THE NEWS

Illuminating Quotations

2009-11-20T16:38:00.068Z

On 12 December 2009, renowned political journalist, Peter Oborne, told it like it is in The Daily Mail, when he said:

"THE KEY BATTLE IN BRITISH POLITICS IS BETWEEN A PAMPERED, COSY AND CORRUPT POLITICAL CLASS WHICH HAS LOST ALL CONNECTION WITH THE REAL WORLD - AND THE MASS OF ORDINARY PEOPLE BETRAYED BY POLITICIANS OF ALL PARTIES."

On 21 June 2009, the African immigrant Sorious Samura wrote the following in The Sunday Independent:

“When I moved to Britain I believed I had escaped... horrific sexual violence... I was mistaken. Gang rape is happening here – and what I have found most disturbing as an African is that A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF THESE ATTACKS ARE BEING CARRIED OUT BY BLACK OR MIXED-RACE YOUNG MEN…

In December, nine schoolboys, (8 of them black) some as young as 13 at the time of the attack, were convicted of raping a 14-year-old (white) girl. She was dragged between tower blocks in Hackney where she was threatened with a knife, hit and raped during an ordeal that lasted an hour and a half – some of which was filmed on mobile phones. In January, three (black) men were convicted of gang raping a 16-year-old with learning disabilities for two hours BEFORE DOUSING HER WITH CAUSTIC SODA in an effort to get rid of the evidence…

Despite the seriousness of the crime, I was amazed to discover that NO NATIONAL STATISTICS EXIST: gang rape is simply not recorded as a separate crime category…

One of the few police forces to have begun recording the figures of reported gang rape is the Metropolitan Police. In 2008 alone, they received reports of 85 gang rapes... We tracked down 29 cases, from January 2006 to March 2009, in which a total of 92 young people were convicted of involvement in gang rape... Of those convicted, 66 WERE BLACK OR MIXED RACE, 13 were white and THE REMAINDER WERE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES INCLUDING AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ AND LIBYA…

The groups of young men I met in London... explained how they make arrangements for ‘line-ups’ in which one girl has oral sex with up to six or seven of them at one time…

Girls can unwittingly walk into a trap, innocently visiting someone's house to listen to music or watch a film only to discover that A GROUP OF BOYS ARE LYING IN WAIT. Or they might be hanging out with friends in a park and suddenly realise they have become surrounded by A GROUP OF BOYS INTENT ON SEX…

Occasionally gang rape is used to punish a girl for minor transgressions against gang members... I met A GIRL WHO ADMITTED SHE HAD HELPED TO SET UP GIRLS FOR GANG RAPE. As the girlfriend of a gang member, SHE ORGANISED THESE RAPES, partly out of fear and PARTLY TO FIT IN...

‘There was just loads of boys and the girl's tights were ripped up, like, she was bleeding as well, because I THINK SHE WAS A VIRGIN, and they were just taking turns on her basically, and SHE WAS CRYING, and I didn't get involved because I thought if I get involved they're gonna turn on me'...

A 14-year-old girl described her ordeal when she was gang raped by a total of nine boys who told her that she was not the only girl they had attacked. In that case, nine boys were subsequently convicted of raping her. The youngest perpetrator was just 12 years old...

The Rev Joyce Daley, from the Black Parents Forum in Hackney, told me that gang rape... IS HAPPENING ON A REGULAR BASIS… Sheldon Thomas, a youth worker in Brixton, said:

‘WE'VE GOT A GENERATION THAT LOOKS AT SEX AS IF IT'S NOTHING, AND TREATS DISRESPECTING WOMEN AS IF IT'S NOTHING. These guys are like 13, 14 and 15, and their actual attitudes towards young girls – towards sex – is mind-blowing. It's actually leaving you asking: WHERE ARE THEIR MORALS, WHERE ARE THEIR VALUES?"

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/gang-rape-is-it-a-race-issue-1711381.html

Morals?

Values? They were not imported to be be moral or to value those who gave them sanctuary here. They were brought over to destroy. The “black or mixed race” gang rapists, those from “Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya”, and all the rest of the foreigners imported into our world in recent times, are the foot soldiers in the war being waged by the elite belligerents of the New World Order upon the working-class communities of the white world.

Hey! All you New Labour and Lib Dem voters! All you PC Crowd “pity the poor immigrant” types! THIS IS WHAT YOU VOTED FOR! YOU DID THIS!

As for you who voted for Old Labour and the Tories, you did it as well. This has been happening ever since they started coming over here in droves. Like the man says, “no national statistics exist.” Immigrant-upon-indigenous gang rape was brushed under the carpet by ALL the mainstream parties. It still is.

THEY are at war with our little girls, ladies and gentlemen. Why are you still voting for THEM?

Are you at war with our little girls as well?

On 9 November 2010, EU President, Herman Van Rompuy, said this in Berlin:

"THE TIME OF THE HOMOGENOUS NATION STATE IS OVER... WE HAVE TOGETHER TO FIGHT THE DANGER OF A NEW EUROSCEPTICISM...

In every member state, there are people who believe their country can survive alone in the globalised world. IT IS MORE THAN AN ILLUSION – IT IS A LIE...

The biggest enemy of Europe today is fear. Fear leads to egoism. Egoism leads to nationalism. Nationalism leads to war...

Today’s nationalism is often not a positive feeling of pride in one’s own identity, but a negative feeling of apprehension of the others...

Just imagine the big recession of 2008/09 with the old currencies. A currency war always ends in protectionism."

On 20 November 2009, Paul Belien, the author of "A Throne In Brussels: Britain, the Saxe-Coburgs and the Belgianisation Of Europe", who knows Van Rompuy personally, said this in The Daily Mail:

"DEVOID OF PATRIOTISM AND CONTEMPTUOUS OF DEMOCRACY, HERMAN VAN ROMPUY PERFECTLY EMBODIES THE CULTURE OF THE EU. HIS SOLE POLITICAL IDEAL IS THE CREATION OF A FEDERAL SUPERSTATE, DESTROYING NATIONAL IDENTITIES ACROSS EUROPE...

The tragedy of Van Rompuy's political career is that he used to have a very different outlook. When I first met him in 1985, he was much more sceptical about European federalism. A conservative Catholic, he had been heavily influenced by the Flemish philosopher Lode Claes, WHO PASSIONATELY BELIEVED THAT WITHOUT A GENUINE SPIRIT OF NATIONHOOD, THERE COULD BE NO DEMOCRACY AND NO POLITICAL MORALITY.

Van Rompuy wrote elegantly about THE IMPORTANCE OF TRADITIONAL VALUES AND THE NEED TO MAINTAIN THE CHRISTIAN ROOTS OF EUROPE. He was so disgusted by the Belgian establishment's rejection of these principles he told me he was thinking of leaving politics. But his bosses the Flemish Christian-Democrat Party were appalled at the thought of losing this bright young star. So he was offered rapid advancement up the political ladder.

Van Rompuy accepted, and embarked on a series of shabby compromises which brought him high office but proved HE HAD SOLD HIS SOUL.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229670/Herman-Van-Rompuy-shrewd-master-shabby-compromise.html#ixzz154B6HIfY

On 29 March 2010, The Jewish Chronicle quoted the New Labour MP, Martin Linton, as having said the following at a House of Commons meeting the previous week:

“THERE ARE LONG TENTACLES OF ISRAEL IN THIS COUNTRY WHO ARE FUNDING ELECTION CAMPAIGNS AND PUTTING MONEY INTO THE BRITISH POLITICAL SYSTEM FOR THEIR OWN ENDS.

You must consider over the next few weeks, when you make decisions about how you vote… YOU MUST MAKE THEM AWARE OF THE ATTEMPT BY ISRAELIS AND BY PRO-ISRAELIS TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION.”

At the same meeting the New Labour MP, Sir Gerald Kaufman, a Jew himself, said this:

“Just as Lord Ashcroft owns most of the Conservative Party, RIGHT-WING JEWISH MILLIONAIRES OWN THE REST,”

The Jewish Chronicle also told us this:

“ANDREW DISMORE (a New Labour MP) HAS BEEN A CONSISTENT CHAMPION OF THE CONCERNS OF THE LOCAL JEWISH COMMUNITY. But after a series of allegations about his EXPENSES, he faces a tough fight with the Tories’ Matthew Offord and MATTHEW HARRIS, SECRETARY OF LIB DEM FRIENDS OF ISRAEL.

One of the most intriguing battles will be for the Bury South seat of MIDDLE EAST MINISTER IVAN LEWIS, A FORMER CHAIR OF MANCHESTER JEWISH FEDERATION. Although Mr Lewis sits on a substantial majority, he faces a formidable opponent in MICHELLE WISEMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF MANCHESTER JEWISH CARE.”

An edition of the aforementioned Peter Oborne's courageous documentary, The Israel Lobby, may be viewed here.

On 15 February 2010, Muslim gang member, Amir, was quoted thus by The Sun:

"BRITAIN'S UNDERWORLD BELONGS TO THE MUSLIMS…

People don't f*** with us because they think we're all in al-Qaeda. Our status in the criminal hierarchy changed literally the day the Twin Towers went down. From then, Asians have been associated with terrorism. People, including other criminals, think if you're Asian you'll blow up a Tube train or bomb an aeroplane. IN THE PAST 20 YEARS WE'VE CAPITALISED ON THAT. IF WE'RE GOING TO BE THOUGHT OF AS EXTREMISTS, WHY NOT USE THAT FEAR?…

WITH ISLAM COMES FEAR, AND WITH FEAR COMES POWER…

Through religion we speak the same language, live in the same areas, go to the same schools AND CAN EVEN USE MOSQUES AS A SAFE PLACE AWAY FROM THE POLICE OR OTHER GANGS. If you f*** with a Muslim gang you'd better be able to run fast or hide well, because THEY WILL COME BACK AT YOU IN NUMBERS…

WE CARRY SWORDS FOR PROTECTION. I'VE HAD TO USE MINE MORE THAN ONCE… These days NOBODY FIGHTS ON THEIR OWN. YOU'LL GET ATTACKED BY A WHOLE GANG…

If you go to school in an ethnic area you either join a gang or end up bullied, in some cases TO THE POINT OF BEING KILLED. So TO AVOID A LIFE OF HELL A KID JOINS A GANG. Once you're in, life is easy - no more beatings, people to talk to, stuff to do. AFTER SCHOOL YOU GRADUATE INTO MORE SERIOUS GANG ACTIVITY…

A boss can make up to £8,000 a day running a gang of 40 workers drug-dealing or scamming credit cards, and a worker can make £1,000.

Ten years ago, Asian gangs would go to war with Yardies and white gangs. But now, WE'VE GOT LONDON ALL SEWN UP… MUSLIMS HAVE THIS COUNTRY UNDER CONTROL. NOBODY CAN TOUCH US."

The Sun added:

“The 21-year-old, WHOSE ORGANISATION TURNED OVER THOUSANDS OF POUNDS A DAY FROM DRUG-DEALING AND CREDIT CARD SCAMS, claims a post-9/11 fear of terrorism has allowed Muslims to develop a stranglehold on our criminal community. Through Islam, he says, THEY HAVE NUMBERS WHICH CANNOT BE MATCHED, and rival gangs are being forced out by ruthless Islamic criminals who only deal with each other.

They recruit black and white members in Britain's jails, TEMPTING THEM TO CONVERT TO ISLAM in exchange for a cushier life inside. Once released, THE CONVERTED CONS HAVE ACCESS TO AN ENTIRELY NEW NETWORK OF MUSLIM CRIMINAL CONTACTS - and are trusted because they pray to Allah.

Amir claims that BRITAIN'S UNDERWORLD WILL SOON BE COMPLETELY DOMINATED BY ISLAMIC GANGS…

We spoke to a former prisoner we will refer to only as Steven, who was repeatedly approached by prison imams - Muslim priests - and asked to convert. Steven, who is British-born and white, rejected the approaches. He says:

‘When I went inside the MUSLIMS OFFERED ME HELP FROM TOP LAWYERS ON THE OUTSIDE WHO WOULD FIGHT TO GET MY SENTENCE CHANGED, IF I JOINED THEM.

I always resisted, but you have to understand how tempting it is to convert. First, you have their protection. You're totally alone in prison when you get there, AND IF YOU CAN'T LOOK AFTER YOURSELF LIFE IS HELL. YOU'RE BEATEN, ROBBED AND BULLIED.

Second, EVERY FRIDAY MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED PRAYER MEETINGS. THIS IS FREE TIME AWAY FROM THE GUARDS, SO THEY CAN PLOT, MAKE NEW CONTACTS AND OFTEN DISCUSS ANTI-WEST IDEOLOGY.

MUSLIMS ALSO GET BETTER FOOD. They have money sent in for their kitchens from the Muslim community outside, and they get special Halal dishes stipulated by Islam. Then, WHEN A CONVERTED PRISONER FINISHES HIS TIME, HE LEAVES AS AN EVEN BIGGER CRIMINAL WITH AN ENTIRELY NEW CONTACT BOOK OF MUSLIM CRIMINALS TO DO BUSINESS WITH…

Where the Muslim gangs come into their own is shifting drugs. If a white gang from London buys a kilo of coke, they then have to sell it. You can only sell your gear if you have contacts. The white gang will only know a few people in their area and won't trust or be trusted by other gangs. They won't deal with Eastern European, black or Asian gangs.

But THE MUSLIM NETWORK IS VAST AND STRETCHES UP AND DOWN THE UK, SO THEY CAN SHIFT DRUGS EXTREMELY QUICKLY. THAT MAKES THE MONEY-MAKING POTENTIAL OF A MUSLIM GANG A HUNDRED TIMES THAT OF A BRITISH OR EUROPEAN GANG’.”

This is what the politicians have given us over the course of the last fifty years, ladies and gentlemen.

Along with more than a thousand Mosques and a hundred thousand Asian-run businesses. This is what the anti-British race laws tell us we must endure. This is what the same politicians, the media darlings, the PC Crowd, Big Business, the Global Villagers and the immigrants themselves insist we must now “cohere” with.

If ever some brainwashed lemming dares to call you “racist” for railing against those who gave away what was once wholly ours to such savage effect that the immigrant criminal is now able to boast that “Muslims have this country under control”, call him TRAITOR!

For that, indeed, is what he is.

Anyone claiming to be British who would put the “Eastern European, black or Asian gangs”, the “Islamic gangs”, the "Muslim Priests”, the “Muslim network” and the plotters who “often discuss anti-West ideology”, before those such alien forces routinely brutalise, should be tried for treason, found guilty and punished accordingly.

Even if it is only stupidity or cowardice that causes them to attack their own with such rubber-stamped, fashion-following zeal.

On 8 February 2010, Vanessa Allen informed us thus in The Daily Mail:

“For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britain’s freedom and independence. The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nation’s frontier with the Continent.

But now part of THAT PROUD HISTORY IS UP FOR SALE AND THE LEADING BIDDER IS REVEALED AS THE FORMER AGE-OLD ENEMY – FRANCE.

It is one of a string of public assets which have been EARMARKED FOR PRIVATISATION AS THE GOVERNMENT BATTLES WITH A RECORD £830BILLION NATIONAL DEBT.

A sale of the Port of Dover, Europe’s busiest ferry port, could net up to £350million for the Treasury. Its harbour board applied to the Transport Secretary for voluntary privatisation last month. THE SALE IS EXPECTED TO BE RUBBER-STAMPED AND THE LEADING BIDDER HAS EMERGED AS NORD-PAS-DE-CALAIS REGIONAL COUNCIL, WHICH ALSO OWNS CALAIS...

The Port of Dover is the largest British port still in the public sector and made a profit of £15.1million in 2008.”

As I keep saying, ladies and gentlemen, the powers-that-be are at war with us.

On 27 January 2010, David Pilditch wrote the following in The Daily Express:

"TONY BLAIR WAS WARNED TWO MONTHS BEFORE THE INVASION OF IRAQ THAT IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL TO GO TO WAR WITHOUT UN BACKING... SENIOR GOVERNMENT LAWYERS TOLD THE IRAQ INQUIRY THAT THEY ADVISED THE ACTION HAD 'NO LEGAL BASIS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW'.

Last night it was reported EVERY ONE OF THE 27 LAWYERS IN THE DEPARTMENT ADVISED THE WAR WAS ILLEGAL. Yesterday Sir Michael Wood, who was the Foreign Office’s chief legal adviser, told the hearing HE WARNED THE THEN FOREIGN SECRETARY JACK STRAW AN INVASION WOULD 'AMOUNT TO THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION'.

Sir Michael said he considered resigning in protest at the decision to join the US-led attack. He described how HE WAS SIDELINED AFTER HE MADE CLEAR HIS OBJECTIONS TO MILITARY ACTION. His deputy, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, quit in protest on the eve of the invasion in March 2003...

Newly declassified Government papers show Lord Goldsmith, then Attorney General, was initially 'pessimistic' that there was sufficient legal basis for military action. HE WAS URGED TO CHANGE HIS VIEW BY MR STRAW – AND EVENTUALLY RULED IT WAS LAWFUL. Sir Michael told the inquiry:

'He [Straw] took the view that I was being very dogmatic and that international law was pretty vague and that HE WASN’T USED TO PEOPLE TAKING SUCH A FIRM POSITION.'

Ms Wilmshurst told the inquiry the FOREIGN OFFICE LAWYERS HAD BEEN UNITED IN THEIR BELIEF OF THE NEED FOR A SECOND UN RESOLUTION. But she said:

'IT WAS CLEAR THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS NOT GOING TO STAND IN THE WAY OF THE GOVERNMENT... THE PROCESS THAT WAS FOLLOWED IN THIS CASE WAS LAMENTABLE'...

Labour MP John McDonnell SAID IT BROUGHT THE PROSPECT OF A TRIAL OF TONY BLAIR AND OTHER LEADERS OF THE GOVERNMENT AT THE TIME OF THE INVASION A STEP CLOSER.

'The net is clearly closing in on those who took us into the illegal and immoral war. The time is coming when THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE WILL BE FORCED TO CONSIDER THE PROSECUTION OF THOSE WHO PERPETRATED THIS ACT OF UNJUST AGGRESSION'."

In my opinion, Tony Blair is the greatest traitor that ever held power in this country.

Gordon Brown is the the second greatest.

Bassetlaw's MP, John Mann, has voted the same way as both of the aforementioned anti-Brits 100 per cent of the time since he entered parliament.

The 2005 New Labour Manifesto promised the British people a referendum on whether we should sign up to the proposed European Constitution.

This is how it was put:

“It is a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe. WE WILL PUT IT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM and campaign wholeheartedly for a ‘yes’ vote to keep Britain a leading nation in Europe.”

In a 24 June 2007 statement during a BBC interview with Jon Sopel, Gordon Brown reiterated this position thus:

"The manifesto is what we put to the public. WE'VE GOT TO HONOUR THAT MANIFESTO. THAT IS AN ISSUE OF TRUST WITH ME AND THE ELECTORATE."

Brown lied.

There will be no referendum. We are now, officially, subject to the rule of unelected and faceless Brussels Eurocrat in just about everything.

David Cameron as good as promised us a referendum as well. Now we are being told that we won't get one if the Tories get in.

Politicians lie, you see.

It's as simple as that.

On 5 December 2009, Ulrich Schluer, a member of the Swiss People's Party that voted to ban the building of any more minarets in Switzerland, was quoted thus by The Sun:

“I'm surprised a country like GREAT BRITAIN with its grand tradition of liberty and freedom IS NOW GAGGING MPS WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT MUSLIM EXTREMISM. If there were an Islamist bomb attack in London YOU CAN HARDLY DESCRIBE THE PEOPLE WHO DID IT AS FRIENDS...

I'M FEARFUL FOR THE FUTURE OF BRITAIN. WHEN PUBLIC FIGURES ARE NO LONGER ABLE TO SPEAK THE TRUTH OR EXPRESS THEMSELVES IN RELEVANT LANGUAGE, IT ISN'T REALLY A FREE COUNTRY AT ALL... POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS GETTING BEYOND A JOKE AND COMPROMISING HARD-WON FREEDOMS IN MANY EUROPEAN COUNTRIES...

As in other European countries, WE HAVE SEEN MUSLIM LEADERS AND IMAMS SLOWLY TRYING TO INTRODUCE SHARIA LAW... The minaret ban received huge support because VOTERS FELT STRONGLY THAT THIS POLITICAL SYMBOL APPEARING IN OUR TOWNS AND CITIES WOULD LIKEWISE UNDERMINE OUR DEMOCRACY.”

On behalf of the British people, thanks for saying it like it is, Mr Schluer.

On 23 October 2009, Andrew Neather, a former government advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, dropped this revelatory bombshell in The Evening Standard:

“THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION…

Eventually published in January 2001, the innocuously labelled ‘RDS Occasional Paper no. 67’, ‘Migration: an economic and social analysis’ focused heavily on the labour market case. But THE EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL.

I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date…

THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS…

The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”.

You might think, from the astounding revelations Andrew Neather apprises us of above, that he is a whistleblower.

Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't Listen to the Whingers - London Needs Immigrants, suggests, he is still four square behind the imposition of the Multicult upon the bewildered and disenfranchised majority.

On 1 February 2009, Frank Field, the former New Labour Welfare Minister, was quoted thus in The Daily Express:

"HIS (Gordon Brown's) CLAIM TO HAVE PROVIDED BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS IS AS HOLLOW AS IT COULD BE... Foreign firms can win a contract and import their own labour TO THE EXCLUSION OF BRITISH WORKERS.

I have been calling on ministers for years to cut down on the number of people coming here to work. NO GOVERNMENT HAS HAD MORE WARNINGS. OF THE THREE MILLION JOBS CREATED IN THE LAST DECADE, NINE OUT OF 10 HAVE GONE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT BRITISH.”

On 1 October 2009, Mr Field was quoted thus by The Daily Telegraph:

“Come the election, Labour will have been in office for 13 years. Voters are entitled to ask why, if crisis moves are required now, the Government didn't act sooner to counter the hothouse in which neighbours from hell are so easily bred…

All the crime figures over the past 50 to 100 years show how anti-social disorder has gradually taken over. In my constituency of Birkenhead, THERE ARE NOW MORE VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON THAN THERE WERE IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY 50 YEARS AGO…

THIS IS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY, and IT IS TIME FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO EMPOWER DECENT CITIZENS TO RECLAIM THE STREETS.”

On 30 November 2009, former New Labour Minister, Tom Harris, said this on his own blog, here:

"This post from Alex Smith of LabourList has caught my attention...

'THE LABOUR PARTY HAS EMBRACED AN IDEOLOGY THAT ACTIVELY UNDERMINES THE BELIEFS AND CULTURE OF ORDINARY WORKING PEOPLE. IMMIGRATION, WHILST THE MOST TOPICAL, ISN’T THE ONLY BATTLEGROUND. One by one, it seems that THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL OUTLOOK OF MANY IS SCORNED UPON BY AN ELITE WHO, WHILST LAUGHABLY PAINTING THEMSELVES AS ON THE SIDE OF THE ‘OPPRESSED’, CHOOSE TO STUDIOUSLY IGNORE THIS PARTICULAR SUBJUGATION. ON ISSUES RANGING FROM SCHOOL/PARENTAL DISCIPLINE (’CHILD ABUSE’), TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (’BARBARIC’), TO PATRIOTISM (’LITTLE ENGLANDER’), TO EURO-SCEPTICISM (’XENOPHOBIC’), TO IMMIGRATION (’RACIST’), TO MORALITY (’BIGOTED’) – ACROSS ALL THESE ISSUES AND MORE, THE GENERAL BELIEFS OF VAST SWATHES OF THE ELECTORATE ARE DEMONISED AND RIDICULED BY AN ELITE INTERESTED ONLY IN SECURING THE DOMINANCE OF THEIR OWN PARTICULAR WORLDVIEW’…

He clealry (sic) has a point... And although Merrick talks of immigration as just one of the pressure points, it’s clearly near the top of an awful lot of people’s agenda today.

A few weeks ago... I was forced to concede by commenters that LABOUR HAD, IN THE PAST, BEEN GUILTY OF ATTEMPTING TO SHUT DOWN DEBATES ON IMMIGRATION BY SHOUTING 'RACIST'... IT WAS STUPID AND WRONG...

Knocking on doors in my constituency on Saturday morning, I once again had to try to defend the government’s policies on immigration. This is a very regular occurrence these days, particularly in so-called 'solid' Labour areas. These people are not racists by any stretch of the imagination, but THEY ARE WORRIED. AND THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT THEIR CONCERNS NOW BECAUSE IT’S ONLY NOW THEY FEEL THEY HAVE 'PERMISSION' TO DO SO... More often than not, the people expressing the concerns are the people least likely to have benefited directly from Britain’s economic growth to 2008. And they have as much right to have a say in this area – and to be listened to – as anyone else.

I DETECT A HUGE AMOUNT OF SNOBBERY FROM SOME ON THE LIBERAL LEFT TOWARDS SUCH PEOPLE AND THEIR VIEWS...

And WE ARE WAY, WAY PAST THE POINT AT WHICH WE CAN SNEER 'RACIST' AT GOOD PEOPLE FOR DARING TO HOLD A VIEW WITH WHICH WE’RE UNCOMFORTABLE."

I wonder why Tom Harris is saying this right now?

Does he imagine that he can hang on to his seat by baring his behind, the “stupid and wrong” one, a few months before the election? Does he think he will be forgiven for 12 years of saying nothing, for saying it now, when the immigrant horse has well and truly bolted?

Actually, that’s not quite right, is it? He did say something. He was one of those who, by his own admission, sneered “'racist' at good people”. He was one of those who stood by and applauded whilst the “liberal left” were directing their PC bile “towards such people and their views.”

And all the while those we never wanted kept piling in.

On 14 December 2009, Ken Macdonald QC, who was Tony Blair’s Director of Public Prosecutions from 2003 to 2006 and Gordon Brown’s until 2008, presented the accusatory essay, INTOXICATED BY POWER, BLAIR TRICKED US INTO WAR, in The Times.

This is it:

“The degree of deceit involved in our decision to go to war on Iraq becomes steadily clearer. THIS WAS A FOREIGN POLICY DISGRACE OF EPIC PROPORTIONS and playing footsie on Sunday morning television does nothing to repair the damage. It is now very difficult to avoid the conclusion that TONY BLAIR ENGAGED IN AN ALARMING SUBTERFUGE WITH HIS PARTNER GEORGE BUSH AND WENT ON TO MISLEAD AND CAJOLE THE BRITISH PEOPLE INTO A DEADLY WAR THEY HAD MADE PERFECTLY CLEAR THEY DIDN’T WANT, and on a basis that it’s increasingly hard to believe even he found truly credible. Who is any longer naive enough to accept that the then Prime Minister’s mind remained innocently open after his visit to Crawford, Texas?…

BLAIR’S FUNDAMENTAL FLAW WAS HIS SYCOPHANCY TOWARDS POWER… WASHINGTON TURNED HIS HEAD AND HE COULDN’T RESIST THE STAGE OR THE GLAMOUR THAT IT GAVE HIM. IN THIS SENSE HE WAS WEAK AND, AS WE CAN SEE, HE REMAINS SO. Since those sorry days we have frequently heard him repeating THE SELF-REGARDING MANTRA THAT ‘HAND ON HEART, I ONLY DID WHAT I THOUGHT WAS RIGHT‘. But THIS IS A NARCISSIST’S DEFENCE AND SELF-BELIEF IS NO ANSWER TO MISJUDGMENT: IT IS CERTAINLY NO ANSWER TO DEATH. ‘Yo, Blair‘, perhaps, was his truest measure…

IN BRITISH PUBLIC LIFE, LOYALTY AND SERVICE TO POWER CAN SOMETIMES COUNT FOR MORE TO INSIDERS than any tricky questions of wider reputation. IT’S THE REGARD YOU ARE HELD IN BY YOUR PEERS THAT REALLY COUNTS, SO THAT STEADFASTNESS IN THE FACE OF ATTACK AND THREATENED EXPOSURE BRINGS ITS OWN RICH HIERARCHY OF HONOUR AND REWARD. Disloyalty, on the other hand, means a terrible casting out, a rocky and barren Roman exile that few have the courage to endure…

IT IS PRECISELY THIS PRIVATELY ARRANGED NATURE OF BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT POWER, STUBBORN BEYOND SYMPATHY FOR YEARS IN THE FACE OF THE MODERN WORLD, THAT HAS BROUGHT OUR POLITICS SO LOW. If Chilcot fails to reveal the truth without fear in this Middle Eastern story of violence and destruction, the inquiry will be held in deserved and withering contempt. This would be a serious blow to the integrity of the State. It would not restore trust…

THE TAX ON DISHONESTY IS RISING… CITIZENS BELIEVE DEEPLY IN A DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO KNOW AND THEY NO LONGER ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR UNWORTHINESS TO ENJOY ITS NOURISHMENT. Naturally, THIS IS A LESS COMFORTABLE WORLD FOR PEOPLE IN POWER, BUT IT’S A MUCH BETTER WORLD FOR EVERYONE ELSE. The real tragedy of Iraq, beyond all the danger and the terrible loss, is that it rendered any affair of the heart between government and people no more than a wisp, like A LIE IN THE WIND. It broke faith…

We have seen enormous acts of courage on the part of our men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan. The most heart-rending sacrifices have been made… But none of this sprinkles, as he might once have hoped it would, any starlight on Tony Blair. On the contrary, it is entirely the work of WARRIORS THRUST CARELESSLY INTO DEATH’S WAY BY A PRIME MINISTER LOST IN SELF-AGGRANDISEMENT and a governing class too closed to speak truth to power.”

The rats are leaving the establishment ship at a wonderfully alarming rate, are they not?

If anyone out there thinks I’m being harsh, associating MacDonald with the bringers of Black Death, I ask you this: why did he not speak out when it mattered? Was he really “tricked into war”? Were the parliamentarians and the press who lusted for it at the time equally “tricked”?

Many of the elite characters slavering for a great slaughter at the time will, indeed, have been “tricked”, in so far as they chose not to question what they ought to have been questioning. In so far as they did not investigate in any depth what they should have.

MacDonald was one of those who went along with “a foreign policy disgrace of epic proportions”. He wasn’t interested in challenging and/or exposing Tony Blair’s “sycophancy”. He, with many others, aided and abetted Bush and Blair as they “went on to mislead and cajole the British people into a deadly war they had made perfectly clear they didn’t want”.

The MacDonalds were much better placed to know what the reality was than the many, outside the loop, who protested. And, if they were not aware of the full facts, they would easily have been able to find out what they were if they had chosen to do so.

They didn’t.

A great many concerned British citizens, who believed “deeply in a democratic right to know”, did.

That’s why I say Ken MacDonald is a bit of an old, murine ship-leaver.

Nevertheless, if his belated condemnation helps to nail Tony B Liar to the cross, I’d forgive him the long silence on these matters.

Maybe.

On 6 November 2009, Sue Reid’s remarkable exposé, ‘How the Kremlin hijacked Labour: Diary of a Kremlin insider reveals the hold Soviets had over Labour politicians’, appeared in The Daily Mail.

This is it:

“The leader of the Communist Party of Great Britain stood in front of the group of high-flying young Left-wingers at Cambridge University. Harry Pollitt told them:

'Don't join us. Work hard, get good degrees, JOIN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND SERVE OUR CAUSE FROM WITHIN'...

Within a decade, the Communist Party foundered (its membership peaked at 60,000 in 1945) as Pollitt's bright young devotees infiltrated the Establishment.

THEY WERE SOON EXERCISING CONSIDERABLE INFLUENCE IN UNIVERSITIES, THE STATE EDUCATION SYSTEM, PUBLISHING HOUSES, THE LEGAL HIERARCHY AND THE CIVIL SERVICE. BUT IT WAS IN POLITICS THAT THESE HIGH-FLYING MEMBERS OF THE LEFT ESTABLISHED THEIR GREATEST POWER-BASE, BOTH IN THE LABOUR PARTY AND THE TRADES' UNION MOVEMENT.

Just how deep the tentacles of communism reached into the heart of British government has now been revealed with the emergence of an extraordinary diary by Anatoly Chernyaev, the Soviet Union's contact man with the West at the icy height of the Cold War... IT TELLS THE STORY OF A 'SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP'… BETWEEN THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND SOVIET COMMUNISTS...

One of the most shocking of the diary's many revelations is how LABOUR LEADERS MICHAEL FOOT AND NEIL KINNOCK COLLUDED WITH THE SOVIET COMMUNISTS to try to beat their 'common enemy', Margaret Thatcher. But more worrying, perhaps, is the fact that the document shows in stark detail how THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF SO MANY OF THOSE WHO GOVERN US TODAY WAS SHAPED BY THE UNSPEAKABLE COMMUNIST CREED OF THE SOVIET UNION.

The unpalatable truth is that many ministers in Government today rose through the ranks of A BRITISH SOCIALIST MOVEMENT THAT WAS HEAVILY INFLUENCED - AND EVEN CONTROLLED - BY THE KREMLIN IN MOSCOW...

TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION LEADER JACK JONES - WHO RECEIVED EFFUSIVE PRAISE FROM PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN WHEN HE DIED IN APRIL THIS YEAR - WAS A PAID AGENT FOR THE USSR. In exchange for information, he used to take cash handouts from his Soviet handler in London, Oleg Gordievsky, even as late as the 1980s...

One of the key figures in this murky affair was RON HAYWARD, THE LABOUR PARTY'S GENERAL SECRETARY between 1972 and 1982, who died in 1996... It is clear from the diary that HAYWARD ENVISAGED A REAL SOVIET-STYLE SYSTEM IN BRITAIN, with the Party General Secretary (ie Hayward himself) - not a Prime Minister selected by MPs - at the very top. He would refer to himself openly as the 'party leader'. More specifically, he informed the Soviets that HE WANTED TO DEVELOP A CADRE OF YOUNG ACTIVISTS TO PREPARE FOR COMMUNIST RULE.

'I AM THE FIRST LABOUR LEADER IN BRITISH HISTORY WHO IS NOT AFRAID TO COME OUT ALONGSIDE COMMUNISTS WITH THE SAME AGENDA', he said...

It was in the unions where Chernyaev's International Department aimed to infiltrate the deepest. THE REGULAR TO-ING AND FRO-ING BETWEEN UNION LEADERS AND MOSCOW WAS COMMONPLACE...

The diary says, the TGWU's deputy leader Alec Kitson turned up drunkenly at a meeting with Chernyaev in the Russian capital. He had been drinking with his Soviet trade union counterparts for hours beforehand. 'There was a f*** in every sentence that came out of Kitson's mouth,' the diary records. But when Kitson sobered up, he and Chernyaev concocted a plan to send a team of Russians to the Scottish TUC conference 'TO DELIVER THE SOVIET POINT OF VIEW'...

Party leaders such as the donkey-jacketed MICHAEL FOOT AND THE WELSHMAN NEIL KINNOCK WERE AT TIMES DEEPLY REVERENTIAL TO THEIR RUSSIAN 'COMRADES', the diary reveals...

IN DECEMBER 1984, KINNOCK WENT TO MOSCOW ACCOMPANIED BY, AMONG OTHERS, THE YOUNG CHARLES CLARKE AND PATRICIA HEWITT - both to become ministers in Blair's government - to see Brezhnev's successor, the senile Constantin Chernenko... The Russian promised he would help in the Labour Party's attempts to oust Margaret Thatcher from power...

IN 1985, KINNOCK AGAIN TURNED TO MOSCOW FOR SUPPORT... The diarist recorded: 'WE HAVE DISCUSSED EVERYTHING WITH HIM. I TOOK IT UPON MYSELF TO PROMISE HIM EVERYTHING THEY WANTED FROM US...

ONE OF JACK JONES'S BRIGHTEST PROTEGES... WAS GORDON BROWN. THE DECISION TO GIVE THE YOUNG SCOTSMAN HIS FIRST AND ONLY SAFE SEAT, DUNFERMLINE EAST, WAS MADE BY TWO TGWU SENIOR OFFICIALS - ONE OF THEM WAS JACK JONES, THE OTHER THE DRUNKEN ALEC KITSON. BOTH WERE FRIENDS OF THE KREMLIN.

THE UNION'S PATRONAGE WAS UBIQUITOUS. NEIL KINNOCK AND TONY BLAIR, AS WELL AS CABINET MINISTERS MARGARET BECKETT, HARRIET HARMAN AND JOHN REID, WERE ALL SPONSORED BY TGWU AND MADE THEIR LABOUR PARTY CAREERS THANKS TO IT.

The control the Soviets had over Labour, its leadership and aspiring politicians, is still having a profound impact on Britain. As the Spectator says: 'Indeed, NEW LABOUR, WHICH HAS GOVERNED SINCE 1997, CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD UNLESS THESE COMMUNIST INFLUENCES ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. Many of New Labour's characteristics - its deep suspicion of outsiders, its STRUCTURAL HOSTILITY TO DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, ITS SECRECY, ITS FAITH IN BUREAUCRACY, THE EMBEDDED PREFERENCE FOR STRIKING DEALS OUT OF THE PUBLIC EYE, AND ITS RUTHLESS RELIANCE ON A SMALL GROUP OF TRUSTED ACTIVISTS, RESULT FROM THE LENGTHY DETENTE WITH THE KREMLIN'...

As for Harry Pollitt, the British communist who played such a vital role in the Soviet infiltration of this country... he is better known in Moscow, where he is proclaimed as a hero, than here. In 1970, some years after his death, THE USSR ISSUED A POSTAGE STAMP WITH POLLITT'S PICTURE ON IT. A year later, IN 1971, HIS DEVOTION TO THE SOVIET CAUSE AND TO THE SPREAD OF 'INTERNATIONAL COMMUNISM' WAS FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGED BY MOSCOW. THE SOVIET NAVY LAUNCHED A NEW BATTLESHIP AND NAMED IT AFTER HIM.

MEANWHILE, HIS MANY DISCIPLES IN THE FIFTH COLUMN HE CREATED IN BRITAIN CONTINUE TO EXERT THEIR MALIGN INFLUENCE.” More...

On 26 September 2006, during his final Prime Ministerial appearance at a Labour Party Conference, Tony Blair said this:

"30 million people now come to Britain every year… YET WE HAVE NO MEANS OF CHECKING WHO IS HERE LAWFULLY!"

10 years as the boss and he never bothers to introduce a system which might tell us who should be here and who shouldn't?

Not a great idea if you care about the British, I say.

On 8 December 2009, Gordon Brown's Immigration Minster, Phil Woolas, said this during a BBC Radio 4 interview:

"There are 285million people who visit the United Kingdom every year".

30 million? 285 million?

I wonder which of these two figures is closer to the truth? If it's 285 million, I wonder how many of them ever bother to leave?

As a result of a grotesque level of anti-British machination and deceit at the highest level, ladies and gentlemen, it may well be that we are already outnumbered in our own land by the alien who has no intention of leaving.

On 15 July 2007, at the RISE Anti-Racist Festival, Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London and Chairman of Unite Against Fascism, said this:

"London's fortunes are tied up with our stand against racism and prejudice... Fighting racism is a daily fight and a political priority for our city."

Regarding the teenage violence that had plagued London in 2007, Tim Donovan put these questions to the Mayor:

"Are you worried about this recent spate of teenage violence is it something new and alarming?... Tony Blair said, not long ago, that this was a black, cultural thing, do you agree?"

To which he replied:

"There is an element of that, particularly around the drug trade but NO! IT’S A LOT OF WHITE KIDS STABBING OTHER WHITE KIDS!"

Now that is as big a lie, if not bigger, than any Tony B Liar ever told.

In the year to 15 July 2007, when Livingstone said what he said, 16 teenagers had been murdered in London.

Ten of the dead teenagers were black boys, three were black girls, one was mixed race and the other two dead children were white. At the time of Livingstone’s great lie, ALL OF THE KNOWN KILLERS AND THOSE SUSPECTED OF THE KILLINGS WERE BLACK.

Red Ken's casual dishonesty has been captured in A Lot of White Kids

On 3 March 2008, Emily Thornberry, New Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"I SUSPECT THERE ARE HARDLY ANY CHILDREN IN ISLINGTON WHO HAVE NOT BEEN MUGGED AT SOME STAGE… If you talk to kids it is the main thing they are afraid of... It is a hidden crime. Kids are robbing other kids but you don't hear about it... YOUNG PEOPLE ARE BEING MUGGED REGULARLY. WE DON'T WANT IT TO BECOME A WAY OF LIFE."

Er, Emily, "if hardly any children in Islington... have not been mugged", it already HAS "become a way of life"!

And the fact that it’s “hidden” and we "don't hear about it", well, that's down to New Labour, Emily.

Your lot. That's who's done its best over the years to keep such damning information quiet.

On 19 April 2009, Alice Mahon, MP for Halifax between 1987 and 2005, told us why she was resigning from the New Labour Party.

“I can no longer be a member of a party that AT THE LEADERSHIP LEVEL HAS BETRAYED MANY OF THE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES THAT INSPIRED ME as a teenager to join… I've reached the end of the road with the Labour Party. I'VE LOST FAITH IN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE DIRECTION THEY ARE TAKING US IN… What is the point in being in a party when you don't believe in most of the policies that they are pursuing”.

Speaking of the Damien McBride/Derek Draper email scandal, Ms Mahon added:

“Most decent people in the party would be shocked and absolutely scandalised by the smears that were about to be launched on our behalf. I cannot imagine what kind of person would think it is a good idea to smear a couple who have just lost a loving son, I really can't…

THIS LABOUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD HANG ITS HEAD IN SHAME FOR INFLICTING THIS ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC JUST AS WE FACE THE MOST SEVERE RECESSION ANY OF US HAVE EXPERIENCED IN A LIFETIME."

During the 3 June 2009 edition of Channel 4 News, veteran Labour left-winger, Tony Benn said this:

“BLAIR WAS A TORY. HE TOOK OVER MRS THATCHER’S ECONOMIC POLICY AND TRIED TO FOLLOW IT. THIS CRISIS IS A CRISIS OF THATCHERISM AND BLAIRISM COMBINED...

People are really, really angry about the expenses and about a lot of other things… There was no referendum on Lisbon, WHICH WAS PROMISED. They’re privatising part of the post office, WHICH THEY PROMISED NOT TO DO. There’s a war in Afghanistan which WE WERE NEVER CONSULTED ABOUT. THERE A LOT OF MONEY FOR THE BANKERS BUT NO HELP FOR THE PEOPLE.”

On 19 April 2009, John McDonnell MP, another veteran Labour left-winger, was quoted thus by The Morning Star:

"THE LABOUR LEADERSHIP MUST APPRECIATE THE POLITICAL CATASTROPHE THAT IS EMERGING. We need the Prime Minister to immediately launch an inquiry into the operation of the party WITH THE AIM OF RESTORING DEMOCRACY."

On 16 April 2006, Councillor Peter Arnold, the Lib Dem Leader of Newcastle City Council, was quoted thus by The Independent:

"THERE IS NO NEED FOR AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT BECAUSE THERE IS NO ENGLAND... There are millions of Scots, Welsh and Irish living in England. The overwhelming majority of non-white migrants also live in England, along with many hundreds of thousands of other Europeans and people from other parts of the world. ENGLAND IS THE GENUINE MONGREL NATION, AND I WELCOME THAT… I HAVE NO LOYALTY TO ENGLAND!"

The Lib Dem Council Leader who has no loyalty to England, is now the Lord Mayor of Newcastle.

On 26 January 2009, David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party said the following as he was being interviewed by Jeff Randall for Sky News:

“WE BELIEVE IN A MULTIRACIAL BRITAIN. WE BELIEVE IT’S A SUCCESS. WE THINK IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN GOOD FOR BRITAIN IN THE PAST. WE THINK IMMIGRATION WILL CONTINUE.”

On 14 July 2009, New Labour’s "Cohesion" Minister, Shahid Malik, said this in The House of Commons:

“FAIRNESS DOES NOT MEAN TREATING EVERYBODY EQUALLY”. More...

Malik commented as he did in a debate about the contrast between the preferential treatment doled out to the Gypsy and Traveller communities, which Malik thought was right and just, at the expense of local people.

Remember what George Orwell said?

“All animals are Equal but SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS”.

I think you’ll agree that this New Labour lot are nothing if not Orwellian.

On 13 January 2010, Samantha Mosedale described what happened after a family of Romanian Gypsies moved into their home in The Daily Mail:

“We called the police as soon as we found out they were in there. AN OFFICER SUGGESTED I WAS RACIST when I asked if they were Romanians, and did they have a legal right to be in this country.

We are hard-working citizens YET GET TREATED LIKE CRIMINALS WHEN OUR HOME IS STOLEN. This whole thing is making me feel constantly sick. All we want to do is get on with our lives. WE FEEL LET DOWN BY THE LAW, BY GOVERNMENT, AND BY THE POLICE, IN FACT ALL THE AUTHORITIES THAT ONE WOULD EXPECT TO PROTECT SOCIETY...

All the children are incredibly unsettled… We were in the process of creating our dream home and it has been ruined. At the moment there are at least four women, four children and one man living in our home, but neighbours said they have seen many more people going in and out. In the meantime WE FACE THE PROSPECT OF BECOMING HOMELESS OURSELVES”.

Her husband Julian added:

“When the papers were served on them THEY TORE THEM UP AND THREW THEM BACK AT THE GUY WHO'D TAKEN THEM ROUND”.

The Mail added:

“When Mr Mosedale turned up with a possession order to reclaim his property yesterday, the families demanded compensation for the £2,000 they claim to have paid to an unnamed man they claim posed as the landlord...

Before the police arrived yesterday, the two husbands disappeared into another house about 100 yards away with an estate agent's board outside. Throughout the day, the women carried their five children (plus some kitchen equipment and one of their two TVs) down the street."

Samantha Mosedale added:

“I just hope someone takes notice of what has happened and the law changes in future.”

Someone take notice, Samantha?

What, like the cop who called you racist? Like a traitorous New Labour government that would rather see a bunch of Romanian Gypsies living in YOUR house than YOU? Like a Cohesion Minister, who doesn't appear to hugely interested in treating everyone equally? No, love, those who make our laws are at war with us. THEY wish the British disenfranchised and demoralised in their own land. Characters like the ones who stole your house are merely THEIR willing foot-soldiers.

I just hope the British people are taking notice. I just hope they still give a damn. Trouble is, we’re not what we were. Too few, nowadays, are prepared to raise any kind of a fuss unless it’s actually happening to them.

Will you and Julian be voting New Labour when the next General Election rolls around, Samantha? Perhaps not. But I guarantee that many who read of your plight will.

It hasn‘t happened to them yet, you see.

On 2 September 2009, BBC 2’s This World featured Liviu Tipurita’s “Gypsy Child Thieves”.

One Gypsy interviewed by Tipurita said he’d sold his daughter and made a tidy sum in the process.

“I got 25 million lei for my daughter in 2004. THIS IS OUR GYPSY CUSTOM; IF SHE’S A VIRGIN, IF SHE’S UNTOUCHED, SHE’S VALUABLE.”

In an attempt to trace the roots of the problem and the origins of this exploitation within the Gypsy community, Tipurita travelled to his native Romania, home to the largest Gypsy population in the world, where he interviewed one of the most powerful leaders of the Gypsy underworld in some depth.

Here are a few excerpts from Liviu Tipurita’s film:

Tipurita: "I’ve come to one of the Gypsy crime strongholds, the city of Cryova. MOST OF THOSE IN PRISON FOR CHILD ENSLAVEMENT... COME FROM HERE. This is a dangerous place…

I’m here to meet up with the powerful leader of the Gypsy underworld. (Brillian) The neighbourhood where he lives is home to over ten thousand Gypsies. Most of them belong to one clan - THE THIEVES.”

Brillian: “That’s my father, one of the greatest Gypsy leaders of Cryova. And HE WAS PART OF THE CLAN OF THE BEST THIEVES. I AM PART OF THIS FAMILY THAT OCCUPIES ITSELF WITH STEALING.”

Tipurita: “FOR HIM STEALING IS A PROFESSION THAT HAS BEEN PASSED ON FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION… Having come from a long line of thieves Brillian has a special insight into the history of Gypsy crime…

When did the Romany Gypsies from Romania start going West?”

Brillian: “Between 1980 and 1989. They earned quickly because, HAVING ESCAPED A COMMUNIST COUNTRY, THEY HAD THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM AND RESIDENCY IN THESE COUNTRIES and they came back with special cars and built outstanding houses and they came back to use the power that they had and they said WHOEVER GOES TO THESE COUNTRIES GETS RICH!”

Tipurita: “When Brillian was a child this district was dirt poor. But at the beginning of the nineties, when THE GYPSIES FROM HERE WENT TO THE WEST TO STEAL AND BEG, the neighbourhood started to pick up.”

Brillian: “When they saw the possibility of making money, at a certain point they no longer wanted to go BEGGING themselves… Then, IN ORDER TO KEEP MAKING MONEY, UNDER THE PRETENCE THAT THEY WANT TO HELP OTHERS, THEY TRY TO PERSUADE THEM TO GO AND BEG”.

Tipurita: “In the last twenty years the neighbourhood has flourished. And nowadays EVERY STREET HERE HAS DOZENS OF IMPOSING VILLAS THAT BRILLIANT SAYS ARE BUILT ON THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME ABROAD.”

Brillian: “Look at this house… now there’s a guy who stayed for a long time in Italy… HE BEGGED HE STOLE, HE MADE A LOT OF MONEY. And he sent it home and started lending at interest…

These two houses belong to Merisi and Calistrada. Calistrada is my first cousin… THEY SORTED THEMSELVES OUT IN ENGLAND. A LARGE PART OF HIS FORTUNE WAS MADE FROM STEALING… IN ENGLAND...

THE THIEVING, what they’re doing now, it’s no longer a national problem. IT’S HAPPENING ON AN INTERNATIONAL SCALE. Now the whole of Europe, the whole of the world talk about the Gypsies… If the new generations growing up now continue in the same way NO ONE WILL HAVE US! THE WESTERN COUNTRIES WILL CHASE US AWAY”.

Tipurita: "Over the last twenty years I've seen the anti-Gypsy feeling getting stronger, not only in Romania but across Europe. I'VE ALSO SEEN GYPSY PETTY CRIME TURN INTO SERIOUS CRIME, INTO INTERNATIONAL ORGANISED CRIME. Most Gypsies in Romania still live in shacks but THERE ARE ALSO MANY WHO NOW LIVE IN PALACES!" More...

We are all aware that, with a good deal of multicultural relish, New Labour has been importing lots and lots of lovely, fluffy, non-indigenous "organised crime" types into the UK in recent times.

If ever you thought that they were doing so for the greater good, what you see in the edition of Liviu Tipurita's film (Gypsies), may just change your mind.

If that isn't enough to convince you, take a look the essay, Renata Gural and the Demetries.

On 17 January 2010 Muslim "hate-preacher", Anjem Choudary spoke of the Government's decision to ban Islam4UK, the fundamentalist Islamic group he heads, in the The Daily Star Sunday.

He said:

“THERE COULD BE A BLOODBATH ON THE STREETS... When you start to suppress ideological movements, you push them underground and THERE IS MORE CHANCE OF CONFLICT.

IN SOME CITIES, ONE IN SIX OF THE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE MUSLIM. PEOPLE DON’T REALISE THAT THERE ARE ACTUALLY FOUR TO FIVE MILLION MUSLIMS IN THE UK. Many of them do not register to vote so the GOVERNMENT’S FIGURES DO NOT REFLECT THE TRUE SIZE OF THE MUSLIM POPULATION…

IT’S A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION. You have to consider how, IF THERE IS ANOTHER 7/7, the country would cope. More and more disaffected whites would be driven towards far-right extremist groups such as the British National Party and the English Defence League IF THERE WAS ANOTHER ATTACK."

"If", Anjem?

Don't you mean "when"?

On 23 April 2006, The Times reported the remarks of Professor Ted Cantle, Tony Blair's senior race relations advisor at the time of the Oldham Riots.

This is what was said:

"In an apparent reference to Heanor, a predominantly white town in the Amber Valley area of Derbyshire, Cantle said he was concerned about the strength of support for the far-right British National Party in some parts of the East Midlands...

Cantle’s remarks go further by describing parts of the country as 'UNHEALTHILY' WHITE."

The exact wording that Ted Cantle used was this:

"SOME OF THE NEIGHBOURING AREAS OF NOTTS AND DERBYSHIRE DO SEEM TO BE UNHEALTHILY ALL-WHITE."

On 14 July 2009, The UK's Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, said this to other MPs on the Home Affairs Committee:

"I DO NOT LIE AWAKE AT NIGHT WORRYING ABOUT A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION. I’M HAPPY TO LIVE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY. I’m happy to live in a society where we not only welcome those coming to live and work in this country but where we can go and live and work in other countries."

On 21 November 2009, The Tony Rennell article, 'This isn't the Britain we fought for' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII’, was published by The Daily Mail.

This cited many of the comments of WWII veterans, as they surveyed what the world they fought so hard for had become, as featured in the book, The Unknown Warriors by Nicholas Pringle.

Here is what a Commando who took part in the disastrous Dieppe raid (4,000 men were lost) thinks of New Labour:

“MORE OF A SHAMBLES THAN SOME OF THE ACTIONS I WAS IN DURING THE WAR”!

He added:

“THOSE COMRADES OF MINE WHO NEVER MADE IT BACK WOULD BE APPALLED IF THEY COULD SEE THE WORLD AS IT IS TODAY. THEY WOULD WONDER WHAT HAPPENED TO THE BRAVE NEW WORLD THEY FOUGHT SO DAMNED HARD FOR.”

A former Durham Light Infantryman wrote:

“OUR BRITISH CULTURE IS DRAINING AWAY AT AN EVER INCREASING PACE,' 'AND WE ARE ALMOST FORBIDDEN TO MAKE ANY COMMENT.”

A widow from Solihull blamed the Thatcher years “when WE STARTED TO LOSE ALL OUR INDUSTRY AND PROFIT BECAME THE ONLY AIM IN LIFE'.

Speaking of her husband, a veteran of Dunkirk and Burma, she said:

“It is 18 years since I lost him and AS I LOOK AROUND PARTS OF BIRMINGHAM TODAY YOU WOULD NEVER KNOW YOU WERE IN ENGLAND… He would have hated it. He also disliked the immoral way things are going. I don't think people are really happy now, for all the modern, easy-living conveniences.

I DISAGREE WITH SAME-SEX MARRIAGES… RUBBISH TV PROGRAMMES, SO-CALLED CELEBRITIES AND, MOST OF ALL, UNLIMITED IMMIGRATION. I AM VERY UNHAPPY ABOUT THE WAY THIS COUNTRY IS BEING TRANSFORMED.

I go nowhere after dark. I don't even answer my doorbell then.”

A Desert Rat who fought at El Alamein and in Sicily, Italy and Greece added:

'THIS IS NOT THE COUNTRY I FOUGHT FOR. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, LACK OF DISCIPLINE, COMPENSATION MADNESS, UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION - THE ‘DO-GOODERS’ HAVE A LOT TO ANSWER FOR.”

A former “Land Girl” had this to say:

'In my day, DRUGS WERE UNKNOWN, FAMILIES REMAINED TOGETHER, DIVORCE WAS A RARITY AND CHILDREN FELT SECURE. WE'RE NOW CONTROLLED BY GERMANY AND FRANCE. WHAT A SAD IRONY! WERE OUR SACRIFICES MADE SO HOOLIGANS MAY RUN WILD AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR BE ACCEPTED AS THE NORM BY TV INTERVIEWERS AND SOCIETY IN GENERAL”?

An RAF mechanic quoted the following poetic lines:

'I mourned them then,
But now surviving IN A WORLD,
INDIFFERENT TO THEIR HOPES AND DREAMS,
I GRIEVE MORE FOR THE LIVING’.” More...

I grieve for the living too.

That’s why I’m standing for parliament in the next General Election.

I WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK!

If you want it too, ladies and gentlemen, you’re going to have to stop voting for those who stole it!

It’s as simple as that.

Sir Jimmy Young is an 88-year-old DJ who interviews politicians and celebs for BBC Radio.

He was also a pop star in the 1950s and had two number one hits.

On 9 August 2009, he wrote the following in The Sunday Express:

“GORDON BROWN PURSUES HIS POLICY OF OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION, INTENT ON BUILDING UP A CLIENT STATE OF VOTERS WHO WILL BE DULY GRATEFUL TO LABOUR.

Recently Home Secretary Alan Johnson infamously declared that he doesn’t lie awake at night worrying about immigration. Well perhaps he should. Huge numbers of ordinary people declare to pollsters and political activists that the level of immigration is near the top of their list of worries. They protest that allowing our present population of 61million to increase to the 70million predicted by Whitehall statisticians would be A GROSS ABUSE OF BRITISH HOSPITALITY…

But the Government is so traumatised by the public’s resentment of its open-door policy that IT VICIOUSLY ATTACKS ANYONE WHO DARES TO CRITICISE IT.”

On 14 October 2009, Simon Duke wrote the following in The Daily Mail:

"City bank Goldman Sachs is expected to confirm tomorrow that BONUSES WILL SMASH ALL RECORDS IN 2009, JUST A YEAR AFTER THE GOVERNMENT RESCUED THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM OBLIVION...

The return to business as usual for the so-called 'Masters of the Universe' of the Square Mile will anger the MILLIONS OF FAMILIES whose finances have been devastated by the financial crisis...

THE WALL STREET GIANT IS ON COURSE TO LAVISH £14 BILLION ON PAY AND BONUSES ON STAFF THIS YEAR following a surge in profits between July and September… GOLDMAN'S 5,500 UK WORKERS ARE NOW SET TO POCKET AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST £500,000 EACH for this year - the highest rewards in the firm's 140-year history."

As the British people have sought to make sense of sub-prime, the credit-crunch and the world-wide recession that followed, the journalist who has attained most public acclaim and notoriety for guiding us through this financial minefield is, without doubt, Robert Peston, the BBC's Business Editor.

Bearing in mind the fact that Peston is, himself, very much an establishment figure, it would be difficult for any of his fellow bigshots to gainsay any of the astoundingly unequivocal criticisms of the status quo in his 2008 book, Who Runs Britain.

Here's a sample:

“In the late 1970s, THE GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR STARTED TO WIDEN AND WOULD NEVER NARROW AGAIN. INCREASING INEQUALITY WAS TO DEFINE THE THATCHER YEARS FROM 1979 TO 1990... HER WAY OF SEEING THE WORLD BECAME THE ESTABLISHMENT VIEW... In her world, STRIVING FOR EQUALITY AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS WERE ANTITHETICAL ASPIRATIONS, SO EQUALITY MUST DIE - AND IT DID…

In 2005-06, for the first time in many years, the pattern of income growth replicated what went on during the Thatcher years, with THE RICHEST FIFTH OF THE POPULATION SEEING THE HIGHEST INCOME RISE, AND PAY INCREMENTS BECOMING PROGRESSIVELY SMALLER FOR THE LOWER-INCOME GROUPS…

The really striking social phenomenon under New Labour has been THE TRIUMPH OF THE SUPER-RICH... The presence on British soil of a disproportionate number of immensely wealthy people, who are becoming wealthier by the minute, HAS BEEN ENCOURAGED BY TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN. THEY HAVE NURTURED A WELCOMING ENVIRONMENT FOR BILLIONAIRES OF ANY NATIONALITY, WHO CAN LIVE IN THE UK AND PAY RELATIVELY LITTLE TAX…

Brown as Chancellor was, AS A MATTER OF DELIBERATE POLICY, STRIKINGLY GENEROUS TO THE CITY'S NEW PLUTOCRATS - THE OWNERS OF HEDGE-FUND AND PRIVATE-EQUITY FIRMS…

IN 2006, THE ACCOUNTANTS GRANT THORNTON ESTIMATED THAT 54 UK-BASED BILLIONAIRES WERE PAYING INCOME TAX OF JUST £14.7M ON A COMBINED FORTUNE OF £126 BILLION… Of these, at least 32 of the billionaire dynasties had probably not paid any personal taxes on their wealth…

What has been going on is A SUPERCHARGED VERSION OF THE TRENDS PROMOTED BY THATCHER…

By design of a Labour premier, Gordon Brown, and a socialist Mayor, Ken Livingstone, LONDON IS NOW THE CAPITAL CITY OF THE BORDERLESS WORLD OF THE SUPER-RICH.”

In October 2000, The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, which was commissioned by Jack Straw, the New Labour Home Secretary, was published by The Runnymede Trust.

Here are some of the things it said:

"BRITISHNESS AND ENGLISHNESS ARE RACIALLY CODED TERMS WITH A WHITES-ONLY CONNOTATION... A RETHINKING OF THE NATION'S SELF-IMAGE IS NEEDED...

BRITISHNESS, AS MUCH AS ENGLISHNESS, HAS SYSTEMATIC, LARGELY UNSPOKEN, RACIST CONNOTATIONS... IT IS WIDELY UNDERSTOOD THAT ENGLISHNESS, AND THEREFORE BY EXTENSION BRITISHNESS, IS RACIALLY CODED. THE UNSTATED ASSUMPTION IS THAT BRITISHNESS AND WHITENESS GO TOGETHER LIKE ROAST BEEF AND YORKSHIRE PUDDING...

The absence from the national curriculum of A REWRITTEN HISTORY OF BRITAIN as an imperial force, involving dominance in Ireland, Africa, the Caribbean and Asia, is proving to be an unmitigated disaster...

THERE AIN'T NO BLACK IN THE UNION JACK".

When a flurry of pro-British criticism greeted the release of the October 2000 report, Trevor Phillips, who had been the Chairman of the Runnymede Trust from 1993 to 1998 and was Chairman of the Greater London Assembly at the time, dismissed the dissent as:

"THE KNEE-JERK REACTIONS OF LITTLE ENGLANDERS."

Phillips is now the Chairman of the Brit-bashing quango, The Commission for Equalities and Human Rights.

During the 4 June 2006 edition of Dateline London, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, who arrived here as a refugee from Idi Amin's Uganda in 1972, was asked this question by presenter, Gavin Essler:

"What's wrong with white guys, by the way?"

To which Alibhai-Brown replied:

"I don't like them. I WANT THEM TO BE THE LOST SPECIES IN 100 YEARS".

No one, as far as I'm aware, has ever questioned Alibhai-Brown's absolute Asiatic right to want the white man gone.

In the 28 February 1999 edition of The Observer, Andrew Marr, the BBC's top political commentator, said this:

"Widespread and vigorous miscegenation (race mixing)... is the best answer...

Teachers are the most effective anti-racist campaigners in the country, this means more than education in other religions, it means a form of POLITICAL EDUCATION. Only people who understand the economic forces changing their world, threatening them... have a chance of being immune to the old tribal chants.

And the final answer, frankly, is THE VIGOROUS USE OF STATE POWER TO COERCE AND REPRESS!... I firmly believe that REPRESSION CAN BE A GREAT CIVILISING INSTRUMENT FOR GOOD! STAMP HARD on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost KILL THEM OFF!...

A NEW RACE RELATIONS ACT WILL IMPOSE THE WILL OF THE STATE ON MILLIONS!"

The chattering classes have every bit as much of a hold over our lives as the politicians do.

They hand our opinions to us on a plate, they shape our beliefs and attitudes. Everything the media throws at us, from cradle to grave, affects the way we behave and think. Shiny eyed zealots like Andrew Marr do not care what we want or feel, they care only for the promised land that their wisdom, their insight and their determination will lead us on to in the future.

That's us Andrew Marr is talking about, folks. That's the British people Marr wants to breed out of the pages of history.

Now you know what we're up against, what are you going to do about it?

On 29 November 2007, Vanessa Feltz, David Aaronovich, Yasmin Alibhai Brown and Nick Ferrari appeared in an episode of London Talking.

The programme was hosted by the former Blue Peter presenter, Konnie Huq.

Feltz said this on that show:

"If we stopped immigration... WE'D BE BOG BORING, WE WOULD BE BLEAK AND DREARY AND HOMOGENOUS! WE'D LOOK AS IF WE'D BEEN PUMPED OUT BY THE SAME GHASTLY FACTORY PRODUCTION LINE... AS SOON AS YOU GO OUTSIDE LONDON, YOU THINK, 'OH MY GOD'! WHERE HAVE I ENDED UP? IT'S LIKE MIDDLE AMERICA OUT THERE!" More...

The immediate ancestors of Vanessa Feltz, David Aaronovich, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Konnie Huq's and Nick Ferrari's dad may have been immigrants but mine and most of those Vanessa Feltz is happy to sneer at here weren't.

The Brit-loathing attitude evidenced here is by no means new.

In an episode of The Wright Stuff, Matthew Wright said this:

"There aren't a lot of black people in Norfolk."

To which Feltz replied:

"Good Lor, have you seen the people in Norfolk? I think THEY NEED A GREAT INFLUX OF AS MANY DIFFERENT CULTURES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE - STOP ALL THAT INBREEDING! That's what we should do!"

On 9 March 2009, Sir Andrew Green, the Chairman of MigrationWatch, was quoted thus by The Daily Star:

"THE GOVERNMENT HAS HELD PUBLIC OPINION IN CONTEMPT FOR YEARS. DESPITE HAVING DISMANTLED BORDER CONTROLS, THEY DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED IMMIGRATION... THE CONSERVATIVES HANDED OVER BORDER CONTROLS TO THE EU BUT ALL THE OTHER FACTORS ARE DOWN TO NEW LABOUR…

The Government seems to make a habit of blaming ‘global forces’ but OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS THIS PROBLEM IS ALMOST ENTIRELY HOME GROWN".

On 30 May 2009, Jeremy Clarkson, presenter of Top Gear, said this in The Sun:

"THE MAIN PARTIES SEEM TO HAVE COMPLETELY LOST TOUCH WITH WHAT THEIR SUPPORTERS ACTUALLY WANT OUT OF LIFE…

I can quite understand why the champagne socialists are worried about the plight of poor Ndjama. His village has been sacked by rebels, he has nowhere to live and nothing to eat. Of course they would want him to have a home in Britain… THEY WANT NDJAMA TO COME HERE BECAUSE WHEN HE DOES, HE'S NOT GOING TO BE LIVING IN THEIR STREET. SO, NDJAMA WILL GO AND LIVE IN SOMEONE ELSE'S STREET and that person will be quite cross. ESPECIALLY WHEN HE GOES TO WORK ONE DAY AND FINDS NDJAMA AT THE WHEEL OF HIS FORKLIFT TRUCK.

THE LABOUR PARTY SAY THAT IMMIGRATION IS GOOD FOR BRITAIN AND MORALLY THE RIGHT POLICY TO PURSUE… BUT THOSE WHO PUT THEM IN POWER, EMPHATICALLY, DO NOT THINK THIS WAY. We are all tribal. WE LIKE BEING IN A GROUP AND WE DISTRUST OUTSIDERS. WE HAVE OUR FAMILY UNIT, OUR BUNCH OF FRIENDS, THE TOWN WHERE WE LIVE… the country of which we are proud.

THE BIG-HEARTED, LIBERAL-THINKING CHAPS AND CHAPESSES WHO ADVISE BROWN AND HIS GANG OF FIDDLERS MAY THINK THIS IS BACKWARD AND PRE-HISTORIC… But… IF YOU LET HALF OF AFRICA COME TO BRITAIN… YOU'RE GOING TO WIND PEOPLE UP."

On 5 December 2005, Rod Liddle said this in The Spectator:

“THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF STREET CRIME, KNIFE CRIME, GUN CRIME, ROBBERY AND CRIMES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN LONDON IS CARRIED OUT BY YOUNG MEN FROM THE AFRICAN-CARIBBEAN COMMUNITY.

In return, we have rap music, goat curry and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us.”

Quite.

I wonder, given that PC isn't the force it was, if the British were allowed a secret ballot, would they vote to put things back the way they were before Big Brother began importing criminality from elsewhere on the planet?

On 17 February 2009, The Daily Telegraph quoted Dame Stella Rimmington, former head of MI5, following in an interview with La Vanguardia newspaper.

“Since I have retired I feel more at liberty to be against certain decisions of the Government, especially the attempt to pass laws which interfere with people’s privacy… It would be better that the Government recognised that there are risks, rather than FRIGHTENING PEOPLE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO PASS LAWS WHICH RESTRICT CIVIL LIBERTIES, precisely one of the objects of terrorism: that WE LIVE IN FEAR AND UNDER A POLICE STATE”.

Arthur Chaskelson, the Chairman of an International Commission of Jurists, said this in the same Telegraph article:

"WE HAVE BEEN SHOCKED BY THE DAMAGE DONE OVER THE PAST SEVEN YEARS BY EXCESSIVE OR ABUSIVE COUNTER-TERRORISM MEASURES IN A WIDE RANGE OF COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD. Many governments, ignoring the lessons of history, have allowed themselves to be rushed into hasty responses to terrorism that have UNDERMINED CHERISHED VALUES AND VIOLATED HUMAN RIGHTS.”

Welcome to the world of Bush, Blair, Brown and those who own them, Arthur.

Police Federation Chairman, Paul McKeever, was quoted as follows by the 13 May 2009 edition of The Daily Mail:

"THE GOVERNMENT HAS CREATED THE HOKEY COKEY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM... IT’S IN OUT, IN OUT, LET ALL THE PRISONERS OUT. IN OUT, IN OUT, SHAKE THE SYSTEM ABOUT… OFFICERS ARE SICK TO DEATH OF SEEING THE SAME CRIMINALS AGAIN AND AGAIN.”

McKeever said what he said in the presence of the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, at the Police Federation’s annual conference in Bournemouth.

On 27 August 2009, Leo McKinstry commented thus in The Daily Express:

“PATRIOTISM IS ONE OF MAN-KIND’S MOST NOBLE IDEALS, an extension of THE NATURAL LOYALTY WE FEEL TO OUR FAMILIES, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD. In its highest form, it requires us TO LAY DOWN OUR LIVES TO PROTECT OTHERS...

But IN OUR MODERN AGE, PATRIOTISM IS DESPISED RATHER THAN ADMIRED. FOR THE MARXIST IDEOLOGUES WHO NOW RUN BRITAIN, LOVE OF COUNTRY IS A VICE, NOT A VIRTUE...

It is a bizarre paradox of our times that, THANKS TO THE PREDOMINANCE OF MULTI-CULTURAL DOGMA, THE PATRIOTIC INSTINCT THAT LED TO NATIONAL SALVATION IN 1945 IS NOW TREATED AS A THOUGHT CRIME.

THE SENSE OF UNIFYING NATIONAL IDENTITY THAT ONCE MOTIVATED MILLIONS OF BRITONS TO DEFEND THEIR HOMELAND IS HELD TO BE SUSPECT BY A POLITICAL ELITE OBSESSED WITH CULTURAL DIVERSITY. WE ARE TOLD THAT OPPOSITION TO MASS IMMIGRATION IS THE EQUIVALENT OF SIDING WITH THE NAZIS...

The Government’s own educational quango, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, boasts that HISTORY TEACHING SHOULD BE A TOOL FOR ‘VALUING DIVERSITY AND CHALLENGING RACISM’ BY GAINING INSIGHTS ‘INTO ISSUES AROUND HUMAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY AND MIGRATION'...

I recently spoke to a D-Day veteran from the West Midlands. With anger and regret, he told me that HE DID NOT FIGHT IN ORDER TO END UP AS AN ALIEN IN HIS OWN COUNTRY. Even more insulting, he said, was BEING TOLD BY POLITICIANS THAT THE DESTRUCTION OF HIS SOCIETY WAS THE IDEAL FOR WHICH HE HAD GONE INTO BATTLE.”

Leo McKinstry, the mainstream political journalist whose views most closely resemble my own, was once a Labour councillor and an aide to New Labour's Deputy Leader, Harriet Harman.

More of his insightful writings may be perused here.

On 9 June 2009, Patrick O'Flynn opined thus in The Daily Express:

“THE LABOUR PARTY THAT HAS ABANDONED THE BRITISH WORKING CLASS in a process of disengagement that has taken place over decades… ITS POLICIES HAVE UNDERMINED WORKING-CLASS AMBITION, REFUSED TO PUNISH PROPERLY THE CRIMINALITY THAT PLAGUES WORKING-CLASS NEIGHBOURHOODS, RIGGED THE JOBS MARKET AGAINST INDIGENOUS WORKERS, ENCOURAGED EXCESSIVE IMMIGRATION AND DOWNGRADED PATRIOTISM – REPLACING IT WITH THE DISASTROUS IDEOLOGY OF MULTICULTURALISM...

THE DAUGHTER OF AN AFRICAN PRINCE, AFTER BEING PUT THROUGH A BRILLIANT PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ENGLAND, WILL FIND THAT ‘AFFIRMATIVE ACTION’ OPENS ALL KINDS OF CAREER DOORS THAT REMAIN SHUT TO THE WHITE SON OF A WORKING-CLASS FAMILY FROM A COUNCIL ESTATE.”

On 1 February 2009, Simon Walters, Political Editor of The Mail on Sunday, told us this:

"THE LABOUR PEER LORD TRUSCOTT, AT THE HEART OF THE LORDS SLEAZE ROW, HAS SECRET LINKS TO SOVIET RUSSIA, a Mail on Sunday investigation has uncovered. The party faced calls for a new inquiry into Lord Truscott in the face of fresh information about his astonishing rise to power, which throws new light on the 'love at first sight' account of how he met his Russian wife Svetlana in the former Soviet Union.

At the time they married, LADY TRUSCOTT WAS AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY AND HER FATHER WAS A SENIOR RED ARMY OFFICER AT A SECRET MILITARY INSTITUTE CONNECTED TO THE SOVIET EQUIVALENT OF THE SAS.

The Mail on Sunday has also obtained new details about THE COUPLE'S PRIVATE FORTUNE, WHICH INCLUDES A £1MILLION HOME IN MAYFAIR, A COUNTRY HOME IN BATH AND PROPERTY INTERESTS IN RUSSIA. This newspaper has been told that LORD TRUSCOTT WAS AWARDED HIS PEERAGE BY TONY BLAIR IN 2004 AFTER OFFERING PRIVATE ADVICE ON RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA."

It's the Truscott types that really rule our lives nowadays, ladies and gentlemen.

That's who pays no attention to what we want. That's who lies and spins and screws everything up and that's who won't ever take any of the blame.

And all this time you thought you were voting the same way as your dad and grandad.

On 21 June 2008, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:

"THIS IS THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT SINCE OLIVER CROMWELL, DEDICATED TO OVERTHROWING THE MORAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ORDER OF THIS COUNTRY… The truth is – and I know it because I was a Sixties Trotskyist myself – that THE BLAIR-BROWN LABOUR PARTY IS CRAMMED FULL OF UNREFORMED REVOLUTIONARIES. THAT’S WHY THE MI5 FILES OF THAT ERA HAVE BEEN SO ZEALOUSLY DESTROYED.

I tried to obtain my own docket and was refused on feeble grounds. The fact is that mine went in the incinerator ALONG WITH PETER MANDELSON’S, JOHN REID’S AND MANY OTHERS whose interesting pasts are much-rumoured around Westminster…

But now you don’t have to take my word for it. Last week, my lonely warnings were confirmed in an astonishing public statement by Tony McNulty, Minister of State at the Home Office… Believing that everyone there was a Leftist like him, he tried to win them over with these words:

'I KNOW IT’S TERRIBLY HARD TO BELIEVE BUT I USED TO BE RADICAL MYSELF… LIKE A LOT OF GOVERNMENT, I’M AN EX-TROT’…

Looking at the bland, prosperous faces of the Parliamentary Labour Party I see my generation, THE ONES WHO BETWEEN ABOUT 1965 AND 1975 LEARNED TO LOATHE PATRIOTISM, THE ARMED FORCES, PROPER POLICING, PROPER SCHOOLS, TRADITIONAL RELIGION, MARRIAGE, THE MONARCHY AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT ‘ALTERNATIVE’ COMEDIANS ARE PAID HANDSOMELY TO SNEER AT ON THE BBC...

TROTSKY WOULD HAVE APPROVED".

Though Lenin has been given the credit as leader of the Bolshevik revolution, Trotsky did more than any other to make it happen.

He raised many millions of dollars from American businessmen, without which there wouldn't have been a revolution, and, through the campaigns of terror he ordered and organised as Head of the Red Army, all resistance was crushed and Bolshevik rule established.

On 12 October 2008, The Andrew Marr Show featured the Tory MP and former Shadow Home Secretary, David Davis, who had just returned from a fact-finding trip to Afghanistan.

Bear in mind as you read his laudably honest appraisal of the situation, that Davis voted to go to war against Afghanistan.

"THE AFGHANS THINK WE'RE LOSING… WE ARE EFFECTIVELY DEFENDING A GOVERNMENT WHICH IS WEAK, CORRUPT AND INEFFECTIVE. I MEAN APART FROM ITS WARLORD ALLIES, IT DOESN'T EXTEND A RIFLE SHOT BEYOND KABUL IN TERMS OF ITS POWER. And MANY OF THE MINISTERS, GOVERNORS AND SO ON HAVE BECOME MULTI-MILLIONAIRES WHILST PUBLIC SERVANTS, I MEAN WHICH THE ORDINARY AFGHAN… JUST VIEWS WITH HATRED. And on the ground... the Afghan National Police, who we support… well, bluntly, MORE THAN HALF OF THEM ARE DRUG ADDICTS, A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF THEM ARE CORRUPT.

THEY ARE KNOWN PRINCIPALLY FOR STOPPING AFGHANS ON THE ROAD AND TAKING MONEY OFF THEM, FOR ROBBING THEM, EVEN OCCASIONALLY FOR RAPE AND KIDNAP. Now all those things mean YOU'VE GOT A SORT OF BANDITRY IN UNIFORM.

So I'm afraid the truth is… WE ARE NOT SEEN BY THE ORDINARY AFGHAN AS THE LIBERATORS...

You know IF YOU'VE HAD A MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY RAPED OR YOU'VE BEEN ROBBED OR YOU'VE BEEN DENIED JUSTICE IN SOME WAY, THEN I'M AFRAID YOU KNOW THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE IN TOWN IS THE TALIBAN… The most outstanding story we've picked up - and we've confirmed it from a couple of sources - was that ORDINARY AFGHANS WILL LEAVE GOVERNMENT AREAS TO GO TO A TALIBAN AREA TO GET JUSTICE, to get a trial on the subject.”

It's nice to hear a top chap telling the truth for a change, isn't it?

On 8 August 2009, General Sir David Richards, the new head of the British Army, told us that the politicians might be putting the lives of our soldiers at risk in Afghanistan for the next forty years!

He was quoted thus by The Telegraph:

"This is nation building... THE WHOLE PROCESS MIGHT TAKE AS LONG AS 30 TO 40 YEARS. There is absolutely no chance of NATO pulling out."

Long enough for tens of thousands of ours and hundreds of thousands of theirs to lose their lives for the Nation Builders, eh, Dave?

On 15 March 2006, Prince Charles said this:

"NEARLY 25 PER CENT OF ALL HOMELESS PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY ARE EX-SERVICEMEN." More...

On 20 January 2010, The Huffington Post quoted the gay rights campaigner, Peter Tatchell, thus:

“IN BRITAIN… WE CAN ONLY DREAM OF A BLACK HEAD OF STATE… The UK system is rigged against A BLACK LEADER… The Windsors are WHITE and only their descendants are eligible to be monarch and British head of state. The result is a de facto RACE BAR... BLACK PEOPLE ARE EXCLUDED. THE ALL-WHITE WINDSOR FAMILY has the exclusive franchise on the office of head of state. THIS WHITE-FAVOURING FEUDAL SYSTEM is totally out of step with the democratic, egalitarian and meritocratic ethos of modern British life.

A head of state is supposed to represent the nation and its people, and to symbolise its values and culture. In a DIVERSE MULTI-ETHNIC SOCIETY SUCH AS BRITAIN, surely it is wrong to automatically, a priori, deny this honoured, revered role to non-WHITE citizens?…

THE CURRENT METHOD OF APPOINTING THE HEAD OF STATE (is) RACIST BY DEFAULT… It reflects an INSTITUTIONAL RACISM…

ONLY THE GREEN PARTY IS CALLING FOR A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED HEAD OF STATE…

THIS MANNER OF DETERMINING BRITAIN'S HEAD OF STATE IS SURELY AN OFFENSIVE, BIGOTED ANACHRONISM. It is premised on the assumption that the most ignorant, stupid, immoral WHITE Windsor is more entitled to be head of state than THE BEST-INFORMED, WISEST AND MOST MORAL BLACK BRITON. THIS IS A TRULY REPULSIVE RACIST ASSUMPTION…

Catholics and people of non-Christian faiths are also barred from being monarchs and heads of state…

It is true, of course, that BRITAIN COULD ONE DAY HAVE A BLACK HEAD OF STATE. If a future monarch married a non-WHITE person, their first born child could ascend to the throne and become head of state… WHY SHOULD BLACK AND ASIAN BRITONS HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR GENERATIONS? IT IS A VILE INSULT TO MAKE THEM STAND AT THE BACK OF THE QUEUE FOR THE OFFICE OF HEAD OF STATE…

IF WILLIAM MARRIED A BLACK BRITISH WOMAN HIS FIRST-BORN MALE CHILD FROM THAT MARRIAGE COULD INHERIT THE HEAD OF STATE TITLE.” More...

The top, gay Australian doesn’t appear to like white folks much, does he?

As a point of interest, are there any native Britons out there, of a non-homosexual persuasion, who are "dream(ing) of a black head of state"?

Ah yes, New Labour,* the Tories** and the PC Crowd. Anyone else?

Thought not.

* In July 2000, Tony Blair said this at a meeting of non-indigenous business leaders:

"One day, yes, one day, THERE WILL BE A BLACK PRIME MINISTER!"

** On 2 June 2008, the former Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party, Jeffrey Archer, was interviewed by the Editor-in-Chief of The Indian Express, Shekhar Gupta.

At one point in the interview, Gupta asked Archer if he saw any change in Britain. He replied:

"Massive. It IS GOING TO BE TAKEN OVER BY THE INDIANS. And I don't joke...

WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS WHAT THE JEWS DID 30-40 YEARS AGO WHEN THEY CAME TO ENGLAND AFTER THE WAR. THEY TOOK OVER THE LOCAL COUNCILS AND THEY BECAME MAYORS. NOW THEY ARE IN PARLIAMENT. THE INDIANS ARE NOW TAKING OVER THE LOCAL COUNCILS. THERE ARE MAYORS ALL OVER ENGLAND WHO ARE INDIAN.

You are young enough, I suspect, TO LIVE TO SEE AN INDIAN PRIME MINISTER IN ENGLAND."

On 4 April 2005, after deciding the fate of six Asian fraudsters, Judge Richard Mawrey said that there was evidence of "MASSIVE, SYSTEMATIC AND ORGANISED FRAUD" in Birmingham.

He added:

"THE SYSTEM IS WIDE OPEN TO FRAUD and any would-be political fraudster knows that...

I have just tried and listened to evidence of ELECTORAL FRAUD THAT WOULD DISGRACE A BANANA REPUBLIC... It indicates a state NOT SIMPLY OF COMPLACENCY, BUT OF DENIAL... Short of writing ‘STEAL ME’ on the (postal vote) envelopes, it is hard to see what more could be done TO ENSURE THEIR COMING INTO THE WRONG HANDS”. More and More.

On 10 June 2006, Sandra Laville, the Crime Correspondent, and Hugh Muir, the Diary Editor wrote the following in The Guardian:

"A secret high-level Metropolitan police report has concluded that MUSLIM OFFICERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BECOME CORRUPT THAN WHITE OFFICERS BECAUSE OF THEIR CULTURAL AND FAMILY BACKGROUNDS… Complaints of misconduct and corruption against Asian officers are 10 TIMES HIGHER THAN AGAINST THEIR WHITE COLLEAGUES.

The main conclusions of the study, commissioned by the Directorate of Professional Standards and WRITTEN BY AN ASIAN DETECTIVE CHIEF INSPECTOR, stated:

'ASIAN OFFICERS AND IN PARTICULAR PAKISTANI MUSLIM OFFICERS ARE UNDER GREATER PRESSURE FROM THE FAMILY, THE EXTENDED FAMILY ... AND THEIR COMMUNITY AGAINST THAT OF THEIR WHITE COLLEAGUES TO ENGAGE IN ACTIVITY THAT MIGHT LEAD TO MISCONDUCT OR CRIMINALITY'...

The report argued that British Pakistanis live in a cash culture in which 'assisting your extended family is considered a duty...

THE FIRST VERSION (of the report) WAS CONSIDERED SO INFLAMMATORY WHEN IT WAS SHOWN TO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE STAFF ASSOCIATIONS FOR BLACK, HINDU, SIKH AND MUSLIM OFFICERS, THAT IT HAD TO BE TONED DOWN."

On 17 January 2010, an article from the LiveLeak news service informed us of an astounding set of statistics released by the Oslo police.

This is what was said:

“ALL 21 REPORTED CASES OF RAPE WITH AGGRAVATED ASSAULT — THE HIGHEST NUMBER SINCE RECORDS WERE STARTED — IN THE NORWEGIAN CAPITAL OF OSLO LAST YEAR WERE COMMITTED BY ‘NON-WESTERN IMMIGRANTS’ AND 90 PERCENT OF ALL RAPE VICTIMS WERE NORWEGIAN WOMEN...

Oslo police spokesman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK...

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, ‘IN EACH AND EVERY CASE, NOT ONLY IN 2008 AND 2009 BUT ALSO IN 2007, THE OFFENDER WAS A NON-WESTERN IMMIGRANT. AT THE SAME TIME, IN 9 OUT OF 10 CASES, THE VICTIM WAS NORWEGIAN, NOT JUST BY NATIONALITY, BUT ALSO BY ETHNICITY… NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE OFFENDERS HAD A WESTERN BACKGROUND’...

According to official figures released in 2008, THIRD WORLD IMMIGRATION ACCOUNTED FOR 25 PERCENT OF OSLO’S POPULATION... The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan. Next in line is Somalia...

In a study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that IMMIGRATION HAS INCREASED THE PRESSURE ON THE WELFARE STATE, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population. THIRD WORLD IMMIGRANTS ARE, THE STUDY SHOWED, RECIPIENTS OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS AT A RATE TEN TIMES THAT OF NATIVE NORWEGIANS, destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.

MORE THAN HALF OF ALL SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS IN THE CITY OF OSLO ARE SPENT ON NON-WESTERN IMMIGRANTS.”

On 28 August 2006, The New Statesman quoted Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones thus:

"Our parents established beachheads in the cities; it is now up to our generation to move out of those beachheads AND CLAIM THE REST OF BRITAIN AS OUR OWN.”

Emmanuel-Jones, who is black, will be the Conservative candidate for the Chippenham constituency in the 2010 General Election.

More Illuminating Quotations may be found here..

Illuminating Quotations 2

2009-09-17T16:07:00.123+01:00

On 1 July 1992, introducing The USS Vincennes: Public War, Secret War for ABC News, America' top political commentator, Ted Koppel, said this:

"GOVERNMENTS LIE. THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME. And, much as we’d like to believe otherwise, the US government is no exception. There were times when we may have believed otherwise. But after Vietnam and Watergate, we know better."

The 2005 New Labour Manifesto promised the British people a referendum on whether we should sign up to the proposed European Constitution.

This is how it was put:

“It is a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe. WE WILL PUT IT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM and campaign wholeheartedly for a ‘yes’ vote to keep Britain a leading nation in Europe.”

In a 24 June 2007 statement during a BBC interview with Jon Sopel, Gordon Brown reiterated this position thus:

"The manifesto is what we put to the public. WE'VE GOT TO HONOUR THAT MANIFESTO. THAT IS AN ISSUE OF TRUST WITH ME AND THE ELECTORATE."

Amazingly, Brown was duplicitous enough to renege upon this utterly categoric statement within the very same interview:

"THIS IS NOT A NEW CONSTITUTION,” he said. “IT'S AN AMENDING TREATY… THE ISSUES THAT WE WERE WORRIED ABOUT HAVE BEEN DEALT WITH… THE PUBLIC WOULD NOT… EXPECT THERE TO BE A REFERENDUM."

Let’s test the "not-a-constitution" assertion against the things one or two other in-the-know folk have said:

The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, was quoted thus in the 29 June 2007 edition of The Daily Telegraph:

"THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONSTITUTION IS MAINTAINED. THIS IS A FACT."

Jose Luis Zapatero, the Spanish Prime Minister, said this on 27 July 2007:

"WE HAVE NOT ABANDONED ANY ESSENTIAL POINT OF THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS WITHOUT DOUBT BETTER THAN A TREATY. IT’S A PROJECT WHICH HAS A FOUNDING CHARACTER, A TREATY FOR A NEW EUROPE."

Bertie Ahern, the Irish Prime Minister, was quoted thus in the 24 June 2007 edition of The Irish Independent:

"90 PER CENT OF THE CONSTITUTION REMAINS... The changes have brought absolutely no spectacular modification to the 2004 accord."

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, the former French President and principal author of the original Constitution, was quoted thus in the 14 June 2007 edition of Le Monde:

"We had to camouflage parts of the Constitutional Treaty… In this way, OPINION WOULD BE LED TO ACCEPT, WITHOUT KNOWING IT, THE PROVISIONS WHICH ONE DOES NOT DARE TO PRESENT TO THE PUBLIC IN A DIRECT MANNER."

Karel de Gucht, the Belgian Minister for Foreign Affairs, was quoted thus by the 23 June 2007 edition of Flanders Information:

"The goal of the Constitutional Treaty was to be legible. The goal of this Treaty is to be illegible. THE CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY WAS CLEAR WHEREAS THIS NEW TREATY IS OBSCURE. IT IS A SUCCESS."

The 3 July 2007 edition of The Telegraph quoted Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg, thus:

"OF COURSE THERE WILL BE A TRANSFER OF SOVEREIGNTY BUT WOULD I BE INTELLIGENT TO DRAW THE PUBLIC ATTENTION TO THIS FACT?"

Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, was quoted as follows by the 13 June 2007 edition of The Guardian:

"THE CHANGES HAVE PURELY BEEN COSMETIC AND THE BASE DOCUMENT STAYS THE SAME."

On 7 March 2008, The Daily Mail commented as follows:

"Yesterday will go down in history as the day our politicians surrendered most of what was left of Britain's sovereignty and trusted the nation's future to a European superstate. It will also go down as one of the blackest ever for our democracy...

BOTH GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION MPS DELIBERATELY BROKE THE SOLEMN PLEDGE THEY MADE TO THE ELECTORATE IN 2005. EVERY LABOUR CANDIDATE WENT INTO THAT ELECTION COMMITTED TO AN UNEQUIVOCAL PLEDGE TO CALL A REFERENDUM ON WHAT WAS THEN CALLED THE EU CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY - now known, after a few cosmetic tweaks, as the Lisbon Treaty. Their manifesto said…

‘WE WILL PUT IT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM'...

Not much room for misunderstanding there, was there?

Yet last night, THE GREAT MAJORITY OF LABOUR MPS TROOPED THROUGH THE DIVISION LOBBIES TO VOTE AGAINST A REFERENDUM. WHAT HOPE IS THERE FOR DEMOCRACY, WHEN MPS PLEDGE ONE THING TO GET ELECTED - AND THEN DO THE EXACT OPPOSITE WHEN THE VOTERS HAVE GIVEN THEM THEIR TRUST?

The LibDems' official position, under their pathetic new leader Nick Clegg, has been every bit as morally contemptible - perhaps even more so. Here, verbatim, is the party's 2005 election pledge…

‘RATIFICATION MUST BE SUBJECT TO A REFERENDUM OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE’… Yet last night, Mr CLEGG ORDERED HIS MPS TO ABSTAIN - THEREBY ENSURING THE TREATY WOULD BE RATIFIED WITHOUT VOTERS' CONSENT…

WHAT WE WITNESSED LAST NIGHT WAS THE POLITICAL CLASS GANGING UP AGAINST THE VOTERS WHO GAVE THEM POWER.

THE RESULT - BARRING A MIRACLE - IS THAT BRITAIN WILL NOW SURRENDER ITS VETO OVER 60 IMPORTANT AREAS OF POLICY TO THE UNELECTED BUREAUCRACY IN BRUSSELS. Meanwhile, we will be obliged to take orders from AN UNELECTED PRESIDENT OF EUROPE - WHO, GOD FORBID, MAY EVEN BE TONY BLAIR.

As the pettifogging regulations flood in from Brussels over the years ahead, there will be absolutely nothing we can do about it. And all because, ON WEDNESDAY MARCH 5, 2008, BRITISH MPS DECIDED EN MASSE TO BREAK THEIR WORD TO THE PEOPLE - AND SURRENDERED THE NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE FOR WHICH THEIR FOREFATHERS LAID DOWN THEIR LIVES.”

Gisela Stuart, the New Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston, who is German, played a key role in drawing up the original EU constitution on the UK‘s behalf.

She was as damning as the author of the preceding article in her 15 October 2007 comment in The Evening Standard:

"Sticking to your guns in defence of A PATENTLY DISHONEST POSITION is not leadership but the soft option and A COP OUT FROM A SPECIFIC PROMISE MADE TO VOTERS", she said. "THE PATH ADOPTED BY THE GOVERNMENT IS NEITHER HONEST NOR COHERENT."

The next day she was quoted thus throughout the mainstream media:

"IT'S A MATTER OF TRUST AND INTEGRITY. A REFERENDUM WAS PROMISED. IT SHOULD BE DELIVERED. IF LABOUR CAN'T TRUST THE PEOPLE, WHY SHOULD THE PEOPLE TRUST LABOUR?"

Anyway, when the next General Election rolls around, if some party hack comes a-knocking on your door and insists that the Lisbon Treaty isn’t, to all intents and purposes, just the same as the original constitutional fit-up, he’ll be lying.

And when you see Gordon Brown revisiting his “public… would not expect there to be a referendum” nonsense, you can be sure that he is telling as big a porkie pie as any his predecessor ever told.

As Ted Koppel said, ladies and gentlemen: “Politicians lie. They do it all the time”.

The really remarkable thing, as far as I’m concerned, is the fact that we keep falling for their lies.

Over and over again.

On 2 November 2009, at a Royal Society for the Arts gathering: the Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, admitted that New Labour had been "maladroit" in handling the immigration issue.

Here are some of the apologetic truths Johnson told:

"I accept that governments of both persuasions, including this one, have been maladroit in their handling of this issue."

"Our record is not perfect".

"There are communities which have been disproportionately affected by immigration, where PEOPLE HAVE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT THE STRAIN THAT THE GROWTH IN THE LOCAL POPULATION HAS PLACED ON JOBS AND SERVICES."

"Unreturned national prisoners and asylum seekers may have accumulated under previous administrations but THEY CONTINUED TO BE IGNORED FOR FAR TOO LONG ON OUR WATCH."

This is all a bit of a turnabout since Johnson made the following blasé comment a little over three months ago:

"I DO NOT LIE AWAKE AT NIGHT WORRYING ABOUT A POPULATION OF 70 MILLION. I’M HAPPY TO LIVE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY."

Most political commentators are putting Johnson's new-found humility down to the popularity of the BNP.

In other words, he's trawling for lost votes.

Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of think tank Migrationwatch UK, responded thus to Johnson's partial climbdown:

"THIS APOLOGY IS THREE MILLION IMMIGRANTS TOO LATE...

We now know that SOME OF HIS COLLEAGUES DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED MASS IMMIGRATION SO AS TO ENGINEER A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY WERE FLYING IN THE FACE OF PUBLIC OPINION, ESPECIALLY THEIR OWN WORKING CLASS SUPPORTERS... LABOUR HAVE SECRETLY ENCOURAGED MASS IMMIGRATION SO AS TO ENGINEER A HUGE CHANGE IN OUR SOCIETY IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT IT WOULD BE TOTALLY AGAINST PUBLIC OPINION."

And that, ladies and gents, is the plain truth.

Here a Johnsonian fib:

"WE STRUGGLED TO CONTAIN THE HUGE SURGE IN MIGRATION, Legal and illegal, that emerged from countries such as Kosovo, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka and Somalia."

Anyone who thinks New Labour "struggled" to do anything other than open the floodgates as wide as they'd go is a brainwashed airhead or a bought-and-paid-for quangocrat.

Here's a misleading half-truth:

"When we came in to government in 1997, THERE WAS NO MAGIC BUTTON we could push immediately to resolve all the historic, political and operation problems associated with immigration."

The "magic button" would have involved New Labour raising the drawbridge and lowering the benefits, so I guess, for them, there was, indeed, "no magic button".

As they always intended to do precisely the opposite.

During the course of Johnson's speech he told one great, big porkie:

"THIS GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER PURSUED AN OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION POLICY."

Lied the Home Secretary.

Here's proof of Johnson's dishonesty:

On 23 October 2009, Andrew Neather, a former government advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, dropped this revelatory bombshell in The Evening Standard:

“THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION…

The PIU's reports were legendarily tedious within Whitehall BUT THEIR BIG IMMIGRATION REPORT WAS SURROUNDED BY AN UNUSUAL AIR OF BOTH ANTICIPATION AND SECRECY. DRAFTS WERE HANDED OUT IN SUMMER 2000 ONLY WITH EXTREME RELUCTANCE: THERE WAS A PARANOIA ABOUT IT REACHING THE MEDIA.

Eventually published in January 2001, the innocuously labelled ‘RDS Occasional Paper no. 67’, ‘Migration: an economic and social analysis’ focused heavily on the labour market case. But THE EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL.

I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date…

THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS…

The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”.

You might think, from the astounding revelations Andrew Neather apprises us of above, that he is a whistleblower.

Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't Listen to the Whingers - London Needs Immigrants, suggests, he is still four square behind the imposition of the Multicult upon the bewildered and disenfranchised majority.

On 14 October 2009, Simon Duke wrote the following in The Daily Mail:

"City bank Goldman Sachs is expected to confirm tomorrow that BONUSES WILL SMASH ALL RECORDS IN 2009, JUST A YEAR AFTER THE GOVERNMENT RESCUED THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM OBLIVION...

The return to business as usual for the so-called 'Masters of the Universe' of the Square Mile will anger the MILLIONS OF FAMILIES whose finances have been devastated by the financial crisis...

THE WALL STREET GIANT IS ON COURSE TO LAVISH £14 BILLION ON PAY AND BONUSES ON STAFF THIS YEAR following a surge in profits between July and September… GOLDMAN'S 5,500 UK WORKERS ARE NOW SET TO POCKET AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST £500,000 EACH for this year - the highest rewards in the firm's 140-year history...

High-flyers, such as UK boss MICHAEL SHERWOOD, COULD EARN BONUSES STRETCHING INTO EIGHT FIGURES."

Sherwood, one of two "Masters of the Universe" working for Goldman Sachs cited in Simon Duke's article, is Jewish.

The other, Peter Sutherland, is, truly, a credit-crunching wallet-stuffer of the highest international order. His "Father of Globalisation" CV suggests he would rank much higher in the NWO hierarchy than ubiquitous factotums like Blair or Brown, for example.

Check out what Wikipedia has to say about him here...

On 13 July 2009, Matt Taibbi, published The Great American Bubble Machine in Rolling Stone magazine.

At the beginning of the article, he says:

"From tech stocks to high gas prices, “GOLDMAN SACHS HAS ENGINEERED EVERY MAJOR MARKET MANIPULATION SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION - AND THEY'RE ABOUT TO DO IT AGAIN”!

Check out Matt Taibbi's great exposé here.

Check out what Matt has to say, in person, about Goldman in this video.

Here’s a novel idea:

Instead of putting the price of everything up and taxing the innocent majority up to the hilt, tax the greedy bankers, the hedge fund managers; the private equity wallahs and the biggest of trough-gobbling big businessmen up to the hilt. Let's have 90 PER CENT OF THEIR INCOME off them! And make the tax retrospective - all the way back to 1979, when Margaret Thatcher began institutionalising fat cat greed!

That’d get rid of the national debt in a flash. And the process would be a just one - As opposed to the injustice of making the decent majority pay for the crimes of an amoral elite minority, that is.

Besides, THEY would still have their 10 per cent, wouldn’t THEY? 10 percent of a billion is still a hundred mil.

99.999 per cent of us would be happy enough with that, I reckon.

As the British people have sought to make sense of sub-prime, the credit-crunch and the world-wide recession that followed, the journalist who has attained most public acclaim and notoriety for guiding us through this financial minefield is, without doubt, Robert Peston, the BBC's Business Editor.

Bearing in mind the fact that Peston is, himself, very much an establishment figure, it would be difficult for any of his fellow bigshots to gainsay any of the astoundingly unequivocal criticisms of the status quo in his 2008 book, Who Runs Britain.

Here's a sample:

“The recent history of British and US companies is littered with sorry tales of companies being damaged by executives' fraudulent or near-fraudulent attempts to manufacture profits in the hope of boosting their personal earnings...

In the late 1970s, THE GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR STARTED TO WIDEN AND WOULD NEVER NARROW AGAIN. INCREASING INEQUALITY WAS TO DEFINE THE THATCHER YEARS FROM 1979 TO 1990... HER WAY OF SEEING THE WORLD BECAME THE ESTABLISHMENT VIEW... In her world, STRIVING FOR EQUALITY AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS WERE ANTITHETICAL ASPIRATIONS, SO EQUALITY MUST DIE - AND IT DID…

In the words of the Institute of Fiscal Studies, the respected economic think tank, in Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2007, THE MAGNITUDE OF THE RISE IN INEQUALITY UNDER HER CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT WAS UNPARALLELED…

In 2005-06, for the first time in many years, the pattern of income growth replicated what went on during the Thatcher years, with THE RICHEST FIFTH OF THE POPULATION SEEING THE HIGHEST INCOME RISE, AND PAY INCREMENTS BECOMING PROGRESSIVELY SMALLER FOR THE LOWER-INCOME GROUPS…

The really striking social phenomenon under New Labour has been THE TRIUMPH OF THE SUPER-RICH... The presence on British soil of a disproportionate number of immensely wealthy people, who are becoming wealthier by the minute, HAS BEEN ENCOURAGED BY TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN. THEY HAVE NURTURED A WELCOMING ENVIRONMENT FOR BILLIONAIRES OF ANY NATIONALITY, WHO CAN LIVE IN THE UK AND PAY RELATIVELY LITTLE TAX…

Brown as Chancellor was, AS A MATTER OF DELIBERATE POLICY, STRIKINGLY GENEROUS TO THE CITY'S NEW PLUTOCRATS - THE OWNERS OF HEDGE-FUND AND PRIVATE-EQUITY FIRMS…

Thanks to the magnanimity of Gordon Brown when he was Chancellor, the tax that the partners of these is have been paying on their share of this profit has been AT MOST 10 PER CENT. In fact, due to clever tax planning, SOME PAY JUST 5 PER CENT AND OTHERS PAY NOTHING AT ALL...

IN 2006, THE ACCOUNTANTS GRANT THORNTON ESTIMATED THAT 54 UK-BASED BILLIONAIRES WERE PAYING INCOME TAX OF JUST £14.7M ON A COMBINED FORTUNE OF £126 BILLION… Of these, at least 32 of the billionaire dynasties had probably not paid any personal taxes on their wealth…

What has been going on is A SUPERCHARGED VERSION OF THE TRENDS PROMOTED BY THATCHER…

By design of a Labour premier, Gordon Brown, and a socialist Mayor, Ken Livingstone, LONDON IS NOW THE CAPITAL CITY OF THE BORDERLESS WORLD OF THE SUPER-RICH.”

On 4 March 2006, Tony Blair appeared on an edition of Parkinson.

During the interview, Michael Parkinson asked him if he regretted sending troops into Iraq. Blair replied:

"In the end there is a judgment that, well, I think IF YOU HAVE FAITH ABOUT THESE THINGS THEN YOU REALISE THAT JUDGMENT IS MADE BY OTHER PEOPLE," he said.

Asked to explain what he meant, Blair replied:

"IF YOU BELIEVE IN GOD, IT'S MADE BY GOD AS WELL."

So now you know.

As far as The Dear Leader was concerned, as soon as Iraq went pear-shaped, the decision to invade wasn't his.

The decision was made by "other people and... God as well".

Is this OK by you, ladies and gentlemen?

Are you happy that the leader of the British people was prepared to bow to will of "others" and "God" in the matter of making war?

Thought not.

On 23 May 2009, John Burton, Tony Blair’s political agent in his Sedgefield constituency for 24 years, described his former boss thus in The Telegraph:

“It's very simple to explain the idea of Blair the Warrior. IT WAS PART OF TONY LIVING OUT HIS FAITH… Tony's Christian faith is part of him, down to his cotton socks. He believed strongly at the time, that INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO, SIERRA LEONE, IRAQ TOO, WAS ALL PART OF THE CHRISTIAN BATTLE; GOOD SHOULD TRIUMPH OVER EVIL… HIS RELIGION GAVE HIM A TOTAL BELIEF IN WHAT'S RIGHT AND WHAT'S WRONG”.

That's the shiny-eyed Messiah, responsible for creating hell on earth in Iraq and Afghanistan, this twit is talking about.

"Living out his faith," Johnny? Whilst so many others were dying from it?

Not my kind of Christianity, pal. And not Jesus Christ's either.

At the Tory Party Conference, in October 2000, Michael Portillo said this:

“We are for all Britons. Black Britons, British Asians, white Britons. BRITAIN IS A COUNTRY OF RICH DIVERSITY”.

Britain is a country of festering hatreds, Michael.

The “rich diversity” rubbish is what saw fifty two innocent Londoners blown to bits on 7/7/2005.

On 11 December 2006, Valerie Amos, Tony Blair’s Leader of the House of Lords, said this from the 10 Downing Street web site:

"OUR MULTI-CULTURAL SOCIETY HAS BEEN A SUCCESS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY BRITISH PEOPLE THINK THAT TOO. EIGHTY PER CENT of those surveyed about multi-culturalism in Britain say that one of the reasons they enjoy being British and living in Britain is BECAUSE OUR SOCIETY IS DIVERSE…

I AM AN IMMIGRANT MYSELF… I value the fact that I have multiple identities. I am British. I was born in Guyana. I HAVE A STRONG AFFINITY TO AFRICA...

THE LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE GOVERNMENT’S INCLUSIVENESS AGENDA...

We will continue to look at THE BEST WAYS OF... PROMOTING INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES AND CHALLENGING THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN OUR WAY OF LIFE."

The Brit-bashing race laws are “the best way” to promote “inclusive communities” and torture those who don’t think like you, Val.

The PC Crowd had that figured out by 1965 when the first such law was introduced.

As regards the eighty per cent who, according to you, “enjoy being British and living in Britain… because our society is diverse”, I wonder which section of the population you surveyed? Was it the bit located in Brixton, Tottenham, Wormwood Scrubs or the Westminster village, perhaps?

What do you think, ladies and gents? Do you think the black Baroness is being just a little economical with the actualité here? I mean, does anyone out there actually believe that the British people enjoy being ethnically cleansed out of their own back yards and sneered at, threatened, fined and imprisoned if they ever dare say “boo“ to the immigrant goose?

Tony Blair made Amos a life peer in 1997 and, in 2003, he appointed her Secretary of State for International Development. At this time the unelected Guyanan immigrant became the first black woman to sit in the UK Cabinet. Later in 2003, she was created Leader of the House of Lords. Although she left the Cabinet when Gordon Brown became Prime Minister, he nominated her as a European Union Special Representative to the African Union.

Amos, who was Chief Executive of the Equal Opportunities Commission from 1989 to 1994 and Deputy Chair of the Runnymede Trust from 1990 to 1998, has spent the whole of her working life promoting the cause of immigrants just like herself.

In other words, she's never had a proper job in her life.

On 17 January 2009, The French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, echoed Marr's desire to disappear the white European in an address to the students of the École Polytechnique in Palaiseau.

Early on in his speech he uses a form of the noun "métissage" seven times within a minute. This word can mean mixing of cultures and/or interbreeding.

Here is a translation of Sarkozy’s words:

"The objective is to meet the challenge of the mélange - the challenge of coming together that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of the melting pot, France has always been familiar with it and, by meeting the challenge of the mix, France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, IT IS CONSANGUINITY THAT HAS ALWAYS PROVOKED THE END OF CIVILISATIONS AND SOCIETIES… In the course of centuries, FRANCE HAS ALWAYS UNDERSTOOD ‘INTER-BREEDING’, FRANCE HAS ALWAYS BEEN MIXED RACE.

France has mixed cultures, ideas and histories. France, who was able to blend these cultures and these histories, constructed a universal language, because FRANCE HERSELF IS UNIVERSAL IN THE DIVERSITY OF HER ORIGINS…

Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: if republican will power does not function, IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE REPUBLIC TO RESORT TO EVEN MORE FORCIBLE METHODS…

We don't have a choice. DIVERSITY AT THE BASE OF THE COUNTRY MUST BE REFLECTED BY DIVERSITY AT THE HEAD OF THE COUNTRY… IT IS NOT A CHOICE. IT IS AN OBLIGATION. IT IS AN IMPERATIVE. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems.

WE MUST CHANGE, SO WE WILL CHANGE."

On 23 April 2006, The Times reported the remarks of Professor Ted Cantle, Tony Blair's senior race relations advisor at the time of the Oldham Riots.

This is what was said:

"In an apparent reference to Heanor, a predominantly white town in the Amber Valley area of Derbyshire, Cantle said he was concerned about the strength of support for the far-right British National Party in some parts of the East Midlands...

Cantle’s remarks go further by describing parts of the country as 'UNHEALTHILY' WHITE."

The exact wording that Ted Cantle used was this:

"SOME OF THE NEIGHBOURING AREAS OF NOTTS AND DERBYSHIRE DO SEEM TO BE UNHEALTHILY ALL-WHITE."

On 30 April 2006, the Institute Of Community Cohesion, an organisation founded by Ted Cantle, produced a report titled: Challenging Local Communities to Change Oldham; a Review of Community Cohesion in Oldham.

This said:

“Oldham needs to further transform itself INTO THE BOROUGH THAT DEFEATED SEGREGATION… a beacon for best practice IN BUILDING COHESION ACROSS ALL ITS COMMUNITIES.”

What do you think The ISC means by this?

Perhaps the following statement will give you a clue:

“The Tenancy Support Team within FCHO has had considerable success in SETTLING AND SUPPORTING BLACK AND MINORITY ETHNIC FAMILIES MOVING INTO AREAS WITH A LOW BME PRESENCE.”

In other words, Cantle’s crew were praising the fact that immigrants had been successfully foist upon those indigenous Oldham residents that had, up till then, successfully repelled attempts to impose the Multicult upon them.

The ISC adds:

“ACCELERATING THE PACE OF CHANGE IS CRITICAL. Oldham will experience dramatic changes in the composition of its population over the next two decades, WITH ITS WHITE POPULATION DECLINING AND ITS BME POPULATION INCREASING.”

Thus did the ISC suggest not only that they are determined that Oldham should become less and less white but that “accelerating the pace” of this process is “critical”!

In the aforementioned Institute Of Community Cohesion document, the word “cohesion” is mentioned no less than 239 times!

A question for you, ladies and gentlemen:

How would you feel if you or any of your loved ones were forced to “cohere” with any of the immigrant criminals listed in the Rogues’ Gallery linked to this site?

Here’s another, even more crucial, question:

What would you think of those who had done the forcing?

On 17 June 2007, Marie Woolf, Political Editor of The Independent on Sunday, told us what David Lammy, New Labour's Culture Minister, was thinking at the time.

This is how she put it:

"David Lammy, the culture minister, has threatened to fine museums and art galleries if they fail to put more black and ethnic minority figures on their management boards. Mr Lammy complains that the boards of most national museums and libraries are 'PALE, MALE AND STALE'.

He said there was a 'WHIFF OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM' in the country's 1,400 museums and galleries because ethnic minorities were so under-represented in top-level jobs."

I wonder if I'd be hauled before the courts if I described those who murdered most of the teenagers who lost their lives in London in the last three years as "black, macho and whiffy"?

On 28 December 2008, Lammy, who was by this time, the Minister for Higher Education, appeared on Celebrity Mastermind.

You might have expected a Higher Education Minister to have done very well on such a show. Particularly as Victoria Derbyshire, a BBC Radio presenter, had recently blown the whistle on her bosses regarding "crib sheets" being made available for the various celebs.

At one point in the show Lammy was asked this question:

"Who acceded to the English throne at the age of 9 on the death of his father Henry VIII in 1547?"

Lammy answered: "Henry VII"!

Which, when you think about it, was not the most intelligent thing a Mastermind contestant has ever said.

Lammy scored a total of 13 points.

Check out his abysmal performance here.

On 27 May 209, the alternative comedian, Eddie Izzard, was quoted thus by The Daily Mirror:

"IF THE SAME GENETIC PEOPLE HAVE KIDS WITH EACH OTHER, WE ALL KNOW WHERE THAT LEADS. IT'S CALLED IN-BREEDING. IT IS THE BLEND OF YOUR GENES THAT MAKES YOU POWERFUL AND MAKES US, AS A COUNTRY, STRONG. IF YOUR MUM'S FROM ENGLAND AND YOUR DAD'S FROM UKRAINE, THAT'S A GOOD THING. IF YOU'RE BORN IN HAWAII, YOUR MUM'S A WHITE WOMAN FROM KANSAS AND YOUR DAD'S A BLACK MAN FROM KENYA, YOU COULD BE PRESIDENT OF THE US…

I WAS BORN IN YEMEN but, whatever the place of my birth, I FEEL I AM A BRITISH EUROPEAN...

If you believe in humanity, in our modern, diverse country, I ask you to reject the politics of hate. On election day, I WILL BE VOTING LABOUR.”

Is there anyone out there, aside from the odd gene-blending transvestite, who thinks British men were fighting and dying in WWII, so that a "British European" alternative comedian could encourage Ukrainian and Kenyan men, amongst many others, to breed we white folk out of existence?

Is there anyone out there who thinks that if the Englishmen who fought and died in World War I were to rise up out of their graves, they wouldn’t string up a traitorous, make-up caked loony like Izzard, who suggested that for them to have had a child with an English girl before their death was tantamount to “in-breeding”?

During the course of his Daily Mirror rant Izzard also said this:

“I believe it's a weakness of the human spirit to hate people”.

And yet the Izzards positively bristle with hatred for anyone who dares to speak up for the indigenous “people” of these islands in these fashionably anti-British times.

The PC Crowd's spittal-drenched hypocrisy would be comical if the lunatics were not running the asylum.

But they are, aren't they?

On 5 September 2009, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman said this in Newsweek:

"Minority parents are more likely to help their children develop a racial identity... from a very young age, minority children are coached to be proud of their ethnic history... THIS WAS EXCEEDINGLY GOOD FOR CHILDREN'S SELF-CONFIDENCE…

That leads to the question that everyone wonders but rarely dares to ask. If 'black pride' is good for African-American children, where does that leave white children? IT'S HORRIFYING TO IMAGINE KIDS BEING ‘PROUD TO BE WHITE’… A PRIDE MESSAGE WOULD NOT JUST BE ABHORRENT — IT'D BE REDUNDANT.” More...

And that, ladies and gents, is what the PC Crowd has been after all along; one life-affirming rule for THEM, another, completely different and deadly rule for US.

Nanette Ecker co-authored a UNESCO report which recommended "children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach (them) about masturbation". (Fox News - 26 August 2009)

Asked if five was “a little early to understand the concept of sexuality”, Ms Ecker replied:

“CHILDREN ARE BORN SEXUAL BEINGS and as adults, die sexual beings. Sexuality extends from birth to death… Using a building-block approach, WE THEREFORE NEED TO START SEXUALITY EDUCATION YOUNG.”

Fox News added:

“The United Nations is recommending that CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS FIVE RECEIVE MANDATORY SEXUAL EDUCATION THAT WOULD TEACH EVEN PRE-KINDERGARTENERS ABOUT MASTURBATION... AND THAT PRIVATE PARTS 'CAN FEEL PLEASURABLE WHEN TOUCHED BY ONESELF'. BY THE TIME THEY'RE 9 YEARS OLD, THEY'LL LEARN ABOUT 'POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF APHRODISIACS,' AND WRESTLE WITH THE IDEAS OF 'HOMOPHOBIA, TRANSPHOBIA AND ABUSE OF POWER".

On 7 July 2008, The Daily Mail told us what a Government-funded advisory group calling itself the National Children's Bureau had in mind for our children.

This is what we were told:

"TODDLERS SHOULD BE TAUGHT ABOUT RACISM AND SINGLED OUT FOR CRITICISM IF THEY HAVE RACIST ATTITUDES…

NURSERY TEACHERS, PLAYGROUP LEADERS AND CHILDMINDERS (must) RECORD AND REPORT EVERY RACIST INCIDENT INVOLVING CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS THREE…

NURSERIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT AS MANY RACIST INCIDENTS AS POSSIBLE TO LOCAL COUNCILS...

EVEN BABIES SHOULD NOT BE IGNORED IN THE HUNT FOR RACISM…

ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS RACIST THEMSELVES"!

The foreword to the NCB document was penned by Lord Hermann Ousely, a West Indian immigrant who was once the Chief Executive of the Commission for Racial Equality.

Lord Herman informed us in his foreword that toddlers can, indeed, be "racists". He also said that children of different races should be encouraged to play together "from day one" in order to prevent bigotry and help them "UNLEARN ANY RACIST ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR THAY MAY HAVE ALREADY LEARNED".

That’s "from day one", ladies and gents.

Lord Herman was actually suggesting that we white folks can develop unsavoury, politically incorrect thoughts in the womb!

Before we’ve actually been born!

On the 14th of September 2008, The Mail on Sunday told us what a government-funded advisory group calling itself "No Outsiders", had in mind for our children.

This is what was said:

"CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS FIVE SHOULD BE TAUGHT TO UNDERSTAND THE PLEASURES OF GAY SEX".

So now you know.

Now you know what the PC Crowd, the politicians and their government-funded advisory groups have in mind for our children and grandchildren.

Now that you know what their plans are, who are going to vote for?

A New Labour candidate?

A Tory? A Lib Dem?

Or do you think you might, for once, consider electing someone who cares a bit more about your kids than they do?

On 4 September 2009, Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, opined thus.

“I URGE PEOPLE, PARTICULARLY DURING RAMADAN, TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT ISLAM, INCREASE YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND LEARNING, EVEN FAST FOR A DAY WITH YOUR MUSLIM NEIGHBOUR AND BREAK YOUR FAST AT THE LOCAL MOSQUE...

MUSLIMS ARE AT THE HEART OF EVERY ASPECT OF SOCIETY. THEIR CONTRIBUTION IS SOMETHING THAT ALL LONDONERS BENEFIT FROM. MUSLIM POLICE OFFICERS, DOCTORS, SCIENTISTS AND TEACHERS ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE FABRIC OF LONDON.”

And you thought Boris was just an amusing, Tory wally whose easy-going and affable heart was always in the right place.

Boris Johnson's Turkish great-grandfather was, of course, a Muslim.

On 11 August 2009, the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, appeared on Radio 4's "Great Lives" to pay tribute to his own choice of a "great life", the former leader of both the South African Communist Party and the ANC's military wing, Jo Slovo.

At one point, Matthew Parris asked Miliband whether there were any circumstances in which terrorism was justified. This was Miliband's reply:

"YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS JUSTIFIABLE, AND YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS EFFECTIVE."

I guess our Foreign Secretary, whose Marxist parents were both immigrants, must believe that terrorism is "justifiable" when Communists like Jo Slovo are doing the terrorising.

And the terrorism in question happens to be black-on-white.

On 9 August 2004, the Darcus Howe documentary, "Who You Calling A Nigger" featured Shaja, a British born Pakistani living in the Burchill's area of Walsall.

Shaja said this on the Channel 4 programme:

"For years it was a NO-GO ZONE FOR WHITE PEOPLE, black people, anyone, man... If you ain't a Paki, you ain't comin' in Burchills' man. You come fuck with us, YOU'RE DEAD...

Twenty years ago, there was no Pakis 'ere, no one was doin' nothin'. But now the Pakis have made a stamp, man. Now, think 20 years ahead, fuck knows, man, THIS IS GOING TO BE PAKISTAN, NOT ENGLAND, PAKISTAN! They're all fucking shipping over, know what I mean, man, fake passports...

I don't like Jews. If I had the chance, I'd do one over, I'd break 'im, man. Jews are my enemies."

On 14 July 2009, New Labour’s "Cohesion" Minister, Shahid Malik, said this in The House of Commons:

“Fairness is what the Department for Communities and Local Government, my Department, and the Government are all about, BUT FAIRNESS DOES NOT MEAN TREATING EVERYBODY EQUALLY; it means addressing the different needs of different people”.

Malik commented as he did in a debate about the contrast between the preferential treatment doled out to the Gypsy and Traveller communities, which Malik thought was right and just, at the expense of local people.

Remember what George Orwell said?

“All animals are Equal but SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS”.

I think you’ll agree that this New Labour lot are nothing if not Orwellian.

PS.

Baroness Sayeeda Warsi is the Tories' Shadow "Cohesion" Minster.

She, just like Malik, is a Muslim.

On 9 July 2009, Fay Maxted of The Survivors Trust was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"IT IS BEYOND OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVITED TO SHAKE HANDS WITH LEADING OFFICIALS at the memorial service... THE SUFFERING OF HOLNESS'S YOUNG VICTIMS SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN FORGOTTEN".

The Mail explained:

"David Cameron was criticised yesterday after HE WAS PICTURED CHATTING TO A VIOLENT GANG RAPIST at the memorial to the July 7 victims. THE CONSERVATIVE LEADER ALSO SHOOK THE HAND OF GARRI HOLNESS...

In the weeks after the 2005 attacks, which claimed 52 lives, it emerged HOLNESS HAD BEEN JAILED FOR HIS PART IN THE HORRIFIC RAPE OF TWO 16-YEAR-OLD GIRLS IN 1985. HE WAS PART OF A GANG KNOWN AS THE YOUNG RAIDERS WHO DRAGGED THE SCHOOLGIRLS INTO AN UNDERGROUND GARAGE IN BRIXTON, SOUTH LONDON, WHERE THEY WERE RAPED MORE THAN 40 TIMES AT KNIFEPOINT...

IN JANUARY 2007 IT EMERGED HOLNESS HAD BEEN AWARDED MORE THAN £100,000 IN COMPENSATION FOR HIS INJURIES... IT IS MORE THAN TEN TIMES THAT GIVEN TO HIS TWO TEENAGE VICTIMS, WHO RECEIVED JUST £7,000 EACH."

On 5 July 2009, Judge Ian Trigger, said this to Lucien McClearley, a Jamaican drug dealer, before jailing him for two years:

“Your case illustrates all too clearly the COMPLETELY LAX IMMIGRATION POLICY that exists and has existed over recent years. People like you, and THERE ARE LITERALLY HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU, COME TO THESE SHORES TO AVAIL THEMSELVES OF THE GENEROUS WELFARE BENEFITS THAT EXIST HERE.

In the past ten years THE NATIONAL DEBT OF THIS COUNTRY HAS RISEN TO EXTRAORDINARY HEIGHTS, LARGELY BECAUSE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HAS WASTED BILLIONS OF POUNDS. MUCH OF THAT HAS BEEN WASTED ON WELFARE PAYMENTS.

For every £1 that the decent citizen, who is hard-working, pays in taxes, nearly 10 PER CENT GOES ON SERVICING THAT NATIONAL DEBT. THAT IS TWICE THE AMOUNT IT WAS IN 1997 WHEN THIS GOVERNMENT CAME TO POWER… The fact that it took nearly two years to process your claim shows how desperate the situation in this country has become.”

On 10 July 2009, Commenting on New Labour's reaction to the embarassing honesty of Judge Ian Trigger, Richard Littlejohn wrote this in The Daily Mail:

"THE FULL APPARATUS OF GOVERNMENT IS DEPLOYED TO DESTROY DISSENTERS. ENTER THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY, STEAL, SELL DRUGS, FORGE PASSPORTS AND YOU'LL BE LAVISHED WITH UNLIMITED LEGAL AID, BENEFITS AND SYMPATHY. SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND THEY WILL TRY TO RUIN YOU. UNDER NEW LABOUR, THE MOST HEINOUS CRIME ANYONE CAN COMMIT IS TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE WICKEDNESS OF THE PAST 12 YEARS."

On 14 September 2009, an unnamed teacher was quoted thus in a Melanie Philips’ Mail on Sunday article:

“PATRIOTISM ABOUT BEING BRITISH DIVIDES GROUPS ALONG RACIAL LINES WHEN WE AIM TO BRING PUPILS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT MAKES US THE SAME.”

Melanie Philips, herself, responded:

“NATIVE-BORN CHILDREN HAVE BEEN LEFT… BEREFT OF ANYTHING IN THEIR COUNTRY WITH WHICH THEY CAN FEEL A PROUD SENSE OF IDENTIFICATION. THESE TEACHERS HAVE PRODUCED EQUALITY, ALL RIGHT: AN EQUALITY OF ROOTLESSNESS. THEY HAVE ALSO PRODUCED WIDESPREAD IGNORANCE... People are usually desperate if they cannot root themselves. Yet FOR IDEOLOGICAL REASONS, THE TEACHING WORLD DECIDED UNILATERALLY TO DEPRIVE CHILDREN OF THE ABILITY TO DO SO.

THE PROMOTION OF MULTICULTURALISM... HAS TURNED PATRIOTISM INTO A DIRTY WORD… WITHOUT PATRIOTISM, A SOCIETY STARTS TO DIE. If the core purpose of education is to transmit a culture down through the generations, IT IS NOT PATRIOTISM THAT IS A MENACE TO THIS COUNTRY, BUT THE TEACHERS WHOSE REAL TARGET IS BRITAIN'S IDENTITY ITSELF.”

Those who educate our children have a track record in the anti-patriotic department.

On 31 January 2008, Michael Hand, of the Institute of Education, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

“THE CASE FOR PROMOTING PATRIOTISM IN SCHOOLS IS WEAK. PATRIOTISM IS LOVE OF ONE'S COUNTRY, BUT ARE COUNTRIES REALLY APPROPRIATE OBJECTS OF LOVE? LOVING THINGS CAN BE BAD FOR US!'... Since all national histories are at best morally ambiguous, IT'S AN OPEN QUESTION WHETHER CITIZENS SHOULD LOVE THEIR COUNTRIES!"

The Mail added:

“Moral failings in Britain's past mean PUPILS SHOULD NOT BE TAUGHT PATRIOTISM, teachers said in a survey. Nearly 90 PER CENT OPPOSED PLANS FOR HISTORY AND CITIZENSHIP LESSONS AIMED AT FOSTERING NATIONAL IDENTITY AND PRIDE...

PATRIOTISM SHOULD BE COVERED AS A 'CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE' ONLY.

The Left-leaning institute polled 47 teachers and 299 students at secondary schools in the capital. THREE-QUARTERS OF THE STAFF SAID THEY FELT OBLIGED TO ALERT THEIR PUPILS TO THE DANGERS OF PATRIOTIC SENTIMENTS.

'PRAISING PATRIOTISM EXCLUDES NON-BRITISH PUPILS,' said one. 'PATRIOTISM ABOUT BEING BRITISH IN MY EXPERIENCE TENDS TO BE A WHITE PRESERVE SO DIVIDES GROUPS ALONG RACIAL LINES, WHEN WHAT WE AIM TO DO IS BRING PUPILS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT MAKES US ALL THE SAME.'

Another said: 'It can be quite divisive. THERE IS A PROPENSITY FOR THAT SORT OF BNP-TYPE THINKING TO COME THROUGH.'

A third said: 'LEFT TO MY OWN DEVICES I WOULDN'T DREAM OF COVERING IT REALLY, EXPLICITLY. TO ME IT SORT OF REEKS OF THE OLD BRITISH EMPIRE’.”

So, the Institute of Education thinks:

PATRIOTISM = CONTROVERSIAL!

OUR HISTORY = MORALLY AMBIGUOUS!

The Author of Report thinks:

PATRIOTISM = CASE FOR IT WEAK!
LOVE OF COUNTRY = INAPPROPRIATE!
LOVING THINGS = BAD FOR US!

And those who teach our children think:

BRITAIN'S PAST = MORALLY DUBIOUS!
PATRIOTISM = DANGEROUS!
PATRIOTISM = EXCLUDES NON-BRITS!
PATRIOTISM = DIVISIVE!
PATRIOTISM = BNP THINKING!

Those who think a love of one's history and country is dangerous should not be teaching our children or compiling Brit-bashing reports.

They should be charged with treason and hauled before the courts.

On 4 September 2009, Douglas Murray, the Director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, wrote the following in The Daily Express:

"WHEN THE UK STATISTICS AUTHORITY RELEASED FIGURES SHOWING THAT ONE IN NINE CURRENT UK RESIDENTS WAS BORN OVERSEAS, (Immigration Minister) PHIL WOOLAS ATTACKED THE MESSENGER, CLAIMING THAT ITS RELEASE OF SUCH FIGURES, RATHER THAN BEING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, WAS 'SINISTER'.

While the Home Secretary doesn't seem to worry about immigration, it is increasingly clear that THE VOTERS WHO PUT HIM IN OFFICE DO. IN POLL AFTER POLL THE PUBLIC SITE IMMIGRATION AS THEIR TOP, OR NEXT-TO-TOP CONCERN. YET THE POLITICAL CLASS IGNORES IT...

THANKS TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS FORCED ON US BY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE FORCING IMMIGRANTS ON US, ONCE THEY ARE HERE THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO...

OUR ENTIRE POLITICAL CLASS AT WESTMINSTER, AND MUCH OF IT IN BRUSSELS, SEEMS TO LABOUR UNDER THE BELIEF THAT WE ARE A COUNTRY YOU CAN PERFORM ANY EXPERIMENT ON. YOU CAN DESTROY OUR SOVEREIGNTY, CHANGE THE FACE OF OUR NATION AND TELL PEOPLE WHO OBJECT THAT THEY ARE BACKWARD RACISTS.

YET SUCH PEOPLE HAVE NO ANSWERS TO THE EVIDENCE BEFORE OUR VERY EYES. ONE IN FIVE MURDERS IN THE UK IS COMMITED BY A FOREIGNER... SOMALI GANGS AND OTHERS BRING GENUINELY DISGUSTING, BACKWARD BEHAVIOUR TO OUR STREETS. YET OUR POLITICAL CLASS WON'T FACE UP TO THE FACT THEY ARE IMPORTING MORE OF THIS...

THEY ARE DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY.”

On 28 March 2009, Simon Walters said this in The Mail on Sunday:

“Most Church of England bishops show little or no interest in the idea of celebrating St George's Day by asking all churches to ring their bells.
ONLY FIVE OUT OF THE CHURCH'S 44 BISHOPS ENTHUSIASTICALLY BACK THE PLAN - AND SEVERAL ARE HOSTILE, CLAIMING IT COULD BE 'DANGEROUS' AND CAUSE A BACKLASH FROM OTHER RELIGIOUS GROUPS.”

By my reckoning that makes 39 out of 44 Bishops are anti-English.

As for those that are “hostile”, they’d be traitors by the same Anglophile reckoning.

On 7 January 2010, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, wrote this in The Times:

“Too often in recent years the call for a rational debate on mass migration has degenerated into NAME-CALLING AND CHARGES OF RACISM... A rise in the UK population by ten million in two decades will put our nation’s resources under considerable strain, STRETCHING ALMOST TO BREAKING POINT THE ENORMOUS RESERVES OF TOLERANCE AND GENEROSITY OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE…

In Dagenham, where I was brought up, there is a very real danger that a white working-class electorate, ALIENATED BY FAR-REACHING SOCIAL CHANGE AND LARGELY IGNORED BY THE MAINSTREAM PARTIES, COULD VOTE FOR A BNP MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT…

The sheer numbers of migrants from within Europe and elsewhere put the resources of Britain under enormous pressure, but also THREATEN THE VERY ETHOS OR DNA OF OUR NATION…

THE IDEA THAT BRITAIN CAN CONTINUE TO WELCOME WITH OPEN ARMS IMMIGRANTS WHO IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISH THEIR OWN TRIBUNALS TO APPLY SHARIA, RATHER THAN MAKE USE OF BRITISH CIVIL LAW, IS DEEPLY SOCIALLY DIVISIVE."

On 20 September 2008, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:

"The cold, miserable truth is that BOTH OUR MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES ARE CORPSES, their original purposes long forgotten, their loyal members driven away or sidelined, THEIR TRADITIONAL VOTERS TAKEN FOR GRANTED. Every so often, by a mysterious process, one of them is declared electable and the other is declared unelectable. And we, the voters, do as we are told…

THE RULE NOWADAYS IS THAT YOU CANNOT BECOME THE GOVERNMENT UNLESS YOU BOW TO THE VIEWS OF THE ‘CENTRE-LEFT’ MEDIA ELITE, especially the broadcast media elite. That elite speaks for the 1968 generation which fanned out in the Seventies into the civil service, education, entertainment, the law, the arts, rock music and - above all - the media...

THE WINNER IS ALWAYS THE ‘CENTRE-LEFT’, WHICH CLAIMS TO BE MODERATE BUT IS IN FACT A SWIRLING CAULDRON OF WILD SIXTIES LEFTISM - ANTI-BRITISH, ANTI-FAMILY, ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-EDUCATION AND PRO-CRIME. BUT IF YOU DARE TO OPPOSE THIS STUFF, THEY’LL CALL YOU AN EXTREMIST.

BRITISH DEMOCRACY, AS WE USED TO KNOW IT, IS QUITE DEAD."

On 8 August 2009, Peter Hitchens said this in The Daily Mail:

“THEY HAVE BECOME THE UNIFORMED WING OF NEW LABOUR, not preventing crime or seeing that it is punished – but mediating neutrally between ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ and SPYING OUT POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS, in their own ranks and beyond. Sooner or later, millions of people will catch on to the fact that THE POLICE IN THIS COUNTRY AREN’T ON THEIR SIDE AND DON’T WANT TO DO WHAT WE PAY THEM FOR."

On 21 September 2009, General Stanley McChrystal, the top American military man in Afghanistan, said this:

"FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESOURCES ... RISKS A LONGER CONFLICT, GREATER CASUALTIES… Any of these risks, in turn, are likely to result in MISSION FAILURE...

Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near term... risks an outcome where DEFEATING THE INSURGENCY IS NO LONGER POSSIBLE...

WE HAVE OPERATED IN A MANNER THAT DISTANCES US PHYSICALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY FROM THE PEOPLE WE SEEK TO PROTECT... IT IS REALISTIC TO EXPECT THAT AFGHAN AND COALITION CASUALTIES WILL INCREASE…

THE WEAKNESS OF STATE INSTITUTIONS, MALIGN ACTIONS OF POWERBROKERS, WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION AND ABUSE OF POWER BY VARIOUS OFFICIALS AND ISAF’S OWN ERRORS HAVE GIVEN AFGHANS LITTLE REASON TO SUPPORT THEIR GOVERNMENT… ISAF does not sufficiently appreciate the dynamics in local communities, nor how the insurgency, corruption, incompetent officials, powerbrokers and criminality all combine to affect the Afghan population...

THE INSURGENTS CONTROL OR CONTEST A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE COUNTRY".

On 28 January 2009, the former head of the Royal Navy, Lord West, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

"TONY BLAIR WOULD NEVER ACCEPT THAT OUR FOREIGN POLICY ACTUALLY HAD ANY IMPACT ON RADICALISATION... WELL THAT IS CLEARLY BULLS***, ‘THAT’S CLEARLY RUBBISH...

TO PRETEND WHAT HAPPENS ABROAD HAS NO IMPACT IS NONSENSE. For example, this business in Gaza has not helped us at all in our counter-radicalisation policy. There is no doubt about that, it would be wrong to say that it has.”

On 13 October 2006, General Sir Richard Dannat, the UK's top soldier, was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:

“I WANT AN ARMY IN FIVE YEARS TIME AND 10 YEARS TIME. DON'T LET'S BREAK IT ON THIS ONE... As a foreigner, you can be welcomed by being invited in a country, but WE WEREN?T INVITED… Whatever consent we may have had in the first place… has largely turned to intolerance. THAT IS A FACT...

I think history will show that THE PLANNING FOR WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE INITIAL SUCCESSFUL WAR FIGHTING PHASE WAS POOR…

When I see the Islamist threat in this country I hope it doesn’t make undue progress because THERE IS A MORAL AND SPIRITUAL VACUUM IN THIS COUNTRY. OUR SOCIETY HAS ALWAYS BEEN EMBEDDED IN CHRISTIAN VALUES...

WE CAN’T WISH THE ISLAMIST CHALLENGE TO OUR SOCIETY AWAY... WE NEED TO FACE UP TO THE ISLAMIST THREAT, TO THOSE WHO ACT IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND IN A PERVERTED WAY TRY TO IMPOSE ISLAM BY FORCE ON SOCIETIES THAT DO NOT WISH IT.

It is said that we live in a post Christian society. I think that is a great shame… It underpins the British army…

I am going to stand up for what is right for the army. HONESTY IS WHAT IT IS ABOUT. THE TRUTH WILL OUT. WE HAVE GOT TO SPEAK THE TRUTH."

Well said, sir.

It's nice to hear another top chap telling the truth for a change.

On 26 June 2009, Frederick Forsyth, author of The Day of the Jackal, wrote this in The Daily Express:

“Not for the first time I am almost speechless at THE CYNICISM AND MENDACITY OF THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT IN SEEKING TO COVER SOMETHING UP WHILE PRETENDING TO BE HONEST...

WHEN A PRIME MINISTER, HAVING TAKEN THE OATH OF A PRIVY COUNSELLOR, GOES TO THE DESPATCH BOX AND LIES, THAT IS NOT SIMPLY AN UNTRUTH, IT IS PERJURY. AND PERJURY IS AN INDICTABLE, EVEN AN IMPEACHABLE, OFFENCE… IN CLAIMING THERE WAS PROOF ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY WAR, BLAIR LIED; AND 179 YOUNG SOLDIERS NOW IN THEIR GRAVES CRY FOR JUSTICE.

It is extremely unlikely they will ever get it. POWERFUL FORCES ARE NOW TRYING TO CREATE THIS MULTI-MILLIONAIRE PRESIDENT OF EUROPE.”

On 8 December 2008, at the savethemales web site, Dr Henry Makow told us that, on March 20 1969, Dr. Richard Day, the National Medical Director of 'Planned Parenthood', informed an audience of elite medical personnel of the sinister plans of the New World Order:

This is how he put it:

"THEY ARE WEANING US OFF NATIONAL ALLEGIANCE AND WILL RESORT TO TERRORISM TO WIN OUR ASSENT TO THEIR GLOBAL POLICE STATE...

THE CENTRAL BANKERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MOST TERRORISM, USING MI-6, MOSSAD AND THE CIA. Dr. Day also said that 'war is obsolete' given the danger of nuclear exchange so TERRORISM WOULD BE USED INSTEAD. This was 1969.

He said that there are always two reasons for anything... THE PRETEXT WHICH MAKES IT PALATABLE TO THE GULLIBLE PUBLIC AND THE REAL REASON...

Dr. Day said sex will be separated from marriage and reproduction to break up the family and reduce population. Abortion, divorce and homosexuality will be made socially acceptable...

PORNOGRAPHY, VIOLENCE AND OBSCENITY ON TV AND IN MOVIES WILL BE INCREASED. People will be desensitized to violence and porn... THERE WILL BE UNEMPLOYMENT AND MASS MIGRATION IN ORDER TO UPROOT LONG ESTABLISHED COMMUNITIES...

He said PEOPLE ARE CONTROLLED BY MEANS OF THE INFORMATION THEY ARE GIVEN. THUS, INFORMATION WILL BE SELECTIVE... PEOPLE WILL SPEND LONGER IN SCHOOL BUT NOT LEARN ANYTHING…

OUR POLITICAL AND CULTURAL 'LEADERS' ARE ACCOMPLICES IN A PLOT TO RE-ENGINEER HUMANITY... WARS, TERRORISM, DEPRESSIONS, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CHANGE, ENTERTAINMENT AND FADS ARE ALL CONTRIVED TO GRADUALLY BRING ABOUT AN ORWELLIAN POLICE STATE.

DR. DAY SAYS POLITICIANS ARE MANIPULATED 'WITHOUT THEIR EVEN KNOWING IT'. Their failure to protect us from this Satanic conspiracy IS A BETRAYAL OF THE FIRST ORDER."

More...

On 3 November 2008, the article, GM genocide: Thousands of Indian Farmers are Committing Suicide after using Genetically Modified Crops, by Andrew Malone, appeared in The Daily Mail.

This said:

"Shankara, like millions of other Indian farmers, had been promised previously unheard of harvests and income IF HE SWITCHED FROM FARMING WITH TRADITIONAL SEEDS TO PLANTING GM SEEDS INSTEAD.

Beguiled by the promise of future riches, he borrowed money in order to buy the GM seeds. But WHEN THE HARVESTS FAILED, HE WAS LEFT WITH SPIRALLING DEBTS - AND NO INCOME. SO SHANKARA BECAME ONE OF AN ESTIMATED 125,000 FARMERS TO TAKE THEIR OWN LIFE AS A RESULT OF THE RUTHLESS DRIVE TO USE INDIA AS A TESTING GROUND FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS...

The Indian government had agreed to allow new bio-tech giants, such as the U.S. market-leader Monsanto, to sell their new seed creations. In return for allowing western companies access to the second most populated country in the world… India was granted International Monetary Fund loans in the Eighties and Nineties, helping to launch an economic revolution. But while cities such as Mumbai and Delhi have boomed, THE FARMERS' LIVES HAVE SLID BACK INTO THE DARK AGES…

Far from being 'magic seeds', GM pest-proof 'breeds' of cotton have been devastated by bollworms, a voracious parasite. Nor were the farmers told that these seeds require double the amount of water. This has proved a matter of life and death. With rains failing for the past two years, MANY GM CROPS HAVE SIMPLY WITHERED AND DIED, LEAVING THE FARMERS WITH CRIPPLING DEBTS AND NO MEANS OF PAYING THEM OFF.

Having taken loans from traditional money lenders at extortionate rates, hundreds of thousands of small farmers have faced losing their land as the expensive seeds fail, while those who could struggle on faced a fresh crisis.

WHEN CROPS FAILED IN THE PAST, FARMERS COULD STILL SAVE SEEDS AND REPLANT THEM THE FOLLOWING YEAR. BUT WITH GM SEEDS THEY CANNOT DO THIS. THAT'S BECAUSE GM SEEDS CONTAIN SO-CALLED 'TERMINATOR TECHNOLOGY', MEANING THAT THEY HAVE BEEN GENETICALLY MODIFIED SO THAT THE RESULTING CROPS DO NOT PRODUCE VIABLE SEEDS OF THEIR OWN.

AS A RESULT, FARMERS HAVE TO BUY NEW SEEDS EACH YEAR AT THE SAME PUNITIVE PRICES… Take the case of Suresh Bhalasa, another farmer who was cremated this week, leaving a wife and two children.

As night fell after the ceremony, and neighbours squatted outside while sacred cows were brought in from the fields, his family had no doubt that their troubles stemmed from the moment THEY WERE ENCOURAGED TO BUY BT COTTON, A GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANT CREATED BY MONSANTO.

'We are ruined now,' said the dead man's 38-year-old wife. 'We bought 100 grams of BT Cotton. Our crop failed twice. My husband had become depressed. He went out to his field, lay down in the cotton and swallowed insecticide’...

The crisis, branded the 'GM Genocide' by campaigners, was highlighted recently when Prince Charles claimed that the issue of GM had become a 'global moral question' - and THE TIME HAD COME TO END ITS UNSTOPPABLE MARCH.

Speaking by video link to a conference in the Indian capital, Delhi, he infuriated bio-tech leaders and some politicians by condemning 'THE TRULY APPALLING AND TRAGIC RATE OF SMALL FARMER SUICIDES IN INDIA, STEMMING... FROM THE FAILURE OF MANY GM CROP VARIETIES'." More...

That’s your global, trough-gobbler for you, they get all “infuriated” when somebody points out that genociding the poor isn't very nice.

Marketed as Nutrasweet, Equal and Spoonful, almost all "low-calorie, diet or no-added sugar drinks" now contain the artificial sweetner, Aspartame.

Since it was introduced in 1981, Aspartame has been the subject of a great many of the complaints reported to the adverse reaction monitors of the US Food and Drug Administration. Coca-Cola knew of the dangers of Aspartame because it originally opposed approval by the FDA. It said that it was inherently unstable and breaks down into methyl alcohol, formic acid, formaldehyde and other toxins.

And yet, Aspartame is now to be found in every diet coke can.

When news leaked out alleging that G.D.Searle, who owned Aspartame, had falsified test results, congress pledged $60,000,000 for the prosecution of the firm's Chairman. However, the Reagan administration closed ranks and prevented the trial of one of their own from taking place.

The chairman of G.D. Searle at the time was none other than DONALD RUMSFELD, George Bush's infamous Defence Secretary and one of the leading Neoconservative "hawks" that forced Gulf War II upon the world.

G.D. Searle is now a subsidiary of MONSANTO.

Anone out there think I'm a conspiracy theorist?

You do?

Check out what Roger Williams, the Lib Dem MP for Brecon and Radnorshire, had to say on the floor of the House of Commons on 14 January 2005:

“For almost a year, I have been looking into the safety of the artificial sweetener, aspartame, and I WAS TRULY HORRIFIED BY WHAT I DISCOVERED. WHEN I began my research, I was unconvinced by the off-the-wall internet conspiracy theories. I am a man of science, not of the internet. However, a number of eminent academics from the UK and further afield have persuaded me beyond doubt that ASPARTAME REPRESENTS A SERIOUS HEALTH PROBLEM.

There is strong scientific evidence that THE COMPONENTS OF ASPARTAME AND THEIR METABOLITES CAN CAUSE VERY SERIOUS TOXIC EFFECTS IN HUMANS. THERE IS ALSO A WEALTH OF SUBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT SUGGESTS A RANGE OF ADVERSE NEUROLOGICAL REACTIONS TO ASPARTAME… LONG-TERM ASPARTAME USE CAUSES CANCER IN RODENTS. THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION RECOGNISES SUCH FINDINGS IN RATS AS HIGHLY PREDICTIVE OF CARCINOGENIC RISK FOR HUMANS...

ASPARTAME IS CONSUMED EVERY DAY BY AN AVERAGE OF ONE IN 15 PEOPLE WORLDWIDE, MOST OF WHOM ARE CHILDREN. How many children in Britain do not consume Walker's prawn cocktail crisps, Orbit or Airwaves chewing gum, Robinson's fruit squash, Lucozade or Diet Coke? Aspartame is even found in Centrum Kidz multivitamins, Lemsip cold and flu sachets for children, and Nurofen Meltlets for children. Those are the very products that are designed to cure our children when they are sick.

The economic reality of a sweetening agent that costs one third of the price of sugar means that IT IS PRESENT IN NO FEWER THAN 6,000 FOODS, DRINKS AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS IN OUR SUPERMARKETS...

ASPARTAME TOXICITY MIMICS CONDITIONS SUCH AS MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, PARKINSON'S DISEASE, ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, ARTHRITIS, CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME, PANIC DISORDER, LUPUS, DIABETES, LYMPHOMA, DEPRESSION AND OTHER PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS…

The conclusions of the Ramazzini study deserve painstaking dissection… This vast
study demonstrated that aspartame administered at varying levels in feed causes a statistically significant increase of lymphomas and leukaemias, malignant tumours of the kidneys in female rats and malignant tumours of peripheral and cranial nerves in male rats. Such tumours occurred even in two of the doses that were well below the acceptable daily intake recommended by regulatory authorities in the EU and the US...

Professor Ralph Walton... demonstrated in 1996 that of the 166 studies conducted on aspartame's safety deemed relevant to humans, 74 WERE SPONSORED BY THE ASPARTAME INDUSTRY and 92 were independently funded. OF THE 92 NON-INDUSTRY SPONSORED STUDIES, 92 PER CENT IDENTIFIED ONE OR MORE PROBLEMS WITH ASPARTAME'S SAFETY. The industry-sponsored studies, on the other hand, found unanimously in favour of aspartame's safety…

ON THE POLITICAL SCENE, DONALD RUMSFELD WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN SECURING ITS APPROVAL. AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SEARLE FROM 1977, HE PUBLICLY PLEDGED TO CALL IN HIS MARKERS TO GET IT APPROVED…

When Ronald Reagan was inaugurated as President in 1981, Donald Rumsfeld was on his transition team. PRESIDENT REAGAN SEALED THE LID ON THE ASPARTAME CONTROVERSY. ON THE VERY DAY OF HIS INAUGURATION, REAGAN PERSONALLY WROTE THE EXECUTIVE ORDER SUSPENDING THE FDA COMMISSIONER'S POWERS ON ASPARTAME. REAGAN REPLACED THE COMMISSIONER ONE MONTH LATER WITH ARTHUR HAYES JR., WHO GRANTED THE OFFICIAL LICENCE FOR ASPARTAME.

The history of its approval is littered with examples showing that IF KEY DECISION-MAKERS FOUND AGAINST ITS SAFETY, THEY WERE DISCREDITED, IGNORED OR REPLACED BY INDUSTRY SYMPATHISERS, WHO WERE IN TURN RECOMPENSED WITH LUCRATIVE JOBS…

THERE IS SOLID EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT ITS REGULAR LONG-TERM USE CAN CAUSE CANCER AND A RANGE OF OTHER HEALTH PROBLEMS. EMERGENCY ACTION IS NOW NEEDED TO REMOVE THE TOXIN FROM OUR OWN AND OUR CHILDREN'S DIETS...

Today, I am giving the Government a chance to set right what previous British, European and international health authorities have so dismally failed to do.

A TOTAL BAN IS THE ONLY WAY TO PROTECT THE BRITISH PUBLIC.” More..

Check out this Aspartame Video

Four years on, Aspartame is still to be found in many of our "foods, drinks and pharmaceutical products".

The politicians never did ban it.

On 12 May 2003, Charlotte Dovey said this in The Evening Standard:

"This week, leaked Government papers revealed plans to add fluoride to all drinking water in England and Wales...

Fluoride may... be linked to INCREASED RISKS OF OSTEOPOROSIS, KIDNEY PROBLEMS, AND EVEN CANCER, AND SOME SAY IT IS STEALTHY MASS MEDICATION...

ARTIFICIAL FLUORIDE IS FOUND IN TOOTHPASTES, TOOTH GELS AND MOUTH RINSES... HALF THE FLUORIDE INGESTED IS RETAINED IN THE BODY - IN THE BONES AND TEETH - the other half is excreted... Taken in quantity IT IS EXTREMELY TOXIC AND DANGEROUS. Just over 2 grams of fluoride (roughly a teaspoon) is enough to kill an 11st adult, while just 300mg (found in a tube of toothpaste) is enough to kill a 1st 6lb child...

Last year THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT OUTLAWED THE SALE OF FLUORIDE TABLETS AND CHEWING GUM. This was based on fears that IT MIGHT INCREASE THE RISK OF OSTEOPOROSIS. FRANCE, ITALY, GERMANY, SWEDEN, DENMARK AND HOLLAND HAVE ALSO REJECTED MASS WATER FLUORIDATION. THERE HAS ALSO BEEN MOUNTING OPPOSITION TO IT IN IRELAND.

A large review of the scientific literature on water fluoridation was recently published in the British Medical Journal. This showed that JUST ONE IN SIX PEOPLE DRINKING FLUORIDATED WATER APPEARS TO BENEFIT.

Fluordation has been linked to:

Dental Fluorosis: ALMOST HALF OF PEOPLE DRINKING FLUORIDATED WATER AT PERMISSIBLE LEVELS... EXHIBIT DENTAL FLUOROSIS. WHITE AND BROWN SPOTS APPEAR ON THE ENAMEL OF THE TEETH - CAUSING AN UNSIGHTLY 'MOTTLED' EFFECT. THIS IS THE FIRST SIGN THAT FLUORIDE HAS POISONED ENZYMES IN THE BODY. SOME DENTISTS UNDERSTANDABLY QUESTION THE WISDOM OF PREVENTING DENTAL DISEASE IN ONE IN SIX PEOPLE, ONLY TO CAUSE IT IN ONE IN TWO.

Skeletal Fluorosis: According to American research, THIS CRIPPLING DISEASE - SYMPTOMS INCLUDE PAINS IN THE BONES AND JOINTS, MUSCLE WEAKNESS AND GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS - MAY OCCUR IN PEOPLE WHO HAVE INGESTED 10-20MG OF FLUORIDE PER DAY FOR 10 TO 20 YEARS. IN THE MOST SEVERE CASES, THE SPINE BECOMES COMPLETELY RIGID.

Osteoporosis... THE BONE APPEARS TO BE WEAKER THAN NORMAL BONE... A STUDY OF ELDERLY PATIENTS IN UTAH FOUND 'A SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT INCREASE' IN THE RISK OF HIP FRACTURE IN BOTH MEN AND WOMEN.

Cancer... A study by the New Jersey Department of Health in the U.S. found A STRONG LINK BETWEEN FLUORIDATION AND BONE CANCER IN YOUNG MALES. THEY REPORTED THAT OSTEOSARCOMA RATES WERE THREE TO SEVEN TIMES HIGHER IN FLUORIDATED AREAS THAN NON-FLUORIDATED AREAS… AT VERY LOW LEVELS FLUORIDE CAN INTERFERE WITH THE MALE HORMONE TESTOSTERONE.

Kidney Problems: A STUDY PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL UROLOGICAL RESEARCH HAS FOUND AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HIGH LEVELS OF FLUORIDE IN THE WATER AND PAINFUL KIDNEY STONES. According to the study, UROLITHIASIS (KIDNEY STONES) WAS 4.6 TIMES MORE COMMON IN AN AREA WITH HIGH FLUORIDE THAN IN A SIMILAR AREA WITHOUT HIGH FLUORIDE…

A document signed by health and environment ministers last month concludes that OPPONENTS ARE IN THE MINORITY AND THAT 'THIS MINORITY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DEPRIVE HEALTH COMMUNITIES FROM OPTING FOR FLUORIDATION‘...

It seems the only way to avoid the fluoridated water is either to buy water filters or spend a small fortune on bottled drinking waters - as many of us already do."

On 22 September 2009, Nirmala M Nagaraj said this in The Times of India:

"For good health, the quality of drinking water is critical. But in Karnataka, where much of groundwater sources are concentrated with fluorides and nitrates, the impact is devastating. DENTAL AND SPINE-RELATED AILMENTS ARE SHOWING UP IN MANY CITIES AND VILLAGES. In some of the fluoride-endemic districts like Kolar, Chitradurga, Gadag and Bellary, SMILES ON THE FACES OF YOUNG CHILDREN HAVE VANISHED AS THEY ARE AFFLICTED BY DENTAL FLUOROSIS...

Dean and director, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Dr S S Hiremath, said: 'More than 6% of the state's population is afflicted by dental flourosis. Children don't have proper teeth formation.'

After years of consuming fluoride, when the spinal cord starts compressing and even before the cause for disability is known, THE PATIENT IS PARALYZED. This is a shocking condition in some fluoride-intense districts like Tumkur, where many people in a few villages have spinal cord-related diseases...

Director of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Dr D Nagaraj, said: 'DUE TO FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION IN WATER, MANY PEOPLE IN DISTRICTS LIKE DHARWAD AND TUMKUR HAVE SPINAL CORD DISEASES.. PEOPLE ARE BATTLING WITH PERMANENT DISABILITIES'."

In June 2009, Gordon Brown made Andy Burnham his new Health Secretary.

In his very first speech in this position, Burnham said this:

“Let’s press ahead with fluoridation of water supplies, given the clear evidence that it can improve children’s dental health.”

A spokesman for the National Pure Water Association responded thus:

“It is complete and utter madness. YOU CANNOT MEDICATE A WHOLE POPULATION. THIS IS POLITICAL and Andy Burnham has a conflict of interest because HE WAS OR IS VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE BRITISH FLUORIDATION SOCIETY WHICH IS BASED IN HIS CONSTITUENCY.” (Burnham was Vice President of the BFS from 2004 until his appointment as Health Secretary)

Which would you prefer for your children, ladies and gents?

Mass medication, a 50 per cent certainty of mottled teeth and a distinct possibility of muscle weakness, interference with your testosterone levels, gastrointestinal disorders, kidney problems, osteoporosis, hip fractures, spinal cord-related diseases, bone cancer and paralysis, all curtesy of Big Brother?

Or fluoride-free water, fluoride-free toothpaste and a good toothbrush used frequently?

PS. Fluoride, a chemical that was, not so long ago, considered to be a toxic waste, can have a soporific effect. It was used in both the Nazi concentration camps and the Soviet gulags to subdue the inmates. More...

Take a look at these videos:

The Fluoride Deception - Part 1

The Fluoride Deception - Part 2

The Fuoride Deception - Part 3

And:

Dumbing Down Society

On 15 January 2009, the article, Did Privatization Increase the Russian Death Rate? By R.M. Schneiderman, appeared in The New York Times' Business section.

Schneiderman answered his own question thus:

"That’s what a new study published online today in The Lancet, an independent medical journal, says.

The authors of the study write that THE RAPID AND WIDESPREAD PRIVATIZATION OF STATE INDUSTRIES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION AND EASTERN BLOC COUNTRIES DURING THE EARLY 1990S INCREASED THE DEATH RATE 13 PERCENT...

As communism collapsed in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the former Eastern bloc countries saw dire health consequences: MORE THAN THREE MILLION PEOPLE DIED PREMATURELY, according to the United Nations... As the former Eastern bloc countries began making the transition from communism to capitalism... some (economists) advocated 'SHOCK THERAPY,' a term that denotes an immediate and rapid transition to capitalism...

JEFFREY SACHS, the director of Columbia University’s Earth Institute, A LEADING ADVOCATE OF THE 'SHOCK THERAPY' SCHOOL OF THOUGHT, SERVED AS AN ECONOMIC ADVISER TO A NUMBER OF THE EASTERN BLOC COUNTRIES, including Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Russia." More...

Jeffrey Sachs is Jewish.

As are most of the "Oligarchs" who plundered the wealth of the ordinary people and profited so obscenely from Russia's particularly nasty variation on the privatisation scam. A good few of these Oligarchs (Roman Abramovich, Boris Berezovsky etc.) are now living in London.

Anyway, that's what Privatisation did for the ordinary Soviet citizen.

The Tory and New Labour versions of the great privatisation rip-off didn't do much for the least well off over here either.

In October 2008, Trevor Philips, Chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said this about the brutish behaviour of some African youths once they get here:

"We admit them - RIGHTLY - and then we plonk them in schools and we expect behave like everyone else. You look at the names of those who are involved, they come from Congo, they come from east Africa and so on. I don't think anybody has been very keen on saying it. Let's recognise what it is that is making it happen. IT IS NOT THE FACT THAT THEY ARE BLACK but the fact that they have come from vicious, wartorn regions."

I see.

If black Africans stab, shoot, rape, rob, mug, pimp or drug up anyone in this country, it's "not because they're black", it's because he's "they have come from vicious, wartorn regions."

Where the "vicious", as well as the victim, just happens to be black.

Nice try, Phil.

It'll work on the PC Crowd, the brainwashed, the dumbed-down, the drugged-up, the government jobsworths, your establishment politician, Big Brother and the immigrants themselves, but the long-suffering silent majority?

Doubt it somehow.

At the Visionaries web site, certain people are described as having been appointed as Joseph Rowntree Visionaries for a Just and Peaceful World.

Karen Chouhan, a girlfriend of the dreadful Ken Livingstone anti-Brit, Lee Jasper, is one of these Visionaries. She was awarded this accolade for her “black-led decision making approach to race equality in the UK”.

At her own page at the Visionaries site, Chouhan describes her “vision” thus:

“Black communities in Britain will be first across the world TO LEAD IN DECIDING RACE EQUALITY POLICY and discourse, working... with government... AND SETTING THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE... THE UK MODEL WILL BE ONE THAT IS COPIED AND IMPACTS WORLDWIDE... WE WILL ONLY HAVE GENUINE EQUALITY WHEN BLACK COMMUNITIES ARE ABLE TO DIRECTLY SET THE RACE AGENDA."

You heard it here, folks, there is a "race agenda" that the visionary has in mind for our white "communities".

It is an agenda that "black communities" will "lead" and be "deciding" upon.

Maybe this self-serving partiality is what old Enoch was warning us of when he spoke of the black man gaining "the whip hand".

Even Enoch didn't imagine their women would be at it as well.

On 8 August 2008, Deputy Chief Constable Jon Murphy was quoted thus in The Times:

“Some 60 per cent of criminal groups are involved in drug trafficking...

WHEN THE GOVERNMENT TOOK A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO CANNABIS THERE WAS A BIG SHIFT BY ORGANISED CRIMINALS INTO CANNABIS... THE PROFITS WERE HIGH BUT THE PENALTIES WERE LESS...

What we’re talking about here is a continuum of harm from a poppy field in Kandahar to a burglary on an estate or somebody getting shot here. The two things are linked.”

So, the idiocy (or intent) of the politicians caused a “big shift by organised criminals into cannabis”.

Don’t you think that they might have guessed that if “the profits were high but the penalties were less”, criminality in this area might increase?

Perhaps the politicians behind the “different approach” (the law was changed so that cannabis usage and possession was no longer an arrestable offence in most cases) weren’t being stupid. Perhaps they weren’t just being ultra PC and lessening the criminal load for their immigrant pets.

Perhaps some of them were, actually, HAPPY to inflict the damage upon our society that was always going to follow from the relaxation of the law.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that 536,000 immigrants signed up with a GP practice in England and Wales in 2008 alone.

On 22 December 2009, The Daily Mail quoted the response of Dr Richard Fieldhouse, Chief Executive of the National Association of Sessional GPs, which represents locum doctors, to these figures thus:

"THE WORKLOAD AT PRACTICES IS STRAINING AT THE SEAMS. Quite a lot of cover is for BURNT OUT GPS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT COPE WITH THIS. People can only work so many hours a week. Some locums have seen bookings increase by 30 per cent year on year."

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the Taxpayer's Alliance, added:

"Existing patients must always come first and IT IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE THAT SOMEONE WHO HAS PAID FOR THE NHS THROUGHOUT THEIR WORKING LIFE SHOULD FACE DELAYS OR QUEUES AS A RESULT OF RECENT IMMIGRATION USING THE NHS AHEAD OF THEM."

Despite the appalling workload of many GPs and the disappearance of quality time with their doctor that the British are suffering as a result of mass migration, the New Labour government (the one that beckoned all these unwanted foreigners into our country) has decreed that the NHS must find savings of £20 billion over the next four years.

On 27 August 2009, the Agony Aunt, Claire Rayner, President of the Patients Association and a former nurse herself, said this:

“For far too long now, the Patients Association has been receiving calls on our helpline from people wanting to talk about THE DREADFUL, NEGLECTFUL, DEMEANING, PAINFUL AND SOMETIMES DOWNRIGHT CRUEL TREATMENT THEIR ELDERLY RELATIVES HAD EXPERIENCED AT THE HANDS OF NHS NURSES. I am sickened by what has happened to some part of my profession of which I was so proud.”

On 15 September 2009, Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, said this in The Daily Mail:

“I AM FED UP TO THE BACK TEETH WITH BANKRUPT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS... In March this year it was revealed that THE DEPARTMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES HAS GIVEN £25,000 TO THE BRITISH HUMANIST ASSOCIATION TO RUN LOCAL CAMPAIGNS PROMOTING ATHEISM! Meanwhile, THE EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HAS GIVEN THEM £35,000 OF TAXPAYERS’ MONEY TO PROMOTE SECULARISM IN THE PUBLIC SERVICES UNDER EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS.”

On 6 August 2009, Martin Sixsmith, a former Head of Communications at the Department of Transport in the Blair Government, said this in The Daily Mail:

“When Mr Brown became Prime Minister he promised to clean things up - he was going to be 'Gordon, not Flash'... HIS PROMISE OF AN END TO SPIN HAS ITSELF BEEN REVEALED AS SPIN OF THE MOST CYNICAL KIND. NOWADAYS CIVIL SERVICE NEUTRALITY IS NO MORE THAN A DISTANT MEMORY... Instead of providing impartial, factual information, OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASES ARE STUFFED WITH TENDENTIOUS PARTY PROPAGANDA, MASSAGED STATISTICS AND DISINFORMATION against political opponents. THOSE IN THE MEDIA NO LONGER BELIEVE WHAT THEY READ AND NEITHER SHOULD THE PUBLIC. ....

It is quite unacceptable for GORDON BROWN'S GOVERNMENT TO TURN PUBLIC SERVANTS INTO A NEW LABOUR MOUTHPIECE. IT MEANS THAT, AS TAXPAYERS, WE ARE PAYING FOR OFFICIALS TO LIE TO US… Quite simply, WE CAN NO LONGER BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD THAT COMES OUT OF OUR PRIME MINISTER'S MOUTH".

On 4 July 2008, Tarique Ghaffur, Assistant Commissioner of the Met, was quoted thus in The Daily Mail:

"I WILL TEACH THOSE PIGS A LESSON ONE DAY".

He was castigating his fellow officers at the time for not promoting him enough. After launching a claim for massive damages against the Met, Ghaffur’s former wife told us this in The Mail article:

"HE'S CRAZY... I THINK HE HAS BENEFITED FROM POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION… HE OWES AN ETERNAL DEBT OF GRATITUDE TO BRITAIN FOR ALLOWING HIM TO COME HERE, TO SAVE HIM FROM PERSECUTION, AND TOLERATING HIS RACE AND RELIGION. YET THIS IS HOW HE REPAYS SUCH KINDNESS.

You cannot take all the opportunities that have been given to you, all the promotions, and then not accept that one day perhaps you will not rise any further. To turn round just because things aren't going your way and accuse someone of racial discrimination, which is such a dreadful allegation, is cowardly and lazy…

The police wanted Asians in the force and those who joined were being pushed onwards and upwards. I DON'T THINK THERE WAS ANY DOUBT THAT TARIQUE BENEFITED FROM HAVING THE RIGHT COLOUR OF SKIN, IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME. FAST TRACKING IS WHAT I WOULD CALL IT…

Within six weeks of us marrying, I DISCOVERED HE HAD A MISTRESS… TARIQUE LATER TOLD ME HE NEVER WANTED TO GET MARRIED, HE DID IT ONLY BECAUSE HIS FATHER THREATENED TO KILL HIMSELF".

On 18 January 2009, the politically correct media darling, Liz Jones, said this in The Independent:

"I’VE NEVER HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH A WHITE MAN. I’VE NEVER HAD SEX WITH A WHITE MAN…
UNLESS YOU ARE BLACK OR ASIAN YOU CANNOT KNOW WHAT RACISM FEELS LIKE… RACISM IS STILL THERE... WE HAVEN’T STAMPED IT OUT, we have merely buried it...

I think IN THE NINETIES I FELL IN LOVE WITH THREE BLACK MEN PARTLY BECAUSE IT WAS FASHIONABLE AND GAVE ME A VENEER OF ‘COOL’ THAT, AS A BORING ESSEX GIRL, I DIDN’T POSSESS. I MARRIED, ON THE WAVE OF ASIANS BEING THE NEW BLACKS, WITH LOTS OF HOT NEW BOOKS IN THE BESTSELLER LISTS, AN INDIAN...

WHITE PEOPLE, no matter how many community projects we might fund or months we might serve fighting for a foreign cause, ARE CAPABLE OF RACIST THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS THAT NEED TO BE STAMPED ON, HARD... RACISM CAN BE IN OUR DNA. We need to examine ourselves more deeply.”

No Liz, you need to examine yourself more deeply.

You need to examine why you wanted your children to look like no one else in the family album. You need to examine why you were such a silly, vacuous airhead in your youth and why you have never grown up. You need to examine why a juvenile desire to be “cool” and not “boring” entitles you, in middle age, to inflict your still juvenile beliefs upon the British people.

A white woman who marries, “on the wave of Asians being the new blacks, with lots of hot new books in the best-seller lists” is an unthinking, undoubtedly brainwashed airhead. The immature certainty of your youth, is still, even now, wagging its finger at those whose attitudes do not correspond precisely to yours, just as they were when you married your “new black” Indian.

Once upon a time, Liz, I may have found your fashionable political correctness irritating.

Nowadays, it smacks of treachery.

On 10 December 1973, National Security Council Memorandum 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests, was added to the USA's list of "Classified and Confidential" documents.

It was declassified, perhaps in error, in 1988. The memo said:

"If future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that MEASURES TO REDUCE FERTILITY BE STARTED AND MADE EFFECTIVE IN THE 1970S AND 1980S."

On 12 September 1999, the BBC reported thus:

"Average sperm count in Britain fell from a high of 113 million per millilitre in 1940 to 66 million in 1990."

On 3 September 2000, Anthony Browne reported thus in The Observer:

"WHITES WILL BE AN ETHNIC MINORITY IN BRITAIN BY THE END OF THE CENTURY. Analysis of official figures indicate that, at current fertility rates and levels of immigration, there will be more non-whites than whites by 2100.

IT WOULD BE THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY THAT A MAJOR INDIGENOUS POPULATION HAS VOLUNTARILY BECOME A MINORITY, rather than through war, famine or disease.

WHITES WILL BE A MINORITY IN LONDON BY 2010." more...

On 4 February 2003, 73 British Parliamentarians signed an Early Day Motion, introduced by the New Labour MP, Neil Gerrard, titled: Humane Treatment for Migrants with HIV.

This said:

"This House notes the recent upsurge in inflammatory media coverage depicting asylum seekers as disease carriers and terrorists, notes how damaging such reports can be to people who have come to this country, in search of a safe haven and freedom from political persecution BUT ALSO HAVE HIV; believes that SUCH MEDIA ATTENTION ONLY FUELS RACISM AND STIGMA which is wholly counterproductive to THE NECESSITY TO TREAT SUCH INDIVIDUALS WITH RESPECT AND COMPASSION".

Now, it seems to me that a politician whose first instinct would put the welfare of an HIV-positive would-be immigrant, before any thought of the dire consequences that the importation of such diseases might have upon his indigenous constituents, poses an enormous threat to the wellbeing of those who elected him.

The unthinking sympathies of such people place the health, happiness and, for that matter, the survival of the native born population at tremendous risk.

If the British electorate would protect themselves and their children from the blinkered generosity of these politically correct bleeding hearts, such one-sided generosity should not be tolerated. The people of Britain should consider when, if ever, their politicians were as keen to act with such charity towards them.

At the time this EDM was signed, in some parts of sub-Saharan Africa, as many as 1 in 4 of all adults were infected with the AIDS virus.

On 11 June 2003, the BBC quoted the Health Committee Chairman, New Labour MP David Hinchliffe, thus:

"I do not use the word lightly, but during the course of the inquiry, it has become plain that WITH SEXUAL HEALTH WE ARE LOOKING AT A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS".

Liberal Democrat MP, Sandra Gidley, added:

"RATES OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE, INCLUDING HIV/AIDS, ARE ASTRONOMICAL."

The BBC explained:

"A report by the influential Commons health committee has found THE NHS IS NO LONGER ABLE TO COPE WITH THE RECORD NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH STIS. It has called for urgent government action to tackle what it describes as a public health crisis. The report reveals that the number of people being diagnosed with infections is continuing to rocket.

ONE IN 10 YOUNG PEOPLE ARE NOW INFECTED WITH CHLAMYDIA, WHICH CAN CAUSE INFERTILITY IN WOMEN. SYPHILIS RATES HAVE JUMPED BY 500% IN THE LAST SIX YEARS, while gonorrhoea infections have doubled. More people are also being diagnosed with HIV than ever before. Around 6,500 people were told they had the disease last year.

THE REPORT FOUND THAT THE NHS IS FAILING TO ADDRESS OR EVEN RECOGNISE THE PROBLEM. IT SAYS SEXUAL HEALTH CLINICS ARE ILL-EQUIPPED TO COPE AND ARE TURNING AWAY HUNDREDS OF PATIENTS EACH WEEK…

THE REPORT BLAMED A LACK OF POLITICAL DIRECTION AND UNDER-FUNDING OVER MANY YEARS FOR THE CRISIS".

On 14 November 2008, The Daily Mail told us this:

"AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT MAY HAVE INFECTED HUNDREDS OF WOMEN WITH HIV IN A STRING OF ONE-NIGHT-STANDS, it has emerged. The infected Jamaican reveller prowled nightclubs to pick up women and then spent almost a year unchecked in hospital where he looked for sex with vulnerable patients. HEALTH OFFICIALS HAVE WRITTEN TO MORE THAN 400 WOMEN TO WARN THEM THEY MIGHT HAVE THE DEADLY VIRUS after having unprotected sex with him." more...

On 14 October 2005, at a meeting convened at Howard University in Washington, Dr. Kamau Kambon, a lecturer in Africana Studies at North Carolina State University, said this:

"We are at war… White people want to kill us. I want you to understand that. They want to kill you. They want to kill you because that is part of their plan… They’re monitoring our people to try to prevent the one person from coming up with the one idea. And the one idea is, HOW WE ARE GOING TO EXTERMINATE WHITE PEOPLE...

WE HAVE TO EXTERMINATE WHITE PEOPLE OFF THE FACE OF THE PLANET TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. (Applause) THE PROBLEM ON THE PLANET IS WHITE PEOPLE… White people want to kill you… because that is part of their plan… THE ONLY NIGGER ON THE PLANET IS THE WHITE MAN AND THE WHITE WOMAN."

Kambon has been a Visiting Professor at North Carolina State University since 2003.

Before teaching at NCSU, he was a Professor of Education at St. Augustine's College in North Carolina's capital, Raleigh. In 1999, a Citizen's Award was bestowed upon him by the left-wing newspaper, The Independent Weekly.

If you find it difficult to believe that an august and respected Professor of African Studies could think and say such things, Kambon's anti-white tirade may be seen here.

On 7 October 2008, The Daily Express quoted Professor Steve Jones, of the Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment at University College, London, thus:

"The country is one of the most sexually open in the world. WE ARE MIXING INTO A GLOBAL MASS, AND THE FUTURE IS BROWN."

On 27 September 2002, the BBC told us this:

"BLONDES ‘TO DIE OUT IN 200 YEARS.’

Scientists believe the last blondes will be in Finland… THE LAST NATURAL BLONDES WILL DIE OUT WITHIN 200 YEARS, SCIENTISTS BELIEVE. A study by experts in Germany suggests people with blonde hair are an endangered species and will become extinct by 2202. Researchers predict the last truly natural blonde will be born in Finland - the country with the highest proportion of blondes… they say TOO FEW PEOPLE NOW CARRY THE GENE FOR BLONDES TO LAST BEYOND THE NEXT TWO CENTURIES."

Is this OK by all you fair-haired, fair skinned Viking types? I'm not. I don't want my tribe to die out, let alone my race.

Anyway, welcome to ancient history, ladies and gents.

Which is what we'll all be a century or so down the line if the PC Crowd continue to have their way.

Robert Whelan, a director of the think-tank Civitas, was quoted thus in the 10 January 2009 edition of The Daily Mail:

"THE WHITE WORKING CLASS IS GROWING BITTER… They loyally supported Old Labour, but NEW LABOUR HAS IGNORED THEM.

Ministers have shut down the debate on mass migration. If the working class object to what is happening, they are called racist. They are not allowed to discuss their concerns publicly… The working classes feel there has been a huge unfairness, particularly when it comes to housing… They feel they have paid into the system, and should get something out. That was how it used to work right up to the 1990s. Then New Labour dismantled the system."

On 2 January 2008, Liverpudlian comedian, Alexei Sayle, was quoted thus by Sky News:

"IT IS THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE MURDERER, THE RAPIST, THE BULLY. THAT'S WHAT ISRAEL IS IN THIS SITUATION."

Sayle, who was speaking out against the Israeli invasion of Gaza, added:

"I think that Israel has an idea of itself as being noble. When you attack somebody but you have this idea of yourself that you're the good guy - you think 'how can this be?' What you do is BLAME THE PEOPLE YOU HAVE KILLED - and you hear all the time from Israeli spokespeople that THEY ARE ANGRY WITH THE PEOPLE THAT THEY HAVE MURDERED, FOR MAKING THEM MURDER THEM."

The following day, he told the BBC that Israel's response was "massively disproportionate", adding:

"Stop killing people, STOP KILLING CHILDREN and then start thinking about the little things after that."

Alexei Sayle is Jewish himself.

On 6 January 2009, Yonotan Shapira, a former captain in the Israeli Air Force, spoke out as follows against the Gaza invasion:

"MY GOVERNMENT IS NOW ENGAGED IN A MASSIVE WAR CRIME KILLING HUNDREDS OF INNOCENTS…
On behalf of thousands of Israelis that are demonstrating right now in the streets of Tel A Viv and Jerusalem and many other places, with Palestinians with Internationals, people from all kinds of backgrounds… are completely, completely ashamed and against this crazy assault… As Jewish people we know that YOU CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE.

WE CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE PEOPLE TO LIVE IN FREEDOM…

Stop THIS MASSIVE KILLING… please, for the sake of Israel for the sake of Palestine and for the sake of the world. I want to cry and to shout and ask you people dying right now… It’s crazy that my government... is continuing this crazy assault thinking that they can kill THE DESIRE OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE…

The Palestinians… THEY ARE BEING TRAPPED IN THIS OPEN-AIR PRISON FOR DECADES AND THEY CANNOT EAT, THEY CANNOT HAVE THEIR MEDICINE, THEY CANNOT GO IN, THEY CANNOT GO OUT. WE LOCK THEM THERE IN A DEEP GHETTO… WE ARE LOCKING ONE AND A HALF MILLION PEOPLE FOR SO LONG AND WE TREAT THEM AS ANIMALS AND THIS IS THE RESULT."

On 13 January 2009, the Israeli historian and Oxford University professor, Avi Shlaim, said this on Channel 4 News:

“The current offensive in Gaza is the climax of the Israeli tendency to shun diplomacy and compromise and to rely overwhelmingly on BRUTE MILITARY FORCE.

The key to Israel’s intransigence in the conflict is UNCRITICAL AMERICAN SUPPORT. Today ISRAEL IS, GETTING AWAY, LITERALLY, WITH MURDER IN GAZA because there is no restraint from America. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN LESS AMERICAN RESTRAINT ON ISRAEL IN THE HISTORY OF THIS TRAGIC CONFLICT.

One recent example of THIS BLIND AMERICAN SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL is the Security Council cease-fire resolution which CONDOLEEZA RICE SUPPORTED, MADE A SPEECH IN FAVOUR and everyone thought America was going to vote for it and yet, AT THE LAST MINUTE, BUSH AND CHENEY VETOED, didn’t veto the resolution but AMERICA ABSTAINED! THAT SENT A CLEAR SIGNAL TO ISRAEL THAT IT CAN CONTINUE WITH THIS INSANE OFFENSIVE.

The only thing that might change is American public opinion, as a result of EXCESSIVE ISRAELI BRUTALITY, gradually changing and that would weaken the power of the Israel lobby in Washington and eventually it might have an effect on American foreign policy towards the region…

Here is the crucial point, THIS IS AN UNNECESSAY AND ILLEGAL WAR because... in July of last year Egypt brokered a cease-fire. The cease-fire succeeded. THE CEASE-FIRE WAS A STUNNING SUCCESS, CONTRARY TO ISRAELI PROPAGANDA. Before cease-fire came into effect, 170 KASSAM ROCKETS A MONTH WERE FIRED FROM GAZA ON ISRAEL After the cease-fire came into effect, for the next 4 months THE NUMBER DROPPED TO 3 A MONTH. Again CONTRARY TO ISRAEL’S PROPAGANDA, IT WAS NOT HAMAS THAT BROKE THE CEASE-FIRE, IT WAS ISRAEL WHO BROKE THE CEASE-FIRE BY LAUNCHING A RAID INTO GAZA AND KILLING SIX HAMAS MEN."

Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia, tells us this about the "Israel Lobby in the United Kingdom":

"After pop music mogul Michael Levy began fundraising for the Labour Party IT BECAME FAR MORE PRO-ISRAEL… LEVY RAN BLAIR’S 1997 CAMPAIGN FOR PRIME MINISTER AND AFTER WINNING BLAIR MADE LEVY A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS (which appointment later became part of the Cash for Honours political scandal) as well as 'special envoy' to the Middle-East…

BROWN IS EVEN MORE PRO-ISRAEL THAN BLAIR AND HAS 'ENSURED CONTINUED JEWISH FUNDING OF ‘NEW LABOUR’ BY APPOINTING FORMER LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DIRECTOR JON MENDELSOHN AS HIS CHIEF FUNDRAISER FOR THE NEXT ELECTION. HE ALSO APPOINTED FORMER BRITISH AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL, SIMON MCDONALD, AS HIS CHIEF FOREIGN POLICY ADVISER. HE APPOINTED SEVERAL FORMER CHAIRS OF LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL TO HIGH POSITIONS: James Purnell as Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport with oversight over the British Broadcasting Corporation and all British media; Jim Murphy as Minister of State for Europe with responsibility for the BBC World Service and the British Council; and Kim Howells as 'Middle East Minister' (Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office with oversight of Middle East affairs)…

LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL HAS A GROWING MEMBERSHIP IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS AND IS SEEN AS A LADDER TO SUCCESS FOR ASPIRING POLITICIANS.

80 PERCENT OF CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ALSO ARE CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL, INCLUDING DAVID CAMERON, LEADER OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY... THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FRIENDS OF ISRAEL WEB SITE IS MORE 'STRIDENTLY PRO-ISRAEL' THAN LABOUR, CALLING ISRAEL’S OCCUPATION OF THE WEST BANK A 'MYTH'...

In late 2007 it was revealed that DAVID ABRAHAMS, WHO WAS DEPUTY CHAIR OF LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL UNTIL 2002, HAD MADE SECRET AND ILLEGAL DONATIONS THROUGH JUNIOR EMPLOYEES OF 600,000 POUNDS STERLING (APPROXIMATELY $1.2 MILLION) TO THE LABOUR PARTY. Abrahams, 'a Jewish millionaire,' admitted in The Jewish Chronicle that he concealed his activity because 'I DIDN'T WANT JEWISH MONEY AND THE LABOUR PARTY BEING PUT TOGETHER'.

The Telegraph ran a photograph of Abrahams with Israeli former ambassador to Britain, Zvi Heifetz, and 'insinuated that ISRAEL WAS THE SOURCE OF THE ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS'. According to an article in Haaretz, several in the media have maintained there was A CONNECTION BETWEEN MONEY DONATED BY ZIONIST JEWS AND THE PRO-ISRAEL POLICY OF BRITISH PRIME MINISTERS TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN.

Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told The Forward 'CLEARLY THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR IT TO TURN AGAINST US'…

The former Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament, Baroness Jenny Tonge said in 2006: 'THE PRO-ISRAELI LOBBY HAS GOT ITS GRIPS ON THE WESTERN WORLD, ITS FINANCIAL GRIPS. I THINK THEY'VE PROBABLY GOT A GRIP ON OUR PARTY’.” ...more

In September 2009, after the BBC had suggested that it would only be fair to give the BNP a spot on the current affairs programme Question Time, John Mann, New Labour MP for Bassetlaw, said this:

"It’s absurd to give the BNP any space. This is how Hitler came to power and these people have got the same objectives. It’s typical BBC intellectualism giving them airtime." (6 September 2009)

John Mann is the Chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism.

The Wikipedia essay can be seen in its entirety here.

In the 15 April 2002 edition of The New Statesman, John Kampfner explained how things were going to be shortly after Tony Blair assumed the leadership of the Labour Party:

"The roots of the British government's current policy towards the Middle East can be traced back to a single event, not the founding of the Jewish state, not the Six Day War, not the Oslo accords or the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, but Brighton in the autumn of 1994.

TO DEFINE YOURSELF AS NEW LABOUR, YOU HAD TO PROVE YOUR CREDENTIALS AS PRO-BUSINESS, ANTI-TAX AND PRO-ISRAEL,' says one party official.

'Palestinian sympathies were the preserve of the old left and we quite simply had to get rid of ours IF WE WANTED TO GET ON.'

At Blair's first party conference as leader, LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ASSEMBLED IN A HUGE TURNOUT FOR ITS MAIN MEETING OF THE WEEK. EVERY ASPIRING YOUNG APPARACHIK FELT THE NEED TO ATTEND. THEY DID THEN. THEY STILL DO."

Such is life in Airstrip 1.

On 21 February 2008, the article, "How Labour used the law to keep criticism of Israel secret", by Richard Norton-Taylor, was published by The Guardian.

This said:

"THE FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE SUCCESSFULLY FOUGHT TO KEEP SECRET ANY MENTION OF ISRAEL CONTAINED ON THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE CONTROVERSIAL, NOW DISCREDITED IRAQ WEAPONS DOSSIER. At the heart of it was NERVOUSNESS AT THE TOP OF GOVERNMENT ABOUT ANY MENTION OF ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR ARSENAL IN AN OFFICIAL PAPER ACCUSING IRAQ OF FLOUTING THE UN'S AUTHORITY ON WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION...

The FCO had no objections to references to other countries in the margin of the Williams document...

The Information Tribunal ordered the release of the draft, without reference to Israel, observing that IT MAY HAVE PLAYED A BIGGER ROLE IN INFLUENCING THE FINAL DOSSIER THAN PREVIOUSLY SUPPOSED. The government tried to distance itself from the Williams draft."

In the 5 April 2003 edition of the Israeli daily, Ha’aretz, Ari Shavit told us this:

"THE WAR IN IRAQ WAS CONCEIVED BY 25 NEOCONSERVATIVE INTELLECTUALS, MOST OF THEM JEWISH, WHO ARE PUSHING PRESIDENT BUSH TO CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY."

Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, of course, didn't need any pushing at all.

On the seventh anniverary of the 9/11 attacks, a rally was held in Lea Bridge Road Mosque, Leyton, East London.

The Muslim lawyer, Anjem Choudary, said this at the event:

"Islam is superior and will never be surpassed. THE FLAG OF ISLAM WILL RISE OVER DOWNING STREET...

IT WOULD BE EASY FOR US TO DECLARE JIHAD IN BRITAIN AND EACH ONE OF US COULD BECOME A TIME-BOMB WAITING TO GO OFF...

The Home Office say there are 1.5million Muslims but there were 1.5million ten years ago. SINCE THEN OUR BROTHERS IN BETHNAL GREEN, WHITECHAPEL AND OTHER PLACES HAVE HAD EIGHT OR NINE CHILDREN EACH. Eight children here, ten children, 15 children. THERE MUST BE AT LEAST SIX MILLION PEOPLE…

BRITAIN WILL BECOME AN ISLAMIC STATE. WE MAY NEVER NEED TO CONQUER IT FROM THE OUTSIDE... We do not integrate into Christianity. WE WILL ENSURE THAT ONE DAY YOU WILL INTEGRATE INTO THE SHARIA ISLAMIC LAW! OUR EYES ARE ON DOWNING STREET... THAT IS WHY THE BRITISH ARE SO AFRAID."

On 30 March 2009, Kenneth Minogue, Emeritus Professor of Political Science at the London School of Economics, wrote this in The Daily Mail:

“Never before in history have our civic institutions laid such emphasis on compassion. The eagerness to show empathy and concern is a central theme of the state, running through everything from the justice system to the Armed Forces. YOUNG OFFENDERS ARE GIVEN COUNSELLING RATHER THAN PUNISHMENT. OUR TROOPS ARE SENT OVERSEAS, NOT TO FIGHT BUT TO 'WIN HEARTS AND MINDS'. In large swathes of the public sector, the fashionable concept of 'EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE' HAS REPLACED EFFICIENCY AS THE CENTRAL GOAL OF THE WORKFORCE. Yet IN THE FACE OF THIS SWEEPING TIDE OF OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED BENEVOLENCE, BRITAIN IS INCREASINGLY VIOLENT AND DEGRADED.

'The gentleness of English civilisation is its most marked characteristic,' George Orwell once wrote.

HOW HOLLOW THOSE WORDS SOUND TODAY, AS THE SHADOWS OF AGGRESSION AND DISORDER LOOM OVER OUR SOCIETY. THE 'NICENESS' MOVEMENT IS ACHIEVING THE VERY OPPOSITE OF ITS PROFESSED AIM. THE RELUCTANCE TO PUNISH WRONG-DOERS ALLOWS THEM TO ESCAPE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS, SO DISCIPLINE COLLAPSES AND THUGGERY TRIUMPHS.”

Anyone but the PC Crowd, the media darlings, New Labour, the Lib Dems, the Health and Safety Nazis, the bought-and-paid-for jobsworths with gold-plated pensions, the immigrants and the criminals disagree with this?

Thought not.

On 9 May 2009, author and journalist, Jeremy Seabrook, wrote the following in The Guardian:

“NEW LABOUR COULD NOT WAIT TO REPUDIATE EVERYTHING THE LABOUR PARTY HAD EVER STOOD FOR AND THIS LEFT ITS FORMER HEARTLAND A POLITICAL DESERT...

THE WHITE WORKING CLASS... COULD BE LEFT TO THEIR FATE IN FORLORN ESTATES OF LIQUOR SHOPS COVERED WITH CHICKEN WIRE, LEAKY DRAINPIPES, SEMI-WILD DOGS AND TATTERED FLAGS OF ST GEORGE – EVERYTHING THAT SYMBOLISED THE LAST GASP OF A DISAPPEARING WORKING CLASS...

Margaret Thatcher... understood that THE BEST WAY TO BE RID OF TROUBLESOME ORGANISED LABOUR WAS TO DESTROY THE ECONOMIC BASE ON WHICH IT DEPENDED AND SHE WAS AN EARLY PROPONENT OF OUTSOURCING MANUFACTURED GOODS. SHE SET ABOUT THE DEMOLITION OF INDUSTRY WITH GUSTO, AND WITH IT, THE UNMAKING OF THE WORKING CLASS, HER ALLIES THE INVISIBLE ARMY OF APPARENTLY INVINCIBLE GLOBAL ECONOMIC FORCES.

A LABOUR PARTY THAT SAW ITS ORIGINAL CONSTITUENCY ERASED FROM THE POLITICAL MAP READILY ABANDONED THE VICTIMS OF THESE PROCESSES, THOSE IT HAD ALWAYS TAKEN FOR GRANTED. ‘OUR OWN PEOPLE’, THEY POSSESSIVELY CALLED THEM, ADDING THAT, NO MATTER WHAT LABOUR DID, ‘THEY HAD NOWHERE ELSE TO GO’...

You don't have to agree with what the British National Party stands for TO RECOGNISE THE LEGITIMACY OF ITS CONCERN FOR 'THESE PEOPLE', THOSE WRITTEN OFF BY A PARTY WHICH, ASSUMING SEIGNEURIAL RIGHTS OVER THEIR VOTE, HAD EXILED THEM TO THE PERIPHERY NOT ONLY OF ITS OWN CONSCIOUSNESS, BUT ALSO OF THE DECLINING INDUSTRIAL TOWNS AND CITIES THEY INHABITED.”

On 22 May 2009, Peter Oborne opined thus in The Daily Mail:

“THE POLITICAL CLASS FINDS ITSELF LITERALLY UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE VALUES THAT APPEAR ADMIRABLE TO MOST PEOPLE, SUCH AS HONESTY, PATRIOTISM AND RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE...

British democracy now faces an historic crisis. THE GULF BETWEEN THE CORRUPT RULING ELITE AND THE GREAT MASS OF ORDINARY BRITISH CITIZENS IS TODAY GREATER THAN AT ANY TIME SINCE THE EARLY 19TH CENTURY. This means there is one great burning question in our public life... Will there BE SOME KIND OF REVOLUTION?”

On 4 February 2009, Melanie Philips said this in The Daily Mail:

“Sometimes you have to pinch yourself to remember that Britain has historically always been the cradle of liberty. For TODAY WE SEEM TO BE SLIDING INEXORABLY INTO A CULTURE OF CONTROL WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY FAMILIAR TO THE STASI OR THE KGB...

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS NOW THE GOVERNING CHARACTERISTIC OF PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS THE BBC AND THE NHS, ALONG WITH AN INTELLIGENTSIA DETERMINED UPON A DRACONIAN PROCESS OF SOCIAL ENGINEERING AIMED AT CHANGING NOT JUST SOCIETY BUT HUMAN NATURE ITSELF...

BEHAVIOUR SUCH AS THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN A KEY FEATURE OF POLICE STATES AND TOTALITARIAN REGIMES. THE STASI OR THE KGB GAINED MUCH OF THEIR POWER OVER THE POPULATION THEY TYRANNISED BY GETTING PEOPLE TO INFORM ON EACH OTHER, USING SUCH INFORMERS TO BRING FORWARD EVIDENCE OF 'THOUGHT CRIMES' from private or overheard conversations. Such use of informers SETS PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER in a climate of permanent and corrosive suspicion.

Destroying the trust which is the basis of relationships, it is thus A PRINCIPAL MEANS OF CONTROLLING THE POPULATION...

It is THIS COMBINATION OF LUNACY AND COERCION which leads one to think that the land of those great apostles of free thinking, John Milton and John Locke, is fast TURNING INTO A NIGHTMARE STRAIGHT OUT OF THE PAGES OF GEORGE ORWELL OR FRANZ KAFKA."

In the 3 August 2009 edition of The Daily Express, Leo McKinstry said this:

“OUR ONCE WELL-ORDERED, COHESIVE NATION HAS BEEN TURNED INTO AN OVERCROWDED LAND FULL OF DISPARATE CULTURES. As the influx of foreigners continues at an unprecedented rate, MANY BRITONS INCREASINGLY FEEL LIKE ALIENS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY…

LABOUR’S OBSESSION WITH DIVERSITY MEANS THAT OUR CIVIC INSTITUTIONS HAVE TRADUCED OUR HISTORY, SMASHED OUR TRADITIONS AND TREATED OUR INSTINCTIVE NATIONAL PRIDE AS A DANGEROUS FORM OF RACISM...

The idea that all migrants come here to work hard is just a myth. In fact MIGRANTS ARE FAR MORE LIKELY THAN BRITISH PEOPLE TO BE UNEMPLOYED, IN RECEIPT OF BENEFITS OR HOUSED IN STATE-FUNDED ACCOMMODATION. MEANWHILE OUR SOCIETY IS NOW BESET BY EXTREMISM, BARBARIC VIOLENCE, ETHNIC TENSIONS AND SUPERSTITION...

MASS IMMIGRATION HAS ACHIEVED ITS GOAL. (LABOUR) HAS SUCCEEDED IN RUINING OUR ONCE GENTLE, UNITED LAND."

On 2 July 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

"HARRIET HARMAN’S NEW ‘EQUALITY’ BILL REQUIRES PUBLIC BODIES TO PRACTISE OVERT DISCRIMINATION IN FAVOUR OF ETHNIC MINORITIES... DURING 12 YEARS OF LABOUR RULE THE CULTURE OF BIAS TOWARDS THE NON-BRITISH HAS BEEN DEEPLY EMBEDDED ACROSS THE PUBLIC SECTOR... UNDER BROWN AND BLAIR, BRITISH-BORN FAMILIES HAVE BEEN RUTHLESSLY MARGINALISED BY A HOUSING SYSTEM THAT IS LOADED AGAINST THEM...

In 2007 the Government claimed that only one per cent of taxpayer-funded homes are handed to immigrants. THIS WAS A BLATANT LIE. ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL STATISTICS PUBLISHED IN APRIL 2008, ONE-IN-NINE, MORE THAN 11 PER CENT, OF ALL SUBSIDISED HOMES ACROSS BRITAIN ARE OCCUPIED BY MIGRANTS... Only last year research by Channel 4... found that 80 PER CENT OF SOMALIS LIVE IN SOCIAL HOUSING, 49 PER CENT OF TURKS AND 41 OF BANGLADESHIS, COMPARED TO JUST 17 PER CENT OF BRITISH-BORN PEOPLE...

IDEOLOGICAL SOCIALISTS ARE ALMOST PSYCHOTIC IN THEIR DETERMINATION TO UPHOLD THE INTERESTS OF FOREIGNERS WHO HAVE CONTRIBUTED NOTHING TO OUR COUNTRY, AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIGENOUS WORKING-CLASS. I saw this myself when I was a Labour councillor in Islington in the early Nineties. In my ward THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT HAD DECIDED THAT A CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE RESERVED MAINLY FOR REFUGEES. AT ONE PARTY MEETING, WHEN SOME WORKING-CLASS MEMBERS JUSTIFIABLY OBJECTED TO THIS ON THE GROUNDS THAT LOCAL PEOPLE WERE BEING EXCLUDED, THEY WERE HOWLED DOWN AS ‘RACISTS’ BY MIDDLE-CLASS LABOUR MEMBERS WHO OWNED THEIR OWN PROPERTIES.”

On 22 January 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:

"It is remarkable that THE LABOUR PARTY, WHICH WAS FOUNDED IN THE EDWARDIAN AGE TO REPRESENT THE WORKING CLASS, SHOULD BE INDULGING IN THIS BETRAYAL OF THE VERY PEOPLE WHO FORM THE BACKBONE OF BRITAIN. Great Labour figures of the past, such as post-war foreign secretary and former union boss Ernie Bevin, saw their job as protecting British workers, not SUBJECTING THEM TO EXPLOITATION AND MARGINALISATION.

Today, on the contrary, LABOUR PRACTISES OPEN PREJUDICE AGAINST THE INDIGENOUS WORKING CLASS IN ITS EAGERNESS TO ENFORCE GLOBALISATION AND DIVERSITY, WHAT LABOUR’S DEPUTY LEADER HARRIET HARMAN HAS DESCRIBED AS 'A NEW SOCIAL ORDER'. In fact, under Harman’s misnamed Equalities Bill, DIRECT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WHITE MEN IS TO BE BECOME LEGAL, AS FIRMS WILL BE ALLOWED TO RESERVE JOBS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITY ETHNIC GROUPS.

IF WE HAD A GOVERNMENT THAT CARED AT ALL ABOUT THE WORKING CLASS, WE WOULD BE HELPING THE BRITISH PEOPLE INSTEAD OF DISCRIMINATING AGAINST THEM."

On 6 August 2008, The Daily Mail quoted Adam Sampson, of the housing charity Shelter, regarding the rate of home repossession in Gordon Brown's Cool Britannia:

"We have reached crisis point in the number of people at risk of repossession and alarm bells must be ringing in Government. These figures paint a terrifying picture showing real people living in the shadow of repossession and ultimately homelessness."

The Mail added:

"Mortgage lenders were criticised yesterday for rushing to evict families from their homes, as the number kicked out SOARED BY 41% IN A YEAR... The Financial Services Authority said some lenders were 'too ready' to repossess customers' homes...

FROM JANUARY TO MARCH, 9,152 PEOPLE LOST THEIR HOMES, compared to 6,471 in the same period last year. The FSA also warns that 302,000 FAMILIES ARE IN 'THE LAST CHANCE SALOON', having not made repayments for at least three months."

On 7 March 2009, Stephen Glover said this in The Daily Mail:

"Twice this week I have been reminded of a peculiar quality of the British. WE LOVE TO PRAISE, HONOUR AND REWARD THOSE WHO DON'T REALLY LIKE US - WHO MAY INDEED HATE US.

While Gordon Brown was sweet-talking the Americans, it was announced that an honorary knighthood is being conferred on 77-year-old Senator Edward Kennedy... One might suppose that Mr Kennedy... was an old friend of this country. BUT HE ISN'T... During the Seventies he portrayed the British role in Northern Ireland as one of virtual occupation, and even suggested that the majority Protestant population be encouraged to 'return' to Britain...

91-year-old historian Eric Hobsbawm... has lived in this country since 1933... One might suppose that Mr Hobsbawm was a kindly old gentleman who would never harm a flea. A panegyric by Seumas Milne in The Guardian newspaper called him Britain's 'greatest living historian'. HE IS ALMOST INVARIABLY SO DESCRIBED... The truth about Mr Hobsbawm is almost the exact opposite of what has been stated. For most of his adult life Mr HOBSBAWM SUPPORTED THE SOVIET UNION, whose methods made MI5 look like a bunch of amateurs...

He either turned a blind eye to Soviet atrocities, OR JUSTIFIED THEM. He defended... the Russian invasion of Hungary in 1956. He deprecated Nikita Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin's totalitarian methods. Long after decent fellow communists had disowned Soviet communism, HOBSBAWM REFUSED TO CONDEMN IT. In his book On History, published in 1997, he wrote: 'Fragile as the communist systems turned out to be, only a limited, even minimal, use of force was necessary to maintain them from 1957 until 1989.' Somehow, he had forgotten about the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.

Asked whether 'the radiant tomorrow' promised by Stalin would have justified 'the loss of 15 to 20 million people', HOBSBAWM SIMPLY REPLIED: 'YES'...

Despite all this - despite his well-publicised support for an inhumane regime - HE IS WIDELEY TEATED AS A GRAND, AS WELL AS A DELIGHTFUL OLD MAN, WHOSE VIEWS DESERVE TO BE VENERATED.

One may wonder why Hobsbawm should seek an honour from a country for which he has never shown much affection, and whose interests he undermined during the Cold War through his support for the Soviet Union... It would be as pointless to demand that he be stripped of his Companion of Honour as it would be to ask Gordon Brown to think again about Senator Kennedy's honorary knighthood. NEW LABOUR HAS EMBRACED BOTH THESE GHASTLY MEN WITH OPEN EYES."

"We love to praise, honour and reward those who don't really like us - who may indeed hate us", says Glover.

This, of course, is not true. We have never wanted anything to do with "those who don't really like us", much less anyone who "hates" us.

However, the powers-that-be do indeed "love to praise, honour and reward those... who may indeed hate us".

The better to dismay and demoralise those THEY, themselves, hate.

Now go to Chronological Quotations

.