarding the called for referendum on the EU, on 19 October 2011, Stewart Jackson, Parliamentary Private Secretary to Owen Paterson, the Northern Ireland Secretary, said this on Radio 4’s World at One programme:

“Some things are more important than party preferment: THE VIEWS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD NO SAY ON A POLICY IN ANY SUBSTANTIVE SENSE FOR 36 YEARS. I owe it to them to give them that say. It’s pretty clear that some of us aren’t going to go any further, so we haven’t got much to lose here.”



On 19 October 2011, Jin Liqun, Chairman of the China Investment Corporation, was heard saying this on Channel Four News:

"Europe is not really short of money. Europe needs to give a clear picture to the Europeans themselves and to the rest of the world that their problems could be worked out. The root cause of the trouble is THE OVER-BURDENED WELFARE SYSTEM, built up since the Second World War in Europe, THE SLOTH-INDUCING, INDOLENCE-INDUCING LABOUR LAWS.

PEOPLE NEED TO WORK A BIT HARDER, THEY NEED TO WORK A BIT LONGER, and they should be more innovative."

Courtesy of our treacherous politicians we're ‘addicted’ to a lot more than benefits and your cheap, job, industry and community-destroying crap, Jin. Drugs, drink and lemming acceptance of our dumbed-down, ‘sloth-inducing’ lot being chief among many society-shattering addictions.

How about we invest the little we have left in building up our industries again, boot the lazy natives back to work and introduce a command economy where the indigenous Brit is encouraged to buy from his own folk instead of yours, Jin After we’ve removed all the Chinamen and other foreigners from the over-burdened welfare system, that is?

No. I didn’t think you’d be too keen on your under-cutting Commie producers having a marketplace like ours restored to its rightful owners.

The advice is sound but disingenuously meant, Jin. And condescension and patronage from a Chinese capitalist, whose Communist decision-makers were happy to subvert, indebt and enchain the people you now criticise, is inappropriate to say the least.



On 19 October 2011, Baroness Young, Chair of a House of Lords Health Committee, was quoted thus by the Mail Online:

“It is absolutely unacceptable that CURRENT EU RULES PUT PATIENTS IN THE UK AND ELSEWHERE AT RISK. From regulating bodies being forced to accredit candidates who may not meet UK standards to the fact that there is no way for prospective employers to check an applicant’s disciplinary history thoroughly, THE EU IS FAILING OUR PATIENTS.”

The Mail added:

“CONTINENTAL DOCTORS AND NURSES ARE ALLOWED TO WORK WITHOUT ANY FORMAL NHS TRAINING IN AN ATTEMPT TO COMPLY WITH EU FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT REQUIREMENTS, a House of Lords committee concluded... Peers also found that THE NHS IS BEING FORCED TO ACCREDIT EU MEDICAL STAFF EVEN IF THEIR TRAINING IS YEARS OUT OF DATE OR IS WELL BELOW UK STANDARDS. SOME COUNTRIES EVEN REFUSE TO TELL REGULATORS SUCH AS THE GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL WHEN DOCTORS HAVE BEEN STRUCK OFF, citing EU data protection directives.

They say that this, coupled with language difficulties, means IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BE CONFIDENT THAT PATIENTS ARE RECEIVING SAFE CARE FROM ALL EUROPEAN MEDICAL STAFF.

EU nurses are cleared to work here even if they have not been on a ward for 20 years… Some midwives… have no idea how to monitor a foetus.

The issue was brought into focus by the case of Dr Daniel Ubani, a German GP who killed 70-year-old David Gray with a tenfold overdose of diamorphine because he did not have the expertise expected of a UK family doctor.

Doctors and nurses are supposed to meet certain levels of training before being allowed to practise here. But different nations’ training programmes vary widely in their quality, and THE GMC SAYS OFTEN THEY ARE 30 YEARS OUT OF DATE."



On 19 October 2011, Christopher Hope told us this in The Mail Online:

“DAVID CAMERON NEXT WEEK WILL ORDER CONSERVATIVE MPS TO VOTE AGAINST HOLDING A REFERENDUM ON BRITAIN'S EUROPEAN UNION MEMBERSHIP. Even as MPs agreed to hold a Commons vote on a referendum, government sources made clear that THE TORIES WOULD BE WHIPPED TO VOTE AGAINST A POLL.

Mr Cameron's decision to impose a three-line whip has angered many MPs, since the vote was called under rules THE COALITION PROMISED WOULD GIVE BACKBENCHERS MORE FREEDOM.”

Globalists to the end.

All of them. That is, all of those who ever get to slither to the top of the greasy political pole in this country.



On 19 October 2011, James Delingpole said this in The Telegraph:

"It requires real talent and serious effort to become the worst Tory prime minister in history… But Dave, I salute you. TODAY YOU HAVE MANAGED IT WITH THE MOST POINTLESS, SPITEFUL, VINDICTIVE, BULLYING ABSURD DIRECTIVE SO FAR IN YOUR ALREADY SWOLLEN CATALOGUE OF DISASTERS AS PRIME MINISTER…

Not only will this decision (to whip Tory MPs into voting against a referendum on the EU) needlessly alienate some of the most talented up-and-coming Conservative MPs… it will confirm to what little of the traditional Tory constituency which hasn't already deserted to UKIP that Cameron's new, ‘detoxed’ principle-free Conservative party is NO LONGER CAPABLE OF REPRESENTING THEIR INTERESTS IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER.”



On 18 October 2011, Keith Gladdis, Arthur Martin and Richard Pendlebury said this in The Mail Online:

“A MILLIONAIRE HEDGE FUND BARON WHO BANKROLLED FORMER DEFENCE SECRETARY LIAM FOX MADE A SERIES OF PERSONAL DONATIONS AND GIFTS TO A STRING OF SENIOR CABINET MINISTERS, INCLUDING THE PRIME MINISTER AND CHANCELLOR…

Banker Michael Hintze has given at least £1.2million to the Conservative Party and provided a further £2.5million in loans since 2005. Mr HINTZE, 58, ALSO GAVE MORE THAN £100,000 TO THE ATLANTIC BRIDGE CHARITY SET UP BY DR FOX AND RUN BY HIS SELF-STYLED ADVISER ADAM WERRITTY.

PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON AND CHANCELLOR GEORGE OSBORNE… BENEFITED PERSONALLY FROM THE FORMER GOLDMAN SACHS BANKER. HOME SECRETARY THERESA MAY, FOREIGN SECRETARY WILLIAM HAGUE AND NEW DEFENCE SECRETARY PHILIP HAMMOND ALSO RECEIVED GIFTS or donations from Mr Hintze or his company, CQS Management. Even London Mayor Boris Johnson and former Tory leadership candidate David Davis have been backed by the banker.”



On 18 October 2011, the BBC quoted an HIV-positive African immigrant “Jane Iwu” (pseudonym) thus:

"I know of a friend who had been to a pastor. SHE TOLD HER TO STOP TAKING HER MEDICATION - that God is a healer and has healed her. This lady believed it. She stopped taking her medication. SHE PASSED AWAY.”

Professor Jane Anderson, director of the Centre for the Study of Sexual Health and HIV, in Hackney, said this:

"I've only seen that once, but it has happened. We see patients quite often who will come having expressed the belief that IF THEY PRAY FREQUENTLY ENOUGH, THEIR HIV WILL SOMEHOW BE CURED. WE HAVE SEEN PEOPLE WHO CHOOSE NOT TO TAKE THE TABLETS AT ALL SO SOMETIMES DIE."

Former Tory Health Minister and Chairman of a House of Lords committee into HIV, Lord Norman Fowler, condemned the African pastors dispensing such advice, saying:

"It's just wrong, bad advice that should be confronted… It's dangerous to the public and dangerous in terms of public health… It's irresponsible… completely wrong advice to the public".

African Health Policy Network chief, Francis Kaikumba, said:

"THIS IS HAPPENING THROUGH A NUMBER OF CHURCHES. We're hearing about more cases of this."

The BBC added:

“At least three people in London with HIV have died after they stopped taking life saving drugs ON THE ADVICE OF THEIR EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN PASTORS. The women died after attending churches in London where THEY WERE ENCOURAGED TO STOP TAKING THE ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS IN THE BELIEF THAT GOD WOULD HEAL THEM…

The Synagogue Church Of All Nations in Southwark, south London, may be involved in such practices. The church is headed by Pastor T B Joshua, NIGERIA'S THIRD RICHEST CLERGYMAN, according to a recent Forbes richlist. The church's website in Lagos shows photos of people it claims have been ‘cured’ of HIV through prayer. In one example, the church's website claims:

‘Mrs Badmus proudly displays her two different medical records confirming she is 100% free from HIV-Aids following the prayer of Pastor T B Joshua‘… ‘Cancer healing’ and ‘baby miracles’ are also advertised…

Mary Buhari, (pseudonym)… told the BBC she had had a phone conversation with a representative of the church, in which she was told she could be cured of HIV. ‘I WAS TOLD THEY CAN CURE ANY ILLNESS ON EARTH THROUGH PRAYER, INCLUDING HIV,’ she said. However, when asked by BBC London if it claimed its pastors can cure HIV, SCOAN responded:

‘We are not the healer. God is the healer. Never a sickness God cannot heal. Never a disease God cannot cure. We don't ask people to stop taking medication… Doctors treat; God heals’.”



On 18 October 2011, Becky Barrow said this in The Mail Online:

“BUSINESSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY ARE COLLAPSING AT THE RATE OF 120 PER DAY… The report, from business information firm Equifax… shows that BETWEEN JULY AND SEPTEMBER… THERE WERE 7,994 'BUSINESS DEATHS' - equal to 121 every working day…

THE PICTURE COULD BE EVEN WORSE THAN THIS, because the figure only includes firms which have gone into liquidation or are subject to a winding-up order. It does not include administration, receivership or a company voluntary arrangement.”



On 18 October 2011, Sophie Borland told us this in The Mail Online:

"PATIENTS ARE BEING BANNED BY THEIR GPS SIMPLY FOR MAKING MINOR COMPLAINTS. Entire families are being unfairly removed from practice lists and barred from making appointments following trivial disagreements with doctors or staff.

One complaint concerned a woman who had merely replaced a flat battery in a device administering anti-sickness medicine to her terminally-ill mother. The woman, who is a trained nurse, said she did not want her mother to suffer while they waited for the practice nurse to arrive for a home visit. But the surgery claimed her actions had undermined the doctor-patient relationship and the woman and her dying mother were told they would no longer be treated by the practice.

A report by Health Service Ombudsman warns that INCREASING NUMBERS OF PATIENTS ARE BEING REMOVED FROM DOCTORS' LISTS 'WITHOUT FAIR WARNING OR PROPER EXPLANATION'. Once a patient has been taken off a surgery's list they are not allowed to make any other appointments, forcing them to find another doctor.”



PC Amechi Onwugbonu, a member of a 7-strong Territorial Support Group operating out of Scotland Yard, accused one of his comrades of “threatening behaviour” and the others of covering up an alleged assault of a group of Arab teenagers in June 2007.

After PCs Mark Jones and Neil Brown were cleared of a racially aggravated assault, they, along with four others, decided to sue Scotland Yard for racial discrimination. On 17 October 2011, the BBC showed William Wilson, the sergeant who led the team in 2007, speaking out after his retirement from the force.

“I feel nothing more than contempt. I FEEL VERY ANGRY, VERY UPSET ABOUT THE WAY I'VE BEEN DEALT WITH. I retired after thirty years and wasn't spoken to by anybody in any senior position. It makes you feel pretty worthless. I don't know why I did the thirty years. I could not recommend it as a career to anybody. I am convinced that there was a panic.

IT WAS A BLACK OFFICER MAKING AN ALLEGATION AGAINST SIX WHITE OFFICERS. If it had been a white officer making that allegation, then the matter would have been dealt with in-house there and then. That would have been the end of it. If there is any allegation by any black or ethnic minority person against white police officers, they have gone in completely the opposite direction to the point where IT IS ACTUALLY THE WHITE OFFICERS GETTING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST.

I THINK THEY ARE TERRIFIED OF THIS LABEL OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM and they are terrified of being accused of not taking a black officer's allegations seriously because that could be twisted round to say they are ignoring him because he is an ethnic minority officer. IT'S POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD.”

Lynne Burns, who represents the six officers, said:

“I think this case is a complete embarrassment and really THEY JUST WANT TO BURY IT... I have heard what the new commissioner has said about honesty, integrity and transparency, ALL THE THINGS THAT THIS CASE IS DISTINCTLY LACKING. I would really like to meet with him.”



After Robert Shaw wrote a letter to his daughter from Portland Prison, where he is serving a sentence of two years eight months, on 17 October 2011, The Sun quoted the words he wrote thus:

“IT'S QUITE GOOD FUN HERE… There is a snooker table, pool table, table tennis, a gym, rock-climbing, football and tennis. I HAVE A TV AND FIND IT VERY RELAXING. Apart from missing everyone, it's quite good."

Not what you’d call a deterrent, is it?



On 17 October 2011, Peter Hitchens said this in his Mail Online blog:

"Labour governments in this country generally 'make' radical changes. Tory governments 'accept' those changes, but only rarely do they embark on destructive urges of their own."



On 16 October 2011, Peter Hitchens said this in his Mail Online blog:

“THE MODISH LEFT KNOW DEEP DOWN THAT THE PUBLIC DON’T AGREE WITH THEM ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY. IN PRIVATE, THEY THEMSELVES MAY NOT EVEN BELIEVE THE NOBLE PUBLIC STATEMENTS THEY SO OFTEN MAKE...

I am no friend of Liam Fox... But I think it is a very dirty business that Left-wing newspapers, which claim to believe that homosexuality is no different from heterosexuality, behave in this way. It’s particularly striking that this came almost immediately after the Prime Minister deliberately teased what is left of the Tory Party by saying HE FAVOURED HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE...

The Left – and Mr CAMERON IS OF THE LEFT – have done this for many years... But the events of the past week show clearly that THE LEFT, FOR ALL THEIR NOISY SANCTITY ON THE SUBJECT, ARE FAR FROM FREE OF PREJUDICE AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS, AND QUITE READY TO USE SUCH BIGOTRY WHEN IT SUITS THEM TO DO SO.”

Hitchens also said this:

“How typical of the furry Archbishop of Canterbury that he can stand up against the persecution of Christianity in Africa, BUT ISN’T AWARE OF IT HERE… HIS BEHAVIOUR IS TYPICAL OF A CHURCH WHICH HAS BEEN SO OBSESSED WITH THE THIRD WORLD FOR SO LONG THAT IT HAS FORGOTTEN THE COUNTRY OF ITS BIRTH, WHERE LEGIONS OF BUREAUCRATS – OFTEN AIDED BY SOPPY VICARS – ARE QUIETLY STRANGLING THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.

My guess is that there will be a thriving Anglican church in Africa several centuries after CANTERBURY CATHEDRAL HAS BEEN CONVERTED INTO A MOSQUE.”



On 16 October 2011, after US Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, told the G20 finance ministers' 15 October summit in Paris that only a massive firewall would protect the eurozone from a Greek default, The Observer quoted Geithner thus:

“THERE ARE SIX DAYS TO SAVE THE WORLD.”

Geithner is Jewish.

Apart from Geithner, a peek at who, precisely, controls Obama’s Treasury Department is instructive. Remember, these are the people who have gotten to grips with the world’s financial crisis to such an extent that the chief among them is predicting that the world will end in six days time.

Neal S. Wolin is the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
Peter Orszag is the Office of Management and Budget
Stuart A. Levey is the Under Secretary for Financial Intelligence (and Terrorism)
Alan Krueger is the Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy
Michael S. Barr is the Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions
David S. Cohen is the Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing

All of the above are Jewish, as is Larry Summers, the Chairman of the National Economic Council and the President’s top Financial Advisor.

Here are the rest of Obama’s top financial appointees:

Kim N. Wallace is the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Legislative Affairs and George W. Madison is General Counsel, US Department of the Treasury Secretary of Treasury. Both are black. Rosie Rios, the US Treasurer, is Hispanic.

Herbert M. Allison, the Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability and Daniel Tangherlini, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Management, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Performance Officer, are white.

Of Geithner's six counselors, five, Matthew Kabaker; Lewis Alexander; Lee Sachs; Jake Siewert and Gene Sperling, are also Jewish.

Here are a few more highly placed Jewish movers and shakers within the US adminstration:

Barney Frank - Chairman of the US House Committee on Financial Services.
Paul A. Volcker – Chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board
Steven L. Rattner – Director of the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry
Kenneth R. Feinberg – Special Master for Compensation, U.S. Treasury Department
Jared Bernstein – Chief Economist and Economic Policy Adviser, Vice President
Peter R. Orszag – Director, Office of Management and Budget
Douglas W. Elmendorf – Director, Congressional Budget Office
Douglas H. Shulman – Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
Jon D. Leibowitz – Chairman, Federal Trade Commission
Sheila C. Bair – Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
John E. Bowman – Director, Office of Thrift Supervision
Karen G. Mills – Administrator, Small Business Administration

As regards the Federal Reserve, the Chairman of the Board of Governors, Ben Bernanke, is also Jewish.

He was top boy when the sh*t hit the fan in 2008. The previous 19-year incumbent, Alan Greenspan, (knighted at the behest of Blair and Brown) who’s laissez-faire approach to economics make him more responsible than anyone else for the world’s financial meltdown, is also Jewish.

Donald L. Kohn, the Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors is also Jewish, as is Stephen Friedman, the Chairman of the bank’s Board of Directors.

Here is a list of the Presidents of the Federal Reserve District Banks:

Eric S. Rosengren - Boston
Charles I. Plosser - Philadelphia
Jeffrey M. Lacker - Richmond
James B. Bullard - St. Louis
Gary H. Stern - Minneapolis
Thomas M. Hoeing - Kansas City
Richard W. Fisher - Dallas
Janet L. Yellen - San Francisco

All of the above are Jewish.

William C. Dudley - New York; Sandra Pianalto - Cleveland; Dennis P. Lockhart - Atlanta and Charles L. Evans - Chicago, are non-Jewish.

When you consider that the Jews comprise around two percent of America’s citizenry, you can see how over-represented they are at the top financial table.

But this isn't all.

Mary Schapiro, Chairperson of the Securities and Exchange Commission is Jewish.
Gary Gensler, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is Jewish.
Daniel Roth, President and CEO of the National Futures Association is Jewish.
Duncan L. Niederauer, CEO and Director of NYSE Euronext is Jewish.
Robert Greifeld, Chief Executive Office of the NASDAQ OMX Group is Jewish.

There’s more.

Bernard Madoff, the $50 billion dollar fraudster, is Jewish.

Dick Fuld, testosterone-fuelled boss of Lehman brothers, whose trough-gobbling shenanigans precipated the bank’s demise, is Jewish.

The Jew, Robert Rubin, was the boss of Goldman Sachs before becoming Clinton's National Economic Council boss and then being promoted to Treasury Secretary, the top job. In 199, it was he who was responsible for the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act. After the 1929 Wall Street Crash, this was put in place to protect the little people from the attentions of the market's most amaoral and predatory beasts. After the repeal of Glass-Seagall, the unprotected cash of the trusting multitudes was, once again, up for grabs.

Rubin resigned and became Citigroup’s CEO in the same year he terminated Glass-Seagall.

A gentleman by the name of Roland Arnall was, before his death, known as "the father of sub-prime". He was Jewish.

James H. Simons was the world's leading hedge-fund manager in 2008, earning $2.5 billion, when the rest of the financial world was falling down around OUR ears. He, too, is Jewish.

Sir Victor Blank, (knighted at the behest of Blair/Brown) Lloyds TSB's top man, bought RBS and blew his own bank out of the water as a result. Lloyds is now part-nationalised because of Blank's inexplicably inept management. He is Jewish, as is Fred "the shred" Goodwin, former RBS Chairman and the most well known of the UK's trough-gobbling bankers.

On 29 September 2011, Peter Oborne opined thus in The Telegraph:

“One of the unintended consequences of Margaret Thatcher’s reforms of the Eighties was the emergence of a new class of feral rich, who abandoned the ordinary morality or sense of civic duty."

'Unintended,' Pete? Milton Friedman's 'theory of market forces' (monetarism) wasn't intended to enrich those who owned the markets? Yeah, right. I bet that'd make Friedman and the most notorious of Thatcher's gurus, Keith Joseph, Arthur Seldon, David Wolfson and Alfred Sherman snigger if they were still around.

As for Nigel Lawson, he's been laughing unintentionally all the way from privatisation and the Big Bang to the collapse of the banking system.

Friedman, Joseph, Seldon, Wolfson, Sherman and Lawson are/were, of course Jewish.

In his 8 November 2009 Sunday Times essay on Goldman Sachs, John Arlidge interviewed a variety of employees at “the world's most powerful, and most secretive, investment bank”.

He tells us that Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman’s Chairman and Chief Executive, is “in a remarkably jolly mood for a man everyone seems to hate”.

“I know I could slit my wrists and people would cheer,” says Blankfein.

Arlidge takes up the story:

“Washington has bolstered the US economy and banks to the tune of $12 TRILLION. Does Blankfein not acknowledge that IT IS MADDENING FOR MOST OF US TO WATCH GOLDMAN GOBBLE UP SO MUCH CASH WHILE WE STRUGGLE? Quite the opposite. He insists WE SHOULD BE CELEBRATING HIS BANK’S SUCCESS, NOT CONDEMNING IT.

‘EVERYBODY SHOULD BE, FRANKLY, HAPPY,’ he says.

Can he be serious? Deadly… Blankfein goes on to say something equally audacious. WE SHOULD WELCOME THE RETURN OF TITANIC PAYDAYS AT GOLDMAN…

Okay, forget bail-outs, forget bonuses, forget all the money stuff, if you can. Surely… IT IS ‘BLACKMAIL’ TO SAY THAT THERE CANNOT BE A RECOVERY UNLESS WE LET BANKERS GET ON WITH WHAT THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE AND PAY THEMSELVES SQUILLIONS… ‘I’ve got news for you,’ he shoots back, eyes narrowing. ‘IF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM GOES DOWN, OUR BUSINESS IS GOING DOWN AND, TRUST ME, YOURS AND EVERYONE ELSE’S IS GOING DOWN, TOO’…

Goldman Sachs isn’t nicknamed ‘Goldmine Sachs’ for nothing. There’s so much of the stuff sloshing around that IN AN AVERAGE YEAR A GOOD INVESTMENT BANKING PARTNER WILL MAKE $3.5M, A GOOD TRADING PARTNER $7-10M AND A MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEMBER $15-25M. SOME 953 EMPLOYEES GOT BONUSES OF AT LEAST $1M IN 2008.…

THE LIST OF FORMER GOLDMAN EXECUTIVES WHO HAVE HELD KEY POSTS IN THE US ADMINISTRATION AND VITAL GLOBAL INSTITUTIONS IN NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON ALONE IS MIND-BOGGLING.

Goldman Sachs may be a Wall Street bank, but ITS ROLE AND INFLUENCE IN LONDON IS HUGE. AROUND 5,500 PEOPLE WORK IN ITS FLEET STREET OFFICE… It is the most profitable bank in the City. Profits per employee averaged £181,000 a year between 2000 and 2008. AVERAGE PAY THIS YEAR IS EXPECTED TO BE £458,000...

The London office is run by Michael Sherwood and Richard Gnodde. Sherwood… seems to model himself on his good friend, the BHS billionaire Sir Philip Green...

Not all Goldmanites avoid the headlines. An abiding tale of the boom years is how three London executives, Jennifer Moses and her husband, Ron Beller, and Scott Mead, had so much cash they did not notice when an assistant, Joyti De-Laurey, stole more than £4m from their accounts... (Moses, an American Jewess, was recruited by Gordon Brown to advise on social policy. Her husband's hedge fund, Pelaton, collapsed, owing shareholders millions, following the credit crunch)

As in the US, the bank is closely linked to the government. Its former chief economist and partner, Gavyn Davies, is married to Gordon Brown’s special adviser Sue Nye. Under Tony Blair, Davies became chairman of the BBC.

His successor as chief economist at Goldman, the late David Walton, was handed a seat on the Bank of England’s interest-rate setting Monetary Policy Committee. Paul Deighton, who is running the London Olympic Games organising committee, used to be Goldman’s chief operating officer. Goldman is a key banking adviser to the government. Brown hired the bank to advise him on the sale of Northern Rock last year.

US treasury secretaries, heads of the New York Stock Exchange, White House and Downing Street advisers — you name it, they’ve worked for Goldman Sachs…

IN 2007, THE GOLDMAN SACHS BOSS LLOYD BLANKFEIN EARNED $68M, A RECORD FOR ANY WALL STREET CEO. A GOOD INVESTMENT BANKING PARTNER AT GOLDMAN WILL MAKE $3.5M A YEAR, A GOOD TRADING PARTNER $7-10M A YEAR, AND A MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEMBER $15-25M...

GOLDMAN’S PROFITS IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THIS YEAR WERE A RECORD $3.4 BILLION...

Vince Cable warns:

‘If we’ve learnt anything, it’s that BANKS HAVE TOO MUCH POWER OVER CONSUMERS AND GOVERNMENTS. GOLDMAN SACHS HAS NEVER BEEN MORE POWERFUL. THAT SHOULD ALARM ALL OF US’…

For Blankfein, in the end, it all comes down to one thing: FINDING THE BEST, FASTEST, AND SAFEST WAY TO MAKE MONEY WITH MONEY, THEN MAKE SOME MORE MONEY, WITH MONEY ON TOP. He’s not interested in a reality check, JUST A BUMPER PAY CHEQUE FOR HIS CLIENTS, FOR HIS FIRM, FOR HIS STAFF, FOR HIS SHAREHOLDERS...

GOLDMAN SACHS, THIS PILLAR OF THE FREE MARKET, BREEDER OF SUPER-CITIZENS... WILL GO ON RAKING IT IN, GETTING RICHER THAN GOD? An impish grin spreads across Blankfein’s face. CALL HIM A FAT CAT WHO MOCKS THE PUBLIC. CALL HIM WICKED. Call him what you will.

He is, he says,

‘JUST A BANKER ‘DOING GOD’S WORK'."

The ’banker doing God's work’ is, of course, Jewish.

Of those mentioned in John Arlidge’s entire essay (most of which is accessible at the link below), I think Richard Gnodde; Reuben Jeffery and Scott Mead are Jewish. Robert Rubin; Stephen Friedman; Timothy Geithner; Joshua Bolten; Robert Hormats; Gary Gensler; Duncan Niederauer; Barney Frank; Michael Sherwood; Jennifer Moses; Ron Beller; Larry Summers, Yoel Zaoui and the Rothschilds, past and present, definitely are.

As were the original Messrs Goldman and Sachs.

http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=1361&iParentId=1360

PS.

On 27 June 2007, Money Week told us this:

“When Sir Ronald Cohen resigned from Apax Partners in 2005, after more than 30 years in the private-equity industry… it meant a new political role. A GENEROUS LABOUR PARTY DONOR, THE ‘FATHER OF VENTURE CAPITAL’ THREW HIS WEIGHT BEHIND GORDON BROWN, emerging as THE INCOMING PM’S CHIEF FUND-RAISER, BUSINESS AIDE AND LINK TO THE CITY. HE’S LIKELY TO WIELD FAR MORE POWER IN THE NEW GOVERNMENT THAN MANY CABINET MINISTERS.

It’s tempting to draw comparisons with Lord Levy, Tony Blair’s ‘private banker’ and sometime Middle Eastern envoy… But Cohen is in a different league… a man of intellectual distinction, amassing a £250m fortune while presenting himself as ‘the acceptable and responsible face of private equity’…

The focus has now switched to his own personal tax affairs. Should it emerge that, as a NON-DOMICILED BRITISH RESIDENT, he enjoys ‘AN ADVANTAGEOUS ARRANGEMENT OFFSHORE,’ the damage to Brown’s shiny new government could be significant…

Born in Cairo in 1945 to a family of Jewish merchants, he became a refugee at the age of 11... Ronald… spoke no English.”

Refugee, ‘Jewish merchants,’ ‘250m fortune,’ ‘father of venture capital’, ‘chief fund-raiser, business aide and link to the City.’ The unelected foreigner with ‘far more power’ certainly ticked all the global, PC and Court Jew boxes, didn’t he?

PPS.

The US-Hungarian financier, George Soros, was the prime mover behind Black Wednesday. He is estimated to have made around a billion dollars from that particular Brit-bashing scam.

Soros is also Jewish.



On 16 October 2011, the article, The murky world of Adam Werritty: Self-styled adviser 'had links to Mossad', appeared in The Independent on Sunday.

In this, Jane Merrick and James Hanning informed us thus:

“Adam Werritty, the man at the centre of the Liam Fox cash-for-access scandal, has been involved in an audacious plot to topple Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad…

The self-styled adviser to Mr Fox, whose close personal friendship with the former defence secretary led to Mr Fox's downfall, has visited Iran on several occasions and met Iranian opposition groups in Washington and London over the past few years…

WERRITTY… IS SO HIGHLY REGARDED BY THE ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE SERVICE MOSSAD, who thought he was Mr Fox's chief of staff, that HE WAS ABLE TO ARRANGE MEETINGS AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT…

Fox resigned on Friday after a stream of revelations surrounding his dealings with his adviser, centring on 18 MEETINGS ABROAD AT WHICH MR WERRITTY WAS PRESENT, including in DUBAI, SRI LANKA AND ISRAEL, AND 22 AT THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE… Fox quit the Cabinet on Friday when details emerged of the BUSINESS AND INTELLIGENCE INTERESTS OF MR WERRITTY'S FINANCIAL BACKERS...

Werritty's travels went further than the luxury hotels of COLOMBO and DUBAI: he has used his House of Commons-branded business card, which said he was Mr Fox's adviser, to pursue his business interests in conflict-torn SOUTH SUDAN, OTHER DEVELOPING AFRICAN COUNTRIES AND IRAQ. The aide has also held talks in London with REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NEW LIBYAN GOVERNMENT...

The revelation that the man who had unrestricted access to Mr Fox while he was serving in David Cameron's Cabinet was at the same time attempting to unseat the Iranian President will fuel alarm in the Foreign Office that HE WAS PURSUING A FREELANCE FOREIGN POLICY AND ACTING AS A ‘ROGUE OPERATOR’…

Werritty, said one source, WORKED CLOSELY WITH US-BACKED NEOCONS WHO THOUGHT THEY COULD ‘BRING DOWN AHMADINEJAD’…

FOX IS AN ENTHUSIASTIC ATLANTICIST AND IS SYMPATHETIC TO THE NEOCON MOVEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, WHICH TAKES A HAWKISH STANCE ON IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS…

One Whitehall source was scathing of Mr Werritty…

‘I can't think of anything more stupid, wandering round Iran flying the British flag… Anything that's done like that has to have government approval, which he doesn't seem to have had’…

In May 2009, Mr Werritty arranged a meeting in Portcullis House between Mr Fox and an Iranian lobbyist with close links to President Ahmadinejad's regime. In February this year, Mr WERRITTY ARRANGED A DINNER WITH MR FOX, BRITAIN'S AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL, MATTHEW GOULD, AND SENIOR POLITICAL FIGURES – UNDERSTOOD TO INCLUDE ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE AGENTS – DURING AN ISRAELI SECURITY CONFERENCE IN HERZLIYA, DURING WHICH SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN WERE DISCUSSED.

Despite Mr Werritty having no official MoD capacity, an Israeli source said there was ‘no question’ that Mr WERRITTY WAS REGARDED AS ANYONE OTHER THAN MR FOX'S CHIEF OF STAFF WHO WAS ABLE TO FIX MEETINGS AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS.”



On 15 October 2011, The Telegraph quoted Gary Fitzgerald, chief executive of Action on Elder Abuse, thus:

“We believe that there is a real danger here that we are seeing EUTHANASIA BY DEFAULT AND BY THE BACK DOOR. In some cases it is occurring by accident, because the practices being used are not safe; in others, WE ARE SEEING JUNIOR DOCTORS TAKING DECISIONS WITHOUT CONSULTING PATIENTS OR FAMILY…

The CQC (Care Quality Council) is there to make sure that better care is provided for everyone, but BY FAILING TO MAKE SURE THAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE MADE IT IS LEAVING VULNERABLE PATIENTS COMPLETELY UNPROTECTED.”

Laura Donnelly and Alastair Jamieson take up the story:

“ELDERLY PATIENTS ARE BEING CONDEMNED TO AN EARLY DEATH BY HOSPITALS MAKING SECRET USE OF ‘DO NOT RESUSCITATE’ ORDERS… A charity for the elderly said the disclosures were evidence of 'EUTHANASIA BY THE BACKDOOR,' with potentially-lethal notices being placed on the files of patients SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WERE OLD AND FRAIL.

The orders, which record an advance decision that a patient's life should not be saved if their heart stops, ARE ROUTINELY BEING APPLIED WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE PATIENT OR THEIR RELATIVES.

On one ward, ONE-THIRD OF DNR ORDERS WERE ISSUED WITHOUT CONSULTATION WITH THE PATIENT OR THEIR FAMILY, according to the NHS's own records. At another hospital, junior doctors freely admitted that the forms were filled out by medical teams without the involvement of patients or relatives. Under medical guidelines, THE ORDERS SHOULD ONLY BE ISSUED AFTER SENIOR STAFF HAVE DISCUSSED THE MATTER WITH THE PATIENT'S FAMILY… The findings emerged in spot checks of 100 hospitals undertaken by the Care Quality Commission, an official watchdog, earlier this year…

Action on Elder Abuse, an independent charity, carried out its own analysis of the official watchdog's inspection reports. The charity's findings, published today, uncover widespread evidence that PATIENTS ARE BEING LEFT TO DIE, WITHOUT FAMILIES KNOWING THAT SUCH DECISIONS HAVE BEEN TAKEN...

Last week, CQC said ONE IN FIVE NHS TRUSTS IT INSPECTED WERE FAILING PATIENTS SO BADLY THAT THEY WERE BREAKING THE LAW, AND EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT STANDARDS AT MORE THAN HALF OF TRUSTS.

During the 100 visits it found patients forced to use the lavatory in front of other patients, with others left exposed on their beds, and using commodes because staff did not have time to take them to the bathroom. At some hospitals, RECORDS WERE FALSIFIED TO INDICATE FOOD OR DRINK HAD BEEN TAKEN. AT OTHERS, ELDERLY PEOPLE WERE LEFT WITHOUT CALL BELLS, IGNORED FOR HOURS, AND LEFT RATTLING WATER JUGS IN AN ATTEMPT TO ALERT STAFF TO THEIR PLIGHT.

Although the inspectorate has powers to close hospitals, or wards, and has issued threats, no such measures have been used since the visits took place between March and June. Nor were any cases referred to safeguarding bodies, which are supposed to intervene if vulnerable adults are being left at risk.”

I wonder, if an analysis was made of those medical professionals who "routinely" apply "do not resuscitate orders" to the indigenous elderly, would the non-indigenous be over-represented?

I'd bet bet my b*lls on it. In the event that some unlikely statistical anomaly intervened and I ended up a castrati, I'd bet what was left that none of the "medical professionals" most associated with these practices were in the habit of voting for a Nationalist party.



On 15 October 2011, The Independent's Jonathan Brown told us that the police are blaming "'Blue Boy' pills that cost as little as 50p for rise in criminality in northern cities."

He added:

“Illicit prescription drugs that can cause severe side effects if taken in the wrong dose ARE BEING SOLD TO CHILDREN ON THE STREETS OF A MAJOR BRITISH CITY FOR 50P. Mano 10, a type of benzodiazepine which is used to treat anxiety, depression and alcoholism, is being blamed by police for an upsurge in criminality in parts of Hull.”

Brown then quoted Sergeant Mark Peasgood, of Humberside Police, thus:

"The effects it has have been described as giving are an instant hit and then you get a downer. You forget about everything and during this time people are taking more; people that might cause anti-social behaviour. WHEN THEY HAVE TAKEN THIS TABLET, THEY LOSE THEIR SENSES COMPLETELY and commit more serious crimes such as burglary. IT IS GOING TO PROGRESS FROM HULL TO DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE COUNTRY."

Peta Godney of Compass, the drug and alcohol charity, added:

"The main danger with the drug is that we just don't know what's in it – IT COULD CONTAIN ANYTHING. If it does have a type of benzo in it, it suppresses the respiratory system, which means YOU ARE IN DANGER OF STOPPING BREATHING."



On 15 October 2011, Sue Reid told us this in The Daily Mail:

“Last year, 37,300 CASES WERE LAUNCHED BY IMMIGRANTS APPEALING TO STAY IN BRITAIN after the Home Office ruled they were not entitled to remain here. Of course, THIS FIGURE ACCOUNTS ONLY FOR THOSE TRACKED DOWN BY OFFICIALS — LEAVING TENS OF THOUSANDS WHO HAVE AVOIDED DETECTION FREE TO STAY. A significant number of those foreigners fighting to remain in Britain are small-time criminals, terrorists or fraudsters...

Now, for the first time, the sheer scale of this scandal can be revealed because documents have been released on the Ministry of Justice website, giving details of scores of appeal cases. A typical example is Rhomaine Miyando Mohan, WHO HAS APPEALED FIVE TIMES IN 11 YEARS against attempts to kick him out in what Senior Immigration Judge Waumsley described as a ‘contemptuous disregard for British immigration law’. THE JAMAICAN HAS FATHERED THREE DAUGHTERS BY TWO BRITISH WOMEN DESPITE BEING DEPORTED IN 2006 FOR OVERSTAYING HIS ONE-MONTH VISITOR’S VISA BY SIX YEARS. After slipping back into the UK on a bogus passport, he was jailed twice for a series of crimes, including driving offences and cocaine possession.
This summer saw the latest attempt by the Home Office to boot him out. His appeal against removal from the UK was turned down. So where is Mohan now? HE REMAINS IN BRITAIN AS OFFICIALS STRUGGLE WITH THE CHAOTIC IMMIGRATION SYSTEM TO DEPORT HIM.

Then there is the case of a woman from Nigeria who came to Britain and overstayed her visa. She took her case to appeal, claiming she would not be safe in her home country. She explained that WHEN STILL IN NIGERIA SHE HAD KILLED A SNAKE ‘BY ACCIDENT’. AS A RESULT, SHE WAS A HATED FIGURE, because her fellow villagers worship snakes as sacred creatures. If she returned home, her safety could not be guaranteed. The files show her appeal failed — but, ON PREVIOUS FORM, SHE IS LIKELY STILL TO BE HERE.

A similar case also exposes the preposterous nature of many of the appeals. It involved a 28-year-old Albanian woman, now living in Brighton, who fought against being deported by arguing that, AS A LESBIAN, SHE WOULD BE KILLED IF SHE RETURNED TO ALBANIA (DESPITE THERE BEING NO LAW THERE THAT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY).

Another file details how American Jonathan Bartley Stables, 46, originally won leave to stay in Britain on the grounds of having a five-year relationship with his 27-year-old gay partner. However, TWO YEARS AGO HE WAS JAILED FOR FIVE YEARS AFTER ADMITTING FIVE CHARGES OF FRAUD. DESCRIBED BY THE TRIAL JUDGE AS ‘A PERSISTENT, ACCOMPLISHED AND PRACTISED FRAUDSTER’, he was listed for deportation. But, on appeal, another judge ruled that Stables — UNDER ARTICLE 8 OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT (which demands a respect for family life and privacy) — had a right to stay with his partner. ACCORDING TO THE JUDGE, THE RIGHT OUTWEIGHED THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN STOPPING CRIME BY FOREIGNERS IN BRITAIN.

Another Ministry of Justice file recounts the story of 50-year-old Pakistani Raja Mohammed Khan, of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, who also used Article 8 to overturn the Home Office’s attempt to deport him after HE KILLED A MAN IN A CAR CRASH WHILE HIGH ON DRUGS. The files show that KHAN CRASHED INTO THE FATHER-OF-TWO WHILE DRIVING AN OVERLOADED MILK DELIVERY VAN AFTER SMOKING HEROIN. He was jailed for five years for causing death by careless driving. Yet, because his second child, a son, has a British passport through his mother, Khan won his appeal not to be deported ON THE GROUNDS OF HIS HUMAN RIGHTS TO A FAMILY LIFE.

Then there’s the case of an Afghani man with the mental age of an infant. He complained through his lawyers that during an appeal hearing into his claim to remain in Britain, the judge fell asleep and therefore missed details of his case.

In the Ministry of Justice files, there is another case involving an Afghani who came to Britain several years ago as a youngster to escape war in his homeland and claiming asylum. Asif Abrahimi, now 18, was told by the Home Office in March that he must leave Britain because it was safe to return to Kabul. Predictably, he appealed — but his claim was rejected.

However, within weeks he was back in the appeal court, saying that HIS NEW ENGLISH GIRLFRIEND WAS PREGNANT WITH HIS BABY AND THAT HE HAD RIGHTS TO A ‘FAMILY LIFE’ UNDER ARTICLE 8 OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. AS A RESULT, HE HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO STAY IN THE UK.

A huge number of cases fit a similar pattern. Take 34-year-old Zimbabwean Rudo Ndemera, who arrived at Gatwick airport in 2002 on a six-month visitors’ visa. She overstayed by several years and was eventually found by officials in 2007. She told them that she had a long-term boyfriend who was a British citizen — thus giving her a right to a ‘family life’ in Britain.

However, SHE FAILED TO PRODUCE PROOF OF HER RELATIONSHIP WITH 35-YEAR-OLD PERSONAL TRAINER ADENIYI ADERINOLA, DESPITE HER LAWYER CLAIMING IN COURT THAT THEIR LOVE COULD BE COMPARED WITH ROMEO AND JULIET. In a rare moment of sanity, the court dismissed Ms Ndemera’s fourth request to stay here. Perhaps it is no surprise to discover, though, that today — months after that hearing — SHE REMAINS IN BRITAIN.

But few cases are more shocking than that involving Rohan Cecil William Winfield, 38, a chef from Barbados, who came to Britain 13 years ago as a visitor. He overstayed his visa and went on to marry a British woman with whom he had three children. He then had an affair with a Spanish girl in London who bore him a baby daughter. However, HE THEN RAPED THE SPANIARD AND WAS JAILED FOR THREE YEARS for the attack and ordered to be deported after his release from prison.

But, in July, A JUDGE RULED THAT WINFIELD SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO REMAIN IN BRITAIN BECAUSE HIS REMOVAL WOULD ‘VIOLATE HIS HUMAN RIGHTS AND THOSE OF HIS FAMILY’ — UNDER ARTICLE 8 OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT.

It is just another example of A FOREIGNER WHO, LIKE SO MANY OTHERS, IS EXPLOITING OUR GROTESQUE HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS AND HAS TURNED OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM INTO A SHAMBLES.”



In a 14 October 2011 article titled, ‘Dominique Strauss-Kahn 'did assault writer but it is too late to charge him', French authorities say’, The Daily Mail quoted a spokesman for the Paris prosecutors’ office thus:

“It is clear that, for lack of sufficient proof, a prosecution may not be initiated over the count of attempted rape, BUT FACTS THAT COULD BE DESCRIBED AS SEXUAL ASSAULT HAVE BEEN RECOGNISED”.

The Mail added:

“Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been cleared of an attack on a French writer – but JUDGES SAID HE HAD ‘SEXUALLY ASSAULTED’ HER. Despite conceding that he had attacked author Tristane Banon, JUDGES CLEARED THE POLITICIAN BECAUSE OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN FRANCE, which is three years for sexual assault.

It is the second time in three months the former International Monetary Fund chief has been cleared of sex charges. IN AUGUST U.S. PROSECUTORS DROPPED CHARGES THAT HE HAD RAPED A MAID IN A NEW YORK HOTEL ROOM IN MAY.”

Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the IMF, is Jewish.



On 14 October 2011, Janet Davies, Executive director of nursing and service delivery at the Royal College of Nursing, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"We know MANY NURSES ARE WILTING UNDER THE STRAIN of longer working hours, taking on the burden on unfilled vacancies and reduced staffing levels. Caring is an integral part of the nursing profession, so it is vital that nurses have the time to provide reassurance and support to all patients. There is a clear link between staffing levels and patient care and if there are not enough nurses on a ward then PATIENT CARE WILL UNDOUBTEDLY SUFFER.’

The Mail added:

"Yesterday the Care Quality Commission warned that ONE IN FIVE HOSPITALS WAS NEGLECTING THE ELDERLY TO SUCH AN EXTENT THEY WERE BREAKING THE LAW.
The watchdog’s inspectors saw patients on some wards rattling their bedrails or banging on water jugs just to attract the attention of nurses.

The report warned that SOME HOSPITALS WERE ‘PUTTING PAPERWORK OVER PEOPLE’ WITH PATIENTS BEING LEFT FOR MORE THAN TEN HOURS WITHOUT A DRINK. Now a study involving 2,943 nurses seen by the Mail has found that 76 PER CENT DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO TALK TO OR COMFORT PATIENTS.

Researchers said THERE WAS AN ABSENCE OF HUMANITY and nurses would have no way of knowing how patients felt or whether they needed anything. The King's College poll, which was carried out at 31 NHS trusts across England, found that 40 PER CENT OF STAFF WERE TOO BUSY TO CARRY OUT NECESSARY CHECKS ON PATIENTS such as taking their temperature.

THIRTY-NINE PER CENT ADMITTED THEY DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO RECORD DETAILS ABOUT PATIENT CARE SUCH AS WHETHER THEY HAD BEEN GIVEN ANYTHING TO EAT OR DRINK.

TWENTY-SIX PER CENT SAID THEY WERE TOO BUSY TO ADMINISTER DRUGS ON TIME AND 24 PER CENT HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO CHECK SKIN FOR SIGNS OF PRESSURE SORES. A further 44 per cent admitted that in the past month at least one patient under their care had suffered a serious fall.

And 26 PER CENT SAID THAT AT LEAST ONE PATIENT IN THE SAME PERIOD HAD BEEN GIVEN THE WRONG DOSE OF DRUGS or developed bed sores…

The CQC’s report was based on findings from unannounced inspections at 100 hospitals to check elderly patients were given enough to eat and drink and were treated with dignity… Inspectors found that 20 HOSPITALS WERE NOT MEETING BASIC STANDARDS OF CARE REQUIRED BY LAW.”



On 13 October 2011, following a Care Quality Commission report which said elderly patients in half of NHS hospitals were not being properly fed or cared for because of a lack of ‘compassion’, Dame Joan Bakewell said this on Radio 4’s Today programme:

“RELIGIOUS COMMITMENT TO CHARITY AND KINDNESS HAS DECLINED… They don’t learn it in their homes, they don’t learn it in their school, IT’S SEEN AS SOFT…

You’re meant to stand up for your own individual personality, make your way in the world and good luck to you. KINDNESS, EMPATHY, GENEROSITY ARE ALL IN SHORT SUPPLY and people used to learn it from the churches – I learnt it at Sunday school. Where do you learn it now? I don’t know…

Medicine has got more technical of course… and nurses are used much more by doctors for the back up of highly technical stuff… WHAT THEY NEED NOW IS TRAINING IN EMPATHY, IN HOW TO SYMPATHISE WITH PEOPLE, IN HOW TO BEHAVE… People need lessons now…

On the whole OUR SOCIETY IS QUITE CRUEL. WE CARE ABOUT MONEY, WE CARE ABOUT FAME, we care about success.”



On 13 October 2011, Conservative MP, Henry Smith, told the Commons that a cleaning company had fired two of his female constituents simply because they were British.

He said:

“Recently I have been dealing with a case on behalf of two constituents who were dismissed from a commercial cleaning firm called Jani-King, allegedly FOR BEING BRITISH…

Most companies will say they are sorry to hear constituents have approached me with a grievance. But in this case I got a nasty letter basically saying it was none of my business. The allegations are quite serious but this case felt different, mainly because of the attitude of the company. This case illustrates a wider issue, that MILLIONS OF JOBS HAVE BEEN CREATED IN BRITAIN IN THE LAST DECADE BUT A LARGE PROPORTION HAVE GONE TO PEOPLE WHO HAVE COME FROM ABROAD. Potentially, it appears THESE TWO WOMEN HAVE BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST.”

On 14 October 2011, The Daily Express quoted one of the women, grandmother Stella Judge, thus:

“The area manager would say ‘I DON’T LIKE BRITISH WORKERS BECAUSE THEY ARE LAZY’. She would rather employ Eastern European people who were quicker, work more hours for less money and don’t complain. She was constantly saying that if we didn’t watch ourselves we would lose our jobs if we didn’t do what she wanted us to do. No one kicked up a stink because THEY WERE AFRAID OF LOSING THEIR JOBS… ON THE DAY IAIN DUNCAN SMITH SAID ‘BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH PEOPLE’ I GOT THE SACK.”

During her time at Jani-King, Ms Judge claims there were 25 foreign workers compared to seven British employees. In disciplinary letters, she was accused of violence, discriminating against other workers on grounds of nationality and language and was told her paperwork was a “shambles”.

The Express also quoted Sarah Pritchard, the other sacked worker, as follows:

“One person was constantly going on about how lazy British workers were. When new staff would come and ask if there were any jobs SHE WOULD TURN AWAY BRITISH PEOPLE AND BRING IN HER OWN TEAM, WHICH HAPPENED TO BE BULGARIAN.”



On 13 October 2011, the Deputy Children's Commissioner, Sue Berelowitz, was quoted thus by the BBC:

"RIGHT NOW THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN ARE BEING HORRIFICALLY ABUSED BY GANGS… CHILDREN ARE BEING FAILED UP AND DOWN THE COUNTRY - IN EVERY VILLAGE, TOWN AND CITY.”

Rebecca Einhorn, of the NSPCC's Street Matters project, said this:

"Many girls' lives are seriously damaged by gangs who run this type of grooming…

Each year we work with up to 250 girls - four out of five of them have been snared by these predatory offenders. We know this type of sexual abuse affects many communities across the UK and has a devastating impact on the young victims.”

Barnardo's chief executive, Anne Marie Carrie, said:

"Sexually exploited children are right under our noses, yet many are still slipping through the net. In this telling new research, it is abundantly clear that, despite victims being amongst the most vulnerable children in society, we still have a long way to go to save them from the clutches of these vile abusers. We need to act now to stop more children being failed."

"Emma", who was 12 when she was targeted, said she was initially 'flattered' by the attention of the men. She added:

"THEY THEN STARTED TO GET NASTY WITH ME, REALLY NASTY, it wasn't fun anymore, it wasn't nice. They had full control over me, they got very violent and threatening, I'D GET RAPED ONE A WEEK, EVERY WEEK.”

The BBC told us that a University of Bedfordshire report had said this:

“CHILDREN IN LOCAL AUTHORITY CARE WERE MORE THAN FOUR TIMES AS LIKELY TO FACE SEXUAL EXPLOITATION THAN THOSE WHO WERE NOT. A snapshot survey of 33 out of 144 local authority areas identified MORE THAN 1,000 CHILDREN BEING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED ON JUST ONE DAY.”

The BBC added:

“Three-quarters of England's local safeguarding and child protection boards were not recording information on child sexual exploitation.”

Sue Berelowitz also said:

“It would… be wrong for anyone to conclude or assert that this is an issue for one particular ethnic community.”

Oh, we know that, Sue.

All manner of immigrant-origin individuals are raping and prostituting our little girls. Check out "the appalling phenomenon of Asian men grooming white girls for sex" below:

On 14 October 2011, The Daily Mail’s Chris Greenwood told us this:

“As many as 10,000 children could be the victims of gang-related sexual abuse, it was claimed last night. And the Children’s Commissioner’s Office said many more could be subjected to exploitation...

The investigation will examine how often vulnerable children are being sexually exploited by organised criminal gangs and other groups. It will study THE APPALLING PHENOMENON OF ASIAN MEN GROOMING WHITE GIRLS FOR SEX and how teenage girl gang members can be forced into prostitution...

Earlier this year an investigation found ONE IN FOUR MEN ACCUSED OF STREET-GROOMING VULNERABLE UNDERAGE GIRLS FOR SEX IS ASIAN. It followed A SERIES OF SHOCKING CASES IN WHICH WHITE GIRLS WERE LURED INTO ABUSE, OFTEN WITH DRUGS AND ALCOHOL…

A young woman who lured two white teenage girls to be raped by three Asian men was jailed for seven years last month. Stephanie Knight, who was 17 at the time, told the pair they were going clubbing but instead plied them with vodka and drugs. She forced them to have sex with ‘her boys’ after driving to a derelict terraced house in Accrington, Lancashire. The two 16-year-old victims were subjected to an appalling ordeal in which both were threatened and subjected to sex attacks.

Three men, BROTHERS AMJAD HUSSAIN, 34, AND SHAHID HUSSAIN, 37, AND THEIR COUSIN, FATHER-OF-FOUR TANVEER BUTT, 39, WERE ALL CONVICTED OF RAPE. They were jailed indefinitely at Preston Crown Court and must serve at least seven-and-a-half years before they can be considered for release.

THE CASE WAS THE LATEST TO FEATURE PAKISTANI SEX ATTACKERS WHO PREYED ON VULNERABLE YOUNG WHITE GIRLS…

CHILDREN’S MINISTER TIM LOUGHTON HAS SUGGESTED THAT CLOSED ASIAN COMMUNITIES HAVE TURNED A BLIND EYE TO CHILD SEX GROOMING BY GANGS OF MEN.”



On 12 October 2011, the BBC’s Chris Rodgers told us this:

“Over the last four years, AT LEAST 400 AFRICAN CHILDREN HAVE BEEN ABDUCTED AND TRAFFICKED TO THE UK AND RESCUED BY THE BRITISH AUTHORITIEs, according to figures obtained by the BBC…

Witch-doctors and traditional African spiritual healers are becoming ever more prominent in Britain… There is evidence that some are involved in the abuse of children who have been abducted from their families in Africa, and trafficked to the UK… A cultural belief in the power of human blood in so-called juju rituals is playing a part in the demand for African children.

Testimonies from many of these children have revealed that once they arrive in Britain, THEY ARE EXPOSED TO VIOLENT AND DEGRADING TREATMENTS, OFTEN INVOLVING THE FORCED EXTRACTION OF THEIR BLOOD TO BE USED FOR CLIENTS DEMANDING BLOOD RITUALS. One boy explained how witch-doctors took his blood to be used in such rituals:

‘THE TRAFFICKERS OR WITCH-DOCTORS TAKE YOUR HAIR AND CUT YOUR ARMS, LEGS, HEADS AND GENITALS AND COLLECT THE BLOOD. THEY SAY IF YOU SPEAK OUT I CAN KILL YOU.’

Another victim feared for her life, saying THE ‘WITCH-DOCTOR TOLD ME THAT ONE DAY HE WOULD NEED MY HEAD. Sometimes I would wake up and HE WOULD BE STANDING OVER ME WITH A KNIFE, every night I was terrified that he would do it’…

According to a US State Department report, Uganda has become one of the main source countries for children to be bought and smuggled to Britain. Some 9,000 children have gone missing in the country over the past four years. The ease with which a child could be procured was apparent when, posing as a British trafficker, I went looking for help in the cafes and bars in the underworld of the Ugandan capital, Kampala.

For $250 (£160) a reformed criminal introduced us to Yunus Kabul, who boasted he had been abducting children for witch-doctors in Africa and abroad, for years. During our conversation he offered as many children as we required.

‘I have enough, A HUNDRED, NO PROBLEM. I have so many communications. I have a network across whole of Uganda’…

Mr Kabul demanded a fee of £10,000 ($15,600) per child…

Back in the UK, despite the testimony of so many victims, THE CULTURAL BELIEF IN THE POWER OF JUJU IS A HUGE CHALLENGE FOR THE AUTHORITIES. One senior police detective says part of the problem is the silence that surrounds the matter.

‘While juju is widely believed, it is rarely spoken about publicly. People THINK EVEN TALKING ABOUT JUJU MIGHT LEAD TO SOMETHING BAD HAPPENING TO THEM,’ says Det Ch Supt Richard Martin, head of the Metropolitan Police's Human Exploitation and Organised Crime Command.”



On 11 October 2011, The Mail Online quoted Terry Jones Thus:

“At the time religion seemed to be on the back burner… It’s come back with a vengeance and WE’D THINK TWICE ABOUT MAKING IT NOW. A SIMILARLY SATIRICAL FILM ABOUT MUSLIMS? PROBABLY NOT – LOOKING AT SALMAN RUSHDIE… I took the view it wasn’t blasphemous. It was heretical because it criticised the structure of the church and the way it interpreted the Gospels.”

The Mail explained:

“Monty Python’s classic comedy Life of Brian could not be made today because of a toxic mixture of political correctness and religious extremism, according to its director. Terry Jones said… he would fear for his life if he directed a similar one nowadays.”



On 11 Ocober 2011, Simon Heffer described Lord Hesketh thus in The Mail Online:

“Alexander Hesketh’s life has been synonymous with the Tory Party. He first canvassed for it at the 1959 election, aged nine. He was a minister in several departments under Mrs Thatcher, and John Major’s chief whip in the House of Lords for three years. He later became Conservative Treasurer.

So to announce that HE IS TO JOIN UKIP AS A HIGH-PROFILE CAMPAIGNER AND FUND-RAISER IS NO ORDINARY POLITICAL DEFECTION…

The tipping point for Hesketh came two years ago when he was ‘appalled’ by THE GOVERNMENT RENEGING ON ITS PROMISE TO HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE CONTROVERSIAL LISBON TREATY which transferred huge powers to Brussels, created the post of EU President and cancelled more than 50 British vetoes over European policy. Although it was prime minister Gordon Brown who signed the treaty, despite Labour having promised a referendum, IT WAS THE TORIES’ BEHAVIOUR WHICH SO UPSET HESKETH. While in Opposition, DAVID CAMERON GAVE AN ‘IRONCLAD’ PLEDGE TO HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE TREATY IF THE TORIES WERE ELECTED. BUT WHEN HE GOT INTO NO 10 HE WENT BACK ON THAT PROMISE.

It was a moment of disillusion for Hesketh, who believes that Cameron was wrong to claim that, since other EU countries had already ratified the treaty, there was no point in the issue being put to a popular vote in Britain.”

Heffer quoted Hesketh thus:

“I’ve left for a number of reasons. An awful lot who lost their jobs did not see the connection with our membership of Europe. This applies to many working-class people to whom the Labour Party said Europe was a good thing. THEY WERE FOOLED but now recognise that their quality of life is on a steadily declining track unless our relationship with Europe gets sorted out…

THERE IS A NEW RULING CLASS IN EUROPE, made up of officials who in Europe pay low rates of tax and get free private education for their children, plus allowances…

I believed until we reneged on the commitment to the referendum that Cameron would have a good hand to play and could have told the rest of Europe we had to sit down and talk about the EU’s future… If you look at every poll, the public are right behind most of the things UKIP believes in... THE ONE GROUP WHO WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE POST-WAR CONSENSUS WAS THE PEOPLE…

I’ve come to the view that THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY HAS CHANGED. If you start to say that the big idea is the Big Society, BUT THAT THE BIG SOCIETY ISN’T GOING TO HAVE A VOTE ON ALL THE ISSUES THAT IT CARES MOST ABOUT, THEN IT’S A WASTED EXERCISE…

I think there’s a vast amount of waste. LOCAL AUTHORITIES ARE RAISING HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY BY CHARGING FOR EVERYTHING AND STILL PROVIDING A POOR SERVICE. You only have to look at what those people who run them are paid, often more than the Prime Minister. It’s outrageous.’

There used to be a difference of about 2 per cent between what banks charged and the base interest rate. It’s now 6 per cent. This means that EVERY SMALL BUSINESS, MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESS, LARGE BUSINESS, SELF-EMPLOYED PERSON AND EVERYONE WHO PAYS TAX IS CONTRIBUTING TO THE REBUILDING OF THE BANKS’ BALANCE SHEETS. THEY NEED TO FREE UP CASH, NOT TO REBUILD THE BANKS’ BALANCE SHEETS…

WE’RE IN AN ECONOMIC VERSION OF THE MUNICH CRISIS.”



On 10 October 2011, Mary Riddell said this in The Daily Telegraph:

“Abdullah Wahdem's home was a pleasant villa set in the citrus groves of northern Gaza. Now its cream stucco frontage is pitted by the bullets and artillery salvos that slammed into the last outpost of a stricken land. Three miles away, across the wasteland, is Sderot, the Israeli town regularly hit by Hamas rockets fired from Gaza. While those attacks have provoked international outrage, few outsiders ever see the return violence visited on innocent inhabitants of a territory under blockade. THE OCCUPANTS OF ABDULLAH'S HOUSE ARE AS GRAVELY SCARRED AS ITS FACADE.

Behind the shutters stands his sister-in-law, a pretty young woman with a closed slit where her left eye was shot away. Her small daughter and the family's other children still wake screaming after artillery rounds fell on their bedroom. Abdullah's 10-year-old son, Mohammed, extends a hand with fingers missing.

‘We are still suffering so much,’ Abdullah says. ‘EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED BY THE ISRAELIS.’ The fruit farm that was once his livelihood has been flattened by ‘sweepers’ that have destroyed trees and bushes to allow maximum visibility in a buffer zone where, according to a local lawyer, A SHOOT-TO-KILL POLICY STILL OPERATES. FARMERS HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN AS THEY TEND THEIR LAND, AND A TEENAGER COLLECTING SCRAP METAL FROM THE RUBBLE WAS SHOT THE DAY BEFORE WE DROVE IN.

Almost three years have passed since the start of Operation Cast Lead, THE ISRAELI AIR FORCE CAMPAIGN THAT KILLED 1,300 PALESTINIANS, MANY OF THEM WOMEN AND CHILDREN, AND INJURED 7,000 MORE. Although the HOSTILITIES THAT CRUSHED 4,000 HOMES AND BOMBED GAZA BACK INTO MEDIEVALISM are over, THE CURRENT CEASEFIRE DOES NOT BETOKEN PEACE, OR EVEN AN ABSENCE OF WAR. The road back from Abdullah's house leads through Beit Hanoun, where an Israeli air raid was reported to have injured three Gazans shortly before our arrival…

In an urban sprawl of buildings bombed to rubble, the odd fruit stall, even a barber and a wedding dress shop, reflect the determination of Gaza's 1.5 million citizens to survive a siege under which necessities, such as fuel and building materials, are either unobtainable or have to be smuggled through tunnels from Egypt. Children with pressed uniforms and schoolbags walk home from classrooms too overcrowded to cope, and THE BLUE SEA LAPPING NORTHERN BEACHES IS POISONED BY RAW SEWAGE. Electricity and the undrinkable tap water are intermittent, and – IN A COUNTRY THAT SHOULD BE PROSPEROUS – CHILDREN ARE ROUTINELY STARVING.

In a nutrition centre to which Save The Children has given $250,000 since the war ended, a grey-faced mother of nine sits with her tiny, 10-day-old triplets. Her name, Tahani, which means Blessings, is unlikely to reflect their futures or that of THE 10 PER CENT OF GAZAN CHILDREN SO MALNOURISHED THAT THEIR DEVELOPMENT IS PERMANENTLY STUNTED. Many of the mothers sitting in this clinic are university graduates, and the director, Dr Adnan Al-Wahaidi, trained at Great Ormond Street. But neither education nor skill can counter THE CURSE OF BEING BORN IN GAZA…

Despite pledges to the contrary, THE GAZAN BORDER REMAINS VIRTUALLY IMPENETRABLE, STIFLING THE ECONOMY AND STARVING THE POPULATION OF LIFE'S STAPLES…

A central player in the mounting diplomatic crisis facing the occupied territories is Miliband's old friend and mentor, Tony Blair. As the special envoy for the Middle East Quartet, made up of the US, Russia, the EU and the UN, HE HAS ATTRACTED THE WRATH OF PALESTINIANS, ONE OF WHOM DESCRIBED HIM AS MORE LIKE AN ‘ISRAELI DIPLOMAT’ THAN A NEUTRAL INTERLOCUTOR…

There is a genuine anxiety over the worth and impartiality of the Quartet. In the marbled offices of the West Bank, some SENIOR PALESTINIAN FIGURES MAKE LITTLE SECRET OF THEIR SCORN FOR BLAIR AND THE ‘USELESS’ ALLIANCE HE REPRESENTS. As Quartet efforts to revive the peace process continue, there is scant mention of Gaza, the dirty secret of the region and the world.”



On 10 October 2011, The Birmingham Mail quoted Makela Patterson, as she relived the moment her ‘friend’ Denise Beckford attacked her without warning, thus:

“I didn’t see the actual knife, she must have had it between her fingers, but I felt it. Blood just started squirting from my neck and she ran off…

I would like to understand why she did it, why she stabbed me four times. I LOOKED AT HER AS A FRIEND, WE USED TO GO CLUBBING TOGETHER AND WE CLICKED. SHE USED TO TREAT ME LIKE HER LITTLE SISTER… The disagreement I had didn’t involve her. She has never given any answers.”



On 10 October 2011, The Welwyn and Hatfield Times quoted a man who hit another man over the head with a bottle, as he sat in a train carriage minding his own business, thus:

“YOU WHITE BOYS NEED TO DIE”.

The Times explained:

“The incident happened just before midnight last Saturday, October 1 on board a train travelling from London King’s Cross... Witnesses claim one of the THREE BLACK MEN… hit the seated man over the head with the bottle while walking through the passenger aisle… The victim made an attempt to press the emergency stop button BUT WAS PREVENTED DOING SO BY THE THREE MEN. One witness, who wished to remain anonymous, said:

‘The train was quiet and just filled with couples of all ages and of PEOPLE MINDING THEIR OWN BUSINESS. THEY HIT THE MAN SITTING DOWN FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON’.”



On 10 October 2011, David Cameron was quoted thus by The Mail Online:

“We must control how many people come into the country… We have to be much better at finding illegal immigrants and getting them out.

Levels of immigration can return to where they were in the 1980s and 90s, a time when immigration was not a front rank political issue. I believe that will mean net migration to this country will be in the order of tens of thousands each year, not the hundreds of thousands every year that we have seen over the last decade… not thousands of people box-ticking their way into the UK. In short, A SYSTEM THAT ACTUALLY CONTROLS MIGRATION FOR THE GOOD OF THIS COUNTRY…

FORCED MARRIAGE IS LITTLE MORE THAN SLAVERY… To force someone into marriage is completely wrong. And I strongly believe this is a problem we should not shy away from addressing. But I know that there is a worry that criminalisation could make it less likely that those at risk will come forward.

So, as a first step, I am announcing today that we will criminalise the breach of Forced Marriage Prevention Orders. IT'S RIDICULOUS THAT AN ORDER MADE TO STOP A FORCED MARRIAGE ISN'T ENFORCED WITH THE FULL RIGOUR OF THE CRIMINAL LAW. And I am also asking the Home Secretary to consult on making forcing someone to marry an offence in its own right, working closely with those who provide support to women forced into marriage to make sure that such a step would not prevent or hinder them from reporting what has happened to them…

We will make migrants wait longer, to show they really are in a genuine relationship before they can get settlement… And we'll also impose stricter and clearer tests on the genuineness of a relationship, including the ability to speak the same language and to know each other's circumstances.

WE WILL ALSO END THE RIDICULOUS SITUATION WHERE A REGISTRAR WHO KNOWS A MARRIAGE IS A SHAM STILL HAS TO PERFORM THE CEREMONY… For too long, they have been overlooked in this debate. And it's time to do right by them… How do we know when we are getting immigration right? It's when we are getting the right people we need for our economy and when all those who come here do so for genuine reasons and join with the rest of society in making our country stronger, richer and more secure. That's the kind of immigration I want. And that's the kind of immigration this Government will deliver.”

Nice, unusually reassuring words from a Prime Minister, Dave. Even though I, as a British Nationalist, would go much further.

Thing is. you won't be making good on them, will you? By the time the next election comes round, you'll have reduced the immigration figures a tad and you'll claim a victory of sorts because of that.

And all the while the black/white quotient will be evolving to the detriment of the original inhabitants of this island.And all the while the immigrant and half-breed will be encouraged and promoted and the indigenous will be demeaned and discouraged.

Nice words, Dave.

Shame about the ideology behand them.



On 9 October 2011, former Prime Minster, Sir John Major, said it was likely that Europe was heading towards a 'federal state within the eurozone' on the BBC's Andrew Marr show.

He added:

"There won't necessarily have to be a treaty in this country for fiscal union. It is conceivable there would be a treaty just among members of the eurozone… At some stage THERE WILL BE ANOTHER TREATY because if there is FISCAL UNION IN EUROPE it changes our relationship to Europe…

In the short term the banks need to be recapitalised and GREECE NEEDS TO DEFAULT…

IF GREECE DEFAULTED AND COULDN'T PAY ITS DEBTS, ALL THE GREEK BONDS THAT ARE HELD IN OTHER BANKING SYSTEMS ACROSS EUROPE WOULD SUDDENLY HAVE NO VALUE. YOU COULD, AS A KNOCK ON EFFECT, CREATE A BANKING CRISIS IN WESTERN EUROPE. That would be absolutely catastrophic. So Greece must not default UNTIL THE BANKS ARE IN A POSITION TO ABSORB ANY LOSSES THERE MAY BE WITHOUT CREATING ANY BANKING CRISIS.”

Seems to me the former PM is encouraging Europe to huddle even closer together, with or without us.

Going the globalist route.

How surprising is that?



On 9 October 2011, Matt Chorley, Political Correspondent of The Independent on Sunday, told us this:

"David Cameron's claim to be the champion of new business was undermined yesterday as new figures showed THE NUMBER OF FIRMS IN BRITAIN FELL BY 20,000 DURING HIS FIRST YEAR AS PRIME MINISTER…

In his Budget in March, CHANCELLOR GEORGE OSBORNE DECLARED HE WANTED BRITAIN TO BECOME ‘THE BEST PLACE IN EUROPE TO START, FINANCE AND GROW A BUSINESS.’ But new figures released by the ONS reveal the number of firms registered for VAT or PAYE actually fell by 20,000, or 0.9 per cent, in the previous year. It is the first set of data showing what has happened to Britain's businesses since the coalition was formed.

Mr Cameron used his party conference speech last week to promise… ‘everything we can to help businesses start, grow, thrive, succeed.’ In the wake of his speech, the Federation of Small Businesses demanded ‘clear action to match the rhetoric’…

Construction and business administration were the sectors worst hit, down more than 4 per cent.”



On 9 October 2011, Peter Hitchens said this in The Mail on Sunday:

"The gruesome carnival of the party conferences is now over… Do you have any idea how fraudulent these things are? They are sealed off from the people by police guards and high fences. The applause is phoney and stage-managed. Even the arguments are faked. The vast halls are half-empty, and reached through bazaars of lobbyists for various forms of greed and folly. The speeches themselves are seldom written by the people who obediently deliver them. There is no real life. ALL THREE MAJOR PARTIES ARE LIVING CORPSES, KEPT WALKING BY TRANSFUSIONS FROM THE TAXPAYER, DODGY BILLIONAIRES OR TRADE-UNION FUNDS…

The hogwash that gushed out of the Prime Minister’s smirking mouth on Wednesday… As a statement of policy and aims from the Prime Minister of a middling nuclear power, IT WAS PITIFUL… The very next day the Bank of England would embark on a desperate plan TO DELIBERATELY PROVOKE YET MORE INFLATION. Let me remind you of what one of our greatest economists, Lord Keynes, once wrote about this awful thing:

‘Lenin is said to have declared that THE BEST WAY TO DESTROY THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM WAS TO DEBAUCH THE CURRENCY. BY A CONTINUING PROCESS OF INFLATION, GOVERNMENTS CAN CONFISCATE, SECRETLY AND UNOBSERVED, AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE WEALTH OF THEIR CITIZENS.’

THIS COLOSSAL, UNFAIR STEALTH TAX ON THE PRUDENT, TO PAY FOR THE FOLLY OF THE IMPRUDENT, IS WHAT WE ARE REDUCED TO… This is, as it turns out, Plan B. WE HAVE DRIVEN THE COUNTRY AND THE PEOPLE DEEP INTO DEBTS THAT CAN NEVER BE PAID. SO WE WILL SHRINK THE DEBT BY SHRINKING EVERYONE’S MONEY.

So much for the careful, the thrifty, the provident who foolishly thought the Tories were their friends. THEIR SAVINGS, THEIR PENSIONS, THEIR LONG YEARS OF CAUTION AND RESTRAINT ALL SHRIVEL TO A HANDFUL OF CHANGE IN A SURPRISINGLY SHORT TIME.

This crisis wasn’t made yesterday, or even in the Blair-Brown years. IT HAS BEEN IN THE MAKING FOR DECADES, as supposedly Conservative politicians have refused to get the Welfare State under control, refused to release this country from the chains loaded on to it by the EU, and risked all on the bubble of the housing market. Of these people it has been rightly said that:

‘THEY COULD NOT DIG, THEY DARED NOT ROB, AND SO THEY LIED TO PLEASE THE MOB.’ I hope I live long enough to see it carved on their tombstones.”

Me too, Pete.

Me too.



On 9 October 2011, Israel Today magazine quoted an 'Occupy Wall Street' activist thus:

"THE JEWS CONTROL WALL STREET!"

Israel Today added:

“The few who dared to heckle the man were told to ‘go to Israel’… When a liberal blogger in the crowd questioned if the man was planted by the hated right-wing Fox News, the man replied forcefully, ‘a f*cking Jew made that up’.”



On 8 October 2011, Jonathan Green said this in The Mail Online:

“Recently, detectives uncovered links to Al Qaeda and the trade in stolen luxury cars. PAKISTANI SYNDICATES WITH FAMILY AND CONNECTIONS IN THE UK, AND LINKS TO AL QAEDA, WHO STEAL CARS ARE EXPORTING THEM TO PAKISTANI CONTACTS IN SOUTH AFRICA… Detectives are following the money trail, WHICH LEADS BACK TO TERRORIST GROUPS IN PAKISTAN…

Car thieves today are international syndicates who not only pay local toughs to burgle and hijack but also have the connections and expertise to dispatch their goods abroad for sale in countries like Zimbabwe or Uganda. Big trucks and 4x4s end up ferried to feed massive demand in any one of Africa’s numerous wars. As trucks are shot to pieces or blown up there is an insatiable demand for new vehicles from which to fight. Libya at present, according to detectives, is being flooded with stolen cars which are used by the rebels. And THE HUB OF THIS TRADE IS SOUTH AFRICA.”

Green quoted Colonel Jakes Van Zyl, a former South African police officer thus:

“We’re finding Pakistani syndicates who are heavily into this. THEY ARE ALL INVOLVED IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING, GUN RUNNING AND COCAINE. Now terrorist groups are viewing it as an easy way to make money.”

Detective Constable Vince Wise, of the Association of Chief Police Officers’ Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service, said this:

“The scale of vehicle crime is changing. It used to be that criminals would nick an Austin with a coat hanger and take it for a joyride. Now we’re seeing serious criminals stealing high-end cars, which are then exported to Africa, and used as a deposit in a drugs deal or for other organised crime. You can’t make more money quicker than you can with stolen cars…

We're seeing serious criminals stealing high-end cars, which are then exported to Africa, and used as a deposit in a drugs deal or for other organised crime.”

Describing the role of ‘war-scarred veterans… immigrants from neighbouring countries who have military experience from Africa’s endless wars’, Detective Wise added:

“They come here with little skill but the knowledge to use an AK-47... THEY KNOW VIOLENCE. THEY COME FROM PLACES WHERE THEY CHOP OFF ARMS AND LEGS IN WAR. So they hijack cars. They can make 6,000 rand (£500) for a vehicle, which is an awful lot of money in the township. You’ll have a guy sitting in Zambia, say. He’s creating the market, buying hijacked cars or imported stolen cars, but HE HAS POLITICAL INFLUENCE AND IS PROTECTED. Everything feeds into this furnace of stolen cars…

These are serious criminal syndicates doing this… For criminals it’s seen as a low-risk crime. If they get caught they only do light, two-year sentences, but the money that can be made is immense…

We’ll try to take out the major players. But new ones keep coming into the business. It’s about income disparity; to get a Range Rover in Mombasa is like a local there winning the lottery seven weekends in a row. It’s a fortune. That’s why THIS WILL NEVER, EVER STOP.”

Colonel Lieberman, a member of an elite South African police unit tackling organised crime, was quoted thus:

“The money from the stolen cars arrives here BUT THE MONEY GOES STRAIGHT OUT OF THE COUNTRY TO PAKISTAN AFTERWARDS.”

An immigrant from Mozambique, given the pseudonym Sifiso in Green‘s article, said this:

“I wanted to be the man driving those nice cars… Toyota Hiluxes and Land Cruisers we could sell very fast… Once you go further you can ask for anything you want. YOU CAN EXCHANGE CARS FOR COCAINE, gold, diamonds. You can get a lot of money for diamonds in South Africa. Or YOU CAN EXCHANGE CARS FOR GUNS. Whatever you want.”

Green quotes an ‘informant’ thus:

“Cars is a very easy game… CORRUPTION IS THE MAIN CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM HERE… I pay contacts inside the vehicle registration department around 7,000 to 8,000 rand (about £600) a month… If you can’t bribe the police, then YOU BRIBE THE PROSECUTOR. If you can’t bribe him, YOU BRIBE THE MAGISTRATE.”

The informant is asked ‘if he feels bad that people in England are having their houses broken into for the sake of someone getting their hands on the keys of a BMW.’

He replies:

“So what?’ IN SOUTH AFRICA THAT’S NOTHING. WE LIVE WITH THAT ALL THE TIME. THAT’S LIFE. SOMEONE STEALS MY CAR I SHOOT THEM.”

Jonathan Green adds:

“DC Wise points to the struggle he faces taking on international criminal syndicates while vehicle crime squads are being reorganised, and in April this year THE HOME OFFICE WITHDREW FUNDING FOR THE VEHICLE CRIME INTELLIGENCE SERVICE.

THE CAR SYNDICATES CAN ACT WITH ALMOST TOTAL IMPUNITY. To ship through containers no passport is required or even proof of identity. Freight companies are reluctant to question too closely their customers given the millions of containers that leave British ports each day. It’s like finding a needle in a haystack. With cars coming under numerous jurisdictions, from the police to the customs, Border Agency and registration authorities in different countries, THE PROBLEM IS LIKELY NEVER TO END.

As the thieves use increasing violence, terrorists’ coffers swell and BRITISH MOTORISTS FIND THEMSELVES IN CRIPPLING DEBT.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-2045557/WARNING-Thieves-want-steal-car-ship-Uganda-OPERATE-IN-THIS-AREA.html

Globalism and immigration, eh?

Such positive influences on our lives. At least that's what the politicians and the PC Crowd keep on telling us.



On 8 October 2011, Alasdair Palmer said this in The Telegraph:

“There were riots and a general strike last week in Greece. In New York, several hundred demonstrators occupied Wall Street, in a sit-down protest against the finance industry that is being imitated in several other US cities, and may well spawn something similar here. The anti-capitalist movement is on a roll…

If they’re not sure what they’re in favour of, they know very well what they’re against: BANKERS AND THEIR BONUSES, AND THE SYSTEM THAT HANDS THEM BILLIONS IN BAIL-OUTS, WHILE CUTTING THE SERVICES RELIED ON BY ORDINARY FOLK… Their grievances against the form of capitalism currently operating in most of the developed world are increasingly widely held…

It is certainly true that some form of banking industry is necessary to growth. IT IS DEMONSTRABLY FALSE THAT THE SORTS OF BANKS THAT GAMBLE WITH THEIR CUSTOMERS’ SAVINGS, AND PAY ENORMOUS BONUSES TO THE EMPLOYEES WHO DO THE GAMBLING, ARE NECESSARY TO GROWTH. From 1950 to 1980, when the economies of Europe and America grew, on average, at least as fast as they did for the next 30 years, most banks did not take these gambles, because THE LAW PREVENTED THEM FROM DOING SO. They also did not pay themselves colossal salaries and bonuses. In the Sixties, the average executive in the finance industry was paid around 20 times the average wage. TODAY, BANKERS ARE FREQUENTLY PAID SEVERAL THOUSAND TIMES MORE THAN THE AVERAGE WORKER.”



On 7 October 2011, The Telegraph quoted the words of Sir Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, who, that week, had described the financial crisis as 'the most serious… since the 1930s, if ever', as he provided another £75billion of ‘quantitative easing.’

The Telegraph added:

“Little more than two years ago, global leaders were happily congratulating themselves on having avoided the mistakes of the 1930s, thereby averting a depression… With the European banking system again on the verge of collapse, there is a sense that POLITICIANS AND ECONOMISTS ARE OUT OF OPTIONS, THAT GOVERNMENTS AND CENTRAL BANKS ARE POWERLESS BEFORE EVENTS…

If it has been obvious for some time that we are caught up in an extreme financial crisis... NEVER BEFORE HAS THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM BEEN SO INTERLINKED AND INTEGRATED, which means that PROBLEMS IN ONE PART OF THE WORLD ARE CAPABLE OF CAUSING SEVERE STRESS ALMOST EVERYWHERE ELSE. We once more face a perfect storm of cascading default, contracting credit and collapsing economic activity.”

That’s globalism for you, folks.

That’s what the globalists have forced upon us during the course of the last fifty years. That’s what they insisted would be good for us.

If ever you feel like blaming someone, blame them. And then, when you’re all done blaming the international financiers, multinational corporation owners, media barons and their bought politicians, blame yourselves as well. Blame yourselves for ever having been foolish enough to believe the lies that the most greedy, self-serving and brutish among us told you.



On 7 October 2011, Hamid Karzai, President of Afghanistan, was quoted thus by the BBC:

"WE'VE DONE TERRIBLY BADLY IN PROVIDING SECURITY TO THE AFGHAN PEOPLE AND THIS IS THE GREATEST SHORTCOMING OF OUR GOVERNMENT AND OF OUR INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS….

What we should do is provide better and a more predictable environment of security to the Afghan citizens and in that THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AND THE AFGHAN GOVERNMENT DEFINITELY HAVE FAILED…

On the overall policy of Pakistan toward Afghanistan and towards the Taliban, definitely, THE TALIBAN WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MOVE A FINGER WITHOUT PAKISTANI SUPPORT.”



On 7 October 2011, commenting on the possible fasct-tracking of ethnic minority and female officers within the force, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Bernard Hogan-Howe, said this in The Police Review magazine:

“I think there is some option for some of the people selected at middle and senior management to come from outside… I might take ten per cent who, after two to three years’ training, are up to strength. I would have an open mind about whether it is at inspector rank or superintendent.”

Asked if such a move would help diversity he added:

“In certain industries, women and ethnic minorities have achieved far more and far more quickly than in the police. If we are recruiting from that pool, it seems to me that we will have a lot more chance of being MORE REPRESENTATIVE OF SOCIETY. Although we are doing better at that at the recruitment stage, it takes an awfully long time to get to middle management and THAT IS WHERE THE SYMBOLISM OF SEEING LEADERS WHO REPRESENT YOU REALLY MATTERS.”

The Daily Telegraph commented thus:

“The police have long been criticised for under representation by women and ethnic minorities and moves to boost diversity have often fallen short of targets… Hogan-Howe suggested proposals to shake-up the traditional entry levels for the police could be used TO IMPROVE DIVERSITY. THEY WOULD BE BROUGHT STRAIGHT IN AT LEVELS ABOVE THE TRADITIONAL CONSTABLE AND UNDERGO FAST-TRACK TRAINING…

High-flying police officers could also be allowed TO LEAP FROG RANKS to get their expertise to the top quicker.”

Not merit, not talent; just the sickeningly routine preference of a treacherous elite for those we never wanted here in the first place. Oh yes, there will a whole lot more positive disrimination and affirmative action for the alien, institutionalised unfairness and discouragement for us before the book is closed on the British peoples.

That Bernard Hogan-Howe, I thought he would turn out to be a tw*t, didn’t you? There’s something deeply un-copper-like about him. Just as there was with Ian Blair. Whatever, another PC slag slithers to the top of the greasy pole.

It is war, ladies and gentlemen. THEY are at war with us.



As the Bank of England pumped another £75bn into the UK economy, the finances of savers and pensioners suffered another huge blow.

The Bank’s governor, Sir Mervyn King, admitted there could be a severe price to pay and expressed sympathy for savers but insisted he would not ‘push Britain into a recession’ just to help them.

On 7 October 2011, The Mail Online quoted Sir Mervyn thus:

“I would desperately like to get back to a world as soon as possible with normal levels of interest rates… I have enormous sympathy with the predicament that savers, and particularly those who are retired, face. THEY ARE SUFFERING FROM THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ECONOMIC CRISIS WHICH THEY DID NOT CAUSE OR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR. But this is a situation… Britain, on its own, cannot easily get out of… The only way to return to a situation with full employment, steady growth and a balanced economy is to make sure other countries expand their spending…

There is not enough money in the economy. THIS IS THE MOST SERIOUS FINANCIAL CRISIS WE HAVE SEEN AT LEAST SINCE THE 1930S, IF NOT EVER.”

Tom McPhail, of financial advisers, Hargreaves Lansdown, said:

“PENSIONERS ARE FACING A PERFECT STORM OF THEIR INVESTMENTS FALLING IN VALUE, COLLAPSING ANNUITY RATES AND RISING INFLATION.”

Andrew Sentance, a former member of the Bank’s monetary policy committee, said:

“The Bank is meant to control inflation and it would appear they’re trying to stimulate the economy when actually what is needed is to get inflation down. Over the past year what we’ve actually seen is inflation squeezing out growth. The reason consumers are not buying more extra goods and services is because THE PRICES OF THE ONES THEY’RE ALREADY BUYING ARE GOING UP TOO RAPIDLY AND THEY DON’T HAVE THE MONEY.”

Simon Rose, of Save Our Savers, said the Monetary Policy Committe was 'failing to do its job', adding:

“ALL SAVERS ARE SEEING THEIR CAPITAL WHITTLED AWAY as inflation outstrips negligible interest rates. FOR THE MILLIONS OF PENSIONERS WHO DEPEND UPON THEIR SAVINGS, THE FUTURE IS TERRIFYING. If the members of the MPC would look beyond their graphs and equations they would see the all too real effect their policies are having on people young and old. THEY ARE PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH THE ECONOMY.”

Joanne Segars, of the National Association of Pension Funds, said:

“This is another kick in the ribs for many people who have worked all their lives and are trying to retire. Annuity rates are woefully low.”

The Mail added:

“The Bank’s decision to pump more money into the economy is also almost guaranteed to drive annuity rates below even their current historic lows. Had you cashed in a £100,000 pension pot in 1990, you would have received an annual income of £16,000. THE EQUIVALENT FIGURE NOW WOULD BE £5,945... To add to the crisis, inflation, currently 4.5 per cent, more than double the Government’s 2 per cent target, is set to climb higher. The Bank blamed the crippling rise in energy bills, UP 14.3 PER CENT THIS YEAR.”



On 7 October 2011, the research team at the New England Complex Sytems Institute published the document, 'Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence'.

In the document, this was said:

"We consider the conditions of peace and violence among ethnic groups, testing a theory designed to predict the locations of violence and interventions that can promote peace… Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence…

Our analysis shows that PEACE DOES NOT DEPEND ON INTEGRATED COEXISTENCE, BUT RATHER ON WELL DEfiNED TOPOGRAPHICAL AND POLITICAL BOUNDARIES SEPARATING GROUPS. Mountains and lakes are an important part of the boundaries between sharply defined linguistic areas…

Our analysis supports the hypothesis that VIOLENCE BETWEEN GROUPS CAN BE INHIBITED BY PHYSICAL AND POLITICAL BOUNDARIES. A similar analysis of the area of the former Yugoslavia shows that during widespread ethnic violence existing POLITICAL BOUNDARIES DID NOT COINCIDE WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF DISTINCT GROUPS, but PEACE PREVAILED IN SPECIfiC AREAS WHERE THEY DID COINCIDE.

The success of peace in Switzerland may serve as a model to resolve conflict in other ethnically diverse countries and regions of the world.”

Don’t hold your breath, you New England researchers.

Since 1923, the Cultural Marxists and their heirs the PC Crowd have been preaching the exact opposite of the stone bl**ding obvious stuff you posit here. And, seeing as the politically correct and their brothers-in-arms, the globalist elite, have ruled the roost in the western world for almost half a century, we won’t be seeing an end to the destruction of our ‘boundaries’ by the alien hordes of Asia, Africa, the West Indies and eastern Europe any time soon.



On 7 October 2011, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

“There are few more repellent sights in civic life than a subsidised professional lobby fighting to defend its vested interests against reform. That is exactly what is happening now with the legal establishment as it battles to uphold the increasingly discredited Human Rights Act. JUDGES, LAWYERS AND CAMPAIGNERS REACTED HYSTERICALLY WHEN HOME SECRETARY THERESA MAY ATTACKED THE WHOLE INIQUITOUS HUMAN RIGHTS CULTURE in her speech to the Tory conference. In particular they vented their fury at her for daring to mention the case of an illegal immigrant from Bolivia whose ownership of a cat had helped him avoid deportation from Britain… Even the Home Secretary’s colleague Ken Clarke, who has devoted much of his career to fighting genuine Conservatism, complained that her claims about the pet had been 'laughable' and 'childish'.

Yet for all the ferocity of the abuse hurled at her Theresa May was absolutely right. Her detractors were the ones resorting to deceit, distortion and hollow propaganda, as an examination of the court papers demonstrates. The unnamed Bolivian came to this country on a two year student visa in 2002 but like so many others DECIDED NOT TO LEAVE ONCE HIS VISA HAD EXPIRED. It was only when HE WAS ARRESTED FOR SHOPLIFTING IN 2007 that the Home Office told him he must leave Britain. But by this time the Bolivian, WHO IS GAY, had embarked on a relationship with another man and together they had acquired a cat called Maya.

So the Bolivian went to court to challenge the ruling by the Home Office, citing Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, which enshrines the 'right to a family life'… Contrary to the campaigners’ phoney propaganda the judge explicitly stated in his six-page verdict that the 'JOINT ACQUISITION OF MAYA REINFORCES MY CONCLUSION ON THE STRENGTH AND QUALITY OF THE FAMILY LIFE' enjoyed by the Bolivian. Astonishingly the judge even argued that HE MIGHT SUFFER 'SERIOUS EMOTIONAL CONSEQUENCES' IF THE BOND WITH HIS PET WAS BROKEN.

Further appeals by the Home Office against this judgment failed. The Bolivian is still here. Far from undermining Theresa May THIS LUDICROUS CASE IS ALL TOO INDICATIVE OF THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, WHICH HAS MADE A MOCKERY OF ALL CONCEPTS OF BRITISH CITIZENSHIP, NATIONAL INTEGRITY AND BORDER CONTROLS.

Thanks to GREEDY LAWYERS AND MORALLY BLIND JUDGES, illegal immigrants can systematically abuse the 'right to a family' clause to remain in the country. But it is all a nonsense. What is to stop the Bolivian having a gay relationship and a cat in his own native land?…

THE HUMAN RIGHTS INDUSTRY IS PLAYING A DIRTY GAME. They are focusing their energies on Catgate in order to make objections to the Human Rights Act seem comical, even extreme. It is a classic diversionary tactic, a cynical attempt to distract public attention from epic abuses of the Act.

With typical cowardice and dishonesty they fail to utter a squeak about the lengthening catalogue of other outrageous human rights cases, such as the decision to allow bogus Iraqi asylum seeker and serial criminal Aso Mohammed Ibrahim to stay in this country even after he ran over and killed 12-year-old Amy Houston and left her 'to die like a dog' in Blackburn in 2003 when he was driving while disqualified. Ibrahim fathered two children in Britain after killing Amy and the decision not to deport him was also based on his 'right to a family life'.

ALTOGETHER 3,200 FOREIGN CRIMINALS, BENEFIT CHEATS AND ILLEGAL MIGRANTS ESCAPE DEPORTATION EVERY YEAR BECAUSE OF THE WRETCHED ACT.

For the sake of our national integrity this grotesque measure has to go. THE HUMAN RIGHTS INDUSTRY IS DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE. They blather about compassion and liberty but IN REALITY THEY REALLY WANT TO MAINTAIN A STRUCTURE THAT PROVIDES LUCRATIVE EARNINGS AT OUR EXPENSE THROUGH ENDLESS APPEALS AND COURT ACTIONS.

In addition MANY JUDGES ADORE THE HUMAN RIGHTS CULTURE BECAUSE IT PROVIDES THEM WITH ENORMOUS SCOPE TO INDULGE IN JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, SLAPPING DOWN ELECTED POLITICIANS AND FORMULATING STATE POLICY WITHOUT HAVING TO GO THROUGH THE BALLOT BOX.

Shami Chakrabarti said this week at the height of Catgate: 'Theresa May knows full well that the Human Rights Act leaves the last word on immigration control to Parliament.' That is precisely what it does not do. IN AN AFFRONT TO DEMOCRACY, IMMIGRATION RULES ARE LARGELY IN THE HANDS OF JUDGES AND THE EUROPEAN COURT…

THE FIRST DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT IS TO PROTECT ITS CITIZENS, NOT FOREIGN CRIMINALS – OR GAY BOLIVIAN CAT ENTHUSIASTS.”



On 6th October 2011, Stephen Glover said this in The Daily Mail:

"Theresa May should have… kept Maya the cat out of her speech at the Tory Party Conference… The Justice Minister Ken Clarke jabbed his colleague in the eye by openly doubting that anyone had escaped deportation on the basis of owning a cat…

An immigration judge certainly did opine that the acquisition of Maya by the Bolivian and his partner ‘reinforced his conclusion on the strength and quality of their family life’. However, a more senior judge later said that he gave no weight to the cat argument...

Now it emerges that THE BOLIVIAN WAS FACING SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATIONS, and that MAYA WAS CO-OWNED BY HIS GAY PARTNER. Mrs May should have made much more of the facts. In any case… there are more than enough egregious… examples of the Human Rights Act being used to prevent the deportation of foreign criminals…

Yet nothing is done, and we think we all know why. The Liberal Democrats oppose the abolition of the Act, which has many more undesirable consequences than I have space here to mention.

Earlier this week DAVID CAMERON, WHO IN OPPOSITION UNDERTOOK TO REPLACE IT with a British Bill of Rights, said that he wanted to scrap the Act immediately, but Mr Clegg was making him go ‘slowly’. Theresa May claims that she too wants to abolish the Human Rights Act. As she apparently can’t, she promised on Tuesday to change existing immigration rules so that judges will be expected to balance the rights of defendants under the Act against the damage they have caused. BUT IT IS NOT AT ALL CLEAR THAT ARTICLE EIGHT, WITH THE VALUE IT PLACES IN FAMILY LIFE, WILL NOT CONTINUE TO BE PRE-EMINENT. In other words, unable or reluctant to abolish the Human Rights Act, THE GOVERNMENT IS TINKERING WITH EXISTING RULES IN THE HOPE THAT IT WILL AT LEAST BE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING...

It is tempting to suspect that, for all his repeated assurances, Mr CAMERON IS NOT COMMITTED IN HIS HEART TO ABOLISHING THE ACT, and is in some measure happy to use Mr Clegg’s opposition as an excuse for doing nothing... As with Europe, so with the Human Rights Act: the Lib Dems are invoked as a convenient excuse for doing nothing.”



On 6 October 2011, General Stanley McChrystal said this at the Council on Foreign relations:

“WE DIDN'T KNOW ENOUGH AND WE STILL DON'T KNOW ENOUGH. Most of us, me included, had A VERY SUPERFICIAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION AND HISTORY, AND WE HAD A FRIGHTENINGLY SIMPLISTIC VIEW OF RECENT HISTORY, THE LAST 50 YEARS.”

McChrystal also said that the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq undermined what they were trying to do in Afghanistan.

"I think they were made more difficult, clearly because THE IRAQ INVASION CHANGED THE MUSLIM WORLD'S VIEW OF AMERICA'S EFFORT. When we went after the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2001, there was a certain understanding that we had the ability and the right to defend ourselves and the fact that Al Qaeda had been harbored by the Taliban was legitimate. I think WHEN WE MADE THE DECISION TO GO INTO IRAQ THAT WAS LESS LEGITIMATE IN THE EYES OF MUCH OF THE MUSLIM WORLD."



Archbishop Desmond Tutu invited the Dalai Lama to deliver a lecture to mark his eightieth birthday in Cape Town.

Tutu’s officials initially applied for a visa for him in June but, by 4 October, the Douth Afrcian government had still not supplied one. The Dalai Lama was, therefore, forced to concede that he would not be able to make the Archbishop’s birthday bash on the Friday following.

On 5 October 2011, Tutu said this at a press conference:

"I have to say I can't believe it, I really can't believe it. Wake me up and tell me this is actually happening here. It's quite unbelievable. The discourtesy they have shown to the Dalai Lama. The Dalai Lama!

The Dalai Lama, anywhere in the world, they have problems finding a venue that can contain the people who want him. He goes to New York and Central Park is overflowing. The discourtesy is mindblowing... Many, many people are appalled in many parts of the world, especially people who supported us during the struggle…

WE ARE SIDING WITH ONE OF THE MOST VICIOUS OPPRESSORS and we are scared to say no. All the people involved in the struggle must be turning in their graves...

OUR GOVERNMENT IS WORSE THAN THE APARTHEID GOVERNMENT because at least you would expect it with the apartheid government… Let the ANC know they have a large majority. Well, Mubarak had a large majority, Gaddafi had a large majority...

OUR GOVERNMENT, REPRESENTING ME, SAYS IT WILL NOT SUPPORT TIBETANS BEING VICIOUSLY OPPRESSED BY CHINA. Hey, Mr. Zuma, you and your government don’t represent me... YOU REPRESENT YOUR OWN INTERESTS... I am warning you, like I warned the Nationalists, that ONE DAY WE WILL START PRAYING FOR THE DEFEAT OF THE ANC GOVERNMENT. You are disgraceful. Watch out! Watch out!"

The Guardian also quoted Ela Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi’s granddaughter, thus:

"I'm very disappointed. We were looking forward to him coming… I really feel the whole situation has been handled so badly. It's discourteous for a person of his stature to be told to wait for so long. For a person of peace to be treated like this is wrong…

EVERYBODY THINKS THIS IS BECAUSE OF PRESSURE FROM CHINA. It's very sad another country is allowed to dictate terms to our government. IT'S GOING BACK TO APARTHEID TIMES. I AM ASHAMED OF MY OWN COUNTRY."



On 5 October 2011, Catherine Ostler wrote this in The Daily Mail:

“When two oligarchs go to war, they do not fight alone. Surrounded by lawyers, translators, body- guards and henchmen, it looked like a scene from Reservoir Dogs yesterday when Russians Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich arrived at London’s High Court. There were so many lawyers that some of them had to sit in the public gallery. Abramovich has three QCs defending him, as well as more junior counsel. The courtroom itself had been swept for bombs, and made sniper-proof.

The case promises to shed light on THE SECRETIVE PRACTICES THAT FOLLOWED THE ASSET STRIPPING OF RUSSIA FOLLOWING THE BREAK-UP OF THE SOVIET UNION IN THE EIGHTIES….

The crux of the row is this. Boris Berezovsky, probably BRITAIN’S RICHEST EVER ASYLUM SEEKER, says that in 2000, Roman Abramovich, his former protégé, friend and business partner, blackmailed him into selling him his share of an oil company, Sibneft, at a knockdown price after Berezovsky, 65, had fallen out with the Kremlin. He claims that Abramovich, 44, threatened that the then President Vladimir Putin would snatch the stake for nothing if he refused to sell. It is alleged that Abramovich bought Berezovsky’s shares for £800 million when they were in fact worth between £1.9 and £4.25 billion…

Abramovich tried to have the case heard in Russia, but Berezovsky insisted it be heard here. He won that round and is now suing Abramovich for £3.2 billion… It is estimated that, collectively, legal fees on the first day alone set the pair back £1 million.

Abramovich yesterday claimed that Berezovsky was never his friend; he said HE USED HIM AS A ‘POLITICAL GODFATHER’ to help him conduct business deals. He added that HE PREVIOUSLY FUNDED BEREZOVSKY’S LAVISH LIFESTYLE TO THE TUNE OF £1.3 BILLION AS PART OF A ‘CODE OF HONOUR’ THAT REPLACED THE RULE OF LAW IN RUSSIA AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF COMMUNISM.

Berezovsky… was a maths professor before he engineered his way into former President Yeltsin’s camp. From the first foothill of a Mercedes dealership that became a chain, HE TURNED HIMSELF INTO RUSSIA’S MOST ACTIVE OLIGARCH in the Nineties.

It was during that decade, while on a boat in the Caribbean, that he met Abramovich — then a young chancer, a risk-taker like himself...After the break-up of the Soviet Union, the new allies bought the controlling stake of oil firm Sibneft together, each putting in £60 million in 1995. But their relationship soured after Berezovsky criticised President Putin on Russian TV over the sinking of the submarine Kursk. BEREZOVSKY FLED TO ENGLAND IN 2000 AND WAS GRANTED ASYLUM HERE three years later. When Abramovich sided with Putin, the two oligarchs stopped talking to one another.

Abramovich is not by nature a politician. At heart, HE IS A MONEY MAN WHO PREFERS TO AMASS HOUSES, YACHTS AND ART… His relationship with Putin has never been quite clear. His advisers have often denied any financial links between them, but their relationship may now be laid bare in court.

On paper, this is a case about THE RUSSIAN ASSETS THAT FELL INTO THE HANDS OF THE FEW. BUT IT IS ALSO ABOUT THE POWER STRUGGLE THAT EXISTS IN MODERN RUSSIA.”

Abramovitch and Berezovsky are both Jewish.

As are so may of those who robbed the Russian people blind during their own particularly nasty variation on the privatisation scam.



On 5 October 2011, David Cameron said this at the Conservative party Conference in Manchester:

“The threat to the world economy, and to Britain, is as serious today as it was in 2008 when world recession loomed. The Eurozone is in crisis…

It is an anxious time. Prices and bills keep going up – petrol, the weekly shop, electricity. On the news it’s job losses, cutbacks, closures. You think about tuition fees, and house prices, the cost of a deposit, and wonder how our children will cope… We need to tell the truth about the overall economic situation… This was no normal recession; WE’RE IN A DEBT CRISIS. IT WAS CAUSED BY TOO MUCH BORROWING, BY INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, BANKS, AND MOST OF ALL, GOVERNMENTS…

Our businesses need the space to grow – literally. THAT’S ONE OF THE REASONS WE’RE REFORMING OUR PLANNING SYSTEM… Now I know people are worried about what this means for conservation… But let’s get the balance right. The proportion of land in England that is currently built up is 9 per cent… There are businesses out there desperate to expand… but they’re stuck in the mud of our planning system… To those who just oppose everything we’re doing, my message is this: Take your arguments down to the job centre. We’ve got to get Britain back to work. THE NEW ECONOMY WE’RE BUILDING MUST WORK FOR EVERYONE…

Labour talked opportunity but ripped the ladders of opportunity away. We had an education system that left hundreds of thousands unprepared for work. A welfare system that trapped millions in dependency. AN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM THAT BROUGHT IN MIGRANT WORKERS TO DO THE JOBS THAT THOSE ON WELFARE WERE BEING PAID NOT TO DO…

LABOUR: WHO TELL US THEY CARE SO MUCH ABOUT FAIRNESS, ABOUT JUSTICE, WHO SAY THEY WANT TO HIT THE RICH AND HELP THE POOR - IT WAS LABOUR GAVE US THE CASINO ECONOMY AND THE WELFARE SOCIETY…

Part of our answer is controlling immigration. So we’ve put a cap on the numbers of non-EU immigrants allowed to come into our country to work. WE MUSTN’T LOCK OUT TALENT - I WANT THE BEST AND BRIGHTEST ENTREPRENEURS, SCIENTISTS AND STUDENTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD TO GET THE RED CARPET TREATMENT. But the bogus colleges, the fake marriages, the people arriving for a month and staying for years, the criminals who use the Human Rights Act to try and stay in the country – we are clamping down on all of them.

We’ve got to get some sense back into our labour market and get British people back into work. FOR YEARS YOU’VE BEEN CONNED BY GOVERNMENTS. TO KEEP THE UNEMPLOYMENT FIGURES DOWN, THEY’VE PARKED AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE ON THE SICK. TWO AND A HALF MILLION, TO BE EXACT. NOT OFFICIALLY UNEMPLOYED, BUT CLAIMING WELFARE, NO QUESTIONS ASKED… IT TURNS OUT THAT OF THE 1.3 MILLION PEOPLE WHO HAVE PUT IN A CLAIM FOR THE NEW SICKNESS BENEFIT IN RECENT YEARS, ONE MILLION ARE EITHER ABLE TO WORK, OR STOPPED THEIR CLAIM BEFORE THEIR MEDICAL ASSESSMENT HAD BEEN COMPLETED…

A few months ago, we were shocked by the scenes on our streets in London and other parts of the country. But perhaps THE MOST SHOCKING THING IS THAT PEOPLE WEREN’T THAT SURPRISED. There was no great call for a public enquiry to find out what had gone wrong. Instead THE SOUND YOU COULD HEAR WAS THE ANGRY, INSISTENT, OVERWHELMING CRY OF A COUNTRY SHOUTING TO ITS LEADERS: WE KNOW. WE KNOW WHY THIS HAPPENED. WE KNOW WHAT’S GONE WRONG. WE KNOW THAT IF THE SYSTEM KEEPS FUDGING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG, WE’LL NEVER IMPROVE BEHAVIOUR. WE KNOW THAT AS LONG AS THE POLICE GO ROUND WITH ONE HAND TIED BEHIND THEIR BACK, WE’LL NEVER MAKE OUR STREETS TRULY SAFE. AND MORE THAN ANYTHING WE KNOW THAT IF PARENTS DON’T MEET THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES, KIDS WILL GET OUT OF CONTROL. YES, PEOPLE SAID: WE KNOW WHAT’S GONE WRONG: and we want you to put it right."

They want you to put it right?

Maybe. But if they realy think you will they'll be sorely disappointed. If the british people want the world back the way it was before the politicians, the PC Crowd, the media, the bankers and the immigrants began screwing it up, they'll have to vote for those who want the same as they do.

And, no matter what they say, the Tories don't.

"For the 120,000 families that are most troubled – and causing the most trouble – a commitment to turn their lives around by the end of this Parliament. Today I can announce this: a new focus on the 65,000 CHILDREN IN CARE. Do you know how many children there are in care under the age of one? 3,660. And how many children under the age of one were adopted in our country last year? Sixty. This may not seem like the biggest issue facing our country, but it is the biggest issue for these children. How can we have let this happen: WE’VE GOT PEOPLE FLYING ALL OVER THE WORLD TO ADOPT BABIES, WHILE THE CARE SYSTEM AT HOME AGONISES ABOUT PLACING BLACK CHILDREN WITH WHITE FAMILIES…

WE’RE CONSULTING ON LEGALISING GAY MARRIAGE… I don’t support gay marriage despite being a Conservative. I SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE BECAUSE I’M A CONSERVATIVE.”

That's all three mainstream parties who 'support gay marriage' then.

If you don't support the idea, you know what you have to do.



On 5 October 2011, Becky Barrow told us this in The Mail Online:

“Stress has become the most common reason for a worker being signed off long-term sick, a report reveals today. Experts said the psychological condition had become so widespread that it was THE ‘21ST CENTURY EQUIVALENT OF THE BLACK DEATH’. Stress has even eclipsed stroke, heart attack, cancer and back problems, according to the report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.”



On 5 October 2011, Mohammed Ishtayeh, a member of the Central Committee of Fatah and a confidant of President Mahmoud Abbas, said this on Voice of Palestine radio:

"We do not expect much of the Quartet. THERE IS DISCONTENT WITH ITS ENVOY MR. TONY BLAIR… OUR GENERAL EVALUATION OF HIS EFFORTS IS THAT HE HAS BECOME OF NO USE AT ALL. HE HAS DEVELOPED A LARGE BIAS IN FAVOUR OF THE ISRAELI SIDE and he has lost a lot of his credibility. We hope the Quartet will reconsider the appointment of this person.”

The Palestinians have only just noticed the ‘bias?’

Where were they before, during and after the build up to war with Iraq?



On 5 October 2011, Dean Everitt, co-ordinator of a march protesting the number of migrant workers in Boston, Lincolnshire, was quoted thus in The Lincolshire Echo:

"THERE ARE SCHOOL-LEAVERS WHO CAN'T GET A JOB BECAUSE MIGRANTS ARE TAKING THEM and working longer hours for less pay. The problem is simple – THEY NEED TO SHUT THE FLOODGATES.”



On 5 October 2011, Detective Inspector Bob Campany, a 30-year veteran of the Metropolitan Police, was quoted thus by the Mail Online:

“Years ago, robbers would attend the Old Bailey wearing suits, and they still do, but TOO OFTEN NOW THEY MASQUERADE AS DEFENCE LAWYERS…

Quite often suspects make it clear they want to give their account in a police interview, but once they have spoken to their legal representatives THEY ARE ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION ADVISED TO MAKE NO COMMENT… The legal advisers hide behind the caveat that they don’t want their clients to incriminate themselves, which roughly translated means THEY DON’T WANT THEIR CLIENT TO TELL THE TRUTH. IF THEY TELL THE TRUTH, THIS NEGATES THEIR OPPORTUNITY FOR A TRIAL, STOPPING LAWYERS FROM EARNING A SHED LOAD OF MONEY. There’s no reason not to give an account in police interview. Interviews are all video-taped anyway. IF THERE IS AN AGGRESSOR IN THE INTERVIEW ROOM IT IS EITHER THE SUSPECT OR THE LAWYER OR BOTH…

Courts have become so obsessive in their desire to ensure a defendant has a fair trial. Nobody doubts that principle but THE NEED TO BE FAIR TO VICTIMS, THEIR FAMILIES, WITNESSES AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS BEING IGNORED.”

That’s what Cultural Marxism is, Bob. The institutionalised inversion of all societal and common-sensical norms such that right becomes wrong, good becomes bad and the criminal becomes the victim.

As long as the attack is concerted within politics, the media, law enforcement and the judiciary, democarcy cannot stand for long against behaviour such as Bob describes.

In recent times Cultural Marxism has come to be known as political correctness.



After Theresa May’s speech the previous day, on 5 October 2011, James Slack and James Chapman warned us thus in The Daily Mail:

“THE CHANGES WILL HAVE NO IMPACT ON THE SEPARATE ARTICLE 3 OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT – which bans the deportation of people to countries where they could face ill-treatment or torture. Last week, it emerged that a string of convicted terrorists, including two fanatics who helped the July 21 bombers, were using Article 3 to fight deportation.”



12-year-old Amy Houston was knocked down and killed by uninsured hit-and-run driver, Aso Mohammed Ibrahim, an illegal immigrant.

After serving a derisory four month sentence, Ibrahim fathered several children upon a British woman. As a result of this, he was allowed to remain in the UK by claiming deportation would be against his human right to have a family life. On 5 October 2011, Paul Houston, Amy’s father, was quoted thus by the Mail Online:

“I don't think anyone would disagree with what Theresa May has said. I am very encouraged by what she said AND JUST HOPE NOW SHE PUTS HER WORDS INTO ACTIONS. FOR TOO LONG, THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT HAS BEEN ABUSED BY CRIMINALS, FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS, TERRORIST AND PAEDOPHILES - ALL THE WRONG PEOPLE IN SOCIETY. IT IS ABOUT TIME THE GOVERNMENT PUT THE VIEWPOINTS AND THE RIGHTS OF THE VICTIMS OVER THE RIGHTS OF THE CRIMINALS.

I have always said THAT IT SEEMS TO BE A CHARTER FOR FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS, CRIMINALS AND TERRORISTS and needs to be looked at. The act needs to benefit the innocent and the vulnerable as it was intended to do.”

Ibrahim, an Iraqi Kurd, arrived in England hidden in the back of a lorry in January 2001.

His application for asylum was refused and, even though a subsequent appeal failed, he was never sent home.

In November 2003, whilst serving a nine-month driving ban for driving without insurance or a licence, he killed Amy. Since his release from prison, Ibrahim has been found guilty of many more crimes; harassment, burglary, theft and further driving offences amongst them.

The Judges who ruled that the illegal immigrant killer should be allowed to stay here were aware of his ongoing criminality.



On 4 October 2011, The Daily Mail quoted the words of Kathleen Booth, manager of the Cumberland Medical Centre in London, as she described the verbal assault launched upon her by Margaret Amao, a practice nurse, at a Nursing and Midwifery Council hearing.

The confrontation began after Amao had refused to do a urine test for a pregnant patient. Kathleen said:

“Miss Amao's nose was almost touching mine when she shouted, ‘who do you think you are?’ As she said this she pointed her finger at me and continued shouting madly and was very aggressive.

She continued shouting as she said, ‘I WILL KILL YOU, see what I will do to you, I WILL CUT YOU UP INTO LITTLE PIECES AND BURY THE PIECES IN THE GROUND.’ As she made these statements she pointed to the floor where she was standing. Her face was still inches from mine. SHE THREATENED TO GOUGE MY EYES OUT and made chopping motions with her hands in front of my face.

She began pacing up and down AND THREATENED TO KILL ME. She said, ‘do not poke your fingers at me, I WILL PICK YOUR EYES OUT.’

I was very scared of her. I thought she was going to hurt me. She was really aggressive and was completely in my face. I was backed up against the wall and got a sharp pain in my back. I was told that the colour drained out of my face and when I mentioned that to the policeman he said it would have been fear…

I was having nightmares. I was seeing things. I am still seeing a counsellor. Over the last few years I have been unable to do my job properly... I seem to get stressed very quickly and I think it is because of the bad dreams, nightmares.”

The Mail added:

“It is alleged that Miss Amao then followed Miss Booth back into her office and after being told the police would be called she said: 'Call the police YOU RACIST BASTARD, I am not an illegal immigrant'.

When two shocked patients asked Miss Booth for complaint forms to complain about Miss Amao's behaviour, she allegedly accused her manager of conspiring with patients against her, saying: 'You see what I am going to do to you, YOU RACIST’.”

Guess what happened?

Though the police were called ‘no further action was taken’ against Margaret Amao.

As for the Nursing and Midwifery Council hearing, it is still considering the case two years and three months after she ‘threatened to kill’ Margaret Booth.



On 4 October 2011, the Home Secretary, Theresa May, said this at the Conservative Party Conference:

"A lot has been said about the riots and their causes. But let me get one thing straight: in the end, THE ONLY CAUSE OF A CRIME IS A CRIMINAL. Whatever their circumstances, EVERYBODY GETS TO CHOOSE BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG…

The disorder this summer wasn’t about poverty or politics. IT WAS ABOUT GREED AND CRIMINALITY, FUELLED BY A CULTURE OF IRRESPONSIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENT…

And now we know more about the culprits. THREE QUARTERS ALREADY HAD A CRIMINAL RECORD. A QUARTER HAD COMMITTED MORE THAN TEN CRIMINAL OFFENCES BEFORE. IN LONDON, A FIFTH WERE KNOWN MEMBERS OF GANGS…

GANG VIOLENCE IS ENDEMIC IN MANY OF OUR CITIES. ACROSS THE COUNTRY GANG MEMBERS ARE INVOLVED WITH THE USE AND SUPPLY OF DRUGS, FIREARMS AND KNIVES.

It’s a deep-rooted problem bound up with FAMILY BREAKDOWN, POOR SCHOOLING and intergenerational worklessness, AS WELL AS POLICING AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM…

By the end of the month I will publish the Government’s new gangs strategy… That strategy will need to address the 120,000 PROBLEM FAMILIES WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SO MUCH CRIME, DISORDER AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ACROSS THE COUNTRY. It will need to tackle drug abuse and addiction. And it will need to deal with THE PREVALENCE OF KNIVES AND GUNS IN OUR TOWNS AND CITIES. It will have at its heart a relentless drive against the violence that wrecks communities and ruins lives.

As Conservatives, we understand instinctively the importance of law and order. There can be no sense of community without clear rules and strong enforcement. No prosperity without stability. No liberty without security…

WHEN A NEIGHBOURHOOD IS UNDER SIEGE BY YOBS COMMITTING REGULAR ACTS OF CRIME AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, THERE CAN BE NO COMMUNITY. WHEN WE SEE RIOTS ON OUR STREETS, HUNDREDS OF SMALL BUSINESSES ARE FORCED TO CLOSE. WHEN A TERRORIST CANNOT BE DEPORTED ON HUMAN RIGHTS GROUNDS, ALL OUR RIGHTS ARE THREATENED.

And as Conservatives, we understand too the need to reduce and control immigration. Of course, limited immigration can bring benefits to Britain, and we’ll always welcome those who genuinely seek refuge from persecution. But WE KNOW WHAT DAMAGE UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION CAN DO. TO OUR SOCIETY, as communities struggle to cope with rapid change. TO OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, as our housing stock and transport system become overloaded. And TO OUR PUBLIC SERVICES, as schools and hospitals have to cope with a sudden increase in demand.

Yet THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT LABOUR LET HAPPEN… Under Margaret Thatcher and John Major, net migration to Britain was never any higher than the tens of thousands. But UNDER TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN, NET MIGRATION TO BRITAIN WAS IN THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS. In total, NET MIGRATION TO BRITAIN UNDER LABOUR WAS 2.2 MILLION – MORE THAN FOUR TIMES THE SIZE OF MANCHESTER...

Cutting immigration is not as simple as turning off a tap – it’s a complex and litigious system – and SO IT WILL TAKE TIME. But we’re taking action on every route to the UK – and the numbers will soon start to come down.

UNDER LABOUR, ECONOMIC MIGRATION WAS SO OUT OF CONTROL THAT ALMOST A THIRD OF THE PEOPLE WHO CAME HERE AS HIGHLY-SKILLED WORKERS DID UNSKILLED JOBS. So we’ve cut out that abuse and we’ve capped economic migration FROM OUTSIDE THE EU.

UNDER LABOUR, THE STUDENT VISA SYSTEM WAS SO BADLY ABUSED THAT IT BECAME THE MAIN WAY TO GET TO BRITAIN. So we’re closing down bogus colleges, regulating the remainder, restricting the right to work here and bring dependants, and making sure that all but the very best go home at the end of their studies.

UNDER LABOUR, TEMPORARY IMMIGRATION LED TO AN AUTOMATIC RIGHT TO SETTLE HERE. So we’re breaking that link, making sure that immigrants who come here to work go home at the end of their visa… So we’re taking action to reduce immigration across every route to Britain…

We all know the stories about the Human Rights Act. THE VIOLENT DRUG DEALER WHO CANNOT BE SENT HOME BECAUSE HIS DAUGHTER, FOR WHOM HE PAYS NO MAINTENANCE, LIVES HERE. THE ROBBER WHO CANNOT BE REMOVED BECAUSE HE HAS A GIRLFRIEND. THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT WHO CANNOT BE DEPORTED BECAUSE – AND I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP – HE HAD A PET CAT. This is why I remain of the view that THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT NEEDS TO GO… We will change the immigration rules to ensure that the misinterpretation of Article Eight of the ECHR, the right to a family life, no longer prevents the deportation of people who shouldn’t be here.

I expect not many people have actually read Article Eight, so let me tell you what it says:

‘Article 8.1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence’… OUR COURTS, THE PROBLEM LIES MAINLY IN BRITISH COURTS, INTERPRET THE RIGHT TO A FAMILY LIFE AS AN ALMOST ABSOLUTE RIGHT.’ Let me read to you the rest of what Article Eight says: ‘Article 8.2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law AND IS NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY IN THE INTERESTS OF NATIONAL SECURITY, PUBLIC SAFETY OR THE ECONOMIC WELL-BEING OF THE COUNTRY, FOR THE PREVENTION OF DISORDER OR CRIME, FOR THE PROTECTION OF HEALTH OR MORALS, OR FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS.’

THE RIGHT TO A FAMILY LIFE IS NOT AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT, and it must not be used to drive a coach and horses through our immigration system. THE MEANING OF ARTICLE EIGHT SHOULD NO LONGER BE PERVERTED…

You know, the Labour Party still claim they had immigration under control… They still don’t get it.

We know now that THEY DENOUNCED ANYBODY WORRIED ABOUT IMMIGRATION AS A BIGOT. And they say we can’t trust the public to vote for police and crime commissioners, because they might elect extremists. THEY HAVE TOTAL CONTEMPT FOR WHAT THE PEOPLE THINK.

When government fails to protect the public from crime and when it fails to control immigration, it might not bother the left-wing elites, because THEY’RE NOT THE ONES WHO PAY THE PRICE. But the people who do are the very people I’m in politics to serve, the men and women who work hard for a living, make sacrifices for their family, and care about their community. It should be our moral mission to help working people build a better future for themselves and their families…

WE SHOULD DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO REWARD THOSE WHO DO THE RIGHT THING… WE SHOULD PUNISH THOSE WHO DO THE WRONG THING.

That’s why WE MUST TRUST THE PEOPLE, by giving them their say about policing their communities. And it’s why WE MUST RESPECT THE PEOPLE, BY DOING WHAT THEY WANT and getting to grips with immigration. That is what I am determined to do.”

Fine words, Theresa.

Very fine words. Thing is, you’ve been a big shot Tory for a long time now, and you Tories didn’t appear to 'trust' or 'care' all that much when they were reducing British industry to a pale shadow of what it once was, did you? When you were exporting our jobs and devasting working-class communities where was the trust and care?

And the 'tens of thousands' Thatcher and Major let in every year, that’s still a hell of a lot of unwanted foreigners bearing down, for the most part, upon those already disheartened working-class communities, don't you think?

And, though a few pips squeaked when New Labour was gleefully ‘rubbing the right’s nose in diversity’, with their deeply treacherous importation of the alien millions, I don’t remember any Tory ever laying it on the line as you have here.

And politicians lie, don’t they? As Ted Koppel once famously said, ‘they lie all the time.’ Oh yes, we are aware that dishonesty is routine at the top level. So, nowadays, most of us expect to be deceived by people in your position.

This isn’t cynicism by the way, this is how it is. This is what bitter experience has taught us. Our politicians cannot be trusted to do the right thing by us. They can be trusted to do the right thing by the Murdochs, the EU, the greedy bankers and the globalists but by the British people? Never. The political class sold us down the river and it has a long way to go before the majority puts any trust at all in its fine words.

Some of us will be watching you very closely from now on, Theresa. If your present oratory matches your future actions we will aplaud you heartily. If they do not you will be roundly condemned. We will ensure that the British people are made aware that Theresa May is one of the very many who promised much but, in the end, delivered nothing.



On 4 October 2011, David Levin, Headmaster of the City of London School, said this at the annual Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference in St Andrews.

"I grew up in South Africa, where apartheid was imposed by the government. People had to live in different areas. Increasingly I am alarmed at the way LONDON IS DIVIDED INTO GHETTOS. We are becoming a silo society… I think LONDON IS SLEEPWALKING TOWARDS JOHANNESBURG. THE GHETTOISATION OF THE COMMUNITY.”

Levin, who is Vice-Chairman of the Conference, added:

“I think LONDON IS SLEEPWALKING TOWARDS JOHANNESBURG – THE GHETTOISATION OF THE COMMUNITY. It means they are not mixing with people from other faiths, different races and different socio-economic backgrounds…

One of the things I have learned pre and post – particularly post – apartheid is that your imagination is much stronger than the reality. YOU MAY NOT LIKE SOMEONE, BUT IF YOU KNOW THEM THEN YOU DO NOT FEAR THEM… I think schools should be an area in which, in a rational protected way, CHILDREN FROM A DIFFERENT BACKGROUND, FAITH, RACIAL GROUPING SHOULD COME TOGETHER in a COMMON PURPOSE of education and get to know each other. I THINK THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT."

I wonder, David, more than 3,500 Boer farmers and their family members have been murdered by marauding black gangs since Nelson Mandela came to power.

Do you think they might still be here if happy-clappy melting-potters like you hadn’t forced them to 'come together' in a 'common purpose' with their killers?

As for us ‘sleepwalking towards Johannesburg’, this is what happens when you fill a homogeneous society with outsiders. All of a sudden you get ghettoes, no-go areas and, if the government prefers the immigrant to the indigenous, ethnic cleansing. At this point, what once worked well becomes hell on earth for those whom the immigrant is allowed to shove aside.

Levin is, of course, complaining that the socially engineered multiculturalising process, imposed upon the British people by the likes of him, isn’t working. Thing is, nowhere on planet earth have people ever wanted to live alongside others they don’t know and don‘t care for. The human race is happiest living amongst its own kind.

This is the way of the animal world.

Unfortuately, it is not the way of the Cultural Marxists who rule our lives.

Levin is a common Jewish name.

Jews were prominent in South-Africa’s anti-apartheid movement and have featured prominently in that country's post-apartheid governments. These things, coupled with the fact that Mr Levin wants to inflict the Multicult upon the British schoolchild, suggest to me that he is, indeed, a Jew.



On 4 October 2011, the Indian grandfather of a child bride was quoted by the thus by the BBC:

"I HATE THE GOVERNMENT FOR TRYING TO STOP US. THIS IS THE WAY WE'VE ALWAYS DONE THINGS. The government bans this, saying do not get under-aged children married, BUT WE DON'T CARE AND WE DO THESE WEDDINGS ANYWAY."

Nel Hedayat added:

“Some 10 MILLION GIRLS A YEAR ARE MARRIED OFF BEFORE THE AGE OF 18 ACROSS THE WORLD, according to a Unicef report released this year…

In the northern state of Rajasthan I witnessed the wedding of two sisters who were about six and 11 years old… Child marriages are illegal in India, and are punishable with a fine of Rs100,000 (£1,300) and two years in prison for anyone who performs, conducts or negligently fails to prevent a child marriage. But THIS DIDN'T SEEM TO BOTHER ANY OF THE GUESTS WHO DANCED MERRILY OR THE PRIEST WHO SOLEMNLY CHANTED THE WEDDING RITES...

According to a study by The International Center for Research on Women, GIRLS IN SOME INDIAN STATES WHO WERE MARRIED BEFORE 18, WERE TWICE AS LIKELY TO REPORT BEING BEATEN, SLAPPED OR THREATENED BY THEIR HUSBANDS THAN GIRLS WHO MARRIED LATER…

In Bangladesh, young girls are married off soon after reaching puberty and usually move in with their husbands straight away… Farah Kabir, country director of Action Aid Bangladesh, explained that with a significant part of the population living below the poverty line, the priority for many families is to get their daughter or sister married off as soon as possible to a man who could provide for her EVEN IF HE WAS MUCH OLDER…

THERE ARE AT LEAST 50 MILLION MARRIED CHILD COUPLES AROUND THE WORLD AND THIS WILL DOUBLE BY THE END OF THE DECADE. The top three countries with the highest proportion of child brides are Niger, Chad and Mali. Bangladesh is fourth and India is 13th in the world table of child marriage statistics by proportion.

An estimated 14 MILLION ADOLESCENTS BETWEEN 15 AND 19 GIVE BIRTH EACH YEAR. GIRLS IN THIS AGE GROUP ARE TWICE AS LIKELY TO DIE DURING PREGNANCY OR CHILDBIRTH AS WOMEN IN THEIR 20S.”

The actor, Hugh Grant, was asked if other Fleet Street newspapers were involved in phone hacking. On 4 October 2011, he responded thus in The Telegraph:

“I know for a fact they have. This will all come out very soon, and not on a minor scale, ON A HUGE INDUSTRIAL SCALE, through the police inquiry or the Leveson inquiry…

There are plenty of depressing reasons why THERE MAY NOT BE A GREAT APPETITE ON (DAVID CAMERON’S) PART, ON THE TORIES PART TO PUT THESE WRONGS RIGHT. THEY HAVE HAD A VERY COSY RELATIONSHIP WITH A VERY POWERFUL MEDIA GIANT, the majority of the press outside News International is right leaning, so why would you want to upset them with media reform?

THE MORE SCRUTINY THERE IS OF THE EXCESSES THAT HAPPENS THE MORE SKELETONS THAT WILL COME OF THE CUPBOARD ABOUT RELATIONS BETWEEN THIS PARTICULAR GOVERNMENT AND MURDOCH.


On 3 October 2011, the jornalist, John Kampfner, Chief Executive of Index on Censorship, said this:

“If we look over the past decade, from Iraq, to the behaviour of bankers, JOURNALISTS HAVE FOUND OUT TOO LITTLE ABOUT THOSE WITH POWER because of our restrictive libel and privacy laws. JOURNALISM IS TOO WEAK, NOT TOO STRONG.”

Perhaps, John.

Perhaps. But cuddling up to the Murdochs, the Maxwells, the Desmonds, the Jewish lobby et al. suggests, not just weakness, but entrenched and deep-seated corruption. To the point, in some cases, of treachery.



On 3 October 2011, Leo McKinstry, wrote the following in The Express:

“THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT CONTINUES TO EXERT ITS MALIGN INFLUENCE. Passed in 1998 to a noisy fanfare by the Labour government, THIS BALEFUL MEASURE ACTS LIKE A POISON ON THE NATIONAL BLOODSTREAM, DESTROYING OUR TRADITIONAL CONCEPT OF JUSTICE AND UNDERMINING DEMOCRACY. WHILE THE BRITISH PUBLIC SUFFERS FROM THIS LUNACY, THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO BENEFIT ARE SELF-SERVING LAWYERS AND THE CRIMINAL CLASSES.

Recent days have provided yet more evidence of the corrosive effects of the human rights culture. Last week it was revealed that Siraj Yassin Abdullah Ali, sentenced to nine years in jail for his role in the Islamist bomb plot of July 21, 2005, has been released after serving half his term and is now walking the streets of London because his ‘human rights’ mean he cannot be deported to his native Eritrea.

In a decision so typical of modern legalistic contempt for basic morality, a court decided that this fundamentalist Muslim might face ‘inhumane treatment’ if he were returned to Eritrea. Well, ANY SUCH TREATMENT COULD HARDLY BE MORE CRUEL THAN THE GRISLY FATE HE WAS PLANNING FOR SCORES OF LONDONERS. ONLY IN A TWISTED ETHICAL UNIVERSE COULD IT BE DECIDED THAT THE BRITISH HAVE A DUTY TO PROTECT A VIOLENT FOREIGNER WHO WANTED TO BLOW US UP. In the wake of this disgraceful fiasco, the home Office admitted that there are at least seven other recent cases where foreign-born Islamic terrorists have thwarted their deportation from Britain by invoking human rights legislation…

Sheik Raed Salah is now in line for compensation thanks to a supposed technical breach of the Human Rights Act. Salah, a hate preacher who is meant to be barred from entering Britain, was seized by immigration officers prior to deportation but because they did not follow correct procedures HE IS NOW DUE A PAYOUT FROM THE TAXPAYER, LIKELY TO BE WORTH £5,000. THIS IS NOT JUSTICE. IT IS AN ABJECT FORM OF JUDICIAL SELF- LOATHING, A SPINELESS INSTINCT TO GROVEL BEFORE OUR ENEMIES AND TREAT THE INTERESTS OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE WITH CONTEMPT.

We see this sort of nonsense all the time, whether it be in the demands for prisoners to be given the vote or the travellers’ ability to halt their eviction from the Dale Farm site in Essex despite a flagrant breach of the planning law. THE HUMAN RIGHTS CULTURE IS CREATING AN INCREASINGLY DANGEROUS BRITAIN, WHERE THE BULLIES ARE GUARDED BY THE STATE, WHERE COMMON SENSE HAS DISAPPEARED AND WHERE ANARCHY TRIUMPHS OVER ORDER...

Every year more than 3,200 foreign criminals, failed asylum seekers and EU benefit tourists use the Human Rights Act to avoid deportation, the majority of them claiming ‘the right to a family life’ under Article 8. ONE SRI LANKAN ROBBER WAS ALLOWED TO STAY BECAUSE HE HAS A GIRLFRIEND HERE, While a Bolivian was granted the right to remain on the grounds that he wanted to care for his pet cat…

The Act ‘is here to stay,’ declared Nick Clegg triumphantly at his party’s conference, implying the coalition would be brought down if there is any attempt by the Tories at repeal. Labour has also pledged to mount a ferocious defence of the Act, which its spokesman SADIQ KHAN CALLS ‘THE MOST SIGNIFICANT DEFENCE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE AGAINST STATE POWER EVER PASSED INTO LAW’…

In fact, this country has had a remarkable tradition of individual liberty stretching back to Magna Carta in 1215. Britain's history is a narrative of the growth of freedom and democracy through the centuries, in contrast to much of continental Europe where the authoritarian state complete with secret police, censorship and huge standing armies was far more common. It was Britain’s respect for liberty which gave birth to the European Convention on Human Rights, drawn up in 1951 in the wake of the Second World War’s horrors.

The man who drafted the Convention, on which the 1998 Act is based, was the senior Tory David Maxwell-Fyfe, who wanted to ensure that the barbarities of genocide and dictatorship would never be repeated. YET THIS ONCE LAUDABLE BULWARK AGAINST TYRANNY HAS BEEN TURNED INTO AN INSTRUMENT OF OPPRESSION AGAINST THE LAW-ABIDING BRITISH. Even Jack Straw, the Labour minister who piloted the Act through Parliament, said: ‘THERE IS A SENSE THAT IT’S A VILLAINS’ CHARTER’…

THE ACT HAS BEEN A DISASTER, FUELLING THE ARROGANCE OF THE UNELECTED JUDICIARY AND MAKING A FORTUNE FOR LEFT-WING LAWYERS.

To restore our national freedom and integrity, the Act has to go. The coalition should listen to Theresa May and the British people, not the ideologues of the Left.”



On 2 October 2011, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, wrote the following in The Telegraph:

“Protectionism beckons AS LEADERS PUSH WORLD INTO DEPRESSION.

The world savings rate has surpassed its modern-era high of 24pc. This is the killer in the global system. It is why we are at imminent risk of tipping into a second, deeper leg of intractable depression...

Charles Dumas from Lombard Street Research… SAID CHINA'S GROTESQUE AND DESTRUCTIVE’ POLICIES OF OVER-INVESTMENT (50PC OF GDP) AND UNDER-CONSUMPTION (36PC OF GDP) ARE UNPRECEDENTED IN HISTORY…

His full wrath is reserved for THE ‘FALLACIOUS AND MALIGNANT POLICIES’ OF ANGELA MERKEL AND WOLFGANG SCHAUBLE IN GERMANY. They are enforcing a Gold Standard outcome on the whole eurozone. ‘SUFFUSED WITH SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS, THEY INSIST THAT THE IMBALANCES MUST BE PUT RIGHT ONLY BY DEFICIT-COUNTRY DEFLATION.’

The sheer scale of global imbalances is made clear in a paper by Stephen Cecchetti at the Bank for International Settlements. His paper contains a chart showing that combined surplus/deficits reached 6pc of world GDP in the boom… Money flows are even more out of kilter. Cross-border liabilities have jumped from $15 trillion to $100 trillion in fifteen years, or 150pc of global GDP. This creates a very big risk.

‘Gross financial flows can stop suddenly, or even reverse. THEY CAN OVERWHELM WEAK OR WEAKLY REGULATED FINANCIAL SYSTEMS,’ said Mr Cecchetti. Well, yes, this is now happening. DID ANYBODY THINK ABOUT THIS WHEN THEY UNLEASHED GLOBALISATION WITH ITS ELEMENTAL DEFORMITY, FREE TRADE WITHOUT FREE CURRENCIES?…

CHINA HOLDS DOWN THE YUAN AGAINST THE DOLLAR THROUGH A DIRTY PEG. GERMANY AND ITS SATELLITES HOLD DOWN THE D-MARK AGAINST CLUB MED COVERTLY THROUGH THE MECHANISM OF EMU… It is not a German plot; it is the unintended effect of A CURRENCY UNION CREATED BY IDEOLOGUES AGAINST BUNDESBANK ADVICE, and which has calamitous implications for German foreign policy and for Latin social stability. My sympathies go to the hard-working citizens of Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal, and Ireland for being LED INTO THIS IMPASSE BY FOOLISH ELITES. A GLOBAL SYSTEM BIASED TOWARDS EXPORT DUMPING HAS HAD UNHAPPY EFFECTS on the US, UK, and Club Med…

A global double-dip would take us to the edge. US democracy cannot allow America’s precious stimulus to leak out to COUNTRIES THAT HAVE BENT THEIR EXCHANGE RATES, TAX SYSTEMS, AND INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES TOWARDS PREDATORY EXPORT ADVANTAGE… Capitol Hill is already launching its latest bill to label CHINA A CURRENCY VIOLATOR, and open the way for retaliatory sanctions.

‘THEY GET AWAY WITH ECONOMIC MURDER and thus far our country has just said, 'Oh, we don't care. This legislation will send a huge shot across China's bow,’ said Senator Chuck Schumer.

The risk – or solution? – is that the US will opt for a variant of Imperial Preference, the pro-growth bloc created behind tariff walls by the British Empire with Scandinavia, Argentina and other like-minded states in 1932. THIS EXPERIMENT HAS BEEN AIR-BRUSHED OUT OF HISTORY BY FREE TRADE HEGEMONISTS. One can imagine how this might unfold. NORTH AMERICA WOULD CLAMP DOWN ON DUMPING… and BRIC solidarity would wither on the vine.

By then you would have the US recovering behind its wall, while surplus states were recoiling from severe shock. Britain would face the moment of truth, offered salvation in the `Pact of the Americas’ or slow asphyxiation by trade ties to EMU’s deflation machine. Portugal and Spain would face the same fateful choice. THIS IS HOW THE EU MIGHT END.

Ultimately, America would get its way…

The IMF's Christine Lagarde understands the risks intuitively. THE GLOBAL ECONOMY IS ENTERING A ‘DANGEROUS NEW PHASE,’ she warns…

In Europe, policy is still on deflationary settings, with Italy and Spain having to tighten fiscal yet further to meet their budget targets... Michael Darda from MKM Partners said THE ECB HAS MADE SUCH A HASH OF MONETARY POLICY THAT NOMINAL GDP FOR THE WHOLE EUROZONE MAY EVEN START TO CONTRACT. That is astonishing. If correct, THERE IS NO HOPE OF AVERTING A DEBT SPIRAL IN ITALY AND SPAIN. ANY SUCH OUTCOME WILL TEST THE EU’S BAIL-OUT MACHINERY TO DESTRUCTION WITHIN MONTHS.

Mr King’s ‘disastrous collapse’ is staring policy-makers in the face.”


Go here for more Chronological Quotations 2

Total Pageviews