“Fresh METROPOLITAN POLICE GUIDANCE that police BAIL CONDITIONS COULD NO LONGER BE ENFORCED has been circulated to police forces across England and Wales, deepening the crisis provoked by a legal ruling OVERTURNING 25 YEARS OF POLICE PRACTICE.
The Met's legal advice makes clear that BAIL CONDITIONS NO LONGER APPLY TO ANYONE WHO HAS BEEN ON POLICE BAIL FOR MORE THAN FOUR DAYS, or more likely a day if 96 hours have passed since they were first arrested. It means the POLICE HAVE LOST THE POWER TO DETAIN OR ARREST SOMEONE FOR BREACHING THEIR BAIL.
There are currently more than 80,000 suspects in England and Wales on police bail, INCLUDING 175 PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN BAILED FOR MURDER, ATTEMPTED MURDER OR CONSPIRACY TO MURDER IN LONDON.”
On 31 June 2011, Jack Doyle said this in The Daily Mail:
“Britain's powerlessness to control who has the right to be in this country was glaringly exposed… by two extraordinary cases. In the first… PREACHER OF HATE… Raed Salah was giving a lecture organised by Islamist radicals to a large crowd in Leicester, AND TODAY HE WAS DUE TO SPEAK AT WESTMINSTER AT THE INVITATION OF LEFT-WING LABOUR MPS.
In the second, A BOMBSHELL RULING BY EUROPEAN JUDGES BLOCKED THE DEPORTATION OF SOME 200 SOMALI CRIMINALS BACK TO THEIR HOMELAND. THE STRASBOURG COURT SAID THE MEN, INCLUDING DRUG DEALERS AND SERIAL BURGLARS, MIGHT BE PERSECUTED IN WAR-TORN SOMALIA, AND THAT THEY MUST BE ALLOWED TO STAY TO PROTECT THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS. So, irrespective of how heinous their crimes or the danger they present to the public, Britain has no power to expel them.
The ruling by the European Court of Human Rights stemmed from appeals against deportation by two asylum seekers convicted of a string of serious offences including burglary, making threats to kill and drug dealing… The two men, who were both granted thousands in legal aid to fight their cases, will now be released from immigration detention centres and will be free to walk the streets. They were jointly awarded more than £20,000 for costs and expenses.”
On 31 June 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Tory MP, Douglas Carswell, and UK Independence Party MEP, Gerard Batten, thus:
Carswell: “The pathetic truth is that WE DO NOT HAVE CONTROL OVER OUR BORDERS, AND THESE CASES QUITE CLEARLY SHOW THAT WE DO NOT CONTROL NOT ONLY WHO COMES IN TO THE COUNTRY BUT WHO WE CHOOSE TO REMOVE. My constituents do not want any more mealy-mouthed promises about getting a grip on this – they want to know what the Government is actually going to do. SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE GIVEN ALL THE PROMISES ON IMMIGRATION YOU WOULD EXPECT OF A SECOND-HAND CAR SALESMAN. Ministers now need to start actually delivering on real promises and real control over our borders.”
Batten: “It is the absolute duty of the British Government to protect the lives and property of British citizens. IF FOREIGN NATIONALS PREY ON PEOPLE HERE THEY SHOULD BE SENT HOME TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM – NO IFS, NO BUTS… For the European Court of Human Rights to give Britain orders is bad enough; KNOWING THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL ROLL OVER TO THEIR DEMANDS IS WORSE. This decision confirms that THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT IS A CRIMINALS' CHARTER.”
The Mail explained what prompted these outbursts:
“Britain's powerlessness to control who has the right to be in this country was glaringly exposed last night by two extraordinary cases. In the first, a… preacher of hate whom the Home Secretary had banned from entering Britain WAS ABLE TO STROLL IN THROUGH HEATHROW. Last night, Raed Salah was giving a lecture organised by Islamist radicals to a large crowd in Leicester, and today HE WAS DUE TO SPEAK AT WESTMINSTER AT THE INVITATION OF LEFT-WING LABOUR MPS.
In the second, A BOMBSHELL RULING BY EUROPEAN JUDGES BLOCKED THE DEPORTATION OF SOME 200 SOMALIS BACK TO THEIR HOMELAND. The Strasbourg court said the men, INCLUDING DRUG DEALERS AND SERIAL BURGLARS, might be persecuted in war-torn Somalia, and that they must be allowed to stay TO PROTECT THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS. So, irrespective of how heinous their crimes or the danger they present to the public, BRITAIN HAS NO POWER TO EXPEL THEM.
The ruling by the European Court of Human Rights stemmed from appeals against deportation by two asylum seekers convicted of A STRING OF SERIOUS OFFENCES INCLUDING BURGLARY, MAKING THREATS TO KILL AND DRUG DEALING. But it will now also apply TO 214 OTHER SIMILAR CASES which have been lodged with the court using Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment, is an 'ABSOLUTE' RIGHT, MEANING THAT IT APPLIES REGARDLESS OF THE OFFENCES COMMITTED.
The two men, who were both granted THOUSANDS IN LEGAL AID to fight their cases, will now be released from immigration detention centres and will be FREE TO WALK THE STREETS. THEY WERE JOINTLY AWARDED MORE THAN £20,000 FOR COSTS AND EXPENSES…
Abdisamad Adow Sufi, 24, entered the country illegally in 2003 using a fake passport… Since then HE HAS AMASSED A STRING OF CONVICTIONS FOR OFFENCES INCLUDING BURGLARY, FRAUD, MAKING THREATS TO KILL, INDECENT EXPOSURE AND THEFT.
The second Somali, drug addict Abdiaziz Ibrahim Elmi, 42, was granted asylum in 1988. SINCE THEN HE HAS COMMITTED CRIMES INCLUDING HANDLING STOLEN GOODS, FRAUD, ROBBERY, CARRYING A REPLICA GUN, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, THEFT AND DEALING HEROIN AND COCAINE. Attempts to deport him began in 2006 and his appeal was rejected by an immigration judge. A deportation order was stayed in 2007 pending the outcome of his Strasbourg case, and SINCE THEN HE HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF POSSESSING CLASS A DRUGS AND CHARGED WITH DRUG DEALING.
The panel of seven judges ruled that because THE LEVEL OF VIOLENCE IN MOGADISHU WAS SO HIGH THERE WAS A REAL RISK OF THE MEN COMING TO HARM. In a unanimous judgment, the court also rejected the argument the men could leave the capital and return to safer parts of the country.
The judges said Sufi could not join his relatives because they lived in an area controlled by a strict Islamic group. If returned, he could face punishment according to their code – also a breach of his rights. He would also be particularly vulnerable if forced to live in a refugee camp BECAUSE OF HIS 'PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS', the court said.
Elmi claimed he would be at risk of persecution if he moved to an area controlled by the same group, because he wore an earring, which might lead to them thinking he was gay. If they found out he was a drug addict and thief he could face amputation, public flogging or execution, he said. The court ruled he had no experience of living in a strict Islamic area BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN IN THIS COUNTRY FOR SO LONG AND WOULD THEREFORE BE AT RISK OF HARM. The ruling said:
'The court reiterated that the prohibition of torture and of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was absolute, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE VICTIMS' CONDUCT. Consequently, THE APPLICANTS' BEHAVIOUR, HOWEVER UNDESIRABLE OR DANGEROUS, COULD NOT BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.'
The case will seriously hamper further attempts by ministers to deport foreign criminals, failed asylum seekers and illegal immigrants back to Somalia. Last year just 35 were kicked out. Around two thirds of the 214 other cases are thought to involve criminals. Others are failed asylum seekers and illegal immigrants.”
On 30 June 2011, Tom Whitehead told us this in The Daily Telegraph:
“The UK population is growing at its fastest rate for half a century driven by immigration and an imminent new baby boom. Almost half a million people were added to the UK population last year – the highest level since 1962... New migrants accounted for almost half the increase while the number of births hit a 20 year high… THE INCREASE IN CHILDREN WAS ALSO PARTLY DOWN TO A RISE IN MIGRANT MOTHERS MEANING IMMIGRATION HAD BOTH A DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACT ON POPULATION GROWTH, according to the Office for National Statistics.”
On 30 June 2011, The Daily Mail told us this:
“Austerity might be on the menu in most capitals of the European Union, but in Brussels the institutions are still hiring. Ever conscious of the need to battle Euro-scepticism and sharpen up its image, THE EU HAS BEGUN RECRUITING AROUND 65 SPIN-DOCTORS, OR 'COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALISTS'.”
On 29 June 2011, Kevin Maguire said this in The Daily Mirror:
“David Cameron was reduced to going cap in hand to beg the head of a surging economy to spare a few billion Renminbi to tide the UK over. The reversal of fortunes means CHINA MAY OWN OUR COUNTRY’S NEXT HIGH-SPEED TRAIN LINE…
The Chinese leader brushed off criticism of his nation’s human rights abuses while Cameron effectively promised not to say anything nasty in public. Wen lauded Shakespeare and visited the Chinese-owned Rover car plant in Birmingham…
Other countries rely heavily on China too. Saab workers in Sweden will be paid this month only because China paid up front for a fleet of motors. China is propping up struggling Greece by buying huge chunks of Hellenic debt…
Diplomats wrestle with what it means for Britain. The European Union may be unpopular but we’d be weaker out than in.”
That what it means for you, Kev. China owns our behinds because of the ineptitude and treachery of the political clique so we better cuddle up to the inept and treacherous EU bureaucrats?
You a Marxist, Kev?
On 28 June 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Lib Dem Councillor, Roy Davies, thus:
“Criminals should be made to pay fines for early release. They get time off for good behaviour, so why not allow them the chance to put money back to cover the cuts? It would be win-win. There would be less money spent on keeping them in prison, and more money for the police service to keep us safe...
A lot of criminals play the system, and some, like drug dealers have a lot of money hidden away that the court never get to know about. But IF THEY COULDN'T COME UP WITH THE MONEY, THEN THEY SERVE A HARDER SENTENCE, THAT'S ALL. Some professional criminals who go from one sentence to another won't be bothered about getting off early, but others will.”
Don't be misled by Davies' "harder sentence" b***ocks, he is a Lib Dem after all.
What he's really after is those with the dish being able to buy their way out of jail early! In other words, if you’ve got the money you can commit crime and be prosecuted less punitively.
What else is new?
I say, if you commit a heinous crime, serve the time AND give us your ill gotten gains!
On 27 June 2011, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
“ALMOST 60 PER CENT OF BURGLARS, INCLUDING REPEAT OFFENDERS, ESCAPE JAIL. AN ASTONISHING 20 PER CENT GET A POLICE CAUTION. Such institutionalised leniency sends a message to criminals that they have little to fear from the judicial system, which is precisely why THEY FEEL FREE TO ACT WITH SUCH BRUTAL CONTEMPT TOWARDS THE LAW-ABIDING PUBLIC. INDEED, IF THE BURGLAR OF MY HOME IS UNDER 18 HE WILL PROBABLY BE REWARDED FOR HIS CRIME, SINCE THE POLITICALLY CORRECT ATTITUDE AMONG MANY YOUTH WORKERS IS THAT JUVENILE DELINQUENTS ARE VICTIMS OF SOCIETY WHO NEED CONSTANT SUPPORT RATHER THAN PUNISHMENT.
YOUNG OFFENDERS INSTITUTIONS ARE LIKE WELL-EQUIPPED HOLIDAY CENTRES COMPLETE WITH GYMS, POOL TABLES, MUSIC STUDIOS, COMPUTER GAMES AND CAFETERIA. THERE IS NO ETHOS OF DISCIPLINE OR OBEDIENCE OF AUTHORITY.
I recently interviewed a trainee youth worker in utter despair about the 'surrender' to criminality. 'Even the worst behaviour is rarely challenged. Reprimands are almost unknown. When a teenager breaches the conditions of his sentence action is hardly ever taken,' he told me.
In one ludicrous case this trainee was given the task of chauffeuring a 16-year-old jobless Albanian gypsy, whose entire family had been involved in violent muggings and burglary, to the local social security office where he signed on for a range of benefits for himself and his pregnant girlfriend.
The theory behind this pathetic manoeuvre was to steer the young Albanian away from crime by lavishing him with welfare payments. But it didn’t work. As my interviewee admitted, THE ALBANIAN TREATED THE CASH AS POCKET MONEY ON TOP OF HIS ILLEGAL EARNINGS!
THE WHOLE BRITISH LEGAL SYSTEM IS AN EXPENSIVE CHARADE. IT IS GEARED ENTIRELY TOWARDS THE SO-CALLED RIGHTS OF OFFENDERS AND AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF SOCIETY OR THE VICTIMS OF CRIME. That imbalance was graphically illustrated during the trial of Levi Bellfield, the monstrous killer of teenager Milly Dowler.
In a complete inversion of justice Milly’s parents were subjected to judicial torture by Bellfield’s defence team as if they were on trial, their private lives held up to brutish scrutiny, their capabilities as parents questioned. Yet Bellfield himself avoided the same kind of interrogation by refusing to go into the witness box. What made this savage farce all the more offensive was that, THROUGH LEGAL AID, WE ALL HAD TO UNDERWRITE BELLFIELD’S LAWYERS WHOSE ATTACKS ON THE DOWLER FAMILY ARGUABLY HAD LITTLE TO DO WITH THE MURDER CHARGES.
THE STATE HAS BROKEN ITS CONTRACT WITH THE LAW-ABIDING MAJORITY OF THE BRITISH PUBLIC. We pay our taxes for our society to be protected from criminal menace. Yet THROUGH A MIX OF LEFT-WING IDEOLOGY AND WARPED PRIORITIES THE STATE HAS ENDED UP IN THE BIZARRE POSITION OF PROTECTING SOCIETY’S ENEMIES. THE CULTURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IS NOTHING MORE THAN A CRIMINALS’ CHARTER WHILE SHORT SENTENCES, EARLY RELEASE OF CONVICTS AND SOFT PRISON REGIMES HAVE SHATTERED CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIARY…
Yesterday in another symbol of the state’s appeasement of criminality, the Ministry of Justice revealed £10MILLION HAS BEEN PAID IN COMPENSATION TO PRISONERS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS, MOST IN RELATION TO TRIVIAL GRIEVANCES. Any nation with moral self-confidence would not give a penny in compensation to convicts who have chosen to abnegate their rights through their own conduct.
The Tories promised that they would be robust on law and order after more than a decade of vacillating Labour rule.. They have dismally failed to live up to that pledge… THE HUMAN RIGHTS CULTURE REMAINS INTACT.”
As I keep on telling you again and again and again, the politicians, the press, the police and the PC Crowd are at war with us!
And you, the sheeple, the lenmmings, the bought and paid-for jobsworths, the drugged-up, the dumbed, down, the degenerate and the decadent KEEP ON VOTING FOR THOSE WHO ARE MAKING WAR UPON US!
You will not be forgiven by those who have to fight to take back what your cowardice abd foolishness gave away.
On 27 June 2011, BBC News told us this:
“Social care budgets for the elderly in England will be cut this year, despite promises to invest more cash, according to an analysis of spending plans. The Age UK research, based on freedom of information data, suggested SPENDING ON THE OVER-65s WOULD DROP BY OVER 8%. The charity predicted the impact of such a cut could be 'devastating' as the system was already at crisis point.”
We know THEY are not about to stop forking out for international aid.
And, seeing as the immigrants keep on piling in, in their many hundreds of thousands, THEY won't be able stop spending on them even if they wanted to. Which THEY don't. But THEY won't stump up for the elderly Brit. He doesn't count for much in their eyes, you see.
The traitor within the gates has been at war with us ever since WWII ended. If you vote for them again your are beyond stupid or a traitor yourself.
On 27 June 2011, The Daily Mail told us this:
“GIRLS AS YOUNG AS ONE ARE BEING FORCED INTO SEX CHANGE OPERATIONS IN INDIA BY PARENTS DESPERATE FOR A SON. Surgeons in the city of Indore are reported to be 'converting' hundreds of girls a year, who are subsequently pumped full of hormone drugs.
A report in the respected Hindustan Times newspaper said the 'shocking, unprecedented trend, catering to the fetish for a son, is unfolding at conservative Indore's well-known clinics and hospitals on children who are one to five years old.”
On 26 June 2011, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:
“As Dave ‘does the talking’, war dead are sneaked out of the back gate The flag-wrapped coffins of dead servicemen are to be driven out of the back gate of RAF Brize Norton when it takes over from Lyneham (a few weeks from now) as the arrival point for the fallen.
They will then be routed down side roads to avoid nearby Carterton – a town almost exactly the same size as Wootton Bassett – and make their way to the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford along A-roads and bypasses. There’ll be a small guard of honour near the hospital entrance (there already is) but somehow or other the cortege won’t go down any High Streets.
I will tell you in a moment what the official excuses are for this. I should have thought the mere words ‘back gate’ would tell most people all they need to know about this decision. And despite the Prime Minister’s oily award of the title ‘Royal’ to Wootton Bassett, you can bet that he’d much rather the public scenes of grief and remembrance in that place had never happened, and that nobody noticed the frequent deaths his weakness and political cowardice are causing.
In the same way, THE DEFENCE MINISTRY HAS ALMOST COMPLETELY SUCCEEDED IN COVERING UP THE APPALLING NUMBERS OF MEN WHO HAVE BEEN GRAVELY INJURED IN AFGHANISTAN BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT HASN’T THE GUTS TO QUIT THIS MEANINGLESS WAR. We hardly ever see them. Were they all to be assembled in one photograph, the nation would demand instant withdrawal and probably get it.
The official version is that the families of the dead will be using a new ‘Repatriation Centre’ at Brize Norton, and that it is near the back gate. Routing the hearses through the base might disrupt its normal operations.
And here’s what was said by Andrew Robathan, whose stirring title is ‘Minister for Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans’. Speaking to Radio Oxford, he explained: ‘The side gate was seen by the Ministry of Defence and the police as the most appropriate way to take out future corteges.’
I love that word ‘appropriate’, the favourite adjective of those who have quietly forsaken the idea that there are such things as ‘RIGHT’ and ‘WRONG’. He continued: ‘I am not sure taking coffins in hearses past schools, past families, past married quarters is necessarily the thing that everybody would wish to see… the focus must be on the families of the dead service personnel. They are the people who care most. That is where our focus is.’
This is a curious statement. None of us exactly ‘wishes’ to see a funeral going by. But surely death should not be hidden away. And surely IT IS RIGHT THAT ALL OF US – ESPECIALLY THE YOUNG AND SERVICE FAMILIES – SHOULD BE REMINDED OF THE PRICE OF COURAGE AND DUTY, AND GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SALUTE THESE FINE THINGS.
You can believe the various official excuses. Or you might recall that until (in April 2008) this newspaper highlighted the way the hearses were left to fight their way through indifferent traffic, even cut up by impatient motorists at roundabouts, they did not get a police escort for the final few miles to the hospital.
Mr Cameron says that he will do the talking about war, and the commanders should do the fighting. Well, he may have a point there, or he would if he were not militarily and diplomatically clueless. But he might also mention that WHILE HE IS DOING THE TALKING, REAL MEN ARE DOING THE DYING, AND THEIR FAMILIES ARE DOING THE WEEPING.
Personally, I don’t think he or his Government colleagues are grown-up enough to pay the price of their own vanity and bombast. So THEY SNEAK THE DEAD OUT BY THE BACK GATE, AND HOPE IT DOESN’T GET ON THE TV.”
On 26 June 2011, The Daily Mail quoted thus from a strategy document written by Christopher Shale, David Cameron's constituency Chairman.
“THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO JOIN THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY... NO REASON TO JOIN. LOTS OF REASONS NOT TO... COLLECTIVELY WE ARE NOT ALWAYS AN APPEALING ...
OVER THE YEARS WE HAVE COME ACROSS AS GRACELESS, VORACIOUS, CRASS, ALWAYS ON THE TAKE...
We are not always a group of people to whom many of our potential members are going to be magnetically drawn... When we come together as a group we sometimes morph into something different, less attractive. Our environment alters us. We must look different – when we communicate, when we’re together...
WE MUST BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY – TRY TO SEE OURSELVES AS OTHERS SEE US."
Shale concludes that people aren't joining the Tory party because "they think we’ll beg and steal from them. And they’re right."
The Mail on Sunday added:
"UNDER CAMERON’S LEADERSHIP TORY MEMBERSHIP NATIONALLY APPEARS TO HAVE FALLEN BY ABOUT A THIRD, FROM 259,000 TO 177,000. At the same time, local associations have seen their power to select candidates decline dramatically… If the Prime Minister’s own association can add only 20-odd members in the year its MP enters Downing Street, what hope is there for other local parties?”
On the morning that the above article was published, Christopher Shale was found dead in a toilet cubicle at the Glastonbury festival.
According to research undertaken by BritainThinks and published by The Independent on Sunday on 26 June 2011:
"WORKING CLASS USED TO BE A CHOICE – WORK WITH YOUR HANDS, DO AN HONEST DAY'S WORK, BE UNPRETENTIOUS, PLAY FOOTBALL. NOW WORKING CLASS TENDS TO JUST MEAN POOR."
The Independent on Sunday added:
“THE WORKING CLASS IS FAST DISAPPEARING IN BRITAIN, according to new research into public attitudes revealed today. Only a quarter of the population now identifying themselves as working class, and pride in their social position is turning to bitterness as manual workers feel themselves squeezed between benefit claimants, immigrants and the expanding middle class…
The survey paints an alarming picture of A GROUP THAT FEELS DISENFRANCHISED, ISOLATED AND THREATENED ON ALL SIDES. When asked to identify their social class, ONLY 24 PER CENT OF PEOPLE CHOSE TO SAY WORKING CLASS, COMPARED WITH 67 PER CENT IN THE LATE 1980S...
Today's report used focus groups in Rotherham and Basildon to probe the attitudes of the modern working class. It concludes that most working-class people feel under siege, ‘BROUGHT DOWN BY THE WORKSHY UNDERCLASS AND UNDERCUT BY IMMIGRANTS’...
Old assumptions about working-class solidarity no longer apply. The survey finds that the middle classes are more likely to feel part of a community, and that WORKING-CLASS RESPONDENTS ARE MORE LIKELY TO FEEL LONELY, UNHAPPY AND PESSIMISTIC…
People felt that being called working class was close to an insult, associating them with the ‘chav’ class who choose to live on benefits. The use of the term ‘chav’ has been described as part of the ‘demonisation of the working class’ by Owen Jones, but the study shows that the working classes use it themselves to disown the workshy.
The term working class ‘used to be a badge of pride, but not any more for most people who still call themselves working class’, said Deborah Mattinson, founder of BritainThinks.
The survey suggests that the working classes have lost out from politicians' emphasis on ‘aspiration’ in recent decades, with the assumption that everyone should want a middle-class life. John Major's aim of a ‘classless society’ in 1990 and Tony Blair's declaration that ‘the class war is over’ in 1999 seem to have cut the traditional working class out of politics.
Working-class participants in the focus groups described politicians as ‘middle-class rich kids.’ Labour are ‘champagne socialists,’ the Conservatives are ‘just the same but in a different colour suit,’ and the Liberal Democrats would ‘say anything to get into power’…
Changes in the labour market are seen as having undermined working-class solidarity. Although some said it was a good thing the mines had closed, many regretted the passing of powerful trade unions to defend their interests.
‘There aren't any unions now,’ said a focus group member. ‘They don't do anything now anyway.’ Another said: ‘No one stands up for each other; now if you get the sack you get the sack.’
Immigration, especially from central Europe, is blamed for depressing wages.
‘There are no unions any more because there are too many foreigners in the country now. They work for pennies. It's killing the British workforce.’ Looking at a photograph of a miner, Steve said:
‘IF HE'S POLISH, HE'S DEFINITELY 90 PER CENT OF THE PEOPLE I WORK WITH’.”
On 26 June 2011, James Forsyth, the political editor of The Spectator, told us that Christopher Shale, the Chairman of David Cameron's own constituency party, was saying that he understood why people weren't joining the Tories and quoted Shale thus
“THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO JOIN... LOTS OF REASONS NOT TO... COLLECTIVELY WE ARE NOT ALWAYS AN APPEALING PROPOSITION... OVER THE YEARS WE HAVE COME ACROSS AS GRACELESS, VORACIOUS, CRASS, ALWAYS ON THE TAKE...
We are not always a group of people to whom many of our potential members are going to be magnetically drawn… When we come together as a group we sometimes morph into something different, less attractive. Our environment alters us. We must look different – when we communicate, when we’re together. We must sound different – in what we say, how we say it, the language we use, our tone of voice. WE MUST BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY – TRY TO SEE OURSELVES AS OTHERS SEE US."
Forsyth continues thus:
"Under Cameron’s leadership Tory membership nationally appears to have fallen by about a third, from 259,000 to 177,000. At the same time, local associations have seen their power to select candidates decline dramatically… If the Prime Minister’s own association can add only 20-odd members in the year its MP enters Downing Street, what hope is there for other local parties?”
On 25 June 2011, Iain Martin told us this in The Daily Mail:
“IT SPEAKS VOLUMES THAT VOTERS’ CONCERNS ABOUT IMMIGRATION SHOULD COME AS A REVELATION TO SOME IN NO 10, WHEN FOR YEARS IT HAS BEEN OBVIOUS TO MILLIONS OUTSIDE THE WESTMINSTER VILLAGE THAT BRITAIN’S LOSS OF CONTROL OF ITS BORDERS HAS BEEN A DISASTER OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS.
LABOUR’S CRIMINALLY RECKLESS OPEN-DOOR POLICY HAS MEANT MORE THAN 5.2MILLION IMMIGRANTS ARRIVING ON OUR SHORES SINCE 1997. When the departures of those moving abroad are taken into account, it has left the foreign-born population in the UK an incredible 3.2million higher. Future historians will be astonished that a once-great country subjected itself to such a sudden and socially unsustainable rise in population.
And what is worrying Downing Street is whether they can do anything about it. Under pressure from Tory MPs to say something about immigration in the run-up to the election, CAMERON COMMITTED HIMSELF TO REDUCING NET MIGRATION TO THE ‘TENS OF THOUSANDS’. BUT IT IS BECOMING HORRIFYINGLY CLEAR THAT CAMERON WILL NOT MANAGE TO GET IMMIGRATION BELOW EVEN 100,000 A YEAR AT THE PRESENT RATE OF PROGRESS.
The Migration Observatory at Oxford University calculated this week that around 165,000 immigrants will still be arriving every year come 2015. The latest figures for the year to last September showed immigration actually going up, with 242,000 net arrivals…
At the current astonishing rates of growth, the independent Office for National Statistics now estimates that the British population will rise from 61.8million today to more than 70million in 2026 — three YEARS EARLIER THAN IT HAS HITHERTO FORECAST. And a staggering 68 per cent of the rise will be attributable to immigration. To put that in perspective, IT IS THE EQUIVALENT OF ADDING EIGHT CITIES THE SIZE OF BIRMINGHAM TO THE UK IN JUST 15 YEARS. OUR LEADERS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE ALL THESE NEW CITIZENS ARE GOING TO BE HOUSED NOR HOW THE ALREADY FAILING SCHOOL SYSTEM AND STRUGGLING NHS ARE GOING TO COPE WITH THEM. Already, as we heard this week, A MILLION CHILDREN IN BRITISH SCHOOLS HAVE ENGLISH AS THEIR SECOND LANGUAGE.
Inside Government, this is all causing something approaching panic. One worried minister described immigration to me as ‘the iceberg’ that could eventually sink the Government...
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith is implementing a programme to get some of the five million on benefits fit for work, but HE IS WORRIED THAT MIGRATION COULD RENDER IT LARGELY INEFFECTIVE... NINE OUT OF TEN NEW JOBS GO TO MIGRANTS.”
On 24 June 2011, Charles Moore said this in The Telegraph:
“We eurosceptics predicted 20 years ago that something like this would come to pass... We have been proved right. So now we fondly imagine that the crazy aspects of the project will be abandoned… Britain, in a strong position because of staying out of the euro, can set the new agenda, it is alleged.
The opposite is happening. THE EXISTING EU TREATIES FORBID BAIL-OUTS, BUT THESE HAVE BEEN ILLEGALLY IGNORED, and now the second rescue of Greece has been agreed. Fiscal union is being pushed forward, SO THAT THE ECONOMIES OF EUROZONE STATES CAN BE CENTRALLY CONTROLLED. EURO-ENTHUSIASTS, SEEING HOW TIRING IT IS TO EXTRACT BAIL-OUT MONEY FROM NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, ARE PROPOSING PAN-EUROPEAN TAXES TO BYPASS THE MEMBER STATES. They want levies on air travel, financial transactions, international telephone calls, even on emails.
The very nature of the Greek bail-outs is helping to bring about this European integration. THEY TRANSFER THE BURDEN OF THE DEBTS FROM THE BANKS AND OTHER DISAPPOINTED CREDITORS TO THE EUROPEAN TAXPAYER. By 2014, 55 per cent of Greek debt will be owned by this much-wronged entity, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS YOU AND ME. As Sir Mervyn King’s new financial policy committee said yesterday, a problem to which British banks have relatively little direct exposure has nevertheless become ‘the most immediate threat’ to our financial stability…
This process should not surprise anyone. IDEOLOGICAL BUREAUCRACIES DO NOT ADMIT ERROR: THEY RUSH TO REINFORCE IT. When Hungary revolted against Communist rule in 1956, the Soviet Union did not say ‘Oh dear, we’ve been getting everything wrong: let’s reform.’ They sent in the tanks. IT TOOK ANOTHER 33 YEARS BEFORE REALITY SUPERVENED, and the Soviet Empire collapsed.
The EU is not, thank goodness, armed, but ITS LEADERS ARE EQUALLY DOGMATIC. IF EUROPE IS NOT WORKING, THEY SAY, IT IS BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT YET GOT ENOUGH OF IT.
Why do we put up with this? The European leaders have two powerful weapons against us – boredom and fear. The first works very well in this country. In March, perhaps as many as 400,000 people paraded through London to protest at proposed Government spending cuts of £6.2 billion. YET THE AMOUNT OF MONEY WHICH BRITAIN HAS COMMITTED TO THE BAIL-OUTS, THUS TAKING IT AWAY FROM OUR OWN PUBLIC SERVICES, IS JUST OVER TWICE THAT AMOUNT. NO ONE TOOK TO THE STREETS. Amid the welter of technicalities, people barely noticed. Only now, £12.5 BILLION LATER, is our Government starting to say that much more than enough is enough.
The second weapon, fear, still holds the angry populations of the eurozone in check. The people of Greece are furious at the austerity measures imposed on them by the European Central Bank, but they know that if they left the euro, the value of their savings would halve. So they pretend to do what is demanded of them, and Europe will pretend, until the next time, that everything is under control.
On the other side of this dud coin, the German people are angry too. THEY HATE SUBSIDISING WHAT THEY SEE AS THE PROFLIGACY OF GREECE (AND IRELAND AND PORTUGAL AND WHOEVER’S NEXT). But Germany too is frightened. It does not want to lose its competitive exchange rate, which the euro assures, or the respectability which being a good European still confers. It does not want the problems of its own banks to be exposed. So the unhappy compromise is that Chancellor Angela MERKEL AGREES TO THE BAIL-OUTS, BUT ONLY ON TERMS SO PUNITIVE THAT THEY CAN’T WORK. THIS IS THE SECOND BAIL-OUT FOR GREECE. ITS PERVERSITY MEANS THAT THERE WILL BE A THIRD.
It must now be a question, though, whether boredom and fear will continue to prove stronger than anger. THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT THAT – TO PUT IT IN A LEFT-WING WAY – THE WORKERS OF EUROPE ARE BEING SCREWED BY THEIR BANKERS AND BUREAUCRATS. THE MONEY OF THE FORMER IS BEING GRABBED TO PAY FOR THE ERRORS OF THE LATTER…
And the poor workers do not really have the redress available in a democracy. Even if, as they increasingly do, they kick out their existing governments, THE NEW LOT GO ON DOING WHAT THE EUROPEAN ELITES WANT. In Ireland, for example, the new Fine Gael government is as slavish as was its defeated predecessor to the demands of Brussels. Things have come to such a pass that a recent poll of Irish opinion found that 49 per cent of Sinn Fein supporters think Ireland would be better off in the sterling area. They are not wrong.
WHEN POWERFUL PEOPLE MAKE OTHER PEOPLE POOR WHILE THEY STAY RICH, POLITICAL ORDER STARTS TO TOTTER. In these trying times, I find it surprisingly instructive to turn again to the most explosive interview on Europe ever given by a British politician. In July 1990, Margaret Thatcher’s closest ally in her government, NICHOLAS RIDLEY, TOLD THE EDITOR OF THE SPECTATOR THAT THE EUROPEAN PROJECT WAS ‘ALL A GERMAN RACKET TO TAKE OVER THE WHOLE OF EUROPE’…
BRITAIN, BECAUSE IT WAS RIGHT ABOUT THE PITFALLS, IS HATED BY THE EUROPEAN LEADERS AS NEVER BEFORE.”
On 24 June 2011, Children's Minister, Tim Loughton, was quoted thus by the BBC:
"I think that POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND RACIAL SENSITIVITIES HAVE IN THE PAST BEEN AN ISSUE. I want to send out a message loud and clear that although we have to be aware of certain characteristics of various ethnic communities and be sensitive as to how we deal with them, A BME (BLACK MINORITY ETHNIC) TAG IS NOT AN EXCUSE FOR US NOT TO INVESTIGATE VIGOROUSLY ANY ABUSE THAT MAY BE GOING ON."
The BBC added:
“A government minister believes A COMBINATION OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND RACIAL SENSITIVITIES HAVE KEPT MANY CASES OF CHILD SEX GROOMING ‘UNDER THE RADAR’... Tim Loughton claims that ‘closed communities’ have sometimes hampered investigations into child sexual exploitation’...
Earlier this year, the former Home Secretary Jack Straw was criticised after he suggested that some men of Pakistani origin saw white girls as ‘easy meat’."
On 24 June 2011, Lord Ahmed was quoted thus by the BBC:
"I HAVE BEEN CRITICISED BY MY OWN COMMUNITY BECAUSE I STARTED TALKING ABOUT IT…
THERE IS A SMALL MINORITY INVOLVED IN DRUG RELATED CRIME AND THIS HEINOUS CRIME OF MESSING WITH YOUNG GIRLS IS OUTRAGEOUS."
On 24 June 2011, Abu Waleed said this to a gathering of Muslims in London:
“It should come as no surprise why the likes of Terry Jones, why the likes of the BNP or the EDL, dare to come out and burn the Koran, or even touch the Koran… because of the rise of Islam within the West and the East… After the September 11 bombings, when everybody thought there was going to be a backlash against the Muslim community… within the first six months, over 35,000 Americans embraced Islam. That is a victory for us.
We can see throughout history how ISLAM CAME TO CONQUER EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY… History, my dear brothers and sisters, always repeats itself.
Pharaoh had a dream that Moses would rise up and overthrow him. Likewise, today, the MI5, the FBI, the British Police, the American government, and the British government are all having this dream... This dream will turn into a living nightmare because THE FLAG OF ISLAM WILL BE OVER THE US EMBASSY, IT WILL BE OVER DOWNING STREET. It will be over every single embassy until every single embassy closes, and in fact, UNTIL ALL THE BORDERS ARE SHUT DOWN, AND WE HAVE ONLY ONE FLAG. Look closely, my dear brothers, at that flag of Islam. That is the flag that they fear the most…
Today, my dear brothers, victory is for Islam. VICTORY IS FOR THE MUSLIMS. Our Prophet, our Messenger, informed us that JUDGMENT DAY WILL NOT COME UNTIL A GROUP OF MUSLIMS RISE IN THIS NATION, and they will go to the White House. The day will come when David Cameron and Barrack Obama will be on their knees… Believe me, the day will come when even QUEEN ELIZABETH WILL WEAR THE NIQAB AND THE BURQA.”
On 22 June 2011, Kate Loveys told us this in The Daily Mail:
“MORE THAN A QUARTER OF PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN ARE FROM AN ETHNIC MINORITY – AN INCREASE OF ALMOST HALF A MILLION SINCE 1997.
The Government’s annual school census painted a picture of a changing Britain where schools are under mounting pressure from mass immigration.
IN SOME AREAS, ONLY 8 PER CENT OF PRIMARY PUPILS ARE FROM A WHITE BRITISH BACKGROUND. NEARLY ONE MILLION CHILDREN AGED FIVE TO 16 – 957,490 – SPEAK ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE, UP FROM ALMOST 800,000 FIVE YEARS AGO.”
On 20 June 2011, James Slack said this in The Daily Mail:
“Judges have made an unprecedented attack on the ‘WHOLLY ABUSIVE’ WAY THAT IMMIGRANTS ARE EXPLOITING THE BRITISH LEGAL SYSTEM.
The Judges Council said that, for some types of appeal, A STAGGERING 85 PER CENT OF CASES DID NOT HAVE ANY ‘MERIT’. They have either been ‘DREAMT UP’ BY LAWYERS SEEKING TO LINE THEIR OWN POCKETS, OR ARE A BLATANT LAST-DITCH ATTEMPT TO STOP DEPORTATIONS TAKING PLACE. Many – including appeals made by foreign criminals – are brought under the controversial Article 8 of LABOUR’S HUMAN RIGHTS ACT – the ‘right to a family and private life’.
And despite the rampant exploitation of the system, the taxpayer is writing legal cheques worth £12million a year for immigration cases. Effectively – and farcically – THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT IS PICKING UP THE BILL FOR THE THWARTING OF ITS OWN ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL IMMIGRATION.”
On 20 June 2011, Daniel Martin said this in The Daily Mail:
“THE BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS OF BRITAIN’S ELDERLY POPULATION ARE BEING ‘NEGLECTED’ BY COUNCILS PROVIDING APPALLING STANDARDS OF HOME CARE, an official investigation has found. OLDER PEOPLE HAVE BEEN LEFT IN BED FOR 17 HOURS AT A TIME, UNDRESSED IN FRONT OF WINDOWS IN OPEN VIEW OF NEIGHBOURS, AND ABANDONED IN SOILED BEDS AND CLOTHES.
SOME RECEIVED VISITS FROM HOME HELPS WHICH WERE SO BRIEF THAT THEY HAD TO CHOOSE BETWEEN BEING WASHED AND BEING FED. MANY OTHERS BECAME MALNOURISHED BECAUSE OF THE FAILURE OF CARERS TO FEED THEM.”
On 19 June 2011, the MP Frank Field said this in The Telegraph:
“In the first year of the Coalition, 87 PER CENT OF THE 400,000 NEWLY CREATED JOBS HAVE GONE TO IMMIGRANTS… according to new official figures uncovered by the Labour MP. Under previous Labour administrations the figure was about 80 per cent...
It is the great paradox of welfare. When Tony Blair won the 1997 election, the total number of benefit claimants of working age stood at 5.7million. When Gordon Brown went to the country in 2010, the level was the same — EVEN THOUGH MORE THAN THREE MILLION JOBS HAD BEEN CREATED UNDER LABOUR.
The problem was that, OF THOSE NEW JOBS, 80 PER CENT WENT TO IMMIGRANT WORKERS. AND NOW, THE SAME DISTURBING PATTERN IS MORE MARKED... I fear that, at the next election, we will still be having the same debate on welfare reform as we had at the last four.”
On 18 June 2011, The Daily Mail published extracts from an open letter to broadcasters and regulator Ofcom written by Mike Stock, of Stock, Aitken and Waterman fame.
“Pop music in this country is almost completely dominated by American acts WHO HAVE TAKEN SEXUALISED IMAGERY, DANCE MOVES AND LYRICAL CONTENT WAY BEYOND THE LIMITS OF DECENCY… This has led to the gradual desensitising of the public who try to convince themselves that if it’s on television it must have been approved by someone. Surely someone will complain and it won’t happen again? But it does – ONLY NEXT TIME, IT’S WORSE…
I am not alone in thinking THERE SHOULD BE MORE CONTROL INTRODUCED TO PREVENT UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL FINDING ITS WAY INTO THE UK MEDIA.”
On 18 June 2011, Trevor Philips, Chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, was quoted thus in The Daily Telegraph:
“I think there's an awful lot of noise about the Church being persecuted but THERE IS A MORE REAL ISSUE THAT THE CONVENTIONAL CHURCHES FACE THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE REALLY DRIVING THEIR REVIVAL AND SUCCESS BELIEVE IN AN OLD TIME RELIGION WHICH IN MY VIEW IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH A MODERN, MULTI-ETHNIC, MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY…
MUSLIM COMMUNITIES in this country are DOING THEIR DAMNEDEST to try to come to terms with their neighbours to try to integrate and they're DOING THEIR BEST to try to develop an idea of Islam that is compatible with living in a modern liberal democracy.
The most likely victim of actual religious discrimination in British society is A MUSLIM but the person who is most likely to feel slighted because of their religion is AN EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN."
Trevor doesn't appear to care very much for Christians, does he?
Muslims on the other hand... That's what the PC Crowd are good at. In whichever way they can, they put the alien first and the indigenous last. That's how you change the world if you're a Cultural Marxist.
The Telegraph added:
"MUSLIMS ARE INTEGRATING INTO BRITISH SOCIETY BETTER THAN MANY CHRISTIANS, according to the head of the Government's equality watchdog. Trevor Phillips warned that ‘AN OLD TIME RELIGION INCOMPATIBLE WITH MODERN SOCIETY’ (the native religion) is driving the revival in the Anglican and Catholic Churches and CLASHING WITH MAINSTREAM VIEWS, (Trevor's PC views) especially on homosexuality. HE ACCUSED CHRISTIANS, particularly evangelicals, of being MORE MILITANT than MUSLIMS in complaining about discrimination, arguing that many of the claims are motivated by a desire for greater political influence."
More militant than Muslims, eh?
That was us waving placards insisting that our religion would "dominate the world" and unbelievers would be beheaded, was it?
The PC powers-that-be don't half tell some fibs.
On 17 June 2011, French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, said this:
“Without the euro THERE IS NO EUROPE AND WITHOUT EUROPE THERE IS NO POSSIBLE PEACE AND SECURITY.”
The following day, BBC Europe editor, Gavin Hewitt, commented thus:
“In raising the stakes to make this a crisis about peace in Europe HE IS TRYING TO FRIGHTEN EUROPEAN LEADERS. The French president’s fear is almost certainly exaggerated. THERE IS NO THREAT TO SECURITY… The European Union existed before the euro and no doubt would survive a contraction the euro-zone.”
On 17 June 2011, James Slack said this in The Daily Mail:
“HUMAN RIGHTS LAW IS DEMOLISHING EVERY ASPECT OF BRITAIN’S IMMIGRATION CONTROLS, GOVERNMENT PAPERS REVEAL. EVERY YEAR, MORE THAN 3,200 FOREIGN CRIMINALS, FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS AND EU ‘BENEFIT TOURISTS’ ARE USING LABOUR’S HUMAN RIGHTS ACT TO THWART HOME OFFICE ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE MIGRANTS – OR STOP THEM ARRIVING IN THE FIRST PLACE.
The majority of cases are using the controversial Article 8, ‘the right to a private or family life’. In the cases of almost 1,200 EU citizens, they had no intention of working but were allowed to stay, potentially to enjoy a life on benefits – because they have a wife, girlfriend or children here.”
On 17 June 2011, Sarah Harris told us this in The Daily Mail:
“UNMARRIED PARENTS ARE SIX TIMES MORE LIKELY TO SPLIT BY THEIR CHILD'S FIFTH BIRTHDAY THAN THOSE WHO ARE MARRIED, say researchers. COHABITING PARTNERS FACE A 'DISPROPORTIONATE' RISK OF BREAKING UP IN THE EARLY YEARS OF THEIR SON OR DAUGHTER'S LIFE. The study from the think-tank the Jubilee Centre will reignite concerns that Britain is fast becoming a nation of broken homes.”
On 16 June 2011, Graeme Paton told us this in The Daily Telegraph:
“Poor children in Britain are more likely to be condemned to educational failure than in most other developed nations… IN A DAMNING INDICTMENT OF LABOUR’S LEGACY, IT EMERGED THAT DEPRIVED PUPILS IN COUNTRIES SUCH AS ESTONIA, INDONESIA, LATVIA, LIECHTENSTEIN, MEXICO AND SLOVENIA PERFORM BETTER THAN THOSE FROM BRITAIN.
Data from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development shows some 31 per cent of poor children internationally manage to exceed expectations for their social class in school tests. But in Britain, the proportion slumps to just a quarter – placing the country below the global average and 39th out of 65 countries.
It suggests DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN IN ENGLAND, SCOTLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND HAVE LESS CHANCE OF CLIMBING THE SOCIAL LADDER THAN IN THE MAJORITY OF DEVELOPED NATIONS.”
On 15 June 2011, James Slack told us this in The Daily Mail:
“UP TO 1,200 PAEDOPHILES AND RAPISTS WILL BE ABLE TO DEMAND THEIR NAMES ARE REMOVED FROM THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTER EVERY YEAR TO PROTECT THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS.”
On 15 June 2011, Tony Blair was interviewed by The Sun’s Tom Newton Dunn.
This is, in part, what he said:
"Look, when I became Labour leader the party had never won two consecutive full terms in office. The longest Labour had ever been in power was six years, right? We won three consecutive full terms and were in power for more than double the length of the longest serving previous Labour government."
And it was all down to you, eh Tony?
No, mate, you got in because of what the Tories did to the working-classes. And then all those foreigners you kept bringing in, not many of them would have voted for the BNP, would they? And the votes you bought with the government jobs you created and the pensions you kept paying out. Every little bit of that would have helped, wouldn’t it? That’s why you kept getting back in, Tony. Nothing to do with Tony B’s talent or charisma.
"New Labour was the concept of a modern Labour party in the middle ground with A SET OF ATTITUDES ORIENTATED TOWARDS THE FUTURE and I believe if we had carried on doing that we would have won the last Election. I wanted to give to you FULL-ON NEW LABOUR, TAKE NEW LABOUR TO THE NEXT LEVEL."
The next f***ing level?
What, drop the A-bomb on Iran? Give your banker pals the keys to the Treasury and all the jobs to foreigners? Oh, wait a minute, you already did that, didn’t you?
“The concept can't possibly be over because the concept isn't time related. It is about the Labour party constantly being at THE CUTTING EDGE, BEING A MODERNISING PARTY, always being full of creative ideas and isn't pinned in its ideological past. That is always the choice for the Labour party. It is the choice for PROGRESSIVE PARTIES."
If the New Labour ‘concept’ isn’t over, are we in line for more wars and recessions and mass immigration when your lot gets in again?
Are you going to whack us with even more foreigner-first political correctness and globalism? Tony, do us all a favour, confess your crimes and shoot yourself, there’s a good lad.
"Getting it right is very tough because of THE INTERPLAY OF RELIGIOUS AND TRIBAL INFLUENCES."
Oh yes, the religious and tribal influence of the Jews is what made Tony B Liar tick and the religious and tribal nfluence of the Islamic hordes increases by the minute.
"Personally I think, thank God Saddam and his two sons are not running Iraq today otherwise YOU WOULD HAVE A FAR TOUGHER SITUATION ACROSS THE WHOLE OF THE REGION."
Far tougher for who, Tony?
A bit tougher for Israel, maybe, but our war dead? A million dead Iraqis? How on earth can it be better for them and their loved ones? How can it be better for all the injured soldiers and civilians? Oh yes, let’s all say a little prayer of thanks for the foresight and wisdom of our dear former dear leaders, Bush and Blair.
"We can't afford to stay out of this situation (Libya) because HOW THE MIDDLE EAST DEVELOPS WILL IMPACT US DRAMATICALLY AND PROFOUNDLY AS A COUNTRY."
It does and it will with bought-and-paid-for Israel-huggers like you, Gordon and Dave in charge, Tony.
"This is an extraordinary moment in time. It is a genuine revolution (the Arab Spring) and what we should now know is that, in fact, Arab and Muslim people do want democracy. IT SHOULD MAKE US VERY PROUD OF WHAT OUR TROOPS DID IN IRAQ.”
What planet is this a creepy lawyer on?
What the f*** does the Arab Spring have to do with your slaughterous endeavours in Iraq? You are actually trying to claim it was Iraq that inspired them? You ask 99 percent of the revolutionaries in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt and the protestors in Syria what they think of Tony Blair’s behaviour in Iraq and they’d vote for your execution, pal. Besides which, you were on first name terms with all the brutish characters that the people since have removed. You thought more of the dictators and what they could do for you than you ever did of the people they ruled.
"The reports of my wealth are greatly exaggerated. I am not worth that, or anything near that. PEOPLE SHOULD JUDGE ME ON WHAT I AM ACTUALLY DOING."
Oh we do judge you on what you’re doing, Tony.
And what you’ve done. And, though it’s not such a big deal, we judge you also by the size of the pay-offs you’ve been collecting since you got prized out.
Judgement Day is coming, Tony.
You can count on it.
"I was an animal following my instinct."
That you were, Tony.
That you were. Blair thought it would be fun to describe a sex scene with Cherie in his autobiography. To show, I suppose, the rest of us that he was, deep down, just one of the guys.
Whereas, all he was doing was confirming the well-known fact that he’s a tw*t.
On 15 June 2011, Kevin Maguire said this in The Daily Mirror:
“WE SHOULD HELP WORLD'S POOREST. Cameron’s right that Britain must help the world’s poorest… Hitting the £12.6bn aid target will save many lives. And it is affordable at less than £4 a week from each of us.
CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME? Yes when it’s to provide homes, water, food, health and schooling for the destitute.”
But not otherwise, Kev?
What about our dumbed-down, drugged up and jobless in our country? What about the victims of crime and the bankers? What about the limbless victims of Blair’s wars?
Kev, I’ve got a better idea. Let the world’s poorest overthrow the tinpot dictators that keep them destitute. Then they can drain their Swiss bank accounts and send us some dosh to help with the recession!
Alternatively, if you, and every last do-gooder chipped in a thousand pounds each, it would only take a tad more than twelve million of you to stump up the cash! And seeing as around 14.5 million people voted for New Labour and the Lib Dems in 2010, well, it stands to reason, they’d all be delighted to fork out for the foreign poor!
Along with the Cameronian Tories.
So, Kev, if you, Dave and all the nice people cough up just £20 a week, we uncaring types won’t have to! I promise you, Kevin, that will make the majority in this country very happy indeed. All you lovely-fluffy people donate a nice round score every week to prop up the A-bomb building and the space programme in India and the dictators elsewhere and that will make you feel five times as self-righteous as your £4 makes you feel right now. And, in so doing, you’ll make the British majority, who couldn’t give a monkeys for those who can’t be bothered to figure out how to wipe their own behinds, deliriously happy. And, as everyone knows, you loony-lefties are so greatly concerned with how the majority feels about things, aren’t you, Kev?
Put the idea to Dave next time you see him, won’t you? I promise you, it’s a real vote winner.
On 13 June 2011, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
“THE NATION STATE IS THE GREATEST VEHICLE EVER INVENTED BY MANKIND FOR THE PROMOTION OF DEMOCRACY AND PROSPERITY. That is because it is essentially an extension of the family with citizens enjoying a shared sense of belonging, unity and heritage.
THE TRAGEDY OF MODERN BRITAIN IS THAT OUR TRADITIONAL IDENTITY IS UNDER REMORSELESS POLITICAL ATTACK. MASS IMMIGRATION, THE DOGMA OF MULTICULTURALISM AND THE GROWING POWER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION HAVE CONSPIRED TO UNDERMINE OUR BRITISH NATIONHOOD. OUR ONCE UNIFIED COUNTRY IS IN DANGER OF BECOMING NOTHING MORE THAN A LAND MASS FILLED WITH DISPARATE PEOPLES.
Despite the opposition of the vast majority of the British public the transformation of our society appears to be gathering pace. In the year to March 2011 NO FEWER THAN 586,000 IMMIGRANTS WERE GRANTED ENTRY, THE VAST MAJORITY FROM ASIA AND AFRICA. IT WAS BY FAR THE HIGHEST TOTAL IN OUR HISTORY, MORE THAN 10 TIMES THE AVERAGE LEVEL OF IMMIGRATION IN THE EIGHTIES…
According to figures released last week 203,600 BRITISH PASSPORTS WERE DISHED OUT TO IMMIGRANTS, A 57 PERCENT INCREASE ON THE FIGURE FOR 2008... Earlier this month a Parliamentary committee revealed that THE HOME OFFICE HAD EFFECTIVELY GRANTED AN AMNESTY TO 160,000 BOGUS REFUGEES, ALLOWING THEM TO SETTLE HERE PERMANENTLY AND CLAIM BENEFITS…
It has been reported that more than 100 serious foreign criminals last year exploited human rights laws to escape deportation. Among those allowed to remain here is A VIOLENT DRUG DEALER FROM TRINIDAD, A NEPALESE KILLER AND A BOLIVIAN WHOM JUDGES DECIDED COULD NOT BE SENT HOME BECAUSE HE HAD BOUGHT HIMSELF A PET CAT…
There will soon be a vast new influx of arrivals from Bulgaria and Romania once the citizens of those two member states are allowed to travel and settle anywhere in Europe without restrictions, as the Brussels Parliament recommended last week. Even worse more than 70million Turkish Muslims will have the right to come to Britain if Turkey is granted EU membership, AS THE COALITION WANTS.
WHAT WE ARE WITNESSING IS A GROTESQUE FORM OF ASSISTED NATIONAL SUICIDE. IN THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION AND EU RULE THE VERY CONCEPT OF BRITISHNESS IS AN IRRELEVANCE...
All around us we can see the dire consequences of the immigration free-for-all, whether it be the spread of SHARIA LAW OR THE PREVALENCE OF VIOLENT GANGS IN OUR INNER CITIES OR THE RISE OF ISLAMIC EXTREMISM.
It is a bizarre irony that IN THE NAME OF LIBERAL TOLERANCE TOWARDS IMMIGRATION WE ARE NOW IMPORTING A NEW KIND OF GROSS INTOLERANCE WHICH IS UTTERLY INIMICAL TO BRITISH VALUES. In the East London borough of Tower Hamlets, for instance, where there is a large Muslim population, gangs of zealots now roam the streets posing as a self-appointed moral police, demanding that women wear the veil and that gay pubs be closed.
MASS IMMIGRATION HAS ALSO MEANT THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SOCIAL CONTRACT ON WHICH THE BENEFITS SYSTEM, THE NHS AND MANY OF OUR PUBLIC SERVICES ARE BASED. The founding principle was one of reciprocity: people would be provided with welfare, education or healthcare in return for their contributions to British society through tax, national insurance, work or caring for others. But now THAT ETHIC HAS BEEN SHATTERED. WE ARE NOW FORCED TO SUPPORT MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION TO BRITAIN, SUCH AS THE 12-STRONG ETHIOPIAN FAMILY RECENTLY GIVEN A HUGE HOUSE IN EAST LONDON AT A COST TO THE TAXPAYER OF MORE THAN £75,000 A YEAR.
THE POLITICAL ELITE TRIES TO ASSUAGE THE JUSTIFIABLE ANGER OF THE BRITISH BY PEDDLING DECEITFUL PROPAGANDA SUCH AS THE FALSE CLAIM THAT IMMIGRATION HAS BOOSTED OUR ECONOMY. ACTUALLY IT HAS DONE JUST THE OPPOSITE, DRAGGING DOWN WAGES AND IMPOSING A CRIPPLING BURDEN ON OUR INFRASTRUCTURE. AN EVEN GREATER MYTH BELOVED OF THE LEFT IS THAT BRITAIN IS ‘A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS’ SO THERE IS SUPPOSEDLY NOTHING UNIQUE ABOUT THE MODERN INFLUX FROM ASIA AND AFRICA. BUT THIS IS JUST A LIE.
IN FACT BRITAIN WAS UNTIL THE SEVENTIES ONE OF THE MOST HOMOGENOUS NATIONS...
IT WAS BECAUSE BRITAIN WAS SO HOMOGENOUS THAT IT WAS SO SUCCESSFUL. BUT NOW WE ARE A NATION RIVEN BY ETHNIC DIVISIONS WHERE PATRIOTISM IS REGARDED WITH SUSPICION AND ALL PUBLIC POLICY IS VIEWED THROUGH THE PRISM OF RACE.”
On 13 June 2011, The Daily Mail told us this:
“Slovakia, with a population of just five million, leads the boom in foreigners in the UK, with almost ONE PER CENT OF ITS ENTIRE POPULATIONS LIVING HERE. NEW FIGURES REVEAL 49,000 SLOVAKIANS CAME TO LIVE HERE IN 2010, A MASSIVE 513 PER CENT INCREASE ON THE 8,000 WHO ARRIVED IN 2004.
The former Communist bloc country has a 12.1 per cent unemployment rate - almost double that of Britain - and its workers earn around £7,000 a year. And under EU regulations, migrants are entitled to state handouts including jobseeker's allowances and housing benefit.
MANY OF SLOVAKIA'S NEIGHBOURS LIKE LATVIA, POLAND, BULGARIA AND ROMANIA HAVE JOINED THE RUSH TO LIVE HERE NOW THEY ARE IN THE EU. POLAND HAS 521,000 OF ITS CITIZENS IN BRITAIN - 448 PER CENT UP ON THE 95,000 WHO ARRIVED HERE IN 2004.”
On 12 June 2011, an interview with Tony Blair was published by The Observer.
In this he said:
“TO BE FAITH-LITERATE IS CRUCIAL IN A GLOBALISED WORLD, I believe. I READ THE KORAN EVERY DAY. Partly to understand some of the things happening in the world, but mainly just because IT IS IMMENSELY INSTRUCTIVE.
In March 2006, in a speech given to the Foreign Policy Centre and Reuters, Blair had previously said this:
“The most remarkable thing about reading the Koran… is to understand HOW PROGRESSIVE IT IS. I speak with great diffidence and humility as a member of another faith. I am not qualified to make any judgements. But as an outsider, THE KORAN STRIKES ME AS A REFORMING BOOK, trying to return Judaism and Christianity to their origins, rather as reformers attempted with the Christian Church centuries later. IT IS INCLUSIVE. It extols science and knowledge and abhors superstition. It is practical and WAY AHEAD OF ITS TIME IN ATTITUDES TO MARRIAGE, WOMEN AND GOVERNANCE…
Over centuries it founded an Empire, leading the world in discovery, art and culture. We look back to the early Middle Ages, THE STANDARD BEARERS OF TOLERANCE AT THAT TIME WERE FAR MORE LIKELY TO BE FOUND IN MUSLIM LANDS THAN IN CHRISTIAN.”
The Brit-loathing creep’s got form all right.
On 12 June 2011, Laura Donnelly said this in The Telegraph:
“THOUSANDS OF ELDERLY PEOPLE ARE LIVING IN CARE HOMES WHICH HAVE FAILED TO MEET THE MOST BASIC STANDARDS, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL FIGURES. MORE THAN 1,800 HOMES FOR THE OLD AND DISABLED ARE NOT PROVIDING DECENT CARE, WITH STAFF EVEN FAILING TO ENSURE THAT THE FRAIL AND VULNERABLE ARE PROPERLY FED, the statistics from watchdogs reveal.
CAMPAIGNERS SAID ELDERLY PEOPLE WERE BEING LEFT IN CONDITIONS WHICH WOULD NOT BEFIT A DOG, AS SHOCKING FAILINGS BECAME ‘SYSTEMIC’ amid a deepening crisis in the sector.
The disclosure, in a Parliamentary answer, reveals that in total, 1819 HOMES FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED PEOPLE – ONE IN TEN OF ALL CARE HOMES – ARE NOT MEETING STANDARDS DESIGNED TO PROTECT RESIDENTS FROM THE RISK OF ABUSE. ALMOST AS MANY WERE PUTTING ELDERLY PEOPLE IN DANGER BECAUSE MEDICINES WERE NOT ADMINISTERED SAFELY, WHILE MORE THAN 1,600 DID NOT EVEN ENSURE FRAIL AND ELDERLY PEOPLE GOT THE FOOD AND DRINK THEY NEEDED.”
On 12 June 2011, Nick Ferrari said this in The Express:
“FAIR PLAY IS NOT EUROPE’S STRONG SUIT. THE EU’S ACCOUNTS WEREN’T AUDITED FOR 14 YEARS, IT HAS 662 BANK ACCOUNTS IN 45 DIFFERENT COUNTRIES AND HAS BEEN THE TARGET OF CLAIMS OF CORRUPTION ALMOST FROM THE DAY IT STRUGGLED TO ITS OVERPAID FEET…
The truth about Europe is simple.. THEY ALL DESPISE THE BRITISH AND GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO SET US UP ON EVERY POSSIBLE OCCASION…
The world is being turned on its head by the rapid rise of trading superpowers such as India, Brazil and China and Blair justified his pitch by saying that the only way Britain can continue to carry any clout is to get some muscle. ‘The rationale for Europe today is about power, not peace,’ he said. ‘We won’t have the weight and influence a country like Britain needs unless we’re part of that European power as well.’ Strange, Switzerland seems to survive or, in fact, thrive with a per capita GDP three times better than ours…
In the interview in which he floated this idea, he was asked if he could name the MEP who represented him. He tried and got it wrong. CLUELESS, JUST LIKE HIS PIECE OF EUROTRASH.”
If Nick Ferrari is right (he is) about the rest of the EU despising us, then our own politicians must despise us too, (they do) seeing as there is no way any of them will ever let us have the referendum we we want on EU membership.
If our politicians are aware (they are) of the fact that we are despised and the rest of the EU goes “out of their way to set us up on every occasion”, then we are being ruled by a traitorous cabal who have our WORST interests at heart.
The ruling elite is at war with us, ladies and gentlemen. The immigrants are their footsoldiers, the EU, the UN and NATO their command centres and control of the media their weapon of mass destruction.
On 12 June 2011, Tony Blair was quoted thus by The Guardian:
“I have always been very certain about my ethical values."
You certainly did clue us up on your ethics whilst you were in power, Tony.
Everything for the New World Order, Israel and your past, present and future paymasters. Sweet FA for for the rest of us.
“I came out of university in 1975. Life had got tougher. Idealism wasn’t enough; we were far more practically focused.”
No idealist you, Tony.
“Reports of my wealth are greatly exaggerated.”
Compared to whom?
Compared to the out of work teenager on Tyneside? Or the Oligarch billionaires you were so fond of?
“The experiment that said ‘the bigger the state, the more just the society’ clearly failed. There is no point pretending that it didn’t.”
Whose experiment was that, Tony?
It certainly wasn’t one the majority of the British wanted to take part in.
“One thing I am sure of is that the way to make poor people better off is not just to target a wealthier group of people and take their money off them.”
Oh, we got that, Tony.
The fact that you weren’t ever going to make the fattest of the fat cats pay what they ought was written in very large letters indeed.
"People always used to say to me: listen to the people. That was a fine idea, of course, but unfortunately the people were all saying different things.”
The people were ALL saying different things?
Some of the time maybe, most of the time, no. Much of the time a clear majority were saying they wanted “things” and you, very deliberately, took no notice.
“I read the Qur’an every day… it is immensely instructive.”
On 13 June 2011, The Dail Mail clarified Blair’s attitude to all things Qur’anic thus:
“Mr Blair has previously praised the Muslim faith as ‘beautiful’ and said the Prophet Mohammed had been ‘an enormously civilizing force’. In 2006 he said the Koran was a ‘reforming book, it is inclusive. It extols science and knowledge and abhors superstition. It is practical and way ahead of its time in attitudes to marriage, women and governance’.”
So now you know.
On 11 June 2011, Alasdair Palmer said this in The Telegraph:
“Most EU politicians, just like most EU policies, lack legitimacy and they know it. So when Tony Blair insisted last week that Europe needs an ‘elected president’, he was giving voice to the deep-seated belief of nearly every official involved in the pan-European political bureaucracy that greater unity is better for everyone. Never mind that ‘the project’ lacks popular support. Even the fact that the voters now voice concerns about (for instance) open borders between members of the EU has no effect whatever on the Eurocrats' conviction that there can only be one direction of travel: towards ever closer union within the EU, AND THEREFORE TOWARDS THE ULTIMATE OBLITERATION OF THE NATION STATE...
INDIVIDUAL NATIONS AND THEIR ELECTED ASSEMBLIES ARE SEEN BY THE PEOPLE OF THOSE NATIONS AS THE ONLY INSTITUTIONS FOR MAKING LAWS THAT THEY THEMSELVES HAVE ENDORSED. Electing a European President will not change this. It will merely give a spurious democratic veneer to the unification project – when, in fact, THE EFFECT WILL BE TO ERODE THE ONLY CONNECTION BETWEEN THE WAY LAWS ARE MADE AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. The legislation that emerges from Brussels has no such connection...
TOO MANY EUROPEAN COUNTRIES WANT THE BENEFITS OF MILITARY CO-OPERATION BUT AREN'T WILLING TO SHARE ITS RISKS AND COSTS: THEY WANT A FREE RIDE. This is, in a way, reassuring, because it shows how the unification project founders on the rock of national self-interest. It suggests that at heart, it is nothing more than a way of making Eurocrats feel important. But the tragedy is that THEIR SELF-AGGRANDISEMENT MAY STILL END UP DESTROYING OUR DEMOCRACY.”
On 9 June 2011, Anna Davis told us this in The London Evening Standard:
“ONE IN FIVE LONDON PARENTS HAS SUCH POOR LITERACY SKILLS THEY CANNOT READ A BEDTIME STORY TO THEIR CHILDREN. SHOCKING NEW FIGURES REVEAL HOW 370,000 MOTHERS AND FATHER ARE NOT CONFIDENT ENOUGH TO READ ALOUD - SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THEIR CHILD'S CHANCES OF LEARNING TO READ. The exclusive research shows for the first time how London's illiteracy crisis is affecting families.”
On 8 June 2011, Melanie Philipps said this in The Daily Mail:
“Hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money earmarked to counter terrorism WAS INSTEAD HANDED TO EXTREMIST GROUPS, it emerged last night. Radical Islamists were bankrolled with money which should have been used to combat their anti-Western ideology, a Government report concluded.
The money was spent as part of the Prevent programme which was funded with hundreds of millions of pounds to try to stop young Muslims from becoming radicalised.
The report also revealed: hundreds of thousands of pounds were wasted on pointless sports clubs or ‘COHESION SCHEMES’. More than 1,100 people were reported to the authorities after displaying extremist sympathies – a quarter of whom were children. THE ASTONISHING SCALE OF ISLAMIC TEACHING OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM SCHOOL SYSTEM IN UP TO 2,000 MADRASSAS ATTENDED BY AN ESTIMATED 100,000 CHILDREN…
The Met also employed as an anti-terrorism adviser Mohamed Ali Harrath, who was wanted by Interpol and authorities in his native Tunisia because of his links to an alleged terror organisation.”
On 7 June 2011, Fiona Byrne, the Mayor of Marrickville, a suburb of Sydney in Australia, was presented with a letter of support from the Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
In this he wrote:
“I want to pay my respects to you and your fellow councillors in Marrickville FOR TAKING A STAND TO ISOLATE THE ISRAELI STATE. We in South Africa, who both suffered apartheid and defeated it, have the moral right and responsibility to name and shame INSTITUTIONALIZED SEPARATION, EXCLUSION AND DOMINATION BY ONE ETHNIC GROUP OVER OTHERS… I HAVE SEEN HOW THE PALESTINIANS ARE OPPRESSED, DISPOSSESSED AND EXILED.”
On 13 June 2011, Joshua Levi responded thus in The Australian Jewish News:
“Desmond Tutu may have helped South Africa bring about the end of apartheid, but his open support for Marrickville Council’s Boycott Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israel has left the Jewish community cold...
Former South African apartheid activist and past president of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, Robin Margo, said Tutu was wrong.
‘Archbishop Tutu was a hero in the struggle against apartheid. He gave courage to many people, including me, in dark times. But he is wrong about Israel,’ Margo, now the president of the New Israel Fund Australia, said. THERE IS DISCRIMINATION IN ISRAEL, AS THERE IS IN OUR DEMOCRACY, but it is a gross distortion to describe Israel as practicing apartheid’…
When Marrickville Council voted to impose a boycott against Israel last year, LEADERS FROM THE LIBERAL, LABOR AND EVEN FEDERAL GREENS PARTIES CAME OUT IN OPPOSITION TO THE POLICY and called on it to focus on local issues. NSW PREMIER BARRY O’FARRELL EVEN THREATENED TO SACK THE COUNCIL IF IT VOTED TO IMPOSE THE BDS POLICY.”
‘It is a gross distortion to describe Israel as practicing apartheid’, insists Robin Margo.
I don’t know about that, Robin. On 16 November 2009, David Goldberg, Rabbi Emeritus of England’s Liberal Jewish Synagogue, said this in the documentary, ‘Inside Britain's Israel Lobby:’
“IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES, ISRAEL IS AN APARTHEID STATE. There is no two ways about it. When settlers travel on one road and Palestinians have to use another road; WHEN SETTLERS ARE GOVERNED BY ISRAELI LAW AND PALESTINIANS ARE GOVERNED BY MILITARY LAW, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT APARTHEID."
The trouble with bulls***, Robin is this: when nobody believes it any more, you’re liable to look and sound pretty silly when you continue to spout it.
On 7 June 2011, Ruth Sunderland and Daniel Martin said this in The Daily Mail:
“ONE OF TONY BLAIR’S MOST TRUSTED AIDES WAS DRAGGED INTO THE SOUTHERN CROSS CARE HOME SCANDAL. JEREMY HEYWOOD WAS A LEADING FIGURE AT INVESTMENT BANK MORGAN STANLEY, WHICH ADVISED ON THE SALE OF THE TROUBLED FIRM IN 2006. HE IS NOW DAVID CAMERON’S PERMANENT SECRETARY AT DOWNING STREET AND IS TIPPED TO BE THE NEXT CABINET SECRETARY.
His No 10 role puts him at the nerve-centre of a Government that may end up using taxpayers’ money to bail out the residential care group. It is not clear how much of a personal bonus Mr Heywood was paid for overseeing the Southern Cross float in 2006. However banking sources said it is certain that HE WILL HAVE BEEN HANDSOMELY REWARDED FOR RUNNING THE TEAM WHICH WON IT.
The floatation has been heavily criticised because it left the company financially vulnerable and unable to withstand the property crash of 2008. Some 31,000 FRAIL ELDERLY PEOPLE IN 750 CARE HOMES FACE AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE NOW SOUTHERN CROSS IS HOVERING ON THE BRINK OF BANKRUPTCY.”
In the 7 June 2011 edition of The Daily Mail, Salwa al Mutairi, a Kuwaiti political activist and TV host, was quoted as having said this:
"In the Chechnyan war, surely there are female Russian captives. So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait. Better than to have our men engage in forbidden sexual relations… I don’t see any problem in this, no problem at all… The only solution for a decent man who has the means, who is overpowered by desire and who does not want to commit fornication, is to acquire jawari (Concubines)... There was no shame in it and it is not haram (forbidden) under Islamic Sharia law."
Concubines, she said, would suit Muslim men who feared being “seduced or tempted into immoral behaviour by the beauty of their female servants."
One Saudi mufti, allegedly, told her:
"The context must be that of a Muslim nation conquering a non-Muslim nation, so these jawari have to be prisoners of war."
So that’s what the female adherents of political correctness have to look forward to when their nation is conquered by Islam.
After Islam has firstly swatted aside political correctness, of course.
PS. Kuwait was the country on whose behalf we fought the first Gulf war.
On 5 June 2011, Emily Dugan said this in The Independent:
“THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV IN BRITAIN WILL TOP 100,000 FOR THE FIRST TIME NEXT YEAR. The toll of those infected, to be announced this week by the Health Protection Agency (HPA), is revealed as the world marks 30 years since the first cases of the disease were diagnosed...
The amount of people contracting the disease in Britain each year has doubled in the past decade, with some 3,800 diagnosed last year. EPIDEMIOLOGISTS AT THE HPA NOW PREDICT THAT THERE WILL BE MORE THAN 100,000 HIV-POSITIVE PEOPLE – DIAGNOSED AND UNDIAGNOSED – IN BRITAIN BY THE END OF 2012.”
On 5 June 2011, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:
“I regret to inform you that you are an extremist, bonkers, a spittle-flecked member of the lunatic fringe. That is because you agree with me that Wayne Bishop, whose triumphantly smirking, selfish face looks out at us from amid his terrifying brood of children, ought to be breaking rocks on Dartmoor instead, and to hell with his ‘right’ to a family life.
Bishop is a burglar. He is also a menacing lout who badly needs to learn some lessons in manners, but never will. We’ve all seen faces like that and learned to cross the street, or shift down the bus, to avoid them when we see them coming. Some people, and God help them, cannot avoid them because they live next to them...
As the Ministry of Injustice finally admitted last week, it is harder by far to get into prison than it is to get into university. Here are the figures, which should be tattooed on the foreheads of every member of the Cabinet so we are constantly reminded of how useless they all are:
‘96,710 CRIMINALS SENTENCED LAST YEAR FOR MORE SERIOUS ‘INDICTABLE’ OFFENCES HAD 15 OR MORE PREVIOUS CRIMES AGAINST THEIR NAME. THEY INCLUDED VIOLENT MUGGERS, BURGLARS AND DRUG DEALERS. OF THOSE, ONLY 36 PER CENT – AROUND 34,600 OFFENDERS – WERE GIVEN IMMEDIATE CUSTODY.’
SO EVEN AFTER 15 OR MORE PREVIOUS OFFENCES, THEY WON’T PUT MOST OF THEM AWAY. So it’s almost an irrelevance that Bishop has been let out of prison in the name of his Human Wrongs. It is amazing that he was inside in the first place. You are (for the moment) allowed to laugh at this, or to complain about it. But if, like me, you actually want to do anything about it, then you become an extremist, bonkers, spittle-flecked, lunatic etc.
Because AGAINST YOU, YOU WILL FIND ALL THREE MAJOR PARTIES, MOST ESPECIALLY THE TREACHEROUS, SLIPPERY AND DISHONEST TORIES, THE BBC, THE LEGAL PROFESSION, THE POLICE AND THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. THEY BELIEVE THE SYSTEM THAT ALLOWS WAYNE BISHOP AND HIS MANY FRIENDS TO SMIRK AT YOU WHILE THEY LIVE OFF YOU IS A GOOD SYSTEM. THEY THINK YOU ARE CRUEL, CRUDE, OUTRAGEOUS AND UNCIVILISED TO WANT A JUSTICE SYSTEM THAT PUNISHES BAD PEOPLE SWIFTLY IN WAYS THEY WON’T FORGET.
Well, WAYNE BISHOP IS THE RESULT OF ALL THEIR COMPASSION AND KINDNESS and, as I grow older and nastier, I can’t help wishing that the people who created him could be forced to go and live next door to him for the rest of their natural lives...
If you hate the way people such as Wayne Bishop are caressed by our society, WHY DO YOU KEEP VOTING FOR THE TORIES WHO HELP TO CARESS HIM, AND DO NOTHING TO RESCUE YOU FROM HIM AND FROM PEOPLE LIKE HIM?”
On 5 June 2011, addressing a foreign policy conference in London, International Development Secretary, Andrew Mitchell, said this:
“Just as the Americans are a military superpower, we are a development superpower – WE ARE IN THE LEAD. My ambition is that over the next four years people will come to think… of Britain’s fantastic development work around the poorest parts of the world WITH THE SAME PRIDE AND SATISFACTION THAT THEY SEE IN SOME OF OUR GREAT INSTITUTIONS LIKE THE ARMED FORCES AND THE MONARCHY. THIS IS BRILLIANT WORK THAT BRITAIN IS DOING…
In my 30 years in politics, I have never been so proud as when George Osborne said we would stand by THIS COMMITMENT NOT TO BALANCE OUR BOOKS ON THE BACKS OF THE POOREST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD.’
Tory MP Peter Bone responded thus:
“The idea that we are going to be a world superpower in overseas aid – I have no idea what that means. It is the sort of complete tosh you would expect from a Labour minister. THE COALITION GOVERNMENT IS LOSING THE PLOT OVER THIS – THEY ARE TOTALLY OUT OF STEP WITH THE PUBLIC MOOD. It is all very well talking about the pride we have in our Armed Forces, but the fact is WE ARE INCREASING FOREIGN AID BY £4BILLION AT A TIME WHEN OUR ARMED FORCES ARE BEING DRAMATICALLY CUT. The priorities are all wrong – THAT MONEY SHOULD BE GOING TO OUR ARMED FORCES, because they are the best at doing overseas aid.’
Fellow Tory, Philip Davies, said this:
“WHY ARE WE GIVING £300MILLION A YEAR TO INDIA WHEN IT IS SPENDING BILLIONS ON DEFENCE AND HAS ITS OWN SPACE PROGRAMME? I DO NOT SEE WHY GIVING MONEY TO INDIA IS JUDGED TO BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN LOCKING UP CRIMINALS IN OUR JAILS, WHICH APPARENTLY WE DON’T HAVE THE MONEY FOR. TALK OF BECOMING A DEVELOPMENT SUPERPOWER JUST SOUNDS LIKE A VANITY TRIP WE COULD DO WITHOUT.”
Between them, the multi-milloinaires, Andrew Mitchell and David Cameron, have seen that Britain spends more on international aid than any other G8 country.
Mitchell made a fortune with investment bank Lazard and is said to be one of the richest members of the Cabinet.
On 12 May 2011, the work and Pensions Secretary, Iain Duncan-Smith, said this:
“LABOUR’S OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION POLICY MEANT THAT THE COMPETITION FOR LOW SKILL JOBS IN MANY AREAS INCREASED, AND A LIFE ON BENEFITS BECAME A MORE ATTRACTIVE OPTION THAN A LIFE IN WORK.
THE GROWTH OF INCOME INEQUALITY IN THE UK… IS NOW THE HIGHEST IT HAS EVER BEEN.”
On 12 May 2011, The Daily Mail quoted Judge David Archer thus:
"I find that the appellant’s protected rights under Articles 2 and 3 of the Human Rights Convention will be breached by returning him to Zimbabwe."
The asylum tribunal Archer was presiding over ruled that Phillip Machemedze, a promiscuous, HIV-positive sadist who had willingly tortured, raped and murdered opponents of Robert Mugabe’s regime in Zimbabwe, should be allowed to remain in Britain indefinitely.
The Mail explains:
“In his wisdom, Judge David Archer ruled last month that, having supposedly fled Mugabe’s regime in 2000, cut all ties with it and subsequently confessed to his crimes… Machemedze and his wife, who live off Britain’s state benefits, will be in grave danger if they are sent home.”
It would be nice to think such a bestial type would be in “grave danger”, wouldn’t it? I mean, if anyone deserves to be in grave danger it really ought to be “a man who has admitted hacking the limbs off prisoners so that they died slowly in agony”, ought it not?
Thing is, for the majority of the time he has been here Machemedze has been in no danger at all.
“Far from repenting and turning his back on his brutal secret work for Mugabe, he has, in fact, remained in the employment of Zimbabwe’s security services since entering Britain on a six-month tourist visa in 2000. Intelligence records passed to the Mail show that Machemedze has been paid thousands of pounds by Mugabe’s espionage network while living in Britain... Machemedze is believed to have been paid to identify enemies of the regime living among Britain’s 200,000-strong Zimbabwean community. He has even had the £300 monthly school fees for two children, whom he left behind in Zimbabwe, paid for out of CIO (Zimbabwe’s Central Intelligence Organisation) funds.
‘He has been working for us all the time,’ said (a senior intelligence) source, himself a cold-blooded killer.“
Anyway, this is what the politicians and the judiciary of the United Kingdom are happy to protect and nurture.
This is the “diversity” of the PC Crowd at its most exemplary. Such are the building blocks of New Labour’s brave, new “cohesive” society. And, if we ever dare to complain about such brutish savages being allowed to share our island, we are "racists", we are "Fascists," "Nazis" and "bigots."
Those we vote for are at war with us, ladies and gentlemen. The Phillip Machemedzes are their foot soldiers.
In a 10 May 2011Daily Mail article titled, "Blair says Europe needs an elected President (so is this your job application Tony?)" The Mail quoted Blair thus:
"The gene pool now going into politics is frighteningly limited."
And whose protégé was David Miliband, Tony?
Might the elder son of an immigrant who was both a Communist and a Jew have been your chosen heir? And whose protégé was Ed Miliband, Tony? Might the younger son of the same bloke have been Gordon's chosen heir? And wasn't it you who began booting the old school Labour folk into deep space as soon as you became leader?
"The gene pool... is frighteningly limited" nowadays, Tony, because of the "changes" imposed by you and Gordon Brown.
“The rationale for Europe today is about power, not peace.”
Just the same as it was back in 1973 when we joined then.
"People want government that works, that is above all effective in making change. To achieve this, governments have to… embrace new ways of thinking… Progressive parties win when they're at the cutting edge of the future, when they're modernisers.”
Anyone other than a died-in-the-wool Blairite agree with this?
I thought most British folk hankered after the olden days. You know, back when things hadn’t been modernised out of all recognition? Back when Iraq hadn’t been invaded, we weren’t in the EU and the Blair/Brown combo wasn’t a thousand light years up the behinds of cooperate fat cats and hedge fund managers. Back when the immigrant hordes were elsewhere on the planet and Britain still belonged to the British.
Oh no, Tony, most of us long for the olden days when the Labour Party represented the British working man and the fat cat, the wallet-stuffing banker, the aggressive, self-serving foreigner and Big Brother were the enemies. As for the “government that works” thing, wouldn’t most of us want a government that worked on our behalf instead of theirs?
We don’t like change. We particularly dislike change for the worse. But this Prime Minister was never afraid of inverting the truth. It is Blair, after all, who will forever be associated with “spin” and the lies of Tony B Liar.
In the 7 June 2011 edition of [I]The Daily Mail,[/I] Salwa al Mutairi, a Kuwaiti political activist and TV host, was quoted as having said that sex slavery be legalised and non-Muslim prisoners from war-torn countries would make suitable concubines.
"There was no shame in it and it is not haram (forbidden) under Islamic Sharia law,” said al Mautairi, adding:
"In the Chechnyan war, surely there are female Russian captives. So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait. Better than to have our men engage in forbidden sexual relations… I don’t see any problem in this, no problem at all… The only solution for a decent man who has the means, who is overpowered by desire and who does not want to commit fornication, is to acquire jawari." (Concubines)
Concubines would suit Muslim men who feared being “seduced or tempted into immoral behaviour by the beauty of their female servants”," she said.
One Saudi mufti allegedly told her:
"The context must be that of a Muslim nation conquering a non-Muslim nation, so these jawari have to be prisoners of war."
So that’s what the female adherents of political correctness have to look forward to when their nation is eventually conquered by Islam.
After Islam has firstly swatted aside political correctness, of course.
On 7 May 2011, former Mossad Chief, Meir Dagan, was quoted thus by The Jerusalem post:
“An aerial attack against Iran’s nuclear reactors would be foolish… Anyone attacking Iran needs to understand that it could start a regional war which will include missile fire from Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon.”
On 30 April 2011, Eric Pickles, the Community Secretary, was quoted thus in The Daily Mail:
“LABOUR HAS BEEN CONSPIRING WITH EUROPEAN BUREAUCRATS TO WIPE ENGLAND OFF THE MAP… Massive amounts of taxpayers’ money is being wasted on vanity projects. I intend to fight these plans, stop this waste and protect England’s national and local identities from EU empire-building.”
Pickles was furious with the EU for ploughing huge amounts of money into the ‘Arc Manche’, a chauvinistic attempt by Brussels to merge Northern France and Southern England.
On 29 April 2011, The Telegraph told us this:
"John Harvey bravely intervened after a gang of 12 yobs started vandalising a cricket club where he works in Tunbridge Wells, Kent, and grabbed the main culprit. The groundsman at Linden Park Cricket Club called police as he held the teenager telling cops he had caught the yob in the act and they should send an officer to arrest the teen. But, as the 47-year-old was desperately trying to keep hold of the teen as the other yobs armed with sticks surrounded him, THE POLICE OPERATOR WARNED HIM HE COULD BE CHARGED WITH ASSAULT."
John takes up the story:
"I expected to be thoroughly supported by the police as a civilian and not rebuked. I was expecting a response car immediately. I had restrained someone in the act of vandalism and she said 'I MUST WARN YOU, YOU ARE LEAVING YOURSELF OPEN TO AN ASSAULT CHARGE'…
I told her 'You'd better be quick, there are 12 of them… SHE WAS READING SCREEN PROMPTS AND INSISTING I GAVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS AND I SAID 'WITH 12 KIDS IN FRONT OF ME?’ That sort of thing has to be put by the wayside. I could have been in the morgue by now."
Oh the PC Crowd couldn’t give a toss about you, John.
They care about the “yobs” but you? Oh no, the law-abiding citizen is the enemy. They yob is the PC Crowd’s footsoldier.
Chief Inspector Simon Black said:
“The call taker who spoke with Mr Harvey acted correctly in the advice she gave."
Two fingers up at all you have-a-go heros then. Direct from the Coppers’ top table.
On 28 April 2011, the This is Leicestershire new website quoted 74-year-old grandfather, Tom Carnegie, thus:
"I don't know why they did it. THIS IS NOT THE WORLD I GREW UP IN.
It was a lovely evening and... everything seemed fine. On the way home, I saw this group and just assumed they were locals. They asked me for a cigarette and I said, 'of course', because I'm a bit of a softie. I don't really remember what happened next but THEY JUST STARTED HITTING ME… I've got bruises all over. While I was down they went into my pocket and took my cigarette case and my wallet. I had £40 or £50 in it because I'd got my pension the day before."
The “four or five men” who attacked Tom were Asian.
They were “all dressed in black”. Which suggests to me they weren’t just in the business of attacking and robbing an elderly white man, they were making a statement of pseudo-military intent as well.
"I don't know why they did it. This is not the world I grew up in”, says Tom.
Wake up, Tom. They did it because “this is not the world” you “grew up in”! This is the world the traitorous politicians and their immigrant footsoldiers forced upon us!
On 28 April 2011, The Sun quoted a 22-year-old Tunisian called Ali thus:
“Britain is like paradise. Friends who have already made it into Britain have told me about THE RICHES YOU CAN MAKE THERE WITHOUT WORKING. I HEAR THE BRITISH BENEFITS SYSTEM IS GENEROUS. Britain supported our revolution so WE WILL BE MORE THAN WELCOME THERE."
Would-be immigrant, Noureddine Bouzoumta, also Tunisian, said:
"I HEAR THE GOVERNMENT IN BRITAIN GIVES MONEY. I WANT TO GO TO ENGLAND. I WILL BE RICH. I WILL RECEIVE BENEFITS."
The Sun added:
“The flood of migrants is unlikely to stop while the dream of benefits, housing and earnings from the black economy continues to lure them to the UK.”
That’s how it’s been for the last 60 years. No government did a damn thing to stop it and most, no matter what the rhetoric at election time, actively encouraged it.
THEY are at war with us and the immigrants are their footsoldiers.
On 27 April 2011, Duncan Gardham told us this in The Telegraph:
"ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM IS BEING ALLOWED TO FLOURISH AT UNIVERSITIES, ENDANGERING NATIONAL SECURITY, MPs and peers said yesterday. Academics are turning a blind eye to radicals because they do not want to spy on students, a report claimed.
DESPITE ‘DAMNING EVIDENCE’ OF A SERIOUS PROBLEM, LITTLE PROGRESS HAD BEEN MADE IN TACKLING THE UNSUSTAINABLE SITUATION, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Homeland Security said… Such extremism ‘endangers our security at home’… said the group, which includes the former home secretary Lord Reid.”
That’s John Reid, one of Tony Blair’s Home Secretaries. Blair’s government istitutionalised mass immigration and they after 7/7/2005, when the Muslims blew us up, it did not decrease, they brought even more in.
Like I keep telling you, ladies and gentlemn, THEY are at war with us.
On 27 April 2011, Melanie Phillips said this in The Daily Mail:
WikiLeaks documents, detailing the backgrounds of the inmates of the Guantanamo Bay detention centre… THE UK… FURNISHED NO FEWER THAN 35 OF THE MEMBERS OF AL QAEDA, MORE THAN ANY OTHER NATION, WHO ENDED UP IN GUANTANAMO AFTER HAVING BEEN INDOCTRINATED BY ISLAMIC PREACHERS IN BRITAIN INTO MURDEROUS HATRED AGAINST THE WEST. The documents record how terrorist recruits from across Africa and the Middle East flocked to London to claim asylum…
They were drawn like bees to a honeypot by Britain’s uniquely self-destructive combination of a GENEROUS WELFARE STATE, a long tradition of turning a blind eye to foreign political dissidents, and A JUDICIARY AND POLITICAL CLASS WHICH HAD EFFECTIVELY DECIDED TO TEAR UP BRITAIN’S BORDER CONTROLS IN THE CAUSE OF ‘UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS’...
And as these files state, this didn’t just take place in London’s notorious Finsbury Park mosque under those two key preachers and terrorist recruiters Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza. It also occurred in self-styled moderate establishments such as the flagship Regent’s Park and East London mosques. Between them all, they dispatched dozens of extremists to be trained in terrorism against the West in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
One new and startling fact also thrown up by the WikiLeaks treasure trove is THE POSSIBLE PART IN THIS PROCESS PLAYED BY THE BBC. For, after several suspected terrorists were all found to possess a phone number at the BBC World Service, THE U.S. GOVERNMENT SUSPECTED THE BBC OF BEING A ‘POSSIBLE PROPAGANDA MEDIA NETWORK’ FOR AL QAEDA...
This radicalisation has come about through A LETHAL COCKTAIL OF MULTICULTURALISM, WELFARISM AND SHEER SPINELESS FUNK BY THE BRITISH AUTHORITIES, LACED WITH POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WHICH TURNED RIGHT AND WRONG UPSIDE DOWN.
What beggars belief even more is that the Government has been paying millions in compensation to some of these terrorists for having so inconsiderately deprived them of their ‘human rights’ by locking them up. Even more ludicrously, we now learn that one Guantanamo inmate was paid more than £300,000 of British taxpayers’ money to eradicate his poppy crops in Afghanistan. But instead he allegedly supported Al Qaeda — while continuing to act as a major drugs trafficker…
There are still signs of muddled thinking at the top. For example, Security Minister Baroness Neville-Jones, who is drawing up the Government’s new counter-terrorism strategy, recently identified her task as ‘trying to convince minorities in this country that it’s their country as much as anybody else’s’…
It is not just terrorism that threatens Britain. It is also THE STEADY INCURSION OF ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW, WHOSE PRINCIPLES ARE INIMICAL TO WESTERN VALUES AND HUMAN RIGHTS. This ‘sharia creep’ is now highly advanced in Britain. A parallel jurisdiction in Islamic family law has been allowed to develop in Muslim areas, turning British Muslim women into second-class citizens and worse.
There has been an enormous growth of Islamic banking — which, WikiLeaks says, the Americans feared might serve as an umbrella for the financing of Islamic terrorism. Several education authorities have quietly taken to serving halal meat to all pupils. As TV programmes have shown, some Muslim schools and apparently ‘moderate mosques’ are teaching pupils and worshippers to hate ‘unbelievers’.
Islamic extremist speakers appear unchallenged regularly at British universities… And the Government still hasn’t dealt with HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, WHICH HAS DRIVEN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM SO CATASTROPHICALLY OFF THE RAILS AND HAS COME TO ACT AS THE JUDICIAL WEAPON OF THE ISLAMIC JIHAD…
Terrorism uses violence against civilians to force society to yield to its demands. The Islamic jihad, by contrast, is a world-wide war on many fronts to destroy a society altogether.
The British security service has warned repeatedly that it fears a dirty bomb in Britain is all but inevitable… So while the security people sweat over how to keep the British people safe from such a monstrous event, PARLIAMENTARIANS, HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES ACTIVISTS POSTURE PREPOSTEROUSLY AS DEFENDERS OF WESTERN VALUES PROTECTING THE ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ OF KNOWN TERRORISTS”.
“Sheer spineless funk by the British authorities”, Mel?
No, dear. Cold, calculating, deep-Red treachery is what is is. There have been animals abroad in the upper reaches of government and the media who have wished our country and its people ill for a very long time now. Many of them hail from your own tribe.
People like Lord Anthony Lester, the creature behind the introduction of the Human Rights Act you mention in your piece.
As for Baroness Neville-Jones, and her ‘trying to convince minorities in this country that it’s their country as much as anybody else’s’ thing, well, there’s your archetypal PC Traitor in one neat sentence, Mel. And this woman has been a top civil servant forever, she’s a former Chairman of the British Joint Intelligence Committee, a Dame, a BBC Governor and is currently david Cameron’s Minister of State for Security and Counter Terrorism.
In other words, this is what has been giving our country away to everyone else on the planet for more than sixty years now. Curtesy of the voting habits of the dumbed-down, drugged, decadent and degenerate British people.
Commenting on the hypocrisy of fellow journalist, Andrew Marr, TV personality and Private Eye Editor, Ian Hislop, commented thus in the 27 April 2011 edition of The Daily Express:
“As a leading BBC interviewer who is asking politicians about failures in judgment, failures in their private lives, inconsistencies, it was pretty rank of him to have an injunction while working as an active journalist… In a sense, he led the pack because he was the most respectable of the people putting super-injunctions in. But the principle remains wrong, which he knows”.
The Mail clarified:
“Marr, married to columnist Jackie Ashley with whom he has three children, said he now felt ‘uneasy’ about the order taken out to protect his family’s privacy. The woman with whom he had the affair is a political journalist who has a young daughter. Their liaison ended in 2003. At the time, Mr Marr believed he had fathered a child with the woman… Under the terms of the injunction, media organisations were banned from publishing details… The revelation comes amid growing concern at the use of gagging orders by celebrities. A married Premier League footballer wonanonymity after an alleged affair with Big Brother star Imogen Thomas.”
On 25 April 2011, Christopher Hope commented thus in The Telegraph:
“A phone number of someone at the BBC was found in the phone books and phones of a number of extremists seized by US forces. A detainee assessment, dated 21 April 2007, states:
‘The London, United Kingdom, phone number 0044 207 XXX XXXX was discovered in numerous seized phone books and phones associated with extremist-linked individuals. THE NUMBER IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION.’ Analysis by The Daily Telegraph suggests the number is one for Bush House, home of the BBC World Service.
The assessment continues that US forces uncovered many ‘extremist links’ to this number, suggesting that extremists could have made contact with BBC employees who were sympathetic to extremists...
The BBC number was given in the file of Turki Mish’awi Za’id Alj-Amri, a Saudi who was ‘assessed to be a member of al-Qaeda, who travelled to Afghanistan to participate in Jihad’…
In September 2006 the BBC’s then-chairman Michael Grade organised an ‘impartiality summit’… to assess whether there was a left-leaning bias at the broadcaster. An account of the meeting, leaked to a Sunday newspaper the following month, showed that that executives accepted they would broadcast an interview with al-Qaeda mastermind Osama Bin Laden, if they were given the opportunity.
Andrew Marr (a former Communist) later told the newspaper:
‘The BBC is not impartial or neutral. It’s a publicly funded, urban organisation with an abnormally large number of young people, ethnic minorities and gay people. It has a liberal bias not so much a party-political bias. It is better expressed as a cultural liberal bias’.”
On 23 April 2011, Neil Sears and Ryan Kisiel quoted David Moyle thus in The Daily Mail:
"I was very surprised and disappointed that THE SCHOOL EXECUTIVE TRIED TO CRIMINALISE ME OVER IT… If there was a perceived problem with the image I would have thought they could have spoken directly to me about it… I was taken aback by the reaction of the council, WHO NOT ONLY FULLY ENDORSED THE DISPROPORTIONATE REACTION OF THE SCHOOL MANAGEMENT, BUT ALSO CONTRIVED ADDITIONAL CHARGES ABOUT THE POSTER that had no relation at all to the original complaint.’
The Mail explained:
For a poster advertising a primary school parents’ meeting, it is certainly unusual. Using models, it depicts scientist Charles Darwin surrounded by an angry mob wielding flaming torches and makeshift weapons. According to the school governor who created it, City executive David Moyle, it is a satirical joke about pushy middle-class parents demanding higher standards. Yet WHEN BLACK HEADMISTRESS SHIRLEY PATTERSON SAW IT, SHE BELIEVED IT REPRESENTED HER SURROUNDED BY WHITE PARENTS. She reportedly compared it TO A SCENE FROM MISSISSIPPI BURNING, A FILM ABOUT THE KU KLUX KLAN’S RACIST LYNCHINGS, saying it left her ‘fearing for her and her family’s safety’.
SHE CALLED THE POLICE, CLAIMING HARASSMENT. THEN A COUNCIL INQUIRY SPENT WEEKS DETERMINING THE RACE OF THE CHARLES DARWIN FIGURE. NOW MR MOYLE HAS BEEN SUSPENDED FROM THE GOVERNING BODY OF GOODRICH PRIMARY SCHOOL…
Although the police realised Darwin was white, and said NO CRIME HAD BEEN COMMITTED, Southwark council insisted it had ‘appropriately’ investigated the ‘DEEPLY DISTURBING’ POSTER.
THE LABOUR AUTHORITY refused to reveal details of its inquiry – which involved half a dozen officers at a time when 500 jobs are set to be cut. And it will not discuss how a model of A WHITE, BEARDED, VICTORIAN SCIENTIST COULD BE CONFUSED WITH A BLACK 21ST CENTURY HEADMISTRESS…
The council inquiry, carried out by a whole team of officers including the assistant director of access, inclusion and education, Pauline Armour, ruled the poster was ‘AN IMAGE OF VIOLENCE AND INTIMIDATION’, and ‘DEEPLY DISTURBING AND DAMAGING TO CHILDREN’…
Parent governor Mr Moyle… a former treasurer of the parents’ association… was asked to advertise a meeting. He found the image on a website mocking ‘creationists’ angered by Darwin’s theory of evolution, and stuck posters around the school. The next week he was told Mrs Patterson had complained to the National Union of Teachers…
Mrs Patterson replaced a popular long-term headmaster of Goodrich school when he retired in 2007.”
On 21 April 2011, the Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, said this in The Independent:
“IT IS OUR DUTY TO COME TO THE AID OF THE OPPRESSED and to offer protection where it is needed... More notice needs to be taken, I believe, of increasingly unpalatable evidence from countries like Congo and Cameroon that some returnees from the UK, including those with young children, are subjected to imprisonment, torture, abuse and starvation. By the time we learn of their appalling fate, it is too late to say, ‘we got it wrong’…
It is particularly important that WE RESPOND TO INDIVIDUALS WHO DO SEEK SANCTUARY IN OUR COUNTRIES in a principled and compassionate way. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE PROVIDING PROTECTION TO ALL THOSE FLEEING PERSECUTION OR ESCAPING SITUATIONS OF CONFLICT AND WIDESPREAD HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, and providing adequate support to those in the asylum system so that they can meet their essential living needs.
When the public-spending cuts bite, IT SHOULD NOT BE THE MOST VULNERABLE OF ALL WHO SUFFER… THERE WILL ALWAYS BE THOSE WHO NEED OUR PROTECTION AND OUR SUPPORT – are we big-hearted enough to accept this? It would be tragic if, because of misplaced fears over immigration numbers, we shut our doors to those seeking sanctuary from persecution.
In 1973, I myself was a refugee who had to escape Idi Amin's brutal regime in Uganda... I was received in Britain with great compassion and care – it was almost a home from home… However, I recall the struggles of surviving on the very limited financial support available at the time... I would like to think that those genuinely needing protection today find that Britain is no less committed to help than its partners in the international community...
Let Easter be a time of hope for everyone – but especially the broken, the homeless, the fugitive and the destitute.”
He means the broken, homeless, fugitive and destitute immigrant, folks. I wonder if blokes like Sentamu ever stop to consider that the supply of such people is limitless. There are, quite literally, billions who would pile into our country if they could. Rather than cleaning up the mess they and their ancestors made of their own backyard, that is. Sentamu knows full well how native Brit has suffered because of this “pity-the-poor-immigrant” b***ocks.
"In 1973 I was forced to flee Idi Amin's brutal regime. I found compassion and care in Britain."
Yes, John, and you and your positively-discriminatory PC sponsors took a great big, British job away from the British in the process, didn't you? Multiply that scenario by five million or so and you end up with a whole lot of small-minded indigenous dinosaurs who could't give a toss for you, your asylum-seeking foreigners, the immigrant already here, the PC Crowd who imported them or your Big Society. (The latest Brit-flattening Big Brother gimmick)
This "care and compassion" lark, it hasn't exactly been aimed at all those native Brits who have been clamouring for all immigration to cease since way back in the 1950s, now has it?
Big Society? Run by whom and for whose benefit, John? For you, Cameron, Blair, the greedy bankers and the aggressively self-serving immigrant? I don't want a whole lot more people like you coming into my home and telling me what to be, what to do and what to think, pal. If you weren't here, we wouldn’t have to endure the patronage of a foreigner who, racially, has a lot more in common with Idi Amin than any of us.
If you and the alien hordes want to pontificate, patronise and nick all the jobs, b***er off back to Africa, India, Pakistan, the West Indies and eastern Europe and find compassion there.
Oh yes, John, as far as the uncared-for, small-minded British majority is concerned, you can stick the Big Sentamu-enhancing Society you favour on top of the bonfire.
Speaking of bonfires, where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?
On 14 April 2011, The Jewish Chronicle quoted James Hardin, editor of The Times, thus:
"I AM PRO-ISRAEL. I BELIEVE IN THE STATE OF ISRAEL. I would have had a real problem if I had been coming to a paper with a history of being anti-Israel. And, of course, RUPERT MURDOCH IS PRO-ISRAEL…
The Jewish Chronicle added:
“Asked by an audience member for his views on BBC coverage, he said it was ‘not a pro-Israel newsroom and IT HAS TAKEN MANAGEMENT TO GET SOME BALANCE IN THERE’.”
Harding is Jewish.
On 11 March 2011, Communities Minister, Baroness Hanham, was quoted thus by The Jewish Chronicle:
“The last place that we want antisemitism to take a hold is in our schools or universities… STAMP IT OUT at the very earliest stages… a range of guidance, providing a practical framework, is available to higher education institutions to help them to support tolerance…
What is on the internet goes beyond hate, and VERY SOON WE WILL HAVE TO FIND A WAY OF OBLITERATING AND BLOTTING OUT SUCH UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL.”
On 20 February 2011, the author, Ian McEwan, said the following during his Jerusalem Prize acceptance speech:
“A recent discovery for me has been S Yizhar's Khirbet Khizeh, published in 1949 -- the luminous account of THE CLEARING OF AN ARAB VILLAGE DURING THE '48 WAR -- and of a protest that never quite leaves the throat of its narrator AS THE HOUSES ARE DEMOLISHED AND THE VILLAGERS DRIVEN FROM THEIR LAND… Khirbet Khizet remains painfully relevant, and the moral questioning lives on.
There are so many writers one could mention, but let me single out three senior figures who have earned the respect and love of readers around the world -- Amoz Oz, Abrahim Yehoshua and David Grossman… In their long careers THEY HAVE OPPOSED THE SETTLEMENTS….
Hamas… has embraced the nihilism of the suicide bomber, of rockets fired blindly into towns, and embraced the nihilism of an extinctionist policy towards Israel. But (to take just one example) IT WAS ALSO NIHILISM THAT FIRED A ROCKET AT THE UNDEFENDED GAZAN HOME OF THE PALESTINIAN DOCTOR, IZZELDIN ABUELAISH, IN 2008, KILLING HIS THREE DAUGHTERS AND HIS NIECE. IT IS NIHILISM TO MAKE A LONG TERM PRISON CAMP OF THE GAZA STRIP. Nihilism has unleashed the tsunami of concrete across the occupied territories.
When the distinguished judges of this prize commend me for my 'love of people and concern for their right to self-realisation', they seem to be demanding that I mention, and I must oblige, THE CONTINUED EVICTIONS AND DEMOLITIONS, AND RELENTLESS PURCHASES OF PALESTINIAN HOMES IN EAST JERUSALEM, THE PROCESS OF RIGHT OF RETURN GRANTED TO JEWS BUT NOT ARABS. These so-called 'facts on the ground' are a hardening concrete poured over the future, over future generations of Palestinian and Israeli children who will inherit the conflict and find it even more difficult to resolve than it is today…
A great and self-evident injustice hangs in the air, PEOPLE HAVE BEEN AND ARE BEING DISPLACED…
Where is Israel's political creativity? What do national politicians have?… Surely not the concrete mixer? Surely not the eviction order?… That was surely not the best Israeli politicians could do, when they succumbed to what David Grossman has called 'the temptation of strength', and casually brushed aside remarkable concessions from the Palestinian Authority?…
After her recent visit here, The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights notes that the firing of rockets into Israel from Gaza constitutes a war crime. She also notes that that THE ANNEXATION OF EAST JERUSALEM CONTRAVENES INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THAT EAST JERUSALEM IS STEADILY BEING DRAINED OF ITS PALESTINIAN INHABITANTS.”
On 15 February 2011, The Daily Mail quoted a National Clinical Assessment Service study thus:
“NON-WHITE DOCTORS QUALIFYING OUTSIDE THE UK ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE REFERRED.”
The Mail’s correspondent, Daniel Martin, added:
"A GP IS THREE TIMES AS LIKELY TO BE SUSPENDED IF THEY ARE TRAINED IN EUROPE RATHER THAN THE UK – AND SIX TIMES MORE LIKELY IF THEY ARE TRAINED OUTSIDE EUROPE.”
Professor Alastair Scotland, the Director of NCAS, said this:
“These statistics show clearly that THERE IS A GREATER LIKELIHOOD OF CONCERNS BEING RAISED IN SOME GROUPS THAN OTHERS.”
Which is what you might call a euphemism.
The original BBC blurb advertising Louis Theroux’s 3 February 2011 BBC2 documentary, ‘The Ultra Zionists’ said this:
"In part these men and women are a tiny GROUP OF RELIGIOUS EXTREMISTS who claim they are acting on divine promises from thousands of years ago. In part THEY ARE POSSIBLY THE BIGGEST THREAT TO WORLD PEACE TODAY."
When Jewish elements complained about the description, the BBC quickly apologised and amended it, saying:
"This billing for The Ultra Zionists did not reflect the programme accurately. As soon as the mistake was brought to our attention, we rectified the situation by replacing it with the correct billing."
Speaking about The Ultra Zionists, Theroux said:
"The Zionists view Arabs and Palestinians as squatting in what is theirs. I was intrigued by that. I thought it was morally questionable…
Before I went, I thought that for an Israeli, pre-1967 borders should be enough. Given that SO MANY ARABS WERE DISPLACED IN 1948 AND WERE LIVING AS REFUGEES, TAKING MORE LAND SEEMED EXCESSIVE AND THE SETTLERS WERE CONTRIBUTING TO THE PROBLEM.
I wanted to show that the army was policing the Israeli extremists, and instead of just showing extremist views we could show that the ones reining them in were the Israeli military. But I think I overestimated that. THEY LET SETTLERS DO WHAT THEY WANT. I WAS SHOCKED AND DISAPPOINTED BY THAT. I DIDN'T REALISE TO WHAT EXTENT THE STATE ENCOURAGED SETTLERS."
On 12 and 13 January 2011, Mick Gradwell, a former detective superintendent, was quoted thus in The Daily Mail, The Guardian and The Star:
“When I joined in 1979 one of my first tasks was to police around a nightclub where Asian men cruised around in BMWs and Mercs trying to pick up young drunken girls.
THE MAIN PRESSURE POLICE HAVE IS BEING CALLED INSTITUTIONALLY RACIST IF THEY HIGHLIGHT A CRIME TREND LIKE THIS. There's a fantastic reluctance to be absolutely straight because some people may take such offence. YOU HAVE GIRLS BEING ABUSED AND RAPED AND YET THE MOST SENIOR OFFICERS ARE REFUSING TO COMMENT ON IT. On what other subject would you get that? HOW MANY YOUNG GIRLS HAVE BEEN ABUSED AND RAPED BECAUSE OF THE RELUCTANCE OF THE AUTHORITIES TO SAY WHAT IS HAPPENING?’’
Well, I say “the most senior officers” should be tried for treason alongside the politicians. They should also be tried for aiding and abetting paedophilia, rape and the prostitution of minors. And, as there is an extremely obvious racist (anti-white) element to their crimes, they should be punished, according to the politicians’ own anti-racism legislation, with “even more severity”.
When the politicians and “the most senior police officers” are found guilty of these extraordinarily heinous crimes, what should be done with them?
I say they should be executed.
Not so long ago, when the world was just and common sense was the prevailing ethos, that would have been the punishment.
Unfortunately, in an age when the PC Crowd, the EU and the global villagers hold sway through bought-and-paid-for folk like Blair, Brown, Harman, Mandelson, Straw, Blunkett, Cameron and Clegg, the politicians and “the most senior police officers” are more likely to end up with a medal.
On 12 January 2011, the article 'We are racist, like our parents were' by Obed Suhail, a senior editor for MyPRGenie, was published in The Pakistani Express Tribune, a subsidiary of The Herald Tribune.
"Like most middle class Pakistanis, (my parents) were worried that the complexion of my skin will become dark if I spent too much time outside. My aunts flung concerned glances at me and my cousins during summers… and made taunting comments about our tanned skin. Thus, FROM A VERY EARLY AGE I LEARNED THAT HAVING DARK SKIN WAS SOMETHING TO BE EMBARRASSED OF.
My classmates were also familiar with this racial demarcation, so MAKING FUN OF KIDS WITH A DARKER SKIN TONE WAS QUITE COMMON. THE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DARK-SKINNED PEOPLE IN PAKISTAN IS AS PREVALENT AMONG ADULTS AS IT IS AT THE SCHOOL LEVEL… Many companies believe that EMPLOYEES WITH A WHITE-COMPLEXION CAN MAKE A BETTER IMPRESSION ON THE CLIENTS. While looking for a suitable spouse for their sons, parents almost always give extra points to fair-skinned girls… A FEW OF MY MALE COUSINS REJECTED SCORES OF GIRLS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN… WE’VE BEEN CONDITIONED SINCE CHILDHOOD TO HOLD THE FAIRER-SKIN TONE IN HIGHER REGARD…
While many Indian actresses have a darker skin tone, NOT ONCE HAVE I SEEN A PAKISTANI ACTRESS WHO WAS NOT WHITE. There are many Pakistani ads, songs and films that advocate the merits of having a fair-complexion. Even corporations are instilling and reinforcing this racism in our minds by promoting beauty products and creams aimed at making the skin fairer."
So, whilst the British government was criminalising the indigenous white population of the UK for the new fangled PC crime of racism, they were importing died-in-the-wool racists from Pakistan.
Who, of course, would be the beneficiaries of the anti-indigenous legislation. As I keep saying, ladies and gentlemen, THEY are at war with us. They always were, they always will be.
The war will only end when YOU find the courage to be rid of THEM.
On 3 January 2011, the Economic Collapse blog said this:
“Just who is George Soros? Well, he is a billionaire 'philanthropist' who came to be known as 'the Man Who Broke the Bank of England' when he raked in a staggering one billion dollars during the 1992 'Black Wednesday' currency crisis…
George Soros and his pet organizations have played a key role in quite a few 'revolutions' around the globe over the last several decades, but these days the main goal of George Soros is to bring political change to the United States… WHAT HE WANTS IS A BIG BROTHER-STYLE ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT based on extreme European-style socialism, strict population control and the radical green agenda…
Much of what Soros is trying to accomplish lines up with the goals of the international banking elite… THE INTERNATIONAL BANKING ELITE VERY MUCH WANT A GLOBAL CURRENCY AND A 'NEW WORLD ORDER', BUT WHAT THEY DON'T NEED IS A 'SQUEAKY WHEEL' LIKE SOROS RUNNING AROUND DRAWING UNNEEDED ATTENTION TO THOSE GOALS…
THE SAME HANDFUL OF ELITIST ORGANIZATIONS HAS DOMINATED THE CABINETS OF EVERY SINGLE PRESIDENT THAT WE HAVE HAD SINCE WORLD WAR II. If you doubt this, just CHECK OUT HOW MANY MEMBERS OF EACH PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION OVER THE LAST 40 YEARS HAVE BELONGED TO EITHER THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION OR THE BILDERBERG GROUP…
Soros has been saying the the U.S. dollar needs to go down for quite a while now, and he speaks of the coming fall of the dollar as if it is inevitable… Soros even had the gall to say that having the dollar be the reserve currency of the world is not in our national interest and that a move to a global currency is 'a healthy, if painful, adjustment' that we are just going to have to endure for the greater good of the world economy. But shouldn't the American people have something to say about all of this? Perhaps the American people do not want a 'managed decline' of the U.S. dollar. Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a new 'global currency'. Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a 'New World Order'.
But TO MEN LIKE GEORGE SOROS, IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER WHAT 'THE LITTLE PEOPLE' THINK. IN THE WORLD THAT SOROS LIVES IN, THOSE WITH OVERWHELMING AMOUNTS OF MONEY AND POWER KNOW WHAT IS BEST FOR THE REST OF US, AND IF 'THE LITTLE PEOPLE' DON'T SEEM TO WANT TO GO ALONG INITIALLY THEN PUBLIC OPINION CAN BE BOUGHT IF YOU JUST SPEND ENOUGH MONEY.
THE SAD TRUTH IS THAT WE ALREADY LIVE IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY. Just go into just about any store across the United States and start picking up products to see where they were made. Very few of the things we buy are still made in the United States.
Today, labor is a global commodity. American workers must now directly compete for jobs with those making slave labor wages in China and India. THE FACT THAT MILLIONS OF U.S. JOBS ARE BEING OFFSHORED AND OUTSOURCED DOES NOT BOTHER ADVOCATES OF GLOBALISM AT ALL… Most Americans have little to no idea just HOW MUCH INFLUENCE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS THE UNITED NATIONS, THE WORLD BANK, THE IMF AND THE WTO HAVE OVER OUR DAILY LIVES…
WE ALREADY LIVE IN A WORLD THAT HAS BEEN DEEPLY, DEEPLY INTEGRATED. AS THIS CONTINUES, AT SOME POINT IT WILL ONLY SEEM 'NATURAL' FOR AMERICA TO AGREE TO A TRUE GLOBAL CURRENCY AND FULL GLOBAL POLITICAL INTEGRATION...
Let us hope that the American people wake up enough to not just go passively into a 'New World Order'. A global economy is bad for America and a global government would be really bad for America.”
On 22 December 2010, Allison Good wrote the following at The Jerusalem Post:
“There’s this weird relationship between Jews and evangelical Christians in America… A similar parallel is emerging with Israel’s right and European radical populist movements such as France’s Front National, Britain’s National Front and UK Independence Party, the Netherlands’ Dutch Party for Freedom, and believe me, the list goes on and on… Radical populism has become mainstream.
These parties are nationalist, white, anti-immigration, anti-Muslim, pro-law and order and they emphasize a return to traditional family values. THEY ARE EXTREME ROMANTICS OF THE WORST SORT, XENOPHOBES STUCK IN THE RHETORIC OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY…
France’s president, Nicolas Sarkozy, recently deported a slew of Roma because their gypsy camps are illegal. Not that it does anything, since ROMA ARE EU CITIZENS AND CAN THEREFORE GO RIGHT BACK TO FRANCE…
Enter politician and legislative representative Geert Wilders, the leader of the Dutch Party for Freedom… Wilders’ policies apparently include ‘introducing Israeli-type ‘administrative detention’ or arrest without trial, banning the building of mosques and suspending immigration of non-Western foreigners to the Netherlands… and claims that Jerusalem is the ‘main front protecting the West’ from Islam’…
How can Israel’s right even stand to communicate with people like Wilders? Is he the lesser of two evils? We need to keep an eye on this budding relationship. Israel truly is a country of failed ideologies if its hardcore Zionists are collaborating with the would-be fascists in Europe.”
Interesting how Ms Good equates those who are “white… pro-law and order and… emphasize a return to traditional family values” with “extreme Romantics of the worst sort, xenophobes stuck in the rhetoric of the nineteenth century,” don’t you think?
Worst sort? Xenophobes? Nineteenth century? The Jerusalem Post thinks it’s OK for the likes of Alison Good to sneer at those who stick up for family values and law and order are to be sneered at?
Oh yes. If they happen to be of white, European origin.
That really IS how some Jews think.
On 29 November 2010, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown said this in The Independent:
"I've been goaded into writing this column by the barbs and taunts, by the blame and racist toxins filling my inbox this week."
So, you would have carried on keeping stuff like this hidden if people like us hadn’t goaded you into highlighting the crimes your ethnic kinfolk have been routinely committing in recent times?
Your confession surprises no one, Yazzer.
"At least they can no longer accuse me of 'HIDING THE TRUTH'."
Perhaps not, but we can accuse you of hiding it until now.
You must also forgive us for presuming you would have carried right on hiding it without all the taunting and goading.
"HORRIFIC SEXUAL CRIMES AGAINST YOUNG GIRLS WERE COMMITTED BY A PAEDOPHILE GANG IN DERBY… Several gang members were convicted and sent down. These urban predators stalked and 'chose' their victims, took them for ice creams and nice meals… drove them around in flash cars, handed out drink and cigarettes, drugged their trusting prey, then raped them over and over again, threatening them with hammers, and worse, if they told.
SUCH RINGS HAVE BEEN EXPOSED BEFORE, AND MANY OTHERS CARRY ON WITHOUT DETECTION. It is the nightmare of every parent, and FOR THE CHILDREN WHO ARE BRUTALISED IT IS THE END OF THEIR INNOCENCE and a total desecration of their human rights…
THE DERBY GANG WAS ALL ASIAN except for one seasoned white abuser. MOST OF THE ASIANS WERE MUSLIM PAKISTANIS and… THEIR VICTIMS WERE ALMOST ALL WHITE. Because I am Asian and 'a ****ing Muslim' and THE RAPISTS WERE MY PEOPLE COMMITTING A "PAKI" CRIME AGAINST WHITE FEMALES, I am guilty too, apparently, part of the evil posse."
You have been guilty of covering it up, Yasmin.
You would have been guilty of an eternal cover up if you hadn’t been goaded and taunted into this belated confession.
"Two days after the Derby case, another such network was exposed – of white men in Cornwall who plucked white girls to groom, violate and control. Was theirs a lesser crime? No. It's naked racism to believe that sex assaults on white women by black or Asian men are more depraved and animalistic than those carried out by white men, who presumably remember to say 'please' and 'thank you' before and after."
Naked racism, eh?
And it wasn’t naked racism that prompted you to cover up the crimes of your Pakistani Muslim compatriots until we goaded and taunted you into behaving righteously? And, in your creepy, non-'racist' world, I don’t suppose prevalence would have anything to do with it? You know, how often it occurs? Leaving aside the priestly homosexuals, whose perversion was indirectly encouraged for so long by the Catholic Church, I doubt you’d find a comparable level of routine padeophilia within the indigenous community. And you and I both know FOR ABSOLUTE CERTAIN that Muslim and Black girls ARE NOT being raped routinely by white, British men. Where such behaviour does occur, it is white-upon-white.
And then there’s the little matter of immigrant ingratitude, Yasmin. Some would say that you are right to say that 'it's naked racism to believe that sex assaults on white women by black or Asian men are more depraved and animalistic than those carried out by white men.' Well, I’m not going to argue the point but the Muslim perverts committing these crimes against our little girls begged and pleaded to be allowed into our country in order to share our world, JUST LIKE YOU DID BACK IN 1972.
And this is what we get in return. Spot the difference, Yasmin? No? That’s because you a Brit-loather of the first water. It oozes from your every Muslim pore. It has been doing so ever since positive discrimination and political correctness got you your first job as a journalist.
Personally, I would blowtorch the genitals from the 'depraved and animalistic… white men.' What would you do to those who commit 'Paki' crime against white females”?
Spot the difference again, Yasmin?
"But when I ask myself was a greater crime committed by the Asian molesters, the honest answer has to be yes.
Confession is good for the soul, Yasmin.
If you have one in the first place, that is.
"Conscientious Asian community activists in Derby have said that these criminal acts were nothing to do with race or religion. The perpetrators were bad men who did terrible things. That is surely self-delusion or a cover-up."
Well said, Yasmin.
"The official inquiry into the case concluded that the care agencies were ill-equipped to deal with the scale of the abuse being perpetrated by the gang. But it also concluded that THERE NEEDS TO BE AN HONEST NATIONAL CONVERSATION ABOUT HOW EXPLOITATION IN SOME PLACES INTERSECTS WITH "CULTURE, ETHNICITY AND IDENTITY".
"Let's begin then. Because without such an open conversation, prejudices fester and MILLIONS OF BRITONS COME TO BELIEVE THAT SERIOUS OFFENDERS FROM CERTAIN ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS GROUPS HAVE PROTECTED STATUS WITHIN OUR COUNTRY."
And this isn’t true?
"IN THE CASE OF THE ASIAN MEN, DISGUSTING CULTURAL BELIEFS FURTHER VALIDATE THEIR ACTS AND THEIR UNCONTROLLABLE LECHERY IS, IN PART, A SYMPTOM OF REPRESSED SEXUALITY AND SICK ATTITUDES."
"MANY (Asian men) HAVE HAPPY AND EQUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH WHITE PARTNERS."
Ah, the melting pot.
Thought you MIGHT get the breed-whitey-out-of-existence thing into the article somewhere, Yasmin.
"aN ALARMING NUMBER OF ASIAN INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES DO BELIEVE THAT WHITE FEMALES HAVE NO MORALS, ARE FREE AND AVAILABLE, DESERVING OF NO RESPECT OR PROTECTION."
Do you think such anti-British folks should all be deported back to the Stone Age, Yasmin?
Or would you describe those advocating such common-sense protection for the most innocent members of the British community as 'racist'?
"Up in Bradford a few years back, I met MUSLIM PIMPS, SOME WEARING MINI KORAN PENDANTS ON HEAVY, GOLD CHAINS. "NOT OUR GIRLS," THEY REASSURED ME, 'JUST THEM WHITE GIRLS FROM THE ESTATES, CHEAP GIRLS. THEY LOVE IT MAN, ALL THE MONEY THEY MAKE! WHAT ELSE WILL THEY DO WITH THEIR LIVES? WE'RE HELPING THEM MAKE A CAREER.'
Have you ever mentioned this before, Yasmin?
You know, in your Brit-loathing articles?
"Much laughter, until I asked them what they would do if a white pimp groomed their daughters. THEY WOULD KILL THE PIMP AND THE GIRLS TOO, THEY SAID. They would too."
Are we racists for wanting such foetid anti-Brits dealt with, Yasmin?
That’s what you PC Crowders would have called us not so long ago. You know, back when political correctness used to shut everybody up but the British Nationalist.
"Then there was AN 18-YEAR-OLD WHITE BOY FROM MANCHESTER WHO SAID HE WAS LURED AND RAPED AT THE AGE OF 10 BY AN ASIAN SCOUTMASTER AND HIS MUSLIM MATES, WHO WOULD, IN PUBLIC, HYSTERICALLY DENOUNCE HOMOSEXUALITY."
Was this the kind of brutish and hypocritical community that made you, Yasmin?
"The injuries suffered by child victims are not determined by race or religion."
Here we go.
So all the confessions you confess to above are b*llocks then?
"Listen to Miranda, now in her twenties, who was repeatedly raped by a British Asian pimp in Rotherham. She was also abused by her own dad when she was 11: 'Ahmed told me I was making him do it because I was sinful, not a true believer. That he would never do it if I was a Muslim. My dad would cry afterwards. I hate them both, but Ahmed was worse.'
Oh, Ahmed was worse, Miranda.
Him I would boil. Your father, the coward who allowed the foreign pimp to abuse you, I would merely flog and brand.
All of the behaviour cited above was born of officially encouraged sentiments like the one expressed by Yasmin Alibhai-Brown during the 4 June 2006, edition of Dateline London, when Gavin Essler posed this question:
"What's wrong with white guys, by the way?"
To which the immigrant non-racist replied:
"I don't like them. I WANT THEM TO BE THE LOST SPECIES IN 100 YEARS!"
She has never been interviewed by the police for making this genocidal remark.
Much less prosecuted.
On 9 November 2010, EU President, Herman Van Rompuy, said this in Berlin:
"THE TIME OF THE HOMOGENOUS NATION STATE IS OVER...
WE HAVE TOGETHER TO FIGHT THE DANGER OF A NEW EUROSCEPTICISM...
In every member state, there are people who believe their country can survive alone in the globalised world. IT IS MORE THAN AN ILLUSION – IT IS A LIE...
The biggest enemy of Europe today is fear. Fear leads to egoism. Egoism leads to nationalism. Nationalism leads to war...
Today’s nationalism is often not a positive feeling of pride in one’s own identity, but a negative feeling of apprehension of the others...
Just imagine the big recession of 2008/09 with the old currencies. A currency war always ends in protectionism."
On 2 November 2010, Education Secretary, Michael Gove, was quoted thus by The Guardian:
"I DON'T BELIEVE THAT MEMBERSHIP OF THE BNP IS COMPATIBLE WITH BEING A TEACHER. One of the things I plan to do is to allow headteachers and governing bodies the powers and confidence to be able to dismiss teachers engaging in extremist activity.
I cannot see how membership of the British National party can co-exist with SHAPING YOUNG MINDS."
We Want those “young minds” shaped alrighty!
But not by the indigenous Brit who cares overmuch about his own!!!
On 31 October, 2010, David S. Broder said this in The Washington Post:
“Obama can still storm back to win a second term in 2012. He is that much better than the competition.
In what respects is he enduringly superior? Let's start with the basics. He is much smarter than his challengers in either party, better able to read the evidence and come to the right conclusions…
Can Obama harness the forces that might spur new growth? This is the key question for the next two years. What are those forces? Essentially, there are two. One is the power of the business cycle, the tidal force that throughout history has dictated when the economy expands and when it contracts.
What else might affect the economy? The answer is obvious, but its implications are frightening. War and peace influence the economy. Look back at FDR and the Great Depression. WHAT FINALLY RESOLVED THAT ECONOMIC CRISIS? WORLD WAR II.
Here is where Obama is likely to prevail. WITH STRONG REPUBLICAN SUPPORT IN CONGRESS FOR CHALLENGING IRAN'S AMBITION TO BECOME A NUCLEAR POWER, HE CAN SPEND MUCH OF 2011 AND 2012 ORCHESTRATING A SHOWDOWN WITH THE MULLAHS. THIS WILL HELP HIM POLITICALLY BECAUSE THE OPPOSITION PARTY WILL BE URGING HIM ON. AND AS TENSIONS RISE AND WE ACCELERATE PREPARATIONS FOR WAR, THE ECONOMY WILL IMPROVE…
The nation will rally around Obama because IRAN IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO THE WORLD IN THE YOUNG CENTURY. IF HE CAN CONFRONT THIS THREAT AND CONTAIN IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS, HE WILL HAVE MADE THE WORLD SAFER AND MAY BE REGARDED AS ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL PRESIDENTS IN HISTORY.
David Broder, who will never go to war himself, is, of course, Jewish.
On 31 October 2010, episode 15 of Sunday Morning Live featured the Rev Sharon Ferguson, the Chief Executive of the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement and pastor of the Metropolitan Community Church in London.
In this programme she said:
"I believe IT ONLY MAKES COMMON SENSE THAT LESBIANS ARE BETTER PARENTS. We know that children flourish most when they are brought up in a loving and stable environment. And research has shown that it’s mostly the female parent that provides that stability…
IF YOU HAVE TWO WOMEN BRINGING UP IT’S JUST COMMON SENSE THAT YOUR GOING TO GET DOUBLE THE DOSE OF THAT LOVE AND STABILITY THAT IS SO IMPORTANT.
And common sense has been backed up by scientific research… The reseearch has clearly shown that CHILDREN BROUGHT UP BY TWO WOMEN HAVE FEWER BEHAVIOURAL PROBLEMS, FEWER PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS AND THEIR SELF CONFIDENCE AND THEIR SELF-ESTEEM IS MUCH HIGHER…
IT’S UP TO US TO EDUCATE OUR CHILDREN THAT FAMILIES COME IN ALL SHAPES AND SIZES, NOT JUST A MUMMY AND A DADDY, 2.4 children and a Red Setter…
Yes, CHILDREN OF LESBIAN PARENTS ARE LIKELY TO BE TEASED AND BULLIED…
I myself have been a registered foster parent for many years."
On 31 October 2010, The Daily Mail quoted John Glen, the Tory party’s former head of research, who became an MP in 2010, thus:
"I don’t anticipate any early calls to Government. I’M A WHITE, CHRISTIAN, MARRIED BLOKE FROM THE HOME COUNTIES SO I PROBABLY DON’T FIT THE DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THE LEADERSHIP WANTS AT THE MOMENT…
What is important is that you don’t lose your soul along the way. I’d rather be a damn good constituency MP AND BE KNOWN TO SPEAK THE TRUTH than someone who has got on the ladder too soon and is not experienced or able enough to deal with the pressure.
I’VE NOTICED SOME COLLEAGUES OUT TO MAKE A NAME FOR THEMSELVES.”
Good for you, mate.
Let’s hope the “speak the truth” bit isn’t just your average MP bollocks.
On 30 October 2010, The Daily Telegraph, reported Father Tim Codling, the rector of a church in Essex, who was "ignored when he tried to warn church authorities he suspected the majority of weddings in his church to be fake", thus:
"I got the feeling that THEY THOUGHT I WAS BEING AWKWARD AND DIFFICULT... THEY WERE THOROUGHLY DISINTERESTED IN WHAT I WAS SAYING...
IT IS A VIOLATION OF OUR SACRED SPACE…. WE HAVE BEEN LET DOWN BY THE CHURCH."
In October 2010, a video of a Swiss couple’s marriage at the Vilu Reef resort in the Maldives came to light.
The marriage was conducted by a Muslim 'celebrant' in English and Dhivehi. Unbeknown to the couple, that part of the ceremony conducted in the Maldivian language wasn’t quite quite what they thought it was.
Here are some of the things that the celebrant, an 'assistant Food and Beverage Manager' called Hussein Didi, actually said:
“Keep fornicating frequently, and keep spreading hatred among people... YOU ARE SWINE. THE CHILDREN THAT YOU BEAR FROM THIS MARRIAGE WILL ALL BE BASTARD SWINE... marked with spots and blemishes…
Your marriage is not a valid one. YOU ARE NOT THE KIND OF PEOPLE WHO CAN HAVE A VALID MARRIAGE. One of you is an infidel. The other, too, is an infidel – and we have reason to believe – an atheist, who does not even believe in an infidel religion...
You fornicate and make a lot of children. You drink and you eat pork... Fornication has been legalised according to Article six, 1.11 of the Penal Code… That is, frequent fornication by homosexuals… GERMS OF ANGER AND HATRED WILL BREED AND DRIP FROM THE TIPS OF YOUR PENISES… WORMS MAY COME FROM THE TIP OF YOUR PENIS… YOU ARE SWINE ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION… THIEF MOTHERFUCKER…
Before you penetrate a CHICKEN'S ASS, CHECK CAREFULLY FOR RASHES ON THE RECTUM... because the people of the countries that you are from are familiar with the taste of the assholes of chicken.”
At the end of the ceremony the 'celebrant' reverts to English and says:
“So now, in Maldivian law, in Islam, you are already married.”
People clap as the couple, whose marriage vows have just been mocked in some of the filthiest language known to Dhivehi, are videoed making their way to the next part of their ceremony, the planting of a coconut tree to mark the occasion. As the bride bends down, a man is heard is saying:
“I can see her breasts! She is wearing something because my beard has gone grey watching those things… I have seen so many of them now that I don’t even want to look any more when I see them.”
And that’s what they think of us.
How many of the Muslims who, so we are contantly reminded, bring ‘diversity,’ ‘difference’ and ‘enrichment’ to our society, think similarly, do you think? How many of those our politically correct betters insist we must ‘cohere’ with would have thought the marriage ceremony conducted by Hussein Didi was a real hoot?
The politcians and the PC Crowd, along with a good few immigrants, have been taking the p*** out of us, ladies and gentlemen, since the Asian hordes began piling into our country after they began slaughtering each other on the Indian subcontinent in the late 1940s.
Immediately after we Brits left the joint.
On 19 October 2010, The Daily Mail quoted the Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, thus:
“Today OUR PRISONS AND MENTAL HEALTH UNITS ARE DISPROPORTIONATELY FULL OF MEN AND WOMEN FROM MINORITY ETHNIC BACKGROUNDS. OUR YOUNG OFFENDERS’ UNITS ARE FULL OF YOUNG BLACK MEN, MANY OF WHOM UNDER-ACHIEVED AT SCHOOL AND THOUGHT THAT THE ONLY WAY OUT TO EARNING A QUICK BUCK WAS BY COMMITTING CRIME.
Work hard at your education, stay focused and don’t sit around waiting for success to be delivered to you on a plate, because it won’t be. DON’T BLAME SOMEONE ELSE…
Your future success does not lie in GUNS, GANGS AND KNIVES or in the worship of celebrities but in the pursuit of study and hard work and in valuing who you are under God…
WE CANNOT LAY ALL THE BLAME OF AFRICA’S ILLS AT THE FEET OF EUROPE AND THE COLONIAL MASTERS. THE HIGH NUMBER OF AFRICAN NATIONS THAT HAVE REWRITTEN THEIR CONSTITUTIONS IN ORDER TO STAY IN POWER INDEFINITELY IS STAGGERING. THIS CANNOT BE HEALTHY FOR DEMOCRACY NOR FOR THE NATION’S POOR.
Europe may have underdeveloped Africa but I believe WE’VE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY SINCE TO SHAPE OUR FUTURE AND DESTINY AND ARE IN DANGER OF SQUANDERING THESE OPPORTUNITIES.”
On 18 October 2010, The Jerusalem Post quoted Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages and a senior Sephardi adjudicator, thus:
"GOYIM WERE BORN ONLY TO SERVE US. Without that, they HAVE NO PLACE IN THE WORLD – ONLY TO SERVE THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL…
With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? IMAGINE THAT ONE’S DONKEY WOULD DIE, THEY’D LOSE THEIR MONEY. THIS IS HIS SERVANT... THAT’S WHY HE GETS A LONG LIFE, TO WORK WELL FOR THIS JEW…
Why are gentiles needed? THEY WILL WORK, THEY WILL PLOW, THEY WILL REAP. WE WILL SIT LIKE AN EFFENDI AND EAT. THAT IS WHY GENTILES WERE CREATED."
GOYIM WERE BORN ONLY TO SERVE US
And there you have it, ladies and getlemen, straight from the horse's a*se.
I wonder what the PC Crowd will have to say about the lovely, fluffy Rabbi?
During the 17 October 2010 edition of the BBC’s Sunday Morning Live, David Craig, the author of “Squandered” and “Fleeced”, said this:
"I first came into contact with politicians only about two or three years ago when I started writing books about how Britain is managed OR RATHER MISMANAGED. What shocked me, I spent time in Westminster and in Brussels, was THE ARROGANCE, THE GREED, THE SELFISHNESS AND THE CYNICISM OF EVERYBODY I MET. And THE UTTER CONTEMPT THAT THESE PEOPLE HELD THE ORDINARY VOTERS IN, who pay their expenses and their generous salaries.
If I can just give one very brief example. Just before the expenses scandal broke all the politicians and leaders were trooping up on television saying how they were going to be honest and open and transparent but there was a little known bill going through the House of Commons to keep MPS EXPENSES SECRET. OF 646 MPS LESS THAN 20 VOTED AGAINST IT SO OVER 630 WERE IN FAVOUR OF KEEPING THEIR EXPENSES SECRET.
My impression is that WE NO LONGER HAVE CONVICTION POLITICIANS like a Foot a Callaghan or a Thatcher WE HAVE PEOPLE WHO ARE ONLY IN IT FOR THEMSELVES. THERE IS NO PUBLIC SERVICE THERE IS JUST SELF SERVICE NOW."
It's not just me saying it, is it?
On 17 October 2010, the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, said this to a Christian Democrat Union Party gathering in Potsdam, Germany.
“At the beginning of the 60s our country called the foreign workers to come to Germany and now they live in our country. WE KIDDED OURSELVES a while, we said: ‘They won’t stay, sometime they will be gone.’ But THIS ISN’T REALITY…
THE MULTICULTURAL APPROACH… that we are now living side by side and are happy about it’ – DOES NOT WORK... HAS FAILED, UTTERLY FAILED…
We feel bound to the Christian image of humanity, that is what defines us. THOSE WHO DO NOT ACCEPT THIS ARE IN THE WRONG PLACE HERE.”
On 17 October 2010 Stephan Kramer, of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, responded by saying that the immigration debate was making people feel "uneasy and scared".
So let’s not have a debate, eh Stephan?
Let’s squash any old chit chat that makes folks like you feel “uneasy and scared“. Let’s pass another truth-squashing race law just for you, eh?
Those days are gone, Stephan.
Get used to it.
On 13 October 2010, Rupert Murdoch spoke thus at the annual Anti-Defamation League dinner in New York:
“In the United States, I fear that our foreign policy sometimes emboldens… extremists...
Tonight I’d like to speak about two things that worry me most. First is THE DISTURBING NEW HOME THAT ANTI-SEMITISM HAS FOUND IN POLITE SOCIETY – ESPECIALLY IN EUROPE. Second is how violence and extremism are encouraged when the world sees Israel’s greatest ally distancing herself from the Jewish state…
Today it seems that THE MOST VIRULENT STRAINS COME FROM THE LEFT. Often this new anti-Semitism dresses itself up as legitimate disagreement with Israel. Back in 2002 the president of Harvard, Larry Summers, put it this way:
.Where anti-Semitism and views that are profoundly anti-Israeli have traditionally been the primary preserve of poorly educated right-wing populists, PROFOUNDLY ANTI-ISRAEL VIEWS ARE INCREASINGLY FINDING SUPPORT IN PROGRESSIVE INTELLECTUAL COMMUNITIES. SERIOUS AND THOUGHTFUL PEOPLE ARE ADVOCATING AND TAKING ACTIONS THAT ARE ANTI-SEMITIC in their effect if not their intent’…
Far from being dismissed out of hand, ANTI-SEMITISM TODAY ENJOYS SUPPORT AT BOTH THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST REACHES OF EUROPEAN SOCIETY, from its most elite politicians to its largely Muslim ghettoes…
We saw a recent outbreak when A EUROPEAN COMMISSIONER TRADE MINISTER DECLARED THAT PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE OF THE JEWISH LOBBY IN AMERICA… This minister did not suggest the problem was any specific Israeli policy. The problem, as he defined it, is THE NATURE OF THE JEWS…
You don’t have to look far for other danger signs: The Norwegian government forbids a Norwegian-based, German shipbuilder from using its waters to test a submarine being built for the Israeli navy.
Britain and Spain are boycotting an OECD tourism meeting in Jerusalem. In the Netherlands, police report a 50% increase in the number of anti-Semitic incidents.
Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised by these things. According to one infamous European poll a few years back, EUROPEANS LISTED ISRAEL AHEAD OF IRAN AND NORTH KOREA AS THE GREATEST THREAT TO WORLD PEACE.
In Europe today, some of the most egregious attacks on Jewish people, Jewish symbols, and Jewish houses of worship have come from the Muslim population. Unfortunately, far from making clear that such behavior will not be tolerated, too often the official response is what we’ve seen from the Swedish mayor – who suggested JEWS AND ISRAEL WERE PARTLY TO BLAME THEMSELVES.
When Europe’s political leaders do not stand up to the thugs, they lend credence to the idea that ISRAEL IS THE SOURCE OF ALL THE WORLD’S PROBLEMS…
That brings me to my second point: the importance of good relations between Israel and the United States. Some believe that if America wants to gain credibility in the Muslim world and advance the cause of peace, Washington needs to put some distance between itself and Israel. My view is the opposite. Far from making peace more possible, we are making hostilities more certain. Far from making things better for the Palestinian people, SOUR RELATIONS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL GUARANTEES THAT ORDINARY PALESTINIANS WILL CONTINUE TO SUFFER…
I was pleased to hear the State Department’s spokesman clarify America’s position yesterday. He said that the United States recognizes ‘THE SPECIAL NATURE OF THE ISRAELI STATE. IT IS A STATE FOR THE JEWISH PEOPLE’…
The threats Jews face today are different. But these threats are real. These threats are soaked in an ugly language familiar to anyone old enough to remember World War II. And these threats cannot be addressed until we see them for what they are: part of AN ONGOING WAR AGAINST THE JEWS.”
I wonder why the Jews have always been so hated, Rupert?
I wonder even more why so few Jews have ever addressed the notion that it might WHAT THE JEWS DO TO OTHERS that sows the seeds of the “ongoing war" against them.
On 7 October 20010, Ynet.com published an essay by Avi Rath titled, Europe, prepare for flood and subtitled: Open letter to Europeans, who killed Jews and are now contending with radical Islam.
This is it:
“Good evening Europe! Hello to you, dear continent. For a while now I've been meaning to write you a few words, as a close neighbor here in the Middle East who loves traveling through your beautiful landscape, and whose roots lie deep within the continent. You were our home for thousands of years, and especially for the past 1,000 years. We've known good times of neighborly relations as well as economic, cultural and spiritual prosperity. Yet we had also known difficult days of hatred, expulsions, humiliation, and blood libels. Oh, did we ever know such days.
Somehow, we survived; both you and us. To our regret, and shamefully for you, we were not the ones who chose to end our affair with you, dear continent. We could have maintained neighborly relations and cooperation for many more years, yet for reasons of your own you chose to put an end to this partnership, literally.
The plan was formulated on your soil, the camps were built there and the trains traveled there; the graves were dug on your soil, and the blood flowed to your rivers. Within a short period of time, you cut off a significant, 1,000-year Jewish presence. You murdered and expelled millions of loyal Jewish citizens. You eliminated not only them, but also all their contributions to the culture, economy, art, humanities, academics, literature, medicine, education, commerce, banking, and life in general.
I've been meaning to write you for a long time, yet it hasn't worked out. However, this week, after seeing two things, I decided that I must say a few words.
First, I SAW REPORTS DRAFTED BY ALL SORTS OF DEMOGRAPHY AND SOCIOLOGY EXPERTS, WHO CLAIM THAT WITHIN A FEW YEARS, YOU, EUROPE, WILL BE TURNING MUSLIM. In some European states, 50% of all births at this time already are Muslim. If we add this to the low birthrates of non-Muslim European - where you, the white, Christian Europe, shall turn into a Muslim continent.
You are indeed trying to engage in rearguard battles against this phenomenon – against mosques in Switzerland, against burqas in France, against immigration, and against all sorts of other things. Yet you too realize that THIS TRAIN CANNOT BE STOPPED. Nobody will be able to forbid a Muslim woman from putting on a veil. Indeed, THE LIBERAL, ENLIGHTENED, AND SCANTILY-CLAD EUROPEAN WOMEN REALIZE THAT A DAY MAY COME WHERE RADICAL ISLAM GAINS ENOUGH STRENGTH TO END THE PARTY.
The second thing I saw was the travel advisories issued by many states to warn their citizens against heading to Europe for fear of terrorism. Someone already noted (and it wasn't necessarily a Jew) that while not all Muslims are terrorists, for some reason most terrorists are Muslim.
Slowly, our dear continent, you are starting to understand what you're dealing with here. You are starting to understand the kind of religion and culture brought along by radical Islam. Suddenly, you discover hatred and the culture of martyrs, as well as intolerance and isolation, alienation in the face of real democracy, and the shunning of human and women's rights.
Suddenly, RADICAL ISLAM IS STUCK LIKE A BONE IN EUROPE'S THROAT. YOU CANNOT EJECT IT – BECAUSE THAT WOULD IMMEDIATELY RAISE CRIES OF RACISM, HUMAN RIGHTS, and the usual babble – but you cannot swallow it either, because the white, democratic, liberal and Christian European culture cannot contain such radical cultural and religious elements. It will end with a major explosion, in more than one way.
Dear continent, there is no vacuum in the world. YOU EXPELLED AND EXTERMINATED US, AND GOT THE MUSLIM WORLD INSTEAD. AT first it was nice, getting a little Mideastern atmosphere and breeze, yet WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME THE RADICAL ISLAMIC STORM ARRIVED AND NOW THREATENS TO SWEEP YOU AWAY, OUR DEAR NEIGHBOR.
NOW YOU ARE STARTING TO SLEEP IN THE BED YOU MADE. SUDDENLY YOU ARE DISCOVERING WOMEN WEARING VEILS, ZEALOUS EYES, AND MOSQUES AT EVERY CORNER. SUDDENLY YOU NEED TO CONTEND WITH HIGH BIRTHRATES, A CULTURE WITH RADICAL CHARACTERISTICS WHICH YOU CULTIVATED, AND TERRORISM AND VIOLENCE WHICH YOU IGNORED. You cannot deny this for much longer. The confrontation is already here. Unfortunately we are already experts on the issue, even though here too there is no shortage of naïve, self-righteous individuals.
The first time the Creator decided to raze the world as result of our conduct, he agreed to grant humanity another chance. He asked Noah to go into the ark in order to create a new basis for the world and produce a more decent humanity. The ark was the world's chance; a momentary shelter.
So dear Europe, will you be wise enough to prepare ahead of time a physical and cultural Noah's Ark in order to survive and preserve yourself? Or WILL YOUR AGGRESSIVENESS, ARROGANCE, AND HYPOCRISY NOT ALLOW YOU TO ADMIT TO THE DISASTER YOU BROUGHT UPON YOURSELF, turning into a continent living on borrowed time?
Regards, Your Jewish neighbor from the Middle East."
On 6 October 2010, Deputy Headmistress, Katharine Birbalsingh, a former Marxist, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"We need to instil competition amongst the kids and help build their motivation by ensuring they’re not given everything and that they are held to account for what they do.
We have a situation where STANDARDS HAVE BEEN SO DUMBED DOWN THAT EVEN THE CHILDREN KNOW IT. When I give them past exam papers to do from 1998, they groan and beg for a 2005 or 6 paper, because THEY KNOW IT’LL BE EASIER.
Exclusion quotas bind our headteachers, league tables have all of us pursuing targets and grades. INSTEAD OF TEACHING PROPERLY... THE ORDINARY CHILD… IS LOST IN A SEA OF BUREAUCRACY…
Ranking children by ability is viewed as poisonous by teachers which means that PUPILS LIVE IN DARKNESS WITHOUT ANY IDEA OF HOW THEY COMPARE TO THOSE AROUND THEM, let alone to those who are educated in the private sector...
BLACK UNDERACHIEVEMENT is due in part to THE CHAOS OF OUR CLASSROOMS, and in part, to THE ACCUSATION OF RACISM.
IF YOU KEEP TELLING TEACHERS THAT THEY’RE RACIST FOR TRYING TO DISCIPLINE BLACK BOYS, AND IF YOU KEEP TELLING HEADS THAT THEY’RE RACIST FOR TRYING TO EXCLUDE BLACK BOYS, IN THE END, THE SCHOOLS STOP REPRIMANDING THESE CHILDREN.
BLACK CHILDREN UNDERACHIEVE BECAUSE OF WHAT THE WELL-MEANING LIBERAL DOES TO HIM.
I don’t think ordinary parents have any idea about what goes on in their schools. But IT IS TOTALLY AND UTTERLY CHAOTIC. TEACHERS SPEND MOST OF THEIR TIME TELLING CHILDREN TO SIT DOWN OR STOP DISRUPTING THE CLASS RATHER THAN TEACHING…
LEAGUE TABLES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT HOW GOOD A SCHOOL REALLY IS, JUST HOW GOOD THE SCHOOL IS AT PLAYING THE SYSTEM AND PICKING THE EASIER EXAMS…
I’d like to see bad teachers getting fired and heads given the powers to discipline children…
THE UNIONS ARE KEEPING BAD TEACHERS AND BAD SUPPORT STAFF FROM BEING FIRED.”
Well, the Nationalist has been saying this stuff for ever.
And the PC Crowd has been demonising him for just as long. The Marxist deceiver may, however, have a little difficulty in sneering at this Jenny-come-lately to the truth table. Her parents were Caribbean immigrants.
If I was the boss I would bring back the death penalty for treason.
On 1 October 2010, The Daily Mail quoted Liberal Democrat MP, John Hemming, thus:
“ALL PARTIES ARE INVOLVED IN POLITICAL FRAUD BUT THE LABOUR PARTY IS INVOLVED FAR MORE THAN ANY OF THE OTHER PARTIES and the Labour Party tends to benefit from it. IT IS PROBABLY THE EASIEST ELECTION SYSTEM IN THE WORLD TO FIDDLE. IT IS EXTRAORDINARILY BAD. We need to recognise the important of having honest elections.
There has been an obsession with getting more and more votes cast by NOT REALLY BOTHERING ABOUT WHO CASTS THEM. WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR ATTITUDES so that we have integrity in the electoral process.”
I'm not sure when Barbara Lerner Spectre said these the things she says in the video but I discovered it in early October 2010.
That's why it's situated here.
Barbara Lerner Spectre set up Paideia, an institute of Jewish learning in Stockholm, ten years ago. The Jewish-American founding director of Paideia has this to say in the video:
"I think there’s a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time EUROPE HAS NOT YET LEARNED HOW TO BE MULTICULTURAL. And I think WE ARE GOING TO BE PART OF THE THROES OF THAT TRANSFORMATION which MUST take place. EUROPE IS NOT going to be the monolithic societies (sic) they once were in the last century. JEWS ARE GOING TO BE AT THE CENTRE OF THAT.
It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. THEY ARE NOW GOING INTO A MULTICULTURAL MODE AND JEWS WILL BE RESENTED BECAUSE OF OUR LEADING ROLE BUT WITHOUT THAT LEADING ROLE AND WITHOUT THAT TRANSFORMATION, EUROPE WILL NOT SURVIVE."
Without the Jews Europe Will Not Survive!
So, a ring-through-their-noses-and-prod-the-swine-in-the-right-direction-person tells us that “we have not yet learned to be multicultural”. (Naughty)
And that “a transformation MUST (her emphasis) take place” with the Jew at the helm. (You are already at the “centre” of it Babs and have been from the beginning)
And, if this “transformation” doesn’t take place, with Jews playing the “leading role” in it, “Europe will not survive”!
Strong stuff, Babs.
If we don’t allow you to dictate our “multicultural future”, will the concerned Jew see to it that we don’t “survive“, I wonder? You know, out of spite? Or, if enough of us drugged-up, dumbed-down, decadent, degenerate and brainwashed Europeans wise up in time and boot you out of our affairs, will you stand back and applaud if we manage to get our act together?
You being so concerned for our welfare and all that?
The Jew has been after "transforming" us Gentile folk for a very long time now.
In his 1924 book, How Odd of God, Rabbi Lewis Browne put it like this:
"We must redeem the Jews and REMAKE THE GENTILES. That is WHAT THE COMMUNISTS ARE TRYING TO DO IN RUSSIA AND, BECAUSE OF THEIR DETERMINATION AND MONSTROUS ENERGY, THEY MAY ACTUALLY EFFECT IT."
In this context, the learned Rabbi will certainly have been aware that his Jewish readership will have interpreted the euphemism “communists” as “Jewish communists”.
When Lenin died in the same year that How Odd of God was published, of the top five Soviet leaders, if you count Lev Kamenev, whose father was Jewish, as one of the chosen, the Georgian Asiatic, Joseph Stalin, was the only non-Jew.
On 30 September 2010, The New Statesman quoted Baroness Sayeeda Hussain Warsi, Chairman of the Conservative Party and Minister without Portfolio in David Cameron's cabinet, thus:
"There were at least three seats where we lost, where we didn't gain the seat, BASED ON ELECTORAL FRAUD… IT IS PREDOMINANTLY WITHIN THE ASIAN COMMUNITY… Was there something over and above that we could have done? Well, actually not, if there is going to be voter fraud."
Warsi is the first Muslim female to serve in the Cabinet.
On 28 September 2010, Hugh Muir said this in The Guardian:
You spot them pretty quickly, my friend Jerome Mack tells me. Put 15 people in a room and the chances are that there will be two of them. Thirteen will make the effort. The other two will be BIGOTS and proud of it.
There are many derided jobs and Jerome does one of them. Try this for size. 'Hi, I'm an equalities trainer'... Despite what you read about BUSYBODIES INTERFERING WITH NORMAL HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS AND CURTAILING FREEDOM OF SPEECH, how everything would be all right IF ONLY THE MALCONTENTS WOULD STOP CREATING THE PROBLEMS, Jerome says what he does is pretty necessary. 'WE WORK FOR PRIVATE COMPANIES, THE NHS, THE POLICE. WE HAVE WORKED FOR THE ARMY'...
We all think WE'RE BASICALLY GOOD, EVEN THOSE WHO PALPABLY AREN'T. And WE ARE ALL CREATURES OF OUR CONDITIONING...
Jerome and his team might conduct TRAINING FOR 10,000 PEOPLE A YEAR, but these are the ones who get angry. Depending on what newspapers are saying, all sorts of things make them angry. Right now TRAVELLERS, GAY PEOPLE AND EASTERN EUROPEANS sit top of the list.
But there's an UPSIDE, and it is THE OTHER 13, because there was a time when in that room, the BIGOTRY of the two would be infectious. No one would stop them, quite a few would join in. 'THINGS HAVE CHANGED,' Jerome tells me. 'They challenge the BIGOTRY now, they SHAKE THEIR HEADS, obviously DISAPPROVING. The 13 HAVE BEEN EMPOWERED, the TWO DISEMPOWERED... IT'S A WORK IN PROGRESS. THE 13, THEY'RE GREAT. But THE TWO ARE ALWAYS A MENACE. And THEY NEVER QUITE GO AWAY."
"They never quite go away".
And we never will, Hugh.
You have my word on that.
Hugh Muir and Jerome Mack are black.
On 23 September 2010, The Daily Mail told us that Munira Mirza, a senior advisor to Boris Johnson, had said that teachers were being made to spy on nursery age youngsters by the Race Relations Act 2000.
“TEACHERS ARE NOW REQUIRED TO REPORT INCIDENTS OF RACIST ABUSE AMONG CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS THREE to local authorities, resulting in a massive increase of cases and REINFORCING THE PERCEPTION THAT WE NEED AN ARMY OF EXPERTS TO MANAGE RACE RELATIONS FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE.
Does this heightened awareness of racism help to stamp it out? QUITE THE OPPOSITE. IT CREATES A CLIMATE OF SUSPICION AND ANXIETY.”
“A climate of suspicion and anxiety”, is just what the PC Crowd always wanted, Munira.
Writing in Prospect Magazine, Ms Mirza also said this:
“The Act COMPELLED 43,000 public authorities, including schools and churches, ‘to promote good relations between persons of different racial groups…
Teachers are allowed to report racism EVEN IF THE ALLEGED ‘VICTIM’ WAS NOT OFFENDED OR IF THE CHILD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY WERE SAYING.
Freedom of Information replies obtained by civil liberties group the Manifesto Club show that BETWEEN 2002 AND 2009, 280,000 INCIDENTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED.”
That WAS New Labour.
Let's hope that particularly virulent brand of Brit-bashing political correctness is dead. As Ed Miliband said after winning the Labour leadership election:
"The era of New Labour has passed".
Of course, politicians do tend to SAY one thing and DO another. And ED, they say, is very RED.
As was his dad.
And he did write New Labour's 2010 election Manifesto. And he was up Gordon Brown's bot from way back.
So it's probably all balls.
On 23 September 2010, The Daily Telegraph quoted Tony Sewell, a former teacher at Reading University and the Director of the charity, Generating Genius, thus:
"WHAT WE NOW SEE IN SCHOOLS IS CHILDREN UNDERMINED BY POOR PARENTING, PEER-GROUP PRESSURE AND AN INABILITY TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN BEHAVIOUR. "THEY ARE NOT SUBJECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM. THEY HAVE FAILED THEIR GCSES BECAUSE THEY DID NOT DO THE HOMEWORK, DID NOT PAY ATTENTION AND WERE DISRESPECTFUL TO THEIR TEACHERS…
WHY CAN’T BLACK BOYS BE INSPIRED BY ANYONE AROUND THEM WHO IS POSITIVE, INCLUDING WHITE TEACHERS? YOUNG BLACK BOYS ARE CONSTANTLY ON EDGE, FEELING THAT THE WORLD IS AGAINST THEM BUT UNABLE TO FIND THE REAL SOURCE OF THEIR TROUBLE.
WE HAVE A GENERATION WHO HAVE ALL THE LANGUAGE AND DISCOURSE OF THE RACE RELATIONS INDUSTRY BUT NO DEVIL TO FIGHT."
Tony Sewell is black.
On 18 September 2010, the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel was quoted thus by The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
"OUR COUNTRY IS GOING TO CARRY ON CHANGING… INTEGRATION IS ALSO A TASK FOR THE SOCIETY…
For years we've been deceiving ourselves about this. MOSQUES, for example, ARE GOING TO BE A MORE PROMINENT PART OF OUR CITIES THAN THEY WERE BEFORE.”
Merkel is an East German.
From the Commie side of town.
On 16 September Gary Nicks, Political Editor of The Star, told us this:
“Diane Abbott was reported to police yesterday for allegedly inciting racial hatred. SHE SUGGESTED BLACK WORKERS SHOULD ESCAPE GOVERNMENT JOB CUTS.
The politician sparked a furious backlash by CALLING FOR WHITE MALES TO BE AXED FIRST when sweeping public sector savings are announced next month. MPs accused her of POLITICALLY CORRECT MADNESS and an official complaint was lodged with the police.
The Daily Star was swamped with angry calls from readers who blitzed our voteline. We asked ‘Is Diane Abbott racist?’ and A MASSIVE 98% OF YOU SAID YES… The English Democrats contacted the police and promised to lodge complaints with the Equality and Human Rights Commission and with Ms Abbott, who was Britain’s first black female MP…
Cheshire Constabulary, where the complaint was lodged, said IT WOULD NOT BE PURSUING THE CASE.”
On 9 September 2010, Tom Watson, Labour MP for West Bromwich East, said this in the House of Commons:
“Anyone can have their phone tapped by the newspapers, and they do… SOMETHING VERY DARK Lurks in the evidence files of the Mulcaire case, and DARK AND MYSTERIOUS FORCES ARE KEEPING IT THAT WAY…
If Members want justification for supporting the motion, they need look no further than Rupert Murdoch’s Rebekah Brooks… In this House we are all, in our own way, scared of the Rebekah Brookses of this world…. It is almost laughable that we sit here in Parliament, the central institution of our sacred democracy, among us are some of the most powerful people in the land, yet WE ARE SCARED OF THE POWER THAT REBEKAH BROOKS WIELDS WITHOUT A JOT OF RESPONSIBILITY OR ACCOUNTABILITY.
THE BARONS OF THE MEDIA with their red-topped assassins, ARE THE BIGGEST BEASTS IN THE MODERN JUNGLE. THEY HAVE NO PREDATORS, THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE, THEY LAUGH AT THE LAW, THEY SNEER AT PARLIAMENT, THEY HAVE THE POWER TO HURT US AND THEY DO WITH GUSTO AND PRECISION, WITH JOY AND CRIMINALITY. PRIME MINISTERS QUAIL BEFORE THEM, and that is how they like it. That, indeed, has become how they insist upon it, and WE ARE POWERLESS IN THE FACE OF THEM. WE ARE AFRAID...
That is the tawdry secret that dare not speak its name. THE MOST POWERFUL PEOPLE IN THE LAND, PRIME MINISTERS, MINISTERS, AND MPS OF EVERY PARTY, ARE GUILTY IN THEIR OWN WAY OF PERPETUATING A MEDIA CULTURE THAT ALLOWS THE CHARACTER OF THE DECENT TO BE TRADUCED OUT OF CASUAL MALICE, FOR MONEY, FOR SPITE, FOR SPORT OR FOR ANY REASON THAT THE MEDIA LIKE…
I sense that we are at the beginning of the endgame. Things will get better because, in many senses, they cannot get worse. The little guys, the reporters on the ground who joined a newspaper to seek the truth, have ended up working in a living hell. If we want to, we in this House have the power to change that. We can make a start by getting to the bottom of the phone hacking scandal. WHATEVER LIES IN THOSE MULCAIRE FILES IS KEY."
On 9 September 2010, Chris Bryant, Labour MP for Rhondda, said this in the House of Commons:
“The vast majority of those who had their phones hacked were not MPs… Royal princes, footballers, actors and, in many cases, ordinary members of the public had their phone messages intercepted and interfered with… Illegal hacking, suborning police officers and obtaining information by illegal means do not enhance our democracy. In fact, THEY UNDERMINE IT…
THERE ARE THOSE WHO WOULD WANT TO PLAY THIS DOWN. People have said to me, ‘After all, what’s the fuss about a few phone messages?’… I am sorry to say that IN VERY FEW, IF ANY, OF THOSE CASES HAVE THE POLICE PURSUED ANY LINES OF INVESTIGATION... THE PCC HAS DONE NOTHING, AND HARDLY ANYONE ELSE HAS DONE ANYTHING…
I suspect that, so far, we have seen only the tip of the iceberg in relation to right hon. and hon. Members... Assistant Commissioner Yates made it clear the other day, in evidence to another Select Committee, that HE HAS NOT BEEN NOTIFYING MEMBERS…
If somebody went to the police and alleged that somebody was stalking them, and the police visited the stalker’s house and found not only photographs of, and personal details about, the person who made the allegation, but photographs of another 20 people, I presume and hope that the police would go to those other 20 people and inform them that their personal situation had been compromised... THE POLICE SHOULD HAVE ENGAGED IN PRECISELY THE SAME DUTY OF CARE TOWARDS NOT JUST RIGHT HON. AND HON. MEMBERS, BUT ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO HAD BEEN THE SUBJECT OF MR MULCAIRE’S ATTENTION…
Two former members of staff at the News of the World have said that the HACKING WAS FAR MORE EXTENSIVE THAN SO FAR REVEALED. Indeed, today, Paul McMullan, a former features executive and member of the News of the World’s investigations team, has said that HE PERSONALLY COMMISSIONED SEVERAL HUNDRED ILLEGAL ACTS, AND THAT THE USE OF ILLEGAL TECHNIQUES AT THE NEWSPAPER WAS ABSOLUTELY NO SECRET.”
On 3 September 2010, the EU trade commissioner and former Belgian Foreign Minister , Karel de Gucht, suggested that the latest Middle East peace talks were doomed because of the power of the Jewish lobby in Washington.
He said this in a Belgian radio interview:
“Don't underestimate the opinion… of the average Jew outside Israel. There is indeed a belief, it's difficult to describe it otherwise, among most Jews that THEY ARE RIGHT. And a belief is something that's difficult to counter with rational arguments. And it's not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that THEY ARE RIGHT. So IT IS NOT EASY TO HAVE, EVEN WITH MODERATE JEWS, A RATIONAL DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE EAST…
Do not underestimate the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill. That is the best organised lobby in the States, YOU SHOULDN'T UNDERESTIMATE THE GRIP IT HAS ON AMERICAN POLITICS, NO MATTER WHETHER IT'S REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS."
In response to the above, Moshe Kantor, the head of the European Jewish Congress, said this:
"This is part of a dangerous trend of INCITEMENT AGAINST JEWS and Israel in Europe THAT NEEDS TO BE STAMPED OUT IMMEDIATELY. What sort of environment allows such remarks to be made openly by a senior politician? Once again we hear OUTRAGEOUS ANTISEMITISM from a senior European official. THE LIBEL OF JEWISH POWER IS APPARENTLY ACCEPTABLE AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE EU."
You’re actually trying to tell us that “Jewish power” is a myth? Well, if it’s a myth I guess your ‘stamp it out’ outburst will have no effect whatsoever upon Mr de Gucht.
De Gucht was soon apologising profusely for telling how it is. To whit:
“I did not mean in any possible way to cause offense or stigmatize the Jewish Community… Anti-Semitism has no place in today's world."
In Tony Blair's memoir, 'A Journey,' released on 1 September 2011, he wrote:
"When I addressed the TUC they were polite, but not much more than that. We both knew what we thought of each other... They couldn't understand why I was doing what I was doing; and I COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY COULDN'T SEE IT WAS THE WAY OF THE FUTURE."
"The way of the future."
Thus spake a t**rag.
On 29 August 2010, Thilo Sarrazin, author of the book, 'Germany does away with itself’, and a member of the six-man board of Germany's Bundesbank, was quoted thus by The Daily Telegraph:
“All Jews share the same gene… Jews share a particular gene, Basques share particular genes, that differentiate them from others… The cultural peculiarities of the people is no myth, but determines the reality of Europe.
I DON’T WANT THE COUNTRY OF MY GRANDCHILDREN AND FOREFATHERS TO BE IN BROAD SWATHES MUSLIM, WHERE TURKISH AND ARABIC IS WIDELY SPOKEN, WHERE WOMEN WEAR HEADSCARVES AND WHERE THE DAILY RHYTHM OF LIFE IS SET BY THE CALL OF THE MUEZZINS. If I want to experience that, I can just take a vacation in the Orient.”
He was quoted thus by The Daily Express:
"MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS DON'T INTEGRATE AS WELL AS OTHER IMMIGRANT GROUPS across Europe. The reasons for this are apparently not based on their ethnicity, but are ROOTED IN THE CULTURE OF ISLAM".
In October 2009, Mr Sarrazin said that Turks were, “CONQUERING GERMANY in exactly the same way the Kosovars conquered Kosovo: WITH A HIGHER BIRTH RATE.”
On 8 August 2010, Peter Hitchens sais this in The Daily Mail:
"Bradley Wernham, now 19... has been thieving since he was 12 years old, targeting everything from churches to expensive cars. The grief, anger and distress of his victims – about which our Criminal Injustice System cares nothing – can barely be imagined... But IN THIS MAD NATION – UNDER RULES WHICH THE CURRENT GOVERNMENT HAS NO PLANS TO CHANGE – A DELUDED JUDGE GAVE THIS CREATURE A ‘LAST CHANCE’ AFTER HUNDREDS OF ROBBERIES.
Three months ago, IN DEFIANCE OF ALL COMMON SENSE, JUDGE CHRISTOPHER BALL ARRANGED FOR WERNHAM AND HIS GIRLFRIEND TO LIVE RENT-FREE AT YOUR EXPENSE, IN A TOWN WHERE HE WAS UNTIL THEN UNKNOWN, WHILE HE SUPPOSEDLY DID ‘COMMUNITY SERVICE’. To the surprise of nobody except that judge, Wernham learned the only lesson possible from this treatment – that THE POLICE AND THE COURTS ARE PATHETIC AND FEEBLE AND CAN SAFELY BE LAUGHED AT. SO HE CARRIED ON COMMITTING HIS CRIMES.
Mr Injustice Ball has now sentenced Wernham to what is officially called ‘five years’ in prison, but which will, in fact, add up to 18 months...
NO WONDER THE THIEF SMIRKED AS HE WAS TOLD HIS FATE. DURING HIS IMPRISONMENT, WERNHAM CAN RELAX, PLAY POOL AND WATCH TV AMONG PEOPLE JUST LIKE HIMSELF. IF HE WANTS TO, HE WILL ALSO BE ABLE TO TAKE ILLEGAL DRUGS, WHICH OUR PRISON REGIME TACITLY PERMIT IN THE HOPE OF KEEPING THE CONVICTS QUIET.
Maybe if he had been sternly dealt with at the age of 12, Wernham might have been turned into a good and useful person. BUT STRICTNESS AND SEVERITY HAVE BEEN MADE ILLEGAL, SO THAT CHANCE WAS LOST. Now, all the rest of us can hope for is that he eventually grows too old and unhealthy to be a menace and contents himself with being A PARASITE ON THE WELFARE SYSTEM.”
On 7 August 2010, Sue Reid told us this in The Daily Mail:
“MANY SCHOOLGIRLS - SOME AGED JUST EIGHT - ALL OVER THE NORTH OF ENGLAND ARE FALLING PREY TO GANGS WHO GROOM THEM TO BE LUCRATIVE SEX SLAVES. It is an organised crime which police say reaps four times more money for these gangs than dealing in drugs.
This week, a privately educated schoolgirl forced into sex slavery at 14 gave evidence in court against nine men, who were jailed for her ‘sustained sexual abuse’ over many months. She was picked up in 2008 by ASAD HASSAN, 27, while walking through Rochdale… He took her to a nightclub and gave her vodka before his friends, MOHAMMED BASHARAT, 27, AND MOHAMMED ATIF, 28, drove her to a private house and ALL THREE HAD SEX WITH HER. The daughter of a professional couple, SHE WAS THEN PASSED AROUND FROM MAN TO MAN, as Superintendent Paul Savill, of Greater Manchester Police explained after the case.
‘THE LEVEL OF ABUSE WAS BEYOND BELIEF. SHE WAS A COMMODITY, BEATEN, THREATENED AND SEXUALLY EXPLOITED.’
As with Emma, the experience of this girl has a very uncomfortable RACIAL ELEMENT to it, WHICH IS OFTEN NOT SPOKEN ABOUT. In both cases, THEY WERE WHITE GIRLS AND THE GANG MEMBERS WERE ASIAN. Emma says:
‘MOST OF THE MEN RUNNING THE SEX SLAVE GANGS IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND ARE ASIANS OF PAKISTANI ORIGIN. BUT VERY FEW OF THE AUTHORITIES WILL ADMIT THIS.’
Is she right to say so? If she is, WHY ARE SO FEW PEOPLE IN OFFICIALDOM WILLING TO DISCUSS THE ISSUE?
ONE CHARITY — RISKY BUSINESS, OPERATING IN ROTHERHAM — REFUSED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THE RACIAL MAKE-UP OF THE GANGS, although, with the help of Emma herself, IT COUNSELS SCORES OF WHITE GIRLS WHO HAVE BEEN SEXUALLY EXPLOITED BY ASIANS.
At another charity, Coalition for the Removal of Pimping, based in Leeds, the CHIEF EXECUTIVE GILLIAN GIBBONS SAID:
‘THIS IS A CRIME COMMITTED BY MEN. We are trying to work IN THEIR COMMUNITIES to change their attitudes to women. I CANNOT COMMENT ON THE RACE OF THE CRIMINALS INVOLVED'...
THE MOTHERS SAY THAT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND A FEAR OF BEING BRANDED RACIST IS AT THE HEART OF THE TABOO. One mother from Yorkshire, WHOSE 13-YEAR-OLD GIRL WAS LURED INTO SEX SLAVERY, told me:
‘ALMOST EVERY MAN FOUND GUILTY OF GROOMING UNDER-AGE GIRLS IN THIS PART OF BRITAIN IS ASIAN, AND EVERYONE KNOWS THAT.’
Seven years ago, (Ann Cryer, MP) said:
‘IT’S A FACT THAT ALL THE VICTIMS OF THESE TERRIBLE CRIMES ARE WHITE GIRLS, AND ALL THE ALLEGED PERPETRATORS ARE ASIAN MEN’… There is also a problem with THE VIEW ASIAN MEN HAVE ABOUT WHITE GIRLS. IT IS GENERALLY FAIRLY LOW’.”
On 6 August 2010, The Pink Paper quoted the UK's leading gay activist, Peter Tatchell, thus:
"Our 2012 bid promoted London as a MULTICULTURAL city that celebrates EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY…
Profiling and celebrating the many communities that make London such a wonderful, vibrant city would make the 2012 Olympics truly unique and special.
NO OTHER OLYMPIC HOST CITY HAS MADE CULTURAL DIVERSITY A FOCUS OF ITS GAMES...
RACISM, MISOGYNY, HOMOPHOBIA AND ANTI-JEWISH AND ANTI-MUSLIM PREJUDICE contradict the Olympic values of non-discrimination and fair play...
It is not enough to have BLACK, FEMALE AND GAY staff and volunteers, or to include them in the Olympic ceremonials. London's DIVERSE communities should be an identifiable, visible highlight of the Opening and Closing Ceremonies.
This CULTURAL DIVERSITY should be a key selling point of the 2012 Olympics: LONDON AS A WORLD CITY THAT WELCOMES AND EMBRACES PEOPLE FROM ALL CULTURES.
I want THE CELEBRATION OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION to be a centrepiece feature of the 2012 games, so that LONDON CAN PROJECT THE DREAM OF A FUTURE WORLD WHERE PEOPLE FROM ALL CULTURES CAN LIVE, WORK AND LOVE TOGETHER."
"The dream of a future world where people from all cultures can live, work and love together," muses the gay, Australian immigrant.
Living and loving together in order to breed "coffee coloured people by the score", presumably.
And blotting out the white folk forever.
No indeed, the "racism, misogyny, homophobia and anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim prejudice" of the nasty. white indigenous majority will not be allowed to stand if all the Peter pederasts have anything to do with it.
Pederast: "A man who has sexual relations, especially anal intercourse, with a boy".
As far as I'm aware, Mr Tatchell has never had "anal intercourse with a boy".
However, he proudly boasts that Outrage!, the campaigning organisation which he heads, was responsible for launching "a new campaign TO REDUCE THE AGE OF CONSENT TO FOURTEEN... FOURTEEN IS MORE REALISTIC THAN SIXTEEN AND MUCH FAIRER".
And when, in New Labour’s first term, the government saw to it that the legal age of "consent" regarding homosexual sex was lowered to sixteen, Tatchell was, actually, on the books as a legal advisor.
On the 27th of June, 1998, he was quoted thus in The Guardian:
"Several of my friends... had sex with adults FROM THE AGES OF NINE TO NINETEEN... It is time society acknowledged THE TRUTH THAT NOT ALL SEX INVOLVING CHILDREN IS UNWANTED, ABUSIVE AND HARMFUL".
On 4 August 2010, The Metro newspaper advised us thus:
"MEN WITH THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF BISPHENOL A (BPA) IN THEIR BODIES HAD SPERM COUNTS WHICH WERE 23 PER CENT LOWER ON AVERAGE THAN MEN WITH THE LEAST EXPOSURE, a study showed. There was also A TEN PER CENT INCREASE IN THEIR SPERM DNA DAMAGE.
BPA IS USED TO HARDEN PLASTICS AND IS FOUND IN THE LININGS OF FOOD AND DRINK CANS, REUSABLE WATER BOTTLES, CD CASES, PLASTIC CUTLERY AND BABY BOTTLES.
DESPITE BEING BANNED IN CANADA, THREE US STATES AND DENMARK, BRITISH AUTHORITIES INSIST THE CONTROVERSIAL COMPOUND IS SAFE.
DAMAGED SPERM ARE MORE LIKELY TO LEAD TO INFERTILITY AND A GREATER LIKELIHOOD OF MISCARRIED FOETUSES AND EVEN BIRTH DEFECTS.
BPA WAS FOUND IN 90 PER CENT OF URINE SAMPLES given by 190 men recruited at a fertility clinic for the Harvard University study.”
On 30 July 2010, Frederick Forsyth complained thus in The Daily Express:
"CONSERVATIVE VOTERS WERE GIVEN A FLAT PLEDGE THE TORIES WOULD FINALLY CLAMP DOWN ON NO-CAP IMMIGRATION AND END THE INCOMING TIDE OF FOREIGNERS, both EU and non-EU. THIS CANNOT NOW HAPPEN because Lib Dem pompous ass Vince Cable doesn’t like it.
The same voters were told A CHAINSAW WOULD BE TAKEN TO THE JUNGLE OF POINTLESS QUANGOS AND OVER-PAID LABOUR LUVVIES WHO HEAD AND STAFF THEM. Well, quango queen Dame Suzi Leather, as useless a supercargo as one will come across in a long day’s march, still holds sway at THE CHARITIES COMMISSION, NOW TURNED INTO A WEAPON OF LEFT-WING BIGOTRY. And Labour stalwart Jeff Rooker cannot be moved from the Food Standards Agency, doubling up on health and safety.
A third promise was to take a scythe to the vast army of Labour-recruited petty bureaucrats, the useless jobsworths and their mandarin bosses who either use their position to harass and persecute the law-abiding harmless or do nothing at all... But MINISTER-IN-CHARGE FRANCIS MAUDE, TELLS US THEY CANNOT BE EASED OUT BECAUSE THEIR SEVERANCES ARE SO LAVISH WE CANNOT AFFORD TO FIRE THEM. SO THESE HALF-MILLION UNNECESSARY PARASITES WADDLE ON, LEECHES UPON THE BUTTOCK OF OUR GROANING ECONOMY.
We were also promised (cast-iron was the word) that NOT ONLY WOULD THERE BE NO MORE TRANSFERS OF POWER TO BRUSSELS BUT CERTAIN CRUCIAL SOVEREIGN POWERS WOULD BE REPATRIATED... HOME SECRETARY THERESA MAY HAS JUST CAPITULATED TO A DEMAND FROM BRUSSELS THAT IN FUTURE ANY EU POLICE FORCE CAN DEMAND, AS OF RIGHT AND WITHOUT A PRIMA FACIE CASE, ALL THE PERSONAL DETAILS IT WANTS TO KNOW ABOUT ANY BRITISH CITIZEN."
On 27 July 2010, at a press conference in the Turkish Parliament, David Cameron said that a European Union without Turkey at its heart was "not stronger but weaker... not more secure but less... not richer but poorer".
"THINGS CAN CHANGE… IT MAKES ME ANGRY THAT YOUR PROGRESS TOWARDS EU MEMBERSHIP CAN BE FRUSTRATED IN THE WAY IT HAS BEEN…
I'M HERE TO MAKE THE CASE FOR TURKEY'S MEMBERSHIP OF THE EU. AND TO FIGHT FOR IT… This is something I feel very passionately about… Together, I WANT US TO PAVE THE ROAD FROM ANKARA TO BRUSSELS…
Europe is defined not by religion, but by values. The EU IS A SECULAR ORGANIZATION. And EUROPE WELCOMES PEOPLE OF ALL FAITHS, OR NONE…
My view is clear. I BELIEVE IT IS JUST WRONG TO SAY THAT TURKEY CAN… NOT BE ALLOWED TO SIT IN THE TENT. SO I WILL REMAIN YOUR STRONGEST POSSIBLE ADVOCATE FOR EU MEMBERSHIP AND GREATER INFLUENCE AT THE TOP TABLE OF EUROPEAN DIPLOMACY…
THE PREJUDICED - those who wilfully misunderstand Islam, they see no difference between real Islam and the distorted version of the extremists. They think the problem is Islam itself. And they think the values of Islam can just never be compatible with the values of other religions, societies or cultures. ALL OF THESE ARGUMENTS ARE JUST PLAIN WRONG. And as a new government in Britain, I WANT US TO BE AT THE FOREFRONT OF AN INTERNATIONAL EFFORT TO DEFEAT THEM…
PEOPLE MUST FLOW IN BOTH DIRECTIONS."
So, David Cameron, just like New Labour leadership favourite, David Miliband*, wants the Turks in the EU. And, once the Turks are in, millions of them will be on the first Easyjet over to Slough, you can be sure of that.
And woe betide those “prejudiced” Brits who “wilfully misunderstand” the Turkish hordes when they move in next door, after having had the “road from Ankara to Brussels” paved for them by the “top table“. They’d be “just plain wrong”, you see. And our Dave would be “at the forefront of the international (globalist) effort to defeat them“.
“Them” being us, of course.
That’s who the Daves Cameron and Miliband want defeated.
Us. Those who voted for them in May 2010.
“Defeat” is what is what you voted for back then, isn’t it?
One of David Cameron’s great granddads was a Jewish immigrant.
David Miliband is the son of Jewish immigrants. His father, Ralph Miliband, was an unreconstructed Marxist. As were Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot et al.
The oh-so “secular” types, Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky, were also Jewish.
* As long ago as September 2007, David Miliband was saying this in The Daily Telegraph:
“AN OUTWARD-LOOKING EU NEEDS, AS A CLEAR GOAL, THE INCLUSION OF TURKEY AS A FULL AND EQUAL MEMBER”. Miliband Quote
On 26 July 2010, Israeli President, Shimon Peres, said this in an interview with Benny Morris for Tablet Magazine:
"OUR NEXT BIG PROBLEM IS ENGLAND.... In England there has always been something deeply pro-Arab… and anti-Israeli in the establishment.
They abstained in the 1947 U.N. Partition Resolution, despite the Balfour Declaration. They maintained an arms embargo against us; they had a defense treaty with Jordan. They always worked against us...
THERE IS ALSO ANTI-SEMITISM. THERE IS IN ENGLAND A SAYING THAT AN ANTI-SEMITE IS
SOMEONE WHO HATES THE JEWS MORE THAN IS NECESSARY."
Peres can say this on the back of the fact that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were the most pro-Judaic Prime Ministers in British history.
David Cameron, whose great-grandfather was Jewish, has, since he became Tory leader made numerous pro-Isaeli comments and both the front-runners for the leadership of New Labour, David and Ed Miliband, are Jewish.
It would seem that, of you aren't 100 per cent FOR the Jews, they perceive you as being AGAINST them.
Which bogey phrase was concocted in the 1860s by an Austrian gentleman by the name of Moritz Steinschneider.
He was Jewish.
In the 26 July 2010 edition of The Daily Express, Leo McKinstry said this:
"WE ARE NOW RULED BY A GOVERNMENT THAT IS EVEN SOFTER ON CRIME THAN LABOUR WAS...
All evidence shows that THE HEAVIER THE SENTENCE, THE LOWER THE LIKELIHOOD OF RE-OFFENDING ON RELEASE. Only 6.5 per cent of those who serve 10 years or more are convicted of another crime, compared to nearly 70 per cent of those receiving ‘community’ sentences...
Tory-Liberal Democrat Ministers seem to have forgotten that ONE OF THEIR FIRST DUTIES IS TO PROTECT BRITISH SOCIETY. Instead THEY HAVE SWALLOWED WHOLESALE THE FASHIONABLE, LEFT-WING IDEOLOGY OF THE ANTI-PUNISHMENT BRIGADE, WHICH, IN THE NAME OF SUPPOSED COMPASSION, WANTS TO ALLOW CRIMINALS TO ROAM FREE...
THIS NEW DOGMA IS THE UTTER NEGATION OF JUSTICE. IT REPRESENTS THE FINAL SURRENDER TO CRIMINALITY, REFLECTING ALL THE WORST FEATURES OF THE MENTALITY OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WHICH HAS SUCH A VICE-LIKE GRIP ON THE RULING CLASS... EXPLANATION FOR AN OFFENDER’S ACTIONS CAN QUICKLY DESCEND INTO JUSTIFICATION.
Similarly, we can see the malign influence of THE FREUDIAN PSYCHOANALYTIC DOCTRINE, where every problem can be resolved simply by talking about it. In effect, JUSTICE IS BEING REPLACED BY FORM OF LONGWINDED THERAPY...
ACROSS THE PROBATION SERVICES, THE COURTS AND THE POLICE, TRADITIONAL MASCULINE AUTHORITY HAS GIVEN WAY TO A HAND-WRINGING ABHORRENCE OF PUNISHMENT... We are constantly told, for instance, that drug rehabilitation schemes are the way to deal with addicted criminals, yet SUCH PROGRAMMES ARE HOPELESSLY INEFFECTUAL. IN ANY GIVEN YEAR, OUT OF MORE THAN 200,000 ATTENDING, JUST 3.7 PER CENT OF USERS EMERGE DRUG FREE... It is just another piece of morally bankrupt nonsense designed to keep criminals out of the place where THEY REALLY BELONG: BEHIND BARS."
Sigmund Freud was Jewish.
In the 26 July 2010 edition of The Daily Express, John Midgley, founder of the Campaign Against Political Correctness, expressed his anger that the campaign group, LIBERTY, had had sent the MP, Philip Hollobone, a letter warning him that he was breaching anti-discrimination laws.
This because Mr Hollobone had insisted that Muslim females entering his surgery wearing Burkhas or veils must show their faces.
This is how John put it:
"IT’S A DIABOLICAL LIBERTY THAT AN ORGANISATION SUCH AS LIBERTY IS USING A POLITICALLY CORRECT PIECE OF LEGISLATION TO PREVENT DEBATE ON A LEGITIMATE AREA OF CONCERN. Isn’t it amazing THIS ORGANISATION SHOULD WANT TO UNDERMINE FREE SPEECH IN A FREE COUNTRY?”
On 25 July 2010, Jeremy Clarkson said this on Top Gear:
“We think the most dangerous time to drive a car is round about now. Sunny skies, light breezes, girls wearing short skirts, because the thing is, you can't not look. You can't physically not look…
I was in a cab in Piccadilly the other day when A WOMAN IN A FULL BURKA crossing the road in front of me tripped over the pavement, went head over heels and UP IT CAME, RED G-STRING AND STOCKINGS”.
Nice one Jeremy!
Trouble is, the Abdul-come-latelies don’t seem to be able to see the funny side when the joke’s on them, do they?
Take Muslim preacher, Omar Bakri Mohammed. He was quoted by the 27 July 2010 edition of The Daily Star as having responded thus, on 26 July 2010:
“THIS SHOWS HOW MUCH HATRED HE HAS FOR MUSLIMS in general, AND MUSLIM WOMEN IN PARTICULAR. If he speaks about the honour of Muslim women, IT REQUIRES MUSLIM PEOPLE TO RESPOND. AND IF HE DOESN’T APOLOGISE HE COULD FACE MUSLIM YOUTH ATTACKING HIM PHYSICALLY.”
On 1 August 2010, The Star quoted another Muslim preacher, Anjem Choudary, thus:
“Clarkson may think he was funny or was telling a joke when he said these things. But this is not funny to everyone. And BY MAKING FUN OR DISRESPECTING THE BURKA AND MUSLIM WOMEN HE HAS DEEPLY OFFENDED MANY PEOPLE. It is a grave offence to disrespect a Muslim woman.
PEOPLE HAVE GONE TO WAR TO PROTECT THE HONOUR OF MUSLIM WOMEN!
AND THEY WILL GO TO WAR AGAIN!
Clarkson has stirred a hornets’ nest among young Islamic fundamentalists. HE HAS FANNED THE FLAMES OF THEIR CAUSE…
Clarkson’s comments may not have been directly against Islam but he has upset many people – and actions have consequences. He has angered many young believers of Islam and HE MAY FACE REPERCUSSIONS. THERE ARE A GROWING NUMBER OF YOUNG ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS IN THIS COUNTRY AND MANY ARE READY TO CAUSE VIOLENCE TO PROTECT ISLAM.
I would urge Clarkson to make a full and public apology to those he has mistakenly offended. OTHERWISE HIS SAFETY COULD BE AT RISK…
I BELIEVE THAT ONE DAY BRITAIN, AND INDEED EVERY PART OF THE WORLD, WILL BE GOVERNED BY AND UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE MUSLIMS IMPLEMENTING ISLAMIC LAW.
And IT WILL HAPPEN. It may come peacefully. BUT IT MAY COME THROUGH A HOLY WAR THAT WILL SEE RIVERS OF BLOOD ON THE STREETS.
CLARKSON HAS BROUGHT THIS DAY CLOSER.”
Take a joke, eh, Anjem?
Take a joke, eh?
This IS what the Westminster wallet-stuffers have been pandering to for more than fifty years now. This IS what THEY have being filling up our country with against our will, you know.
“Rivers of blood on the streets“?
That’d be the red, white and blue blood of the British people, those who didn’t fancy being governed by the “Muslims implementing Islamic law“, I suppose, eh, Anjem?
Well, folks, if Anjem’s prophecy ever does come to pass, you won’t be able to say you didn’t deserve it, will you? I mean, you do keep on voting for the traitorous b***ers who brought all the Anjems and the Mohammeds over here in the first place, don't you? No matter what they do, you just keep right on electing the same old traitorous bunch, by God! Oh, yes, you surely deserve whatever fate old Anjem has planned for you alright.
Trouble is, your children and grandchildren do not.
That, I guess, is where Cameron’s “Fascists” and Brown’s “bigoted woman” and the PC Crowd‘s “racists”, “Fascists”, “Nazis”, “haters” and “bigots” all step up.
As for PC Crowd, the quotations too numerous to mention.are
Just type any one or all of the following into Google:
"Fascist"; "Nazi"; "bigot"; "hater"; "racist" and see what comes up.
In the 24 July edition of The Daily Express, Patrick O'Flynn stuck the boot into Tony Blair thus:
"In her testimony to the Iraq Inquiry the highly respected Baroness Manningham-Buller threw the kitchen sink at Blair. She said TOPPLING SADDAM HUSSEIN COULD NEVER HAVE BEEN JUSTIFIED ON NATIONAL SECURITY GROUNDS, THAT IT GAVE OSAMA BIN LADEN HIS 'IRAQI JIHAD', THAT IT LED TO A LOSS OF FOCUS ON THE MISSION IN AFGHANISTAN AND THAT IT RADICALISED MANY YOUNG BRITISH MUSLIMS AGAINST THEIR OWN COUNTRY, INCREASING THE TERROR THREAT WE FACED AND LEADING UP TO 80 BRITISH JIHADISTS TO TRAVEL TO IRAQ TO FIGHT AGAINST OUR FORCES.
She might have added that THE WAR COST HUNDREDS OF BRITISH LIVES, THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN LIVES AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF IRAQI LIVES, LED TO IRAN BECOMING THE UNCHALLENGED REGIONAL SUPERPOWER AND DID IMMENSE DAMAGE TO BRITAIN’S REPUTATION… Meanwhile THE LABOUR LEADERSHIP CONTENDERS RACE TO DISSOCIATE THEMSELVES FROM HIM THOUGH ONLY DIANE ABBOTT OBJECTED TO HIS BASIC POLITICAL DIRECTION WHILE HE WAS IN OFFICE...
US public opinion is furious about the release of the Lockerbie bomber having got wind of claims of a quid pro quo involving a BP oil deal with Colonel Gaddafi. IT WAS BLAIR WHO LAID THE GROUND FOR THAT OIL DEAL ON A TRIP TO TRIPOLI WHEN HE WAS PM...
A BYWORD FOR FAILURE AT HOME AND FOR CATASTROPHE ABROAD: this is about as far away as it is possible to imagine from the place in history Anthony Blair envisaged for himself."
In the 24 July edition of The Daily Mail, Peter Oborne opipned thus:
"Claims that French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been in receipt of massive cash backhanders should come as no surprise to attentive students of European politics... A safe rule of thumb is to assume that ANY TOPFLIGHT POLITICIAN FROM FRANCE, ITALY OR GERMANY IS A CRIMINAL WHO OUGHT TO BE SERVING A LONG STRETCH BEHIND BARS.
IN ITALY, GOVERNMENT HAS LONG BEEN A LARGE-SCALE GANGSTER ENTERPRISE. Senior judges openly accuse PRIME MINISTER SILVIO BERLUSCONI OF INTERVENING IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM TO ESCAPE CONVICTION in three ongoing corruption trials.
I remember once listening open-mouthed a senior member of John Major's Cabinet spelt out to me the evidence he had been shown which proved (so he told me) that FRANCOIS MITTERAND HAD ARRANGED THE MURDER OF AT LEAST THREE OF HIS POLITICAL OPPONENTS.
CHANCELLOR HELMUT KOHL OF GERMANY WAS AWASH WITH SLUSH FUNDS AND HIS PROSECUTION (AND LIKELY JAIL) WAS HALTED ONLY WHEN A COURT DECIDED THAT IT WAS BEST TO DROP ALL CHARGES IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST.
Given this record (and there are scores of other examples) IT IS NO WONDER THAT TONY BLAIR, PETER MANDELSON AND SO MANY OF THEIR MORALLY SQUALID NEW LABOUR ASSOCIATES REMAIN SUCH ENORMOUS ENTHUSIASTS FOR THE EUROPEAN IDEAL."
On 23 July 2010, The Daily Mail quoted an unnamed Magistrate thus:
"WE TAKE EXCEPTION TO PEOPLE COMING TO OUR SHORES AND ABUSING OUR HOSPITALITY".
The Mail then added:
"A MAGISTRATE HAS BEEN FORCED TO APOLOGISE FOR COMPLAINING THAT A FOREIGN DEFENDANT WAS ‘ABUSING OUR HOSPITALITY’...
The JP was punished by senior judges for having 'DISPLAYED PREJUDICE' AGAINST PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT BRITISH. A disciplinary board found the magistrate had failed to show ‘the qualities of social awareness and sound judgement’ expected of a court official. THEY EVEN CONSIDERED SACKING HIM from the bench, it was revealed…
The magistrate was ‘reprimanded’ on the orders of Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge AND ORDERED TO ‘ UNDERTAKE FURTHER TRAINING’...
Criminologist Dr David Green, of the Civitas think-tank, said:
‘The magistrate has been sent for ‘further training’, WHICH SOUNDS TO ME LIKE RE-EDUCATION AS ONCE PRACTISED BY COMMUNIST CHINA AND NORTH KOREA'."
Big brother is alive and well and living in England, folks.
He really is.
On 22 July 2010, David Cameron, on his first visit to the U.S. as Prime Minister, said this in an interview with Sky News:
"I think IT'S IMPORTANT IN LIFE TO SPEAK AS IT IS, and the fact is that we are a very effective partner of the U.S., but WE ARE THE JUNIOR PARTNER. WE WERE THE JUNIOR PARTNER IN 1940 WHEN WE WERE FIGHTING THE NAZIS."
In fact, Britain stood alone against the Nazis in 1940.
The US waited until 7 December 1941 to enter the war. We also had far more men under arms that the US until as late as 1944.
Bit of a Tony-Blair-poodle-like, "junior partner" faux-pas there, Dave.
Nothing changes, does it?
On 21 July 2010, Lord Carlile of Berriew, a former Lib Dem MP who, from 2005 onwards, has acted as an independent reviewer of anti-terror laws, was quoted this by The Independent:
“IT'S CERTAINLY THE CASE THAT THE THREAT AND NUMBER OF HOME-GROWN TERRORISTS… INCREASED AFTER THE IRAQ WAR. This makes life difficult both for the old government, who have criticisms to answer, and for the current Government. It makes their review of current terrorism law a delicate exercise because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN THE THREAT.
We are where we were."
On 20 July 2010, Baroness Eliza Manningham-Buller, former head of MI5, said the following at the Chilcot Inquiry:
‘OUR INVOLVEMENT IN IRAQ RADICALISED A WHOLE GENERATION OF YOUNG PEOPLE… who saw our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan as being an attack on Islam… Arguably WE GAVE OSAMA BIN LADEN HIS IRAQI JIHAD SO THAT HE WAS ABLE TO MOVE INTO IRAQ in a way that he was not before…
THERE WAS NO CREDIBLE INTELLIGENCE TO SUGGEST THAT CONNECTION AND THAT WAS THE JUDGMENT, I MIGHT SAY, OF THE CIA…
The nature of intelligence – it is a source of information, it is rarely complete, it needs to be assessed, it is fragmentary... WE WERE ASKED TO PUT IN SOME LOW-GRADE, SMALL INTELLIGENCE TO IT [THE SEPTEMBER 2002 DOSSIER] AND WE REFUSED BECAUSE WE DIDN'T THINK IT WAS RELIABLE…
WE REGARDED THE DIRECT THREAT FROM IRAQ AS LOW... WE DIDN'T BELIEVE HE HAD THE CAPABILITY TO DO ANYTHING IN THE UK..
It was communicated through the JIC assessments, to which I fed in... I believe they [senior ministers] did read them. If they read them, THEY CAN HAVE HAD NO DOUBT."
And yet, despite the fact that Blair was left in “no doubt“ that the intelligence service “regarded the direct threat from Iraq as low“, on 24 Sept 2002, Tony Blair said this in the House of Commons:
"It [the intelligence service] concludes that IRAQ HAS CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, THAT SADDAM HAS CONTINUED TO PRODUCE THEM, THAT HE HAS EXISTING AND ACTIVE MILITARY PLANS FOR THE USE OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, WHICH COULD BE ACTIVATED WITHIN 45 MINUTES; AND THAT HE IS ACTIVELY TRYING TO ACQUIRE NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITY."
And, on 29 Jan 2010, he said this to the Chilcot Inquiry:
"THERE IS SOME INTELLIGENCE EVIDENCE ABOUT LOOSE LINKS BETWEEN AL-QA'IDA AND VARIOUS PEOPLE IN IRAQ... IT WOULD NOT BE CORRECT TO SAY THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATEVER OF LINKAGES BETWEEN AL-QA'IDA AND IRAQ."
"IF I AM ASKED WHETHER I BELIEVE WE ARE SAFER, MORE SECURE, THAT IRAQ IS BETTER, THAT OUR OWN SECURITY IS BETTER, WITH SADDAM AND HIS TWO SONS OUT OF OFFICE AND OUT OF POWER, I BELIEVE INDEED WE ARE. It was better to deal with this threat, to remove him from office, and I DO GENUINELY BELIEVE THAT THE WORLD IS SAFER AS A RESULT."
Anyone out there outside of the Westmister village, who thinks this creature should not be sent to The Hague and put on trial for war crimes?
Right, the odd Sedgefield tellietubby, a jostle of new Labour wannabes and some chap in tha shadows called Solomon.
Apart from that, the vardict semms to be almost UNANIMOUS!
Arrest that genocide merchant!
On 19 July 2010, Jon Gower Davies, former head of religious studies at Newcastle University. was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"The British people might be forgiven for thinking that THEIR BASIC RELIGIOUS-CULTURAL INHERITANCE, THE CULTURE UNDER WHICH WE HAVE GROWN UP, IS NOT JUST OUT OF CONTROL BUT UNDER SOME INSIDIOUS ATTACK…
The law has been invited to insert its punitive, plodding and PRIMITIVE self into areas of life from which we have long been accustomed to assume not simply its absence, but the positive existence of a freely-negotiated civic culture... The new laws do not simply remove blasphemy BUT EXTEND IT: AND EXTEND IT TO PROVIDE A SPECIAL DE FACTO PROTECTION TO ISLAM."
The Mail added:
"THE MAJORITY OF DEFENDANTS IN RACE OR RELIGIOUS HATE CRIMES WERE WHITE BRITISH MALES...
WHEN A MUSLIM MAN DEFACED A WAR MEMORIAL IN BURTON UPON TRENT AFTER SPRAYING THE WORDS ‘ISLAM WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD—OSAMA IS ON HIS WAY’ AND ‘KILL GORDON BROWN’ ACROSS THE PLINTH, HE WAS PROSECUTED FOR CRIMINAL DAMAGE BUT NOT FOR RELIGIOUS OR RACE OFFENCES."
On 18 July 2010, Moroccan goatherd, Yassin Al-Jermoni, speaking exclusively to The News of the World, had this to say regarding his love affair with EastEnder, Cheryl Fergison, who plays who plays downtrodden frump, Heather Trott, in the soap:
"SHE IS FAT…. WE ALL HAVE FLAWS. HERS IS THE FATNESS… WHAT DOES IT MATTER THAT SHE IS OLD? OR FAT? I AM YOUNG AND SHE IS OLD but we are in love…
We are in Africa - EVERYONE LOOKS FOR MONEY, AND SO I LOOK FOR MONEY. IT IS WHAT WE DO. I WANT MONEY and I want visa and to go to Europe.
THANKS TO MY FAT NEW BRIDE I AM RICH. No more goats for Yassin. I have done well, no? Thank you Cheryl. She does not want me to talk about goats. MY GOATHERD DAYS ARE BEHIND ME. I HAVE MONEY NOW FROM CHERYL. SHE LIKES TO KEEP ME NICE...
Do you like my sexy tracksuit? It is very nice. And I HAVE GOLD JEWELLERY TOO. THANK YOU CHERYL…
She said SHE WILL GIVE UP EVERYTHING FOR ME, even the television. She was lonely. Now she has love. I WILL BE FAMOUS WHEN WE ARE TOGETHER. I am ready for this. WITH FAME COMES MANY RICHES. I AM READY…
She is a passionate woman. We desire each other. We have the chemistry when we make love. Cheryl will come again in August and we will plan the wedding… SOON WE ARE TOGETHER AND WHAT'S MINE IS HERS AND ALL HERS IS MINE”.
Appreciate the honesty, Yassin.
Not the gold-digging-what’s-hers-is-mine-come-to-England-get-famous-and-rich stuff, but the honesty is just the ticket.
The gormless braggadocio, in this specific instance, is also welcome.
On 17 July 2010, in an interview with Matthew Norman, The Daily Telegraph quoted Lord Peter Mandelson as having described Tony Blair thus:
“HE’S ABSOLUTELY HOPELESS… HE’S WEAK, HE’S SHALLOW, HE VACILLATES, HE CAN’T MAKE A DECISION, HE’S ONLY INTERESTED IN HIS OWN GLORY”.
On 16 July 2010, the Israeli jazz musician, Gilead Atzmon, said this on his own blog:
“A survey that was published a few days ago suggests that British Jews are nothing but ‘peace lovers’. The Guardian was also quick to report that 77% of ‘British Jews favour a 'two-state solution' in Israel.’
In practice, this actually means that AT LEAST 77% OF BRITISH JEWS BELIEVE THAT MILLIONS OF DISPOSSESSED PALESTINIANS SHOULD CONTINUE TO DWELL IN REFUGEE CAMPS AND NEVER BE ALLOWED TO THEIR HOMES, CITIES, AND VILLAGES. I am actually far from impressed with British Jewry’s inclination towards peace.
I wonder what drives 77% of British Jews? Why don’t they really welcome Palestinian people to return to their land and enjoy exactly the same civil rights British Jews celebrate in the UK?…
At the time we were devastated to find out that 94% OF THE ISRAELIS SUPPORTED THE IDF'S MURDEROUS TACTICS AT THE TIME OF OPERATION CAST LEAD… The lack of ethics in British Jewry is far more concerning. Eighteen months after the massacre in Gaza and a year after the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict found Israel guilty of numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity, nearly three quarters (72%) OF BRITISH JEWS AGREED THAT ISRAEL'S ACTION IN GAZA IN 2008 AND 2009 WAS ‘A LEGITIMATE ACT OF SELF-DEFENCE’. I believe that in practice this means that 7 OUT OF 10 BRITISH JEWS SUPPORT ISRAELI WAR CRIMES…
The study, which was carried out by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research, found that Jews in Britain strongly identify with Israel, with nine out of 10 having visited the country…
The notion that IN BRITAIN THERE IS A MINORITY COMMUNITY, THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF WHOM, SUPPORT WAR CRIMES is pretty shocking, especially considering the devastating fact that EVERY POLITICAL PARTY IN THIS COUNTRY IS BANKROLLED BY DIFFERENT SHADES OF THE ‘FRIENDS OF ISRAEL.’
In comparison I wonder how the British public would react if they find out that 72% of the Muslim community supported the killings in Mumbai, 7/7 or 9/11.”
Citing Peter Mandelson’s memoirs, The 14 July 2010 edition of The Daily Mail quoted Tony Blair as having described Gordon Brown as:
“MAD, BAD, DANGEROUS AND BEYOND HOPE OF REDEMPTION… FLAWED, LACKING PERSPECTIVE AND HAVING A PARANOIA ABOUT HIM…
HE'S LIKE SOMETHING OUT OF THE MAFIOSI. HE'S AGGRESSIVE, BRUTAL… THERE IS NO ONE TO MATCH GORDON FOR SOMEONE WHO ARTICULATES HIGH PRINCIPLES WHILE PRACTISING THE LOWEST SKULDUGGERY.”
This is what Blair thought about the man he resigned in favour of.
On 14 July 2010, former Conservative MP, Ann Widdecombe, said this in The Daily Express:
"IT BEGGARS BELIEF THAT SOMALIAN ASYLUM SEEKERS, EXISTING ON BENEFIT, SHOULD BE HOUSED AT PUBLIC EXPENSE IN A POSH HOUSE WORTH TWO MILLION POUNDS WHILE THE TAXPAYERS WHO FUND THIS EXTRAVAGANCE STRUGGLE WITH MORTGAGES, REDUNDANCIES AND SAVAGE TAX INCREASES…
THE REFUGEES CONCERNED CLAIMED THAT THE HOUSE ALLOCATED TO THEM IN ANOTHER PART OF LONDON WAS TOO POOR…
Meanwhile a barmy Supreme Court judge, Lord Rodgers, says that BEING HOMOSEXUAL IN A SOCIETY WHICH OUTLAWS THE PRACTICE IS REASON ENOUGH FOR BEING GIVEN ASYLUM…
THE ASYLUM SYSTEM IS THE MOST ABUSED GATEWAY TO LIFE IN THE WEST AND IN PARTICULAR TO BRITAIN…
The judge has now opened up yet another raft of abuse as people arrive claiming to be homosexual. Perhaps Lord Rodgers will set out the criteria for proving such claims? Attendance at a Kylie concert? Talking loudly about boys?…
OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM IS ALREADY THE LAUGHING STOCK OF THE WORLD."
On 13 July 2010, the Comment section of The Daily Express mused, truthfully, thus:
SOME OF THOSE WHO WERE PILLORIED AS RACISTS FOR CLAIMING THAT IMMIGRANTS WERE ‘TAKING OVER’ THEIR NEIGHBOURHOODS IN THE SIXTIES AND SEVENTIES WERE TELLING THE TRUTH...
The transition to a multi-racial society has happened remarkably quickly and WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC being sought by the political elite...
At its best, modern Britain is more culturally stimulating and free than was the case 70 years ago. But AT ITS WORST IT IS A COUNTRY OF RESENTFUL STRANGERS LIVING IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER BUT WITH LITTLE IN COMMON."
On 11 July 2010, Leo McKinstry opined thus in The Daily Express:
“He is THE COMMITTED SOCIALIST WHO YEARNS FOR THE LUXURIOUS LIFESTYLE OF A WEALTHY OLIGARCH... The architect of the rebranding of his party HE ULTIMATELY CAME TO SYMBOLISE THE SHALLOWNESS, DECEIT, ELITISM AND HYPOCRISY THAT MADE LABOUR SO UNPOPULAR. This week Peter Mandelson, THE ‘PRINCE OF DARKNESS’, publishes his memoirs…
As we might expect from a politician who has spent a lifetime practising the arts of guile and duplicity MANDELSON’S AUTOBIOGRAPHY WILL HARDLY PRESENT THE RAW, UNVARNISHED TRUTH… Mandelson will no doubt glide smoothly over the disasters of his career such as his two resignations from Blair’s Cabinet or HIS CENTRAL ROLE IN THE CREATION OF THE £1BILLION MILLENNIUM DOME, THAT EXPENSIVE, HOLLOW MONUMENT TO NEW LABOUR’S VANITY…
Part PANTOMIME VILLAIN, part MACHIAVELLIAN OPERATOR… full of high theatricality and LOW CUNNING he was drawn to power and wealth like an eager bloodhound in search of its quarry... THE SON OF THE ADVERTISING MANAGER OF THE JEWISH CHRONICLE... his ambition drove him to the top... He enjoyed success as a television producer and then AS LABOUR’S CHIEF SPIN-DOCTOR UNDER NEIL KINNOCK...
He twice had to resign from the Cabinet in scandal, the first in 1998 over a property deal in which he failed to reveal that he had been given a private loan of £373,000 by the millionaire Labour MP Geoffrey Robinson, the second in 2001 over accusations that HE TRIED TO INFLUENCE THE AWARD OF BRITISH CITIZENSHIP TO AN INDIAN TYCOON...
He spent an unhappy few years as the British commissioner in Brussels before returning triumphantly to the Cabinet... This was the Indian summer of his political career as HE AMASSED AN ARRAY OF TITLES AND EXERTED UNPRECEDENTED CONTROL OVER GOVERNMENT…
Mandelson’s legacy... is a dubious one. THE TRIUMPH OF SPIN OVER SUBSTANCE DEGRADED POLITICS, LEADING TO ENDLESS MANIPULATION AND STATE PROPAGANDA. Britain’s involvement in the Iraq War, on the basis of a dodgy dossier, was the ultimate emblem of this approach. SPIN, MANDELSON’S CREATION, WAS THE POISON THAT DESTROYED LABOUR FROM WITHIN.”
On 10 July 2010, The Daily Mail published extracts from the diaries of former New Labour Immigration Minister, Phil Woolas.
Regarding the expenses crackdown, Woolas complains that he is running out of money and describes Sir Paul Kennedy, who oversaw the expenses appeal process, as a "reactionary, arrogant bully who, far from cleaning up Parliament, is making it worse.
"The expenses c*** is taking its toll... It looks like I fiddled £706 even though it's just the retrospective. WHO THE F*** WANTS TO BE AN MP?"
Later, however, he appears to be revelling in the job and boasts:
"A LITTLE BIT OF FAME (IN POLITICAL CIRCLES, I AM WELL KNOWN) CARRIES HUGE AUTHORITY... The experience and knowledge is awesome and MAKES YOU FEEL LIKE A SUPERMAN."
Woolas appears to suggest that some of his Oldham east and Saddleworth constituents are too "racist" to vote for an Asian when he writes:
"The Tories have selected an Asian. THE WHITE TORY VOTE WILL GO FOR THE LIB DEM BECAUSE THEY'D SOONER HAVE A LIB DEM WHOSE VIEWS THEY OPPOSE!"
Speaking of Gordon Brown's electoral campaign, Woolas says:
"I SWING FROM LOVING ADMIRATION FOR GB TO FURIOUS CONTEMPT FOR HIS MACHINE POLITICAL ATTITUDE."
After Brown’s ‘bigot’ outburst in Rochdale, which neighbours Woolas’ seat, he had to cover for Brown. Of that experience, he says:
"WHY F***ING ME? Completely wiped out of event and I ended up on Newsnight defending the Great Leader."
On 9 July 2010, New Labour leadership favourite, David Miliband, gave the Keir Hardie lecture in Mountain Ash, Wales.
In this he admitted that:
"WE LOST THE TRUST OF THE PEOPLE".
"I supported and voted for him. (Gordon Brown) I agreed that WE NEEDED GREATER MORAL SERIOUSNESS AND LESS INDIFFERENCE TO THE EXCESSES OF A CELEBRITY-DRENCHED CULTURE… I agreed with him on the importance of party reform and A MEANINGFUL INTERNATIONALISM… I agreed that we needed a civic morality to champion civility when confronting a widespread indifference to others.
BUT IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. It was not just more of the same. FAR FROM CORRECTING THEM, FAILINGS – TACTICS, SPIN, HIGH-HANDEDNESS – INTENSIFIED… THE ROOTS OF THAT FAILURE WERE DEEP, NOT RECENT…
LACK OF DEMOCRATIC DISCUSSION, the hollowing out of the party… WE WERE SEEN AS A FEARSOME BUT NOT ATTRACTIVE POLITICAL MACHINE AND THE UGLINESS OF THAT KIND OF POLITICS. We did not come to represent a new dawn but another government whose time had passed.
We seemed to sever welfare from desert and this led people to think that THEIR TAXES WERE BEING WASTED, THAT THEY WERE BEING USED. WHEN WE SAID FAIRNESS, PEOPLE THOUGHT IT WAS ANYTHING BUT…
MANY OF THE 'HARDWORKING FAMILIES' WE WISHED TO APPEAL TO DID NOT VIEW US AS THEIR PARTY… People felt like consumers and not partners. WE TALKED ABOUT 'WE' BUT IT MEANT US, NOT THEM, SO THE WORKFORCE OFTEN FELT NEGLECTED AND CITIZENS THE SAME”.
Tony Blair gave the boy Miliband the office to write New Labour’s 1997 manifesto, so, even before he became an MP, he was up there hobnobbing with the elite, creating policy and driving it forward.
His latter day confession tells us that he knew all along how despised he and his ilk were and why. When it mattered he did nothing but promote and defend the indefensible. Now he’s after the top job he tries to convince the drugged-up, the dumbed-down, the brainwashed and the dead that it was nothing to do with him.
It has everything to do with him! He’s IT! He was there when the horror was being compiled. He didn’t just nod the following through, he will have argued the case for much, perhaps all, of it:
Lack of “moral seriousness”; “the excesses of a celebrity-drenched culture” “meaningful internationalism“; (rule by the global elite) “widespread indifference to others”; “spin“; “high-handedness”; “deep-rooted failure”; “lack of democratic discussion”; “fearsome”; “not attractive”; “ugly politics“; “taxes wasted“, “anything but fairness”; “neglected citizens and workforce” and “US NOT THEM”!
Oh yes, Mr Miliband, you’re IT alright.
On 8 July 2010, Stephen Glover opined thus in The Daily Mail:
"The architect LORD FOSTER, THE INDIAN METAL MAGNATE LORD BAGRI, AND THE TORY PEERS LORD LAIDLAW AND LORD MCALPINE HAVE ANNOUNCED THAT THEY ARE RESIGNING FROM THE HOUSE OF LORDS SO THAT THEY CAN RETAIN THEIR NON-DOMICILED TAX STATUS WHICH EXEMPTS THEM FROM BRITISH TAX. SO TOO IS LADY DUNN, A HONG KONG CHINESE MULTI-MILLIONAIRESS...
Both Labour and the Lib Dems did their utmost during the election campaign to blacken Lord Ashcroft's name. Now it emerges that the billionaire peer is willing to pay tax here so that he can keep his seat in the Lords…
THE FIVE REFUSENIKS, BY CONTRAST, HAVE PUT THEIR OWN FINANCIAL WELL-BEING FIRST…
What is galling is that THESE FIVE CHARACTERS, having taken so little care as to their responsibilities in the second chamber over many years, should now put THEIR FINANCIAL SELF-INTEREST BEFORE THEIR SENSE OF PUBLIC DUTY…
More galling still - in fact, almost insupportable - is the news that THESE FOUR LIFE PEERS AND ONE LIFE PEERESS WILL BE ALLOWED TO KEEP THEIR TITLES AFTER THEY HAVE DESERTED THE LORDS… Everything they have got out of being a Lord or a Lady - all that prestige in a world still too easily dazzled by titles - they will retain…
In many respects, WHAT WE HAVE NOW IS WORSE THAN WHAT WENT BEFORE - a second chamber that is not only undemocratic, as the pre-1999 version obviously was, but also contains some LIFE PEERS BUSY FEATHERING THEIR NESTS, AND OTHERS WHO HAVE LOST THAT SENSE OF DUTY and independence which characterised the old House of Lords.”
On 7 July 2010, The Guardian quoted Sir Richard Dalton, the UK's Ambassador to Iran from 2003 to 2006, as he gave evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry.
Tony Blair "VERY MUCH EXAGGERATED" Iran's role in supporting al-Qaida insurgents in their attacks on British and US forces in Iraq. Sir Richard added:
"I also felt at the time of Mr Blair's testimony to you that HE WAS SEEKING TO CAST A RETROSPECTIVELY BENIGN LIGHT ON A SERIES OF VERY BAD DECISIONS taken about the legality of an attack on Iraq by saying it was not only right to do it, but we might have to do it again...
I felt strongly then and I do now that A MILITARY ADVENTURE AGAINST IRAN ... WOULD BE ILLEGAL IN THE ABSENCE OF AN IMMINENT AND REAL THREAT TO ANY COUNTRY FROM IRAN. No such nuclear threat exists at present."
Sir Richard also described George Bush's depiction of Iran as part of an "axis of evil" as A "MONSTROUS ERROR".
On 2 July 2010, Tom Utley fumed righteously thus in The Daily Mail:
“Surely we must now agree that if there was any breath left in satire's frail old lungs.. it was finally snuffed out yesterday WHEN THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER OF THE UNITED STATES AWARDED ITS COVETED ANNUAL LIBERTY MEDAL TO TONY BLAIR FOR HIS 'STEADFAST COMMITMENT TO CONFLICT RESOLUTION'. With exquisite timing, the centre chose to add our former Prime Minister to its roll of honour… on the day after the declassification of the official advice he received on the legality of invading Iraq.
The documents show that LESS THAN TWO MONTHS BEFORE THE 2003 INVASION, ATTORNEY GENERAL LORD GOLDSMITH WROTE TO HIM about the relevant UN Security Council resolution, saying:
'I REMAIN OF THE VIEW THAT THE CORRECT LEGAL INTERPRETATION OF RESOLUTION 1441 IS THAT IT DOES NOT AUTHORISE THE USE OF MILITARY FORCE without a further determination by the Security Council.'
Mr Blair underlined the bit about not authorising action, and wrote in the margin:
'I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS’…
Of course, Mr Blair understood perfectly well that HIS GOVERNMENT'S CHIEF LAW OFFICER WAS TELLING HIM IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL TO INVADE IRAQ without a new UN resolution… But then, Mr BLAIR NEVER DID GET THE HANG OF THIS LIBERTY LARK… Still less did he understand how it depends on subtle constitutional safeguards, including the office of Attorney General, that have evolved over the centuries to keep EGOMANIACAL PRIME MINISTERS in check.
So instead of adapting his conduct according to his advice, and calling off the invasion, he came up with A TYPICALLY BLAIRITE SOLUTION: HE SIMPLY SENT HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL AWAY TO THINK AGAIN - UNTIL, TO HIS ETERNAL SHAME, LORD GOLDSMITH RETURNED WITH THE ADVICE HIS BOSS HAD WANTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Suddenly, and mysteriously, he pronounced it legally permissible for Mr BLAIR TO INDULGE HIS TASTE FOR WARMONGERING AND SUCKING UP TO THE AMERICANS - WITH RESULTS THAT THE PARENTS, WIDOWS AND ORPHANS OF BRITISH SERVICEMEN AND COUNTLESS IRAQI CIVILIANS WILL MOURN FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES.
How will the maimed and bereaved of that unjust and unnecessary war react when they see Mr Blair this September... accepting his Liberty Medal (and his cheque for $100,000) from Bill Clinton in Philadelphia?
But it's not only his Iraq adventure that makes the former Prime Minister SO SPECTACULARLY UNFIT TO RECEIVE AN AWARD FOR 'LEADERSHIP IN THE PURSUIT OF FREEDOM'. Indeed, I CAN'T THINK OF A SINGLE POLITICIAN IN OUR MODERN PEACETIME HISTORY WHO DID AS MUCH AS MR BLAIR TO ERODE OUR TRADITIONAL LIBERTIES, CHIPPING AWAY AT THEIR CORNERSTONES AND VANDALISING EVERY CONSTITUTIONAL OBSTACLE THAT STOOD IN HIS WAY.
Take the independence of the Civil Service - since Victorian times, one of the firmest guarantors of our freedom and the most reliable check on the lies of ministers. One of Mr Blair's first acts in office was to dispatch an army of partisan 'political advisers' into every Whitehall department, WITH THE JOB OF TWISTING FACTS AND FIGURES TO SUIT THE GOVERNMENT'S PURPOSES…
Or take Cabinet government - a system that evolved to prevent any individual from exercising excessive influence over the affairs of state. Mr BLAIR EFFECTIVELY DID AWAY WITH IT, PREFERRING TO DISCUSS THE DECISIONS THAT REALLY MATTERED WITH ONLY A HANDFUL OF UNELECTED CRONIES, SUCH AS HIS PRESS SECRETARY ALASTAIR CAMPBELL, from the comfort of his Downing Street sofa. On the most important decisions, his Cabinet colleagues were kept completely in the dark, while on others they were treated as mere rubber stamps.
Or Parliament. What other prime minister has treated Lords and Commons with such contempt, bypassing them wherever possible and SPINNING MOST OF HIS PROPOSALS TO THE MEDIA before deigning to announce them in the Palace of Westminster?..
More insidious still was Mr Blair's beloved HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, WHICH HAS TURNED JUDGES INTO LAWMAKERS, BEYOND DEMOCRATIC CONTROL… SETTING THE RIGHTS OF FOREIGN RAPISTS AND WOULD-BE TERRORISTS ABOVE THOSE OF THEIR VICTIMS…
Meanwhile, as we all know, NICK CLEGG IS SO GUNG-HO ABOUT THE HRA - and David Cameron so faint-hearted about repealing it - that nothing effective will be done for at least five years, and probably decades to come.
It's the same with the European Union, THAT MONSTROUS AFFRONT TO OUR FREEDOM TO MAKE OUR OWN LAWS. IT WAS MR BLAIR, CLOSELY FOLLOWED BY GORDON BROWN, WHO BETRAYED LABOUR'S PROMISE OF A REFERENDUM ON THE LISBON TREATY, THEREBY CONDEMNING US TO EVER-TIGHTER CONTROL FROM BRUSSELS.”
On 30 June 2010, Sandra Parsons opined thus in The Daily Mail:
“Instead of finding whatever work they can, too many of Britain's poorest young men choose to stay at home, easily able to afford the satellite television and cans of strong beer that all too often fuel their day.
Unsurprisingly, THEY FEEL USELESS and frustrated - emotions... which explode into AGGRESSION, VIOLENCE AND CRIME, together with A TERRIFYINGLY FECKLESS ATTITUDE TO PROCREATING WITH DIFFERENT WOMEN.
I say procreating because their loveless actions have nothing to do with fathering. For any child, the lack of a strong, responsible father figure is a tragedy. Despite what our politicians think, most single mothers do not want to go out to work, at least until their children are older. What they, and their children, want is A MAN TO FULFIL A ROLE THAT USED TO BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED AND WHICH THESE DAYS SEEMS ALMOST QUAINT: THAT OF PROVIDER.
If a young boy does not see his father getting up and going to work every day, why should he go to school - still less aspire to a job afterwards? And why should he treat women with respect if that role model doesn't? Thus OUR DISASTROUS WELFARE SYSTEM CREATES A CYCLE OF DEPENDENCY.”
I wonder which section of “British” society is most responsible for the “terrifyingly feckless attitude to procreating with different women” that Ms Parsons speaks of here?
I wonder which bits of "our disastrous welfare system" are way over-represented in the annual “violence and crime” statistics?
Check out what Oona King has to say about “absent dads” here: ABSENT DADS
The impeccably PC Ms King is the daughter of a black American and her mother is Jewish, so, whatever you do, don’t let the anti-Brits catch you impugning Ms King’s grasp of the facts.
As for the crime stats, check out the interracial homicide figures for England and Wales here: Interracial Homicide
On 30 June 2010, The Sun quoted a Blackberry message sent by Chelsea defender, Ashley Cole, just hours BEFORE flying out to England's pre-World Cup training camp in Austria.
Cole posted the following as HIS STATUS MESSAGE, allowing all those designated as his friends to see it.
"I HATE ENGLAND AND THE F***ING PEOPLE!"
We, the “f***ing people” do not hate you Ashley. We just wish you, and others who feel as you do, would address your feelings in a logical way.
If you don’t like England or the English, common sense suggests that you should relocate to some place you prefer, where “the people” are more to your liking.
I mean, the £120,000 or so you pocket every week, would certainly allow you to set yourself up in style anywhere else on the planet, now wouldn’t it?
Anyone out there think this hate-filled black chap is going to heed my advice?
No. Of course he's not
Our World Cup “flop” is having far too much fun in jolly old England biting the hands that feed him, isn’t he?
At the UK’s 2010 Methodist Conference Agenda, the paper “Justice for Palestine and Israel”, signed by 30 organisations and individuals, was debated.
Here are a few of the things that were said early on in this paper:
"The conflict in Israel/Palestine IS CENTRAL TO CURRENT PATTERNS OF INSECURITY IN THE WORLD... THE KEY HINDRANCE TO SECURITY AND A LASTING PEACE FOR ALL IN THE REGION IS THE OCCUPATION OF PALESTINIAN TERRITORY BY THE STATE OF ISRAEL, NOW IN ITS FIFTH DECADE...
Israel militarily occupied the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip1 and the Syrian Golan Heights in 1967. After 43 years, it remains the occupying power and
thus responsible under international law for the welfare of the Palestinian inhabitants of these territories. THE OCCUPATION, HOWEVER, CAUSES GREAT SUFFERING TO PALESTINIANS as well as Israelis...
It is important for Methodists to… differentiate the Israel they read about in their Bibles FROM THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAEL THEY SEE IN MODERN NEWS FOOTAGE...
British Methodists would do well to listen TO THE PERSPECTIVES OF PALESTINIAN CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIANS in how they respond to questions of NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY AND HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION, THE RIGHTS OF MINORITIES AND THE PLACE OF INDIVIDUALS IN A WIDER COMMUNITY.”
It’s brave stuff this from the Methodists. If you are prepared for a long and often turgid read, You might wish to take a look at the whole document, which can be found here: Justice for Israel and Palestine
On 28 June 2010, David Frost, the Director General of the British Chambers of Commerce, said this during an interview on Sky News’ Jeff Randall Live:
"We need to be careful that at a time when we need to get all the growth we can in the UK economy that WE REMEMBER THE NEEDS OF BRITISH BUSINESS.
The City for example... relies on a pool of GLOBAL TALENT; specialist engineering companies working in the North Sea, THOSE VITAL NEW SCIENCE AND INNOVATION COMPANIES RELY ON GETTING THEIR EMPLOYEES FROM ACROSS THE GLOBE. WE CAN'T STOP THAT.
We need to look at the whole picture and of course what is happening is, because MANY OF THE LOCAL EMPLOYEES DON'T HAVE THE SKILLS, DON'T HAVE THE WORK ETHIC, Then of course BUSINESSES ARE TURNING TO EASTERN EUROPEAN MIGRANTS and YOU CAN'T REFORM MIGRATION WITHOUT REFORMING THE BENEFITS SYSTEM.
Too many companies report through to me that they offer the job to the local person but they say 'IT'S NOT WORTH IT - I GET MORE MONEY ON BENEFIT' and therefore IMMIGRATION HAS GOT TO BE TACKLED HAND AND HAND WITH WELFARE REFORM."
So, give the jobs to immigrants (a la Gordon B, Tony B and New Labour) and cut the benefits of the workshy British. (A la Dave C and the “Coalition”)
Thus spake one of the UK's top big business mouthpieces.
I wonder why Frost, Brown, Blair, Clegg, Cameron and co. so rarely seem moved to ask:
“Why don’t we train up our own”?
On 27 June 2010, The Daily Mail quoted what was said when Andrew Neil, the Presenter of BBC 2’s This Week, clashed with one of the show’s regular commentators, Labour MP, Diane Abbott.
“Labour leadership contender Diane Abbott was seething after being branded A ‘RACIST’ AND AN EXPENSES CHEAT by political pundit Andrew Neil. Ms Abbott, who earned £36,000 a year as a regular guest on the show alongside Michael Portillo until stepping down to fight for the Labour leadership, had defended her stance, saying:
‘West Indian mums will go to the wall for their children.’
Mr Neil hit back by demanding:
‘So BLACK MUMS LOVE THEIR KIDS MORE THAN WHITE MUMS, DO THEY?’ Furious Ms Abbott said:
‘I have said everything I am going to say about where I send my son to school.’
Mr Neil persisted:
‘Supposing Michael said white mums will go to the wall for their children. Why did you say that? ISN’T IT A RACIST REMARK? IF WEST INDIAN MUMS ARE AS WONDERFUL AS YOU SAY, WHY ARE THERE SO MANY DYSFUNCTIONAL WEST INDIAN FAMILIES IN THIS COUNTRY? AND WHY DO SO MANY YOUNG WEST INDIAN MEN END UP IN A LIFE OF CRIME AND GANGS? YOU DIDN’T WANT YOUR SON TO GO TO A SCHOOL FULL OF KIDS WHO HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP BY WEST INDIAN MUMS.’
As Ms Abbott repeatedly refused to reply, Mr Neil asked:
‘WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT WEST INDIAN MUMS ARE NO BETTER THAN WHITE MUMS OR ASIAN MUMS?’ When Ms Abbott, squirming in her seat, replied,
‘I have nothing to say,’ Mr Neil taunted her:
‘You don’t want to do that – you still think West Indian mums are the best?’
The clash came after Ms Abbott said last week:
‘I knew what could happen if my son went to THE WRONG SCHOOL AND GOT IN WITH THE WRONG CROWD. THEY ARE SUBJECTED TO PEER PRESSURE and when that happens it’s very hard for a mother to save her son. ONCE A BLACK BOY IS LOST TO THE WORLD OF GANGS IT’S VERY HARD TO GET THEM BACK.’
Mr Neil also confronted her over the £142,000 SHE CLAIMED LAST YEAR IN COMMONS EXPENSES. He said:
‘We discovered YOU CLAIMED £1,100 ON TAXIS, INCLUDING AN INDIVIDUAL CLAIM FOR £192. Is that acceptable for an inner London MP?’
Ms Abbott stumbled: ‘The £192 figure is, I think, a dozen taxi bills.’ Mr Neil replied: ‘You put in one claim, you didn’t designate each one.’ Ms Abbott: ‘No, no, I added it up.’
Mr Neil: ‘Do you think the taxpayer should be paying over £1,000 for running around London in a taxi?’
Ms Abbott: ‘I don’t run around London in taxis. I take a couple of taxis a week to get home late at night.’
Mr Neil: ‘WHY DON’T YOU DIP INTO YOUR OWN POCKET? YOU’RE WELL PAID.”
The confrontation may be seen in full here: ABBOTT v NEIL
On 27 June 2010, The Guardian quoted John Ralfe, a leading pension expert, thus:
“GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS HAVE BEEN FLATTERED BY HIDING A £15BN ANNUAL COST. THEY FIDDLED THE FIGURES. THE TREASURY UNDER GORDON BROWN MOVED THE GOALPOSTS…
IF THEY HAD COME CLEAN ON THIS EARLIER, THERE COULD HAVE BEEN A GRADUAL SERIES OF MEASURES TO MAKE THE COST OF PUBLIC SECTOR PENSIONS MORE MANAGEABLE, rather than having to take action all at once.”
The Guardian added:
“Gordon Brown's Treasury was this weekend accused of dramatically understating the cost of paying public sector pensions. The official bill to taxpayers for future retirement payments is put at £15bn a year, but THE ACTUAL COST IS £30BN…
This means that COSTS OF £120BN TO £150BN HAVE GONE UNRECOGNISED IN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS SINCE 1997.
The Office for Budget Responsibility put the figure close to Ralfe's, at £26bn, in its report on the UK economy.”
On 22 June 2010, the editorial of Haaretz, the oldest and, according to Wikipedia, the "most influential" Israeli daily newspaper, featured the article, “The silent expulsion“.
This is what was said:
“Citizens of Israel can leave the country for any length of time, and their citizenship and all their rights are theirs in perpetuity. But when it comes to Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem, ISRAEL APPLIES DRACONIAN REGULATIONS WHOSE COVERT INTENT IS TO BRING ABOUT THE EXPULSION OF AS MANY PALESTINIANS AS POSSIBLE FROM THEIR HOME CITY...
At a time when the prime minister speaks grandiloquently of the reunification of Jerusalem, ISRAEL PRACTICES INEQUALITY AND DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE CITY'S ARAB RESIDENTS... THE SCREWS HAVE BEEN TIGHTENED IN RECENT YEARS: In 2008 the residents' rights of 4,557 Palestinian inhabitants of the city were abrogated...
WILL ISRAEL CONTINUE TREATING THE PALESTINIAN INHABITANTS OF ITS CAPITAL AS IF THEY WERE FOREIGN MIGRANTS”?
Er, is the Pope Catholic?
Yes, sir. As long as the Israeli Jew continues to vote for the Netanyahu/Sharon/Shamir/Begin type, the indigenous non-Jew will continue to be treated as a foreigner in his own homeland.
Shmuel Rosner, Haaretz's former U.S. correspondent, once said this:
"People who read it are better educated and more sophisticated than most but the rest of the country doesn't know it exists."
It's the "covert intent" of the self-serving, self-approving, less "educated/sophisticated... rest of the country", along with the "Netanyahu/Sharon/Shamir/Begin" types guiding them, that the Palestinians and the wider world are concerned about, Schmuel.
If those who understand and sympathise with Haaretz editorials like the one posted above were running the world, I guess the "bigoted", "Fascist", "racist", anti-Semitic", neo-Nazi" whistleblowing folk would be out of a job.
Speed the day!
The first known use of the word "racist" appeared in the 1930 essay, The History of the Russian Revolution, which was written by Leon Trotsky.
Trotsky, born Leon Bronstein, the second most influential figure after Lenin in the early years of the Revolution, was Jewish.
As was Mauritz Steinschneider who, in 1860, first coined the term, "anti-Semitic".
In a 14 June 2010 interview with the Brussels-based magazine, EU Observer, John Monks, former head of the TUC, now head of the European TUC, said this:
“I had a discussion with Barroso (Jose Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission) last Friday about what can be done for Greece, Spain, Portugal and the rest and his message was blunt:
‘Look, if they do not carry out these austerity packages, THESE COUNTRIES COULD VIRTUALLY DISAPPEAR IN THE WAY THAT WE KNOW THEM AS DEMOCRACIES. THEY'VE GOT NO CHOICE, THIS IS IT’…
He's very, very worried. He shocked us with AN APOCALYPTIC VISION OF DEMOCRACIES IN EUROPE COLLAPSING BECAUSE OF THE STATE OF INDEBTEDNESS...
THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. THIS IS 1931, WE'RE HEADING BACK TO THE 1930S, WITH THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND WE ENDED UP WITH MILITARIST DICTATORSHIP... IT'S POTENTIALLY VERY SERIOUS, NOT JUST ECONOMICALLY, BUT POLITICALLY AS WELL.”
Barroso is the former Prime Minster of Portugal.
He was a Revolutionary Communist before that.
On 13 June 2010, The Daily Telegraph quoted Eddie Excell, an out-of-work, King's Lynn job seeker, thus:
"THERE ARE JOBS I CAN'T GET BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING DONE BY EASTERN EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS. I THINK THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO STOP LETTING SO MANY FOREIGN PEOPLE IN."
Amen to that, Eddie.
Amen to that.
On 12 June 2011, Andrew Gilligan said this in The Mail Online:
“Victims say that OFFICERS IN THE BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS HAVE IGNORED OR DOWNPLAYED OUTBREAKS OF HATE CRIME, AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE IMPLICATING MUSLIMS IN THEM, BECAUSE THEY FEAR BEING ACCUSED OF RACISM.
The claims come as four Tower Hamlets Muslims were jailed for at least 19 years for attacking a local white teacher who gave religious studies lessons to Muslim girls.
The Sunday Telegraph has uncovered more than a dozen other cases in Tower Hamlets where BOTH MUSLIMS AND NON-MUSLIMS HAVE BEEN THREATENED OR BEATEN FOR BEHAVIOUR DEEMED TO BREACH fundamentalist ‘Islamic norms.’
One victim, Mohammed Monzur Rahman, said he was left partially blind and with a dislocated shoulder after being attacked by a mob in Cannon Street Road, Shadwell, for smoking during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan last year. ‘Two guys stopped me in the street and asked me why I was smoking,’ he said. ‘I just carried on, and before I knew another dozen guys came and jumped me. The next thing I knew, I was waking up in hospital.’
Teachers in several local schools have told The Sunday Telegraph that they feel ‘under pressure’ from local Muslim extremists, who have mounted campaigns through both parents and pupils – and, in one case, through another teacher - to enforce the compulsory wearing of the veil for Muslim girls. ‘It was totally orchestrated,’ said one teacher. ‘The atmosphere became extremely unpleasant for a while, with constant verbal aggression from both the children and some parents against the head over this issue.’
One teacher at the Bigland Green primary school, Nicholas Kafouris, last year took the council to an employment tribunal, saying he was forced out of his job for complaining that Muslim pupils were engaging in racist and anti-Semitic bullying and saying they supported terrorism… THE NUMBER OF ASSAULTS ON TEACHERS IN TOWER HAMLETS RESULTING IN EXCLUSIONS HAS MORE THAN DOUBLED FROM 190 IN 2007/8 TO 383 IN 2008/9, the latest available year, though not all are necessarily race-related.
Tower Hamlets’ gay community has become a particular target of extremists. Homophobic crimes in the borough have risen by 80 per cent since 2007/8... Last year, a mob of 30 young Muslims stormed a local gay pub, the George and Dragon, beating and abusing patrons. Many customers of the pub told The Sunday Telegraph that they have been attacked and harassed by local Muslim youths. In 2008 a 20-year-old student, Oli Hemsley, was left permanently paralysed after an attack by a group of young Muslims outside the pub. Only one of his assailants has been caught and jailed.
Even during meetings of the local council, prominent supporters of Tower Hamlets’ controversial directly-elected mayor, Lutfur Rahman, dropped by the Labour Party for his links to Islamic fundamentalism, have persistently targeted gay councillors with homophobic abuse and intimidation from the public gallery.
The Labour leader, Josh Peck, was attacked with animal noises and cries of ‘Unnatural acts! Unnatural acts!’ when he rose to speak. The Conservative leader, Peter Golds, was repeatedly heckled as ‘Mrs Golds’ and a ‘poofter.’ Mr Golds said: ‘If that happened in a football stadium, arrests would have taken place. I have complained, twice, to the police, and have heard nothing. A Labour colleague waited three hours at the police station before being told that nothing would be done. The police are afraid of being accused of Islamophobia. Another Labour councillor said that THE MET IS NOW THE REVERSE OF WHAT IT MUST HAVE BEEN LIKE IN THE 1970S, WITH A COMPLETE LACK OF INTEREST WHEN WHITE PEOPLE MAKE COMPLAINTS OF HARASSMENT AND HATRED.’
In February this year, dozens of stickers appeared across Tower Hamlets quoting the Koran, declaring the borough a ‘gay-free zone’ and stating that ‘verily Allah is severe in punishment.’
The Sunday Telegraph has learned that during a routine stop-and-search at the time police found a young Muslim man with a number of the stickers in his possession. HE WAS RELEASED WITHOUT CHARGE ON THE ADVICE OF THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE. Police also had CCTV images of a second unidentified Muslim youth posting the stickers at a local railway station, but refused to release the pictures for several weeks.
Peter Tatchell, the gay human rights campaigner, said: ‘THE POLICE SAID NO-ONE WAS ALLOWED TO TALK PUBLICLY ABOUT THIS BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T WANT TO UPSET THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY… The fact that the police wouldn’t publicly say what they knew was an absolute disgrace.’
When the CCTV footage was finally released, in early April, the culprit was quickly identified as 18-year-old Mohammed Hasnath, who last week pleaded guilty to a public order offence and was fined £100... Hasnath’s ‘interests’ on his Facebook page include Khalid Yasin, a hate preacher who describes Jews as ‘filth’ and teaches that homosexuals must be killed. Yasin has spoken at least four times since 2007 at the East London Mosque, Tower Hamlets’ most prominent Muslim institution. ALTHOUGH THE MOSQUE CLAIMS TO BE AGAINST EXTREMISM, DISCRIMINATION, AND VIOLENCE, IT HAS HOSTED DOZENS OF HATE, EXTREMIST OR TERRORIST PREACHERS AND ALSO HOSTED A ‘SPOT THE FAG’ CONTEST.
In the same week that it issued a press release condemning the anti-gay stickers, the mosque was also due to host a ‘gala dinner’ with Uthman Lateef, a homophobic hate preacher.
The mosque is controlled by a fundamentalist group, the Islamic Forum of Europe, which says that IT IS DEDICATED TO CHANGING THE ‘VERY INFRASTRUCTURE OF SOCIETY, ITS INSTITUTIONS, ITS CULTURE, ITS POLITICAL ORDER AND ITS CREED ... FROM IGNORANCE TO ISLAM’…
In an email obtained by The Sunday Telegraph, one IFE activist, Abu Talha, used the name of the group to threaten a local Muslim woman who ran a dating agency.
‘I am asking you kindly to stop these activities as it goes against the teachings of Islam,’ he wrote. ‘Let me remind you that I have a huge network of brothers and sisters who would be willing to help me take this further… If by tomorrow you haven’t changed your mind … then the campaign will begin.’ The dating agency has now closed and the woman has left the area…
The Metropolitan Police said: ‘When any allegation of crime is made to us, we investigate appropriately. We will always take action against hate crime in accordance with, and within the confines of, the law’.”
Which assertion, as the article demonstrates, is absolute b***ocks.
On 12 June 2010, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:
"It was the churches, not the State, who began mass education in this country. Thanks to their schools, they also spread the Christian story and its revolutionary moral message – HELPING TO MAKE BRITAIN WHAT IT WAS UNTIL RECENTLY: A BEACON OF ORDERED LIBERTY.
When the schools were nationalised after 1945, the State promised to carry on teaching the faith. But THAT PROMISE HAS NOW BEEN ALMOST COMPLETELY BROKEN, even in many officially Christian schools. Ofsted – too busy classifying terrible schools as ‘good’ – has at last caught up with this scandal.
CHRISTIANITY HAS BEEN UNDER ATTACK HERE FOR DECADES, ESPECIALLY IN THE UNIVERSITIES, so it is no surprise that it’s hard to find anyone willing or able to teach it. But I wonder whether the anti-Christians will like the society that results from the death of the faith that shaped our civilisation.
SHARIA LAW, HERE WE COME.“
On 11 June 2010, after the child of Orthodox Jews was refused a place at the King David Jewish school in favour of a non-Jew, Dawn Chapple, the child’s mother, was quoted thus by The Jewish Chronicle:
"That guy married a non-Jewish woman who converted Reform. But I'M 100 PER CENT AN ORTHODOX JEW. He's won a place for his son, that my daughter can't have. I THINK IT'S DISGUSTING THAT NON-JEWISH CHILDREN HAVE MORE RIGHTS ON OUR OWN SCHOOL MORE THAN A JEWISH CHILD."
“Disgusting” that non-Jews have “more rights” than Jews, Dawn?
Sounds like racism to me.
Lord Lester, who has been at the heart of the putsch to impose the race laws upon the British people, ever since the first such law was introduced, is Jewish.
As are/were so many within a PC movement that has relentlessly promoted the immigrant (whilst denigrating the native British) in recent times.
The word “racist” first appeared in a 1932 translation of Trotsky’s, “The History of the Russian Revolution”.
The Russian Revolutionary leader, Leon Trotsky (born Leon Bronstein) was also Jewish.
The word “racism” was popularised throughout the English speaking world by the 1938 translation of a 1934 work by the German “sex-expert”, Magnus Hirschfeld. The British publisher, Victor Gollancz, the Hungarian immigrant who published Hirschfeld‘s book, was Jewish too.
As was Magnus Hirschfeld.
Political correctness began life in 1923 as Cultural Marxism. The alumnae and disciples of the “Frankfurt School” were responsible for its creation and world-wide promotion.
Most of the original Cultural Marxists were also Jewish.
Check out the essay, Who Stole Our Culture
What goes around comes around, Dawn.
On 11 June 2010, The Daily Express quoted David Miliband, who will probably be New Labour's next leader, thus:
"BRITAIN IS BETTER BECAUSE OF IMMIGRATION."
Miliband's parents were both Jewish immigrants.
After Lancashire County Council banned their employees from wearing England shirts or flying the flag of St. Georges during the World Cup, The 11 June 2010 edition of The Daily Express quoted one staff member this:
"The Mayor has a St George’s flag flying on the top of Preston town hall, so does that offend the public? THIS IS CAUSED BY THE BUREAUCRATIC PC BRIGADE AS USUAL.”
"People think it is OPPRESSIVE. I have been working with kids and they are asking why we can’t put flags on the bus"?
On 8 June 2010, The Daily Mail quoted the $65billion dollar fraudster, Bernie Madoff, as having said this to his fellow jailbirds:
"FU*K MY VICTIMS, I carried them for 20 years."
The Mail added:
"A profile on the conman, who was sentenced to 150 years behind bars for orchestrating THE WORLD'S BIGGEST INVESTMENT SCAM, has revealed HE HAS NO SYMPATHY FOR THE THOUSANDS OF 'GREEDY' VICTIMS WHOSE LIFE SAVINGS HE DECIMATED. Inmates told the New York Magazine how THE 71-YEAR-OLD APPEARED PROUD OF HIS CRIMES.”
At keast two of those Madoff defrauded are known to have committed suicide.
He is Jewish
On 8 June 2010, after describing Tony Blair as the "special envoy of the Quartet of Middle East peace mediators", the Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz, quoted him thus:
"I'M 100 PERCENT ON ISRAEL'S SIDE. ISRAEL HAS THE RIGHT TO INSPECT WHAT GOES INTO GAZA."
Thus spake the wholly "impartial" "special envoy".
"There are rockets fired from Gaza and that there are people in Gaza who want to kill innocent Israelis", continued the special one.
Hey, Tony, are there any Israelis in Israel (and Jews in the wider world) who want to kill innocent Palestinians? How many of the recently killed and wounded peace activists would have been "innocent", do you think? For that matter, how many of the 1300 Gazans killed in the 2009 invasion would have been "guilty"?
I wonder also, might there be any Israelis in Israel who'd like to kill innocent Iraqis, Lebanese and Iranians? If there were, would this incline you to be "100 per cent" on the "side" of the Palestinians, Iraqis, Lebanese and Iranians? How about suggesting that the Palestinians, Iraqis, Lebanese and Iranians should "have the right" to "inspect" whatever "goes into" Israel?
That'd be fair, wouldn't it?
It's all gone quiet over there, Tony.
Tony B adds:
"Iran with nuclear weapons is not something we should contemplate or allow"!
How about an Israel "with nuclear weapons", Tony?
Would that be something "we should allow"?
It's all gone quiet over there again.
Should the world ever afford itself the "right" to "inspect" Israel, I suggest that, when the inspection's over, it checks out Tony B's back yard, shed, garage and cellar as well.
On 7 June 2010, The Daily Mail quoted New Labour leadership candidate, Ed Balls, as having said this to Gordon Brown:
"I SAID TO HIM THAT HE SHOULD'VE BEEN TALKING IMMIGRATION FOR THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF AND IT WAS A MISTAKE TO BRUSH IT UNDER THE CARPET. There is an economic impact on wages... The movement of unskilled workers could be destabilising.'
The Mail was sceptical, saying:
"As a senior Treasury adviser in 2004, IT WAS MR BALLS' DEPARTMENT WHICH GAVE UNFETTERED ACCESS TO JOBS IN BRITAIN FOR THE NEW EU MEMBERS IN EASTERN EUROPE. And in 2006, as a City Minister, Mr BALLS LAVISHED PRAISE ON THE EU COMMON MARKET, CALLING IT 'ONE OF EUROPE'S DEFINING ACHIEVEMENTS'.”
The bloke’s a joke.
Anyone who believes his volte-face is anything other than the most cynical politicking is a brainwashed moron or a bought-and-paid-for Ballsite.
Despite what he said just one day afterwards, on 6 June 2010, The Guardian had quoted Ed Balls thus:
"There have been real economic gains from the arrival of young, hard-working migrants from eastern Europe over the past six years... I have no doubt that IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN A POWERFUL DRIVER OF BOTH ECONOMIC GROWTH AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN OUR COUNTRY. In the public meetings I hold, it is only the BNP supporters who deny that our NHS and IT industries depend on immigration."
On 6 June 2010, Peter Oborne said this in The Daily Mail:
"THE SINGLE MOST INVIDIOUS LEGACY OF THE BLAIR-BROWN GOVERNMENT IS THE DESTRUCTION OF INTEGRITY IN BRITISH PUBLIC LIFE. IN THE YEARS AFTER 1997, IT BECAME NORMAL FOR THE PRIME MINISTER AND HIS SPOKESMAN TO LIE, CHEAT, MISLEAD AND MANIPULATE THE TRUTH...
This week provided a clear example of how far the rot had gone when FORMER MINISTER ADAM INGRAM WAS FORCED TO CONFESS THAT HE LIED TO PARLIAMENT OVER BRITISH TREATMENT OF IRAQI PRISONERS FOLLOWING THE INVASION OF 2003.
Ingram was Defence Minister in the months following the war and during that time HE REPEATEDLY GAVE ASSURANCES THAT BRITISH SOLDIERS DID NOT USE THE ILLEGAL TECHNIQUE OF HOODING DETAINEES WHEN INTERROGATING IRAQI PRISONERS. And yet - thanks to the public inquiry into the death of hotel receptionist Baha Mousa in Basra in September 2003 - WE NOW KNOW THAT, AT THE TIME INGRAM WAS GIVING THESE ASSURANCES TO PARLIAMENT, HE KNEW EXTREMELY WELL THAT WHAT HE WAS SAYING WAS FALSE. Indeed, Ingram had received briefing documents which stated beyond doubt that prisoners were being hooded - among them Baha Mousa. Such distorting of the truth to his colleagues is profoundly shocking, and IN ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT IN MODERN BRITISH HISTORY INGRAM WOULD SURELY HAVE BEEN FORCED TO RESIGN AS A MATTER OF HONOUR...
THE MINISTERIAL CODE DEMANDS THAT MINISTERS MUST NOT MISLEAD PARLIAMENT AND THAT IF THEY DO SO UNWITTINGLY, THEY MUST RETURN AT ONCE TO THE COMMONS AND CORRECT. THE BLAIR GOVERNMENT WAS DIFFERENT. ADAM INGRAM'S DECEPTION OF MPS IS JUST ONE OF SEVERAL CASES WHEN PARLIAMENT AND THE BRITISH PUBLIC WERE MISLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE IRAQ WAR. FOR EXAMPLE, WE ALREADY KNOW THAT TONY BLAIR HIMSELF LIED TO MPS ABOUT THE HIDEOUS ABUSE OF PRISONERS HELD AT ABU GHRAIB JAIL IN IRAQ WHEN DETAILS OF THEIR TREATMENT BECAME PUBLIC in the summer of 2004.
'It is not correct that ministers or I were aware of those allegations in respect of American troops,' Blair told the then Tory leader Michael Howard.
BLAIR'S STATEMENT WAS FALSE. In fact, one British minister - Bill Rammell - had been briefed by the Red Cross about the atrocities at Abu Ghraib several months before. And FORMER HOME SECRETARY ALAN JOHNSON FALSELY ASSERTED THAT CLAIMS OF BRITISH INTELLIGENCE COMPLICITY IN THE TORTURE OF THE TERROR SUSPECT BINYAM MOHAMED WERE 'BASELESS, GROUNDLESS ACCUSATIONS'.
In addition, we already know that TONY BLAIR'S PRESS SECRETARY ALASTAIR CAMPBELL REPEATEDLY LIED ABOUT HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE NOW DISCREDITED DOSSIER ON SADDAM HUSSEIN'S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION when appearing in front of MPs from the Foreign Affairs Committee in the summer of 2003. Furthermore, THERE ARE THE NUMEROUS LIES REITERATED BY TONY BLAIR CONCERNING THE EVIDENCE HE HAD RECEIVED FROM BRITISH INTELLIGENCE CONCERNING IRAQI WMD BOTH TO PARLIAMENT AND TO THE MEDIA.”
On 6 June 2010, Simon Walters, The Mail on Sunday's Political Editor, said this:
“DAVID MILIBAND'S LABOUR LEADERSHIP CAMPAIGN IS BEING BANKROLLED TO THE TUNE OF £50,000 BY LABOUR TYCOON LORD SAINSBURY – while designer Ozwald Boateng has provided him with cut-price suits to improve his wooden image.
Lord Sainsbury’s support for the former Foreign Secretary’s bid to succeed Gordon Brown is the latest evidence of Mr Miliband’s Blairite links. LORD SAINSBURY, WHO GAVE £10 MILLION TO LABOUR AND WAS MADE A TRADE MINISTER BY TONY BLAIR, IS PAYING FOR MR MILIBAND’S CAMPAIGN HQ in Smith Square, Westminster, which is next door to Margaret Thatcher’s old Tory head office.
Lord Sainsbury is one of Britain’s richest men and his family’s fortune is estimated at £2.1 billion. He has 11 homes around the world.
Although Mr Blair has refused to say publicly who he is backing, most Labour MPs believe that he wants Mr Miliband, who ran the former Prime Minister’s No 10 policy unit, to win. In a further gesture of support, Mr BLAIR HAS ALLOWED JO GIBBONS, A SENIOR AIDE AT HIS BLAIR FOUNDATION, TO TAKE TIME OFF TO HELP RUN MR MILIBAND’S CAMPAIGN.”
Miliband is Jewish.
So is Sainsbury.
Boateng is black.
Tony Blair is a tw*t.
And, in my humble opinion, the greatest traitor our islands have ever produced.
On 6 June 2010, David Miliband said this on The Andrew Marr Show:
“I think that a cap on skilled migrants from outside the European Union... IT'S WORTHLESS because it will catch people who this country needs.”
On 3 June 2010, The Keighley News reported that a “father of three… said he had watched in despair as his young daughter deteriorated from a happy-go-lucky schoolgirl into a sombre, scared shell in less than six months…
She had become a victim of sexual grooming by a gang of men who he, the police and Social Services seemed powerless to stop.”
The father added:
“I am at the end of my tether. WHY CAN’T WE PROTECT OUR OWN CHILDREN FROM THESE PEOPLE? They (officials at his daughter’s school) said that they were worried MY DAUGHTER HAD BEEN SEEN GETTING INTO CARS AT THE END OF SCHOOL WITH GROUPS OF ASIAN MEN. When I approached her about it, she denied it but her friends showed me her Facebook page, which contained references to cocaine and cannabis…
All the members have two names, their real names AND ONES THAT BEGIN WITH ‘GANGSTER THIS’ AND GANGSTER THAT’. My daughter is not allowed a mobile phone but I found out that they had given her two and I HAVE READ THREATENING MESSAGES SENT TO HER. I confiscated them and banned her from using the Internet but now she has started running away and I have to frequently report her missing to the police.
I asked for her to be put in protective custody but THEY TOLD ME THAT WHEREVER THEY SEND HER, GLASGOW OR LONDON, THE GANG WOULD STILL GET TO HER. They then told me that all the protective custody places were full but MY DAUGHTER IS 14, SHE SHOULD BE A PRIORITY.”
The Keighley News said:
“Social Services gave him a black diary to write down when events took place along with a piece of paper entitled ‘TEN TOP TIPS TO HELP WHEN YOUR CHILD IS A VICTIM OF GROOMING‘.
The father said:
“I THOUGHT THAT WAS LAUGHABLE. A COMPLETE JOKE. Everyone I speak to says I HAVE BEEN BADLY LET DOWN BY THE SYSTEM and I agree. WHY WON’T ANYONE DO ANYTHING TO HELP HER? I have done everything by the book, I have done everything I can and THINGS HAVE GONE FROM BAD TO WORSE. I want it to stop.
Now I want to warn other parents to be aware of what is going on out there and THE FACT THAT THE LAW NEEDS TO CHANGE IN ORDER TO PROSECUTE THESE PEOPLE.”
And the British people keep on voting for those who brought this malign state of affairs about.
They keep on voting for those who destroyed the safe, secure and gentle world our daughters and granddaughters once grew up in and installed hell-on-earth in its place.
The British are not what they were a few short years ago, that's for sure.
On 2 June 2010, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Mail:
“FOR TOO LONG, THE STATE'S ELITE HAS BEEN ABLE TO KEEP ITS CULTURE OF SELF-ENRICHMENT HIDDEN FROM THE TAXPAYERS... THERE ARE 172 CIVIL SERVANTS ON SALARIES ABOVE £150,000... The total pay of these well-heeled pen-pushers tops £29million, a sum that is a monument to the climate of profligacy and entitlement that now prevails in the upper reaches of the public sector…
We have been systematically plundered by A NEW BREED OF QUANGOCRATS, LOCAL AUTHORITY CHIEFTANS AND PUBLIC SECTOR GREED MERCHANTS…
Across the public sector as a whole, there were at least 806 public officials in 2008/9 on remuneration packages worth over £150,000 a year. Eight were earning over £1million, and 35 were raking in over £500,000... THE BBC HAS NO FEWER THAN 382 STAFF EARNING ABOVE £100,000. This phalanx of corporation money grabbers is led by Director-General Mark Thompson, whose salary is £664,000...
THIS SORT OF EXCESS CAN BE FOUND EVERYWHERE AT THE TOP OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR… THE TOP TEN EARNERS HAVE SEEN THEIR SALARIES GO UP BY 91 PER CENT... No fewer than 1,250 senior council staff earned more than £100,000 last year, a 14 per cent rise on 2007/8. In addition, 166 municipal chiefs had salaries of over £150,000 and 31 of them more than £200,000...
Recently, Sir Norman Bettison, who earns £213,000 as Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, warned that TOP PUBLIC SECTOR SALARIES HAVE GONE 'MAD' AND COULD NO LONGER BE JUSTIFIED.
'My old man, who was made redundant in the steel industry upheaval of the 1980s, would not have been able to comprehend it,' he said...
IN A TIME OF ECONOMIC CRISIS, WITH THE FISCAL DEFICIT WEIGHING SO HEAVILY, IT IS ABSURD THAT WE ARE PAYING FOR ALL THIS LARGESSE FROM WHICH WE GAIN SO LITTLE…
THE IDEA THAT HIGH PAY IS NEEDED TO ATTRACT TALENT IS EQUALLY ABSURD. MANY OF THE JOBS ARE JUST ROUTINE, REQUIRING SIMPLY ADMINISTRATIVE COMPETENCE RATHER THAN BRILLIANT BUSINESS ACUMEN AND CREATIVE SKILLS. Indeed... many of these state managers have no experience of business whatsoever but instead just worked their way up the hierarchies, OFTEN BY THE CYNICAL EXPEDIENT OF PLEASING THEIR POLITICAL MASTERS... It can only be hoped that the new searchlight of accountability will finally shame their SNOUTS OUT OF THE TROUGH.”
On 1 June 2010, Melanie Phillips reported thus in The Daily Mail:
“The stellar career of DAVID LAWS has been ruined by yet another episode of that long-running Westminster drama: HOW TO RIP OFF THE TAXPAYER AND NEARLY GET AWAY WITH IT. For let there be absolutely no mistake: despite all the self-justifying soap-operatics about how he had been too terrified to reveal that he was gay, the events that brought him down had absolutely nothing to do with his sexuality.
After all, his much-vaunted 'desire for privacy' had not forced him to claim some £40,000 in expenses to cover his 'rent' - WHICH WENT STRAIGHT TO HIS LONG-TERM GAY LOVER, THUS EFFECTIVELY CHANNELLING TAXPAYERS' MONEY INTO HIS OWN HOUSEHOLD.
Nor - even more damagingly - had his 'desire for privacy' caused him to reduce his expense claims for 'utilities' from between £50 and £150 per month to a mere £37 after the rules were changed in 2008, requiring MPs to provide receipts for any claims above £25.
Moreover HIS CLAIM THAT JAMES LUNDIE, HIS LOVER FOR THE PAST NINE YEARS, WAS NOT TECHNICALLY HIS PARTNER WAS CLEARLY UNSUSTAINABLE. After all, in 2007 Laws had extended the mortgage on his main Somerset home to help Lundie buy a property.
THIS NEW COALITION WAS SUPPOSED TO HERALD AN END TO SUCH POLITICAL ARROGANCE AND DECEIT; AN END TO THE ATTEMPTS BY VENAL POLITICIANS TO SPIN AND SQUIRM THEIR WAY OUT OF TROUBLE BY TREATING THE PUBLIC AS IDIOTS.”
On 28 May 2010, Pru Goward, a former Australian sex discrimination commissioner, commented thus on the practice of female circumcision in The Australian Daily Telegraph:
“When I was commissioner there were some reports of girls with ruptured bladders and urethras. I would say you must report this to the police. They would say THE FAMILY WOULD LIE and say she fell on a piece of glass.
THERE’S NOT BEEN ONE PROSECUTION. PEOPLE COMING HERE AS A REFUGEE OR A MIGRANT need to have it explained to them it attracts a jail sentence, we will prosecute you and if they don’t like that THEY SHOULD APPLY TO GO TO ANOTHER COUNTRY.”
The Telegraph added:
“Ms Goward said she YOUNG GIRLS WERE BEING TAKEN TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS WITH RUPTURED BLADDERS AND OTHER SERIOUS INJURIES AS A RESULT OF MUTILATIONS… Female genital mutilation has been outlawed in Australia since the 1990s but is COMMON AMONG AFRICAN, ASIAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN COMMUNITIES.
WITH THE RISE IN SOMALI AND SUDANESE LIVING IN AUSTRALIA, DOCTORS ARE SEEING MORE CASES OF YOUNG GIRLS, AND WOMEN, NEEDING SURGERY AFTER ILLEGAL OPERATIONS”.
Incredibly, The Telegraph then told us that the authorities were considering the legalisation of the practice!
“THE PRACTICE, INVOLVING CUTTING A GIRL'S GENITALS, SOMETIMES WITH RAZORS OR PIECES OF GLASS, COULD BE ALLOWED IN A CLINICAL SETTING to stem illegal backyard procedures which are leaving young girls scarred for life.”
On 27 May 2010, after labelling Liverpool Council's decision to withdraw funding from a military show "a disgrace", Peter Dunning, who lost both legs whilst serving in Afghanistan, was quoted thus at the ClickLiverpool web site:
"THE COUNCIL ARE JUST AFRAID OF A MUSLIM BACKLASH, similar to the protests in London last year."
"A military show was cancelled after town hall chiefs withdrew funding, BECAUSE IT DIDN'T MEET THEIR 'DIVERSITY CRITERIA'. The eighth annual Liverpool Military Show was due to take place at Walton Hall Park on Saturday, and featured a memorial service to fallen war heroes. But the event was scrapped at the last minute when council officials pulled out of providing £8,000 towards the costs.
Organisers say they were informed that THE SHOW DID NOT 'SCORE HIGHLY ENOUGH' ON LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL'S 'DIVERSITY SCALE' TO JUSTIFY FUNDING...
Just 10 days earlier, LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL HAD FUNDED THEIR ANNUAL 'IDAHO' GAY PRIDE FESTIVAL, CELEBRATING THE 'INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST HOMOPHOBIA'. TOWN HALL BOSSES HAVE ALSO AGREED TO PROVIDE £80,000 OF FUNDING FOR THE LIVERPOOL 'HOMOTOPIA' FESTIVAL IN AUGUST...
Last year's show helped raise around £13,000 for the Army Benevolent Fund, Combat Stress, St John Ambulance and the Army Cadet Force.”
On 20 May 2010, the Conservative Home Secretary, Theresa May, said that she had changed her mind on gay adoption on the BBC’s Question Time:
"ON GAY ADOPTION I HAVE CHANGED MY MIND... I think it's better for a child who is perhaps in an institutional environment, if they have an opportunity of being in A STABLE, FAMILY ENVIRONMENT - be that a heterosexual couple OR A GAY COUPLE - then I think it's more important that that child is in that STABLE AND LOVING ENVIRONMENT."
She said this despite voting against gay adoption in 2002 and against the repeal of Section 28, the law which banned councils from "promoting" homosexuality, in 2000.
And so it goes on.
David Cameron made Theresa May Minister for “Women and “Equalities”, as well as Home Secretary, in the new coalition government.
On 18 May 2010, Paul Jeeves informed us thus in The Daily Express:
"LABOUR’S UNCHECKED OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION POLICY HAS LEFT A LEGACY OF CLASSROOM CHAOS WITH THOUSANDS OF PUPILS UNABLE TO UTTER A SINGLE WORD OF ENGLISH. THE MASSIVE INFLUX OF EASTERN EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS AND A RISING BIRTH RATE AMONG NONENGLISH-SPEAKING ASIAN FAMILIES HAS LEFT TEACHERS UNABLE TO COMMUNICATE WITH VAST SECTIONS OF THEIR CLASSES.
AND THIS IS HOLDING BACK NATIVE ENGLISH-SPEAKING PUPILS.
The data, released by the Department for Education, shows that FOR 43.1 PER CENT OF PRIMARY PUPILS AND 30.3 PER CENT OF SECONDARY SCHOOLCHILDREN ENGLISH IS NOT THEIR FIRST LANGUAGE. There are now almost ONE MILLION SCHOOLCHILDREN IN BRITAIN WHO DO NOT SPEAK ENGLISH AS THEIR FIRST LANGUAGE… ONE-IN-SEVEN PUPILS IN PRIMARY, SECONDARY AND SPECIAL SCHOOLS IN ENGLAND SPEAKS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE AT HOME. AND MORE THAN A QUARTER OF ALL PUPILS IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS ARE CLASSIFIED AS BEING OF ETHNIC MINORITY ORIGIN, according the Department for Education statistics released last week.
SOME SCHOOLS HAVE TO CATER FOR UP TO 50 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES BEING SPOKEN AMONG THEIR PUPILS prompting parents of English-speaking children to seek alternative schools…
Pam Milner, of NASUWT, said:
‘We are at a crossroads. I would like to see the top people coming to Bradford for a flavour of what’s happening and meet the unions so we can say you have the power to do something about it BEFORE WE GO INTO MELTDOWN. We haven’t got enough capacity or teachers and if we don’t address the situation IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE’.”
We have been melting down for some time now, Pam.
But you’re right, things “will only get worse“.
And to think, just 12 days ago, despite all the evidence of Brit-loathing governmental treachery, THIS is what the British people voted for YET AGAIN!!!
If anyone out there imagines that the Conservatives haven't played their part in the multiculturalising project over the years, trust me, they have. And they intend to carry right on doing so!
This is what was said in the 2010 Tory Manifesto:
"IMMIGRATION HAS ENRICHED OUR NATION OVER THE YEARS... WE WANT TO ATTRACT THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST PEOPLE".
It is war, ladies and gentlemen.
It always was; it always will be.
And THEY will carry on waging war until we stop them.
If we don't stop them? If we carry on voting for the same old genocide merchants?
The British peoples will disappear from the pages of history just a few short years down the line.
It is war, ladies and gentlemen.
It really is.
Speaking at a press conference on 16 May 2010, David Laws, the Liberal Democrat's Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said this:
"When I arrived at my desk on the very first day as Chief Secretary, I found a letter from the previous Chief Secretary to give me some advice, I assumed, on how I conduct myself over the months ahead. Unfortunately, when I opened it, it was a one-sentence letter which simply said
’Dear Chief Secretary, I'M AFRAID TO TELL YOU THERE'S NO MONEY LEFT’."
This is what passes for a joke in New Labour Land.
At least, that's what Liam Byrne said it was.
On 13 May 2010, Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP, said this in his newsletter:
“The electoral wipe-out in Barking and Dagenham shocked us all...
Faced with the election of 12 BNP councillors years ago, LABOUR SET ABOUT A DELIBERATE PROCESS TO FLOOD BARKING & DAGENHAM WITH FOREIGNERS, replacing the newly politically conscious local British with AN IMPORTED ELECTORATE GUARANTEED TO VOTE LABOUR. The formulae is simple: IF YOU DON'T VOTE LABOUR THEY WILL REPLACE YOU!…
The percentage of foreigners in Barking & Dagenham has sky-rocketed over the last 4 years, UP FROM AROUND 15% TO NEARLY 40%, and BNP polling station tellers were shocked and horrified on polling day to witness the enormous queues of foreign faces eagerly waiting to vote for their party, Labour.
THE OLD EAST END OF LONDON IS NOW COMPLETELY DEAD. By the time another General Election comes about, OUR ANCIENT CAPITAL CITY WILL BE COMPLETELY OVERRUN... LABOUR HAS SUCCEEDED WHERE THE LUFTWAFFE FAILED...
What we are witnessing is nothing less than THE GRADUAL ERADICATION OF OUR PEOPLE FROM OUR ANCIENT HOMELAND.
WE HAVE LOST OUR CAPITAL CITY; IT IS OUR CHOICE WHETHER WE LOSE THE REST OF OUR COUNTRY."
On 11 May 2010, Patrick O'Flynn said this in The Daily Express:
"Now Messrs Cameron and Osborne, Clegg and Laws are not merely running their parties but discussing the terms upon which they can run the country too. Their contemporaries inside the Labour Party, the likes of Ed Balls and the Milibands, are playing catch-up; preparing to do battle for the leadership...
THEY ARE DRAWN FROM SO NARROW A SOCIAL GROUP, TYPIFIED BY EXTREMELY LIMITED LIFE EXPERIENCES… Nearly all of them can be accurately summarised in a single term: RICH KIDS...
Most come from very wealthy families and only the Milibands were state educated. But as the children of Britain’s leading Left-wing academic of the Seventies and Eighties, the Marxist sociologist Ralph, (a Jewish immigrant) their upbringing was as rarefied as that of their contemporaries.
They were used to their parents’ house in London’s Primrose Hill thronging with senior Labour politicians of the day...
THERE HAS BEEN A MARKED TREND IN RECENT YEARS FOR THOSE FROM WELL-OFF BACKGROUNDS TO TIGHTEN THEIR STRANGLEHOLD ON THE HOUSE OF COMMONS... NEARLY 40 PER CENT OF THE MPS ELECTED LAST WEEK WERE PRIVATELY EDUCATED, compared to just seven per cent of the over-all population. Among Tories the imbalance is even more marked – 54 per cent went to fee-paying schools.
What can explain a trend that so obviously runs against the democratic spirit of the age?... THE ABOLITION OF SELECTIVE STATE EDUCATION IN MOST OF BRITAIN HAS WASTED THE POTENTIAL OF MANY ABLE PEOPLE FROM MODEST BACKGROUNDS. GETTING RID OF THE GRAMMAR SCHOOLS AND REPLACING THEM WITH MIXED-ABILITY COMPREHENSIVES HAS DONE SUCH PEOPLE NO FAVOURS...
Party leaders Edward Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Michael Howard were all alumni of grammars. Grammar schools also gave the Labour Party most of its top talent from Harold Wilson to Barbara Castle to Denis Healey. By the Sixties the grammars had the public schools on the run and were helping to really democratise Britain by putting people from ordinary backgrounds into top positions across society. They accounted for more than 60 per cent of Oxbridge entrants, dwarfing numbers from private schools. But then A FORMER PUBLIC SCHOOL BOY DECIDED TO CLOSE THEM DOWN – NOT A TORY BUT LABOUR’S ANTHONY CROSLAND (Highgate School).
'IF IT’S THE LAST THING I DO, I’M GOING TO DESTROY EVERY GRAMMAR SCHOOL,' he declared. A DECADE LATER 90 PER CENT WERE GONE. CROSLAND’S WORK WAS FINISHED BY SHIRLEY WILLIAMS (St Paul’s Girls). In between times HEATH AND HIS EDUCATION SECRETARY THATCHER CONTINUED THE PROGRAMME TO CLOSE DOWN GRAMMARS AND OPEN COMPREHENSIVES. IN NORFOLK PROFESSOR MICHAEL BALLS, THE FATHER OF ED, LED THE SUCCESSFUL CAMPAIGN TO SHUT THE GRAMMARS. HE THEN ENSURED HIS OWN SON BENEFITED FROM AN ACADEMICALLY SELECTIVE EDUCATION BY SENDING HIM TO A PRIVATE SCHOOL. WE ARE NOW SEEING THE END RESULT OF THIS POLICY – A SHOCKING DECLINE IN SOCIAL MOBILITY.”
On 9 May 2010, The Sunday Times quoted Ababu Namwamba, a Kenyan MP and an official observer of the process of the British General Election, thus:
“The allegations of fraud and of voters being turned away threaten the integrity of the vote, especially in marginal constituencies where candidates have a majority of less than 1,000... One candidate told me that THE BRITISH SYSTEM IS POSSIBLY THE MOST CORRUPTIBLE IN THE WHOLE WORLD.”
Marie Marilyn Jalloh, an MP from Sierra Leone, added:
“There has to be some doubt over the legitimacy of the result. Where people have been disenfranchised of cases of fraud are found there should be another vote.
In my country this would be very controversial. YOUR SYSTEM IS A RECIPE FOR CORRUPTION; it was a massive shock when I saw YOU DIDN'T NEED ANY IDENTIFICATION TO VOTE. In Sierra Leone you need an identity card and also need to give your fingerprint. HERE YOU NEED NOTHING. IN THIS RESPECT, OUR OWN SYSTEM IS MORE SECURE THAN YOURS.”
The “system” that Ms Jalloh believes is a “recipe for corruption” was created and overseen by the New Labour government.
In Hannah Rothschild's diary of the time, she quotes Peter Mandelson as having said this on 6 May 2010:
“Win or lose, I could just stay and keep handing out money like a Bourbon king."
"Everyone laughs but he cries as he sinks a knife into a large fruitcake."
On 4 May 2010, North West Norfolk candidate, Manish Sood, was seen saying the following things throughout the British media:
“Immigration has gone up which is creating friction within communities. The country is getting bigger and messier. The role of ministers has gone bureaucratic and the action of ministers has gone downhill - IT IS CORRUPT.
The loss of social values is the basic problem and this is not what the Labour Party is about. I believe Gordon Brown has been the worst prime minister we have had in this country. It is a disgrace and he owes an apology to the people and the Queen...
THINGS ARE GOING TOTALLY WRONG... IT'S A REAL DISASTER FOR THE CITIES, THE COUNTRY AND THE NATION... We really have to come down hard on the Labour Party, on the Labour government and the Prime Minister really does need to wake up and see that this is a problem.”
Sood was a NEW LABOUR candidate when he complained thusly!
After Gordon Brown's "bigoted woman" remark, Jack Straw, was asked to justify it by one of his Blackburn constituents.
On 3 May 2010, The Telegraph quoted his reply:
“He’s apologised for that", said Straw, adding:
"I UNDERSTAND WHY SOME PEOPLE IN THE WHITE COMMUNITY WOULD SEE THIS TOWN CHANGING AND BE DISTURBED ABOUT IT.”
Thus spake one of New Labour’s top “town-changing” totalitarians.
Jack Straw describes himself as “third-generation” Jewish.
On 2 May 2010, The Daily Mail quoted a March 10 letter to Nigerian asylum-seeker, Rhoda Sulaimon, signed by former Cabinet Minister, Hazel Blears:
"I am just writing to you as I understand from my constituency office that you are experiencing problems with your immigration matter", said Blears. "Please rest assured that I have contacted the UK Border Agency on your behalf and raised the matter with them. I will of course be in touch when I receive a response."
After receiving the letter, Ms Sulaimon volunteered to work for Blears' election campaign.
Shortly before the above correspondence was published by The Mail, Blears had said:
"I HAD ABSOLUTELY NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE SITUATION WHATSOEVER."
Ms Sulaimon had emailed Blears about her case as early February, prompting the March 10 letter.
Just another lying politician, then.
Nothing new there.
On 2 May 2010, Michael Franklyn, the Neighbourhood Watch co-ordinator of Castle Road, Chatham and a former employee of Medway Council’s social services department, was quoted thus in The Daily Express:
“A LOT OF THE PROBLEMS OF ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ARE BEING CAUSED BY THE SLOVAKIAN (GYPSY) KIDS. You see them around when clearly they should be at school and we get reports about them shouting and banging down the road at 1am and 2am. There are people up here who won’t open their doors after dark.
I suspect A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE TOO FRIGHTENED TO SAY ANYTHING. I will report things but there IS A LACK OF A RESPONSE FROM THE POLICE. Many of the incidents they don’t even record as crime can be quite disturbing.
The police always talk these days about A PERCEPTION OF CRIME. I don’t perceive eggs being thrown at doors, I don’t perceive being spat at, I don’t perceive the kids trying to break the phone box down the road, I don’t perceive the kids swearing at other people and throwing bricks at houses, I don’t perceive them urinating in the alley or even having sex there. I don’t perceive these things, I see them. THEY ARE VERY REAL.
I think anyone you talk to, if they were honest, would tell you THE PROBLEMS HAVE GOT A HELL OF A LOT WORSE IN RECENT YEARS.”
I guess Mr Franklyn must be what Gordon Brown would call a “bigot”,
On 2 May 2010, in response to an earlier speaker who urged more Muslims to enter politics:, Sayeeda Warsi, the Conservative Party's spokeswoman for community cohesion, said this at a dinner held in honour of the President of Pakistan-controlled Kashmir:
"[He] says that we need more Muslims MPs, that we need more Muslims in the House of Lords. I would actually disagree with that because I think one of the lessons we have learnt in the last five years in politics is that NOT ALL MUSLIMS THAT GO INTO POLITICS HAVE ASOOL...
Not everyone puts their community before their own career".
Asool is Urdu for "morals"/"principles".
Not all Muslims behave in a principled or moral way, eh, Sayeeda?
If a Brit had said that he'd be half way to Pentonville by now.
Still, thanks for stating the stone bleedin' obvious. The truth is precious, whatever its source.
On 2 May 2010, Hazel Blears, the former New Labour Cabinet Minister was quoted thus by The Mail on Sunday:
"I HAD ABSOLUTELY NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE SITUATION WHATSOEVER."
Blears thus denied any knowledge of Rhoda Sulaimon’s immigration status.
Ms Sulaimon, an illegal immigrant from Nigeria, had been working on Blears' election campaign team.
Blears was lying. She had previously written to Sulaimon on 10 March saying this:
“I am just writing to you as I understand from my constituency office that you are experiencing problems WITH YOUR IMMIGRATION MATTER. Please rest assured that I have contacted the UK Border Agency on your behalf and raised the matter with them. I will of course be in touch when I receive a response."
Sulaimon had originally emailed Blears about her case in February, prompting the March 10 letter.
On 30 April 2010, the comedian, Frankie Boyle, was quoted thus by The Guardian:
"The show's producers will have thought that ISRAEL, AN AGGRESSIVE, TERRORIST STATE WITH A NUCLEAR ARSENAL, was an appropriate target for satire. The Trust's ruling… says that if you imagine that A STATE BUSILY GOING ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF AN ENTIRE PEOPLE is fair game, you are mistaken. ISRAEL IS OUT OF BOUNDS.
It's tragic for such a great institution but IT IS NOW CRAVENLY AFRAID OF GIVING OFFENCE AND VULNERABLE TO ANY KIND OF WELL-DRILLED LOBBYING. I told the jokes on a Radio 4 show called Political Animal. That title seems to promise provocative comedy with a point of view. In practice the BBC wish to deliver the flavour of political comedy WITH NONE OF THE CONTENT."
Frankie had previously cracked the following joke on the Radio 4 programme, Political Animal:
"I've been studying Israeli army martial arts. I now know 16 ways to kick a Palestinian woman in the back. People think that the Middle East is very complex but I have an analogy that sums it up quite well. If you imagine that Palestine is a big cake, well, THAT CAKE IS BEING PUNCHED TO PIECES BY A VERY ANGRY JEW"!
Following a complaint from JUST ONE LISTENER, who said the comments were "DISGUSTING" and "ANTISEMITIC", the BBC Trust's editorial standards committee investigated and apologised. The committee said it endorsed the editorial complaints unit's finding about the use of the word "JEW", adding:
"The committee wished to apologise to the complainant on behalf of the BBC for any offence the remark may have caused him and other listeners to the programme."
Just one thing, Frankie: it's not so much Israel that is "out of bounds".
It's the Jew.
We all have to pretend the one isn't the same as the other.
That's democracy (the censorious kind that suits our Hebrew chums) for you.
On 28 April 2010, Gordon Brown was caught on mike describing sixty-five-year-old Labour supporter, Gillian Duffy, a “BIGOTED WOMAN”.
He described he thus because she had the temerity to challenge him on, amongst other things, immigration and crime.
As he went to get into his car, Brown said this to Gillian:
"Very nice to meet you, very nice to meet you."
But off camera, and not realising he still had a Sky News microphone pinned to his shirt, he was heard to say:
"That was a disaster - They should never have put me with that woman… She's just a sort of BIGOTED WOMAN that said she used to be Labour. I mean it's just ridiculous.”
Gillian, a widow used to work with disabled children before she retired, responded thus:
"I'm very upset. He's an educated person. Why has he come out with words like that?
He's supposed to be leading the country and he's calling an ordinary woman who's come up and asked questions that most people would ask him... IT'S GOING TO BE TAX, TAX, TAX FOR ANOTHER 20 YEARS TO GET OUT OF THIS NATIONAL DEBT, and HE'S CALLING ME A BIGOT."
Brown’s comments and Gillian’s response can be seen here.
This is how The Daily Mail put it the following day:
“When challenged about immigration, Mr BROWN REVERTED TO THE PAVLOVIAN RESPONSE OF BRITAIN'S POLITICALLY CORRECT, CHATTERING CLASSES WHO CRY RACISM OR BIGOTRY WHENEVER THE SUBJECT IS RAISED.
THUS HAS OUR LIBERAL ESTABLISHMENT - AND THE BBC ARE THE WORST OFFENDERS - SHUT DOWN THE DEBATE ON THE MOST PROFOUND CHANGE IN THIS COUNTRY'S MAKE-UP IN ITS HISTORY. INDEED, AT TIMES, THESE SUPPOSED DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND LIBERTY HAVE BEHAVED LIKE STATE CENSORS.
Even now, with immigration among the top two concerns of the electorate, the Tories are shy about promising tougher border controls for fear they, too, will be labelled 'nasty' or bigoted by the Left. But HOW IS IT BIGOTED TO WORRY ABOUT THE STRAIN PLACED ON SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS BY THE ARRIVAL OF ONE MILLION IMMIGRANTS FROM EASTERN EUROPE IN BARELY FIVE YEARS?
How is it bigoted to worry that the number of illegal immigrants - the very people who Nick Clegg wants to grant an amnesty to, in what is probably the most loony of his many lunatic policies - is now 1.1million?
HOW IS IT BIGOTED TO BE CONCERNED THAT, WHILE YOUNG BRITONS SIT IDLE ON BENEFITS, CHEAP MIGRANT WORKERS ARE BEING USED TO FILL THE GAP IN THE LABOUR MARKET?
This has nothing to do with race or bigotry. It is about jobs, welfare, public services and an unsustainable density of population”!
Which sums the reality up nicely.
Unfortunately, the PC Crowd have never been too concerned with reality. Except where it impacts negatively upon the unreality they favour, that is. That’s when the “liberal establishment” flourish the little Red book of bogey words and the “racist”, “Fascist”, “Nazi” stuff is trotted out.
And 65-year-old Grandmas get labelled “bigots”.
It is war, you know.
THEY really do want us gone.
I promise you, ladies and gentlemen, THEY will never stop doing what THEY do.
Until we stop them.
Go here for more Chronological Quotations 7