WWII hero, Lieutenant General James Doolittle, was a member of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board from 1955 until 1965.

Before taking up that position, in July 1954, President Eisenhower asked him to compile a top secret report on the CIA's covert activities and to 'make any recommendations calculated to improve the conduct of these operations.'

In the subsequent report, Doolittle said:
"Hitherto acceptable norms of human conduct do not apply. If the United States is to survive, long-standing American concepts of 'fair play' must be reconsidered. We must develop effective espionage and counter-espionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated, and more effective methods than those used against us.

It may become necessary that the American people be made acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy."
The following top secret information was published by US and UK officials:in a September 1957 document:
"In order to facilitate the action of liberative forces, reduce the capabilities of the Syrian regime to organise and direct its military actions, to hold losses and destruction to a minimum, and to bring about desired results in the shortest possible time, a special effort should be made to eliminate certain key individuals. 
Their removal should be accomplished early in the course of the uprising and intervention and in the light of circumstances existing at the time." 
The assassinations signalled above, the consequent 'regime change' and destabilisation of the region that was supposed to ensue, were approved by both the Macmillan and Eisenhower administrations. Abd al-Hamid Sarraj, head of Syrian military intelligence; Afif al-Bizri, chief of the Syrian general staff; and Khalid Bakdash, leader of the Syrian Communist party, were the intended targets. These had been identified as the real power behind the 'figurehead President', Shukri al-Quwatli.

The document continues:
"Once a political decision is reached to proceed with internal disturbances in Syria, CIA is prepared, and SIS [MI6] will attempt, to mount minor sabotage and coup de main incidents within Syria, working through contacts with individuals. The two services should consult, as appropriate, to avoid any overlapping or interference with each other's activities." 
The document also said that Syria had to be 'made to appear as the sponsor of plots, sabotage and violence directed against neighbouring governments' and called for the arming of 'political factions with paramilitary or other actionist capabilities.' It added:
"CIA and SIS should use their capabilities in both the psychological and action fields to augment tension." 
The man most responsible for the 'preferred plan' outlined above was the CIA's Middle East chief, Kermit Roosevelt, grandson of President Theodore Roosevelt.

If the great and the good could scheme to inflict such Machiavellian nastiness upon a sovereign country and its leaders back then, they could do so now, couldn’t they? Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Iran come straight to mind.

"The Zionists who rule Israel, and the Zionists in America, have been trying to trick the U.S. into a Mideast war on the side of Israel. If more Americans are not made aware of the truth about Zionist Israel you can be sure that sooner or later those atheists who claim to be God's Chosen People will trick the U.S. into a Mideast war against the Arabs, who in the past, have always been America's friends." ---Jack Bernstein, Author (His prediction was made in 1984.) The initial draft of 'Defence Policy Guidance' was presented to Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defence in Bush senior’s administration by its creators, Under Secretary of Defence Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Under Secretary of Defence, Lewis Libby, on 18 February 1992.

"The US must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order… In non-defence areas, we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order.

We must maintain the mechanism for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role. …The sense that the World Order is ultimately backed by the US will be an important stabilizing factor.

While the US cannot become the world's policeman, by assuming responsibility for righting every wrong, we will retain the pre-eminent responsibility for addressing selectively those wrongs which threaten not only our interests, but those of our allies or friends…

In the Middle East and Southwest Asia, our overall objective is to remain the predominant outside power in the region and preserve US and Western access to the region's oil."

A second draft of 'Defence Policy Guidance' was published on 16 April 1992.

This said:

"In the Middle East and Persian Gulf, we seek to foster regional stability, deter aggression against our friends and interests in the region, protect US nationals and property, and safeguard our access to international air and seaways and to the region's oil.

The United States is committed to the security of Israel and to maintaining the qualitative edge that is critical to Israel's security. Israel's confidence in its security and US-Israel strategic cooperation contribute to the stability of the entire region, as demonstrated once again during the Persian Gulf War."

Dick Cheney would, subsequently, become George W. Bush's Vice-President and, from 2001 to 2005, Paul Wolfowitz would serve as U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense, just as he had with Bush senior. 

In March 2005, the younger Bush nominated Wolfowitz as President of the World Bank. Nobel Laureate in Economics and the Bank's former chief economist, Joseph Stiglitz, said:
"The World Bank will once again become a hate figure. This could bring street protests and violence across the developing world." 
He was forced to resign in June 2007 after it became known that he had personally ordered a substantial pay rise and a promotion for Shaha Ali Riza, an Arab employee of the Bank and his long-standing lover.

Lewis Libby was also active in Bush junior administration, becoming Cheney's chief of staff in 2001.

Mary Matalin, also a Cheney adviser, said this of him 

"He is to the Vice President what the Vice President is to the President."

Libby would, on 5 June 2007, be sentenced to 30 months in prison for obstructing justice, perjury and making false statements.

On 2 July 2007, using his executive powers, President Bush set him free. On 24 October 2002, Michael Kinsley said this in Slate Magazine:
"Tariq Aziz has a theory. Saddam Hussein's deputy told the New York Times this week, 'the reason for this warmongering policy toward Iraq is oil and Israel.' Although no one wishes to agree with Tariq Aziz, he has put succinctly what many people in Washington apparently believe. The lack of public discussion about the role of Israel in the thinking of 'President Bush' is easier to understand, but weird nevertheless. It is the proverbial elephant in the room: Everybody sees it, no one mentions it. The reason is obvious and admirable: neither supporters nor opponents of a war against Iraq wish to evoke the classic anti-Semitic image of the king's Jewish advisers whispering poison into his ear and betraying the country to foreign interests."
On 5 February 2003, Joe Klein said this in Time Magazine:
"A stronger Israel is very much embedded in the rationale for war with Iraq. It is a part of the argument that dare not speak its name, a fantasy quietly cherished by the neo-conservative faction in the Bush Administration and by many leaders of the American Jewish community. The fantasy involves a domino theory. The destruction of Saddam's Iraq will not only remove an enemy of long-standing but will also change the basic power equation in the region. It will send a message to Syria and Iran about the perils of support for Islamic terrorists. It will send a message to the Palestinians too: Democratize and make peace on Israeli terms, or forget about a state of your own."
On 5 April 2003, Ari Shavit said this in Haaretz:
"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history... Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer, people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another."
On 6 April 2003. James Rosen said this in The Sacramento Bee:
"In 1996, as Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to take office, eight Jewish neoconservative leaders sent him a six-page memo outlining an aggressive vision of government. At the top of their list was overthrowing Saddam and replacing him with a monarch under the control of Jordan. The neoconservatives sketched out a kind of domino theory in which the governments of Syria and other Arab countries might later fall or be replaced in the wake of Saddam... They urged Netanyahu to spurn the Oslo peace accords and to stop making concessions to the Palestinians. Lead writer of the memo was Perle. Other signatories were Feith, now undersecretary of defense, and Wurmser, a senior adviser to John Bolton, undersecretary of state. Fred Donner, a professor of Near Eastern history at the University of Chicago, said he was struck by the similarities between the ideas in the memo and ideas now at the forefront of Bush's foreign policy."
On 4 April 2003, New York Times columnist, Thomas Friedman, said this:
"I could give you the names of 25 people (all of whom are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office) who, if you had exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not have happened. It is not only the neo-conservatives who led us to the outskirts of Baghdad. What led us to the outskirts of Baghdad is a very American combination of anxiety and hubris."
On 10 February 2003, top blogger, Dr. Henry Makow Phd., inventor of the Board game 'Scruples' said this:
"If the U.S. gets bogged down with heavy casualties on both sides, Americans are going to blame big oil and Zionism for getting them into this mess. Everybody knows that the only country that fears Iraq's WMD's is Israel; American-Jewish neo-conservatives on the Defence Policy Board (Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz) planned this war in 1998 and made it Bush Administration policy; the purpose of the war is to change the balance of power in the Middle East so Israel can settle the Palestinian issue on its own terms; and Congress trembles in fear before the Israeli Lobby, 'AIPAC.' At this perilous juncture in US history, there is no effective opposition because Zionist Jews appear to control both parties. The Jewish 'Anti Defamation League' considers it a barometer of anti-Semitism to say, 'Jews have too much power.' But is something anti-Semitic if it is true? Anti Semitism is racial prejudice. Zionist power is not a racial prejudice; it is a fact of life. When a special interest group hijacks American foreign policy, it is a patriotic duty to say so. In recent decades, Zionists have succeeded in making support for Zionism synonymous with 'Jewish.' They have made Israel appear to be a vulnerable country facing annihilation in a sea of bloodthirsty Arabs. In fact, Israel has 200-400 nuclear bombs and is one of the most powerful nations on earth. It has evaded many opportunities for a just peace because it's secret agenda is to dominate the region. Israel keeps this quiet because most Jews, including Israelis, did not sign on for that."
On 13 April 2009, a gentleman calling himself 'Desert Larry' phoned in to Jason Bermas on the 'Info Warrior' radio show and said, '... the Jewish people, they seem to run 90% of all the media and all of the Hollywood movies.' At which point, Bernas cut him off. Thereafter, he responded thus: "All right thanks for the call, everybody hates the Jews... I have 5 minutes to take on the Nazis or the people that just don't like Jews for some reason. Look man. It's not a Jewish conspiracy, OK? Get over it. I'm Sorry. Hook-nosed people don't run the world in some kind of cave while they suck the blood our of babies in some weird ritual you believe in... 'Jews run the media, they're like rats and cockroaches!' Give me a break, dude, please go hang yourself. There's somebody I wouldn't mind with a little population control. if you hate the Jews don't call into my show... 'The Jews run the media!' Why don't you discredit the media a little further, sir? Come on; 'the Jews,' come on, it's just so beyond ridiculous. And then you have these guys that find a Jew under every bed... it's just unbelievable, unbelievable... What are people's obsessions with hating Jews? What about the Jewish question Jason? The question is, if you're asking that question, why are you still breathing? I mean why haven't you really just taken a toaster oven and thrown it in the bathtub with yourself and had a party? Because that's what you need to do. Nothing I hate more than the anti-Semites and the Nazis, not a thing. Can't stand it." So, for telling a truth that the Jew doesn't want told, the man who tells it is a Jew-hating, anti-Semite Nazi who should be subject to 'population control' (sterilisation?). Indeed, he shouldn't even be alive ('breathing') and, if he was to die in particularly unfortunate way, (toaster in the bath) that would be just great. According to Jason Bermas. Oh yes, for atating the stone bl**ding obvious that's what he 'needs to do' all right. Thing is, ladies and gentlemen, the Jews ARE enormously over-represented in the media of the Western world (just as they are in banking and politics) and, these days, just about everyone knows it. Jason Bermas certainly does. In the strictly-controlled, politically correct world according to Bermas and co., however, whilst knowing it is perfectly acceptable, daring to say it should get you toasted. Interesting then that some Jewish notables are so confident of their unassailable position at the top of the heap, they are happy to confirm the actuality of Desert Larry's abbreviated observation. Check these out here and in the video below. On 7 October 2009, a video of Dr Douglas Rushkoff telling it how it really is was posted at YouTube:

In this he said:
"The thing that makes Judaism dangerous to everybody, to every race, to every nation, to every idea is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation-state.

We don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people. These are all artificial constructions and Judaism really teaches us how to see that.

In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real. And that’s very upsetting to people."

Rushkoff is an author, blogger documentary maker and a regular commentator for CNN.

Total Pageviews